THE DIRECTOR's
UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SURVEY NOTES Volume 44, Number 1 January 2012 NORTHWEST UTAH UTAH'S NEWEST ENERGY HOTSPOT? The Director’s Perspective and gold production to contribute $3.3 billion and especially since the economic downturn to this figure. In addition, Utah continues that began in late 2008. The downturn has to be a strong net exporter of energy in the significantly affected the consumption of form of natural gas and electricity, largely industrial minerals such as aggregate (sand, generated from coal. Utah produces about gravel, crushed stone) and cement, which are 30 percent more energy than it consumes, down by over 30 percent since they peaked in a trend that has continued since the early 2007 (for a historical review, see “Director’s 1980s (see graphs of production and con- Perspective” in the September 2009 issue of sumption of energy in Utah). Declining coal Survey Notes). Similarly, the consumption of production since 2001 has largely been com- petroleum products in Utah has decreased by Richard G. Allis pensated for by increases in natural gas and by about 10 percent during this time, largely oil production. due to a decrease in diesel fuel use, with The Utah Geological Survey has recently motor gasoline demand remaining rela- Utah’s overall energy consumption has produced two important reports that will tively steady. As a result of this decline and help inform discussions about Utah’s grown at an average of 2.1 percent per year economic directions. One is a second edition since 1960, a figure very close to the state’s continued on page 5 of “Utah’s Energy Landscape” (UGS Circular average popula- 10,000 113, by Michael Vanden Berg), which shows tion growth over energy production and consumption trends that time (2.3 9,000 updated with 2010 data.
[Show full text]