DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplemental Figures and Tables Table S1. Summary of the Trio And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplemental Figures and Tables Table S1. Summary of the Trio And Supplementary material J Med Genet Supplemental figures and tables Table S1. Summary of the trio and single proband-based exome sequencing experiment. Sequencing Mean Percent Candidate Total NS/SS/I Family Individual output sequencing target de novo variantsa variantsa (in Gb) Depth (median) ≥ 10X SNV Trio 1 P1 dijex132 3,49 101.13 93.9 47848 14369 1 Mother dijex133 3,18 92.05 94.0 48178 14498 - Father dijex134 3,19 92.29 94.0 46912 14019 - Trio 2 P2 dijex135 3,23 93.38 94.0 48097 14526 1 Mother dijex136 3,63 105.11 94.4 48258 14480 - Father dijex137 3,32 96.19 94.0 47934 14657 - Trio 3 P3 dijex138 3,19 92.38 93.5 48365 14504 2 Mother dijex139 3 86.75 93.8 48229 14400 - Father dijex140 3,43 99.31 94.1 48035 14540 - Trio 4 P4 dijex141 3,42 98.89 94.5 47107 14126 2 Mother dijex142 3,69 106.78 94.4 47583 14365 - Father dijex143 3,38 97.81 94.3 48296 14667 - Trio 5 P5 dijex144 3,02 87.48 93.8 47648 14425 3 Mother dijex145 3,16 91.37 93.9 47284 14275 - Father dijex146 3,3 95.66 93.9 47964 14589 - Trio 6 P6 dijex147 3,51 101.74 94.1 48192 14568 3 Mother dijex148 3,15 91.20 93.8 48211 14638 - Father dijex149 3,11 90.12 93.8 47109 14178 - Trio 7 P7 dijex150 3,23 93.64 94.4 47648 14393 2 Mother dijex151 3,66 105.85 94.6 48040 14633 - Father dijex152 3,06 88.55 94.1 47950 14557 - Trio 8 P8 dijex153 3,18 91.99 94.0 48028 14633 4 Mother dijex154 3,42 99.05 94.0 48065 14472 - Father dijex155 3,43 99.40 94.0 48475 14635 - Trio 9 P9 dijex156 3,41 98.83 94.3 48682 14759 2 Mother dijex157 3,21 92.90 94.0 47604 14276 - Father dijex158 3,18 92.14 93.7 47682 14477 - Trio 10 P10 dijex159 2,85 82.49 93.6 47162 14193 1 Mother dijex160 3,02 87.53 93.7 47015 14266 - Father dijex161 3,66 105.82 94.0 47922 14530 - Trio 11 P11 dijex240 4,55 131.82 94.4 47777 14297 0 Mother dijex241 3,82 110.64 94.2 48415 14548 - Father dijex242 4,23 122.57 94.6 47923 14330 - Trio 12 P12 dijex244 2,9 84.10 93.7 47602 14441 2 Mother dijex245 3,44 99.63 94.1 47781 14564 - Father dijex246 2,85 82.45 93.7 48235 14841 - Trio 13 P13 dijex250 3,56 102.96 93.4 49688 15008 4 Mother dijex251 3,43 99.19 94.3 47888 14526 - Father dijex252 3,37 97.56 94.1 48549 14718 - Trio 14 P14 dijex253 3,02 87.49 93.8 47912 14322 3 Mother dijex254 4,27 123.50 94.6 48149 14513 - Father dijex255 3,12 90.42 94.0 48015 14327 - Trio 15 P15 dijex256 2,66 77.03 93.4 47958 14517 3 Mother dijex257 3,16 91.52 94.0 47898 14533 - Father dijex258 3,4 98.52 94.1 47962 14357 - 1 Chevarin M, et al. J Med Genet 2020;0:1–9. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106425 Supplementary material J Med Genet Trio 16 P16 dijex374 2,89 83.66 94.0 55874 16557 0 Mother dijex376 3,01 87.24 94.2 57333 17154 - Father dijex375 3,01 87.21 94.2 56358 16861 - Trio 17 P17 dijex380 3,03 87.59 94.2 48224 14622 1 Mother dijex382 3,31 95.79 94.3 48945 14852 - Father dijex381 3,19 92.31 94.3 49171 15121 - Trio 18 P18 dijex377 3,07 89.01 94.3 47841 14520 2 Mother dijex379 3,02 87.42 94.2 48018 14594 - Father dijex378 3,25 94.09 94.3 48139 14539 - Trio 19 P19 dijex397 2,78 80.48 93.4 48341 14717 3 Mother dijex399 3,34 96.68 93.9 49299 15038 - Father dijex398 3,88 112.28 94.3 49618 15164 - Trio 20 P20 dijex265 3,35 97.00 94.3 48951 14806 1 Mother dijex393 3,29 95.25 93.7 47506 14352 - Father dijex392 3,29 95.15 93.9 49258 14968 - Trio 21 P21 dijex272 2,94 85.04 93.8 48799 14735 1 Mother dijex395 2,63 76.23 93.1 47352 14327 - Father dijex394 3,15 91.21 93.7 47966 14509 - Trio 22 P22 dijex383 3,24 93.68 94.1 48134 14494 1 Mother dijex385 3,13 90.63 94.3 49245 14972 - Father dijex384 3,31 95.70 94.5 49344 15058 - Trio 23 P23 