DOCSLIB.ORG

8 the WESTFIELD LEADER the Leading and Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newspaper in Union County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
8 the WESTFIELD LEADER the Leading and Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newspaper in Union County o 8 THE WESTFIELD LEADER The Leading and Most Widely Circulated Weekly Newspaper In Union County USPS $80020 EIGIj Second Class PostaffO Paid WESTFIELD, NEW JERSEY, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1979 Published 20 Pages—20 Cents ~ -~AR —NO.27 nt WmifleM. N. J. pry Thursday Legal Issues Stall Action Municipal Tax Hike On Munsee Way Plea Irate Indian Forest the original character and continued by emphasizing tersections. Chairman Association members "tranquility" of the neigh- that the lot is designated as Dooley mentioned closing First in Three Years formed a standing-room- borhood which she a building lot on the tax map the street is not that simple only crowd at the meeting of described as a "natural, and if a variance were not and is probably a "last Westfield property owners percent is still with us, it the Planning Board Monday and Council, thanks also to municipal increase is only updating of a 20-year-old residential parkland," granted, the lot would be resort" to alleviate the will see the first municipal was felt by a majority on astute municipal ad- 4.4 percent for a total of agreement with New Jersey night to protest the con- A potential decrease in "zoned into idleness." residents' concerns. tax hike in three years if the council thai the final form of struction of a single-family ministrative planning and $3,035,000.00. Bell Telephone Co. which property values as a result Lebowitz countered by Because the public town budget of $7,922,01)0 is Ihe budget is fair and fiscal management, have "The reason Ihe town of enables that utility to use residence at 108 Munsee of the home was mentioned saying that the hardship hearing on the Munsee Way approved following a public equitable to all depart- Way, a move many put together a very sound Westfield can submit a town sidewalks and streets by several residents, among was "self-created" as a application took nearly two hearing Mar. 1:1. but ihe ments. Obviously Ihere was 1979 budget. The budget budget for 1979 with such a for its operations, and a fee- residents in the area see as a them, J.I. Sladkus of 801 result of previous tran- hours, the board postponed increase - for town services very litllc room to add or threat to the "unique totals $7,922,000 including marginal tax increase is due setting ordinance for use of Lenape Trail who said, "We sactions (of which Minogue final action on much of its at least - will be only $15 for improve upon Ihe services the Iradidtional $1,201,000 (o anticipated substantial Memorial Pool and tennis residenlial style" of the don't want our property was not a part) which business until its next a home assessed at $50,(101). to Westfield residents. If the neighborhood. reserve for uncollected increases on the revenue courts values to go down by a subdivided the lot without meeting March 5, including The total properly lax state allowed I am sure taxes. This is an increase of side of the budget. These Pool and tennis permit Patrick D. Minogue, substandard lot." He added municipall approval. the appeal of Anthony bite, however, will be aboui there are those who would some $4G5,54i; or G.2 percent increased revenues are seen lees will remain Ihe same purchaser under contract of that the association would In response lo another Mormile introduced last 10 times lh;il amount be willing lo pay a higher over last year's budget. To in court fines and costs, for residents, but because the Munsee Way property, is like to plant trees on the neighborhood contingenl. the month to erect an auto because of I ho projected :w lax rate for a better quality support this increase there franchise taxes, gross Clrecn Acres funding was seeking a variance to build vacant lot to make it more Planning Board referred to repair garage at 401-413 point rise in I lie total of life in Westfield. I suggest will be a slight lax increase receipt laxes and most used for the Memorial Park on the lot which is deficient attractive. the Town Council the South Elmer St. amount tn be raised for however that this may nol of .03 mills or $15 on a particularly interesl on facilities on North Scotch in frontage by ap- It was the legal question request of some Sherwood Town Engineer James budgets supporting not only be Ihe majority opinion of property assessed at $50,000. investments and deposits of Plains Ave., these must be proximately 20 feet. regarding hardship that Parkway residents to dead- Josephs was satisfied with the town, but its schools and the average taxpayer. However 1 hasten to point some $204,G75.00. West- opened lo non-residents. Additionally, zoning stalled action by Planning end the street at the the revised site plan in its share of county expenses "The cost of operating out lhat this is the firs! year field's treasurer has been Fees are double ($21(1 for a regulations mandate paving Board members who Mountainside line, with the terms of drainage, but as well. your (own is ever