DOCSLIB.ORG

Battlefield Archeology of Pea Ridge National Military Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Battlefield Archeology of Pea Ridge National Military Park “THE BATTLE RAGED…WITH TERRIBLE FURY:” BATTLEFIELD ARCHEOLOGY OF PEA RIDGE NATIONAL MILITARY PARK By Carl G. Carlson-Drexler, Douglas D. Scott, and Harold Roeker Midwest Archeological Center Technical Report No. 112 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Midwest Archeological Center “THE BATTLE RAGED…WITH TErrIBLE FURY:” BATTLEFIELD ArCHEOLOGY OF PEA RIDGE NATIONAL MILITARY PARK By Carl G. Carlson-Drexler, Douglas D. Scott, and Harold Roeker Midwest Archeological Center Technical Report No. 112 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Midwest Archeological Center United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska 2008 This report has been reviewed against the criteria contained in 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1) and, upon recommendation of the Midwest Regional Office and the Midwest Archeological Center, has been classified as Available Making the report available meets the criteria of 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Pea Ridge battlefield archeological project is the product of a cooperative effort on the part of many people. Among the most supportive were the staff of Pea Ridge National Military Park. They extended their welcome and tendered every possible assistance to the field crew during our in-park work. We want to especially thank Superintendent John Scott for all of his assistance and guidance, the late Douglas Keller for his constant support and determination to spend as much time in the field with us as possible and former Chief of Interpretation Mary Cox Davis for her unflagging support and advice and for assisting us in the field, and the park’s maintenance staff who did everything in their power to aid the field investigations. We are grateful to Charles Haecker for all of his help during the field investigations and to Greg Kendrick who “loaned” Charlie to us from Intermountain Region. We could not have accomplished this work without the hard work of a small army of metal detectorists and volunteers, some of whom were park staff who gave generously of their time off. It was their hard work in all sorts of weather conditions that allowed this project to become a success. We offer our grateful and heartfelt thanks to the volunteer crews: Chris Adams, Conrad Angone, Floyd Barnhill, Derek Batten, Olga Berg, Carolyn Bernaski, Sam Bilyeu, Dana Burgess, Steve Burgess, Steve Burt, Frank Butler, Kenneth Byrd, Jeff Call, John Casteel, Glen Christophersen, Mike Clark, Cici Craglow, Julie Coleman, Jim Dobkins, Ransom Ellis, Fagan, Ronald Fagan, Jessica Faldon, Roger Farrer, Jack Ferguson, Norman Ferguson, Gail Fowler, Tom Frew, John Gibson, Larry Gibson, John Goodwin, Justin Goodwin, Henry Gresham, Charles Haecker, Steve Hall, Don Hamilton, Dick Harmon, Monte Harris, Erik Hazel, John Heuston, Bob Hofer, Glen Hofer, Rose Ann Hofer, Steve Hoover, Craig Jones, Ed LaMastus, Dave Lewis, Giselle Lewis, Sam Littrell, Ike Lockridge, Richard Lockridge, Larry Ludwig, Gordan McCain, Will McCain, John Nessmith, Bob Norris, Bob Rea, Tom Reed, Kent Ruddick, Sandy Ruddick, Ann Schafer Ed Schafer, Don Schafter, Don Schmid, Harold Sharp, Bob Sigafoos, Ellie Smidley, Dustin Smidley, Don Smith, Mike Swalley, Vicki Swalley, Glen Swanson, Jerry Sweeney, Tom Sweeney, Darla Thomas, Curtis Tilgham, Elizabeth Tyurikow, Tami Vitali, Sandy Wells, Jack West, Mark Wheeler, Travis Whenhust, James White, Nola White, Chris Whitehead, Mark Whitehead, Walter Whitehead, Phil Whitlow, Scott Wilkey, Warren Wilkey, John Willmann, and Bruce Wright. These volunteers contributed 3610 hours to the project, for which we are eternally grateful. As always the staff of the Midwest Archeological Center provided unqualified support in the course of the project. Thomas Thiessen, Park Program Manager, and Mark Lynott, Center Manager gave us sage advice and support for the project’s duration. We would particularly like to thank Jill Lewis for her yeoman-like efforts in handling the travel vouchers for all of the volunteers, and Linda Clarke for her diligent work on the cooperative agreement and assuring that the volunteer paper work was promptly handled. Bruce Jones, MWAC volunteer coordinator assisted us in many ways and we tender our thanks to him. Jan Dial-Jones, Karin Roberts, Claudia Schaffer, and Lisa Stanley of the Collections i PEA RIDGE Management team aided us and tutored us in the fine art of collections cataloging, for which we are very grateful. Scott Stadler provided much needed mapping support in 2002, and Rolando Garza of Palo Alto Battlefield did the same for us in 2003. Don Arp assisted in the artifact processing during 2002. We wish to extend our sincere appreciation to William Volf, who took on the task of conducting the geophysical investigations, and Alicia Coles for her willingness to explore the potential for metallurgical examination of some of the artillery shell fragments. Their hard work made the project more complete. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................i Table of Contents .............................................................................................................iii List of Figures ...................................................................................................................v 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 The Pea Ridge National Military Park Archeological Inventory ..............................4 Previous Archaeological Investigations ....................................................................6 Leetown Excavation ..........................................................................................6 Oberson’s Field Remote Sensing .....................................................................10 ARPA Investigations ........................................................................................11 Student Research Projects ................................................................................11 2. A Brief Battle History .................................................................................................15 Leetown ....................................................................................................................16 Elkhorn Tavern .........................................................................................................19 3. Archeological Project Methods ...................................................................................23 Field Data Collection Methods ................................................................................23 4. Metal Detected Artifacts - Description and Analysis ..................................................25 Analytical Procedures ..............................................................................................25 Firearms Identification Procedures ..........................................................................25 Artifact Descriptions ................................................................................................26 5. Interpreting the Archeological Evidence ....................................................................61 Firearms Types at Pea Ridge – The Historical Accounts .........................................61 Firearm Types at Pea Ridge Derived from the Archeological Record .....................71 Small arms - Pistols, Muskets, Rifled Muskets, Rifles, and Shotguns.............72 Artillery at Pea Ridge – The Archeological Evidence .....................................76 The First Day’s Fighting, March 7, 1862 .................................................................79 Narrow Ridge North of Elk Horn Tavern ........................................................81 iii Elk Horn Tavern ...............................................................................................96 Clemon’s Field ................................................................................................97 Leetown ...........................................................................................................101 The Fight in Morgan’s Woods .........................................................................112 The Second Day’s Fighting in Cox’s Field, March 8, 1862 ...................................120 6. Conclusions ................................................................................................................127 References Cited .............................................................................................................133 Appendix A .....................................................................................................................143 Appendix B .....................................................................................................................153 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Pea Ridge National Military Park and the 1862 campaign ..............................2 Figure 2. Pea Ridge National Military Park with major features noted. ..........................3 Figure 3. Metal detected inventory areas at Pea Ridge. ...................................................6 Figure 4. A 1903 plat map of the Pea Ridge battlefield showing land ownership. .................................................................................................................7 Figure 5. A 1940 aerial photograph of the Pea Ridge area showing farmsteads and the significant amount of clearing that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Staff Officers of the Confederate States Army. 1861-1865
    QJurttell itttiuetsity Hibrary Stliaca, xV'cni tUu-k THE JAMES VERNER SCAIFE COLLECTION CIVIL WAR LITERATURE THE GIFT OF JAMES VERNER SCAIFE CLASS OF 1889 1919 Cornell University Library E545 .U58 List of staff officers of the Confederat 3 1924 030 921 096 olin The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030921096 LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES ARMY 1861-1865. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1891. LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE ARMY. Abercrombie, R. S., lieut., A. D. C. to Gen. J. H. Olanton, November 16, 1863. Abercrombie, Wiley, lieut., A. D. C. to Brig. Gen. S. G. French, August 11, 1864. Abernathy, John T., special volunteer commissary in department com- manded by Brig. Gen. G. J. Pillow, November 22, 1861. Abrams, W. D., capt., I. F. T. to Lieut. Gen. Lee, June 11, 1864. Adair, Walter T., surg. 2d Cherokee Begt., staff of Col. Wm. P. Adair. Adams, , lieut., to Gen. Gauo, 1862. Adams, B. C, capt., A. G. S., April 27, 1862; maj., 0. S., staff General Bodes, July, 1863 ; ordered to report to Lieut. Col. R. G. Cole, June 15, 1864. Adams, C, lieut., O. O. to Gen. R. V. Richardson, March, 1864. Adams, Carter, maj., C. S., staff Gen. Bryan Grimes, 1865. Adams, Charles W., col., A. I. G. to Maj. Gen. T. C. Hiudman, Octo- ber 6, 1862, to March 4, 1863. Adams, James M., capt., A.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign George David Schieffler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2017 Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign George David Schieffler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Schieffler, George David, "Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 2426. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2426 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by George David Schieffler The University of the South Bachelor of Arts in History, 2003 University of Arkansas Master of Arts in History, 2005 August 2017 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ____________________________________ Dr. Daniel E. Sutherland Dissertation Director ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Dr. Elliott West Dr. Patrick G. Williams Committee Member Committee Member Abstract “Civil War in the Delta” describes how the American Civil War came to Helena, Arkansas, and its Phillips County environs, and how its people—black and white, male and female, rich and poor, free and enslaved, soldier and civilian—lived that conflict from the spring of 1861 to the summer of 1863, when Union soldiers repelled a Confederate assault on the town.