dijex412 2,24 64.81 92.5 50721 15564 1 Mother dijex413 2,19 63.49 91.9 50642 15781 - Father dijex414 2,60 75.14 94.0 50727 15345 - Trio 24 P24 dijex758 3,52 101.96 96.5 49726 15181 2 Mother dijex759 3,63 105.22 96.4 50321 15479 - Father dijex760 3,69 106.72 96.3 49637 15195 - Trio 25 P25 dijex761 3,54 102.52 96.2 49847 15187 2 Mother dijex762 3,02 87.40 95.3 50109 15319 - Father dijex763 3,56 103.04 95.3 49315 15146 - Trio 26 P26 dijex838 5,34 154.69 96.7 52024 15681 2 Mother dijex839 3,29 95.16 95.6 51028 15515 - Father dijex840 3,14 90.84 95.4 50760 15436 - Trio 27 P27 dijex841 3,29 95.16 94.3 50051 15336 0 Mother dijex842 3,39 98.24 91.1 50603 15684 - Father dijex843 2,86 82.76 94.1 50754 15641 - Trio 28 P28 dijex879 4,67 135.12 95.9 48101 14483 2 Mother dijex880 2,96 85.68 94.5 48318 14761 - Father dijex881 2,89 83.62 94.4 47376 14402 - Trio 29 P29 dijex882 3,14 90.80 94.7 48538 14924 4 Mother dijex884 3,34 96.55 94.5 48458 14837 - Father dijex883 2,73 78.94 94.4 48003 14708 - Trio 30 P30 dijex905 3,15 91.09 94.6 48744 14886 2 Mother dijex906 3,07 88.93 94.5 48592 14859 - Father dijex907 3,32 96.25 94.7 48866 14898 - Trio 31 P31 dijex908 3,73 107.96 95.0 48714 14914 3 Mother dijex909 3,33 96.33 94.9 48419 14945 - Father dijex910 3,32 96.20 94.7 47989 14625 - Trio 32 P32 dijex911 3,27 94.72 94.8 48169 14623 1 Mother dijex912 3,44 99.66 95.0 48409 14746 - Father dijex913 3,34 96.71 94.6 47853 14556 - Trio 33 P33 dijex1277 3,29 95.18 95.8 58552 17553 1 + CNV Mother dijex1315 2,88 83.32 95.7 59246 17930 - Father dijex1316 3,32 96.22 96.3 59522 17894 - 2 Chevarin M, et al. J Med Genet 2020;0:1–9. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106425 Supplementary material J Med Genet Solo 1 P34 dijex260 3,31 95.91 94.4 50938 15524 1 Solo 2 P35 dijex261 2,91 84.38 93.8 47796 14360 1 Solo 3 P36 dijex262 3,45 99.82 94.4 48560 14788 1 Solo 4 P37 dijex270 3,26 94.35 94.4 47250 14231 1 Solo 5 P38 dijex271 3,41 98.68 94.3 47740 14341 1 Solo 6 P39 dijex273 2,9 84.05 93.8 47212 14141 0 Solo 7 P40 dijex239 3,22 93.15 93.9 48447 14658 1 Solo 8 P41 dijex243 3,18 92.06 93.8 47813 14403 1 Solo 9 P42 dijex247 2,9 84.02 93.8 47995 14656 0 Solo 10 P43 dijex680 3,18 92.11 94.4 48882 14823 0 Solo 11 P44 dijex673 4,23 122.60 96.4 55694 16885 1 Solo 12 P45 dijex917 3,54 102.57 94.9 51197 15446 0 Solo 13 P46 dijex918 2,79 80.70 94.3 48151 14731 1 Solo 14 P47 dijex919 2,96 85.80 94.4 51849 15575 1 Solo 15 P48 dijex927 3,43 99.30 94.8 48267 14630 0 Solo 16 P49 dijex676 4,09 118.36 96.6 49411 15095 1 Solo 17 P50 dijex1278 3,61 104.42 96.1 49938 15168 0 Solo 18 P51 dijex1279 3,99 115.47 96.2 58548 17715 0 Solo 19 P52 dijex1292 3,91 113.10 96.3 49345 15119 1 Solo 20 P53 dijex1317 3,42 99.03 96.7 49705 14872 0 Solo 21 P54 dijex1383 4,68 135.44 96.9 50328 15152 0 Solo 22 P55 dijex1299 3,17 91.68 95.9 50286 15296 0 Solo 23 P56 dijex814 3,18 92.20 96.3 49657 15060 1 Solo 24 P57 dijex465 3,41 98.85 96.0 51337 15765 1 Solo 25 P58 dijex926 3,20 92,87 94,9 47414 14357 1 Solo 26 P59 dijex268 3,16 91.61 93.5 48320 14847 1 Solo 27 P60 dijex249 3,16 91.43 94.1 58020 17446 1 Solo 28 P61 dijex264 2,97 85.97 93.7 51780 15566 1 Solo 29 P62 dijex266 3,30 95.56 94.1 48566 14737 2 Solo 30 P63 dijex263 3,14 90.98 94.0 57077 17098 4 Solo 31 P64 dijex1509 3,36 97.48 96.6 60377 16569 1 Gb, gigabases; NS/SS/I, nonsynonymous changes, splice-site variants and insertions/deletions. aVariants that passed on the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) hard-filtering parameters used for variant calling.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prevalence and Incidence of Rare Diseases: Bibliographic Data
