>-:MYTHS Zof: TH-E: OWENS QVALL-EY- Paiuste

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

>-:MYTHS Zof: TH-E: OWENS QVALL-EY- Paiuste - >-:MYTHS zOF: TH-E: OWENS QVALL-EY- PAIUsTE: URSVOF ao PUBLICATIONS:Z NC 0w4w0LOGY-D ETENO ;; VO1UXe 34, NO. 5, PP.N 355440; ,, tt ; .; .. .. V s , _ :_'; ;.'1 r, .' _s ' ' _ ,-/s,\,_ J'.D ''' ',D'., ', /,' a, .. ., ..,, {*- ad .' '; ¢'. ,, .: UNIVERSXTY-OP CALIFORNIA PP(ESS :: BERKELEY, CALIPORNIA {s0,'.,r.wf.__.'!o-j1936:...,_+';_.'#:'...-,..,,'!,i MYTHS OF THE OWENS VALLEY PAIUTE BY JULIAN H. STEWARD UNIVESITY OF CALIFORNIA PuBLICATIONs IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY Volume 34, No. 5, pp. 355-440 Issued August 19, 1936 Price, 75 cents UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA CAEBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONTENTS PAGE Introduction .. .............................. 355 Literary aspects of the myths ....................... I ...... 356 Etiological myths .. ....................... 364 1. Creation of the Earth .. ....................... 364 2. Creation of the Earth .. ....................... 364 3. Creation of the Earth ........................ 364 4. Origin of the Paiute .. ....................... 365 5. Origin of the Paiute .. ....................... 366 6. Origin of Death .. ....................... 368 7. Origin of Death .. ....................... 369 8. Origin of Fire .. ....................... 369 9. Origin of Fire .. ....................... 370 10. Cottontail and the Sun .. ....................... 371 11. Cottontail and the Sun .. ....................... 371 12. The Flood ......................... 372 13. How the Deer Were Let Out ......................... 372 14. Origin of Childbirth .. ....................... 373 15. Wi'ntidumahu .. ....................... 373 Coyote cycle .............................................................. 374 16. Coyote and the Ducks .............................. 374 17. Coyote and Wildcat .............................. 374 18. Coyote and Badger .............................. 375 19. Coyote and Trap .............................. 378 20. Coyote and the Rain .............................. 379 21. Coyote and the Pakahi'to'o ............................ 379 22. Coyote and Cottontail .............................. 380 23. Coyote and His Daughter ............................. 381 24. Coyote, Magpie, and Dove ............................ 382 25. Coyote, Wolf, and the Deer ............................ 383 26. Coyote, Mouse, and the Meat ........................... 385 27. Coyote and His Brother's Wife ........................... 387 Epics and miscellaneous myths ............................. 388 28. Tuhuki'ni'i and the Gambler ............... ................. 388 29. How Tuhuki'ni'i Recovered His Wife ................................ 396 30. Hai'nani .. .............................. 397 31. Hai'nanu .. .............................. 408 32. Race to Koso Springs ............................... 411 33. Race to Koso Springs ................. 416 34. Wolf and Roadrunner ................. 417 35. Wolf and Roadrunner ................. 422 36. Nitniimic the Giant ................. 424 37. Ntint1mic the Giant ................. 425 38. Moon and His Dog ................. 425 Some Mono Lake Paiute myths ......................... 428 39. The Woman and the Giants ......................... 428 40. The Giant Fish .......................... 429 41. Tu'kini ......................... 429 42. The Theft of Pine Nuts .. 431 ....................... 43. Hai'nanu ......................... 433 Some Shoshoni myths .. ....................... 434 44. Origin of the Shoshoni .. ....................... 434 45. Origin of Fire .. 434 ....................... 46. Tuhu'ni and Mount Whitney ......................... 435 47. Race to Koso .. 436 Springs ....................... Myth songs ......................... 