DOCSLIB.ORG

Technology Transfer for Water and Wastewater Treatment Industry in Colombia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technology Transfer for Water and Wastewater Treatment Industry in Colombia 2016/17 KSP-IDB Joint Consulting Project : Project Joint Consulting 2016/17 KSP-IDB 2016/17 KSP-IDB Joint Consulting Project : Technology Transfer for Water and Wastewater Treatment Industry in Colombia Technology Transfer for Water and Wastewater Treatment Industry in Colombia Industry Treatment and Wastewater Water for Transfer Technology Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Republic of KoreaⅠGovernment Complex, Sejong, 30109, Republic of Korea www.mosf.go.kr The Export-Import Bank of KoreaⅠ38 Eunhaeng-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07242, Republic of Korea www.koreaexim.go.kr 2016/17 KSP‐IDB Joint Consulting Project Project Title Technology Transfer for Water and Wastewater Treatment Industry in Colombia Prepared by Daegu Technopark, Korea Engineering Consultants Corporation, DYETEC Financed by Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Republic of Korea Supported by The Export-Import Bank of Korea (Korea Eximbank) - Seung Ho Sohn, Director General - Jae Jeong Moon, Director of KSP Team - Yu Shin Kim, Senior KSP Specialist of KSP Team - Sun Young Lim, Researcher of KSP Team Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) Prepared for Vice Ministry of Water and Sanitation, Columbia Project Manager Yo Han Kim, Daegu Technopark Researchers Chul Gyun Hwang, Daegu Technopark Hyun Wook Hwangbo, Daegu Technopark Young Mok Yun, Daegu Technopark Jung Su Park, Daegu Technopark Suk Won Choi, Korea Engineering Consultants Corporation Jin Heon Kim, Korea Engineering Consultants Corporation Sang Hun Lee, DYETEC Dong Hoon Shin, DYETECJose Moran, Evolve Consulting Co., Ltd. i Contents 2016/17 KSP‐IDB Joint Consulting Project Summary Ⅰ. Introduction ··················································································································· 1 1 . B a c k g r o u n d a n d P u r p o s e s ·············································································································· 1 1. 1‐1 . B a c k g r o u n d ································································································································· 1 1. 1‐2 . P u r p o s e s ······································································································································ 3 2 . R a n g e a n d E x p e c t e d O u t c o m e s ··································································································· 3 1. 2‐1 . R a n g e ········································································································································· 3 1. 2‐2 . E x p e c t e d O u t c o m e s ··············································································································· 3 3 . P r o j e c t D i r e c t i o n s a n d M a j o r D e t a i l s ·························································································· 3 Ⅱ. Analysis of Colombia Water Treatment Status ·················································· 7 1 . W a t e r T r e a t m n e t P o l i c y a n d C u r r e n t S t a t u s ············································································ 7 1. 1‐1 . E n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d W a t e r T r e a t m n e t P o l i c y ···································································· 7 1. 1‐2 . W a t e r T r e a t m e n t R e g u l a t i o n s ·························································································· 1 0 1. 1‐3 . W a t e r T r e a t m e n t S t a t u s a n d G o a l s ················································································· 1 3 2 . W a t e r T r e a t m e n t I n d u s t r y ············································································································ 1 8 1. 2‐1 . W a t e r M a r k e t S t a t u s a n d P r o s p e c t s ·············································································· 1 8 1. 2‐2 . W a t e r T r e a t m e n t T e c h n o l o g y a n d C o m p a n i e s ····························································· 2 1 Ⅲ. Analysis of Korea Water Treatment Status ······················································ 25 1 . W a t e r T r e a t m e n t P o l i c y a n d C u r r e n t S t a t u s ········································································· 2 5 1. 1‐1 . W a t e r I n d u s t r y P o l i c y ··········································································································· 2 5 1. 1‐2. Current Conditions and Policy Trends of Domestic Sewerage ····························· 2 9 1. 1‐3. The Proposed Quality Standards for Released Water 1. 1‐3. o f S e w a g e T r e a t m e n t F a c i l i t y ·························································································· 3 5 1. 1‐4. Comparision of Water Treatment in Korea and Colombia ······································· 3 7 2 . W a t e r I n s u s t r y ································································································································· 4 4 1. 