Tip Sheet: Best Practices for Transitioning Your Hard-Court Game to Clay

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tip Sheet: Best Practices for Transitioning Your Hard-Court Game to Clay Tip Sheet: Best Practices for Transitioning your Hard-Court Game to Clay Tennis strategy and skill is dependent on your court type. Grass, hard and clay are all very different and all require their own unique strategy. When transitioning to clay consider the following 5 points to make sure that you are on the top of your game. 1) The shoes. This year I bought myself some Adidas Feather Clay Court Shoes. They have special soles with tiny cleat like rubber knobs which grip the clay very nicely. You can slide but you don't have to slide. When you do it is because you want to not because you have to. This was the single best investment I ever made. I can even change directions now without losing my footing. Don't even think of bringing your hardcourt shoes. 2) To go forward you must take a few steps back. I have always played on the baseline and hit on the rise. I am not that tall (5'5") and found that hitting on the rise gave me the advantage of giving my opponent his or her pace back. Because my strokes are very compact and flat there isn't much margin for error and my game is well suited to a fast court. But on clay my frustration built up because I always felt insecure. I often times just bunted the ball back or even completely missed the ball because it hit an irregular spot on the court. I would say that my on the rise shots were 50% less effective on clay. A coach of mine made it clear to me that I needed to make more forward and back adjustments on clay. So I begrudgingly decided to step well behind the baseline (4 feet) and simply try and hit everything deeper and with more topspin. That is when the words "love" and "clay court" finally occurred in the same sentence. Guess what? It worked. I could suddenly hit my returns well. My shots would not go out. Most importantly, I could still retrieve so many balls. Balls that were winners on hard courts were easily reachable. Suddenly, I had become the wall that everyone dreads playing. 3) Pit Bull. I played with a tennis pro and asked him why I didn't win when I played. When he watched me play a few points he noted that I didn't attack enough. My shots were too conservative, often landing short. He told me to "attack like a pit bull." So I started hitting the ball harder and voila I begun to win more points. But flat shots can work well on hard courts. What do you do on clay courts? You put more topspin. The way to attack is by making the opponent stand further back. Topspin not only gives you much more margin it makes the ball bounce higher and that makes your opponents life difficult. So I had gone from trying to rip through the ball to ripping over the ball. It is such a simple strategy and it worked. I am curious to see if more topspin helps my flat hardcourt game. But for now I am happy to spin away. 4) Variety. We all love to hit winners through big serves, huge strokes and overhead volleys. Hey, I am a victim, too. I love hitting the clean winner past my opponent. The problem is that it is only one point and there are many ways to win a point with a less risky shot. I watched a junior match and guess what? They were mixing it all up. Drop shots, moonballs, big strokes, and slices. I saw every shot in the book from two 15 year olds. Granted, they are more effective on a clay court but I think that even on hard courts a well rounded game would help. Do you really need to hit the same fast shot to win? Of course, not. I am sure you have played the dink, lob junk baller who runs through the best players on your court. Clay allows you to learn more variety and this variety can then translate into a better game. There is one downside. Coming to the net on clay is much more difficult. So us hard courters to have the advantage of a more developed net game. So there you have it. You'll find a bunch of articles about how to play on clay. I have given you a few pointers but the real key is to learn to attack differently. Slowly, I have begun to feel the bliss of hitting an aggressive clay court shot. On this surface, you hurt your opponent by making them hit a nasty deep, spinny, ball one more time. I sound like a glorified pusher don't I. I love clay. .
