DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 21: Phenomena

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 21: Phenomena Chapter 21: Phenomena Phenomena: Below are the names and pictures of several organic compounds. Can you determine the naming conventions of these compounds? What are the b) CH3 a) H CCH 2 2CH2 CH3 c) H CCH names of the CH 3 3 H C CH ethane following H3CCH2CH2 2 2 heptane d) structures and CH2 CH2 H3CCH2CH2CH3 methylcyclopentane butane why? e) CH2CH2 g) f) CH3 H2C CH2 H3C CH H C CH CH 2 2 2 H3CCHCHCH2 3 H C CH CH CH 2 2 2 2 CH cyclobutane cyclopentane 3 2,3-dimethylpentane H3CCHCH3 j) CH3 h) H3C CH3 i) H C CH 3 CH 3 CH H CCHCH CH CH 2 3 2 3 methylpropane H2C CH2 methylbutane H C CH 2 2 CH3 methylcyclopropane m) CH H2C CH2 k) l) 2 CH H3CCH2CH2CH2CH H CCH CH CH CH CH H CCH 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 CH CH2 CH2CH3 pentane hexane 3-ethylhexane H2CCH2CH3 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Big Idea: The large number of hydrocarbons arise Molecules from the ability of carbon atoms to form • Simple Organic long chains and rings Molecules with one another. The • Isomers properties of • Functional Groups hydrocarbons are dominated by the • Organic Reactions functional groups • Polymers present. Functional • Biochemistry groups properties are independent of their bonding environment. 2 Simple Organic Molecules Structural Representations Lewis Structure H H H H H H H C C C C C C H H H H H H H Chemical Formula CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3 Line notation 3 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Structural Representations Lewis Structure Line Notation O Note: When other groups of Chemical Formula hydrocarbons are coming off of a longer chain of carbons CH2CHC(CH3)2CH2OCH3 they are put in parentheses in the chemical formula. 4 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Short Space Long Chemical Chemical Name Filling Short Hand Formula Formula Model H CH4 CH4 Methane C H H H C2H6 CH3CH3 Ethane C3H8 CH3CH2CH3 Propane C4H10 CH3CH2CH2CH3 Butane C5H12 CH3CH2CH2CH2CH3 Pentane 5 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Short Space Chemical Long Chemical Formula Name Filling Short Hand Formula Model CH CH CH CH CH CH C6H14 3 2 2 2 2 3 Hexane CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3 C7H16 Heptane CH CH CH CH CH CH CH CH C8H18 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Octane CH CH CH CH CH CH CH CH CH C9H20 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Nonane CH CH CH CH CH CH CH CH CH CH C10H22 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Decane 6 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Branching Alkanes (CnH2n+2) 1. The longest continuous chain of carbon Example: atoms determines the root name for the hydrocarbon. Note the longest chain might not be in a straight line. 2. The longest chain will be named by Example: taking the core name and adding -ane. # of Carbons Core Name # of Carbons CoreName 1 meth- 6 hex- root name: hexane 2 eth- 7 hept- 3 prop- 8 oct- 4 but- 9 nan- 5 pent- 10 dec- 7 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Branching Alkanes (CnH2n+2) 3. When alkane groups Example: appears as a CH3CH2- ethyl substituent (bonded to a larger alkane), they are named by taking the core name and adding –yl. 4. When halogens are Halogen Name present as substituents F fluoro they are named using Cl chloro the following: Br bromo I iodo 8 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Branching Alkanes (CnH2n+2) 5. When multiple of the same Example: substituents are present the trimethyl appropriate prefix is added to the name of the substituent. # of the same Name substituents 2 di- 3 tri- 4 tetra- 9 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Branching Alkanes (CnH2n+2) 6. Number the carbons in Example: the chain so that the Correct Incorrect lowest number is given 1 3 4 2 2 4 3 1 to the substituent. 7. If both directions give Example: the same lowest number for the 1st Correct Incorrect 1 5 substituent then use the 3 5 3 1 numbering which gives 2 4 4 2 the lowest number for 2,2,4 2,4,4 the 2nd substituent. 10 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Branching Alkanes (CnH2n+2) 8. If two numbering schemes have the same lowest Example: numbering scheme, give the Correct Incorrect lowest number to the 3 4 substituent that appears first in 5 1 2 6 6 4 2 1 3 5 the name. Cl Cl 9. In front of each substituent, list the carbon number in which the substituent is bonds to in the Example: alkane. If there are multiple of 2,2,4-trimethyl one type of substituent, multiple numbers will need to be used. 4 2 Separate multiple numbers with 1 5 3 comas. Separate the number 6 from the name with a hyphen. 