Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 Earth and Planetary Sciences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 Earth and Planetary Sciences Director of undergraduate studies: Celli Hull ([email protected]); earth.yale.edu The Earth and Planetary Sciences (EPS) program, formerly Geology and Geophysics, prepares students for the application of scientific principles and methods to the understanding of the Earth system and other planets. Subjects range from the history of Earth and life to present-day environmental processes and climate change, the deep interiors of Earth and other planets, tectonic plates, oceans, atmospheres, climates, land surface, natural resources, and biota. The emphasis of the curriculum is on employing basic principles from the core sciences (physics, chemistry, and biology) to further an understanding of Earth’s past and present, and addressing issues relating to its future. Students gain a broad background in the natural sciences, and also select a specific track to focus their work on planetary or environmental phenomena of particular interest. The four B.S. tracks emphasize hands-on research experience in fieldwork, in laboratories, or in theoretical analyses and computer modeling. While some graduates continue on to research, consulting, or industrial careers in Earth, environmental, and planetary sciences, the major’s broad scientific training prepares students for a wide variety of other paths, including medicine, law, public policy, and teaching. There is also a B.A. track, which is most suitable for students who wish to study Earth and Planetary Sciences as a second major, complementing other majors in, for example, Mathematics, Economics, Physics, Biology, or Engineering, and who do so in preparation for a career in law, business, government, or environmental fields. Prerequisites With permission of the director of undergraduate studies (DUS), acceleration credits awarded at matriculation for high scores on national or international examinations (such as Advanced Placement subject tests) may be used to satisfy prerequisites, even if the student does not choose to accelerate. Higher-level courses may, with the permission of the DUS, be substituted for prerequisites and for specific required courses. For prerequisites specific for each track, see Requirements of the Major. Requirements of the Major B.S. degree program Majors in the B.S. program in Earth and Planetary Sciences choose from four tracks: Atmosphere, Ocean, and Climate; Environmental and Energy Geoscience; Paleontology and Geobiology; and Solid Earth Science. The tracks are suggested pathways to professional careers and major areas of research in earth and planetary sciences. Students may change tracks during their course of study with guidance from the DUS. 1. The Atmosphere, Ocean, and Climate track provides a comprehensive understanding of the atmosphere-ocean-climate system. Topics range from past climate changes, including the ice ages, to present-day atmospheric and ocean circulation, to weather phenomena, to global warming projections. The prerequisites are CHEM 165 or CHEM 167; PHYS 180, 181 and PHYS 205L, 206L; ENAS 130 or equivalent; and mathematics through differential equations (MATH 120 or ENAS 151, and ENAS 194). The major requirements consist of at least eleven term courses, for eleven course credits, beyond the prerequisites, including either the senior essay or the senior thesis. To begin study of Earth processes, majors take an introductory course in EPS, with any accompanying laboratory, selected from EPS 100, 101, 110, and 111L, or EPS 125 and 126L. Five core courses, totaling five course credits, introduce students to Earth’s climate system (EPS 140), meteorology (EPS 322), physical oceanography (EPS 335), fluid mechanics (MENG 361), and statistics or linear algebra (S&DS 230 or 238 or MATH 222). Other higher-level courses in EPS can be substituted with the permission of the DUS. Four electives are chosen from topics in the environment and in processes that govern the atmosphere, ocean, and land surface, physics, and statistics. A list of suggested electives is available from the office of the DUS or on the department website. At least one elective must be from EPS. 2. The Environmental and Energy Geoscience track provides a scientific understanding of the natural and anthropogenic processes that shape the Earth-atmosphere-biosphere system, including energy and material flows among its components. It emphasizes comparative studies of past and current Earth processes to inform models of humankind’s role within