Recommended publications
  • Project Report Porsche Tennis Grand Prix
    06/15 Project report Porsche Tennis Grand Prix www.conica.com PROJECT CHALLENGE THE PORSCHE TENNIS WTA INDOOR TENNIS GRAND PRIX ON CLAY COURTS Eight days, total concentration and the best female tennis In 2009, the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix kicked off a new players in the world on the court. The Porsche Tennis Grand era. With an annual indoor tournament on clay courts, Prix, held in the famous Porsche Arena in Stuttgart, is one of the event offered the best female professional tennis the top events in the world of professional tennis. In 1977, a players in the world the perfect opportunity to prepare gala with four professional players was held at indoor courts for the clay season. in Filderstadt-Plattenhardt. This idea led to the first tourna- ment in 1978, which later evolved to become the WTA tourna- The challenge: creating a clay court system that can ment in Filderstadt. Today, the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix is adapt to the technical and environmental conditions of one of the longest-running tournaments on the Women’s Tour an indoor facility and is also easy to install before the and features some of the best players in the world of tennis, tournament and remove afterwards. Furthermore, the making it a premier event on the WTA tour. The Porsche Tennis system must offer ideal clay court conditions – from Grand Prix represents precision, athleticism, competitive spirit the first to the last rally. and excellent technique on a perfect court. FACTS 2015 FEATURES 8 PLAYERS FROM THE TOP 10 AND 13 PLAYERS FROM THE TOP 20 HIGHEST WTA TOURNAMENT CATEGORY AFTER THE FOUR GRAND SLAM TOURNAMENTS SELECTED NUMEROUS TIMES BY THE PLAYERS AS THEIR FAVOURITE WTA TOURNAMENT TOTAL PRIZE MONEY: 731 000 US DOLLARS 37 200 SPECTATORS SOLUTION RESULT CONIPUR® PRO CLAY PERFECT CONDITIONS, FROM CONICA THRILLING TENNIS CONIPUR® PRO CLAY is a clay court system for indoor and The Porsche Tennis Grand Prix 2015 offered the spectators outdoor tennis.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi State Men's Tennis History
    MISSISSIPPI STATE MEN’S TENNIS HISTORY 1965: Southeastern Conference Champions 1967: Southeastern Conference Champions 1992: Southeastern Conference Regular Season Champions 1992: Southeastern Conference Indoors "Mythical" Team Champions 1992: Blue-Gray National Collegiate Classic Champions 1993: Southeastern Conference Regular Season Champions 1993: Southeastern Conference Champions 1996: Southeastern Conference Tournament Champions 2011: Southeastern Conference Western Division Champions 2012: Blue-Gray National Collegiate Classic Champions 2012: Southeastern Conference Western Division Champions S 2018: Southeastern Conference Tournament Champions 2019: Southeastern Conference Tournament Champions HIP S 1993 SEC CHAMPIONS FRONT ROW (L-R): MANAGER DREW ANTHONY, JOHN HALL, REMI BARBARIN, STEPHANE PLOT, SYLVAIN GUICHARD, MANAGER SHANNON JENKINS, ASSISTANT COACH DWAYNE CLEGG. BACK ROW (L-R): JEREMY ALLEY, MARC SIMS, DANIEL COURCOL, LAURENT ORSINI, PION LAURENT MIQUELARD, CHASE HENSON, PER NILSSON, KRISTIAN BROEMS, UNDERGRADUATE ASSISTANT HRISTOPHE AMIENS RETT LIDEWELL EAD OACH NDY ACKSON M C D , B G , H C A J . HA C M EA 1965 SEC CHAMPIONS FRONT ROW (L-R): GRAHAM PRIMROSE, PHIL LIVINGSTON, ROBERT DEAN, ORLANDO BRACAMONTE. BACK ROW (L-R): HEAD COACH TOM SAWYER, HAGAN STATON, MACK CAMERON, TITO ECHIBURU, BOBBY BRIEN, MANAGER GEORGE BIDDLE. MSU T 2011 SEC WESTERN DIVISION CHAMPIONS FRONT ROW (L-R): HREHAN HAKEEM, ARTEM ILYUSHIN, TREY SEYMOUR, ANTONIO LASTRE, LOUIS CANT, ASSISTANT COACH MATT HILL. BACK ROW (L-R): VOLUNTEER ASSISTANT COACH CHRIS DOERR, MALTE STROPP, TANNER STUMP, MAX GREGOR, GEORGE COUPLAND, ZACH WHITE, JAMES CHAUDRY, HEAD COACH PER NILSSON. 1967 SEC CHAMPIONS FRONT ROW (L-R): JOHN EDMOND, BOBBY BRIEN, PIERRE LAMARCHE, HUGH THOMSON. BACK ROW (L-R): HEAD COACH TOM SAWYER, ROB CADWALLADER, GLEN GRISILLO, MACK CAMERON, GARY HOCKEY, TED JONES, GRADUATE ASSISTANT COACH GRAHAM PRIMROSE.
