<<

SPECIAL ARTICLE www.jasn.org

Frontiers in Nephrology: Early —A View Beyond the Lumen

Mario Gossl,* Lilach O. Lerman,† and Amir Lerman*

Divisions of *Cardiovascular Diseases and †Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota

ABSTRACT permeability) of the , even- Endothelial dysfunction is an established clinical marker of early coronary tually leads to formation of histologically disease and has been shown to be associated with increased cardiovascular mor- identifiable atherosclerotic lesions. At bidity and mortality. New concepts now extend the view of endothelial dysfunction this point, atherogenesis may become a beyond the traditional involvement of the coronary arterial endothelium alone. self-perpetuating process, a vicious cycle Recent research indicates that the coronary vessel wall, especially the vasa vaso- in which accumulating inflammatory rum, as well as bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells may be subject and noninflammatory cells release che- to proatherosclerotic changes, even before the development of angiographically mokines, cytokines, and growth and evident endothelial dysfunction; therefore, “microvascular endothelial dysfunction,” transcription factors that attract more which is composed of dysfunction of the vasa vasorum’s endothelium as well as inflammatory cells and lead to progres- “microcellular endothelial dysfunction,” reflecting impaired mobilization and func- sion of the atherosclerotic lesion and tion of endothelial progenitor cells, may precede “macrovascular endothelial dys- eventually to local complications, function.” Vasa vasorum neovascularization, with endothelial leakage and dysfunc- namely plaque rupture with local arterial tion increasing influx of proinflammatory and proatherogenic cellular and (Figure 1). noncellular substances into the vessel wall, is proposed as one feature of this new Recent research has broadened our concept. In addition, the role of bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells view of the atherosclerotic process. is discussed as are the potential impact of impaired progenitor cell mobilization, Whereas the luminal endothelium was tra- release from the marrow, and function in acute and stable coronary artery disease. ditionally considered as playing the main Finally, potential future therapies are proposed, focusing on interventions that may role in vascular regulations, we know today prevent or diminish the development of the microvascular and microcellular endo- that a considerable amount of endothe- thelial dysfunction. lium is also present in the abluminal part of the vessel wall, at the level of the vasa vaso- J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2836–2842, 2007. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007030333 rum. Several studies2–5 identified a possible major impact of inflammatory invasion from the adventitia into the inner vessel THE TRADITIONAL VIEW OF merous studies have identified risk fac- wall layers, rather than only the entrance ATHEROSCLEROSIS tors for the development of endothelial via the luminal endothelium. dysfunction, but factors such as hyper- It is therefore obvious that the vascu- Atherosclerosis is considered a systemic, cholesterolemia, smoking, diabetes, met- lar endothelium and its interaction with chronic inflammatory disease predomi- abolic syndrome, and hypertension are the surrounding environment play a cru- nantly of the arterial vessel wall with local the most prominent. cial role in the pathogenesis of athero- complications that determine morbidity Endothelial dysfunction involves the and mortality. The classic response-to- trans-formation of vasoprotective prop- injury model described physical injury to erties of the endothelium into proath- Published online ahead of print. Publication date the endothelium as the first step of erosclerotic features: The endothelium available at www.jasn.org. atherogenesis, but it has been subse- becomes procoagulant, produces vaso- Correspondence to: Dr. Amir Lerman, Division of quently recognized that endothelial dys- constrictive molecules, and releases cyto- Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN function (e.g., the impaired bioavailabil- kines that attract inflammatory cells, in- 55905. Phone: 507-255-6670; Fax: 507-255-1824; ity of the endothelial-derived vasodilator cluding lymphocytes and macrophages. E-mail: [email protected] substance nitric oxide [NO]) may also be Accumulation of these inflammatory Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of considered as a functional “injury.”1 Nu- cells, as well as increased leakiness (i.e., Nephrology

