Visitor Guide
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report 2006-2007: Part 2 – Overview
24 international broadcasting then... The opening transmission of Radio Australia in December 1939, known then as “Australia Calling”. “Australia Calling… Australia Calling”, diminishing series of transmission “hops” announced the clipped voice of John Royal around the globe. For decades to come, through the crackle of shortwave radio. It was listeners would tune their receivers in the a few days before Christmas 1939. Overseas early morning and dusk and again at night broadcasting station VLQ 2—V-for-victory, to receive the clearest signals. Even then, L-for-liberty, Q-for-quality—had come alive signal strength lifted and fell repeatedly, to the impending terror of World War II. amid the atmospheric hash. The forerunner of Radio Australia broadcast Australia Calling/Radio Australia based itself in those European languages that were still in Melbourne well south of the wartime widely used throughout South-East Asia at “Brisbane Line” and safe from possible the end of in the colonial age—German, Dutch, Japanese invasion. Even today, one of Radio French, Spanish and English. Australia’s principal transmitter stations is located in the Victorian city of Shepparton. Transmission signals leapt to the ionosphere —a layer of electro-magnetic particles By 1955, ABC Chairman Sir Richard Boyer surrounding the planet—before reflecting summed up the Radio Australia achievement: down to earth and bouncing up again in a “We have sought to tell the story of this section 2 25 country with due pride in our achievements international broadcasting with Australia and way of life, but without ignoring the Television. Neither the ABC nor, later, differences and divisions which are inevitable commercial owners of the service could in and indeed the proof of a free country”. -
Newcastle Fortresses
NEWCASTLE FORTRESSES Thanks to Margaret (Marg) Gayler for this article. During World War 2, Newcastle and the surrounding coast between Nelson Bay and Swansea was fortified by Defence forces to protect the east coast of New South Wales against the enemy, in case of attack from the Japanese between 1940 and 1943. There were the established Forts along the coastline, including Fort Tomaree, Fort Wallace (Stockton), Fort Scratchley, Nobbys Head (Newcastle East) and Shepherd’s Hill (Bar Beach) and Fort Redhead. The likes of Fort Tomaree (Nelson Bay), Fort Redhead (Dudley) and combined defence force that operated from Mine Camp (Catherine Hill Bay) came online during the Second World War to also protect our coast and industries like BHP from any attempt to bomb the Industries as they along with other smaller industries in the area helped in the war effort by supplying steel, razor wire, pith hats to our armed forces fighting overseas and here in Australia. With Australia at war overseas the Government of the day during the war years decided it was an urgency to fortify our coast line with not only the Army but also with the help of Navy and Air- Force in several places along the coast. So there was established a line of communication up and down the coast using all three defence forces involved. Starting with Fort Tomaree and working the way down to Fort Redhead adding a brief description of Mine Camp and the role of the RAAF, also mentioning where the Anti Aircraft placements were around Newcastle at the time of WW2. -
Shifting Sands at Stockton Beach Report
NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL SHIFTING SANDS AT STOCKTON BEACH Prepared by: Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited Environmental and Catchment Management Consultants in association with June 2002 1411/R04/V2 Report No. 1411/R04/V2 Prepared for: NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL SHIFTING SANDS AT STOCKTON BEACH Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited Environmental and Catchment Management Consultants PO Box 838 Toronto NSW 2283 Ph. (02) 4950 5322 Fax (02) 4950 5737 Shifting Sands at Stockton Beach Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1.1 2.0 PREVIOUS STUDIES AND REPORTS ................................. 2.1 2.1 BETWEEN WIND AND WATER (COLTHEART 1997) ............................2.1 2.2 NEWCASTLE HARBOUR INVESTIGATION (PWD (1963) REPORT 104)..........................................................................................2.2 2.3 NEWCASTLE HARBOUR – HYDROGRAPHIC HISTORY (MANLEY 1963) ......................................................................................2.2 2.4 LITTORAL DRIFT IN THE VICINITY OF NEWCASTLE HARBOUR (BOLEYN AND CAMPBELL CIRCA 1966) .............................................2.4 2.5 NEWCASTLE HARBOUR SILTATION INVESTIGATION (PWD 1969)...2.5 2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DEEPENING OF NEWCASTLE HARBOUR (MSB 1976) ...................................................2.6 2.7 FEASIBILITY STUDY ON NOURISHMENT OF STOCKTON BEACH (DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1978) ..........................................2.7 2.8 NEWCASTLE COASTLINE HAZARD DEFINITION STUDY (WBM -
