DOCSLIB.ORG

The PDF for the Report Is 9912 Kb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The PDF for the Report Is 9912 Kb Prepared in cooperation with Holloman Air Force Base and the City of Alamogordo Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in the Basin-Fill Aquifer of the Tularosa Basin, South-Central New Mexico, Predevelopment through 2040 Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5197 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in the Basin-Fill Aquifer of the Tularosa Basin, South-Central New Mexico, Predevelopment through 2040 By G.F. Huff Prepared in cooperation with Holloman Air Force Base and the City of Alamogordo Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5197 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. iii Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................................. 2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 2 Geohydrology ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Geology .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Aquifer Properties ............................................................................................................................... 2 Ground- and Surface-Water Flows ................................................................................................... 4 Water Use ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Ground-Water Quality ......................................................................................................................... 8 Simulation of Ground-Water Flow .............................................................................................................. 8 Model Description ............................................................................................................................... 8 Mathematical Models ................................................................................................................ 8 Model Discretization .................................................................................................................. 8 Boundary Conditions .................................................................................................................. 8 Model Stresses ........................................................................................................................... 8 Mountain-Front Recharge ................................................................................................ 8 Ground-Water Withdrawal ............................................................................................... 9 Return Flow ......................................................................................................................... 9 Evapotranspiration .......................................................................................................... 23 Streams and Interbasin Ground-Water Flow .............................................................. 23 Simulated Hydrologic Properties ........................................................................................... 23 Model Calibration .............................................................................................................................. 23 Steady-State Calibration ......................................................................................................... 23 Transient Calibration ................................................................................................................ 25 Calibration Strategy and Results ............................................................................................ 26 Sensitivity Analysis ................................................................................................................... 29 Model Benchmarking and Potential Effects of Return Flow ...................................................... 29 Model Results ..................................................................................................................................... 30 Simulated Flows ........................................................................................................................ 30 Simulated Water Levels ........................................................................................................... 30 Declines in Simulated Water Levels ...................................................................................... 30 Generalized Simulated Directions of Ground-Water Flow ................................................. 33 Model Limitations .............................................................................................................................. 42 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 43 References Cited ........................................................................................................................................ 85 Appendix 1. Computation of Ground-Water-Flow Directions .............................................................. 89 iv Figures 1. Location of the Tularosa geologic basin and study area ...................................................... 3 2. Generalized section across the Tularosa Basin. Line of section shown in figure 1 ........ 5 3–11. Maps showing: 3. Location of subbasins on the margin of the Tularosa hydrologic basin (modified from Waltemeyer, 2001) ............................................................................................. 6 4. Location of ground-water flow-model grid ........................................................................... 18 5. Location of active ground-water flow-model layers ........................................................... 19 6. Location of cells in which recharge is implemented in the ground-water-flow model ........................................................................................................................................... 20 7. Areas of municipal ground-water withdrawals ................................................................... 21 8. Areas of agricultural ground-water withdrawals and agricultural surface-water diversions .................................................................................................................................... 22 9. Location of model cells representing steady-state and transient-model calibration points ....................................................................................................................... 24 10. Water-level contours representing measured 1911-12 water levels and simulated steady-state water levels in the uppermost active model cells ...................... 31 11. Zones of hydrologic properties ............................................................................................... 32 12–13. Graphs showing: 12. Test for nonnormality of steady-state residual errors ......................................................... 