Inflation Drops to 7.5 Percent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inflation Drops to 7.5 Percent 34 - THE HERALD. Wed,, April 22, 1981 Inflation drops to 7.5 percent WASHINGTON (UPI) - A The Labor Department, using un­ means goods costing consumers $100 nual rate, a sign of moderating price leveling off of gasoline and oil prices of $337 will climb in July to about ly adjusted. published seasonally adjusted index in 1967 now cost $^.10. pressure throughout the economy. $374.00. ’The 11.2 percent raise in With today’s announcement helped bring down the annual rate of figures, calculated the annual rate ’The Labor Department said gas­ In February energy prices inflation to 7.5 percent in March, the payments is less than the 14.3 per­ having a major bearing on Social of consumer price Inflation at 7.5 oline prices took a big jump in skyrocketed because of decontrol, cent raise made last year at this Security benefits. Treasury lowest level since last summer, the percent. That is the lowest since Ju­ March, but by much less than in accounting for 54.3 percent of the government reported today. time, but more than 1979’s increase Secretary Donald Regan said ly, when plummeting mortgage in­ January or February, as the effects entire CPI Increase. of 9.9 percent. Wednesday he opposes “the whole The-latest reading of the Con­ terest rates brought overall price in­ of President Reagan’s early decon­ Both transportation and housing sumer Price Index means Social The maximum Social Security theory of indexing” — tying wages flation down to a 1 percent annual trol of domestic oil prices began to indexes reflected the good news of benefit for a single worker retiring and government benefits to inflation Security payments will climb by 11.2 level, after revision. February’s an­ fade. ’The decline promised even energy price moderation index in percent starting in July for 36 this year is $677 a month. That pay­ through cost-of-livihg increases. nualized inflation rate was 12.1 per­ more dramatic improvement for the March, showing their smallest in­ ment now goes up to $752.90 begin­ million recipients. cent. next month, April, when energy in­ creases in seven months. “If we indexed everything who Slower gasoline and oil price rises ning in July. The unadjusted figure — the peg flation is expected to be much less Food and beverage prices, which The March rise in consumer would care about inflation?" he helped offset rising food and not only for Social SMurity payment pronounced. grew by 0.3 in February, asked clothing prices to produce a 0.6 per­ prices compares with a 1 percent Increases but also for many private Had gasoline and oil prices stayed accelerate slightly in March, up 0.4 rise in February, 0.7 percent in cent hike in the index for the month, contract cost of living adjustments flat in March, price increases for all percent. “To the extent we can eliminate seasonally adjusted. In February, it January, 1.1 percent in December indexing we will,” Regan promised — showed the Consumer Price Index other consumer goods would have The increase in Social Security and 1 percent for each of the went up 1 percent. for March reaching 265.1. That gone up only 4.9 percent, at an an­ payments means the average check in remarks to about 50 construction M erit previous three months, all seasonal­ industrv lobbyists. Revamp of iHaudirati.'I 2 ■ Vi*,, Crossroads S i K ' Manchester, Conn. supported Thursday April 23, 1981 25 Cents 3 MANCHESTER - A town counseling and substance abuse in­ Department of Human Services’ formation center faces a $2,500 evaluation released today supports budget deficit for the remainder of Constant pain the Crossroads counseling and drug the present fiscal year. The human information center and the re­ service department’s decision to organization of the Drug Advisory keep fiscal 1981 appropriations for Council, the non-profit organization the center in its budget wasn’t which established Crossroads. assured until the evaluation was haunts Reagan ’The DAC about two weeks ago completed. moved to disassociate itself from Mrs. Marcus’ apparent decision to direct control over Crossroads, and support the expenditure takes some WASHINGTON (UPI) - Presi­ first few months (in office) and so the human services department of the bite from her earlier dent Reagan, in constant "pain or forth,” he said. "I see some of the agreed. As a result. Crossroads is statements calling Crossroad’s discomfort" from his chest wound, milling in crowds and so forth that expected to seek revised status as a future “tentative.” Still, the town says he wonders why