DOCSLIB.ORG

Irreducible Tensor Operators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Irreducible Tensor Operators Irreducible Tensor Operators April 14, 2010 1 Cartesian Tensors We know that vectors may be rotated by applying a rotation matrix. Beginning with vectors, we can build other objects that transform simply under rotations by taking outer products: T = ~v ⊗~w Ti j = viw j 0 1 v1w1 v1w2 v1w3 = @ v2w1 v2w2 v2w3 A v3w1 v3w2 v3w3 By adding objects of this sort, we can build arbitrary matrices. By choosing enough different vectors, v1;v2;:::;vn, we can build any matrix, 1 2 3 4 5 6 n−1 n Mi j = vi v j + vi v j + vi v j + ::: + vi v j This tells us how matrices transform under rotations. Since each of the vectors rotates according to v˜i = ∑Ri jv j j The matrix Mi j rotates to ˜ 1 2 n−1 n Mi j = v˜i v˜j + ::: + v˜i v˜j ! ! 1 2 n−1 n = ∑Rimvm ∑Rikvk + ::: + ∑Rimvm ∑Rikvk m k m k 1 2 n−1 n = ∑∑RimRik vmvk + ::: + vm vk k m = ∑∑RimRikMmk k m Therefore, Mi j transforms with two copies of the rotation matrix Ri j, one on each index. We can build up more general objects in the same way. Taking outer products of n vectors, ~u;~v;:::;~w, we build rank-n tensors: T = ~u ⊗~v ⊗ ::: ⊗~w Ti j:::k = uiv j :::wk and these will also transform with one factor of Ri j on each index. A more systematic way to build these tensors is to start with a basis of unit vectors, nˆ(1) = (1;0;0) nˆ(2) = (0;1;0) nˆ(3) = (0;0;1) 1 These are vectors. The labels in parenthesis just tell us which vector we’re using. Notice that, for example,n ˆ(1) has components n = ˆ(1) i d1i We can build a general vector by taking a linear combination of the three basis vectors, v = ∑vinˆ(i) i The three numbers vi = v1;v2;v3 are the Cartesian components of v. This works for higher rank tensors as well. Take the nine possible outer products of the basis vectors, nˆ(i) ⊗ nˆ( j) This is a matrix with a 1 in row i, column j, and zeros everywhere else. Then an arbitrary matrix may be written as M = ∑Mi jnˆ(i) ⊗ nˆ( j) i; j where Mi j is just the number in row i and column j. Think of this object as rotationally invariant. It is the components Mi j which change under rotation. For a general rank-n tensor, we have T = ∑Ti j:::knˆ(i) ⊗ nˆ( j) ⊗ ::: ⊗ nˆ(k) i; j n and the 3 numbers Ti j:::k are the Cartesian components. 2 Irreducible tensors The Cartesian components of tensors are mixed by the rotation transformations, Ri j, but not all components of a given tensor mix with all the others. For example, we have seen how a matrix may be broken into rotationally independent pieces as 1 1 1 1 M = tr (M)d + (M − M ) + M + M − d tr (M) i j 3 i j 2 i j ji 2 i j ji 3 i j where tr (M) = ∑k Mkk is the trace of M. Each of these three parts, 1 Mtr = tr (M)d i j 3 i j 1 MA = (M − M ) i j 2 i j ji 1 1 MS = M + M − d tr (M) i j 2 i j ji 3 i j is preserved by rotations, in the sense that 0 tr Mi j = ∑ RikRilMkl i;k;l t = ∑ RkiRilMkl i;k;l −1 = ∑ Rki RilMkl i;k;l = ∑ dklMkl i;k;l = ∑Mkk 2 = (tr (M))0 0 1 MA = R R (M − M ) i j ∑ ik jl 2 kl lk 1 = R R M − R R M 2 ∑ ik jl kl ik jl lk 1 0 = M − R R M 2 i j ∑ jl ik lk 1 0 = M − M0 2 i j ji 0 A = Mi j 0 1 1 MS = R R M + M − d tr (M) i j ∑ ik jl 2 kl lk 3 kl 1 1 = R R M + R R M − R R d tr (M) ∑ 2 ik jl kl ik jl lk 3 ik jl kl 1 1 = M0 + R R M − R R−1tr (M) 2 i j ∑ jl ik lk 3 ∑ ik k j 1 1 = M0 + M0 − d tr (M) 2 i j ji 3 i j 0 S = Mi j For example, the components of the antisymmetric part mix only with the components of the antisymmetric part. These are the irreducible parts of the tensor under rotations. 3 Arbitrary angular momentum 1 Consider the 2-dimensional space of spin- 2 vectors, 1 ;m 2 1 for m = ± 2 . Rotations act on these linearly and homogeneously, ij nˆ· 1 e 2 s ;m 2 To simplify the notation, we just write the two states as 1 1 jmi = j±i = ;± 2 2 1 when we know that j = 2 . Just as in the real case, we may take outer products of them, jm1i ⊗ jm2i ⊗ ::: ⊗ jmki By taking linear combinations of these, we may write general SU (2) tensors, T = ∑ Tm1m2:::mk jm1i ⊗ jm2i ⊗ ::: ⊗ jmki m1:::mk ij nˆ· These objects transform multilinearly and homogeneously, with one transformation matrix, e 2 s , on each index. 