Background-Information-Mackie-House.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
August 2016 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Mackie House, 41 National Circuit (Block 16 Section 7, Forrest) At its meeting of 25 August 2016 the ACT Heritage Council decided that Mackie House was not eligible for provisional registration. The information contained in this report was considered by the ACT Heritage Council in assessing the nomination for Mackie House against the heritage significance criteria outlined in s10 of the Heritage Act 2004. HISTORY Doug and Jill Mackie moved to Canberra from Sydney in 1956. Doug Mackie was proprietor of the Kingston newsagency before moving into property development. In 1958, the couple bought a block of almost half an acre at 41 National Circuit for £970 (Reeves and Roberts 2013: 98). The Mackies commissioned the Sydney firm of McConnel, Smith and Johnson to design a four bedroom home. The supervising architect was Peter Keys, recently returned from London, who was Doug Mackie’s first cousin (their mothers were twins). The Mackies obtained a permit to build within two months of signing the lease and their house on 41 National Circuit (‘Mackie House’) was certified finished ten months later (Reeves and Roberts 2013: 98). The Sydney-based practice of McConnel, Smith & Johnson (MSJ) was established in 1955. The firm had its origins in a post-war office formed in 1949 by Kenneth McConnel, a talented designer whose sensitive designs had been recognised before World War II with the presentation of Sulman Award when he was a partner of Fowell, McConnel & Mansfield. One of McConnel's early and ongoing projects was the War Veterans’ Home, Dee Why, NSW (1949-73), which was built in six stages and planned as a village, informally sited in its bush landscape (Goad and Willis 2011: 436). McConnel’s practice grew in the early 1950s: S.B. (Stan) Smith joined in 1950 and R.N. (Peter) Johnson joined in 1951. Smith, a modernist and admirer of Walter Gropius's idea of collaboration within an architect's office, encouraged a team based approach to practice and this was taken up. As Jennifer Taylor has written, the firm 'approached architecture as problem-solving, insisting on a rational basis for design, and valuing above all a building that "works well"'. Smith became a partner in 1952 and Johnson followed in 1954. From 1955 the firm was henceforth known as McConnel, Smith & Johnson (Goad and Willis 2011: 436). Towards the end of the 1950s, young architects in the firm included, among others, David Jackson, Tony Moore and Peter Keys, all recently returned from London where the issues of urban context, modernist critique and brutalism were part of daily discourse (Goad and Willis 2011: 437). By the early 1970s, the firm had opened an office in Canberra and had completed a series of reserved but typically responsible projects: the CSIRO Headquarters building (1970), the Canberra Club (1976); and the National Press Club (1976), all in the National Capital Development Commission's (NCDC) preferred idiom of the day: simple modern architecture finished in off-form concrete or off-white pre-cast concrete panels (Goad and Willis 2011: 437). In 1970, the NCDC commissioned MSJ to design the Benjamin Offices, Belconnen (1970-80), a vast office complex for 3500 public servants that would match the scale of John Andrews's nearby Cameron Offices. MSJ broke the complex 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION – Mackie House down into groups of low rise office blocks, rhomboid in plan and connected by elevated pedestrian walkways: a challenging task, largely successfully achieved, to create a humane urban system on such a scale (Goad and Willis 2011: 437). Mackie House won the RAIA Canberra Medallion Award in 1962. The Canberra Times entry from Thursday 8 November 1962 (p. 2) reads: The home of Mr and Mrs Mackie, of Forrest, was chosen from 14 entries for its exceptional merit in architecture. The president of the ACT Chapter of the RAIA, Mr M.J Moir, said: It has been unanimously agreed that the Medallion be awarded for the House of Mr. and Mrs. Mackie, 41 National Cct, Forrest. The architects are McConnel, Smith and Johnson of Sydney, and the nomination was made by Peter Keys of that firm. The jury was impressed with the general level of design skill evident in the houses nominated, almost all of which showed excellent characteristics in one or more respects. The house chosen for the award is commendable for achieving a balance of advantages which, in the opinion of the jury, constitutes exceptional merit in architecture. It is unclear how the design, siting, and construction of Mackie House achieved exceptional merit, and what criteria were applied in order to determine this outcome. The first Canberra Medallion award was announced in 1955, and at this date, in contrast to the mass production, low cost and limited