DOCSLIB.ORG

Insect Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Insect Index A D Acyrthosiphon pisum (A. pisum), 10, 12 Diaphorina citri (D. citri), 108 Aelia, 15 Diceraeus (Dichelops), 5, 15, 17, 18, 49, 54, Amblypelta, 56 66–90, 127, 133, 134, 152, 153, 156, Amorbus, 56 157, 159, 160 Amorbus obscuricornis (A. obscuricornis), 56 Diceraeus (Dichelops) furcatus (D. furcatus), Anasa tristis (A. tristis), 5, 14, 55, 58, 66, 99, 5, 15, 18, 49, 53, 69–71, 85–87, 90, 91, 100, 109, 124 127, 133, 153, 156–160 Anisoscelis, 41 Diceraeus (Dichelops) melacanthus Apolygus lucorum (A. lucorum), 5, 14, 101, (D. melacanthus), 5, 15, 17, 54, 104–107, 121, 136 67, 70, 78, 83, 84, 127, 134, 152, Arvelius, 15 156, 159 Aulacosternum nigrorubrum Dicyphus hesperus (D. hesperus), 29 (A. nigrorubrum), 56 E B Edessa, 15 Bagrada hilaris (B. hilaris), 53, 125, 137 Edessa meditabunda (E. meditabunda), 5, 15, Blissus, 13, 51, 96, 111 16, 49–51, 55, 67, 71–72, 75, 84–88, Blissus insularis (B. insularis), 5, 13, 50, 97, 98, 109, 111, 112, 122, 134, 158, 161 111, 134, 139 Edessa rufomarginata (E. rufomarginata), 51 Blissus occiduus (B. occiduus), 5, 13, 97, Empoasca, 40, 102 111, 134 Empoasca fabae (E. fabae), 55 Engytatus nicotianae (E. nicotianae), 58 Erthesina fullo (E. fullo), 28–30, 35, 36 C Eurydema rugosa (E. rugosa), 35, 36, 53 Chelinidea, 41 Euschistus, 15, 53 Chinavia, 15 Euschistus heros (E. heros), 5, 15, 29, 49, 67, Chinavia erythrocnemis 72–75, 84, 85, 87, 89, 111, 134, 137, (C. erythrocnemis), 120 141, 155–158 Chinavia hilaris (C. hilaris), 59, 137 Eutrichopodopsis nitens (E. nitens), 136 Cimex lectularius (C. lectularius), 141 Clavigralla, 41 Creontiades dilutus (C. dilutus), 54 F Cyrtomenus bergi (C. bergi), 53 Frankliniella occidentalis (F. occidentalis), 12 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 163 A. R. Panizzi et al., Electronic Monitoring of Feeding Behavior of Phytophagous True Bugs (Heteroptera), Entomology in Focus 6, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64674-5 164 Insect Index G Nezara, 15 Gelonus tasmanicus (G. tasmanicus), 56 Nezara viridula (N. viridula), 5, 12, 15, Graphocephala atropunctata 35, 36, 49, 53, 58, 59, 66, 67, 78–79, (G. atropunctata), 11 84, 89, 121, 122, 134, 136, 137, 141, 158 Nysius huttoni, 53 H Halyomorpha halys (H. halys), 5, 13, 15, 49, 51, 58, 67, 75–78, 84–86, 89, 109, 111, O 112, 134, 137, 139, 141, 142 Ochlerus, 59 Helicoverpa armigera (H. armigera), 5, 14 Oebalus, 15 Heliopeltis clavifer (H. clavifer), 35 Oncopeltus fasciatus, 51 Hexacladia, 137 Holymenia, 41 Hygia cliens (H. cliens), 27 P Palomena angulosa (P. angulosa), 51 Piesma quadratum (P. quadratum), 58 J Piezodorus, 15 Jadera haematoloma (J. haematoloma), 27 Piezodorus guildinii (P. guildinii), 5, 15, 18, 53, 67, 80–82, 84, 85, 87, 108, 133, 137, 140, 158 L Plautia, 15 Leptocoris tagalicus (L. tagalicus), 27 Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (P. seriatus), 57 Leptoglossus, 27, 41, 56 Pyrrhocoris sibiricus (P. sibiricus), 29, Leptoglossus brevirostris (L. brevirostris), 27 35, 36 Leptoglossus fulvicornis (L. fulvicornis), 27 Lincus, 51, 59 Lygocoris pabulinus (L. pabulinus), 35, 36 R Lygus, 34, 54, 57, 77, 100–107, 109, 111, 121, Rhodnius prolixus (R. prolixus), 31 128, 134, 155 Lygus hesperus (L. hesperus), 