11 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Branching Alkanes (CnH2n+2) 10. Substituents are listed in alphabetic order with respect to their root name (methyl, ethyl etc.). If multiple substituents are present, they are separated from each other with a hyphen. The substituent that is closest to the root name is combined with the root name. Example: 4-ethyl-2,3-dimethyloctane 12 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules isopropyl CH3CHCH3 R H ―CH2―C―CH3 R isobutyl CH3 CH3CHCH2CH3 sec-butyl R CH3 ―C―CH3 R tert-butyl CH3 13 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Student Question Which of the following has the lowest boiling point? a) Butane b) Ethane c) Propane d) Methane 14 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Alkene and Alkynes 1. If a double bond is present, Example: the root hydrocarbon is the pentene longest chain that contains the double bond. The root hydrocarbon will be named by adding –ene to the core. 2. If a triple bond is present, the root hydrocarbon is the Example: longest chain that contains butyne the triple bond. The root hydrocarbon will be named by adding –yne to the core. 15 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Alkene and Alkynes 3. If multiple double and triple bonds are present Example: heptadiene the following notation is placed in front of the –ene # of bonds Name or –yne suffix which 2 di- identifies the number of 3 tri- bonds in addition an “a” is added to the root name. 4 tetra- 4. The root chain will be Example: numbered so that multiple Correct bonds get the lowest 2 4 6 8 possible number. This takes 1 3 5 7 precedence over giving Incorrect branching hydrocarbons or 7 5 3 1 8 2 halogens. 6 4 16 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Alkene and Alkynes Example: 5. Bonds are numbered in the C Numbers Bond Numbers same order as the carbons. 1 3 5 7 2 4 6 6. The bond number is placed in Example: front of the root name. If there root name: 3-octene are multiple double or triple bonds, multiple numbers will need to be used. Separate multiple numbers with comas. Separate the number from the name with a hyphen. 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 7. Usethe rules for naming Example: alkanes to name the rest of 7-methyl-3-octene the substituents. 17 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Cyclic Hydrocarbons 1. Use a ring for the root name if the ring has more carbons than any of the other chains. 2. The root name is formed by adding the prefix cyclo- to the core name (indicating the number of carbons). 3. If only single bonds exist in the ring, the suffix –ane is added to the core name. 4. If double bonds exist in the ring, the suffix –ene is added to the core name. If multiple double bonds exist, include di-, -tri-, etc. 5. Number the cyclic hydrocarbon so that double bonds get preference over halogen or hydrocarbon chains 2 3 Examples: 2 4 3 1 4 1 5 18 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Rules for Naming Cyclic Hydrocarbons 6. Include the number indicating the substituents placement in front of the name of the substituent. If there is only one double bond then the number 1 does not need to be included prior to the core name because the position of the double bond is implied. If there is only 1 substituent and no double bonds, the number does not need to be included because it is implied. Examples: Br 3-methylcylopentene 2-methyl-1,3-cylopentadiene bromocylopropane 7. Use rules for naming alkanes to complete the name of the structure. Example: 1-ethyl-2-methylcylobutane 19 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Shapes of Cyclic Hydrocarbons Carbon atoms in cycloalkanes are sp3 hybridized therefore the ideal C-C bond angle is 109.5˚. Cyclopropane Cyclobutane Cyclopentane Bond Angle: ~60˚ Bond Angle: ~90˚ Bond Angle: 108˚ Cyclohexane Flat Bond Angle: 120˚ Bent Bond Angle: ~109.5˚ 20 Chapter 21: Organic and Biochemical Molecules Simple Organic Molecules Aromatics: A compound that includes a benzene ring as part of its structure benzene toluene Note: Instead of showing the resonance structures for benzene, the symbol is used to represent benzene.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Organometallic Chemistry from the Interacting Quantum Atoms Approach