the environment’s future. The prerequisites are broad and flexible and include CHEM 165 or CHEM 167 and mathematics through multivariate calculus (MATH 120 or ENAS 151). Depending on their area of focus, students may choose a prerequisite in physics (PHYS 170, 171; or PHYS 180, 181; or PHYS 200, 201), or they may choose cellular biology (BIOL 101 and 102, or MCDB 120) and evolutionary biology (BIOL 103 and 104, or E&EB 122, or EPS 125 and 126L). The major requirements consist of at least eleven term courses, for eleven course credits, beyond the prerequisites, including either the senior essay or the senior thesis. To begin study of the Earth system, majors take two introductory courses in EPS, with any accompanying laboratories, selected from EPS 100, 101, 110, and 111L, EPS 125 and 126L, or EPS 140. Four core courses are chosen from topics in general resource use and sustainability (EPS 205), Earth's surface processes (EPS 232), the microbiology of surface and near-surface environments (EPS 255), fossil fuels and energy transitions (EPS 274), renewable energies (EPS 275), geochemical principles (EPS 301), structural geology (EPS 312), meteorology (EPS 322), and satellite- based image analysis (EPS 362). Other higher-level courses in EPS can be substituted with the permission of the DUS. Four electives chosen from Earth & Planetary Sciences, Environmental Studies, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Engineering, or related fields provide a broad approach to scientific study of the environment. A list of suggested electives is available from the office of the DUS or on the department website. Electives may be chosen from the core courses, and at least two must be from EPS. 3. The Paleontology and Geobiology track focuses on the fossil record of life and evolution, geochemical imprints of life, and interactions between life and Earth. Topics range from morphology, function, relationships, and biogeography of the fossils themselves, through the contexts of fossil finds in terms of stratigraphy, sediment geochemistry, paleoecology, paleoclimate, and geomorphology, to analysis of the larger causes of paleontological, geobiological, and evolutionary patterns. Integrative approaches 2 Earth and Planetary Sciences are emphasized that link fossil evidence with the physical and chemical evolution of Earth. The prerequisites are college-level biology (BIOL 101–104, or MCDB 120 and E&EB 122), CHEM 165 or CHEM 167, and mathematics through multivariate calculus (MATH 120 or ENAS 151). The major requirements consist of at least thirteen term courses, for twelve course credits, beyond the prerequisites, including either the senior essay or the senior thesis. Students take one of EPS 100, 101, 110, and 111L, to gain geological and environmental context, and they are introduced to the fossil record and evolution in EPS 125 and 126L. Four core courses give majors a comprehensive background in sedimentary rocks and rock correlation (EPS 232 or equivalent), the study of evolution (E&EB 225 or equivalent), microbiology in past and present environments (EPS 255 or equivalent), Earth's carbon cycle and climate (EPS 310, 402, or equivalent), and statistical data analysis as applied to the life sciences (S&DS 101 or equivalent). Other higher-level courses in EPS can be substituted with the permission of the DUS. Four electives selected from Earth and Planetary Sciences, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, and related fields offer students flexibility in pursuing their specific interests. A list of suggested electives is available from the office of the DUS or on the department website. At least one elective must be from EPS. 4. The Solid Earth Science track emphasizes an integrated geological, geochemical, and geophysical approach to the study of processes operating within Earth and their manifestations on the surface. It includes the structure, dynamics, and kinetics of Earth's interior and their impacts on our environment both in the long term (e.g., the evolution of the land surface) and in the short term (e.g., the causes of natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanic eruptions). Students acquire a fundamental understanding of the solid Earth system, both as it exists today and as it has evolved over geologic time scales. The prerequisites are CHEM 165 or CHEM 167, physics (PHYS 170, 171; or PHYS 180, 181; or PHYS 200, 201), and mathematics through multivariate calculus (MATH 120 or ENAS 151). The major requirements consist of at least eleven courses, for eleven course credits, beyond the prerequisites, including either the senior essay or the senior thesis. To begin study of the Earth system, majors take two introductory courses in EPS, with any accompanying laboratories, selected from EPS 100, 101, 110, and 111L, EPS 125 and 126L, or EPS 140. The core of the track consists of four courses chosen from topics in mountain building and global tectonics (EPS 212), rocks and minerals (EPS 220), sedimentary rocks and processes (EPS 232 or equivalent), geochemical principles
