PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA

PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD)

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL

FIFTY-FOURTH PARLIAMENT

FIRST SESSION

19 September 2001 (extract from Book 2)

Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard

By authority of the Victorian Government Printer

The Governor

JOHN LANDY, AC, MBE

The Lieutenant-Governor

Lady SOUTHEY, AM

The Ministry

Premier and Minister for Multicultural Affairs ...... The Hon. S. P. Bracks, MP

Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Planning...... The Hon. J. W. Thwaites, MP

Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister assisting the Minister for Workcover...... The Hon. M. M. Gould, MLC

Minister for Transport...... The Hon. P. Batchelor, MP

Minister for Energy and Resources, Minister for Ports and Minister assisting the Minister for State and Regional Development. . . The Hon. C. C. Broad, MLC

Minister for State and Regional Development and Treasurer...... The Hon. J. M. Brumby, MP

Minister for Local Government, Minister for Workcover and Minister assisting the Minister for Transport regarding Roads...... The Hon. R. G. Cameron, MP

Minister for Community Services...... The Hon. C. M. Campbell, MP

Minister for Education and Minister for the Arts...... The Hon. M. E. Delahunty, MP

Minister for Environment and Conservation and Minister for Women’s Affairs...... The Hon. S. M. Garbutt, MP

Minister for Police and Emergency Services and Minister for Corrections...... The Hon. A. Haermeyer, MP

Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs...... The Hon. K. G. Hamilton, MP

Attorney-General, Minister for Manufacturing Industry and Minister for Racing...... The Hon. R. J. Hulls, MP

Minister for Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment and Minister for Finance...... The Hon. L. J. Kosky, MP

Minister for Sport and Recreation, Minister for Youth Affairs and Minister assisting the Minister for Planning...... The Hon. J. M. Madden, MLC

Minister for Gaming, Minister for Major Projects and Tourism and Minister assisting the Premier on Multicultural Affairs...... The Hon. J. Pandazopoulos, MP

Minister for Housing, Minister for Aged Care and Minister assisting the Minister for Health ...... The Hon. B. J. Pike, MP

Minister for Small Business and Minister for Consumer Affairs...... The Hon. M. R. Thomson, MLC

Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet...... The Hon. G. W. Jennings Legislative Council Committees

Economic Development Committee — The Honourables R. A. Best, Andrea Coote G. R. Craige, Kaye Darveniza, N. B. Lucas, J. M. McQuilten and T. C. Theophanous.

Privileges Committee — The Honourables W. R. Baxter, D. McL. Davis, C. A. Furletti, M. M. Gould and G. W. Jennings.

Standing Orders Committee — The Honourables the President, G. B. Ashman, B. W. Bishop, G. W. Jennings, Jenny Mikakos, G. D. Romanes and K. M. Smith.

Joint Committees

Drugs and Crime Prevention Committee — (Council): The Honourables B. C. Boardman and S. M. Nguyen. (Assembly): Mr Cooper, Mr Jasper, Mr Lupton, Mr Mildenhall and Mr Wynne.

Environment and Natural Resources Committee — (Council): The Honourables R. F. Smith and E. G. Stoney. (Assembly): Mr Delahunty, Ms Duncan, Mrs Fyffe, Ms Lindell and Mr Seitz.

Family and Community Development Committee — (Council): The Honourables E. J. Powell, G. D. Romanes and J. W. G. Ross. (Assembly): Mr Hardman, Mr Lim, Mr Nardella and Mrs Peulich.

House Committee — (Council): The Honourables the President (ex officio), G. B. Ashman, R. A. Best, J. M. McQuilten, Jenny Mikakos and R. F. Smith. (Assembly): Mr Speaker (ex officio), Ms Beattie, Mr Kilgour, Ms McCall, Mr Rowe, Mr Savage and Mr Stensholt.

Law Reform Committee — (Council): The Honourables R. H. Bowden, D. G. Hadden and P. A. Katsambanis. (Assembly): Mr Languiller, Ms McCall, Mr Stensholt and Mr Thompson.