    CORSO DI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN SCIENZE CHIMICHE CICLO XXIII TESI DI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY FROM THE INTERACTING QUANTUM ATOMS APPROACH sigla del settore scientifico disciplinare CHIM03 NOME DEL TUTOR NOME DEL DOTTORANDO Prof: Angelo Sironi Davide Tiana NOME DEL COORDINATORE DEL DOTTORATO Prof. Silvia Ardizzone ANNO ACCADEMICO 2009/2010 1 2 Index Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 The ligand field theory (LFT) .................................................................................................................................... 5 The chemistry from a real space point of view ................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 1: The quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAM) ............................................................... 12 Topological analysis of electron charge density ........................................................................................... 12 Analysis of the electronic charge density Laplacian ................................................................................... 16 Other properties ........................................................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2: The interacting quantum atoms theory (IQA) ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Shapes, Valence Bond Theory, and Molecular Orbital Theory Review Questions
    Chemical Bonding II: Molecular Shapes, Valence Bond Theory, and Molecular Orbital Theory Review Questions 10.1 J The properties of molecules are directly related to their shape. The sensation of taste, immune response, the sense of smell, and many types of drug action all depend on shape-specific interactions between molecules and proteins. According to VSEPR theory, the repulsion between electron groups on interior atoms of a molecule determines the geometry of the molecule. The five basic electron geometries are (1) Linear, which has two electron groups. (2) Trigonal planar, which has three electron groups. (3) Tetrahedral, which has four electron groups. (4) Trigonal bipyramid, which has five electron groups. (5) Octahedral, which has six electron groups. An electron group is defined as a lone pair of electrons, a single bond, a multiple bond, or even a single electron. H—C—H 109.5= ijj^^jl (a) Linear geometry \ \ (b) Trigonal planar geometry I Tetrahedral geometry I Equatorial chlorine Axial chlorine "P—Cl: \ Trigonal bipyramidal geometry 1 I Octahedral geometry I 369 370 Chapter 10 Chemical Bonding II The electron geometry is the geometrical arrangement of the electron groups around the central atom. The molecular geometry is the geometrical arrangement of the atoms around the central atom. The electron geometry and the molecular geometry are the same when every electron group bonds two atoms together. The presence of unbonded lone-pair electrons gives a different molecular geometry and electron geometry. (a) Four electron groups give tetrahedral electron geometry, while three bonding groups and one lone pair give a trigonal pyramidal molecular geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Pauling's Defence of Bent-Equivalent Bonds
    Pauling’s Defence of Bent-Equivalent Bonds: A View of Evolving Explanatory Demands in Modern Chemistry Summary Linus Pauling played a key role in creating valence-bond theory, one of two competing theories of the chemical bond that appeared in the first half of the 20th century. While the chemical community preferred his theory over molecular-orbital theory for a number of years, valence-bond theory began to fall into disuse during the 1950s. This shift in the chemical community’s perception of Pauling’s theory motivated Pauling to defend the theory, and he did so in a peculiar way. Rather than publishing a defence of the full theory in leading journals of the day, Pauling published a defence of a particular model of the double bond predicted by the theory in a revised edition of his famous textbook, The Nature of the Chemical Bond. This paper explores that peculiar choice by considering both the circumstances that brought about the defence and the mathematical apparatus Pauling employed, using new discoveries from the Ava Helen and Linus Pauling Papers archive. Keywords: Linus Pauling, Chemical Bond, Double Bond, Chemistry, Valence, Resonance, Explanation, Chemical Education Contents 1. Introduction………………………………………………………….. 