DOCSLIB.ORG

Christopher Freeman Who Passed Away on Monday August 16Th 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Christopher Freeman Who Passed Away on Monday August 16Th 2010 In memory of Chris Freeman (11/09/1921-16/08/2010) Christopher Freeman who passed away on Monday August 16th 2010 was not just the founding Director of the Science Policy Research Unit (today the Science and Technology Policy Research www.sussex.ac.uk/spru) at the University of Sussex in 1966, he was, and probably less known to many, also the intellectual anchorage behind the creation of MERIT in 1988. He continued to be heavily involved in MERIT research for at least another 15 years. At the opening of the institute, and maybe to the surprise of many of the Dutch officials present, Freeman emphasized in particular the importance of the need for intellectual and financial independence from changing policy fortunes, and MERIT (and UNU-MERIT today) certainly cherished that advice over the years. It is twenty two years after the event, particularly moving to listen to Chris Freeman's speech at the opening of MERIT back in 1988. The other lectures at that opening were given by the late Ilja Prigogine and Zvi Griliches. At MERIT Chris Freeman was very active in getting involved in many of the first MERIT projects, too many to list here. But his influence on both staff and students in those early years was phenomenal. A whole generation of scholars and PhD students from John Hagedoorn to Jerry Silverberg, Patrick van Cayseele, Bart Verspagen, Rajneesh Narula, Aldo Geuna, Anthony Arundel, Rene Kemp, Adriaan van Zon, Paul Diederen, Theon van Dijk, Hans van Meijl, Acharya Rohini and many more were involved in joint research projects with Chris Chris Freeman speaking at the opening of and wrote joint papers with him. MERIT in 1988 And then there was of course Chris' influence in getting a number of crucial international projects off the ground which established MERIT's international reputation very quickly: the 1988 Pinter book on Technical Change and Economic Theory edited by Chris together with Giovanni Dosi, Dick Nelson, Jerry Silverberg and Luc Soete, and the many more which followed including the book with Giorgio Sirilli and Sanyaja Lall on National Innovation Systems, edited by Dick Nelson in 1993, which all saw the light here in Maastricht. In 1993, Chris also contributed with Anthony Arundel, Gerhard Bräunling, Paul David, Giovanni Dosi, Dominic Foray, Frieder Meyer-Krahmer, Robin Miège, Keith Pavitt, Pascal Petit, Keith Smith and Luc Soete, to the EC report : An Integrated Approach to European Innovation and Technology Diffusion Policy: a Maastricht Memorandum, probably the EU report which has kept most of its relevance over the years, setting out the grand challenges policy mission posed by environmentally sustainable development and proposing policies aimed at a more rapid diffusion of a green technology paradigm in Europe. In 1995 and 1996, Chris contributed with amongst others Gerhard Bosch and Manuel Castells to probably one of the most far sighted EC reports Building the Information Society for us All. In the Appendix below a full list is given of all publications of Chris Freeman while at MERIT. He will be deeply missed by all of those who knew him so well while he was at MERIT, both academic and administrative staff for his intellectual leadership, personal charisma and above all incredible kindness. Below follows a personal reflection by Luc Soete, a close personal friend of Chris Freeman with whom he set up MERIT in 1988, and a personal memoir by Bart Verspagen, who was a PhD student at the time Chris was with MERIT. Luc Soete, Chris Freeman and Wil Albeda, 1988 Chris Freeman: a personal reflection by Luc Soete It is with great sadness that I heard that Chris Freeman, one of the founding fathers of MERIT, a mentor to many of us here in Maastricht in the 80's and 90's, and a very close personal friend for over thirty five years, passed away last Monday August 16th 2010. Chris was born on September 11th, 1921 and on the occasion of his 80th birthday, Wilma Coenegrachts, Susan Lees - his secretary at SPRU - and myself decided to organize a birthday conference party. After his hip operation, Chris had some difficulty in walking and had decided for himself that he didn't like travelling anymore, so we took it on us to organise it with Susan's help in his home town, Lewes. It became a truly memorable conference and will always with Staffan Jacobsson remain for me the way I want to remember Chris. It was of course first of all memorable because of the date. Nine years after, it is probably easy for most of us to remember where we were on 9/11. I do remember that in the evening I was discussing with Chris, Wilma and Susan what to do with our