DOCSLIB.ORG

Plant Conservation Report 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plant Conservation Report 2020 Secretariat of the CBD Technical Series No. 95 Convention on Biological Diversity 4 PLANT CONSERVATION95 REPORT 2020: A review of progress towards the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020 CBD Technical Series No. 95 PLANT CONSERVATION REPORT 2020: A review of progress towards the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020 A contribution to the fifth edition of the Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO-5). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the copyright holders concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Secretariat of the Convention and Botanic Gardens Conservation International would appreciate receiving a copy of any publications that use this document as a source. Reuse of the figures is subject to permission from the original rights holders. Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity in collaboration with Botanic Gardens Conservation International. ISBN 9789292257040 (print version); ISBN 9789292257057 (web version) Copyright © 2020, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity Citation: Sharrock, S. (2020). Plant Conservation Report 2020: A review of progress in implementation of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Canada and Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK. Technical Series No. 95: 68 pages. For further information, contact: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade Centre, 413 Rue St. Jacques, Suite 800, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H2Y 1N9 Tel: +1 (514) 288 2220 Fax: +1 (514) 288 6588 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.cbd.int/ 2 PLANT CONSERVATION REPORT 2020 THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY: Authors Suzanne Sharrock with input from members of the Global Partnership for Plant Conservation. A cknowledgments The production of this publication was made possible thanks to funds provided by Missouri Botanical Garden. We are very grateful for this support. We gratefully acknowledge the help and information provided by all members of the Global Partnership for Plant Conservation as well as the support and encouragement of Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. In particular, we acknowledge the following individuals who provided comments, feedback and suggestions on the report and ideas for the case studies featured in this report: Steven Bachman, Megan Barstow, Jože Bavcon, Emily Beech, Hesiquio Benitez, Stuart Butchart, Colin Clubbe, Carly Cowell, Annie Cung, Eduardo Dalcin, Alexandra Davey, Maïté Delmas, Anurag Dhyani, Luigi Guarino, Tim Hirsch, Peter Hollingsworth, Nicola Hutchinson, Katie Marfleet, Michael Kiehn, Michael Krause, Nikos Krigas, Lucinda McDade, Abby Meyer, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Kieran Noonan- Mooney, Domitilla Raimondo, Hai Ren, Malin Rivers, Emiliano Sánchez Martínez, Kirsty Shaw, Paul Smith, Anastasiya Timoshyna, Damian Wrigley and Peter Wyse Jackson. Ian Harvey-Brown A REVIEW OF PROGRESS TOWARDS THE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION 2011-2020 3 CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 9 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 11 SOME OVERALL SUCCESSES OF THE GSPC ......................................................................... 12 NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GSPC ........................................................................ 13 GSPC targets and their relationship with national biodiversity targets .................................................................... 14 National Strategies for Plant Conservation ................................................................................................................... 15 SECTOR-SPECIFIC RESPONSES ............................................................................................. 17 PROGRESS TOWARDS THE GSPC TARGETS ......................................................................... 18 Target 1: An online flora of all known plants ................................................................................................................ 19 Global progress ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 National implementation .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Target 1 – issues to consider ..................................................................................................................................... 20 Target 2: An assessment of the conservation status of all known plant species, as far as possible, to guide conservation action ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Global progress ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 National implementation .......................................................................................................................................... 22 Target 2 – issues to consider ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Target 3: Information, research and associated outputs and methods necessary to implement the Strategy developed and shared .................................................................................................................................. 24 Global progress.....................................................................................................................................................24 National implementation.....................................................................................................................................24 Target 4: At least 15 per cent of each ecological region or vegetation type secured through effective management and/or restoration ....................................................................................................................... 26 Global progress ........................................................................................................................................................... 26 National implementation .......................................................................................................................................... 27 Target 5: At least 75% of the most important areas for plant diversity of each ecological region protected, with effective management in place for conserving plants and their genetic diversity ............................................ 28 Global progress ........................................................................................................................................................... 28 National implementation .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Target 6: At least 75% of production land in each sector managed sustainably, consistent with the conservation of plant diversity .................................................................................................................................. 30 Global progress ........................................................................................................................................................... 30 National implementation .......................................................................................................................................... 30 Target 7: At least 75 per cent of known threatened plant species conserved in situ ................................................. 31 Global progress ........................................................................................................................................................... 31 National implementation.....................................................................................................................................31 Target 7 - issues to consider .................................................................................................................................32 4 PLANT CONSERVATION REPORT 2020 Target 8: At least 75 per cent of threatened plant species in ex situ collections, preferably in the country of origin, and at least 20 per cent available for recovery and restoration programmes ..........................................33 Global progress.....................................................................................................................................................33 National implementation.....................................................................................................................................35
