DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Smith County, Mississippi (2001)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Smith County, Mississippi (2001) United States In cooperation with Department of the U.S. Forest Service Agriculture and the Mississippi Soil Survey of Agricultural and Forestry Natural Experiment Station Smith County, Resources Conservation Service Mississippi How To Use This Soil Survey This document provides text and tables that describe the soils in the survey area. A symbol is assigned to each soil. The symbol relates the text and tables to soil maps. The soil maps are available online from the Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey. nrcs.usda.gov/). Select the area for which you would like a soil map using the Area of Interest tab. After defining your area of interest, click on the Soil Map tab to view or print a soil map. Note the map unit symbols on the soil map. Turn to the Contents in this document. The Contents lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. It also shows which tables have data on specific land uses for each detailed soil map unit and lists other sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 4 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1994. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1997. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1994. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Smith County Soil and Water Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: Watermelons growing in an area of Ruston fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes. This well drained, loamy soil is classified as prime farmland and is well suited to a variety of crops. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. 5 Contents How to Use This Soil Survey .................................. 3 LuA—Louin silty clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes........ 51 Contents .................................................................. 5 Ma—Mantachie silt loam, frequently flooded ...... 53 Foreword ................................................................. 7 MgC—Maytag silty clay, 1 to 8 percent General Nature of the County ................................... 9 slopes .......................................................... 55 How This Survey Was Made ............................... 11 OrB—Ora fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent General Soil Map Units ........................................ 13 slopes .......................................................... 57 1. Trebloc-Stough-Kirkville ............................... 13 OrC—Ora fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent 2. Urbo-Kirkville-Leeper ................................... 14 slopes .......................................................... 59 3. Jena-Quitman-Stough .................................. 15 Pa—Pits-Udorthents complex ............................ 60 4. Savannah-Stough ........................................ 16 PrA—Prentiss fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent 5. Smithdale-Ruston ........................................ 17 slopes .......................................................... 62 6. Sweatman-Smithdale-Ora ............................ 17 QuA—Quitman fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 7. Savannah-Smithdale-Ora............................. 18 percent slopes, occasionally flooded............ 63 8. Smithdale-Ruston-Ora ................................. 19 RuA—Ruston fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent 9. Ichusa-Freest-Maytag .................................. 20 slopes .......................................................... 65 Detailed Soil Map Units ........................................ 23 RuB—Ruston fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent Ad—Adaton silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ....... 24 slopes .......................................................... 66 Ag—Alaga loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent RuC—Ruston fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, rarely flooded ................................... 25 slopes .......................................................... 68 An—Annemaine fine sandy loam, SaA—Savannah fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded ............ 27 percent slopes ............................................. 70 Bb—Bibb fine sandy loam, frequently flooded .... 28 SaB—Savannah fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 BoB2—Boswell loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, percent slopes ............................................. 71 eroded ......................................................... 30 SaC—Savannah fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 BoC2—Boswell loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, percent slopes ............................................. 73 eroded ......................................................... 32 SB—Savannah-Boswell complex, 2 to 8 Ca—Cahaba fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent percent slopes ............................................. 75 slopes, rarely flooded ................................... 