DOCSLIB.ORG

The Agricultural Pollution of Watercourses: the Precedents Set by the Beet-Sugar and Milk Industries by JOHN SHEAIL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Agricultural Pollution of Watercourses: the Precedents Set by the Beet-Sugar and Milk Industries by JOHN SHEAIL The Agricultural Pollution of Watercourses: The Precedents Set by the Beet-sugar and Milk Industries By JOHN SHEAIL Abstract The inter=war years were an important period in the development of an institutional and research response to pollution issues. The paper focuses on the problems arising from the newly-established beet- sugar factories and the increasingly=centralized milk-handling and =processing industries. Through research and development, it proved possible to accommodate the otherwise wholly welcome develop= ments in rural enterprise, without incurring the risk of serious pollution to the nearby watercourses. 'Y JUNE 199o, two of the UK Research experiences of the newly-established beet- Councils, namely the Agricultural and sugar factories and increasing centralization l . Food Research Council and the Science of milk collection and distribution, and the and Engineering Research Council, estab- processing of milk products. lished a Clean Technology Unit. It was pointed out that 'leaks' and waste products I had often occurred within the interlinked An institutional framework that sought to processes that characterized farming and ensure that policy initiatives were under- the manufacture of farm produce. In some pinned by surveys and experimentation, instances they posed a serious environmen= began to evolve in the I92OS. Mounting tal threat. The Unit was intended to pro- concern as to 'the deplorable position of mote research that forestalled pollution, the (inland) fisheries in relation to river rather than removed it at the 'end of the pollution' caused the Ministry of Agricul- pipe'. Through the rigorous analytical ture and Fisheries (MAF) to appoint an approach of process engineering, control advisory Standing Committee on River strategies would be developed for the Pollution (SCORP) in 1921. Representa- whole production process. tives of the salmon, trout and coarse fish- The purpose of this paper is to provide ing interests, which had done so much to an historical context for the concern and highlight the state of the rivers, together commitment embodied in the Clean Tech- with representatives of the Federation of nology and other initiatives, being taken British Industries, made up the member- to mitigate, if not eliminate, forms of agri= ship of the committee, which was chaired cultural pollution. The examples are drawn initially by the Fisheries Minister and later from the inter-war years. Not only were the Fisheries Secretary, Henry G Maurice. these decades important for the develop- Through a greater knowledge of the con- ment of an institutional framework to fight dition of individual watercourses, and col- pollution in the United Kingdom, but they laboration between fishing interests and yielded further examples of how inno- industry, the Ministry hoped to encourage vation, whilst wholly welcome from an major improvements, x economic, social and political stance, might 'J Sheail, 'Pollution and the protection of inland fisheries in inter- nevertheless bring unwelcome environ- war Britain', in M Shortland, ed, Science and Nature, Oxford, mental impacts. The paper will cite the 1993, pp 41-56. Ag Hist Rev, 4I, I, pp 31-43 3 1 3 2 THE AGRICULTURAL HISTORY REVIEW As each river was surveyed, or re- By the outbreak of war in I939, the surveyed, members of the SCORP and volume and reputation of the Board's 1 their respective fishery bodies, demanded work warranted the establishment of a action to tackle the many examples of central research laboratory. Prominent pollution identified. Whilst refusing to among the water-pollution issues investi- countenance the establishment of a central gated, that included detailed surveys of statutory body to administer the river the river Tees and Mersey estuary, were system, the Government conceded the investigations as to ways of treating beet- need for a more comprehensive approach sugar and milk effluents. Temporary war- to research. River pollution was a national time accommodation was provided for a problem that would