A27 Arundel Bypass Stage 2 - Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 8 – Biodiversity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A27 Arundel Bypass Stage 2 - Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 8 – Biodiversity A27 Arundel Bypass Stage 2 - Environmental Assessment Report Chapter 8 – Biodiversity ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT – BIODIVERSITY CHAPTER Notice This document is the Biodiversity chapter from the Environmental Assessment Report (EAR) for Project Control Framework (PCF) Stage 2 of the A27 Arundel Bypass Scheme ('the Scheme'), completed in May 2018. Three design options for the Scheme (Option 1, Option 3 and Option 5A) were being considered at this time. Following a Preferred Route Announcement for the Scheme in May 2018, Highways England announced a further non-statutory public consultation to be undertaken in 2019. This resulted in the scheme returning to PCF Stage 2. New documents will be completed as a part of this Stage that will consider design developments and any other evidence available. A27 Arundel Bypass Chapter 8 – Biodiversity 8 BIODIVERSITY 8.1 INTRODUCTION 8.1.1 This biodiversity chapter provides an ecological impact assessment of the A27 Arundel Bypass upon designated sites, habitats and species. Likely significant effects associated with each Scheme Option (Option 1, Option 3 and Option 5A) are assessed and discussed. A comparison of the three Scheme Options against one another, in respect of relative magnitude of ecological impact, is presented. This analysis is required by Highway England to inform selection of a preferred route option. 8.1.2 The ecological impact assessment considers Important Ecological Features within appropriate study areas measured from the edge of the preliminary footprint of each of the three Scheme Options. Study areas have been selected with respect to the features considered to allow possible direct and indirect impacts to be fully accounted for, and are described in Section 8.2. 8.1.3 The assessment is based on desk study and field survey information presented in the PCF Stage 1 Environmental Study Report. In addition, it includes desk study information gathered in 2017 provided by the Mid-Arun Valley Environmental Survey based on their surveys undertaken between 2015 and 2017. 8.1.4 A range of habitat, protected and notable species surveys are being undertaken by Highways England between February 2017 and August 2018. Appendix E summarises methods for ecological surveys being undertaken in 2017/2018 and key preliminary findings. Detailed survey findings from 2017/2018 surveys will be presented at PCF Stage 3, however, preliminary findings have been incorporated into this assessment. 8.1.5 The Ordnance Survey 1:25,000 series map has been used to reference individual place names in this chapter (for example, Paine’s Wood, Barn’s Copse, Tortington Common etc.). Where place names need to be referenced that do not correspond to those published by the Ordnance Survey, the location name given is accompanied by a National Grid reference (e.g. Sandy Hole Pond, National Grid reference SU9819106947). An eight or ten figure grid reference is provided where the ecological feature may be pin-pointed precisely; a six figure grid reference is provided where the feature is a broader area. Place names commonly referred to in the text are also mapped in Figure 8-1. 8.2 LEGISLATIVE AND POLICY FRAMEWORK EU DIRECTIVES AND INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS WILD BIRDS DIRECTIVE 2009/147/EC 8.2.1 This directive creates a comprehensive scheme of protection for all wild bird species naturally occurring in the European Union. The Directive places great emphasis on the protection of habitats for endangered as well as migratory species, especially through the establishment of a coherent network of Special Protection Areas. HABITATS DIRECTIVE 92/43/EEC 8.2.2 Together with the Birds Directive, this Directive forms the cornerstone of Europe's nature conservation policy. It is built around two pillars: network of protected sites and system of strict species protection. This directive provides for the establishment of a network of Special Areas for Conservation. 8-1 A27 Arundel Bypass Chapter 8 – Biodiversity WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 8.2.3 The Directive establishes a framework for the protection of inland surface waters (rivers and lakes), transitional waters (estuaries), coastal waters and groundwater. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DIRECTIVE 2011/92/EU 8.2.4 The Directive requires Environmental Impact Assessment to be undertaken in relation to a wide range of defined public and private projects, which are defined in Annexes I and II. UK AND ENGLISH LEGISLATION FRAMEWORK 8.2.5 A number of statutes exist to ensure direct and indirect protection of England’s habitats and species. Those with direct relevance are summarised in this section THE CONSERVATION OF HABITATS AND SPECIES REGULATIONS 2017 8.2.6 The Regulations which implement the Habitats Directive (EC Directive 92/43/EEC) in the United Kingdom require those consenting a development (in the case of the Scheme, the competent authority is the Secretary of State for Transport) to decide whether or not a plan or project can proceed having undertaken the an ‘appropriate assessment’ which: Determines whether a project may have a significant effect on a European site1; If required, undertake an appropriate assessment of the project; and Decide whether there may be an adverse effect on the integrity of the European site in light of the appropriate assessment. 