El Paso Region Freight Rail Study Phase II – Final Report July 2013 Rail Division

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

El Paso Region Freight Rail Study Phase II – Final Report July 2013 Rail Division El Paso Region Freight Rail Study Phase II – Final Report July 2013 Rail Division Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ii Rail Modeling ............................................................................................................................... ii Safety Issues ............................................................................................................................... iii Identified Improvements ............................................................................................................ iv Section 5A: Rail Modeling .......................................................................................................... 5-1 Section 5.1: Rail Traffic Controller ......................................................................................... 5-1 RTC Input Files ...................................................................................................................... 5-2 RTC Dispatching Logic ......................................................................................................... 5-3 Section 5.2: The RTC Base Case ............................................................................................ 5-4 Section 5.3: Updating the Phase I RTC Base Case Model ................................................... 5-4 Updated RTC Base Case ...................................................................................................... 5-5 Section 5.4: Applied RTC Methodology .................................................................................. 5-6 Section 5.5: RTC Base Case Model Parameters ................................................................... 5-8 Section 5.6: RTC Base Case Model Results ....................................................................... 5-10 Revised RTC Base Case with Strauss Yard ...................................................................... 5-10 Section 5.7: RTC Growth Models ......................................................................................... 5-12 Planning Case 1 ................................................................................................................ 5-13 Planning Case 2 ................................................................................................................ 5-14 Planning Case 3 ................................................................................................................ 5-15 Planning Case 4 ................................................................................................................ 5-16 Planning Case 5 ................................................................................................................ 5-17 Planning Case 6 ................................................................................................................ 5-18 Section 5.8: RTC Model Findings......................................................................................... 5-19 Section 6 A: Freight Rail and Rail-Roadway Interface Safety Issues ....................................... 6-1 Section 6.1: Safety Data and Statistics .................................................................................. 6-1 Roadway-Rail At-Grade Crossing Accidents ........................................................................ 6-2 Trespasser Incidents ............................................................................................................ 6-4 Train Accidents ..................................................................................................................... 6-5 Hazardous Materials and Truck vs. Rail Freight.............................................................. 6-10 EL PASO FREIGHT RAIL STUDY PHASE II, FINAL REPORT Section 6.2: Emergency Response Operations ................................................................... 6-13 Section 6.3: Safety Improvements ...................................................................................... 6-14 Section 7: Improvements Analysis ............................................................................................. 7-1 Section 7.1: Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) ............................................................................... 7-1 Methodological Framework ................................................................................................. 7-2 Section 7.2: Grade Crossings ................................................................................................. 7-3 Base Case (No Build) and (Build) Alternatives ................................................................... 7-6 Demand Assumptions .......................................................................................................... 7-7 Project Costs and Schedule Assumptions .......................................................................... 7-7 Benefit Categories ................................................................................................................ 7-9 Travel Time Savings due to Grade Separation; Crossing Closure ..................................... 7-9 Reduced Accident Costs due to Grade Separation; Crossing Closure .......................... 7-10 Reduced Vehicle Operating Costs due to Grade Separation; Crossing Closure ........... 7-11 Environmental (Air Quality) Savings due to Grade Separation; Crossing Closure ........ 7-11 Grade Separation BCA Results ......................................................................................... 7-12 Section 7.3: Railroad Infrastructure Improvements .......................................................... 7-15 Base (No-Build) Case and Alternatives (Build) Scenarios .............................................. 7-15 Demand Assumptions ....................................................................................................... 7-16 Project Costs and Schedule .............................................................................................. 