437 [ iii ] INTRODUCTION TmH MYTHS PRESENTED in this paper were collected from the Indians of east- ern California. These people have been mentioned in the literature both as Northern Paiute and as Eastern Mono. Both names have linguistic connota- tion, but the former seems preferable because these Indians are most closely related linguistically and culturally to the tribes of the Great Basin. The Northern Paiute language apparently varies through slight differences in dialect from the Owens Valley Paiute to the Paviotso-Bannock of northern Nevada, southern Idaho, and eastern Oregon. The Indians of eastern Califor- nia, moreover, speak of themselves as Paiute (in their own language, nii'ma, the people), whereas the term Mono seems to be unknown to them. The name Eastern Mono is useful mainly in distinguishing them from the Western Mono, who speak another Shoshonean dialect. In the following paper these Indians are referred to as Paiute, qualified according to location, as Owens Valley Paiute, with the understanding that the relationship suggested is with the Northern Paiute or Paviotso-Bannock, not with the Southern Paiute (Shivwits, Moapa, etc.). These myths were collected in the course of ethnographical research in the summers of 1927 and 1928. The majority are from Owens valley, Inyo county, especially from the present towns of Big Pine and Bishop, which were for- merly points of aboriginal concentration, and maintain the largest Indian communities today. A few myths were obtained from the Mono Lake Paiute and several others from the Shoshoni of Lone Pine, Owens valley. Myths 1, 4, 6, 28, 29, and 34 were told at Big Pine by Jack Stewart, George Collins interpreting; 2, 5, 10, 12, 13, 31, 33, and 35 at Bishop by Mose Way- land, Harrison Diaz interpreting; 3, 14, 15, and 37 at Bishop by Ed Lewis, who was reared at Independence; 7 and 20 at Bishop by Roy Lewis; 8, 16, 30, 32, and 38 at Big Pine by George Collins; 9, 11, 17 to 19, 21 to 27, and 36 at Bishop by Tom Stone; 39 to 42 at Mono lake by Bridgeport Tom; 43 at Mono lake by Joe McBride; and 44 to 47 at Lone Pine by Frank Bellas. [ 355 ] 356 University of Califormi Publications in Am. Arch. and Ethn. LITERARY ASPECTS OF THE MYTHS TEREE ASPECTS of these myths are analyzed: the native literary pattern; the diffusion of plots, episodes, and characters; and the individual ability of the narrators. Literary pattern.-The pattern of the Owens Valley Paiute myths is simi- lar to that of the myths of other Great Basin peoples. The stories are devel- oped by direct narrative, with characterization subordinate to action except in the Coyote cycle. The action is presented through description. Dialogue is used as in the European novel and, in a myth told by a skillful narrator, con- tributes greatly to characterization and somewhat to action. The plot, how- ever, is rarely anticipated in dialogue. In the tale of Tuhuki'ni'", the warnings given to the hero by his relatives concerning the gambler's tricks suggest anticipation but do not reveal the climax. Some narrators, especially Tom Stone, were unusually adept in the use of dialogue. Demonstration of magic is the favored theme and scarcely a myth, irre- spective of type, is without it. Magic is used in the creation of things, appears in Coyote's inglorious failures, and is exhibited in the clashes of great men who have supernatural powers. The concrete situations are generally those of hunting and gambling, both favorite occupations of these people. Half the Coyote stories, for example, relate hunting incidents. Themes of love are conspicuously absent. Tuhuki'- ni'1's display of conjugal devotion in recovering his wife, in number 29, is scarcely a romantic love lyric. Accounts of lust, however, are very common, Coyote usually being connected with libidinous adventures. Tales of war are rare, for the Owens Valley Indians were on the whole a peaceful people. The characters are generally animals. Coyote, the inveterate trickster of Western mythology, is the most important figure. Such literary characteris- tics as unity of plot and successful motivation vary with the type of story and the narrator's individuality. These, with other aspects of the literary pattern, will be considered below. Diffusion of elements.