DOCSLIB.ORG

Puget Sound Commercial Salmon Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2013 Puget Sound Commercial Salmon Regulations Sockeye fishing 1963, Rosario Strait State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Mailing Address: 600 Capitol Way N, Olympia WA 98501-1091, (360) 902-2200, TDD (360) 902-2207 Main Office Location: Natural Resources Building, 1111 Washington Street SE, Olympia WA The 2013 season structure for the Puget Sound commercial salmon season was defined during Pacific Fisheries Management Council process and North of Falcon (PFMC/NoF) public meetings. The following rules and regulations are a result of discussions involving state, tribal and federal fisheries management agencies; representatives of the commercial and recreational industries; and other interested parties. This pamphlet summarizes the agreed to schedules and rules for non-treaty Puget Sound commercial salmon fisheries in 2013. The fishing schedule is similar to recent years and includes opportunity to harvest pink salmon in Puget Sound. Major management highlights for the 2013 season include: Derelict Gear Reporting In 2012 the state passed a law making it mandatory for commercial fishermen to report lost nets to the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. The regulations require any person who loses or abandons commercial net fishing gear to report it to the Department of Fish and Wildlife within 24 hours of loss. Derelict Gear Hotline: 1-855-542-3935 Orca Vessel Rules In 2011 the Federal Government (NOAA Fisheries) released new protective regulations for Endangered Species Act (ESA) listed Killer Whales (Orcas). These rules prohibit vessels from approaching any killer whale closer than 200 yards and forbid vessels from intercepting a whale or positioning the vessel in its path. Exemptions to the rules apply to treaty Indian and commercial fishing vessel lawfully engaged in actively setting, retrieving, or closely tending fishing gear or transferring catch. The regulations do apply to all fishing vessels transiting to or from fishing. Areas 7 and 7A (Fraser Fisheries) Operators of all commercial salmon fishing gear types must complete a “fish friendly” workshop and be in possession of their certification card to participate in any salmon openings in Areas 7 and 7A, including chum openings. Certification cards issued in 2004 – 2012 remain valid for 2013. Brailing is required during ALL purse seine salmon openings in Areas 7 and 7A, including chum openings, and in Areas 7B and 7C during Fraser Panel Control, which is expected to continue through September 28th. Gill net participation during weeks 41 and 42 chum fishery in Areas 7 and 7A requires utilization of on-board recovery boxes, and soak time (first mesh in to last mesh out) for gill net sets is not to exceed 45 minutes. Limited Participation Fisheries All Puget Sound Commercial permit holders were mailed a limited participation entry form during the last week in May. This form included information and regulations on the planned 2013 limited participation fisheries and is included on pages 44-46 of this pamphlet. In Area 8A, there are limited participation coho fisheries scheduled for both gillnets and purse seines. The purse seine fishery is planned for September 23rd and 30th. The limited entry gillnet fishery is planned for September 24th with a regular commercial opening planned for the following week. The number of fishers is limited to two boats per gear type. In Area 10 there is a limited participation pink fishery scheduled during weeks 33-35. The number of vessels is limited to five gillnets and five purse seines, which will be randomly selected in accordance with WAC 220-47-500 (Limited participation salmon net fisheries). Participating vessels are required to have WDFW observers on-board while fishing and must pay a $250 fee per day of fishing. The fishery will close for all gears when 200 Chinook mortalities are reached. Both gears must release Chinook and coho and are required to use recovery boxes (see page 12 for recovery box specifications). Purse seines are required to brail catch or use a rolling wedge to bring fish aboard the vessel. Gillnets will be open night hours from 7pm to 7am. Mesh size requirements are 4 ½ inch minimum and 5 ½ inch maximum mesh. Soak times (first mesh in to last mesh out) must not exceed 90 minutes. Beach Seines Four beach seine permits will again be issued in 2013 for use in the Area 12A coho season with possible chum openings in the Hoodsport Hatchery area. The selection process for issuing permits still follows the guidelines in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 220-47-427. Legal beach seine gear is defined in WAC 220-47-427(7) (a) – (b). Exclusion Zones (Note that these are only highlights of 2013 closures and a complete list of exclusion zones and area closures is included in this pamphlet beginning on page 17) In Area 7B, the outer