DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resources Division 2003 Annual Report June 2004 Natural Resources Report NPS/NRWRD/NRR-04/01

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Resources Division 2003 Annual Report June 2004 Natural Resources Report NPS/NRWRD/NRR-04/01 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Water Resources Division 2003 ANNUAL REPORT Water Resources Division 2003 ANNUAL REPORT Natural Resource Program Center 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Natural Resources Report NPS/NRWRD/NRR-04/01 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC This entire publication, including useful embedded hyperlinks, is available in PDF format at: http://www.nature.nps.gov/water/wrdpub.htm front cover, large photo: Missouri National Recreational River (Jackson, 2003) front cover, inset photos: Channel Islands National Seashore, Sleeping Bear Dunes National Park, Grand Teton National Park (NPS) opposite: Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park (NPS, 1993) Flood on Clear Creek, Obed Wild and Scenic River (Hughes, 2002) The Water Resources Division of the National Park Service is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operation support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, groundwater, fishery and marine resources management, and aquatic ecology. The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the National Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. CONTENTS A Word from the Associate Director Natural Resource Stewardship and Science.........................................................................7 Comments from the Division Chief .................................................................................................... 8 Washington Program Coordination Office................................................................................ 10 Water Resources in National Parks Reference Collection ......................................................... 11 Planning and Evaluation Branch Highlights ...................................................................... 12 • Coral Reef Monuments Gain Momentum.............................................................................. 14 • Wetland Mitigation Partnerships: Opportunities for Funding Wetland Restorations in National Parks................................................................................................ 15 • Focus On The Future: Water Resources Planning In The Context Of Overall Park Planning........................................................................................................................... 17 • Understanding Hydrologic Hazards in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park & Preserve .......... 18 • Survey of Plankton in the Green River at Mammoth Cave National Park........................... 20 Water Operations Branch Highlights ................................................................................. 23 • River Management on the Missouri....................................................................................... 24 • Sensitivity and Detection Limits For Field Measurements .................................................... 26 • Project To Develop A Summary Compendium Of Watershed Condition Assessment Methods............................................................................................................... 28 • Assessing Flood Hazard in Channel Islands National Park.................................................... 29 • Agency Collaboration in Support of Water Quality Monitoring ......................................... 30 • WRD Completes Six Month Evaluation of Water Quality Monitoring Instruments............ 31 • WRD Developing Database to Track Water Quality Performance Management for NPS and DOI Strategic Plans ............................................................................................. 33 • Development of a River Bank Management Program – Cuyahoga Valley National Park........................................................................................................................... 34 • Servicewide Water Quality Information Management Program Update............................ 35 • Baseline Water Quality Data Inventory and Analysis Report Procedures Redevelopment ....................................................................................................................... 36 • NPS Partners to Create the High-Resolution National Hydrography Dataset ..................... 37 Water Rights Branch Highlights ......................................................................................... 38 • Pending Water Right Application – Chickasaw National Recreation Area.......................... 39 • Paired Basin Study within Obed Wild and Scenic River Watershed to Assist in Determining the Impacts of Small Impoundments on Flow................................................. 40 • Instream Flow Water Right for Rincon Creek at Saguaro National Park............................. 41 • Collaborative Watershed Management in Progress at Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore ................................................................................................................. 43 • Floodplain Decay Study on the Little Missouri River, Theodore Roosevelt National Park........................................................................................................................... 44 • Status of the Black Canyon Water Right................................................................................ 