    Number 1 | January 2019 Prevalence and incidence of rare diseases: Bibliographic data Prevalence, incidence or number of published cases listed by diseases (in alphabetical order) www.orpha.net www.orphadata.org If a range of national data is available, the average is Methodology calculated to estimate the worldwide or European prevalence or incidence. When a range of data sources is available, the most Orphanet carries out a systematic survey of literature in recent data source that meets a certain number of quality order to estimate the prevalence and incidence of rare criteria is favoured (registries, meta-analyses, diseases. This study aims to collect new data regarding population-based studies, large cohorts studies). point prevalence, birth prevalence and incidence, and to update already published data according to new For congenital diseases, the prevalence is estimated, so scientific studies or other available data. that: Prevalence = birth prevalence x (patient life This data is presented in the following reports published expectancy/general population life expectancy). biannually: When only incidence data is documented, the prevalence is estimated when possible, so that : • Prevalence, incidence or number of published cases listed by diseases (in alphabetical order); Prevalence = incidence x disease mean duration. • Diseases listed by decreasing prevalence, incidence When neither prevalence nor incidence data is available, or number of published cases; which is the case for very rare diseases, the number of cases or families documented in the medical literature is Data collection provided. A number of different sources are used : Limitations of the study • Registries (RARECARE, EUROCAT, etc) ; The prevalence and incidence data presented in this report are only estimations and cannot be considered to • National/international health institutes and agencies be absolutely correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Orphanet Report Series Rare Diseases Collection
    Marche des Maladies Rares – Alliance Maladies Rares Orphanet Report Series Rare Diseases collection DecemberOctober 2013 2009 List of rare diseases and synonyms Listed in alphabetical order www.orpha.net 20102206 Rare diseases listed in alphabetical order ORPHA ORPHA ORPHA Disease name Disease name Disease name Number Number Number 289157 1-alpha-hydroxylase deficiency 309127 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase 228384 5q14.3 microdeletion syndrome deficiency 293948 1p21.3 microdeletion syndrome 314655 5q31.3 microdeletion syndrome 939 3-hydroxyisobutyric aciduria 1606 1p36 deletion syndrome 228415 5q35 microduplication syndrome 2616 3M syndrome 250989 1q21.1 microdeletion syndrome 96125 6p subtelomeric deletion syndrome 2616 3-M syndrome 250994 1q21.1 microduplication syndrome 251046 6p22 microdeletion syndrome 293843 3MC syndrome 250999 1q41q42 microdeletion syndrome 96125 6p25 microdeletion syndrome 6 3-methylcrotonylglycinuria 250999 1q41-q42 microdeletion syndrome 99135 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 67046 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 1 deficiency 238769 1q44 microdeletion syndrome 111 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 2 13 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase 976 2,8 dihydroxyadenine urolithiasis deficiency 67047 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 3 869 2A syndrome 75857 6q terminal deletion 67048 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 4 79154 2-aminoadipic 2-oxoadipic aciduria 171829 6q16 deletion syndrome 66634 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 5 19 2-hydroxyglutaric acidemia 251056 6q25 microdeletion syndrome 352328 3-methylglutaconic
    [Show full text]
  • Sotos Syndrome
