The Ice‐Ocean Governor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER The Ice-Ocean Governor: Ice-Ocean Stress Feedback Limits 10.1029/2018GL080171 Beaufort Gyre Spin-Up Special Section: The Arctic: An AGU Joint Gianluca Meneghello1 , John Marshall1 , Jean-Michel Campin1 , Edward Doddridge1 , Special Collection and Mary-Louise Timmermans2 Key Points: 1Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, • Spin-up of the Beaufort Gyre is 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA regulated by a negative feedback between ice-ocean stress and surface currents: an ice-ocean stress governor • In the present Arctic system, the Abstract The Beaufort Gyre is a key circulation system of the Arctic Ocean and its main reservoir of governor is likely a key process freshwater. Freshwater storage and release affects Arctic sea ice cover, as well as North Atlantic and global controlling the equilibration of climate. We describe a mechanism that is fundamental to the dynamics of the gyre, namely, the ice-ocean the gyre • Continued sea ice loss will likely stress governor. Wind blows over the ice, and the ice drags the ocean. But as the gyre spins up, currents lead to reduced effectiveness of the catch the ice up and turn off the surface stress. This governor sets the basic properties of the gyre, such as governor and change the its depth, freshwater content, and strength. Analytical and numerical modeling is employed to contrast the fundamental internal dynamics of the gyre equilibration processes in an ice-covered versus ice-free gyre. We argue that as the Arctic warms, reduced sea ice extent and more mobile ice will result in a deeper and faster Beaufort Gyre, accumulating more freshwater that will be released by Ekman upwelling or baroclinic instability. Supporting Information: • Supporting Information S1 Plain Language Summary The Beaufort Gyre, located north of Alaska and Canada, is a key circulation system of the Arctic Ocean. Changes in its depth and circulation influence the evolution of the Correspondence to: Arctic sea ice cover, the North Atlantic circulation, and the global climate. The gyre is driven by persistent, G. Meneghello, [email protected] ice-mediated winds, accumulating surface freshwater toward the center, deepening the gyre, and spinning up its currents. We describe a mechanism, dubbed here the ice-ocean governor, in which the interaction of surface currents with the ice regulates the depth of the Beaufort Gyre: The spinning up of the gyre reduces Citation: Meneghello, G., Marshall, J. C., the relative speed between the ocean and the ice, and hence the freshwater accumulation. This competes Campin, J.-M., Doddridge, E., & with, and we argue is more important than, the release of freshwater by flow instability, which moves water Timmermans, M.-L. (2018). The from the center toward the periphery. In the current climate the depth and speed of the Beaufort Gyre are ice-ocean governor: Ice-ocean stress feedback limits Beaufort Gyre spin-up, mainly set by the governor, but this may change in a warming world where reduced ice cover will render the Geophysical Research Letters, 45. ice-ocean governor less effective. The resulting deeper, swifter gyre will likely exhibit more variability in its https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080171 freshwater storage and flow speeds. Received 23 AUG 2018 Accepted 29 SEP 2018 1. Introduction Accepted article online 17 OCT 2018 Anticyclonic winds centered over the Arctic Ocean’s Beaufort Gyre (BG) force a lateral Ekman transport bring- ing surface freshwater toward the center of the gyre and steepening isopycnals. This convergence increases the freshwater content of the BG and spins up its geostrophic current (McPhee et al., 2009; Proshutinsky et al., 2002, 2015; Proshutinsky & Johnson, 1997; Proshutinsky et al., 2009; Timmermans et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016). Freshwater accumulation, storage, and release from the BG, controlled by these wind-driven dynamics, have far-reaching influence on Arctic and global climate (Proshutinsky et al., 2015). However, wind variability alone cannot explain the variability in freshwater content (Giles et al., 2012). Gyre spin-up and freshwater increase, proportional to the curl of the ocean surface stress, are complicated by the presence of sea ice cover, which acts to decouple wind and surface ocean stresses through internal lateral stresses and interacts with surface currents. Here we present a theoretical framework that illustrates how the interaction between under-ice geostrophic ocean currents and sea ice cover (described by the observational studies of Dewey et al., 2018; Kwok & Morison, 2017; Meneghello et al., 2017, 2018; Zhong et al., 2018) plays a key role in equilibrating the freshwater content of the BG. Inspired by self-limiting speed regulators (or governors) in mechanical systems (Bennet, 1993; Maxwell, 1867), we call this mechanism the ice-ocean stress governor. More specifically, the term governor refers to a mechanism for regulating the speed of a system by automatically ©2018. American Geophysical Union. restricting the flow of