DOCSLIB.ORG

Cambridge City Council ID:10030344

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cambridge City Council ID:10030344 From: Patsy Dell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 15 June 2015 08:58 To: A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Cc: Philip Doggett; 'Jeremy Procter' Subject: A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon DCO Examination - Submission of Representations from Cambridge City Council ID:10030344 Please find enclosed Cambridge City Council’s written representations on the three matters set out below. A further submission in relation to the Cambridge Crematorium is being sent to you separately. I would be grateful if you would acknowledge safe receipt. I also confirm that four hard copies of each of the above documents are also on their way to you. Our representations consists of: Matter 1 – Air Quality Statement of Representation ID:10030344/CCC1 Appendices: • J2A and Cambridge City Council meeting note 29 January 2014 • Cambridge City Council Air Quality Note – 8 May 2015 Matter 10 Noise and Vibration Statement of Representation ID:10030344/CCC2 Matter 12 – Transportation and Traffic Statement of Representation ID:10030344/CCC3 Appendices: • Traffic Monitoring report • TN01 A14 - Systra Consultants 2015 Forecasted Impacts on local Road Network At this stage the City Council also wishes to notify you of its wish to attend any issue specific hearings relating to Air Quality and Transportation and Traffic. Yours sincerely, Patsy Dell Patsy Dell Head of Planning Services Cambridge City Council The Guildhall CAMBRIDGE CB2 3QJ 01223 457103 This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All GCSX traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation. Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this e-mail? __________________________________________________________________________ The information in this email may be confidential and legally privileged. You are advised to scan attachments for viruses before opening them. Statement by Cambridge City Council June 2015 ID: 10030344/CCC/2 June 2015 Examination of application by Highways England for an Order Granting Development Consent for the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Matter 10 – Noise and Vibration Examination Statement by Cambridge City Council June 2015 1 Statement by Cambridge City Council June 2015 Contents Page List of Abbreviations 3 Introduction 4 Responses to Inspectors Questions 6 Appendices 1. References 15 2 Statement by Cambridge City Council June 2015 Abbreviations CCC Cambridgeshire County Council CCiC Cambridge City Council CRTN Calculation of Road Traffic Noise DCO Development Consent Order DMRB Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (HD213/11) ES Environmental Statement IAN Interim Advise Note SCDC South Cambridgeshire District Council 3 Statement by Cambridge City Council June 2015 Introduction 1. This statement sets out the response from Cambridge City Council in response to the Examination Matter 10 in relation to Noise and Vibration. 2. This document needs to be read alongside the Examination Statement for Transport Assessment and Traffic Modelling submitted by Cambridge City Council (ID10030344/CCC/4) 3. This statement sets out the response from Cambridge City Council in relation to Noise and Vibration issues arising from the Highway England’s Environmental Statement of December 2014 and the CHARM2 Traffic Modelling associated with the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme. 4. The documents referred to in this statement are listed in Appendix 1. Examination document reference numbers are used throughout for convenience. 5. This Document was prepared by Adam Finch, Senior Technical Officer, Environmental Quality and Growth Team, Cambridge City Council. He is an Experienced and Qualified officer with degree level qualifications in Environmental Science and discrete post graduate qualifications in acoustics, air quality and contaminated land. He has over 12 years of experience in both public and private sector roles consulting on the environmental impacts of development. Overview Officers from South Cambridgeshire District Council have provided separate commentary on the Inspectors Questions with regards to the potential impacts of noise and vibration. We are in agreement with those comments and much has been echoed in the documentary provided below. Chapter 14 of the ES concludes that a greater number of dwellings will benefit from improved noise levels than will be impacted adversely, However, there remains a significant element of uncertainty within the modelled noise output. This specifically relates to the CHARM 2 traffic forecasting model which has yet to be agreed with Cambridgeshire County Council. These issues are summarised below and the Noise and Vibration issues explored in more detail with reference to the specific questions raised by the inspector in this examination statement. The transport issues are addressed in 4 Statement by Cambridge City Council June 2015 detail in the Transport Assessment & Traffic Modelling Examination Statement. 