8.2.7 The Regulations also require those proposing a development that may negatively impact a European Protected Species of plant or animal (those listed on Schedule 2 of the Regulations/Annex IV of the EC Habitats Directive) to pass three licensing tests which are regulated by Natural England: The impact is necessary for imperative reasons of overriding public interest including those of a social or economic nature (Regulation 55, Section 2e); There is no satisfactory alternative to the proposed development (Regulation 55, Section 9a); and That the development will not be detrimental to the maintenance of the species concerned at a favourable conservation status in their natural range (Regulation 55, Section 9b). 8.2.8 All species of bat, hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellenarius), great crested newt (Triturus cristatus), lesser whirlpool ram’s-horn snail (Anisus vorticulus), otter (Lutra lutra) and white clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes) are all examples of European Protected Species which are considered in this assessment. Hazel dormouse and numerous species of bat have been confirmed as present in the Field Survey Area (see Section 8.4 Baseline). WILDLIFE AND COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1981 8.2.9 This is the primary legislation in Great Britain for the protection of flora, fauna and the countryside. This legislation covers four areas: 1 European sites include: Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas, sites of Community importance (SCIs), and candidate SACs. As a matter of Government policy, potential Special Protection Areas and Ramsar sites are also treated as European sites. 8-2 A27 Arundel Bypass Chapter 8 – Biodiversity Wildlife protection, including protection of wild birds, their eggs and nests, protection of other animal and protection of plants; Nature Conservation, Countryside & National Parks; Public Rights of Way; and Miscellaneous provisions. THE COUNTRYSIDE AND RIGHTS OF WAY ACT 2000 8.2.10 The Act places a duty on Government Departments and the National Assembly for Wales to have regard for the conservation of biodiversity and maintain lists of species and habitats for which conservation steps should be taken or promoted, in accordance with the Convention on Biological Diversity. 8.2.11 Schedule 9 of the Act amends SSSI provisions of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, including provisions to change SSSIs and providing increased powers for their protection and management. 8.2.12 Schedule 12 of the Act amends the species provisions of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, strengthening the legal protection for threatened species. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL COMMUNITIES ACT 2006 8.2.13 The Act was designed to help achieve a rich and diverse natural environment and thriving rural communities through modernised and simplified arrangements for delivering Government policy. The Act established a new independent body - Natural England - responsible for conserving, enhancing, and managing England's natural environment for the benefit of current and future generations. The Act made amendments to both the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 and the Countryside and Rights of Way (CROW) Act 2000. 8.2.14 Section 40 of the Act imposes a duty on public authorities, including Highways England, which is that: “In exercising its functions, have regard, so far as is consistent with the proper exercise of those functions, to the purpose of conserving biodiversity.” 8.2.15 Section 41 of the Act requires the Secretary of State to: “publish a list of the living organisms and types of habitat which in the Secretary of State's opinion are of principal importance for the purpose of conserving biodiversity.” These are alternative referred to as Habitats/Species of Principal Importance. THE NATIONAL PARKS AND ACCESS TO THE COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1949 8.2.16 In England and Wales National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty are designated under the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. The purposes of designation for National Parks are to: Conserve and enhance their natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage and Promote public understanding and enjoyment of their special qualities. 8.2.17 All the national parks in England, Wales and Scotland have an aim
Recommended publications
  • The Sussex Recorder
    THE SUSSEX RECORDER Proceedings from the Biological Recorders' Seminar held at The Downlands Centre, Hassocks March 1994 Compiled and edited by Harry Montgomery Sussex Wildlife Trust Woods Mill Henfield West Sussex BN5 9SD THE SUSSEX RECORDER Proceedings from the Biological Recorders' Seminar held at The Downlands Centre, Hassocks March 1994 Compiled and edited by Harry Montgomery Sussex Wildlife Trust Woods Mill Henfield West Sussex BN5 9SD Sussex Wildlife Trust Woods Mill, Henfield, West Sussex BN5 9SD Telephone 01273 492630 Facsimile 01273 494500 The Proceedings of the 1994 Biological Recorders' Seminar The fifth Biological Recorders' Seminar took place in March and was again a very successful day. It has taken a while to prepare the proceedings as usual, but a copy is now enclosed and I hope you find it interesting. None of this work would have been possible without the help of volunteers. would particularly like to thank Dennis Dey and his team of helpers who organised the event, including the excellent lunch, and Harry Montgomery who collated, edited and organised the mailing out of the proceedings. I hope to circulate a copy of the proceedings to everyone who is interested; if you think I may have missed anyone or got a wrong address, please let me know. The document will also be on sale to the general public for £4.00 + p&p. Although there is no charge to recorders, our finances are severely stretched so any donations towards the cost would be greatly appreciated. The date for the next seminar has been set for Saturday, 25th February 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection Criteria for Screening Schedule 2 Development