5, 14, 33, 37, 54, 57, 100–103, 105–107, 109, S 125, 127 Scaphoideus titanus (S. titanus), 77 Lygus lineolaris (L. lineolaris), 5, 11, 14, 54, Sinea confusa (S. confusa), 31 101, 103, 106, 122, 125, 134, 137, 140, Stenotus rubrovittatus (S. rubrovittatus), 5, 14, 141, 143 101, 104–107, 124 Lygus pabulinus (Lygus pabulinus), 35 Stephanitis nashi (S. nashi), 29, 30 Stephanitis pyrioides (S. pyrioides), 57 Stephanitis typica (S. typica), 58 M Megacopta cribraria (M. cribaria), 6, 15, 51, 107, 134, 137 T Mictis, 56 Thaumastocoris peregrinus (T. peregrinus), Mictis profana (M. profana), 33, 41, 56 31, 52, 57 Mormidea, 15 Tibraca, 15 Murgantia histrionica (M. histrionica), 53, Tibraca limbativentris (T. limbativentris), 6, 141, 142 15, 67, 82–84, 134 Trichopoda giacomelli (T. giacomelli), 136 Trigonotylus caelestialium (T. caelestialium), N 5, 14, 101, 104–107, 124 Nabis alternatus (N. alternatus), 31 Narnia, 41 Nesidiocoris tenuis (N. tenuis), 5, 14, 101, Z 104–107, 136 Zelus renardii (Z. renardii), 31 Subject Index A B Acacia iteaphylla, 56 Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), 140 Acanthocephalini, 41 Bacteria, 50, 57–59, 137 Acanthocerini, 41 Bagrada bug, 53 AC-DC monitor, 6, 11, 12, 67, 70, 73, 78, 80, Balloon vine, 27 82, 97, 103–104, 107, 124–126 Barley, 13, 97, 153, 154 AC-DC systems, 11 Bed bugs, 141 AC monitors, 10–12, 107, 124 Berytidae, 32 α-glucosidase, 33, 38, 41, 50 Blissidae, 5, 13, 50, 51, 95–113, 118, 139 Alydidae, 52 Blissids, 13, 29, 34, 97, 111, 112, 121, 133 Amorbini, 41, 50, 51 Bloodsuckers, 2 Anisoscelini, 41, 52 Boll rot, 58 Ant, 50 Brassica, 53 Antennation, 103, 109, 155 Broad bean, 5 Anthocoridae, 30 Brown marmorated stink bug, 13, 15, 58, 75, Antibiosis, 138, 139 139, 141, 142 Antibiotic plants, 143 Brown-winged stink bug, 15, 71 Antixenosis, 138 Bt-crops, 140 Antixenotic plants, 143 Buffalo gourd, 99, 100 Aphids, 4, 7–9, 11, 19, 31, 49, 66, 72, 86, 98, Buffalograss, 5 112, 118, 119, 122–124, 140 Apples, 56 Aradids, 27, 48 C Aradoidea, 52 Cabbage bugs, 53 Artifcial diet, 31, 33, 101, 102, 105–107, 118, Cambium, 48 127, 128 Cappeini, 51 Asopinae, 15, 27, 29 Cardiospermum grandiforum, 27 Auchenorrhyncha, 31, 34, 38, 39, Cassava, 53, 56 48–50, 58 Caulifower, 101, 102 Auchenorrhynchans, 4, 11, 34, 49, 55 Cell laceration, 39–41, 56, 68–71, 73, 75, 79, Australian soapberry bug, 27 82, 83, 85, 88, 89, 105, 106, 110, 111, Avocados, 56 153, 159 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 165 A. R. Panizzi et al., Electronic Monitoring of Feeding Behavior of Phytophagous True Bugs (Heteroptera), Entomology in Focus 6, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64674-5 166 Subject Index Cell rupture, 17, 18, 38–41, 48, 49, 51–54, Dead heart, 18, 82, 83 56–57, 59, 65, 69, 71, 74, 75, 77, 79, Digestive enzymes, 7, 17, 30, 33, 96 81, 83, 88, 89, 104–106, 110, 111, 128, Dipsocoromorpha, 28 132, 159 Dipterans, 2 Cell-rupturing feeding strategy, 17, 18, 39, Discocephalinae, 50, 51 69, 88, 132 Discocephalini, 50 Chelinideini, 41 Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), 141, 142 Chemical damage, 132, 143 Chemosensory, 27, 28, 34 Chicory, 158 E Chinch bugs, 13, 51, 55, 77, 96–99, 111, 112, Edessinae, 15, 50, 51 128, 134, 139 Edessini, 50 Chlorenchyma, 41, 52 Egestion, 34, 72, 73, 76, 99, 