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2007) 15, 264–271 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1018-4813/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/ejhg PRACTICAL GENETICS In association with Sotos syndrome Sotos syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition characterised by a distinctive facial appearance, learning disability and overgrowth resulting in tall stature and macrocephaly. In 2002, Sotos syndrome was shown to be caused by mutations and deletions of NSD1, which encodes a histone methyltransferase implicated in chromatin regulation. More recently, the NSD1 mutational spectrum has been defined, the phenotype of Sotos syndrome clarified and diagnostic and management guidelines developed. Introduction In brief Sotos syndrome was first described in 1964 by Juan Sotos Sotos syndrome is characterised by a distinctive facial and the major diagnostic criteria of a distinctive facial appearance, learning disability and childhood over- appearance, childhood overgrowth and learning disability growth. were established in 1994 by Cole and Hughes.1,2 In 2002, Sotos syndrome is associated with cardiac anomalies, cloning of the breakpoints of a de novo t(5;8)(q35;q24.1) renal anomalies, seizures and/or scoliosis in B25% of translocation in a child with Sotos syndrome led to the cases and a broad variety of additional features occur discovery that Sotos syndrome is caused by haploinsuffi- less frequently. ciency of the Nuclear receptor Set Domain containing NSD1 abnormalities, such as truncating mutations, protein 1 gene, NSD1.3 Subsequently, extensive analyses of missense mutations in functional domains, partial overgrowth cases have shown that intragenic NSD1 muta- gene deletions and 5q35 microdeletions encompass- tions and 5q35 microdeletions encompassing NSD1 cause ing NSD1, are identifiable in the majority (490%) of 490% of Sotos syndrome cases.4–10 In addition, NSD1 Sotos syndrome cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypermobility Syndrome
    EDS and TOMORROW • NO financial disclosures • Currently at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital • As of 9/1/12, will be at Lutheran General Hospital in Chicago • Also serve on the Board of Directors of the Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation (all Directors are volunteers) • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome(s) • A group of inherited (genetic) disorders of connective tissue • Named after Edvard Ehlers of Denmark and Henri- Alexandre Danlos of France Villefranche 1997 Berlin 1988 Classical Type Gravis (Type I) Mitis (Type II) Hypermobile Type Hypermobile (Type III) Vascular Type Arterial-ecchymotic (Type IV) Kyphoscoliosis Type Ocular-Scoliotic (Type VI) Arthrochalasia Type Arthrochalasia (Type VIIA, B) Dermatosporaxis Type Dermatosporaxis (Type VIIC ) 2012? • X-Linked EDS (EDS Type V) • Periodontitis type (EDS Type VIII) • Familial Hypermobility Syndrome (EDS Type XI) • Benign Joint Hypermobility Syndrome • Hypermobility Syndrome • Progeroid EDS • Marfanoid habitus with joint laxity • Unspecified Forms • Brittle cornea syndrome • PRDM5 • ZNF469 • Spondylocheiro dysplastic • Musculocontractural/adducted thumb clubfoot/Kosho • D4ST1 deficient EDS • Tenascin-X deficiency EDS Type Genetic Defect Inheritance Classical Type V collagen (60%) Dominant Other? Hypermobile Largely unknown Dominant Vascular Type III collagen Dominant Kyphoscoliosis Lysyl hydroxylase (PLOD1) Recessive Arthrochalasia Type I collagen Dominant Dermatosporaxis ADAMTS2 Recessive Joint Hypermobility 1. Passive dorsiflexion of 5th digit to or beyond 90° 2. Passive flexion of thumbs to the forearm 3. Hyperextension of the elbows beyond 10° 1. >10° in females 2. >0° in males 4. Hyperextension of the knees beyond 10° 1. Some knee laxity is normal 2. Sometimes difficult to understand posture- forward flexion of the hips usually helps 5. Forward flexion of the trunk with knees fully extended, palms resting on floor 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Soonerstart Automatic Qualifying Syndromes and Conditions
