Czech-American Relations: a Roadmap for the Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Czech-American Relations: a Roadmap for the Future DECEMBER 2014 POLICY PAPER CZECH-AMERICAN RELATIONS: A ROADMAP FOr tHE FUTURE JOHN K. GLENN | Policy Director, U.S. Global Leadership Coalition BRUCE P. JACKSON | President, Project for Transitional Democracies LUKáš KovANDA | Economic Consultant A. WESS MITCHELL | President, CEPA CAMERON MUNTER | Professor of International Relations, Pomona College TOMáš PoJAR | Vice President for International Relations, CEVRO Institute Jiří SchneiDER | Senior Fellow, Prague Security Studies Institute ALEXANDR VONDRA | Director, Prague Centre for Transatlantic Relations (CEVRO Institute) POLICYR PAPE CZE CH-AMERICAN RELATIONS: A ROADMAP FOr tHE FUTURE FROM MASARYK TO HAVEL: coup d’etat in February 1948 were East, nothing was possible but every- A DESIRE TO BRING A PIECE just bitter consequences of Yalta. thing mattered; in the West, everything of AmeriCA HOME Thus, U.S. postwar policy towards the was possible but nothing mattered. region was shaped by realpolitik and After 1989, Czech and American On July 4, 1928 a bronze statue of consisted of defense commitment to policymakers have acted exactly in Woodrow Wilson was erected in front of Western Europe and a recognition of opposite: like everything mattered and the Prague main rail station. It was more Soviet sphere of influence in the East. everything was possible. than just a tribute to Wilson’s foreign That was a bitter pill to Hungary in The U.S. response to the 1990s policy and its support for the Czech and 1956 and to Czechoslovakia in1968. euphoria was quick and positive. Slovak right for their self-determination. However, the American engagement in Firstly, they focused on economy. In It also showed a remarkable Jeffersonian the half of Europe largely contributed to 1990, they supported Czechoslovakia inspiration at the cradle of Czechoslo- the victory of the West in the Cold War. in its entry into IMF and the World Bank. vak Republic in 1918. The founder of After the fall of the Iron Curtain in In 1991, Czechoslovakia was granted the new, independent republic, Tomáš 1989, democratic revolutions led to with the most-favored-nation-clause in Garrigue Masaryk, noted: “I devoted a comprehensive transformation of mutual trade, the bilateral Investment much time thinking to the idea that the countries of Central Europe into liberal Protection Agreement (BIPA) was Czechoslovak state would resemble democracies based on the rule of law signed, and the Czechoslovakian-U.S. America in that we too have no dynasty and market economy. Solidarity and Entreprise Fund has been established. of our own and dislike foreign dynasty”1. alliance among democratic states in The Czechs sought the U.S. investment Therefore it was quite symbolical that defense of common values were be- in strategic sectors like telecommuni- – on the occasion of the first ever visit of lieved to provide necessary institutional cation (Bell), energy (Westinghouse, the U.S. President to Prague in Novem- framework for abandoning bonds of Conoco) and defense (Boeing) in the ber 1990 – George H.W. Bush unveiled totalitarian past as well as for their 1990s. a plaque commemorating Wilson’s future “return to Europe”. New politi- Secondly, the Clinton administra- words: “The world must be made safe cal elites in Central Europe have been tion, with the support of Republicans- for democracy.” He spoke about Europe deeply convinced that a new order in lead Congress since 1994, provided whole and free and recalled high costs of the region should be based on a strong a leadership in the process of NATO the U.S. isolationism after the First World Transatlantic bond with the U.S., which enlargement. Between 1997 and 1999, War. Ronald D. Asmus and Alexandr has never had – unlike “other powers” the Czech Republic – together with Vondra have captured prevailing – hegemonic ambitions in Europe. The Poland and Hungary – has became opinion: “In Central European eyes, it continuing U.S. engagement in Europe the member of NATO, and later on, the was America’s retreat from European was seen as a vital Czech strategic in- Prague NATO 2002 Summit offered the politics in the 1920s that paved the way terest. President Václav Havel, the first membership to other states of Central for the rise of Hitler and Stalin and even- statesman from former Soviet-bloc to and Eastern Europe (CEE) including tual destruction of their independence.”2 visit NATO HQ, was tireless in argu- Slovakia. The American leadership in Clearly, a destruction of Czechoslovakia ing for NATO’s continued relevance shaping a post-Cold war architecture in 1938 was marked by absence of the after the end of Cold War: “It is only in Europe had paved a road to swift U.S. in Europe. By the same token, the now that the Alliance has a chance to big-bang EU enlargement in 2004. U.S. involvement