34 SdD—Smithdale fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 FrB—Freest fine sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent percent slopes ............................................. 77 slopes .......................................................... 36 SdF—Smithdale fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 FrC—Freest fine sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent percent slopes ............................................. 79 slopes .......................................................... 38 SR—Smithdale-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to HeD—Heidel sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent 40 percent slopes ........................................ 80 slopes .......................................................... 39 St—Stough fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent HeF—Heidel sandy loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ........................ 82 slopes .......................................................... 41 SwB—Sweatman fine sandy loam, IcB—Ichusa silty clay loam, 2 to 5 percent 2 to 5 percent slopes.................................... 84 slopes .......................................................... 43 SwC—Sweatman fine sandy loam, IcC—Ichusa silty clay loam, 5 to 8 percent 5 to 8 percent slopes.................................... 85 slopes .......................................................... 44 SwD—Sweatman fine sandy loam, Je—Jena fine sandy loam, occasionally 8 to 15 percent slopes.................................. 87 flooded ......................................................... 46 SwF—Sweatman fine sandy loam, 15 to 35 Kr—Kirkville fine sandy loam, occasionally percent slopes ............................................. 89 flooded ......................................................... 48 Tr —Trebloc silt loam, frequently flooded ............. 91 Le—Leeper clay loam, occasionally flooded ....... 49 Uo—Urbo clay loam, occasionally flooded ......... 93 6 UU—Una and Urbo soils, frequently flooded ...... 94 Ruston Series................................................... 136 Use and Management of the Soils ...................... 97 Savannah Series .............................................. 137 Crops and Pasture ............................................. 97 Smithdale Series .............................................. 138 Yields per Acre ............................................... 98 Stough Series................................................... 139 Land Capability Classification ........................ 98 Sweatman Series ............................................. 140 Prime Farmland ............................................. 99 Trebloc Series .................................................. 142 Woodland Management and Productivity ........... 99 Una Series ....................................................... 143 Recreation ........................................................ 101 Urbo Series ...................................................... 144 Wildlife Habitat ................................................. 102 Formation of the Soils ........................................ 147 Engineering ...................................................... 103 Factors of Soil Formation ................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flood-Inundation Maps for the Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Mississippi
    Prepared in cooperation with the City of Hattiesburg, City of Petal, Forrest County, Mississippi Emergency Management Agency, Mississippi Department of Homeland Security, and the Emergency Management District Flood-Inundation Maps for the Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Mississippi Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3228 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Left, photograph looking downstream at the Leaf River at State Highway 42 above Hattiesburg, Mississippi, April 25, 2012. Right, inundation map of Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Mississippi (02473000), at 34.0 feet gage datum (see Sheet 13 for details). Flood-Inundation Maps for the Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Mississippi By John B. Storm Prepared in cooperation with the City of Hattiesburg, City of Petal, Forrest County, Mississippi Emergency Management Agency, Mississippi Department of Homeland Security, and the Emergency Management District Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3228 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Perry County, Mississippi
    United States In cooperation with Department of U.S. Forest Service and the Agriculture Mississippi Agricultural and Soil Survey of Forestry Experiment Natural Station Perry County, Resources Conservation Service Mississippi Interim Publication—January 1999 How To Use This Soil Survey This document provides text and tables that describe the soils in the survey area. A symbol is assigned to each soil. The symbol relates the text and tables to soil maps. The soil maps are available online from the Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey. nrcs.usda.gov/). Select the area for which you would like a soil map using the Area of Interest tab. After defining your area of interest, click on the Soil Map tab to view or print a soil map. Note the map unit symbols on the soil map. Turn to the Contents in this document. The Contents lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. It also shows which tables have data on specific land uses for each detailed soil map unit and lists other sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 4 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1992. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mississippi Commission on Wildlife, Fisheries, And