2836 ISSN : 1046-6673/1811-2836 J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2836–2842, 2007 www.jasn.org SPECIAL ARTICLE sclerosis. Exposed to multiple circulating adequate interaction is crucial for a suc- important role in the repair of injured en- atherogenic risk factors, it undergoes a cessful repair. Endothelial dysfunction has dothelium, and EPC dysfunction may be a constant injury-and-repair process that been identified as a marker of early athero- very early marker of atherosclerotic may result in several potential outcomes, sclerotic disease before the development of disease. which may also be a progressive cascade a lumen-compromising plaque and, The pathomechanisms of conduit ves- of events (Figure 1): hence, as an indicator of the unsuccessful sel endothelial dysfunction have been rela- repair process. As a result, endothelial dys- tively well established.8 Therefore, in this 1. The repair is successful and heals the endothelium function has been shown to be associated review, we focus on possible expression and vascular wall, and endothelial function remains 6 normal. with adverse cardiovascular outcomes ; and consequences of endothelial dysfunc- 2. The repair is unsuccessful, and although the endo- however, endothelial dysfunction not only tion within the vessel wall and EPC, two thelium and vascular wall show no morphologic may be the result of unsuccessful repair but novel and exciting areas of current basic changes, endothelial dysfunction occurs (impaired also may actually be among the underlying and clinical research that may open new bioavailability of NO, abnormal vasoconstriction). causes. Indeed, Lerman and Zeiher7 re- ways for therapeutic approaches. 3. The repair is unsuccessful, results in vascular scar- ring characterized by fibrotic tissue and calcifica- cently suggested that the site of endothelial tion, and promotes the injury process. dysfunction should be extended beyond MICROVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL 4. The repair is lacking or insufficient, and the injury the traditional location at the conduit ves- DYSFUNCTION OF THE VASA process continues into complicated atherosclerotic sels into the vessel wall and possibly even VASORUM lesions. into the bone marrow, the origin of endo- The proper function of all systems in- thelial progenitor cells (EPC). In addition, Early endothelial injury (e.g., in hyper- volved in the repair process as well as their EPC have been demonstrated to play an cholesterolemia, smoking, or diabetes)

Figure 1. Four different outcomes of the repair process in early atherosclerosis, focusing on two participating systems reviewed here: Vasa vasorum and bone marrow–derived EPC. The initial event is an injury inflicted on the endothelial layer through genetic disposition and/or atherosclerotic risk factors, both at the luminal side and at the level of vasa vasorum within the vessel wall. Subsequently, endothelial cell activation, vasa vasorum neovascularization, and mobilization of EPC take place. (1) Normal, successful repair of the injury, resulting in a preserved endothelial function and vessel wall morphology. (2 through 4) Results of abnormal, unsuccessful repair: (2) The vessel wall still shows no morphologic changes, but endothelial function is impaired. (3) The vessel wall morphology changes into vascular scarring characterized by fibrotic tissue and calcification. (4) The repair is lacking or insufficient, injury continues, and a complicated atherosclerotic lesion develops.

J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2836–2842, 2007 Endothelial Dysfunction: A New View 2837 SPECIAL ARTICLE www.jasn.org may lead to a leaky endothelial layer.9 substances (e.g., oxidized LDL, cyto- hypercholesterolemia is associated not This early injury not only takes place at kines, macrophages) into the vessel only with macrovascular endothelial the luminal endothelium but also may wall12,13 and that they in turn also play a dysfunction (i.e., paradoxic vasocon- conceivably extend to the endothelium significant role in draining the arterial striction) but also with dysfunction of of the vasa vasorum within the vessel vessel wall.14 Moreover, it has been the vasa vasorum’s endothelium. This wall. Vasa vasorum (both arterial and ve- shown in a porcine model of hypercho- may lead to intermittent vasoconstric- nous) are microvessels located within the lesterolemic early atherosclerosis that tion causing hypoxia within the vessel wall of bigger , such as the renal vasa vasorum neovascularization occurs wall and subsequent reactive, local pro- and coronary arteries, providing blood before the development of atheroscle- duction of vascular endothelial growth supply to and drainage from the vessel rotic plaques.15–17 This vasa vasorum factor (VEGF) with enhanced vasa vaso- wall.10 Importantly, the arterial vasa va- neovascularization leads to an average rum neovascularization and a further in- sorum originate either from the artery it- increase of endothelial exchange surface crease in endothelial exchange surface, self (vasa vasorum interna) or from its within the vessel wall of Ͼ60%,11 which creating a vicious cycle. major branches (vasa vasorum externa) conceivably further promotes influx of Together, these important facts sug- and are thus directly connected to the proatherogenic substances into the ves- gest that the inner and the outer arterial systemic circulation (Figure 2). The sig- sel wall. In addition, using cryogenic mi- vessel wall layers are simultaneously ex- nificance of the vasa vasorum becomes crocomputed tomography, we demon- posed to proatherosclerotic cellular and evident when considering the endothe- strated that the drainage function of noncellular blood components. In fact, lial exchange surface that they provide these newly formed vasa vasorum is also the medial layers are literally surrounded within the vessel wall, which is as large as significantly impaired in this animal by the influx of blood-born noxious sub- 33% of the main lumen’s endothelium in model,14 leading to saturation of the ves- stances or cells through the endothelium normal arteries.11 Several recent studies sel wall tissue and longer exposure time of both the main lumen and the vasa va- demonstrated that the vasa vasorum in- of medial and adventitial cells to proin- sorum. This indicates that microvascular deed serve as important entry ports for flammatory and proatherogenic sub- endothelial dysfunction at the level of the influx of cellular and noncellular stances. Furthermore, functional data vasa vasorum in the early phases of proinflammatory and proatherosclerotic suggest that in the porcine animal model, atherogenesis may amplify alterations