require many years' Water Pollution Research Laboratory in work to resolve. A Water Pollution 194o.4 Research Board was appointed in 1927, under the aegis of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (the II forerunner of the Science (and Engineer- The pollution caused by beet-sugar ing) Research Council). The Board's effluent was so serious and novel as to Director of Research, W T Calvert, was make the factory-owners pioneers in forg- Chemical Inspector for the Ministry of ing the kind of close relationship sought Health, having previously been Chief between different industries and the Water Chemist to the West Riding of Yorkshire Pollution Research Board. Whilst sugar Rivers Board. = beet (Beta vulgaris) had been grown for The Board had three research objec- nearly two centuries, a large-scale pro- tives, namely the treatment of water for cessing industry had only developed in public supply, purification of sewage, and the I92OS (Fig I). The amount of beet prevention of pollution by trade effluents. sugar manufactured rose from 7ooo tons As the Principal Assistant Secretary of the in 1922-3 to over 5oo,ooo tons by Department of Scientific and Industrial 1938-39. A report published by the MAF Research (DSIR), Henry T Tizard, told in 193 I, described the establishment of the the first meeting, the Government were industry as a 'large-scale experiment with- prepared to meet the costs of purely scien- out parallel in the recent history of this tific work; the costs of the industrial appli- country'. Direct State support was pro- cations would be borne by industry. More vided under the British Sugar (Subsidy) positively, there were outstanding oppor- Act of 1925. By the time the Water tunities to fulfil an avowed intention of Pollution Research Board was set up in the DSIR, namely to bring companies in I927, there were fourteen factories, and relevant sectors of industry together the prospect of many more. An inquiry jointly to fund and facilitate the necessary into future support for the industry, in research. Annual reports of the Board 1935, found them well-equipped; they recounted the close contacts made with compared favourably with those on the companies. Relevant information and Continent. Beet-sugar production was 'a facilities were made freely available to the technical process of considerable nicety'. Board's scientists) As a continuous operation from washing Water Pollution Research Board (WPRB), Water pollution research 1947, HMSO, p 1. J Public Record Office (PRO), DSIR 13, 5; WPRB, Report for the ),ear ended e 9 june agM, HMSO, 193x, pp 2 & 6-8; H Melville, 4pRO, DSIR x3, 93; WPRB, Water pollution research a939-1945, The Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, 1962. HMSO, 1947. THE AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION OF WATERCOURSES 33 ~Ev so rapidly as to reduce the concentration ) PRE 1925 of dissolved oxygen to so low a level as @1925 / C to destroy fish and other aquatic life, @192, ? \ characteristic of a healthy river. 6 1925 / o-.._ , When King George V toured the Col- wick factory in November I926, local ? o%o. \ newspapers highlighted how he enquired as to what became of the waste waters, commenting, 'You must be very careful you do not get in danger of river pol- i_ co,w,cK O ~ rKi.a's ,v.. lution'. The Managing Director assured him that the water was not returned to ~_ l P~TERBOROUO.CII,~ C) t the river until it had been filtered and J t3 5"~ (3 / purified. Less than half of one per cent in weight of the beet was lost during the manufacturing process. A month later, however, magistrates fined the company £25, with £15 costs, as a result of an action brought with reluctance, but after due warning, by the Trent Fishery Board. The secretary of the Nottingham City Police Angling Club recounted how hun- FIGURE I dreds of dead and dying fish had been Devdop,nent of beet-sugar factories (after H D Watts, found. Chemical analysis of the river The location of the beet-sugar industry in England and water, and post-mortem examination of Wales, 19 I2-36, Transactions of the Institute of British two bream, carried out by lecturers at Geo2raphers, 53, I97L p to9) University College, Nottingham, pointed to their having been killed by the beet the roots to the bagging of the sugar, it effluent. 