    SoonerStart Automatic Qualifying Syndromes and Conditions - Appendix O Abetalipoproteinemia Acanthocytosis (see Abetalipoproteinemia) Accutane, Fetal Effects of (see Fetal Retinoid Syndrome) Acidemia, 2-Oxoglutaric Acidemia, Glutaric I Acidemia, Isovaleric Acidemia, Methylmalonic Acidemia, Propionic Aciduria, 3-Methylglutaconic Type II Aciduria, Argininosuccinic Acoustic-Cervico-Oculo Syndrome (see Cervico-Oculo-Acoustic Syndrome) Acrocephalopolysyndactyly Type II Acrocephalosyndactyly Type I Acrodysostosis Acrofacial Dysostosis, Nager Type Adams-Oliver Syndrome (see Limb and Scalp Defects, Adams-Oliver Type) Adrenoleukodystrophy, Neonatal (see Cerebro-Hepato-Renal Syndrome) Aglossia Congenita (see Hypoglossia-Hypodactylia) Aicardi Syndrome AIDS Infection (see Fetal Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) Alaninuria (see Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Deficiency) Albers-Schonberg Disease (see Osteopetrosis, Malignant Recessive) Albinism, Ocular (includes Autosomal Recessive Type) Albinism, Oculocutaneous, Brown Type (Type IV) Albinism, Oculocutaneous, Tyrosinase Negative (Type IA) Albinism, Oculocutaneous, Tyrosinase Positive (Type II) Albinism, Oculocutaneous, Yellow Mutant (Type IB) Albinism-Black Locks-Deafness Albright Hereditary Osteodystrophy (see Parathyroid Hormone Resistance) Alexander Disease Alopecia - Mental Retardation Alpers Disease Alpha 1,4 - Glucosidase Deficiency (see Glycogenosis, Type IIA) Alpha-L-Fucosidase Deficiency (see Fucosidosis) Alport Syndrome (see Nephritis-Deafness, Hereditary Type) Amaurosis (see Blindness) Amaurosis
    [Show full text]
  • With a Learning Disability; Guidance for General Practice
    Improving identification of people with a learning disability: guidance for general practice NHS England and Improvement Publishing Approval Reference: 001030 Version 1 NHS England and NHS Improvement Contents Introduction .................................................................................... 2 Actions for practices ....................................................................... 4 Appendix 1: List of codes that indicate a learning disability ........... 7 Appendix 2: List of codes that may indicate a learning disability . 14 Appendix 3: List of outdated codes .............................................. 20 Appendix 4: Learning disability identification check-list ............... 22 1 | Contents Introduction 1. The NHS Long Term Plan1 commits to improve uptake of the existing annual health check in primary care for people aged over 14 years with a learning disability, so that at least 75% of those eligible have a learning disability health check each year. 2. There is also a need to increase the number of people receiving the annual seasonal flu vaccination, given the level of avoidable mortality associated with respiratory problems. 3. In 2017/18, only 44.6% of patients with a learning disability received a flu vaccination and only 55.1% of patients with a learning disability received an annual learning disability health check.2 4. In June 2019, NHS England and NHS Improvement announced a series of measures to improve coverage of annual health checks and flu vaccination for people with a learning disability. One of the commitments was to improve the quality of registers for people with a learning disability3. Clinical coding review 5. Most GP practices have developed a register of their patients known to have a learning disability. This has been developed from clinical diagnoses, from information gathered from learning disabilities teams and social services and has formed the basis of registers for people with learning disability developed for the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF).