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BGBM Annual Report 2017–2019
    NETWORKING FOR DIVERSITY Annual Report 2017 – 2019 2017 – BGBM BGBM Annual Report 2017 – 2019 Cover image: Research into global biodiversity and its significance for humanity is impossible without networks. The topic of networking can be understood in different ways: in the natural world, with the life processes within an organism – visible in the network of the veins of a leaf or in the genetic diversity in populations of plants – networking takes place by means of pollen, via pollinators or the wind. In the world of research, individual objects, such as a particular plant, are networked with the data obtained from them. Networking is also crucial if this data is to be effective as a knowledge base for solving global issues of the future: collaboration between scientific experts within and across disciplines and with stakeholders at regional, national and international level. Contents Foreword 5 Organisation 56 A network for plants 6 Facts and figures 57 Staff, visiting scientists, doctoral students 57 Key events of 2017 – 2019 10 Affiliated and unsalaried scientists, volunteers 58 BGBM publications 59 When diversity goes online 16 Species newly described by BGBM authors 78 Families and genera newly described by BGBM authors 82 On the quest for diversity 20 Online resources and databases 83 Externally funded projects 87 Invisible diversity 24 Hosted scientific events 2017 – 2019 92 Collections 93 Humboldt 2.0 30 Library 96 BGBM Press: publications 97 Between East and West 36 Botanical Museum 99 Press and public relations 101 At the service of science 40 Visitor numbers 102 Budget 103 A research museum 44 Publication information 104 Hands-on science 50 Our symbol, the corncockle 52 4 5 Foreword BGBM Annual Report 2017 – 2019 We are facing vital challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • A World Flora Online by 2020: a Discussion Document on Plans for the Achievement of Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation by 2020
    CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/INF/38 23 April 2012 ENGLISH ONLY SUBSIDIARY BODY ON SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Sixteenth meeting Montreal, 30 April-5 May 2012 Item 8 of the provisional agenda* GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PLANT CONSERVATION: WORLD FLORA ONLINE BY 2020 Note by the Executive Secretary 1. In decision X/17 the Conference of the Parties adopted the consolidated update of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) 2011-2020, with sixteen updated global targets for plant conservation, including Target 1 of developing, by 2020, an online Flora of all known plants. 2. This document provides a report for information to the participants of sixteenth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice on steps taken to develop a ―World Flora online‖, its relevance for the implementation of the Convention and for the achievement of the other targets of the GSPC. 3. The document, prepared jointly by the Missouri Botanical Garden, the New York Botanical Garden, the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, is presented in the form and language in which it was received by the Secretariat. * UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/1. I order to minimize the environmental impacts of the Secretariat’s processes, and to contribute to the Secretary-General’s initiative for a C-Neutral UN, this document is printed in limited numbers. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/INF/38 Page 2 A World Flora Online by 2020: a discussion document on plans for the achievement of Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation by 2020 Presented to the Sixteenth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 30 April – 5 May 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • QQR 7 Information Pack
    7th Quinquennial Review of Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) Information Pack (version 2.21) 14 May 2021 1 Version 2.2: Four reptiles and two seals removed from the EPS list (Annex 1); one EPS amphibian and two EPS reptiles that are all Endangered removed from Annex 2 – these species were included in Version 2 and/or 2.1 in error. See Annex 1 and Annex 2 for further information. 1. Introduction Every five years, the country nature conservation bodies (Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and NatureScot), working jointly through the UK Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), review Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (WCA) 1981. The review will provide recommendations to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and to Ministers for the Environment in the Scottish Government and Welsh Government for changes to these schedules2. This is known as the Quinquennial Review (QQR). As part of the QQR, stakeholders are provided with the opportunity to propose changes to the species on the schedules. This Information Pack has been produced for the 7th QQR (QQR 7). It is important to note that this QQR differs from previous ones. The Information Pack explains the new selection criteria, provides a timetable, and explains the process to be used by stakeholders. Contact details of the QQR Inter-agency Group who are managing QQR 7, are listed in Section 5. In addition, the Information Pack provides details of how to complete the online survey through which stakeholders propose new species for inclusion on, or removal of existing species from Schedules 5 and 8, or propose a change to how species are protected on the schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • A Planning Proposal Which Nominates High Conservation Protection For
    If you would like to add your note of support to this Gateway submission to protect the Hacking River Catchment of Otford, Stanwell Park & Helensburgh, surrounding the “Royal National Park” from development, please add your name and details here http://www.otfordeco.com/submission.html A Planning Proposal which nominates high conservation protection for former 7d zoned lands and a cost effective exit strategy for owners of lots without developments rights Prepared by Otford Protection Society Incorporated Page 1 of 91 Planning Proposal – Land adjacent to Royal National Park – 30 April 2010 The Director General N.S.W. Planning – Head Office 23-33 Bridge Street (GPO Box 39) Sydney NSW 2000 Dear Director General, Planning Proposal: WOLLONGONG CITY COUNCIL - A PLANNING PROPOSAL WHICH NOMINATES HIGH CONSERVATION PROTECTION FOR FORMER 7D ZONED LANDS AND A COST EFFECTIVE EXIT STRATEGY FOR OWNERS OF LOTS WITHOUT DEVELOPMENTS RIGHTS Otford Protection Society Incorporated, by a resolution on May 2, 2010 at a Committee Meeting, has prepared this planning proposal, in accordance with Division 4 LEPs of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (as amended) and section 27 of the Local Government Act 1993, to initiate a draft local environmental plan which nominates high conservation protection for former 7d zoned lands and a cost effective exit strategy for owners of lots without developments rights. Approval be granted for Otford Protection Society Incorporated, delegated authority, to prepare and submit a planning proposal to the Minister
    [Show full text]
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
    Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales
    [Show full text]
  • Značajke I Evolucija 5S Rdna U Vrstama Iz Roda Pulsatilla (Mill.)
