DOCSLIB.ORG

Profile for the Parishes Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Profile for the Parishes of St. Nicholas with St Mary’s Great Wakering Foulness and All Saints with St Mary’s Barling Magna Little Wakering The Profile for the Parishes of Great Wakering with Foulness Island and Barling Magna with Little Wakering 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Priest-in-Charge of our parishes since 2008 has recently assumed the additional role of Priest-in-Charge of the nearby parish of St Andrews Rochford with Sutton and Shopland and taken up residence in the Rochford Rectory. We are looking for an Associate Priest and Team Vicar designate to live in the Great Wakering Vicarage and to work with our Priest-in-charge in the care, support and development of all the parishes. This is a response to the ‘Re-imagining Ministry’ document passed by the Diocesan Synod in March 2013. Our Parishes are close to Shoeburyness and Southend-on-sea. Both have good rail links to London, which is about an hour away and used by commuters. Shoeburyness has the historic Shoebury Garrison, now vacated by the army and re-developed as a residential village which retains the original character. Shoeburyness also has two popular beach areas for bathing, walking or water sports. There are a number of shops and businesses and an Asda supermarket which is served by a bus from Great Wakering. Southend-on Sea is the nearest town. It has two commuter rail lines and an expanding airport. It has the usual High Street stores and new library and university buildings in the town centre. Its long pier is a local attraction and renowned as the longest pleasure pier in the world. The coastal area between Shoeburyness and Leigh- on-Sea, a historic fishing port popular for its seafood, is a mixture of colourful and character areas of different types. There is everything from traditional sea front fun to quiet walks and peaceful places to sit. These are enjoyed by visitors and locals alike. The town has two theatres with good quality professional and amateur shows and plays. There are also many well maintained public parks, gardens and woodland areas. Sports facilities are excellent, and include several golf courses, a recently built state of the art swimming and Olympic standard diving pool, and a public sports centre and gym at Garon Park. Southend has two grammar schools as well as a number of other primary and secondary schools. Our villages consist of four churches albeit St Mary’s Church at Foulness Island has now closed and St Mary’s Church in Little Wakering is classified a chapel of ease. 2 The Profile for the Parishes of Great Wakering with Foulness Island and Barling Magna with Little Wakering 2.0 QUALITIES REQUIRED FROM OUR NEW ASSOCIATE PRIEST 1) A prayerful person who is an inspiring preacher 2) Someone who can relate to people of all ages 3) Someone who will have a visible presence in the community 4) A good listener, caring & compassionate 5) Someone with the ability to identify, enable and value the gifts of all members of the congregation. 6) A good communicator, a team person who is ready to listen to, and value, the views and ideas of the PCC and Congregation 3.0 STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF ST NICHOLAS GREAT WAKERING Following an informal discussion with our congregation, we have discovered the following strengths and weaknesses. Strengths Friendly and welcoming congregation Beautiful historic church in an attractive setting Enthusiasm and good teamwork amongst the congregation Committed organist, choir and small music group open to all styles of music Outreach activities including Messy Church & the Broomway Beagle delivered to every household Strong ecumenical links Weaknesses Ageing congregation Ongoing upkeep of a listed building Lack of people to promote local outreach Very active village were we compete for peoples time and attention 3 The Profile for the Parishes of Great Wakering with Foulness Island and Barling Magna with Little Wakering 3.1 STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF ALL SAINTS, BARLING MAGNA Strengths Continuity of Services Community spirit amongst the congregation Messy Church Home Groups Friendly, supportive fellowship A gentle church Uplifting services Churches are of historical interest Lovely atmosphere Weaknesses Congregation size decreasing Limited numbers restrict the amount of community outreach we can achieve At the moment there is a lack of young people attending church, especially teenagers More pastoral care required 4.0 PRIORITIES FOR OUR NEW ASSOCIATE PRIEST AND PARISHES Grow the church membership. Create a Pastoral care team using the gifts within our congregation. Take our full place in the Re-imagined ministry set up. Enable the gifts within our congregation to be used to the full. Maintain a weekly worshipping presence at the heart of the local community. Build on the success of Messy Church Build on