Cellular Automata in Operational Probabilistic Theories

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cellular Automata in Operational Probabilistic Theories Cellular automata in operational probabilistic theories Paolo Perinotti QUIT Group, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli studi di Pavia, and INFN sezione di Pavia, via Bassi 6, 27100 Pavia, Italy The theory of cellular automata in oper- 5.3 Causal influence . 37 ational probabilistic theories is developed. 5.3.1 Relation with signalling . 38 We start introducing the composition of 5.4 Block decomposition . 39 infinitely many elementary systems, and then use this notion to define update rules 6 Homogeneity 41 for such infinite composite systems. The notion of causal influence is introduced, 7 Locality 47 and its relation with the usual property of signalling is discussed. We then introduce 8 Cellular Automata 51 homogeneity, namely the property of an 8.1 Results . 51 update rule to evolve every system in the same way, and prove that systems evolving 9 Examples 55 by a homogeneous rule always correspond 9.1 Classical case . 55 to vertices of a Cayley graph. Next, we de- 9.2 Quantum case . 55 fine the notion of locality for update rules. 9.3 Fermionic case . 56 Cellular automata are then defined as ho- mogeneous and local update rules. Finally, 10 Conclusion 56 we prove a general version of the wrapping lemma, that connects CA on different Cay- Acknowledgments 57 ley graphs sharing some small-scale struc- A Identification of the sup- and operational ture of neighbourhoods. norm for effects 57 Contents B Quasi-local states 57 1 Introduction1 C Proof of identity 94 64 2 Detailed outlook3 D Homogeneity and causal influence 64 3 Operational Probabilistic Theories4 E Proof of right and left invertibility of a 3.1 Formal framework . 5 locally defined GUR 64 3.2 Causality and the no-restriction hypothesis . 8 F Proof of theorem 10 65 3.3 Norms . 10 G Proof of lemmas 66 and 67 66 arXiv:1911.11216v4 [quant-ph] 8 Jul 2021 4 The quasi-local algebra in OPTs 13 4.1 Quasi-local effects . 14 References 67 4.2 Extended states . 19 4.3 Quasi-local transformations . 22 1 Introduction 5 Global update rules 31 5.1 Update rule . 32 In the last two decades a new approach to quan- 5.2 Admissibility and local action . 35 tum foundations arose, grounded on the quan- tum information experience [1,2,3,4]. This line Paolo Perinotti: [email protected], of research on the fundamental aspects of quan- http://www.qubit.it tum theory benefits from new ideas, concepts and Accepted in Quantum 2020-07-03, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0. 1 methods [5,6,7] that lead to a wealth of remark- ence. The notion of a cellular automaton for able results [8,9, 10, 11]. In particular, quan- quantum systems was first devised as the quan- tum theory can be now understood as a theory tum version of its classical counterpart, e.g. in of information processing, that is selected among Refs. [27, 28, 29, 30], but turned out to give rise to a universe of alternate theories [12, 13,1, 14] by a rather independent theory, developed starting operational principles about the possibility or im- from Ref. [31]: the theory of Quantum Cellular possibility to perform specific information pro- Automata (QCAs). The latter counts presently cessing tasks [9, 15]. various important results—see e.g. Refs. [32, 33], The scenario of alternate theories among which just to mention a few. We stress that, most the principles select quantum theory is called the commonly, QCAs are defined to be reversible al- framework of Operational Probabilistic Theories gorithms, and most results in the literature are (OPTs) [8, 15], and has connections with the less proved with this hypothesis. It is known, how- structured concept of Generalized Probabilistic ever, that many desirable preoperties fail to hold Theory (GPT) [5, 16, 17], as well as the dia- in the irreversible case (see e.g. Ref. [34]). In the grammatic category theoretical approach often present work we will not consider irreversible cel- referred to as quantum picturialism [18, 19]. In- lular automata, and leave this subject for further spiration for the framework came also from quan- studies. tum logic [20, 21]. Quantum theory, namely the theory of Hilbert spaces, density matrices, completely positive In order to use cellular automata as candi- maps and POVMs (in particular we refer to the date physical laws in the foundational perspec- elegant exposition of Ref. [22]), can thus be re- tive based on OPTs, one has two choices at formulated as a special theory of information pro- hand. The first one is to start treating automata cessing. Besides the many advantages of this re- within a definite theory, and this is the approach sult, one has to face a main issue: the theory adopted so far, in