Experimental Evaluation of Distortion in Amplitude Modulation Techniques for Parametric Loudspeakers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Experimental Evaluation of Distortion in Amplitude Modulation Techniques for Parametric Loudspeakers applied sciences Article Experimental Evaluation of Distortion in Amplitude Modulation Techniques for Parametric Loudspeakers Ricardo San Martín 1,* , Pablo Tello 1, Ana Valencia 1 and Asier Marzo 2 1 Acoustics Group, Institute for Advanced Materials and Mathematics—INAMAT, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain; [email protected] (P.T.); [email protected] (A.V.) 2 UpnaLab, Institute of Smart Cities—ISC, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 February 2020; Accepted: 16 March 2020; Published: 19 March 2020 Abstract: Parametric loudspeakers can generate a highly directional beam of sound, having applications in targeted audio delivery. Audible sound modulated into an ultrasonic carrier will get self-demodulated along the highly directive beam due to the non-linearity of air. This non-linear demodularization should be compensated to reduce audio distortion, different amplitude modulation techniques have been developed during the last years. However, some studies are only theoretical whereas others do not analyze the audio distortion in depth. Here, we present a detailed experimental evaluation of the frequency response, harmonic distortion and intermodulation distortion for various amplitude modulation techniques applied with different indices of modulation. We used a simple method to measure the audible signal that prevents the saturation of the microphones when the high levels of the ultrasonic carrier are present. This work could be useful for selecting predistortion techniques and indices of modulation for regular parametric arrays. Keywords: parametric arrays; predistortion techniques; amplitude modulation; directional speakers; harmonic distortion; intermodulation distortion 1. Introduction Parametric loudspeakers exploit the non-linear behavior of acoustic waves travelling through air to generate audible sound along a highly directive path due to the self-demodulation property of finite-amplitude ultrasonic waves [1]. The audible components are more directional than sounds produced by conventional loudspeakers, hence they can find application in contexts where audio must be targeted precisely in space. The directional nature of parametric speakers has been used for directing users towards specific objects [2], and a hand-held directional speaker was used to provide targeted information about the objects pointed by the user [3]. Additionally, sound landscapes in which the audience receives sound stimuli from specific locations can be created with directional speakers [4]. In general, directional speakers enable the targeted delivery of audio for applications in advertising, dual-language systems or notifications [5]. In 1963, Westervelt [6] theoretically described the generation of difference frequency waves from two high-frequency collimated beams referred to as primary waves. Berktay [7] extended this approach and evaluated some possible applications in underwater acoustic transmission. His analysis was not limited to two primary waves and could be applied to a single self-demodulated primary wave. If the primary wave p1 is a generic carrier modulated in amplitude such that: p1(t) = E(t)P0sin!ct, (1) Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2070; doi:10.3390/app10062070 www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 11 Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2070 2 of 11 1 where and ω are the amplitude and the angular frequency of the carrier, and () is the 2 envelope function, then Berktay’s farfield solution predicts a self-demodulated wave where P0 and !c are the amplitude and the angular frequency of the carrier, and E(t) is the envelope 3 proportional to the second time derivative of the square of the modulation envelope: function, then Berktay’s farfield solution predicts a self-demodulated wave p2 proportional to the second time derivative of the square of() the∝ modulation ∂ ()/∂ envelope:, (2) 4 2 2 2 2 5 This dependence implies that the self-demodulatedp (t) P @ E (wavet)/@t (,) is not linear to () and that it will (2) 2 / 0 6 suffer from high levels of distortion due to the generated harmonics and a strong low-pass 7 Thisequalization. dependence implies that the self-demodulated wave (p2) is not linear to E(t) and that it will suffer 8 fromVarious high levels preprocessing of distortion techniques due to the generatedhave been harmonics developed and to areduce strong distortion low-pass equalization. using different 9 modulationsVarious preprocessingof the envelope techniques (). Existing have experimental been developed measuremen to reducets [8-10] distortion are mostly using dibasedfferent on 10 modulationsthe total harmonic of the distortion envelope Eor(t )at. Existingcertain repr experimentalesentative measurementsfrequencies, which [8–10 may] are not mostly completely based 11 oncapture the total the harmonicnon-linear distortion response orof atthe certain speakers. representative Here, we frequencies,present an extensive which may comparison not completely of the 12 capturedifferent the amplitude non-linear modulation response oftechniques the speakers. under Here, various we modulation present an extensiveindices in comparisonterms of frequency of the 13 diresponse,fferent amplitude harmonic modulation distortion techniques and intermodul under variousation modulationdistortion. indicesThis instudy terms analyzes of frequency the 14 response,intermodulation harmonic distortion distortion and and the intermodulation harmonics dist distortion.ortions of This the study different analyzes amplitude the intermodulation modulation 15 distortiontechniques and for the various harmonics modulation distortions indices. of the Furthermore, different amplitude the