46 APPENDIX A - TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.............................................................................. 49 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - SERVICEWIDE.................................................................................... 49 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - VITAL SIGNS MONITORING NETWORKS.......................................... 54 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - REGIONS AND PARKS ....................................................................... 57 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY NATURAL RESOURCE CHALLENGE AQUATIC RESOURCE FIELD PROFESSIONALS SERVICEWIDE ........................................................................................................................... 88 REGION, NETWORK, AND PARK SUPPORT............................................................................. 88 APPENDIX B - SUMMARY OF WATER RESOURCES DIVISION FUNDING: PROJECT AND PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS...................................................................... 97 APPENDIX C – PUBLICATIONS / CONTRIBUTIONS / AWARDS ......................................... 118 APPENDIX D – STAFF.......................................................................................................... 122 Acadia National Park (NPS) Water Resources Division Annual Report–2003 7 A Word from the Associate Director Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Mike Soukup, Ph.D. This annual report management and staff of parks, support provides a summary of offices, regional offices, and the Washington the 2003 accomplishments office on water resource issues. I continue to of the National Park believe that WRD provides a model for cost Service’s Water Resources effective, centralized support for the vast Division. The Division majority of parks that do not have the range provides Servicewide of water resource technical expertise they program management, need. accountability, technical assistance, and policy guidance with respect to the Much of this year’s success can be preservation, protection, and management attributed to the continued significant of water and aquatic resources of units of support from Congress for the Natural the National Park System. WRD provides Resource Challenge. The Challenge will its services directly to parks through a broad enable the Service to make major strides in range of programs in the areas of water preserving, protecting and understanding rights; water quality; floodplain management; water resources of the National Park groundwater analysis; watershed and System. The Challenge has been effective in wetlands protection and restoration; water garnering budget increases for water quality resources management planning; fisheries monitoring, water resources protection and and marine resources management; restoration projects, watershed condition policy, legislative, and regulatory analysis; assessments, and additional park-based information management; and training. The aquatic resource professionals. I continue Division’s work plan is developed from the to be very pleased with the leadership role annual Servicewide Comprehensive Call and that the Water Resources Division has played an annual technical assistance call to identify in developing and guiding implementation park needs, which in turn determines WRD’s of the water resources component of priorities. In addition to direct support the Challenge and providing program to parks, the Division provides day-to- accountability to Congress. day support to regional offices, networks, and the Washington office in addressing And kudos for this year’s accomplishments water resources issues facing the NPS. The are particularly well deserved given that Dan Division is located in Fort Collins, Colorado, Kimball, a pillar of strength in the Division, with additional offices in Denver, Colorado, has been moved to accept the challenge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TDEC’S Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for  the Stream’S Status Changes
    Draft Version YEAR 2016 303(d) LIST July, 2016 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION Planning and Standards Unit Division of Water Resources William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower 312 Rosa L. Parks Ave Nashville, TN 37243 Table of Contents Page Guidance for Understanding and Interpreting the Draft 303(d) List ……………………………………………………………………....... 1 2016 Public Meeting Schedule ……………………………………………………………. 8 Key to the 303(d) List ………………………………………………………………………. 9 TMDL Priorities ……………………………………………………………………………... 10 Draft 2016 303(d) List ……………………………………………………………………… 11 Barren River Watershed (TN05110002)…………………………………………. 11 Upper Cumberland Basin (TN05130101 & TN05130104)…………………….. 12 Obey River Watershed (TN05130105)…………………………………………... 14 Cordell Hull Watershed (TN05130106)………………………………………….. 16 Collins River Watershed (TN05130107)…………………………………………. 16 Caney Fork River Watershed (TN05130108)…………………………………… 18 Old Hickory Watershed (TN05130201)………………………………………….. 22 Cheatham Reservoir Watershed (TN05130202)……………………………….. 24 Stones River Watershed (TN05130203)………………………………………… 30 Harpeth River Watershed (TN05130204)……………………………………….. 35 Barkley Reservoir Watershed (TN05130205)…………………………………… 41 Red River Watershed (TN05130206)……………………………………………. 42 North Fork Holston River Watershed (TN06010101)…………………………... 45 South Fork Holston River Watershed (TN06010102)………………………….. 45 Watauga River Watershed (TN06010103)………………………………………. 53 Holston River Basin (TN06010104)………………………………………………. 56 Upper French Broad River Basin (TN06010105 & TN06010106)…………….