    [Show full text]
  • Scoliosis, Blindness and Arachnodactyly in a Large Turkish Family: Is It a New Syndrome? Genetic Counseling, 19(3):319-330
    Dundar, M; Erkilic, K; Argun, M; Caglayan, AO; Comeglio, P; Koseoglu, E; Matyas, G; Child, AH (2008). Scoliosis, blindness and arachnodactyly in a large Turkish family: Is it a new syndrome? Genetic Counseling, 19(3):319-330. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch University of Zurich Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. Zurich Open Repository and Archive http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Genetic Counseling 2008, 19(3):319-330. Winterthurerstr. 190 CH-8057 Zurich http://www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2008 Scoliosis, blindness and arachnodactyly in a large Turkish family: Is it a new syndrome? Dundar, M; Erkilic, K; Argun, M; Caglayan, AO; Comeglio, P; Koseoglu, E; Matyas, G; Child, AH Dundar, M; Erkilic, K; Argun, M; Caglayan, AO; Comeglio, P; Koseoglu, E; Matyas, G; Child, AH (2008). Scoliosis, blindness and arachnodactyly in a large Turkish family: Is it a new syndrome? Genetic Counseling, 19(3):319-330. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Genetic Counseling 2008, 19(3):319-330. Scoliosis, blindness and arachnodactyly in a large Turkish family: Is it a new syndrome? Abstract In this report we have described an affected sib in a large Turkish family who appears to have a new distinct dominantly-inherited blindness, scoliosis and arachnodactyly syndrome. The combination of clinical abnormalities in these patients did not initially suggest Marfan syndrome or other connective tissue disorders associated with ectopia lentis. The proband was a 16-year-old boy who was referred to our clinics for scoliosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Shprintzen-Goldberg Syndrome
    Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome Description Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome is a disorder that affects many parts of the body. Affected individuals have a combination of distinctive facial features and skeletal and neurological abnormalities. A common feature in people with Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome is craniosynostosis, which is the premature fusion of certain skull bones. This early fusion prevents the skull from growing normally. Affected individuals can also have distinctive facial features, including a long, narrow head; widely spaced eyes (hypertelorism); protruding eyes ( exophthalmos); outside corners of the eyes that point downward (downslanting palpebral fissures); a high, narrow palate; a small lower jaw (micrognathia); and low-set ears that are rotated backward. People with Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome are often said to have a marfanoid habitus, because their bodies resemble those of people with a genetic condition called Marfan syndrome. For example, they may have long, slender fingers (arachnodactyly), unusually long limbs, a sunken chest (pectus excavatum) or protruding chest (pectus carinatum), and an abnormal side-to-side curvature of the spine (scoliosis). People with Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome can have other skeletal abnormalities, such as one or more fingers that are permanently bent (camptodactyly) and an unusually large range of joint movement (hypermobility). People with Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome often have delayed development and mild to moderate intellectual disability. Other common features of Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome include heart or brain abnormalities, weak muscle tone (hypotonia) in infancy, and a soft out-pouching around the belly-button (umbilical hernia) or lower abdomen (inguinal hernia). Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome has signs and symptoms similar to those of Marfan syndrome and another genetic condition called Loeys-Dietz syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Au-Kline Syndrome