birthday conference party. The actual timing of the conference had been planned on the weekend of September 14th till 16th 2001 in the White Hart Hotel in Lewes, the place where the previous Freeman Festschrift conference had been with Bengt-Ake Lundvall held on the occasion of his retirement in 19861. We decided against all odds to go ahead. The international travelling situation at that moment was pretty traumatic. We had many of our invited participants stuck in airports across the world. Some remained stuck such as John de la Mothe and Kurt Unger and couldn't make it, but most came. It was, given the circumstances, an emotional conference: tension was in the air, doubts about the future of the world as we had known it were on everybody's mind. We had asked Chris to choose participants: we just imposed on him the space constraints of the Mrs Nelson, Chris Freeman and Keith Pavitt White Hart hotel and it became of course 1 For that conference an impressive Festschrift was published by Roy MacLeod with Frances Pinter. very quickly incredibly tough for Chris to make choices. (Un-)Fortunately some people were not available those dates: Jorge Katz, Richard Nelson, Hubert Schmitz, Charles Edquist, Eduardo Albuquerque, Keith Pavitt, Morris Teubal and last but not least Alison Young who were all on Chris' priority list could not make it. We had structured the programme around different facets of Chris' academic contributions. In a first session, called the "entrepreneurial" Freeman with with Slavo Radosevic, Despina Kanellou contributions from Esben Sloth-Andersen, Pari Patel, Giorgio Sirilli, Martin Bell, Bent Dalum, Jan Fagerberg and Mario Cimoli, the focus of the discussions were on Chris's contributions to the measurement of R&D, the technological specialisation of countries and the national systems of innovation concept. In a second session called the "optimistic" Freeman with contributions from Carlota Perez, Paul David, Giovanni Dosi, Steffan Jacobsson and Franciso Louça, the focus shifted to Freeman's contributions on technological trajectories, techno-economic paradigms and long waves. In a third session entitled the "world" Freeman with contributions from Mary Kaldor, Slavo Radosevic, Sanja Lall, José Cassiolato, Gabriela Dutrénit, Lim Chaisiung, Alexander Veracruz and Mamo Muchie the debate centred around Freeman's contributions on global transition and development, newly industrialising countries and catching up, the failure of development studies, and the concept of development through innovation. The final session, entitled the "concerned" Freeman with contributions from Geneviève with Mammo Muchie Schmeder, Dominique Foray, Andrew Tylecote, Daniele Archibugi, Helena Lastres, Sergio Barro, Norleta Ariffin, Bjorn Johnson and Mike Hobday focused on technological unemployment, the Information Society, the green economy and the economics of hope and human development. And there were of course memorable dinner and lunch speeches from Frances Pinter, Bill Page, Bengt-Åke Lundvall and as the final, farewell speech from Chris Freeman himself. There are few conferences where people don't want to leave to catch an early train or plane. This one was the one, I will always remember as the conference where people didn't want to leave, wanted to stay to discuss, talk and listen to Chris. For Chris as he made clear in with Gabriela Dutrenit and Alexandre Vera Cruz his speech this was his academic farewell, now it was to the new generations sitting around the table to take over. I remembered that back in 1986, he actually said exactly the same thing on his retirement. I wasn't convinced, as I had made clear in the paper I had prepared for the 1986 Festschrift in which I concluded my overview of Freeman's many contributions with the words: "watch out for Christopher Freeman!" How right I was. Saying goodbye to him, I promised I would come and visit him every year for his birthday. This weekend I was just starting to organize my next visit to Lewes to see him for his 89th birthday… The last nine years have nevertheless brought me and my wife Ingrid very fond birthday celebrations with him, Carlota Perez, Pari Patel and his wife and many members of Chris's family to cherish and to remember. My academic but also my personal life has been heavily influenced by Chris Freeman. I with Sergio Barrio first met Chris when I was a PhD student at SPRU back in 1975. Chris was not just an extraordinarily well read scholar, but he also had a unique personality which could probably best be described as what I would call "anti-elitist". This was clearly engrained in his political convictions but he was probably the only person in the world who would apply it so consistently to himself. To the dismay of Carlota and probably most of his friends, growing older he would stubbornly refuse any sign of the slightest favouritism, for example in getting his hip Frances Pinter and Carlota Perez replaced and thus waited and waited in the NHS queue for an operation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • • SSH-2007-8.2 Horizontal Measures to Support International