2 2. Using Valence Bonds and Molecular Orbitals to Explain the Double Bond………………………………………………………................. 3 3. Textbook Explanations……………………………………………… 5 4. The Origins of Bent-Equivalent Bonds ……………………..……… 7 4.1 An Early Defence …………………………………………….. 8 5. Catalysing the Mature Defence……………………………………… 9 5.1 Soviet Suppression and Pedagogical Disfavour ………………. 11 5.2 Wilson…………………………………………………………. 12 5.3 Kekulé…………………………………………………………. 14 6. Concentrating Bond Orbitals into a Defence………………………… 15 7. Conclusions………………………………………………………….. 17 Word Count: 8658 (9936 with footnotes) Pauling’s Defence of Bent-Equivalent Bonds Page 2 of 19 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Applications of X-Ray Charge-Density Analysis
    Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1583−1627 1583 Chemical Applications of X-ray Charge-Density Analysis Tibor S. Koritsanszky† Department of Chemistry, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa Philip Coppens* Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, 14260-3000 Received October 18, 2000 Contents VII. Physical Properties from the Experimental 1617 Density I. Charge Densities from X-ray Diffraction 1583 A. Net Atomic and Molecular Charges 1617 II. Elements of Electron Density Determination 1585 B. Solid-State Dipole and Higher Moments and 1618 A. Expressions 1585 Nonlinear Optical Properties 1. Electron Density 1585 C. Electric Field Gradient at the Nuclear 1621 2. Structure Factor and Difference Densities 1585 Positions 3. Aspherical-Atom Formalism 1586 D. Electrostatic Potential 1621 4. Electrostatic Properties from the Charge 1586 E. Quantitative Evaluation of Electrostatic 1623 Density Interactions from the X-ray Charge Density B. Experiment and Analysis 1587 VIII. Concluding Remarks 1624 1. Experimental Conditions 1587 IX. Glossary of Abbreviations 1624 2. Data Analysis 1588 X. Acknowledgments 1624 III. Chemistry from the Electron Density 1590 XI. References 1625 A. Use of the Deformation Density 1590 B. Theory of Atoms in Molecules 1591 I. Charge Densities from X-ray Diffraction 1. Topological Atom 1591 As X-ray scattering by electrons is much stronger 2. Topological Structure of Molecules 1591 than that of the nuclei, intensities of scattered X-rays 3. Topological Classification of Atomic 1591 are almost exclusively determined by the distribution Interactions of the electrons. Thus, X-ray diffraction is a priori a 4. Laplacian of the Electron Density 1592 tool for the determination of electron distribution in 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of Three-Electron Bond in the Four Works with Brief Comments
    ry: C ist urr m en e t Dmytrovych, Organic Chem Curr Res 2017, 6:2 h R C e c s i DOI: 10.4172/2161-0401.1000182 e n a a r Organic Chemistry c g r h O ISSN: 2161-0401 Current Research ResearchResearch Article Article Open Accesss Theory of Three-Electron Bond in the Four Works with Brief Comments Bezverkhniy Volodymyr Dmytrovych* Street Chernivtsi 6, Village Nedoboevtsi, Chernivtsi Region, Khotyn District, Ukraine Abstract Using the concept of three-electron bond we can represent the actual electron structure of benzene and other molecules, explain specificity of the aromatic bond and calculate the delocalization energy. Gives theoretical justification and experimental confirmation of existence of the three-electron bond. It was shown, that functional relation y=a+b/x+c/ x2 fully describes dependence of energy and multiplicity of chemical bond from bond distance. Keywords: Benzene; Three-electron bond; Semi-virtual particle; Structure of the Benzene Molecule on the Basis of the Fermion; Entangled quantum state; Interfering universe Three-Electron Bond Introduction Results and Discussion Chemical bond has been always a basis of chemistry. Advancement Supposing that the chemical bond between two atoms can be of chemical science can be considered as evolution, development of established by means of three electrons with oppositely oriented spins concepts about chemical bond. Aromatic bond is fundamental basis ( ) the structure of the benzene molecule can be expressed as follows of organic chemistry. Concept of three-electron bond in benzene (Figures 2 and 3). molecule enables to explain specificity of aromatic bond. It also becomes ↑↓↑ It is interesting to point out that spins of central electrons on opposite apparent, why planar molecules with 6, 10 etc.