Figure 2. Volume-rendered microcomputed tomography images of the two types of arterial coronary vasa vasorum (examples are from porcine coronaries that represent human anatomy). The main coronary artery lumen and major branches are displayed in gray, vasa vasorum in yellow. Vasa vasorum interna (left) arise directly from the main coronary artery lumen and arborize into the vessel wall. Vasa vasorum externa (the most prevalent type of arterial vasa vasorum; right) originate from major branches of the coronary artery and dive back into the main coronary’s vessel wall.

2838 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2836–2842, 2007 www.jasn.org SPECIAL ARTICLE within the vessel wall that disrupt its ho- tion, and shorter cumulative event-free receptor (VEGF-R2/KDR) is the current meostasis and promote atherogenesis. survival.31 In contrast, in patients with standard. In addition, recent studies It is not surprising, then, that increas- acute coronary syndromes (acute myo- have suggested an important distinction ing evidence suggests that these “vessels cardial infarction and unstable angina between EPC purely identified by cell of vessels” (vasa vasorum) play an im- pectoris), the majority of published liter- surface antigens or by their capability to portant role in the initiation, progres- ature suggests that the number of EPC is form discrete colonies of endothelial sion, and complications of atherosclero- increased.33,34 This increase has been ob- cells in culture35,36 (CF-EPC). Hence, a sis.18–20 Moreover, the spatial vasa served within a few hours from the onset reduction in the number of circulating vasorum density and distribution in dif- of the acute event until 2 mo after.33 EPC may not necessarily reflect in re- ferent vascular beds (carotid, coronary, Most likely, the acute increase in EPC duced potential for neovascularization renal, and femoral arteries) are associ- mobilization is caused by concomitant or re-endothelialization. ated with their propensity to develop release of inflammatory and hematopoi- Studies in patients with diabetes have atherosclerosis.21,22 etic cytokines (e.g., VEGF, IL-8, stromal- shown that recruitment of EPC to the In summary, early microvascular en- derived factor-1). Alas, what looks like a vascular injury site is impaired, indicat- dothelial dysfunction has a significant reasonable, clear difference of EPC ing that endothelial dysfunction, which impact on vessel wall homeostasis, lead- counts in stable (low EPC) versus unsta- is well documented in patients with dia- ing to a proatherosclerotic environment ble (high EPC) coronary syndromes sec- betes, may play a role in this scenario.37 even before the development of visible ondary to a release of mobilizing cyto- In addition, animal models of decreased atherosclerotic lesions. The question kines during the stress situation was NO activity show impaired functionality whether vasa vasorum neovasculariza- lately challenged by a study by Guven et of EPC in repairing the vascular injury tion is beneficial or detrimental, whether al.,35 who found that in patients with an- site.38 Another potential role for the EPC it is a trigger or just an epiphenomenon giographically documented significant from mesenchymal origin may be in de- of atherosclerosis, is still not fully an- coronary artery disease, the number of termining the kind of vascular repair swered; however, it is evident that the se- EPC was actually increased and EPC such as coronary calcification, with