    Horsham District Council EIA Screening Assessment HDC Reference: HP/Scr/17/03 Applicant Reference: TS/11978 Development Proposal: Construction of two new industrial buildings and ancillary storage unit with access, parking, landscaping and ancillary works on land at Water Lane, Storrington, West Sussex . EIA Regulations Is the proposed development listed in schedule 1? No Is the proposed development listed in Schedule 2? The proposal is for an urban development project under the EIA Regulations (Note ‘wide of scope, broad of purpose’ legal judgement) 2015 10(b). The development site is 2.8 ha and therefore, exceeds the threshold of 1ha for urban development which is not for a dwellinghouse. Is the proposed development in a sensitive area as defined in No Regulation 2? (SSSI, National Park, property on World Heritage List, Scheduled monuments, AONB, SPA or SAC) Schedule 3 – Selection Criteria for Screening Schedule 2 Development 1. Characteristics of Development Description (include permanent / temporary impacts, positive Significance and / or negative impacts / likelihood of impact as applicable) a) Size of development (e.g. site area, scale) The site area is 2.8ha with a proposal for two new industrial buildings Potential for significant each with a gross external area of 2,323sqm and a small storage impact due to culmination building with a gross external area of 370sqm. with other recent b) cumulation with other development There could be cumulative effects with the existing industrial units to developments in the the south of the site. In addition, a residential development of 75 units area. These impacts are is currently being constructed to the south east of the site and considered in detail planning permission has been granted for a 98 dwellings on a former below industrial site to the south west of the proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment June 2021
    Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Horsham District Council July 2021 Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Damiano Weitowitz James Riley Max Wade James Riley Consultant Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Technical Director Isla Hoffmann Heap Senior Ecologist Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 13/10/20 Emerging draft JR James Riley Technical to inform plan Director development 1 18/12/20 Updated to JR James Riley Technical assess Director Regulation 19 LP. 2 15/01/2021 Update JR James Riley Technical following client Director comments 3 30/06/21 Further update JR James Riley Technical Director Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Horsham District Council AECOM Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Prepared for: Horsham District Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2021 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Horsham District Council AECOM Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Lane, Warningcamp, West Sussex
    Clay Lane, Warningcamp, West Sussex Chichester Clay Lane, Warningcamp, Arundel, West Sussex, BN18 9QN This fine early Victorian farmhouse has been refurbished throughout and is located in the heart of the Saxon village of Warningcamp, about one mile east of the Historic town of Arundel. sitting room | dining room | 4 double bedrooms (1 en suite) | bathroom | pantry | utility room | double garage | large mature garden Arun District Council Council Tax Band G - £2,456.03 Rent - £2,500 pcm Description Clay Lane Farmhouse has been redecorated from top to bottom to provide a spacious family home. The accommodation comprises a large sitting room with an open fireplace, a dining room, a good sized kitchen with an adjacent shelved pantry. There is also a utility room and a cloakroom on the ground floor. On the first floor are four double bedrooms (one with an ensuite shower room), and a family bathroom. Situation Arundel is a picturesque, historic town with a cathedral, castle, many attractive period buildings and a variety of cafes and restaurants. Cultural and leisure opportunities include the thriving annual arts festival, and a good selection of antique shops and markets. There are tennis courts and a bowling green within the town whilst horse racing can be found at Goodwood and Fontwell. Golf is available at Ham Manor and Goodwood, and sailing from Littlehampton Marina and Chichester Harbour. Drama and music are catered for at Arundel's Priory Playhouse and Chichester's famous Festival Theatre. A mainline station at Arundel provides services to both London (Victoria) and Gatwick. Fees Apply W N S E W N S E F/P Living Room F/P 3.5m x 3.4m Dining Room Kitchen 11'7" x 11'3" 3.3m x 2.7m 2.2m x 2.0m Once tenancy terms have beenF/P agreed, a non-refundable7'4" x 6'6" Living10'10" Room x 8'11" (Maximum) F/P administration fee is 3.5mpayable.