water, air, fuel, etc., when the speed increases and increasing the flow when it decreases All Rights Reserved. (Murray et al., 2018). MENEGHELLO ET AL. 1 Geophysical Research Letters 10.1029/2018GL080171 Figure 1. Ekman pumping climatology. (a) Mean Ekman pumping over 2003–2014; negative (blue) indicates downwelling and positive (red) upwelling. (left) Downwelling estimates locally exceed 30 m/year if the geostrophic current is neglected; (middle) inclusion of the geostrophic current results in an upwelling effect, largely compensating the ice-driven downwelling; (right) the net Ekman pumping, the sum of the previous two panels, yields moderate downwelling together with patches of upwelling. The Beaufort Gyre Region is marked by a red line in the inset. (b) Monthly Ekman pumping climatology integrated overthe Beaufort Gyre Region and its partitioned contributions, where negative indicates downwelling. Black bars show total Ekman pumping, equivalent to the right panel in (a). Red and orange bars show pumping induced by winds over ice-free regions and by ice in ice-covered regions, respectively. Within ice-covered regions, downward pointing empty green bars show downwelling induced by the ice if the geostrophic current is neglected, while the upward directed blue bars show upwelling induced by the geostrophic currents flowing under the sea ice. Blue and green bars largely balance each other and exactly balance if urel = 0. Gray dots represent ice concentration. All data and methods are described in Meneghello et al. (2018). The total stress at the ocean surface is a combination of ice-ocean stress i and air-ocean stress a, each of which may be estimated by a quadratic drag law, weighted by the sea ice concentration : ( ) ( ) | | | | = C |u | u + (1 − ) C |u | u . (1) ⏟⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏟⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏟Di rel rel ⏟⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏟⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏞⏟a Da a a i a . CDi = 0 0055 and CDa = 0 00125 are dimensionless drag coefficients for the ice-ocean and air-ocean stress 3 3 respectively, = 1,028 kg/m is water density, and a = 1.25 kg/m is air density. In the computation of a, the surface ocean velocity, of a few centimeters per second, is considered negligible with respect to a wind velocity ua of a few meters per second. However, surface ocean velocity cannot be neglected in the estimation of i: The ice-ocean relative velocity urel is expressed as the difference between the ice velocity ui and the i geostrophic surface ocean velocity ug.Thatis,urel =(ui −ug)e , where is a turning angle taking into account the Ekman layer. Figure 1, modified from Meneghello et al. (2018), shows how the intensity of the ocean surface currents plays a central role in modulating the Ekman pumping in an ice-covered gyre (Dewey et al., 2018; Meneghello et al., 2017, 2018; Zhong et al., 2018). Estimates of wind- and ice-induced downwelling can exceed 30 m/year locally if the geostrophic current is neglected (Figure 1a, blue region in the left panel; see also Yang, 2006, 2009). However, this is largely compensated by the upwelling effect of the surface current flowing below the ice (red region in the central panel), acting as a negative feedback and reducing the downwelling. That is, the governor drives the system toward urel = 0. Consequently, the net Ekman downwelling is strongly reduced MENEGHELLO ET AL. 2 Geophysical Research Letters 10.1029/2018GL080171 (right panel). A monthly climatology of the 2003–2014 Ekman pumping and its components averaged over the Beaufort Gyre Region (Figure 1b) shows how the total Ekman pumping is reduced by the geostrophic current and even reversed during the months of January, February, and March (Meneghello et al., 2018). Through analytical calculations and an idealized numerical model, we demonstrate here how the governor acts as a mechanism to equilibrate the freshwater content of the gyre. For example, should the anticy- clonic ice-ocean stress curl —and freshwater accumulation rate—intensify, the geostrophic flow of the gyre will strengthen, reducing the surface stress until the governor turns off the ice-ocean stress. This is a dis- tinct alternative to the eddy equilibration mechanism first proposed for the Southern Ocean (Karsten et al., 2002; Marshall & Radko, 2003) and more recently extended to the BG (Davis et al., 2014; Lique et al., 2015; Manucharyan & Spall, 2016; Manucharyan et al., 2016; Meneghello et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2016). To explore the governor mechanism and test our theoretical model, we analyze the response of an idealized gyre under two different limit-case scenarios: (i) an ice-driven gyre ( = 1 in equation (1), in which forcing depends purely on gradients of = i) and (ii) an ice-free, wind-driven gyre ( = 0, in which forcing depends purely on gradients of = a). We conclude with a discussion of the implications of the governor for the Arctic Ocean’s circulation and its freshwater content.
Recommended publications
  • For the Arctic Ocean: a Proposed Coordinated Modelling Experiment