EPC verity of atherosclerosis correlates with numbers correlated with maximum an- that carry an osteogenic potential.39 vasa vasorum neovascularization,23–26 giographic stenosis severity. However, The extension of endothelial dysfunc- and animal models of atherosclerosis in- this study used more rigorous histologic tion may be seen in two distinct ways. On dicate that inhibition of vasa vasorum and flow cytometric techniques to quan- the one hand it may extend into bone neovascularization reduces plaque size tify EPC as well as an angiographic defi- marrow microvascular endothelial dys- and influx of proinflammatory cells.13,27 nition of coronary artery disease, which function (i.e., the release of EPC from the Clearly, vasa vasorum may be a very in- makes it hard to compare directly with bone marrow is impaired as a result of teresting future therapeutic target. earlier, potentially conflicting studies. loss of efferent vessels). On the other In all observations, however, it is cru- hand, cardiovascular risk factors and ag- cial to exclude potential cofounders that ing may lead to impaired mobilization, MICROCELLULAR ENDOTHELIAL can influence the EPC counts. These in- migration, proliferation, and survival of DYSFUNCTION OF EPC clude comorbidities, current medical EPC, as well as to dysfunctional EPC that therapy, and the interval between acute are thus proatherogenic.40 Of course, Bone marrow–derived EPC generated stress events (e.g., acute myocardial in- both mechanisms may coexist; therefore, substantial interest and have been the fo- farction, unstable angina pectoris, other endothelial dysfunction and the abnor- cus of basic and clinical cardiovascular significant medical conditions) and pre- mal repair may also be characterized by research in recent years. Emerging evi- vious coronary interventions. Further- the modification of the number and dence suggests that EPC play an impor- more, is seems that potentially conflict- function of proatherogenic EPC pro- tant role in the repair of endothelial in- ing data may be due at least in part to duced and released into systemic circula- jury and restoring local endothelial methodologic differences, especially re- tion; therefore, both the vessel wall (vasa function.28,29 Conversely, a reduction of garding the definition of EPC and coro- vasorum) and circulating EPC are poten- EPC numbers has been shown to be as- nary artery disease. Future studies will tially impaired in the setting of endothe- sociated with endothelial dysfunction30 have to clarify the role of the various lial dysfunction. Moreover, these two and adverse cardiovascular out- types of EPC in well-defined clinical sce- systems might be related. The discrep- comes.31,32 narios, especially because EPC may be- ancy between the number of circulating In stable coronary artery disease (con- come a future therapeutic target. EPC and their colony-forming capacity firmed by coronary angiography), a low Despite the ongoing controversy raises the hypothesis that reduction of number of EPC (CD34ϩ/VEGFR-2ϩ)is about how best to classify EPC, identifi- peripheral EPC may reflect the impair- associated with a higher risk for cardio- cation of hematopoietic cell surface ment of re-endothelialization at the in- vascular death, first major cardiovascu- markers such as CD34 and CD133 and jury site, whereas the increase in the frac- lar event, revascularization, hospitaliza- the vascular endothelial growth factor tion of CF-EPC may confer increased

