Daniele Archibugi Curriculum Vitae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Daniele Archibugi Curriculum Vitae 12 June 2019 Daniele Archibugi Curriculum Vitae Personal Information Daniele Archibugi, born in Rome, 17 July 1958 Institute for Research on Population and Social Policy (IRPPS) Italian National Research Council Via Palestro, 32 - 00185 Rome, Italy, Email: [email protected] Tel. +39 06 492724241 - Fax +39 06 49383724 Current Positions Acting Director, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policy, Italian National Research Council (since July 2018). Director (Dirigente tecnologo) at the Italian National Research Council (since April 1998, tenure position since 1987, employed since 1985). Professor of Governance, Innovation and Public Policy, University of London. Birkbeck College, School of Management and Organizational Psychology (since September 2005). Member of the Academic Council, Venice International University (since 2018). Honorary Professor, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex (since June 2006) Previous Positions Lauro De Bosis Professor, Department of Government and Center for European Studies, Harvard University (September 2004 – January 2005). Leverhulme Visiting Professor, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK, Department of Government and Centre for the Study of Global Governance, Academic year 2003- 2004. Member of the Executive Board of the “Marco Fanno” Association, chaired by Professor Mario Draghi (2004-2011). Commissioner of the Public Services Authority of Rome City Council (five-year mandate from January 1997 to March 2002). Researcher at the Institute for Studies on Scientific Research of the Italian National Research Council (from April 1985 to March 1998). 1 Visiting Professor, Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, UK, academic years 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96. Associate Fellow of the Global Security Programme, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge, UK, academic years 1991-92 and 1992-93. Visiting Fellow, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, UK, academic year 1991-92. Visiting Fellow of the Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, UK, academic year 1991-92 and 1992-93. Education D.Phil. in Science and Technology Policy, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, UK, (1984-89). Supervisor: Professor Keith Pavitt. Junior Consultant at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Paris (1983). Stagiaire at the European Commission, Task Force for the Co-ordination of Financial Instruments, Directorate-General Regional Policy, Brussels (1981-82). Laurea (graduated) in Economics at the University of Rome "La Sapienza" (1976-82) with 110/110 cum laude. Supervisor: Professor Federico Caffè. Awards and Prizes Membre d'honneur of the Réseau de Recherche sur l'Innovation, June 2016. Short Term Mobility Grant, Italian National Research Council, to visit the University of California at Santa Barbara, November 2015. British Council Grant, 23 April-23 May 1994, “Mobility Grant”, to visit and disseminate knowledge, Robinson College and Judge Institute of Management Studies, University of Cambridge, UK. Advanced Scholarship CNR-NATO; 1992-93, Italian Economic and Social Research Board. Advanced Scholarship CNR-NATO, 1991-92, Italian Innovation and Technologies Research Board. “Marco Fanno” grant for post-graduate studies at a foreign university (1° classified), Mediocredito Centrale, 1983. Junior Fellowship, OECD, Paris, 1983, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Awarded a grant for a Doctorate in Economic Theory and Policy, Sapienza Università di Roma, I° Cycle, 1983. 2 Intern, European Commission, Brussels, 1981-82, Task force for the coordination of policy instruments. Languages Italian, mother tongue, English, fluent, Spanish, fluent and French, fluent. Professional Associations He has participated to the following professional associations: APSA, American Political Science Association – ISA, International Studies Association – GARNET, Network of Excellence on Global Governance, Regionalisation and Regulation: The Role of the EU – SISP, Società Italiana di Scienza Politica; - WISC, World International Studies Committee; - EAEPE, Evolutionary Association for Evolutionary Political Economy; - EASST, European Association for the Study of Science and Technology; - Schumpeter Society; - DRUID, Danish Research Unit on Industrial Dynamics, - Réseau de Recherche sur l'Innovation. Media Collaboration with several newspapers and magazines, including The Guardian, La Repubblica, Il Sole 24 Ore, il manifesto, l’Unità, Avvenire, Il Messaggero. His research activities have been reported by numerous newspapers and magazines (La Repubblica, Corriere della Sera, La Stampa, Il Sole 24 ore, Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, The Economist, Business Week, Le Monde, Libération, El País, La