Library Committee — (Council): The Honourables the President, E. C. Carbines, M. T. Luckins, E. J. Powell and C. A. Strong. (Assembly): Mr Speaker, Ms Duncan, Mr Languiller, Mrs Peulich and Mr Seitz.

Printing Committee — (Council): The Honourables the President, Andrea Coote, Kaye Darveniza and E. J. Powell. (Assembly): Mr Speaker, Ms Gillett, Mr Nardella and Mr Richardson.

Public Accounts and Estimates Committee — (Council): The Honourables D. McL. Davis, R. M. Hallam, G. K. Rich-Phillips and T. C. Theophanous. (Assembly): Ms Barker, Mr Clark, Ms Davies, Mr Holding, Mr Loney and Mrs Maddigan.

Road Safety Committee — (Council): The Honourables Andrew Brideson and E. C. Carbines. (Assembly): Mr Kilgour, Mr Langdon, Mr Plowman, Mr Spry and Mr Trezise.

Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee — (Council): The Honourables M. A. Birrell, Jenny Mikakos, O. P. Olexander and C. A. Strong. (Assembly): Ms Beattie, Mr Carli, Ms Gillett, Mr Maclellan and Mr Robinson.

Heads of Parliamentary Departments

Assembly — Clerk of the Parliaments and Clerk of the Legislative Assembly: Mr R. W. Purdey Council — Clerk of the Legislative Council: Mr W. R. Tunnecliffe Hansard — Chief Reporter: Ms C. J. Williams Library — Librarian: Mr B. J. Davidson Parliamentary Services — Manager: Mr M. L. Bromley MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL

FIFTY-FOURTH PARLIAMENT — FIRST SESSION

President: The Hon. B. A. CHAMBERLAIN Deputy President and Chairman of Committees: The Hon. B. W. BISHOP Temporary Chairmen of Committees: The Honourables G. B. Ashman, R. A. Best, Kaye Darveniza, D. G. Hadden, P. R. Hall, Jenny Mikakos, R. F. Smith, E. G. Stoney and C. A. Strong Leader of the Government: The Hon. M. M. GOULD Deputy Leader of the Government: The Hon. G. W. JENNINGS Leader of the Opposition: The Hon. BILL FORWOOD from 13 September 2001 The Hon. M. A. BIRRELL to 13 September 2001 Deputy Leader of the Opposition: The Hon. C. A. FURLETTI from 13 September 2001 The Hon. BILL FORWOOD to 13 September 2001 Leader of the National Party: The Hon. P. R. HALL from 20 March 2001 The Hon. R. M. HALLAM to 20 March 2001

Deputy Leader of the National Party: The Hon. E. J. POWELL from 20 March 2001 The Hon. P. R. HALL to 20 March 2001

Member Province Party Member Province Party

Ashman, Hon. Gerald Barry Koonung LP Hall, Hon. Peter Ronald Gippsland NP Atkinson, Hon. Bruce Norman Koonung LP Hallam, Hon. Roger Murray Western NP Baxter, Hon. William Robert North Eastern NP Jennings, Hon. Gavin Wayne Melbourne ALP Best, Hon. Ronald Alexander North Western NP Katsambanis, Hon. Peter Argyris Monash LP Birrell, Hon. Mark Alexander East Yarra LP Lucas, Hon. Neil Bedford, PSM Eumemmerring LP Bishop, Hon. Barry Wilfred North Western NP Luckins, Hon. Maree Therese Waverley LP Boardman, Hon. Blair Cameron Chelsea LP McQuilten, Hon. John Martin Ballarat ALP Bowden, Hon. Ronald Henry South Eastern LP Madden, Hon. Justin Mark Doutta Galla ALP Brideson, Hon. Andrew Ronald Waverley LP Mikakos, Hon. Jenny Jika Jika ALP Broad, Hon. Candy Celeste Melbourne North ALP Nguyen, Hon. Sang Minh Melbourne West ALP Carbines, Hon. Elaine Cafferty Geelong ALP Olexander, Hon. Andrew Phillip Silvan LP Chamberlain, Hon. Bruce Anthony Western LP Powell, Hon. Elizabeth Jeanette North Eastern NP Coote, Hon. Andrea Monash LP Rich-Phillips, Hon. Gordon Kenneth Eumemmerring LP Cover, Hon. Ian James Geelong LP Romanes, Hon. Glenyys Dorothy Melbourne ALP Craige, Hon. Geoffrey Ronald Central Highlands LP Ross, Hon. John William Gamaliel Higinbotham LP Darveniza, Hon. Kaye Melbourne West ALP Smith, Hon. Kenneth Maurice South Eastern LP Davis, Hon. David McLean East Yarra LP Smith, Hon. Robert Fredrick Chelsea ALP Davis, Hon. Philip Rivers Gippsland LP Smith, Hon. Wendy Irene Silvan LP Forwood, Hon. Bill Templestowe LP Stoney, Hon. Eadley Graeme Central Highlands LP Furletti, Hon. Carlo Angelo Templestowe LP Strong, Hon. Christopher Arthur Higinbotham LP Gould, Hon. Monica Mary Doutta Galla ALP Theophanous, Hon. Theo Charles Jika Jika ALP Hadden, Hon. Dianne Gladys Ballarat ALP Thomson, Hon. Marsha Rose Melbourne North ALP

