Question for Written Answer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Question for Written Answer Question for written answer E-006042/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Charlie Weimers (ECR), Eugen Jurzyca (ECR), Derk Jan Eppink (ECR), Bert-Jan Ruissen (ECR), Jorge Buxadé Villalba (ECR), Gunnar Beck (ID) Subject: Implementation of the ‘one in, one out’ principle In the working methods of the European Commission presented in December 2019, President von der Leyen instructed the Commission to implement the ‘one in, one out’ principle for all upcoming legislation1. The successful and aggressive implementation of such policies has contributed positively to economic growth and job creation by stemming the flow of regulation, red tape and bureaucratic burden, while increasing the chances that non-regulatory methods of achieving policy goals are considered234. Considering the abovesaid facts, can the Commission: 1. confirm that the ‘one in, one out’ policy has been ‘applied coherently across the Commission services’, as promised by President von der Leyen? 2. provide an update on the state of play of the new instrument it promised to put in place to implement the ‘one in, one out’ principle for all upcoming legislation? 3. provide a full account of all legislation (regulations, directives, decisions and implementing decisions) enacted and repealed during the first year in office of the von der Leyen Commission5? 1 President of the European Commission, Communication from the President to the Commission on the Working Methods of the European Commission, European Commission, Brussels, 2019. 2 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, One-in, One-out: Statement of New Regulation, HM Government, London, 2011. 3 According to research conducted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), such rules generated annual savings of tens of millions (Canada) or billions (the UK and Germany). Trnka, D. and Thuerer, Y., ‘One-In, X-Out: Regulatory offsetting in selected OECD countries’, OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers, No 11, OECD, Paris, 2019, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/67d71764-en.pdf 4 A more aggressive ‘One in, Two out’ approach eliminated USD 50.9 billion in overall regulatory costs across the US Government between 2017 and 2019 – Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Regulatory Reform under Executive Order 13771: Final Accounting for Fiscal Year 2019, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC, 2019, https://www.reginfo.gov/public/pdf/eo13771/EO_13771_Final_Accounting_for_Fiscal_Year_2019.pdf 5 A search of the EUR-LEX database finds that 974 regulations, 80 directives, 1059 decisions and 366 implementing decisions were added during 2019. PE661.170v01-00.
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF Version
    Next weekend in New Direction 10th Anniversary Dinner p.22 BORDEAUX p.20 ACRE Summer Gala Dinner p.23 Issue #8 | July 2019 A fortnightly Newspaper by the Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) | theconservative.online THE OFFICIAL OPPOSITION by Jan Zahradil MEP, President of ACRE For the next five years, we aim to serve as the peoples voice, acting as a counter balance between those who want a federal Europe, and those who want to destroy the Union. We will continue to defend the view that Europe works best when it does less, but it does it better. ith the elec- power handed to those who which would have create a in a position to act as the offi- comes as a result of keeping tion now out of want to use it to build a federal more business friendly Europe. cial opposition in the European power as close to the people as Spitzenkandidat the way, and the Europe. A coalition that will That would have put the sin- Parliament. We’ll hold this new possible. And we remain com- JAN ZAHRADIL political groups be led from the left, with any gle market, rather than social coalition to account, and ensure mitted to the view that our nowW establishing themselves, we voting majority dependent on policy, back at the centre of the that they do not use their new strength comes from a willing- Jan Zahradil was ACRE’s can- can now talk with some clarity the support of the Greens and European Union. That would majority to take power away ness to work together on issues didate for the Presidency of the about what the next five years the socialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Commissioner Varhelyi on EU Finanial Assistance
    To the Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations Olivér Várhelyi 26/10/2020 Dear Commissioner Várhelyi, We are writing to you to express our concern at reports about the way the European Commission is intending to distribute EUR 53 million in financial assistance to Belarus. We express our admiration for the courage and resolve shown by the Belarusian people during the COVID-19 pandemic, and note that the European Union and its Member States stood in solidarity with the people of Belarus, providing financial and material support through bilateral and regional programmes and instruments. All this has taken place in the context of the Belarusian authorities’ lethargic response, and even denials of the pandemic and its impact, all the while increasing repression against its own people in the context of the presidential elections. The presidential election, marred by widespread violations and a campaign of repression which is on-going to this day, has demonstrated the true brutality of the Lukashenka regime and its disregard for the Belarusian people. It is in this context that we strongly urge the Commission to i) apply a ‘less for less’ principle with regards to the Belarusian authorities until all political prisoners are released, fundamental human rights are respected and free and fair elections take place, all the while pursuing a 'more for more' principle with regards to the Belarusian civil society; ii) be creative with the disbursement of funds through relevant instruments and implementing partners; and iii) allow more flexibility in project implementation given the changing circumstances. The Foreign Affairs Council of 12th October 2020 called for the recalibration of EU bilateral financial assistance to Belarus.