Recommended publications
  • Rowan C. Martindale Curriculum Vitae Associate Professor (Invertebrate Paleontology) at the University of Texas at Austin
    ROWAN C. MARTINDALE CURRICULUM VITAE ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR (INVERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY) AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Department of Geological Sciences E-mail: [email protected] Jackson School of Geosciences Website: www.jsg.utexas.edu/martindale/ 2275 Speedway Stop C9000 Orchid ID: 0000-0003-2681-083X Austin, TX 78712-1722 Phone: 512-475-6439 Office: JSG 3.216A RESEARCH INTERESTS The overarching theme of my work is the connection between Earth and life through time, more precisely, understanding ancient (Mesozoic and Cenozoic) ocean ecosystems and the evolutionary and environmental events that shaped them. My research is interdisciplinary, (paleontology, sedimentology, biology, geochemistry, and oceanography) and focuses on: extinctions and carbon cycle perturbation events (e.g., Oceanic Anoxic Events, acidification events); marine (paleo)ecology and reef systems; the evolution of reef builders (e.g., coral photosymbiosis); and exceptionally preserved fossil deposits (Lagerstätten). ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Associate Professor, University of Texas at Austin September 2020 to Present Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Austin August 2014 to August 2020 Postdoctoral Researcher, Harvard University August 2012 to July 2014 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology; Mentor: Dr. Andrew H. Knoll. EDUCATION Doctorate, University of Southern California 2007 to 2012 Dissertation: “Paleoecology of Upper Triassic reef ecosystems and their demise at the Triassic-Jurassic extinction, a potential ocean acidification event”. Advisor: Dr. David J. Bottjer, degree conferred August 7th, 2012. Bachelor of Science Honors Degree, Queen’s University 2003 to 2007 Geology major with a general concentration in Biology (Geological Sciences Medal Winner). AWARDS AND RECOGNITION Awards During Tenure at UT Austin • 2019 National Science Foundation CAREER Award: Awarded to candidates who are judged to have the potential to serve as academic role models in research and education.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Philosophical Questions About Paleontology and Their Practica1 Consequences
    ACTA GEOLOGICA HISPANICA. Concept and method in Paleontology. 16 (1981) nos 1-2, pags. 7-23 Some philosophical questions about paleontology and their practica1 consequences by Miquel DE RENZI Depto. de Geología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Valencia. Burjassot (Valencia). This papcr attempts to objectively discuss the actual state ofpaleontology. The En aquest treball s'ha intentat fer un balanc d'alguns aspectes de I'estat de la progress of this science stood still somewhat during the latter part of the last paleontologia. La historia de la paleontologia mostra un estancarnent a les century which caused it to develop apart from the biological sciences. an area to darreries del segle passac aquest estancament va Fer que la nostra ciencia s'anes which it is naturally tied. As aconsequence, this bruought a long-term stagnation, allunyant cada cop mes de I'area de les ciencies bii~logiques,amb les qualsestava because biology, dunng this century, has made great progress and paleontology lligada naturalment AixO va portar, com a conseqüencia, un important has not During the last 20 years paleontology as a science hasrecuperatedsome endarreriment, car la biologia, durant aquest segle, ha donat un gran pas of this loss, but we as scientists need to be careful in various aspects of its endavant, mentre que aquest no ha estat el cas de lapaleontologia Al nostre pais development -i possiblement a molts d'altres- la paleontologia es, fonamentalment, un estn per datar estrats. Tanmateix, un mal estri, car la datació es basadaen les especies fossils i la seva determinació es fonamenta en el ccncepte d'especie biolbgica; els fossils pero en moltes ocasions, són utilitzats mes aviat com si fossin segells o monedes.
