PDU Case Report XXXX/YY Date

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PDU Case Report XXXX/YY Date planning report PDU/ PDU/2586/02 1 February 2012 Areas 7 and 1c, Canning Town London Thames Gateway Development Corporation (in the London Borough of Newham) planning application no. 11/00662/LTGDC Strategic planning application stage II referral (new powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Outline application for the creation of a new town centre development within a series of buildings ranging from 4 to 18 storeys comprising residential (circa 1,100 units); retail (including foodstore); leisure, community and health; offices; live/work units; research and development/light industry; student accommodation; and hotel uses as well as detailed application for Phase 1 of the development. The applicant The applicant is Bouygues and the architect is Aecom and Haworth Tompkins for Phase 1. Strategic issues The outstanding issues relating to affordable housing, housing quality, density, inclusive design/lifetime neighbourhoods, student accommodation, transportation, and energy efficiency standards have been satisfactorily resolved. The Development Corporation’s decision In this instance the London Thames Gateway Development Corporation has resolved to grant permission but giving delegated authority for officers to refuse permission if the Section 106 agreement is not signed within a specified date. Recommendation That the LTGDC be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal. page 1 Context 1 On 10 May 2011 the Mayor of London received documents from Newham Council, on behalf of the London Thames Gateway Development Corporation (LTGDC) notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. This was referred to the Mayor under Category under Categories 1A, 1B, and 1C of the Schedule to the Order 2008: 1A “Development which comprises or includes the provision of more than 150 houses, flats, or houses and flats.” 1B ”Development (other than development which only comprises the provision of house, flats, or houses and flats) which comprises or includes the erection of a building or buildings outside Central London and with a total floorspace of more than 15 000 sq.m.” 1C “Development which comprises or includes the erection of a building that is more than 30 metres high and is outside the City of London.” 2 On 16 June 2011 the Mayor considered planning report PDU/2586/1, and subsequently advised the Corporation that the application did not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 112 but that the possible remedies set out in paragraph 114 of that report could address these deficiencies. 3 A copy of the above-mentioned report is attached. The essentials of the case with regard to the proposal, the site, case history, strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance are as set out therein, unless otherwise stated in this report. Since then, the application has been revised in response to the Mayor’s concerns (see below). On 12 January 2012 the LTGDC decided that it was minded to grant full planning permission in respect of Phase 1 on Development Parcel 1 and outline permission in respect to the remaining plots subject to conditions the completion of a legal agreement under Section 106 agreement and 19 January 2012 it advised the Mayor of this decision. Under the provisions of Article 5 of the Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 the Mayor may allow the draft decision to proceed unchanged or direct the LTGDC under Article 6 to refuse the application. The Mayor has until 1 February 2012 to notify the LTGDC of his decision and to issue any direction. 4 The environmental information for the purposes of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 has been taken into account in the consideration of this case. 5 The decision on this case, and the reasons will be made available on the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk. Update 6 At the consultation stage the Corporation was advised that the application complied with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 112 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in paragraph 114 of that report could address these deficiencies: Affordable housing. Housing mix. Density. Housing quality. page 2 Student accommodation. Inclusive design. Climate change. Transport. Affordable Housing 7 At the initial application stage the quantum of affordable housing for the outline development was not provided with the application. The GLA required that a minimum level of affordable housing should be secured in any permission to ensure the application was compliant with the London Plan and that clarification on existing and previous residential use should be provided. 8 Since the stage 1 report the applicant has submitted a development appraisal to justify the proposed level and tenure mix of affordable housing that could be delivered as part of a viable scheme on a confidential basis. That appraisal has been independently assessed and verified by Jones Lang LaSalle on behalf of LTGDC. 9 The development appraisal and accompanying affordable housing statement concludes that, at this time, the development is only viable with affordable housing set at 30% (with grant) across the entire site and 27.5% (without grant except for Phase 1) across the entire site. However, subject to future viability and HCA grant funding, the proposed development could provide up to a maximum of 35% affordable housing. London Thames Gateway Development Corporation are satisfied that the details within the submitted development appraisal are robust and accurate for a scheme of this nature. 