Diversifying the Priorities of Kosovo Diplomacy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has There Been an Evolution in How Serbian Media Perceive Kosovo?
Policy Analysis - No. 01/2016 The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has there been an evolution in how Serbian media perceive Kosovo? The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has there been an evolution in how Serbian media perceive Kosovo? ABOUT GLPS Group for Legal and Political Studies is an independent, non-partisan and non-profit public policy organization based in Prishtina, Kosovo. Our mission is to conduct credible policy research in the fields of politics, law and economics and to push forward policy solutions that address the failures and/or tackle the problems in the said policy fields. www.legalpoliticalstudies.org 2 The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has there been an evolution in how Serbian media perceive Kosovo? Policy Analysis No. 05/2016 The Serbian Media and the Dialogue: Has there been an evolution in how Serbian media perceive Kosovo? Lowell West* January 2016 For their contribution, we would like to thank the external peer reviewer(s) who provided excellent comments on earlier drafts of this policy product. GLPS internal staff provided very helpful inputs, edits and contributed with excellent research support. © Group for Legal and Political Studies, January, 2016 The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of Group for Legal and Political Studies donors, their staff, associates or Board(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any mean without the permission. Contact the administrative office of the Group for Legal and Political Studies for such requests. Group for Legal and Political Studies „Rexhep Luci‟ str. -
Kosovo After Haradinaj
KOSOVO AFTER HARADINAJ Europe Report N°163 – 26 May 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE RISK AND DEFLECTION OF REBELLION................................................... 2 A. MANAGEMENT OF THE HARADINAJ INDICTMENT ..................................................................2 B. SHADOW WARRIORS TEST THE WATER.................................................................................4 C. THE "WILD WEST" ON THE BRINK ........................................................................................6 D. DUKAGJINI TURNS IN ON ITSELF ...........................................................................................9 III. KOSOVO'S NEW POLITICAL CONFIGURATION.............................................. 12 A. THE SHAPE OF KOSOVO ALBANIAN POLITICS .....................................................................12 B. THE OCTOBER 2004 ELECTIONS .........................................................................................13 C. THE NETWORK CONSOLIDATES CONTROL ..........................................................................14 D. THE ECLIPSE OF THE PARTY OF WAR? ................................................................................16 E. TRANSCENDING OR DEEPENING WARTIME DIVISIONS?.......................................................20 IV. KOSOVO'S POLITICAL SYSTEM AND FINAL STATUS.................................. -
Kosovo: Background and U.S
Kosovo: Background and U.S. Policy Updated March 11, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46175 SUMMARY R46175 Kosovo: Background and U.S. Policy March 11, 2021 Kosovo, a country in the Western Balkans with a predominantly Albanian-speaking population, declared independence from Serbia in 2008, less than a decade after a brief but lethal war. It has Sarah E. Garding since been recognized by about 100 countries. The United States and most European Union (EU) Analyst in European Affairs member states recognize Kosovo. Serbia, Russia, China, and various other countries (including five EU member states) do not. Key issues for Kosovo include the following: New Leadership. Albin Kurti is poised to become prime minister for the second time after his left-leaning Self-Determination Party (Vetëvendosje) won a landslide victory in early parliamentary elections in February 2021. The poll was Kosovo’s second snap parliamentary election in less than two years. Once of the new parliament’s initial responsibilities is to elect the country’s next president. Acting President Vjosa Osmani, whose candidacy is backed by Vetëvendosje, is heavily favored to win. Parliament’s failure to elect a president could trigger early parliamentary elections, however. Dialogue with Serbia. The unresolved dispute between Kosovo and Serbia is one of the main threats to regional stability in the Western Balkans. Since 2011, the EU has facilitated a dialogue aimed at normalizing their relations. In July 2020, Kosovo and Serbia returned to EU-led talks after a 20-month suspension. Shortly thereafter, the two parties agreed to new measures on economic cooperation at talks hosted by the White House. -
Statement by Herman Van Rompuy President of the European Council Following His Meeting with Atifete Jahjaga President of Kosovo