    For the Arctic Ocean: a Proposed Coordinated Modelling Experiment

    ‘Climate Response Functions’ for the Arctic Ocean: a proposed coordinated modelling experiment John Marshall1, Jeffery Scott1, and Andrey Proshutinsky2 1Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 USA 2Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1050 USA Correspondence to: John Marshall ([email protected]) Abstract. A coordinated set of Arctic modelling experiments is proposed which explore how the Arctic responds to changes in external forcing. Our goal is to compute and compare ‘Climate Response Functions’ (CRFs) — the transient response of key observable indicators such as sea-ice extent, freshwater content of the Beaufort Gyre, etc. — to abrupt ‘step’ changes in forcing fields across a number of Arctic models. Changes in wind, freshwater sources and inflows to the Arctic basin are considered. 5 Convolutions of known or postulated time-series of these forcing fields with their respective CRFs then yields the (linear) response of these observables. This allows the project to inform, and interface directly with, Arctic observations and observers and the climate change community. Here we outline the rationale behind such experiments and illustrate our approach in the context of a coarse-resolution model of the Arctic based on the MITgcm. We conclude summarising the expected benefits of such an activity and encourage other modelling groups to compute CRFs with their own models so that we might begin to 10 document their robustness to model formulation, resolution and parameterization. 1 Introduction Much progress has been made in understanding the role of the ocean in climate change by computing and thinking about ‘Climate Response Functions’ (CRFs), that is perturbations to the climate induced by step changes in, for example, greenhouse gases, fresh water fluxes, or ozone concentrations (see, e.g.
  • Arctic Ocean Circulation and Exchange with North Atlantic Andrey

    Arctic Ocean Circulation and Exchange with North Atlantic Andrey

    The 2014 OCB Summer Science Workshop The Coupled North Atlantic-Arctic System: Processes and Dynamics (Mon. July 21) Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Quissett Campus, Clark 507, Woods Hole, MA. 8/6/2014 The 2014 OCB Summer Workshop 1 Collaborators: R. Krishfield and J. Toole, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution M-L. Timmermans, Yale University D. Dukhovskoy, Florida State University. Projects: Beaufort Gyre Explorations studies Ice-Tethered profilers to monitor the Arctic Ocean conditions Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project Manifestations and consequences of Arctic climate change Sources of funding: NSF, WHOI 8/6/2014 The 2014 OCB Summer Workshop 2 NBC News Learn program in partnership with the National Science Foundation prepared a 5-minute film describing our Beaufort Gyre exploration project hypothesis, objectives, tasks and preliminary results. This film is located at the Beauofort Gyre website www.whoi.edu/beaufortgyre. 8/6/2014 The 2014 OCB Summer Workshop 3 Great salinity anomalies of The Great Salinity Anomaly, a large, the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s near-surface pool of fresher-than- usual water, was tracked as it (Dickson et al., 1988; Belkin traveled in the sub-polar gyre et al., 1988) currents from 1968 to 1982. This surface freshening of the North Atlantic coincided very well with Arctic cooling of the 1970s. At this time warm cyclone trajectories were shifted south and heat advection to the Arctic by atmosphere was shutdown. Cold air Surface Warm deep water 1000 m Arctic Ocean - largest freshwater reservoir 45,000 km3 17,300 km3 Aagaard and Carmack, 1989 And the oceanic Beaufort 2,800 km3 Gyre (BG) of the Canadian 2,900 km3 Basin is the largest 3,800 km3 freshwater reservoir in the Arctic Ocean (Aagaard and 5,300 km3 12,200 km3 Carmack, 1989).
  • Characterizing the Beaufort Gyre in the Canadian Basin of the Arctic Ocean from Satellite Observations Between 2003-2014

