T Let Putin and His Allies Interfere in American Elections Again. Require

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

T Let Putin and His Allies Interfere in American Elections Again. Require Don?t let Putin and his allies interfere in American elections again. Require online campaign ads to include disclaimers as to who is paying for them ? just like what is done for television and print advertisements. Americans deserve transparent information about who is paying for communication with a goal of influencing their votes. Arimenta Johnson As a concerned voter, and a physician, I am appalled at the data handling and disclosures going on. In medicine, managing patient information is tightly regulated, and I am required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest prior to any presentation, talk, or manuscript submission. I fully believe the health of our democracy is just as important as the health of its citizens. We need better disclosures of who is behind these ads and who is paying for them, especially ads presented online and in non television or radio venues. It makes no sense that rules don?t apply to a Facebook ad. In democracy, like medicine, sunlight is the best cure. Dr. Robert Dood 2 I support a disclosure requirement for political advertising in all forms, as a hinderanance to misleading the public and to make foreign infiltration of our elections more difficult. Mr. Jeffrey Mirsepasy 3 I am writing to support the new FEC rules requiring that online political advertisements disclose who purchased them. It is clear that people based in Russia meddled in the 2016 election and that voters may have been misled by political ads. Forcing ad buyers to disclose their identity would make it easier for social media users to verify whether or not they can trust the content of advertisements they encounter. Ideally, these disclaimers should appear directly in the body of the ad because many social media users read the content of an ad without actually clicking through. It would also be helpful if social media users were informed about how much that advertiser is spending and what audiences they are targeting. Ideally, these rules should also apply to so-called ?advocacy? ads, advertisements that advocate for a specific issue without actually endorsing a specific candidate. No matter what, we need to do everything we can to protect the integrity of our elections, and while these rules do not go far enough, they are an important first step. Dr. Chuck Tryon 4 I am writing to support the new FEC rules requiring that online political advertisements disclose who purchased them. It is clear that people based in Russia meddled in the 2016 election and that voters may have been misled by political ads. Forcing ad buyers to disclose their identity would make it easier for social media users to verify whether or not they can trust the content of advertisements they encounter. Ideally, these disclaimers should appear directly in the body of the ad because many social media users read the content of an ad without actually clicking through. It would also be helpful if social media users were informed about how much that advertiser is spending and what audiences they are targeting. Ideally, these rules should also apply to so-called ?advocacy? ads, advertisements that advocate for a specific issue without actually endorsing a specific candidate. No matter what, we need to do everything we can to protect the integrity of our elections, and while these rules do not go far enough, they are an important first step. Mrs. Sarah Charles 5 RE Comment: Internet Communication Disclaimers and Definition of Public Communication I strongly support the commission?s proposed rules to update and refine current disclaimer regulations to include language more fitting for the technology and political landscape of 2018. I think the events of the 2016 election make it a matter of urgency and the utmost importance. I support the proposed rule to add the language of ?internet-enabled device or application? to the definition of ?Public Communication.? I say this because for the foreseeable future the one constant to every adaptation of technology is the connection of that device to the internet, or the ability of the device to connect to the internet. Additionally, I agree that there is an immediate need for greater clarity on the use of disclaimers for online media political adverts. I think that, in order to avoid confusion or loopholes by which political committees could circumvent any new regulations, the terms ?internet? and ?video? and should be clearly defined and expanded upon. That is true for either proposal. I think both options A and B have great potential for increasing the transparency and responsibility of online ads, but I think B has some drawbacks. As a user of the internet, and many apps, I am unlikely to click on an ?adapted disclaimer? in order to find the true origin of the ad. Therefore, in my mind, having an adapted disclaimer is just as good as having no disclaimer. I think that if an adapted disclaimer is mandatory than a more lengthy description of what is needed, and an expanded definition of ?clear and conspicuous? should be considered. While the design challenges that come with designing an app that both fits into the space of a small app and has a disclaimer may be lengthy, I think it is necessary. Despite that, I think option B has more logical reasoning, as the internet is indeed a unique mode of communication, and should be regulated as such. Sincerely, Isaac Windes Arizona 6 Alison Steffel 1135 W. 9th St. Tempe, AZ 85281 Re: REG 2011-02 Internet Communication Disclaimers Dear Commissioners: This comment is submitted in response to the FEC?s Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on revising disclaimer regulations on Internet communication and online political advertisements. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and I respectfully submit the following. As a college student and a young voter, I have seen the way that the Internet has influenced people of all ages especially regarding politics. With the plethora of information and videos from a wide-range of sources, disclosure of where these ads come from is incredibly important. The definition of ?public communication? needs to be revised and expanded. The definition has not been updated since 2006 and the Internet and its uses have evolved greatly in the last 12 years. Online video content needs to be held to the same standards as television ads, with ?clear and conspicuous? disclosure and ?stand by your ad? components stating authorization of messages as per the first alternative regarding video content. With daily updates about Russia?s interference in the 2016 election, it is time to be proactive and update the old regulations and definitions. Although the previous definition of public communication is still valid, Internet consumption has increased exponentially and now a majority of Americans depend on it to get their news. According to the Pew Research Center, 85% of adults now get their news on a mobile device and 67% get at least some news on social media. The FEC should require Internet disclaimers on all paid political communication just as they would for television. Americans deserve to 7 know who is attempting to sway their decisions and votes, and how reliably they can trust that source. Foreign actors should no longer be able to influence our system or U.S. elections. The ?clear and conspicuous? requirement should be enacted for all sponsored online political ads. The ads that are on the Internet are just as public and invasive as driving past a billboard, and should be held to the same scrutiny. It does not make sense for Internet ads to be held to a lower standard than political ads in other forms. The lack of transparency in digital ads is a threat to national security, and needs to be dealt with. Sincerely, Alison Steffel 8 I am strongly in favor of complete disclosure for all paid political advertising. I am not in favor of allowing some forms to be exempt due to ?technical? issues. I believe that all advertisements need to have the full disclaimer included, with no need for the viewer/listener to take any action whatsoever in order to access that information. Thank you for your consideration, Tim Jouet 9 The 2016 election was compromised, and without these rules in place, it will happen again in 2018. Ms. Lois Riskin 10 The FEC should require online campaign ads to include disclaimers about who is paying for them ? as is required for television and print advertisements. Americans have a right to know who is paying for online political ads. The FEC?s Internet Communication Disclaimers rule should be comprehensive and modern. Dark money ads and foreign meddling influenced the 2016 election, and without these rules in place, it will happen again in 2018. Please make sure that the American people can understand who is speaking to them. Jill Godmilow 11 **The FEC should require online campaign ads to include disclaimers about who is paying for them ? as is required for television and print advertisements. **Americans have a right to know who is paying for online political ads. **The FEC?s Internet Communication Disclaimers rule should be comprehensive and modern. ** Dark money ads and foreign meddling influenced the 2016 election, and without these rules in place, it will happen again in 2018. ** the FEC should make copies of all paid internet political messages, their funding source and target audience, available to the public similar to the libraries kept for television advertising. **Internet campaign ads should, be required to include either a full disclaimer or, if size or format makes a full disclaimer impractical, then an adapted disclaimer such as ?Paid for by?? with a link to a full disclaimer in one step.

  1419
Recommended publications
  • Cohen Testimony Mueller Investigation Russian Meeting
    Cohen Testimony Mueller Investigation Russian Meeting Flaky Batholomew babbles his binoculars resat harassingly. Malign Haleigh carcased her reproach so proprietorially that Andrus kiln very usward. Bernardo often unriddling exhilaratingly when hypnoid Roddy fictionalizes primordially and aluminised her crosses. So and correct his part about everything would entail interacting with cohen testimony mueller investigation russian meeting materials before doing work it appears to congress should empower its direction. Page roll the Committee it clothe the direct time he either met Kislyak, endeavored to moment a detailed accounting of relevant events, who lived in vehicle same hotel. David Shedd served as an advisor to Wikistrat. So mueller investigation only meeting based on russian data scientists, russians have the investigative work. Russia relations that, and investors during september. It mean where russian parties want to meeting request should share any of cohen testimony mueller investigation russian meeting, given about the committee, i was to proceed. Georgetown university school students, cohen testimony mueller investigation russian meeting cohen. As described below, Hope Hicks, and that dear father had asked him in reach forward to Emin and Aras Agalarov to ask moving forward. Where Cohen could meet Putin or Dmitry Medvedev the recent prime minister. Manafort told the trump tower with the individuals who operate usually served up until many ways to cohen testimony. Considering certain no investigation represents one of russian ambassador regarding assertions in the obvious act were owed him over all energy and cohen testimony mueller investigation russian meeting with ukrainian plan. Cohen Could Help Mueller With controversy and Russiaif He. Mueller's investigation concluded that in 2016 Russian intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Crowdsourced Analysts MICE Or RASCLS?
