DOCSLIB.ORG

Life Histories of Potamodromous Fishes [Chapter 4]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Life Histories of Potamodromous Fishes [Chapter 4] This file was created by scanning the printed publication. To enable searches, the text was digitized using OCR software but some spelling errors may occur. CHAPTER 4 Life Histories of Potamodromous Fishes Russell F. Thurow Definitions of potamodromy, potamodromous migrations and movements Potamodromous fishes move and complete their life cycle entirely within freshwater. Myers (1949) proposed the term potamodromous to distinguish freshwater migratory fishes from diadromous fishes, which migrate between the sea and freshwater and oceanodromous fishes that migrate wholly within the sea. Diadromous fishes include anadromous, catadromous and amphidromous fishes (see Chapter 2, Morais and Daverat 2016). Despite its historical precedence, potamodromous has not been broadly accepted. Three other terms, 'non-anadromous', 'resident', and 'inland' are more commonly substituted in the fisheries literature. Unfortunately, these three terms have multiple definitions, as well as regional connotations which may confound their application to a broad geographic area (Gresswell et al. 1997). Consequently, potamodromous provides a more precise and more broadly applicable definition of fishes that remain wholly within freshwater. Although potamodromous fishes are widespread among freshwater fish assemblages, the significance of potamodromy has received far less attention than diadromy (Northcote 1998). Unlike diadromy, no global analysis ofpotamodromous species has been undertaken, and it is limited by the difficulties in amassing information for inconspicuous and little-studied species, especially in the tropics (Flecker et al. 201 0). Potamodromous fishes were included in a group-by-group review by Lucas and Baras (200 1) of the migration and life cycle characteristics of species representative of families of fishes exhibiting migration in fresh and brackish water environments. Lucas and Baras (2001) explained that infon:llation was limited for some groups of freshwater fishes mostly found in tropical freshwater regions. This was partly because USDA-Forest ervice-Rocky Mountain Research Station, 322 East Front Street-Suite 401, Boise, Idaho 83702, USA. 30 An Introduction to Fish Migration of a paucity of infom1ation concerning spatial ecology at the species level; some of these group (Cichlidae haraciformes and Silurifonnes) are very speciose, totaling over 5,000 species and representing nearly 50% of all fish pecies in freshwater (Lucas and Ban1s 2001 . Flecker et al. (20 I 0) reported that in both the tropic and temperate zone, potamodromy is likely the most common fonn ofmigration in stream fi shes. im i larly, Lucas and Baras (200 I) observed that in many large tropical rivers, more than 95% of the migratory fishes are potamodromous. Migration and movements between biomes on a daily seasonal or annual basis, represent a fundamental aspect of the ecology of populations and individuals (Hobson 1999. Despite residing only in freshwater for a variety of reasons, potamodromous fishes move and migrate various distance U1roughout their life c cle. As Dingle and Drake (2007) ob erved our understanding of the movements of organisms has been hindered by impreci e and ambiguous te.m1inology. A a result it may be useful to begin by defining the terms movement and migration. Movement may be defined as the act of changi11g locations or positions. In potamodromous fishes, these movements are most commonly associated with seeking essential resources (i.e., food) and they may be in response to other organisms (i.e. seeking cover from predators). For example, a potamodromous sculpin Cottus spp. residing in a pool may suddenly move and change position' to consume an aquatic insect larvae on the tream substrate. This same sculpin may change its location' in the same pool by moving beneath a boulder to escape an avian predator. Dingle (1996) observed that most movements occur within a relatively well defined area or home range. An organism h·avels or moves within its home range to acquire the resources it needs to survive. The size of the home range wi ll tend to vary depending on the habitat and the size and movement abiliti.es of the organism (Dingle 1996). Consequently, the sculpin in our example above will ha e a much smaller home range compared to the average home range size (mean home range of 146 ha) for a 70- 100 em long muskellunge Esox masquinongy (Miller and Menzel 1986). Movements and associated behaviors within a home range have also been tenned station keeping' and perhaps the most prominent example is foraging (Kennedy 1985 · Di11gle 1996). foraging is a repetitive and meandering movement that focuses on locating resources (food cover or mates). Foraging characteristically occurs on hort timescales and small spatial scales wHhin the home range (Dingle and Drake 2007). ln our examples above depending in part on food availability the much larger and faster swimming muskellunge will potentially forage within a much larger area compared to the sculpin. A specialized form of foraging that includes to-and-fro movements, is the diel vertical movement