increasing in the past three years that doing an outstanding job of family membership at Ihe 18 feet of Munsee Way for requested legal briefs for recommendation that both several board members felt The tax rate is expected lo year after year. The cost of Ihe town budget has called obtaining the highest in- pool. $1(1 for an adult tennis access by emergency their March 5 meeting from the Westfield and Moun- the garage varies too increase from the 1!I7H tab of leaf removal, insurance for a tax increase. Your lax teresl rates availbalc on the permit) for those who live vehicles if a home is con- Swain and the association's tainside councils work greatly with the intent of the $4.29 to $4.5!) per SI 00 premiums, utility rales and rale for municipal purposes market. He obtained a outside WestfieUI desiring to structed. Indian Forest attorney, E. Lebowitz of 910 together to improve the zoning ordinance. assessed valuation this fuel have risen sub- over the past few years: creditable 10 '•'•» percent on a residents are particularly use the Memorial Park pool MinisinkWay, in addition to area. In the B-2 zone, the garage year, resulting in a total lax stantially. Recent wage 1976 6<l mills recent transaction and tennis courts. These are opposed to paving the road an opinion from the board's increase of about $15« for settlements with certain because they fear increased Lieutenant Thomas constitutes a conditional use 1977 .09 mills "Although salaries and Ihe only Westfield facilities own attorney, William Bass. Catalon filed a traffic safety and therefore the board property assessed at Ko.ooo. departments have ap- 1978 Gil mills wages will increase by open to non-residents. traffic in the neighborhood The municipal budget, proached almost 7.2 perecnl from motorists using the Swain argued that his was report with the board must find facts to justify 1979 .71 mills approximately !S2O5,OIK) lo Scheduled for public a "classic hardship case," recommending that a yellow each deviation from the introduced ;il Tuesday on an annual basis. For- "This record equates (o an $3,414.000. your council is hearing and final action al road, and their own streets, night's meeting of the Town tunately to date we have not as a short-cut to Rt. 22. because his client had at- center line be drawn on the ordinance, including average increase of .MM; not providing for any new Ihe Fob 20 meeting of Ihe tempted to purchase the street and that stop signs deficiencies in sideyard, Council, calls for ex- bad the astronomical ex- mills over the four year personnel. Other expenses Town Council are or- Minogue's attorney Frank vacant lot adjacent to his might be erected at the setback and total area. penditures of $7.!I22.O()() of pense of snow removal period or $:o:s for a including debt service will dinances authorizing Ihe Swain indicated that his property to obtain the Crescent Parkway and Mormile and lot owner which $3,035,457 is lo be faced by the town in 1978. property with assessed increase some $233.00(1. This hiring of a town labor at- client would be willing to required frontage. He Belvidere Ave. in- Frank Caldora will come raised by taxation. The winter is nol over and i1 valuation of $50,000.00 figure (foes include Ihe afore torney and prohibiting construct the home without back to the board in March Increased revenues are should be noted that one of "Finally based on in- mentioned appropriation of trucks over four tons from the pavement if the Plan- with more information to credited by Don Alpaugh. the worsl storms of 1071! fell formation al hand your $45,000 for snow removal. using North Chestnut St. ning Board decided to Planners Approve Code help the board render its finance chairman, for during the month of anticipated 197!) taxes will Weslfield's 1979 municipal between East Broad St. and waiver that requirement. decision. keeping lox increases at a February. Hecause we were be. budget will increase by Mountain Ave. Indian Forest residents Also postponed until next low figure In a statement caught short handed last Municipal, $3,035,457.49, some $466,000 but the h>x A theater license was still objected to the deficient Deleting RM-2 Zones month was the appeal of explaining the budget, year in providing for the high cost of snow removal .71 (1979.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union County, New Jersey (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 1 OF 3 UNION COUNTY, NEW JERSEY (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER BERKELEY HEIGHTS, TOWNSHIP OF 340459 PLAINFIELD, CITY OF 345312 CLARK, TOWNSHIP OF 345290 RAHWAY, CITY OF 345314 CRANFORD, TOWNSHIP OF 345291 ROSELLE, BOROUGH OF 340472 ELIZABETH, CITY OF 345523 ROSELLE PARK, BOROUGH OF 340473 FANWOOD, BOROUGH OF 340463 SCOTCH PLAINS, TOWNSHIP OF 340474 GARWOOD, BOROUGH OF 340464 SPRINGFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF 345321 HILLSIDE, TOWNSHIP OF 340465 SUMMIT, CITY OF 340476 KENILWORTH, BOROUGH OF 340466 UNION, TOWNSHIP OF 340477 LINDEN, CITY OF 340467 WESTFIELD, TOWN OF 340478 MOUNTAINSIDE, BOROUGH OF 340468 WINFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF 1 340479 NEW PROVIDENCE, BOROUGH OF 345306 1 No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified PRELIMINARY REVISED: APRIL 18, 2016 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 34039CV001B Version Number 2.2.2.2 NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: September 20, 2006 Revised Countywide FIS Date: [TBD] – to change Base Flood Elevations, Special Flood Hazard Areas and zone designations; to update the effects of wave actions, roads and road names; and to reflect revised shoreline and updated topographic information.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT MASTER PLAN CITY of PLAINFIELD in the County of Union