    [Show full text]
  • PROMISES and REALITY Slovak Economy
    PROMISES AND REALITY Slovak Economy 1995–1998 Authors: Juraj Borgula Martin Bútora Zora Bútorová Alena Císarová Vladimír Dvořáček Michal Horváth Marek Jakoby Eugen Jurzyca Inez Krautmannová Grigorij Mesežnikov Viktor Nižňanský Peter Pažitný Emília Sičáková Alena Smržová Jaroslava Zapletalová Daniela Zemanovičová Eduard Žitňanský Project Co-ordinators: Marek Jakoby Viktor Nižňanský M.E.S.A. 10 – Center for Economic and Social Analyses Bratislava 1998 -2- M.E.S.A. 10 – Center for Economic and Social Analyses is an economic think tank created in 1992 with the main objective of supporting economic and social transformation to make the Slovak Republic a modern and prosperous society. M.E.S.A. 10 develops analyses, does monitoring, prepare studies, comments on current economic policy, organizes lectures, discussion clubs, conferences and seminars on macro- economy, social issues, privatization, fiscal decentralization issues. Board of Directors Ivan Mikloš, Jana Červenáková, Pavol Kinčeš, František Kurej, Viktor Nižňanský, Gabriel Palacka, Vladimír Rajčák, Juraj Stern, František Šebej Executive Director Viktor Nižňanský M.E.S.A. 10 Hviezdoslavovo námestie 17, 811 02 Bratislava Phone: (421 – 7) 54435328 Fax: (421 – 7) 54432189 E-mail: mesa10&internet.sk Home page: http://www.mesa10.sk This publication was issued due to a kind support of the Open Society Foundation. M.E.S.A. 10 thanks Ivan Miklos for his initiative in creating this publication and for the possibility to use his analyses in this publication. M.E.S.A. 10 thanks to the Institute for Public Affairs and to Creative Department for co-operation and assistance in issuing this publication. © M.E.S.A. 10 - Center for Economic and Social Analyses, Bratislava 1998 -3- TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Josep Borrell Fontelles High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Rue De La Loi 200 1040 Brussels Belgium
    Mr. Josep Borrell Fontelles High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Rue de la Loi 200 1040 Brussels Belgium In Brussels, 08 April 2020 Dear Mr High Representative, On January 31 the WHO declared that the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus originating from China’s Wuhan is a public health emergency of international concern. As of today, the global number of confirmed cases passed one million mark. Many countries around the world are severely affected by this pandemic. The WHO treatment of Taiwan as part of China has caused problems for Taiwan. Not only is its democratically elected government barred from taking part in the World Health Assembly, but Taiwanese experts are also arbitrarily prevented from taking part in technical meetings. If the motto of the WHO is ‘health for all’ and ‘leaving no one behind’, the Taiwanese people are certainly not treated that way. It is not fair to the 23 million people of Taiwan. Given the Taiwan’s early vigilance and effective efforts in containing this pandemic that have been widely recognized internationally I think that it is of utmost importance to cooperate and share knowledge and experience and include Taiwan in international organizations, mechanisms and activities. Therefore, I would like to request your support for Taiwan to be incorporated in the WHO meetings, mechanism and activities, support Taiwan’s full participation in both the World Health Assembly as an observer and the WHO’s disease prevention mechanisms, including its Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN). It will enable Taiwan to help the global efforts in fighting the COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.10.2020 A9-0162/162/Rev Amendment
    1.10.2020 A9-0162/162/rev Amendment 162/rev Anna Zalewska, Alexandr Vondra, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Eugen Jurzyca, Beata Kempa, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Elżbieta Kruk, Grzegorz Tobiszowski, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Mazurek, Angel Dzhambazki, Andrey Slabakov, Joanna Kopcińska, Andżelika Anna Możdżanowska, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Izabela-Helena Kloc, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk on behalf of the ECR Group Report A9-0162/2020 Jytte Guteland European Climate Law (COM(2020)0080 – COM(2020)0563– C9 0077/2020 – 2020/0036(COD)) Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Having regard to the Treaty on the Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 192(1) thereof, particular Articles 192(1) and 194(2) thereof, Or. en AM\P9_AMA(2020)0162(162-168)_REV_EN.docx PE658.338v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 1.10.2020 A9-0162/163/rev Amendment 163/rev Anna Zalewska, Alexandr Vondra, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Beata Kempa, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Elżbieta Kruk, Grzegorz Tobiszowski, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Mazurek, Angel Dzhambazki, Andrey Slabakov, Joanna Kopcińska, Andżelika Anna Możdżanowska, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Izabela-Helena Kloc, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk on behalf of the ECR Group Report A9-0162/2020 Jytte Guteland European Climate Law (COM(2020)0080 – COM(2020)0563– C9 0077/2020 – 2020/0036(COD)) Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Dsa in Your Pocket