northeast portion (Hale Passage) will be closed to gillnet fishing during the first 3 weeks of September (September 1st – 21st) to protect Thompson River coho. Purse seiners fishing in this area must release all coho. The specific area description can be found on page 29 of this pamphlet. In Area 7B, that portion of Bellingham Bay and Portage Bay that is on or adjacent to the Lummi Indian Reservation, as defined by the line described in the regulations is closed. Area 7B Lummi Reservation Exclusion: That portion of Bellingham Bay and Portage Bay adjacent to Lummi Indian Reservation is closed north and west of a line from the intersection of Marine Drive and Hoff Road (48°46'59"N, 122°34'25"W)projected 180° true for 2.75 nautical miles (nm) to a point at 48°45'11"N, 122°34'25"W, then 250° true for 1.4 nm to a point at 48°44'50"N, 122°35'42"W, then 270° true for 1.4 nm to 48°44'50"N, 122°37'08"W, then 230° true for 1.3 nm to 48°44'24"N, 122°37'52"W,then 200° true for 1 nm to 48°43'45"N, 122°38'12"W,then 90° true for 1 nm to a point just northeast of Portage Island (48°43'45"N, 122°37'14"W), then 160° true for 1.4 nm to a point just east of Portage Island (48°42'52"N, 122°36'37"W). Area 8A. During pink fisheries, 8A is closed south of a line from the Clinton ferry dock to the Mukilteo ferry dock to reduce gear conflicts with recreational anglers. Additional pink and coho closure areas apply. Area 8A Pink Exclusion: During pink fisheries closed 1) in those waters southerly of a line projected from the Clinton ferry dock to the Mukilteo ferry dock, 2) in those waters easterly of a line from the most southern boundary point of Area 8D thence through the green light at the entrance jetty of the Snohomish River. Area 10. The following Area 10 exclusions are in effect for the 2013 season: Area 10 Pink Seasonal Closure: Those waters east inside of a line originating from West Point extending west to the closest mid channel buoy, thence true through Point Wells until reaching latitude 47° 44’ 500”, thence extending directly east to the shoreline. Additional Area 10 Purse Seine Pink Seasonal Closure: The area within 500 feet of the eastern shore in Area 10 is closed to purse seines north of latitude 47° 44’ 500”. Area 10 Exclusion: Closed in that portion easterly of a line projected from Meadow Point to West Point. Area 10 Inseason Restriction: During Area 10 coho or chum directed fisheries, closed in those waters of Elliott Bay east of a line projected from Alki Point to the light at Fourmile Rock. 2013 PUGET SOUND COMMERCIAL SALMON REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE GENERAL PRESEASON INFORMATION………………………………………………………….. 1 PRESEASON RUNSIZE AND IN‐SEASON EXPECTATIONS……………………………………. 2 PRELIMINARY FISHING SCHEDULE…………………………………………………………….. 4 COMMERCIAL FISHING LICENSE INFORMATION…………………………………………….. 6 DEFINITIONS……………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 WHOLESALE FISH BUYING/ SELLING/ CATCH REPORTING……………………………… 9 REGULATIONS AND GENERAL RULES…………………………………………………………. 11 GEAR SPECIFIC RULES PURSE SEINE………………………………………………………………… 13 GILLNET……………………………………………………………………… 14 REEF NET……………………………………………………………………. 15 BEACH SEINE………………………………………………………………... 15 TESTING COMMERCIAL FISHING GEAR……………………………………………………….. 16 PUGET SOUND SALMON MANAGEMENT AND CATCH REPORTING AREAS……………... 17 EXCLUSION ZONES AND IN‐SEASON AREA RESTRICTIONS………………………………... 21 WDFW ADVISORIES …………………………………………………………………………….. 38 U.S.C.G. VESSEL TRAFFIC SERVICE ADVISORIES…………………………………………… 39 KILLER WHALE VESSEL REGULATIONS………………………………………………………. 40 NAVAL BASE INFORMATION…………………………………………….………………............ 41 DERELICT GEAR REPORTING…………………………………………………………………… 42 PINNIPED DETERRENTS…………………………………………………………………………. 43 LIMITED PARTICIPATION FISHERIES ………..………………………………………………… 44 FISHING HOTLINE INFORMATION (INSIDE BACK COVER) This publication is available in alternate formats upon request. For information regarding alternate formats please contact 1-360-902-2200 or TTD 1-800-833- 6388 and allow seven (7) working days to process requests. This publication and other commercial salmon information is available on the WDFW website at http://wdfw.wa.gov, then click on Fishing/Commercial and follow the links to Puget Sound commercial salmon regulations and information. PRESEASON RUNSIZE AND SEASON EXPECTATIONS Tables on pages 2 and 3 show the 2013 forecasts, summaries of past run-sizes, catch, and days open for major non-treaty commercial fisheries. Pages 4 and 5 show the fishing schedule for Puget Sound all-citizen salmon fishing in 2013 based on negotiated preliminary pre-season fishery expectations only. Actual openings may differ from those shown in this document, as WDFW will respond in-season to evaluations of runsizes, catch,
Recommended publications
  • Overview of the Potential Interactions and Impacts of Commercial Fishing Methods on Marine Habitats and Species Protected Under the Eu Habitats Directive