analysis modulation is split by techniques order. To for avoid various the 16 modulationpresence of indices.spurious Furthermore, signal in the the measurem analysis isents, split byour order. method To avoidpreviously the presence selects ofa spuriousdynamic 17 signalmicrophone in the with measurements, limited frequency our method response. previously selects a dynamic microphone with limited 18 frequencyIn the response. Material and Methods section we describe: the experimental setup, the measurement 19 procedure,In the Sectionthe method2 we describe: employed the to experimental measure audi setup,ble thesound measurement in the presence procedure, of high-levels the method of 20 employedultrasonic tocarrier measure and audiblethe evaluated sound amplitude in the presence modulation of high-levels techniques. of ultrasonicIn the results carrier section, and thewe 21 evaluatedreport and amplitude analyze the modulation response techniques.and distortion In the of Sectionthe different3, we reportmodulation and analyze techniques the response and indices. and 22 distortionWe conclude of the by di summarizingfferent modulation the results techniques and their and potential indices. Weimplications. conclude by summarizing the results and their potential implications. 23 2. Materials and Methods 2. Materials and Methods 24 2.1. Experimental Setup 2.1. Experimental Setup 25 A PC (Intel Xeon with 16Gb of RAM, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, California, USA) was A PC (Intel Xeon with 16Gb of RAM, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, California, USA) was connected 26 connected to the audio output card (Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, Focusrite plc. High Wycombe, to the audio output card (Focusrite Scarlett 18i20, Focusrite plc. High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, 27 Buckinghamshire, England) for general audio input/output. For emitting audible sound, the card England) for general audio input/output. For emitting audible sound, the card output was connected 28 output was connected to an auto-amplified monitor (Neumann KH120A, Georg Neumann GmbH, to an auto-amplified monitor (Neumann KH120A, Georg Neumann GmbH, Berlin, Germany). For the 29 Berlin, Germany). For the ultrasonic output, the card was connected into an amplifier (Akozon DC12- ultrasonic output, the card was connected into an amplifier (Akozon DC12-24V 2 100 W power 30 24V 2 × 100 W power amplifier, 14-100 KHz, Akozon, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China)× and then into a amplifier, 14-100 KHz, Akozon, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China) and then into a parametric array shown 31 parametric array shown in Figure 1 (array SSCI-018425 made of 49 transducers, Switch Science Inc., in Figure1 (array SSCI-018425 made of 49 transducers, Switch Science Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The largest 32 Tokyo, Japan). The largest output voltage amplitude of the amplifier was 24 Vpp, which was output voltage amplitude of the amplifier was 24 Vpp, which was sufficient and within the normal 33 sufficient and within the normal operating voltage of the transducers forming the array. operating voltage of the transducers forming the array. 34 35 FigureFigure 1.1. UltrasonicUltrasonic arrayarray employedemployed forfor thethe parametricparametric speakerspeaker mademade ofof 4949 ultrasonicultrasonic transducerstransducers ofof 36 1616 mmmm diameter.diameter. 37 ForFor receivingreceiving audio,audio, aa microphonemicrophone (di(differentfferent modelsmodels werewere employed)employed) waswas placedplaced 22 metersmeters awayaway 38 fromfrom thethe sound source. source. Except Except for for the the GRAS GRAS microphone, microphone, which which needed needed the Norsonic the Norsonic type 335 type front- 335 39 front-endend for signal for signal conditioning, conditioning, the microphones the microphones were weredirectly directly connected connected
Recommended publications
  • Glossary Physics (I-Introduction)
    1 Glossary Physics (I-introduction) - Efficiency: The percent of the work put into a machine that is converted into useful work output; = work done / energy used [-]. = eta In machines: The work output of any machine cannot exceed the work input (<=100%); in an ideal machine, where no energy is transformed into heat: work(input) = work(output), =100%. Energy: The property of a system that enables it to do work. Conservation o. E.: Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it may be transformed from one form into another, but the total amount of energy never changes. Equilibrium: The state of an object when not acted upon by a net force or net torque; an object in equilibrium may be at rest or moving at uniform velocity - not accelerating. Mechanical E.: The state of an object or system of objects for which any impressed forces cancels to zero and no acceleration occurs. Dynamic E.: Object is moving without experiencing acceleration. Static E.: Object is at rest.F Force: The influence that can cause an object to be accelerated or retarded; is always in the direction of the net force, hence a vector quantity; the four elementary forces are: Electromagnetic F.: Is an attraction or repulsion G, gravit. const.6.672E-11[Nm2/kg2] between electric charges: d, distance [m] 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (q1q2/d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] m,M, mass [kg] Gravitational F.: Is a mutual attraction between all masses: q, charge [As] [C] 2 2 2 2 F = GmM/d [Nm /kg kg 1/m ] = [N] 0, dielectric constant Strong F.: (nuclear force) Acts within the nuclei of atoms: 8.854E-12 [C2/Nm2] [F/m] 2 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (e /d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] , 3.14 [-] Weak F.: Manifests itself in special reactions among elementary e, 1.60210 E-19 [As] [C] particles, such as the reaction that occur in radioactive decay.
