DOCSLIB.ORG

Notulae 9-7 Inhalt.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

306 Notes on some collections of dragonflies from northern Madagascar Merlijn Jocque1,2,3*, Dan Slootmakers1, Siel Wellens1,3, Lily-Arison Rene De Roland4, John C. Mittermeier5 & Dale Wright6 1 Biodiversity Inventory for Conservation NPO (BINCO), Walmersumstraat 44, 3380 Glab- beek, Belgium; [email protected] 2 Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecology (ATECO), Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS), Vautierstraat 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium 3 Operation Wallacea Ltd, Wallace House, Old Bolingbroke, Lincolnshire, PE23 4EX, UK 4 The Peregrine Fund Madagascar, PO Box 4113, Antananarivo, Madagascar 5 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Ox- ford, OX1 3QY, UK 6 BirdLife South Africa, Centre for Biodiversity Conservation, Kirstenbosch Botanical Gar- dens, Cape Town, South Africa * Corresponding author Abstract. The Madagascar dragonfly fauna remains poorly documented. We list dragonfly observations from two Rapid Biodiversity Surveys in Mahajanga Province, northern Mada- gascar. Surveyed sites include a coastal area with several lakes close to Mariarano sampled in 2016 and a montane forested area with isolated forest patches in the Mahimoborondro and Bemanevika protected areas in north-central Madagascar close to Bealalana sampled in 2019. A total of 40 species were collected with observations made on three species IUCN listed as data deficient:Tatocnemis sinuatipennis, Neodythemis cf. trinervulata, and Pseudagrion simile. Further key words. Dragonfly, damselfly, Anisoptera, Zygoptera, biodiversity, data deficient Introduction Madagascar is known as a place of rich biodiversity and high endemism owing to its long geographic isolation, proximity to the African continent and large area supporting a wide variety of habitats (Goodman et al. 2003). While our knowledge of many taxa is good, large gaps remain, especially for several invertebrate groups. Madagascan dragonflies first received attention in the work ofRambur (1842) and major contributions later included works by Schmidt (1951), Fraser (1956) and more recently Dijkstra (2021) and Dijkstra & Cohen (2021). This last forthcom- ing publication provides a good overview of the history of odonatological studies in Madagascar and summarizes the information available. Several species complexes need further study and the information regarding regional distribution of species is limited, hindering the development of a reliable Red List as a tool to prioritize conservation actions for dragonflies. In a bid to help fill some gaps on the map we present here dragonfly observations from fieldwork in two distinct locations in Mahajanga Province. Notulae odonatologicae 9(7)9(6) 2021:2020: 277-313306-313 – DOI:10.5281/zenodo.4746222 307 Material and methods Dragonflies in the wider Mariarano (Mahajanga District) area on the north-west side of Madagascar (Fig. 1, II) were surveyed in the dry period in the months July–August 2016. The landscape was mostly dry forest interspersed with lakes and minor wetlands. Odonates in the region north of Bealanana (Bealanana District) (Fig. 1, I) were surveyed in the rainy season from 29-i- till 14-ii-2019 in the for- ests of the Bemanevika and Mahimborondro Protected Areas in northern-central