Blood Amber Military Resource Grab Clears out Indigenous Peoples in Kachin State’S Hugawng Valley Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Blood Amber Military Resource Grab Clears out Indigenous Peoples in Kachin State’S Hugawng Valley Contents Blood Amber Military resource grab clears out indigenous peoples in Kachin State’s Hugawng Valley Contents Summary............................................................................4 Introduction........................................................................7 Map: New displacement in Kachin April 2018 Background........................................................................8 The amber region: A home to indigenous inhabitants...........10 Amber mining in the Hugawng Valley....................................12 History of small-scale mining Amber boom 2010-2017 Export to China..................................................................16 Military expansion and amber income..................................17 Maps: Burma Army battalions in Kachin State 1994-2006 Hugawng Valley off ensive.....................................................21 A warning from the sky Attacks begin Timeline Government moves to control the mines International actors silent Fighting drags on and escalates Civilians prevented from escaping or receiving aid Government denies existence of IDPs Maps: Burma military presence in Hugawng Valley Control cemented Intimidation by government and military Mining resumes Local response to the off ensive..............................................31 Humanitarian support—only from locals Request to return home Analysis............................................................................33 Repeated pattern: Burma Army seizure of Kachin resources False premise #1: Protecting the environment False premise #2: Legalizing mining protects resources and benefits people Conclusion and solutions.....................................................36 Appendices........................................................................38 Warning dropped from the sky on June 5, 2017 Statement from Kachin political parties on the offensive Open Letter from Hugawng Valley IDPs to the President Reply to villagers from President’s Office Letter from Kachin State Parliament Office to Chief Minister of Kachin State Letter from Members of Parliament on civilians displaced by the amber mine offensive Proposal to the President by Members of Parliament Interviews conducted for this report Summary In 2018, Burmese government mining area, but the Burma Army troops stepped up their war in collected taxes on all amber trans- Kachin State, further driving out port routes as the precious resource indigenous populations and ex- was exported across Kachin State panding control over the area’s into China, where the annual value rich natural resources and strategic of the trade is estimated at 1 billion trading routes. The fiercest offensive USD a year. was fought in northwest Kachin State’s Hugawng Valley, to secure In June 2017, the Burma Army the historic Ledo Road linking India moved to take over the amber trade and China, which is part of China’s at the source. They used aircraft Belt and Road Initiative, and to seize to drop thousands of leaflets over hugely lucrative amber mines. the mining area, ordering all local residents to evacuate within ten days Kachin State amber is a global – or be branded as KIA insurgents. treasure: it is the only type in the This included not only the mine world formed during the age of the workers but also nearly 5,000 indig- dinosaurs. “Blood amber” is the enous villagers who had lived and Chinese name of the extremely rare, farmed there for generations. deep red variety of the gem found only in the Hugawng Valley – a The offensive lasted nearly one year, name which resonates grimly with during which civilians suffered not local residents who have been driven only the seizure of their lands and out by the recent offensive. property, but also military harass- ment and violence. On January 26, The amber mining boom began 2018, three civilians were killed by in 2010, due to demand from the an aerial attack, including the young Chinese market, causing tens of mother of a 3 year-old child. thousands of migrant miners from across Burma to flock to the region. In January 2018, nearly 3,000 In 2015, discovery of a 99-million- civilians were trapped in the con- year-old feathered dinosaur tail in flict area by the Burma Army, who Hugawng Valley amber further refused to allow them to pass to fuelled the trade. safety, holding them for eleven days without proper food or healthcare The Kachin Independence Army and blocking delivery of humanitar- (KIA) controlled the remote amber ian aid. To this day, the thousands 4 of indigenous inhabitants of the since government security forces amber mining area are living in seized control of the mines, generat- makeshift shelters in urban church ing huge profits for government