Nación, El Mercurio and others). He has often been interviewed by media, including TG1, TG2, TG3, Rai5, La7, Sat2000 in Italy and BBC1, BBC2, CNN, SkyTV in the UK. Main research projects Partner of the PRIN-MIUR Project “Innovation for Global Challenges in a Connected World: The role of Local Resources and Socio-Economic Conditions”, 2019-ongoing, Research team at IRPPS- CNR. Coordinator of the research team “Globalization: Economic, Political and Technological Determinants and Impact”, IRPPS-CNR, 2009-ongoing. One member of the team was awarded a European Commission’s “Marie Curie - International Outgoing Fellowships for career development (IOF)” and three the “Marie Curie - Intra-European Fellowships for career development (IEF)”. Co-coordinator, with Fabrizio Tuzi, of the Working Group on Science and Innovation Indicators, Italian National Research Council, aimed at producing a periodical report on the Italy, 2017- ongoing. Co-promoter, with Marion Frenz, of the Research Project “The Dangers of Regional Divergence in Innovation in Europe”, School of Business, Economics and Informatics, Birkbeck College, University of London, 2019-ongoing. 3 Co-promoter, with Marion Frenz, of the Impact Grant “How Effective Scientific Push Policies are to promote Innovation Investment?”, School of Business, Economics and Informatics, Birkbeck College, University of London, 2017-2018. Co-promoter, with Marion Frenz, of the Research Project “Which Innovations Will Lead on The Path to Economic Recovery?”, 2015-2017, Funded by the School of Business, Economics and Informatics, Birkbeck College, University of London. Academic coordinator of the project “Awareness-raising about Union Citizenship”, European Commission, DG Justice, October 2014-March 2016 and leading the IRPPS-CNR team. Coordinator of the Local Scientific Committee of the Conference “Responsible Research and Innovation. Science, Innovation and Society”, Italian Presidency of the European Union, European Commission, Rome, April 2014-March 2015. Member of the Advisory Group on Societal Challenge “Europe in the World”, Horizon 2020, European Commission, January 2014-February 2016. Member of the High-Level Expert Group of the European Commission, Joint Research Centre, on “Financing R&D and Innovation for Corporate Growth in the EU: Strategies, Drivers and Barriers”, March 2013-October 2013. Member of the Expert Group “Global Europe 2030/2050”, European Commission, Directorate- General Research, May 2010-October 2012. Coordinator, Research Project “The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights”, Birkbeck College, University of London, 2010-2011. Chairman, European Commission Expert Group, “Opening to the World: International Cooperation in Science and Technology”, Directorate-General for Research, June 2007 – April 2008. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/pdf/eg6-international-cooperation_en.pdf Project on Cosmopolitan Democracy: The State of the Art, Scheme RSTL (“Ricerca Spontanea a Tema Libero”), Italian National Research Council, 2008-2009. Coordinator of the team at IRPPS-CNR of the Research Project on Measuring Innovation, European Commission, Directorate-General Enterprises (June 2008 – May 2010). Coordinator of the IRPSS-CNR team of the GARNET project, Network of Excellence on Global Governance, Regionalisation and Regulation: The Role of the EU (2006-2010), European Commission’s Framework Programme VI. Coordinator of the team at the IRPPS-CNR of the Research Project MEADOW, “Measuring the Dynamics of Organizations and Work: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Data on Organizational Change and Its Economic and Social Impact”, March 2007 – March 2009. Coordinator of the Italian team of the project for the European Science Foundation, European Collaborative Research Projects in the Social Sciences, “Science and Technology Research in a Knowledge Based Economy”, Country Project “Science and Technology in Large and Small Firms”, April 2006 – April 2009. 4 Member of the European Network DIME (Dynamics of Institutions and Markets in Europe), co- organizer (with Birgitte Andersen) of the International Conference “Intellectual Property Rights for Business and Society”, University of London, Birkbeck College, 14-16 September 2006. Member of the Research Team on International Public Goods, Universidad Complutense of Madrid, for UNIDO and the Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, 2004-2005. Available at http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/import/41226_State_of_Art_Paper_ICEI.pdf Member of the Expert Group on Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy, Project Supervisor Prof. Robin Cowan, European Commission, Directorate-General Enterprise,
Recommended publications
