ThoracolumbarThoracolumbar andand LumbarLumbar BurstBurst FracturesFractures
SussanSussan Salas,Salas, MDMD ThomasThomas JeffersonJefferson UniversityUniversity HospitalHospital DepartmentDepartment ofof NeurologicalNeurological SurgerySurgery ThoracolumbarThoracolumbar/Lumbar/Lumbar BurstBurst Fractures:Fractures: OverviewOverview
EpidemiologyEpidemiology AnatomyAnatomy InitialInitial AssessmentAssessment ImagingImaging InjuryInjury Mechanism/BiomechanicsMechanism/Biomechanics FractureFracture ClassificationClassification TreatmentTreatment Options:Options: OperativeOperative vs.vs. NonNon-- operativeoperative ManagementManagement EpidemiologyEpidemiology
79,00079,000 spinalspinal fracturesfractures inin U.S.U.S. eacheach yearyear –– 72.5%72.5% involveinvolve thoracicthoracic oror lumbarlumbar spinespine [1,2] MostMost commoncommon sitesite ofof injuryinjury isis thoracolumbarthoracolumbar junctionjunction MechanicalMechanical transitiontransition zonezone betweenbetween rigidrigid thoracicthoracic andand moremore mobilemobile lumbarlumbar spinespine [3-5]
LumbarLumbar spinespine moremore proneprone toto injuryinjury Absence of ribs, transition from kyphotic to lordotic posture, sagitally oriented facet joints [6]
OperativeOperative versusversus nonnon--operativeoperative mgmt:mgmt: controversycontroversy AnatomyAnatomy
Vertebral column: 29 vertebrae organized in 4 curves: 2 primary curves present at birth: thoracic and sacral (kyphosis) 2 compensatory curves - result of adaptation to upright posture: cervical and lumbar (lordosis) AnatomyAnatomy
T spine: made rigid by ribcage articulations (ligamentous support); facet joints in coronal plane limit flexion/extension L spine: facet joints in sagittal plane increase flexion/extension but decrease lateral bending/rotation TL junction: facet joints in oblique orientation; provide support and resistance to 35-45% of torsional and shear forces on spine InitialInitial AssessmentAssessment ABCsABCs && ImmobilizationImmobilization:: patientspatients shouldshould bebe immobilizedimmobilized untiluntil stabilitystability ofof fracturefracture cancan bebe assessedassessed adequatelyadequately –– avoidavoid loss/worseningloss/worsening ofof neurologicalneurological deficitsdeficits [4] NeurologicalNeurological examexam:: performedperformed asas soonsoon asas thethe patientpatient isis hemodynamicallyhemodynamically stable:stable: motor,motor, sensation,sensation, DTRsDTRs,, digitaldigital rectalrectal examexam [10] NeurologicNeurologic deficitsdeficits fromfrom TLTL fxsfxs cancan involveinvolve spinalspinal cordcord oror caudacauda equinaequina 70%70% ofof thoracolumbarthoracolumbar injuriesinjuries dodo notnot havehave associatedassociated neurologicneurologic deficitsdeficits [2] InitialInitial Assessment:Assessment: Motor Examination Upper extremity C5-shoulder abduction C6-wrist extension C7-wrist flexion C8-finger flexion T1-finger abduction InitialInitial Assessment:Assessment: Motor Examination
Lower extremity L1-hip flexion L2-hip adduction L3-knee extension L4-ankle dorsiflexion L5-toe extension InitialInitial Assessment:Assessment: DermatomesDermatomes InitialInitial Assessment:Assessment: Classification of injury
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) A = Complete – No Sacral Motor / Sensory B = Incomplete – Sacral sensory sparing C = Incomplete – Motor Sparing (<3) D = Incomplete – Motor Sparing (>3) E = Normal Motor & Sensory E Imaging:Imaging: XX--RaysRays
APAP andand laterallateral:: APAP view:view: pedicles,pedicles, VBsVBs,, discdisc spaces,spaces, spinousspinous processesprocesses LateralLateral view:view: VBVB heights,heights, discdisc spacespace relations,relations, VBVB alignment,alignment, paraspinalparaspinal swellingswelling Imaging:Imaging: XX--rayray
InIn thethe presencepresence ofof injury,injury, thethe entireentire spinespine shouldshould bebe imagedimaged toto rulerule outout noncontiguousnoncontiguous injuriesinjuries DegreeDegree ofof kyphosiskyphosis cancan bebe measuredmeasured usingusing CobbCobb Measurement.Measurement. Imaging:Imaging: CTCT
CTCT yieldsyields moremore diagnosticdiagnostic informationinformation thanthan plainplain radiographsradiographs regardingregarding extentextent ofof bonybony injuryinjury [6,12] Imaging:Imaging: MRIMRI