of fishes such as alewife Alosa pseudoharengus to con ume zooplankton (Jans en and Brandt L980). Another example of a station keeping behavior is the territorial behavior that results in agonistic encounters between individuals. McNicol et al. ( 1985) repotted frequent agonistic interactions between young-of-the-year brook trout Salvelinusfontinalis in a second-order woodland stream. Migration differs substantially from the oft§n repetitive movements within home ranges described above. Home range movements are primarily in response to local resources. Migration is considered a more specialized type of movement often, Life Histories ofPotamodromous Fishes 31 but not necessarily occurring at larger temporal and spatial scales. Dingle (1996) emphasized that migration differs from other types of movements both qualitatively and quantitatively. Unlike the sculpin, muskellunge, and alewife movements described above, Dingle ( 1996) observed that migration is not a proximate response to resources nor does it serve to keep an organism in its habitat. Rather, migration results in fishes moving from one habitat and relocating to another habitat outside their home range. Dingle ( 1996) observed that the most distinctive feature of migration is that migrants do not respond to sensory cues from resources (e.g., food or shelter) that would typically elicit responses. For example, during their annual migration to spawning sites, adult walleye Stizostedion vitreum vitreum may feed or temporarily seek shelter. However, unlike the above referenced foraging movement of a muskellunge within its home range, the presence of an abundant food source or suitable cover will not cause migrating walleye to stop. Their upstream migration ceases only when adult walleye arrive at their spawning location (i.e., Crowe 1962). Migration involves two levels, the behavioral level that applies to individuals and the ecological level that applies to populations (Dingle and Drake 2007). Therefore, a broad conceptual understanding of migration encompasses both its mechanism and its function. Northcote (1978) distinguished migration from other types of fish movements and suggested four main features : (1) resulting in an alternation between two or more well-separated habitats; (2) occurring with regular periodicity (often seasonal) within the individual lifespan; (3) involving a large fraction of the population; and (4) being directed rather than a random wandering or passive drift. Decades later, Dingle and Drake (2007) suggested that migration represents four different but overlapping concepts which are very similar to those ofNorthcote (1978). The concepts of Dingle and Drake (2007) are also applicable to potamodromous fishes: (1) a type of locomotory activity that is notably persistent, undistracted, and straightened out (i.e., fall downstream migrations of adult westslope cutthroat trout Salmo clarkia lewisii to overwintering areas in large pools) (Bjornn and Mallet 1964); (2) a relocation of the animal that is on a much greater scale, and involves movement of much longer duration, than those arising in its normal daily activities (i.e., spring upstream migrations of mature walleye to spawning areas) (Crowe 1962); (3) a seasonal to-and-fro movement of populations between regions where conditions are alternately favorable or unfavorable (i.e., summer upstream migrations of brook trout seeking cold water refugia (Petty et al. 2012) followed by fall downstream migrations to more suitable overwintering habitats) (Chisholm et al. 1987); and ( 4) movements leading to redistribution or dispersal within a spatially extended population (i.e., downstream drift of newly hatched white sucker Catostomus commersoni larvae to areas with higher zooplankton production) (Corbett and Powles 1986). Dingle and Drake (2007) explained that migration of types 1 and 2 relate to individual organisms, while types 3 and 4 explicitly concern populations. Further, type 1 migration describes a process, whereas the other three migrations describe the outcomes (for individuals or populations) of migration by individuals. Baker (1978) proposed that the sum of all migrations and movements during ~n organism's lifetime be termed a 'lifetime track'. An organism's lifetime track ls essentially the time series of its successive locations throughout its lifetime 32 An Introduction to Fish Migration (Dingle and Drake 2007). Technological advances in tracking devices now allow
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Diversity of Fish (Pisces) in Freshwater