CONTENTS

WEDNESDAY, 19 SEPTEMBER 2001 Minister for Industrial Relations: responsibilities...... 153 AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICALS Responses ...... 153 (CONTROL OF USE) (FURTHER AMENDMENT) NAMING OF MEMBER...... 149 BILL Introduction and first reading...... 93 PAPER ...... 93 BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Sessional orders ...... 93, 105 Standing orders...... 104 Adjournment...... 145 STAMP DUTY: REFORM ...... 110 QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE Boating: licences...... 115 Industrial relations: disputes...... 115 Retail tenancies: leases...... 115 Electricity: ministers forum...... 116 Petrol: terminal gate pricing...... 117 International Association of Athletics Federations ...... 117 Freeza program ...... 117 Ansett Australia: Traveland ...... 118 Ventura Bus Lines Pty Ltd...... 118 Fishing: scallop...... 119 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Answers...... 119, 145 PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL Second reading...... 120 Third reading...... 132 Remaining stages ...... 132 COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL Second reading...... 132 Third reading...... 143 Remaining stages ...... 143 BUSINESS INVESTIGATIONS (REPEAL) BILL Introduction and first reading...... 143 INFERTILITY TREATMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL Second reading...... 143 ADJOURNMENT Maroondah Highway–Don Road: traffic control...... 145 Road safety: vehicle testers ...... 145 Rail: regional links...... 146 Housing: rent security ...... 146 Epsom Primary School...... 147 Schools: walking bus program...... 147 Australian Football League: grand final tickets...... 147 Freeza program ...... 149 Gippsland: coastal subsidence...... 150 Insurance: public liability ...... 150 Roads: holiday traffic ...... 151 Pakenham bypass...... 151 Monashlink Community Health Centre...... 151 Rail: Somerville crossing...... 152 Pakenham Secondary College ...... 152 Alfred hospital...... 152 Barwon Heads Football and Netball Club...... 153 CONTENTS