104 Chloroplasts, 40, 41, 52, 57 Electrical circuit, 4, 6 Chlorosis, 57 Electrical penetration graph (EPG), 2–19, 34, Cibarium, 30, 33–35 35, 39–42, 48–51, 53, 54, 58, 59, Cicadas, 34 66–68, 70–73, 76–80, 82–90, 96–113, Cimicomorpha, 27–31, 38, 39, 48, 117–128, 131–143, 151–161 96, 110–112 Electrodes, 4, 118 Citrus, 56, 59 Electromotive force, 6, 128 Clavigrallini, 41, 52 Electronic monitoring/measurement Cloresmini, 41, 51 system, 2, 10 Clypeus, 26, 34 Electropenetrography, 4–9, 37, 151 Cocoa, 56 Emf components, 6–12, 16 Coconut, 58, 59 EMIF technique, 12–13 Coffee, 59 Empress trees, 58 Colpurini, 41, 51 Endosperm, 16, 48, 49, 52, 54, 68, 69, 73–75, Conductive glue, 118–120 79–83, 88, 89, 99, 112, 133, 140, 153, Conductive paint, 119 154, 158, 159 Contact insecticides, 135, 143 Endosperm ingestion, 49, 68, 69, 79–81, 133 Control strategies, 2, 90, 134 Endosymbionts, 137, 138, 160 Copper wire, 118 Entomopathogenic agents, 137 Coreidae, 5, 14, 27, 32, 33, 35, 38, 41, 50, 52, Entomopathogens, 136–138 55, 58, 95–113, 118 Enzymatic maceration, 68, 70, 82, 153, 154 Coreids, 4, 14, 27, 29, 32, 33, 35, 38, 41, 49, EPG monitor, 4, 10, 18, 103, 105, 109, 118, 51, 56, 66, 96, 99, 111, 133 124, 127, 154 Coreini, 41, 50 EPG techniques, 3–9, 16, 19, 66, 67, 97, 122, Coreoidea, 50, 52 128, 133–135, 139, 143, 161 Coreoids, 52, 54, 59 Eremothecium coryli, 59 Corn, 54, 55, 142 Esophagus, 30, 33, 35 Corn rootworm, 142 Eucalyptus, 31, 41, 56, 57 Cotton, 5, 14, 49, 53, 54, 56–59, 78, 101–103, Euphorbs, 59 105–107, 122, 134, 140, 143, 155 Cry proteins, 140 Crystalline proteins (Cry), 140 F Cucumber, 99, 100 Faba bean, 76, 77, 85, 89, 139 Cucurbit yellow vine disease, 58 Fabaceae, 71, 73, 80, 107 Cucurbits, 5, 14, 58, 66, 99, 100 Feeding behavior, 1–19, 26, 31, 37, 39, 40, 42, Cydnids, 27, 53 52, 55, 65–90, 95–113, 118, 122–126, 128, 134–136, 139, 140, 142, 143, 152–154, 160, 161 D Feeding damages, 2, 37, 40, 136, 143 Dasynini, 41, 50 Feeding events, 106, 122, 123, 125, 136, Data analyses, 118 139, 140 DC monitor, 10–12, 71, 76, 86, 99, 105, 107, 124 Feeding sites, 19, 135, 140, 152 DC systems, 11, 76, 105 Feeding strategies, 37, 39, 40, 136, 140, 161 Subject Index 167 Feeding tactics, 39, 40, 161 Insecticides contact, see Contact insecticides; Flanges, 18, 30–32, 35, 38, 39, 79, 98 Systemic insecticides Food canal, 7, 26, 28, 30, 33–35, 54 Integrated pest management (IPM), 160 Food meatus, 33 Food regurgitate (saliva regurgitate), 157, 158 J Foregut, 33–35 Juga, 28 Froghoppers, 49 Fungi, 137 K Kudzu bug, 15, 51, 107, 108 G Gelling saliva, 7, 16, 18, 30–32, 35, 38, 39, 42, 48, 55, 68, 71, 74, 77, 79–81, 84, 96, L 98, 103, 110, 142, 152 Labial dabbing, 27–28, 34, 35, 76, 78, 79, 84, Gene silencing, 133, 141–143, 160 100, 109 Genetically modifed (GM) plants, 140, 143 Labial tapping, 84 Geocoridae, 29 Labium, 26, 27, 31, 34–37, 39, 71, 73, 76, 80, Gerromorpha, 28 81, 84, 109, 157 Giga-8, 71, 76, 105, 124 Labrum, 26, 35–37 Gold wire, 4, 13, 118–121 Lace bug, 58 Grapes, 36 Lacerate-and-fush, 38–40, 52, 69, 96 Green beans, 5, 13, 14, 59, 101, 136, 142 Larch, 48 Green-belly stink bug(s), 15, 67, 70, 141 Largidae, 52 Green vegetable bug, 15, 78 Largids, 29, 30 Guava, 56 Leaf-footed bug(s),
Recommended publications
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies

    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies

    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
  • Venoms of Heteropteran Insects: a Treasure Trove of Diverse Pharmacological Toolkits

    Venoms of Heteropteran Insects: a Treasure Trove of Diverse Pharmacological Toolkits

    Review Venoms of Heteropteran Insects: A Treasure Trove of Diverse Pharmacological Toolkits Andrew A. Walker 1,*, Christiane Weirauch 2, Bryan G. Fry 3 and Glenn F. King 1 Received: 21 December 2015; Accepted: 26 January 2016; Published: 12 February 2016 Academic Editor: Jan Tytgat 1 Institute for Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (G.F.K.) 2 Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; [email protected] (C.W.) 3 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (B.G.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-7-3346-2011 Abstract: The piercing-sucking mouthparts of the true bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) have allowed diversification from a plant-feeding ancestor into a wide range of trophic strategies that include predation and blood-feeding. Crucial to the success of each of these strategies is the injection of venom. Here we review the current state of knowledge with regard to heteropteran venoms. Predaceous species produce venoms that induce rapid paralysis and liquefaction. These venoms are powerfully insecticidal, and may cause paralysis or death when injected into vertebrates. Disulfide- rich peptides, bioactive phospholipids, small molecules such as N,N-dimethylaniline and 1,2,5- trithiepane, and toxic enzymes such as phospholipase A2, have been reported in predatory venoms. However, the detailed composition and molecular targets of predatory venoms are largely unknown. In contrast, recent research into blood-feeding heteropterans has revealed the structure and function of many protein and non-protein components that facilitate acquisition of blood meals.
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation

    University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation

    BIOLOGICAL STUDIES ON THE GUT SYMBIONT BURKHOLDERIA ASSOCIATED WITH BLISSUS INSULARIS (HEMIPTERA: BLISSIDAE) By YAO XU A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2015 1 © 2015 Yao Xu 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am fortunate to have been mentored by Dr. Drion Boucias during my doctoral program. His constructive criticism, guidance, and generosity of time and resources allowed me to achieve both breadth and depth in research. Without his inspirational ideas and timely feedback, this dissertation would never have been accomplished on time. I owe my deepest gratitude to my co- advisor, Dr. Eileen Buss, for her encouragement, support, and advice on my academic and personal development. I thank her for admitting me, guiding me to enter the world of Southern chinch bugs, and trusting me. I also would like to thank my other committee members, Drs. Frederick Fishel (Department of Agronomy, UF), Kevin Kenworthy (Department of Agronomy, UF), and Cindy McKenzie (United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service). I appreciate their time, comments, and encouragement on my research and this dissertation. Many scientists and colleagues have been helpful to me during my doctoral program. First, I thank Dr. Michael Scharf (Department of Entomology, Purdue University) for his valuable comments on the detoxification enzyme work, and especially for hosting me in his laboratory in March 2014. Second, I thank Dr. Paul Linser (Whitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience, UF) for his guidance on the confocal microscopy and allowing me to use the microscopes in his laboratory in April 2015.
  • Effects of Landscape, Intraguild Interactions, and a Neonicotinoid on Natural Enemy and Pest Interactions in Soybeans

    Effects of Landscape, Intraguild Interactions, and a Neonicotinoid on Natural Enemy and Pest Interactions in Soybeans

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Entomology Entomology 2016 EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE, INTRAGUILD INTERACTIONS, AND A NEONICOTINOID ON NATURAL ENEMY AND PEST INTERACTIONS IN SOYBEANS Hannah J. Penn University of Kentucky, [email protected] Author ORCID Identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-5991 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.441 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Penn, Hannah J., "EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE, INTRAGUILD INTERACTIONS, AND A NEONICOTINOID ON NATURAL ENEMY AND PEST INTERACTIONS IN SOYBEANS" (2016). Theses and Dissertations-- Entomology. 30. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/entomology_etds/30 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Entomology by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest

    Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest

    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
  • Networking Agroecology: Integrating the Diversity of Agroecosystem Interactions

    Networking Agroecology: Integrating the Diversity of Agroecosystem Interactions

    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the book Advances In Ecological Research, Vol. 49 published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who know you, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From David A. Bohan, Alan Raybould, Christian Mulder, Guy Woodward, Alireza Tamaddoni-Nezhad, Nico Bluthgen, Michael J.O. Pocock, Stephen Muggleton, Darren M. Evans, Julia Astegiano, François Massol, Nicolas Loeuille, Sandrine Petit, Sarina Macfadyen, Networking Agroecology: Integrating the Diversity of Agroecosystem Interactions. In Guy Woodward and David A. Bohan, editors: Advances In Ecological Research, Vol. 49, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press, 2013, pp. 1-67. ISBN: 978-0-12-420002-9 © Copyright 2013 Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Author's personal copy CHAPTER ONE Networking Agroecology:
  • Predation of the Chinch Bug, Blissus Occiduus Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) by Geocoris Uliginosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)

    Predation of the Chinch Bug, Blissus Occiduus Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) by Geocoris Uliginosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2008 Predation of the Chinch Bug, Blissus occiduus Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) by Geocoris uliginosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) J. D. Carstens University of Nebraska-Lincoln Frederick P. Baxendale University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Tiffany Heng-Moss University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Robert J. Wright University of Nebraska, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Carstens, J. D.; Baxendale, Frederick P.; Heng-Moss, Tiffany; and Wright, Robert J., "Predation of the Chinch Bug, Blissus occiduus Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) by Geocoris uliginosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)" (2008). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 157. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/157 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. JOURNAL OF THE KANSAS ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 81(4), 2008, pp. 328–338 Predation of the Chinch Bug, Blissus occiduus Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae) by Geocoris uliginosus (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) J. D. CARSTENS,F.P.BAXENDALE,T.M.HENG-MOSS, AND R. J. WRIGHT Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583 ABSTRACT: Big-eyed bugs have been well documented as predators on a diverse group of arthropod prey in turfgrasses; however, little is known about the big-eyed bug species associated with buffalograss, or their feeding habits relative to the western chinch bug, Blissus occiduus Barber.
  • Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance Of

    Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance Of

    HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance of Arthropods in Residential Turfgrass 1 S. V. JOSEPH AND S. K. BRAMAN Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, GrifÞn, GA 30223-1797 J. Econ. Entomol. 102(3): 1116Ð1122 (2009) ABSTRACT The effect of taxa [common Bermuda grass, Cynodon dactylon (L.); centipedegrass, Eremochloa ophiuroides Munro Hack; St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze; and zoysiagrass, Zoysia spp.], density, height, and weed density on abundance of natural enemies, and their potential prey were evaluated in residential turf. Total predatory Heteroptera were most abundant in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass and included Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae, Geocoridae, and Miridae. Anthocoridae and Lasiochilidae were most common in St. Augustinegrass, and their abundance correlated positively with species of Blissidae and Delphacidae. Chinch bugs were present in all turf taxa, but were 23Ð47 times more abundant in St. Augustinegrass. Anthocorids/lasiochilids were more numerous on taller grasses, as were Blissidae, Delphacidae, Cicadellidae, and Cercopidae. Geocoridae and Miridae were most common in zoysiagrass and were collected in higher numbers with increasing weed density. However, no predatory Heteroptera were affected by grass density. Other beneÞcial insects such as staphylinids and parasitic Hymenoptera were captured most often in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass. These differences in abundance could be in response to primary or alternate prey, or reßect the inßuence of turf microenvironmental characteristics. In this study, SimpsonÕs diversity index for predatory Heteroptera showed the greatest diversity and evenness in centipedegrass, whereas the herbivores and detritivores were most diverse in St. Augustinegrass lawns. These results demonstrate the complex role of plant taxa in structuring arthropod communities in turf.
  • Appendix S1. Supplementary Methods. Supporting Information to Martin

    Appendix S1. Supplementary Methods. Supporting Information to Martin

    1 Appendix S1. Supplementary methods. 2 Supporting Information to Martin, E. A. et al. The interplay of landscape composition and 3 configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agro-ecosystem services 4 across Europe. 5 6 Data preparation 7 Sites and landscapes 8 Raw data collected from researchers across Europe represented sampling and experiments for 9 144 arthropod families from 1960 sites in 10 countries and 29 regions in Europe. We defined 10 sites as belonging to the same study if they were measured by the same group of researchers, 11 using at least one identical method in all sites and years. According to country regulations, 12 land use maps were either directly collected from data holders, or a script was provided to 13 contributors to run calculations on locally held maps. Vector maps of land use were required 14 to be sufficiently detailed to detect boundaries between crop field polygons in order to enable 15 calculation of configuration measures (Fig. S1). As this is not the case of publicly available 16 land cover data, high quality maps compiled and partially ground-validated by study 17 participants were used. These maps were based on digitization of 1-2 m resolution 18 orthophotos and/or on official land use maps obtained from national or regional county 19 offices for each study. Minimum mapping units of the included maps, which allowed 20 boundary detection between crop fields, were 4*4 m (i.e., the smallest elements that were 21 mapped were ca. 4*4 m; see an example land use map in Fig.
  • Annotated Checklist of the Plant Bug Tribe Mirini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) Recorded on the Korean Peninsula, with Descriptions of Three New Species

    Annotated Checklist of the Plant Bug Tribe Mirini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) Recorded on the Korean Peninsula, with Descriptions of Three New Species