    Overview of the Potential Interactions and Impacts of Commercial Fishing Methods on Marine Habitats and Species Protected Under the Eu Habitats Directive

    THE N2K GROUP European Economic Interest Group OVERVIEW OF THE POTENTIAL INTERACTIONS AND IMPACTS OF COMMERCIAL FISHING METHODS ON MARINE HABITATS AND SPECIES PROTECTED UNDER THE EU HABITATS DIRECTIVE Contents GLOSSARY................................................................................................................................................3 1. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Fisheries interactions ....................................................................................................................7 2. FISHERIES AND NATURA 2000 - PRESSURES, INTERACTIONS, AND IMPACTS ....................................8 2.1 POTENTIAL PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PRESSURES AND IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH COMMERCIAL FISHING METHODS ............................................................................................8 DREDGES .......................................................................................................................................11 TRAWL - PELAGIC ..........................................................................................................................12 HOOK & LINE.................................................................................................................................12 TRAPS ............................................................................................................................................12 NETS ..............................................................................................................................................13
  • From Semiahmoo First Nation to the Review Panel Re: Oral Presentation

    From Semiahmoo First Nation to the Review Panel Re: Oral Presentation

    Date: May 16, 2019 s EMIAHMOO FIRST NATION Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Roberts Bank Terminal2 Project Public Hearing Phase Overview of Oral Hearing Submission by Semiahmoo First Nation To: Cindy Parker Review Panel Manager Roberts Bank Termina12 Project c/o Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Ottawa, ON K1A OH3 16049 Beach Road, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3Z 9R6 Tel: 604.536.3101 Fax: 604.536.6116 E-mail: [email protected] The Semiahmoo First Nation ("Semiahmoo") holds Aboriginal rights and title and exercises our rights, practices and culture throughout our Traditional Territory. Additionally, Semiahmoo exercises our rights, practices and culture throughout the broader resources area, which includes the lower Fraser River, Roberts Bank, Semiahmoo Bay, Boundary Bay, Fraser River, Nicomekl River, Serpentine River, Little Campbell River the Gulf Islands including San Juan Island, Vancouver Island, Washington State and the Salish Sea. Semiahmoo has communicated the adverse effects of the Roberts Band Terminal2 Project ("RBT2") on our Aboriginal rights and title to the project proponent and the Crown. Semiahmoo has previously demanded studies regarding cumulative effects of marine shipping in regard to the regarding the Marine Shipping Addendum and RBT2 including: • a traditional marine use study to examine the impacts on our Aboriginal rights and title; • a study of the effects of sedimentation on the foreshore of the Semiahmoo Indian Reserve lands from the tide, current and
  • List of Authorized Fisheries and Fishing Gear