    MISSISSIPPI COMMISSION ON WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS Title 40: Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks Part 3. Fisheries Part 3, Chapter 3: Regulations regarding commercial fishing. Rule 3.1 REGULATIONS REGARDING COMMERCIAL FISHING. A. The following rules, regulations and required licenses relative to freshwater commercial fishing, commercial fishing equipment tags, seines, nets and traps and wholesale minnow dealers are hereby adopted for all residents and non-residents for public waters identified in MISS. CODE ANN. §51-3-1. Nonresidents shall comply with all subsections of MISS. CODE ANN. §49-7-9.1, except for the subsection which specifies the fee for a resident commercial fishing license. B. Non-game gross fish, non native fish, minnows, non-game fish, crawfish, and freshwater shrimp may be taken and sold from freshwaters of Mississippi, except in those waters specifically in section H which are closed to freshwater commercial fishing equipment and slat baskets as stated herein. C. LICENSES 1. Persons who engage in the following activities must have a freshwater commercial fishing license to do the following: a. Fish freshwater commercial fishing equipment (hoop or barrel nets, gill or trammel nets, slat baskets or trotlines with more than 100 hooks in aggregate). b. Harvest, sell, resell, or purchase for re-sale non-game gross fish, or non- native fish. c. Sell minnows at wholesale (with the exception of those MS residents growing minnows on their own property, Section 49-7-29) or sell minnows or nongame fish captured from the wild. Minnows are defined as golden shiners, fathead minnows, goldfish, emerald shiner, and mosquitofish.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of February-March 1961 in the Southeastern States
    Floods of February-March 1961 in the Southeastern States GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 452 Floods of February-March 1961 in the Southeastern States By Harry H. Barnes, Jr., and William P. Somers GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 452 Washington 1961 United States Department of the Interior STEWART L. UDALL, SECRETARY Geological Survey THOMAS B. NOLAN, DIRECTOR Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract.......................... 1 Flood damages.......... 6 Introduction ...................... 1 Aerial photography..... 8 General description of the floods, 1 Incomplete field data.. 8 Louisiana....................... 2 Streamflow data........ 10 Mississippi..................... 3 Records of discharge, 10 Alabama......................... 6 Summary of peak stages and discharges. 10 Georgia......................... 6 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Isohyetal map of southeastern States, shoving storm rainfall February 17-20, 1961........................................................... 2 2. Isohyetal map of southeastern States, showing storm rainfall February 20-23, 1961........................................................... 3 3. Isohyetal map of southeastern States, showing storm rainfall February 23-26, 1961........................................................... 4 4. Isohyetal map of southeastern States, showing storm rainfall February 17-26, 1961........................................................... 5 5. Graph of stage and discharge of Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Miss., February 17 to
    [Show full text]
  • State Geological Survey
    MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILLIAM CLIFFORD MORSE, Ph.D. Director BULLETIN 44 FORREST COUNTY MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY By VELLORA MEEK FOSTER, M.Sc. TESTS By THOMAS EDWIN McCUTCHEON, B.S., Cer. Engr. UNIVERSITY, MISSISSIPPI 1941 Please do not destroy this report; rather return it to the Mississippi Geological Survey, University, Mississippi, and receive postage refund. VELLORA MEEK FOSTER 1904 - 1941 STUDENT ASSOCIATE GEOLOGIST FRIEND .MAX MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILLIAM CLIFFORD MORSE, Ph.D. DIRECTOR BULLETIN 44 FORREST COUNTY MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY By VELLORA MEEK FOSTER, M.Sc. TESTS By THOMAS EDWIN McCUTCHEON, B.S., Cer.Engr. Prepared in cooperation with the Forrest citizens and the WPA as a report on 0. P. 465-62-8-275. UNIVERSITY, MISSISSIPPI 1941 MISSISSIPPI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMISSION His Excellency, Paul Burney Johnson Governor Hon. Joseph Sloan Vandiver State Superintendent of Education Hon. Alfred Benjamin Butts Chancellor, University of Mississippi Hon. Duke Humphrey President, Mississippi State College Hon. William David McCain Director, Dept. of