Georgia Water Quality
GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia PHOTO: Kathy Methier Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update PREFACE The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) developed this document entitled “Georgia Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Monitoring and Assessment Strategy”. As a part of the State’s Water Quality Management Program, this report focuses on the GAEPD’s water quality monitoring efforts to address key elements identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) monitoring strategy guidance entitled “Elements of a State Monitoring and Assessment Program, March 2003”. This report updates the State’s water quality monitoring strategy as required by the USEPA’s regulations addressing water management plans of the Clean Water Act, Section 106(e)(1). Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... -
Hunter Economic Zone
Issue No. 3/14 June 2014 The Club aims to: • encourage and further the study and conservation of Australian birds and their habitat • encourage bird observing as a leisure-time activity A Black-necked Stork pair at Hexham Swamp performing a spectacular “Up-down” display before chasing away the interloper - in this case a young female - Rod Warnock CONTENTS President’s Column 2 Conservation Issues New Members 2 Hunter Economic Zone 9 Club Activity Reports Macquarie Island now pest-free 10 Glenrock and Redhead 2 Powling Street Wetlands, Port Fairy 11 Borah TSR near Barraba 3 Bird Articles Tocal Field Days 4 Plankton makes scents for seabirds 12 Tocal Agricultural College 4 Superb Fairy-wrens sing to their chicks Rufous Scrub-bird Monitoring 5 before birth 13 Future Activity - BirdLife Seminar 5 BirdLife Australia News 13 Birding Features Birding Feature Hunter Striated Pardalote Subspecies ID 6 Trans-Tasman Birding Links since 2000 14 Trials of Photography - Oystercatchers 7 Club Night & Hunterbirding Observations 15 Featured Birdwatching Site - Allyn River 8 Club Activities June to August 18 Please send Newsletter articles direct to the Editor, HBOC postal address: Liz Crawford at: [email protected] PO Box 24 New Lambton NSW 2305 Deadline for the next edition - 31 July 2014 Website: www.hboc.org.au President’s Column I’ve just been on the phone to a lady that lives in Sydney was here for a few days visiting the area, talking to club and is part of a birdwatching group of friends that are members and attending our May club meeting. -
The Case of Port Stephens, Australia
Visions in Leisure and Business Volume 14 Number 4 Article 2 1996 Building Community Commitment for a Region's Future: The Case of Port Stephens, Australia Harold Richins The University of New Castle Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/visions Recommended Citation Richins, Harold (1996) "Building Community Commitment for a Region's Future: The Case of Port Stephens, Australia," Visions in Leisure and Business: Vol. 14 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/visions/vol14/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Visions in Leisure and Business by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@BGSU. BUILDING COMMUNITY COMMITMENT FOR A REGION'S FUTURE: THE CASE OF PORT STEPHENS, AUSTRALIA BY DR. HAROLD RICHINS,SENIOR LECTURER AND TOURISM COORDINATOR DEPARTMENT OF LEISURE AND TOURISM STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY DRIVE CALLAGHAN, NEW SOUTH WALES AUSTRALIA ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION With tremendous growth in coastal A number of coastal communities of · communities of Australia within the last two Australia have seen tremendous growth in decades, intense pressures have been placed the last 10-20 years due primarily to on localcommunities, especiallyin the areas increased interest in domestic and where tourism is a growing phenomenon. international tourism. In addition, there has People living in these sensitive regions have been strong movement away from cities been searching for long term solutions. (over 80% of Australian live in cities), There are many challenges, however, in where people have sought "lifestyle" meeting the needs and dealing with the changes and the dream to "live in paradise." complex relationships between tourists, This growthhas created intense pressures on residents, investors, providers of tourist and local commumnes in culturally and lifestyle experiences, non-government and environmentally sensitive regions. -