the attempt on we’ve done and I find myself self-incorporated agency. his life didn’t happen “27 times wondering. Well, why didn't this Board of Directors must make nuts before.” Mrs. Hanna Marcus, human ser­ and bolts decisions on what is con­ happen 27 times before. ” vices director, today reminded a sidered an extremely tight 1981 Reagan said would-be assassins The interview was held in the formal needs assessment hasn’t had many opportunities to shoot him White House map room. Reporters budget, and its decision on the down since he took office three been undertaken, but said, “At the Crossroads’ appropriation will Helen Thomas of UPI and James present time there is no feasible months ago. but he plans no ad­ Gerstenzang of the AP agreed to decide the agency’s future. ditional security because of the alternative for the agency In the evaluation, the human ser­ limit the questions to Reagan's (Crossroads).’’ March 30 shooting. health and his recollections of the vices department found the agency shooting. ’The report supporting Crossroads initiated a more structured program “1 have a hunch I'll be more will be forwarded to the Board of Reagan vividly recalled the from that which eariier had come alert” in the future, Reagan said in attempted assassination. The shots Directors, as they consider a under fire. In explaining the im­ an interview Wednesday with proposal to allocate $50,031 in the The pain. Initially not realizing he provement, the report singled out United Press International and The was hit. Then seeing his own blood next fiscal for its operation. ’The the agency’s director Elizabeth Associated Press — his first since town funds 90 percent of the center’s Asked if he ever felt in mortal Peterson. being hit by a .22-caliber slug 25 danger, Reagan said: operations. "The present director was days ago. Despite the funding, the "No, as a matter of fact it still working alone during July of 1980. "The 70-year-old president, seems kind of unreal I knew there All staff positions were not filled un­ wearing a gray light wool suit, had to be shots and my first instinct til October. ’The assessment of ac­ walked a bit stiffly. But he was in was to take a look behind and see tivities were reviewed from the good spirits, had rosy cheeks and what was going on and the Secret standpoint of observation of a punctuated many of his comments Service man behind me had a developing program,” the report with humor. different idea, and the next thing 1 said. Generally, he said, “I'm feeling knew I found myself pushed into the Witness At the same time, the evaluation fine." car. found the DAC deficient in gover­ Late in the interview, he said: "I knew I had been hit but I ning Crossroads. Citing the DAC for “There is just that kind of pain or thought it was from the Secret Se. tells of not controlling policy changes, it discomfort there constantly that you vice man landing on me in the car. I concluded that its members were hope day by day is getting less, and must say it was the most paralyzing not well-informed on the activities that I think is getting less and less. pain. I’ve described it as if someone of the agency. “But ... other than that. I've hit you with a hammer. Five years ago, M ER IT started a whole racism “The DAC is presently attempting resumed at a little slower pace my "But that sensation came after I to re-establish its own purpose and it regimen of exercise I've always was in the car ... and I thought the is doubtful that they have been in a HARTFORD - Mildred Torres, done for keeping fit and I don't think pain would go away. Suddenly I new era in low tar sm ddng by delivering position to exercise the control I’m going to hurdle any tables in the found I was coughing up blood. We an activist in Hartford’s Hispanic needed for the direction of the community and a former Hartford room here for awhile." both decided maybe I had broken a Crossroads program,” said the Reagan said he isn't plagued with rib, and had punctured a lung so we City Council member, testified in evaluation. It also reported DAC taste way out (fproport ion to tar federal court this morning that nightmares about the shooting, but had to go to the hospital ' members were unfamiliar with its President Reagan describes in an interview Wednesday the has thought about it often, par­ Reagan said his main concern on Manchester has a “Racist” reputa­ own by-laws. tion. attempt on his life. Reagan said “I knew i had been hurt... but i ticularly in the context of his brief the way to the hospital was he felt Now the M ERITera surges ahead While not solidly establishing the term in office.