in European battlefield become exactly what the Washington played indispensable role in liberation of Treaty meant it to be – an open alliance 1 “Masaryk and America: Testimony of Western Europe from Nazi rule. of all democratic countries in the Euro- a Relationship” by George J. Kovtun. In 1945, a demarcation line between Atlantic region, protecting its area and Library of Congress, 1988. U.S. and Soviet zones – only a part its shared values.”3 2 Asmus, Ronald, D. and Vondra, Alexandr: of western Bohemia was liberated “The Origins of the Atlanticism in Central by General Patton’s 3rd US Army – and Eastern Europe”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Volume 18, Num- conceded Czechoslovakia to the THE ROMANTIC ERA OF 1990S: ber 2, July 2005. Soviet sphere of influence and sealed VALUES MATTERS, EVERYTHING 3 “NATO: The Safeguard of Stability and its geopolitical fate for more than four IS POSSIBLE Peace In the Euro-Atlantic Region”, decades. A rejection of Marshall Plan V. Havel‘s Speech at NATO Workshop by the Czechoslovak government upon Philip Roth once said the difference On Political-Military Decision Making, Stalin’s request in 1947 and communist between East and West was that in the Warsaw, Poland 19–23 June 1996. PCTR // CEVRO Institute The policy paper is funded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Jungmannova 17 / 110 00 Praha 1 / Czech Republic Czech Republic as a part of the wider projects of public diplomacy to tel. / +420 221 506 737 // e-mail / [email protected] // www.cevroinstitut.cz rise awareness of NATO and Security Policy of the Czech Republic. 2 CZE CH-AMERICAN RELATIONS: A ROADMAP FOr tHE FUTURE POLICYR PAPE As a result, the Czech Republic has rights (“The One World”) and most states tend to seek the affection of gained the best security guarantees in recently has established itself as an distant powers to balance or offset its modern history and found itself in important venue for meetings bringing the unwanted attentions of their larger a relatively safe security havens, encir- together actors from the Middle East, neighbors. But this balancing game cled by states, with which it shared the Europe and the North America, includ- works best in an international system same values and interests. ing Israelis and people from countries of many roughly equal powers. In addi- The Czech Republic did not stay which do not recognize Israel. tion to the inequality of power (and thus aside as a mere consumer of security. Generally speaking, the Czech- also responsibility) between a small In 1991, Czechoslovak NBC battalion American relations between 1990 and state and a distant power, there are took part in Desert Storm operation 2009 enjoyed a kind of a “sunshine also asymmetries of interests, which to liberate Kuwait. The Czech Armed era”. Starting with the famous Presi- are magnified by different geographical Forces contributed to every peace- dent Havel’s speech before a joint ses- realities. The Czech Republic might see keeping effort in the Balkans. In 1999, sion of the U.S. Congress in February a powerful ally as useful in controlling only two weeks after the accession in 1990, Czech government officials were passions within CEE and in restraining NATO, Czech commitment was tested welcomed in the White House year by the power of Russia (or Germany in in a heated domestic debate to ap- year as friends and allies. The last four past). By contrast, the United States prove air strikes against Belgrade and U.S. Presidents have visited Prague. might see all of Mitteleuropa as either in sending Czech troops to Kosovo. Both parties embraced a shared set of a bridge to or a barrier against Russia Following terrorist attacks of 9/11, values: Americans embraced Václav depending on the policy du jour. The the Czech Republic proved to be Havel as a secular saint, and Czechs only possible exception to a logic of a reliable ally taking part in operations embraced America as a symbol of geography could be terrorism, which in Afghanistan without any caveats. freedom. countries perceive in the same way The U.S.-led invasion to Iraq in 2003 People-to-people contacts were across great distances, but even brought a division of Europe. The driven by a similar enthusiasm and here capitals may differ on whether Czech Republic stood by the U.S. – a sense of culture proximity. It drew and when to fight in Iran, Iraq, Syria, along with Denmark, Hungary, Great young Americans to Prague in the Somalia or Mali. Britain, Italy, Poland, Portugal and early 90s, and it inspired a steady In 2009, a turning point in Czech- Spain – and President Havel signed the stream of Czech students to the U.S. American relationship occurred. “letter of eight”4 to call for European In 2008, the U.S. administration finally When the Czech government was unity in enforcing of the UNSC Resolu- added the Czech Republic to the Visa approached in 2007 (after five years tion 1441.