Madagascar. Dragonflies were collected on trips to the forest from camps from where the biodiversity surveys were organized. The landscape consisted of patches of montane forest in highland grasslands intersected by small rivers and isolated lakes in old volcanic craters. During both surveys dragonflies were collected on an opportunistic basis using insect nets. We sampled as wide a range of habitats as possible to obtain a good representation of the dragonflies that were active at the time of our surveys. Speci- mens were preserved in 70 % ethanol and subsequently identified by Rosser Garri- son from the California Department of Food & Ag riculture (Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch) in Sacramento, California, USA. After identification, part of the material was deposited in the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, and part of the material was deposited in the personal collection of R. Garrison. List of localities with odonate records Indicated are (in that order) the localitity, administrative units on the level of re- gions and districts, geographic coordinates in decimal degrees, and altitude in me- ters above sea level. (1) 16 km NNE Bamanevika, Sofia, Bealanana (-14.3163, 48.723), 1 586 m a.s.l. (2) 16 km NNE Bamanevika, Sofia, Bealanana (-14.3553, 48.6085), 1 642 m a.s.l. (3) 11 km NNE Bamanevika, Sofia, Bealanana (-14.3234, 48.6751), 1 831 m a.s.l. (4) 16 km NNE Bamanevika, Sofia, Bealanana (-14.3503, 48.6096), 1 644 m a.s.l. (5) 16 km NNE Bamanevika, Sofia, Bealanana (-14.3483, 48.579), 1 582 m a.s.l. (6) 16 km NNE Bamanevika, Sofia, Bealanana (-14.2991, 48.7519), 1 652 m a.s.l. (7) 16 km NNE Bamanevika, Sofia, Bealanana (-14.361, 48.59), 1 557 m a.s.l. (8) 16 km NNE Bamanevika, Sofia, Bealanana (-14.3585, 48.6028), 1604 m a.s.l. (9) 4 km N Bamanevika, Sofia, Bealanana (-14.332, 48.589), 1 600 m a.s.l. (10) Maria rano, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4993, 46.7104), 60 m. a.s.l. (11) Maria- rano, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4873, 46.6999) 42 m. a.s.l. (12) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.488, 46.6502), 26 m a.s.l. (13) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4524, 46.661), 26 m a.s.l. (14) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4778, 46.6689), 14 m a.s.l. (15) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4931, 46.65), 23 m a.s.l. (16) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4575, 46.6535), 22 m a.s.l. (17) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4878, 46.6472), 20 m a.s.l. (18) Matse- Notulae odonatologicae 9(7) 2021: 277-313 308 droy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4917, 46.6557), 35 m a.s.l (19) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4578, 46.6608), 18 m a.s.l. (20) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4816, 46.7412), 47 m a.s.l. (21) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4856, 46.6841) 11 m a.s.l. (22) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.487, 46.6465), 35 m a.s.l. (23) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4653, 46.6452), 61 m a.s.l. Fig. 1. Geographical positions of collecting sites in northern Madagascar: (I) Bealanana area, (II) Mahajanga area. Notulae odonatologicae 9(7) 2021: 277-313 309 (24) Mariarano, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.455, 