    The EULAKS Summer School TheRoleof theSSH in theConstruction of theKnowledge-basedSociety – European and Latin American Perspectives Dirk Johann (ZSI), Austria MOST II – 10th Session of the Intergovernmental Council UNESCO Paris, 14 March 2011 Project funded under the Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities www.eulaks.eu GENERAL INFORMATION • SSH-2007-8.2 Horizontal measures to support international cooperation • Project Reference: 217190 • Type of contract: Support Action (CSA) • Start: 2008-02-01 (5-month extension requested) • End: 2010-10-31 • Duration: 33 months • Estimated costs: € 775,942.00 • EC Funding: € 694,094.00 2 1 EULAKS IS … … a Euro-Latin training and learning network in the Social Sciences and Humanities 3 EULAKS PRETENDS TO … … promote a shared unterstanding of the challenges in the construction of Knowledge Societies in Europe and Latin America through the support for networks and partnerships between social science communities of both regions 4 2 EULAKS CONSORTIUM 3 European and 4 Latin American partner institutions 5 EULAKS OBJECTIVES • To promote the role of the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in the EU – LAC policy dialogue on S&T cooperation • To support current and future collaborative research endeavours in the field of SSH between the European Union and Latin America • To strengthen networks that link social science communities and institutions to policymakers and practitioners in both regions 6 3 The EULAKS Summer School at FLACSO 7 Organisation • Academic Committee (launch of call, evaluation of applications,
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Change and the New Context for Development.Pdf
    Technical change and the new context for development Carlota Perez Published as: Perez, Carlota (1994) "Technical change and the new context for development", in Lynn Mytelka ed., South-South Co-operation in a Global Perspective, OECD, Paris, pp. 55-87 Table of contents Introduction 1. The growth of intangibles in investment 2. Investing in organizational change: a. Organization as the Achilles heel of the traditional technology leader b. A change in common sense and the difficulty of diffusion c. Reorganization as an effective option of modernization 3. Investing in human capital a. From people as cost to investment in people b. The need for a participatory framework c. Education and training at the core or development strategies 4. Investing in technological capability a. A new focus on innovation and diffusion b. Networks of collaboration c. Networks and the habits of an ISI past 5. Market focusing and strategic specialization a. The collective dimension of specialization b. Turning static advantages into dynamic strengths: rescuing the development value of natural resources c. Market segment and technology focus d. Networks and territorial proximity 6. Internal constraints and windows of opportunity a. Obstacles to surmount and opportunities to pursue b. Some avenues for south-south cooperation Bibliography 1 Introduction For the past two decades the world has been shaken by three successive waves of change. First there was the all-pervasive impact of information technology on products, production, services and communication. Then there was the managerial revolution with the diffusion of organizational practices pioneered by the Japanese and other challenges to traditional mass production emerging in various countries of Europe and elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://eprints.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Knowledge Accumulation and Vaccine Innovation: Lessons from Polio and HIV/AIDS Ohid Yaqub Doctor of Philosophy University of Sussex Submitted in September 2008 ii I hereby declare that this thesis has not been submitted, either in the same or different form, to this or any other university for a degree. Ohid Yaqub iii To my parents and Corinne, Two worlds that should not be separate. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and supervised by Paul Nightingale. Paul is a supervisor who is extremely generous with his time, ideas and encouragement; and who manages to make academia look extremely fun. His energy and enthusiasm were most important to me when I really thought the ship was sinking. I cannot thank him enough and feel privileged to have worked with him. My first opportunity to pursue some of the ideas in this thesis was under the supervision of Ed Steinmueller and Aldo Geuna.