    Hydrobiologia (2008) 595:545–567 DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9034-0 FRESHWATER ANIMAL DIVERSITY ASSESSMENT Global diversity of fish (Pisces) in freshwater C. Le´veˆque Æ T. Oberdorff Æ D. Paugy Æ M. L. J. Stiassny Æ P. A. Tedesco Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract The precise number of extant fish spe- species live in lakes and rivers that cover only 1% cies remains to be determined. About 28,900 species of the earth’s surface, while the remaining 16,000 were listed in FishBase in 2005, but some experts species live in salt water covering a full 70%. While feel that the final total may be considerably higher. freshwater species belong to some 170 families (or Freshwater fishes comprise until now almost 13,000 207 if peripheral species are also considered), the species (and 2,513 genera) (including only fresh- bulk of species occur in a relatively few groups: water and strictly peripheral species), or about the Characiformes, Cypriniformes, Siluriformes, 15,000 if all species occurring from fresh to and Gymnotiformes, the Perciformes (noteably the brackishwaters are included. Noteworthy is the fact family Cichlidae), and the Cyprinodontiformes. that the estimated 13,000 strictly freshwater fish Biogeographically the distribution of strictly fresh- water species and genera are, respectively 4,035 species (705 genera) in the Neotropical region, 2,938 (390 genera) in the Afrotropical, 2,345 (440 Guest editors: E. V. Balian, C. Le´veˆque, H. Segers & K. Martens genera) in the Oriental, 1,844 (380 genera) in the Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment Palaearctic, 1,411 (298 genera) in the Nearctic, and 261 (94 genera) in the Australian.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi
    Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 (http://www.accessscience.com/) Article by: Boschung, Herbert Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Gardiner, Brian Linnean Society of London, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, United Kingdom. Publication year: 2014 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400) Content Morphology Euteleostei Bibliography Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi The most recent group of actinopterygians (rayfin fishes), first appearing in the Upper Triassic (Fig. 1). About 26,840 species are contained within the Teleostei, accounting for more than half of all living vertebrates and over 96% of all living fishes. Teleosts comprise 517 families, of which 69 are extinct, leaving 448 extant families; of these, about 43% have no fossil record. See also: Actinopterygii (/content/actinopterygii/009100); Osteichthyes (/content/osteichthyes/478500) Fig. 1 Cladogram showing the relationships of the extant teleosts with the other extant actinopterygians. (J. S. Nelson, Fishes of the World, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 2006) 1 of 9 10/7/2015 1:07 PM Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 Morphology Much of the evidence for teleost monophyly (evolving from a common ancestral form) and relationships comes from the caudal skeleton and concomitant acquisition of a homocercal tail (upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin are symmetrical). This type of tail primitively results from an ontogenetic fusion of centra (bodies of vertebrae) and the possession of paired bracing bones located bilaterally along the dorsal region of the caudal skeleton, derived ontogenetically from the neural arches (uroneurals) of the ural (tail) centra.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency
    Coarse Fish Migration Occurrence, Causes and Implications Research and Development Technical Report WI52 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY All pulps used in production of this paper is sourced from sustainable managed forests and are elemental chlorine free and wood free Coarse Fish Migration Occurrence, Causes and: Implications: Technical Report W 152.. MC Lucas (1): T J Thorn (l), A Duncan (2), 0 Slavik (3) (1) Department of Biological Sciences, University of Durham (2) Royal Holloway. Institute of Environmental Research, University-of London (3) Water Research Institute, Prague Research Contractor:. University of Durham Further copies of thii report are available from: Environment Agency R&D Dissemination Centre, c/o WRc, Frankland Road, Swindon, Wilts SN5 SYF ? WC tel: 01793-865000 fax: 01793-514562 e-mail: [email protected] Publishing Organisation: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West Almondsbury Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 ISBNNW-06/98-65-B-BCOA 0 Environment Agency 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,. photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Environment Agency. Its officers, servant or agents accept no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage arising from the interpretation or use of the information, or reliance upon views contained herein. Dissemination status Internal: Released to Regions External: Released to the Public Domain Statement of use This report summarises the findings of aliterature reveiw of the occurrence, causes and implications of coarse fish migration in UK rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Acanthopterygii, Bone, Eurypterygii, Osteology, Percomprpha