particular within Fermionic as such is devoid of its physical content. El- theory [35, 36, 37]. In the linear case, Fermionic ementary systems are thought of as elementary cellular automata reduce to Quantum Walks, and information carriers—brutally speaking, memory this brings in the picture all the tools from such cells—rather than elementary particles or fields in widely studied topic [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. The space-time. While this framework is satisfactory non-linear case is far less studied [44, 45], and for an effective, empirical description of physical does not offer as many results for the analy- experiments, when it comes to provide a theo- sis. Needless to say, this approach faces difficul- retical foundation for the physics of elementary ties that are specific of the theory at hand, and systems, the informational approach at this stage prevents a comparison of different theories on a calls for a way to re-embrace mechanical notions ground that is genuinely physical. such as mass, energy, position, space-time, and complete the picture encompassing the dynamics of quantum systems. The second approach is initiated in the present A recent proposal for this endeavour is based paper, and consists in defining cellular automata on the idea that physical laws have to be ulti- in the general context of OPTs. This perspective mately understood as algorithms, that make sys- offers the possibility of extracting the essential tems evolve, changing their state, exactly as the features of the theory of quantum or Fermionic memory cells of a computer are updated by the cellular automata, those that are not specific of run of an algorithm [23, 24, 25]. Such a program the theory but are well suited in any theory of already achieved successful results in the recon- information processing. As a consequence, one struction of Weyl’s, Dirac’s and Maxwell’s equa- can generalise some results, and figure out why tions (for a comprehensive review see Ref. [26]). and how others fail to extend to the broader sce- The most natural candidate algorithm for de- nario. Moving a much less structured mathemat- scribing a physical law in this context is a cellular ical context, this approach can use only few tools, automaton. The theory of cellular automata is but provides results that have the widest appli- a wide and established branch of computer sci- cability range. Accepted in Quantum 2020-07-03, click title to verify. Published under CC-BY 4.0. 2 2 Detailed outlook the algebra of quasi-local transformations, that allows for the description of transformations on In this section we provide a short, non technical an infinite system that can be arbitrarily well ap- discussion of the main results. The purpose of proximated by local operations on finitely many this work is to define cellular automata in OPTs, subsystems. Indeed, an important part of the and prove some general results that will help ap- theory of CAs in OPTs is built by ruling the way plying the theory to special cases of interest. in which quasi-local transformations are trans- A cellular automaton is an algorithm that up- formed by the CA. In particular, the way in which dates the information stored in an array of mem- the CA propagates the effects of a local transfor- ory cells in discrete steps, in such a way that one mation on surrounding subsystems will be the key needs to read the content of a few neighbouring to the definition of the neighbourhood of the sub- cells to determine the state of a given cell at the system, a concept that is central to the theory of next step. Cellular automata in the literature CAs. are often, but not always, defined to be homoge- neous: in this case the local rule for the update Once this is done, the next step consists in of the cell is the same for every cell. Here we defining update rules, and their admissibility con- will adopt homogeneity, but the subject is pre- ditions, which are the subject of Section5, along sented so that the generalisation of definitions to with causal influence and a block-decomposition inhomogeneous CA is straightforward. theorem. Update rules are defined in the first place as automorphisms of the space of quasi- Typically, the interesting case of a cellular au- V local effects, but an important request they must tomaton is the one involving an infinite memory abide is that when they act on a quasi-local trans- array. The first challenge we have to face is then formation by conjugation as −1, the ob- to extend the theory of OPTs from finite, arbi- A VAV tained transformation is again quasi-local. trarily large composite systems to actually infi- nite ones. This piece of theory has an interest The next step is taken in section6, and con- per se, for many reasons ranging from the possi- sists in defining the property of homogeneity.