2‐1. Current Status and Prospects of the Domestic Water Market in K o r e a ············ 4 4 1. 2‐2 . O v e r s e a s E x p a n s i o n o f W a t e r I n d u s t r y ········································································ 4 7 1. 2‐3 . W a t e r T r e a t m e n t T e c h n o l o g y S t a t u s ············································································· 4 8 3. Study of PPP Cases in korea ····································································································· 5 0 1. 3‐1 . R e g u l a t i o n s a n d P o l i c i e s r e g a r d i n g P P P ········································································· 5 0 1. 3‐2 . T y p e s o f P P P ··························································································································· 5 3 1. 3‐3. Domestic PPP Trend ············································································································· 5 5 1. 3‐4 . S u c c e s s f u l C a s e s ···················································································································· 5 6 ii 1 . 3‐5 . C a s e s o f F a i l u r e ······················································································································ 6 7 1. 3‐6 . P r o p o s a l s ··································································································································· 7 0 4 . W a t e r R e s o u r c e s & C a s e S t u d y o f R i v e r D e v e l o p m e n t ···················································· 7 3 1. 4‐1 . C a s e o f H a n R i v e r D e v e l o p m e n t ······················································································ 7 4 1. 4‐2 . C a s e o f G e u m h o R i v e r D e v e l o p m e n t ·············································································· 7 5 Ⅳ. Colombia Technology Demand and Korea Technolgy Analysis ················· 77 1 . T e c h n i c a l A n a l y s i s o f C o l o m b i a a n d K o r e a ············································································ 7 7 1. 1‐1 . T e c h n o l o g y D e m a n d o f C o l o m b i a ···················································································· 7 6 1. 1‐2 . S u r v e y o f K o r e a T e c h n o l o g y ······························································································ 8 1 1. 1‐3 . M a t c h i n g K o r e a n T e c h n o l o g y t o C o l o m b i a n D e m a n d ················································ 8 4 1. 1‐4 . C o n c l u s i o n ································································································································ 8 7 Ⅴ. Policy Proposals for the Establishment of Technology Transfer Plans ····· 89 1 . P r o p o s a l s r e g a r d i n g T e c h n o l o g y T r a n s f e r P l a n s ··································································· 8 9 1. 1‐1 . C o o p e r a t i o n b e t w e e n c o m p a n i e s ······················································································ 8 9 1. 1‐2 . R e p r e s e n t a t i v e C a s e s o f T e c h n o l o g y T r a n s f e r ····························································· 9 1 1. 1‐3 . P r o p o s a l o f T e c h n o l o g y T r a n s f e r M o d e l ······································································ 1 0 1 Ⅵ. Conclusion ··············································································································· 103 References ························································································································ 105 iii Contents 2016/17 KSP‐IDB Joint Consulting Project List of Tables Table 1. Principal tasks and specific details of the project ················································ 4 T a b l e 2 . G o v e r n m e n t B u d g e t f o r W a t e r T r e a t m e n t i n 2 0 1 5 ·············································· 9 Table 3. Governmental Organizations in charge of Water and S e w a g e S y s t e m i n C o l o m b i a ························································································ 9 Table 4. Sewage Treatment Standards in Colombia (Ordinance no. 1 5 9 4 / 1 9 8 4 ) ····· 1 0 Table 5. Standard of Water Quality for Discharged Water in Colombia (Chemicals) ···11 Table 6. Standard of Water Quality for Water Supply in Colombia ( C h e m i c a l s ) ······ 1 2 Table 7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Development of a Web-Based Decision Support System for Supporting
    Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2012) 10091–10102 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Expert Systems with Applications journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/eswa Development of a web-based decision support system for supporting integrated water resources management in Daegu city, South Korea ⇑ ⇑ Yong Zeng a, , Yanpeng Cai b,c, Peng Jia d,e, , Hoogkee Jee e a State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, College of Geosciences, China Petroleum University, Beijing 102249, China b AIRS-CSEE, Environment Canada, Regina, Canada S4S 0A2 c State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China d Center for Geocomputation and Geoinformatics, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China e Water Resources Engineering Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University, Republic of Korea article info abstract Keywords: Demands on fresh water by human beings have been continuously increasing due to population growth, Water resources management living standard improvement, and economic development. At the same time, many regions are suffering Decision support system greatly from floods and droughts. Those are the results of ineffective management of water resources due Evolutionary algorithms to the associated complexities. In this study, a decision support system (DSS) was developed for support- Water allocation ing integrated water resources management in Daegu city, Republic of Korea. The developed DSS con- tained four subsystems including database, modelbase, and knowledgebase, as well as general user interface (GUI). It was then connected with the National Water Management Information System (WAMIS). A flow prediction could be conducted through the incorporated HEC-HMS Version 3.0.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Tributaries by Influence Index on the Mid-Lower Portion of the Nakdong River Basin
    Environ. Eng. Res. 2018; 23(2): 150-158 pISSN 1226-1025 https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2017.067 eISSN 2005-968X Evaluation of the tributaries by influence index on the mid-lower portion of the Nakdong River basin Shun-Hwa Lee1, Seung-Gyu Jung1, Seoung-Muk Park1, Byung-Dae Lee2† 1Department of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea 2Department of Health Management, Uiduk University, Gyeongju 38004, Republic of Korea ABSTRACT The deteriorating role of Nakdong River due to the Four Major Rivers Project has caused a series of problems, including water pollution, drying streams, aggravation of the hydroecology. Geumho River and Gyeongseong-cheon had a higher concentration index and is believed to impact the water quality of the main stream. The influence index of Geumho River and Nam River between 2015 and 2016, which have a large amount of discharge, was the highest among the tributaries in terms of the load material balance. Showing the highest average concentration and average load in the index assessment, Geumho River is believed to require an intensive management for improving the water quality of the main stream. Furthermore, when the cumulative percentage of the average concentration and average load was compared based on the water quality improvement of the tributaries mixed to Nakdong River, which was set to 60%, Geumho River, Nam River, Topyeong-cheon, and Cha-cheon, which showed the highest ratio in that order, were determined to require a water quality management program as a priority. Keywords: Effect of tributaries, Index assessment, Load mass balance, Water quality of Nakdong River 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Korea 2001 in Pursuit of Economic and Environmental Sustainability Ministry of Environment Republic of Korea
    Green Korea 2001 In pursuit of economic and environmental sustainability Ministry of Environment Republic of Korea Preface The past century has witnessed humankind benefit from the material progress made possible due to scientific and technological achievements. At the same time, however, we saw our planet come under ever-increasing stress that now challenges its ability to provide for future generations. Human activities are causing climate change; oceans are rising and threatening entire societies. Seemingly everywhere around us we see greater water and air pollution, growing waste, and shrinking green space. If this situation continues, our ways of life and possibly our very survival will not be sustained. It is time for us to re-evaluate the lifestyles of the past century and harness all the wisdom we have, as a nation and as a community, to find ways to achieve a balanced coexistence between human activities and the ecosphere. The Earth is the source of life for all and is where our children and their children will live. It is imperative that we serve as good stewards and bequeath the planet to them in a better state than it is now. Maintaining sustainability is, at its essence, both a survival strategy and an obligation we have towards future generations, as a government, as businesses, and as individuals. The Korean government, in keeping with the demands of the times, has been pursuing environmental policies based on sustainability. On World Environment Day (June 5, 2000), President Kim Dae Jung announced his environmental vision of expanding the meaning of peace to include the concept of genuine harmony and reconciliation between human societies and nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Tributaries by Influence Index on the Mid-Lower Portion of the Nakdong River Basin