Recommended publications
  • The Discriminatory History of Gun Control David Babat University of Rhode Island
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2009 The Discriminatory History of Gun Control David Babat University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Babat, David, "The Discriminatory History of Gun Control" (2009). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 140. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/140http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/140 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. David Babat [email protected] The Discriminatory History of Gun Control Introduction Gun control in the United States is based on a long history of discrimination which continues to this day. While blacks were the first targets of gun control measures, different racial and ethnic minorities have been targeted over time, and today the poor now face economic discrimination in many gun control laws. Gun control may be portrayed as a measure to reduce crime,1 but even in its earliest forms firearms regulation has been used as a means to control specific societal groups by keeping them from possessing weapons. The first selectively restrictive gun control legislation was enacted in the pre-Revolution South and primarily aimed at keeping free blacks from owning firearms and maintaining a white monopoly on power. Many different forms of gun control laws were implemented before and after the Revolution to keep firearms out of African-American hands.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Favors: a Sampling of Assault Weapon and Saturday Night Special Manufacturers That Would Be Protected
    Violence Policy Center 1 140 1gth Street, NW 202.822.8200 voice Suite 600 202.822.8205 fax rr Washington, DC 20036 www.vpc.org web "Small" Fauors A Sampling of Assault Weapon and Saturday Night Special Manufacturers That Would be Protected by the Product Liability Bill's "Small Business" Gap on Punitive Damages JUNE 19gB (Revised edition) The Violence Policy Center is a national non-profit educational organization that conducts research and public education on firearms violence and provides information and analysis to policymakers, journalists, grassroots advocates, and the general public. The Center examines the role of firearms in America, analyzes trends and patterns in firearms violence, and explores new ways to reduce firearm-related death and injury. For more information about this report, please contact Violence Policy Center Director of Federal Policy Kristen Rand at 202-822-8200 x102. Past studies released by the Violence Policy Center include: a Young Guns: How the Gun Lobby Nurtures America's Youth Gun Culture (March 1998) a Target America: Can the Flood of Foreign Assault Weapons Be Stopped? (March 1998) a Where Did You Get That Statistic?-A Firearms and Firearms Violence Bibliography and Research Guide for Advocates Working to Reduce Firearms Violence (February 1998) a License to Kill: Arrests lnvolving Texas Concealed Handgun License Holders (January 1998) a That Was Then, This is Now: The NRA and the Gun lndustry Talk About Assault Weaponslrom Both Sides of Their Mouths (December 1997) a Joe Camel With Feathers: How the
    [Show full text]
  • Lawsuits Against the Gun Industry: a Comparative Institutional Analysis Timothy D
    Georgia State University College of Law Reading Room Faculty Publications By Year Faculty Publications 2000 Lawsuits Against the Gun Industry: A Comparative Institutional Analysis Timothy D. Lytton Georgia State University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub Part of the Second Amendment Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Timothy D. Lytton, Lawsuits Against the Gun Industry: A Comparative Institutional Analysis, 32 Conn. L. Rev. 1247 (2000). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications By Year by an authorized administrator of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lawsuits Against the Gun Industry: A Comparative Institutional Analysis TIMOTHY D. LYTrON" I. INTRODUCTION The current wave of lawsuits against the gun industry is part of a na- tionwide debate over how to reduce gun violence. Proponents of these lawsuits view litigation as a way to promote controversial proposals aimed at reducing gun violence, such as making manufacturers responsible for supervising retail gun sales and forcing them to install safety features that would render guns inoperable in the hands of unauthorized users.' To op- ponents, these proposals would unfairly burden gun manufacturers and could make it harder for law-abiding citizens to use guns for self-defense? Lawsuits against the gun industry are also part of another debate over the proper role of the tort system in the process of making public policy. Proponents of the suits argue that litigation is a legitimate way to regulate a powerful industry whose lobbying efforts have distorted the legislative process? Opponents counter that policymaking ought to be left to legisla- * Associate Professor,New York Law School (Albany Law School beginning July 1, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Exceptions