33 13. Values of steady-state residual errors, simulated steady-state water levels, and standard deviation and mean value of residual errors ....................................................... 34 14. Distribution of steady-state residual errors .......................................................................... 44 15–17. Graphs showing: 15A. Simulated and measured water levels from 1948 to 1995 at transient-model calibration points ....................................................................................................................... 45 15B. Simulated and measured water levels from 1948 to 1995 at transient-model calibration points ....................................................................................................................... 46 15C. Simulated and measured water levels from 1948 to 1995 at transient-model calibration points. ...................................................................................................................... 47 15D. Simulated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • White Sands National Monument / Inventory of Water Rights and Groundwater Evaluation Data
    WHITE SANDS NATIONAL MONUMENT INVENTORY OF WATER RIGHTS AND GROUNDWATER EVALUATION DATA prepared by Eileen H. Embid Steven T. Finch, Jr., CPG JOHN SHOMAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water Resource and Environmental Consultants 2611 Broadbent Parkway NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107 505-345-3407 prepared for White Sands National Monument New Mexico November 2011 WHITE SANDS NATIONAL MONUMENT INVENTORY OF WATER RIGHTS AND GROUNDWATER EVALUATION DATA prepared by Eileen H. Embid Steven T. Finch, Jr., CPG JOHN SHOMAKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water Resource and Environmental Consultants 2611 Broadbent Parkway NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107 505-345-3407 www.shomaker.com prepared for White Sands National Monument New Mexico November 2011 JSAI ii CONTENTS page 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 WELL AND WATER-LEVEL INVENTORY.................................................................... 2 2.1 Water-Rights Records ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Well and Water-Level Data.............................................................................................. 4 2.2 Spring Data....................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 DATABASE......................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Database Structure...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • White Sands National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science White Sands National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2012/585 ON THE COVER White Sands National Monument contains a portion of the largest gypsum dune field in the world. At sunset, the white, gypsum sand appears pink and purple as the sun sets over the San Andres Mountains. Photograph by Katie KellerLynn (Colorado State University). THIS PAGE Modern-day Lake Lucero is a large playa (ephemeral lake) that formed in the sediments of ancient Lake Otero. When the playa is covered with water, waves along the shoreline break down the sediments, making them available for eolian transport to the dune field. Photograph by Anna Szykiewicz (University of Texas at El Paso). White Sands National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2012/585 National Park Service Geologic Resources Division PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 October 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunes and Dreams: a History of White Sands National Monument
    Dunes and Dreams: A History of White Sands National Monument Administrative History White Sands National Monument by Michael Welsh 1995 National Park Service Division of History Intermountain Cultural Resources Center Santa Fe, New Mexico Professional Paper No. 55 Table of Contents List of Illustrations Acknowledgements Foreword Chapter One: A Monument in Waiting: Environment and Ethnicity in the Tularosa Basin Chapter Two: The Politics of Monument-Building: White Sands, 1898-1933 Chapter Three: New Deal, New Monument, New Mexico, 1933-1939 Chapter Four: Global War at White Sands, 1940-1945 Chapter Five: Baby Boom, Sunbelt Boom, Sonic Boom: The Dunes in the Cold War Era, 1945- 1970 Chapter Six: A Brave New World: White Sands and the Close of the 20th Century, 1970-1994 Bibliography List of Illustrations Figure 1. Dune Pedestal Figure 2. Selenite crystal formation at Lake Lucero Figure 3. Cave formation, Lake Lucero Figure 4. Cactus growth Figure 5. Desert lizard Figure 6. Visitors to White Sands Dunes (1904) Figure 7. Frank and Hazel Ridinger's White Sands Motel (1930s) Figure 8. Roadside sign for White Sands west of Alamogordo (1930) Figure 9. Early registration booth (restroom in background) (1930s) Figure 10. Grinding stone unearthed at Blazer's Mill on Mescalero Apache Reservation (1930s) Figure 11. Nineteenth-Century Spanish carreta and replica in Visitors Center Courtyard (1930s) Figure 12. Pouring gypsum for road shoulder construction (1930s) Figure 13. Blading gypsum road into the heart of the sands (1930s) Figure 14. Hazards of road grading (1930s) Figure 15. Adobe style of construction by New Deal Agency Work Crews (1930s) Figure 16.
    [Show full text]
  • White Sands NM: Dunes and Dreams
    White Sands NM: Dunes and Dreams White Sands Administrative History Dunes and Dreams: A History of White Sands National Monument Michael Welsh 1995 Administrative History White Sands National Monument National Park Service Division of History Intermountain Cultural Resources Center Santa Fe, New Mexico Professional Paper No. 55 TABLE OF CONTENTS whsa/adhi/adhi.htm Last Updated: 22-Jan-2001 file:///C|/Web/WHSA/InDepthmaterials/adhi/adhi.htm [9/7/2007 10:04:09 AM] White Sands NM: An Administrative History (Table of Contents) White Sands Administrative History TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations Acknowledgements Foreword Chapter One: A Monument in Waiting: Environment and Ethnicity in the Tularosa Basin Chapter Two: The Politics of Monument-Building: White Sands, 1898-1933 Chapter Three: New Deal, New Monument, New Mexico, 1933-1939 Chapter Four: Global War at White Sands, 1940-1945 Chapter Five: Baby Boom, Sunbelt Boom, Sonic Boom: The Dunes in the Cold War Era, 1945-1970 Chapter Six: A Brave New World: White Sands and the Close of the 20th Century, 1970-1994 Bibliography LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS file:///C|/Web/WHSA/InDepthmaterials/adhi/adhit.htm (1 of 3) [9/7/2007 10:04:10 AM] White Sands NM: An Administrative History (Table of Contents) Figure 1. Dune Pedestal Figure 2. Selenite crystal formation at Lake Lucero Figure 3. Cave formation, Lake Lucero Figure 4. Cactus growth Figure 5. Desert lizard Figure 6. Visitors to White Sands Dunes (1904) Figure 7. Frank and Hazel Ridinger's White Sands Motel (1930s) Figure 8. Roadside sign for White Sands west of Alamogordo (1930) Figure 9.