    [Show full text]
  • RANDOM VIBRATION—AN OVERVIEW by Barry Controls, Hopkinton, MA
    RANDOM VIBRATION—AN OVERVIEW by Barry Controls, Hopkinton, MA ABSTRACT Random vibration is becoming increasingly recognized as the most realistic method of simulating the dynamic environment of military applications. Whereas the use of random vibration specifications was previously limited to particular missile applications, its use has been extended to areas in which sinusoidal vibration has historically predominated, including propeller driven aircraft and even moderate shipboard environments. These changes have evolved from the growing awareness that random motion is the rule, rather than the exception, and from advances in electronics which improve our ability to measure and duplicate complex dynamic environments. The purpose of this article is to present some fundamental concepts of random vibration which should be understood when designing a structure or an isolation system. INTRODUCTION Random vibration is somewhat of a misnomer. If the generally accepted meaning of the term "random" were applicable, it would not be possible to analyze a system subjected to "random" vibration. Furthermore, if this term were considered in the context of having no specific pattern (i.e., haphazard), it would not be possible to define a vibration environment, for the environment would vary in a totally unpredictable manner. Fortunately, this is not the case. The majority of random processes fall in a special category termed stationary. This means that the parameters by which random vibration is characterized do not change significantly when analyzed statistically over a given period of time - the RMS amplitude is constant with time. For instance, the vibration generated by a particular event, say, a missile launch, will be statistically similar whether the event is measured today or six months from today.
    [Show full text]
  • Loudspeaker FM and AM Distortion an 10
    Loudspeaker FM and AM Distortion AN 10 Application Note to the KLIPPEL R&D SYSTEM The amplitude modulation of a high frequency tone f1 (voice tone) and a low frequency tone f2 (bass tone) is measured by using the 3D Distortion Measurement module (DIS) of the KLIPPEL R&D SYSTEM. The maximal variation of the envelope of the voice tone f1 is represented by the top and bottom value referred to the averaged envelope. The amplitude modulation distortion (AMD) is the ratio between the rms value of the variation referred to the averaged value and is comparable to the modulation distortion Ld2 and Ld3 of the IEC standard 60268 provided that the loudspeaker generates pure amplitude modulation of second- or third-order. The measurement of amplitude modulation distortion (AMD) allows assessment of the effects of Bl(x) and Le(x) nonlinearity and radiation distortion due to pure amplitude modulation without Doppler effect. CONTENTS: 1 Method of Measurement ............................................................................................................................... 2 2 Checklist for dominant modulation distortion ............................................................................................... 3 3 Using the 3D distortion measurement (DIS) .................................................................................................. 4 4 Setup parameters for DIS Module .................................................................................................................. 4 5 Example .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oscillating Currents
    Oscillating Currents • Ch.30: Induced E Fields: Faraday’s Law • Ch.30: RL Circuits • Ch.31: Oscillations and AC Circuits Review: Inductance • If the current through a coil of wire changes, there is an induced emf proportional to the rate of change of the current. •Define the proportionality constant to be the inductance L : di εεε === −−−L dt • SI unit of inductance is the henry (H). LC Circuit Oscillations Suppose we try to discharge a capacitor, using an inductor instead of a resistor: At time t=0 the capacitor has maximum charge and the current is zero. Later, current is increasing and capacitor’s charge is decreasing Oscillations (cont’d) What happens when q=0? Does I=0 also? No, because inductor does not allow sudden changes. In fact, q = 0 means i = maximum! So now, charge starts to build up on C again, but in the opposite direction! Textbook Figure 31-1 Energy is moving back and forth between C,L 1 2 1 2 UL === UB === 2 Li UC === UE === 2 q / C Textbook Figure 31-1 Mechanical Analogy • Looks like SHM (Ch. 15) Mass on spring. • Variable q is like x, distortion of spring. • Then i=dq/dt , like v=dx/dt , velocity of mass. By analogy with SHM, we can guess that q === Q cos(ωωω t) dq i === === −−−ωωωQ sin(ωωω t) dt Look at Guessed Solution dq q === Q cos(ωωω t) i === === −−−ωωωQ sin(ωωω t) dt q i Mathematical description of oscillations Note essential terminology: amplitude, phase, frequency, period, angular frequency. You MUST know what these words mean! If necessary review Chapters 10, 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Amplifier Frequency Response