    Characterizing the Beaufort Gyre in the Canadian Basin of the Arctic Ocean from Satellite Observations Between 2003-2014

    Characterizing the Beaufort Gyre in the Canadian Basin of the Arctic Ocean from satellite observations between 2003-2014 Heather Regan, Camille Lique Laboratoire d’Océanographie Physique et Spatiale IFREMER, Brest, France Thomas Armitage JPL, CalTech, Pasadena, USA Ocean Salinity Science – November 2018 Background: Arctic Freshwater • The Arctic Basin stores a large amount of freshwater (FW) • Most1.3 Water of the Masses storage and Circulation occurs in the Beaufort Gyre 7 120oE 120oE (a) 90 (b) 90 o E o o E o E E 150 150 60 60 o W o W o o E E 180 180 W W E E o o o o 30 30 150 150 120 120 o o o o W W 0 0 90 90 o o W o o W W W 30 30 60oW 60oW 27 29 31 33 35 0 5 10 15 20 Sea SurFace Salinity Salinity FW content (Freshwater ContentSreF = 34.8) (m) from MIMOC climatology from MIMOC climatology Figure 1.3: (a) Sea surface salinity and (b) liquid freshwater content (FWc) from MIMOC. The freshwater content is calculated by vertically integrating the salinity anomaly (Equation 1.1) from the surface to the depth of the 34.8 psu isohaline. The black box in (b) marks the location of the Beaufort Gyre as defined by Proshutinsky et al. (2009) and Giles et al. (2012). It is the single largest region of freshwater storage in the Arctic and will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 2. The white contour in (a) marks the location of the 34.8 psu isohaline.
  • Freshwater Outflow from Beaufort Sea Could Alter Global Climate Patterns

    Freshwater Outflow from Beaufort Sea Could Alter Global Climate Patterns

    Freshwater outflow from Beaufort Sea could alter global climate patterns February 24, 2021 LOS ALAMOS, N.M., Feb. 23, 2021—The Beaufort Sea, the Arctic Ocean’s largest freshwater reservoir, has increased its freshwater content by 40 percent over the last two decades, putting global climate patterns at risk. A rapid release of this freshwater into the Atlantic Ocean could wreak havoc on the delicate climate balance that dictates global climate. “A freshwater release of this size into the subpolar North Atlantic could impact a critical circulation pattern, called the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, which has a significant influence on northern-hemisphere climate,” said Wilbert Weijer, a Los Alamos National Laboratory author on the project. A joint modeling study by Los Alamos researchers and collaborators from the University of Washington and NOAA dove into the mechanics surrounding this scenario. The team initially studied a previous release event that occurred between 1983 and 1995, and using virtual dye tracers and numerical modeling, the researchers simulated the ocean circulation and followed the spread of the freshwater release. “People have already spent a lot of time studying why the Beaufort Sea freshwater has gotten so high in the past few decades,” said lead author Jiaxu Zhang, who began the work during her post-doctoral fellowship at Los Alamos National Laboratory in the Center for Nonlinear Studies. She is now at UW’s Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean and Ecosystem Studies. “But they rarely care where the freshwater goes, and we think that’s a much more important problem.” The study was the most detailed and sophisticated of its kind, lending numerical insights into the decrease of salinity in specific ocean areas as well as the routes of freshwater release.
  • Variability and Changes of Arctic Sea Ice Draft Distribution – Submarine Sonar Measurements Revisited

    Variability and Changes of Arctic Sea Ice Draft Distribution – Submarine Sonar Measurements Revisited