-The Owens Valley Paiute drew from a large stock of Great Basin mythological material. Fellow Shoshoneans supplied them with a large number of plots, episodes, and characters, whereas the tribes of California exercised comparatively little influence. The available myth ele- ments constituted a large stock-in-trade from which tales could be constructed, and provided material for unlimited variations. Some tales were borrowed in their entirety, for example, Coyote and His Daughter, number 23, which occurs in substantially the same form and detail as far north as the Columbia rivere and as far east as southern Nevada.2 Others vary considerably even within a small area. Thus, Creation of the Earth is told differently at Bishop, Big Pine, and Independence in Owens valley (numbers 1, 2, and 3), despite the intimate connections between these communities. 'Sapir, Edward. Wishram Texts, AES-P 2:105-107, 1909. 2Lowie, R. H. Shoshonean Tales, JAFL 37:172, 1924. Steward: M3yths of the Owens Valley Paiute3 357 There are probably few myths or even myth elements which demonstrably originated with the Owens Valley Paiute. The distinctive characteristic of their mythology is its synthesis of elements, which probably is produced by the narrators themselves. Ability of the narrators.-The Indians of OwensValley, like the other Great Basin peoples, had unusual freedom in story construction because their myths, properly speaking, were all folktales. There was no religious association to prescribe exact adherence to a theoretical norm.8 On several occasions I pointed out
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Long Valley Caldera, Mono-Inyo Craters
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP 1-1933 US. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF LONG VALLEY CALDERA, MONO-INYO CRATERS VOLCANIC CHAIN, AND VICINITY, EASTERN CALIFORNIA By Roy A. Bailey GEOLOGIC SETTING VOLCANISM Long Valley caldera and the Mono-Inyo Craters Long Valley caldera volcanic chain compose a late Tertiary to Quaternary Volcanism in the Long Valley area (Bailey and others, volcanic complex on the west edge of the Basin and 1976; Bailey, 1982b) began about 3.6 Ma with Range Province at the base of the Sierra Nevada frontal widespread eruption of trachybasaltic-trachyandesitic fault escarpment. The caldera, an east-west-elongate, lavas on a moderately well dissected upland surface oval depression 17 by 32 km, is located just northwest (Huber, 1981).Erosional remnants of these mafic lavas of the northern end of the Owens Valley rift and forms are scattered over a 4,000-km2 area extending from the a reentrant or offset in the Sierran escarpment, Adobe Hills (5-10 km notheast of the map area), commonly referred to as the "Mammoth embayment.'? around the periphery of Long Valley caldera, and The Mono-Inyo Craters volcanic chain forms a north- southwestward into the High Sierra. Although these trending zone of volcanic vents extending 45 km from lavas never formed a continuous cover over this region, the west moat of the caldera to Mono Lake. The their wide distribution suggests an extensive mantle prevolcanic basement in the area is mainly Mesozoic source for these initial mafic eruptions. Between 3.0 granitic rock of the Sierra Nevada batholith and and 2.5 Ma quartz-latite domes and flows erupted near Paleozoic metasedimentary and Mesozoic metavolcanic the north and northwest rims of the present caldera, at rocks of the Mount Morrisen, Gull Lake, and Ritter and near Bald Mountain and on San Joaquin Ridge Range roof pendants (map A).