Recommended publications
  • Dear Senator
    Dear Senator: We support, strongly and without qualification, President Obama’s nomination of Chuck Hagel to be the next Secretary of Defense. Most of us have known the Senator for a decade or more and consistently have found him to be one of the best informed leaders in the U.S. Congress on national security issues. Senator Hagel’s credentials for the job are impeccable. As a decorated Vietnam veteran, a successful entrepreneur in the private sector, and a two-term United States senator, he brings exceptional qualifications and experience to the Department of Defense, particularly at this time of budget constraint and challenges in reshaping America’s military power while keeping it strong for the coming decades. Senator Hagel’s political courage has impressed us all. He has stood and argued publicly for what he believes is best for the United States. Time and again, he has chosen to take the path of standing up for our nation, rather than the path of political expediency. He has always supported the pillars of American foreign policy: a strong military; a robust Atlantic partnership; a commitment to the security of Israel, as a friend and ally; a determination to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons; and the defense of human rights as a core principle of America’s role in the world. We have spent most of our lives in the service of our country, deeply committed to America’s security and the example of our democracy. Many of us served in the U.S. armed services and most of us have served for decades as professional diplomats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Terrorism Trap: the Hidden Impact of America's War on Terror
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2019 The Terrorism Trap: The Hidden Impact of America's War on Terror John Akins University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Recommended Citation Akins, John, "The Terrorism Trap: The Hidden Impact of America's War on Terror. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/5624 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by John Akins entitled "The Terrorism Trap: The Hidden Impact of America's War on Terror." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Political Science. Krista Wiegand, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Brandon Prins, Gary Uzonyi, Candace White Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) The Terrorism Trap: The Hidden Impact of America’s War on Terror A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville John Harrison Akins August 2019 Copyright © 2019 by John Harrison Akins All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iran Nuclear Deal: What You Need to Know About the Jcpoa
    THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE JCPOA wh.gov/iran-deal What You Need to Know: JCPOA Packet The Details of the JCPOA • FAQs: All the Answers on JCPOA • JCPOA Exceeds WINEP Benchmarks • Timely Access to Iran’s Nuclear Program • JCPOA Meeting (and Exceeding) the Lausanne Framework • JCPOA Does Not Simply Delay an Iranian Nuclear Weapon • Tools to Counter Iranian Missile and Arms Activity • Sanctions That Remain In Place Under the JCPOA • Sanctions Relief — Countering Iran’s Regional Activities What They’re Saying About the JCPOA • National Security Experts and Former Officials • Regional Editorials: State by State • What the World is Saying About the JCPOA Letters and Statements of Support • Iran Project Letter • Letter from former Diplomats — including five former Ambassadors to Israel • Over 100 Ambassador letter to POTUS • US Conference of Catholic Bishops Letter • Atlantic Council Iran Task Force Statement Appendix • Statement by the President on Iran • SFRC Hearing Testimony, SEC Kerry July 14, 2015 July 23, 2015 • Key Excerpts of the JCPOA • SFRC Hearing Testimony, SEC Lew July 23, 2015 • Secretary Kerry Press Availability on Nuclear Deal with Iran • SFRC Hearing Testimony, SEC Moniz July 14, 2015 July 23, 2015 • Secretary Kerry and Secretary Moniz • SASC Hearing Testimony, SEC Carter Washington Post op-ed July 29, 2015 July 22, 2015 THE DETAILS OF THE JCPOA After 20 months of intensive negotiations, the U.S. and our international partners have reached an historic deal that will verifiably prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The United States refused to take a bad deal, pressing for a deal that met every single one of our bottom lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Income Inequality and Poverty: Are We Asking the Right Questions?