1. Traffic forecasting: a. Traffic modelling presented in the ES is subject to a number of uncertainties identified by the County Council transport officers, in the CHARM 2 Traffic Model. Further work is being undertaken by HE with CCC and CCiC to address these. b. Traffic forecasts for the local road network in the north of Cambridge are of particular concern to Cambridge City Council. c. All of the presented in the ES Noise and Vibration forecasting is based upon those traffic forecasts. 2. Noise and Vibration Modelling a. The noise modelling exercise has not recognised all relevant receptors. Coverage of receptor locations such as parks and external amenity spaces is lacking. b. With the exception of various receptor locations, there is no provision of modelled outputs for the impacts of the scheme on a wider scale (i.e; where there is no receptor selected, it is not possible to accurately determine the impacts). c. Since the submission of the ES, new guidance (IAN185/15) has been issued providing details on more accurate modelling of road traffic “links”. d. The noise modelling assessment is focussed largely on the day-time impacts. There is little discussion of the impacts at night. e. Assessment of noise from borrow pits has been incorporated into the wider assessment of construction noise and vibration rather than being assessed under the National Planning Policy Guidance. f. For the City Council we have specific concerns about noise impacts on the Amenity of the City Council owned Crematorium near Madingley from changes to the road layout within the scheme. Responses to specific questions set out by the Examining Panel Author: Adam Finch Question Reference: Q1.10.1 Question: Does the assessment of noise effects in ES chapter 14 consider all appropriate residential receptors along the route, taking account of individual dwellings and 5 Statement by Cambridge City Council June 2015 communities? Response: Chapter 14 of the ES does largely consider the majority of residential receptors (including individual dwellings and communities). However, there is little or no discussion on other important receptors that are potentially impacted by the proposed scheme. One such receptor is the Cambridge City Crematorium (including the Gardens of Remembrance) which Is potentially impacted by a new local access road to its rear in addition to the impacts from the widening of the A14. There are various receptor locations identified (within the Crematorium, this is R747) for which the existing noise climate is considered. R747 is located to the front of the Crematorium where the noise climate is undoubtedly influenced by the A14 and not representative of the Gardens of Remembrance. Chapter 14 of the ES provides contour plots of the modelled noise output for the scheme without mitigation and contour plots for the scheme with mitigation. There is no provision of modelled output for the actual impact on existing noise levels. As such, it is difficult to assess the impact of the scheme at locations not identified as receptor locations (such as the rear of the Crematorium). This appears to be in conflict with the requirements of DMRB for which contour/modelled output is required for the impacts at all individual receptors and so allowing an assessment of the significance of the impact against the existing noise climate. Author: Adam Finch Question Reference: Q1.10.2 Question: Was the baseline data for the noise assessment agreed with local authorities? Please identify any matters where agreement was not reached and explain why. Response: The baseline data has been agreed with CCC. After discussions with the noise consultants, it was agreed that the model performs well along the Cambridge Northern Bypass when compared to the monitored noise levels at specified locations. 6 Statement by Cambridge City Council June 2015 Author: Adam Finch Question Reference: Q1.10.3 Question: Significant impacts from noise and vibration during construction are predicted to impact on both residential and non-residential receptors. How would site specific noise controls be agreed with the local authorities? Response: The applicant is to provide a detailed Code of Construction Practice (CoCP). The CoCP contains the details as to how construction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects by Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun
    Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects By Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire October 2018 i STUDENT DECLARATION I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work Signature of Candidate: ____________________________________________________ Type of Award: ________________________ PhD _______________________ School: ______________________ Engineering ____________________ ii ABSTRACT The governments of various countries have continued to adopt Public Private Partnership (PPP) for infrastructure projects delivery due to its many advantages over the traditional procurement method. However, concerns have been raised by stakeholders about the viability of PPP to deliver Value for Money (VfM), especially for the client. These discussions have generated debates and arguments in policy and advisory documents within the last decade mainly in the renegotiation of PPP water and transport projects and their VfM implications. Poor or non-achievement of VfM in PPP contracts renegotiation has led to this study in PPP road projects with the overall aim of integrating VfM considerations into the renegotiation process of PPP road projects. Mixed methodology research approach is used to achieve the objectives set for the study. Interviews and questionnaires of professionals involved in Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO) road projects in the UK are used in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk County Council
    Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 GVA Grimley Ltd 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR 0870 900 8990 www.gvagrimley.co.uk This report is designed to be printed double sided. Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 Reference: P:\PLANNING\621\Instruction\Clients\Suffolk County Council\Western Suffolk ELR\10.0 Reports\Final Report\Final\WesternSuffolkELRFinalReport090506.doc Contact: Michael Dall Tel: 020 7911 2127 Email: [email protected] www.gvagrimley.co.uk Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 2. POLICY CONTEXT....................................................................................................... 5 3. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET ANALYSIS.................................................... 24 4. EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY ANALYSIS.............................................................. 78 5. EMPLOYMENT FLOORSPACE PROJECTIONS..................................................... 107 6. BALANCING DEMAND AND SUPPLY .................................................................... 147 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................... 151 Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The Western Suffolk Study Area 5 Figure 2 Claydon Business Park, Claydon 26 Figure 3 Industrial Use in
    [Show full text]
  • 29 July 1931
    [2') Jc'sy, 1931.] '10313 ]Eon. J. NICHOLSON: Very well, Sir. I-on. H. SEDDON: The definition of I move an amendment- "Chattel" haviin been amended, it becomes necessary to strike out certain other words. That after the woard ''contrary'' the fol- lowing be strutck out:-''and AhalI extend( to I move all amendment- any hire -puirvbasr agree tut miad e an.d in 'That the following be st ruck ohut: - opera tiont at or before the vommnemcent'ut uf M.Notor veelde' and 'vehicle ' have tli, this Act.'' same nmeanlings respectively as in the Tra'iv Acet, 1919-1i93O.' The M1INI STER FORt COUNTRY WATER SUPPLIES: Though I did not Amnicdmen t put a 31( passed; the clause, take part in the debat!' on this matter yes- ;es almended, agreed to. tcrda v, I ca nnot sit silent under the state- I1iil again reportel with further amend- nients made by '.%r. Nicholson. We have ilcuts. beffore us the evidence given to the select committee by reputable firms. They are not l)iLe aIdjI)uI Jld (it t,.4 p.m. worrying in the slightest degree about the restrospective phase of the Bill. Mr. Nichol- son has said we should he fair and impartial. The clause is fair and impartial. 'What is there wrong with allowing the hirer to go to court when he canl prove that the interest charged is excessive? Is he not entitled to pro)tection, no matter how long the agreement has been made? Surely Mr. Nicholson does not wish to protect firms who do business on unfit'r and utir-nisonable lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to This A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Public Exhibition. This Exhibition Is About the Work We Are Doing
    A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme A1 Welcome Alconbury D3 Woolley A141 S2 Huntingdon St Ives A14 Town centre improvements including removal of A14 viaduct Ellington D3 The Hemingfords Brampton D2 Existing A14 Godmanchester Fenstanton Fen Drayton Proposed A14 Swavesey Buckden D3 D3 D2 The Offords A1 Northstowe Hilton Conington New development S2 A1198 D3 Boxworth Lolworth Histon Bar Hill D4 Milton Girton A14 D3 M11 Routes for construction traffic East Coast Mainline railway Cambridge River Great Ouse A428 Huntingdon Southern Bypass S2 Single 2 lane carriageway A1 widening D2 Dual 2 lane carriageway A14 on-line improvements D3 Dual 3 lane carriageway Cambridge Northern Bypass D4 Dual 4 lane carriageway Local access roads © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey 100030649 Highways England, creative S160069 Welcome to this A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme public exhibition. This exhibition is about the work we are doing in Huntingdon as part of the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme. Members of the project team are here to answer any questions you might have. Thank you Highways England – Creative BED19_0157 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme Why is the scheme necessary? The A14 provides an east- west route linking the Midlands with East Anglia. It begins at Catthorpe near Rugby, where it connects with the M1 and M6 motorway, and continues east for approximately 130 miles to the port town of Felixstowe. It forms one of the UK’s strategic routes and is part of the Trans-European Transport Network. The A14 between Cambridge and Huntingdon serves an additional purpose, connecting the A1(M) motorway to the North The scheme will: of England with the M11 motorway � combat congestion, making the to London and the South East.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedback Feedback