7 had to be carefully balanced (Fig 2)) Visually, the most obvious effect of Much publicity was given to the fact pollution was the growth of the sapro- that nothing was wasted. If the farmer phytic organisms, known collectively as kept the beet tops, and could be persuaded 'sewage fungus'. Whereas it was common- to use the residues from the manufacturing place to find a small growth within a process (as happened on the Continent short distance of the outfall of sewage and in America), practically everything works, an unmistakable and heavy crop was returned to the soil. There remained, extended for some twenty miles along the however, the question of the waste waters, river Ouse, below the Ely and Wissington that would have to be discharged to factories, and for twelve miles down- nearby streams or rivers. Whilst they con- stream of the Bury St Edmunds works in tained scarcely any directly toxic sub- Suffolk. Besides its unpleasant appearance, stances, the organic matter decomposed portions of the fungus broke loose and Ministry of" Agriculture and Fisheries, Report a:a the sugar beet floated downstream in masses, adhering indastry at borne and abroad, Economic series 27, HMSO, London, to any obstruction. In time, every object 1931, p i; PP, 1934-35. Xl, Ministry of Agriculture, Report of the UK S.gar Industry Inquiry Committee, Cmd 487I; H D Watts, in the water might be covered, thereby 'The location of the beet sugar industry in England and Wales', 1912-36, Trans hlst Brit Geog, 53, '97 I, pp95-~16; H D Watts, ~'Notti.ghamJo.rnal, :4 November 1926.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investigating Decentralised Energy in Bury St Edmunds
    INVESTIGATING DECENTRALISED ENERGY IN BURY ST EDMUNDS A REPORT FOR ST EDMUNDSBURY BOROUGH COUNCIL J U LY 2 011 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 5 2.0 Drivers for decentralised energy 7 3.0 Carbon emissions and energy consumption in context 11 4.0 Decentralised energy in Bury St Edmunds 15 5.0 Options identification 23 6.0 Options appraisal 35 7.0 Detailed assessment of option 2: North West Bury 59 8.0 Conclusions 71 9.0 Reflecting the Network in Strategies for Bury St Edmunds 77 10.0 Spatial Planning 79 Appendix A Technical methodology 85 Appendix B Funding sources 89 Version: 1.4 Version date: 25th July 2011 Comment: Prepared by Raphael Sibille, LDA Design Approved by Rob Shaw, LDA Design Cover image courtesy of Genista CC THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED AND CHECKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ISO 9001:2000 3 4 Investigating decentralised energy in Bury St Edmunds 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of a 1.1. PROJECT OBJECTIVES study carried out by LDA Design on behalf of St Edmundsbury Council and its partners. It provides The agreement between the project partners contained a technical evidence base to support local authority within the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) actions and planning policies for decentralised includes the strategic aim of the project: energy. It also provides technical and financial options appraisals to help inform public and private The Parties agree to work together to investigate investment in decentralised energy (heating, cooling developing decentralised energy solutions for Bury St and electricity) projects in Bury St Edmunds and their Edmunds (the Project).
    [Show full text]
  • Fairtrade-And-Sugar-Briefing-Jan13
    FAIRTRADE AND SUGAR Commodity Briefing January 2013 FAIRTRADE AND SUGAR iNTRODUCTION Around 80 per cent of the worlds sugar is derived from sugar cane, grown by millions of small-scale farmers and plantation workers in developing countries. This briefing offers an overview of the sector and explores why Fairtrade is needed and what it can achieve. We hope it will provide a valuable resource for all those involved with, or interested in, Fairtrade sugar, whether from a commercial, campaigning or academic perspective. Fast facts: the sugar lowdown • Sugar is one of the most valuable agricultural commodities. In 2011 its global export trade was worth $47bn, up from $10bn in 2000. • Of the total $47bn, $33.5bn of sugar exports are from developing countries and $12.2bn from developed countries.1 • The sugar industry supports the livelihoods of millions of people – not