10 The proposed affordable housing tenure split across the entire site will deliver a 50:50 split between affordable rented and intermediate accommodation. The split within Phase 1 is weighted towards affordable rented accommodation; however this is balanced out through the later phases of the development. This detailed application comprises of 71 affordable units, including 51 affordable rent units and 20 intermediate units. Within Phase 1 this equates to 39.6% affordable housing. One Housing Group has been identified as the preferred RSL partner for Phase 1. The intermediate units will be provided within Block A1 and affordable rented units within Block A3 and 2 townhouses in Block A4. It is noted that the extra care accommodation has not been factored into the affordable housing percentages. 11 The London Plan (paragraph 3.75) states that, “In making arrangements for assessing planning obligations, boroughs should consider whether it is appropriate to put in place provisions for re-appraising the viability of schemes prior to implementation. To take account of economic uncertainties, and in respect of schemes presently anticipated to deliver low levels of affordable housing, these provisions may be used to ensure that maximum public benefit is secured over the period of the development”. Having considered the financial appraisal, LTGDC is content to accept the applicant’s commitment to provide a minimum of 30% affordable housing across the site, with re-appraisal, negotiation and review of each phase of development, prior to the implementation of any subsequent phase(s) of development. Further, in response to GLA comments that the Mayor is not consulted on reserved matters applications and will therefore not be afforded an opportunity to consider the level of affordable housing provided in the later phases. LTGDC and LBN officers have agreed to seek a minimum percentage of 30% across the whole site to be secured within the section 106 agreement – details of which are set out in paragraph 20. 12 GLA accept this approach to securing across site affordable housing provision and the application is compliant with the London Plan. page 3 Extra Care Accommodation 13 In addition to the above, the development also provides for extra care accommodation which is targeted at older people and is a form of retirement housing which can accommodate both independent living and personal care. The provision was supported by the GLA, although clarification was sought regarding whether this would be classed as C2 or C3 under the Use Classes Order as was classification as to whether these are to be counted as affordable units and the mechanism to ensure affordability. 14 Condition C3 part (b) which sets out the quantum of built floorspace and distribution on land uses in a table and identifies extra care as a Sui Generis use meets GLA concerns at the initial application stage. Housing Mix 15 At the consultation stage, the housing mix of the outline application was not provided and the GLA required that the applicant commit to a minimum level of family accommodation. 16 The issue with the housing mix was the applicant stated that planning permission is not being sought for housing mix as part of the outline application and that the precise housing mix for each development plot would be resolved during the reserved matters stage. As highlighted with the affordable housing provision, the applicant was informed that the Mayor is not consulted on reserved matters applications and would not have an opportunity to comment on the housing mix in line with the SPG. Any permission should set parameters for housing mix across the development, with particular reference to the level family accommodation. 17 The full consent for Phase 1 provides for the following mix of units: Bedroom Numbers Unit Numbers Percentage (%) 1 bed (2 person) flat 54 30.2 2 bed (3 person) flat 12 6.7 2 bed (4 person) flat 71 39.7 3 bed (5 person) flat 21 11.7 3 bed (5 person) town 14 7.8 house 3 bed (5 person) duplex 7 3.9 units Total 179 18 Within the presented mix 78.4% of the 2 bed 4 person and 3 bed 5 person units are allocated to affordable rented units.
Recommended publications
  • YPG2EL Newspaper
    THE YOUNG PERSON’S GUIDE TO EAST LONDON East London places they don’t put in travel guides! Recipient of a Media Trust Community Voices award A BIG THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS This organisation has been awarded a Transformers grant, funded by the National Lottery through the Olympic Lottery Distributor and managed by ELBA Café Verde @ Riverside > The Mosaic, 45 Narrow Street, Limehouse, London E14 8DN > Fresh food, authentic Italian menu, nice surroundings – a good place to hang out, sit with an ice cream and watch the fountain. For the full review and travel information go to page 5. great places to visit in East London reviewed by the EY ETCH FO P UN K D C A JA T I E O H N Discover T B 9 teenagers who live there. In this guide you’ll find reviews, A C 9 K 9 1 I N E G C N YO I U E S travel information and photos of over 200 places to visit, NG PEOPL all within the five London 2012 Olympic boroughs. WWW.YPG2EL.ORG Young Persons Guide to East London 3 About the Project How to use the guide ind an East London that won’t be All sites are listed A-Z order. Each place entry in the travel guides. This guide begins with the areas of interest to which it F will take you to the places most relates: visited by East London teenagers, whether Arts and Culture, Beckton District Park South to eat, shop, play or just hang out. Hanging Out, Parks, clubs, sport, arts and music Great Views, venues, mosques, temples and churches, Sport, Let’s youth centres, markets, places of history Shop, Transport, and heritage are all here.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Character Assessment
