New Age, Vol. 11, No.22, Sept. 26, 1912
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PAGE PAGE PRESENTDAY CRITICISM .................. 517 NOTES OF THE WEEK .................. 505 PATRIOTS.By Leonard Inkster ............... 518 CURRENTCANT AND CURRENTSENSE ............ 509 VIEWS AND REVIEWS.By A. E. R. ............ 519 FOREIGNAFFAIRS. By S. Verdad ............ 510 THE TREATMENT OF THE INSANE. By Alfred Randall ... 520 MILITARYNOTES. By Romney ............... 51I REVIEWS ........................ 521 THEAMERICAN UNWRITTEN LAW. By Aeacus ......... 511 THESOMNAMBULIST. By S. D. Shallard ......... 521 JAROSLAV VRCHLICKY. By P. Selver 522 COMEDYOR CORRUPTION 512 ............ .................. PASTICHE.By Alice Morning, C. W., and C. E. Bechhöfer ULSTERDAY. By Bentley Capper 513 524 ............ LETTERSTO THE EDITORfrom Pierse Loftus, Employer, Dr. A PLEAFOR THE AGRICULTURALLABOURER. By H. R. Gled- Victor Lafosse, Black-Eye, A. Wallace, William McFee, stone ........................ 514 S. Dicey, William Loftus Hare, W. M., Walter G. PATRIAMIA-IV. By Ezra Pound ............ 515 Whitehouse 525 EPIGRAMS.By H. B. S. .................. 516 ..................... All communications relative to THENEW AGE should was, everybody, after Mr. MacDonald's speech at the be addressed to THE NEW AGE, 38, Cursitor Street, Newport Congress, knew: it was the 'Tory Party, the E.C. party of the " wild beast." How foolish $or friends to quarrel in the face of that party of hyenas ! The moral of the by-elections was, therefore, the need for cement- NOTES OF THE WEEK. ing the coalition bletween the Liberal and Labour Parties-and particularly during the remainder of the As the Parliamentary Session is about to be resumed, present session. As if to overprove the willingness of the hatchet of discord which showed signs of being dis- the Labour Party to do even more than its share to- interred between the Liberal and Labour Parties is wards peace, the " Westminster Gazette " announced, being deeply buried again. In the " Daily Chronicle " apparently with authority, that " the Labour leader is of Friday last a " Labour Member," whom wle suspect coming back to Parliament with the full intention lof from his peculiar absence of style to be no other than supporting the Government's programme. " That will Mr. Ramsay MacDonald, discourses on the political be news to thle Newport comrades who demanded the relations of the two parties at recent by-elections and reversal of the Osborne judgment! But further than draws a moral therefrom. The difference (of opinion, this, the same Labour leader (Mr. MacDonald to wit) he is needlessly anxious to show, did not toriginatle from will probably " find an opportunity before Parliament anything the Labour Party did to the Liberals, Far meets to make it clear that his party supports the In- was it from the intention of the Labour Party at Old- surance Act on a contributory bash" How very ham, Hanky or Midlothian to provloke wantonly retalia- obliging ! tion from the Liberal Party. On the contrary, it was *** at Oldham that thje Liberals first indicated that in their It would naturally occur to any observer, not quite out opinion the Labour Party had all the seats it deserved; of his senses, that this attitudle of the Labour Party (or and it was at Hanky that they went a step further and let us say Mr. MacDonald and have done with pre- cxpressed their opinion that th'e Labour Party had, in tences) is only susceptible of one explanation : thle ex- fact, too many seats already. When this terrible dis- planation that hlr. MacDonald has bleen bribed. Let not covery of the Liberal attack was madle, the Labour the horrid word offend lour readers wben the thing tak- Party really had nothing to do but fight at Crewe and ing place under thkeir noses does not move them to at Midlothian. It wient greatly against the grain that mutiny. Bribed, we say; it would naturally occur to this sh'ould have to be done. Of all the conditions of any observer in his senses that since the Midlothian warfare peace was always the desire of thte Labour election Mr. MacDonald had been bribed. How, you ?arty. But when driven into a corner, even certain ask? Well, how are people bribed in politics to main- semi-domestic little quadrupeds will fight for life. The tain the wage system which they have sworn to destroy? Labour Party could in all humility be allowed, theriefore, Ask those who know. But bribery, wfe are sorry to say, one tiny struggle, one bite of the hand of its master. is not an explanation that fits th'e case. Bribery im- Midlothian showed what thley could do if the attack plies at I'east brains to be bought or power or influence should be oontinued ...but they prayed the Lord that or at least something. Even in corruption supply and the Liberals would now*** desist. demand