    [Show full text]
  • Short Range Transit Plan – 2009 (PDF)
    Eastern Sierra Transit Authority Short Range Transit Plan Volume 1 Service and Financial Plan Final Report January 2009 Eastern Sierra Transit Authority Short Range Transit Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................... ES-1 Short Range Transit Plan Objectives ....................................................................... ES-1 Overview of Existing Services.................................................................................... ES-1 Transit Needs .............................................................................................................. ES-1 Transit Dependent Population ...........................................................................ES-1 Tourist and Visitor Market ................................................................................ES-2 Seamless Transit System ...................................................................................ES-3 ESTA Mission, Goals and Performance Standards................................................. ES-3 395 Corridor Services................................................................................................. ES-4 Rural Transit Services................................................................................................ ES-5 Bishop Local Services................................................................................................. ES-6 Mammoth Local Services..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lone Pine / Mt. Whitney 23-24 Snowboarders
    Inyo National Forest >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Visitor Guide 2011-2012 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> $1.00 Suggested Donation FRED RICHTER Inspiring Destinations © Inyo National Forest Facts xtending 165 miles along the White Mountain and Owens River Mam moth Mountain Ski California/Nevada border Headwaters wildernesses. Devils Area becomes a sum mer “Inyo” is a Paiute Ebetween Los Angeles and Postpile Na tion al Mon u ment, mecca for mountain bike Reno, the Inyo National Forest, ad min is tered by the National Park en thu si asts as they ride Indian word meaning established May 25, 1907, in cludes Ser vice, is also located within the the chal leng ing Ka mi ka ze 1,900,543 acres of pris tine lakes, Inyo Na tion al For est in the Reds Trail from the top of the “Dwelling Place of fragile mead ows, wind ing streams, Mead ow area west of Mam moth 11,053­foot high rugged Sierra Ne va da peaks and Lakes. In addition, the Inyo is home Mam moth Moun tain or the Great Spirit.” arid Great Basin moun tains. El e va­ to the tallest peak in the low er 48 one of the many other trails tions range from 3,900 to 14,497 states, Mt. Whitney (14,497 feet) that transect the front feet, pro vid ing diverse habitats and is adjacent to the lowest point coun try of the forest. that sup port vegetation patterns in North America at Badwater in Thirty­six trailheads provideJ ranging from semiarid deserts to Death Val ley Na tion al Park (282 ac cess to over 1,200 miles of trail high al pine fell­fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowcreek Ski Area Deer Study 1994 Spring and Fall Migration Study
    SNOWCREEKSKI AREA DEERSTUDY 1994SPRING AND FALL MIGRATION STUDY heparedfor: DempseyConstruction C orporation P.O.Box 657 MammothLakes, CA 93546 6191934-6,861 hepared by: TimothyTaylor & Associates P.O.Box l9l JuneLake, CA93529 619t648-7227 I\,larch1995 Tableof Contents Page Chapterl. Introductionand Methods.... .............l-l INTRODUCTTON..... ...........l-l PERMITAREA...... 1.2 METHODS....,.......... ............r-2 RadioTelemetry Studies...... ........L-2 RadioTracking ofDeer...... ..................l-2 HoldineArea Studies.............. .....14 D-eerCounts Surveys... ........14 tlabitatUse Studies................ ..............l-6 MigrationCorridor Counts...... .....1-7 InfraredSensor Equipment ...................l-7 HabitatMapping... .....l-7 WeatherData.......... ....1-7 ORGANIZATIONOF THISREPORT.. ..................l-8 Chapter2. SpringMigration Surveys..... .............2-l STAGE 1: MIGRATION BETWEEN THE WINTER RA}.IGE IN ROUNDVALLEY A}ID TI{E SFIERWINHOLDING AREA....... ........... 2.1 Locationsof DeerMovements................ ......2-l STAGE2: TIIE SHERWINHOLDING AREA....... .................2-3 Timing andIntensity of DeerUse in the SherwinHolding Area.......2-3 Radio-CollaredDeer.. ........2-3 DeerCount Surveys..... .......2-5 Estimatesof DeerAbundance in theSherwin Holding Area.............2-10 Patternsof DeerHabitat Use in theSherwin Holding Area.......... ....2-14 DeerCount Surveys..... .......2-14 Radio-CollaredDeer.. .........2-19 Patternsof DeerDistribution in the SherwinHolding Area.......... ....2-19 STAGE 3: DEER MIGRATION
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2017 to 09/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2017 to 09/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Sierra Nevada Forest Plan - Land management planning On Hold N/A N/A Donald Yasuda Amendment (SNFPA) 916-640-1168 EIS [email protected] Description: Prepare a narrowly focused analysis to comply with two orders issued by the Eastern District Court of California on November 4, 2009. Correct the 2004 SNFPA Final SEIS to address range of alternatives and analytical consistency issues. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/snfpa/2010seis Location: UNIT - Eldorado National Forest All Units, Lassen National Forest All Units, Modoc National Forest All Units, Sequoia National Forest All Units, Tahoe National Forest All Units, Lake Tahoe Basin Mgt Unit, Carson Ranger District, Bridgeport Ranger District, Plumas National Forest All Units, Sierra National Forest All Units, Stanislaus National Forest All Units, Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yuba, Douglas, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Along the Sierra Nevada Range, from the Oregon/California border south to Lake Isabella as well as lands in western Nevada. Sierra Nevada National Forests. R5 - Pacific Southwest Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:11/2017 12/2017 Nevia Brown National Forests Land DEIS NOA in Federal Register 7075629121 Management Plans Revision 05/27/2016 [email protected] EIS Est.