and compounds, unrecognized as IDPs military elites, while driving local and unable to return home. people off their lands and destroying their livelihoods. Despite using the premise of “pro- tecting the environment” to justify The central government must recog- the offensive, unregulated amber nize the rights of indigenous peoples mining resumed in the region just to live on their land and manage one year after the offensive began, their own resources, and must im- exposing the Burma military’s real mediately take steps to allow people motives in seizing the mines. displaced from the amber region to return home. The offensive follows a repeated pattern of military expansion and Constitutional change is critical to violence against ethnic peoples in resolve conflict in Burma. Local Kachin State in order to consolidate people in Kachin State must own, extractive businesses to profit the manage, and receive revenues from military and central government the natural resources of the land at the expense of local indigenous where they live and work. populations. International pressure is urgently Past documentation by KDNG needed to help protect civilians in has already shown that, far from conflict zones in Kachin State and protecting the environment, the elsewhere in Burma. Foreign eco- government and military has been nomic investment and peace process responsible for large-scale environ- funding should be frozen until the mental destruction in the Hugawng Burma military stops its offensives Valley over the last 20 years. It has against Kachin and other ethnic authorized destructive gold mining peoples. In the meantime, interna- throughout the valley, and given per- tional humanitarian aid should be mission for Yuzana Company to de- sent to help communities displaced stroy hundreds of acres of forest and from their homes and livelihoods by farmlands to carry out monocrop central government aggression. agriculture for the Chinese market. Similarly in nearby Hpakant, jade mining has expanded exponentially 5 Amber region Ledo Mining areas, Ledo Road, and proposed dams added by KDNG 6 Introduction In 2018, the Burma Army stepped This report is written to help better up offensives across Kachin State to understand the background history expand central government control of Hugawng Valley’s people, land, over the area’s rich natural resourc- and amber mines. It analyzes the es and strategic trading routes. An source of problems around natural offensive in Injangyang township resources and proposes solutions to cleared out thousands of Kachin address them. The report is a call to villagers from north of the planned allow the native Hugawng people to Myitsone dam project. An offensive get involved and make decisions in in Hpakant further cleared out how resources are distributed and villagers from the hills around the used, and to begin a new course of jade mines. development that is better able to be sustained for the next generation. But the fiercest offensive took place in the Hugawng Valley. It was aimed to secure control of the historic Ledo Road—which links India and China and is part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative—and to seize Tsa Ji the area’s lucrative amber mines. General Secretary, KDNG Hugawng Valley amber shot to international fame in 2015 when a Chinese paleontologist discovered a feathered dinosaur tail embedded in hunk of amber in Myitkyina’s mar- ket. This report details the history of the amber mining trade in Hugawng Valley, how the offensive was carried out, and the dispossession of the area’s indigenous inhabitants. It is based on in-depth interviews with twenty-one people from the area. 7 Background When the British arrived, taxing began. One kyat was collected Kachin State is a land of long moun- from each household; 50 pyas tain ranges enclosing lush flat valleys. went to the British government Rivers loop through like unraveled and another 50 pyas to the local yarn, and the Irrawaddy flows south chief (Mung Du). The Chief from the Himalayas on its way to Yan- in turn gave 25 pyas out of his gon and the Andaman Sea. Wedged share to the village head. Thus between India and China, Kachin they administered the land and State is home to Kachin, Naga, and population. (Interview No. 6) other ethnic peoples who have lived here for centuries. The state is rich in The fertile alluvial soils on the banks mineral resources, including gold, the of the Danai River, the main head- highest quality jade in the world, and water of the Chindwin, provide amber deposits dating from the age of the valley with vast areas of arable the dinosaurs. land. Local people grow wet paddy in lowland areas, practice rotational The Hugawng Valley lies mainly in agriculture in upland areas, and raise the township of Danai, northwest domestic animals. They also subsist by of Myitkyina,
Recommended publications
  • The Union Report the Union Report : Census Report Volume 2 Census Report Volume 2