Monitoring Beach Changes As an Integral Component of Coastal Management
N° 15 Monitoring beach changes as an integral component of coastal management NVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT IN COASTAL REGIONS AND IN SMALL ISLANDS E Previous titles in the CSI info series: Titles in the CSI series Coastal region and small island papers: 1 Integrated framework for the management of beach resources 1 Managing beach resources in the smaller Caribbean islands. within the smaller caribbean islands. Workshop results. 1997. Workshop Papers. Edited by Gillian Cambers. 1997. 269 pp. 31 pp. (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/pub2.htm (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papers1.htm 2 UNESCO on coastal regions and small islands. Titles for 2 Coasts of Haiti. Resource assessment and management needs. management, research and capacity-building (1980–1995). 1997. 1998. 39 pp. (English and French). 21 pp. (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/pub1.htm www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papers2.htm www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papiers2.htm 3 Qualité de l’eau de la nappe phréatique à Yeumbeul, Sénégal. Étude sur le terrain. 1997. 27 pp. (French only). 3 CARICOMP – Caribbean Coral Reef, Seagrass and Mangrove www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/info3.htm Sites. Edited by Björn Kjerfve. 1999. 185 pp. (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/papers/papers3.htm 4 Planning for coastline change. Guidelines for construction setbacks in the Eastern Caribbean Islands. 1997. 14 pp. 4 Applications of Satellite and Airborne Image Data to Coastal (English only). www.unesco.org/csi/pub/info/info4.htm Management. Seventh computer-based learning module. Edited by A. -
Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales
Rare or threatened vascular plant species of Wollemi National Park, central eastern New South Wales. Stephen A.J. Bell Eastcoast Flora Survey PO Box 216 Kotara Fair, NSW 2289, AUSTRALIA Abstract: Wollemi National Park (c. 32o 20’– 33o 30’S, 150o– 151oE), approximately 100 km north-west of Sydney, conserves over 500 000 ha of the Triassic sandstone environments of the Central Coast and Tablelands of New South Wales, and occupies approximately 25% of the Sydney Basin biogeographical region. 94 taxa of conservation signiicance have been recorded and Wollemi is recognised as an important reservoir of rare and uncommon plant taxa, conserving more than 20% of all listed threatened species for the Central Coast, Central Tablelands and Central Western Slopes botanical divisions. For a land area occupying only 0.05% of these divisions, Wollemi is of paramount importance in regional conservation. Surveys within Wollemi National Park over the last decade have recorded several new populations of signiicant vascular plant species, including some sizeable range extensions. This paper summarises the current status of all rare or threatened taxa, describes habitat and associated species for many of these and proposes IUCN (2001) codes for all, as well as suggesting revisions to current conservation risk codes for some species. For Wollemi National Park 37 species are currently listed as Endangered (15 species) or Vulnerable (22 species) under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. An additional 50 species are currently listed as nationally rare under the Briggs and Leigh (1996) classiication, or have been suggested as such by various workers. Seven species are awaiting further taxonomic investigation, including Eucalyptus sp. -
Nelson Bay Foreshore Plan of Management
Nelson Bay Foreshore Plan of Management February 2008 Contents 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Land to Which this Plan Applies 4 1.3 Core Principles 6 2. Site Description 7 2.1 History 7 2.2 Landform and Geology 9 2.3 Current Land Use 9 2.4 Values 10 3. Planning Context 12 3.1 Legislative and Planning Framework 12 3.2 Land Use Zoning 12 3.3 Port Stephens Development Control Plan (DCP) 2007 14 3.4 Port Stephens -Great Lakes Marine Park 14 3.5 Status and Use of Reserves 15 3.6 Heritage 16 3.7 Port Stephens Foreshore Management Plan 16 3.8 Native Title 17 3.9 Nelson Bay 2030 Strategy 17 4. Management Framework 18 4.1 Overarching Principles 18 4.2 Roles 18 4.3 Management Units 18 4.4 Management Objectives 20 4.5 Sustainability 20 4.6 Proposed Integrated Foreshore Redevelopment Plan 20 4.7 Funding 20 5. Management Issues, Outcomes and Strategies 22 5.1 Management Unit 1 – Nelson Bay Boat Harbour 22 5.1.1 Overview 22 5.1.2 Desired Outcomes 23 5.2 Management Unit 2 – Apex Park 24 5.2.1 Overview 24 2 5.2.2 Desired Outcomes 24 5.3 Management Unit 3 – Victoria Parade (South) 25 5.3.1 Overview 25 5.3.2 Desired Outcomes 26 5.4 Management Unit 4 – Neil Carroll Park Group 27 5.4.1 Overview 27 5.4.2 Desired Outcomes 28 5.5 Management Unit 5 – Nelson Bay Beach Waterfront 29 5.5.1 Overview 29 5.5.2 Desired Outcomes 29 5.6 Authorised Uses under the Crown Lands Act 1989 30 5.7 Additional Uses Authorised by this Plan 31 5.8 Management Strategies 31 6. -