Recommended publications
  • LN13.Digi.Pdf (4.880Mb)
    Jarkko Kari (Editor) Proceedings of JAC 2010 Journées Automates Cellulaires Turku Centrefor Computer Science TUCS Lecture Notes No 13, Dec 2010 Proceedings of JAC 2010 Journ´eesAutomates Cellulaires December 15-17, 2010, Turku, Finland Editor: Jarkko Kari TUCS Lecture Notes 13 December 2010 ISBN 978-952-12-2503-1 (printed) ISBN 978-952-12-2504-8 (electronic) ISSN 1797-8823 (printed) ISSN 1797-8831 (electronic) Foreword The second Symposium on Cellular Automata “Journ´eesAutomates Cellulaires” (JAC 2010) took place in Turku, Finland, on December 15-17, 2010. The first two conference days were held in the Educarium building of the University of Turku, while the talks of the third day were given onboard passenger ferry boats in the beautiful Turku archipelago, along the route Turku–Mariehamn–Turku. The con- ference was organized by FUNDIM, the Fundamentals of Computing and Discrete Mathematics research center at the mathematics department of the University of Turku. The program of the conference included 17 submitted papers that were selected by the international program committee, based on three peer reviews of each paper. These papers form the core of these proceedings. I want to thank the members of the program committee and the external referees for the excellent work that have done in choosing the papers to be presented in the conference. In addition to the submitted papers, the program of JAC 2010 included four dis- tinguished invited speakers: Michel Coornaert (Universit´ede Strasbourg, France), Bruno Durand (Universit´ede Provence, Marseille, France), Dora Giammarresi (Uni- versit`adi Roma Tor Vergata, Italy) and Martin Kutrib (Universit¨atGießen, Ger- many).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Quantum Computing
    International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS) - Volume-1, Issue-6, September 2015 ISSN: 2395-3470 www.ijseas.com Understanding Quantum Computing Dr. K J Sarma, SMIEEE; Dept of Humanities and Mathematics & Academic cell Malla Reddy Engineering College (Autonomous ), Secunderabad, India, Abstract: It has been decided that Quantum estimated number of atoms in the universe and Computing (Q.C.) should be pursued, as it this enormous potential computational power is would be one of the priority research areas of the well worth harvesting.” M.A. Nielsen and I.L. future having a potential for computational Chuang [ 26 ] technology development and growth. Hence there is a need to motivate and involve The digital computers operate with the help of youngsters in research activity related to transistors. Digital computers require data to be quantum computing. There is a need to keep the encoded into binary digits (bits), each of which youngsters informed of the what, why, where, is always in one of two definite states (0 or 1), when, how of quantum computing. A review and the memory is made up of the bits. The of the origin and the progress of the binary digits for data encoding quantum developments in Quantum Computing is made computation uses qubits (quantum bits), which In this paper the author tried to review various can be in super-positions of states. aspects of the Quantum Computing like A Quantum Turing machine [40] is a theoretical Architecture, Operating system, Infrastructure model of such a computer, and is also known as required if any, links with other computing the universal quantum computer.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Computer Scientists Quantum Mechanics N
    From Cbits to Qbits: Teaching computer scientists quantum mechanics N. David Mermin Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-2501 ͑Received 22 July 2002; accepted 26 September 2002͒ A strategy is suggested for teaching mathematically literate students, with no background in physics, just enough quantum mechanics for them to understand and develop algorithms in quantum computation and quantum information theory. Although the article as a whole addresses teachers of physics well versed in quantum mechanics, the central pedagogical development is addressed directly to computer scientists and mathematicians, with only occasional asides to their teacher. Physicists uninterested in quantum pedagogy may be amused ͑or irritated͒ by some of the views of standard quantum mechanics that arise naturally from this unorthodox perspective. © 2003 American Association of Physics Teachers. ͓DOI: 10.1119/1.1522741͔ I. COMPUTER SCIENCE AND QUANTUM to realize—is an extremely simple example of a physical MECHANICS system. It is discrete, not continuous. It is made out of a finite number of units, each of which is the simplest possible These ‘‘bras’’ and ‘‘kets’’—they’re just vectors! kind of quantum mechanical system, a 2-state system, whose —Newly enlightened computer scientist1 possible behavior is highly constrained and easily analyzed. There is a new audience for the teaching of quantum me- Much of the analytical complexity of learning quantum me- chanics whose background and needs require a new style of chanics is connected to mastering the description of continu- quantum pedagogy. The audience consists of computer sci- ous ͑infinite-state͒ systems in (3ϩ1)-dimensional space- entists.