    The Cryosphere, 5, 917–929, 2011 www.the-cryosphere.net/5/917/2011/ The Cryosphere doi:10.5194/tc-5-917-2011 © Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Variability and changes of Arctic sea ice draft distribution – submarine sonar measurements revisited A. Oikkonen1 and J. Haapala2 1University of Helsinki, Department of Physics, P.O. Box 48, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 2Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland Received: 21 December 2010 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 12 January 2011 Revised: 16 September 2011 – Accepted: 27 September 2011 – Published: 24 October 2011 Abstract. Changes in the mean sea ice thickness and concen- 1 Introduction tration in the Arctic are well known. However, quantitative information about changes in the ice thickness distribution The Arctic Ocean exhibits large climate variations on a time and the composition of the pack ice is lacking. In this pa- scale of decades. This variability is largely driven by the per we determine the ice draft distributions, mean and modal large-scale atmospheric circulation, which affects meridional thicknesses, and their regional and seasonal variability in the heat and moisture transport from the mid-latitudes to the Arc- Arctic for the time period 1975–2000. We compare charac- tic region and, as a consequence, alters the surface heat bal- teristics of the Arctic pack ice for the years 1975–1987 and ance of the Arctic Ocean. Another, perhaps more significant, 1988–2000. These periods represent different large-scale at- effect is that sea ice and ocean surface circulation patterns mospheric circulation modes and sea ice circulation patterns, are modified in accordance with the atmospheric changes.
  • Flowcam® Publications

    Flowcam® Publications

    9/17/2021 FlowCam® Publications If you are interested in obtaining a copy of any of these publications, please contact Yokogawa Fluid Imaging Technologies at [email protected] and we will help you. Publication Volume Date Authors Title doi: Jan Xinyue He, Chao Chen, Zili Zhang, Haiyan Hu, Anhui Tan, Temporal and spatial characteristics of harmful algae blooms in the offshore Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 10.1117/1.JRS.16.01200 2022 Zhiyuan Xing waters, China during 1990 to 2019 4 doi: M.N. Müller, G.T. Yogui, A.O. Gálvez, L.G. de Sales Jannuzzi, Aug Cellular accumulation of crude oil compounds reduces the competitive fitness Environmental Pollution 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.1 J.F. de Souza Filho, M. de Jesus Flores Montes, P.A.M. de 2021 of the coral symbiont Symbiodinium glynnii 17938 Castro Melo, S. Neumann-Leitão, E. Zanardi-Lamardo doi: Aug Whitney Hassett, Julie Zimmerman, Gretchen Rollwagen- An experimental evaluation of the efficacy of imaging flow cytometry Lake and Reservoir Management 10.1080/10402381.2021 2021 Bollens, Stephen Bollens & Timothy D. Counihan (FlowCam) for detecting invasive Dreissened and Corbiculid bivalve veligers .1961176 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021- Aug Dmitry V. Malashenkov, Veronika Dashkova, Kymbat Comparative analysis of freshwater phytoplankton communities in two lakes of Scientific Reports 95223-z 2021 Zhakupova, Ivan A. Vorobjev, Natasha S. Barteneva Burabay National Park using morphological and molecular approaches A. Neeley, S. Beaulieu, C. Proctor, I. Centinić, J. Futrelle, I.S. doi: Jul Standards and practices for reporting plankton and other particle observations Woods Hole Open Access Server Ramos, H.
  • Freshwater in the Arctic Ocean 2010-2019

    Freshwater in the Arctic Ocean 2010-2019

    https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2020-113 Preprint. Discussion started: 8 December 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Freshwater in the Arctic Ocean 2010-2019 Amy Solomon1,2, Céline Heuzé3, Benjamin Rabe4, Sheldon Bacon5, Laurent Bertino6, Patrick Heimbach7, Jun Inoue8, Doroteaciro Iovino9, Ruth Mottram10, Xiangdong Zhang11, Yevgeny Aksenov5, Ronan McAdam9, An Nguyen7, Roshin P. Raj6, Han Tang11 5 1Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, USA 2Physical Sciences Laboratory, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden 4Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany 5National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK 10 6Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center and Bjerknes Center for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway 7University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA 8National Institute of Polar Research, Tachikawa, Japan 9Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici, Bologna, Italy 10Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark 15 11University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA Correspondence to: Amy Solomon ([email protected]) Abstract. The Arctic climate system is rapidly transitioning into a new regime with a reduction in the extent of sea ice, enhanced mixing in the ocean and atmosphere, and thus enhanced coupling within the ocean-ice-atmosphere system; these physical changes are leading to ecosystem changes in the Arctic Ocean. In this review paper, we assess one of the critically 20 important aspects of this new regime, the variability of Arctic freshwater, which plays a fundamental role in the Arctic climate system by impacting ocean stratification and sea ice formation. Liquid and solid freshwater exports also affect the global climate system, notably by impacting the global ocean overturning circulation.
  • The Weddell Gyre, Southern Ocean: Present Knowledge and Future Challenges

