Brake System Design Optimization Volume L a Survey and Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Brake System Design Optimization Volume L a Survey and Assessment REPORT NO. FRA/ORD-78/20, I BRAKE SYSTEM DESIGN OPTIMIZATION Volume I: A Survey and Assessment L.L. Eshelman C.C. Shelleman J.P. Henderson A.T. Kearney, Inc. 100 South Wacker Drive Chicago IL 60606 JUNE 1978 FINAL REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION Office of Research and Development Washington DC 20590 05 - Braking Systems NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern­ ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro­ ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con­ sid~red essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Govemment Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FRA/ORD-78/20, I 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 1978 BRAKF. SYSTEM DESIGN OPTIMIZATION 6. Performing Orgonizotion Code Volume I: A Survey and Assessment 1--::----,...,.---------------------------i B. ~erlorming Organization Report No. 7. Author's)L.L. Eshelman, C.C. Shelleman, DOT-TSC-FRA-78-1, I J.P. · Hen<;Ierson · · 1\ , 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) A. T. Kearney, Inc.* RR816/R8317 100 South Wacker Drive 11. Contract or Grant No. Chicago IL 60606 DOT-TSC-1040 13. Type of Report and Period Covered ~------------------------------------------------~12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Final Report U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration April 1977 to March 1978 Office of Research and Development 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington DC ~2~0~5~9~0~------------------------L------------------------ 15. Supplementary Notes *Under contract to: U.S. Department of Transportation Transportation Systems Center Kendall Squar~ Cambrido-e MA 11 2142 16. Abstract Existing freight car braking systems, components, and sub­ systems are characterized both physically and functionally, and life-cycle costs are examined. Potential improvements to existing systems previously proposed or available are identified and described in functional and economic terms. Innovative braking systems which offer a potential benefit are identified, described, and assessed for functional and economic characteristics. Potential improvements are divided into two categories: those which could be implemented in the short term (10 years) and those which could be implemented in the long term (20 years). Areas which need additional study are identified. 17. Key Wards 18. Distribution Statement Rail Fteight Braking Systems DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. PUBLIC Rail Freight Equipment Technology THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 140 Form DOT F 1700.7 <8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized PREFACE The work described in this report was carried out under the direction of the Transportation Systems Center of the U. s. De­ partment of Transportation in the context of an overall project of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to provide a techni­ cal basis for the improvement of rail transportation service, efficiency, productivity and safety. The work was sponsored by the FRA Office of Research and Development, Office of Freight Systems. This final report is organized into two volumes. Volume I describes the work performed and presents the results of the study and is a complete report. Volume II contains supporting materials developed in the course of the study which add substantially to the information base but are not essential to the object of the study. Kearney gratefully acknowledges the cooperation of the many railroads, rapid transit companies, manufacturers, research and development organizations, AAR Brake Equipment Committee members and staff, and other interested parties who provided the informa­ tion required to conduct a professional, objective study. We would also like to thank DOT personnel in the Transportation Systems Center and the Federal Railroad Administration for their cooperation and assistance throughout the course of the study. iii METRIC CONVERSION FACTORS Approximoll Conversion• to Motric M11sures ::: Appro um•t• ConvlrSIOns from Metric Mcnsur•s --:: N N --:: s,.~.~ wa.u v,. Knew Molti,ly ~Y To Fiw4 s.-., ..et W\eo YM how s, llhhi'ly ~, To F1o4 Sy•hl --:: ;; LENGTH 0 LENGTH " ,.,.,,;:.r-.et('l" 0.04 mche~ --:: ": (.9r'lt>rr'I"IOr!' o.• 1nches mete-~s 31 teet h •nches 2,5 rt>nt•rnet~s --:: iTIIIIters , yards ft teet 30 ceot•meters -: vd 0.9 meters lo.•loneter~ 0.6 mrles "" '""'' 1,6 kol~tets -: m•les !:: ·~ -:: AREA AREA -:: =' squ.¥e Cfllt•mt>~teu 0 16 square roches ,.. ~e •nches 6.5 square C!;'ni•IT'l'IE!i'S crr• -:: -~ ~ '"' m' s.qu.Mf! tn(lll!f, 1.2 square yards tt' sq~re feet 0.09 square IT\Etters -:: .,., 2 m' ~relui(YT'If'll!tfS 0.4 square mrles vd square yards 0.8 square "'W!ters ,.. .: ""' :! twl'ct.VP'5 110.000 'l'l) 1.5 ....... square mtles 2.6 square kiiO"f'et~s m•' •~' "" acres o.