    [Show full text]
  • INFIERY-GSIERRA.Pdf
    Germán Sierra (Instituto de Física Teórica UAM-CSIC, Madrid) 6th INFIERY Summer School Madrid, 1st September 2021 Plan of the lecture - Part I: Historial background - Part II: The qubit and quantum gates Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Quantum Mechanics Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Quantum Mechanics Computer Sciences Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Quantum Mechanics Computer Sciences Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Information Theory Quantum Mechanics Computer Sciences Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Information Theory Cryptography Quantum Mechanics Quantum Mechanics Golden age of Physics Quantum Mechanics Golden age of Physics First Quantum Revolution About an improvement of Wien's spectral equation Max Planck 1858 - 1947 On the theory of the law of energy distribution in normal spectrum is light a wave or a particle? is light a wave or a particle? Isaac Newton 1642-1727 is light Thomas Young 1773-1829 a wave or a particle? Isaac Newton 1642-1727 is light Thomas Young 1773-1829 a wave or a particle? Isaac Newton 1642-1727 James Maxwell 1831-1879 is light Thomas Young 1773-1829 a wave or a particle? Isaac Newton 1642-1727 James Maxwell 1831-1879 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) On a heuristic point of view about the creation and generation of light Annalen der Physik, 1905 when a ray of light propagates from a point, energy is not distributed continuously over increasing volume, but it is composed of a finite number of energy quanta, in space,that move without being divided and that they can be absorbed or emitted only as a whole. On a heuristic point of view about the creation and generation of light Annalen der Physik, 1905 when a ray of light propagates from a point, energy is not distributed continuously over increasing volume, but it is composed of a finite number of energy quanta, in space,that move without being divided and that they can be absorbed or emitted only as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Realization of Schumacher's Information
    Experimental Realization of Schumacher's Information Geometric Bell Inequality Tahereh Rezaei,1 Shahabeddin M. Aslmarand,1 Robert Snyder,1, 2 Behzad Khajavi,3 Paul M. Alsing,4 Michael Fanto,4 Doyeol (David) Ahn,5, 1 and Warner A. Miller1 1)Department of Physics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, 33431 2)L3Harris, 10001 Jack Finney Blvd, CBN018, Greenville, TX 75402, USA. 3)Dept of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, 77204 4)Air Force Research Laboratory, Information Directorate,Rome, NY 13441 5)Center Quantum Information Processing, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul 130-743, Republic of Korea Abstract Quantum mechanics can produce correlations that are stronger than classically allowed. This stronger{than{ classical correlation is the \fuel" for quantum computing. In 1991 Schumacher forwarded a beautiful geometric approach, analogous to the well-known result of Bell, to capture non-classicality of this correlation for a singlet state. He used well-established information distance defined on an ensemble of identically{prepared states. He calculated that for certain detector settings used to measure the entangled state, the resulting geometry violated a triangle inequality | a violation that is not possible classically. This provided a novel information{based geometric Bell inequality in terms of a \covariance distance." Here we experimentally- reproduce his construction and demonstrate a definitive violation for a Bell state of two photons based on the usual spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a paired BBO crystal. The state we produced had a visibility of Vad = 0:970. We discuss generalizations to higher dimensional multipartite quantum states. I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physics of Quantum Information
    The Physics of Quantum Information Complementarity, Uncertainty, and Entanglement Joseph M. Renes 12 December 2012 arXiv:1212.2379v1 [quant-ph] 11 Dec 2012 Habilitation TU Darmstadt, Fachbereich Physik 2011 Contents Preface 1 1 Introduction: What is Quantum Information? 5 1.1 Understanding Classical Information via the InformationGame ................ 6 1.2 ComplementarityintheInformationGame . .................. 7 1.3 EntanglementintheInformationGame . .................. 8 2 Illustrations and Motivations 11 2.1 TeleportationandSuperdenseCoding . ................... 11 2.2 QuantumError-Correction......................... ................... 12 2.3 EntanglementDistillation ........................ .................... 17 2.4 QuantumKeyDistribution.......................... .................. 18 3 Characterizing Quantum Information 23 3.1 Amplitude and Phase Predictability & Entanglement . ..................... 23 3.2 Duality&Decoupling.............................. .................. 28 3.3 EntropicCharacterizations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..................... 31 3.4 SecretKeys&PrivateStates ........................ ................... 33 4 Processing Quantum Information 37 4.1 OptimalEntanglementDistillation . ..................... 37 4.2 OptimalStateMerging............................. .................. 43 4.3 Secret Key Distillation and Private Communication . ...................... 45 5 Duality of Protocols 47 5.1 Duality of Privacy Amplification and Information Reconciliation ................ 47 5.2 Different Approaches to
    [Show full text]
  • The Universe As a Cyclic Organized Information
    NeuroQuantology | March 2015 | Volume 13 | Issue 1 | Page 1 Meijer D.K.F., John Wheeler’s world revised The Universe as a Cyclic Organized Information System: John Wheeler’s World Revisited Dirk K. F. Meijer ABSTRACT This essay highlights the scientific vision of John Archibald Wheeler, a giant of 20th century physics. His ideas provided the important insight that humanity may be in the very center of disclosure and manifestation of the evolution of our universe. This on the basis of scientific reasoning derived from quantum physics rather than simple anthropocentrism or scale chauvinism. Wheeler, the Joseph Henry Professor of Physics Emeritus at Princeton University, became 96. Over a long, productive scientific life, he was known for his drive to address big, overarching questions in physics, subjects which he liked to be merged with philosophical questions about the origin of matter, information and the universe. His interests ranged far and wide and were characterized by true fearlessness. Wheeler's work was not only in gravity and nuclear physics. In the 1950s Wheeler grew increasingly intrigued by the philosophical implications of quantum physics. According to Wheeler, there was no universe until the rise of consciousness to perceive it. In fact, Wheeler was one of the first prominent physicists seriously to propose that reality might not be a wholly physical phenomenon. In some sense, Wheeler suggested, reality grows out of the act of observation, and thus consciousness itself: it is “participatory.” He also stated that information is the most fundamental building block of reality, and that the universe should be seen as a self- synthesized information system: a self-excited circuit that is developing through a (closed loop) cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Qics - Periodic Activity Report Iii
    QICS - PERIODIC ACTIVITY REPORT III Bob Coecke Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford FP6 FET STREP - project no 033763 Full name: Foundational Structures for Quantum Information and Computation Thematic priority: Quantum Information Processing and Communications Period covered: Jan. 1st 2009 – Aug. 7th 2010 Date of preparation: Aug. 7th 2010 Start date of project: Jan. 1st 2007 Duration: 42 months Q I C S QICS — proposal no 033763 — Progress report III — 7 August 2010 1 Contents I Publishable executive summary3 II Project objectives and major achievements during the reporting period7 1 Objectives, work done, comparison to state-of-the-art and other developments8 1.1 Objectives of QICS as stated in the initial proposal................................8 1.2 Objectives for the workpackages as stated in the initial proposal......................... 10 1.3 Comparison of these objectives to the current state-of-the-art........................... 11 1.4 Progress made on the objectives during the reporting period............................ 11 1.5 Next steps to be taken for reaching the objectives................................. 11 2 Recruitment, mobility, spin-off 12 3 QICS events and presentations 13 3.1 The QICS school.................................................. 13 3.2 Other QICS events and QICS supported events.................................. 17 3.3 Presentation of QICS output............................................ 17 III Workpackage progress reports of the period — includes project deliverables — 18 4 W1 – deliverable D1: Structures and methods for measurement-based quantum computation 20 4.1 Progress towards objectives and performed tasks for W1.T1............................ 21 4.1.1 Review article on W1............................................ 21 4.1.2 Study normal forms for quantum algorithms in measurement-based computer models.........
    [Show full text]