46.6912), 16 m a.s.l. (25) Maria- rano, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4929, 46.6958) 20 m a.s.l. (26) Matsedroy, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.4793, 46.6373), 91 m. a.s.l. (27) Antafianeva, Boeny, Mahajanga II (-15.468, 46.7485), 14 m a.s.l. Results A total of 40 Odonata species were recorded from 27 sampling sites. All species were of ‘Least Concern’ (IUCN) except for three species currently classified as ‘Data Deficient’, viz. Tatocnemis sinuatipennis, Neodythemis cf. trinervulata, and Pseud­ agrion simile (cf. Schütte 2017a, 2017b, 2017c). Numbers in bold in parentheses correspond with the list of localities with odonate records. List of species recorded Lestidae 1. Lestes ochraceus unicolor McLachlan, 1895 (15) 2♂ (18) 1♂ 2. Lestes simulator McLachlan, 1895 (1) 7♂ (3) 1♂ (15) 2♂1♀ (16) 3♂1♀ (17) 1♂1♀ (18) 3♂1♀ (22) 4♂ Argiolestidae 3. Nesolestes martini Schmidt, 1951 (1) 6♂ (2) 1♂ (6) 1♂ (7) 2♂ Calopterygidae 4. Phaon rasoherinae Fraser, 1949 (10) 1♂ (11) 2♂1♀ (17) 1♂ Protolestidae 5. Protolestes fickei Förster, 1899 (8) 1♂ (6) 2♀ Tatocnemididae 6. Tatocnemis sinuatipennis (Selys, 1891) (8) 4♂6♀ Platycnemididae 7. Proplatycnemis alatipes (McLachlan, 1872) (1)1♂ (6) 1♂ (7) 2♂1♀ 8. Proplatycnemis malgassica (Schmidt, 1951) (14) 2♂2♀ (22) 1♂ Notulae odonatologicae 9(7) 2021: 277-313 310 Coenagrionidae 9. Africallagma rubristigma (Schmidt, 1951) (3) 1♂1♀ 10. Azuragrion kauderni (Sjöstedt, 1917) (1) 1♂ (7) 2♂ (12) 4♂1♀ (13) 1♂ (14) 3♂ (15) 22♂6♀ (16) 15♂3♀ (17) 30♂2♀ (18) 3♂ (19) 1♂ (22) 13♂ 11. Ceriagrion glabrum (Burmeister, 1839) (12) 4♂2♀ (13) 2♂5♀ (14) 2♂1♀ (15) 3♂3♀ (17) 7♂12♀ (18) 2♂4♀ (19) 2♂ (20) 1♂ (22) 5♂ 12. Ischnura senegalensis (Rambur, 1842) (15) 5♂15♀ (16) 1♀ (22) 2♂ 13. Pseudagrion punctum (Rambur, 1842) (14) 3♂ (18) 1♂ 14. Pseudagrion dispar Schmidt, 1951 (4) 1♂ 15. Pseudagrion malgassicum Schmidt, 1951 (14) 2♂ (16) 1♀ (21) 1♀ 16. Pseudagrion simile Schmidt, 1951 (4) 1♂ (6) 2♂ (8) 1♂ Aeshnidae 17. Anaciaeschna triangulifera McLachlan, 1896 Close to Antsohihy 18. Anax tumorifer McLachlan, 1885 (5) 2♂ Corduliidae 19. Hemicordulia similis (Rambur, 1842) (9) 1♂ Libellulidae 20. Acisoma attenboroughi Mens et al. 2016 (12) 1♂ (13) 1♂1♀ (17) 1♂ (19) 1♀ 21. Chalcostephia flavifrons Kirby, 1889 (23) 1♀ 22. Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé, 1832) (1) 2♀ (12) 2♂ (15) 1♂ (18) 1♂ 23. Diplacodes exilis Ris, 1911 (16) 1♂ (17) 1♂ 24. Diplacodes lefebvrii (Rambur, 1842) (12) 12♂7♀ (13) 3♂5♀ (14) 3♀ (15) 9♂8♀ (16) 13♂13♀ (17) 23♂36♀ (18) 7♂4♀ (19) 2♂5♀ (22) 8♂ (24) 1♂ Notulae odonatologicae 9(7) 2021: 277-313 311 25. Hemistigma affine (Rambur, 1842) (25) 1♀ (26) 1♂1♀ 26. Neodythemis hildebrandti Karsch, 1889 (1) 1♂ (7) 1♂1♀ 27. Neodythemis cf. trinervulata (Martin, 1902) (1) 1♂ 28. Orthetrum azureum (Rambur, 1842) (9) 1♂ 29. Orthetrum lemur Ris, 1909 (12) 2♀ (14) 1♂ (27) 1♂ 30. Orthetrum stemmale (Burmeister, 1839) (25) 2♂ 31. Orthetrum trinacria (Selys, 1841) (15) 1♂1♀ (18) 1♂1♀ (22) 1♂ 32. Palpopleura vestita Rambur, 1842 (1) 2♂ (9) 1♂ (27) 1♂ 33. Pantala flavescens (Fabricius, 1798) (22) 1♂ (24) 1♂ 34. Rhyothemis semihyalina (Desjardins, 1832) (12) 2♂ (16) 2♂ (17) 1♀ (22) 1♂ 35.
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Factors Influencing Odonata Communities of Three Mediterranean Rivers: Kebir-East, Seybouse, and Rhumel Wadis, Northeastern Algeria