MRIMRI allowsallows visualizationvisualization ofof softsoft tissuetissue componentscomponents ofof spinalspinal injuriesinjuries [6] UsefulUseful atat thoracothoraco-- lumbarlumbar junctionjunction duedue toto variablevariable locationlocation ofof conusconus medullarismedullaris InjuryInjury Mechanism/BiomechanicsMechanism/Biomechanics
GravityGravity exertsexerts continualcontinual axialaxial loadload onon thethe vertebralvertebral columncolumn BodyBody’’ss centercenter ofof gravitygravity isis approxapprox 4cm4cm anterioranterior toto firstfirst sacralsacral vertebravertebra –– resultsresults inin ventralventral bendingbending vectorvector actingacting onon spinalspinal columncolumn PosteriorPosterior ligamentousligamentous complexcomplex actsacts asas dorsaldorsal tensiontension bandband toto counteractcounteract thesethese forcesforces -- netnet sumsum ofof vectorsvectors actingacting onon spinespine equalequal zerozero EssentialEssential toto preventprevent changechange inin spinespine’’ss sagittalsagittal alignmentalignment InjuryInjury Mechanism/BiomechanicsMechanism/Biomechanics PLCPLC:: interspinousinterspinous ligamentsligaments andand ligamentumligamentum flavumflavum TraumaTrauma resultingresulting inin spinalspinal ligament/osseousligament/osseous structurestructure disruptiondisruption maymay changechange netnet vectorvector sumsum actingacting onon spinespine fromfrom zero,zero, resultingresulting inin potentialpotential forfor spinalspinal imbalanceimbalance InjuryInjury Mechanism/BiomechanicsMechanism/Biomechanics WhitesideWhiteside [9]:: analogyanalogy ofof constructionconstruction cranecrane FailureFailure ofof thethe cablecable leadsleads toto thethe cranecrane fallingfalling forwardforward –– inin spine,spine, illustratedillustrated byby characteristiccharacteristic kyphotickyphotic deformitydeformity seenseen withwith unstableunstable burstburst fxsfxs FractureFracture ClassificationClassification
FractureFracture classificationclassification allowsallows organizationorganization andand treatmenttreatment ofof fracturesfractures throughthrough protocolsprotocols developeddeveloped toto maximizemaximize patientpatient outcomesoutcomes
MostMost classificationclassification schemesschemes basedbased onon criteriacriteria forfor describingdescribing stabilitystability FractureFracture Classification:Classification: HoldsworthHoldsworth
HoldsworthHoldsworth [15]: twotwo--columncolumn modelmodel ofof spinespine stabilitystability (1960s).(1960s). SeparatedSeparated spinespine intointo anterioranterior weightweight--bearingbearing columncolumn (a)(a) andand posteriorposterior tensiontension--bearingbearing columncolumn (b)(b) BurstBurst fracturesfractures unstableunstable ifif PLCPLC isis disrupteddisrupted FractureFracture Classification:Classification: DenisDenis
DenisDenis [3]:[3]: threethree--columncolumn classificationclassification ofof spinalspinal fracturesfractures (1980s).(1980s). InjuryInjury toto middlemiddle columncolumn waswas necessarynecessary andand sufficientsufficient toto createcreate instabilityinstability BasedBased classificationclassification onon resultsresults ofof biomechanicalbiomechanical studiesstudies demonstratingdemonstrating thatthat isolatedisolated rupturerupture ofof PLCPLC isis insufficientinsufficient toto createcreate instabilityinstability FractureFracture Classification:Classification: DenisDenis
DividesDivides spinalspinal fracturesfractures intointo minorminor andand majormajor injuriesinjuries MinorMinor injuries:injuries: fracturesfractures ofof transversetransverse process,process, parspars interarticularisinterarticularis,, spinousspinous processprocess MajorMajor injuries:injuries: Fracture type Column Anterior Middle Posterior Compression Compression Intact Intact , or distraction Burst Compression Compression Intact Seat-belt type Intact Distraction Fracture Compression, Distraction , rotation , shear dislocation rotation , shear FractureFracture Classification:Classification: DenisDenis
CompressionCompression FractureFracture BurstBurst FractureFracture FractureFracture Classification:Classification: DenisDenis