    [Show full text]
  • Destructive Creation
    Innovation, Europe and Policy Reflections on innovation studies Luc Soete Maastricht University The Netherlands UNU-MERIT 25th anniversary, Vaeshartelt, 28th November, 2014 First a parenthesis on long waves and my days at SPRU • Long waves: I had my own personal interpretation of long wave performance that got most interest and comments from Marie Jahoda, Chris Freeman and Keith Pavitt: – Based on an article of Marie Jahoda in Futures on generation conflicts; – Proposals for alternative thoughts on marriage across generations – a first draft was written, never published though... • Wouldn’t dare to go in more technical details here but the main idea was that men and women were intertemporarily “mismatched”: men displayed a long cyle of (sexual) boom and dust; women by contrast witnessed a continuous gradual growth path leveling of at mid-life but staying more or less constant till old age. • Marie Jahoda and I therefore proposed to reform marriage from two to three, now with intergenerational partners: a younger man, a middle-aged woman and an older man, over time opposite sex partners would be added, so in the next phase a younger women, a middle aged man and an older woman. • Our proposal would reduce divorce rates, solve intergenerational conflicts, reduce child raising and household costs and increase social cohesion in society. • Unfortunately the paper on the Jahoda-Soete cycle was never published... The Jahoda-Soete cycle • In line with the long wave hype of the time at SPRU, we considered a four phase cycle: – In the first phase
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare 5.0: Why We Need a Social Revolution and How to Make It Happen
    Welfare 5.0: Why we need a social revolution and how to make it happen By Hilary Cottam September 2020 Welfare 5.0: Why we need a social revolution and how to make it happen September 2020 Written by Hilary Cottam Published by UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP) 11 Montague Street London, WC1B 5BP ucl.ac.uk/iipp This report can be referenced as follows: Cottam, H. (2020). Welfare 5.0: Why we need a social revolution and how to make it happen. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Policy Report, (IIPP WP 2020-10). https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2020-10 © 2020 Hilary Cottam Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose The mission of the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP) is to change how public value is imagined, practised and evaluated to tackle societal challenges — delivering economic growth that is innovation-led, sustainable and inclusive. Growth has not only a rate but also a direction: IIPP confronts this directionality head on. Finding solutions to global challenges requires purposeful organisations to collaborate in fundamentally new ways — across the state, businesses and civil society. Together, they can help reshape markets to produce growth that delivers public value. Building symbiotic eco-systems requires new tools and new forms of collaboration. IIPP rethinks the role of the state in these collaborations. Rather than just a market fixer, it can be an active co-creator of value. A mission-oriented approach can be used to set inspirational goals, with dynamic tools — from procurement to prize schemes — to nurture bottom-up experimentation and exploration across different sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE and OPPORTUNITIES for DEVELOPMENT AS a MOVING TARGET Distr
    TD(X)/RT.1/9 UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT UNCTAD X High-level Round Table on Trade and Development: Directions for the Twenty-first Century TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT AS A MOVING TARGET Distr. GENERAL TD(X)/RT.1/9 20 December 1999 Original: ENGLISH UNCTAD X High-level Round Table on Trade and Development: Directions for the Twenty-first Century Bangkok, 12 February 2000 TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT AS A MOVING TARGET* Paper prepared by Carlota Perez Independent Consultant, Caracas, Venezuela Honorary Research Fellow, University of Sussex, United Kingdom * The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNCTAD secretariat. GE.99- Executive Summary This paper provides an interpretation of development as a process of accumulation of technological and social capabilities in developing countries that is dependent upon their ability to take advantage of different and successive windows of opportunity. The nature of such windows would be determined by evolving technologies in the leading countries of the world system. The interplay of continuity and discontinuity, which characterizes technical change, would open successive spaces of possibility – some narrower, some wider, some only sufficient for initiating development processes, and others for allowing significant leaps forward. The shifts in the direction of technical change associated with each technological revolution would provide the best opportunities for catching up. At each stage, it would be vital to identify the changes in industrial power structures and the interests of firms in the advanced world in order to negotiate complementary strategies and establish positive-sum games.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Innovation Lead the Economic Recovery?