    [Show full text]
  • OUR HERITAGE February 2015 Ourour Heritageheritage Volume 2 Issue 2
    OUR HERITAGE February 2015 OurOur HeritageHeritage Volume 2 Issue 2 Mississippi Division United Daughters of the Confederacy ® Division Officers President’s Message By Janice Strohm President Janice Strohm V President Kay Henry hew! I’m getting behind on 2nd V P Rebecca Fairchild nearly everything. Surely 3rd VP Courtney Hodge W y’all didn’t expect me have Rec. Secretary Sandy Gaddis those over 1,000 Santas put away Treasurer Mary Landin yet. Spending sixteen nights in January away from home put us Registrar Pam Mauldin behind. We were behind getting Historian Lynda McKinney everything out because of an RMSA Carole Gospodnetich unplanned trip over the Thanksgiving weekend. This did Appointive Officers give me an opportunity to meet on Dec. 2 with the Tupelo Chapter. Chaplain Beth Koostra Larry and I enjoyed helping pack the goody sacks going to the nursing Editor Sharon Tallman home patients and playing Corr. Secretary Tina Johnston Confederate bingo! My other UDC On January 30, I met with the 150th activity was on December 6 when I Council at the Marriott in Jackson. attended the joint meeting of the The members attending and I were Biloxi Beauvoir 623 and Gulfport shown the spacious rooms in which 621 Christmas luncheon at the we will register and hold Gulfport Yacht Club. Granddaughter meetings, have our luncheon and banquet, and hold our January activities included attending meetings on Saturday. Convention the 20th Anniversary celebration of Chairman Margaret Murdock is the Mary Ann Randolph Custis Lee getting everything in order. We are Chapter 2583 on January 24 and kicking off the Convention on the Lee-Jackson Banquet in Thursday with a bus trip to Louisville on January 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverage of Native Americans at the 1862 Battle of Pea Ridge, Arkansas
    THIS ACT OF BRUTAL SAVAGEISM 1 “This Act of Brutal Savageism”: Coverage of Native Americans at the 1862 Battle of Pea Ridge, Arkansas James E. Mueller, Ph.D. University of North Texas Abstract The clash between Confederates and Yankees at Pea Ridge, Arkansas, in 1862 is famous as the battle that saved Missouri for the Union, preventing a Southern army from a planned invasion to drive through the state and capture St. Louis. But a less well-known fact is that Pea Ridge was the only major battle of the Civil War in which Native American troops participated in significant numbers. About 1,000 Indians from the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek and Cherokee tribes fought for the South at Pea Ridge, and some might have scalped dead and wounded Union troops. This article examines stories about the battle from a sample of both Northern and Southern newspapers with the intent to shed light on the coverage of Native Americans during the Civil War. The article concludes that the type and quantity of coverage of Indians at Pea Ridge depended upon whether the journalists were Southern or Northern. The article thus adds further support to the notion that the Civil War press served as an arm of the government, and the stories of war correspondents of both sides have to be evaluated with the knowledge that facts were often secondary to supporting the war effort. Keywords: Native Americans, Civil War, war reporting, Pea Ridge, Arkansas One of the most famous representations of the 1862 battle of Pea Ridge,1 Arkansas, is an 1889 Kurz and Allison print that shows Indians riding in a wild cavalry charge against masses of Union troops and artillery.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2010 Newsletter
    April 2010 I Salute The Confederate Flag With Affection, Reverence, and Undying Devotion to the Cause for Which It Stands. Commander : David Allen 1st Lieutenant Cdr : From The Adjutant John Harris 2nd Lieutenant Cdr & Gen. R. E. Rodes Camp 262, SCV, will meet Wednesday night, April 14th, at 7 PM in the Adjutant : Tuscaloosa Public Library. This will not be a change in our practice of meeting the 2nd Frank Delbridge Thursday night of each month. Color Sergeant : The Library needed to use the meeting room on our regular scheduled night, and we re- Clyde Biggs scheduled our meeting accordingly. We will be back on schedule next month. Compatriot Chaplain : Jarrod Farley will present a video entitled "Shiloh - The War is Civil no more" at our meeting. Dr. Wiley Hales We held an election of officers last meeting, Our new officers are: David Allen - Newsletter : Commander, John Harris - 1st Lt. Commander, Frank Delbridge Jr. - 2nd Lt. Commander. James Simms Clyde Biggs will act as Color Sergeant and Frank Delbridge will remain as Adjutant for the [email protected] time being in addition to being 2nd Lt. Commander. Website : Brad Smith We will be discussing plans for our Confederate Memorial Day observance which will be [email protected] held April 25th at 3 PM at Nazareth Primitive Baptist Church near Samantha. The year 2010 marks the beginning of the Sesquicentennial anniversary of the Civil War and we need to INSIDE THIS make a good showing each time we get a chance during the years 2010-2015. We must show ISSUE the forces of political correctness that we remain proud to honor the heritage of our Confederate ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 11 No. 4 – Fall 2017