• hectarf's n. -: < :: MASS (weight) MASS (weight) -= -:: :::: 00:15 ounces 0) 28 grams --:: 9 9'""'• lo.1IQ91"&ml ;.2 pounds lb lb povods 0.45 k•logtc'ln'IS kq '9 t~st10'JCi.oJ' 1.1 5h01'1 11)1'1$ skort tOf's 0.9 toones -:: !2000 lb) --:: s VOLUME -:: VOLUME ... teaspoons l'l"lll•llters mdl,llt.-t·, 0.01 tlurd <"'(.mrf.l'l i•fl' p111{!!1 ,.,.. tablespoon., ,, fY'•II•I•ter1o ~ 2.1 ""' II oz fluid ounce.s J<) .,,ll•ltters n I 1<11!'<, l 06 QU81U "' r:ups 0.14 11\f>l'< o!.,...., O.:lfl gaiiQfl!' ..."' p•nts O.C7 lt!l>rs ~.· ,ut>'< """lf"IS Jt, 1:lrbn. lf•fll "',..;' •"tot"L'"'">PIPIO, 1 l cubH" ~.]-1"\1· ql'" Cl"':\115 0.9S lqr.-r« -:: ~' Q<'II!Yls H '<tf'•<; <~&' cuh•c ft>et 0.03 {lib" '''f'l.;>f<, -: vd'"' cub•c yards 0.76 cut"-•c 'T'>E'I("f\ 1!!!f.'.~_RE~!.'"~ TEMPERATURE (uoct) 9 S (then f ~twe.nhfl•t ,· '""''I• ~ ltlf'l: -"f<\l••ffl J:'l '"Jl'IP"'f.t\ll"fl ., .0.1 fahntnhetl 5 9 taftet c~ts•ut tempenstu,.. subtrf,ctmg ·~·awrl" ., 321 '.' 9~ 6 ?l1 1 41' 80 2t:' Z()(' /•·-=- t 1~0 I .L t··.l. r.J-T1- >I' 't-...l t-·..1.-r~·-ljL. ,-A- , ... t-·L·,.-'-·-'-r..L-~---1 4•' 0 11' 40 ~lj R(l 't'"fl -----l ~ ·•c 37 - · u EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is a survey and assessment of freight train braking technology. The historical events that occurred in the development of freight train air brake systems are dis­ cussed first, followed by a detailed description of the life cycle cost and functional performance characteristics of air brake systems and components, including estimates of the population of the components presently in service. The report then presents an assessment of the overall brake system per­ formance characteristics as they affect train handling, stop distance, and grade balancing power. Results of implementing innovative variations of the key train braking performance characteristics were investigated using the computerized Train Operations Simulator (TOS) developed by the Association of American Railroads. Finally, conclusions and recommendations were developed that delineate the steps that should be taken to achieve improved freight train braking safety and per­ formance over both the short and long terms. Volume I of this report was structured to contain the degree of detail adequate to support the findings and conclu­ sions, without obscuring the pattern in which each section was developed. Volume II contains substantially more technical detail than Volume I, and as such represents an information and data base that supports Volume I. The present freight train air brake system represents the culmination of years of improvement made to the basic brake system adopted in 1933 when the "AB Valve" was approved for general use by the Master Car Builders. This braking system consists of a single pneumatic train line that is manually con­ nected between cars, and a pneumatic control valve on each car. The single pneumatic train line performs two basic functions: (l) it provides the brake energizing energy for each car in the form of compressed air which is stored in a reservoir on each car, and (2) it communicates control signals in the form of pressure changes which are interpreted by the control valve on each car, which in turn causes the car brakes to be applied and released. Although the basic system initially provided adequate braking performance and safety margins and exhibited favorable v ., cost characteristics, the demands placed upon it over the years have been severe. Freight train tonnages, lengths, and speeds have increased several fold since the turn of the century. To meet these demands, many improvements have been necessary. These include the development of more sophisticated and faster reacting control valves, the introduction of composition brake shoes, the use of welded brake pipe fittings to reduce leakage, improved freight car wheel metallurgy that can withstand in­ creased thermal loads, and many others. However, these improvements in technology were not totally adequate in preventing a deterioration in freight train braking performance. To prevent this detoriation the industry also re­ sorted to two supplementary methods of increasing braking le­ vels to meet these increasing demands. These methods included a general increase in brake system air pressures and increased use of locomotive dynamic brakes. The increases in brake system demands are still occurring, primarily because of the continuing influx of high gross-to­ tare ratio freight cars into the North American Fleet.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-88
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2006-88 Union Pacific Midas, CA November 9, 2006 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2006-88 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Union Pacific RR Co. [UP ] UP 1106RS011 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident N/A N/A N/A 3.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Union Pacific RR Co. [UP ] UP 1106RS011 4. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident Month Day Year 11 09 2006 11:02: AM PM 7. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other (single entry in code box) 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture (describe in narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 01 8. Cars Carrying 9. HAZMAT Cars 10. Cars Releasing 11. People 12. Division HAZMAT Damaged/Derailed HAZMAT Evacuated 0 0 0 0 Roseville 13. Nearest City/Town 14.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Power Supply