    [Show full text]
  • SVP's Letter to Editors of Journals and Publishers on Burmese Amber And
    Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 7918 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 300 McLean, VA 22102 USA Phone: (301) 634-7024 Email: [email protected] Web: www.vertpaleo.org FEIN: 06-0906643 April 21, 2020 Subject: Fossils from conflict zones and reproducibility of fossil-based scientific data Dear Editors, We are writing you today to promote the awareness of a couple of troubling matters in our scientific discipline, paleontology, because we value your professional academic publication as an important ‘gatekeeper’ to set high ethical standards in our scientific field. We represent the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP: http://vertpaleo.org/), a non-profit international scientific organization with over 2,000 researchers, educators, students, and enthusiasts, to advance the science of vertebrate palaeontology and to support and encourage the discovery, preservation, and protection of vertebrate fossils, fossil sites, and their geological and paleontological contexts. The first troubling matter concerns situations surrounding fossils in and from conflict zones. One particularly alarming example is with the so-called ‘Burmese amber’ that contains exquisitely well-preserved fossils trapped in 100-million-year-old (Cretaceous) tree sap from Myanmar. They include insects and plants, as well as various vertebrates such as lizards, snakes, birds, and dinosaurs, which have provided a wealth of biological information about the ‘dinosaur-era’ terrestrial ecosystem. Yet, the scientific value of these specimens comes at a cost (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/11/science/amber-myanmar-paleontologists.html). Where Burmese amber is mined in hazardous conditions, smuggled out of the country, and sold as gemstones, the most disheartening issue is that the recent surge of exciting scientific discoveries, particularly involving vertebrate fossils, has in part fueled the commercial trading of amber.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise Dictionary of Paleontology Second Edition
    springer.com Life Sciences : Evolutionary Biology Carlton, Robert L. A Concise Dictionary of Paleontology Second Edition Presents a unique English language dictionary of paleontological terms, taxa, localities, and concepts Focuses on the most common orders, genera, and species, paying careful attention to overall historical significance in terms of turning points such as mass extinctions Written for students, libraries, museums, and general readers of scientific literature This new and significantly updated authored dictionary is a unique glossary of paleontological Springer terms, taxa, localities, and concepts. It focuses primarily on identifying the most significant 2nd ed. 2019, XII, 469 p. groups of fossil animals and plants in relation to their evolution and phylogeny. It also focuses 2nd on mass extinctions, on taxa that are problematic in some significant way, on the principal edition fossil-Lagerstätten of the world, and on historical turning points marked by index fossils. Although there are many current resources on the subject, none contains an accurate representation of the paleontological lexicon. Although well aware that the fast-changing field Printed book of paleontology will always defy any attempt at complete description, the author has attempted Hardcover to provide an accurate and comprehensive set of about 4,000 entries that will be useful to professionals as well as to general readers of scientific literature without a background in Printed book paleontology. Hardcover ISBN 978-3-030-25585-5 £ 149,99 | CHF 200,50 | 169,99 € | Order online at springer.com/booksellers Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH 186,99 € (A) | 181,89 € (D) Customer Service Available Tiergartenstrasse 15-17 Discount group 69121 Heidelberg Standard (0) Germany T: +49 (0)6221 345-4301 Product category [email protected] Dictionary Other renditions Softcover ISBN 978-3-030-25588-6 Softcover ISBN 978-3-030-25587-9 Prices and other details are subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greatest Challenge to 21St Century Paleontology: When Commercialization of Fossils Threatens the Science