    Violence Policy Center 1140 1 9th Street, NW 202.822.8200 voice Suite 600 202.822.8205 fax Washington, DC 20036 www.vpc.org web DEADLY EXCEPTIONS Gun Manufacturers That Would be Protected by the "Small Business" Cap on Punitive Damages February 2000 The Violence Policy Center is a national non-profit educationalorganization that conducts research and public education on firearms violence and provides information and analysis to policymakers, journalists, grassroots advocates, and the general public. The Center examines the role of firearms in America, analyzes trends and patterns in firearms violence, and explores new ways to reduce firearm-related death and injury. For more information about this report, please contact Violence Policy Center Director of Federal Policy Kristen Rand at 202-822-82O0 x102. This study was funded with the support of The Center on Crime, Communities & Culture of The Open Society lnstitute, The George Gund Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, and The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Past studies released by the Violence Policy Center include a Where Did You Get That Statistic? -A Bibliography and Resource Guide for Advocates Working to Reduce Gun Death and lnjury (January 20OO) a The Endgame: Any Settlement of Firearms Litigation Must Address Three Specific Areas of Gun lndustry Conduct and Include a Strict Enforcement Mechanism (December 1999) a Cashing in on the New Millennium: How the Firearms Industry Exploits Y2K Fears to Sell More Guns (December 1999) a Firearms Production in America-|999 Edition (November 1999) a When Men Murder Women: An Analysis of I gg7 Homicide Data (October 1999) a Gold Medal Gunslingers: Combat Shooting Targets the Olympic Games (July 1999) a One Shot, One Kill: Civilian Sales of Military Sniper Rifles (May 1999) a Start 'Em Young: Recruitment of Kids to the Gun Culture (April 1999) a License to Kiil, and Kidnap, and Rape, and Drive Drunk..
    [Show full text]
  • Section Four the Gun Industry's Response
    The Consumer Federation of America (CFA) is a nonprofit association of 300 consumer groups, representing more than 50 million Americans that was established in 1968 to advance the consumer interest through research, education, and advocacy. This report was authored by CFA Firearms Project Director Susan Peschin, firearms consumer safety and policy consultant Whit Collins, and former chief lobbyist for the gun industry Robert Ricker. CFA thanks the following individuals for their expertise, comments, and review: Josh Horwitz and Jill Ward of the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence Richard Miller of Monsees, Miller, Mayer, Presley & Amick Chris Waldrop and Rachel Weintraub of Consumer Federation of America This report was generously funded by The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. - 2 - - 3 - Introduction Beyond the rhetorical debate between “gun control” and “gun rights” lies a longstanding and unaddressed problem: every year many gun owners and bystanders are killed or injured by defective or hazardously-designed guns. Consider the following real-life examples that graphically illustrate how guns with safety-related defects can kill or seriously injure gun owners and innocent bystanders: • A gun owner took his .22 Colt single-action revolver with him on a fishing trip. He was sitting on a rock when the gun fell from his holster, struck a rock, and discharged. The bullet lodged in his bladder, damaging vital nerves and rendering him impotent.1 • Mike Lewy was unloading his Remington Model 700 rifle in his basement apartment. As he moved the safety to the fire position in order to lift the bolt handle to eject a chambered cartridge, the gun discharged.
    [Show full text]
  • The Racist Origins of US Gun Control
    The Racist Origins of US Gun Control Laws Designed To Disarm Slaves, Freedmen, And African-Americans by Steve Ekwall OVERVIEW Before the Civil War ended, State "Slave Codes" prohibited slaves from owning guns. After President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, and after the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolishing slavery was adopted and the Civil War ended in 1865, States persisted in prohibiting blacks, now freemen, from owning guns under laws renamed "Black Codes." They did so on the basis that blacks were not citizens, and thus did not have the same rights, including the right to keep and bear arms protected in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as whites. This view was specifically articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in its infamous 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford to uphold slavery. The United States Congress overrode most portions of the Black Codes by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The legislative histories of both the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as The Special Report of the Anti-Slavery Conference of 1867, are replete with denunciations of those particular statutes that denied blacks equal access to firearms. [Kates, "Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment," 82 Mich. L. Rev. 204, 256 (1983)] However, facially neutral disarming through economic means laws remain in effect. After the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1878, most States turned to "facially neutral" business or transaction taxes on handgun purchases. However, the intention of these laws was not neutral.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIEF of BLACK GUNS MATTER, a GIRL & a GUN WOMEN’S SHOOTING LEAGUE and ARMED EQUALITY AS AMICI CURIAE in SUPPORT of PETITIONERS ______Jonathan S
