Emerging from the Shadow of Climate Change Denial Justin Kenrick1 Social and Political Science University of Edinburgh, Scotland
[email protected] Introduction This paper was presented at the Copenhagen Academic Blockade in 2009 and was titled ‘In the Shadow of Climate Change Denial’.2 It focused on the way the climate change movement itself encompasses at least three forms of denial: the denial of hope, the denial of despair, and the denial of power. The paper argued that these different forms of denial derive from a focus on climate change, and that we can emerge from these forms of denial by focusing instead on the system driving climate change. At current rates, the climate is being destabilized to such an extent that by 2100 it will be “hot enough to make most of the world uninhabitable” (McGlade in Edwards 2009). Meanwhile world poverty is being entrenched as a consequence of a capitalist economy that extracts resources with the least environmental consideration, produces commodities at the cheapest labor cost, and sells them 1 Published under the Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2 Originally presented at The Academic Seminar Blockade: Climate Change: Power, policy and public action, Sunday 13 December 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 2013, 12(1), 102-130 103 through inducing unnecessary needs. The problem is not climate change or poverty or resource depletion but rather a particular socio-economic system. The paper given at the Academic Conference Blockade argued that the way to ensure the best possible outcome in this precarious situation is through establishing a tacit alliance between three – apparently mutually contradictory - strategies.