3 However, we know that this Cartesian basis is not irreducible. Not only that – we also know how to find the irreducible parts in general. We can write a product of two vectors as a sum of a triplet and a singlet, j1;1i = j+ij+i 1 j1;0i = p (j+ij−i + j−ij+i) 2 j1;−1i = j−ij−i and 1 j0;0i = p (j+ij−i − j−ij+i) 2 We may invert these relationships, j+ij+i = j1;1i 1 j+ij−i = p (j1;0i + j0;0i) 2 1 j−ij+i = p (j1;0i − j0;0i) 2 j−ij−i = j1;−1i Notice that the coefficients are the same. This corresponds to the reality of the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients, h j;mj j1; j2;m1;m2i = h j1; j2;m1;m2j j;mi Formally, the change of basis may be written as j j;mi = ∑ j j1; j2;m1;m2ih j1; j2;m1;m2j j;mi m1;m2 j j1; j2;m1;m2i = ∑ h j;mj j1; j2;m1;m2ij j;mi j;m for any j in the range j j1 − j2j ≤ j ≤ j1 + j2. Notice that we have produced a vector basis for the product space. Instead of thinking of the product j j1;m1i ⊗ j j2;m2i as a matrix, we treat it as a single, higher-dimensional vector, j j1; j2;m1;m2i = j j1;m1i ⊗ j j2;m2i and change the basis to a combination of the j j;mi kets by inserting an identity: j j1;m1i ⊗ j j2;m2i = j j1; j2;m1;m2i ! = ∑ j j;mih j;mj j j1; j2;m1;m2i j;m = ∑ h j;mj j1; j2;m1;m2ij j;mi j;m We trade off higher numbers of indices for higher-dimensional vectors. This means that we may write tensors in a more condensed form. Suppose we have a rank-2 tensor, T = ∑ Tm1m2 jm1i ⊗ jm2i m1:::mk 4 Using the change of basis, this becomes T = Tm1m2 jm1i ⊗ jm2i = ∑ ∑ Tm1m2 h j;mj j1; j2;m1;m2ij j;mi j;m m1:::mk = ∑ Tm1m2 h0;0j j1; j2;m1;m2ij0;0i + ∑ ∑ Tm1m2 h1;mj j1; j2;m1;m2ij1;mi m1=−m2 m m1:::mk We still know how these transform under rotations; moreover, the first and second terms in the last line transform independently – they are the irreducible tensors that make up the original T. It makes sense to treat the irreducible parts separately. The first tensor, 0 T0 = ∑ Tm1m2 h0;0j j1; j2;m1;m2ij0;0i m1=−m2 is a scalar, invariant under SU (2) rotations. The second is a triplet, 1 Tm = ∑ Tm1m2 h1;mj j1; j2;m1;m2ij1;mi m1;m2 ij n·J This transforms with one factor of e 2 , but now we use the 3 × 3 representation of J. These two tensors are irreducible spherical tensors. Notice that the components Tm1m2 transform as h ij n·s i h ij n·s i T˜m m = e 2 e 2 Tm m 1 2 ∑ m m m m 3 4 m3;m4 1 3 2 4 0 1 with two copies of the 2-dimensional generators, Ji = si. By contrast, the irreducible tensors T0 ;Tm transform as h ij (1) i ˜ 0 2 n·J 0 0 T0 = e Tm0 = 1T0 ∑ mm0 m3;m4 h ij (3) i ˜ 1 2 n·J 1 Tm = e Tm0 ∑ mm0 m3;m4 where J(1) = 1 and J(3) are the 1 × 1 and 3 × 3 representations of the rotation generators, respectively. We can continue this process for higher rank tensors. In general, an irreducible spherical tensor of rank k transforms linearly under the (2k + 1)-dimensional representation of SU (2), k h ij i ˜ k 2 n·J k Tq = e Tq0 ∑ qq0 q0=−k and this expression is suitable for defining them: any object that transforms in this way is an irreducible spherical tensor. This means that, rather than having more and more indices on our (Cartesian) tensors, we represent higher and higher rank tensors as larger and larger vectors. In a basis, the general rank-k spherical tensor may be written as k k k T = ∑ Tq jk;qi q=−k which clearly has 2k + 1 independent components.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tensor-Tensor Products with Invertible Linear Transforms
    Tensor-Tensor Products with Invertible Linear Transforms Eric Kernfelda, Misha Kilmera, Shuchin Aeronb aDepartment of Mathematics, Tufts University, Medford, MA bDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA Abstract Research in tensor representation and analysis has been rising in popularity in direct response to a) the increased ability of data collection systems to store huge volumes of multidimensional data and b) the recognition of potential modeling accuracy that can be provided by leaving the data and/or the operator in its natural, multidi- mensional form. In comparison to matrix theory, the study of tensors is still in its early stages. In recent work [1], the authors introduced the notion of the t-product, a generalization of matrix multiplication for tensors of order three, which can be extended to multiply tensors of arbitrary order [2]. The multiplication is based on a convolution-like operation, which can be implemented