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No. 348 Wilderness November 19, 2019 Planning
    Tennessee ISSN 1089-6104 Citizens for Newsletter No. 348 Wilderness November 19, 2019 Planning Taking Care of Wild Places 1. Oak Ridge and the Oak Ridge Reservation ...... p. 3 A. 69 kV Powerline Proposed for Natural Area B. Openings on the Oak Ridge Site Specific Advisory Board 2. Tennessee News ............................. .p. 3 A. No.-ris Dam State Park Update B. Rocky Fork State Park Update C. State Releases 303D List for Public Comment 3. Other News ................................ p. 4 A. Ethane Cracker Plants and Plastics B. Scenic Byways Act C. Prescl'ibed Bums Slated at Cades Cove 4. Climate Resilience .....................p. 5 5. TCWP News ................................ p. 5 A. Upcoming Activities B. Recent Activities C. TCWP Folks Honored D. Members in the News E. Thanks and a Tip ofthe Hat F. Note from the Executive Director Editor: Sandra K. Goss, P. 0 . Box 6873 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 865-583-3967 [email protected] A Member of Community Shares NL 348, 11/19/19 2 You and Your guest are invited Please join us at the annual Tennessee Citizens for Wilderness Planning Holiday Party Thursday, December 12, 2019 7:00 - 9:30 Home of Jenny Freeman & Bill Allen 371 East Drive, Oak Ridge www.tcwp.org 865.583-3967 member, Community Shares Bring a bottle of wine, a small appetizer, or dessert if you would like. No RSVP necessary. Come and enjoy good company and good food. HOW TO REACH ELECTED OFFICIALS Sen. Marsha Blackburn Sen. Lamar Alexander: Rep. Chuck Fleischmann: Ph: 202-224-3344; FAX: 202-228-0566 Ph: 202-224-4944; FAX: 202-228-3398 Phone: 202-225-3271 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] FAX: 202-225-3494 Local: 865-637-4180 (FAX 637-9886) Local: 865-545-4253 (FAX 545-4252) Local (O.R.): 865-576-1976 800 Market St., Suite 121, Knoxville 37902 800 Market St., Suite 112, Knoxville 37902 https://fleischmann.house.gov/contact-me To call any rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Reference Stream Morphology and Large Woody Debris Assessment
    Tennessee Reference Stream Morphology and Large Woody Debris Assessment Report and Guidebook Prepared for: Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Prepared by: Jennings Environmental, LLC December 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report includes reference stream morphology and large woody debris data collected throughout Tennessee in 2015-2017. Hydraulic geometry data are presented as regional curves for Ecoregions 66, 67, 68/69, 71, and 65/74 to support stream assessment and restoration planning. Morphology relationships describe bankfull channel dimensions, pattern, and profile measurements in relation to channel-forming discharge and watershed drainage area. Large woody debris (LWD) data collected at reference streams serve as an indicator of natural stream conditions in forested floodplains. These databases and relationships are valuable for assessing disturbed streams to evaluate degree of departure from equilibrium, selecting and planning restoration projects to improve natural stream functions, and monitoring changes in stream conditions in undisturbed and restored stream systems. These databases should be supplemented with additional information collected during site assessment and restoration planning to improve understanding of local stream conditions throughout Tennessee. The morphology data collection included 114 undisturbed streams ranging in width from 3 to 132 feet with watershed drainage areas ranging from 0.02 to 117 square miles. Wherever available, United States Geological Survey (USGS) gage station sites were surveyed to provide long-term hydrologic information close to the reference stream. Bankfull stage indicators at a USGS gage provided the opportunity to quantify the channel-forming discharge and exceedance probability of this flow event. For reference streams with no gages, natural equilibrium stream segments with clearly identifiable incipient-floodplain bankfull stage indicators were surveyed to determine morphology parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolved by the Senate and House Of