    Arkansas Military History Journal A Publication of the Arkansas National Guard Museum, Inc. Vol. 11 Fall 2017 No. 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chairman Brigadier General John O. Payne Ex-Officio Vice Chairman Major General (Ret) Kendall Penn Ex-Officio Secretary Dr. Raymond D. Screws (Non-Voting) Ex-Officio Treasurer Colonel Damon N. Cluck Board Members Ex-Officio. Major Marden Hueter Ex-Officio. Captain Barry Owens At Large – Lieutenant Colonel (Ret) Clement J. Papineau, Jr. At Large – Chief Master Sergeant Melvin E. McElyea At Large – Major Sharetta Glover CPT William Shannon (Non-Voting Consultant) Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Anderson (Non-Voting Consultant) Deanna Holdcraft (Non-Voting Consultant) Museum Staff Dr. Raymond D. Screws, Director/Journal Editor Erica McGraw, Museum Assistant, Journal Layout & Design Incorporated 27 June 1989 Arkansas Non-profit Corporation Cover Photograph: The Hempstead Rifles, a volunteer militia company of the 8th Arkansas Militia Regiment,Hempstead County Table of Contents Message from the Editor ........................................................................................................ 4 The Arkansas Militia in the Civil War ...................................................................................... 5 By COL Damon Cluck The Impact of World War II on the State of Arkansas ............................................................ 25 Hannah McConnell Featured Artifact: 155 mm C, Model of 1917 Schneider ....................................................... 29 By LTC Matthew W. Anderson Message from the Editor The previous two issues of the journal focused on WWI and Camp Pike to coincide with the centennial of the United States entry into the First World War and the construction of the Post now known as Camp Pike. In the coming year, commemoration of the Great War will still be important, with the centennial of the Armistice on 11 November 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR THOSE WHO STILL HEAR the Gunsrm by William Glenn Robertson
    FOR THOSE WHO STILL HEAR THE GUNSrM by William Glenn Robertson Dave Rmh of B&G The Armies (~ollide Bragg }~orces His Way Across (~hickamattga (~reek The failure of Gen. Braxton Bragg's bold and bring the remainder to La Fayette, Ga. (see Mills on the previous day by elements of effort to cripple the Federal XIV Corps in Pg. 51). By 8:30a.m., Bragg had decided upon Thomas J. Wood's Federal division, was to McLemore's Cove on September 11, 1863 (see the next offensive action to take. Believing that remain in contact with the Federals in its Maps, Pp. 10-ll) did not break the offensive Maj. Gen. Thomas L. Crittenden's XXI Corps front. On Armstrong's right, Brig. Gen. John spirit of either the Army of Tennessee or its might be vulnerable, he resolved to send forces Pegram was to deploy his two brigades in an commander. After a few hours of fitful rest, north from La Fayette to strike any elements arc stretching southeast toward the hamlet Bragg was again issuing orders as early as of that corps that could be found. ofVillanow, Ga., on the direct route from La seven o'clock the morning of the 12th. At that Accordingly, Lt. Gen. Leonidas Polk was Fayette to Resaca. When he learned around hour he directed Brig. Gen. Bushrod R. told to move Frank Cheatham's large five­ noon that Armstrong had broken contact with Johnson to continue shielding the army's supply brigade division ten miles north on the the Federals at Lee and Gordon's Mills, line by blocking any Federal push toward Chattanooga road to Rock Spring Church (see Bragg sternly sent him forward again.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2010 General Orders Vol. 22 No. 4