    List of Authorized Fisheries and Fishing Gear

    Tab E, No. 7c Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 231 / Thursday, December 2, 1999 / Rules and Regulations 67511 This is a condensed version of the Federal Register notice DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE January 27, 1999, NMFS by final rule SUMMARY: NMFS revises the list of published the LOF (64 FR 4030). On National Oceanic and Atmospheric authorized fisheries and fishing gear July 28, 1999, NMFS delayed the Administration used in those fisheries (LOF) effectiveness of the LOF and invited contained in 50 CFR 600.725(v). additional public comments (64 FR 50 CFR Part 600 Effective December 1, 1999, no person 40781). This final rule revises the LOF or vessel may employ fishing gear or [Docket No. 980519132–9315–03; participate in a fishery in the and makes it effective on December 1, I.D.022498F] exclusive economic zone (EEZ) not 1999. RIN 0648–AK49 included in this LOF without giving 90 days’ advance notice to the Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; appropriate Fishery Management List of Fisheries and Gear, and Council (Council) or, with respect to Notification Guidelines Atlantic highly migratory species AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries (HMS), the Secretary of Commerce Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and (Secretary). Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), DATES: Effective December 1, 1999. Commerce. ADDRESSES: Copies of the regulatory ACTION: Final rule impact review for the final rule for . this action can be obtained from Dr. Gary C. Matlock, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Send comments regarding the collection-of-information requirements associated with this rule to the above address and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Washington, DC 20503 (Attention: NOAA Desk Officer).
  • Coryphaena Hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean M

    Coryphaena Hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean M

    Research Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.706 Age, Growth and Reproduction of Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean M. GATT1, M. DIMECH1 and P.J. SCHEMBRI1 1 Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida MSD 2080, Malta Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Kostas Stergiou Received: 24 November 2014; Accepted: 22 January 2015; Published on line: 27 April 2015. Abstract Age, growth and reproduction of the dolphinfishCoryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758 collected from the Central Mediterranean in the period 2004-2010 by the traditional Maltese fish aggregating devices (FAD) and surface longline fisheries were studied. The a and b parameters of the length-weight relationship for fish 11-142 cm fork length (FL) (n = 4042) were determined as a = 0.018 and 0.022 with b = 2.85 and 2.79, for males and females respectively. The counting of annual increments from dorsal spines of >65 cm FL dolphinfish at X25 magnification (n = 47) permitting an age reading resolution in years, and the counting of daily increments from sagittal otoliths of <65 cm FL dolphinfish at X400 magnification (n = 583) permitting an age reading resolution in days, were estimated; the von Bertalanffy growth model applied to these fish gave the following parameters:L∞ = 107.8 cm FL and 120.2 cm FL, and K = 1.9 yr-1 and 1.56 yr-1, for males and females respectively.
  • Pacific Salmon & Steelhead 2015-2020