    [Show full text]
  • D. Michael P. Mingos Editor 100 Years Old and Getting Stronger
    Structure and Bonding 169 Series Editor: D.M.P. Mingos D. Michael P. Mingos Editor The Chemical Bond I 100 Years Old and Getting Stronger 169 Structure and Bonding Series Editor: D.M.P. Mingos, Oxford, United Kingdom Editorial Board: F.A. Armstrong, Oxford, United Kingdom X. Duan, Beijing, China L.H. Gade, Heidelberg, Germany K.R. Poeppelmeier, Evanston, IL, USA G. Parkin, NewYork, USA M. Takano, Kyoto, Japan Aims and Scope The series Structure and Bonding publishes critical reviews on topics of research concerned with chemical structure and bonding. The scope of the series spans the entire Periodic Table and addresses structure and bonding issues associated with all of the elements. It also focuses attention on new and developing areas of modern structural and theoretical chemistry such as nanostructures, molecular electronics, designed molecular solids, surfaces, metal clusters and supramolecular structures. Physical and spectroscopic techniques used to determine, examine and model structures fall within the purview of Structure and Bonding to the extent that the focus is on the scientific results obtained and not on specialist information concerning the techniques themselves. Issues associated with the development of bonding models and generalizations that illuminate the reactivity pathways and rates of chemical processes are also relevant. The individual volumes in the series are thematic. The goal of each volume is to give the reader, whether at a university or in industry, a comprehensive overview of an area where new insights are emerging that are of interest to a larger scientific audience. Thus each review within the volume critically surveys one aspect of that topic and places it within the context of the volume as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Conjugation and Hyperconjugation in Terms of Electron Distributions
    J. Am. Chem. SOC.1983, 105, 5061-5068 5061 crownlike geometry with pseudoaxial methyl is observed as the can be rationalized by least hindered attack on a local conformer preferred local conformation of the minor epoxides (19, for ex- similar to 1. Similar results have been observed for systems having ample) obtained from E-disubstituted 3-methylcycloalkenes. either allylic hydroxyl or alkyl substitution, so the effect must be Transition-state geometries resembling any of these (E)-olefin relatively large. conformers will encounter considerable transannular interactions We believe that consistently high selectivity results from a good as rehybridization proceeds. Thus, several factors complicate the match between preferred local ground-state and transition-state correlation of favored ground-state and transition-state local geometry. Both CH3and R occupy innocuous locations near the conformation in reactions involving E-disubstituted cycloalkenes olefin plane in conformers such as 1, and there is sufficient and bulky reagents. As noted earlier, our generalization is intended flexibility to minimize transannular effects as rehybridization for use only with (E)-olefins having allylic alkyl substitution. occurs. The selectivity is often large enough (>20:1 product ratios) Although there are examples in the literature where allylic OH to justify stereochemical predications based on the dominant local directs epoxidations in the same stereochemical sense as in our conformer even in more complex systems where other important system with allylic CH3,11b9cthe effect is smaller and not as reliable. conformational factors may not be known. This is evident from the nonselective epoxidation of 20. Predictions in the (E)-olefin series must be made with ca~ti0n.l~ Acknowledgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Bent Bonds and the Antiperiplanar Hypothesis As a Simple Model to Predict Dielsealder Reactivity: Retrospective Or Perspective?