    Au-Kline syndrome Description Au-Kline syndrome is a condition that affects many body systems. Individuals with this condition typically have weak muscle tone (hypotonia), intellectual disability, and delayed development. Speech is delayed in children with Au-Kline syndrome, and some are able to say only one or a few words or are never able to speak. In addition, affected children learn to walk later than usual, and some are never able to walk on their own. Individuals with Au-Kline syndrome can have distinctive facial features, including long openings of the eyelids (long palpebral fissures), drooping eyelids (ptosis), and shallow eye sockets. Other common facial features in this condition include a broad nasal bridge, a mouth with the outer corners turned downward and often held in an open position, and a deep groove down the middle of the tongue. Less common abnormalities include premature joining of certain skull bones (craniosynostosis) in affected infants, an opening or unusually high arch in the roof of the mouth (cleft or high-arched palate), a split in the soft flap of tissue that hangs from the back of the mouth (bifid uvula), and missing teeth (oligodontia). Malformations of the heart, blood vessels, kidneys, or bones can also occur in people with Au-Kline syndrome. For example, in some affected individuals, the large blood vessel that distributes blood from the heart to the rest of the body (the aorta) becomes weakened and stretched (aortic dilatation), which can be life-threatening. Some people with Au-Kline syndrome have an abnormal curvature of the spine (scoliosis).
    [Show full text]
  • A Genomic Approach to Delineating the Occurrence of Scoliosis in Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article A Genomic Approach to Delineating the Occurrence of Scoliosis in Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita Xenia Latypova 1, Stefan Giovanni Creadore 2, Noémi Dahan-Oliel 3,4, Anxhela Gjyshi Gustafson 2, Steven Wei-Hung Hwang 5, Tanya Bedard 6, Kamran Shazand 2, Harold J. P. van Bosse 5 , Philip F. Giampietro 7,* and Klaus Dieterich 8,* 1 Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France; [email protected] 2 Shriners Hospitals for Children Headquarters, Tampa, FL 33607, USA; [email protected] (S.G.C.); [email protected] (A.G.G.); [email protected] (K.S.) 3 Shriners Hospitals for Children, Montreal, QC H4A 0A9, Canada; [email protected] 4 School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 2M1, Canada 5 Shriners Hospitals for Children, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA; [email protected] (S.W.-H.H.); [email protected] (H.J.P.v.B.) 6 Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3E4, Canada; [email protected] 7 Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA 8 Institut of Advanced Biosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1209, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.F.G.); [email protected] (K.D.) Citation: Latypova, X.; Creadore, S.G.; Dahan-Oliel, N.; Gustafson, Abstract: Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) describes a group of conditions characterized A.G.; Wei-Hung Hwang, S.; Bedard, by the presence of non-progressive congenital contractures in multiple body areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Congenital Contractural Arachnodactyly; Two Unrelated Newborns with Novel Clinical Findings