the firm foundation of ministry already being experienced in our parish. Enable our churches to move forward into their next phase by equipping us with the necessary tools of discipleship and to develop the potential of our congregations to reach out to new members. To build on good links with the local school and encourage growth involving families and young people. To assist in forging closer links between the congregations of the churches in Barling Magna, Little Wakering, Great Wakering and Rochford. Be actively involved in Deanery and Diocesan initiatives such as Re- Imagining Ministry 4 The Profile for the Parishes of Great Wakering with Foulness Island and Barling Magna with Little Wakering 5.0 ROCHFORD DEANERY – A WIDER VIEW BY RURAL DEAN CANON MIKE LODGE With over 82,000 residents in the Deanery there are eighteen churches scattered over this large geographical area, with parish populations ranging from 700 to 35,000! The East of England plan suggests an increase in housing in the Rochford Deanery of 1450 units by 2015, the population growth having an impact on the Deanery. With the expansion of London Southend Airport it is anticipated that we will see an even higher potential increase in housing and consequential population surge. The churches and parishes are served currently by nine stipendiary priests, reducing to seven by 2025, one of whom is currently 2.5 days in the parish of St Nicholas, Rawreth, and 3.5 days 'Faith in Action' Adviser' for the Bradwell Area; also giving advice across the Diocese. Two recently appointed priests also serve (2 days/week) as Vocations Adviser and Mission Development Adviser and are working closely together to encourage these areas of ministry across the Deanery. The broad range of churchmanship in the Deanery reflects the diversity found within the Church of England as a whole. The biblical model that resonates most with all the parishes is that of 'one body with many members', as found in the Apostle Paul's first letter to the Corinthians, chapter 12. Within each of our parishes the particular gifts brought by stipendiary clergy have an important role to play in the eyes of the laity. It is recognised that both the potential shortage of stipendiary clergy and the ability of some parishes to pay for stipendiary clergy, means that there needs to be a greater focus on ‘Re-imagining ministry’ with regard to other forms of ministry (self- supporting clergy and licensed lay ministry), within the context of the Diocesan strategic priority of a ‘Transforming Presence’. Through ‘Re-imagining Ministry’ much work has been carried out to identify potential Mission and Ministry Units, which is on-going, although serious consideration is being given to the creation of two defined ‘Units’. As part of this process facilitated discussions are being organised in order to respond to a ‘risk assessment’ that has been carried out, enabling ongoing focused decisions to be made with regard to long term objectives. http://www.chelmsford.anglican.org/policies/reimagining-ministry www.rochford-deanery.org.uk 5 The Profile for the Parishes of Great Wakering with Foulness Island and Barling Magna with Little Wakering 6.0 ROCHFORD PARISH OVERVIEW Letter from the Team Rector Designate Since my appointment to Rochford earlier this year while continuing as Priest-in- Charge of Great Wakering w Foulness and Barling Magna & Little Wakering, in a pioneering post as part of a new strategy within the Diocese of Mission and Ministry Units, the possibilities of a fully collaborative ministry are already taking shape. I look forward to sharing this ministry with a colleague soon and expect our churches and parishes to continue to work together in this exciting venture. This appointment offers a unique challenge and environment, as you will discover reading through the profile, for anyone interested in living out their faith and bringing the gospel of Jesus Christ to a special part of South-East Essex. There is opportunity to innovate and build on established practice and enjoy some fun and serious ministry alongside supportive and warm fellowship. It is my belief that whoever is appointed will find a welcoming community both in and outside the church. If you would like to discuss this post informally please feel free to contact me by email or telephone. Rev Alun J. Hurd Email: [email protected] Tel no 01702 817991 Rochford and its Church – a brief description The town of Rochford is in a largely agricultural area, but its good transport links to London, Southend and Chelmsford make it a popular dormitory town. New housing development within the parish is underway, and plans for further growth remain in the pipeline. The Parish Church of Rochford is situated not in the centre of the town, but in the middle of a golf course. It is a beautiful building, steeped in history, and its location makes it a popular venue for weddings.
Recommended publications
  • Research Framework Revised.Vp