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://eprints.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Knowledge Accumulation and Vaccine Innovation: Lessons from Polio and HIV/AIDS Ohid Yaqub Doctor of Philosophy University of Sussex Submitted in September 2008 ii I hereby declare that this thesis has not been submitted, either in the same or different form, to this or any other university for a degree. Ohid Yaqub iii To my parents and Corinne, Two worlds that should not be separate. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and supervised by Paul Nightingale. Paul is a supervisor who is extremely generous with his time, ideas and encouragement; and who manages to make academia look extremely fun. His energy and enthusiasm were most important to me when I really thought the ship was sinking. I cannot thank him enough and feel privileged to have worked with him. My first opportunity to pursue some of the ideas in this thesis was under the supervision of Ed Steinmueller and Aldo Geuna.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF in a New
    The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is an autonomous agency engaging in multi-disciplinary research on the social dimensions of contemporary problems affecting development. Its work is guided by the conviction that, for effective development policies to be formulated, an understanding of the social and political context is crucial. The Institute attempts to provide governments, development agencies, grassroots organizations and scholars with a better understanding of how development policies and processes of economic, social and environmental change affect different social groups. Working through an extensive network of national research centres, UNRISD aims to promote original research and strengthen research capacity in developing countries. Current research programmes include: Business Responsibility for Sustainable Development; Emerging Mass Tourism in the South; Gender, Poverty and Well-Being; Globalization and Citizenship; Grassroots Initiatives and Knowledge Networks for Land Reform in Developing Countries; New Information and Communication Technologies; Public Sector Reform and Crisis-Ridden States; Technical Co-operation and Women’s Lives: Integrating Gender into Development Policy; and Volunteer Action and Local Democracy: A Partnership for a Better Urban Future. Recent research programmes have included: Crisis, Adjustment and Social Change; Culture and Development; Environment, Sustainable Development and Social Change; Ethnic Conflict and Development; Participation and Changes in Property
    [Show full text]
  • Will Innovation Lead the Economic Recovery?
    Research Policy 46 (2017) 535–543 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research Policy jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/respol Blade Runner economics: Will innovation lead the economic recovery? a,b,∗ Daniele Archibugi a Italian National Research Council, IRPPS, Via Palestro, 32-00185 Rome, Italy b Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom a r a t i b s c t l e i n f o r a c t Article history: According to Schumpeterian theories, economic expansions are associated with the introduction of suc- Received 22 April 2015 cessful new products, processes and services while depressions are linked to stagnant periods with few Received in revised form 5 January 2016 innovations. Can the economic crisis set in motion in 2008 be explained by the inability to innovate and Accepted 13 January 2016 upgrade production? And, conversely, will an economic recovery require a new stream of innovations? Available online 17 October 2016 Drawing on the debate which emerged after the 1970s economic crisis, this discussion paper tries to assess whether it is likely that the next long-term expansion will be linked to a new stream of innova- Keywords: tions. While most evidence suggests that ICTs continue to provide the back-bone of economic activities, Creative destruction there is the prospect that biotechnology will eventually start to fulfil the promise envisaged over 30 years Economic crisis ago in the film Blade Runner. Emerging technologies Long waves © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Science fiction Technological forecasting 1. Artificial life in Venice Biological artefacts: Artificial animals (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: a Historical Perspective