EUROPEAN COUNCIL THE PRESIDENT EN Brussels, 6 September 2011 EUCO 66/11 PRESSE 298 PR PCE 39 Statement by Herman Van Rompuy President of the European Council following his meeting with Atifete Jahjaga President of Kosovo I am pleased to welcome President Jahjaga in Brussels today. Her visit takes place only a few days after the latest round of the Pristina - Belgrade dialogue, so allow me to start on that topic. Let me emphasise that the EU is very satisfied with the latest agreements on Customs Stamps and Cadastre. The agreements reached last Friday are truly European solutions to some very difficult issues. In particular, the agreement on customs stamps is crucial, since it will result in the lifting of the mutual trade embargoes. This is a significant step in improving relations in the region and ensuring freedom of movement of goods in accordance with European values and standards. However, there is more to do. Discussions need to continue and further progress needs to be made on the remaining issues. We need to find equally creative and pragmatic solutions for the issues of telecommunication, energy, and representation in regional fora. Dialogue, compromise and consensus seeking are the European way. Both sides have everything to gain from these deals, as the aim of this dialogue is to bring both sides closer to the EU, to improve mutual cooperation, and to improve the lives of ordinary people. This brings me to the other topic of our discussion today, namely the relations between the European Union and Kosovo, and related developments in Kosovo itself. -
Western Balkans Stability Monitor
Western Balkans Stability Monitor December 2018 Issue* * The issue is published in December and primarily covers issues occurring in the previous month. Table of contents Regional Overview 4 Albania 6 Government Stability 7 Opposition Activities 7 Regional Relations 8 Security 9 Looking Forward 10 Bosnia-Herzegovina 11 Government Stability 12 Opposition Activities 14 Regional Relations 15 Security 16 Looking Forward 17 Kosovo 18 Government Stability 19 Opposition Activities 20 Regional Relations 21 Security 23 Looking Forward 24 Macedonia 25 Government Stability 26 Opposition Activities 27 Regional Relations 29 Security 30 Looking Forward 31 2 Montenegro 32 Government Stability 33 Opposition Activities 34 Regional Relations 35 Security 36 Looking Forward 37 Serbia 38 Government stability 39 Opposition activities 40 Regional relations 41 Security 42 Looking Forward 43 About Risk Dimensions 44 War 44 Terrorism 44 Government Instability 44 Civil Unrest 44 Ethnic Unrest 44 About 45 Contact 45 3 Regional Overview Instability across the region remained unevenly spread over the last month in the Western Balkans. While most of the countries of the region remained broadly stable, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo set themselves apart as pockets of real – or possible – instability. In the case of Bosnia, the risk of instability largely derived from the post-election challenge of forming ruling coalitions at different levels of government. The process of ethnic coalition building can be challenging enough at the best of times. However, this time around it is compounded by the lack of a legal basis for forming part of the Federation entity’s Parliament (the upper House of Peoples), without which the Federation entity government cannot be formed. -
Downloaded 4.0 License
Security and Human Rights (2020) 1-5 Book Review ∵ Daan W. Everts (with a foreword by Jaap de Hoop Scheffer), Peacekeeping in Albania and Kosovo; Conflict response and international intervention in the Western Balkans, 1997 – 2002 (I.B.Tauris, July 2020), 228p. £. 13,99 paperback Fortunately, at the international scene there are those characters who venture into complex crises and relentlessly work for their solution. Sergio Viero de Melo seems to be their icon. Certainly, Daan Everts, the author of Peacekeeping in Albania and Kosovo belongs to this exceptional group of pragmatic crisis managers in the field. Between 1997 and 2002 he was the osce’s represent- ative in crisis-hit Albania and Kosovo. Now, twenty years later, Mr Everts has published his experiences, and luckily so; the book is rich in content and style, and should become obligatory reading for prospective diplomats and military officers; and it certainly is interesting material for veterans of all sorts. Everts presents the vicissitudes of his life in Tirana and Pristina against the background of adequate introductions to Albanian and Kosovar history, which offer no new insights or facts. All in all, the book is a sublime primary source of diplomatic practice. The largest, and clearly more interesting part of the book is devoted to the intervention in Kosovo. As a matter of fact, the 1999 war in Kosovo deepened ethnic tensions in the territory. Therefore, the author says, the mission in Kosovo was highly complex, also because the mandate was ambivalent with regard to Kosovo’s final status. Furthermore, the international community (Everts clearly does not like that term) for the time being had to govern Kosovo as a protectorate. -
Report Between the President and Constitutional Court and Its Influence on the Functioning of the Constitutional System in Kosovo Msc