    News & Views around Volume 4 Issue 7 October 2010 Editorial Contact: Janet Erskine 01763 838300 [email protected] MOBILE LIBRARY TIMETABLE FEEDBACK th 8th October, 12 November from our County Councillor The Church 13.25 – 14.05 DISAPPOINTING ENDING The Flint Cross junction BUT HOPE REMEMBER - Melbourn Library – appears to be finished in terms FOR THE Use it or lose it! of safety works and, when FUTURE asked, Highways said that the 50MPH speed limit, which we FEEDBACK understood would be integral to from the Parish Council Great Chishill's cricket season the scheme, will indeed be ended in disappointment as the imposed - that's one of the last Youth Club Funding 1st eleven’s three-year spell in bits of work still to do. Thanks County Councillors voted by a the top flight of village to people who have been in small majority to cut the Youth competition in Cambridgeshire touch with concerns. A budget by a third (£1million). came to an end. With just a few comment about visibility and Consequently our Youth Club is points separating the four the new bollards has also been in need of funding. Our lead teams involved in the battle to taken back to Highways and worker, Dan, is currently avoid the dreaded drop, it came they are coming out to have a funded by the County Council down to the last round of look at the problem. but this funding will most fixtures on the final Saturday probably end at the end of of the season. A poor Thriplow Recycling March 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Henges in Yorkshire
    Looking south across the Thornborough Henges. SE2879/116 NMR17991/01 20/5/04. ©English Heritage. NMR Prehistoric Monuments in the A1 Corridor Information and activities for teachers, group leaders and young archaeologists about the henges, cursus, barrows and other monuments in this area Between Ferrybridge and Catterick the modern A1 carries more than 50,000 vehicles a day through West and North Yorkshire. It passes close to a number of significant but often overlooked monuments that are up to 6,000 years old. The earliest of these are the long, narrow enclosures known as cursus. These were followed by massive ditched and banked enclosures called henges and then smaller monuments, including round barrows. The A1 also passes by Iron Age settlements and Roman towns, forts and villas. This map shows the route of the A1 in Yorkshire and North of Boroughbridge the A1 the major prehistoric monuments that lie close by. follows Dere Street Roman road. Please be aware that the monuments featured in this booklet may lie on privately-owned land. 1 The Landscape Setting of the A1 Road Neolithic and Bronze Age Monuments Between Boroughbridge and Cursus monuments are very long larger fields A1 Road quarries Catterick the A1 heads north with rectangular enclosures, typically more the Pennines to the west and than 1km long. They are thought to the low lying vales of York and date from the middle to late Neolithic Mowbray to the east. This area period and were probably used for has a rural feel with a few larger ceremonies and rituals. settlements (like the cathedral city of Ripon and the market town of The western end of the Thornborough pockets of woodland cursus is rounded but some are square.
    [Show full text]
  • Round Britain Walk Postcards
    20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 1 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 2 Welcome to the Norfolk Broads The Broads have been a favourite boating holiday destination since the early 20th century. The waterways are lock-free, although there are three Congratulations, bridges under which only small cruisers can pass. The area attracts you have reached all kinds of visitors, including ramblers, The Norfolk Broads. artists, anglers, and bird-watchers as well as people "messing about in boats". The Norfolk wherry, the traditional cargo craft of the area, can still be seen on the Broads as some specimens have been preserved and restored. 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 3 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 4 Welcome toT he Angel of theNorth As the name suggests, it is a steel sculpture of an angel, standing 20 metres (66 feet) tall, with wings 54 metres (178 feet) wide – making it wider than the Congratulations, Statue of Liberty's height. The wings you have reached themselves are not planar, but are angled The Angel of the 3.5 degrees forward, which Gormley has been quoted as saying was to create North, Tyne and Wear. ”a sense of embrace”. It stands on a hill overlooking the A1 road and the A167 road into Tyneside and the East Coast Main Line rail route. 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 5 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 6 Welcome to Eilean Donan Castle Eilean Donan (Scottish Gaelic for Island of Donan), is a small island in Loch Duich in the western Highlands of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme December 2017