    New Global Studies Volume 1, Issue 1 2007 Article 1 The Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: A Historical Perspective David E.H. Edgerton, Hans Rausing Professor of Science and Technology, Imperial College, London Recommended Citation: Edgerton, David E.H. (2007) "The Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno- Globalism: A Historical Perspective," New Global Studies: Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 1. DOI: 10.2202/1940-0004.1013 ©2007 New Global Studies. All rights reserved. The Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: A Historical Perspective David E.H. Edgerton Abstract Techno-nationalism and techno-globalism are descriptive and prescriptive categories for understanding the impact of technology on society and vice versa. They reflect the underlying assumptions made by analysts of the place of technology in the world, and denote ideologies, rather than technological policies or realities. They also help us to realize that standard accounts of the nation and globalization are not as securely based as they appear. Indeed, nations and states are important in ways techno-nationalism does not capture, and the international and global dimension is crucial in ways which that techno-globalism overlooks. Yet an analysis of both terms yields building blocks to a more sophisticated appreciation of the linkages between the nation, technological innovation and globalization. KEYWORDS: techno-globalism, techno-nationalism, technology Author Notes: David E.H. Edgerton is the Hans Rausing Professor of History of Science at the Technology Imperial College, London. Edgerton: Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism In this article I distinguish two approaches, which I label techno- nationalism and techno-globalism, to the study of technology and society at macro-level.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmopolitan Democracy: Paths and Agents Daniele Archibugi and David Held
    1 Cosmopolitan Democracy: Paths and Agents Daniele Archibugi and David Held Twenty years after When at the end of the Cold War and at the beginning of a new wave of democratization we suggested the idea of a cosmopolitan democracy (Archibugi and Held, 1995; Held, 1995), we were aware that we were pouring old wine into new bottles. The attempt to make world politics more transparent, more accountable, more participatory and more respectful of the rule of law had pioneers spanning from Immanuel Kant to Richard Falk. Still, the idea that ‘democracy’ as a concept and a practice could and should be applied beyond nation states was some- how innovative. If we read the international relations textbooks prior to 1989, we may be surprised to note that many of them do not even contain the word ‘democracy’. When the word appears, it is generally in reference to the internal political system of states and certainly not in relation to the possibility of subjugating world politics to democratic rules. Even international organizations (IOs) were mostly seen as purely inter- governmental bodies and the prospect of making them more democratic was not contemplated. The European Union, the first IO composed exclusively by democratic regimes and with some germs of democratic norms in its modus operandi, was mostly discussed in relation to the lim- its it imposed on its member countries rather than in terms of its ability to deal publicly with transnational issues. The state of the art was not very different in the realm of democratic theory. Most of the textbooks dedicated to democracy, including the first edition of the work of one of us (Held, 1987), did not contain any reference to the problem of democ- racy beyond borders.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE (As of December 31, 2019)
    s CURRICULUM VITAE (as of December 31, 2019) Sven Ove Granstrand List of Contents I. EDUCATION 1 II. POSITIONS 1 III. RESEARCH 3 1. AREAS OF PAST AND CURRENT RESEARCH INTEREST 3 2. RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS 3 3. MAJOR PAST AND PRESENT RESEARCH ACTIVITIES 20 IV. KEYNOTE SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS 22 1. MAJOR CONFERENCES AND SYMPOSIA ORGANIZED AND CHAIRED (RESULTING IN PUBLISHED CONFERENCE BOOKS) 22 2. KEYNOTE SPEECHES AND CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS 1999/2000-•‐2018 22 V. TEACHING 31 1. TEACHING EXPERIENCE 31 2. TEACHING MATERIAL 31 VI. CONSULTING 33 1. CONSULTING EXPERIENCE 33 2. OPEN CONSULTING REPORTS 33 VII. MISCELLANEOUS 34 1. OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 34 2. MEMBERSHIPS IN PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS (PAST AND PRESENT) 35 3. WEBSITES 36 CURRICULUM VITAE (as of December 31, 2018) Name Sven Ove Granstrand Born August 1944 in Sweden Webpage www.ip-research.org I. EDUCATION M.Sc., Chalmers University of Technology (Mechanical Engineering 1969) M.Sc., University of Gothenburg (Mathematics 1969, Excellent with Distinction in Mathematics 1971) MBA, Graduate School of Business in Gothenburg (Excellent with Distinction in Business Economics 1971) M.Sc., Stanford University (Operations Research, 1972) Ph.D., Department of Industrial Management, Chalmers University of Technology, 1979 II. POSITIONS Teaching assistant Dep't of Control Engineering, 1968-69 Chalmers Univ. of Technology Operations research assistant Albert Heijn Co., Zaandam, Summer 1969 Holland Assistant Dep't of Industrial Management Autumn 1969 Chalmers Univ. of Technology Lecturer in Operations Research -'- 1970 and Decision Analysis Captain in the Swedish Artillery Appointed Reserve (graduated as number one at A6, Jönköping Jan. 1, 1973 the cadet school) Acting professor, part-time Dep't of Industrial Management Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniele Archibugi*§ Andrea Filippetti*°§