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report The Union Report : Census Report Volume 2 Volume Report : Census The Union Report Census Report Volume 2 Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population May 2015 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report Census Report Volume 2 For more information contact: Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population Office No. 48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431 062 www.dop.gov.mm May, 2015 Figure 1: Map of Myanmar by State, Region and District Census Report Volume 2 (Union) i Foreword The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census (2014 MPHC) was conducted from 29th March to 10th April 2014 on a de facto basis. The successful planning and implementation of the census activities, followed by the timely release of the provisional results in August 2014 and now the main results in May 2015, is a clear testimony of the Government’s resolve to publish all information collected from respondents in accordance with the Population and Housing Census Law No. 19 of 2013. It is my hope that the main census results will be interpreted correctly and will effectively inform the planning and decision-making processes in our quest for national development. The census structures put in place, including the Central Census Commission, Census Committees and Offices at all administrative levels and the International Technical Advisory Board (ITAB), a group of 15 experts from different countries and institutions involved in censuses and statistics internationally, provided the requisite administrative and technical inputs for the implementation of the census.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Monitor No.49
    Euro-Burma Office 10 November 22 November 2010 Election Monitor ELECTION MONITOR NO. 49 DIPLOMATS OF FOREIGN MISSIONS OBSERVE VOTING PROCESS IN VARIOUS STATES AND REGIONS Representatives of foreign embassies and UN agencies based in Myanmar, members of the Myanmar Foreign Correspondents Club and local journalists observed the polling stations and studied the casting of votes at a number of polling stations on the day of the elections. According the state-run media, the diplomats and guests were organized into small groups and conducted to the various regions and states to witness the elections. The following are the number of polling stations and number of eligible voters for the various regions and states:1 1. Kachin State - 866 polling stations for 824,968 eligible voters. 2. Magway Region- 4436 polling stations in 1705 wards and villages with 2,695,546 eligible voters 3. Chin State - 510 polling stations with 66827 eligible voters 4. Sagaing Region - 3,307 polling stations with 3,114,222 eligible voters in 125 constituencies 5. Bago Region - 1251 polling stations and 1057656 voters 6. Shan State (North ) - 1268 polling stations in five districts, 19 townships and 839 wards/ villages and there were 1,060,807 eligible voters. 7. Shan State(East) - 506 polling stations and 331,448 eligible voters 8. Shan State (South)- 908,030 eligible voters cast votes at 975 polling stations 9. Mandalay Region - 653 polling stations where more than 85,500 eligible voters 10. Rakhine State - 2824 polling stations and over 1769000 eligible voters in 17 townships in Rakhine State, 1267 polling stations and over 863000 eligible voters in Sittway District and 139 polling stations and over 146000 eligible voters in Sittway Township.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Migration and Land Rights in Burma
    -R&YVQE,SYWMRK0ERHERH4VSTIVX] ,04 VMKLXWEVIMRI\XVMGEFP]PMROIHXSXLIGSYRXV]«W SRKSMRKWXVYKKPIJSVNYWXMGIERHHIQSGVEG]ERHWYWXEMREFPIPMZIPMLSSHW7MRGI[LIRXLI QMPMXEV]VIKMQIXSSOTS[IVSZIVSRIQMPPMSRTISTPILEZIFIIRHMWTPEGIHEWYFWXERXMZIRYQFIV EVIJVSQIXLRMGREXMSREPMX]GSQQYRMXMIWHIRMIHXLIVMKLXXSVIWMHIMRXLIMVLSQIPERHW0ERH GSR´WGEXMSRF]+SZIVRQIRXJSVGIWMWVIWTSRWMFPIJSVQER]WYGL,04ZMSPEXMSRWMR&YVQE -R'3,6)GSQQMWWMSRIH%WLPI]7SYXLSRISJXLI[SVPH«WPIEHMRK&YVQEVIWIEVGLIVWXS GEVV]SYXSRWMXIVIWIEVGLSR,04VMKLXW8LIIRWYMRKVITSVX(MWTPEGIQIRXERH(MWTSWWIWWMSR *SVGIH1MKVEXMSRERH0ERH6MKLXWMR&YVQEJSVQWEGSQTVILIRWMZIPSSOEXXLIOI],04 MWWYIWEJJIGXMRK&YVQEXSHE]ERHLS[XLIWIQMKLXFIWXFIEHHVIWWIHMRXLIJYXYVI Displacement and Dispossession: 8LMWVITSVX´RHWXLEXWYGLTVSFPIQWGERSRP]FIVIWSPZIHXLVSYKLWYFWXERXMEPERHWYWXEMRIH GLERKIMR&YVQEETSPMXMGEPXVERWMXMSRXLEXWLSYPHMRGPYHIMQTVSZIHEGGIWWXSEVERKISJ Forced Migration and Land Rights JYRHEQIRXEPVMKLXWEWIRWLVMRIHMRMRXIVREXMSREPPE[ERHGSRZIRXMSRWMRGPYHMRKVIWTIGXJSV ,04VMKLXW4VSXIGXMSRJVSQ ERHHYVMRK JSVGIHQMKVEXMSRERHWSPYXMSRWXSXLI[MHIWTVIEH ,04GVMWIWMR&YVQEHITIRHYPXMQEXIP]SRWIXXPIQIRXWXSXLIGSRµMGXW[LMGLLEZI[VEGOIHXLI GSYRXV]JSVQSVIXLERLEPJEGIRXYV] BURMA )JJSVXWEXGSRµMGXVIWSPYXMSRLEZIXLYWJEVQIX[MXLSRP]ZIV]PMQMXIHWYGGIWW2IZIVXLIPIWW XLMWVITSVXHIWGVMFIWWSQIMRXIVIWXMRKERHYWIJYPTVSNIGXWXLERLEZIFIIRMQTPIQIRXIHF]GMZMP WSGMIX]KVSYTWMR&YVQE8LIWII\EQTPIWWLS[XLEXRSX[MXLWXERHMRKXLIRIIHJSVJYRHEQIRXEP TSPMXMGEPGLERKIMR&YVQEWXITWGERERHWLSYPHFIXEOIRRS[XSEHHVIWW,04MWWYIW-RTEVXMGYPEV STTSVXYRMXMIWI\MWXXSEWWMWXXLIVILEFMPMXEXMSRSJHMWTPEGIHTISTPIMR[E]W[LMGLPMROTSPMXMGEP