    The Weddell Gyre, Southern Ocean: Present Knowledge and Future Challenges

    Vernet Maria (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-7534-5343) Hoppema Mario (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-2326-619X) Geibert Walter (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-8646-2334) Brown Peter (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-1152-1114) Haas Christian (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-7674-3500) Hellmer Hartmut, Heinz (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-9357-9853) Jokat Wilfried (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-7793-5854) Jullion Loïc (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-6269-6750) Mazloff Matthew, R. (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-1650-5850) Bakker Dorothee, C. E. (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-9234-5337) Brearley J., Alexander (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-3700-8017) Hattermann Tore (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-5538-2267) Hauck Judith (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-4723-9652) Hillenbrand Claus-Dieter (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-0240-7317) Huhn Oliver (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-3626-9135) Koch Boris, Peter (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-8453-731X) Lechtenfeld Oliver (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-5313-6014) Meredith Michael (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-7342-7756) Naveira Garabato Alberto, C. (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-6071-605X) Peeken Ilka (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-1531-1664) Rutgers van der Loeff Michiel (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-1393-3742) Schmidtko Sunke (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-3272-7055) Strass Volker, H. (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-7539-1400) Torres-Valdés Sinhué (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-2749-4170) Verdy Ariane (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-2774-2691) This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1029/2018RG000604 © 2019 American Geophysical Union.
  • The Beaufort Gyre Variation and Its Impacts on the Canada Basin In

    The Beaufort Gyre Variation and Its Impacts on the Canada Basin In

    Acta Oceanol. Sin., 2015, Vol. 34, No. 7, P. 19–31 DOI: 10.1007/s13131-015-0657-0 http://www.hyxb.org.cn E-mail: [email protected] The Beaufort Gyre variation and its impacts on the Canada Basin in 2003–2012 ZHONG Wenli1*, ZHAO Jinping1, SHI Jiuxin1, CAO Yong1 1 Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China Received 20 June 2014; accepted 3 Februbary 2015 ©The Chinese Society of Oceanography and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Abstract The Beaufort Gyre (BG) was spun up in the last decade which is an important factor in regulating the variation of the upper ocean. The heat content and freshwater content of the upper ocean increased gradually in the Canada Basin, as did momentum input. Both the geostrophic wind curl and freshwater content could contribute to the spin-up of BG. However, even though there is no change of the wind field the increasing freshwater alone could result in the spin-up of BG. In this study we show that the Pacific Water is difficult to flow into the central basin as the BG spins up and the maximum temperature of the Pacific Summer Water (PSW) experienced a dramatic decrease inside the BG in 2005 and 2009 due to a change of flow pathway of PSW. The enhancement of Ekman Pumping (EP) contributed to the deepening of the Pacific Winter Water by piling up more freshwater. This change of water column dynamics has also contributed to the deepening ofthe Atlantic Water core after 2007. The EP decreased significantly in 2012 (indicating a spin down of BG) and the direction of Ekman transport turned to the north, which favoured the release of freshwater that had resided in the basin for years.
  • ARCTIC OCEAN CIRCULATION - Going Around at the Top of the World