    Research in Zoology 2014, 4(2): 29-42 DOI: 10.5923/j.zoology.20140402.01 Comparative Osteology of the Jaws in Representatives of the Eurypterygian Fishes Yazdan Keivany Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Division), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156-83111, Iran Abstract The osteology of the jaws in representatives of 49 genera in 40 families of eurypterygian fishes, including: Aulopiformes, Myctophiformes, Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Percopsiformes, Mugiliformes, Atheriniformes, Beloniformes, Cyprinodontiformes, Stephanoberyciformes, Beryciformes, Zeiformes, Gasterosteiformes, Synbranchiformes, Scorpaeniformes (including Dactylopteridae), and Perciformes (including Elassomatidae) were studied. Generally, in this group, the upper jaw consists of the premaxilla, maxilla, and supramaxilla. The lower jaw consists of the dentary, anguloarticular, retroarticular, and sesamoid articular. In higher taxa, the premaxilla bears ascending, articular, and postmaxillary processes. The maxilla usually bears a ventral and a dorsal articular process. The supramaxilla is present only in some taxa. The dentary is usually toothed and bears coronoid and posteroventral processes. The retroarticular is small and located at the posteroventral corner of the anguloarticular. Keywords Acanthopterygii, Bone, Eurypterygii, Osteology, Percomprpha following method for clearing and staining bone and 1. Introduction cartilage provided in reference [18]. A camera lucida attached to a Wild M5 dissecting stereomicroscope was used Despite the introduction of modern techniques such as to prepare the drawings. The bones in the first figure of each DNA sequencing and barcoding, osteology, due to its anatomical section are arbitrarily shaded and labeled and in reliability, still plays an important role in the systematic the others are shaded in a consistent manner (dark, medium, study of fishes and comprises a major percent of today’s and clear) to facilitate comparison among the taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Bowfin (Amia Calva)
    Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife’s Animal Information Series Bowfin (Amia calva) Do they have any other names? Other names for the bowfin are dogfish, grindle, grinnel, cypress trout, swamp muskie, black fish, cottonfish, swamp bass, poisson-castor, speckled cat, shoepic or choupic, and beaverfish. Why are they called bowfin? Amia is Greek for “fish” and calva is Greek for “bald or smooth” which refers to the bowfin’s scaleless head. The name “bowfin” refers to the long curved fin on the back of the fish. What do they look like? The bowfin is an elongate and nearly-cylindrical fish with a long dorsal (back) fin that extends from the middle of the back to the tail. The tail fin is rounded and has a black spot on the upper base of the tail. This black spot resembles an eye that predators will mistakenly attack, allowing the bowfin to get away. The back and tail fins are dark- green with darker bands or bars and the lower fins are bright green. The back and upper sides are mottled olive-green with pale green on the belly. The head is without scales but the body is covered in smooth-edged scales. They also have a large mouth with many sharp teeth and each nostril has a prominent barbel-like flap. Photo Credit: Duane Raver, USFWS 2012-MLC Page 1 Bowfin vs. Snakehead Bowfins are often mistaken as snakeheads, which are an exotic fish species native to Africa and Asia. Snakeheads are an aggressive invasive species that have little to no predators outside their native waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Leo Semenovich Berg and the Biology of Acipenseriformes: a Dedication
    Environmental Biology of Fishes 48: 15–22, 1997. 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Leo Semenovich Berg and the biology of Acipenseriformes: a dedication Vadim J. Birstein1 & William E. Bemis2 1 The Sturgeon Society, 331 West 57th Street, Suite 159, New York, NY 10019, U.S.A. 2 Department of Biology and Graduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, U.S.A. Received 5.3.1996 Accepted 23.5.1996 Key words: T. Dobzhansky, A. Sewertzoff, T. Lysenko, Paleonisciformes, biogeography This volume is dedicated to the memory of Leo Semenovich Berg (1876–1950), a Russian ichthyologist and geographer. In the foreword to the English translation of Berg’s remarkable treatise, ‘Nomogenesis or evolu- tion according to law’, Theodosius Dobzhansky wrote: ‘Berg was one of the outstanding intellects among Russian scientists. The breadth of his interests and the depth as well as the amplitude of his scholarship were remarkable. He had the reputation of being a ‘walking library’, because of the amount of information he could produce from his memory’ (Dobzhansky 1969, p. xi). Berg was prolific, publishing 217 papers and monographs on ichthyology, 30 papers on general zoology and biology, 20 papers on paleontology, 32 papers on zoogeo- graphy, 320 papers and monographs on geography, geology, and ethnography, as well as 290 biographies, obituaries, and popular articles (Berg 1955, Sokolov 1955). Berg was born 120 years ago, on 14 March 1876, in Sciences. Berg was never formally recognized by the town of Bendery. According to laws of the Rus- the Soviet Academy for his accomplishments in sian Empire, Berg could not enter the university as biology, and only later (1946) was he elected a mem- a Jew, so he was baptized and became a Lutheran, ber of the Geography Branch of the Soviet Acade- which allowed him to study and receive his diploma my of Sciences (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Sturgeon Classification – Dichotomous Keys Subject