    906 PUBLIC LAW 90-541-0CT. I, 1968 [82 STAT. Public Law 90-541 October 1, 1968 JOINT RESOLUTION [H.J. Res, 1461] Making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1969, and for other purposes. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatimes of tlie United Continuing ap­ propriations, States of America in Congress assernbled, That clause (c) of section 1969. 102 of the joint resolution of June 29, 1968 (Public Law 90-366), is Ante, p. 475. hereby further amended by striking out "September 30, 1968" and inserting in lieu thereof "October 12, 1968". Approved October 1, 1968. Public Law 90-542 October 2, 1968 AN ACT ------[S. 119] To proYide for a Xational Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purPoses. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Wild and Scenic United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) this Act Rivers Act. may be cited as the "vVild and Scenic Rivers Act". (b) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandin~ly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoy­ ment of l?resent and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appro­ priate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be com­ plemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof m their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo River Study Report, Tennessee
    I 96th Congress, 1st Session House Document No. 95-199, Part V Filt: llPS­ T" o '" c.,. Propo tA. BUFFALO RIVER, TENNESSEE I WILD AND SCENIC RIVER STUDY I MESSAGE I FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES I TRANSMITTING A REPORT ON THE BUFFALO RIVER IN TENNESSEE, PURSUANT TO I SECTION 4(a) OF THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVER ACT, AS AMENDED I I I • --~- I ----------- --- ---- ----- - I OCTOBER 5, 1979.-Message and accompanying papers referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and ordered to be printed I U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE PLEASE RETURN TO: 52-15(} 0 WASHINGTON : 1979 T£CHNtCAt. INFORMATION CENT R NATIONAL PARK SERVICE B&WScans ON MICROFILM 3 .. z"( 0 Zc:os I I I I I I I "I I I • I I III TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES: In my Environmental Message of August 2, 1979, I proposed legislation to add a number of rivers and trails to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers and National Trails Systems. Enclosed are reports and draft legislation that would I add the following three river segments to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System as federally administered components: I Gunnison River, Colorado Encampment River, Colorado I Priest River, Idaho I am reaffirming my support for designation of a segment of the Illinois River in Oregon for which legislation was I • submitted to the Congress last year. I am also reaffirming I my support for the following four river segments proposed in my last Environmental Message for inclusion in the System: Bruneau River, Idaho I Dolores River, Colorado Upper Mississippi River, Minnesota Salmon River, Idaho .
    [Show full text]
  • Invade the Southeast by Nancy Fraley, National Park Service
    National Park Service Exotic Plant Management Teams Invade the Southeast by Nancy Fraley, National Park Service odeled after the approach used M in wildland fire fighting, Exotic Plant Management Teams (EPMTs) provide highly trained, mobile strike forces of plant management specialists to assist national park units in the control of invasive, exot- ic plants. Each Exotic Plant Management Team employs the expertise of local experts and the capabilities of local agen- cies. Each sets its own work priorities based on the following factors: severity of threat to high-quality natural areas and rare species; extent of targeted infestation; probability of successful control and potential for restoration; opportunities for public involvement; and park commitment to follow-up monitoring and treatment. In the southeastern United States, 40 nation- al park units now can call upon the resources of an EPMT. The success of this initiative derives, in part, from the ability of these teams to adapt to the needs and conditions of the individual parks they serve. As of January 2004, the National Park Service (NPS) has established three EPMTs in the southeastern US. Nationwide there are 17 EPMTs serving national park units. These teams are funded through the NPS Natural Resource Challenge, a multidisci- plinary five-year program established in 1999 to strengthen natural resource man- agement within the national park system. The teams represent a formidable tool for invasive, exotic plant control and play an integral role in reaching the goals identi- fied in the NPS Natural Resource Challenge. Today, exotic plants infest some 2.6 million acres in the National Park System, reducing the natural diversity of these great places.