    Brief Report / Kısa Rapor Congenital Contractural Arachnodactyly; two unrelated newborns with novel clinical findings İbrahim Akalın1,2, Didem Armangil3, Esad Köklü3 1Trabzon Women’s and Children’s Hospital, ABSTRACT Genetic Diseases Diagnosis Center, Trabzon, Congenital Contractural Arachnodactyly (CCA; Beals syndrome) is a rare auto- Turkey. somal dominant disorder of connective tissue. CCA represents similar pheno- 2 Istanbul Medeniyet University, Goztepe typical features of Marfan syndrome such as tall stature and arachnodactyly, Training & Research Hospital, Medical Ge- with contrasting multiple joint contractures involving elbows, knees and even netics. İstanbul, Turkey fingers with typical crumpled ear helices. Here, we present two separate new- 3Trabzon Women’s and Children’s Hospital, borns representing novel findings such as retinal hemorrhage, bilateral sim- Neonatalogy Unit, Trabzon, Turkey. ian lines and cryptorchism in addition to classical findings. However, pedigree analyses of patients were suggesting somatic mosaicism in addition to the rep- resented distinct features of Beals syndrome; one with milder phenotype and even lack of typical crumpled ear helices, and the other with severe vertebral findings such as kyphoscoliosis. Key words: Beals syndrome, Marfan syndrome, arachnodactyly, retinal hemorrhage, kyphoscoliosis Eur J Basic Med Sci 2012;2(2):50-55 Received: 24.04.2012 Konjenital Kontraktürel Araknodaktili; yeni klinik bulgular içeren iki farklı yenidoğan olgu Accepted: 25.04.2012 ÖZET Congenital Contractural Arachnodactyly (CCA; Beals syndrome) otozomal rese- sif geçişli nadir bir bağ doku hastalığıdır. CCA, uzun boy ve araknodaktili gibi Marfan sendromundakine benzer klinik özellikler ile farklı olarak dirsek, diz ve hatta parmakları içeren çoklu eklem kontraktürleri ile tipik buruşuk kulak kepçesi görünümü sergiler. Biz bu yazımızda klasik bulgularına ek olarak reti- nal kanama, bilateral simian çizgiler ve kriptorşizm bulguları olan iki akraba olmayan yenidoğanı sunmaktayız.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Pathways Involved in Human Speech Disorders
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Genetic pathways involved in human speech disorders 1,2 1,3 Joery den Hoed and Simon E Fisher Rare genetic variants that disrupt speech development provide describe how next-generation sequencing and gene- entry points for deciphering the neurobiological foundations of driven studies are transforming this field, and argue that key human capacities. The value of this approach is illustrated emerging cell-based models of human brain development by FOXP2, a transcription factor gene that was implicated in will be crucial for a fuller understanding of how gene speech apraxia, and subsequently investigated using human disruptions yield speech disorders. cell-based systems and animal models. Advances in next- generation sequencing, coupled to de novo paradigms, Molecular perspectives on speech - the facilitated discovery of etiological variants in additional genes in example of FOXP2 speech disorder cohorts. As for other neurodevelopmental FOXP2 was the first gene for which rare variants could be syndromes, gene-driven studies show blurring of boundaries implicated in a monogenic speech disorder (primarily between diagnostic categories, with some risk genes shared characterized by childhood apraxia of speech; CAS; across speech disorders, intellectual disability and autism. Table 1). Since the initial report describing a causative Convergent evidence hints at involvement of regulatory genes point mutation in a multigenerational family, as well as a co-expressed in early human brain development, suggesting translocation disturbing the gene in an independent case that etiological pathways could be amenable for investigation in [3], different genetic disruptions of FOXP2 have been emerging neural models such as cerebral organoids.
    [Show full text]