    A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme December 2017 Winter has officially started, but thanks to long periods of dry conditions, our earthworks season extended well into November. Bridge structures are rising steadily along the whole route of the scheme and traffic will soon be able to travel on a brand-new section of the A1 at Brampton. The latest ‘flythrough’ can be viewed on YouTube; just click on this link A14 Fly-through Sections 1 & 2 - Alconbury to the East Coast Main Line Section 3 - East Coast Main Line to Swavesey Sections 4 & 5 - Swavesey to Milton Traffic Management Sections 1 & 2: Night time closures will continue on the A1 north of Alconbury during vegetation clearance for the next few weeks. Narrow lanes and a 40mph speed limit is in force on the A1. The northbound off slip road at Brampton Hut will be closed from 21:00 hrs on Friday 17 November and will re-open at 06:00 hrs on Monday 20 November. Section 3: There will be closures on Conington Road on the 2& 3 December and 9&10 December. Sections 4 & 5: Narrow lanes and speed restrictions continue on the A14 between Swavesey and the Girton interchange. Speed is limited to 40 mph in this area and speed cameras monitor compliance. An extension to the traffic management 40 mph section of the eastbound A14 carriageway towards the Girton interchange is underway. Lane closures are in place on the eastbound A428 at the Madingley turn-off and on the northbound A1307 between Girton Road and the A14.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Ubiquitous Computing with Sensor Networks in Urban Environments
    Evolution of Ubiquitous Computing with Sensor Networks in Urban Environments Eiko Yoneki University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory Cambridge CB3 0FD, United Kingdom [email protected] ABSTRACT of smart WSNs with a bigger network such as the Internet A significant increase in real world event monitoring capability increases the coverage area and application domain of the with wireless sensor networks will lead to a further evolution of ad hoc network. Based on such a technological vision, new ubiquitous computing. This paper describes this evolution, lead- types of applications will rely on ad hoc connections between ing to humans being connected to the real world via comput- nearby nodes to establish multi-hop dynamic routes in order ers without awareness. We address an ad hoc communication to propagate data and messages between out-of-range nodes. paradigm, a data-centric approach, and a middleware’s task, to Sensors could be attached to any object, which may move understand the ultimate goal of this new world. We also briefly around, or be placed stationally. Furthermore sensors could explain our upcoming new traffic monitoring project in the city be attached to the human body creating Personal Area Net- of Cambridge. work (PAN). The communication among objects, humans, and computers happens at home, at an office, on a street, at EMERGENCE OF WIRELESS SENSOR NET- the train station, in a car, in a restaurant, or in other places at any time. Fig.1 shows application spaces for ubiquitous WORKS computing with WSNs. Ubiquitous Computing opens com- The evolution of cyber space started from mainframe com- munications over tiny sensor networks through Internet scale puters and moved to PCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Meeting 1 February 2016
    MELBOURN PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES DRAFT MINUTES SUBJECT TO FORMAL RATIFICATION AT THE NEXT PLANNING MEETING. Minutes of the Planning Committee held on Monday, 1st February 2016 in the upstairs meeting room of the Community Hub at 7.20 p.m. Present: Cllrs Tulloch, M.Linnette, J Hales, J Regan, R Gatward, C Stead. In attendance: The Clerk PL138/15 Apologies for Absence: Cllrs Sherwen and Cllr Crosby for health reasons, Cllr Bloomfield for work commitments, and Cllr Norman for personal reasons. PL139/15 Declarations of Interest: N/A PL140/15 Minutes of the meeting held on 11th January 2016: Cllr Regan confirmed that the statement relating to the Electrical Test Certificate is an important health and safety issue and that should be mentioned within the minutes. Wording changed to: Cllr Regan raised his concern that prior to completion of the car park the following paper work must be received as soon as possible as without this Melbourn Parish Council will not settle final payment. Electrical Test Certificate (This is important due to Health and Safety Regulations). O&M Manual for reviewing and approving A list of Interserve’s Sub Contractors Final costing from Interserve Cllr Hales stated that in the Standing Orders any councillor not given their apologies to The Clerk in advance of the meeting should be noted as absent in the minutes. IT WAS PROPOSED BY CLLR GATWARD AND SECONDED BY CLLR REGAN AND AGREED THAT MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 11TH JANUARY 2016 BE SIGNED AS A TRUE RECORD. PL141/15 Report on the last meeting: 11th January 2016 PL133/15 Cllr Linnette suggested replacing the fence on the Beeton Close side of the workshop and closing the opposite side with a gate to stop members of the public gaining access to the back.