    Environ. Eng. Res. 2018; 23(2): 150-158 pISSN 1226-1025 https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2017.067 eISSN 2005-968X Evaluation of the tributaries by influence index on the mid-lower portion of the Nakdong River basin Shun-Hwa Lee1, Seung-Gyu Jung1, Seoung-Muk Park1, Byung-Dae Lee2† 1Department of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea 2Department of Health Management, Uiduk University, Gyeongju 38004, Republic of Korea ABSTRACT The deteriorating role of Nakdong River due to the Four Major Rivers Project has caused a series of problems, including water pollution, drying streams, aggravation of the hydroecology. Geumho River and Gyeongseong-cheon had a higher concentration index and is believed to impact the water quality of the main stream. The influence index of Geumho River and Nam River between 2015 and 2016, which have a large amount of discharge, was the highest among the tributaries in terms of the load material balance. Showing the highest average concentration and average load in the index assessment, Geumho River is believed to require an intensive management for improving the water quality of the main stream. Furthermore, when the cumulative percentage of the average concentration and average load was compared based on the water quality improvement of the tributaries mixed to Nakdong River, which was set to 60%, Geumho River, Nam River, Topyeong-cheon, and Cha-cheon, which showed the highest ratio in that order, were determined to require a water quality management program as a priority. Keywords: Effect of tributaries, Index assessment, Load mass balance, Water quality of Nakdong River 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Tributaries by Influence Index on the Mid-Lower Portion of the Nakdong River Basin
    Environ. Eng. Res. 2018 Research Article https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2017.067 pISSN 1226-1025 eISSN 2005-968X In Press, Uncorrected Proof Evaluation of the tributaries by influence index on the mid-lower portion of the Nakdong River basin 1 1 1 2† Shun-Hwa Lee , Seung-Gyu Jung , Seoung-Muk Park , Byung-Dae Lee 1Department of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea 2Department of Health Management, Uiduk University, Gyeongju 38004, Republic of Korea Abstract The deteriorating role of Nakdong River due to the Four Major Rivers Project has caused a series of problems, including water pollution, drying streams, aggravation of the hydroecology. Geumho River and Gyeongseong- cheon had a higher concentration index and is believed to impact the water quality of the main stream. The influence index of Geumho River and Nam River between 2015 and 2016, which have a large amount of discharge, was the highest among the tributaries in terms of the load material balance. Showing the highest average concentration and average load in the index assessment, Geumho River is believed to require an intensive management for improving the water quality of the main stream. Furthermore, when the cumulative percentage of the average concentration and average load was compared based on the water quality improvement of the tributaries mixed to Nakdong River, which was set to 60%, Geumho River, Nam River, Topyeong-cheon, and Cha-cheon, which showed the highest ratio in that order, were determined to require a water quality
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Flood Tracking Technique for Flood Disaster Management in Urban Areas
    Sustainable Water Resources Management XI 221 DEVELOPMENT OF FLOOD TRACKING TECHNIQUE FOR FLOOD DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN URBAN AREAS DONG HO KANG1, SUK HO LEE2 & BYUNG SIK KIM1 1Department of Urban and Environmental Disaster Prevention Engineering, Kangwon National University, Republic of Korea 2Risk Management Research Department, UNO Co., Ltd., Republic of Korea ABSTRACT The change in precipitation due to climate change has induced local and torrential rainfalls. As a result, protected lowlands have an increased risk of damage caused by river inundation and subsequent flooding. Thus, it is necessary to have the technology to predict the damage due to flooding in a protected lowland. This study developed a distributed flood and inundation model called Simplified Inundation Model (SIMOD) to simulate a flooding path for identifying how flooding caused by river embankment’s breakage is inundated and spread in a protected lowland. Two methods were applied to simulate a flood path: the multiple flow direction method (MFDM) and the flat-water assumption (FWA) method. Virtual scenarios were set to calculate an inundation range over time in the Seongseoje, located downstream of the Geumho river, and evaluate the model. In addition, the urban inundation analysis was executed using the SIMOD. The results were compared to results from using the commercial inundation analysis two-dimensional flood routing model (FLO-2D) to verify the model’s applicability. The study applied the digital elevation model (DEM) terrain data for conventional flooding analysis and digital surface model (DSM) terrain data to represent urban building groups and road distribution. The 24-hour simulation was done less than 7 minutes using the SIMOD, and the difference in flooded areas was less than 20% compared to FLO-2D.
    [Show full text]