DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Notes PN-40

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Notes PN-40 Burk 1956 ' CopjWSir 1956 by THE TAX FOUNDATION, INC. 30 ROOh w Pkma, Now York 10, Now York _ _^1 ~'' _ _ -_ . ._ _ . THE TAX FOUNDATIO N BOARD OF TRUSTEES - - Orris. W. Amm B. E. Hts-iranrsDx = - Eftc. rice Presiierr. FirstRm"@dBank•/Sdtl4keCity Roswn.L MAcmL C ~ s":•e ~t«.e - - ELLswoirm C ALVORD Atwd Atmd WALT= T. MmKaT 5, JR. Forstmann red" Compny = GEatcs D dAtcEr -_ - ra t~xiwts.8.7eysESmort A. T. Mmc= - CBum L CAmpmr..L HERSERT J- M, m CAommi . Fs ewcc C•mmitt , - Tic Ter Fie deri s Cawnecticc•t L4* & Paorw Ce.rpaY — ` RATMom Mom S. SWAM COLT xesssseek Cioraay Booker- Tr" Cootpmy T. JnTumn Coou= Preriden;Stud rd 09 Co. of Cow nor• awmor.Unmd Fran Compny = - - - H. W. PRomm, JR. FREDMUC G. Downs CA-man. Armstrong C-k fi p-y EscG rice Prealem4 GeaerdMaws Corpora" A. W. og, CHARLES T. FmtM JR. eras mFinancen"w Cewzatirreee ; Arnide~tt, x t;«..tBark / Db`r it - eYtiwA4ncre Etertrie Cerprti+s LAMAR Fampic, JR. DR. CUT E. SNAMY - - Ciermo. Anderaow, Cm Compny Ciacefli , B-bwd-S mtkcm Cauca FRED F. FLORENCti DR. WALTEn E. SPAH R Preaidee , RCPSWC N6d@i Bak Of DOMMS ,Year York UnizersiO GORDON GRAN, JR. Louts J. TABER - oatltaiiesom Ckeasicd C•rp arimm President, Formers do Traders file tnsomwe Co. _ JOHN W. HANES = RmE H. TATLOR Olin l tetsiies" Cienied Corpratios Presid-IK Uni- M Compxt o/ Cdi ande F. PEATFT HEFrELfT rcER CLOUD WAMr= President F. A.Perery sk Compssy CAdnxan. Carrier Corporation H. J. HEI M If DR. ROBERT E Witmm President X_ L Heins Com pmty Chairmen. Standard Oil Company (ladimse) CRARr.Es R. Hoox BEN H. WOOTEN CAairman. Armco Steel Corporation President' First National Bank in Dallas OFFICER S JOHN W. HANES CHARLES R. Hook HERBERT J. MILLER _ CA.irmam Vice CAairmom Executive Wrectar RoswELL MAcmL S. SLOAN COLT Ai.FRED PARKER President Treasurer Secretary CHAPTER PAG E I INTRODUCTION 7 - A. Purpose of Study 7 B_ Definition of Excise Taxes 7 11 HISTORIC .:. DEVELOPMENT OF EXCISE TAXE 9 A. The Earliest Exciser- Hamilton X{_ Jefferson 9 _ `B_ Successive Wartime Excise Systems and Peacetime Rerral _ 9 = C. Z. Continuing Emergency Excise Tax System I? - ^ r III -DETERMINING THE ROLE OF EXCISE TAXES IN THE FEDERAL _ TAX SYSTEM __ --- 19 A. Distribution of the Tax Burden by Income Classes 19 1_ Distribution of the Excise Tax Burden 1 9 _ 2_ Overemphasis on the Question of Regressivity vs . Progr_ssivity 23 - H_ Other Considerations Involved in Tax Policy _ . _ . _ 1 . Amount of Revenue Required Z5 Z. Diversity in Revenue Sources 26 -- 5_ Non-Revenue Purposes Z7 4- Overlapping with btate and Local Taxes ZS C_ Advantages of Excise Taxes_. 29 - 1 . Stability of Yield 29 2. Reaching Income Not Directly Subject to the Income Tax Z9 3. Convenience for the Taxpayer 34 - D_ Conclusion 35 - IV THE PRESENT EXCISE TAX SYSTEM 36 A. Liquor and Tobacco Taxes 36 B. Taxes on Transportation and Communications 36 1 . Highway User and Related Taxes 38 < 2. Taxes on Transportation and Communication Services 40 = C. Taxes or. Miscellaneous Goods and Services 40 _ D_ Weaknesses of the Present Excise Tax System 42 1_ Discriminatory Rates 42 __- 2. Selection of Taxable Items 43 = 3. The Concentration of Present Excises 43 _ V ALTERNATIVES FOR REVISION OF EXCISE TAXES 45 A_ A Permanent Selective Excise System 45 B_ A General Sales Tax 46 L C. Relative Merits of a Retail Sales Tax, a General Manufacturers ' Excise Tax, and a : alue Added Tax 48 t . Avoidance of Discrimination 48 2. Distribution of the Burden by Income Classes 49 3. Consumer Awareness of the :ax and Its Amount 50 4. Pyramiding 50 5. Overlapping with State and Local Taxes 5 1 6. Ease of Administration 5 Z 7. Ease of Compliance 5 3 8. Size of Tax Rate and Base :53 D. Conclusion 53 APPENDiX 55 A. Estimated Base of a Federal Retail Sales Tax 55 B . Estimated Base of a Manufacturers Excise Tax 56 C. Estimated Base of a Value Added Tax - 60 TABLE PAG E 1. Federal Tax Collections by Source, Selected Periods 1792-1912 10 2_ Federal Excise Tax Rates on Selected Items, as of December 31 , Selected Years 1913-1955 1213 3. Federal Tax Collections by Source, Fiscal Years 1913-1955 14 4_ Federal Tax Collections by Source, Percentage Distribution . Fiscal Years 1913-1955 _ : 15 = - 5_ Federal Excise Tax Collections by Maior Source, Fiscal Years -= - 161913-1955_ _ -------------- = - 6. Estimated Revenre Effect of the Revenue Act of 1932, Fiscai Year 1933 . 