    Research Policy 46 (2017) 535–543 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Research Policy jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/respol Blade Runner economics: Will innovation lead the economic recovery? a,b,∗ Daniele Archibugi a Italian National Research Council, IRPPS, Via Palestro, 32-00185 Rome, Italy b Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom a r a t i b s c t l e i n f o r a c t Article history: According to Schumpeterian theories, economic expansions are associated with the introduction of suc- Received 22 April 2015 cessful new products, processes and services while depressions are linked to stagnant periods with few Received in revised form 5 January 2016 innovations. Can the economic crisis set in motion in 2008 be explained by the inability to innovate and Accepted 13 January 2016 upgrade production? And, conversely, will an economic recovery require a new stream of innovations? Available online 17 October 2016 Drawing on the debate which emerged after the 1970s economic crisis, this discussion paper tries to assess whether it is likely that the next long-term expansion will be linked to a new stream of innova- Keywords: tions. While most evidence suggests that ICTs continue to provide the back-bone of economic activities, Creative destruction there is the prospect that biotechnology will eventually start to fulfil the promise envisaged over 30 years Economic crisis ago in the film Blade Runner. Emerging technologies Long waves © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Science fiction Technological forecasting 1. Artificial life in Venice Biological artefacts: Artificial animals (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: a Historical Perspective
    New Global Studies Volume 1, Issue 1 2007 Article 1 The Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: A Historical Perspective David E.H. Edgerton, Hans Rausing Professor of Science and Technology, Imperial College, London Recommended Citation: Edgerton, David E.H. (2007) "The Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno- Globalism: A Historical Perspective," New Global Studies: Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 1. DOI: 10.2202/1940-0004.1013 ©2007 New Global Studies. All rights reserved. The Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: A Historical Perspective David E.H. Edgerton Abstract Techno-nationalism and techno-globalism are descriptive and prescriptive categories for understanding the impact of technology on society and vice versa. They reflect the underlying assumptions made by analysts of the place of technology in the world, and denote ideologies, rather than technological policies or realities. They also help us to realize that standard accounts of the nation and globalization are not as securely based as they appear. Indeed, nations and states are important in ways techno-nationalism does not capture, and the international and global dimension is crucial in ways which that techno-globalism overlooks. Yet an analysis of both terms yields building blocks to a more sophisticated appreciation of the linkages between the nation, technological innovation and globalization. KEYWORDS: techno-globalism, techno-nationalism, technology Author Notes: David E.H. Edgerton is the Hans Rausing Professor of History of Science at the Technology Imperial College, London. Edgerton: Contradictions of Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism In this article I distinguish two approaches, which I label techno- nationalism and techno-globalism, to the study of technology and society at macro-level.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking How Public Value Is Created, Nurtured and Evaluated
    Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Rethinking how public value is created, nurtured and evaluated. Picking winners Picking the willing Outsourcing Capacity building Cost beneft Dynamic spillovers De-risking Welcoming uncertainty Fixing markets Co-creating and shaping Levelling the playing feld Tilting towards a direction Entrepreneurial societies need entrepreneurial states The UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP) was founded by Professor Mariana Mazzucato, author of the highly-acclaimed The Entrepreneurial State: debunking public vs. private sector myths. IIPP aims to develop a path-breaking framework for creating, nurturing and evaluating public value in order to achieve economic growth that is more innovation-led, inclusive and sustainable. IIPP will lead a debate about the direction of economic growth and governments’ use of mission-oriented policies to confront the world’s most urgent challenges: from climate change to inequality and the problems facing ageing societies. Our work will feed into policies on innovation, fnancial reform, institutional change and sustainable development. A cornerstone of IIPP’s research is that markets are not created out of thin air: they are outcomes of the interactions between different actors in the economy, operating in the public, private and voluntary sectors. In this context, public policy is not just about fxing market failures, but about actively co-creating and shaping markets. Our teaching and research programmes will help public organisations refocus themselves to become more mission-led, driven by public purpose, and able to welcome and manage the explorative and risk-taking processes that structural change and transformation require. Policy-makers focusing on public versus private are asking the wrong question.