    Palaeontologia Electronica http://palaeo-electronica.org The greatest challenge to 21st century paleontology: When commercialization of fossils threatens the science Kenshu Shimada, Philip J. Currie, Eric Scott, and Stuart S. Sumida As we proceed into the 21st century, the sci- responses to geological and climatic factors. Pale- ence of paleontology has achieved a remarkable ontology presently enjoys a new “Golden Age,” prominence and popularity, providing increasingly progressing by leaps while also serving, as always, detailed perspective on critical biological and geo- to inspire young minds to explore science and the logical processes. Spectacular new discoveries natural world. excite the imagination and spur new investigations, Yet at the outset of the millennium, three inter- while more abundant fossils studied using new connected, troubling challenges confront paleontol- techniques enable more precise interpretations of ogists: 1) a shrinking job market, 2) diminishing diversity, variation, changes through time, and funding sources, and 3) heightened commercial- Editor’s note: The commercial collection and sale of fossils, as well as the still developing regulations involving collection of fossils on public lands, have emerged as one of the most contentious issues in pale- ontology. These issues pit not only professional paleontologists and commercial collectors against each other, but have produced rifts within the paleontological community. Here Shimada and his co-authors vig- orously present a position supported by many vertebrate paleontologists. I repeat a call in an earlier com- mentary (Plotnick, 2011; palaeo-electronica.org/2011_1/commentary/mainstream.htm) for additional contributions that would discuss these issues that are so crucial to our field. Please send directly to Roy E.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanostructure of Biogenic Versus Abiogenic Calcium Carbonate Crystals
    Nanostructure of biogenic versus abiogenic calcium carbonate crystals JAROSŁAW STOLARSKI and MACIEJ MAZUR Stolarski, J. and Mazur, M. 2005. Nanostructure of biogenic versus abiogenic calcium carbonate crystals. Acta Palae− ontologica Polonica 50 (4): 847–865. The mineral phase of the aragonite skeletal fibers of extant scleractinians (Favia, Goniastrea) examined with Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) consists entirely of grains ca. 50–100 nm in diameter separated from each other by spaces of a few nanometers. A similar pattern of nanograin arrangement was observed in basal calcite skeleton of extant calcareous sponges (Petrobiona) and aragonitic extant stylasterid coralla (Adelopora). Aragonite fibers of the fossil scleractinians: Neogene Paracyathus (Korytnica, Poland), Cretaceous Rennensismilia (Gosau, Austria), Trochocyathus (Black Hills, South Dakota, USA), Jurassic Isastraea (Ostromice, Poland), and unidentified Triassic tropiastraeid (Alpe di Specie, It− aly) are also nanogranular, though boundaries between individual grains occasionally are not well resolved. On the other hand, in diagenetically altered coralla (fibrous skeleton beside aragonite bears distinct calcite signals) of the Triassic cor− als from Alakir Cay, Turkey (Pachysolenia), a typical nanogranular pattern is not recognizable. Also aragonite crystals produced synthetically in sterile environment did not exhibit a nanogranular pattern. Unexpectedly, nanograins were rec− ognized in some crystals of sparry calcite regarded as abiotically precipitated. Our findings support the idea that nanogranular organization of calcium carbonate fibers is not, per se, evidence of their biogenic versus abiogenic origin or their aragonitic versus calcitic composition but rather, a feature of CaCO3 formed in an aqueous solution in the presence of organic molecules that control nanograin formation. Consistent orientation of crystalographic axes of polycrystalline skeletal fibers in extant or fossil coralla, suggests that nanograins are monocrystalline and crystallographically ordered (at least after deposition).
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0186-6546 Gar W. Rothwell Edwin and Ruth Kennedy Distinguished Professor Emeritus Department of Environmental and Plant Biology Porter Hall 401E T: 740 593 1129 Ohio University F: 740 593 1130 Athens, OH 45701 E: [email protected] also Courtesy Professor Department of Botany and PlantPathology Oregon State University T: 541 737- 5252 Corvallis, OR 97331 E: [email protected] Education Ph.D.,1973 University of Alberta (Botany) M.S., 1969 University of Illinois, Chicago (Biology) B.A., 1966 Central Washington University (Biology) Academic Awards and Honors 2018 International Organisation of Palaeobotany lifetime Honorary Membership 2014 Fellow of the Paleontological Society 2009 Distinguished Fellow of the Botanical Society of America 2004 Ohio University Distinguished Professor 2002 Michael A. Cichan Award, Botanical Society of America 1999-2004 Ohio University Presidential Research Scholar in Biomedical and Life Sciences 1993 Edgar T. Wherry Award, Botanical Society of America 1991-1992 Outstanding Graduate Faculty Award, Ohio University 1982-1983 Chairman, Paleobotanical Section, Botanical Society of America 1972-1973 University of Alberta Dissertation Fellow 1971 Paleobotanical (Isabel Cookson) Award, Botanical Society of America Positions Held 2011-present Courtesy Professor of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University 2008-2009 Visiting Senior Researcher, University of Alberta 2004-present Edwin and Ruth Kennedy Distinguished Professor of Environmental and Plant Biology, Ohio
