<<

Special Feature: Comprehensive CME Program on Part 1 Conferences and Lectures

Radiation : Based on a general overview of disaster medicine

JMAJ 56(1): 30–36, 2013

Kazuaki KOHRIYAMA*1

Key words Disaster medicine, Nuclear , Bonfire’s law, Local health provider, Medical association

Disaster Is a Common Product of nerable. Further, cities require transportation Civilization: We have no choice but systems, chemical facilities, and energy produc­ to deal with unforeseen disaster at tion facilities in order to function. Such facilities any time are risk factors for disasters themselves. In a city, these facilities may be sequentially affected, I believe that the purpose of today’s training even in a , and a simple disaster program is to clarify how the Japan Medical can turn into a compound disaster and the dam­ Association (JMA) should be involved in disas­ age grows in scale. ter management as a professional group of phy­ A civilization always progresses. Thus, humans sicians. From that aspect, the Great East Japan are destined to face a mega-disaster on a scale and and the subsequent we have not previously experienced. Nuclear Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant disaster is indeed one such potential event. provided both opportunities and lessons for us. Today, I will discuss radiation emergency medi­ Emergency Medical Resources cine in the context of this training program. Required in Non-Metropolitan Areas in Being civilized means being urbanized. In Times of Disaster Can Be Extensive the Indus Civilization that flourished in 2000 BC, about 40,000 people lived in its largest Urbanized areas have higher populations than city, Mohenjo Daro. The population of London non-urbanized areas. Naturally, the size of the was about 50,000 in the 1500’s, but increased to population affected in a disaster is greater in several million during the Industrial Revolution. urbanized areas. This may lead to the conclu- In Japan, the urbanization rate in the 1950s sion that a disaster occurring in a non-urbanized was 56%. At that time, natural disasters such area with a small population would require as or typhoons would result in fewer emergency medical resources. However, the deaths of thousands of people. The current that assumption is false. urbanization rate is over 80%, and some metrop­ The rates of urbanization and aging are nega­ olises today are of proportions that were unimag­ tively correlated. The aging rate in urbanized inable during the 1950s. The population that a areas is lower than that in non-urbanized areas. disaster can affect is, therefore, far greater now In my survey of ambulance transport data in than that in the 1950s. When a city is exposed Kita­kyushu City, the number of transported cases to a massive amount of energy—either externally increased exponentially with increasing age when in the form of a natural disaster or internally as the patients were in their late 50’s or older. Con­ an infectious disease—many lives become vul­ sidering these 2 facts, the following conclusions

*1 Professor, Emergency Life-Saving Technique Academy of KYUSHU, Fukuoka, Japan ([email protected]). This article is based on the lecture presented at Disaster Medicine Training Course on JMAT Activities held on March 10, 2012.

30 JMAJ, January / February 2013 — Vol. 56, No. 1 RADIATION EMERGENCY MEDICINE: BASED ON A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF DISASTER MEDICINE