    Tetrahedron 69 (2013) 6022e6033 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Tetrahedron journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tet Perspectives Bent bonds and the antiperiplanar hypothesis as a simple model to predict DielseAlder reactivity: retrospective or perspective? Ghislain Deslongchamps a, Pierre Deslongchamps b,c,* a Department of Chemistry, University of New Brunswick, PO Box 4400, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada b Departement de Chimie, Universite Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada c OmegaChem Inc., 480 rue Perreault, St-Romuald, QC G6W 7V6, Canada article info Article history: Received 24 April 2013 Accepted 3 May 2013 Available online 10 May 2013 Keywords: Bent bonds Antiperiplanar hypothesis DielseAlder Diradicaloid Contents 1. Introduction . ...................... 6022 2. The DielseAlder reaction revisited . ................................................ 6023 2.1. 1,3-Butadiene . .................................................6023 2.2. Prototypical DielseAlder reaction . .........................................6024 2.3. Dimerization of cyclopentadiene . .........................................6025 2.4. Thiele’sacid ........................................................... .. .................................................6026 2.5. Dimerization of 1,3-butadiene . .........................................6026 2.6. Furanone dienophiles . .........................................6026 2.7. Substituent effects on facial selectivity . .........................................6027 2.8. Retro-DielseAlder reaction
    [Show full text]
  • Organometallic Chemistry and Catalysis Grenoble Sciences
    ATOMIC WEIGHTS OF THE ELEMENTS a, b (adapted from T.B. Coplen et al., Inorg. Chim. Acta 217, 217, 1994) Element Symbol Atomic Atomic Element Symbol Atomic Atomic Number Weight Number Weight Actiniumc 227Ac 89 227.03 Mercury Hg 80 200.59(2) Aluminum Al 13 26.982 Molybdenum Mo 42 95.94 Americiumc Am 95 241.06 Neodynium Nd 60 144.24(3) Antimony Sb 51 121.76 Neon Ne 10 20.180 Argon Ar 18 39.948 Neptuniumc 237Np 93 237.05 Arsenic As 33 74.922 Nickel Ni 28 58.693 Astatinec 210At 85 209.99 Niobium Nb 41 92.906 Barium Ba 56 137.33 Nitrogen N 7 14.007 Berkeliumc 249Bk 97 249.08 Nobeliumc 259No 102 259.10 Beryllium Be 4 9.0122 Osmium Os 76 190.23(3) Bismuth Bi 83 208.98 Oxygen O 8 15.999 Boron B 5 10.811(5) Palladium Pd 46 106.42 Bromine Br 35 79.904 Phosphorus P 15 30.974 Cadmium Cd 48 112.41 Platinum Pt 78 195.08(3) Calcium Ca 20 40.078(4) Plutoniumc 239Pu 94 239.05 Californiumc 232Cf 98 252.08 Poloniumc 210Po 84 209.98 Carbon C 6 12.011 Potassium K 19 39.098 Cerium Ce 58 140.12 Praseodynium Pr 59 140.91 Cesium Cs 55 132.91 Promethiumc 147Pm 61 146.92 Chlorine Cl 17 35.453 Proactiniumc Pa 91 231.04 Chromium Cr 24 51.996 Radiumc 226Ra 88 226.03 Cobalt Co 27 58.933 Radonc 222Rn 86 222.02 Copper Cu 29 63.546(3) Rhenium Re 75 186.21 Curiumc 244Cm 96 244.06 Rhodium Rh 45 102.91 Dysprosiumc Dy 66 162.50(3) Rubidium Rb 37 85.468 Einsteiniumc 252Es 99 252.08 Ruthenium Ru 44 101.07(2) Erbium Er 68 167.26(3) Samarium Sm 62 150.36(3) Europium Eu 63 151.96 Scandium Sc 21 44.956 Fermiumc 257Fm 100 257.1 Selenium Se 34 78.96(3) Fluorine F 9 18.998 Silicon
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Modeling Experiment
    (004:141) Experiment #11 MOLECULAR MODELING: AROMATIC RESONANCE EFFECTS IN CYCLIC KETONES Goal: In this experim ent, you will us e computational chemistry to probe the effects of aromaticity upon bond strengths and lengths. The vibrational spectral frequencies for a variety of cyclic ketones will b e predicted using m olecular orbital methods, and the trends in bond length and C=O stretching frequency will be com pared to expectations based on resonance theory and aromaticity models. If you wish you may work in groups of two or three, and share the results of your computations. Discuss th e results am ongst yourselves, but each person must write up and submit his or her own report. For the calculations, use the PC SPART AN ‘02 com puter program (Wavefunction Inc.) on PCs in the Chemistry Department (locations will be announced). You will draw and calculate properties of each of the molecules shown below: O O O O O O 1 (004:141) Experiment #11 Background Principles of Resonance Kekulé