17 ~- - Y 7- Total Tax Burden as a Percentage of Total Income by Money Income - - Classes, Calendar Years 1948 and 1959 .20 - Federal Excise Tax and Corporate Income Tax Burden as a Percentage ,- , ooff Total Income, by Morey Income Cb sses . Calendar Years 1948 and 1954 - - ,- 9. Personal Deductions for faxes as a Percentage of Ae ;justed Gros s ., ==Income or. Feder+l Income Tax Returns with Itemized Deductions , ~` = by Adjust.-.d Gross Income glasses. Income Year 1952 _ _ _ `s - W . _ Total Personal Income and Taxable Income Under Federal Individua l Income Tax, Calendar and Income Years 194E-1952 30 Total Compiled Receipts and Net Income of Corporations Unde r _ Federal Corporation Incorr _ Tax; Income Yeas 1940-1951 31 - - ' :t - _ -12. :- Relationship of Total Personal Income to Taxable 1rcame Under Federal Individual Income Tax. Calendar and Income Year 1952 - . 32 - 13. -Relationship of Tax Base to Total Income . and Ef:ective Tax Rate - Under Federal Individual Income Tax, Income Years 1939 and 1952 . -34 14. Federal Excise Tax Collections b; Detailed Source, Fiscal Year 1955 37 15. Rates of Federal Excise Taxes on Alcol=olic Beverages and Tobacco, y - = January 1956 38 16. -Rates of Federal Excise Taxes on Transportation and Communications, January 1956 39 17. Rate-. of Federal Excise Taxes on Certain Miscellaneous Goods an d Services . January 1956 41 1.8. Selected Taxable and Non-Taxable Commodities Under Federal Excis e - Taxes. January 1956 44 19. Family Expenditures by Type as a Percent of Family Income, by Money Income Class . Calendar Year 1950 47 = - 20- ,_ . Ranking of Three Forms of General Sales or Excise Taxes for Federal - Purposes Under Selected Criteria 54 - - APPENDIX TABLE S At . Estimated Base of a Federal Retail Sales Tax, Fiscal Year 1955 :57 ~= = A2. Estimated Base of a Manufacturers Excise Tax, Calendar Year 1955 59 A3.- Estimated Base of a Ya :ue Added-Tax, Calendar Year 1954 and 1955 60 I` – . 4 ~f _ . r~ ~i l~ " r ~ ~ \ t ~ I~ ( I i % ~ f. r 1 i t ~I i i ri i i r _ i f . ~r , ~ ~~ i i . I . ~. ' I r ~ ~ ~ - ~, ~ r i L~ !J , r; . - ,- I - , . ~ - ~ ;~ ~I `, I , ;, I , , , ~ . , , I, 1 I I ~~ ~ ~ . - ~, ` r !~ ~ r _. I ~ ~ : 'E ` ' , ' ~ f ~ ~ ,f ~ P 1 f f ~- ~~ ~ ;I , ~~ ,~L s: ,,'' . , ~; ,, , /I ~l J . : ~ ~ i S4 ; ~r . IY r 1 1 ~ ,II . y I , r .,` ~~ ~~ I (ti . ~~ ~1 r ~I ''i i .. I r ; - ~ _ l~ i rf P I P' ~ it { ~ f ~ r '~ 1 ~ ~` d ! .L S L lf ' I I I ~ ~ I f ., t~ l r i5 v III ~ 'rr 1 r , i I i r .~r ~`f t~ ' I I f ' ~ P 1 r 1 1' i ~ ~ .f ~~. I P . ~, ~ , l '.1 I J ` (, Ir ; P , i ~9f ' r + 4i I I. r ,~A I I ~`PI f ~ l 11 ' `r ~ I R1 1~ . fl 11 r 1' v Ir , I ~ e, j /~l r . '~l~~i I 1111+ F ~. ~ r t t ' I 'I - , ~ i i ~ P • II 1 ~ - it ~ _ l fl ! Ir fl ' J ~ Z ~ 71~~~~1 ~I~i I. i I III P . 4f ., ~ I~ / , rl ~ I ~~ ~ 1~ ' II (~Itl I~~I I~ ~ y/ . ' - ~i f ~ 1 F rf ~ . I~ ~ .~ 1 - a ~ r~ 1~ + ~ : ~ . r l '.~ • r . Y, ~.r' , ~~ ,~( rf INTRODUCTION -A. Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study is to find a logical, permanent basis for F :.ieral excise taxation . As will be shown in Chapter 11, the present system of Federal =excises is to a large extent a result of various pressures on Congress, particularl y of the emergency needs for revenue during the 1930s, World War II, and the Korea n War. Because they have been rather haphazardly selected, present excises involv e discrimination among taxpayers and undesirable effects on economic activity . To find a new basis for excise taxation requires first an examination o f what has been done in the past, and second, an analysis of the proper role of ex- cises in the Federal tax system . Chapter II contains an historical sketch of excis e taxes from 1791 to the present. Chapter III contains