    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A Bilingual Interdisciplinary Journal Vol. 16. No. 1-2, 2020 In this issue: Youliy Ninov: An Alternative View on Saving and Investment From an Austrian Economics Perspective Bradley K. Hobbs and Nikolai G. Wenzel: Income Inequality and Poverty: Are We Asking the Right Questions? Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski: Austrian Economics as a Paradigm of Golden Mean Thinking Frank Daumann and Florian Follert: COVID-19 and Rent-Seeking Competition: Some Insights from Germany NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A Bilingual Interdisciplinary Journal New Perspectives on Political Economy is a peer-reviewed semi-annual bilingual interdisciplinary journal, published since 2005 in Prague. The journal aims at contributing to scholarship at the intersection of political science, political philosophy, political economy and law. The main objective of the journal is to enhance our understanding of private property-, market- and individual liberty-based perspectives in the respected sciences. We also believe that only via exchange among social scientists from different fields and cross-disciplinary research can we critically analyze and fully understand forces that drive policy-making and be able to spell out policy implications and consequences. The journal welcomes submissions of unpublished research papers, book reviews, and educational notes. Published by CEVRO Institute Academic Press New Perspectives on Political Economy CEVRO Institute, Jungmannova 17, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic Manuscripts should be submitted electronically to [email protected]. Full text available via DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals and also via EBSCO Publishing databases. Information for Authors Authors submitting manuscripts should include abstracts of not more than 250 words and JEL classification codes.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter J. Boettke
    PETER J. BOETTKE BB&T Professor for the Study of Capitalism, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, & University Professor of Economics and Philosophy Department of Economics, MSN 3G4 George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030 Tel: 703-993-1149 Fax: 703-993-1133 Web: http://www.peter-boettke.com http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=182652 http://www.coordinationproblem.org PERSONAL Date of birth: January 3, 1960 Nationality: United States EDUCATION Ph.D. in Economics, George Mason University, January, 1989 M.A. in Economics, George Mason University, January, 1987 B.A. in Economics, Grove City College, May, 1983 TITLE OF DOCTORAL THESIS: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism, 1918-1928 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Academic Positions 1987 –88 Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, George Mason University 1988 –90 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, School of Business Administration, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309 1990 –97 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, New York University, New York, NY 10003 1997 –98 Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Finance, School of Business, Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY 10471 1998 – 2003 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030 (tenured Fall 2000) 2003 –07 Professor, Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030 2007 – University Professor, George Mason University 2011 – Affiliate Faculty, Department of Philosophy, George Mason University FIELDS OF INTEREST
    [Show full text]
  • Createspace Word Templates
    MOLINARI REVIEW Molinari Review 1, No. 2 (Fall 2019) © The Molinari Institute 2019 All content in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by: The Molinari Institute 402 Martin Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36830 U.S.A. ISBN: 978-1-947236-00-4 MOLINARI REVIEW The Molinari Review is a peer-reviewed, open-access, print-on-demand, interdiscipli- nary journal of libertarian research. We publish scholarship, sympathetic or critical, in and/or on the libertarian tradition, broadly understood as including classical liberalism, individualist anarchism, social anarchism, anarcho-capitalism, anarcho- communism, anarcho-syndicalism, anarcha-feminism, panarchism, voluntaryism, mu- tualism, agorism, distributism, bleeding-heart libertarianism, Austrianism, Georgism, public choice, and beyond – essentially, everything from Emma Goldman to Ayn Rand, C. L. R. James to F. A. Hayek, Alexis de Tocqueville to Michel Foucault. (We see exciting affiliations among these strands of the libertarian tradition; but you don’t have to agree with us about that to publish in our pages.) Disciplines in which we seek to publish include philosophy, political science, eco- nomics, history, sociology, psychology, anthropology, theology, ecology, literature, and law. We aim to enhance the visibility of libertarian scholarship, to expand the boundaries of traditional libertarian discussion, and to provide a home for cutting- edge research in the theory and practice of human liberty. INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS Submissions should be sent by email to Roderick T. Long at [email protected] as Word .doc or .docx files, prepared for blind review (i.e. all author information re- moved), and accompanied by an abstract of around 150 words as a guide for referees.