    DRAFT MASTER PLAN CITY OF PLAINFIELD in the County of Union State of New Jersey Prepared by Remington & Vernick Engineers 232 Kings Highway East Haddonfield, NJ 08033 April 2009 _________________________ _____________________________ Craig F. Remington, P.L.S., P.P. George R. Stevenson, Jr., P.P., AICP License #LI01877 License #LI05487 N.B. The original of this document was signed and sealed in accordance with NJAC 13:41-1.3.b Mayor Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs City Council Rashid Burney Linda Carter Adrian O. Mapp Annie C. McWilliams William Reid Elliot Simmons Cory Storch City Solicitor Marc Dashield, Esq. Clerk Laddie Wyatt City Planner William Nierstedt, P.P., AICP Planning Board Members Ken Robertson, Chairman Horace Baldwin Ron Scott Bey Charles Eke Gordon Fuller Barbara James Cory Storch William Toth Sidney Jackson Planning Board Attorney Michele Donato, Esquire Director of Public Works and Urban Development Jennifer Wenson Maier TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Land Use Element 25 Circulation Element 48 Housing Element 76 Community Facilities/Social Services Plan Element 101 Recreation Plan Element 128 Historic Preservation Element 150 Stormwater Management Plan Element 161 Consistency Statement 174 Introduction The master plan shall generally comprise a report or statement and land use and development proposals, with maps, diagrams and text, presenting, at least the following elements (1) and (2) and where appropriate, the following elements (3) through (14): (1) A statement of objectives, principles, assumptions, policies and standards upon which the constituent proposals for the physical, economic and social development of the municipality are based; (NJSA 40:55D-28 MLUL) 1. Purpose The purpose of this document is to update and create anew the Master Plan of the City of Plainfield.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTY New Jersey
    STORM DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL PLAN T ! COUNTY new jersey The preparation of this report was financialfy aided through a Federal grout from me Urban Renewal Adminiitration of the Department of Housing and Urban Development 'mder the Urban Planning Assistance Program authorized by section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954, as amended. The remainder has been financed by local funds and by an appropriation of the state of New Jersey as port of the Cooperative Governmental Planning Program. Prepared by : ELSON T. KILLAM ASSOCIATES, INC. APRIL UNION COUNTY 1971 PLANNING BOARD ELSON T. KILLAM ASSOCIATES, INC. VIII. CHRONICALLY FLOODED AREAS Exhibit XV shows the locations of reported areas of frequent flood­ ing within Union County. Two basic distinctions have been made tidal flooding and flooding from storm water runoff. The areas of tidal flooding shown on Exhibit XV will generally occur during a fifty-year frequency tide with tidal elevation of +10' and with no storm water runoff. The total area inundated under such conditions has been estimated to be approximately 4,800 acres or 7.3 percent of the total land area of the County! The method of reducing this extensive area of flooding is discussed in Chapter IX of this report. Other areas of frequent flooding shown on Exhibit XV occur from storm water runoff during periods of heavy rainfall. Questionnaires were sent to each municipality in the County requesting data on the location and description of areas of frequent flooding. It was re­ quested that areas of flooding be predicated upon occurring on the average of at least once every five years, cause extensive property damage, endanger human lives, or halt travel on arterial streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Insurance Study Middlesex County, NJ
    VOLUME 1 OF 3 MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Middlesex County This Preliminary FIS report only includes revised Floodway Data Tables and revised Flood Profiles. The unrevised components will appear in the final FIS report. COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER CARTERET, BOROUGH OF 340257 NORTH BRUNSWICK, TOWNSHIP OF 340271 CRANBURY, TOWNSHIP OF 340258 OLD BRIDGE, TOWNSHIP OF 340265 DUNELLEN, BOROUGH OF 340259 PERTH AMBOY, CITY OF 340272 EAST BRUNSWICK, TOWNSHIP OF 340260 PISCATAWAY, TOWNSHIP OF 340274 EDISON, TOWNSHIP OF 340261 PLAINSBORO, TOWNSHIP OF 340275 HELMETTA, BOROUGH OF 340262 SAYREVILLE, BOROUGH OF 340276 HIGHLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF 340263 SOUTH AMBOY, CITY OF 340277 JAMESBURG, BOROUGH OF 340264 SOUTH BRUNSWICK, TOWNSHIP OF 340278 METUCHEN, BOROUGH OF 340266 SOUTH PLAINFIELD, BOROUGH OF 340279 MIDDLESEX, BOROUGH OF 345305 SOUTH RIVER, BOROUGH OF 340280 MILLTOWN, BOROUGH OF 340268 SPOTSWOOD, BOROUGH OF 340282 MONROE, TOWNSHIP OF 340269 WOODBRIDGE, TOWNSHIP OF 345331 NEW BRUNSWICK, CITY OF 340270 EFFECTIVE: PRELIMINARY JANUARY 31, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 34023CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2: Township of Clark September 2015