holds. But in the case of the Labour Party, as represented, at least, by thce distinguished " Labour By one of those coincidences that only psychical re- Member " whlo writes for the " Daily Chronicle," there search can explain, the article by a " Labour Member " is in tbe Party neither anything worth the bribing nor in the " Daily Chronicle" was accompanied in the any need to bribe. On the contrary, so dense is thle evening by an article on thle same topic, and evidently superstition of Liberal friendliness to Labour that we inspired from the same source, in the " Westminster honestly believe that bribes would be necessary to de- Gazette.'' The " Westminster Gazette " naturally ap- tach the Labour Party from the Liberal alliance. Listen, proached the subject from the Liberal end of the stick; for example, to this) from a member of a party born of but after a column of progress it concluded its journey independence if not for it : " It is to the interest of the at the same point at which its morning ppedecessor had Labour Party to have a Liberal rather than a Unionist arrived from the other end of the stick. The strain be- Administration in authlority." And to this : " Labour, tween the two partises, it agreed, had been the conse- if it cannot get all it wants, ought not to aid ...the quence of faults on both sides; there had not been Opposition to cross the floor of thle House of Com- enough of that " give and take" which makes politics mons." If we wlere the Liberal Chief Whip and read possible ; feelings, othserwise mutually friendly, had been these wlords on the eve of a new sesjsicon, we should inadvertently exacerbated, with, of course, gain to not trouble t'b devise any plans appointments, neither party but only to the enemy. What that enemq 506 honours, money, and so forth-for attaching the party Liberal Party, but the unselfish poor men scattered up that issued thlem. We should save our money for Sir and down the Labour movement. We have repeatedly Edward Carson and people who knew their price and warned Our readers, on authority not to be disputed, would insist upon it. Thle Labour Party, on the other that the programme of Labour legislation so far accept- hand, is willing to give itself away with a pound of tea. able to the Labour Party is infinitely short of the pro- *++ gramme sketched out for realisation by the international Now what is the explanation of this strange survival capitalists themselves. A conspiracy of our own of belief in the friendliness of the Liberal Party in par- hatching, we shall be told-a mere mare’s-nest! But ticular to Labour? We can find it only in two facts : without intending to boast of our sources of information the fact that thle Labour movement knows no history we may fairly assure our readers that the conspiracy whatever and is from head to tail unlettered and un- is none Of our invention; we wish it were; it rests on read; and the fact that its leaders hiave never reflected facts well known to Anglo-American capitalists and on the present situation for a single moment. Doubt- Anglo-Jewish financiers. They, at least, will not privately lesls, like everybody else, they read-they read even deny it. There are signs, also, to which we .can point these weekly “ Notes”; but for all the impression their Our incredulous readers as insusceptible of any other reading makes on them, thleir beads might be sieves and hypothesis than that of a conspiracy. Compare, for our words water. For both past history and present example, the contemporary Labour legislation of the fact, as almost any journal likely to ‘be read by thse leading capitalist oountries; is it similar or is it differ- Labour leaders repeatedly maintains, conclusively ent? With small changes, one Labour Bill would serve prove that whatever may once have been the natural equally England, Germany, America, and every wealthy affinity of Liberalism with Labour, that affinity no nation, But the Labour fly imagines that its little party longer holds. The estrangement between the two in- is turning this mighty internation21 capitalist wheel. terests has become no less complete than the estrange- What Mr. MacDonald thinks to-day, the whole capi- ment between England and America which once, but talist world is putting into legislation to-morrow. That long ago, were joined by something thicker than water. is a mare’s-nest if you like! The truth is that there is The tendency of the Labour Party to take shelter under nothing as yet-with the single exception of the Right the wings of Liberalism is a heritage of the days when to Work or Maintenance Bill-on the Labour Party’s thle Liberal Party was indleed fighting, in one sense, the programme that the “selfish rich men ” are not pre- economic battle. When capitalism and the wage pared or preparing to accept with both hands.