SeatSeat--beltbelt typetype FractureFracture dislocationdislocation FractureFracture Classification:Classification: DenisDenis DenisDenis’’ 33 typestypes ofof instability:instability: MechanicalMechanical (1(1st degree)degree) –– maymay resultresult inin latelate kyphotickyphotic deformity.deformity. RequireRequire externalexternal oror operativeoperative stabilization.stabilization. NeurologicNeurologic (2(2nd degree)degree) –– retropulsionretropulsion ofof bonebone fragmentsfragments predisposepredispose patientspatients toto increasedincreased riskrisk forfor neurologicneurologic injury.injury. ControversyControversy re:re: operativeoperative stabilization.stabilization. Mechanical/neurologicMechanical/neurologic (3(3rd degree)degree) –– developdevelop afterafter burstburst fxfx w/neurow/neuro deficitdeficit oror fracture/dislocation.fracture/dislocation. HighlyHighly unstableunstable >> requirerequire operativeoperative decompressiondecompression andand stabilization.stabilization. FractureFracture Classification:Classification: McCormackMcCormack McCormackMcCormack [17]:: loadload--sharingsharing classification,classification, designeddesigned specificallyspecifically forfor thoracolumbarthoracolumbar burstburst fxsfxs (1994)(1994) UsesUses pointpoint system:system: gradesgrades amountamount ofof VBVB comminutioncomminution,, displacementdisplacement ofof fracturefracture fragments,fragments, degreedegree ofof kyphosiskyphosis (1(1--99 points)points)
Score 1 point 2 points 3 points Sagittal collapse 30% >30% 60% Shift 1mm 2mm >2mm Correction 3 degrees 9 degrees 10 degrees FractureFracture Classification:Classification: McCormackMcCormack WithWith McCormack,McCormack, patientspatients withwith >6>6 pointspoints havehave aa largelarge voidvoid oror gap,gap, resultingresulting inin leastleast supportivesupportive anterioranterior andand middlemiddle columnscolumns andand predisposingpredisposing posteriorposterior instrumentationinstrumentation forfor failurefailure
OriginalOriginal goalgoal waswas toto predictpredict failurefailure ofof shortshort-- segmentsegment posteriorposterior fixationfixation forfor burstburst fxsfxs –– prescribesprescribes thatthat injuriesinjuries withwith highhigh scoresscores shouldshould undergoundergo supplementalsupplemental anterioranterior columncolumn supportsupport FractureFracture Classification:Classification: TLICSTLICS Injury morphology [13] TLICSTLICS systemsystem Compression 1 designeddesigned byby thethe SpineSpine Burst 1 TraumaTrauma StudyStudy GroupGroup Translation rotation 3 Distraction 4 (2008).(2008). BasedBased onon 33 PLC integrity aspects:aspects: Intact 0 morphologymorphology ofof thethe injuryinjury Indeterminate 2 Disrupted 3 integrityintegrity ofof thethe PLCPLC Neurological status neurologicalneurological statusstatus ofof thethe Intact 0 patientpatient Nerve root injury 2 Complete 2 Incomplete 3 FractureFracture Classification:Classification: TLICSTLICS
TLICSTLICS determinationdetermination forfor surgery:surgery: <3<3 pointspoints cancan bebe treatedtreated nonnon--operativelyoperatively >5>5 pointspoints usuallyusually requirerequire surgicalsurgical interventionintervention == 44 pointspoints cancan bebe treatedtreated w/orw/or w/ow/o surgerysurgery TLICSTLICS determinationdetermination ofof surgicalsurgical approach:approach: IncompleteIncomplete ++ anterioranterior compressioncompression == ANTANT IncompetentIncompetent PLCPLC == POSTPOST NeurologicalNeurological deficitdeficit ++ incompetentincompetent PLCPLC == ANTANT ++ POSTPOST TreatmentTreatment OptionsOptions
ControversyControversy regardingregarding operativeoperative vs.vs. nonnon-- operativeoperative management,management, surgicalsurgical approachapproach
TreatmentTreatment basedbased onon maximizingmaximizing neurologicneurologic recoveryrecovery andand preventingpreventing neurologicneurologic declinedecline –– identifyidentify unstableunstable fracturesfractures NonNon--operativeoperative ManagementManagement
MostMost fracturesfractures inin thoracolumbarthoracolumbar/lumbar/lumbar regionregion consistconsist ofof compression,compression, burstburst fractures,fractures, andand isolatedisolated dorsaldorsal columncolumn fracturesfractures –– stablestable fxsfxs CompressionCompression fxsfxs:: stablestable ifif PLC,PLC, alongalong withwith dorsaldorsal vertebralvertebral body,body, isis notnot disrupteddisrupted (Denis)(Denis) –– bracingbracing BurstBurst fxsfxs:: stablestable ifif nono PLCPLC injury/dorsalinjury/dorsal elementelement fxfx.. NeurologicallyNeurologically intactintact patientpatient >> bracingbracing NonNon--operativeoperative ManagementManagement MumfordMumford etet alal