    [Show full text]
  • A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme
    A14 CAMBRIDGE TO HUNTINGDON IMPROVEMENT SCHEME DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER - EXAMINATION Representation on Local Traffic Impacts By Cambridgeshire County Council Shire Hall, Castle Hill, Cambridge, CB3 0AP 2 September 2015 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Development Consent Order Written Representation on Local Traffic for Deadline 8 CONTENTS CONTENTS 2 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. CHARM TRAFFIC MODEL 4 3. LOCAL TRAFFIC IMPACTS 6 3.2 Local Impact Report 7 4. SPECIFIC ISSUES 8 4.2 B1514 Brampton Road 8 4.3 Hinchingbrooke 8 4.4 Spittals 9 4.5 Galley Hill 9 5. ADDITIONAL WORK 10 6. MONITORING 12 7. INTERACTION WITH OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 13 7.1 Northstowe 13 7.2 A428 13 APPENDIX A - EXISTING NORTHSTOWE MONITORING 16 APPENDIX B – ADDITIONAL MONITORING LOCATIONS 18 APPENDIX C – ROAD CLOSURE GUIDELINES 19 APPENDIX D – SYSTRA REPORT 25 Page 2 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Development Consent Order Written Representation on Local Traffic for Deadline 8 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 This Written Representation is in respect of Local Traffic Impacts and supersedes Chapter 10 of the County Council’s previous written representation (REP3-006) 1.1.2 This Written Representation, in respect of the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme (the Scheme) Development Consent Order (the Order or DCO), is made in accordance with the Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010, Rule 10. It must be read in conjunction with the Local Impact Report submitted for Deadline 8. 1.1.3 The Local Impact Report presents local traffic impacts and recommendations for mitigation. Information in the Local Impact Report is generally not repeated in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • SUFFOLK LOCAL PLAN MODELLING Forecasting Report - Forecasts with Demand Adjustments
    Suffolk County Council SUFFOLK LOCAL PLAN MODELLING Forecasting Report - Forecasts with demand adjustments SCC LP 9.2 OCTOBER 2020 PUBLIC Suffolk County Council SUFFOLK LOCAL PLAN MODELLING Forecasting Report - Forecasts with demand adjustments TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70044944 OUR REF. NO. SCC LP 9.2 DATE: OCTOBER 2020 WSP WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Phone: +44 20 7314 5000 Fax: +44 20 7314 5111 WSP.com PUBLIC QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Draft Draft Final Date July 2020 September 2020 October 2020 Prepared by Louise Murray- Leonardo Mendes Leonardo Mendes Bruce Signature Checked by Leonardo Mendes Charlotte Herridge Charlotte Herridge Signature Authorised by Michael Johns Michael Johns Michael Johns Signature Project number 70044944 70044944 70044944 Report number SCC_LP 9.0 SCC_LP 9.1 SCC_LP 9.2 File reference SUFFOLK LOCAL PLAN MODELLING PUBLIC | WSP Project No.: 70044944 | Our Ref No.: SCC LP 9.2 October 2020 Suffolk County Council CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 GLOSSARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 4 2.1 BACKGROUND 4 2.2 TRANSPORT MODEL 4 2.3 STUDY AREA 6 2.4 FUTURE HIGHWAY SCHEMES 11 2.5 FORECAST DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS 14 3 RESULTS 16 3.1 SUFFOLK HIGHWAY FOCUS 16 3.2 VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO 16 3.3 MODEL RUNS COMPARED 16 3.4 PASSENGER CAR UNIT HOUR DELAY REDUCTION BY LPA – DEMAND ADJUSTMENT IMPACT 17 3.5 OVERALL JUNCTION V/C SUMMARY BY LPA – DEMAND ADJUSTMENT IMPACT 22 3.6 OVERALL LINK V/C SUMMARY BY LPA – DEMAND ADJUSTMENT IMPACT 25 3.7 RESULTS SUMMARIES
    [Show full text]