an analysis of the variou s issues and considerations involved in excise tax policy ; it is concluded that excise s should play a more important roie in the Federal tax system . In Chapter IV the characteristics of the present excise tax system are examined in some detail and its weaknesses are set out . In Chapter V the alternatives of an extension of th e selective excise tax system vs. adoption of a general sales or excise tax are con- sidered; three forms of the latter are compared--a retail sales tax, a manufac- turers excise tax, and a value added tax . Since this is a study of tax policy, little attention is given to technical and administrative problems . These problems have recently been studied in detail b y a subcommittee of the House Ways and Means Committee .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Requiem for the Rollover Rule: Capital Gains, Farmland Loss, and the Law of Unintended Consequences
    University of Arkansas ∙ System Division of Agriculture [email protected] ∙ (479) 575-7646 An Agricultural Law Research Article A Requiem for the Rollover Rule: Capital Gains, Farmland Loss, and the Law of Unintended Consequences by Christine A. Klein Originally published in WASHINGTON & LEE LAW REVIEW 55 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 403 (1998) www.NationalAgLawCenter.org A Requiem for the Rollover Rule: Capital Gains, Farmland Loss, and the Law of Unintended Consequences Christine A. Klein' Table ofContents I. Introduction........................................ 404 II. The "American Dream" Narrative: Tax Preferences for Home Owners .................................... .. 407 A. The Home Sale Preference of Former § 1034 . .. 410 B. The Ambivalent Taxation of Capital Gains 412 III. The Restrictive Subtext: The Rollover Rule 414 A. The Rollover Mechanism , 416 B. Converting the Involuntary Conversion Provision 420 C. A Case of Mistaken Identity: Is a Home Like a Ship? . .. 422 IV. The Revenue Act of 1951 424 A. War and Taxes ................................ .. 425 B. From Hot War to Cold War. ..................... .. 427 C. A Bipartisan Oasis: The Home Sale Preference . .. 432 V. The Unintended Consequences ofthe Rollover Rule: Three Hypotheses 433 A. Over-Investment in Housing 434 B. Inflation of Housing Prices 437 C. Conversion ofFarmland into Suburban Housing 438 VI. A Tale of Two Counties: A Case Study 439 A. Santa Clara County, California: 1990-96 441 B. Boulder County, Colorado: 1990-96................. 443 I. Over-Investment in Housing 446 * Associate Professor of Law, Detroit College of Law at Michigan State University. LL.M., Columbia University; J.D., University of Colorado; B.A., Middlebury College. I am grateful to Michael C.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayo Clinic, a Minnesota Corporation
    United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3189 ___________________________ Mayo Clinic, a Minnesota Corporation lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: October 20, 2020 Filed: May 13, 2021 ____________ Before SMITH, Chief Judge, LOKEN and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Mayo Clinic (“Mayo”), a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, oversees healthcare system subsidiaries and operates the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science (“Mayo College”). Mayo is a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3).1 After an audit in 2009, the Internal Revenue Service concluded that Mayo owed unrelated business income tax (“UBIT”) on certain investment income it received from the investment pool it manages for its subsidiaries. The IRS issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment and reaffirmed its position in a 2013 Technical Advice Memorandum. At issue is $11,501,621 in UBIT for tax years 2003, 2005-2007, and 2010-2012. Mayo2 paid the tax and brought this refund action. The issue, briefly stated, is whether Mayo is a “qualified organization” exempted from paying UBIT on “unrelated debt-financed income” under IRC § 514(c)(9)(C)(i). Qualified organizations include “an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii) . .” Section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii) describes “an educational organization which normally maintains a regular faculty and curriculum and normally has a regularly enrolled body of pupils or students in attendance at the place where its educational activities are regularly carried on.” The IRS denied Mayo the exemption because it is not an “educational organization” as defined in 26 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Tax Burden: a Historical Perspective