    No. 20-843 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ________________ NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., ROBERT NASH, BRANDON KOCH, Petitioners, v. KEVIN P. BRUEN, in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of New York State Police, RICHARD J. MCNALLY, JR., in His Official Capacity as Justice of the New York Supreme Court, Third Judicial District, and Licensing Officer for Rensselaer County, Respondents. ________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _________________________________________________ BRIEF OF BLACK GUNS MATTER, A GIRL & A GUN WOMEN’S SHOOTING LEAGUE AND ARMED EQUALITY AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS _________________________________________________ Jonathan S. Goldstein Counsel of Record Shawn M. Rodgers GOLDSTEIN LAW PARTNERS, LLC 11 Church Road Hatfield, PA 19440 610.949.0444 July 20, 2021 [email protected] LEGAL PRINTERS LLC ! Washington, DC ! 202-747-2400 ! legalprinters.com i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the State of New York’s denial of a petitioner’s application for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED ........................................ i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .............................. 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....................................................... 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................. 5 I. SECTION 400.00(2)(F)
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Violence in America
    GUN VIOLENCE IN AMERICA GUN VIOLENCE IN AMERICA The Struggle for Control Alexander DeConde Northeastern University Press Boston Northeastern University Press Copyright 2001 by Alexander DeConde All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data DeConde, Alexander Gun violence in America : the struggle for control / Alexander DeConde. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1–55553–486–4 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Gun control—United States. 2. Violent crimes—United States. 3. Firearms ownership—United States. 4. United States—Politics and government. I. Title. HV7436.D43 2001 363.3Ј3Ј0973—dc21 00–054821 Designed by Janis Owens Composed in Electra by Coghill Composition Company in Richmond, Virginia. Printed and bound by The Maple Press Company in York, Pennsylvania. The paper is Sebago Antique, an acid-free sheet. Manufactured in the United States of America 050403020154321 Contents Introduction 3 1 Origins and Precedents 7 2 The Colonial Record 17 3 To the Second Amendment 27 4 Militias, Duels, and Gun Keeping 39 5 A Gun Culture Emerges 53 6 Reconstruction, Cheap Guns, and the Wild West 71 7 The National Rifle Association 89 8 Urban Control Movements 105 9 Gun-Roaring Twenties 119 10 Direct Federal Controls 137 11 Guns Flourish, Opposition Rises 155 12 Control Act of 1968 171 13 Control Groups on the Rise 189 14 Gun Lobby Glory Years 203 15 A Wholly Owned NRA Subsidiary? 219 16 The Struggle Nationalized 235 17 The Brady Act 249 18 School Shootings and Gun Shows 265 19 Clinton v.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Gun Control in America
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1976 The History of Gun Control in America Gary W. Hansen Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the United States History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hansen, Gary W., "The History of Gun Control in America" (1976). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2281. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2278 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN .ABSTR.::\CT 01" '.l'HE THESIS OF G<'H'Y W. Hansen for. the Mas tm: of Arts in HiBtory presented February 27, 1976. T:tt le: The History of Gun Control in America APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS CO.MHITTEE: ;,,.0 \ It Tltamas D. Mor·r is -------·-- This thesis examines the significant-------- guu control legi.s lat ion enacted in the Unii.:ed States, and the movement ~-to enact it. Tt is a content:ton---- of thi.s thesis that s<?~nt.1.- mcut favm: ing gun cont·!:.·ol com\f:.s esnenti.a lly from u~b.;;i.r~ ,_ ......_ which are most remote. frc:n Amer.tc..:i 's fronti.~!r her.i- tage, and thi;: common usag(" cf fire arms. Sent in~i:-:nt op;~·.;;.e inr.; gun control~ on thE: other hand, comeG pri.m.r-1ri ly frcfl1 th+~ ------- - West and South which are the areas nearent the frontier -,:.'-,,.,:...,;.-,~·- .