    EE105 – Fall 2015 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits Prof. Ming C. Wu [email protected] 511 Sutardja Dai Hall (SDH) 2-1 Amplifier Gain vO Voltage Gain: Av = vI iO Current Gain: Ai = iI load power vOiO Power Gain: Ap = = input power vIiI Note: Ap = Av Ai Note: Av and Ai can be positive, negative, or even complex numbers. Nagative gain means the output is 180° out of phase with input. However, power gain should always be a positive number. Gain is usually expressed in Decibel (dB): 2 Av (dB) =10log Av = 20log Av 2 Ai (dB) =10log Ai = 20log Ai Ap (dB) =10log Ap 2-2 1 Amplifier Power Supply and Dissipation • Circuit needs dc power supplies (e.g., battery) to function. • Typical power supplies are designated VCC (more positive voltage supply) and -VEE (more negative supply). • Total dc power dissipation of the amplifier Pdc = VCC ICC +VEE IEE • Power balance equation Pdc + PI = PL + Pdissipated PI : power drawn from signal source PL : power delivered to the load (useful power) Pdissipated : power dissipated in the amplifier circuit (not counting load) P • Amplifier power efficiency η = L Pdc Power efficiency is important for "power amplifiers" such as output amplifiers for speakers or wireless transmitters. 2-3 Amplifier Saturation • Amplifier transfer characteristics is linear only over a limited range of input and output voltages • Beyond linear range, the output voltage (or current) waveforms saturates, resulting in distortions – Lose fidelity in stereo – Cause interference in wireless system 2-4 2 Symbol Convention iC (t) = IC +ic (t) iC (t) : total instantaneous current IC : dc current ic (t) : small signal current Usually ic (t) = Ic sinωt Please note case of the symbol: lowercase-uppercase: total current lowercase-lowercase: small signal ac component uppercase-uppercase: dc component uppercase-lowercase: amplitude of ac component Similarly for voltage expressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Distortion: Consequences of Data Cleaning
    Statistical Distortion: Consequences of Data Cleaning Tamraparni Dasu Ji Meng Loh AT&T Labs Research AT&T Labs Research 180 Park Avenue 180 Park Avenue Florham Park, NJ 07932 Florham Park, NJ 07932 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT There is considerable research in the database community We introduce the notion of statistical distortion as an essen- on varied aspects of data quality, data repair and data clean- tial metric for measuring the effectiveness of data cleaning ing. Recent work includes the use of machine learning for strategies. We use this metric to propose a widely applica- guiding database repair [14]; inferring and imputing miss- ble yet scalable experimental framework for evaluating data ing values in databases [10] ; resolving inconsistencies using cleaning strategies along three dimensions: glitch improve- functional dependencies [6]; and for data fusion [8]. ment, statistical distortion and cost-related criteria. Exist- From an enterprise perspective, data and information qual- ing metrics focus on glitch improvement and cost, but not ity assessment has been an active area of research as well. on the statistical impact of data cleaning strategies. We The paper [12] describes subjective and objective measures illustrate our framework on real world data, with a compre- for assessing the quality of a corporation’s data. An overview hensive suite of experiments and analyses. of well known data quality techniques and their comparative uses and benefits is provided in [2]. A DIMACS/CICCADA 1 workshop on data quality metrics featured a mix of speak- 1. INTRODUCTION ers from database and statistics communities. It covered a Measuring effectiveness of data cleaning strategies is al- wide array of topics from schema mapping, graphs, detailed most as difficult as devising cleaning strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Additive Synthesis, Amplitude Modulation and Frequency Modulation