    [Show full text]
  • White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico Volume 1
    Final Environmental Impact Statement for Development and Implementation of Range-Wide Mission and Major Capabilities at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico Volume 1 NOVEMBER 2009 This page intentionally left blank Final EIS for Development and Implementation of Range-Wide Mission and Major Capabilities at WSMR November 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS S. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ S-1 S.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ S-1 S.1.1 Proposed Action ........................................................................................................ S-1 S.2 WSMR Mission and Geographic Setting ............................................................................... S-2 S.3 Alternatives ............................................................................................................................ S-3 S.3.1 No Action Alternative ............................................................................................... S-3 S.3.2 Alternative 1, Implement Land Use Changes and Enhanced Test Capabilities ................................................................................................................ S-8 S.3.3 Alternative 2, Implement Alternative 1 Plus Military Unit Stationing and Training Capability...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Resources Foundation Report White Sands National Monument
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Physical Resources Foundation Report White Sands National Monument Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/NRR—2009/166 ON THE COVER Barchan dunes of White Sands National Monument as seen from the air. Photograph courtesy of White Sands National Monument Physical Resources Foundation Report White Sands National Monument Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/NRR —2009/166 Jeffery Bennett Big Bend National Park P.O. Box 129 Big Bend National Park, TX, 79830 (prepared water resources sections in report) Douglas Wilder NPS Midwest Region Geospatial Support Center 120 Russell Labs 1630 Linden Drive Madison, WI 53706 (prepared geologic resources sections in report) November 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Paleontological Resources from National Park Service Areas in New Mexico Vincent L
    Lucas, S. G. and Sullivan, R. M., eds. , 2014, Fossil Vertebrates of NM. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 64. 1 VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES FROM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AREAS IN NEW MEXICO VINCENT L. SANTUCCI1, JUSTIN TWEET2, DAVID BUSTOS3, JIM VON HADEN4 AND PHILLIP VARELA4 1National Park Service, Geologic Resources Division, 1201 Eye Street, Washington, D.C. 20005, [email protected]; 2Tweet Paleo-Consulting, 9149 79th St. S., Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016, [email protected];3White Sands National Monument, Alamogordo, New Mexico, 88330, [email protected]; 4Chaco Culture National Historical Park, 1808 County Rd 7950, Nageezi, New Mexico 87037, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—Vertebrate paleontological resources are well documented from three National Park Service areas in New Mexico. Baseline paleontological resource inventories undertaken at Carlsbad Caverns National Park, Chaco Culture National Historical Park and White Sands National Monument have yielded important information on each park’s vertebrate fossil record. Late Cretaceous marine and terrestrial vertebrates are preserved at Chaco Culture National Historical Park. Important assemblages of Pleistocene and Holocene vertebrate fossils are well documented from caves at Carlsbad Caverns National Park. An extensive Late Pleistocene megatracksite, consisting of thousands of vertebrate ichnofossils, has been documented in and around White Sands National Monument. A fourth NPS unit, Salinas Pueblo Missions National Monument, may have yielded mammoth remains, but the report is equivocal. INTRODUCTION The vertebrate paleontological resources in the national parks and monuments of New Mexico shed light on the fossil record of the American Southwest. Fossils are recognized as non-renewable resources that possess both scientific and educational values.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneath the Gypsum Dunes: Cenozoic History of Wind and Water from a Core Drilled at White Sands, New Mexico
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2019 Beneath the Gypsum Dunes: Cenozoic History of Wind and Water from a Core Drilled at White Sands, New Mexico Jackson Bentley Jakeway West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, Sedimentology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation Jakeway, Jackson Bentley, "Beneath the Gypsum Dunes: Cenozoic History of Wind and Water from a Core Drilled at White Sands, New Mexico" (2019). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4083. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4083 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Beneath the Gypsum Dunes: Cenozoic History of Wind and Water from a Core Drilled at White Sands, New Mexico Jackson Bentley Jakeway Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University Master of Science in Geology Kathleen Benison, Ph.D., Chair Joe Donovan, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • White Sands National Monument Natural Resource Condition Assessment