    Research Framework Revised.Vp

    Frontispiece: the Norfolk Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey team recording timbers and ballast from the wreck of The Sheraton on Hunstanton beach, with Hunstanton cliffs and lighthouse in the background. Photo: David Robertson, copyright NAU Archaeology Research and Archaeology Revisited: a revised framework for the East of England edited by Maria Medlycott East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper No.24, 2011 ALGAO East of England EAST ANGLIAN ARCHAEOLOGY OCCASIONAL PAPER NO.24 Published by Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers East of England http://www.algao.org.uk/cttees/Regions Editor: David Gurney EAA Managing Editor: Jenny Glazebrook Editorial Board: Brian Ayers, Director, The Butrint Foundation Owen Bedwin, Head of Historic Environment, Essex County Council Stewart Bryant, Head of Historic Environment, Hertfordshire County Council Will Fletcher, English Heritage Kasia Gdaniec, Historic Environment, Cambridgeshire County Council David Gurney, Historic Environment Manager, Norfolk County Council Debbie Priddy, English Heritage Adrian Tindall, Archaeological Consultant Keith Wade, Archaeological Service Manager, Suffolk County Council Set in Times Roman by Jenny Glazebrook using Corel Ventura™ Printed by Henry Ling Limited, The Dorset Press © ALGAO East of England ISBN 978 0 9510695 6 1 This Research Framework was published with the aid of funding from English Heritage East Anglian Archaeology was established in 1975 by the Scole Committee for Archaeology in East Anglia. The scope of the series expanded to include all six eastern counties and responsi- bility for publication passed in 2002 to the Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers, East of England (ALGAO East). Cover illustration: The excavation of prehistoric burial monuments at Hanson’s Needingworth Quarry at Over, Cambridgeshire, by Cambridge Archaeological Unit in 2008.
  • Setting the Council Tax 2017/18;

    Setting the Council Tax 2017/18;

    COUNCIL – 21 February 2017 Item 12 SETTING THE COUNCIL TAX 2017/18 1 SUMMARY 1.1 This report seeks authorisation from Council to set the Council Tax for the year 2017/18. 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 At the Council Meeting held on 14 February 2017, the Council agreed the revenue budget for 2017/18 within the Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) and Council agreed to increase Council Tax by 1.95%, making an average Band D property charge £217.17. 2.2 In order to set the Council Tax, information is required from Essex County Council, Police and Crime Commissioner, Essex Fire Authority and the Parish and Town Councils. This information is provided in appendices A to E. 3 2017/18 COUNCIL TAX 3.1 When publishing Council Tax figures for local authority areas, it is usual practice to use the Band D charge and an average charge for the Parish/Town Council tax. The 2017/18 charge compared to 2016/17 is shown below:- 2016/17 2017/18 Increase Increase £ £ £ % Essex County Council 1,108.35 1,108.35 - - Essex County Council Social Care Levy 21.78 55.35 33.57 3.00 Essex Fire Authority 67.68 69.03 1.35 1.99 Police & Crime Commissioner 152.10 157.05 4.95 3.25 Town/Parish Councils 41.07 44.39 3.32 8.09 Rochford District Council 213.02 217.17 4.15 1.95 Total 1,604.00 1,651.34 3.2 While the average Band D Charge for the District is £217.17, this will vary across the District due to the differences in the Town/Parish Councils.
  • Weekly List of Planing Applications