    LCT C: Urban Valley Floor with Marshlands SPA, which provides a nationally important habitat for overwintering birds. Cultural Influences 4.64 The low-lying land of rich alluvial deposits supported a system of grazing, referred to as the Lammas system5 from the Anglo-Saxon period to the end of the C19th. Grazing rights on the marshes were extinguished by the early C20th and a substantial proportion of the marshlands, with the exception of Walthamstow Marshes, were then modified by industrial activities and landfill, including the dumping of bomb rubble after WW2. In the 1950 and 60s the construction of flood relief channels ended the periodic inundation of the marshlands. 4.65 Communication routes through the valley floor proliferated over the C20th, including pylons, roads and railway lines mounted on embankments, but residential and industrial development remains largely confined to the margins. 4.66 Public access and recreation now characterises much of the marshlands, with some areas managed as nature reserves. However substantial infrastructure, such as the railway lines and flood relief channels and adjacent industrial development, means access through and into the marshes from surrounding urban areas is often severed. The tow-path following the River Lee Navigation provides a continuous link along the valley for visitors to enjoy the landscape. 5 A system of grazing whereby cattle was grazed only after the cutting and collection of hay Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 85 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Lee Valley Regional Park Landscape Strategy 86 April 2019 LCA C1: Rammey Marsh Occasional long views out to wooded valley sides between Residential properties overlooking the southern area across the riverside vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Update Exhibition Boards
    COMMUNITY UPDATE NOVEMBER 2015 INTRODUCTION WELCOME TO THE SILVERTOWN WAY PLANNING CONTEXT COMMUNITY UPDATE EXHIBITION. • The redevelopment will be guided by National Planning Guidance (NPPF), the London Plan and LBN Planning Documents (including the Core Strategy 2012, saved policies within the LBN Canning Town and Custom House are undergoing a major transformation led by the London UDP 2001 and the Canning Town and Custom House SPD 2008). Borough of Newham, with several major developments in the pipeline and with a big push for regeneration of the town centre. In 2013, the Mayor of London announced that it would • Affordable and Family housing will reflect planning policy requirements. be releasing 2.56 hectares of land south of Canning Town station and west of Silvertown Way to enable the delivery of a high-quality residential-led development which benefits from • The site is identified as a strategic site (‘Silvertown Way West’) within the Newham Core good access to public transport. The redevelopment provisionally includes more than 1000 Strategy for: homes, including affordable and private rented homes, and 8000 square metres of non- “Mixed use comprising residential, and business, with commercial units.” residential floor space. • The site is identified within the Canning Town and Custom House SPD as Area 8 (see map Linden Homes has appointed JTP, architects and masterplanners, to work with the local below). community to develop a Vision for land at Silvertown Way and its relationships with neighbouring areas. This process began with a Community Planning Weekend in April 2015 • The northern part of the site is within the Canning Town District Centre & 400m catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Silvertown Tunnel Supporting Technical Documentation
    TRANSPORT FOR LONDON RIVER CROSSINGS: SILVERTOWN TUNNEL SUPPORTING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION This report is part of a wider INTRODUCTORY suite of documents which ENVIRONMENTAL outline our approach to traffic, environmental, optioneering ASSESSMENT REPORT and engineering disciplines, Hyder Consulting amongst others. October 2014 We would like to know if you have any comments on our This Introductory Environmental approach to the environmental Assessment Report summarises the environmental work undertaken to date as assessment, the potential part of the EIA process for the proposed impacts we have identified and Silvertown Tunnel and presents an early mitigation we have suggested. indication of the potential impacts of the To give us your views, please proposal and the mitigation measures respond to our consultation at being considered. www.tfl.gov.uk/silvertown- tunnel. Please note that consultation on the Silvertown Tunnel is running from October – December 2014 TRANSPORT FOR LONDON This report (or note) forms part of a suite of documents that support the public consultation for Silvertown Tunnel in Autumn 2014. This document should be read in conjunction with other documents in the suite that provide evidential inputs and/or rely on outputs or findings. The suite of documents with brief descriptions is listed below:- Silvertown Crossing Assessment of Needs and Options This report sets out in detail, the need for a new river crossing at Silvertown, examines and assesses eight possible crossing options and identifies the preferred option. Outline strategy for user charging at Blackwall and Silvertown Tunnels This note sets out TfL’s emerging approach to charging at Blackwall and Silvertown Tunnels. Silvertown Tunnel Traffic Forecasting Report This report presents the traffic impacts that the Silvertown Tunnel would have on the highway network.