    Vol. 22 General Orders No. 4 Nov. Rains’ Regiment 2010 www.houstoncivilwar.com NOVEMBER 2010 MEETING Background on Thursday, November 18, 2010 The Battle of Pea Ridge The Briar Club 2603 Timmons Lane @ Westheimer From the Jaws of Victory: The Confederate 6:00 Cash Bar Defeat at the Battle of Pea Ridge will explore the Pea 7:00 Dinner & Meeting Ridge campaign from the perspective of the Confederate Army of the West. The Army of the West E-Mail Reservation is Preferred; was one of the largest Confederate armies raised at [email protected] west of the Mississippi River yet during the battle of or call Don Zuckero at (281) 479-1232 Pea Ridge a series of blunders and unfortunate by 6 PM on Monday Nov. 15, 2010 events would ultimately lead to their defeat by the Dinner $33; Lecture Only $5 smaller Union Army of the Southwest. The Confederate loss helped secure the state of Missouri Reservations are required for Lecture Only! for the Union and freed up several thousand Union troops that could be utilized for other campaigns. By late 1861 and early 1862, Federal forces in The HCWRT PRESENTS Missouri had pushed nearly all Confederate forces out of the state. When General Earl Van Dorn took Troy Banzhaf and command of the department, he had to react with his roughly 17,000 man, 60 gun Army of the West to “The Battle of Pea Ridge” events already underway. Van Dorn wanted to attack and destroy the Union forces, make his way into For our November 2010 meeting, the Houston Missouri, and capture St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Pea Ridge Was a Civil War Battle That Was Fought in Northwest Arkansas
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita History Class Publications Department of History 4-2-2015 The aB ttle of eP a Ridge Robert Lewis Ouachita Baptist University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/history Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Lewis, Robert, "The aB ttle of eP a Ridge" (2015). History Class Publications. 26. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/history/26 This Class Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Class Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Robert Lewis Research Seminar Rough Draft April 2, 2015 Introduction: The Battle of Pea Ridge was a Civil War battle that was fought in northwest Arkansas. The battle was the largest and most significant Civil War battle fought west of the Mississippi River. Despite the fact the battle involved a large number of forces on both sides, and the outcome of the battle greatly influenced which side controlled the states west of the Mississippi for the remainder of the Civil War the battle has been understudied by historians. There is a great story to be told regarding the Battle of Pea Ridge. The story is unique, because for many of the commanding officers the battle represents either the pinnacle of their career or a stain on their legacy that could not be washed away even in the years following the Civil War. The story of Pea Ridge should not be told solely for the military implications of the battle, while they are significant and cannot be ignored; the real significance of the Battle of Pea Ridge goes beyond the offensive and counter offensive maneuverers that took place on the battlefield, and rests in the legacy the battle left on the men who fought it, and the immediate and lasting effect the battle had on the landscape of the area near which it was fought.
    [Show full text]
  • The Union in Crisis and the American Civil
    Tactic used by the Union Navy in which Union ships prevented merchant vessels from entering or leaving the South’s ports, crippling southern trade. Labeled as the finest soldiers in the United States by General Winfield Scott prior to the Civil War, Lee accepted command of the Confederate Army out of duty to his native-state, Virginia, even though he opposed secession and did not own slaves. 2-part Union plan of attack devised by General Winfield Scott; 1st, the Union would blockade southern ports, starving the South of income and supplies. 2nd, the Union army would drive south along the Mississippi River, splitting the Confederacy in two. The first large-scale battle of the Civil War; an invading Union force of 30,000 was stopped at Bull Run Creek near Manassas, Virginia and retreated back to Washington D.C. The Battle of Bull Run proved to both North and South that the war would not be a short engagement; reports of the carnage of the battle shocked both sides as well. Thomas J. Jackson; Confederate general, second-in-command to Robert E. Lee. A Virginia-Native, West Point graduate, and devoutly religious, Jackson is the only General on either side who was never defeated. He was killed by friendly-fire following the Confederate victory at Chancelorsville in 1863. Irvin McDowell – Commander of Union forces in the Battle of Bull Run; following defeat McDowell was relieved of duty and sent to Arizona to fight against the Apaches. George B. McClellan – Second Commander of the Army of the Potomac (Union Army of the East); McClellan trained the inexperienced army and turned it into a skilled fight force, but his reluctance to lead the army into battle forced Lincoln to remove him as Commander in 1862.