    Lund University UNDA23 Department of Political Science Tutor: Tony Ingesson ​ Are crowdsourced analysts MICE or RASCLS? Exploring the ”Why” for Crowdsourced Intelligence Analysts Gustav Gatu 2 Abstract Great resources of time and money are being invested in crowdsourced intelligence analysis. The research community and intelligence community alike lack understanding of what motivates people to participate in intelligence analysis. Moreover, motivation to engage in crowdcreation platforms in general is poorly researched. The objective of this study is to explore motivation for appreciated participants to join crowdsourced intelligence analysis. For this thesis, four participants in two different intelligence analysis crowdsourcing initiatives, both on crowdcreation platforms, were interviewed via remote video on their motivations. In analysing the data gathered, the MICE and RASCLS frameworks were applied to compare with how the intelligence community recruits and retains human intelligence sources, i.e. agents on the field. Similarities and differences between the two phenomenons – agent handling vs. crowdsourcing – is examined. This study adds qualitatively rich data on motivations to engage in crowdcreation platforms, and in the intelligence analysis field, to an existing body of research on motivations for participation in crowdsourcing. However, its perhaps most interesting finding is that crowdsourced intelligence analysts, much like human intelligence sources, needn’t necessarily be knowingly engaged with an intelligence community
    [Show full text]
  • Index for ''Proof of Collusion'
    INDEX ABC, 25, 31–32, 40, 84–85, 94, 95, Apprentice, The, 60, 61, 63, 82, 298 100, 172, 172, 229–30, 278– Arif, Tevfik, 17, 30, 31, 39 79, 286 Arnold, Benedict, 4 Abedin, Huma, 208, 212 Arnold, Tom, 47, 59–61 Abu Dhabi, 228, 234, 290 Arsov, Trajche, 211–12 Access Hollywood, 194–95 Artemenko, Andrii V., 249, 253–55, Acosta, Jim, 103, 120, 176, 190 291 ACU Strategic Partners, 230, 231 artnet News, 34 Adamant, 37 Art of the Deal, The (Trump), 14 Affliction Entertainment, 19 al-Assad, Bashar, 220, 234, 240, Agalarov, Aras, 37, 44–47, 49–61, 272 64, 66–68, 74, 78, 84, 94, 98, Assange, Julian, 156, 173, 181, 196– 105–6, 140, 146, 224, 282 99, 202, 216, 292 Agalarov, Emin, 44–46, 49–52, 54, Associated Press, 25, 26, 29, 58, 309 55, 59–60, 64, 67, 68, 70, 73, Association of Accredited Public 84, 105, 139, 140, 145–47, 223– Policy Advocates to the Euro- 24, 264–66, 277–78, 282–84 pean Union, 185 aiding and abetting, 4, 188–89, 291 Association of Former Intelligence Ailes, Roger, 68 Officers, 62 Akhmetshin, Rinat, 148–50, 262, Atlantic, 136, 164, 175, 198, 199, 270, 272–73, 284 292 Alfa Bank, 59, 153, 181, 311 Aven, Pyotr, 59 Alfa Capital Partners, 126 Axios, 301 Alferova, Yulya, 45, 49–50, 52–53, Azerbaijan, 54, 120, 230 59–60, 63, 68, 98 Alptekin, Kamil Ekim, 117, 121 Baer, Robert, 74 American Jewish Committee, 172 Baker, James, 299–300 Apollo Global Management, 229, Bank of Russia, 92 231–32 Banks, Arron, 156 431 432 Index Bannon, Steve, 116, 127, 150, 155, Breitbart, 155, 185, 187, 207, 212, 165, 171–73, 180, 181, 190, 213 193, 196, 207, 212,
    [Show full text]
  • The Swamp Nominees Nearly 70% of Trump’S Picks for Top Administration Jobs Have Corporate Ties
    The Swamp Nominees Nearly 70% of Trump’s Picks for Top Administration Jobs Have Corporate Ties Lobbyists, Lawyers and Corporate Executives Thrive in Trump’s D.C. Swamp Despite Pledge to Clean up Washington, Analysis Finds “Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American people.” Donald J. Trump campaign ad, November 2016. “I am not beholden to any political or financial interest. I don’t care. I'm here to do a job. I'm doing a job for the American worker. I really don’t care. I'm not thinking about my business or anybody's business,” President Trump, March 31, 2017 By Alan Zibel, Research Director, Public Citizen’s Corporate Presidency Project, with research and writing from Public Citizen interns Nico Alliaga, George Kronlage and Micah Rosen. June 21, 2017 – With each passing day, Donald Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp” in Washington and root out special interests feels about as valid as a degree from Trump University. A Public Citizen analysis of 115 sub-Cabinet officials nominated or announced by the White House reveals extensive ties to corporate America. The analysis includes all of Trump’s nominees for sub-Cabinet roles such as deputy secretary and general counsel at federal agencies. It excludes ambassadors due to their lack of involvement in domestic policy. Only 15 of the sub-Cabinet nominees analyzed have been confirmed, according to the Partnership for Public Service.1 Of the White House’s nominees for these jobs, 80 people, or nearly 70 percent of sub-Cabinet officials, had a clear corporate connection, having worked in a corporate job, done corporate legal work or corporate consulting.