    [Show full text]
  • THE STATE of LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS in KACHIN Photo Credits
    Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN Photo credits Mike Adair Emilie Röell Myanmar Survey Research A photo record of the UNDP Governance Mapping Trip for Kachin State. Travel to Tanai, Putao, Momauk and Myitkyina townships from Jan 6 to Jan 23, 2015 is available here: http://tinyurl.com/Kachin-Trip-2015 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN UNDP MYANMAR Table of Contents Acknowledgements II Acronyms III Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 5 2. Kachin State 7 2.1 Kachin geography 9 2.2 Population distribution 10 2.3 Socio-economic dimensions 11 2.4 Some historical perspectives 13 2.5 Current security situation 18 2.6 State institutions 18 3. Methodology 24 3.1 Objectives of mapping 25 3.2 Mapping tools 25 3.3 Selected townships in Kachin 26 4. Governance at the front line – Findings on participation, responsiveness and accountability for service provision 27 4.1 Introduction to the townships 28 4.1.1 Overarching development priorities 33 4.1.2 Safety and security perceptions 34 4.1.3 Citizens’ views on overall improvements 36 4.1.4 Service Provider’s and people’s views on improvements and challenges in selected basic services 37 4.1.5 Issues pertaining to access services 54 4.2 Development planning and participation 57 4.2.1 Development committees 58 4.2.2 Planning and use of development funds 61 4.2.3 Challenges to township planning and participatory development 65 4.3 Information, transparency and accountability 67 4.3.1 Information at township level 67 4.3.2 TDSCs and TMACs as accountability mechanisms 69 4.3.3 WA/VTAs and W/VTSDCs 70 4.3.4 Grievances and disputes 75 4.3.5 Citizens’ awareness and freedom to express 78 4.3.6 Role of civil society organisations 81 5.
    [Show full text]
  • DASHED HOPES the Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS DASHED HOPES The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar WATCH Dashed Hopes The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar Copyright © 2019 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-36970 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org FEBRUARY 2019 ISBN: 978-1-6231-36970 Dashed Hopes The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Myanmar Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 5 I. Background ..................................................................................................................... 6 II. Section 66(d)
    [Show full text]
  • KACHIN STATE, MOHNYIN DISTRICT Mohnyin Township Report
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census KACHIN STATE, MOHNYIN DISTRICT Mohnyin Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population October 2017 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Kachin State, Mohnyin District Mohnyin Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population Office No.48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431062 www.dop.gov.mm October 2017 Figure 1: Map of Kachin State, showing the townships MohnyinTownship Figures at a Glance 1 Total Population 160,598 2 Population males 78,795 (49.1%) Population females 81,803 (50.9%) Percentage of urban population 20.7% Area (Km2) 6,036.3 3 Population density (per Km2) 26.6 persons Median age 24.7 years Number of wards 5 Number of village tracts 29 Number of private households 30,190 Percentage of female headed households 30.0% Mean household size 4.9 persons4 Percentage of population by age group Children (0 – 14 years) 31.4% Economically productive (15 – 64 years) 63.8% Elderly population (65+ years) 4.8% Dependency ratios Total dependency ratio 56.8 Child dependency ratio 49.3 Old dependency ratio 7.5 Ageing index 15.3 Sex ratio (males per 100 females) 96 Literacy rate (persons aged 15 and over) 95.4% Male 97.5% Female 93.7% People with disability Number Per cent Any form of disability 4,562 2.8 Walking 1,662 1.0 Seeing 2,296 1.4 Hearing 1,314 0.8 Remembering 1,443 0.9 Type of Identity Card (persons aged 10 and over) Number Per cent Citizenship Scrutiny 94,919 73.6 Associate
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Dynamics and Protection of Civilians in Kachin State