J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2836–2842, 2007 Endothelial Dysfunction: A New View 2839 SPECIAL ARTICLE www.jasn.org propensity for neovascularization that EPC may also be detrimental in a pa- New diagnostic techniques that are may exhibit in vasa vasorum. Whereas tients with existing complex lesions; designed to detect the early manifesta- vasa vasorum neovascularization may be plaque rupture and acute lethal throm- tion of atherosclerosis are needed. These detrimental as a result of the increased bosis may be a consequence.18 Con- new diagnostic techniques should in- number of entry ports for proatheroscle- versely, experimental data have demon- clude the assessment of endothelial func- rotic substances into the vessel wall, re- strated that intravenous transfusion of tion, the number and function of EPC, endothelialization of the vascular injury EPC may reduce neointima formation.44 and the degree of inflammation and neo- site with EPC would be beneficial. The same complexity is true for a po- vascularization. On the basis of these Hence, the observations of reduced EPC tential antiangiogenic treatment to prevent novel diagnostic tests, a new therapy that in coronary artery disease patients in one vasa vasorum neovascularization. The cur- is directed toward the mechanism of ath- study31 but increased colony-forming rent data are equivocal,45 and the response erosclerosis in addition to the correction EPC in another35 might not be a true to therapy may depend on the vascular of risk factors may attenuate disease pro- contradiction. Whereas the former ex- beds involved. One possible solution might gression and complications. plains the failure to repair the injured en- be local, specifically designed drug delivery dothelium or alternatively re-endotheli- (e.g., through resolvable stents46) that may alization with inadequate EPC (e.g., with not have long-term adverse effects. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS osteogenic potential or other dysfunc- There is an increasing body of evi- tions), the latter explains vasa vasorum dence demonstrating the pleiotropic ef- This work was supported in part by the Na- neovascularization associated with pro- fects of hydroxymethyl glutaryl CoA re- tional Institutes of Health (grants HL6984 gression of atherosclerosis. ductase inhibitors (statins); especially and HL77131) and the Mayo Clinic College It is obvious that the atherosclerotic their anti-inflammatory and antiangio- of Medicine. process is very complex and affected by genic effects certainly make this a possi- the interactions among many systems; ble approach.47 In addition, several stud- therefore, vasa vasorum may well repre- ies have shown that statins increase the DISCLOSURES sent the tubes that deliver the progenitor mobilization of bone marrow–derived None. cells into the vessel wall and their neovas- EPC, possibly through the Akt signaling cularization may enhance delivery.41 pathway.48,49 This increase is reported to Vasa vasorum neovascularization may be comparable to the effect of VEGF on REFERENCES also be detrimental if this facilitates de- EPC mobilization. Taking into account livery of proatherogenic EPC to the in- the low prevalence of adverse effects, sev- 1. Ross R: Atherosclerosis: An inflammatory jured site. eral investigations are advocating the disease. N Engl J Med 340: 115–126, 1999 concept of a wider use of statins, consid- 2. Bobryshev YV, Lord RS: Mapping of vascular ering, of course, that an increase of circu- dendritic cells in atherosclerotic arteries sug- gests their involvement in local immune-in- POSSIBLE FUTURE THERAPEUTIC lating EPC would be beneficial. This con- flammatory reactions. Cardiovasc Res 37: APPROACHES cept is underscored by the recent 799–810, 1998 placement of statins over the counter in 3. Wilcox JN, Scott NA: Potential role of the Clearly, future antiatherosclerotic ther- the United Kingdom. The questions are adventitia in arteritis and atherosclerosis. Int apy has to start very early, before func- the potential long-term adverse effects J Cardiol 54[Suppl]: S21–S35, 1996 4. Okamoto E, Couse T, De Leon H, Vinten- tional and morphologic changes that and ethical boundaries that may prevent Johansen J, Goodman RB, Scott NA, Wilcox take place potentially become irrevers- us from exploring potential interven- JN: Perivascular inflammation after balloon ible. In patients with cardiovascular risk tions. angioplasty of porcine coronary arteries. Cir- factors, local or systemic delivery of en- It seems that the future of antiathero- culation 104: 2228–2235, 2001 dogenous EPC may be an option; how- sclerosis therapy lies in the very early detec- 5. Moos MP, John N, Grabner R, Nossmann S, Gunther B, Vollandt R, Funk CD, Kaiser B, ever, this approach has to be carefully tion of typical features of atherosclerosis Habenicht AJ: The lamina adventitia is the evaluated because recent research indi- and endothelial dysfunction (inflamma- major site of immune cell accumulation in cates that transfused EPC may promote tion, neovascularization); unfortunately, standard chow-fed apolipoprotein E-defi- atherosclerosis42 potentially by their these are difficult to detect using current in cient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol paracrine function to attract proathero- vivo imaging techniques. In addition, bi- 25: 2386–2391, 2005 6. Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nish- sclerotic cells as well as by induction of omarkers are evaluated for the detection of imura RA, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A: Long- neovascularization. In addition, they patients at risk, but larger, prospective term follow-up of patients with mild coro- may differentiate into smooth muscle studies are still needed to pinpoint the best nary artery disease and endothelial cells as a result of a potential common measurements that may allow us to iden- dysfunction. Circulation 101: 948–954, 2000 7. Lerman A, Zeiher AM: Endothelial function: mesenchymal stem cell precursor43 and tify the patient with coronary artery disease Cardiac events. Circulation 111: 363–368, thus promote lesion progression. Induc- before he or she develops endothelial dys- 2005 tion of vessel wall neovascularization by function of any kind. 8. Bonetti PO, Lerman LO, Lerman A: Endothe-