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth Volume Author/Editor: Ernst R. Berndt and Jack E. Triplett, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-04384-3 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/bern91-1 Conference Date: May 12-14, 1988 Publication Date: January 1991 Chapter Title: Measuring Tax Burden: A Historical Perspective Chapter Author: B. K. Atrostic, James R. Nunns Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5981 Chapter pages in book: (p. 343 - 420) 11 Measuring Tax Burden: A Historical Perspective B. K. Atrostic and James R. Nunns 11.1 Introduction 11.1.1 Overview Measures of tax burden are indicators of how well tax policy meets one of its primary goals, equitably raising the revenues needed to run government. Equity has two aspects. The first, vertical equity, concerns the way taxes are distributed among taxpayers with different abilities to pay. The second, hori- zontal equity, concerns the way taxes are distributed among taxpayers with the same ability to pay. Tax burden measures thus answer broad economic and social questions about the effect of tax policy on the distribution of income and wealth. The history of these measures incorporates the histories of economic and world affairs, major tax and economic policy legislation, intellectual and so- cial movements, and data and technological innovation in the fifty years since the first meeting of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Economic Way Of
    |America’s Economic Way of War How did economic and financial factors determine how America waged war in the twentieth century? This important new book exposes the influence of economics and finance on the questions of whether the nation should go to war, how wars would be fought, how resources would be mobilized, and the long-term consequences for the American economy. Ranging from the Spanish–American War to the Gulf War, Hugh Rockoff explores the ways in which war can provide unique opportunities for understanding the basic principles of economics as wars produce immense changes in monetary and fiscal policy and so provide a wealth of infor- mation about how these policies actually work. He shows that wars have been more costly to the United States than most Americans realize as a substantial reliance on borrowing from the public, money creation, and other strategies to finance America’s war efforts have hidden the true cost of war. hugh rockoff is a professor of Economics at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, and a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. His publications include numerous papers in professional journals, The Free Banking Era: A Re-examination (1975), Drastic Measures: A History of Wage and Price Controls in the United States (1984), and a textbook, History of the American Economy (2010, with Gary Walton). NEW APPROACHES TO ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL HISTORY series editors Nigel Goose, University of Hertfordshire Larry Neal, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign New Approaches to Economic and Social History is an important new textbook series published in association with the Economic History Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Preface ..................................................................................................... ix Introductory Notes to Tables ................................................................. xi Chapter A: Selected Economic Statistics ............................................... 