    ARCTIC OCEAN CIRCULATION - Going Around at the Top of the World

    ARCTIC OCEAN CIRCULATION - going around at the Top of the World Rebecca Woodgate University of Washington, Seattle [email protected] Tel: 206-221-3268 Accepted for Nature Education Knowledge Project, May 2012 Citation: Woodgate, R. (2013) Arctic Ocean Circulation: Going Around At the Top Of the World. Nature Education Knowledge 4(8):8 Available online at: https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/arctic-ocean- circulation-going-around-at-the-102811553 Welcome to the Arctic Ocean The Arctic Ocean (Figure 1), the smallest of the world’s five major oceans, is about 4000km (2500 miles) long and 2400km (1500 miles) wide, about the size of the continental USA. It lies entirely within the Arctic Circle, contains deep (~ 4500m) basins, the slowest spreading ridges in the world, and about 15% of the world’s shelf seas [Menard and Smith, 1966], with the area of the Arctic shelves being almost half the area of the deep Arctic basins [Jakobsson, 2002]. The Arctic is most remarkable for its perennial (multiyear) sea-ice, which historically covered about half the Arctic Ocean [Stroeve et al., 2007], although in recent years (2007 onwards, compared to the 1980s), warming of the Arctic has reduced the perennial sea-ice area by around 40% [Nghiem et al., 2007] and thinned the mean ice thickness from ~ 3m to ~ 1.5m [Kwok and Rothrock, 2009]. The sea-ice, seasonally covering the entire Arctic Ocean, is one key to the remarkable quietness of the Arctic Ocean - it damps surface and internal waves and modifies transfer of wind momentum to the water.
  • Upper Ocean Velocities in the Beaufort Gyre

    Upper Ocean Velocities in the Beaufort Gyre

    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 25, NO. 2, PAGES 183-186, January 15, 1998 Upper ocean velocities in the Beaufort Gyre A. J. Plueddemann1 , R. Krishfield1 ,T.Takizawa2 K. Hatakeyama2 and S. Honjo1 Abstract. A 23 month time series of upper ocean veloci- The IOEB was deployed from the Arctic Leads Exper- ties in the Beaufort Gyre was obtained from an autonomous iment ice camp in the Beaufort Sea [LeadEx Group, 1993] drifting buoy equipped with an Acoustic Doppler Current and tracked for 4 years while executing a broad, anticy- Profiler. The buoy was deployed in the Beaufort Sea and clonic arc centered on the Canada Basin. The long-term drifted over the Canada Basin, Chukchi Shelf, and Chukchi drift was consistent with the mean pattern of ice motion esti- Plateau. Time-evolving spectral analysis was used to exam- mated from satellite-tracked drifters [Colony and Thorndike, ine velocity variability in three frequency bands: an eddy 1984] and indicated that the buoy was captured within the band (2–5 day periods), a diurnal band, and a semidiurnal wind-driven Beaufort Gyre [Pfirman et al., 1997]. Dur- band. The eddy band and the semidiurnal band dominated ing most of the first two years, the IOEB transmitted the horizontal kinetic energy. Although eddy energy was data from meteorological sensors, a current profiler, and a clearly confined to the Beaufort Sea and Canada basin, ed- transmissometer-fluorometer logger. Shorter duration time dies were found further to the south and west than in previ- series were obtained from ice thermistor strings and subsur- ous observations.
  • Beaufort Gyre Freshwater Reservoir

    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114, C00A10, doi:10.1029/2008JC005104, 2009 Click Here for Full Article Beaufort Gyre freshwater reservoir: State and variability from observations Andrey Proshutinsky,1 Richard Krishfield,1 Mary-Louise Timmermans,1 John Toole,1 Eddy Carmack,2 Fiona McLaughlin,2 William J. Williams,2 Sarah Zimmermann,2 Motoyo Itoh,3 and Koji Shimada3 Received 2 September 2008; revised 9 March 2009; accepted 7 April 2009; published 24 June 2009. [1] We investigate basin-scale mechanisms regulating anomalies in freshwater content (FWC) in the Beaufort Gyre (BG) of the Arctic Ocean using historical observations and data collected in 2003–2007. Specifically, the mean annual cycle and interannual and decadal FWC variability are explored. The major cause of the large FWC in the BG is the process of Ekman pumping (EP) due to the Arctic High anticyclonic circulation centered in the BG. The mean seasonal cycle of liquid FWC is a result of interplay between the mechanical (EP) and thermal (ice transformations) factors and has two peaks. One peak occurs around June–July when the sea ice thickness reaches its minimum (maximum ice melt). The second maximum is observed in November–January when wind curl is strongest (maximum EP) and the salt input from the growing ice has not yet reached its maximum. Interannual changes in FWC during 2003–2007 are characterized by a strong positive trend in the region varying by location with a maximum of approximately 170 cm aÀ1 in the center of EP influenced region. Decadal FWC variability in the period 1950–2000 is dominated by a significant change in the 1990s forced by an atmospheric circulation regime change.