    [Show full text]
  • US Foreign Policy in Pakistan
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2015 U.S. Foreign Policy in Pakistan: Bringing Pakistan Into Line with American Counterterrorism Interests Henry E. Appel Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Appel, Henry E., "U.S. Foreign Policy in Pakistan: Bringing Pakistan Into Line with American Counterterrorism Interests" (2015). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 1117. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1117 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE U.S. FOREIGN POLICY IN PAKISTAN: BRINGING PAKISTAN INTO LINE WITH AMERICAN COUNTERTERRORISM INTERESTS SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR JENNIFER TAW AND DEAN NICHOLAS WARNER BY HENRY E. APPEL FOR SENIOR THESIS FALL 2014/SPRING 2015 APRIL 27, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................5 Abstract............................................................................................................................6 1 – Introduction...............................................................................................................7 Organization..........................................................................................................8 2 – Realism, The Filter Effect and the U.S. Foreign Policy in Pakistan...................12
    [Show full text]
  • NEW PERSPECTIVES on POLITICAL ECONOMY a Bilingual Interdisciplinary Journal Vol
    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A bilingual interdisciplinary journal Vol. 8, No. 1 2012 NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A bilingual interdisciplinary journal / Vol. 8, No. 1, 2012 New Perspectives on Political Economy is a peer-reviewed semi-annual bilingual interdisci- plinary journal, published since 2005 in Prague. The journal aims at contributing to schol- arship at the intersection of political science, political philosophy, political economy and law. The main objective of the journal is to enhance our understanding of private property-, market- and individual liberty-based perspectives in the respected sciences. We also belive that only via exchange among social scientists from different fields and cross-disciplinary research can we critically analyze and fully understand forces that drive policy-making and be able to spell out policy implications and consequences. The journal welcomes submis- sions of unpublished research papers, book reviews, and educational notes. Published by CEVRO Institute Academic Press EDITORIAL ADDRESS: New Perspectives on Political Economy CEVRO Institute, Jungmannova 17, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic Manuscripts should be submitted electronically. All manuscripts and correspondence should be addressed to [email protected]. Full text available via DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals and also via EBSCO Pub- lishing databases. INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS Authors submitting manuscripts should include abstracts of not more than 250 words and JEL classification codes. New Perspectives on Political Economy edits for clarity, brevity, and in accordance with the Chicago Manual of Style. Authors should use footnotes rather than endnotes or in-text references, and must include complete bibliographical information. Authors should include information on their titles and professional affiliations, along with e-mail address.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Tobacco Trade in Turkish-American Relations, 1923-29
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 12-1988 The oler of the tobacco trade in Turkish-American relations, 1923-29. Robert Carey Goodman Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Goodman, Robert Carey, "The or le of the tobacco trade in Turkish-American relations, 1923-29." (1988). Master's Theses. Paper 540. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Role of the Tobacco Trade in Turkish-American Relations, 1923-29 by Robert Carey Goodman III Candidate for the Master of Arts in History University of Richmond, 1987 Thesis Director: John D. Treadway This study of the tobacco trade between Turkey and the United States provides new perspectives on two major themes in Turkish-American relations between 1923 and 1929: the effect of Turkish nationalism on American interests in Ataturk's Turkey, and the effort to restore Turkish- American diplomatic ties broken during World War I. The marked rise in American cigarette consumption after World War I made the tobacco trade a crucial link between Turkey and America because it required the importation of aromatic tobacco. During the Turkish Republic's first decades, the value of American tobacco imports from Turkey exceeded the value of all American exports to that country. The tobacco trade survived Turkish nationalism and unsatisfactory diplomatic relations because of the financial benefits it brought to both states.