    [Show full text]
  • Player Perceptions and Biomechanical Responses to Tennis Court Surfaces: the Implications to Technique and Injury Risk
    PLAYER PERCEPTIONS AND BIOMECHANICAL RESPONSES TO TENNIS COURT SURFACES: THE IMPLICATIONS TO TECHNIQUE AND INJURY RISK Submitted by Chelsea Starbuck, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sport and Health Sciences September 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract Elite tennis players are required to perform on a variety of tennis court surfaces which differ in mechanical characteristics, such as friction and hardness, influencing their performance and risk of injury. To understand the influence of surfaces on performance and injury risk, three studies were conducted to investigate tennis players’ perceptions and biomechanical responses during tennis-specific movements on different court surfaces. In study 1, tennis players perceptions of acrylic and clay courts were identified following a thematic inductive analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 7) to develop of a series of visual analogue scales (VAS) to quantify perceptions during studies 2 and 3. Perceptions of predictability of the surface and players’ ability to slide and change direction emerged, in addition to anticipated perceptions of grip and hardness. Study 2 aimed to examine the influence of court surfaces and prior clay court experience on perceptions and biomechanical characteristics of tennis-specific skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of Ball Degradation Events in Professional Tennis
    Sports Eng DOI 10.1007/s12283-017-0228-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Characterisation of ball degradation events in professional tennis 1,2,3 1 3 1 Ben Lane • Paul Sherratt • Xiao Hu • Andy Harland Ó The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Tennis balls are acknowledged to degrade with appears to influence the distribution of ball speed on impact use and are replaced at regular intervals during professional with the surface or racket, suggesting a surface-specific matches to maintain consistency and uniformity in per- degradation test may be beneficial. As a result of these formance, such that the game is not adversely affected. findings a new test protocol has been proposed, utilising the Balls are subject to the international tennis federation’s in-play data, to define the frequency of impacts and impact (ITF) ball approval process, which includes a degradation conditions to equate to nine games of professional tennis test to ensure a minimum standard of performance. The across the different surfaces. aim of this investigation was to establish if the ITF degradation test can assess ball longevity and rate of Keywords Tennis Á Ball Á Impact Á Hawk-Eye Á Surface Á degradation and determine if there is a need for a new Speed Á Angle Á Degradation degradation test that is more representative of in-play conditions. Ball tracking data from four different profes- sional events, spanning the three major court surfaces, 1 Introduction including both men’s and women’s matches were analysed. The frequency of first serves, second serves, racket impacts Approximately 360 million tennis balls are manufactured and surface impacts were assessed and the corresponding each year [1], with wholesale sales figures in the region of distribution of ball speed and (for surface impacts) impact $92 million in the United States alone in 2015 [2].