    [Show full text]
  • View Characterisation and Analysis
    South Downs National Park: View Characterisation and Analysis Final Report Prepared by LUC on behalf of the South Downs National Park Authority November 2015 Project Title: 6298 SDNP View Characterisation and Analysis Client: South Downs National Park Authority Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by Director V1 12/8/15 Draft report R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern Swann V2 9/9/15 Final report R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern Swann V3 4/11/15 Minor changes to final R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern report Swann South Downs National Park: View Characterisation and Analysis Final Report Prepared by LUC on behalf of the South Downs National Park Authority November 2015 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Bristol Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Edinburgh London NW1 1JD Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper LUC BRISTOL 12th Floor Colston Tower Colston Street Bristol BS1 4XE T +44 (0)117 929 1997 [email protected] LUC GLASGOW 37 Otago Street Glasgow G12 8JJ T +44 (0)141 334 9595 [email protected] LUC EDINBURGH 28 Stafford Street Edinburgh EH3 7BD T +44 (0)131 202 1616 [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 1 Background to the study 1 Aims and purpose 1 Outputs and uses 1 2 View patterns, representative views and visual sensitivity 4 Introduction 4 View
    [Show full text]
  • Notes by the Revd Robert Foster. October 2017, Corrected 15 January 2018
    Notes by the Revd Robert Foster. October 2017, corrected 15 January 2018. Trevor Cooper (TC). Introduction: the Revd Robert Foster’s notes The Reverend Robert Foster is known to have left four sets of notes about Burpham. 1. Of the Village of Burpham This contains Foster’s notes on the village, with separate sections on the roads and houses. Foster’s original copy is in WSRO Par 31/7/5. It is undated, but certainly after 1891 (date mentioned in text); it refers in general terms to his successor, so probably written towards the end of his life. It was originally accompanied by at least three photos, no longer with the document. Note that the final few pages have become attached to item 2 (described below) but have been re-attached in TC’s transcript. A handwritten transcript in another hand is owned by Mrs Pat Hay-Wills. TC has a scan of this transcript, which omits the final three paragraphs, breaking short in the middle of a sentence. It also skips a couple of lines in the middle of the piece. There is a photocopy of this handwritten transcript in WSRO MP3194. There is also a typescript of this handwritten transcript on the village website (October 2017). A new typed transcript of the original will be found below, made by TC October 2017. 2. Of Burpham church etc etc Foster’s original copy is in WSRO Par 31/7/5. It is undated, but mentions an 1891 window to Robert Drewitt so is after that date. Note that the final few pages rightly belong to item 1 and have been placed there in this transcript.