only smallholders and estate workers but also those working within the wider industry and family dependents. • Around 160 million tonnes of sugar are produced every year. The largest producers are Brazil (22%), India (15%) and the European Union (10%).2 • More than 123 countries produce sugar worldwide, with 70% of the world’s sugar consumed in producer countries and only 30% traded on the international market. • About 80% of global production comes from sugar cane (which is grown in the tropics) and 20% comes from sugar beet (grown in temperate climates, including Europe). • The juice from both sugar cane and sugar beet is extracted and processed into raw sugar. • World consumption of sugar has grown at an average annual rate of 2.7% over the past 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Home of Business Intelligence
    an informa business MarketLine Strategy, SWOT and Corporate Finance Report Associated British Foods plc London Stock Exchange (ABF) December 2014 REFERENCE CODE: D886F8BC-2D7F-4694-9934-DE660A3D64CB PUBLICATION DATE: December 2014 WWW.MARKETLINE.COM MARKETLINE. THIS PROFILE IS A LICENSED PRODUCT AND IS NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED COMPANY SNAPSHOT COMPANY SNAPSHOT Reference Code : D886F8BC-2D7F-4694-9934-DE660A3D64CB Publication Date: December 2014 Associated British Foods plc Fax: 44 20 7399 6580 Weston Centre Phone: 44 20 7399 6500 10 Grosvenor Street Website: www.abf.co.uk London W1K 4QY Industry: Consumer Packaged Goods United Kingdom Overview Associated British Foods (ABF or 'the group') is a diversified food, ingredients and retail group. The group operates in Europe, Africa, Australia, the Americas and Asia. It is headquartered in London, the UK and employed about 112,652 people, on an average, for the year ending September 2013. The group recorded revenues of £13,315 million (approximately $20,796.7 million) in the financial year ended September 2013 (FY2013), an increase of 8.7% over FY2012. The operating profit of the group was £1,093 million (approximately $1,707.2 million) in FY2013, an increase of 25.2% over FY2012. The net profit was £591 million (approximately $923.1 million) in FY2013, an increase of 6.5% over FY2012. SWOT Strengths Weaknesses Diversified set of businesses insulates the group from Dependence on the UK market business-specific risks Primark brand in the value retail space Focus on sustainability Opportunities Threats Growth potential in the bio-fuels market Intense competition Growing preference of customers to shop online Increasing labor cost in the US and the UK Positive trends in the global industrial enzymes market Key Employees Employee Name Job Title Board George Weston Chief Executive Officer Executive Board John G.
    [Show full text]
  • British Sugar TOPSOIL Introduction
    British Sugar TOPSOIL Sampling, analysis & Questions to ask a supplier Andy Spetch 1 Presentation ABF / AB Sugar / British Sugar British Sugar TOPSOIL 2 Associated British Foods & British Sugar Background Andy Spetch National TOPSOIL Manager Associated British Foods (ABF) Global Presence ABF sells into more than 100 countries worldwide with operations in 50 countries across Europe, southern Africa, the Americas, Asia and Australia. 4 Financial Highlights Group revenue £15.4bn Adjusted operating profit £1,363m Adjusted profit before tax £1,310m Adjusted earnings per share 127.1p Dividends per share 41.0p Gross investment £945m Net cash £673m 5 ABF Group at a glance GROCERY SUGAR AGRICULTURE INGREDIENTS RETAIL Grocery comprises A leading multinational AB Agri occupies a Yeast and bakery Primark is a major retail consumer-facing in the expanding unique position across ingredients production group employing 73,000 businesses that international markets for the agri-food supply supporting and enabling people. It operates over manufacture and market sugar and sugar-derived chain. Its focus is to add the world’s bakers, both 345 stores in the UK, a variety of well-known value and drive profit for Ireland, Spain, Portugal, brands both nationally co-products, with large and small, across and internationally. operations in the UK, partners all along that craft/artisan and Germany, the Products include hot Spain, southern Africa chain by improving the industrial as well as Netherlands, Belgium, beverages, sugar and and China. sustainability of food high-value ingredients Austria, France, Italy and sweeteners, meat, production. for food and non-food the US. It offers vegetable oils, bread, applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Here We Operate to Promote STEM Skills in Education