    3 Power supply Table of contents Article 44 Installation, etc. of Contact Lines, etc. .........................................................................2 Article 45 Approach or Crossing of Overhead Contact Lines, etc................................................ 10 Article 46 Insulation Division of Contact Lines............................................................................ 12 Article 47 Prevention of Problems under Overbridges, etc........................................................... 13 Article 48 Installation of Return Current Rails ........................................................................... 13 Article 49 Lightning protection..................................................................................................... 13 Article 51 Facilities at substations................................................................................................. 14 Article 52 Installation of electrical equipment and switchboards ................................................. 15 Article 53 Protection of electrical equipment................................................................................ 16 Article 54 Insulation of electric lines ............................................................................................ 16 Article 55 Grounding of Electrical Equipment ............................................................................. 18 Article 99 Inspection and monitoring of the contact lines on the main line.................................. 19 Article 101 Records........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Vaccum Braking System
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCE ISSN NO: 0972-1347 The Role of Vaccum Braking System 1 2 3 Author :- Ankit Yadav , Aniket Mahajan , Gagandeep singh 1,2,3 Depa rtm e n t of Mec ha nic a l Engineering Chan dig a rh University, Moha li Abstract The vacuum brake was made for a long time, utilized instead of the pneumatic brake system. Pneumatic brake mechanisms take compressed air as the power used to drive disc or drum on to wheels. The vacuum braking mechanism is controlled through a brake pipe. In which a brake valve in the driver's side with braking mechanism in each wheel of vehicle. A vacuum is made in the pipe by and enjector. The enjector gives air weight from the brake pipe to make the vacuum utilizing steam on a steam train, or an exhauster utilizing electric power. With no vacuum the brake is completely connected. The vacuum in the brake pipe is made and kept up by an engine driven exhauster. The exhauster has two velocities, rapid and low speed. The fast is changed in to make a vacuum and along these lines discharge the brakes. Ease back speed is utilized to keep the vacuum at the expected level to keep up brake discharge. Vacuum against little holes in the brake pipe is kept up by it. Key Words :- Vacuum brake, pneumatic brake, exhauster, atmospheric pressure, steam locomotive INTRODUCTION The vacuum brake was, for a long time, utilized instead of the air powered brake as the standard, safeguard, prepare brake utilized by railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilevel Rail Car - Wikipedia
    Bilevel rail car - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilevel_rail_car Bilevel rail car The bilevel car (American English) or double-decker train (British English and Canadian English) is a type of rail car that has two levels of passenger accommodation, as opposed to one, increasing passenger capacity (in example cases of up to 57% per car).[1] In some countries such vehicles are commonly referred to as dostos, derived from the German Doppelstockwagen. The use of double-decker carriages, where feasible, can resolve capacity problems on a railway, avoiding other options which have an associated infrastructure cost such as longer trains (which require longer station Double-deck rail car operated by Agence métropolitaine de transport platforms), more trains per hour (which the signalling or safety in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The requirements may not allow) or adding extra tracks besides the existing Lucien-L'Allier station is in the back line. ground. Bilevel trains are claimed to be more energy efficient,[2] and may have a lower operating cost per passenger.[3] A bilevel car may carry about twice as many as a normal car, without requiring double the weight to pull or material to build. However, a bilevel train may take longer to exchange passengers at each station, since more people will enter and exit from each car. The increased dwell time makes them most popular on long-distance routes which make fewer stops (and may be popular with passengers for offering a better view).[1] Bilevel cars may not be usable in countries or older railway systems with Bombardier double-deck rail cars in low loading gauges.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Forces in the Elements of the Brake Rigging of Bogies of Freight Cars