structural formulas are essential tools for understanding organic chem istry. However, the structures of som e compounds and ions cannot be represented by a single formula. For example, sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitric acid (HNO3) may each be described by two equivalent formulas (equations 1 & 2). For clarity the two am biguous bonds to oxygen are given different colors in these formulas. If only one formula for sulfur dioxide were correct and accurate, then the double bond to oxygen would be shorter and stronger than the single bond. Since experim ental evidence indicates that this molecule is bent (bond angle 120°) and has equal lengths of sulfur-oxygen bonds (1.432 Å), a single formula is inadequate, and the actual structure resembles an average of the two form ulas.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanics Calculations of Dimetal Bonds
    MOLECULAR MECHANICS CALCULATIONS OF DIMETAL BONDS Frangoise Marcelle Mary O'Neill A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (1 Auqu~~t 1992 ----. ,_' ..Iium:_~ • __ , .;;.... ...... ....__ Abstract Two aspects of the beautiful conceptual str'lcture of M-M multiple bonding remain puzzling; the large variability of the Cr(II)-Cr(II) quadruple bonds within the Cr2 (X"Y)4Lz compounds, and their response to axial ligation. Most theoretical workers emphasize the inductive effect of the bridging ligand X"Y, while most experimental workers view the influence of the axial ligands L, as most important in determining the Cr-Cr distance. The controversy concerning the relative effects has been diffi':::ultto resolve. Previous efforts to understand the bond-length variations in the system have been unfruitful because of added steric distortions on the M-M distance. A method capable of probing the electronic nature of the M-M bond, in the absence of steric complications, is required. The electronic and steric effects can effectively be separated in molecules with dimetal centres using the methods of molecular mechanics. using the M02 system as our model of M-M bonding in these binuclear comp xes belonging to group VIA, unique or characteristic (~, ro) coup Les , where k, is the force (; constant and ro the electronic bond distance, for the Mo-Mo bond of orders 4.0, 3.5, 3.0, 2.0 and 1.0 were generated. Relationships bebveen bond order and either k, or ro are then formulated.
    [Show full text]
  • The C–F Bond As a Conformational Tool in Organic and Biological Chemistry
    The C–F bond as a conformational tool in organic and biological chemistry Luke Hunter Review Open Access Address: Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 2010, 6, No. 38. School of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.38 Email: Received: 12 January 2010 Luke Hunter - [email protected] Accepted: 15 March 2010 Published: 20 April 2010 Keywords: Guest Editor: D. O’Hagan conformation; functional molecules; organofluorine chemistry; stereochemistry; stereoelectronic effects © 2010 Hunter; licensee Beilstein-Institut. License and terms: see end of document. Abstract Organofluorine compounds are widely used in many different applications, ranging from pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals to advanced materials and polymers. It has been recognised for many years that fluorine substitution can confer useful molecular prop- erties such as enhanced stability and hydrophobicity. Another impact of fluorine substitution is to influence the conformations of organic molecules. The stereoselective introduction of fluorine atoms can therefore be exploited as a conformational tool for the synthesis of shape-controlled functional molecules. This review will begin by describing some general aspects of the C–F bond and the various conformational effects associated with C–F bonds (i.e. dipole–dipole interactions, charge–dipole interactions and hyper- conjugation). Examples of functional molecules that exploit these conformational effects will then be presented, drawing from a diverse range of molecules including pharmaceuticals, organocatalysts, liquid crystals and peptides. Review General aspects of the C–F bond Fluorine is a small atom, with an atomic radius intermediate charges attract each other. Hence, the C–F bond has significant between that of hydrogen and oxygen (Table 1).
    [Show full text]