    [Show full text]
  • Canary Wharf
    CREATED BY BE MORE NATURAL. TIME FOR YOURSELF, FOR FINDING THE BALANCE THAT WORKS FOR YOU. BE MORE GREEN. A POSITIVE IMPACT, AS PART OF A SOLUTION THAT’S CHANGING THE WORLD. BE MORE INDULGENT. EVERYDAY LUXURIES YOU DESERVE, THAT IMPROVE YOUR SENSE OF WELL-BEING. BE MORE AT HOME. A HOME THAT MAKES THE DAY COMPLETE, FROM WAKING, TO WORKING, TO RELAXING. BE MORE CONNECTED. CONNECT WITH THE INDOORS AND THE OUTDOORS, IN ONE OF THE WORLD’S GREAT CITIES. *All images shown are computer Proud to be a member of the generated images. Berkeley Group of companies POPLAR RIVERSIDE Leven Banks park — subject to planning* CITY, RIVER, PARK, CLUB INSPIRED BY LIFE SHAPED BY LANDSCAPE Poplar Riverside is located on the banks of the award-winning Bergman Interiors. They include River Lea just 1.7 miles from Canary Wharf. a large co-working suite with open plan spaces, The scheme will include over 2,800 homes and meeting rooms, private hire dining rooms and a 2.5-acre public park, conveniently situated a bar, as well as private outdoor terraces, in Zone 2/3. a lobby-style Great Room, private cinema room and games room. On foot, Canning Town Underground station is under a mile away, while by bike, Canary The frst foor Riverside Spa includes a 20m Wharf can be reached in 12 minutes and pool, jacuzzi, private treatment room and salt Stratford in 16 minutes. and steam rooms, with views of the River Lea. The 20 acres at Poplar Riverside are being Poplar Riverside has a clear connection to transformed into a genuine indoor/outdoor outdoor living and one of the world’s greatest living experience with over half the area cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal London Docks Preliminary Ecological Assessment
    Royal London Docks Preliminary Ecological Assessment November 2018 Derelict Millennium Mill and mute swans from Pontoon Dock ©M Waller Author Tony Wileman MCIEEM Reviewers Mathew Frith CEnv, MCIEEM Rosie Whicheloe MCIEEM Protecting London’s Wildlife for the future The London Wildlife Trust is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales 1600379 and registered charity number 283895. Registered Office: Dean Bradley House, 52 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2AF Royal London Docks Preliminary Ecological Appraisal November 2018 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 SITE CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 AIMS OF THE SURVEY .................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 5 DESKTOP STUDY .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Silvertown Crossing Study
    TRANSPORT FOR LONDON RIVER CROSSINGS: SILVERTOWN TUNNEL SUPPORTING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION This report is part of a wider SILVERTOWN CROSSING suite of documents which STUDY: TUNNEL outline our approach to traffic, environmental, optioneering ENGINEERING and engineering disciplines, Mott MacDonald amongst others. We would like to know if you have any June 2012 comments on our approach to This report presents the subsequent this work. To give us your studies of both bored tunnel and views, please respond to our immersed tunnel crossings of the consultation at Thames at Silvertown. www.tfl.gov.uk/silvertown- tunnel Please note that consultation on the Silvertown Tunnel is running from October – December 2014 Silvertown Crossing Study Tunnel Engineering June 2012 Transport for London Silvertown298348 MNC CrossingTUN 001 Study A C:\DOCUME~1\tuc06895\OTLocal\PiMS Live \Workbin \592E6A14.0 \Silvertown Crossing Study Rev 001 draft for 16 December 2011 Tunnel Engineering June 2012 Transport for London Windsor House, 42-50 Victoria Street, London SW1H OTL Mott MacDonald, Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom T +44(0) 20 8774 2000 F +44 (0) 20 8681 5706, W www.mottmac.com Silvertown Crossing Study Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description 001 24/02/2012 N Tucker /J Baber S Allen M Leggett Draft – for comment 002 22/06/2012 N Tucker/J Baber S Allen M Leggett Final - updated for comments This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only.