    E3S Web of Conferences 166, 07004 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016607004 ICSF 2020 Determination of forces in the elements of the brake rigging of bogies of freight cars İsrail Elyazov1, Vasyl Ravlyuk2,*, Andriy Rybin2, and Vitalii Hrebeniuk2 1Azerbaijan Technical University, Department of Railway Transport Operation, 25 H. Javid Ave., Baku, Az 1073, Azerbaijan 2Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport, Department of Cars, 7 Feuerbach Sq., Kharkov, 61050, Ukraine Abstract. The article presents the results of studies the purpose of which was solving the problem of deceleration of abnormal wear of brake pads in freight cars of Ukrzaliznytsia JSC. In the studies, the design schemes of brake rigging during braking were considered theoretically. Particular attention was paid to the determination of force loads acting in the rods of the rigging and the contact area of the brake pads with the rolling surfaces of the wheels during braking. Design analysis was performed to determine rational solutions from the point of view of determined force load of the rigging elements of the bogies during braking, in particular, taking into account the action of harmful torque caused by the movement of the bogie on inequalities “track joints”. Based on the conducted studies, it was decided to create a 2D generalized model diagram to determine reliable information on the operation of triangle brake rigging. 1 Introduction a basis to propose a generalized mathematical design model for which theoretical studies with corresponding Today, the main task of Ukrzaliznytsya JSC is increasing calculations have been performed. the volume of freight transportation, which requires increasing the weight and the speed of freight trains.
    [Show full text]
  • How Understanding a Railway's Historic Evolution Can Guide Future
    College of Engineering, School of Civil Engineering University of Birmingham Managing Technical and Operational Change: How understanding a railway’s historic evolution can guide future development: A London Underground case study. by Piers Connor Submitted as his PhD Thesis DATE: 15th February 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Managing Technical & Operational Development PhD Thesis Abstract The argument for this thesis is that patterns of past engineering and operational development can be used to support the creation of a good, robust strategy for future development and that, in order to achieve this, a corporate understanding of the history of the engineering, operational and organisational changes in the business is essential for any evolving railway undertaking. It has been the objective of the author of this study to determine whether it is essential that the history and development of a railway undertaking be known and understood by its management and staff in order for the railway to function in an efficient manner and for it to be able to develop robust and appropriate improvement strategies in a cost-effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Braking Systems in Railway Vehicles
    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 4 Issue01,January-2015 Braking Systems in Railway Vehicles Rakesh Chandmal Sharma1 , Manish Dhingra2, Rajeev Kumar Pathak3 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, M. M. University, Mullana (Ambala) INDIA, 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, T. M. University, Moradabad INDIA 3Department of Mechanical Engg, Rakshpal Bahahur College of Engg. and Tech., Bareilly INDIA Abstract— Brake is an essential feature in order to retard and Researchers in the past have investigated different stop the railway vehicle within minimum possible time. This aspects of braking of railway vehicle. Bureika & Mikaliunas paper presents a discussion about the different braking [1] provided the calculations for Vehicle Braking Force systems used in railway vehicles. This paper also considers Fitted with UIC Air Brake for Passenger Trains, Wagon electrodynamic and electromagnetic braking of trains, which is Braking Force Fitted with a UIC Air Brake for Freight of particular importance in high-speed trains. The calculation Trains Wagon, Braking Distance. Liudvinavicius & Lingaitis for stopping distance for railway vehicle is provided in this [2] studied different features and related mathematics of study. electrodynamic braking in high‐speed trains. Vernersson [3] developed a dimensional finite element model of block and Keywords— Air brake; Straight air brake system; Automatic air brake system; Braking distance; Brake cylinder; Brake pipe; Vacuum brake; wheel, which was coupled through a contact interface for the Brake delay time purpose of control of heat generation and also the heat partitioning at block-wheel surface through thermal contact I. INTRODUCTION resistances. Influence of temperature in wheels and brake The brakes are used on the coaches of railway trains to block at rail tread braking was analyzed under brake rig enable deceleration, control acceleration (downhill) or to conditions in the later part of study by Vernersson [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Cascades Fleet Management Plan