    Weekly List of Planing Applications

    LIST OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS RECEIVED WEEK ENDING: 16th April 2021 The following applications have been received by the Council. Any persons or organisations wishing to make comments on these applications should do so in writing to Marcus Hotten, Assistant Director of Place & Environment, Main Reception Council Offices, South Street, Rochford, SS4 1BW within 18 days of the date of this list. (Planning applications for review relate to: Full planning permission (FUL), Change Of Use (COU),Listed Building (LBC), Advertisement (ADV), Lawfulness Existing only (LDC)). Members should contact the Planning Officers if they consider there would be justification for a Member site visit concerning any particular Committee Item listed herein, prior to the application being considered at Committee. This should be done within the next 14 days. Copies of the applications and plans may be inspected at the above address during normal office hours. _____________________________________________________ 20/00843/FUL Parish: Rochford Parish Council Ward: Roche South Responsibility: Committee/Weekly List; Officer: Ms Katie Ellis Proposal: Proposal for construction of 3no. 1 bed Flats including parking and ancillary areas. Determination 9th June 2021 Date Location: Land Rear Of 77 West Street Rochford Grid Reference Easting 587313 Northing 190491 Applicant: Mr M Bullock Agent: Mr Jason Hopkins 22 Lime Avenue 170 Rawreth Lane Leigh-on-sea Rayleigh Essex SS69RN United Kingdom Ward Cllr(s): Cllr M J Lucas-Gill Cllr M J Steptoe Cllr A L Williams _____________________________________________________
  • The Arup Journal

    The Arup Journal

    THE ARUP JOURNAL 25TH YEAR SPRING 1990 THEARUP Foreword Povl Ahm JOURNAL Chairman Ove Arup Partnership Vol.25 No.1 Spring 1990 Editor: David J. Brown Published by Art Editor: Ove Arup Partnership Desmond Wyeth FCSD 13 Fitzroy Street, Deputy Editor: London W1 P 680 Caroline Lucas Contents Foreword, The Arup Journal is now beginning its 25th year. It is difficult to believe, since by Povl Ahm 2 it seems only yesterday that Peter Dunican wrote his 'personal view' on the occasion of 10 years of the Journal. At least it seems only yesterday to me. Structural engineering: To some of our younger members it may seem like an eternity. some social and political implications, Sadly, Peter is not here to help to celebrate the birthday of what was so by Peter Dunican 3 definitely his baby. His love for communication and his commitment to this publication was essential for the creation of The Arup Journal in the first Stansted Airport Terminal: instance, and for its continued existence and growth over most of its life. the structure, Fortunately, he has not been alone in this effort. Rosemary Devine saw The by Jack Zunz, Martin Manning, Arup Journal through its first difficult years. Then Peter Haggett took over as David Kaye and Chris Jofeh 7 Editor in September 1968 and managed the difficult task of not only Liffey Valley Bridge, maintaining the high standard that had been set from the beginning, but in by Bill Smyth and John Higgins 16 fact developing and improving it through almost 20 years in charge.
  • The Great Wakering Parish Plan 2015

    The Great Wakering Parish Plan 2015

    The Great Wakering Parish Plan 2015 The way we are today and our vision for the future. Abridged Survey Analysis Page Contents Survey notes and Welcome 3 About Great Wakering 4 The Parish Plan and The Steering Group 6 THE GREAT WAKERING PARISH PLAN 2015 The Survey explained 7 Issues of particular concern 8 Amenities 10 Community 13 Economy 23 Education 27 Environment 36 Housing 44 Juniors 52 Sea Defences 58 Services 62 Traffic. 67 Transport 75 Youth 80 Youth Education 90 Action Plan explained 98 Summary and Notes 98 Appendix A - Maps from Local Development 99 Framework (LDF), Allocations Document “A golden opportunity for every voice to be heard” Great Wakering Survey Results/September 2015 2 The view of central government is that local communities in the Survey UK should have their own voice and their own say in policies and plans that affect local life and opportunities. As a step in notes and establishing what people think or need, a survey has been conducted by The Great Wakering Parish Plan Steering Group. welcome This document contains the abridged results of that survey, hence its formal title of The Abridged Survey Analysis. The purpose of which is to set out the key responses to the questionnaire, which was distributed to 2,500 households in the THE GREAT WAKERING Great Wakering area during 2012. PARISH PLAN 2015 This document will be available on request and has been used to provide the platform of evidence leading to the next and final publication – The Action Plan document - which will present actions to be pursued into the future.
  • This Document Has Been Created by AHDS History and Is Based on Information Supplied by the Depositor