    [Show full text]
  • Walks & Strolls
    WALKS & STROLLS AUGUST - OCTOBER 2018 Dear Members, British Summer Time continues throughout this programme, so let’s use the long days to enjoy our walking and travelling. After a late start, early summer has been beautifully green, so we hope to see full harvests in due course. With our varied weather, plants and animals on the Downs have much to cope with each year and it’s interesting to see how they are affected. You’ll notice this time that several Saturdays do not have any of the longer walks. Several Saturday walks leaders have had health and/or age issues lately! They have mostly been covered by strolls on these days, which are particularly welcome. Thinking about strolls, sadly Peter Harris has found it necessary to say farewell as a strolls leader. We are most grateful for his contribution over the years, especially for his entertaining themed strolls, and hope we shall still see him out strolling from time to time. All your walk offers are valuable but arranging them suitably is not always easy. The same areas do seem to cluster. So it’s worked out that lunch at Burpham is popular - in successive walks. However they do cover quite different ground. And if some people had not been able to swap there would have been three. Let’s just call it “Love Burpham Week”! In general we are down on number of walks leaders. Ideally all walkers would take part in leading so there would be a large enough pool of leaders to cope with temporary unavailability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cabinet Agenda
    E-mail: [email protected] Direct line: 01403 215465 THE CABINET Thursday 20th March 2014 at 5.30 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBER, PARK NORTH, NORTH STREET, HORSHAM Councillors: Ray Dawe Leader Helena Croft Deputy Leader and Communication, Horsham Town & Special Projects Andrew Baldwin The Environment Jonathan Chowen Arts, Heritage & Leisure Gordon Lindsay Resources Roger Paterson The Local Economy Sue Rogers Safer & Healthier District Claire Vickers Living & Working Communities You are summoned to the meeting to transact the following business Tom Crowley Chief Executive AGENDA Page No. 1. Apologies for absence. 2. To approve as correct the record of the meeting of 30th January 2014 1 (herewith). 3. To receive any declarations of interest from Members of the Cabinet. 4. To receive any announcements from the Leader, Cabinet Members or Chief Executive. 5. To receive questions from and provide answers to the public in relation to matters which in the opinion of the person presiding at the meeting are relevant to the business of the meeting. 6. To consider the following reports: (a) Report of the Cabinet Member for Living & Working Communities on 11 The Horsham District Sport, Open Space and Recreation Assessment Horsham District Council, Park North, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 1RL Tel: 01403 215100 (calls may be recorded) www.horsham.gov.uk Chief Executive - Tom Crowley (b) Report of the Cabinet Member for Living & Working Communities on 17 The Horsham District Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment accompanies this agenda as a separate document) (c) Report of the Cabinet Member for a Safer & Healthier District on the 23 approval of the West Sussex Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (Appendices 2 and 3 accompany this agenda as a separate document) (d) Report of the Cabinet Member for Resources on Business Rates 33 Retail Relief 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Nov 2018 – Jan 2019 Walks, Strolls & Events
    Nov 2018 – Jan 2019 Walks, Strolls & Events South Downs Walks and Strolls Programme Registered Office: 2 Swan Court, Station Road, Pulborough, West Sussex RH20 1RL Tel: 01798 875073 Email: [email protected] www. southdownssociety.org.uk The Society is a limited company by guarantee, registered No. 319437 and is a registered charity No.230329 Dear Members This autumn/winter brings a fine range of walks and strolls. Thankfully as one or two leaders drop out, others return from sickness and injury. Thank you all leaders for your continuing efforts to fill our programme. As we write this letter, the weather is perfect for walking. We have recovered from the summer's heat, which was too much for some of us, but we now start to consider the possibility of mud! One strolls leader has entitled her mini-series 'On Sussex Hills' after the Sussex drinking song composed by Hilaire Belloc and sung frequently by the South Downs Folk Singers. Many other leaders have obviously been thinking the same, alert to the difficulties last winter and spring brought us - spot the hills in the titles! Some of you have been asking about numbers on walks. For the May to July programme the average was 6 or 7 per walk. Certainly in the very hot weather many stayed at home. Hopefully we shall see some of you at the Christmas lunch on 7th December and at the Christmas Walk and Stroll on 13th December with lunch at the The Shepherd and Dog, Fulking followed by Carols in Newtimber Church. Rosemary Warren (Walks co-ordinator).
    [Show full text]
  • To: Paul Marshall, Leader, West Sussex County Council James Walsh, Leader, Arun District Council
    To: Paul Marshall, Leader, West Sussex County Council James Walsh, Leader, Arun District Council 5th February 2021 Arundel to Ford station cycle lane and footpath Dear Paul and James, We the undersigned representing the Arundel and Ford communities at every level wish to express our full support for the Arundel to Ford station foot and cycle pathway. It is an opportunity to build an important piece of sustainable infrastructure that is both wanted and deliverable. This scheme, as comprehensively set out in the report published by Arundel Town Council, will improve the safety of our children’s journeys to school and making walking and cycling the natural choices for shorter journeys improving our environment and the local quality of life. The construction of this route is a long standing - and the single most important - ‘ask’ of our local authorities by Arundel residents and as the result we believe is a key test of whether local authorities are prepared to work collaboratively to deliver practical improvements for the people whom they represent. We also believe that it is precisely the type of scheme that the Department of Transport are looking for with the Government’s aim to double cycling and increase walking by 2025. Our understanding is that West Sussex County Council is set to benefit from £2.4 million as Tranche 2 from the Department of Transport’s Active Travel Fund bringing the total amount for West Sussex to £3.1 million. This letter is itself proof point of the strong community support which we understand is one of the criteria for projects to be funded.