    Sveučilište u Zagrebu Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet Ivan Bakšić i Ana Dudaš Značajke i evolucija 5S rDNA u vrstama iz roda Pulsatilla (Mill.) Zagreb, 2019. Ovaj rad izrađen je na Zavodu za molekularnu biologiju Prirodoslovno-matematičkog fakulteta pod vodstvom prof. dr. sc. Višnje Besendorfer i predan je na natječaj za dodjelu Rektorove nagrade u akademskoj godini 2018./2019. Sadržaj 1. UVOD ..................................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Važnost ribosomske DNA (rDNA) u filogeniji .............................................................................1 1.2. Modeli evolucije multigenskih porodica .......................................................................................1 1.3. Značajke roda Pulsatilla ................................................................................................................2 2. OPĆI I SPECIFIČNI CILJEVI RADA ............................................................................................6 3. MATERIJALI I METODE ...............................................................................................................7 3.1. Materijal ........................................................................................................................................7 3.1.1. Biljni materijal ........................................................................................................................7 3.2. Metode ...........................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • 27April12acquatic Plants
    International Plant Protection Convention Protecting the world’s plant resources from pests 01 2012 ENG Aquatic plants their uses and risks Implementation Review and Support System Support and Review Implementation A review of the global status of aquatic plants Aquatic plants their uses and risks A review of the global status of aquatic plants Ryan M. Wersal, Ph.D. & John D. Madsen, Ph.D. i The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of speciic companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Ofice of Knowledge Exchange,
    [Show full text]
  • List of UK BAP Priority Vascular Plant Species (2007)
    UK Biodiversity Action Plan List of UK BAP Priority Vascular Plant Species (2007) For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/ List of UK BAP Priority Vascular Plant Species A list of UK BAP priority vascular plant species, created between 1995 and 1999, and subsequently updated in response to the Species and Habitats Review Report, published in 2007, is provided in the table below. The table also provides details of the species' occurrences in the four UK countries, and describes whether the species was an 'original' species (on the original list created between 1995 and 1999), or was added following the 2007 review. All original species were provided with Species Action Plans (SAPs), species statements, or are included within grouped plans or statements, whereas there are no published plans for the species added in 2007. Scientific names and commonly used synonyms derive from the Nameserver facility of the UK Species Dictionary, which is managed by the Natural History Museum. Scientific name Common Taxon England Scotland Wales Northern Original UK name Ireland BAP species? Aceras Man Orchid vascular Y N N N anthropophorum plant Adonis annua Pheasant's- vascular Y U N N eye plant Ajuga chamaepitys Ground-pine vascular Y N N N plant Ajuga pyramidalis Pyramidal vascular Y Y N Y Bugle plant Alchemilla acutiloba a Lady's- vascular Y Y N N mantle plant Alchemilla micans vascular Y Y N N plant Alchemilla minima Alchemilla vascular Y N N N Yes – SAP plant Alchemilla monticola vascular Y N N N plant Alchemilla vascular Y N N N subcrenata plant Alisma gramineum Ribbon- vascular Y N N N Yes – SAP leaved Water- plant plantain Apium repens Creeping vascular Y N N N Yes – SAP Marshwort plant Arabis glabra Tower vascular Y N N N Yes – SAP Mustard plant Arenaria norvegica Arctic vascular N Y N N subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Buchanania Obovata) Compared to Other Anacardiaceae Fruit and Nuts
    The Nutritional Potential of the Native Australian Green Plum (Buchanania obovata) Compared to Other Anacardiaceae Fruit and Nuts Author Fyfe, S, Smyth, HE, Schirra, HJ, Rychlik, M, Sultanbawa, Y Published 2020 Journal Title Frontiers in Nutrition Version Version of Record (VoR) DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.600215 Copyright Statement © 2020 Fyfe, Smyth, Schirra, Rychlik and Sultanbawa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/405739 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au REVIEW published: 16 December 2020 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.600215 The Nutritional Potential of the Native Australian Green Plum (Buchanania obovata) Compared to Other Anacardiaceae Fruit and Nuts Selina Fyfe 1*, Heather E. Smyth 1, Horst Joachim Schirra 2, Michael Rychlik 1,3 and Yasmina Sultanbawa 1 1 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Coopers Plains, QLD, Australia, 2 Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 3 Chair of Analytical Food Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany The native Australian green plum (Buchanania obovata) is a small fruit that grows in the northern parts of the Northern Territory and Western Australia. The fruit belongs to the family Anacardiaceae, which includes the other agriculturally important fruit mangoes, pistachios and cashew nuts.