    This Document Has Been Created by AHDS History and Is Based on Information Supplied by the Depositor

    This document has been created by AHDS History and is based on information supplied by the depositor SN 3980 - Agricultural Census Parish Summaries, 1877 and 1931 This study contained a limited amount of documentation. The parish codes given below are to be used to interpret the data for the year of 1877. The parish codes for the 1931 data were not given in the initial deposit; consequently it is not possible to establish the parish of origin for the 1931 data.
  • Managing the Coast

    Managing the Coast

    Managing the coast Essex and South Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Landguard Point (Felixstowe) to Two Tree Island (Southend) Non-technical summary of final plan 2010 Front cover images: (top left) Harwich and Felixstowe Ports, (top right) Clacton Pier, © Mike Page, 2008 (bottom left) Naze Tower, (bottom right) Salcott Creek saltmarshes Back cover image: Frinton-on-Sea, © Mike Page, 2008 Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. © Crown Copyright and database right 2010. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number 100026380. © Environment Agency Contents What is a Shoreline Management Plan? 4 How we developed the plan 4 - The partnership 4 - Finding the right balance 5 - How we involved you 7 An overview of the Essex and South Suffolk coast 8 How we divided the coast 10 How we will manage the coast - Stour and Orwell Estuaries 14 - Hamford Water 18 - Tendring Peninsula 21 - Colne Estuary and Mersea Island 23 - Blackwater Estuary 27 - Dengie Peninsula 31 - Crouch and Roach Estuaries, Potton, Rushley and 33 Foulness Islands and Southend frontage What happens next 38 Where to go for more information 39 Glossary 41 Essex and South Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 3 Introduction What is a Shoreline Management Plan? A Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) identifies the best ways to manage flood and erosion risk to people and the developed, historic and natural environment in the short, medium and long-term. The overall aim of the plan is to support the best possible balance of all values and features which will create opportunities to work with others and make improvements. Approximately 10 years ago the first round of SMPs were completed for the entire length of the coastline of England and Wales.
  • This Application Is in Outline Form with All Matters Reserved at This Stage

    This Application Is in Outline Form with All Matters Reserved at This Stage

    Rochford District Council SCHEDULE OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS TO BE CONSIDERED BY PLANNING COMMITTEE 29th August 2002 All planning applications are considered against the background of current Town and Country Planning legislation, rules, orders and circulars, and any development, structure and locals plans issued or made thereunder. In addition, account is taken of any guidance notes, advice and relevant policies issued by statutory authorities. Each planning application included in this Schedule is filed with representations received and consultation replies as a single case file. The above documents can be made available for inspection as Committee background papers at the office of Planning Services, Acacia House, East Street, Rochford. If you require a copy of this document in larger print, please contact the Planning Administration Section on 01702 – 318191. PLANNING SERVICES COMMITTEE - 29th August 2002 BARLING AND SUTTON Cllr R S Allen FOULNESS AND GREAT WAKERING Cllr T E Goodwin Cllr C G Seagers Cllr Mrs B J Wilkins HAWKWELL NORTH Cllr M A Starke Cllr M G B Starke ROCHFORD Cllr R A Amner Mrs L Barber Cllr Mrs M S Vince WHEATLEY Cllr J M Pullen Cllr Mrs M J Webster WHITHOUSE Cllr S P Smith Cllr P F A Webster - 2 - PLANNING COMMITTEE 29th August 2002 REFERRED ITEMS R1 02/00296/COU Christopher Board PAGE 5 Change of Use of Agricultural Land to Football and Cricket Pitch Use Land at Pelhams Farm Hall Road Rochford R2 02/00496/OUT Kevin Steptoe PAGE 10 Outline Application to Erect New Sports Pavillion With First Floor Offices (Demolish
  • Appendix F – Shoreline Interactions & Response