    PWG Update Conflict Dynamics and Protection of Civilians in Kachin State September 2016 Objectives: a) To provide an update on the Protection Analyses1 on the conflict dynamics in Kachin State, particularly as related to Protection of Civilians. b) To draw attention to the increased tension and conflict in close proximity to IDP camps and civilian residences and call on all parties to the conflict to respect the civilian character of these camps and communities. c) To facilitate, drive and inform discussion and response to Protection concerns in Kachin state within the PWG, the Inter Cluster Working Group, the AHCT and HCT, particularly in relation to Protection and Advocacy on key issues, including Emergency Preparedness; d) To provide a reminder and guidance of obligations to meet relevant international standards on the Protection of Civilians, with a particular focus on the responsibilities of parties to the conflict under International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights Law and Criminal Law. e) To initiate discussion and form the basis of a coordinated advocacy strategy by PWG and other relevant stakeholders. BACKGROUND Since the breakdown of the ceasefire and resumption of fighting between the Myanmar Army and the KIA in Kachin State in 2011, several conflict related security and Protection trends have emerged including, but not limited to, use of landmines, use of heavy artillery in in proximity to civilian settlements and airstrikes as well as reports of increased human rights abuses targeting individuals. More than 91,000 people2 are currently forcibly displaced across Government Controlled Areas (GCA) and Non-Government Controlled Areas (NGCA) of Kachin. The PWG have been active throughout the conflict monitoring Protection concerns3.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Crisis and Human Rights Violations
    n the tenth week since the coup, the total death April 3-9 toll rose to 701. Between April 3 to 9, at least 151 15 armed clashes people were killed across Myanmar. Of them, over O between KIA and Burma Army 80 were killed on a single day (April 9) in a single city (Bago). This week the coup regime launched a campaign to take 8 artillery shellings legal action against anyone who voices opposition to the in the Kachin area junta online. So far, they have targeted activists, celebrities, February 1 - April 9 journalists and social influencers. Even as violence against civilians continues, there were protests against the coup 701 killed regime in all the major towns in the country, including in by Burma security forces Kachin State, every day of this week. Armed conflict between As of April 7 the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) and the Burma Army continues to intensify in the Kachin area. Between April 3 and 5532 in CDM April 9, there were at least 15 armed clashes between the KIA in Kachin State and Burma Army, and at least 8 instances of artillery shelling (each with several rounds) in the Kachin area. The Massacre Humanitarian Crisis and in Bago n In the early hours of April 9, Human Rights Violations more than 250 security forces launched attacks on four n On April 1, a Daru Hka villager, Kayun Du Roi, was injured residential areas of Bago using by mortar shrapnels fired by the Burma Army. automatic weapons and heavy explosives. n On April 4, two Bang Hka villagers were reportedly taken n More than 80 civilians were killed.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Situation Update (2 - 8 August 2021) Summary
    Myanmar Situation Update (2 - 8 August 2021) Summary As 8 August 2021 marked for Myanmar the 33rd anniversary of the 1988 pro-democracy uprising, a historic protest movement in which the cry for democracy of Myanmar’s people was heard around the world, activists around the country renewed calls to end military rule once and for all. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) picked Brunei’s second foreign minister, Erywan Yusof, as its special envoy to Myanmar. He has been tasked with opening dialogue between the military rulers and their opponents in an effort to halt the violence, and stated that he should be given full access to all parties in Myanmar. 413 Myanmar civil society organizations released a statement rejecting the special envoy and expressing deep disappointment with ASEAN and their lack of inclusive decision-making process. The junta has approved the appointment as reported by state-controlled media. Myanmar's ambassador to the United Nations who is denounced by the junta, Kyaw Moe Tun said that an apparent threat had been made against him and that U.S. authorities had stepped up his security. Later, two Myanmar citizens were charged with one count of conspiracy to assault or violently attack him. If convicted, they can face a prison sentence of up to five years. Sources reported that conspirators accused of plotting an attack have military ties. Twenty-eight junta-backed political parties, including the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), on Wednesday released a joint statement that they would welcome the new elections the military junta says it will hold in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Mansi Township Report