    Appendix 2: Township of Clark September 2015 Appendix 2: Township of Clark 1 Planning Process and Participation This appendix is part of the 2015 Union County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) update, and includes only jurisdiction-specific information about the Township of Clark, which is one of the 20 municipalities within Union County that is participating in the plan update. Union County led the planning process and outreach for this update. For a detailed description of the planning process and the public outreach efforts for this update, see Section 3 of the HMP. The County formed a Steering Committee, which was responsible for key decisions during the plan update. This committee sent a letter to the Mayor of each municipality within the County. The Mayors and local officials selected a single individual to represent the town in the broader process. This person was the point of contact for the plan update, but worked with other municipal employees, consultants, volunteers, and other stakeholders throughout the planning process. This collection of participants, considered the local planning committee, is listed below. The committee was responsible for various decisions that informed the development of this appendix, including: prioritizing the natural hazards that can affect the community, reviewing and prioritizing the mitigation actions that are included in Table 2-1, and informing community leaders about the status of the County mitigation plan update, including this appendix The Clark Township Planning Committee evaluated and identified the hazards of concern, completed the request for information (RFI), reviewed the plan documents and vulnerability assessment, identified local stakeholders for outreach, and worked collectively to update the mitigation strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Woodbridge
    Draft Impervious Cover Reduction Action Plan for Woodbridge Township, Middlesex County, New Jersey Prepared for Woodbridge Township by the Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program November 16, 2015 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Methodology …………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Green Infrastructure Practices …………………………………………………………………… 8 Potential Project Sites ………………………………………………………………………….. 10 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………... 11 Attachment: Climate Resilient Green Infrastructure a. Overview Map of the Project b. Green Infrastructure Sites c. Proposed Green Infrastructure Concepts d. Summary of Existing Conditions e. Summary of Proposed Green Infrastructure Practices Introduction Located in Middlesex County in central New Jersey, Woodbridge Township covers approximately 24.0 square miles west of Arthur Kill, a tidal strait separating Staten Island, New York City from New Jersey. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate that Woodbridge Township is dominated by urban land uses. A total of 79.2% of the municipality’s land use is classified as urban. Of the urban land in Woodbridge Township, medium and high density residential are the dominant land uses (Figure 3). The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s (NJDEP) 2007 land use/land cover geographical information system (GIS) data layer categorizes Woodbridge Township into many unique land use areas, assigning a percent impervious cover for each delineated area. These impervious cover values were used to estimate the impervious coverage for Woodbridge Township. Based upon the 2007 NJDEP land use/land cover data, approximately 38.7% of Woodbridge Township has impervious cover. This level of impervious cover suggests that the streams in Woodbridge Township are likely non-supporting streams.1 Methodology Woodbridge Township contains portions of seven subwatersheds (Figure 4). For this impervious cover reduction action plan, projects have been identified in each of these watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Union County, New Jersey Final Draft February 11Th, 2016
    2016 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Union County, New Jersey Final Draft February 11th, 2016 Table of Contents Section 1: Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview and Purpose................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Organization of the Plan .............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Planning Process .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Hazards and Risk .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Hazards ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Risk ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Goals Objectives and Actions ...................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Approval and Adoption ............................................................................................................... 4 1.7 Monitoring and Updating the Plan .............................................................................................. 4 Section