    [Show full text]
  • Silvertown Way Community Forum 16 June 2015 Introduction Community Planning Design Progress Transport Energy
    SILVERTOWN WAY COMMUNITY FORUM 16 JUNE 2015 INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY PLANNING DESIGN PROGRESS TRANSPORT ENERGY THE REPORT BACK LANDOWNER DEVELOPMENT TEAM CORE CONSULTANT TEAM GLA John Thompson & Partners Masterplanners & Architects (Private and affordable) Cartwright Pickard Architects Architects (PRS) Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Planning Consultant Ardent Transport and civil engineering Long & Partners Sustainability TEAM 9 Site WEST HAM A Road 8 DLR Jubilee Line 7 District Line Metropolitan Line DEVONS 4 Emirates Air Line ROAD Tube Station STAR LANE DLR Station A12 Rail Station 3 A13 6 Towpath FAT Walk (Proposed) CANNING TOWN LANGDON PARK POPLAR 1 5 CANNING TOWN 1 Keir Hardie Recreation 2 Ground 2 Bow Creek Ecology Park CUSTOM HOUSE ALL SAINTS LEAMOUTH PRINCE REGENT 3 Malmesbury Park ROYAL VICTORIA 4 Star Park EAST INDIA EXCEL LONDON 5 Ashburton Wood BLACKWALL EMIRATES POPLAR ROYAL DOCKS 6 Canning Town Recreation ROYAL VICTORIA DOCK Ground 7 Hermit Road Recreation Ground CANARY WHARF 02 ARENA CANARY 8 Memorial Recreation Ground NORTH WHARF WEST SILVERTOWN 9 Three Mills Green GREENWICH PONTOON DOCK 10 10 Lyle Park SOUTH QUAYS 11 11 Thames Barrier Park EMIRATES GREENWICH PENINSULA SITE LOCATION A13 Canning Town Station 1 44 Silvertown Way 2.56 hectares Caxton Street North Peto Street North 2 Lower Lea Crossing 3 Victoria Dock Road SITE PHOTOS 1 Silvertown Way SITE PHOTOS 2 Victoria Dock Road SITE PHOTOS 3 Peto Street North SITE PHOTOS 4 Canning Town Station SITE PHOTOS Site Boundary 5 1 London City Island: Ballymore 2 Royal Gateway:
    [Show full text]
  • Active Newham
    ABCDEGF H Key to facilities towards Wanstead L.B. Redbridge Wanstead Flats Ball Cage Multi Sports Location ALDER Scale ½ mile 1 Km D D Basketball Court MUGA (Multi-Use Games Area) 4-mile S B 0 Jog Route R Bridlepath ROA O Allotments BMX Neighbourhood Sports Programme O One grid square = approx ½ mile K towards Ilford 1 Wanstead Flats Playing Fields, L.B. Redbridge E Bowling Green Olympic Park Entrance Epping Forest 1 City of London TR £ N Cemetery 3 minutes cycling A Boxing Club Paid Parking 7 E 4 7 - 10 minutes walking 0 Walk 6 C Cafeteria Play Area average 1,000 steps D A M E ROAD ALDERSBROOK VE A N SI D NE Y ER O Changing Room Play, Sow and Grow Project R ST LANE CHE O R OL C A Routes T D + L R O A D Dr M K Shetty’s Community Centre Rugby Pitch G H W S Surgery > OAD FOR R A R S towards Leyton towards Leytonstone CAPE EST L R Manor A T FO D H Enjoy your walk and discover Newham! ON L.B. Waltham Forest L.B. Waltham Forest A N RO ES Cricket Pitch/Nets Sensory Garden Park O E Manor Park C T R T A RI R YLNE T Library D HA I OA OAD DR > D R V I E W D NG VANSITTART ROAD S T R D Disability Club Sports Facility E E M CU A 1 2 Y I F OR O R VE Field R Froud Centre F + Manor Park Forest Gate S R M L LFERTON Jack Cornwell S S I X T H HA WO Summer Programme Dr N Bhadra’s L West Ham IN TATION ROAD Centre O I T Cemetery O E T R Fencing FORESTFOOORESTREE S T GAGAD ATTE S R Surgery RD JAC D K A R M Cemetery T C OR O (Children and Young People Services) M G N P L WELL FIELD RO R T F L E ST A H ATI E OAD R Stratford Walk 2.3 miles / 1½ - 2 hours ODESSA ROAD OU WA D D OAD L E O A M R Synthetic Turf Pitch Fishing NFI I 1 W O O R O A D L > Lord Lister I R Dr S Dhariwal’s M F C L L towards Hackney RTH F Start / Finish: Stratford Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Planning Weekend APRIL 2015 INTRODUCTION
    COMMUNITY PLANNING WEEKEND APRIL 2015 INTRODUCTION Welcome to the Silvertown Way Community Planning Weekend. The aim of the Weekend is PLAnninG ContEXT to create a Vision for land at Silvertown Way and its relationships with neighbouring areas. • The redevelopment will be guided by National Planning Guidance (NPPF), the London Plan Canning Town and Custom House are undergoing a major transformation led by the London and LBN Planning Documents (including the Core Strategy 2012, saved policies within the LBN Borough of Newham, with several major developments in the pipeline and with a big push UDP 2001 and the Canning Town and Custom House SPD 2008). for regeneration of the town centre. In 2013, the Mayor of London announced