    British Sugar: A Homegrown Success Story The benefit of our beet sugar industry to the UK Supports up to 9,500 UK jobs in the wider economy Partners with over 3,000 growers Involved with 7,000 different suppliers Supplies around Invested 50% £250 million of the UK’s demand for sugar in the past five years to make our four factories even more efficient Produced over Spends 300,000 tonnes £90 million of sugar for export to Europe on goods and services, and the world in 2017/18 primarily in the East of England Together with our growers, helped Together with our growers, invests improve beet sugar yields by more than million 25% £2a year in R&D through the British Beet in the past ten years Research Organisation to improve yields A thriving homegrown sugar industry We’re proud to be a vibrant, world-class industry in the East of England. The British beet sugar industry supports 9,500 jobs in the broader UK economy and we work with 7,000 businesses, playing a critical role in the rural economy – truly a homegrown success story. Against the backdrop of a challenging and competitive marketplace we have consistently invested £50m each year – meaning an investment of over £500m in the past decade – to make our factories in Bury St Edmunds, Cantley, Newark and Wissington as efficient and productive as possible. and pursuing our commitment to efficiency and productivity throughout our supply chain and everything we do. We remain focused, as-ever, on producing a quality product and ensuring we are the supplier of choice for our customers – both This continued focus on improvement means we are well placed in the UK and abroad, as we increasingly look to grow our export to respond to the challenges and opportunities presented by the capability.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Greshamian Magazine 2018
    Old Greshamian Magazine 2018 Old Greshamian Old Greshamian Magazine November 2018 • Number 157 Old Greshamian Magazine October 2018 Number 157 Cover Photo: The newly rediscovered painting of the “real” Sir John Gresham (c.1495 – 1556), attr. Steven van der Meulen (? Antwerp fl.1543 – 1563) © National Trust Images Printed by The Lavenham Press 2 Contents Contact Details and OG Club Committee ........................................................................................ 4 Messages from the Chairman and the Headmaster ........................................................................ 5 Headmaster’s Speech Day Speech 2018 ....................................................................................... 8 The Bourdillon Tower ..................................................................................................................... 13 Forthcoming Events....................................................................................................................... 18 Reunions in the Past Year ............................................................................................................. 18 OG Masonic Lodge........................................................................................................................ 29 Friends of Gresham’s (FOGs) ....................................................................................................... 30 Development at Gresham’s ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to British Sugar British Sugar at a Glance