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    SIGNÈ THOMAS CURRICULUM VITA Website: www.SigneThomas.com Email: [email protected] [email protected] EDUCATION PhD in Economics (in progress: ABD), Universidad Francisco Marroquín (UFM) ) UFM Dissertation (in progress): “The Relationships Between Economic Institutions, Poverty, Entrepreneurship, and Human Trafficking.” Dissertation Chair: James Gwartney Masters in Applied Economics, Florida State University, (FSU) Tallahassee, FL, August 2014 ) Applied Research Project: “Major League Soccer in Miami, FL” with Brian Drewke and Jacob Lennoff (2014). B.A. in Economics and International Affairs, Florida State University (FSU), Tallahassee, FL, May 2013 ) FSU Honors Thesis: “The Impact of Economic Freedom on Women’s Socioeconomic Status” (2013). Thesis Committee Chair: Randall Holcombe FIELDS OF SPECIALIZATION Economic Education, Financial Literacy, Entrepreneurship, Economic Institutions, Economic Development, Formal Organizations, Market Behavior ACADEMIC POSITIONS K. W. Davis Visiting Lecturer: Teaching faculty for Trinity College; 2020-present. Project Director: The Stavros Center for the Advancement of Free Enterprise and Economic Education, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL; 2019-2020. Research Associate: DeVoe Moore Center, Florida State University; 2019-2020. Adjunct Professor: The Jim Moran School of Entrepreneurship, Florida State University; 2018-2019. CSE Project Director: Common Sense Economics (CSE), The Stavros Center for the Advancement of Free 2020 VITA CURRICULUM Enterprise and Economic Education, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL; 2014-2019. ) Responsibilities included: collaborate with James Gwartney to coordinate program initiatives and projects. Role includes but is not limited to teaching, marketing, course development and curriculum design (for CSE 1000, 1001, and 1002), and course building in online course learning management systems. Proficient in 3 systems: Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle. Creator and manager of intern program at the FSU Stavros Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle for Pakistan
    ebooksall.com ebooksall.com ebooksall.com SHUJA NAWAZ THE BATTLE F OR PAKISTAN The Bitter US Friendship and a Tough Neighbourhood PENGUIN BOOKS ebooksall.com Contents Important Milestones 2007–19 Abbreviations and Acronyms Preface: Salvaging a Misalliance 1. The Revenge of Democracy? 2. Friends or Frenemies? 3. 2011: A Most Horrible Year! 4. From Tora Bora to Pathan Gali 5. Internal Battles 6. Salala: Anatomy of a Failed Alliance 7. Mismanaging the Civil–Military Relationship 8. US Aid: Leverage or a Trap? 9. Mil-to-Mil Relations: Do More 10. Standing in the Right Corner 11. Transforming the Pakistan Army 12. Pakistan’s Military Dilemma 13. Choices Footnotes Important Milestones 2007–19 Preface: Salvaging a Misalliance 1. The Revenge of Democracy? 2. Friends or Frenemies? 3. 2011: A Most Horrible Year! 4. From Tora Bora to Pathan Gali 5. Internal Battles 6. Salala: Anatomy of a Failed Alliance 7. Mismanaging the Civil–Military Relationship 8. US Aid: Leverage or a Trap? 9. Mil-to-Mil Relations: Do More 10. Standing in the Right Corner 11. Transforming the Pakistan Army 12. Pakistan’s Military Dilemma 13. Choices Select Bibliography ebooksall.com Acknowledgements Follow Penguin Copyright ebooksall.com Advance Praise for the Book ‘An intriguing, comprehensive and compassionate analysis of the dysfunctional relationship between the United States and Pakistan by the premier expert on the Pakistan Army. Shuja Nawaz exposes the misconceptions and contradictions on both sides of one of the most crucial bilateral relations in the world’ —BRUCE RIEDEL, senior fellow and director of the Brookings Intelligence Project, and author of Deadly Embrace: Pakistan, America and the Future of the Global Jihad ‘A superb, thoroughly researched account of the complex dynamics that have defined the internal and external realities of Pakistan over the past dozen years.
    [Show full text]
  • Vysoká Škola CEVRO Institut Master's Thesis Bc
    Vysoká škola CEVRO Institut Master’s Thesis Bc. Pavel Martínek Prague 2020 Vysoká škola CEVRO Institut, z.ú. The Potential Implementation of Universal Basic Income and its Actual Development Bc. Pavel Martínek Study Program: Philosophy, Politics and Economics Specialization: Austrian Economics Adviser: Mgr. Ing. Pavol Minárik, Ph.D. Master’s Thesis Prague 2020 I hereby declare that this master's thesis is my own and autonomous work. All sources and aids used have been indicated as such. All texts either quoted directly or paraphrased have been indicated by text citations. Full bibliographic details are given in the reference list which also contains internet sources containing URL. This work has not been submitted to any other examination authority. Prague, 29. 7. 2020,………………………….. Abstract The universal basic income model has gone through a long theoretical and practical development. This is evidenced by the interest of theorists dating back to the sixteenth century and several launched and still ongoing pilot projects and experiments around the world. The theoretical part of this work describes the theoretical development of the concept of basic income and compares the approaches of different schools of economic thought to this model of redistribution of income and wealth in society. The empirical part answers the question of whether the implementation of universal basic income increases the welfare of society. The research focuses on projects that have been launched in Namibia, Finland, Iran and India. Based on the used comparative analysis of the conclusions stemming from the projects and the experiments, it can be stated that universal basic income positively affects the welfare of society.
    [Show full text]