    DSA IN YOUR POCKET European commission FILE CONSULTATIONS / CALL FOR FEEDBACK RESPONSIBLE UNIT FEEDBACK Open public consultation DG CNECT/F.2 E-commerce and Closed DSA package Digital Services Act package Platforms 02 June - 08 September 2020 Inception Impact Assessment DG CNECT/F.2 E-commerce and E-commerce Digital Services Act: deepening the Internal Closed Platforms aspects Market and clarifying responsibilities for 02 June - 30 June 2020 digital services Inception Impact Assessment DG CNECT/F.2 E-commerce and Digital Services Act package – ex ante Platforms Closed Ex-ante tools regulatory instrument of very large online DG GROW/E.4 Retail and Online 02 June - 30 June 2020 platforms acting as gatekeepers Services European Parliament RESPONSIBLE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME LEGAL AFFAIRS (JURI) COMMITTEE PROTECTION (IMCO) AFFAIRS (LIBE) File Reference IMCO 2020/2018(INL) JURI 2020/2019(INL) LIBE 2020/2022(INI) Digital Services Act: adapting commercial Digital Services Act: Improving the Digital Services Act and fundamental Draft report and civil law rules for commercial entities functioning of the Single Market rights issues posed operating online Alex Agius Saliba Tiemo Wölken Kris Peeters Rapporteur (S&D, MT) (S&D, DE) (EPP, BE) Pablo Arias Echeverría (EPP, ES) József Szájer (EPP, HU) Marina Kaljurand (S&D, EE) Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ) Karen Melchior (RE, DK) Moritz Körner (RE, DE) Shadow Alexandra Geese (Greens, DE) Patrick Breyer (Greens, DE) Patrick Breyer (Greens, DE) Rapporteurs Alessandra Basso
    [Show full text]
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 11 Lutego 2020 R. (2021/C 261/02)
    2.7.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 261/53 Wtorek, 11 lutego 2020 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 11 LUTEGO 2020 R. (2021/C 261/02) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 54 2. Propozycja mandatu dotyczącego negocjacji w sprawie nowego partnerstwa ze Zjednoczonym Królestwem 54 Wielkiej Brytanii i Irlandii Północnej (debata) . 3. Skład komisji i delegacji . 55 4. Zawarcie Umowy o wolnym handlu między UE a Wietnamem *** — Zawarcie Umowy o wolnym handlu między UE a Wietnamem (rezolucja) — Umowa o ochronie inwestycji między UE a Wietnamem *** — 55 Umowa o ochronie inwestycji między UE a Wietnamem (rezolucja) (debata) . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 56 6. Komunikat Przewodniczącego . 56 7. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 56 8. Europejski Bank Centralny — raport roczny 2018 (debata) . 56 9. Naruszenie decyzji Rady 2017/2074 w sprawie środków ograniczających w związku z sytuacją w Wenezueli 57 — nielegalny wjazd osoby objętej sankcjami na terytorium państwa członkowskiego UE (debata) . 10. Plan USA dla Bliskiego Wschodu: reakcja UE zgodnie z prawem międzynarodowym (debata) . 58 11. Obecna sytuacja w zakresie bezpieczeństwa w Syrii (debata) . 58 12. Nowa kompleksowa strategia UE-Afryka (debata) . 59 13. Walka z antysemityzmem, rasizmem i nienawiścią w Europie (debata) . 59 14. Skład komisji i delegacji . 60 15. Obecne zagrożenie praworządności w Polsce (debata) . 60 16. Skład Parlamentu . 61 17. Nielegalny handel zwierzętami domowymi w UE (debata) . 61 18. Zatwierdzenie protokołu niniejszego posiedzenia . 61 19. Porządek obrad następnego posiedzenia . 62 20. Zamknięcie posiedzenia . 62 LISTA OBECNOŚCI . 63 C 261/54 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 2.7.2021 Wtorek, 11 lutego 2020 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 11 LUTEGO 2020 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Xt Xt Report
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0000/2020 1.10.2020 REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on a Digital Services Act: adapting commercial and civil law rules for commercial entities operating online (2020/2019(INL)) Committee on Legal Affairs Rapporteur: Tiemo Wölken (Initiative – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure) RR\1213818XT.docx PE650.529v02-00 XT United in diversity XT PR_INL CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 3 ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION: DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED .... 13 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 31 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ......................................................................................................................... 34 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION .............................. 