    Pacific Salmon & Steelhead 2015-2020

    Pacific Salmon & Steelhead 2015-2020 Bibliography Trevor Riley, Head of Public Services, NOAA Central Library Katie Rowley, Research Librarian, NOAA Central Library Hope Shinn, Research Librarian, NOAA Central Library Jamie Roberts, Research Librarian, NOAA Central Library Erin Cheever, Research Librarian, NOAA Central Library NCRL subject guide 2020-15 https://doi.org/10.25923/7f5f-pz64 September 2020 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research NOAA Central Library – Silver Spring, Maryland Table of Contents Background & Scope ................................................................................................................................. 3 Sources Reviewed ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Section I: California Central Valley ............................................................................................................ 6 Section II: South-Central & Southern California Coast ........................................................................... 38 Section III: North-Central California Coast .............................................................................................. 47 Section IV: Southern Oregon & Northern California Coast ..................................................................... 76 Section V: Oregon Coast ........................................................................................................................
  • Quality Assurance Project Plan (H.C.S., 2006)

    Quality Assurance Project Plan (H.C.S., 2006)

    California Creek and Drayton Harbor Microbial Source Tracking Pilot Study Monitoring Plan December 2006 Prepared for: Puget Sound Restoration Fund, Ferndale, Washington (360)-384-9135 Prepared by: Hirsch Consulting Services Lummi Island, Washington (360)-758-4046 ([email protected]) Approved by Geoff Menzies, Puget Sound Restoration Fund ___________________________ Date__________ Debby Sargeant, Department of Health Office of Food Safety and Shellfish ___________________________ Date__________ TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 1 ORGANIZATION AND SCHEDULE .......................................................................................................... 2 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................ 3 DRAYTON HARBOR WATERSHED AND THE CALIFORNIA CREEK SUB-BASIN .............................................. 3 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Beneficial Uses ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Potential Pollution Sources .................................................................................................................. 7 Existing Water Quality Monitoring Data
  • Mayor Wayne Baldwin Office of the Mayor

    Mayor Wayne Baldwin Office of the Mayor

    MAYOR WAYNE BALDWIN OFFICE OF THE MAYOR , WHITE ROCK, BC CANADA May 12, 2016 File No. 0220-20 Transmitted by Email: todd.stone.M [email protected] The Honourable Todd Stone, MLA Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure Room 305, Parliament Buildings Victoria, BC V8V 1X4 Dear Minister Stone: Re: Transportation of Dangerous Goods by Rail — Rail Relocation We are writing to you and to the Honourable Marc Garneau, Federal Minister of Transportation seeking consideration and support for the relocation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSFR) from to the its current route along the coastline of the Semiahmoo Peninsula, travelling from the United States would CN/CP trackage to the Port of Vancouver, to a more direct, inland route. A relocation of this route address an extremely and increasing dangerous situation in terms of an inevitable rail derailment and other safety, environmental community concerns while providing a superior route from a time travel and operational standpoint. for a The City of White Rock and the City of Surrey are seeking partnership and funding opportunities study on options for rail relocation. predecessor, the In the early 1900’s the government granted a Right of Way for a railroad to the BNSFR’s Great Northern Railway along the coastline of the Semiahmoo Peninsula. Three communities north of the White Rock U.S. border inhabit the area along the Peninsula, the Semiahmoo First Nation, the City of of approximately (with a population of approximately 20,000) and the City of Surrey (with a population 540,000). there were between two In recent years, the volume of train traffic has increased significantly.
  • STEATITE PLAQUE and a CARVED TOOTH from SEMIAHMOO SPIT by Don Welsh