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE 1526. Energy and Resources: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts...... 168 THURSDAY, 16 AUGUST 2001 1527. Energy and Resources: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 168 1497. Industrial Relations: Sweeney Research Pty 1528. Energy and Resources: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd contracts...... 157 Ltd — contracts...... 168 1498. Industrial Relations: Sweeney Research Pty 1529. Ports: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — Ltd contracts...... 157 contracts...... 169 1499. Industrial Relations: Shannon’s Way Pty 1530. Ports: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — Ltd — contracts...... 157 contracts...... 169 1500. Industrial Relations: Shannon’s Way Pty 1531. Ports: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 169 Ltd — contracts...... 158 1532. Ports: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 170 1501. Premier: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1533. Treasurer: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 158 contracts...... 170 1502. Premier: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1534. Treasurer: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 159 contracts...... 170 1503. Premier: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1535. Treasurer: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 159 contracts...... 170 1504. Premier: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1536. Treasurer: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 159 contracts...... 171 1505. Workcover: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1537. State and Regional Development: Sweeney contracts ...... 160 Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 171 1506. Workcover: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1538. State and Regional Development: Sweeney contracts ...... 160 Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 171 1507. Workcover: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1539. State and Regional Development: contracts ...... 160 Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 171 1508. Workcover: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1540. State and Regional Development: contracts ...... 161 Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 172 1509. Arts: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1541. Environment and Conservation: Sweeney contracts ...... 161 Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 172 1510. Arts: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1542. Environment and Conservation: Sweeney contracts ...... 162 Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 172 1511. Arts: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 162 1543. Environment and Conservation: Shannon’s 1512. Arts: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 163 Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 172 1513. Health: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1544. Environment and Conservation: Shannon’s contracts ...... 163 Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 173 1514. Health: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1545. Agriculture: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 163 contracts...... 173 1515. Health: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 163 1546. Agriculture: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1516. Health: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 164 contracts...... 173 1517. Finance: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1547. Agriculture: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 164 contracts...... 174 1518. Finance: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1548. Agriculture: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 165 contracts...... 174 1519. Finance: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1549. Transport: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 165 contracts...... 174 1520. Finance: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1550. Transport: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 165 contracts...... 175 1521. Multicultural Affairs: Sweeney Research 1551. Transport: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 166 contracts...... 175 1522. Multicultural Affairs: Sweeney Research 1552. Transport: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 166 contracts...... 175 1523. Multicultural Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty 1553. Local Government: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts...... 167 Ltd — contracts...... 176 1524. Multicultural Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty 1554. Local Government: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 167 Ltd — contracts...... 176 1525. Energy and Resources: Sweeney Research 1555. Local Government: Shannon’s Way Pty Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 167 Ltd — contracts...... 176 CONTENTS

1556. Local Government: Shannon’s Way Pty 1583. Planning: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — Ltd — contracts...... 177 contracts...... 186 1557. Sport and Recreation: Sweeney Research 1584. Planning: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — Pty Ltd — contracts...... 177 contracts...... 186 1558. Sport and Recreation: Sweeney Research 1585. Manufacturing Industry: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts...... 177 Pty Ltd — contracts...... 187 1559. Sport and Recreation: Shannon’s Way Pty 1586. Manufacturing Industry: Sweeney Research Ltd — contracts...... 178 Pty Ltd — contracts...... 187 1560. Sport and Recreation: Shannon’s Way Pty 1587. Manufacturing Industry: Shannon’s Way Ltd — contracts...... 178 Pty Ltd — contracts...... 187 1561. Youth Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1588. Manufacturing Industry: Shannon’s Way contracts...... 178 Pty Ltd — contracts...... 188 1562. Youth Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1589. Racing: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts...... 179 contracts...... 188 1563. Youth Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1590. Racing: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts...... 179 contracts...... 188 1564. Youth Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1591. Racing: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 179 contracts...... 189 1565. Education: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1592. Racing: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 179 contracts...... 189 1566. Education: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1593. Major Projects and Tourism: Sweeney contracts...... 180 Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 189 1567. Education: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1594. Major Projects and Tourism: Sweeney contracts...... 180 Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 190 1568. Education: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1595. Major Projects and Tourism: Shannon’s contracts...... 180 Way Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 190 1569. Post Compulsory Education, Training and 1596. Major Projects and Tourism: Shannon’s Employment: Sweeney Research Pty Way Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 190 Ltd — contracts...... 181 1597. Gaming: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1570. Post Compulsory Education, Training and contracts...... 190 Employment: Sweeney Research Pty 1598. Gaming: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — Ltd — contracts...... 181 contracts...... 191 1571. Post Compulsory Education, Training and 1599. Gaming: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — Employment: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts...... 191 contracts...... 182 1600. Gaming: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1572. Post Compulsory Education, Training and contracts...... 191 Employment: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1601. Small Business: Sweeney Research Pty contracts...... 182 Ltd — contracts ...... 191 1573. Police and Emergency Services: Sweeney 1602. Small Business: Sweeney Research Pty Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 182 Ltd — contracts ...... 192 1574. Police and Emergency Services: Sweeney 1603. Small Business: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — Research Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 183 contracts...... 192 1575. Police and Emergency Services: Shannon’s 1604. Small Business: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — Way Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 183 contracts...... 192 1576. Police and Emergency Services: Shannon’s 1605. Consumer Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Way Pty Ltd — contracts ...... 184 Ltd — contracts ...... 192 1577. Corrections: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1606. Consumer Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty contracts...... 184 Ltd — contracts ...... 193 1578. Corrections: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1607. Consumer Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty contracts...... 184 Ltd — contracts ...... 193 1579. Corrections: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1608. Consumer Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty contracts...... 185 Ltd — contracts ...... 194 1580. Corrections: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1609. Attorney-General: Sweeney Research Pty contracts...... 185 Ltd — contracts ...... 194 1581. Planning: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1610. Attorney-General: Sweeney Research Pty contracts...... 185 Ltd — contracts ...... 195 1582. Planning: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1611. Attorney-General: Shannon’s Way Pty contracts...... 186 Ltd — contracts ...... 195 CONTENTS

