http://www.diva-portal.org Postprint This is the accepted version of a paper published in Droit et Cultures. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Johnsdotter, S. (2020) The growing demand in Europe for reconstructive clitoral surgery after Female Genital Cutting: A looping effect of the dominant discourse? Droit et Cultures, 79(1): 141-166 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-37490 The growing demand in Europe for reconstructive clitoral surgery after Female Genital Cutting: A looping effect of the dominant discourse? Sara Johnsdotter, PhD Malmö University, Sweden
[email protected] _____________________________________________________ Author’s version Johnsdotter, Sara (2019): “The growing demand in Europe for reconstructive clitoral surgery after Female Genital Cutting: A looping effect of the dominant discourse?” Forthcoming in Droit et Cultures. _____________________________________________________ Abstract When activism to combat ‘female circumcision’ gained momentum in the 1980s, a discursive gap was created that persists until today. On the one hand, campaigners, activists, governments and some scholars promoted a discourse that focused on these practices as mutilations; on the other hand, not all scholars were willing to adopt the new term (FGM, ‘female genital mutilation’) or to drop the perspective that these practices must be described within their wider contexts, with the full variations in different settings. Starting from this gap, this article discusses ‘reconstructive clitoral surgery’, or ‘clitoris repair’, as a cultural phenomenon growing out of the first discursive stream.