    Appendix F – Shoreline Interactions & Response

    Appendix F Shoreline Interactions & Responses Final version 2.4 15 October 2010 Essex and South Suffolk SMP2 -Fi - Appendix F – Shoreline Interactions & Response Final version 2.4 15 October 2010 CONTENTS Page F1. INTRODUCTION 1 F2. DEVELOP BASELINE SCENARIOS 1 F2.1 Introduction 1 F2.1.1 Aim 1 F2.1.2 Geographical units 2 F2.1.3 Task methodology 2 F2.1.4 Sea level rise 6 F2.1.5 Assumptions and general notes 6 F2.1.6 Tables layout 7 F2.2 Frontage A - Stour and Orwell Estuaries 8 F2.3 Frontage B - Hamford Water 23 F2.4 Frontage C – Tendring Peninsula 34 F2.5 Frontage D - Colne Estuary 46 F2.6 Frontage E – Mersea Island 57 F2.7 Frontage F - Blackwater Estuary 64 F2.8 Frontage G - Dengie Flat 75 F2.9 Frontage H - Crouch and Roach Estuaries 86 F2.10 Frontage I - Foulness Island 96 F2.11 Frontage J - Southend-on-Sea and Shoebury 106 F3. ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL DEFENCES 117 F3.1 Introduction 117 F3.2 Residual Life 118 F3.2.1 SMP Guidance 118 F3.2.2 Essex and South Suffolk SMP Approach – ‘Estimated Unmaintained Life’ 118 F3.2.3 Approach for non-EA defences 121 F3.2.4 Assumptions and Considerations 122 F3.3 Validation by Asset Managers and Operations Delivery 124 F3.4 RESULTS 125 F3.4.1 Referencing of the defences 125 F3.4.2 Assessment 125 F3.4.3 Discussion 126 F4. COASTAL RISK MAPS 136 F4.1 Introduction 136 F4.2 Stour and Orwell 137 F4.2.1 General description 137 F4.2.2 Key estuarine processes and issues 137 F4.2.3 Zones of erosion and accretion 138 F4.2.4 Opportunities 139 F4.3 Hamford Water 140 F4.3.1 General description 140 F4.3.2 Key estuarine
  • UC MOD Shoeburyness: Range Sea Danger Area To

    UC MOD Shoeburyness: Range Sea Danger Area To

    From: QQ SHB Enquiries <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 13:09 Subject: UC MOD Shoeburyness: Range Sea Danger Area To: Ministry of Defence (MOD) Shoeburyness: Range Sea Danger Area With the summer approaching, it’s timely to remind local sailing clubs and associations of the restrictions in the vicinity of the Foulness and Maplin Sands. QinetiQ operates the live weapons test and evaluation Range in Shoeburyness and on Foulness Island in Essex, known as MOD Shoeburyness. The Range is active Monday to Friday (occasionally at weekends), all year round conducting activities that involve firing and detonating live ammunition, often over long distances out to sea. To enable the Range to work safely and ensure that hazardous activities do not present a risk to members of the public, it operates under the jurisdiction of the Artillery Ranges Byelaws 1936 and the Shoeburyness and District Military Lands Byelaws 1935 (under the Military Lands Acts 1892 to 1903). The byelaws govern the use of the land and rights of access and passage through the byelaw area. The byelaws cover an area of the Thames Estuary and the North Sea and the inner waterway that runs from Havengore Creek across to the River Roach and the River Crouch. This area comprises the Range Sea Danger Area (RSDA), unauthorised entry to this area is both prohibited and dangerous. QinetiQ is responsible for managing access to the RSDA and ensuring that boats, yachts and personal watercraft do not stray into the area, putting themselves and their vessels at risk. In order to help monitor the RSDA whilst the Range is active, QinetiQ uses marine surveillance radar and has a Range Safety Boat which patrols the in area and advises any unauthorised vessels to leave in accordance with the byelaws and in the interests of health and safety.
  • Crouch and Roach Estuary Management Plan