1612. Attorney-General: Shannon’s Way Pty 1801. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 238 Ltd — contracts...... 195 1802. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 239 1613. Women’s Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty 1803. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 239 Ltd — contracts...... 196 1804. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 239 1614. Women’s Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty 1805. Aged Care: statewide programs centrally Ltd — contracts...... 196 managed ...... 239 1615. Women’s Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty 1810. Aged Care: sub-acute services funding...... 240 Ltd — contracts...... 197 1817. Aged Care: Hospital in the Home program 1616. Women’s Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty and post-acute care funding...... 240 Ltd — contracts...... 197 1818. Aged Care: Hospital to Home program...... 240 1617. Community Services: Sweeney Research Pty 1819. Aged Care: Hospital Demand Strategy...... 241 Ltd — contracts...... 197 1824. Aged Care: Hospital in the Home program...... 242 1618. Community Services: Sweeney Research Pty 1839. Housing: high-rise public housing estates — Ltd — contracts...... 198 fire risk management...... 242 1619. Community Services: Shannon’s Way Pty 1840. Housing: Raglan–Ingles estate, Port Ltd — contracts...... 198 Melbourne ...... 244 1620. Community Services: Shannon’s Way Pty 1841. Housing: public housing — tenure reviews ...... 244 Ltd — contracts...... 199 1851. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 244 1621. Housing: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1852. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 245 contracts ...... 199 1853. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 245 1622. Housing: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1854. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 245 contracts ...... 199 1855. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 245 1623. Housing: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1856. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 246 contracts ...... 199 1857. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 246 1624. Housing: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1858. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 246 contracts ...... 200 1859. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 246 1625. Aboriginal Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty 1862. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 247 Ltd — contracts...... 200 1863. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 247 1626. Aboriginal Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty 1864. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 247 Ltd — contracts...... 201 1867. Ports: West Swanson Dock ...... 247 1627. Aboriginal Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty 1868. Ports: West Swanson Dock ...... 247 Ltd — contracts...... 201 1869. Ports: West Swanson Dock ...... 248 1628. Aboriginal Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty 1874. Ports: West Swanson Dock ...... 248 Ltd — contracts...... 201 1875. Ports: Webb Dock...... 248 1670. Aged Care: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1876. Education: extension education program ...... 249 contracts ...... 202 1877. Education: extension education program ...... 249 1671. Aged Care: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — 1878. Health: pastoral carers and counsellors — contracts ...... 202 funding...... 249 1672. Aged Care: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1905. Housing: training — departmental and contracts ...... 202 housing officers...... 251 1673. Aged Care: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — 1908. Housing: public housing — new and contracts ...... 203 upgraded...... 251 1724. Housing: social housing innovations project...... 203 1909. Housing: public housing — sales and 1775. Community Services: preschool funding ...... 206 demolition...... 252 1780. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 230 1910. Education: eastern metropolitan region 1781. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 230 annual report...... 253 1782. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 230 1913. Education: schools nursing program ...... 253 1789. Major Projects and Tourism: regional 1914. Small Business: Small Business Advisory events audit...... 231 Council ...... 256 1790. Major Projects and Tourism: 1915. Major Projects and Tourism: Tourism gold discovery anniversary ...... 232 Victoria — board ...... 256 1791. State and Regional Development: Rural 1916. Major Projects and Tourism: overseas Community Development program ...... 233 tourism marketing budget ...... 257 1792. Major Projects and Tourism: Tourism 1917. State and Regional Development: annual Industry and Infrastructure Development summit of rural and regional mayors...... 257 program...... 233 1918. State and Regional Development: regional 1793. Major Projects and Tourism: Event strategic leadership ...... 258 Facilitation program ...... 235 1919. State and Regional Development: regional 1800. Ports: proposed third stevedore...... 238 development web site...... 258 CONTENTS