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontology and the History of Life
    36954_u01.qxd 7/11/08 2:01 PM Page 80 Paleontology and the History of Life Michael Benton And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. Genesis 2:19 People have always been astounded by the diversity of life, although perhaps in different ways. In prescientific times farmers saw how their crops and live- stock were merely part of a much larger richness of life, and people have al- ways striven to understand the complexity and arrangement of living things. From Aristotle to Linnaeus, scientists attempted to catalog life and to under- stand where it had come from. During the eighteenth century it became clear to all savants that the earth had been populated formerly by strange and mar- velous creatures that had since become extinct. By 1820 some rough picture of the succession of floras and faunas through geological time was beginning to emerge. Charles Darwin, during the voyage of HMS Beagle in the early 1830s, became increasingly convinced that life was more diverse than he had imagined—every island he visited sported a new crop of plants and animals. He saw the lateral (geographic) and vertical (historic) links between species and realized by 1837 that species were all linked by a great tree. The tree con- cept made it clear why species that in his time were geographically close should also be genealogically close.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to Common Misconceptions About Biological Evolution Leah M
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Evolution Papers in the Biological Sciences 5-2017 Answers to common misconceptions about biological evolution Leah M. Abebe University of Nebraska-Lincoln Blake Bartels University of Nebraska-Lincoln Kaitlyn M. Caron University of Nebraska-Lincoln Adam M. Gleeson University of Nebraska-Lincoln Samuel N. Johnson University of Nebraska-Lincoln See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscievolution Part of the Evolution Commons Abebe, Leah M.; Bartels, Blake; Caron, Kaitlyn M.; Gleeson, Adam M.; Johnson, Samuel N.; Kluza, Tyler J.; Knopik, Nicholas W.; Kramer, Kristen N.; Maza, Masiel S.; Stava, Kaitlyn A.; Sullivan, Kaitlyn; Trimble, Jordan T.; and Zink, Robert M. , editor, "Answers to common misconceptions about biological evolution" (2017). Papers in Evolution. 4. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscievolution/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Evolution by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Leah M. Abebe; Blake Bartels; Kaitlyn M. Caron; Adam M. Gleeson; Samuel N. Johnson; Tyler J. Kluza; Nicholas W. Knopik; Kristen N. Kramer; Masiel S. Maza; Kaitlyn A. Stava; Kaitlyn Sullivan; Jordan T. Trimble; and Robert M. Zink , editor This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscievolution/4 Answers to common misconceptions about biological evolution Class of BIOS 472, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Spring 2017 Students: Leah M. Abebe, Blake Bartels, Kaitlyn M.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Paleontology Option in Earth Sciences? the Paleontology Option Offers Students a General Geology Degree with an Emphasis in Paleontology
    What is the Paleontology Option in Earth Sciences? The Paleontology Option offers students a general geology degree with an emphasis in paleontology. Over 95% of all species that have ever existed are now extinct and biological diversity in past was far greater than today. The Paleontology Option, therefore, examines biological and geological processes that influence the diversification and extinction of a wide range of organisms, from microbes to plants and animals. This multi-disciplinary study investigates the history of life recorded in the rock record, the structure of past ecosystems, and patterns of evolution. What courses would I take in the Paleontology curriculum? Geology and paleontology incorporate a wide variety of analytical methods in the study of the Earth and ancient life. Consequently, lower division courses in the Paleontology Option introduce students to the fundamental principles of chemistry, physics, mathematics, and biology. Courses in physical geology and geography provide an overview of the Earth’s physical processes and their spatial distribution. Proper