can be drawn. Urbanized areas require more local municipality—and so is the restoration. emergency medical resources in the acute phase However, when local municipalities responsible of disaster because of the higher population. On for these duties suffer extensive damage, they the other hand, the number of people affected of course cannot execute their duties, and it is by a disaster is smaller in non-urbanized areas only natural that the central government will act because such areas are less populated. However, on their behalf. In my eyes, however, the govern­ the higher aging rate in a non-urbanized area will ment has made very little progress in this regard likely increase the proportion of people requiring since the Great East Japan Earthquake. emergency medicine in the acute phase. We can anticipate the following relationship: General Overview of Existing Disaster (Size of population that requires emergency Medicine: “Local response systems for medicine in times of disaster) the acute phase of disaster medicine” =(Population size)2(Aging rate) are undeveloped Therefore, a disaster occurring in a non-urbanized area does not necessarily require fewer emergency In order to conduct a general overview of disas­ medical resources. We should be sufficiently pre­ ter medicine, let us set 2 axes: One axis is the pared at all times. response, as in “whether the response comes from inside disaster areas or outside” and the Disaster Can Affect the Most Vulnerable other is the time-phase, as in “if the response is Part of Community in the acute phase or chronic phase.” The Disaster Medical Assistance Team When the number and proportion of deaths (DMAT) is the program responding to the needs resulting from the Great East Japan Earthquake in “the acute phase from outside,” whereas the are examined by town, it can be seen that for Japan Medical Association Team (JMAT) of the a small town receiving relatively few casualties, JMA is the program responding to the needs in those casualties represented a high proportion “the sub-acute to chronic phase from outside.” of the town’s population, and therefore the This means that there is no disaster medicine proportional damage was significant. The most system that responds to “the acute phase from pronounced example is the town of Otsuchi, inside” (Fig. 1). Basic disaster management plans Iwate Prefecture. Before the disaster, the popu­ have incorporated disaster medicine responses lation of Otsuchi was approximately 12,000 in disaster areas as extensions of daily medical and the aging rate was 28.5%; the Prefectural practice. However, the people of Japan learned Otsuchi (with 121 beds) was responsible that disaster medicine is very different from daily for the community health care of the area. This medicine, through their experience during major hospital, however, was completely demolished disasters such as the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake. by the tsunami. This meant that both emergency Disaster medicine, in any case, should start medicine and community health care were inac­ “immediately after a disaster” at “disaster areas,” cessible during the acute phase of the disaster and medical institutions in disaster areas must and for an extensive period of time afterwards. get involved whether they would wish to or not. Earlier today, Dr. Kayden said that the idea that Therefore, a disaster medicine response system “we will recover from the damage in several should be prepared to start during “the acute weeks” is just a “common myth in disaster,” and phase from inside.” However, this “acute phase she is indeed correct. Dr. Arii earlier introduced from inside” aspect of disaster medicine response the idea of conducting visual observation and has been hardly addressed. rapid assessment of disaster areas on foot imme- The Kitakyushu Medical Association and the diately after a disaster, and I believe these sur­ Fukuoka Prefecture Medical Association, along veys would be extremely valuable in determining with the Yanagawa-Yamato Medical Association the extent of damage to community health care (Fukuoka Prefecture) that responded to their and quantifying the necessary aid. activities, have spent several years constructing The duty of establishing and maintaining a disaster medicine system to respond during community health care is, as stipulated in the “the acute phase from inside.” We wish to provide Medical Affairs Act, the responsibility of the the details of this system through the JMA in

JMAJ, January / February 2013 — Vol. 56, No. 1 31 Kohriyama K

Responding to other areas

DMAT JMAT

Acute phase Chronic phase

Prefectural medical associations City-level medical associations Municipal medical associations

Responding locally

(All rights reserved by K. Kohriyama.)

Fig. 1 Mapping of disaster medicine focusing on the assistance areas and the time phases

the future, and we hope that it will serve as a environment, but that is not the point. Because model for other medical associations to study. thickness tests of secondary pipes had been neglected for 27 years, the pipe that should have The Risk of Nuclear Disasters been replaced remained in use beyond its func­ tional lifespan, and consequently burst. The rule The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant of thumb for industrial , Heinrich’s law, accident, which is yet to be concluded in my states that “in a workplace, for every accident personal view, is often described as an unfore­ that causes a major injury, there are 29 accidents seen and unexpected nuclear disaster because that cause minor injuries and 300 accidents that this accident followed a once-in-every-1,000- cause no injuries.” The oversight at the Mihama years natural disaster that has become known Plant could easily happen at other plants—no, as the Great East Japan Earthquake. After such it may be happening already. The construction a major accident, how will the risk of a future of many nuclear plants in Japan began almost nuclear disaster be considered in future? Will 40 years ago, and accidents due to “oversights” such accidents continue to be “unexpected”? could start to occur soon. Furthermore, there are In 2004, the third unit of the Mihama Nuclear situations that we now know to be risky that Power Plant (Fukui Prefecture; construction could not have been addressed when these started in 1972) experienced an accident, in which nuclear reactors were being developed, because the secondary pipe burst and spouted high- the advancement of science was insufficient temperature vapor. There were workmen nearby, at the time of construction. Such situations in­ preparing for a regular maintenance check; 11 clude stress corrosion cracking in pipes and were injured and 5 lost their lives. The accident neutron embrittlement of pressurized containers. occurred at a secondary pipe, and there was no These factors are bound to increase the risk of risk of radioactive materials leaking into the nuclear disasters.