    Additive Synthesis, Amplitude Modulation and Frequency Modulation Prof Eduardo R Miranda Varèse-Gastprofessor [email protected] Electronic Music Studio TU Berlin Institute of Communications Research http://www.kgw.tu-berlin.de/ Topics: Additive Synthesis Amplitude Modulation (and Ring Modulation) Frequency Modulation Additive Synthesis • The technique assumes that any periodic waveform can be modelled as a sum sinusoids at various amplitude envelopes and time-varying frequencies. • Works by summing up individually generated sinusoids in order to form a specific sound. Additive Synthesis eg21 Additive Synthesis eg24 • A very powerful and flexible technique. • But it is difficult to control manually and is computationally expensive. • Musical timbres: composed of dozens of time-varying partials. • It requires dozens of oscillators, noise generators and envelopes to obtain convincing simulations of acoustic sounds. • The specification and control of the parameter values for these components are difficult and time consuming. • Alternative approach: tools to obtain the synthesis parameters automatically from the analysis of the spectrum of sampled sounds. Amplitude Modulation • Modulation occurs when some aspect of an audio signal (carrier) varies according to the behaviour of another signal (modulator). • AM = when a modulator drives the amplitude of a carrier. • Simple AM: uses only 2 sinewave oscillators. eg23 • Complex AM: may involve more than 2 signals; or signals other than sinewaves may be employed as carriers and/or modulators. • Two types of AM: a) Classic AM b) Ring Modulation Classic AM • The output from the modulator is added to an offset amplitude value. • If there is no modulation, then the amplitude of the carrier will be equal to the offset.
    [Show full text]
  • En 300 720 V2.1.0 (2015-12)
    Draft ETSI EN 300 720 V2.1.0 (2015-12) HARMONISED EUROPEAN STANDARD Ultra-High Frequency (UHF) on-board vessels communications systems and equipment; Harmonised Standard covering the essential requirements of article 3.2 of the Directive 2014/53/EU 2 Draft ETSI EN 300 720 V2.1.0 (2015-12) Reference REN/ERM-TG26-136 Keywords Harmonised Standard, maritime, radio, UHF ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88 Important notice The present document can be downloaded from: http://www.etsi.org/standards-search The present document may be made available in electronic versions and/or in print. The content of any electronic and/or print versions of the present document shall not be modified without the prior written authorization of ETSI. In case of any existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions and/or in print, the only prevailing document is the print of the Portable Document Format (PDF) version kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at http://portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services: https://portal.etsi.org/People/CommiteeSupportStaff.aspx Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm except as authorized by written permission of ETSI.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequency Response and Bode Plots
    1 Frequency Response and Bode Plots 1.1 Preliminaries The steady-state sinusoidal frequency-response of a circuit is described by the phasor transfer function Hj( ) . A Bode plot is a graph of the magnitude (in dB) or phase of the transfer function versus frequency. Of course we can easily program the transfer function into a computer to make such plots, and for very complicated transfer functions this may be our only recourse. But in many cases the key features of the plot can be quickly sketched by hand using some simple rules that identify the impact of the poles and zeroes in shaping the frequency response. The advantage of this approach is the insight it provides on how the circuit elements influence the frequency response. This is especially important in the design of frequency-selective circuits. We will first consider how to generate Bode plots for simple poles, and then discuss how to handle the general second-order response. Before doing this, however, it may be helpful to review some properties of transfer functions, the decibel scale, and properties of the log function. Poles, Zeroes, and Stability The s-domain transfer function is always a rational polynomial function of the form Ns() smm as12 a s m asa Hs() K K mm12 10 (1.1) nn12 n Ds() s bsnn12 b s bsb 10 As we have seen already, the polynomials in the numerator and denominator are factored to find the poles and zeroes; these are the values of s that make the numerator or denominator zero. If we write the zeroes as zz123,, zetc., and similarly write the poles as pp123,, p , then Hs( ) can be written in factored form as ()()()s zsz sz Hs() K 12 m (1.2) ()()()s psp12 sp n 1 © Bob York 2009 2 Frequency Response and Bode Plots The pole and zero locations can be real or complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Audio Test Methods and Measurements for End-Of-Line Loudspeaker Quality Control