    [Show full text]
  • Outstandingly Remarkable Values, Obed Wild and Scenic River
    National Park Service OBED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER U.S. Department of the Interior TENNESSEE OUtstANDINGLY REMARKABLE VALUES Dear Friends of the Obed Wild and Scenic River, What comes to mind when you think about the Obed Wild and Scenic River? A wild river and its tributaries flowing through a rugged landscape of spectacular gorges? The thrill of a demanding whitewater boating experience? A family-friendly place to explore the magnificent scenery of the Cumberland Plateau? A place that compels us to learn about the abundant diversity of a fragile ecosystem or to better understand the history of those who thrived on this land before us? The Obed Wild and Scenic River is all of this, and much more. To help us protect this river system for the benefit and enjoyment of future generations, we have contemplated this very question to determine what makes it truly outstandingly remarkable. Based on the hard work of my staff and others within the National Park Service, I am pleased to present to you the outstandingly remarkable values of the Obed Wild and Scenic River. The statements that follow have been developed to provide a strong foundation for the future management and protection of this nationally significant river system—to help us focus our daily attention on the river’s most important aspects. I urge you to read these statements and to share your thoughts with us about what makes the Obed so outstandingly remarkable to you. Thank you for sharing your passion for the Obed Wild and Scenic River by helping to shape its future.
    [Show full text]
  • 20117202334.Pdf
    Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are adopted by the Service. Objectives of the plan will be attained and any necessary funds will be made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific tasks and may not represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in developing the plan, other than the Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. By approving this recovery plan, the Regional Director certifies that the data used in its development represent the best scientific and commercial information available at the time it was written. Copies of all documents reviewed in the development of this plan are available in the administrative record located at the Asheville Field Office in Asheville, North Carolina. Literature citations should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Recovery Plan for Cumberland Elktoe, Oyster Mussel, Cumberlandian Combshell, Purple Bean, and Rough Rabbitsfoot.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Plateau Geological History
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area Oneida, Tennessee Geology and History of the Cumberland Plateau Geological History Rising over 1000 feet above the region around it, the Cumberland Plateau is a large, flat-topped tableland. Deceptively rugged, the Plateau has often acted as a barrier to man and nature’s attempts to overcome it. The Plateau is characterized by rugged terrain, a moderate climate, and abundant rainfall. Although the soils are typically thin and infertile, the area was once covered by a dense hardwood forest equal to that of the Appalachians less than sixty miles to the east. As a landform, this great plateau reaches from north-central Alabama through Tennessee and Kentucky and Pennsylvania to the western New York border. Geographers call this landform the Appalachian Plateau, although it is known by various names as it passes through the differ­ ent regions. In Tennessee and Kentucky, it is called the Cumberland Plateau. Within this region, the Cumberland River and its tributaries are formed. A view from any over- look quickly confirms that the area is indeed a plateau. The adjoining ridges are all the same height, presenting a flat horizon. The River Systems The Clear Fork River and the New River come together to form the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River, the third largest tributary to the Cumberland. The Big South Fork watershed drains an area of 1382 square Leatherwood Ford in the evening sun miles primarily in Scott, Fentress, and Morgan counties in Tennessee and Wayne and Overlooks McCreary counties in Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussels of the National Park Service Obed Wild and Scenic River, Tennessee