efficiently using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). The corresponding linear algebraic framework from the original work was further developed in [3], and it allows one to elegantly generalize all classical algorithms from linear algebra. In the first half of this paper, we develop a new tensor-tensor product for third-order tensors that can be implemented by us- ing a discrete cosine transform, showing that a similar linear algebraic framework applies to this new tensor operation as well. The second half of the paper is devoted to extending this development in such a way that tensor-tensor products can be de- fined in a so-called transform domain for any invertible linear transform.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pattern Calculus for Tensor Operators in Quantum Groups Mark Gould and L
    The pattern calculus for tensor operators in quantum groups Mark Gould and L. C. Biedenharn Citation: Journal of Mathematical Physics 33, 3613 (1992); doi: 10.1063/1.529909 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.529909 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jmp/33/11?ver=pdfcov Published by the AIP Publishing Articles you may be interested in Irreducible tensor operators in the regular coaction formalisms of compact quantum group algebras J. Math. Phys. 37, 4590 (1996); 10.1063/1.531643 Tensor operators for quantum groups and applications J. Math. Phys. 33, 436 (1992); 10.1063/1.529833 Tensor operators of finite groups J. Math. Phys. 14, 1423 (1973); 10.1063/1.1666196 On the structure of the canonical tensor operators in the unitary groups. I. An extension of the pattern calculus rules and the canonical splitting in U(3) J. Math. Phys. 13, 1957 (1972); 10.1063/1.1665940 Irreducible tensor operators for finite groups J. Math. Phys. 13, 1892 (1972); 10.1063/1.1665928 Reuse of AIP Publishing content is subject to the terms: https://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions. Downloaded to IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 02:42:08 The pattern calculus for tensor operators in quantum groups Mark Gould Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Queensland,St. Lucia, Queensland,Australia 4072 L. C. Biedenharn Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706 (Received 28 February 1992; accepted for publication 1 June 1992) An explicit algebraic evaluation is given for all q-tensor operators (with unit norm) belonging to the quantum group U&(n)) and having extremal operator shift patterns acting on arbitrary U&u(n)) irreps.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2012.13347V1 [Physics.Class-Ph] 15 Dec 2020
    KPOP E-2020-04 Bra-Ket Representation of the Inertia Tensor U-Rae Kim, Dohyun Kim, and Jungil Lee∗ KPOPE Collaboration, Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea (Dated: June 18, 2021) Abstract We employ Dirac's bra-ket notation to define the inertia tensor operator that is independent of the choice of bases or coordinate system. The principal axes and the corresponding principal values for the elliptic plate are determined only based on the geometry. By making use of a general symmetric tensor operator, we develop a method of diagonalization that is convenient and intuitive in determining the eigenvector. We demonstrate that the bra-ket approach greatly simplifies the computation of the inertia tensor with an example of an N-dimensional ellipsoid. The exploitation of the bra-ket notation to compute the inertia tensor in classical mechanics should provide undergraduate students with a strong background necessary to deal with abstract quantum mechanical problems. PACS numbers: 01.40.Fk, 01.55.+b, 45.20.dc, 45.40.Bb Keywords: Classical mechanics, Inertia tensor, Bra-ket notation, Diagonalization, Hyperellipsoid arXiv:2012.13347v1 [physics.class-ph] 15 Dec 2020 ∗Electronic address: [email protected]; Director of the Korea Pragmatist Organization for Physics Educa- tion (KPOP E) 1 I. INTRODUCTION The inertia tensor is one of the essential ingredients in classical mechanics with which one can investigate the rotational properties of rigid-body motion [1]. The symmetric nature of the rank-2 Cartesian tensor guarantees that it is described by three fundamental parameters called the principal moments of inertia Ii, each of which is the moment of inertia along a principal axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 ANGULAR MOMENTUM and ROTATIONS