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science White Sands National Monument Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/WHSA/NRR—2017/1508 ON THE COVER Photograph of the rolling transverse barchan dune field in White Sands National Monument Photograph by Kathy Allen, SMUMN GSS White Sands National Monument Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/WHSA/NRR—2017/1508 Andy J. Nadeau Kathy Allen Kevin Benck Anna M. Davis Hannah Hutchins Sarah Gardner Shannon Amberg Andrew Robertson GeoSpatial Services Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 890 Prairie Island Road Winona, Minnesota 55987 September 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Oterocompplan Draft 0720-Web
    OTERO COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 2020 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT July 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Comprehensive Planning update process began in December 2019 and will be finalized in 2020. County Manager Pamela Heltner County Commissioners Commissioner Gerald Matherly, District 1 Commissioner Couy Griffin, District 2 Commissioner Lori Bies, District 3 Advisory Committee Laurie Anderson, Otero County Economic Development Council Director Richard Boss, City of Alamogordo Mayor Steve Boyle, County Assessor Randall Chavez, Lincoln National Forest Sacramento District Ranger Nathan Fuchs, Natural Resources Conservation Services Conservationist Sid Gordon, Otero County Extension Office Ag Agent René Hatfield, Otero County Economic Development Council GB Oliver, Alamogordo Chamber of Commerce Director Board Member Stella Rael, City of Alamogordo Planner Gary Scarbrough, Public Land Use Advisory Committee Chairman Margaret Trujillo, Village of Tularosa Mayor Dave Venable, Village of Cloudcroft Mayor Thank you to all the community members and stakeholders who provided ideas and input! Prepared by: Sites Southwest, LLC Phyllis Taylor, AICP Rosemary Dudley, AICP Madeline Sexton Michael Wright TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1-1 Otero County Profile 2-1 Historic and Cultural Resources 3-1 Natural Resources 4-1 Public Land and Resource Management 5-1 Private Land Use 6-1 Housing 7-1 Economic Development 8-1 Community Facilities and Services 9-1 Infrastructure 10-1 Transportation 11-1 Hazard Mitigation 12-1 Implementation 13-1 Introduction Otero County’s population and economy is growing. Home to the country’s newest National Park—White Sands, the expanding Holloman Air Force Base, the majestic Sacramento Mountains and Lincoln National Forest, and the unique fauna and flora found within, Otero County has ample attractions that are drawing new residents, companies, and jobs that are providing its younger generations opportunities to stay and raise their children.
    [Show full text]
  • White Sands National Park NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
    White Sands National Park NATIONAL PARK SERVICE America's newest national park (as of December 2019), White Sands 221 is famous for its extensive sea of white gypsum dunes—indeed, it is the largest gypsum dune field in the world. Located in the southern OPPOSITE: Gypsum dunes and Tularosa Basin, the park was established as a national monument grasses in interdune flats with the San Andres and Organ mountains in 1933 and encompasses nearly 176,000 acres (275 square miles, in the background. including 115 square miles of gypsum sand dunes). The park not only contains the large dune field but also a saline mudflat called Alkali Flat, a smaller ephemeral salt lake (or playa) named Lake Lucero, parts of the gypsum-dust plains east of the dune field, and alluvial fans from the surrounding mountains. The dune field and Alkali Flat extend more than 12 miles to the north of the park onto the White Sands Missile Range. Six major factors account for the exceptional accumulation of gypsum sand in this area: 1. The area has internal drainage (there is no surface exit from the basin for water). In this respect, the basin is similar to the evaporitic Great Salt Lake of Utah. 2. The area has a prolific source of calcium sulfate (gypsum) from Permian rocks found in nearby mountains, especially to the north, as well as from equivalent rocks present beneath the Tularosa Basin. Those older gypsum deposits (mainly in the Yeso and San Andres formations) are easily dissolved and transported by surface and ground- water into the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Assessment of Paleoseismicity at White Sands
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary assessment of paleoseismicity at White Sands Missile Range, southern New Mexico: Evidence for recency of faulting, fault segmentation, and repeat intervals for major earthquakes in the region By Michael N. Machette Open-File Report Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Experimental Waterways Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature U.S. Geological Survey Denver, CO 80225 1987 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction............................................................. 1 Geologic setting of White Sands Missile Range............................ 1 Methods for determining times of faulting................................ 5 Strati graphic control............................................... 5 Fault-scarp morphology.............................................. 6 Scarp nomenclature and measurement of scarp profiles........... 7 Relation between maximum scarp-slope angle and scarp height.... 9 Compound fault scarps.......................................... 11 Discussion of prominent faults near White Sands Missile Range............ 14 San Andres Mountains fault.......................................... 15 Organ Mountains fault............................................... 24 East Franklin Mountains fault....................................... 27 Alamogordo fault.................................................... 30 Intrabasin faults..................................................
    [Show full text]