    STEATITE PLAQUE and a CARVED TOOTH from SEMIAHMOO SPIT by Don Welsh

    STEATITE PLAQUE AND A CARVED TOOTH FROM SEMIAHMOO SPIT By Don Welsh This steatite plaque (Figure 1) and carved bear tooth (Figure 2) were excavated in site 45WH 17 Semiahmoo Spit. The following article attempts, in retrospect, to provide ethnographic and archaeological context to these most interesting artifacts. The steatite plaque was uncovered in pit 16-F-73 cut one, quad B during the Sehome High School field school, directed by the late Milton Clothier," from 1970 to 1973. I would like to thank his widow for providing the manuscript of the excavation report. Although requested, no one seems to know what happened to the artifacts, the site map, or excavation plans. So there is a repository number for artifacts but no one knows where they repose, the definite location of the pit in which they were recovered or in fact where the pits were located within the site. The Semiahmoo Spit Site Semiahmoo Spit, ( 45-WH-17), is a large complex shell midden site situated at the base of Semiahmoo Spit where it c ontacts the Birch Point uplands (Figure 3). Semiahmoo Spit, just south of the Canada/U.S. border, is a sand spit trending northeast and separating Drayton Harbor (on the east) from Semiahmoo Bay (on the west). Wayne Suttles recorded this location, from interviews with Julius Charles and Lucy Celestine, as the Semiahmoo winter Figure 1. Steatite Plaque From Clothier 1973 (accession# 245-73-1) . village S' eel uch on the west side of the spit and Nuwnuwulich on the east side. S'eeluch was allegedly a high class village while Nuwnuwulich was second class.
  • Attachment 1 Agenda Item Summary

    Attachment 1 Agenda Item Summary

    Attachment 1 Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND Current permanent regulations do not allow for harvest of bait fish (also known as forage fish) in Oregon inland waters for commercial purposes, with the exception of the Columbia River and a small herring fishery in Yaquina Bay. Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) prohibit commercial fishing in select inland waters such as Nestucca Bay (ORS 511.606) and waters of Curry County (ORS 511.206 and ORS 511.306). This exhibit discusses allowing commercial harvest of baitfish in select inland waters and provides an approach to rulemaking by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission (Commission). There are two issues: allowing harvesting of anchovies to be used as live bait in the commercial albacore fishery, and accommodating a long-term small volume shorebased bait business operating in Winchester Bay. Forage Fish Management Bait fish, also known as forage fish or Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS), are managed jointly through federal and state processes. The Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) adopted the CPS Fishery Management Plan (FMP) in June of 1978. At that time, it was titled the Northern Anchovy Fishery Management Plan. The FMP was specific to management of the northern anchovy fishery until 1998, when an amendment was accepted that expanded the FMP to the entire CPS fishery. Stocks managed under the CPS FMP include Pacific sardine, Pacific (chub) mackerel, northern anchovy, market squid and jack mackerel. The Commission has the authority to implement regulations governing CPS fisheries that are consistent with or more restrictive than those implemented federally. Most notably, the Commission is responsible for management of the Oregon Pacific sardine fishery, in which participation is limited through state rule.
  • Tuna Fishing in Indonesia

    Tuna Fishing in Indonesia

    J. MARCZILLE T. BOELY M. UNAR G.S. MERTA B. SABHOTOMO J.C.B. UKTOLSEJA Éditions de i’0 RSTO Dl INSTITUT FRANÇAIS DE RECHEliCHE SCIENTIFIQUE POUR LE L¶ÉVELBPPEMENT EN COOPÉRATION TUNA FISHING IN INDONESIA (( La loi du II mars 1957 n’autorisant, aux termes des alinéas 2 et 3 de l’article 41, d’une part, (( que les ((copies ou reproductions strictement réservées à l’usage privé du copiste et non destinées (( à une utilisation collective» et, d’autre part, que les analyses et les courtes citations dans un but (( d’exemple et d’illustration, ((toute représentation ou reproduction intégrale, ou partielle, faite sans le G consentement de l’auteur ou de ses ayants droit ou ayant cause, est illicite)) (alinéa Ier de l’article 40). (( Cette représentation ou reproduction, par quelque procédé que ce soit, constituerait donc une (( contrefaçon sanctionnée par les articles 425 et suivants du Code Pénal)). ;: . I.S.B.N. : 2-7099-0739-9 @ O.R.S.T.O.M. 1984 Balai Peneletian Perikanan Laut Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Dbveloppemnt en Coopération (O.R.S.T.O.M.) TUNA FISHING IN INDONESIA by f. "w?&LLE " Il: UNAR: G.S. MERTA- 8. SAOHOTOMG- J.C.B. UKTOLSEJA- * Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération (O.R.S.T.O.M.). +W Central Research Institute for Fisheries - Jakarta. +HI+ Research Institute for Marine Fisheries - Jakarta. SUIUMARY - Abstract . ..*.......*...*......*................... 2 _.'- <. .. 3, A R&U~&.......;...:..: . ..~.......................'.................... <,).' . ..B 4 - ,-Pendahuluan .-...............a......... .l. - Catch-statistics of tuna and tuna-like fishes in Indonesia.....;.................;5 : : Industrial longline fishing in .
  • Fundamental Studies on the Fishing Efficiency of Purse Seine