    [Show full text]
  • Unrest in Long Valley Caldera, California, 1978–2004
    Unrest in Long Valley Caldera, California, 1978–2004 DAVID P. HILL US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: Long Valley Caldera and the Mono–Inyo Domes volcanic field in eastern California lie in a left-stepping offset along the eastern escarpment of the Sierra Nevada, at the northern end of the Owens Valley and the western margin of the Basin and Range Province. Over the last 4 Ma, this volcanic field has produced multiple volcanic eruptions, including the caldera-forming eruption at 760 000 a BP and the recent Mono–Inyo Domes eruptions 500–660 a BP and 250 a BP. Beginning in the late 1970s, the caldera entered a sustained period of unrest that persisted through the end of the century without culminating in an eruption. The unrest has included recurring earthquake swarms; tumescence of the resurgent dome by nearly 80 cm; the onset of diffuse magmatic carbon dioxide emissions around the flanks of Mammoth Mountain on the southwest margin of the caldera; and other indicators of magma transport at mid- to upper-crustal depths. Although we have made substantial progress in understanding the processes driving this unrest, many key questions remain, including the distribution, size, and relation between magma bodies within the mid-to-upper crust beneath the caldera, Mammoth Mountain, and the Inyo Mono volcanic chain, and how these magma bodies are connected to the roots of the magmatic system in the lower crust or upper mantle. Long Valley Caldera in eastern California is one northward from the west-central part of the of several large calderas around the world that caldera to Mono Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Pac Cell Fop 1971 Sh
    GUIDEBO.E-lK to the Quaternary Geology of the East-Central Sierra Nevada GUIDEBOOK to the Quaternary Geology of the East-Central Sierra Nevada This guidebook was prepared for the XVI Field Conference of the Rocky Mountnin Section of the Friends of the Pleistocene, October 9-10, 1971. by Michael F. Sheridnn Associate Professor Department of Geology Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85281 .. PRICE $5.00 c/o Michael F. Sheridan 2.526 N. 56th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85008 First Edition, October 1971 COVER~blique aerfal view of Bishop, C11li£orni11. U. S. Geologicnl Survey high Copyrip;ht ©by Michael F. Sheridan nltitudc photo, series 744 R, number 208. Approximate scnle of 1:121,000. 2526 North 56th Street, Phoenix, Arizom1 85008 Printed bu Lebeau Printing Company, Phoenix, Arizona CONTENTS Page Introduction .. ....................... .. .. .... .......... .. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Glacial Geology . 7 This guidebook is the outgrowth of several guides compiled by Volcanic Geology . ............... 9 R. D. Reger and R. K. Merrill for field trips in Glacial Geology and Volcanology classes in the Department of Geology, Arizona State Road Log .... .. ...... .................... ... .... ....... .. 11 University. These trips conducted by Dr. Troy L. Pewe have led to an integrated picture of the dramatic glacial and volcanic history of this Road Log Day 1 ... .. ....... ....... ............. .. .. ... .. 14 region. I would like to thank Troy L. Pcwc and Jan Sheridan for reading early versions of the manuscript and providing useful comments. Appre­ Road Log Day 2 ........ ..... .. ..... .. ............... .. .... 40 ciation is extended to the Geological Society of America and Robert P. Sharp for permission to use previously published materials. References .................................................. 57 ILLUSTRATIONS INTRODUCTION Page The eastern Sierra Nevada from Bishop to Mono Lake is noted for Figure 1-Index Map ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of Paleozoic Rocks in the Mount Morrison Pendant