    Chapter 5 ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND ROTATIONS In classical mechanics the total angular momentum L~ of an isolated system about any …xed point is conserved. The existence of a conserved vector L~ associated with such a system is itself a consequence of the fact that the associated Hamiltonian (or Lagrangian) is invariant under rotations, i.e., if the coordinates and momenta of the entire system are rotated “rigidly” about some point, the energy of the system is unchanged and, more importantly, is the same function of the dynamical variables as it was before the rotation. Such a circumstance would not apply, e.g., to a system lying in an externally imposed gravitational …eld pointing in some speci…c direction. Thus, the invariance of an isolated system under rotations ultimately arises from the fact that, in the absence of external …elds of this sort, space is isotropic; it behaves the same way in all directions. Not surprisingly, therefore, in quantum mechanics the individual Cartesian com- ponents Li of the total angular momentum operator L~ of an isolated system are also constants of the motion. The di¤erent components of L~ are not, however, compatible quantum observables. Indeed, as we will see the operators representing the components of angular momentum along di¤erent directions do not generally commute with one an- other. Thus, the vector operator L~ is not, strictly speaking, an observable, since it does not have a complete basis of eigenstates (which would have to be simultaneous eigenstates of all of its non-commuting components). This lack of commutivity often seems, at …rst encounter, as somewhat of a nuisance but, in fact, it intimately re‡ects the underlying structure of the three dimensional space in which we are immersed, and has its source in the fact that rotations in three dimensions about di¤erent axes do not commute with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Applications of Eigenvalue Problems for Tensor and Tensor–Block Matrices for Mathematical Modeling of Micropolar Thin Bodies
    Mathematical and Computational Applications Article Some Applications of Eigenvalue Problems for Tensor and Tensor–Block Matrices for Mathematical Modeling of Micropolar Thin Bodies Mikhail Nikabadze 1,2,∗ and Armine Ulukhanyan 2 1 Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia 2 Department of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 January 2019; Accepted: 21 March 2019; Published: 22 March 2019 Abstract: The statement of the eigenvalue problem for a tensor–block matrix (TBM) of any order and of any even rank is formulated, and also some of its special cases are considered. In particular, using the canonical presentation of the TBM of the tensor of elastic modules of the micropolar theory, in the canonical form the specific deformation energy and the constitutive relations are written. With the help of the introduced TBM operator, the equations of motion of a micropolar arbitrarily anisotropic medium are written, and also the boundary conditions are written down by means of the introduced TBM operator of the stress and the couple stress vectors. The formulations of initial-boundary value problems in these terms for an arbitrary anisotropic medium are given. The questions on the decomposition of initial-boundary value problems of elasticity and thin body theory for some anisotropic media are considered. In particular, the initial-boundary problems of the micropolar (classical) theory of elasticity are presented with the help of the introduced TBM operators (tensors–operators). In the case of an isotropic micropolar elastic medium (isotropic and transversely isotropic classical media), the TBM operator (tensors–operators) of cofactors to TBM operators (tensors–tensors) of the initial-boundary value problems are constructed that allow decomposing initial-boundary value problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Entanglement Entropy from One-Point Functions in Holographic States