    [Show full text]
  • KRC Tennis Renovations Meeting March 2017
    March 2017 Kiwanis Tennis Complex • Original 1975 buildings, lighting (42 30-foot poles), and 15 asphalt courts • 1995 and 2008 – Replaced cushioned playing surface • 40,000 – 50,000 user contacts annually • Popular for lessons, competitive leagues, organized drop in play, and general play • ~40% of use is lessons, with growth in youth under 10 lessons Existing Lighting • Light fixtures are no longer manufactured • One light pole was damaged by wind storm in 2012 Existing Lighting • Current lighting levels are below minimum USTA recommendations • Existing fixtures create glare and light spillage Evolution of Lighting Technology Lighting Improvements • Replace existing lighting system with new foundations, poles, LED fixtures, conduit, conductors, and SES (Service Entrance Section) • 50 feet = 17 new poles • ~$1.45M • 30 feet = 39 new poles • ~$2.00M View to West from S. College Ave. Homes Existing Courts Cushioned surface 1.5 ” Asphalt surface 4” Base Subgrade • Asphalt base is raveling • Failure in the upper court surface • Cracks will continue to widen • Hazardous to players • On-going maintenance Tennis Court Improvements Cushioned surface • Post-tensioned concrete with ½” Cable 4” cushioned playing surface Post tensioned concrete slab • Resistance to cracking and settling 2” Structural fill • Better drainage • Elimination of control joints • More uniform playing surface • Lower maintenance costs and longer service life (30+ years) Next Steps Next Mar-17 Funding and Funding and Outreach 4 months Apr-17 Public May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Design Design and Permitting Sep-17 Oct-17 9 months Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Construction 6 Jun-18 months Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Open Kiwanis Recreation Center Tennis Complex Restoration Project Survey Results Overview A public meeting was held on March 29 to get feedback on the proposed new lighting and court renovations.
    [Show full text]
  • Stefanos Tsitsipas Press Conference
    Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters Principality of Monaco Sunday, 11 April 2021 Stefanos Tsitsipas Press Conference STEFANOS TSITSIPAS: I would go for Lorenzo Musetti. THE MODERATOR: Questions, please. He has played plenty of matches on clay. I think he's getting in shape match by match. I would go for that. Q. How are you feeling entering this clay season? How do you feel about your game and physically? Q. Obviously you've made the semis of your last two slams. I'm wondering, does that perhaps give you, STEFANOS TSITSIPAS: I've practiced a lot of days on allow you to have higher expectations entering this clay. I've been feeling well. My body is in good shape. clay season with eyes on Roland Garros? Do you feel Currently I feel like I'm working a lot on my physicality you're due a final now or even further? when I play friendly matches on clay. I think that's going to be the most important aspect in my game during the clay STEFANOS TSITSIPAS: I'm fighting for the Race to Turin. court season. I'm trying to make as many points as possible and get podiums, as well. Q. How do you feel here with the setting, with no public? I know you've been used for a while to play in It is important for me to be playing a lot of tournaments these conditions. Some players say it's cool to have prior to the French Open. Clay is a surface that I love to more space in the club, even though they regret the play and explore my game.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Stms
    www.tennismedicine.org MAY 2019 INSIDE THE STMS STMS Adductor How To Get Dirty Member Spotlight Strains and Enjoy it! With Deb Skinstad Understanding Injury Risk & Transitioning from hard Performance Enhancement courts to clay www.tennismedicine.org The clay court season is in full swing! Wow, and what a real treat it’s been already. One of the highlights for me was watching in the photographs and an accompanying Editor’s Nadal and Fognini’s semi-final battle in Monte- video - stretching routines and exercises Carlo. And, to finish off this incredible run on - sums up an excellent take home message Corner clay, Fognini went onto win the Monte-Carlo with practical significance and ramifications event in fine form, beating Lajovic in two sets. for tennis players. Secondly, in our ‘Coaching with Deborah Skinstad The Monte-Carlo win is Fognini’s first ever Corner’, we are introduced to an international Master’s 1000 title. tennis coach Norman McMarthy, from Cape Town, South Africa. Norman gives our readers Beside the viewing excitement, the an inside scoop on clay court tennis and the commentary for clay court tennis is riveting transition from hard court tennis to clay court as well. Phrases and words like ‘perfecting the tennis – specifically targeting our competitive clay court craft’, ‘marathon’, ‘style’, ‘skill’, and junior players. Norman’s article is entitled: ‘long cross-court rallies’, to name a few. For How to get dirty and enjoy it! Transitioning the viewer, spectator and fan, these images from hard courts to clay’. Thirdly, we have and narration paint a vivid picture of grit, some great material, as always, from the endurance and athleticism that clay court professional tennis tour, namely the WTA with tennis – the slowest grand slam surface – is their ‘Physically Speaking’ articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Cups and Individual Championships