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census KACHIN STATE, BHAMO DISTRICT Mansi Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population October 2017 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Kachin State, Bhamo District Mansi Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population Office No.48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431062 www.dop.gov.mm October 2017 Figure 1: Map of Kachin State, showing the townships Mansi Township Figures at a Glance 1 Enumerated Population 52,945 2 Total Population Estimated Population 31,243 Population males 26,156 (49.4%) Population females 26,789 (50.6%) Percentage of urban population 15.4% Area (Km2) 2,932.8 3 Population density (per Km2) 28.7 persons Median age 24.9 years Number of wards 4 Number of village tracts 20 Number of private households 10,554 Percentage of female headed households 32.2% Mean household size 4.9 persons 4 Percentage of population by age group Children (0 – 14 years) 32.3% Economically productive (15 – 64 years) 63.3% Elderly population (65+ years) 4.4% Dependency ratios Total dependency ratio 57.9 Child dependency ratio 50.9 Old dependency ratio 7.0 Ageing index 13.8 Sex ratio (males per 100 females) 98 Literacy rate (persons aged 15 and over) 89.3% Male 91.8% Female 86.9% People with disability Number Per cent Any form of disability 2,118 4.0 Walking 765 1.4 Seeing 1,063 2.0 Hearing 790 1.5 Remembering 811 1.5 Type of Identity Card (persons aged 10 and over) Number Per cent Citizenship
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar: Drop Defamation Cases Against Kachin Anti-War Protest Organizers Trial Against Three Protesters Continues Today
    Myanmar: Drop Defamation Cases Against Kachin Anti-War Protest Organizers Trial against three protesters continues today (YANGON, May 21, 2018)-The Government of Myanmar should immediately and unconditionally drop criminal defamation charges against three ethnic-Kachin human rights defenders, said the Kachin Women’s Association of Thailand (KWAT) and Fortify Rights today. The cross-examination of prosecution witnesses will begin in Myitkyina Township Court today. “It is not a crime to want the Burmese military to end attacks on innocent people,” said Moon Nay Li, General Secretary of KWAT. “All these activists did was speak the truth, and they’re facing years in prison because of it.” On May 8, Lieutenant Colonel Myo Min Oo from the Myanmar Army’s Northern Command filed criminal defamation complaints against Mr. Lum Zawng, 29, Ms. Nang Pu, 47, and Mr. Zau Jat, 41, for alleged statements made during a press conference and peaceful protest on April 30 and May 1 in Kachin State’s Myitkyina Township. On April 30, Lum Zawng, a Kachin lawyer, helped organize a press conference and allegedly called for the evacuation of civilians trapped in conflict areas due to fighting between the Burmese military and the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), an armed ethnic group. On April 30 and May 1, more than 3,000 people attended a peaceful protest in Myitkyina Township that Lum Zawng, Nang Pu, and Zau Jat helped organize. During the protest, Nang Pu—a founding member of the Htoi Gender and Development Foundation, a Kachin community-based organization dedicated to women’s empowerment—allegedly accused the military of preventing the movement of civilians and killing civilians.
    [Show full text]
  • Burma's Identity Crisis
    Burma’s identity crisis How ethno-religious nationalism has led to religious intolerance, crimes against humanity and genocide May 2019 Daniel Sinclair/CSW February 2019 For public use Burma’s Identity Crisis Explanatory note CSW has always used the name ‘Burma’, rather than the official name of the country, ‘Myanmar’, and continues to do so. Ever since the military regime changed the name to Myanmar in 1989, one year after the bloody suppression of pro- democracy demonstrations, Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy (NLD), and many of the country’s ethnic nationalities, requested the international community not to adopt the military’s name, arguing that the regime had no mandate to change the name of the country. Although Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD are now in government, it is unclear what their wishes are, and so we tend to use Burma and Myanmar interchangeably, depending on the context. In this report we use Burma throughout, except when directly quoting sources which themselves use Myanmar. Similarly we use the name ‘Rangoon’ for the country’s formal capital and major city, except where the official name ‘Yangon’ is used in direct quotations. Much of the research for this report was conducted first hand by CSW, through visits to Burma and its borders, interviewing ethnic and religious minorities, Buddhist monks, civil society and refugees. However, given the scale of the topic, and limitations on access to some areas, we have referred to information researched and published by other human rights groups and international organisations, notably the United Nations, the US Commission on International Religious Freedom, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Fortify Rights and the Burma Human Rights Network.
    [Show full text]