    Topic/Lesson: Sturgeon Classification – Dichotomous Keys Subject: Classification and dichotomous keys Author: Rob Yeomans Time One 90 minute block or two 45 minute periods Duration: Overview: Students will use pictures of 7 members of the order Acipenseriformes to build a dichotomous key to identify each species. Objectives: Students will be able to: • Describe how to construct a dichotomous key. • Explain the hierarchal grouping of taxonomy. • Define a species. • Use their observational skills to differentiate species of sturgeon. • Understand the human impact on many species of sturgeon. Materials: • Whiteboard • Projector and screen • Dichotomous key assignment Procedures: 1) At the start of class, put the KPCOFGS of Atlantic sturgeon on the board, out of order. Have the class put each category in order from biggest to smallest and then define each term (What does it mean to be in kingdom Animalia? Phylum Chordata?) If the students don’t know, tell them—especially when you get down to order, family and genus. • Kingdom Animalia (multicellular, heterotrophic, eukaryotic) • Phylum Chordata (have at some point a notochord, dorsal nerve cord, gill slits and a post-anal tail) • Class Actinopterygii (All ray finned fishes. Fins are made of bony spines connected by a webbing of skin for support) • Order Acipenseriformes (primitive, cartilaginous endoskeleton, lack of a vertebral column) • Family Acipenseridae (true sturgeon; elongated bodies, lack of scales, anadromous, bottom feeders) • Genus Acipenser (Atlantic Sturgeon) 1 • Species oxyrinchus Comment to the class that there are actually two subspecies of oxyrinchus. Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus is the Atlantic sturgeon and Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi is the Gulf sturgeon 2) Reinforce the fact that sturgeon are a primitive fish and fossils have been found dating back 144-65 million years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of (3S,3′S)- and Meso-Stereoisomers of Alloxanthin and Determination of Absolute Configuration of Alloxanthin Isolated from Aquatic Animals
    Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 2623-2632; doi:10.3390/md12052623 OPEN ACCESS marine drugs ISSN 1660-3397 www.mdpi.com/journal/marinedrugs Article Synthesis of (3S,3′S)- and meso-Stereoisomers of Alloxanthin and Determination of Absolute Configuration of Alloxanthin Isolated from Aquatic Animals Yumiko Yamano 1,*, Takashi Maoka 2 and Akimori Wada 1 1 Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Motoyamakita-machi, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658-8558, Japan; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Research Institute for Production Development, 15 Shimogamo-morimoto-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-0805, Japan; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel./Fax.: +81-78-441-7562. Received: 20 March 2014; in revised form: 15 April 2014 / Accepted: 15 April 2014 / Published: 8 May 2014 Abstract: In order to determine the absolute configuration of naturally occurring alloxanthin, a HPLC analytical method for three stereoisomers 1a–c was established by using a chiral column. Two authentic samples, (3S,3′S)- and meso-stereoisomers 1b and 1c, were chemically synthesized according to the method previously developed for (3R,3′R)-alloxanthin (1a). Application of this method to various alloxanthin specimens of aquatic animals demonstrated that those isolated from shellfishes, tunicates, and crucian carp are identical with (3R,3′R)-stereoisomer 1a, and unexpectedly those from lake shrimp, catfish, biwa goby, and biwa trout are mixtures of three stereoisomers of 1a–c. Keywords: carotenoid; alloxanthin; synthesis; chiral HPLC separation; absolute configuration 1. Introduction Alloxanthin (1) (Figure 1) was first isolated from Cryptomonas algae [1] and its structure was determined to be 7,8,7′,8′-tetreradehydro-β,β-carotene-3,3′-diol by MS, IR and 1H-NMR spectroscopies [2].
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Fish Migration
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This article was originally published in Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology: From Genome to Environment, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Binder T.R., Cooke S.J., and Hinch S.G. (2011) The Biology of Fish Migration. In: Farrell A.P., (ed.), Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology: From Genome to Environment, volume 3, pp. 1921–1927. San Diego: Academic Press. ª 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy PHYSIOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATIONS OF DIFFERENT FISH GROUPS Fish Migrations Contents The Biology of Fish Migration Tracking Oceanic Fish Eel Migrations Pacific Salmon Migration: Completing the Cycle The Biology of Fish Migration TR Binder, Hammond Bay Biological Station, Millersburg, MI, USA SJ Cooke, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada SG Hinch, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada ª 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. What is Migration? Environmental Factors That Influence Migration Classifying Migrations Anthropogenic Impacts on Migration Orientation and Navigation Further Reading Energetics of Migration Glossary Fluvial Relating to a river, stream, or other flowing Amphidromy An uncommon subcategory of water.
    [Show full text]