    Environmental Factors Influencing Odonata Communities of Three Mediterranean Rivers: Kebir-East, Seybouse, and Rhumel Wadis, Northeastern Algeria

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by I-Revues Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie), Vol. 72 (3), 2017 : 314-329 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS INFLUENCING ODONATA COMMUNITIES OF THREE MEDITERRANEAN RIVERS: KEBIR-EAST, SEYBOUSE, AND RHUMEL WADIS, NORTHEASTERN ALGERIA 1,2 1,2,3 Amina YALLES SATHA & Boudjéma SAMRAOUI 1 Laboratoire de Conservation des Zones Humides, University of Guelma, Guelma, Algeria. E-mails: [email protected] & [email protected] 2 University of 08 mai 1945, Guelma, Algeria 3 Biology Department, University of Annaba, Annaba, Algeria RÉSUMÉ.— Facteurs environnementaux influençant les communautés d’Odonates de trois rivières méditerranéennes : les oueds Kebir-Est, Seybouse et Rumel, nord-est algérien.— Les Odonates sont une composante importante des peuplements des milieux lotiques et leur abondance et diversité renseignent sur l’intégrité écologique de ces hydrosystèmes. L’inventaire odonatologique de trois oueds majeurs algériens : Kebir- Est, Seybouse et Rhumel, a permis l’identification de 40 espèces. Nos résultats révèlent la présence de Calopteryx exul, endémique maghrébin, dans l’oued Seybouse et semblent confirmer l’extinction de la population type dans l’oued Rhumel où l’espèce avait été découverte au XIXe siècle. Nos résultats indiquent également l’expansion de plusieurs espèces: Coenagrion caerulescens, Orthetrum nitidinerve, Trithemis kirbyi et Urothemis edwardsii dont la population relictuelle est en danger critique d’extinction. La mesure de diverses variables physicochimiques (altitude, température, conductivité, etc.) nous a permis d’explorer une possible co-structure entre les jeux de données faunistiques et de variables environnementales. L’analyse des données indique que la richesse spécifique est, selon l’oued, variablement correlée à l’hydropériode, à la conductivité et à la température de l’eau, suggérant son utilité dans l’évaluation de l’intégrité écologique des cours d’eau méditerranéens.
  • Species Composition and Diversity of Insects of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve in Ghana

    Species Composition and Diversity of Insects of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve in Ghana

    Open Journal of Ecology, 2014, 4, 1061-1079 Published Online December 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/oje http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oje.2014.417087 Species Composition and Diversity of Insects of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve in Ghana Rosina Kyerematen1,2*, Erasmus Henaku Owusu1, Daniel Acquah-Lamptey1, Roger Sigismund Anderson2, Yaa Ntiamoa-Baidu1,3 1Department of Animal Biology and Conservation Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 2African Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 3Centre for African Wetlands, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana Email: *[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 6 September 2014; revised 9 November 2014; accepted 21 November 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve, the only one in Ghana, was established to promote scientific re- search, particularly on how nature revitalizes itself after major disasters, and also to check the southward drift of the savannah grassland. This study presents the first comprehensive inventory of species composition and diversity of insects of the Reserve. Insects were surveyed between September 2011 and June 2012 to capture the end of the rainy season, the dry season and the peak of the wet season. Samples were taken from two sites within the Reserve, Dagomba and Oku using various sampling techniques including pitfall traps, malaise traps and sweep nets. Insect com- munities were characterized in terms of, 1) species richness estimators, 2) species richness, 3) Shannon-Weiner Index of Diversity, 4) Pielou’s evenness and 5) Bray-Curtis similarity.
  • A Note on the Altitudinal Distribution of Odonata Between Dumre and Khansar in Central Nepal M. Mahato Natural History Museum. A

    A Note on the Altitudinal Distribution of Odonata Between Dumre and Khansar in Central Nepal M. Mahato Natural History Museum. A

    A note on the altitudinal distribution of Odonata between Dumre and Khansar in central Nepal M. Mahato Natural History Museum. Anandakuti. Swayambhu, Kathmandu. Nepal Abstract — 34 spp. were collected at 21 locali- Lamjungand Mananglcf. Fig. I). In the distribu- ties between Dumre (alt 420 and Khansar tion of avail- m) taxa, the climate and the type of (alt. 3580 m). along the Marsayandi River, du- able aquatic habitats play the key role. The 1984. This subtro- ring September. range covers climate of Dumre (Tanahu) is subtropical and pical to alpine climatic zones. At higher eleva- that of Khansar (Mahang) is subalpine to al- commixtum tions only Sympetrum was re- pine. There is heavier rainfall in the southern corded. risi In Onychogomphus (Phalyak Sangu, part of the study area than in the North. the alt. 672 m) had not been the previously reported upper Manang(above 3352 m) most of pre- from Nepal. cipitation falls as snow (Anonymous, 1974). the trek from Along Dumre to Khansar 26 Introduction but sites were visited, dragonflies were found A collection made in dragonfly was September, only at 21 localities. The specimens are depo- 1984 along the Marsayandi River, between sited in the Natural History Museum. Kath- Dumre (alt. 420 m) and Khansar (alt. 3580 m). mandu. covering (from S to N) the districts of Tanahu. 122 Notul. Vol. 2, No, odonatol., 8, pp. 121-136, December I, 1986 lianum (Fabr.) A; — Isch- Fraser nura carpentieri $: K; — I. aurora(Brauer) S'- B; I.forcipata Morton Q\ E, H. Lestidae — Indolestes cya- neus (Sel.) H. Chlorolestidae — Mega- lestes major Sel.
  • Anisoptera: Libellulidae)