    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 115: 467–492, 2018 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2018.048 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Annotated checklist of the plant bug tribe Mirini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Mirinae) recorded on the Korean Peninsula, with descriptions of three new species MINSUK OH 1, 2, TOMOHIDE YASUNAGA3, RAM KESHARI DUWAL4 and SEUNGHWAN LEE 1, 2, * 1 Laboratory of Insect Biosystematics, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Korea; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Research Associate, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA; e-mail: [email protected] 4 Visiting Scientists, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A, 0C6, Canada; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Heteroptera, Miridae, Mirinae, Mirini, checklist, key, new species, new record, Korean Peninsula Abstract. An annotated checklist of the tribe Mirini (Miridae: Mirinae) recorded on the Korean peninsula is presented. A total of 113 species, including newly described and newly recorded species are recognized. Three new species, Apolygus hwasoonanus Oh, Yasunaga & Lee, sp. n., A. seonheulensis Oh, Yasunaga & Lee, sp. n. and Stenotus penniseticola Oh, Yasunaga & Lee, sp. n., are described. Eight species, Apolygus adustus (Jakovlev, 1876), Charagochilus (Charagochilus) longicornis Reuter, 1885, C. (C.) pallidicollis Zheng, 1990, Pinalitopsis rhodopotnia Yasunaga, Schwartz & Chérot, 2002, Philostephanus tibialis (Lu & Zheng, 1998), Rhabdomiris striatellus (Fabricius, 1794), Yamatolygus insulanus Yasunaga, 1992 and Y. pilosus Yasunaga, 1992 are re- ported for the fi rst time from the Korean peninsula.
  • Zootaxa 2424: 1–41 (2010) Review, Cladistic Analysis

    Zootaxa 2424: 1–41 (2010) Review, Cladistic Analysis

    Zootaxa 2424: 1–41 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Review, cladistic analysis and biogeography of Nezara Amyot & Serville (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) AUGUSTO FERRARI1, CRISTIANO FELDENS SCHWERTNER1, 3 & JOCELIA GRAZIA2 Laboratório de Entomologia Sistemática, Departamento de Zoologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Bloco IV, prédio 43435, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1CAPES Fellowship 2CNPq Fellowship 3Current address: Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – Campus Diadema, Rua Prof. Artur Riedel, 275, 09972-270, Diadema, SP, Brazil Table of contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Material and methods .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Results and discussion ........................................................................................................................................................
  • Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea

    Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea

    VIVIANA CAUDURO MATESCO SISTEMÁTICA DE THYREOCORIDAE AMYOT & SERVILLE (HEMIPTERA: HETEROPTERA: PENTATOMOIDEA): REVISÃO DE ALKINDUS DISTANT, MORFOLOGIA DO OVO DE DUAS ESPÉCIES DE GALGUPHA AMYOT & SERVILLE E ANÁLISE CLADÍSTICA DE CORIMELAENA WHITE, COM CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE A FILOGENIA DE THYREOCORIDAE, E MORFOLOGIA DO OVO DE 16 ESPÉCIES DE PENTATOMIDAE COMO EXEMPLO DO USO DE CARACTERES DE IMATUROS EM FILOGENIAS Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, como requisito parcial à obtenção do Título de Doutor em Biologia Animal. Área de concentração: Biologia Comparada Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Jocelia Grazia Co-Orientador: Prof. Dr. Cristiano F. Schwertner UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL PORTO ALEGRE 2014 “Sistemática de Thyreocoridae Amyot & Serville (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomoidea): revisão de Alkindus Distant, morfologia do ovo de duas espécies de Galgupha Amyot & Serville e análise cladística de Corimelaena White, com considerações sobre a filogenia de Thyreocoridae, e morfologia do ovo de 16 espécies de Pentatomidae como exemplo de uso de caracteres de imaturos em filogenias” VIVIANA CAUDURO MATESCO Tese apresentada como parte dos requisitos para obtenção de grau de Doutor em Biologia Animal, área de concentração Biologia Comparada. ________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Augusto Ferrari (UFRGS) ________________________________________ Dra. Caroline Greve (CNPq ex-bolsista PDJ) ________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Cláudio José Barros de Carvalho (UFPR) ________________________________________ Profa. Dra. Jocelia Grazia (Orientadora) Porto Alegre, 05 de fevereiro de 2014. AGRADECIMENTOS À minha orientadora, Profa. Dra. Jocelia Grazia, pelos ensinamentos e por todas as oportunidades que me deu durante os treze anos em que estive no Laboratório de Entomologia Sistemática. Ao meu co-orientador, Prof.