Tomaree National Park Walking and Cycling
Nelson Head PORT STEPHENS Tomaree National Park Inner Lighthouse Tomaree Head Day Use Area Little Beach Tomaree Gun Emplacements One Mile Beach Fly Point Gan Gan Rd r Day Use Area D n d o Tomaree Lookout R s r t e t n t i t S a hoal B o S a P y Rd s P h e m c Ja a n Nelson Bay n a Morna r l Shoal Bay ANNA o B Point e Zenith Beach M d BAY P ia l P or r ict T V p Zenith Beach Day Use Area Fishermans Bay R m d a K t t Port Stephens w i S n S S P l FISHERMANS g h Information Centre n r O s c T c r o e t a BAY l t n e u A k d d s v h c a e y R t R S Anna Bay c C o E i t if D t ac e P r n y S e Surf Club a Shoa e r Boat Harbour l B B ay B a l o m re l a Little Kingsley L r n m Glovers i T r ne o BOAT o Birubi e T Beach A h Kingsley v HARBOUR NELSON Hill Trl u Wreck Beach TASMAN SEA o Point s S t BAY ra G Iris Moore Fishermans Bay l S Dau Use Area t Day Use Area TASMAN SEA re e t F i re T SHOAL Inset - Tomaree NP South rl BAY Nelson Bay d R d e R Golf Course re ach a Be Ta m n llean o ea P Box Beach Rd T c Bo O x Be ach Rd Gan Gan Lookout Kurra ra Trl WARNING - Crossing Fingal Spit can be dangerous. -
The Shorebirds of Port Stephens Recent and Historical Perspectives
THE SHOREBIRDS OF PORT STEPHENS RECENT AND HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES A D Stuart HBOC Special Report No. 2 © May 2004 THE SHOREBIRDS OF PORT STEPHENS RECENT AND HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES A D Stuart May 2004 HBOC Special Report No. 2 Cover Photo: Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis (Photographer: Chris Herbert). The Eastern Curlew is a common and abundant shorebird of Port Stephens. At least 600 birds are present each summer and many of the immature birds remain through the winter months. Port Stephens is an internationally significant habitat for the species. This report is copyright. Copyright for the entire contents is vested in the author and has been assigned to Hunter Bird Observers Club. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise without prior written permission. Enquiries should be made to Hunter Bird Observers Club. © Hunter Bird Observers Club Inc P.O. Box 24 New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia http://users.hunterlink.net.au/hboc/home.htm Price: $20 HBOC Special Reports 1. Birds of Ash Island, A D Stuart, December 2002 2. The Shorebirds of Port Stephens. Recent and Historical Perspectives, A D Stuart, May 2004 3. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. HIGH TIDE SURVEYS AT SWAN BAY (WORIMI NATURE RESERVE) 3 2.1. Summary 3 2.2. Survey Methodology 6 2.3. Discussion 7 2.4. Acknowledgements 8 3. PORT STEPHENS HIGH TIDE SURVEY 8 FEBRUARY 2004 12 3.1. -
The Permanent Walk Booklet Update
1 2 THE OLD AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURAL COMPANY KARUAH TO TAHLEE WALK BOOKLET (Revised for 2015) We acknowledge and recognise the Worimi people on whose land we walk. GENERAL INTRODUCTION WHY WALK? Once every year, Karuah residents and friends walk the 5 kilometres or so from Karuah to Tahlee along the Old AACo Road. It only happens once a year because the road crosses Yalimbah Creek and the bridge that used to cross the creek has gone. In the late 1950s, the bridge which had been built under the direction of Robert Dawson in 1826 was burnt down by persons unknown. At that stage, the bridge was more than 130 years old, a remarkable age for a wooden bridge. Up to that point residents of the two villages had travelled back and forth on a daily basis. From then on, they were forced to take the current route which is 14 kilometres long. So, every year for the last five years, a local oyster farmer has offered an oyster barge to carry people over the creek and around 150 people re-enact the trip from village to village. Karuah Progress association hosts the day which includes a light lunch, guides, afternoon tea and an inspection of historic Tahlee House and a bus ride back to Karuah via the new route as well as a photocopied version of this booklet. TAHLEE AND KARUAH – IN THE EARLY 19TH CENTURY: In 1825 when the Australian Agricultural Company was formed, 10,000 shares were offered at one hundred pounds per share and they were snapped up by the rich and famous.