    Anisoptera: Libellulidae)

    Odonatologica 7 (3): 237-245 September I, 1978 Reproductive behaviourof Acisoma panorpoidesinflatum Selys (Anisoptera: Libellulidae) A.T. Hassan Entomology Research Laboratory, Department ofZoology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria Received December 21, 1977 / Accepted February 20, 1978 The observations were carried out at 2 localities in Nigeria. The dd defend territories, maintained on a temporary basis. The number of days on which individuals visited water varied from 1-14 (mean 5.33). The territory length in amounted to 1.5-2.0 m (between 09.00-10.30 hrs), and 0.50-0.75 m (later the day). The territories were defended for 842 min. Sperm transfer was not between 3.9-6.8 observed after a d had secured a 9. Copulation ranged sec. the Both sexes mated more than once daily. After copulation partners were resting either separately or, infrequently, in tandem (0.0-106.7 sec). Ovi- position is complex and lasted for 20.9-160.3 sec (mean 74.7). The perching plants provided suitable oviposition sites. INTRODUCTION Reproductive behaviour of libellulid dragonflies, particularly males, had been observed MOORE and experimented on by various workers, e.g. (1952, 1957, 1960), JACOBS (1955), 1TO (1060), KORMONDY (1961), PAJUNEN (1962), CAMPANELLA (1972), PARR & PARR (1974), and GREEN (1974), amongst others, revealed that libellulids hold and defend territories, and exhibit localiza- tion to varying degrees. of This investigation is an examination of the reproductive behaviour Acisoma panorpoides inflatum Selys with respect to the time of arrival at water, the size and maintenance of the territory, the degree of localization, and copulation and oviposition behaviour.
  • The Phylogeny of the Zygopterous Dragonflies As Based on The

    The Phylogeny of the Zygopterous Dragonflies As Based on The

    THE PHYLOGENY OF THE ZYGOPTEROUS DRAGON- FLIES AS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE OF THE PENES* CLARENCE HAMILTON KENNEDY, Ohio State University. This paper is merely the briefest outline of the writer's discoveries with regard to the inter-relationship of the major groups of the Zygoptera, a full account of which will appear in his thesis on the subject. Three papers1 by the writer discussing the value of this organ in classification of the Odonata have already been published. At the beginning, this study of the Zygoptera was viewed as an undertaking to define the various genera more exactly. The writer in no wise questioned the validity of the Selysian concep- tion that placed the Zygopterous subfamilies in series with the richly veined '' Calopterygines'' as primitive and the Pro- toneurinae as the latest and final reduction of venation. However, following Munz2 for the Agrioninae the writer was able to pick out here and there series of genera where the devel- opment was undoubtedly from a thinly veined wing to one richly veined, i. e., Megalagrion of Hawaii, the Argia series, Leptagrion, etc. These discoveries broke down the prejudice in the writer's mind for the irreversibility of evolution in the reduction of venation in the Odonata orders as a whole. Undoubt- ably in the Zygoptera many instances occur where a richly veined wing is merely the response to the necessity of greater wing area to support a larger body. As the study progressed the writer found almost invariably that generalized or connecting forms were usually sparsely veined as compared to their relatives.
  • (Malagasy Tia Tanindrazana) GAST