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA–GRAY DAVIS, GOVERNOR DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY THE RESOURCES AGENCY–MARY D. NICHOLS, SECRETARY Mount Morrison Pendant, Sierra Nevada, California JAMES F. DAVIS, STATE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION–DARRYL YOUNG, DIRECTOR MAP SHEET 53 o o 118o 45‘ 118 55‘ 118 52‘ 30“ 50‘ 47‘ 30“ 37o 37‘ 30“ 37o 37‘ 30“ CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS DISCUSSION based our work on the initial mapping of Rinehart and Ross (1964), and incorporate ble on the east (cross section C–C’). We interpret this fault to be an east-vergent thrust some orientation data and unit boundaries from their work and that of Willahan (1991) fault placing the entire lower Paleozoic section structurally above the Pennsylvanian SURFICIAL DEPOSITS SURFICIAL DEPOSITS INTRODUCTION and Wise (1996). Geologic mapping was compiled on a topographic base map construct- Mount Baldwin Marble. This represents the largest stratigraphic separation of any fault Sevehah Group––Consists of: ed from a mosaic of the Convict Lake 7.5’ quadrangle plus portions of the adjacent in the Mount Morrison pendant. The Mount Aggie Formation in the upper plate of this Q QUATERNARY Q Surficial Deposits (Quaternary)––Unconsolidated alluvium, Squares Tunnel Formation (Upper Devonian)––Black chert and The Mount Morrison pendant consists of middle(?) Cambrian to middle(?) Permian Bloody Mountain, Graveyard Peak and Mount Abbot quadrangles. The Convict Lake thrust is intensely deformed, and discontinuous beds and large lenses of marble sur- Ds colluvium, and glacial deposits; includes lacustrine and stream argillite with light-gray, phosphatic lenses and nodules; generally metasedimentary rocks that are structurally overlain by Triassic and Jurassic and Bloody Mountain quadrangles utilize a contour interval of 20 meters, whereas the rounded by argillite are clearly visible from U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2017 to 06/30/2017 Inyo National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Sierra Nevada Forest Plan - Land management planning On Hold N/A N/A Donald Yasuda Amendment (SNFPA) 916-640-1168 EIS [email protected] Description: Prepare a narrowly focused analysis to comply with two orders issued by the Eastern District Court of California on November 4, 2009. Correct the 2004 SNFPA Final SEIS to address range of alternatives and analytical consistency issues. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/snfpa/2010seis Location: UNIT - Eldorado National Forest All Units, Lassen National Forest All Units, Modoc National Forest All Units, Sequoia National Forest All Units, Tahoe National Forest All Units, Lake Tahoe Basin Mgt Unit, Carson Ranger District, Bridgeport Ranger District, Plumas National Forest All Units, Sierra National Forest All Units, Stanislaus National Forest All Units, Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yuba, Douglas, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Along the Sierra Nevada Range, from the Oregon/California border south to Lake Isabella as well as lands in western Nevada. Sierra Nevada National Forests. R5 - Pacific Southwest Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:11/2017 12/2017 Nevia Brown National Forests Land DEIS NOA in Federal Register 7075629121 Management Plans Revision 05/27/2016 [email protected] EIS Est.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a PDF of Points of Interest in the Owens River Valley