    SENIOR www.scta.usta.com SoSuthern CaliforniaCT TennisA Association news JUNE 2005 Cups And Individual Championships Mark Winters iven the International Tennis Federation team and World GChampionships success enjoyed by Southern Californians in Perth, Australia, it would seem that their adaptability and talent turned them into first rate grass courts players. Anyone thinking that this statement is an exaggeration need only look at the results. Glenn Erickson captained the Men’s 40 Trabert Cup winner. Gretchen Magers was stalwart, going undefeated in the Women’s 40 Young Cup victory. As he does annually, Mike Fedderly played a major role in the Men’s 45 Dubler Cup trophy triumph. Tracey Thompson was a member of the Women’s 45 Cour t Cup team that California was well represented in Perth. Photos: Pat Parsons was a finalist. Geoff Cykman was on the Men’s 50 Perry Cup squad that did the same. Judy Louie, (who wrote the story on page 3), played for the Women’s 55 Connolly Cup team that also reached the final. Jennifer Dawson was on the Women’s 35 Lenglen Cup team that finished third. Kandy Chain, Leslie Airola-Murveit and Carolyn Nichols were all part of the Women’s 50 Bueno Cup third place result. Curtis Dunn and captain Hunter Gallaway were involved in the Men’s 35 Italia Cup fourth place finish. In individual play, which the host country dominated, taking eight of the 20 titles, locals were steadfast. Erickson teamed with singles winner Mario Tabares to take the Men’s 40 doubles title. Fedderly and singles final- ist Val Wilder were the Men’s 45 dou- bles champions.
    [Show full text]
  • Products Summary
    PRODUCTS SUMMARY Rebound Ace Sports Pty. Ltd. is an Australian owned company manufacturing the World ’ s most renowned sports surfaces. Recognised as the leader in sports sur- faces with the most technologically advanced systems designed for player develop- ment and performance for all ball sports. Rebound Ace Sports has a range of sur- faces for indoor and outdoor tennis, netball, basketball, concrete and asphalt-based multi-sport and playground areas, and indoor sports surfaces such as gymnasiums, multi-purpose halls, volleyball, badminton, futsal and many others. Uncoated concrete and asphalt courts will oxidize over time due to ultra violet expo- sure and weathering, stones loosen, and the surface becomes abrasive and danger- ous, physically demanding on limbs and bones, and becomes stained, pitted, cracked and unsightly after very little use. All of the Rebound Ace Sports outdoor surfaces are slip resistant even in damp conditions, ITF classified, and long-lasting even with constant use. Rebound Ace Sports ’ IMPACT indoor surface is suitable for both sports and non-sporting activities, and has become the superior choice to unforgiving hardwood and shiny lacquered parquetry floors. SURFACE LAYER DIAGRAMS Incorporating Your local Rebound Ace Approved Applicator is: TEB CONSTRUCTIONS 47 Conservatory Circuit, OAKDEN 5086 SA. Email: [email protected] Rebound Ace Sports Pty.Ltd. Christina & Tom Burgess (08) 83958198 WWW.REBOUNDACESPORTS.COM.AU 19 Argon Street, Carole Park (M) 0419832282 (E) [email protected] Queensland Australia 4300 Ph: +61 7 37238800 Fx: + 61 7 32714659 PHONE: 1800 786617 Email : [email protected] Printed June 2012 Rebound Ace GS 8 Suitable for outdoor or indoor; asphalt or concrete Suitable for outdoor or indoor; asphalt or concrete Rebound SYNPAVE bases base.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics of Tennis Lesson 4 Energy
    The Physics of Tennis Lesson 4: Energy changes when a ball interacts with different surfaces Unit Overview: In this unit students continue to develop understanding of what can be at first glance a complicated system, the game of tennis. In this activity we have taken two components of the game of tennis, the ball and court, to see if we can model the interactions between them. This activity focuses on the energy interactions between ball and court. Objectives: Students will be able to- • Describe what forces interact when the ball hits a surface. • Understand what changes occur when potential and kinetic energy conversion is taking place within a system. At the high school level students should include connections to the concept of “work =FxD” and calculations of Ek = ½ 2 mv and Ep =mgh according to the conservation of energy principal. • Identify the types of energy used in this system. (restricted to potential & kinetic energy) • Comparative relative energy losses for typical court compositions. Lesson Time Required: Four class periods Next Generation Science/Common Core Standards: • NGSS: HS-PS3-1.Create a computational model to calculate the change in the energy of one component in a system when the change in energy of the other component(s) and energy flows in and out of the system are known. • CCSS.Math. Content: 8.F.B.4 Use functions to model relationships between quantities. • Construct a function to model a linear relationship between two quantities. Determine the rate of change and initial value of the function from a description of a relationship or from two (x, y) values, including reading these from a table or from a graph.