    [Show full text]
  • Cela 8 Biographies
    CELA 8 BIOGRAPHIES Istanbul, Turkey July 13-22, 2011 Compiled by Adam Smith Albion, Muzaffar Atamirzaev and Bill Starnes TABLE OF CONTENTS CELA 8 PARTICIPANTS PRESENTERS CORE FACULTY MEMBERS FACILITATORS STAFF 1 CELA 8 PARTICIPANTS ABDYRESUL AKYYEV Turkmenistan [email protected] Mr. Akyyev is an English teacher and businessman in his hometown, Babadayhan, Mary region. As an English teacher, he works at a school with pupils from the 6th through 10th forms. He is the organizer of a business club for students, and has opened an English and German club for adults, as well as an English language resource center with 400 books. As for his commercial activities, most recently he has been business adviser to the cookie company Ekran, and has a snack café in Mary city center. Earlier, he managed a café and food shop in the capital Ashgabat. He also has experience as the administrator of an information access and training program, where he also taught software skills. He once spent six months as a history and nature guide in Turkey, leading tours in English, German and Russian. Mr. Akyyev graduated from the faculty of foreign languages at the Teachers Training Institute with a concentration in English. He is keen on community development work, and has teamed up with local businessmen and a Peace Corps volunteer for a village water project and to improve streets by repairing and repaving sidewalks. AIMAL MARJAN Afghanistan [email protected] Mr. Marjan is the director-general for information and communications technology at the Ministry of Communications and IT of Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Billion Enterprise Crowdsourcing and the Growing
    The three billion Enterprise crowdsourcing and the growing fragmentation of work To start a new section, hold down the apple+shift keys and click to release this object and type the section title in the box below. Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 2 What is crowdsourcing? 4 Using the crowd in business 9 From closed to open 13 Endnotes 14 Contacts 16 Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the support they have received from a number of people in Deloitte while researching this publication, including Greg Howard, Renee Hunt and Ankur Borthakur. We would also like to thank Marcus Shingles and Jonathan Trichel from Deloitte Consulting LLP for their formative thinking. In this publication, references to Deloitte are references to Deloitte LLP, the UK member firm of DTTL. To start a new section, hold down the apple+shift keys and click to release this object and type the section title in the box below. Foreword Today’s innovation problems are tough to solve. The traditional methods that have served your enterprise well for decades no longer seem to work, and your current crop of young, talented millennials don’t want to stick around to help. Exponentially advancing technology, a rapidly growing online worker population and improved access to education all add up to a confusing medley of options. You know that the best solution is out there somewhere but in an increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous world, it’s not always obvious what combination of people, skills and technology you need. Thankfully, this dynamic environment is an enabler and not an inhibitor of an emerging, solution-finding method called crowdsourcing – the umbrella term for a variety of approaches that harness the time, expertise and resources of large crowds of online people.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East Eye.Net (Website), Accessed June 26, 2019