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PUblication MAnagement THE GLOBALIZATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS : FOUR LEARNT LESSONS AND FOUR THESES Daniele Archibugi *§ Andrea Filippetti *°§ *Italian National Research Council – CNR - IRPPS °University ‘La Sapienza’ of Rome – Department of Economics §Birkbeck College – University of London Journal of Global Policy , vol. 1, no. 1, 2010, forthcoming Abstract Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) have become ubiquitous in the current debate and have emerged as the key issue of global innovation policy. The ‘Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights’ (TRIPS), signed on 1994 as a founding element of the World Trade Organization, represent the most important attempt to establish a global harmonization of Intellectual Property protection. The aim of this paper is to critically re-examine what has become the common wisdom around IPRs, TRIPS and their effects. We argue that supporters of IPRs in the Western corporations and governments as well as detractors in global movements and developing countries have both over- estimated their importance in the process of generation and diffusion of knowledge and innovation. On the basis of some key learnt lessons on the nature of innovation and technological change, we assess four theses about TRIPS and their impact on the global generation and distribution of knowledge. The policy implications concerning international organizations and technological transfer are finally discussed. 1 THE GLOBALIZATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS : FOUR LEARNT LESSONS AND FOUR THESES BULLETPOINTS For Summary • Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) have emerged as the key issue of global innovation policy: through the ‘Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights agreement’ (TRIPS), there is an attempt to impose worldwide a Western system of IPRs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmopolitan Democracy As Global Governance” by Chuck Rosenberg
    Note on “Cosmopolitan Democracy as Global Governance” by Chuck Rosenberg One of our study circle participants in New York, who is mother to a very aware 20-something and den-mother to several more, mentioned to them that she was looking deeply into One World and cosmopolitanism and global governance. Their response was, “Oh, great. The Davos crowd will run the world.” And of course that is a key objection, or at least grounds for skepticism, from many quarters…fear of an all-powerful supranational entity that will be in charge of everything, “for everyone’s good”. It need not be that way, but the shape of democratic global governance remains vague…how would full participation be attained? Would the ultimate solution supplant or augment existing instruments such as states or intergovernmental bodies? How do we get from where we are, with powerful nation-states dominating global decision-making and controlling the lion’s share of the world’s resources, to a peaceful, sustainable, and just future that puts the needs of all of the world’s citizens first? There are a group of thinkers who are working through this very problem—they include, notably but not only, Mary Kaldor, David Held, Richard Falk, and Daniele Archibugi. Of these, Archibugi is perhaps first among peers in developing the kind of analysis and advocating for the kind of incremental but substantive actions that would move us along the path toward a genuinely democratic system of global governance. Daniele Archibugi (Rome, 1958), an Italian social scientist, works on the economics and policy of technological change and on the political theory of international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mpifg Working Paper 97/5, David Held: Democracy and Globalization
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Held, David Working Paper Democracy and globalization MPIfG Working Paper, No. 97/5 Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne Suggested Citation: Held, David (1997) : Democracy and globalization, MPIfG Working Paper, No. 97/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp97-5/wp97-5.html This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41649 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu MPIfG Working Paper 97/5, May 1997 Democracy and Globalization[1] by David Held MPIfG Lecture Series Economic Globalization and National Democracy, lecture given on March 20, 1997 David Held is a professor of politics and sociology at the Faculty of Social Science at the Open University in Milton Keynes, UK, and director of Polity Press in Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • National Policies for Technical Change: Where Are the Increasing Returns to Economic Research?