4141 ptspts withwith thoracothoraco--lumbarlumbar burstburst fxsfxs w/ow/o neurologicalneurological deficitdeficit treatedtreated conservativelyconservatively AtAt injury,injury, canalcanal compromisecompromise averagedaveraged 37%37% -- atat 22 yearsyears f/uf/u,, 2/32/3 resolutionresolution ofof fragmentsfragments occludingoccluding canalcanal OutcomeOutcome evaluation:evaluation: 49%49% patientspatients reportedreported excellentexcellent outcomesoutcomes relativerelative toto painpain andand functionfunction ProgressionProgression ofof bodybody collapsecollapse onon imagingimaging averagedaveraged 8%8% 11 ptpt developeddeveloped neurologicneurologic deteriorationdeterioration promptingprompting surgerysurgery –– allall otherother ptspts remainedremained neurologicallyneurologically intactintact NonNon--operativeoperative ManagementManagement CantorCantor etet alal 1818 neurologicallyneurologically intactintact patientspatients withwith burstburst fxsfxs w/ow/o PLCPLC disruptiondisruption –– treatedtreated withwith earlyearly ambulationambulation w/bracingw/bracing KyphosisKyphosis:: 1919 degreesdegrees atat timetime ofof injury,injury, 2020 degreesdegrees atat f/uf/u VBVB heightheight loss:loss: 36%36% onon presentation,presentation, maxmax changechange 5%5% atat f/uf/u AtAt f/u15f/u15 ptspts ratedrated theirtheir painpain asas littlelittle oror none,none, 1717 ptspts hadhad littlelittle oror nono restrictionrestriction ofof activity.activity. CTCT scanscan 11 yryr afterafter injuryinjury inin 88 ptspts showedshowed >50%>50% resorptionresorption ofof retropulsedretropulsed bonebone NoNo patientpatient hadhad deteriorationdeterioration ofof neurologicalneurological function.function. SurgicalSurgical TreatmentTreatment
SurgicalSurgical TreatmentTreatment –– 33 components:components: NeuralNeural DecompressionDecompression StabilizationStabilization FusionFusion SurgicalSurgical treatment:treatment: DecompressionDecompression
TLTL andand LspineLspine fxfx w/w/ neuroneuro deficitdeficit havehave significantlysignificantly higherhigher recoveryrecovery raterate whenwhen treatedtreated withwith surgery.surgery. PrimaryPrimary goal:goal: decompressiondecompression ofof thethe spinalspinal canalcanal [4,7] Anterior,Anterior, comparedcompared toto posteriorposterior andand posterolateralposterolateral decompressiondecompression hashas aa higherhigher raterate ofof neurologicneurologic improvementimprovement (88%(88% vs.vs. 64%)64%) andand recoveryrecovery ofof B&BB&B functionfunction (69%(69% vs.vs. 33%).33%).[8,18] AnteriorAnterior decompressiondecompression viavia corpectomycorpectomy:: maximalmaximal degreedegree ofof canalcanal decompressiondecompression TreatmentTreatment ofof lowlow lumbarlumbar (L3(L3--5)5) burstburst fxfx requirerequire posteriorposterior approachapproach SurgicalSurgical treatment:treatment: DecompressionDecompression
TimingTiming ofof surgerysurgery inin patientspatients w/burstw/burst fxsfxs w/neurologicw/neurologic deficitdeficit isis unclearunclear MostMost clinicalclinical studiesstudies havehave shownshown nono correlationcorrelation b/wb/w timingtiming andand amountamount ofof neurologicneurologic recoveryrecovery [7,11] OneOne studystudy ((MirzaMirza etet al,al, 1999)1999) showedshowed improvedimproved neurologicneurologic recoveryrecovery w/surgeryw/surgery withinwithin 7272 hrshrs vs.vs. 1010-- 1414 daysdays [16] PatientsPatients w/progressivew/progressive deficitdeficit needneed emergentemergent decompressiondecompression SurgicalSurgical Treatment:Treatment: StabilizationStabilization
PrimaryPrimary rolerole ofof surgicalsurgical instrumentation:instrumentation: restorerestore immediateimmediate stabilitystability andand correctcorrect acuteacute deformitiesdeformities AnteriorAnterior stabilization:stabilization: Advantage:Advantage: limitslimits fusionfusion toto levellevel aboveabove andand belowbelow injuryinjury Disadvantage:Disadvantage: riskrisk ofof vascularvascular andand visceralvisceral injuryinjury SurgicalSurgical Treatment:Treatment: StabilizationStabilization OptionsOptions forfor posteriorposterior stabilization:stabilization: rodsrods securedsecured byby screws,screws, hooks,hooks, oror wireswires PediclePedicle