    (Malagasy Tia Tanindrazana) GAST

    NOMBRE DISTRICT COMMUNE ENTITE NOM ET PRENOM(S) CANDIDATS CANDIDATS ANALALAVA AMBALIHA 1 MATITA (Malagasy Tia Tanindrazana) GASTON RAZAFINARIVO MICHEL (Indépendant Razafinarivo ANALALAVA AMBALIHA 1 RASANDILINE Feline Michel) ANALALAVA AMBARIJEBY SUD 1 MATITA (Malagasy Tia Tanindrazana) FERDINAND GROUPEMENT DE P.P IRD (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ ANALALAVA AMBARIJEBY SUD 1 ANDRIAMAHERY Housnah Bechara Ayate Andry Rajoelina) ANALALAVA AMBARIJEBY SUD 1 VINCENT (Inedependant Vincent) VINCENT ANALALAVA AMBOLOBOZO 1 MATITA (Malagasy Tia Tanindrazana) ANICET ANALALAVA AMBOLOBOZO 1 IRD (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ Andry Rajoelina) TOMBOMISY Jean Rasidy ANALALAVA ANALALAVA 1 MATITA (Malagasy Tia Tanindrazana) AMADA GROUPEMENT DE P.P IRD (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ ANALALAVA ANALALAVA 1 JEAN Baptiste Andry Rajoelina) FANJAVA VELOGNO (Independant Fanjava ANALALAVA ANALALAVA 1 VELOMANANA Firmin Velogno) ANALALAVA ANDRIBAVONTSINA 1 IRD (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ Andry Rajoelina) JAOHEVITRY Richard ANALALAVA ANDRIBAVONTSINA 1 MATITA (Malagasy Tia Tanindrazana) TAVANDRAINA Parfait ANALALAVA ANDRIBAVONTSINA 1 ROZELA (Indépendant Rozela) ROZELA ANALALAVA ANGOAKA SUD 1 IRD (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ Andry Rajoelina) TSARAFARA Jean Denis ANALALAVA ANGOAKA SUD 1 MATITA (Malagasy Tia Tanindrazana) SERGE Rochin RANDRIANJAFIMANANA GHISLAIN (Independant ANALALAVA ANKARAMY 1 RASENDRAHASINA Jeannot Randrianjafimanana Ghislain) VONINOSY SUZANE (Independant Voninosy ANALALAVA ANKARAMY 1 MISIZARA Béatrice Suzanne) ANALALAVA ANKARAMY 1 IRD (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ Andry Rajoelina)
  • Description of 11 New Astiella (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae) Species Endemic to Madagascar

    Description of 11 New Astiella (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae) Species Endemic to Madagascar

    European Journal of Taxonomy 312: 1–40 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.312 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · GROENINCKX I. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article Description of 11 new Astiella (Spermacoceae, Rubiaceae) species endemic to Madagascar Inge GROENINCKX 1, Steven JANSSENS 2, Erik SMETS 3 & Brecht VERSTRAETE 4,* 1 Plant Conservation and Population Biology, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 31, P.O. Box 2435, 3001 Leuven, Belgium. 2 Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium. 3 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. 4 Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Sølvgade 83S, 1307 Copenhagen, Denmark. 1 Email: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. Astiella is an herbaceous genus endemic to Madagascar, originally described with a single species A. delicatula Jovet. Molecular and morphological evidence place it in the tribe Spermacoceae s. lat. of Rubiaceae. During herbarium studies and fieldwork in Madagascar, 11 new Astiella species were identified and these are described here: A. antongilensis Groeninckx sp. nov., A. antsalovansis Groeninckx sp. nov., A. confusa Groeninckx sp. nov., A. deblockiae Groeninckx sp. nov., A. desseinii Groeninckx sp. nov., A. homolleae Groeninckx sp. nov., A. latifolia Groeninckx sp. nov., A. longifimbria Groeninckx sp. nov., A. perrieri Groeninckx sp. nov., A. pulla Groeninckx sp. nov., and A. tsaratanensis Groeninckx sp. nov. The genus Astiella now holds 12 species in total that are all endemic to Madagascar.
  • By the Lepidoptera (Eg Patterns Are Frequently Used