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Control and the Color of Law
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 37 Issue 2 Article 5 June 2019 Gun Control and the Color of Law Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Second Amendment Commons Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Gun Control and the Color of Law, 37(2) LAW & INEQ. (2019). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol37/iss2/5 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. 387 GUN CONTROL AND THE COLOR OF THE LAW Alicia L. Granse† There is a world of difference between thirty million unarmed, submissive Black people and thirty million Black people armed with freedom and defense guns and the strategic methods of liberation. – Huey P. Newton, June 20, 19671 Introduction: In August of 2017, then-St. Paul, Minnesota mayoral candidate Melvin Carter’s home was burglarized. A lockbox containing two firearms he had inherited from his father, a retired St. Paul police officer, was stolen.2 In response, the St. Paul Police Federation (a police union) wrote an open letter to the community asking the Black candidate a series of questions regarding his gun storage practices: where he had gotten the firearms, whether he had taken a gun safety course, and why he had waited to report the break-in.3 The letter was followed by a mailer from the Political Action Committee (PAC) Building a Better St. Paul—primarily funded by the St. Paul Police Federation—which claimed that “[o]ver 100 shots have been fired since August 15 when Melvin Carter’s guns went missing”—despite there being no allegation that Carter’s guns had, in fact, fired a single shot.4 The Carter campaign †.
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Control and Economic Discrimination: the Melting-Point Case-In-Point T
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 85 Article 7 Issue 3 Winter Winter 1995 Gun Control and Economic Discrimination: The Melting-Point Case-in-Point T. Markus Funk Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation T. Markus Funk, Gun Control and Economic Discrimination: The eM lting-Point Case-in-Point, 85 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 764 (1994-1995) This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/95/8503-0764 THE JOURNAL OF CuMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 85, No. 3 Copyright @ 1995 by Northwestern University, School of Law Pybntd in U.S.A. COMMENT GUN CONTROL AND ECONOMIC DISCRIMINATION: THE MELTING- POINT CASE-IN-PONT T. MARKUS FUNK* "Setting a high minimum price for handguns would be an effec- tive means of reducing availability to precisely those groups that ac- count for the bulk of the violent crime problem."' I. INTRODUCTION In 1992, an estimated daily average of 36 people were murdered with handguns, 32 women were raped at gunpoint, 931 people were the victims of armed robberies, and 1557 people were assaulted with a gun in the United States.2 During the same year, handgun crimes accounted for approximately thirteen percent of all documented vio- lent crimes.3 Some states have attempted to bridle such illegal firearm violence with "melting-point laws." The Illinois, South Carolina, Ha- waii, and Minnesota legislatures have adopted rigid melting-point schemes designed to remove so-called Saturday Night Specials from 4 the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Firearms and the Black Community: an Assessment of the Modern Orthodoxy Commentary: Gun Control Policy and the Second Amendment
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Connecticut Law Review School of Law 2013 Firearms and the Black Community: An Assessment of the Modern Orthodoxy Commentary: Gun Control Policy and the Second Amendment Nicholas J. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review Recommended Citation Johnson, Nicholas J., "Firearms and the Black Community: An Assessment of the Modern Orthodoxy Commentary: Gun Control Policy and the Second Amendment" (2013). Connecticut Law Review. 204. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/204 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 45 JULY 2013 NUMBER 5 Article Firearms Policy and the Black Community: An Assessment of the Modern Orthodoxy NICHOLAS J. JOHNSON The heroes of the modern civil rights movement were more than just stoic victims of racist violence. Their history was one of defiance and fighting long before news cameras showed them attacked by dogs and fire hoses. When Fannie Lou Hamer revealed she kept a shotgun in every corner of her bedroom, she was channeling a century old practice. And when delta share cropper Hartman Turnbow, after a shootout with the Klan, said “I don’t figure I was being non-nonviolent, (yes non-nonviolent) I was just protecting my family”, he was invoking an evolved tradition that embraced self-defense and disdained political violence. The precise boundaries and policy implications of that tradition had always been debated as times and context changed. But the basic idea that the community would support indeed exalt the man or woman who fought back in self-defense, even with, nay, especially with arms, has a far longer pedigree than the modern orthodoxy which urges stringent supply controls as the clearly best firearms policy for black folk.
    [Show full text]