screwscrew system:system: instrumentinstrument twotwo levelslevels aboveabove andand belowbelow injuryinjury ShortShort segmentsegment stabilizationstabilization (one(one levellevel aboveabove andand below)below) hashas highhigh raterate ofof constructconstruct failure.failure. IfIf spinalspinal flexibilityflexibility isis priority,priority, cancan bebe combinedcombined w/anteriorw/anterior instrumentationinstrumentation [17,19] SurgicalSurgical Treatment:Treatment: FusionFusion LongLong termterm goalgoal ofof instrumentation:instrumentation: maintainmaintain properproper spinalspinal alignmentalignment andand stabilitystability untiluntil bonebone fusionfusion occursoccurs [9,19] WithoutWithout solidsolid fusion,fusion, metallicmetallic implantsimplants eventuallyeventually breakbreak InIn orderorder forfor fusionfusion toto occur,occur, bonebone graftgraft oror graftgraft replacementreplacement mustmust have:have: OsteogenicityOsteogenicity OsteoinductivityOsteoinductivity OsteoconductivityOsteoconductivity SurgicalSurgical Treatment:Treatment: FusionFusion AnteriorAnterior fusion:fusion: AutograftAutograft (Iliac(Iliac crest)crest) AllograftAllograft (Femoral(Femoral oror humeralhumeral shaft)shaft) SyntheticSynthetic cagecage PosteriorPosterior fusion:fusion: DecorticationDecortication ofof exposedexposed bonebone elementselements ImplantationImplantation ofof bonebone fragmentfragment oror bonebone matrixmatrix ThoracolumbarThoracolumbar/Lumbar/Lumbar BurstBurst Fractures:Fractures: OverviewOverview
EpidemiologyEpidemiology AnatomyAnatomy InitialInitial AssessmentAssessment ImagingImaging InjuryInjury Mechanism/BiomechanicsMechanism/Biomechanics FractureFracture ClassificationClassification TreatmentTreatment Options:Options: OperativeOperative vs.vs. NonNon-- operativeoperative ManagementManagement ReferencesReferences
[1] Tran NT, Watson NA, Tender AF, et al. Mechanism of the burst fracture in the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 1995; 20:1984-8. [2] Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C. Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine 1996;21:492-9. [3] Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983;8:817-31. [4] Bohlman HH. Treatment of fractures and dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:165-9. [5] Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 1994;3:184-201. [6] Flanders AE. Thoracolumbar trauma imaging overview. Inst Course Lect 1999;48:429-31. [7] Benzel EC, Larson SJ. Functional recovery after decompressive operation for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Neurosurgery. 1986;19:772–8. [8] Bradford DS, McBride GG. Surgical management of thoracolumbar spine fractures with incomplete neurologic deficits. Clin Orthop. 1987;218:201–16. [9] Whitesides TE. Traumatic kyphosis of the thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop. 1977;128:78– 92. [10] Holdsworth F. Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1534–51. ReferencesReferences
[11] Bradford DS, Akbarnia BA, Winter RB, et al. Surgical stabilization of fracture and fracture dislocations of the thoracic spine. Spine. 1977;2:185–96. [12] McCulloch PT, France J, Jones DL, et al. Helical computer tomography alone compared with plain radiographs with adjunct computed tomography to evaluate the cervical spine after high-energy trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2388–94. [13] Rihn JA, Anderson DT, Vaccaro A, et al. A review of the TLICS system: a novel, user- friendly thoracolumbar trauma classification system. Acta Orthopaedica 2008; 79 (4): 461-6. [14] Keenen TL, Anthony J, Benson DR. Dural tears associated with lumbar burst fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4:243–5. [15] Holdsworth FW. Fractures, dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1963;45:6–20. [16] Mirza SK, Krengel WF, Chapman JR, et al. Early versus delayed surgery for acute cervical spinal cord injury. Clin Orthop. 1999;359:104–14. [17] McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines R. The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine. 1994;19:1741–44. [18] Gertzbein SD. Scoliosis Research Society: multicenter spine fracture study. Spine. 1992;17:528–40. [19] McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR. Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:162–7