32 JMAJ, January / February 2013 — Vol. 56, No. 1 RADIATION EMERGENCY MEDICINE: BASED ON A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF DISASTER MEDICINE

Basic Knowledge of Radiation: must be taken with radioactive materials that Points are the distance travelled in emit a-ray. air, permeability of living bodies, and Of the radioactive materials used in the DNA damage Fukushima nuclear power plant, plutonium emits a-ray. However, it is believed that there was very With the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant little plutonium contamination at this time, and accident in mind, I wish to organize the knowl­ even if there was, it would be an extremely small edge necessary to understand the health risks quantity. associated with radiation disasters. When considering the health risks from Units of Radiation and Effects on radiation, attention should be paid to the dis- Living Bodies: Bonfire’s law tance that radiation can travel in air, permeability of living organisms, and the damaging effect The units of radiation and the effects on living to DNA. bodies are easy to understand when you imagine “External exposure” occurs when a body standing in front of a bonfire Fig. ( 2). You feel is exposed to radiation from a radioactive mate­ very hot if you stand very close, but you feel rial outside the body. When radioactive mate- warm and comfortable at an appropriate dis­ rial is brought inside the body and the body is tance. When you stand far away, you cannot even exposed to radiation from the inside, it is called tell that there is a bonfire. The amount of heat “internal exposure.” you receive changes with the distance from the Let us start with external exposure. Alpha- bonfire. and b-rays can travel a few millimeters or centi­ “Becquerel” (Bq) is the unit in that meters in the air, respectively; hence, a living is analogous to the strength of the bonfire. This body will not be affected if a radioactive material figure represents the strength of the bonfire itself, is located 1 m or more from the body. Even at and therefore it does not change no matter what distances of several millimeters or centimeters your distance from the bonfire. from the body, clothing or skin will provide The energy provided by radiation, which is protection. Given these facts, we do not have to analogous to the “perceived heat” of the bonfire, consider the effects of a-ray. As for b-ray, when is measured using the unit “gray” (Gy). This fig­ a very strong radioactive material is attached ure increases as you stand closer to the bonfire, to a body, DNA in the subcutaneous tissue a and decreases as you move away. Specifically, few millimeters under the skin—specifically the this figure “Gy” is inversely proportional to the dermis—will be damaged (b-ray burn). The type square of the distance from the bonfire. This of radiation that has systemic effects after exter­ clearly illustrates that the effect of the bonfire nal exposure is g radiation (and neutron ray). is correlated to the distance. Of the radioactive materials used in the Fuku­ The distance, however, is not the only factor shima nuclear power plant, cesium and iodine that influences the effects of the bonfire. Let us emit g-ray. Iodine has a short half-life, and the imagine that there is an ice cream at a certain effects have not been manifested thus far. The distance from the bonfire. It will not start to melt “Radioactive material contamination map from until several seconds after being placed in front the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant” of the bonfire, but it will melt completely after that is widely available to the public addresses several minutes. The effects of the bonfire include cesium contamination. both distance and time factors. Next, I would like to discuss internal expo­ Next, let us imagine an ice cream, a cake with sure. With internal exposure, the distance that whipped cream, and a pumpkin being placed the radiation can travel is irrelevant, because at the same distance from the bonfire for the radioactive material is in direct contact with tis­ same duration. The ice cream will melt, and the sues. Additionally, there is no clothing or skin to cake will melt partially; the pumpkin, however, provide protection. Therefore, cells are directly may become hot but will never melt. In other exposed to the effects of radiation. Because a-ray words, if different objects are placed at the same substantially damage DNA (to a degree approxi­ distance from the bonfire for the same duration, mately 20 times greater than b- or g-ray), caution the effect of the “bonfire” on the different objects

JMAJ, January / February 2013 — Vol. 56, No. 1 33 Kohriyama K

Effects of radiation — Distance, time, and vulnerability of objects exposed —

It will melt completely

It will melt partially

Distance Time

It will not melt

Effect on humans (in Sv)