44 PE650.529v02-00 2/48 RR\1213818XT.docx XT MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION with recommendations to the Commission on a Digital Services Act: adapting commercial and civil law rules for commercial entities operating online (2020/2019(INL)) The European Parliament, – having regard to Article 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, – having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0148/2021 9.2.2021 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 144 of the Rules of Procedure on Human rights situation in Kazakhstan (2021/2544(RSP)) Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Raffaele Fitto, Anna Fotyga, Karol Karski, Elżbieta Kruk, Elżbieta Rafalska, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Veronika Vrecionová, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Joanna Kopcińska, Alexandr Vondra, Assita Kanko, Adam Bielan, Ruža Tomašić, Eugen Jurzyca, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Valdemar Tomaševski, Evžen Tošenovský, Angel Dzhambazki on behalf of the ECR Group RE\P9_B(2021)0148_EN.docx PE689.010v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0148/2021 European Parliament resolution on Human rights situation in Kazakhstan (2021/2544(RSP)) The European Parliament, - having regard to its previous resolutions on Kazakhstan, - having regard to the outcome of 12th Human Rights Dialogue between EU and Kazakhstan of 26-27 November 2020 - having regard to OSCE Statement of the Preliminary findings and Conclusions regarding the elections in Kazakhstan of 10 January 2021; - having regard to the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Kazakhstan; - having regard to Rule 144 of its Rules of Procedure, A. Whereas the principles of democracy, rule of law, human rights and good governance represent a cornerstone of the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Kazakhstan; B. Whereas the parliamentary elections in Kazakhstan held on 10 January 2021, despite some political reforms and good coordination of the authorities with the OSCE/ODIHR, were marked with limitations on fundamental freedoms, including the detention of peaceful demonstrators, as well as systemic shortcomings in relation to respect for freedom of association, of assembly and of expression; C.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Report
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0008/2021 28.1.2021 REPORT on the New Circular Economy Action Plan (2020/2077(INI)) Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Rapporteur: Jan Huitema Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Patrizia Toia, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Anna Cavazzini, Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection (*) Associated committees ˗ Rule 57 of the Rules of Procedure RR\1223517EN.docx PE652.387v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_INI CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 3 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 29 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY ............ 33 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ......................................................................................................................... 44 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE ................................... 51 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT AND TOURISM .............................. 57 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 66 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................ 75 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE .................................... 76 PE652.387v03-00 2/76 RR\1223517EN.docx EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on the New Circular Economy Action Plan (2020/2077(INI)) The European
    [Show full text]
  • 1.10.2020 A9-0162/169/Rev Amendment 169/Rev Anna
    1.10.2020 A9-0162/169/rev Amendment 169/rev Anna Zalewska, Alexandr Vondra, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Beata Kempa, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Elżbieta Kruk, Grzegorz Tobiszowski, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Mazurek, Angel Dzhambazki, Andrey Slabakov, Joanna Kopcińska, Andżelika Anna Możdżanowska, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Izabela-Helena Kloc, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk on behalf of the ECR Group Report A9-0162/2020 Jytte Guteland European Climate Law (COM(2020)0080 – COM(2020)0563 – C9-0077/2020 – 2020/0036(COD)) Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment This Regulation recognises climate change as a collective challenge that requires collective solutions based on fair and just transition. In the spirit of fairness, each Member State and each economic sector shall contribute to this challenge. Or. en AM\P9_AMA(2020)0162(169-175)_REV_EN.docx PE658.338v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 1.10.2020 A9-0162/170/rev Amendment 170/rev Anna Zalewska, Alexandr Vondra, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Eugen Jurzyca, Beata Kempa, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Elżbieta Kruk, Grzegorz Tobiszowski, Kosma Złotowski, Beata Mazurek, Angel Dzhambazki, Andrey Slabakov, Joanna Kopcińska, Andżelika Anna Możdżanowska, Zdzisław Krasnodębski, Izabela-Helena Kloc, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Zbigniew Kuźmiuk, on behalf of the ECR Group Report A9-0162/2020 Jytte Guteland European Climate Law (COM(2020)0080 – COM(2020)0563 – C9-0077/2020 – 2020/0036(COD)) Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph
    [Show full text]