    [Show full text]
  • World Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Buchanania Lanzan: A
    World Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences ISSN (Print): 2321-3310; ISSN (Online): 2321-3086 Published by Atom and Cell Publishers © All Rights Reserved Available online at: http://www.wjpsonline.com/ Review Article Buchanania Lanzan: a species of enormous potentials Mahtab Zakira Siddiqui1*, Arnab Roy Chowdhury1, Niranjan Prasad1 and Moni Thomas2 1Processing and Product Development Division, Indian Institute of Natural Resins & Gums, Namkum, Ranchi – 834 010 (Jharkhand), India 2Directorate of Research Services, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur – 482 004 (M.P.), India Received: 17-02-2014 / Revised: 24-02-2014 / Accepted: 25-03-2014 ABSTRACT Buchanania lanzan Spreng, commonly known as char, achar and chironji, belongs to family Anacardiaceae. It was first described by Francis Hamilton in 1798. The tree is natural wild growth in the tropical deciduous forests of Northern, Western and Central India, mostly in the States of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and in Varanasi and Mirzapur districts of Uttar Pradesh. Besides India, the plant is also found in other tropical Asian countries, Australia and Pacific islands. Tree can be identified by dark grey crocodile bark with red blaze and is a good species for afforestation in bare hill slopes. Traditional indigenous knowledge reveals the immense value of almost all parts of the plant i.e. roots, leaves, fruits, seeds and gum for various medicinal uses. Buchanania lanzan, being a vulnerable medicinal plant, is included in the Red Data Book published by International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN). This species has high socio- economic value providing livelihood to tribal population of the area and has high potential as commercial horticulture species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rock Garden 136 the Ro
    January 2016 January 2016 THE ROCK GARDEN 136 THE ROCK GARDEN 136 January 2016 THE ROCK GARDEN Volume XXXIV Part 3 - 136 January 2016 THE ROCK GARDEN Volume XXXIV Part 3 - 136 PostalPostal Subscriptions Subscriptions from from 1st October, 1st October, 2015 2015 Postal subscriptionsPostal subscriptions are payable are payable annually annually by October by October and provide and provide membership membership of the of the SRGC untilSRGC 30 thuntil September 30th September of the following of the following year. year. SubscriptionSubscription Rates Rates UK UK OverseasOverseas Single annualSingle annual £18 £18 £23 £23 Junior Junior £3 £3 £7 £7 (under 18(under on 1 18st Oct) on 1st Oct) Family Family £21 £21 £25 £25 (Two adults(Two andadults up and to two up childrento two children under 18 under on 1 18st Oct) on 1st Oct) Three yearThree subscriptions year subscriptions are available are available at three at times three the times above the aboveannual annualrates. Renewals rates. Renewals for threefor year three subscriptions year subscriptions may only may be only made be atmade the end at the of endthe three of the year three period. year period. All subscriptionAll subscription payments payments to the club to the must club be must made be inmade GB Pounds in GB Pounds Sterling. Sterling. ChequesCheques should shouldbe made be payablemade payable to ‘The Scottishto ‘The Scottish Rock Garden Rock Garden Club’ and Club’ must and be must be drawn ondrawn a UK on bank. a UK bank. SubscriptionSubscription payments payments may be may made be throughmade through the post the by post Visa byor MastercardVisa or Mastercard providingproviding the following the following information information is sent: is sent: The longThe number long number on the cardon the card The nameThe ofname the cardholder of the cardholder as shown as onshown the cardon the card The cardThe expiry card date expiry date The cv2The 3 digit cv2 number3 digit number (from back (from of back the card) of the card) The cardholder’sThe cardholder’s signature.
    [Show full text]