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Descriptions of Woodbridge
    Township of Woodbridge — Floodplain Management Plan Pa ge 3 B1. Introduction Woodbridge Township has participated in various federal, state, county and local government and private sec- tor programs aimed at reducing flooding impacts within the Township. In the aftermath of Super Storm Sandy, the Township connected flood victims with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other assistance agencies. Also, the Township participated in the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s Blue Acres Program, which has already acquired and removed 139 residential properties from the Township’s Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). Despite such ongoing programs, flooding problems persist at a number of low-lying properties within the Township. To reduce flood damages, and increasing flood-insurance costs, Woodbridge Township is in the process of joining Federal Emergency Management Agen- cy’s (FEMA’s) Community Rating System (CRS) Program. This Program en- courages and recognizes community floodplain management and planning ac- tivities that exceed the minimum requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). CRS rewards such activities by discounting flood insurance premiums for policy holders within a participating community. CRS goals are summarized as follows: • to reduce and avoid flood damage to insurable property; • to strengthen and support the insurance aspects of the NFIP; and • to foster comprehensive floodplain management. By supporting these common goals, Woodbridge Township property owners will become more flood resilient, and less burdened by rising insurance costs. Accordingly, this report was prepared to: 1. Help minimize risks to human life within hazardous floodplains, and reduce the amount of flood damage sustained during future flood events.
    [Show full text]
  • Westfield Westfield
    Page 10 Thursday, July 8, 2004 The Westfield Leader and The Scotch Plains – Fanwood TIMES A WATCHUNG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PUBLICATION St. Aloysius Softball Men Tap Under-Stocked St. Kilian, 9-3 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 9 formed some wizardry with his glove and scored when Betau’s fly to right and pitcher Howie Bialos added a was dropped in the fifth. nice snag of his own. After the Aloysius defense permit- Aloysius looked tough in the top of ted no runs in the fifth, Betau hollered, the first and trampled the plate four “You guys are looking marvelous out times. McKinney beat out an infield there!” single and Woodring reached base In the seventh, Aloysius put to- safely on an error in right. Chianowyz gether three singles and an error to drilled a two-run double and Betau get one runner home – Ken Broyles – followed with an RBI single. After and had the bases loaded with Neal Kennedy singled, Rutkowski ripped LaStrange holding up at third when an RBI single. the notorious “Hecklers” were prod- Stratton whacked his solo blast in ding the base runners to be more the bottom of the first then Aloysius aggressive. David B. Corbin for The Westfield Leader and The Times answered with one in the second. “It’s all fun and game until some- Shackamaxon Golf Pro Michael Kierner O’Hara, who was on second, scored one pulls a hamstring,” uttered on a muffed force out attempt. LaStrange. In the third, Aloysius took a 6-1 Reason prevailed and, in the bot- Shackamaxon Pro Discusses lead when Cihanowyz singled then, tom of the seventh, Cihanowyz ended David B.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Hazard Area Control Act Rules (N.J.A.C. 7:13)
    THIS IS A COURTESY COPY OF THIS RULE. ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT’S RULES ARE COMPILED IN TITLE 7 OF THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. N.J.A.C. 7:13 FLOOD HAZARD AREA CONTROL ACT RULES Statutory authority: N.J.S.A. 58:16A-50 et seq., and portions of N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq., N.J.S.A. 58:11A-1 et seq., N.J.S.A. 13:20-1 et seq., N.J.S.A. 13:1D-29 et seq., and N.J.S.A. 13:1D-1 et seq. Date last amended: February 2, 2015 FOR REGULATORY HISTORY AND EFFECTIVE DATES SEE THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1 THIS IS A COURTESY COPY OF THIS RULE. ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT’S RULES ARE COMPILED IN TITLE 7 OF THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................................................ 5 7:13-1.1 Purpose and scope ....................................................................................................................................... 5 7:13-1.2 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................... 6 7:13-1.3 Types of permits and approvals ................................................................................................................. 17 7:13-1.4 Delegation of authority .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]