Archives and History STAFF William Clifford Morse, Ph.D Director Calvin S. Brown, D.Sc, Ph.D Archeologist IiOuis Cowles Conant, Ph.D Assistant Geologist Harlan Richard Bergquist, Ph.D Assistant Geologist Thomas Edwin McCutcheon, B.S., Cer.Engr Ceramic Engineer Dorothy Mai Dean, B.A Secretary and Librarian Alta Ray Gault, M.S Technician SUPERVISORS—WPA Franklin Earl Vestal, M.S Assistant Geologist Richard Randall Priddy, Ph.D Assistant Geologist Bernard Frank Mandlebaum, B.S.E Chemical Technician LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Office of the Mississippi Geological Survey University, Mississippi October 26, 1941 To His Excellency, Governor Paul Burney Johnson, Chairman, and Members of the Geological Commission Gentlemen: Herewith is Bulletin 44, Forrest County Mineral Resources, which is published as a fulfillment in part of the sponsorship pledge of the Mis sissippi State Geological Survey, necessary to obtain Federal-WPA funds for the various county geologic mineral surveys of the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateral Movement and Stability of Channel Banks Near Two Highway Crossings in the Pascagoula River Basin in Mississippi
    LATERAL MOVEMENT AND STABILITY OF CHANNEL BANKS NEAR TWO HIGHWAY CROSSINGS IN THE PASCAGOULA RIVER BASIN IN MISSISSIPPI By D. Phil Turnipseed U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4131 Prepared in cooperation with the MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Jackson, Mississippi 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Suite 710, Federal Building Open-File Reports Section 100 W. Capitol Street Box 25286, MS 517, Federal Center Jackson, Mississippi 39269 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract..................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................................................................. 2 Purpose and scope...................................................................................... 3 Description of the study areas.................................................................. 5 Chickasawhay River at State Highway 63 at Leakesville......... 5 Leaf River at U.S. Highway 98 near McLain............................... 5 Acknowledgments...................................................................................... 6 Determination of lateral bank movement..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Location of Thermal Refuge for Striped Bass in the Pascagoula River
    Location of Thermal Refuge for Striped Bass in the Pascagoula River Donald C. Jackson1, Eric D. Dibble, and John F. Mareska2 Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University P.O. Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762 We conducted a two-year study (1997–1999) to locate cool water thermal refuge for striped bass Morone saxatilis in the Pascagoula River, its principal tributary streams and associated off-channel environments. Sampling with gill nets (33.2 hours soak time), hoop nets (26,160 hours soak time), electrofishing (39.9 hours pedal time), trotlines (121 lines with 10 hooks each @ 4.6 ± 1.3 hours/line) and angling (99.2 hours) resulted in the capture of only 12 striped bass. Of these, seven were large adult fish that we equipped with radio transmitters and released for telemetry. To increase sample size for the telemetry study, eight adult striped bass from the Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (Ocean Springs, Mississippi) and 15 adult striped bass from the Mammoth Springs National Fish Hatchery (Mammoth Springs, Arkansas) were equipped with radio and/or sonic transmitters and released into the system. Data for one of these Mammoth Springs National Fish Hatchery striped bass were lost, thereby resulting in a total sample size of 30 fish. Ninety-five days in 1998 and 99 days in 1999 were spent tracking striped bass by boat. Six days were spent conducting aerial radio telemetry surveys in 1998. Only the Cedar Creek effluent into the Pascagoula River (N 30 41' 58" W 88 37' 56") was confirmed as thermal refuge for striped bass.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Conditions for Sediment in the Pascagoula River Basin, Mississippi
    Channel and Watershed Processes Research Unit National Sedimentation Laboratory Oxford, Mississippi REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR SEDIMENT IN THE PASCAGOULA RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI By Lauren Farrugia and Andrew Simon April 2005 REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR SEDIMENT IN THE PASCAGOULA RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI Prepared by U.S. Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service National Sedimentation Laboratory Channel and Watershed Process Research Unit For Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality May 2005 Suspended-Sediment Reference Conditions: Pascagoula River Basin iii ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR SEDIMENT IN THE PASCAGOULA RIVER BASIN, MISSISSIPPI ARS Designated Representative and Project Manager: Carlos V. Alonso Technical Direction, Data Analysis: Andrew Simon and Lauren Farrugia Report Preparation: Lauren Farrugia Mapping, GIS and Interactive CD: Danny Klimetz Field Operations and Database Management: Mark Griffith and Lauren Farrugia Field Data Collection and Data Processing: Mark Griffith, Lauren Farrugia, Danny Klimetz, Brian Bell, and Micah Findiesen. Suspended-Sediment Reference Conditions: Pascagoula River Basin iv ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Seven segments within the Pascagoula River Basin are listed as having impaired conditions for aquatic life due to sediment. An additional twelve sites in the basin are listed for