analysis of fossils comes only through understanding their geologic context. Upper division courses in mineralogy and petrology provide the analytical tools for interpreting the rock record. Structural geology, geomorphology, and sedimentology further highlight processes such as plate tectonics, mountain building, erosion, and sediment deposition. Historical geology, vertebrate and invertebrate paleontology introduce students to the major fossil groups and their morphology, evolution and extinction. Additional courses cover vertebrate anatomy, macroevolution, and dinosaur paleontology. Classes in taphonomy, field paleontology, and laboratory techniques emphasize analytical methods, while the six-week geology field course provides experience and practical training in field geology In addition, statistics and Earth Sciences writing and seminar classes are designed to further enhance students’ critical reading, writing, and analytical skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Paleontology Earth Sciences Division Natural History
    Invertebrate Paleontology 19^ Earth Sciences Division Natural History Mu 3311m A NEW SPECIES OF CHIMNEY-BUILDING PENITELLA FROM THE GULF OF ALASKA (BIVALVIA: PHOLADIDAE) * LIBRARY 'Ol ANGBIES GOIJNTV \i: A>., , -APOsrr.'ON GEORGE L. KENNEDY AND JOHN M. ARMENTROUT 1 Made in United States of America Reprinted from THE VELIGER Vol. 32, No. 3, July 1989 © California Malacozoological Society, Inc., 1989 THE VELIGER © CMS, Inc., 1989 The Veliger 32(3):320-325 (July 3, 1989) A New Species of Chimney-Building Penitella from the Gulf of Alaska (Bivalvia: Pholadidae) by GEORGE L. KENNEDY Invertebrate Paleontology Section, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA AND JOHN M. ARMENTROUT Mobil Oil Corporation, New Exploration Ventures, P.O. Box 650232, Dallas, Texas 75265, USA Abstract. Penitella hopkinsi sp. nov., from the Gulf of Alaska, differs from other species in the genus by its blunt and thickened posterior margin that inserts against the base of a chimney of agglutinated sediment (unique in the genus), by the shape of the mesoplax, and by details of the umbonal reflection and dorsal extension of the callum. Anatomy is unknown. Late Pleistocene records of the species range from the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, to Point Arena, California. INTRODUCTION acology]); MCZ, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cam- bridge; NMC, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Recent efforts to identify several enigmatic species of Peni- Ottawa; NSMT, National Science Museum, Tokyo; tella Valenciennes, 1846, from both the northeastern and SBMNH, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, northwestern Pacific revealed that a number of nomencla- Santa Barbara; UCLA, University of California, Los An- tural and taxonomic problems in the genus still need to geles (collections at LACM); UCMP, University of Cal- be resolved (KENNEDY, 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 What Is Geobiology?
    1 WHAT IS GEOBIOLOGY? Andrew H. Knoll1, Donald E. Canfield2, and Kurt O. Konhauser3 1 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138, USA 2 Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark 3 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3 Canada published The Biosphere, setting forth the argument that 1.1 Introduction life has shaped our planet’s surface environment Geobiology is a scientific discipline in which the throughout geologic time. Vernadsky also championed principles and tools of biology are applied to studies of the idea of a noosphere, a planet transformed by the Earth. In concept, geobiology parallels geophysics activities of human beings. A few years later, the Dutch and geochemistry, two longer established disciplines microbiologist Lourens Baas-Becking (1934) coined the within the Earth sciences. Beginning in the 1940s, and term geobiology to describe the interactions between accelerating through the remainder of the twentieth organisms and environment at the chemical level. century, scientists brought the tools of physics and Whereas most paleontologists stressed morphology and chemistry to bear on studies of the Earth, transforming systematics, Vernadsky and Baas-Becking focused on geology from a descriptive science to a quantitative field metabolism – and in the long run that made all the grounded in analysis, experiment and modeling. The difference. geophysical and geochemical revolutions both reflected Geobiological thinking moved to centre stage in the and drove a strong disciplinary emphasis on plate tec- 1970s with articulation of the Gaia Hypothesis by James tonics and planetary differentiation, not least because, Lovelock (1979).
    [Show full text]