    [Show full text]
  • West Sussex County Council Monument Full Report 20/09/2018 Number of Records: 27 Boundary Markers in West Sussex
    West Sussex County Council Monument Full Report 20/09/2018 Number of records: 27 Boundary Markers in West Sussex SMR Number Site Name Record Type MWS1392 Gunters Stone Boundary Marker Monument Gunters Stone is a triangular boundary stone on the Hampshire/Sussex border. Monument Types and Dates BOUNDARY MARKER (Unknown date) Evidence STRUCTURE Description and Sources Description Gunters Stone is a triangular boundary stone on the Hampshire/Sussex border.{1}{2} Sources (1) Map: OS. 1963. 6inch (2) Bibliographic reference: Aldsworth F G. 1975. SU70NW1. Associated resources - None recorded Location National Grid Reference SU 7429 0950 (point) SU70NW Administrative Areas Civil Parish Stoughton, Chichester, West Sussex District Chichester, West Sussex Address/Historic Names - None recorded Designations, Statuses and Scorings Associated Designations - None recorded Other Statuses and Cross-References SHINE Candidate (Possible) Active Sites & Monuments Record - 37 Active OS Number - SU70NW1 Active Ratings and Scorings - None recorded Land Use Associated Historic Landscape Character Records - None recorded Other Land Classes - None recorded Related Monuments - None Recorded Finds - None recorded Associated Events/Activities - None recorded Associated Individuals/Organisations - None recorded MonFullRpt Report generated by HBSMR from exeGesIS SDM Ltd Page 1 SMR Number MWS1771 Site Name Roman Building and Palisade, Broadbridge SMR Number Site Name Record Type MWS1771 Roman Building and Palisade, Broadbridge Monument Monument Types and Dates BOUNDARY MARKER (Roman - 43 AD to 409 AD) Evidence DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FINDSPOT (Domestic-fitting, Roman - 43 AD to 409 AD) Evidence DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE BUILDING (Building-unclassified, Roman - 200 AD to 299 AD) Evidence DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE Description and Sources Description Trial excavation in 1967 on the site of a proposed telephone exchange, 65yds.
    [Show full text]
  • A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report
    A27 Arundel Bypass Environmental Assessment Report Appendix 1-1: South Downs National Park Special Quality Assessment 30 August 2019 SDNP Special Quality Assessment A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the report 1-1 1.2 Overview of the project 1-1 1.3 SDNP special qualities 1-2 1.4 Structure of the SDNP special qualities assessment report 1-3 1.5 Legislative and policy framework 1-4 1.6 Sub-regional and local planning policy 1-8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 - SDNP special qualities assessment structure 1-3 2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 2-1 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Assessment process 2-1 2.3 Potential impacts 2-3 2.4 Guidance 2-4 2.5 Assessment results 2-12 2.6 Assumptions and limitations 2-13 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 - Types of impact associated with each special quality 2-4 Table 2-2 - Alignment between DMRB and the potential impacts identified 2-6 Table 2-3 - General assumptions and limitations 2-13 August 2019 SDNP Special Quality Assessment A27 Arundel Bypass – PCF Stage 2 Further Consultation 3 SPECIAL QUALITY 1: DIVERSE, INSPIRATIONAL LANDSCAPES AND BREATHTAKING VIEWS 3-1 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Assessment methodology 3-2 3.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 3-5 3.4 Study Area 3-5 3.5 Baseline conditions 3-5 3.6 Scoping 3-5 3.7 Design, mitigation and enhancement 3-6 3.8 Assessment of potential impacts 3-9 3.9 Summary of landscape character, visual amenity and experience 3-18 LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 - Assessment assumptions and limitations for SQ1 3-5 Table 3-2
    [Show full text]