Fig. 2 “Bonfire’s law” to understand the effects of radiation

is ultimately determined by each object’s dis- is recorded. tance, time, and vulnerability to heat. The same Internal exposure is estimated based on applies to radiation. the future effects of radioactive materials that The ultimate effect of radiation on a human remain in a body. The manner by which the body is measured using the unit “Sievert” (Sv), radioactive material found in a body will remain which incorporates distance, time, and all other there for the next 50 years (or at 70 years of age factors. This figure illustrates the effect of radia­ for children) is estimated, the effect of the radio­ tion on a , regardless of whether the active material on the DNA is calculated, and exposure was internal or external. then the estimated effect is given in “Sv.” Ultimately, the figure shown in the unit of Effect of Radiation on Living Bodies: “Sv” is adjusted so that a given value will be External exposure uses measured equally damaging regardless of whether it is values, whereas internal exposure from internal exposure or external exposure. uses estimated values As confusing as it may be, 5 Sv of internal expo­ sure is no more dangerous than 5 Sv of external The effect of radiation on living bodies is exposure. assessed by summing the levels of external exposure and internal exposure. Radiation Dose Limit The level of external exposure can be mea­ sured by wearing a personal dosimeter. Most There is a recommended radiation dose limit external exposure is due to g-ray, so a personal that is accepted internationally based on past dosimeter typically measures g radiation. The basic research and epidemiology studies. The assessment of external exposure is based on the recommended radiation dose limit for the gen­ total dose of g-ray that a person is exposed to, eral public (excluding the dose that a person is starting from the time the personal dosimeter naturally exposed to in the environment) is set is first worn (i.e., “zero”) until the measurement at 1 mSv or less per year. Certain professionals

34 JMAJ, January / February 2013 — Vol. 56, No. 1 RADIATION EMERGENCY MEDICINE: BASED ON A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF DISASTER MEDICINE

Long-term care

Community health care provided by local medical institutions Time involved Unity of medical care providers Multiple providers One provider

JMAT

Radiation emergency DMAT medicine

Short-term

(All rights reserved by K. Kohriyama.)

Fig. 3 Mapping of disaster medicine focusing on the time involved and the unity of medical care providers

such as , radiologists, and those who spent outdoors to minimize the direct exposure work at nuclear power plants, are exposed to to g-ray. greater levels of radiation. For those people, In order to reduce internal exposure, it is the dose limit is set differently, at “100 mSv or best to minimize the amount of radioactive less in 5 years and not to exceed 50 mSv for any material that enters through your mouth or nose. given year.” At this point, the risk of develop- You can think of it like influenza prevention. ing cancer for physicians or radiologists is not Hand-washing and mouth-rinsing when you considered to be any higher than that for the come home will help to wash away any radioac­ general population. tive material. In places where high doses of radiation are present, wearing a mask will be Protecting Yourself From the Effects of effective as well. Radioactive Materials Conclusion Let us think only in theories. I say “only in theo­ ries” because whether or not all these theories I would like to summarize my presentation can be implemented depends on many factors, from 2 standpoints, using the Great East Japan such as the radiation status of each region and Earthquake as an example: the time involved health factors. in disaster medicine, and the unity of health care It is the g-ray that is the primary problem in providers (Fig. 3). external exposure. Because g-ray loses energy Figure 3 shows the positions of disaster medi­ each time it passes through an object, its energy cine, DMAT, and JMAT activities when using is considerably reduced inside a building. There­ these standpoints as the axes. When a situation fore, an easy way to protect oneself from the enters the upper left quadrant, it is considered effects of g radiation is to minimize the time that the “health care system in the disaster area

JMAJ, January / February 2013 — Vol. 56, No. 1 35 Kohriyama K

is restored.” I believe that the role of disaster outline of my presentation below. medicine is to help push the health care systems 1. Urbanization is in progress everywhere, and of disaster areas, which in many cases exist in disaster medicine is a mission for all physicians. the lower right quadrant after a disaster, into the 2. Establishing a disaster medicine system re­ upper left quadrant. The more time it takes, the quires a general overview of existing systems. more the local health care providers closest to 3. It is urgent to establish a rapid response sys­ the local residents may need to respond to the tem that can respond locally. anxiety toward radiation among them. Inter­ 4. The risk of nuclear disaster will grow in the pretations of the effects of radiation on health future. below a certain dose can vary considerably; it is 5. Physicians should have a basic understanding in the field of trans-science. Therefore, physicians of radiation medicine to be able to answer the are often asked to provide scientific explanations questions of patients who are experiencing as well as serve as spokespeople in response to anxiety. Physicians should also serve as spokes­ residents’ anxiety. people for conveying patients’ anxiety to the I would like to conclude by providing the government.

36 JMAJ, January / February 2013 — Vol. 56, No. 1