Testing the reliability of the standard and complementary DNA barcodes for the monocot subfamily Alooideae from South Africa Barnabas H. Daru1,2,*, Michelle van der Bank3, Abubakar Bello4, and Kowiyou Yessoufou5 1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, 0028 Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa 3 African Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg, APK Campus, PO Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa 4 Bolus Herbarium, Biological Sciences Department, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa 5 Department of Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida Campus, Florida 1710, South Africa *Corresponding author Corresponding author’s e-mail address:
[email protected] Corresponding author’s mailing address: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 1 ABSTRACT Although a standard DNA barcode has been identified for plants, it does not always provide species-level specimen identifications for investigating important ecological questions. In this study, we assessed the species-level discriminatory power of the standard (rbcLa + matK) and complementary barcodes ITS1 and trnH-psbA within the subfamily Alooideae (Asphodelaceae), a large, recent plant radiation whose species are important in horticulture yet are threatened. Alooideae has its centre of endemism in southern Africa with some outlier species occurring elsewhere in Africa and Madagascar. We sampled 360 specimens representing 235 species within all 11 genera of the subfamily. Applying three distance-based methods, all markers perform poorly for our combined dataset with the highest proportion of correct species-level specimen identifications of 30% found for ITS1.