    By the Lepidoptera (Eg Patterns Are Frequently Used

    Odonatologica 15(3): 335-345 September I, 1986 A survey of some Odonata for ultravioletpatterns* D.F.J. Hilton Department of Biological Sciences, Bishop’s University, Lennoxville, Quebec, J1M 1Z7, Canada Received May 8, 1985 / Revised and Accepted March 3, 1986 series of 338 in families A museum specimens comprising spp. 118 genera and 16 were photographed both with and without a Kodak 18-A ultraviolet (UV) filter. These photographs revealed that only Euphaeaamphicyana reflected UV from its other wings whereas all spp. either did not absorb UV (e.g. 94.5% of the Coenagri- did In with flavescent. onidae) or so to varying degrees. particular, spp. orange or brown UV these wings (or wing patches) exhibited absorption for same areas. However, other spp. with nearly transparent wings (especially certain Gomphidae) Pruinose also had strong UV absorption. body regions reflected UV but the standard acetone treatment for color preservation dissolves thewax particles of the pruinosity and destroys UV reflectivity. As is typical for arthropod cuticle, non-pruinosebody regions absorbed UV and this obscured whatever color patterns might otherwise be visible without the camera’s UV filter. Frequently there is sexual dimorphismin UV and and these role various of patterns (wings body) differences may play a in aspects mating behavior. INTRODUCTION Considerable attention has been paid to the various ultraviolet (UV) patterns exhibited by the Lepidoptera (e.g. SCOTT, 1973). Studies have shown (e.g. RUTOWSKI, 1981) that differing UV-reflectance patterns are frequently used as visual in various of behavior. few insect cues aspects mating Although a other groups have been investigated for the presence of UV patterns (HINTON, 1973; POPE & HINTON, 1977; S1LBERGL1ED, 1979), little informationis available for the Odonata.
  • New Taxa Described by Günther Theischinger (Update 2016)

    New Taxa Described by Günther Theischinger (Update 2016)

    New taxa described by Günther Theischinger (update 2016) Taxa, mostly of genus and species group, described as new: up to end of 2016: 41+, 729+ ODONATA, Aeshnidae Afroaeschna Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 229 (2011). Agyrtacantha browni Marinov & Theischinger, International Dragonfly Fund - Report 53:2 (2012). Agyrtacantha picta Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica xxx (2017). Gynacantha heros Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 41 (4): 356 (2012). Gynacantha nourlangie Theischinger & Watson, in Watson et al., The Australian Dragonflies: 41 (1991). Gynacantha nuda Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 45 (3/4): 318 (2016). Pinheyschna Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 232 (2011). Pinheyschna waterstoni Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 235 (2011). Zosteraeschna Peters & Theischinger, Odonatologica 40(3): 241 (2011). ODONATA, Argiolestidae Argiolestes angulatus Theischinger & Richards, in Tyagi, B.K. (ed.): Odonata Biology of Dragonflies: 34 (2007). Argiolestes fornicatus Theischinger & Richards, in Tyagi, B.K. (ed.): Odonata Biology of Dragonflies: 36 (2007). Argiolestes indentatus Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 35(1): 386 (2006). Argiolestes trigonalis Theischinger & Richards, Odonatologica 37(2): 168 (2008). Austroargiolestes brookhousei Theischinger & O'Farrell, Odonatologica 15 (4): 409 (1986). Austroargiolestes christine Theischinger & O'Farrell, Odonatologica 15 (4): 394 (1986). Austroargiolestes elke Theischinger & O'Farrell, Odonatologica 15 (4): 396 (1986). Austroargiolestes isabellae
  • The Dragonfly Larvae of Namibia.Pdf

    The Dragonfly Larvae of Namibia.Pdf

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260831026 The dragonfly larvae of Namibia (Odonata) Article · January 2014 CITATIONS READS 11 723 3 authors: Frank Suhling Ole Müller Technische Universität Braunschweig Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Gymnasium 99 PUBLICATIONS 1,817 CITATIONS 45 PUBLICATIONS 186 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Andreas Martens Pädagogische Hochschule Karlsruhe 161 PUBLICATIONS 893 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Feeding ecology of owls View project The Quagga mussel Dreissena rostriformis (Deshayes, 1838) in Lake Schwielochsee and the adjoining River Spree in East Brandenburg (Germany) (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Frank Suhling on 25 April 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. LIBELLULA Libellula 28 (1/2) LIBELLULALIBELLULA Libellula 28 (1/2) LIBELLULA Libellula Supplement 13 Libellula Supplement Zeitschrift derder GesellschaftGesellschaft deutschsprachiger deutschsprachiger Odonatologen Odonatologen (GdO) (GdO) e.V. e.V. ZeitschriftZeitschrift der derder GesellschaftGesellschaft Gesellschaft deutschsprachigerdeutschsprachiger deutschsprachiger OdonatologenOdonatologen Odonatologen (GdO)(GdO) (GdO) e.V.e.V. e.V. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft deutschsprachiger Odonatologen (GdO) e.V. ISSN 07230723 - -6514 6514 20092014 ISSNISSN 072307230723 - - -6514 65146514 200920092014 ISSN 0723 - 6514 2009 2014 2009
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Melanoxerus (Rubiaceae), with Descriptions of Three New Species of Trees from Madagascar