1 A1. Resident Population of the United States ............................................................................3 A2. Resident Population by State ..............................................................................................4 A3. Number of Households in the United States .......................................................................6 A4. Total Population by Age Group............................................................................................7 A5. Total Population by Age Group, Percentages .......................................................................8 A6. Civilian Labor Force by Employment Status .......................................................................9 A7. Gross Domestic Product, Net National Product, and National Income ...................................................................................................10 A8. Gross Domestic Product by Component ..........................................................................11 A9. State Gross Domestic Product...........................................................................................12 A10. Selected Economic Measures, Rates of Change...............................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • An Economist's Reflections on the Revenue Act of 1951 Walter W
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1952 An Economist's Reflections on the Revenue Act of 1951 Walter W. Heller Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Heller, Walter W., "An Economist's Reflections on the Revenue Act of 1951" (1952). Minnesota Law Review. 2484. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/2484 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ECONOMIST'S REFLECTIONS ON THE REVENUE ACT OF 1951 WNTALTER W. HELLER* T HE ECONOMIST, no less than the legal practitioner, finds the individual income tax provisions the most interesting aspect of the Revenue Act of 1951. Therefore, after briefly reviewing the revenue impact of the Act as a whole, this commentary will focus mainly on the income tax provisions. It will try to appraise briefly the equity and economic rationality of Congress' action, especially in terms of the charge that Congress has pushed us to, or over, the brink of bearable taxation. Revenue Impact Seen in one light, the 1951 Act is the capstone of an heroic tax effort by which Congress in less than 18 months added $15 billion (at 1951 income levels) to the annual flow of federal tax revenues- all but $1 billion of that amount representing increases in taxes on individual and corporate incomes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revenue Act of 1951: Its Impact on Individual Income Taxes John C
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 1952 The Revenue Act of 1951: Its Impact on Individual Income Taxes John C. O'Byrne Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation O'Byrne, John C., "The Revenue Act of 1951: Its Impact on Individual Income Taxes" (1952). Minnesota Law Review. 1632. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1632 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE REVENUE ACT OF 1951: ITS IMPACT ON INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAXES JOHN C. O'BYRNE* T HE Revenue Act of 1951 is a phantasmagoria of taxes, sections, ideas, philosophies, benefits and loopholes. Well over a hundred different tax matters are touched specifically; the indirect results are incalculable. Income, excess profits, estate, gift and excise taxes -all received the attention of Congress in greater or lesser measure, plus a few nonclassifiable items charged to miscellaneous. The scope of the Act is appalling. Many of its provisions received wide publicity, inter alia the rate increase,' the removal of the tax free aspect of the President's expense account,2 the tax on bookies and wagers,3 the lowered admission taxes on cut-price ladies' day tickets, 4 the "television formula,"5 sale of a residence, 6 and capital gains on livestock.7 Other provisions raised little hue and cry, few huzzabs, yet in limited areas they are of immense importance to particular taxpayers.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on the Revenue Act of 1951