2840 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2836–2842, 2007 www.jasn.org SPECIAL ARTICLE

lial dysfunction: A marker of atherosclerotic 20. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Finn AV, Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23: 168– Gold HK, Tulenko TN, Wrenn SP, Narula J: cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med 353: 175, 2003 Atherosclerotic plaque progression and vul- 999–1007, 2005 9. Eriksson A, Cao R, Roy J, Tritsaris K, Wahl- nerability to rupture: Angiogenesis as a 32. Schmidt-Lucke C, Rossig L, Fichtlscherer S, estedt C, Dissing S, Thyberg J, Cao Y: Small source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arterio- Vasa M, Britten M, Kamper U, Dimmeler S, GTP-binding protein Rac is an essential me- scler Thromb Vasc Biol 25: 2054–2061, 2005 Zeiher AM: Reduced number of circulating diator of vascular endothelial growth factor- 21. Galili O, Herrmann J, Woodrum J, Sattler KJ, endothelial progenitor cells predicts future induced endothelial fenestrations and vas- Lerman LO, Lerman A: Adventitial vasa va- cardiovascular events: Proof of concept for cular permeability. Circulation 107: 1532– sorum heterogeneity among different vascu- the clinical importance of endogenous vas- 1538, 2003 lar beds. J Vasc Surg 40: 529–535, 2004 cular repair. Circulation 111: 2981–2987, 10. Gossl M, Rosol M, Malyar NM, Fitzpatrick 22. Galili O, Sattler KJ, Herrmann J, Woodrum J, 2005 LA, Beighley PE, Zamir M, Ritman EL: Func- Olson M, Lerman LO, Lerman A: Experimen- 33. Massa M, Rosti V, Ferrario M, Campanelli R, tional anatomy and hemodynamic charac- tal hypercholesterolemia differentially af- Ramajoli I, Rosso R, De Ferrari GM, Ferlini M, teristics of vasa vasorum in the walls of por- fects adventitial vasa vasorum and vessel Goffredo L, Bertoletti A, Klersy C, Pecci A, cine coronary arteries. Anat Rec A Discov structure of the left internal thoracic and Moratti R, Tavazzi L: Increased circulating Mol Cell Evol Biol 272: 526–537, 2003 coronary arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg hematopoietic and endothelial progenitor 11. Gossl M, Versari D, Mannheim D, Ritman EL, 129: 767–772, 2005 cells in the early phase of acute myocardial Lerman LO, Lerman A: Increased spatial 23. Langheinrich AC, Michniewicz A, Sedding infarction. Blood 105: 199–206, 2005 vasa vasorum density in the proximal LAD in DG, Walker G, Beighley PE, Rau WS, Bohle 34. Wojakowski W, Tendera M, Michalowska A, hypercholesterolemia: Implications for vul- RM, Ritman EL: Correlation of vasa vasorum Majka M, Kucia M, Maslankiewicz K, nerable plaque-development. Atherosclero- neovascularization and plaque progression Wyderka R, Ochala A, Ratajczak MZ: Mobi- sis 192: 246–252, 2007 in of apolipoprotein E(Ϫ/Ϫ)/low-den- lization of CD34/CXCR4ϩ, CD34/CD117ϩ, 12. de Boer OJ, van der Wal AC, Teeling P, sity lipoprotein(Ϫ/Ϫ) double knockout mice. c-metϩ stem cells, and mononuclear cells Becker AE: Leucocyte recruitment in rupture Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26: 347–352, expressing early cardiac, muscle, and endo- prone regions of lipid-rich plaques: A prom- 2006 thelial markers into peripheral blood in pa- inent role for neovascularization? Cardio- 24. Depre C, Havaux X, Wijns W: Neovascular- tients with acute . Cir- vasc Res 41: 443–449, 1999 ization in human coronary atherosclerotic le- culation 110: 3213–3220, 2004 13. Moulton KS, Vakili K, Zurakowski D, Soliman sions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 39: 35. Guven H, Shepherd RM, Bach RG, Capoccia M, Butterfield C, Sylvin E, Lo KM, Gillies S, 215–220, 1996 BJ, Link DC: The number of endothelial pro- Javaherian K, Folkman J: Inhibition of 25. Depre C, Wijns W, Robert AM, Renkin JP, genitor cell colonies in the blood is in- plaque neovascularization reduces macro- Havaux X: Pathology of unstable plaque: creased in patients with angiographically phage accumulation and progression of ad- Correlation with the clinical severity of acute significant coronary artery disease. JAm vanced atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 