    [Show full text]
  • Tournament Notes
    TournamenT noTes as of march 31, 2010 THE RIVER HILLS USTA $25,000 WOMEN’S CHALLENGER JACKSON, MS • APRIL 4-11 USTA PRO CIRCUIT RETURNS TO JACKSON FOR 12TH STRAIGHT YEAR TournamenT InFormaTIon The River Hills USTA $25,000 Women’s Challenger is the 10th $25,000 women’s tournament of the year and the only $25,000 Site: River Hills Country Club – Jackson, Miss. women’s event held in Mississippi. Jackson Websites: www.riverhillsclub.net, is the second of three consecutive clay court procircuit.usta.com events on the USTA Pro Circuit in the lead-up to the 2010 French Open. Bryn Lennon/Getty Images Qualifying draw begins: Sunday, April 4 Main draw begins: Tuesday, April 6 This year’s main draw is expected to include Julia Cohen, an All-American at the University Main Draw: 32 Singles / 16 Doubles of Miami who reached the semifinals of the NCAA tournament as a sophomore in 2009, Surface: Clay / Outdoor Lauren Albanese, who won the 2006 USTA Prize Money: $25,000 Girls’ 18s National Championships to earn an automatic wild card into the US Open, and Tournament Director: Kimberly Couts, a frequent competitor on the Dave Randall, (601) 987-4417 USTA Pro Circuit who won the 2006 Easter Lauren Albanese won the 2006 USTA Girls’ [email protected] Bowl as a junior and was a former USTA Girls’ 18s National Championships to earn an 16s No. 1. automatic wild card into the US Open. Tournament Press Contact: Kendall Poole, (601) 987-4454 International players in the main draw include freshman in 2009 and led Duke University [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Player Notice
    ELECTRONIC REVIEW PROCEDURES MESSAGE TO PLAYERS At the 2014 US Open, we will be using Hawk-Eye Officiating to review line call decisions made by the Chair Umpire or Line Umpires in Arthur Ashe Stadium, Louis Armstrong Stadium, Grand Stand Stadium, Court 17 and Court 5. To initiate a challenge of a call, the same principle applies as in clay court tennis (i.e. a player/team can only ask the Chair Umpire for a review on a point ending shot, or when you stop play). In order to challenge, a player must show an immediate interest in making a challenge and must do it in a timely manner. The key to the policy is "immediate interest". The player must also make his/her intention to challenge known to the chair umpire either verbally or visually using his/her racquet, arm, hand or finger. Please note that the decision of Hawk-Eye Officiating is final and cannot be appealed. If, for some reason, the system cannot provide a review of the call, the original call made by the Chair Umpire/Line Umpire will stand. In this case, the challenging player/team will not have this count against his/her remaining challenges. Here is how Electronic Review will work: RULES 1. Each player/team receives three (3) challenges per set, plus one (1) additional challenge in a tie-break (successful challenges do not count against a player’s total). In competitions where the Match Tie-Break (MTB) is used, the MTB is considered a new set thus each team will have three (3) challenges in the MTB.
    [Show full text]