designs that characterised government NCDC house production, the Mackie House would have stood out as expensive, and architect designed. It is possible the Mackie House may have stood out as interesting and noteworthy to a judging committee of Canberra circa 1960 (Campbell Dion 2016: 5). Doug and Jill Mackie loved their house. But it eventually became too big for them and they moved in 1993 to a house in Yarralumla designed by Ken Woolley (Reeves and Roberts 2013: 99). Mackie House is listed on the Australian Institute of Architect’s’ Register of Significant Twentieth Century Architecture (Item No. R038). Steel portal framing Steel portal framing was used in the construction of Mackie House. The basic structural form of portal frames was developed during World War II driven by the need to achieve low-cost building envelopes. Now they are the most commonly used structural forms for single-storey industrial structures (ACT Heritage Council 2010). Notable use of steel portal framing in the ACT is demonstrated in the Former Transport Depot, Kingston (1940-1941). The use of a steel fully welded rigid portal frame as the structure to support the roof was innovative at that time not only in Australia but also in the world generally. Prior to World War II in Australia, only two fully welded steel structures appear to have been built. These were bridges in Tasmania, not portal frames. Internationally this structural system was still in its exploratory stage (ACT Heritage Council 2010). From about the mid 1950s to the 1990s the rigid portal frame was often the most economical structural solution in spans between 15 metres and 45 metres. Although the portal frame may require a greater mass of steel than the equivalent column-and-truss structure, the savings in the cost of fabrication and erection due to the relative simplicity of the work nearly always make it the optimum system. Almost all portal frame structures built in Australia are custom designed and manufactured (ACT Heritage Council 2010). Use of steel portal framing in a residential property such as Mackie House in 1959 was unusual. The building covenant placed on the site in Forrest required the house comprise brick construction. The use of the steel portal frame on load- bearing brick walls represents a somewhat innovative structural solution to the relevant planning requirements (AIA N.D.) 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION – Mackie House DESCRIPTION In 1959 (see Images 2, 3 and 4 for post-construction photographs) the completed Mackie House was a long, low dwelling – large for its time – that straddled the very wide block. The front faced Red Hill to the south; the main living areas and bedrooms faced north. Windows in regular bays were full height along the living areas and the master bedroom. These were half height otherwise, with wide eaves to exclude the summer sun. A half-roofed, half-pergola verandah had slender, elegant pillars that emphasised the rhythmic bays (Reeves and Roberts 2013: 99). The house sat on a concrete slab with walls of white, bagged brick. The low-pitched gable roof employed the new technology of steel portal frames over the large formal living and dining areas, a method often used today for warehouses. The ceiling of this room reflected the roof pitch which, combined with a drop of three steps from the bedroom end of the house, created a spacious effect. A free-standing sandstone fireplace here was augmented by an oil-fired heater. The sunroom had a combustion stove while the bedrooms were warmed by convection heat (Reeves and Roberts 2013: 99). The kitchen received northern light from across the family living room but its main outlook was to the east and to the west across a small court. The main living room and the main bedroom extended through the house to the street elevation. A central smaller living room was used for family dining and an alternative formal dining room was provided between the kitchen and the larger living room (Clerehan 1961). The house was built on a concrete slab and the walls were load-bearing brickwork. The slab was covered with a variety of materials – carpet in the bedrooms, hall and living room, cork tiles in the passage, ceramic tiles in the bath and shower-rooms, vinyl tiles in kitchen and laundry, and mahogany parquet in the informal living room (Clerehan 1961). Brickwork externally and internally was rendered. The ceilings were fibrous plaster and followed the roof pitch in the living room area but were flat (at eight feet) in the bedrooms (Clerehan 1961). Architecturally, Mackie House could be described as modernist functionalist, with influences from the Late Twentieth Century Sydney Regional Style1 (c. 1960 – colloquially known as the ‘Sydney School’) and Post-War International Style, (1940 – 1960, as per Apperly et al (1994), with some Spanish influence in the use of curved roof tiles (see Image 5 for 1959 floor plan).