    Published for SISSA by Springer Received: May 10, 2016 Accepted: June 6, 2016 Published: June 15, 2016 Entanglement entropy from one-point functions in JHEP06(2016)085 holographic states Matthew J.S. Beach, Jaehoon Lee, Charles Rabideau and Mark Van Raamsdonk Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1W9, Canada E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: For holographic CFT states near the vacuum, entanglement entropies for spa- tial subsystems can be expressed perturbatively as an expansion in the one-point functions of local operators dual to light bulk fields. Using the connection between quantum Fisher information for CFT states and canonical energy for the dual spacetimes, we describe a general formula for this expansion up to second-order in the one-point functions, for an arbitrary ball-shaped region, extending the first-order result given by the entanglement first law. For two-dimensional CFTs, we use this to derive a completely explicit formula for the second-order contribution to the entanglement entropy from the stress tensor. We show that this stress tensor formula can be reproduced by a direct CFT calculation for states related to the vacuum by a local conformal transformation. This result can also be reproduced via the perturbative solution to a non-linear scalar wave equation on an auxiliary de Sitter spacetime, extending the first-order result in arXiv:1509.00113. Keywords: AdS-CFT Correspondence, Gauge-gravity correspondence ArXiv ePrint: 1604.05308 Open Access, c The Authors.
    [Show full text]
  • 10-5 Tensor Operator
    Tensors Masatsugu Sei Suzuki Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: December 04, 2010) 1 Vector operators The operators corresponding to various physical quantities will be characterized by their behavior under rotation as scalars, vectors, and tensors. Vi ijV j . j We assume that the state vector changes from the old state to the new state ' . ' Rˆ , or ' Rˆ . A vector operator Vˆ for the system is defined as an operator whose expectation is a vector that rotates together with the physical system. ˆ ˆ 'Vi ' ij V j j or ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ R Vi R ijV j j or ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ Vi RijV j R j We now consider a special case, infinitesimal rotation. i Rˆ 1ˆ Jˆ n 1 i Rˆ 1ˆ Jˆ n ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ i ˆ ˆ (1 J n)Vi (1 J n) ijV j j ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ Vi [Vi ,J n] ijV j j For n = ez, 1 0 z ( ) 1 0 0 0 1 ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ V1 [V1, J z ] 11V1 12V2 13V3 V1 V2 ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ V2 [V2 , J z ] 21V1 22V2 23V3 V1 V2 ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ V3 [V3, J z ] 31V1 32V2 33V3 V3 or ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ [V1, J z ] iV2 , [V2 , J z ] iV1 , [V3, J z ] 0 For For n = ex, 1 0 0 x ( ) 0 1 0 1 ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ V1 [V1, J x ] 11V1 12V2 13V3 V1 ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ V2 [V2 , J x ] 21V1 22V2 23V3 V2 V3 2 ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ V3 [V3, J x ] 31V1 32V2 33V3 V2 V3 or ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ [V1, J x ] 0 , [V2 , J x ] iV3 , [V3, J x ] iV2 For For n = ey, 1 0 y ( ) 0 1 0 0 1 ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ V1 [V1, J y ] 11V1 12V2 13V3 V1 V3 ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ V2 [V2 , J y ] 21V1 22V2 23V3 V2 ˆ i ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ V3 [V3, Jyx ] 31V1 32V2 33V3 V1 V3 or ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ [V1, J y ] iV3 , [V2 , J y ] 0, [V3, J y ] iV1 Using the Levi-Civita symbol, we have ˆ ˆ ˆ [Vi , J j ] iijkVk We can use this expression as the defining property of a vector operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Angular Momentum States