    Malacological Review, 2017, 45/46: 193-211 FRESHWATER MUSSELS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE OBED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER, TENNESSEE Steven A. Ahlstedt1, Joseph F. Connell2, Steve Bakaletz3, and Mark T. Fagg4 ABSTRACT The Obed River was designated as a Wild and Scenic River (WSR) in 1976 and is a unit of the National Park Service. The river is considered to be among the highest quality in the state of Tennessee supporting a rich ecological diversity. Two federally listed species (one fish and one mussel) occur in the Obed: spotfin chub Cyprinella monacha, and purple bean Villosa perpurpurea. The Obed is a major tributary to the upper Emory River. Historical mussel collections and recent sampling have documented 27 species in the drainage. Freshwater mussel sampling was relegated to the Obed WSR and tributaries to determine species composition, abundance, and whether reproduction and recruitment is occurring to the fauna. Mussel sampling was conducted from 2000-2001 within the boundaries of the WSR at access points throughout the length of the Obed including portions of the upper Emory River, Daddy’s, Clear, and Whites creek. A total of 585 mussels representing nine species were found during the study. The most abundant mussel found was Villosa iris that comprised 55% of the fauna, followed by Lampsilis fasciola 19% and Medionidus conradicus 14%. The federally endangered V. perpurpurea was represented at 3%. Two species, Pleuronaia barnesiana (live) and Lampsilis cardium (fresh dead), were found as single individuals and P. barnesiana is a new distribution record for the Obed. The mussel fauna in the Obed WSR is relatively rare and historically the river may never have had a more diverse fauna because of the biologically non-productive nature of shale and sandstone that characterize streams on the Cumberland Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • Final PED/EIS, Volume I
    U.S. Department of the Interior Oce of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement North Cumberland Wildlife Management Area Tennessee Lands Unsuitable for Mining Final Petition Evaluation Document / Environmental Impact Statement OSM-EIS-37 Volume I October 2016 This page left intentionally blank. NORTH CUMBERLAND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA, TENNESSEE LANDS UNSUITABLE FOR MINING PETITION EVALUATION DOCUMENT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, OSM-EIS-37 Earl D. Bandy Jr., Director-Knoxville Field Office Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement John J. Duncan Federal Building; 710 Locust Street, 2nd Floor Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 phone: 865-545-4103; email: [email protected] Abstract On September 30, 2010, pursuant to the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA), 30 USC § 1272(c), the State of Tennessee filed a petition with the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) to designate certain lands in the State as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations. These lands include the area within 600 feet of certain ridgelines (a 1,200 foot corridor) lying within the North Cumberland Wildlife Management Area (NCWMA)—comprised of the Royal Blue Wildlife Management Area, the Sundquist Wildlife Management Area, and the New River Wildlife Management Area (also known as the Brimstone Tract Conservation Easement)—and the Emory River Tracts Conservation Easement (ERTCE), encompassing approximately 67,326 acres and 505 miles of ridgelines. In accordance with its responsibility in administering the federal program in Tennessee, the OSMRE must process and make decisions on all petitions submitted to designate areas in the State as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations. The petition includes two primary allegations with numerous allegations of fact and supporting statements.
    [Show full text]
  • 14Th Symposium Proceedings
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH SYMPOSIUM ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF LOWER TENNESSEE AND CUMBERLAND RIVER VALLEYS BRANDON SPRING GROUP CAMP LAND BETWEEN THE LAKES MARCH 25 AND 26, 2011 SPONS0RED BY AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY THE CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR FIELD BIOLOGY AND MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY WATERSHED STUDIES INSTITUTE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE LAND BETWEEN THE LAKES NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Austin Peay State University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age in its programs and activities. The Director of Affirmative Action has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies and can be reached at 601 College Street, Browning Bldg. Room 7A, Clarksville, TN 37044, 931-221-7178, [email protected]. (AP33/7-13/100) TH PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14 SYMPOSIUM ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF LOWER TENNESSEE AND CUMBERLAND RIVER VALLEYS HELD AT BRANDON SPRING GROUP CAMP LAND BETWEEN THE LAKES MARCH 25 AND 26, 2011 Sponsored by: The Center of Excellence for Field Biology Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tennessee and Watershed Studies Institute Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Land Between The Lakes National Recreation Area Golden Pond, Kentucky ******* EDITED BY: Rebecca Johansen, L. Dwayne Estes, Steven W. Hamilton, and Andrew N. Barrass Published by and available from: The Center of Excellence for Field Biology Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, Tennessee 37044 Price: $5.00 SUGGESTED CITATION Johansen, R., L.D.Austin Estes, PeayS.W. Hamilton,State Universit and A.N.y, Clarksville, Barrass (Editors). Tennessee 2013.
    [Show full text]