    [Show full text]
  • 1861-1865 Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State
    IV CONFEDERATE MILITARY OPERATIONS IN ARKANSAS, 1861-1865 THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Maurice G. Fortin, Jr. Denton, Texas December, 1978 Fortin, Maurice G. Jr., Confederate Military Operations in Arkansas, 1861-1865. Master of Arts (History), December, 1978, 142 pp., 6 maps, bibliography, 34 titles. Arkansas occupied a key position in the Confederate Trans-Mississippi Department. It offered a gateway for Con- federate troops to move north and secure Missouri for the Confederacy, or for Union troops to move south towards Texas and Louisiana. During the war, Union and Confederate armies moved back and forth across the state engaging in numerous encounters. This paper is a year by year study of those encounters and engagements occurring in Arkansas between 1861 and 1865. Emphasis is necessarily placed on the significant campaigns and engagements. Actions which occurred in adjacent states but which militarily affected Arkansas are also discussed. The majority of the material was compiled from the Official Records. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS..................... iv Chapter I. SECESSION AND THE FIRST TEST. .. ..... 1 II. INVASION FROM THE NORTH .. ....... 16 III.. THE LOSS OF A CAPITAL.-.-.... .. ...... 55 IV. THE CAMDEN EXPEDITION AND THE MISSOURI RAID........-............................ 87 V. SURRENDER AND THE END OF THE WAR...s.o.....124 BIBLIOGRAPHY.....-.-.-...........-...-... ........ 140 iii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Trans-Mississippi Department. .... .... 9 2. Battle of Pea Ridge, 7-8 March 1862 . 24 3. Battle of Prairie Grove, 7 December 1862 . 48 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Battles, Campaigns, and Sieges
    Union Victories 1862 February 6-16: Fort Henry and Fort Donelson Campaign (Tennessee) March 7-8: Battle of Pea Ridge (Arkansas) April 6-7: Battle of Shiloh/ Pittsburg Landing (Tennessee) April 24-27: Battle of New Orleans (Louisiana) September 17: Battle of Antietam/ Sharpsburg (Maryland) October 8: Battle of Perryville (Kentucky) December 31-January 2, 1863: Battle of Stone’s River/ Murfreesboro (Tennessee) 1863 March 29- July 4: Vicksburg Campaign and Siege (Mississippi)- turning point in the West July 1-3: Battle of Gettysburg (Pennsylvania)- turning point in the East November 23-25: Battle of Chattanooga (Tennessee) 1864 May 7-September 2: Atlanta Campaign (Georgia) June 15-April 2, 1865: Petersburg Campaign and Siege (Virginia) August 5: Battle of Mobile Bay (Alabama) October 19: Battle of Cedar Creek (Virginia) December 15-16: Battle of Nashville (Tennessee) November 14-December 22: Sherman’s March to the Sea (Georgia) 1865 March 19-21: Battle of Bentonville/ Carolinas Campaign (North Carolina) Confederate Victories 1861 April 12-14: Fort Sumter (South Carolina) July 21: First Battle of Manassas/ First Bull Run (Virginia) August 10: Battle of Wilson’s Creek (Missouri) 1862 March 17-July: Peninsula Campaign (Virginia) March 23-June 9: Jackson’s Valley Campaign (Virginia) June 25-July 2: Seven Days Battle (Virginia) August 28-30: Second Battle of Manassas/ Second Bull Run (Virginia) December 11-13: Battle of Fredericksburg (Virginia) 1863 May 1-4: Battle of Chancellorsville (Virginia) September 19-20: Battle of Chickamauga (Georgia)
    [Show full text]