    An Introduction to British Sugar British Sugar at a glance ▪ 4 advanced manufacturing plants processing sugar beet in the UK ‒ Bury, Cantley, Newark and Wissington and head office in Peterborough ‒ Over 3,000 growers ‒ Lowest cost sugar processor in the EU ▪ A major contributor to UK economy, especially in the East Midlands and East Anglia ‒ In 2015 farmers received ~£320m in ▪ More than simply sugar receipts from British Sugar ‒ Power generation for a city the size of Peterborough ‒ Total spend on goods and services was ‒ Fuel ethanol, animal feed, topsoil, pharmaceuticals, in excess of £600m betaine… ‒ Paid more than £200m in corporation tax in past five years ▪ A valuable part of UK agriculture ‒ Support a further 9,500 jobs in the UK economy ‒ Profitable, reliable part of arable rotation ‒ Aids soil health, pest and weed control ‒ Positive sustainability story 2 Supporting British Agriculture • Working in partnership with our growers we have increased sugar beet yields in the UK by more than 25% in the past ten years and by 50% in the past three decades • UK beet production occupies over 100,000 hectares of UK farmland • Eight million tonnes of sugar beet is supplied to British Sugar factories annually • The beet sugar supply chain is concentrated in rural areas and directly involves 7,000 different businesses including 3,000 farming businesses • Research and education in sugar beet by the British Beet Research Organisation (BBRO), jointly funded by British Sugar and the growers, with over £2m of investment per annum ‘UK Beet yields
    [Show full text]
  • SUGAR BEET a Study of Sugar Production in the UK and the Feasibility of Expansion
    Agricultural Enterprise Studies in England and Wales Economic Report No. 7 4.1 SUGAR BEET A Study of Sugar Production in the UK and the feasibility of expansion F. G. Sturrock & M. C. Thompson Agricultural Economics Unit De artment of Land Economy -University of Cambridge 1972 Price 4op Agricultural Enterprise Studies in England and Wales Economic Report No. 7 SUGAR BEET A Study of Sugar Production in the UK and the feasibility of expansion F. G. Sturrock & M. C. Thompson Agricultural Economics Unit Department of Land Economy University of Cambridge 1972 0 Factories 0 Survey farms Frontispiece. Location of farms taking part in the Survey and the sugar beet factories. Sugar beet is grown mainly in Eastern, E. and W. Midland and Yorks and Lancs(MAFF) regions. The S.W. and S.E. were considered for a new factory. Contents • Page Foreword 4 Introduction 6 Chapter 1 A Survey of British Sugar Beet Production: (a) The sample 8 (b) Costs of production 9 (c) Low labour crops 15 (d) Transport 16 Chapter 2 The Implications of Growing More Sugar Beet: (a) Sugar beet and sugar cane 19 (b) The place of sugar beet in British farming 23 (c) British sugar beet in the E.E.C. 27 Chapter 3 The Feasibility of Increasing Sugar Production: (a) The scope for increased production 30 (b) An economic appraisal 35 (c) Balance of payments 38 (d) Australian sugar 38 Summary 40 Appendix 42 Bibliography 45 3 Foreword The economics of particular crop or livestock enterprises have been investigated and reported on by individual departments of agricultural economics at universities in England and Wales for several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Funder List – Companies That Fund Charities
    Funder List – Companies That Fund Charities This is one of 20+ funder lists from the free Charity Excellence Framework Maximising Income questionnaire. Double click the funder name to be taken to their website. If you’re new to corporate fundraising, here is some advice from the Big Give on approaching companies for a donation, here's what the Institute of Fundraising says about corporate partnerships and also the legal stuff from the Fundraising Regulator. Top 10 Corporate Donors 1. Lloyds Banking Group: £64m 2. ITV PLC: £24m 3. Santander UK plc: £22m 4. Ecclesiastical Insurance Group plc: £20.4m 5. HSBC Holdings plc: £18.65 m 6. Marks and Spencer Group plc: £15.5m 7. Goldman Sachs International: £14.3m 8. Impetus - The Private Equity Foundation: £11.6m 9. John Lewis Partnership plc: £11.6m 10. Royal Mail plc: £10.4m. Source: Civil Society. Companies That Support Charities A Accenture Corporate Citizenship Programme, Adnams Community Trust (sells alcohol), Aldi, Allen & Overy Foundation, Alpkit, Antonio Carluccio Foundation, Anglo American Group Foundation, Animal 1 This resource is from the free Charity Excellence Framework - the platform, its huge resource base, COVID19 funder database and toolkits, and quality mark are completely free. Ian McLintock © 2020 Friends Insurance Services, ASDA Foundation, Aston Villa Charitable Trust, Aviva Foundation, Avon Foundation for Women. Not forgetting Aylesbury Vale Community Trust, which I chair - funding for sports and leisure activities that support the community in Aylesbury Vale. B Baillie
    [Show full text]
  • A Bitter Pill?