    Fordham Law Review Volume 20 Issue 3 Article 3 1951 Observations on the Revenue Act of 1951 Arthur H. Goodman Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Arthur H. Goodman, Observations on the Revenue Act of 1951, 20 Fordham L. Rev. 273 (1951). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol20/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OBSERVATIONS ON THE REVENUE ACT OF 1951 ARTHUR H. GOODMANt A new revenue act is always an easy target and, not entirely by coincidence, the critical faculty becomes particularly active when the legislation under analysis strikes one where he can least afford it. Perhaps the only perfect revenue act would be one in which Congress, through some now unforeseeable panacea, found it possible to abolish taxes altogether. Until that happy day, however, the interplay of forces- legal, fiscal, economic and political-attending the adoption of each revenue act, will be watched with the deepest public concern, and the finished product pounced upon as unfair, unintelligible, socialistic, discriminatory, or otherwise contrary to the national interest. The Revenue Act of 1951 is pointed in the right direction; that is to say, it increases the tax collector's participation in the national income.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Construction of Tax Treaties an Analysis of Congressional and Administrative Limitations of an Old Doctrine Herrick K
    Cornell Law Review Volume 47 Article 2 Issue 4 Summer 1962 Liberal Construction of Tax Treaties An Analysis of Congressional and Administrative Limitations of an Old Doctrine Herrick K. Lidstone Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Herrick K. Lidstone, Liberal Construction of Tax Treaties An Analysis of Congressional and Administrative Limitations of an Old Doctrine , 47 Cornell L. Rev. 529 (1962) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol47/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIBERAL CONSTRUCTION OF TAX TREATIES-AN ANALYSIS OF CONGRESSIONAL AND ADMINI- STRATIVE LIMITATIONS OF AN OLD DOCTRINE Herrick K. Lidstonet Automatic data processing, identification numbers for taxpayers, with- holding of income tax from dividends and interest, and tax subsidies for investments in new equipment, revolutionary as they are in United States tax philosophy,' could normally have been expected to obscure the bitter infighting over those portions of H.R. 10650, the Revenue Bill of 1962, which prescribe new rules for taxation of foreign income.2 However, two years of publicizing the flow of gold toward Europe have so dramatized the possibilities for income tax avoidance (and even evasion) in foreign operations and through foreign bank accounts and tax havens that envious taxpayers can almost sympathize with Ingemar 'Johansson's failure to convince the district court that he was the fighting chattel of a Swiss corporation.3 From 1954 to 1961 the political battle was for freedom from income tax on foreign earnings.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Hot Potato: How Closing Loopholes Can Get Policymakers Cooked Stephanie Hunter Mcmahon
    Journal of Legislation Volume 37 | Issue 2 Article 1 5-1-2011 Political Hot Potato: How Closing Loopholes Can Get Policymakers Cooked Stephanie Hunter McMahon Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/jleg Recommended Citation McMahon, Stephanie Hunter (2011) "Political Hot Potato: How Closing Loopholes Can Get Policymakers Cooked," Journal of Legislation: Vol. 37: Iss. 2, Article 1. Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/jleg/vol37/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journal of Legislation at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Legislation by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL HOT POTATO: HOW CLOSING LOOPHOLES CAN GET POLICYMAKERS COOKED Stephanie HunterMcMahon* ABSTRACT Loopholes in the law are weaknesses that allow the law to be circumvented Once created, they prove hard to eliminate. A case study of the evolving tax unit used in the federal income tax explores policymakers' response to loopholes. The 1913 income tax created an opportunity for wealthy married couples to shift ownership of family income between spouses, then to file separately, and, as a result, to reduce their collective taxes. In 1948, Congress closed this loophole by extending the income-splitting benefit to all married taxpayers filing jointly. Congress acted only after the federal judiciary and Treasury Department pleaded for congressional reform and, receiving none, reduced their roles policing wealthy couples' tax abuse. The other branches would no longer accept the delegated power to regulate the tax unit. By examining these developments, this article explores the impact of the separation of powers on the closing of loopholes and adds to our understandingof how the government operates.
    [Show full text]
  • Depreciation Policy: Whither Thou Goest
    SMU Law Review Volume 32 Issue 2 Article 1 1978 Depreciation Policy: Whither Thou Goest Henry J. Lischer Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation Henry J. Lischer, Depreciation Policy: Whither Thou Goest, 32 SW L.J. 545 (1978) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol32/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. DEPRECIATION POLICY: WHITHER THOU GOEST by Henry J. Lischer, Jr.* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. HISTORY OF DEPRECIATION .................................................. 546 A. Financial Accounting History ........................................ 547 B. United States Tax History Through 1968 .......................... 550 II. CONTEMPORARY DEPRECIATION ............................................. 563 A. Tax Shelters and the Tax Reform Act of 1969 ................... 563 B. ADR Depreciation and the Revenue Act of 1971 ................ 567 C. The Tax Reform Act of 1976 ......................................... 569 D. Theoretical Bases for Contemporary Depreciation ............. 571 E. Purposes of Contemporary Depreciation ......................... 573 III. MODIFICATION PROPOSALS ................................................... 573 A. Inflation Adjusted Depreciation ..................................... 573 B. Other Proposed Modifications to Depreciation .................
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Excise Tax on Gasoline and the Highway Trust Fund: a Short History
    Order Code RL30304 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Federal Excise Tax on Gasoline and the Highway Trust Fund: A Short History Updated April 4, 2006 Pamela J. Jackson Analyst in Public Sector Economics Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The Federal Excise Tax on Gasoline and the Highway Trust Fund: A Short History Summary Excise taxes have long been a part of our country’s revenue history. In the field of gasoline taxation, the states led the way with Oregon enacting the first tax on motor fuels in 1919. By 1932, all states and the District of Columbia had followed suit with tax rates that ranged between two and seven cents per gallon. The federal government first imposed its excise tax on gasoline at a one-cent per gallon rate in 1932. The gas tax was enacted to correct a federal budgetary imbalance. It continued to support general revenue during World War II and the Korean War. Economists know the gasoline excise tax as a “manufacturer’s excise tax” because the government imposes it at production (i.e., the producer, refiner, or importer) for efficiency in collection. Particularly in the short run, when the demand for gasoline is relatively inelastic, economists recognize any increase in the gasoline tax is generally passed forward to the retailer, translating into a higher retail gas sales price. Thus, the burden for much of the tax ultimately falls on the consumer. The Highway Revenue Act of 1956 established the federal Highway Trust Fund for the direct purpose of funding the construction of an interstate highway system, and aiding in the finance of primary, secondary, and urban routes.
    [Show full text]