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Resources of Jones County, Mississippi
    GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF JONES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI By E.H. Boswell, Daphne Darden, and Gene A. Bednar U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 85-4342 Prepared in cooperation with the CITY OF LAUREL Jackson, Mississippi 1987 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 100 W. Capitol St., Suite 710 Federal Center, Box 25425 Jackson, Mississippi 39269 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Purpose and scope 2 Description of the area 2 Previous investigations 2 Water development and use 2 Geohydrology 16 Miocene aquifer system 18 Oligocene aquifer system 27 Eocene aquifers 32 Water quality 32 Freshwater aquifers 32 Saline water 41 Aquifer and stream contamination 41 Potential for ground-water development 42 Summary 45 Selected references 47 i i i ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing location of Jones County 3 2. Geologic map of Jones County 4 Figures 3-5. Map showing: 3. Locations of selected water wells in Jones County 14 4. Locations of selected water wells in the Laurel area- 15 5. Configuration of the top of the Glendon Formation in Jones County 19 Figure 6. Geophysical log showing stratigraphic units and aquifers in the Laurel area 21 7. Map showing locations of geohydrologic sections A-A' and B-B' 22 8. Geohydrologic section A-A 1 23 9. Geohydrologic section B-B 1 24 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Jones County, Mississippi and Incorporated Areas
    JONES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ELLISVILLE, CITY OF 280091 JONES COUNTY 280222 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) LAUREL, CITY OF 280092 SANDERSVILLE, TOWN OF 280244 JONES COUNTY SOSO, TOWN OF 280245 EFFECTIVE: Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 28067CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 2 2.0 AREA STUDIED 4 2.1 Scope of Study 4 2.2 Community Description 5 2.3 Principal Flood Problems 6 2.4 Flood Protection Measures 6 3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS 6 3.1 Hydrologic Analyses 7 3.2 Hydraulic Analyses 18 3.3 Vertical Datum 21 4.0 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 22 4.1 Floodplain Boundaries 22 4.2
    [Show full text]
  • Perry County, Mississippi and Incorporated Areas
    PERRY COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Name Number BEAUMONT, TOWN OF 280203 NEW AUGUSTA, CITY OF 280131 PERRY COUNTY 280233 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) RICHTON, TOWN OF 280321 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 28111CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X This preliminary revised Flood Insurance Study contains profiles presented at a reduced scale to minimize reproduction costs. All profiles will be included and printed at full scale in the final published report. Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date – TBD 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017–2018 DEER PROGRAM REPORT Stephen Kirkpatrick
    MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES, AND PARKS 2017–2018 DEER PROGRAM REPORT Stephen Kirkpatrick PREPARED BY MDWFP WILDLIFE BUREAU 2017–2018 Mississippi Deer Program Report 1 2017–2018 Deer Program Report Governor of Mississippi Phil Bryant Lieutenant Governor Tate Reeves Senate Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks Committee Philip Moran, Chairman Angela Burks Hill, Vice-Chairman Jennifer B. Branning Chris Caughman Gary Jackson Sampson Jackson II Chris Massey Derrick T. Simmons Gray Tollison Michael Watson Neil Whaley House of Representatives Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks Committee C. Scott Bounds, Chairman Shane Barnett, Vice-Chairman Lester Carpenter Bryant W. Clark Angela Cockerham John Glen Corley Bob Evans Karl Gibbs Steve Hopkins Robert L. Johnson III Bill Kinkade John Thomas “Trey” Lamar, III Vince Mangold Ken Morgan Karl Oliver Commission on Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks Bill F. Cossar, Chairman Scott Coopwood, Vice-Chairman Robert Taylor Billy Mounger Clay Wagner Administration Sam Polles, Ph.D., Executive Director Robert L. Cook, Deputy Executive Director Michael Bolden, Director of Administrative Services Jennifer Head, Director of Parks/Chief Financial Officer Charles Knight, Executive Officer of Museum, Conservation Outreach, and Education 2 2017–2018 Mississippi Deer Program Report Table of Contents Governor and Legislative Committees .......................................................................................................................... 2 Commission on Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]