Report between the President and Constitutional Court and its influence on the functioning of the Constitutional System in Kosovo MSc. Florent Muçaj, PhD Candidate Faculty of Law, University of Prishtina, Kosovo MSc. Luz Balaj, PhD Candidate Faculty of Law, University of Prishtina, Kosovo Abstract This paper aims at clarifying the report between the President and the Constitutional Court. If we take as a starting point the constitutional mandate of these two institutions it follows that their final mission is the same, i.e., the protection and safeguarding of the constitutional system. This paper, thus, will clarify the key points in which this report is expressed. Further, this paper examines the theoretical aspects of the report between the President and the Constitutional Court, starting from the debate over this issue between Karl Schmitt and Hans Kelsen. An important part of the paper will examine the Constitution of Kosovo, i.e., the contents of the constitutional norm and its application. The analysis focuses on the role such report between the two institutions has on the functioning of the constitutional system. In analyzing the case of Kosovo, this paper examines Constitutional Court cases in which the report between the President and the Constitutional Court has been an issue of review. Such cases assist us in clarifying the main theme of this paper. Therefore, the reader will be able to understand the key elements of the report between the President as a representative of the unity of the people on the one hand and the Constitutional Court as a guarantor of constitutionality on the other hand. -
Msc Programme in Urban Management and Development Rotterdam, the Netherlands September 2017 Thesis Road Safety in Prishtina
MSc Programme in Urban Management and Development Rotterdam, The Netherlands September 2017 Thesis Road Safety in Prishtina: A Study of Perception from Producers’ and Road Users’ Perspectives Name : Yulia Supervisor : Linda Zuijderwijk Specialization : Urban Strategic and Planning (USP) UMD 13 Road Safety in Prishtina: A Study of Perception from Producers’ and Road Users’ Perspectives i MASTER’S PROGRAMME IN URBAN MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (October 2016 – September 2017) Road safety in Prishtina, Kosovo: A study of perception from producers’ and road users’ perspectives Yulia Supervisor: Linda Zuijderwijk UMD 13 Report number: 1041 Rotterdam, September 2017 Road Safety in Prishtina: A Study of Perception from Producers’ and Road Users’ Perspectives ii Summary Prishtina is the capital city of Kosovo, the youngest country in Europe, who declared its independence in 2008. Before its independence, Kosovo is an autonomous province under Serbia, which was part of Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). Kosovo has a long history of conflicts since the occupation of Turkish Ottoman Empire in Balkan Peninsula area until the recent one was the Kosova War in 1998 – 1999. As a post-conflict society, Prishtina is suffering from several urban challenges. One of these challenges is road safety issue indicated by increasing the number of traffic accidents in Prishtina and even nationwide. National government considered this situation as unusual for European countries. This study aimed to answer a research question on how the road safety is perceived from two main perspectives, which are road users (pedestrians and cyclists) and stakeholders in the producer’s level of road safety strategy in Prishtina. This study was conducted in urban zone of Prishtina, which is also the case study, with the regards to the increasing number of traffic accidents, which involve pedestrians and cyclists, as the vulnerable road users. -
The Letter of Support to the Initiative For
President of Kosovo, Mrs. Atifete Jahjaga Member of Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mr. Bakir Izetbegovic President of Serbia, Mr. Boris Tadic President of Slovenia, Mr. Danilo Turk President of Macedonia, Mr. Djordje Ivanov President of Montenegro, Mr. Filip Vujanovic President of Croatia, Mr. Ivo Josipovic Member of Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mr. Nebojsa Radmanovic Member of Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mr. Zeljko Komsic Subject: Establishment of RECOM Sarajevo, Belgrade, Prishtina, Zagreb, Skopje, Podgorica, Ljubljana October 2011 Your Excellencies, Presidents and Members of Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, We believe that citizens of the countries of the former Yugoslavia have a need and the right to know all the facts about war crimes and other massive human rights violations committed during the wars of the 1990s. They also have the right and a need, we believe, to know the consequences of those wars. This is why we are writing to you. For over a decade, since the weapons have been muted, post-Yugoslav societies have not been able to cope with the heavy legacy of the war past, largely because the fate of a number of those killed, forcibly disappeared, tortured, and persecuted – the people who suffered in so many different, horrible ways – remains unknown to date. Only a few names of those who died are known, but more than 13,000 families of forcibly disappeared persons are still searching for their loved ones. On top of this, there is no organized, systematic mechanism for the victims to seek and obtain fair reparation; and the lack of reliable facts about the victims is continually used for political manipulation, nationalist promotion, hatred and intolerance. -
The Issue of the New President Is Looming Over the Election Results