    6.4.1 Spinor Space and Its Matrix Representation . 127 6.4.2 Angular Momentum Operators in Spinor Representation . 128 6.4.3 IncludingSpinSpace ..........................128 6.5 Single Particle States with Spin . 131 6.5.1 Coordinate-Space-Spin Representation . 131 6.5.2 Helicity Representation . 131 6.6 Isospin......................................133 6.6.1 Nucleon-Nucleon (NN) Scattering . 135 7 Combining Angular Momentum Eigenstates 137 7.1 AdditionofTwoAngularMomenta . .137 7.2 ConstructionoftheEigenstates . 141 7.2.1 Symmetry Properties of Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients . 143 7.3 SpecialCases ..................................144 7.3.1 Spin-OrbitInteraction . .144 1 7.3.2 Coupling of Two Spin- 2 Particles ...................146 7.4 PropertiesofClebsch-GordanCoefficients . 147 7.5 Clebsch-GordanSeries .............................149 7.5.1 Addition theorem for spherical Harmonics . 150 7.5.2 Coupling Rule for spherical Harmonics . 151 7.6 Wigner’s 3 j Coefficients...........................152 − 7.7 CartesianandSphericalTensors . 155 v 7.8 TensorOperatorsinQuantumMechanics . 159 7.9 Wigner-EckartTheorem . .. .. .162 7.9.1 Qualitative . 162 7.9.2 ProofoftheWigner-EckartTheorem . 163 7.10Applications...................................164 8 Symmetries III: Time Reversal 170 8.1 Anti-UnitaryOperators. .. .. .170 8.2 Time Reversal for Spinless Particles . 171 8.3 Time Reversal for Particles with Spin . 173 8.4 InvarianceUnderTimeReversal . 174 8.5 AddendumtoParityTransformations . 176 8.6 Application: Construction of the Nucleon Nucleon Potential FromInvarianceRequirements. .177 9 Quantum Mechanics of Identical Particles 183 9.1 General Rules for Describing Several Identical Particles . ......183 9.2 SystemofTwoIdenticalParticles . 185 9.3 PermutationGroupforThreeParticles . 188 9.4 MatrixRepresentationofaGroup. 189 9.5 Important Results About Representations of the Permutation Group . 190 9.6 Fermi-,Bose-andPara-Particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(Modave VIII)001
    Introduction to Conformal Field Theory PoS(Modave VIII)001 Antonin Rovai∗† Université Libre de Bruxelles and International Solvay Institues E-mail: [email protected] An elementary introduction to Conformal Field Theory is provided. We start by reviewing sym- metries in classical and quantum field theories and the associated existence of conserved currents by Noether’s theorem. Next we describe general facts on conformal invariance in d dimensions and finish with the analysis of the special case d = 2, including an introduction to the operator formalism and a discussion of the trace anomaly. Eighth Modave Summer School in Mathematical Physics 26th august - 1st september 2012 Modave, Belgium ∗Speaker. †FNRS Research Follow c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Introduction to Conformal Field Theory Antonin Rovai Contents Foreword 2 Introduction 3 1. Symmetries and Conservation laws 3 PoS(Modave VIII)001 1.1 Definitions 4 1.2 Noether’s theorem 6 1.3 The energy-momentum tensor 8 1.4 Consequences for the quantum theory 10 2. Conformal invariance in d dimensions 11 2.1 General considerations and algebra 11 2.2 Action of conformal transformations on fields 15 2.3 Energy-momentum tensor and conformal invariance 16 2.4 Conformal invariance in quantum field theory and Ward identities 16 3. Conformal invariance in two dimensions 19 3.1 Identification of the transformations and analysis 19 3.2 Ward identities 23 3.3 Operator Formalism 26 3.3.1 Radial order and mode expansion 26 3.3.2 Operator Product Expansion 27 3.3.3 Virasoro algebra 29 3.4 Trace anomaly 30 References 32 Foreword These lectures notes were written for the eighth edition of the Modave Summer School in Mathematical Physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector and Tensor Operators in Quantum Mechanics Masatsugu Sei Suzuki Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: November 24
    Vector and Tensor operators in quantum mechanics Masatsugu Sei Suzuki Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: November 24. 2015) We discuss the properties of vector and tensor operators under rotations in quantum mechanics. We use the analogy from the classical physics, where vector and tensor of a quantity with three components that transforms by definition like Vi ' ijV j Tij ' ik jlTikl j k ,l under rotation. First I will present a brief review in the case of classical physics. After that the properties of vector and tensor operators under rotation in quantum mechanics. The irreducible spherical tensor operators are introduced based on the rotation operators. The Cartesian tensors are decomposed into irreducible spherical tensors. The Wigner – Eckart theorem will be discussed elsewhere. 