30: Coll Cardiol 48: 1579–1587, 2006 USA100: 4736–4741, 2003 694–702, 1997 36. Yoder MC, Mead LE, Prater D, Krier TR, 14. Gossl M, Beighley PE, Malyar NM, Ritman 26. MacNeill BD, Jang I-K, Bouma BE, Iftimia N, Mroueh KN, Li F, Krasich R, Temm CJ, Prchal EL: Transendothelial solute transport in the Takano M, Yabushita H, Shishkov M, Kauff- JT, Ingram DA: Re-defining endothelial pro- coronary vessel wall: Role of vasa vaso- man CR, Houser SL, Aretz HT: Focal and genitor cells via clonal analysis and hemato- rum—A study with cryostatic micro-CT. multi-focal plaque macrophage distributions poietic stem/progenitor cell principals. Am J Physiol Circ Physiol 287: H2346– in patients with acute and stable presenta- Blood 109: 1801–1809, 2007 H2351, 2004 tions of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll 37. Tepper OM, Galiano RD, Capla JM, Kalka C, 15. Herrmann J, Lerman LO, Rodriguez-Porcel Cardiol 44: 972–979, 2004 Gagne PJ, Jacobowitz GR, Levine JP, Gurt- M, Holmes DR, Richardson DM, Ritman EL, 27. Moulton KS, Heller E, Konerding MA, Flynn ner GC: Human endothelial progenitor cells Lerman A: Coronary vasa vasorum neovas- E, Palinski W, Folkman J: Angiogenesis in- from type II diabetics exhibit impaired pro- cularization precedes epicardial endothelial hibitors endostatin or TNP-470 reduce inti- liferation, adhesion, and incorporation into dysfunction in experimental hypercholester- mal neovascularization and plaque growth in vascular structures. Circulation 106: 2781– olemia. Cardiovasc Res 51: 762–766, 2001 apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation 2786, 2002 16. Herrmann J, Samee S, Chade A, Porcel MR, 99: 1726–1732, 1999 38. Aicher A, Heeschen C, Mildner-Rihm C, Ur- Lerman LO, Lerman A: Differential effect of 28. Wassmann S, Werner N, Czech T, Nickenig bich C, Ihling C, Technau-Ihling K, Zeiher experimental hypertension and hypercho- G: Improvement of endothelial function by AM, Dimmeler S: Essential role of endothe- lesterolemia on adventitial remodeling. Ar- systemic transfusion of vascular progenitor lial nitric oxide synthase for mobilization of terioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25: 447–453, cells. Circ Res 99: e74–e83, 2006 stem and progenitor cells. Nat Med 9: 2005 29. Murphy C, Kanaganayagam GS, Jiang B, 1370–1376, 2003 17. Kwon HM, Sangiorgi G, Ritman EL, McK- Chowienczyk PJ, Zbinden R, Saha M, Rah- 39. Gabbasov ZA, Agapov AA, Saburova OS, enna C, Holmes DR Jr, Schwartz RS, Lerman man S, Wheatcroft S, Shah AM, Marber MS, Obedzinskii EA, Soboleva EL: Detection of A: Enhanced coronary vasa vasorum neovas- Kearney MT: Vascular dysfunction and re- circulating stromal stem cells with osteo- cularization in experimental hypercholester- duced circulating endothelial progenitor genic potential in the blood of coronary pa- olemia. J Clin Invest 101: 1551–1556, 1998 cells in young healthy UK South Asian men. tients by laser flow cytometry. Bull Exp Biol 18. Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, Fowler Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27: 936–942, Med 139: 266–268, 2005 DR, Kruth HS, Weber DK, Farb A, Guerrero 2007 40. Choi JH, Kim KL, Huh W, Kim B, Byun J, Suh LJ, Hayase M, Kutys R, Narula J, Finn AV, 30. Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JP, Schenke WH, W, Sung J, Jeon ES, Oh HY, Kim DK: De- Virmani R: Intraplaque hemorrhage and pro- Waclawiw MA, Quyyumi AA, Finkel T: Circu- creased number and impaired angiogenic gression of coronary . N Engl lating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function of endothelial progenitor cells in J Med 349: 2316–2325, 2003 function, and cardiovascular risk. N Engl patients with chronic renal failure. Arterio- 19. Moulton KS: Plaque angiogenesis and ath- J Med 348: 593–600, 2003 scler Thromb Vasc Biol 24: 1246–1252, 2004 erosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep 3: 225– 31. Werner N, Kosiol S, Schiegl T, Ahlers P, 41. Torsney E, Mandal K, Halliday A, Jahangiri 233, 2001 Walenta K, Link A, Bohm M, Nickenig G: M, Xu Q: Characterisation of progenitor