7-16 Benefit Categories ............................................................................................................. 7-17 Travel Time Cost Impact due to Vehicle Delay Time ....................................................... 7-18 Freight Rail Operating Cost Impact due to Reduced Train Delay ................................... 7-19 Vehicle Operating Cost due to Vehicle Delay Time ......................................................... 7-19 Accident Cost Impact at Grade Crossings ....................................................................... 7-19 Emission Cost Impact due to Network Improvements.................................................... 7-20 Emission Cost Impact due to Vehicle Delay Time ........................................................... 7-20 Railroad Infrastructure Improvements BCA Results ....................................................... 7-20 Section 8: Descriptions of Improvements ................................................................................. 8-1 Section 8.1: Safety Improvement Descriptions ..................................................................... 8-1 Group 1: Zaragoza Road ...................................................................................................... 8-1 Group 2: Copia Street, San Marcial Street, Estrella Street, Cebada Street, and Grama Street ..................................................................................................................................... 8-2 EL PASO FREIGHT RAIL STUDY PHASE II, FINAL REPORT Group 3: Buford Street ......................................................................................................... 8-4 Group 4: Fabens Street, 3rd Street, and 4th Street ............................................................ 8-4 Group 5: Pendale Road ........................................................................................................ 8-6 Group 6: Montana Avenue and East Yandell Drive ............................................................ 8-6 Group 7: FM 1110 ................................................................................................................ 8-7 Group 8: Chelsea Street and Concepcion Street ............................................................... 8-8 Group 9: Missouri Avenue ................................................................................................... 8-9 Group 10: Country Club Road .............................................................................................. 8-9 Group 11: FM 1505/North Clark Drive ............................................................................ 8-10 Group 12: Piedras Street, Rosewood Street, Maple Street, Birch Street, Cedar Street, and Elm Street ................................................................................................................... 8-11 Group 13: Redd Road and Green Avenue ....................................................................... 8-13 Group 14: FM 1905/Washington Street ......................................................................... 8-14 Group 15: Sunland Park Drive ......................................................................................... 8-14 Group 16: FM 259 ............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • El Paso, Texas
    Cross-Border Hazardous Materials Transportation Study: El Paso, Texas Saving Lives, Time and Resources March 2013 CROSS-BORDER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION STUDY: EL PASO, TEXAS by David Bierling, Ph.D. Edwin Varela Associate Research Scientist Graduate Assistant Researcher Juan Carlos Villa Edward (Luke) Cowsar Program Manager Student Worker II Debbie Jasek Alexis Garcia Research Specialist Student Worker III Arturo Bujanda Associate Research Specialist Project performed by Center for International Intelligent Transportation Research In cooperation with Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Division of Emergency Management Report No. 186052-00003-1 Project No. 186052-00003: Analysis of Hazardous Materials Shipment Information for Truck Traffic in the El Paso Region March 2013 Report prepared by Center for International Intelligent Transportation Research Texas A&M Transportation Institute 4050 Rio Bravo, Suite 151 El Paso, Texas 79902 TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ iv Disclaimer and Acknowledgments ............................................................................................ vii Abstract ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Freight Advisory Committee
    TRAVEL INFORMATION Dial 1-800-452-9292 for travel assistance from a professional Texas travel counselor, including routing in Texas, emergency road condition information, and other travel services; or to register a comment or State Railroad Map 2016complaint about department operations.° 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W OKLAHOMA NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS FANNIN Class I Railroad [! Emergency Contact Numbers DALLAM [! PERRYTON NORTH CENTRAL STRATFORD HANSFORD LIPSCOMB TEXAS COG DGNO SPEARMAN [! [! 36°N SHERMAN LIPSCOMB 36°N Union Pacific (UP).......................................(800) 848-8715 DALHART OCHILTREE DENTON COLLIN [! DECATUR Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF).........(800) 832-5452 [! [! TXNW DENTON [! MCKINNEY DCTA Kansas City Southern Railway.....................(877) 527-9464 AMARILLO CORPUS CHRISTI [! DUMAS [! ROBERTS CANADIAN Number Abbreviation Railroad Operator [! ARANSAS WISE HARTLEY MOORE STINNETT SAN PATRICIO DGNO 01 TIBR Timberrock Railroad Company HUTCHINSON MIAMI HEMPHILL DGNO 02 GRR Georgetown Railroad CHANNING [! [! 03 RSS Rockdale, Sandow & Southern Railroad Company 04 BLR Blacklands Railroad CCTR FWWR ROCKWALL [! 05 TCT Texas City Terminal Railway POTTER PAMPA WHEELER [! CARSON ! CORPUS CHRISTI DGNO [ DGNO PNR DART 06 TM Texas Mexican Railway Company [! DART OLDHAM 07 TMPX Texas Municipal Power Association WHEELER [! GRAY DART ROCKWALL 08 TSE Texas South-Eastern Railroad CORPUS CHRISTI FWWR PANHANDLE VEGA NUECES MPO 09 TXTC Texas Transportation Company [! TRE DART