    Amtrak Cascades Fleet Management Plan November 2017 Funding support from Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information The material can be made available in an alternative format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA (4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at 360-705-7082. The Oregon Department of Transportation ensures compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 49 CFR, Part 21; related statutes and regulations to the end that no person shall be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation on the grounds of race, color, sex, disability or national origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Equipment Technician Hydraulic Brake Booster System Fundamentals and Service
    Heavy Equipment Technician Hydraulic Brake Booster System Fundamentals and Service Hydraulic Brake Systems First Period Module 190103d Objectives 1. Identify common power assist braking systems. 2. Explain the principles of operation for vacuum brake booster systems. 3. Describe the diagnosis and repair procedures for vacuum brake booster systems. 4. Explain the principles of operation of air-over-hydraulic brake booster systems. Objectives 5. Describe the diagnosis and repair procedures for air-over-hydraulics brake booster systems. 6. Explain the principles of operation for hydraulic over hydraulic brake booster systems 7. Describe the diagnosis and repair procedures for hydraulic over hydraulic brake booster systems Objective One Identify common power assist braking systems. Hydraulic over Hydraulic (hydroboost) System Uses power steering pressure to assist in braking. Used with both gas and diesel engines. Vacuum / Atmospheric System Uses vacuum and atmospheric pressure for assist. Vacuum / Atmospheric System Vacuum Power Booster (Hydrovac) May have a remotely mounted unit (hydro-vac). Air-Over-Hydraulic Systems Air-Pak Booster System Uses pressurized air from a compressor. Usually remotely mounted. Air-Over-Hydraulic Systems Piston Head Air Assembly Chamber Hydraulic Cylinder Assembly Self-Locking Nuts The power cluster can be coupled directly to a master cylinder or to a hydraulic slave cylinder. Objective Two Explain the principles of operation for vacuum brake booster systems. Integral Power Brake Booster Vacuum Suspended Round shaped housing mounted to fire wall.. Master cylinder mounted on booster. Integral Power Brake Booster Vacuum Suspended Uses vacuum created in the engine and atmospheric pressure to move diaphragm Integral Power Brake Booster Vacuum Suspended Vacuum is low pressure and atmospheric pressure is high.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Testing of Innovative Railway Brake System for Freight Wagons
    A NNALS of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara – International Journal of Engineering Tome XVII [2019] | Fascicule 1 [February] 1.Gligorche VRTANOSKI, 2.Tasko SMILESKI DYNAMIC TESTING OF INNOVATIVE RAILWAY BRAKE SYSTEM FOR FREIGHT WAGONS 1.Institute of Production Enginering and Management, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, SS. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, MACEDONIA 2.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, SS. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, MACEDONIA Abstract: In this paper is shown dynamic testing of innovative railway brake system for freight wagons. Brake systems have the essential function of decelerating and stopping of railway rolling stock. Because the brake systems are a subject of large static and dynamic loads in external conditions, lot of tests should be done. In this paper will be shown the way of conducting dynamic testing on the innovative railway brake system. Keywords: railway, dynamic, testing, brake, freight wagon 1. INTRODUCTION The development of rail transport in recent decades goes in direction of increasing the speed and loading performance of the railway vehicles. This directly affects the development of brake technology [11]. The braking system has an essential function of reducing the speed and braking of the vehicle for the minimum possible time. The braking process of rolling stock is of great importance for the safety in the railway traffic. As railway operators focus on the need for greater improvements in efficiency and safety, there is still a significant need to advancements of the railway brake systems [12]. Several types of brake systems are used in the railways. Most commonly are used compressed air brake systems, called pneumatic brake systems [2].