    WHITE MOUNTAINS Mono . Lake C<<M@E@E> C<<M@E@E>@EK8B< ('d`c\j DFEFKLEE<C ?FK:I<<B :8J8;@89CF ><FK?<ID8CGFN<IGC8EK Lake D8DDFK?C8B<J Crowley D8DDFK?DFLEK8@E N?@K<DFLEK8@E :FEM@:KC8B< FN<EJ>FI>< I<J<8I:?JK8K@FE J%E%8%I%C% GFN<IGC8EK D8DDFK?C8B<J8@IGFIK 8E:@<EK9I@JKC<:FE< G@E<:I<<B G@E<=FI<JK SIERRAKLE>JK<ED@E< NEVADA9@J?FG 9@J?FG:I<<BG@G<C@E< FN<EJM8CC<PI8;@F :FPFK<=C8K8@IJKI@G 8JKIFEFDPF9J<IM8KFIP INYO MOUNTAINS 9@>G@E< =@J?JGI@E>J=@J??8K:?<IP FN<EJI@M<I@EK8B< Owens R. 89<I;<<E DK%N?@KE<P=@J??8K:?<IP @E;<G<E;<E:< D8EQ8E8I 8C898D8>8K<J 8C898D8?@CCJ CFE<G@E< N?@KE<PGFIK8C :<IIF>FI;F @EK<I8><E:P@E=F:<EK<I B<<C<I G@KKJ9LI>?>C8JJGC8EK Owens Lake :?8I:F8CB@CEJ :IPJK8C><PJ<I FC8E:?8 ?8@N<<I<J<IMF@I J8: J= 9@J?FG 9@>G@E< @E;<G<E;<E:< =IJ CFE<G@E< I<;?@CC G<8IJFEM@CC< J9 ()'D@C<J C8 (,'D@C<JKF KFJ8E9<IE8I;@EF CFJ8E><C<J J; foreWord The points of interest selected in this book are drawn from the Center for Land Use Interpretation's Land Use Database, a collection of "unusual and exemplary" land use sites in the United States, with an additional level of magnitude applied for this regional survey of the Owens River Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserves (VESR) Comprise, Two of 39 Sites in the University of California’S Natural Reserve System (NRS)
    Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserves INFORMATION AND GUIDE SNARL and Valentine Camp 1016 MOUNT MORRISON ROAD, MAMMOTH LAKES, CA 93546 | LAST UPDATED MAY 20, 2018 Table of Contents About Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserve ...................................................................................... 4 SNARL.................................................................................................................................................. 4 Valentine Camp ................................................................................................................................... 6 Contact Information .................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Resources ..................................................................................................................... 7 What to Bring ............................................................................................................................. 8 Food .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Paper Products .................................................................................................................................... 8 Bedding ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Towel and Toiletries ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflower Hot Spots of the Eastern Sierra Welcome to the Eastern Sierra…
    Wildflower Hot Spots of the Eastern Sierra Welcome to the Eastern Sierra… THE EASTERN SIERRA truly is a land of superlatives: Elevations you will visit using this guide range from the oldest living trees on the planet (bristlecone pines); 3,300 feet (1,005 meters) at Fossil Falls to 10,200 feet the highest peak in the contiguous United States (Mt. (3,100 meters) at the Mosquito Flat trailhead in Rock Whitney); the youngest mountain range in North Creek. Many of the peaks around you soar to more than America (Mono Craters); one of the oldest lakes in 13,000 feet, and a side trip into Death Valley will plunge North America (Mono Lake). All of these and more are you down to below sea level at Badwater. within an easy day’s drive of each other. The spectacular landscapes of this area draw a worldwide audience, and with good reason. The elevation range combined with the diverse geologic environment results in a wide variety of vegetation communities. Three major biotic provinces—the Mojave Geology field classes often visit the area for the Desert, Great Basin, and Sierra Nevada—all converge in relatively easy access to a wide variety of geologic this area. Dozens of plant communities and thousands formations and rock types. Volcanic craters, basalt flows, of plant species occur here, many of them unique to layers of ash and pumice, carbonate formations, and the Eastern Sierra. This guide is an introduction to the granite peaks, walls, and spires all can be seen here. botanical gems to be encountered here.
    [Show full text]