    Crouch and Roach Estuary Management Plan

    THE CROUCH AND ROACH ESTUARY MANAGEMENT PLAN THE CROUCH AND ROACH ESTUARY IS REMOTE AND BEAUTIFUL IT HAS A CHARM OF ITS OWN AND IT DESERVES TO BE CHERISHED Choose a greener Essex. Eating local food reduces greenhouse gas emissions and supports our local economy. Find out more about a greener Essex - visit http://www.agreeneressex.net Page nos. CONTENTS 1- 4 A. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND FOREWORD 5 - 7 A.1. Foreword by Councillor John Jowers, Cabinet Member for Localism, Essex County Council A.2. acknowledgements B. THE VISION AND OBJECTIVES 8 - 9 B.1. The Vision B.2. The Principle Objectives Guiding the Crouch and Roach Estuary Management Plan C. INTRODUCTION 10-14 C.1. The Crouch and Roach Estuary System C.2. Integrated Coastal Zone Management C.3. Essex Estuary Management Plans C.4. The Crouch and Roach Estuary Management Plan C.5. Aims of the Crouch and Roach Estuary Management Plan C.6. Crouch and Roach Estuary Management Plan – Geographical Area Covered C.7. The Crouch and Roach Estuary Project Partners C.8. The Wider Context D. ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK AND LEGAL STATUS 15-18 D.1. Implementation D.2. Links with Existing Strategies D.3. Resource D.4. Monitoring and Evaluation E. LAND OWNERSHIP 19-21 E.1. Total Length of Coastline in kilometres E.2. Crouch Harbour Authority Holding E.3. Crown Estates Property E.4. Ministry of Defence Estates E.5. Other Identified Riverbed Owners E.6. Foreshore Ownership F. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND NATURE CONSERVATION 22-27 F.1. Designations and Protected Areas F.2.
  • Ecology of Map Lin Sands

    Ecology of Map Lin Sands

    Ecologyof Maplin Sands andthe coastal zones ofSuffolk, Essexand North Kent Instituteof TerrestrialEcology NATURALENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL á Natural Environment ResearchCouncil Institute of Terrestrial Ecology ECOLOGYOF MAPLIN SANDS and the coastal zonesof Suffolk,Essex and North Kent LA. Boorman and D.S. Ranwel I Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Colney Norwich INSTITUTEOF TERRESTRIALECOLOGY LIBRARY SERVICE EDINBURGH LABORATO:lIES CUSH ESTATE, PENKUK M '7LOTHIAN EH26 21 SCCIPTra.V. -.:4 C,Copywright 1977 Printed in England by Foister & Jagg Ltd., Cambridge Published in 1977 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology 68 Hills Road CAMBRIDGE C82 1LA ISBN 0 904282 14 7 Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Colney Research Station Colney Lane Colney NORWICH NR4 7UD 0603 (Norwich) 54923 - 5 The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) was established in 1973, from the former Nature Conservancy's research stations and staff, joined later by the Institute of Tree Biology and the Culture Centre of Algae and Protozoa. ITE con- tributes to and draws upon the collective knowledge of the fourteen sister institutes which make up the Natural Environment Research Council, spanning all the environmental sciences. The Institute studies the factors determining the structure, composition and processes of land and freshwater systems, and of individual plant and animal species. It is developing a sounder scien- tific basis for predicting and modelling environ- mental trends arising from natural or man-made change. The results of this research are available to those responsible for the protection, manage- ment and wise use of our natural resources. Nearly half of ITE's work is research commis- sioned by customers, such as the Nature Conser- vancy Council who require information for wild- life conservation, the Forestry Commission and INSTITUTE OF the Department of the Environment.