    The magazine of the Food Ethics Council Sugar A bitter pill? Sidney Mintz | Oliver Cheesman | Rebecca May | David Willers Jeffrey A. McNeely | Amy Serrano | Alison Boyd | Nick Vink Susan Coldwell | Julia Clark | Ian Bretman | Nick Wells Sue Davies | Ben Richardson | David Phillips | Mariann Fischer Boel Michael Heasman | Neville Rigby | Adam Drewnowski summer 2009 | 4 Volume Issue 2 | www.foodethicscouncil.org Carl Atkin | Miriam Boscarsly | Jack Winkler | Clare Devereux Contents Introduction 05 Sugar: old champion, new contenders | Sidney Mintz The environment 11 Sugar production | Oliver Cheesman Food Ethics, the magazine of the Food Ethics 14 Sustainable sugarcane production | Rebecca May Council, seeks to challenge accepted opinion and 16 The Better Sugar Cane Standard | David Willers spark fruitful debate about key issues and developments in food and farming. Distributed Biofuels quarterly to subscribers, each issue features 18 Biofuels: sugar may not always be so sweet | Jeffrey A. McNeely independent news, comment and analysis. The Food Ethics Council challenges government, Human rights business and the public to tackle ethical issues in 19 The Sugar Babies | Amy Serrano food and farming, providing research, analysis and tools to help. The views of contributors to The big question this magazine are not necessarily those of the 21 Sugar: an unhealthy addiction? Food Ethics Council or its members. Alison Boyd | Nick Vink | Dr Susan Coldwell Please do not reproduce without permission. Julia Clark | Ian Bretman | Nick Wells |Sue Davies Articles are copyright of the authors and images as credited. Unless otherwise indicated, all other Power and trade content is copyright of the Food Ethics Council 24 Refined power | Ben Richardson 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Farming Matters in the Fens Keep the Fens Farming
    www.whyfarmingmatters.co.uk Why farming matters in the Fens Keep the Fens farming Lincoln A personal view by Skegness Professor David Bellamy The Fens are one of my favourite ‘head just above water’ landscapes. I have known them Boston since I was evacuated to Wisbech in the War and I have loved them ever since. The Fens are Spalding King’s Lynn a place to get away from it all – a place to go to dream about the marsh-men and their Wisbech Swaffham Norwich methods of fishing and wildfowling, all rooted in those rich soils. March Peterborough Downham Market It was the Romans who first recognised the Thetford Fens’ farming potential and Vermuyden, the Ely th 17 century Dutch engineer, who slowly but surely turned the area into some of the richest Bury St Edmunds farmland in the world. The Fens have always fascinated and challenged in equal measure Newmarket and that continues today as farmers look to Cambridge Ipswich sustainable management of an area that is still subsiding thanks to the effect of the last ice age. Farmers working together with, and not The Fens against, Mother Nature are using sustainable techniques like integrated crop management to provide locally produced chips, crisps, The Fens vegetables and salad, cutting down the waste of fuel on food miles. Conservation groups of Grade 1 agricultural land every shape and size are working in partnership with farmers to repair, re-wet and regenerate, recreating mowing fens and grazing marshes. These not only help protect the landscape against tidal surge but also the rich heritage of flowers, insects, fish and birds that educate, enthral and delight locals and visitors alike.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Beet Sugar Industry Sustainability Report 2011 1
    Contents UK Beet Sugar Industry Sustainability Report 2011 1 The cover photograph ContentsIntroduction was taken at Sir Richard Sutton’s Settled Estates in Lincolnshire during 2010. It features a field margin beside sugar beet, which has been planted to encourage wildlife (see page 18). Section Foreword 1. Executive summary 2. Industry developments 3. Innovation and research 4. Agricultural efficiency 5. Reducing inputs 6. Process optimisation 7. Environmental management 8. Biodiversity 9. Climate change 10. Supporting the rural economy 2 UK Beet Sugar Industry Sustainability Report 2011 Foreword 1 Executive 2 Industry 3 Innovation 4 Agricultural 5 Reducing 6 Process 7 Environmental 8 Biodiversity 9 Climate 10 Supporting the summary developments and research efficiency inputs optimisation management change rural economy Foreword William Martin Gino De Jaegher The challenges of combating global Increasingly, there is an industry focus upon sharing climate change, reducing environmental best practice, developing new supply chain solutions, embracing a ‘no-waste’ culture and diversification into impacts and increasing the efficiency of new derivative co-products, like bioethanol. food production for a growing population are very real for the British beet sugar Our combined efforts and investment have achieved significant results; crop yields have increased industry. Across Europe, the past five substantially, whilst application rates for fertilisers and years have seen radical reforms, resulting plant protection products have reduced. This increased in the removal of almost 6 million tonnes efficiency has enabled farmers to reduce land use for of sugar production, with the closure sugar beet by some 90,000 hectares. of 60% of the EU’s sugar factories and In our factories we are also making more from less.
    [Show full text]