J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2836–2842, 2007 Endothelial Dysfunction: A New View 2841 SPECIAL ARTICLE www.jasn.org

cells in human atherosclerotic vessels. Ath- fusion of endothelial progenitor cells re- primary prevention of atherosclerosis- erosclerosis 191: 259–264, 2007 duces neointima formation after vascular related diseases. Circulation 114: 2517– 42. George J, Afek A, Abashidze A, Shmilovich injury. Circ Res 93: e17–e24, 2003 2527, 2006 H, Deutsch V, Kopolovich J, Miller H, Keren 45. Khurana R, Simons M, Martin JF, Zachary IC: 48. Vasa M, Fichtlscherer S, Adler K, Aicher A, G: Transfer of endothelial progenitor and Role of angiogenesis in cardiovascular dis- Martin H, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S: Increase bone marrow cells influences atherosclerotic ease: A critical appraisal. Circulation 112: in circulating endothelial progenitor cells by plaque size and composition in apolipopro- 1813–1824, 2005 statin therapy in patients with stable coro- tein E knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb 46. Eggebrecht H, Rodermann J, Hunold P, nary artery disease. Circulation 103: 2885– Vasc Biol 25: 2636–2641, 2005 Schmermund A, Bose D, Haude M, Erbel 2890, 2001 43. Lu X, Dunn J, Dickinson AM, Gillespie JI, R: Images in cardiovascular medicine: 49. Dimmeler S, Aicher A, Vasa M, Mildner-Rihm Baudouin SV: Smooth muscle alpha- Novel magnetic resonance-compatible C, Adler K, Tiemann M, Rutten H, Fich- expression in endothelial cells derived from coronary stent—The absorbable magne- tlscherer S, Martin H, Zeiher AM: HMG-CoA CD34ϩ human cord blood cells. Stem Cells sium-alloy stent. Circulation 112: e303– reductase inhibitors (statins) increase endo- Dev 13: 521–527, 2004 e304, 2005 thelial progenitor cells via the PI 3-kinase/ 44. Werner N, Junk S, Laufs U, Link A, Walenta 47. Napoli C, Lerman LO, de Nigris F, Gossl Akt pathway. J Clin Invest 108: 391–397, K, Bohm M, Nickenig G: Intravenous trans- M, Balestrieri ML, Lerman A: Rethinking 2001

2842 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2836–2842, 2007