that it would be releasing 2.56 hectares of land south of Canning Town station and west of Silvertown Way • Affordable and Family housing will reflect planning policy requirements. to enable the delivery of a high-quality residential-led development which benefits from good access to public transport. The redevelopment provisionally includes more than 1000 • The site is identified as a strategic site (‘Silvertown Way West’) within the Newham Core homes, including affordable and private rented homes, and 8000 square metres of non- Strategy for: residential floor space. “Mixed use comprising residential, and business, with commercial units and higher density residential facing the street within the town centre boundary, and business uses extending to Linden Homes has appointed John Thompson & Partners (JTP), architects and face units under arches in Peto Street North. Connectivity to the main town centre and the masterplanners, to work with the local community in developing a Vision for the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Poplar Riverside Brochure
    CREATED BY BE MORE NATURAL. TIME FOR YOURSELF, FOR FINDING THE BALANCE THAT WORKS FOR YOU. BE MORE GREEN. A POSITIVE IMPACT, AS PART OF A SOLUTION THAT’S CHANGING THE WORLD. BE MORE INDULGENT. EVERYDAY LUXURIES YOU DESERVE, THAT IMPROVE YOUR SENSE OF WELL-BEING. BE MORE AT HOME. A HOME THAT MAKES THE DAY COMPLETE, FROM WAKING, TO WORKING, TO RELAXING. BE MORE CONNECTED. CONNECT WITH THE INDOORS AND THE OUTDOORS, IN ONE OF THE WORLD’S GREAT CITIES. *All images shown are computer Proud to be a member of the generated images Berkeley Group of companies POPLAR RIVERSIDE Leven Banks park — subject to planning* CITY, RIVER, PARK, CLUB INSPIRED BY LIFE SHAPED BY LANDSCAPE Poplar Riverside is located on the banks of the The stunning 16,000 sq ft of residents’ facilities River Lea just 1.7 miles from Canary Wharf. at The Riverside Club have been designed by The scheme will include over 2,800 homes and award-winning Bergman Interiors. They include a 2.5-acre public park, conveniently situated a large co-working suite with open plan spaces, in Zone 2/3. meeting rooms, private hire dining rooms and a bar, as well as private outdoor terraces, On foot, Canning Town Underground station a lobby-style Great Room, private cinema room is under a mile away, while by bike, Canary and games room. Wharf can be reached in 12 minutes and Stratford in 16 minutes. The first floor Riverside Spa includes a 20m pool, jacuzzi, private treatment room and salt The 20 acres at Poplar Riverside are being and steam rooms, with views of the River Lea.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchard Wharf) in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Planning Application No
    planning report D&P/ 3926/01 1 September 2016 Castle Wharf Filling Station (Orchard Wharf) in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets planning application no. PA/16/01763 Strategic planning application stage 1 referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008. The proposal Redevelopment of the former Service Station site with a residential-led mixed use development, comprising 338 residential units, together with 376 sqm of flexible non-residential floorspace (Use Classes A1, A2, A3, B1, D1 and D2), 36 sqm café floorspace (Use Class A3), set across two main buildings including a 24 storey tower with stepped blocks of 20, 17, 11 and 8 storeys, linked by a 2 storey podium at ground level, with a single basement level. The applicant The applicant is Galliard Homes, the architect is BUJ and the agent is CBRE. Strategic issues Land-use: Residential led mixed use within the Isle of Dogs Opportunity Area is supported (paras 16-17). Housing: The delivery of 338 new homes across a range of unit sizes and tenures is supported. The application currently proposes 35.4% affordable housing (by habitable room). Further information is required to ensure the maximum reasonable amount of affordable housing is being provided. The quantity of child playspace should be increased and further details should be provided on the type of provision to ensure Policy 3.6 is being met (paras 18-34). Urban design: There have been a number of pre-application meetings to discuss design and the broad design principles are supported (paras 35-42).
    [Show full text]