    [Show full text]
  • O-Steam-Price-List-Mar2017.Pdf
    Part # Description Package Price ======== ================================================== ========= ========== O SCALE STEAM CATALOG PARTS LIST 2 Springs, driver leaf........................ Pkg. 2 $6.25 3 Floor, cab and wood grained deck............. Ea. $14.50 4 Beam, end, front pilot w/coupler pocket...... Ea. $8.00 5 Beam, end, rear pilot w/carry iron.......... Ea. $8.00 6 Bearings, valve rocker....................... Pkg.2 $6.50 8 Coupler pockets, 3-level, for link & pin..... Pkg. 2 $5.75 9 Backhead w/fire door base.................... Ea. $9.00 10 Fire door, working........................... Ea. $7.75 11 Journal, 3/32" bore.......................... Pkg. 4. $5.75 12 Coupler pockets, small, S.F. Street Railway.. Pkg.2 $5.25 13 Brakes, engine............................... Pkg.2 $7.00 14 Smokebox, 22"OD, w/working door.............. Ea. $13.00 15 Drawbar, rear link & pin..................... Ea. $5.00 16 Handles, firedoor............................ Pkg.2. $5.00 17 Shelf, oil can, backhead..................... Ea. $5.75 18 Gauge, backhead, steam pressure.............. Ea. $5.50 19 Lubricator, triple-feed, w/bracket, Seibert.. Ea. $7.50 20 Tri-cock drain w/3 valves, backhead.......... Ea. $5.75 21 Tri-cock valves, backhead, (pl. 48461)....... Pkg. 3 $5.50 23 Throttle, nonworking......................... Ea. $6.75 23.1 Throttle, non working, plastic............... Ea. $5.50 24 Pop-off, pressure, spring & arm.............. Ea. $6.00 25 Levers, reverse/brake, working............... Kit. $7.50 26 Tri-cock drain, less valves.................. Ea. $5.75 27 Seat boxes w/backs........................... Pkg.2 $7.50 28 Injector w/piping, Penberthy,................ Pkg.2 $6.75 29 Oiler, small hand, N/S....................... Pkg.2 $6.00 32 Retainers, journal........................... Pkg.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Improved TOFC/COFC Systems Robert H
    6 basis. On a "maximum" cost basis, however, the ser­ high-rate service. At profitable rates, the Philadelphia­ vice is unprofitable at all rate levels. Cleveland and Chicago-Houston services would carry only 13 and 21 trailers a day, respectively. This dif­ Chicago-Houston City Pair fers from the more conventional concept of a TOFC shuttle train service, such as the "Slingshot," which The long distance between Chicago and Houston dis­ emphasizes low rates and high volume. It would be tinguishes this city pair from the other two. Al­ interesting to repeat this analysis assuming a lower though both rail and truck service tends to be fairly cost, but slower, less reliable service. It is possible good, a reliable TOFC shuttle train service is believed that such a service might prove more profitable than to offer some improvement in service over both. De­ the premium service hypothesized here. spite its long distance, the traffic between this pair of These models have allowed us to understand the cities is fairly heavy-roughly the same as between consequences of the multitude of individual firm deci­ Philadelphia and Cleveland. One might speculate that sions that will determine the market for a service. As the economies of rail line-haul operation would make such, they represent a considerable advance over other a TOFC shuttle train a profitable undertaking between methods, such as aggregate econometric models, which this pair of cities. require gross assumptions about the relationship of Figure 4 presents the comparison of revenues and transportation demand to the economy of a region. costs at various rate levels for the Chicago-Houston Better industry data, production-type demand models, TOFC shuttle train service.
    [Show full text]