Policy Notes No. 01/2021 The issue of the new President is looming over the election results February 2021 1 Group for Legal and Political Studies is an independent, non-partisan and non-profit public policy organization based in Prishtina, Kosovo. Our mission is to conduct credible policy research in the fields of politics, law and economics and to push forward policy solutions that address the failures and/or tackle the problems in the said policy fields. 2 legalpoliticalstudies.org Policy Note 01/2021 THE ISSUE OF THE NEW PRESIDENT IS LOOMING OVER THE ELECTION RESULTS Author: Mehdi Sejdiu* February 2021 © Group for Legal and Political Studies, February 2021. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of Group for Legal and Political Studies donors, their staff, associates or Board(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any mean without the permission. Contact the administrative office of the Group for Legal and Political Studies for such requests. Group for Legal and Political Studies “Rexhep Luci‟ str. 16/1 Prishtina 10 000, Kosovo Website: www.legalpoliticalstudies.org E-mail: [email protected] Tel/fax.: +381 38 234 456 * Group for Legal and Political Studies 3 THE ISSUE OF THE NEW PRESIDENT IS LOOMING OVER THE ELECTION RESULTS Introduction The President is the head of state and represents the unity of the people of the Republic of Kosovo, states Article 83 of the Kosovo constitution. The next President who shall embody this unity has to be appointed no later than April 6-th, as the six-month mandate of the current Acting President Vjosa Osmani will come to an end.1 Ms. -
Kosovo Introduction
KOSOVO INTRODUCTION Like Albania, Kosovar history is believed to date to Illyria in the 4th Century BC and to the Roman Empire. In the 9th to early 11th centuries, the Kosovo region was ruled by Bulgaria. From 1389 to the late 19th century, the region came under Ottoman rule; in the early 20th century, Kosovo was ruled by Serbia. In 1946, Kosovo became part of the Yugoslav federation. During the 1990’s, Kosovo sought independence from Serbia, with brutal results, including mistreatment of ethnic Albanians; during the 2000’s, the United Nations attempted to secure Kosovar independence, which is supported by Albania and rejected by Serbia. At this time, although technically still a part of Serbia, Kosovo is an international protectorate administered by the United Nations. Kosovo, a land-locked area, is bordered clockwise by Serbia, Macedonia, Albania, and Montenegro. The official name is the Republic of Kosovo (Kosova / Kosovë), with its capital at Pristina (Prishtina / Prishtinë). Population estimates vary from 1.8 to 2.2 million. With independence from Serbia declared on February 17, 2008, the Kosovar government is a parliamentary republic. Religious affliations are Muslim, Albanian Orthodox, and Roman Catholic; ethnic populations are Albanian, 88%; Serbs, 7%; and 5% other including Bosnian, Gorani, Roma / Gypsy, Ashkali, Egyptian, and Turkish. Although the official languages are Albanian and Serbian, Bosnian and Turkish are official in those municipalities with substantial minority populations; in addtion, English and German are also spoken. Literacy rates vary from 92% to 98% for men and 88% to 90% for women. Flag map GENERAL INFORMATION National languages of instruction: Albanian and Serbian; Additional local languages of instruction: Bosnian and Turkish Academic year: September to June Bologna (EHEA) signatory date: None Educational Authority: Ministria e Arsimit, Shkencës dhe Teknologjisë (Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology) Rruga. -
CONT Delegation Visit 14-17 June 2011 Kosovo
CONT Delegation visit 14-17 June 2011 Kosovo Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia KOSOVO This document aims to provide background information to the Committee on Budgetary Control Delegation to Kosovo and FYROM, due to take place on 14-17 June 2011. The factual information below deals with various subjects related to Kosovo as regards basic data, political structure overview, an overview of the economy and relations with the European Union. 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON KOSOVO 2.1 Basic data on Kosovo1 General topographic map2 Total land area: 10,887 sq km Population: 2 126 708 (estimate 2010) People: Albanians (88%), Serbs (6%), Bosniaks (3%), Roma (2%), Turks (1%) Capital: Pristina (600 000) Main languages: Albanian, Serbian, Bosniak and Turkish Religions: Islam, Serbian Orthodoxy, Roman Catholicism Currency: Euro Natural resources: coal, lead, zinc, chromium, silver, nickel, magnesium, kaolin, chrome 1 http://rks-gov.net/en-US/Republika/Kosova/Pages/default.aspx; http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel- advice-by-country/country-profile/europe/kosovo; 2 http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plik:Kosovo_kart.jpg&filetimestamp=20060910213128 1 2.2 Political structure - overview3 Official name Republic of Kosovo Independent democratic republic since 17 February 2008. Kosovo is supervised by the international community following the conclusion Form of state: of the political process to determine Kosovo’s final status envisaged in UN Security Council Resolution 1244. Constitution adopted by the Kosovo Assembly on 9 April 2008. It Legal system: came into force on June 15, 2008. The Assembly of Kosovo has 120 members elected for a four-year National legislature: term.