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 12693–12700, November 1996 Colloquium Paper This paper was presented at a colloquium entitled ‘‘Science, Technology, and the Economy,’’ organized by Ariel Pakes and Kenneth L. Sokoloff, held October 20–22, 1995, at the National Academy of Sciences in Irvine, CA. National policies for technical change: Where are the increasing returns to economic research? KEITH PAVITT Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RF, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Improvements over the past 30 years in Today it is normal for trade theorists to think of world statistical data, analysis, and related theory have strength- trade as largely driven by technological differences ened the basis for science and technology policy by confirming between countries; to think of technology as largely the importance of technical change in national economic driven by cumulative processes of innovation and the performance. But two important features of scientific and diffusion of knowledge; to see a possible source of technological activities in the Organization for Economic concern in the self-reinforcing character of technologi- Cooperation and Development countries are still not ad- cal advantage; and to argue that dynamic effects of dressed adequately in mainstream economics: (i) the justifi- technology on growth represent both the main gains cation of public funding for basic research and (ii) persistent from trade and the main costs of protection. the international differences in investment in research and de- theory has become more exciting, more dynamic and velopment and related activities. In addition, one major gap is much closer to the world view long held by insightful now emerging in our systems of empirical measurement—the observers who were skeptical of the old conventional development of software technology, especially in the service wisdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 449 583 EA 030 871 TITLE Knowledge Management in the Learning Society. Education and Skills. INSTITUTION Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris (France). ISBN ISBN-92-64-17182-7 PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 254p. AVAILABLE FROM Book out of print. Full text: http://electrade.gfi.fr/cgi-bin/OECDBookShop.Storefront/. PUB TYPE Books (010)-- Opinion Papers (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Economic Factors; Elementary Secondary Education; *Knowledge Representation; *Learning Experience; Models; Public Schools; *Research Utilization; *Skills; *Social Values ABSTRACT This book focuses on understanding knowledge and learningin the contexts of economic development and social cohesion. Apreliminary overview is presented of the knowledge processes at workin different sectors, and the book identifies a number of waysin which microlevel or sectoral understanding of the knowledge-based economyis important in conjunction with more macrolevel insights. These insights arevaluable for government, economic sectors, and public and privateenterprises and institutions as they seek to improve their knowledge andlearning performance; this performance is an increasingly importantfunction in a learning society. Special attention is given to improvingproduction, mediation, and use in the education sector. The analyses arederived from four forums that consist of high-level participantsfrom the private sector, policymakers, academics from a wide range of disciplines, andauthorities in health and education research--all of whom work on issuesand problems related to how knowledge and learning will become keydrivers of social and economic change in the 21st century. (Contains 53 references.) (DFR) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that canbe made from the original document. M. Knowledge Management in the Learning Society EDUCATION AND =US ti kr, 411116 if 41111.111111111111b 44.4111PIlkillb11110 owl"- filiO111111141, 411P04111101111111 r111111411111'' iii iimkgsk 111110110 110w410' U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • National Innovation Systems: a Retrospective on a Study*
    National Innovation Systems: A Retrospective on a Study* RICHARD R. NELSON (School of International and Public Aflkirs, Columbia University, 420 .West 118th' Street, New York, NY 10027, USA) Downloaded from 1. What is the Study About? http://icc.oxfordjournals.org In this essay I will describe a large comparative study of national innovation systems that has just been completed, tell something of what motivated the study and how it was organized and undertaken, and highlight some of the more interesting findings. This is a difficult task, for the project was not only large but also complex. The heart of the project consisted of studies of 15 countries, including all of the prominent large market oriented industrialized ones, several smaller high income countries, and a number of newly industrializing states. The studies were carefully designed, developed, and written to illuminate the at University of Manchester on June 24, 2010 institutions and mechanisms supporting technical innovation in the various countries, the similarities and differences across countries and how these came to be, and to permit at least preliminary discussion of how the differences seemed to matter. No other project has come remotely close to g treating the range of countries considered here. Moreover, many of the individual studies stand as major contributions in their own right to the J *A volume, containing the full study, will be published in the fill of 1992, under the title of N«/»W Imoin Sysltms: A Ctmpertthx Study, by the Oxford University Pros. Funding for the project was ~j provided by the American Enterprise Institute, Columbia University's Center for Japanese Economy and | Business, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, and the Sloan Foundation through its support ^ of the Consortium on Competition and Cooperation.
    [Show full text]