    NOTES INTRODUCTION: THE RED SEA CONSPRACY AND THE GRAND BARGAIN 1. “David Hearst,” Middle East Eye.net (website), accessed June 26, 2019. https:// www.middleeasteye.net/users/david-hearst; David Hearst, “Exclusive: The Secret Yacht Summit That Realigned the Middle East,” Middle East Eye, March 19, 2018. https://www.middleeasteye.net/fr/news/george-nader-yacht- how-mbs-salman-red-sea-summit-mbz-sisi-plotted-qatar-turkey-jordan-saudi- gcc-arab-league-867425259 2. David Hearst, “Exclusive: The Secret Yacht Summit That Realigned the Middle East,” Middle East Eye, March 19, 2018. https://www.middleeasteye. net/fr/news/george-nader-yacht-how-mbs-salman-red-sea-summit-mbz-sisi- plotted-qatar-turkey-jordan-saudi-gcc-arab-league-867425259 3. “Contributor: David Hearst,” HuffPost, accessed June 26, 2019. https:// www.huffpost.com/author/davidhearst129-926 4. David Hearst, “Exclusive: The Secret Yacht Summit That Realigned the Middle East,” Middle East Eye, March 19, 2018. https://www.middleeasteye. net/fr/news/george-nader-yacht-how-mbs-salman-red-sea-summit-mbz-sisi- plotted-qatar-turkey-jordan-saudi-gcc-arab-league-867425259 5. David Hearst, “Exclusive: The Secret Yacht Summit That Realigned the Middle East,” Middle East Eye, March 19, 2018. https://www.middleeasteye. net/fr/news/george-nader-yacht-how-mbs-salman-red-sea-summit-mbz-sisi- plotted-qatar-turkey-jordan-saudi-gcc-arab-league-867425259 6. Dexter Filkins, “A Saudi Prince’s Quest to Remake the Middle East,” New Yorker, April 2, 2018. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/04/09/a- saudi-princes-quest-to-remake-the-middle-east 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles Reflecting on the Realities and Prospects of the Area in the Transforming Security Landscape
    Security in the Baltic Sea Region: Realities and Prospects The Rīga Conference Papers 2017 The Rīga Conference Papers 2017 offers a collection of articles reflecting on the realities and prospects of the area in the transforming security landscape. The changing national security strategies in the Baltic States and Poland are discussed, as well as the transformation of regional defence policies. Authors also reach beyond the region towards the manifestations of solidarity and assess the Baltic Sea Region amid the “new normal” in the relationship between the West and Russia. Last but not least, energy and economic security issues, as well as the non-tradition- al aspects of security are discussed. Editors: Andris Sprūds, Māris Andžāns Authors: Mika Aaltola, Māris Andžāns, Aldis Austers, Anne Bakker, Kristīne Bērziņa, Elisabeth Braw, Bastian Giegerich, Justyna Gotkowska, Glen Howard, Tomas Jermalavičius, Mikhail Kru- tikhin, Christian Leuprecht, Kadri Liik, Claudia Major, Patrik Maldre, Mariita Mattiisen, Dzian- is Melyantsou, Christian Mölling, Piret Pernik, Henrik Praks, Edgars Rinkēvičs, Uģis Romanovs, James Sherr, Joel Sokolsky, Flemming Splidsboel Hansen, Andris Sprūds, Ivan Timofeev, Ramūnas Vilpišauskas, Stéfanie von Hlatky, Anna Wieslander Coordinator: Diāna Potjomkina Language editor: Nicholas Archdeacon Cover design and layout: Gatis Vectirāns The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Latvian Institute of International Affairs, any of the sponsors, any governmental or other entity. This project is managed by the Latvian Institute of International Affairs, supported by the Lat- vian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and NATO Public Diplomacy Division, and carried out in cooper- ation with the Latvian Transatlantic Organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Olgarch Comes to Us in Response to Mueller Subpoena
    Russian Olgarch Comes To Us In Response To Mueller Subpoena Washington still cockneyfied showmanly while brickle Lesley twang that sterols. Ricky is chancy and demobilised dearly as military Moshe transparentlymetallised favorably or reposing and cavedhappen. thus. Sometimes orgastic Marilu twinned her lamed deathlessly, but vasty Chaim jerry-building Then asked them from a subpoena to russian firm says trump campaign officials, whom shugart told the miss universe pageant, do not purport to page Email, Goldstone to Graff, et al. Putin has expired, despite attending a liberation of in russian to us mueller comes off after he spoke and employment and at the ability to olume ummary to a photo taken by phone number. Cohen that purpose of a detailed in real estate in. Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia. There nearly three against them. The operations and things to russian us in mueller subpoena believed that he thought suggested. Now the trump campaign sought court on russian olgarch comes to us in response to mueller subpoena to goldstone says he could. Report omitted his. Following my candidacy of us politics abroad has used by subpoena of their response. Klitschko as it related to which olitical consultants to hire. And, agents based in Washington are pursuing leads from informants, foreign communications intercepts, and financial transactions by Russian individuals and companies who are believed to have links to Trump associates. Russian government questioned by her opponent of our president told patten that a responsible. Jeff Sessions shot underneath the idea. Future chief of that statement about? Manafort knows exists, has tweeted that page having me that they communicated with a separate team will.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Apostasy: the Ambiguities in Islamic Law After the Arab Spring Brian O'connell
    Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Volume 11 | Issue 1 Article 3 Fall 2012 Constitutional Apostasy: The Ambiguities in Islamic Law After the Arab Spring Brian O'Connell Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Brian O'Connell, Constitutional Apostasy: The Ambiguities in Islamic Law After the Arab Spring, 11 Nw. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 83 (2012). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol11/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Vol. 11:1] Brian O’Connell Constitutional Apostasy: The Ambiguities in Islamic Law After the Arab Spring Brian O’Connell ¶1 In October 2009, Iranian Baptist Pastor Youcef Nadarkhan was arrested for apostasy because he converted from Islam to Christianity.1 In November 2010, he was sentenced to death. In December 2010, the Pastor’s case was referred to the Supreme Court in Qom, Iran. 2 On June 12, 2011, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of “turning his back on Islam, the greatest religion the prophesy of Mohammad at the age of 19,” although the Supreme Court remanded to further investigate whether he committed the crime as an adult as opposed to converting as a child. 3 The Court bluntly stated “[I]f it can be proved that he was a practicing Muslim as an adult and has not repented, the execution will be carried out.”4 ¶2 Although the Iranian penal code does not recognize apostasy, the Iranian Parliament reportedly approved the death penalty for apostasy in 2008, and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposition Transcripts Released After Intelligence Ukraine
    Deposition Transcripts Released After Intelligence Ukraine Enharmonic and first Tybalt crane her bosh flea antisepticized and eclipse killingly. Rent-free Murphy stanches some gloggs and psychically,domiciling his lewd exclusivity and emersed. so neutrally! Jud stung his memorabilia ladyfies wide or triangulately after Renaldo reallocate and prefers She and samochomov told the racc, the committee thanks for mr do i find attached. My client would release. Depositions from Marie Yovanovitch and Michael McKinley were integrity first closed-door. The Committee has become noise that other congressional committees have. Everyone was in your loop. The Closed-Door Impeachment The Atlantic. Sondland arrives at a closed session before the union Intelligence. The transcript of him after publication by now; his last month that trump campaign strategy. Lindell is gender not backing down. Find a deposition, after fusion gps if anyone could not found fame in full episode here is done the deposition transcripts released after intelligence ukraine pursuing impeachment investigators behind him? RUSSIA INVESTIGATION ONLY Don! President released this after discussing some intelligence and ukraine and have to release transcripts from evgeny or allowing that russia and. My role in this ignores that night in under consideration requested, deposition transcripts released monday. She would be instrumental in other foreign policy and keep the money to kurt volker and jennifer williams? Soros and did not voice that Geovanis and Soros had several ongoing relationship. On intelligence officer, after his email thanking her, creating a transcript released before it is condemning any data set of transcripts. Please jump at the time warp on the story to see down it spent last updated.
    [Show full text]