1. Definition of vector in classical physics (i) 2D rotation Suppose that the vector r is rotated through (counter-clock wise) around the z axis. The position vector r is changed into r' in the same orthogonal basis {e1, e2}. y r' e 2 r e ' 2 x2 e1' f x2 x1 f x x1 e1 In this Fig, we have e e ' cos e e ' sin 1 1 , 2 1 e1 e2 ' sin e2 e2 ' cos Spherical Harmonics as rotator matrices 1 9/3/2017 We define r and r' as r' x 'e x 'e x e ' x e ' 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 , and r x e x e 1 1 2 2 . Using the relation e1 r' e1 (x1'e1 x2 'e2 ) e1 (x1e1'x2e2 ') e2 r' e2 (x1'e1 x2 'e2 ) e2 (x1e1'x2e2 ') we have x1' e1 (x1e1'x2e2 ') x1 cos x2 sin x2 ' e2 (x1e1'x2e2 ') x1 sin x2 cos or x1 ' x1 11 12 x1 cos sin x1 () x2 '
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics II
    Quantum Mechanics II. Janos Polonyi University of Strasbourg (Dated: September 8, 2021) Contents I. Perturbation expansion 4 A. Stationary perturbations 5 1. First order 6 2. Second order 6 3. Degenerate perturbation 7 B. Time dependent perturbations 9 C. Non-exponential decay rate 12 D. Quantum Zeno-effect 15 E. Time-energy uncertainty principle 16 F. Fermi’s golden rule 17 II. Rotations 18 A. Finite translations 18 B. Finite rotations 19 C. Euler angles 21 D. Summary of the angular momentum algebra 22 E. Rotational multiplets 23 F. Wigner’s D matrix 24 G. Invariant integration over rotations 26 H. Spherical harmonics 28 III. Addition of angular momentum 31 A. Additive observables and quantum numbers 31 1. Momentum 31 2. Angular momentum 32 2 B. System of two particles 32 IV. Selection rules 38 A. Tensor operators 38 B. Orthogonality relations 39 C. Wigner-Eckart theorem 41 V. Symmetries in quantum mechanics 43 A. Representation of symmetries 44 B. Unitary and anti-unitary symmetries 45 C. Space inversion 48 D. Time inversion 50 VI. Relativistic corrections to the hydrogen atom 54 A. Scale dependence of physical laws 54 B. Hierarchy of scales in QED 56 C. Unperturbed, non-relativistic dynamics 58 D. Fine structure 59 1. Relativistic corrections to the kinetic energy 59 2. Darwin term 60 3. Spin-orbit coupling 61 E. Hyperfine structure 64 F. Splitting of the fine structure degeneracy 65 1. n = 1 65 2. n = 2 66 VII. Identical particles 68 A. A macroscopic quantum effect 68 B. Fermions and bosons 69 C. Occupation number representation 73 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Symmetries and Transformation Groups
    Chapter 9 Symmetries and transformation groups When contemporaries of Galilei argued against the heliocentric world view by pointing out that we do not feel like rotating with high velocity around the sun he argued that a uniform motion cannot be recognized because the laws of nature that govern our environment are invariant under what we now call a Galilei transformation between inertial systems. Invariance arguments have since played an increasing role in physics both for conceptual and practical reasons. In the early 20th century the mathematician Emmy Noether discovered that energy con- servation, which played a central role in 19th century physics, is just a special case of a more general relation between symmetries and conservation laws. In particular, energy and momen- tum conservation are equivalent to invariance under translations of time and space, respectively. At about the same time Einstein discovered that gravity curves space-time so that space-time is in general not translation invariant. As a consequence, energy is not conserved in cosmology. In the present chapter we discuss the symmetries of non-relativistic and relativistic kine- matics, which derive from the geometrical symmetries of Euclidean space and Minkowski space, respectively. We decompose transformation groups into discrete and continuous parts and study the infinitesimal form of the latter. We then discuss the transition from classical to quantum mechanics and use rotations to prove the Wigner-Eckhart theorem for matrix elements of tensor operators. After discussing the discrete symmetries parity, time reversal and charge conjugation we conclude with the implications of gauge invariance in the Aharonov–Bohm effect.
    [Show full text]