    Evaluation of audio test methods and measurements for end-of-line loudspeaker quality control Steve Temme1 and Viktor Dobos2 (1. Listen, Inc., Boston, MA, 02118, USA. [email protected]; 2. Harman/Becker Automotive Systems Kft., H-8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary) ABSTRACT In order to minimize costly warranty repairs, loudspeaker OEMS impose tight specifications and a “total quality” requirement on their part suppliers. At the same time, they also require low prices. This makes it important for driver manufacturers and contract manufacturers to work with their OEM customers to define reasonable specifications and tolerances. They must understand both how the loudspeaker OEMS are testing as part of their incoming QC and also how to implement their own end-of-line measurements to ensure correlation between the two. Specifying and testing loudspeakers can be tricky since loudspeakers are inherently nonlinear, time-variant and effected by their working conditions & environment. This paper examines the loudspeaker characteristics that can be measured, and discusses common pitfalls and how to avoid them on a loudspeaker production line. Several different audio test methods and measurements for end-of- the-line speaker quality control are evaluated, and the most relevant ones identified. Speed, statistics, and full traceability are also discussed. Keywords: end of line loudspeaker testing, frequency response, distortion, Rub & Buzz, limits INTRODUCTION In order to guarantee quality while keeping testing fast and accurate, it is important for audio manufacturers to perform only those tests which will easily identify out-of-specification products, and omit those which do not provide additional information that directly pertains to the quality of the product or its likelihood of failure.
    [Show full text]
  • DTV Interference Rejection Thresholds Are Shown on the Plot As a Reference
    Interference Rejection Thresholds of Consumer Digital Television Receivers Available in 2005 and 2006 March 30, 2007 Technical Research Branch Laboratory Division Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission OET Report Prepared by: FCC/OET 07-TR-1003 Stephen R. Martin ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author gratefully acknowledges the following contributions to this work. Mark Hryszko of the Digital Television group of Advanced Micro Devices provided the “Muddy Waters” RF vector file (mathematically derived from an MPEG2 transport stream) that was used with the Wavetech WS2100 RF player to provide a “desired signal” for the final few tests performed for this report. John Gabrysch of the Commission’s Media Bureau set up and evaluated the performance of the Rohde and Schwarz SFU DTV signal generator and developed channel assignment files for the instrument. The work of Charles Rhodes on third-order intermodulation inspired the paired-signal tests in this project. Gary Sgrignoli of MSW provided a fast-track DTV education to prepare the author for the prequel to this project. The author thanks the following Commission employees for reviewing drafts of this document: Alan Stillwell, Rashmi Doshi, and William Hurst (Office of Engineering and Technology); Doug Miller, John Raymond, and Steve DeSena (Enforcement Bureau); Richard Engelman and Sankar Persaud (International Bureau). The author also acknowledges the support of wife, Dr. Bonnie Dorr, through many long hours spent completing this work. i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Characteristics of Distortion Radiated from Antenna Arrays with Transceiver Nonlinearities Christopher Mollen,´ Ulf Gustavsson, Thomas Eriksson, Erik G
    1 Spatial Characteristics of Distortion Radiated from Antenna Arrays with Transceiver Nonlinearities Christopher Mollen,´ Ulf Gustavsson, Thomas Eriksson, Erik G. Larsson Abstract—The distortion from massive MIMO (multiple-input– paper is to give a rigorous description of the distortion created multiple-output) base stations with nonlinear amplifiers is studied by nonlinear hardware in multi-antenna transmitters, and to and its radiation pattern is derived. The distortion is analyzed quantify to which degree the distortion combines coherently. both in-band and out-of-band. By using an orthogonal Her- mite representation of the amplified signal, the spatial cross- The contribution of this paper is to give a rigorous correlation matrix of the nonlinear distortion is obtained. It continuous-time system model of a multi-antenna transmitter shows that, if the input signal to the amplifiers has a dominant for both single-carrier and OFDM (orthogonal frequency- beam, the distortion is beamformed in the same way as that beam. division multiplexing) transmission that uses digital precoding When there are multiple beams without any one being dominant, to beamform to multiple users. Orthogonal polynomials are it is shown that the distortion is practically isotropic. The derived theory is useful to predict how the nonlinear distortion will used to partition the amplified transmit signal into a desired behave, to analyze the out-of-band radiation, to do reciprocity signal—the linearly amplified signal—and a distortion term calibration, and to schedule users in the frequency plane to that is uncorrelated from the desired signal in order to analyze minimize the effect of in-band distortion.
    [Show full text]