    [Show full text]
  • 00 Pre Techno & Future Euro
    Contributors Bruno Amable is a professor at the University of Lille 2 and a researcher at CEPREMAP, Paris, France. Robert Boyer is a CNRS director of research at CEPREMAP and at EHESS, Paris, France. Eve Caroli is a researcher at INRA/LEA and CEPREMAP, Paris, France. Ü.D. Efendioglu is a researcher at INTECH, UN University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Christopher Freeman is an emeritus professor at SPRU, University of Sus- sex, Brighton, UK. Donatella Gatti is a researcher at WZB, Berlin, Germany. Michael Landesmann is a professor at the University of Linz and scientific director at the Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Vienna, Austria. Ivo De Loo is an assistant professor at the Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands. Huub Meijers is a senior researcher at MERIT and in the Department of Economics and Business Administration of Maastricht University, The Neth- erlands. Lars Mjøset is a professor in the Department of Sociology and Human Geography, and a researcher at the ARENA project, University of Oslo, Norway. Joan Muysken is a professor in the Department of Economics and Business Administration of Maastricht University, The Netherlands. Pascal Petit is a CNRS director of research at CEPREMAP, Paris, France. Mario Pianta is a researcher at CNR-ISRDS, Rome, and a professor at the University of Urbino, Italy. Giovanni Russo is an assistant professor in the Department of Economics at Utrecht University, The Netherlands. xv Pascal Petit and Luc Soete - 9781781950999 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/24/2021 04:52:12PM via free access xvi Contributors Mark Sanders is a researcher at MERIT and in the Department of Econom- ics and Business Administration of Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract: Knowledge Sharing: a Global Challenge
    Parallel working group: Knowledge Sharing Knowledge sharing: a global challenge Luc Soete (UNU-MERIT) Abstract While there remains a huge concentration of knowledge production activities in the developed countries, the last twenty years have seen a major shift in world wide access to codified knowledge. The role of information and communication technologies has been instrumental here, as has been that of more capital and organisational embedded forms of technology transfer such as foreign direct investment. Today one of the most important enabling features for development is knowledge access. Access is, however, not required to knowledge under such codified or capital embedded forms alone, but also to the tools and (legal) ability to replicate and improve upon knowledge. For developing countries it is no longer access to knowledge as passive producers/consumers which fitted well with the old development model where developing countries would be treated as consumers who would not have the ability to innovate or, if more industrially advanced, would imitate production methods developed elsewhere. The cases reviewed in the paper show that while access to codified knowledge may build skills through passive absorption (e.g. through textbooks), access to technology in a form that can be shared and modified without entry barriers can build advanced skills and compensate for the absence of formal training. While access to knowledge as a passive process is politically framed within the language of development aid, access to technology as a way of providing the right and ability of participation is analogous to the arguments favouring free trade: developing countries can then be seen as providing a resource of potential innovators, rather than merely using existing innovations from the developed world.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE (As of December 31, 2019)
    s CURRICULUM VITAE (as of December 31, 2019) Sven Ove Granstrand List of Contents I. EDUCATION 1 II. POSITIONS 1 III. RESEARCH 3 1. AREAS OF PAST AND CURRENT RESEARCH INTEREST 3 2. RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS 3 3. MAJOR PAST AND PRESENT RESEARCH ACTIVITIES 20 IV. KEYNOTE SPEECHES AND PRESENTATIONS 22 1. MAJOR CONFERENCES AND SYMPOSIA ORGANIZED AND CHAIRED (RESULTING IN PUBLISHED CONFERENCE BOOKS) 22 2. KEYNOTE SPEECHES AND CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS 1999/2000-•‐2018 22 V. TEACHING 31 1. TEACHING EXPERIENCE 31 2. TEACHING MATERIAL 31 VI. CONSULTING 33 1. CONSULTING EXPERIENCE 33 2. OPEN CONSULTING REPORTS 33 VII. MISCELLANEOUS 34 1. OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 34 2. MEMBERSHIPS IN PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS (PAST AND PRESENT) 35 3. WEBSITES 36 CURRICULUM VITAE (as of December 31, 2018) Name Sven Ove Granstrand Born August 1944 in Sweden Webpage www.ip-research.org I. EDUCATION M.Sc., Chalmers University of Technology (Mechanical Engineering 1969) M.Sc., University of Gothenburg (Mathematics 1969, Excellent with Distinction in Mathematics 1971) MBA, Graduate School of Business in Gothenburg (Excellent with Distinction in Business Economics 1971) M.Sc., Stanford University (Operations Research, 1972) Ph.D., Department of Industrial Management, Chalmers University of Technology, 1979 II. POSITIONS Teaching assistant Dep't of Control Engineering, 1968-69 Chalmers Univ. of Technology Operations research assistant Albert Heijn Co., Zaandam, Summer 1969 Holland Assistant Dep't of Industrial Management Autumn 1969 Chalmers Univ. of Technology Lecturer in Operations Research -'- 1970 and Decision Analysis Captain in the Swedish Artillery Appointed Reserve (graduated as number one at A6, Jönköping Jan. 1, 1973 the cadet school) Acting professor, part-time Dep't of Industrial Management Sept.
    [Show full text]