    A Taxonomic Revision of Melanoxerus (Rubiaceae), with Descriptions of Three New Species of Trees from Madagascar

    A taxonomic revision of Melanoxerus (Rubiaceae), with descriptions of three new species of trees from Madagascar Kent Kainulainen Abstract KAINULAINEN, K. (2021). A taxonomic revision of Melanoxerus (Rubiaceae), with descriptions of three new species of trees from Madagascar. Candollea 76: 105 – 116. In English, English and French abstracts. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15553/c2021v761a11 This paper provides a taxonomic revision of Melanoxerus Kainul. & Bremer (Rubiaceae) – a genus of deciduous trees with eye-catching flowers and fruits that is endemic to Madagascar. Descriptions of three new species, Melanoxerus antsirananensis Kainul., Melanoxerus atropurpureus Kainul., and Melanoxerus maritimus Kainul. are presented along with distribution maps and a species identification key. The species distributions generally reflect the ecoregions of Madagascar, with Melanoxerus antsirananensis being found in the dry deciduous forests of the north; Melanoxerus atropurpureus in the inland dry deciduous forests of the west; Melanoxerus maritimus in dry deciduous forest on coastal sands; and Melanoxerus suavissimus (Homolle ex Cavaco) Kainul. & B. Bremer in the dry spiny thicket and succulent woodlands of the southwest. Résumé KAINULAINEN, K. (2021). Révision taxonomique du genre Melanoxerus (Rubiaceae), avec la description de trois nouvelles espèces d’arbres de Madagascar. Candollea 76: 105 – 116. En anglais, résumés anglais et français. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15553/c2021v761a11 Cet article propose une révision taxonomique de Melanoxerus Kainul. & Bremer (Rubiaceae), un genre d’arbres à feuilles caduques avec des fleurs et des fruits attrayants qui est endémique de Madagascar. La description de trois nouvelles espèces, Melanoxerus antsirananensis Kainul., Melanoxerus atropurpureus Kainul. et Melanoxerus maritimus Kainul. est présentée accompagné de cartes de répartition et d’une clé d’identification des espèces.
  • Faunal Impact Assessment

    Faunal Impact Assessment

    FAUNAL, FLORAL, WETLAND AND AQUATIC ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AS PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND AUTHORISATION PROCESS FOR A PROPOSED COAL MINE ON THE REMAINING EXTENT OF THE FARM THE DUEL 186 MT, LIMPOPO PROVINCE Prepared for Jacana Environmentals CC May 2019 Section C: Faunal Assessment Prepared by: Scientific Terrestrial Services Report authors: J.J. du Plessis C. Hooton Report reviewer(s): K. Marais (Pr. Sci. Nat) S. van Staden (Pr Sci. Nat) Report Reference: STS 190011 Date: May 2019 Scientific Terrestrial Services CC CC Reg No 2005/122329/23 PO Box 751779 Gardenview 2047 Tel: 011 616 7893 Fax: 086 724 3132 E-mail: [email protected] STS 190011 - SECTION C: FAUNAL ASSESSMENT May 2019 DOCUMENT GUIDE The Document Guide below is for reference to the procedural requirements for environmental authorisation applications in accordance to GN267 of 24 March 2017, as it pertains to the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998) (NEMA); No. Requirement Section in report a) Details of - (i) The specialist who prepared the report Section A: Appendix D (ii) The expertise of that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae Section A: Appendix D b) A declaration that the specialist is independent Section A: Appendix D c) An indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared Section 1 cA) An indication of the quality and age of base data used for the specialist report Section A cB) A description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of the proposed Section