    [Show full text]
  • El Paso Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
    Las Cruces – El Paso Commuter Rail South Central Regional Transit District Passenger Rail Feasibility Study Center for Neighborhood Technology 6/30/2017 Las Cruces-El Paso Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Contents I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 II. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 A. Purpose of the Study ......................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Team ..................................................................................................................................... 6 C. Regional Impact ................................................................................................................................ 7 D. Study Area ......................................................................................................................................... 7 E. 2009 Study ........................................................................................................................................ 9 F. Qualitative Research and Public Engagement .................................................................................. 9 III. Corridor Snapshot: Demography & Economy ................................................................................. 11 A. Population, Age Segmentation,
    [Show full text]
  • El Paso Region Freight Rail Study
    EL PASO REGION FREIGHT RAIL STUDY Final Report April 2011 Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. i REGIONAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. i RAIL SYSTEM INVENTORY ............................................................................................................... ii FREIGHT RAIL MOVEMENT TRENDS ................................................................................................ iv RAIL OPERATIONS .......................................................................................................................... v SAFETY ISSUES AND POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................................ vi SECTION 1: PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................... 1-1 REGIONAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 1-1 REVIEW OF EL PASO RAIL STUDIES AND INITIATIVES .................................................................... 1-1 PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS AND RECENT PROJECTS ...................................................................... 1-8 SECTION 2: PURPOSE OF STUDY............................................................................................ 2-1 SECTION 3: RAIL FREIGHT OPERATIONAL STUDY ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Memories and Miracles
    Volume 27 Issue 1 Winter 1997 Winter 1997 Memories and Miracles - Housing the Rural Poor along the United States-Mexico Border: A Comparative Discussion of Colonia Formation and Remediation in El Paso County, Texas, and Dona Ana County, New Mexico Nancy L. Simmons Recommended Citation Nancy L. Simmons, Memories and Miracles - Housing the Rural Poor along the United States-Mexico Border: A Comparative Discussion of Colonia Formation and Remediation in El Paso County, Texas, and Dona Ana County, New Mexico, 27 N.M. L. Rev. 33 (1997). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmlr/vol27/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The University of New Mexico School of Law. For more information, please visit the New Mexico Law Review website: www.lawschool.unm.edu/nmlr MEMORIES AND MIRACLES-HOUSING THE RURAL POOR ALONG THE UNITED STATES-MEXICO BORDER: A COMPARATIVE DISCUSSION OF COLONIA FORMATION AND REMEDIATION IN EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS, AND DONA ANA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO NANCY L. SIMMONS* The first resident bought land there in 1990. He lived in a cobalt blue adobe house he was building by hand. The developer named the community "Recuerdos," Spanish for memories. The popular story is that after a year there without running water, the first resident re-named Recuerdos "El Milagro," meaning miracle. Five years later, over a dozen families lived there, and several more wanted to move to El Milagro, but could not acquire the necessary permits. Now, primarily due to the efforts of a grass roots organization known as the Colonias Development Council (CDC),' El Milagro, New Mexico, has running water, the beginnings of a community-wide septic system, and, most importantly, a local organizing board.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Corridor Study Report
    SANTA TERESA INTERNATIONAL RAIL STUDY FEASIBILITY CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT APRIL 2016 PREPARED BY: TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Description ............................................................................................................................ 2 1. Purpose & Need .............................................................................................................. 4 2. Background and Previous Studies ................................................................................. 5 3. Coordination/Public Outreach ......................................................................................7 4. Existing Study Area Conditions and Constraints ....................................................... 14 5. Alternatives Screening Methodology and Universe of Alternatives ....................... 24 6. Alternatives Evaluation .................................................................................................. 31 7. Economic and Financial Feasibility ............................................................................. 41 8. Presidential Permit Requirements ................................................................................ 55 Conclusions/Next Steps ..................................................................................................... 57 Santa Teresa International Rail Study: Feasibility Corridor Study Report Santa Teresa International Rail
    [Show full text]