    Fundamental Studies on the Fishing Efficiency of Purse Seine

    Fundamental Studies on the Fishing Efficiency of Purse Seine 著者 "KATIANDAGHO Elof Machten, IMAI Takehiko" journal or 南海研紀要 publication title volume 6 number 2 page range 229-247 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10232/15672 Mem. Kagoshima Univ. Res. Center S. Pac, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1985 229 Fundamental Studies on the Fishing Efficiency of Purse Seine Elof Machten Katiandagho* and Takehiko Imai** Abstract Studies on the efficiency of purse seines were carried out in a water circulating experimental tank in a static water condition using five simplified seine models of different hang-in ratios. The results indicate that the seine with hang-in ratio of 34 % sank the fastest and seines with 25 % and 30 % of hang-in ratios had sinking speeds nearly equal to each other. The final depth of the former seine wall was 91 % of the designed seine depth, while that for the later was 97 % and 100 %. From this data it is thought that a net with about a 30 % hang-in ratio is the most efficient for both fishing and also in terms of construction. Model experiments on the two net designs of mackerel purse seines operating in Indonesian waters revealed high sinking speed those are 53 % and 40 % of set ting time, after that time both model nets decreased the sinking speed. So it is recommended to commence pursing because at this moment, the stretched seine wall of model net A showed 72 % and model net B showed 86 % of seine depth. The effects of various pursing speeds and pursing times on the purseline tension of two model nets A and B showed a quadratic function.
  • Fact Sheet Peace Arch Land Port of Entry Peace Arch Built in 1921, Renovated in 1979 and 2010 (Gross Square Footage 51,782)

    Fact Sheet Peace Arch Land Port of Entry Peace Arch Built in 1921, Renovated in 1979 and 2010 (Gross Square Footage 51,782)

    GSA Northwest/Arctic Region Fact Sheet Peace Arch Land Port of Entry Peace Arch built in 1921, renovated in 1979 and 2010 (Gross square footage 51,782) 100 Peace Portal Drive Blaine, Washington 98230 Property Manager: John Shaffer Cell: (206) 369-4077 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.gsa.gov GSA constructed the new state-of-the-art Peace Arch Land reduce water runoff. The project is also the first land port of Port of Entry (LPOE), in Blaine, Washington, in 2010. The entry to incorporate an advanced exterior lighting design to original 1920’s-era brick building underwent a major rebuild in reduce energy usage and light pollution into the atmosphere, 1979 and then again from 2007 to 2010. The new facility was and the campus incentivizes hybrid and electric vehicles by formally dedicated in March 2011. The modernization including six new charging stations, and provides them with enhanced border security, and provided a more welcoming priority parking spaces. The project has achieved a Leadership experience for visitors to both Canada and the United States. in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold certification The reconstructed LPOE also features innovative technologies from the U.S. Green Building Council, the first LPOE to that will ensure taxpayers benefit from increased energy achieve this distinction in the U.S. Additionally, the new land savings. port showcases additional inspection booths to bolster security, The Peace Arch LPOE serves as the the major U.S. to Canada . The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 border crossing where U.S. Interstate 5 ( I-5) through Seattle partially funded the recent $107 million project.