1920. State and Regional Development: timeliness 1827. Housing: SAAP funding ...... 270 of advice to RIDF applicants...... 258 1828. Housing: SAAP funding ...... 270 1921. State and Regional Development: Bonlac 1829. Housing: Office of Housing operating closure ...... 259 expenses ...... 271 1922. State and Regional Development: one-stop 1830. Housing: SAAP funding ...... 271 shops pilot ...... 259 1831. Small Business: commonwealth–state 1923. State and Regional Development: business housing agreement ...... 271 development output costs ...... 259 1832. Housing: women’s housing policy...... 272 1924. State and Regional Development: business 1833. Housing: Thomson estate, Geelong...... 273 events assistance...... 259 1834. Housing: public tenants — eligibility 1925. State and Regional Development: criteria review...... 274 administration of business event funding...... 260 1835. Housing: segmented waiting list review...... 275 1926. State and Regional Development: enterprise 1837. Housing: interdepartmental committee on improvement services ...... 260 homelessness...... 275 1927. State and Regional Development: regional 1842. Multicultural Affairs: budget ...... 276 development output...... 261 1843. Multicultural Affairs: budget ...... 277 1928. State and Regional Development: strategic 1844. Multicultural Affairs: budget ...... 277 audit of Victorian industry ...... 261 1845. Multicultural Affairs: budget ...... 278 1929. State and Regional Development: rural 1846. Multicultural Affairs: budget ...... 278 community development networks...... 261 1847. Multicultural Affairs: budget ...... 278 1930. State and Regional Development: 1848. Multicultural Affairs: Racial and Religious monitoring and administrative systems — Tolerance Bill — community regional areas...... 262 consultations...... 279 1938. Small Business: Ethnic Enterprise Advisory 1849. Multicultural Affairs: Racial and Religious Council ...... 262 Tolerance Bill — education campaign ...... 279 1939. Consumer Affairs: Florida Direct ...... 262 1850. Multicultural Affairs: Ethnic Enterprise 1983. Industrial Relations: Essential Media Advisory Council ...... 280 Communications...... 263 1860. Premier: racial and religious vilification...... 280 1984. Industrial Relations: Essential Media 1861. Premier: Emily’s List Victoria — funding ...... 281 Communications...... 263 1866. Ports: West Swanson Dock ...... 281 1985. Industrial Relations: Essential Media 1870. Multicultural Affairs: Macedonian Teachers Communications...... 263 Association of Victoria...... 281 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE 1871. Corrections: prisoner capacity and population ...... 282 TUESDAY, 18 SEPTEMBER 2001 1872. Corrections: prisoners’ bank accounts...... 283 1873. Corrections: Office of the Correctional 1765. Planning: security of payments task force...... 265 Services Commissioner — staff ...... 284 1778. Multicultural Affairs: Office of 1879. Treasurer: regional railway lines Multicultural Affairs — staff...... 265 standardisation — funding...... 285 1779. Multicultural Affairs: Victorian 1880. Treasurer: country rail services — funding...... 285 Multicultural Commission — staff...... 265 1881. Treasurer: Better Business Taxes package...... 285 1806. Aged Care: regional funding allocations...... 266 1882. Treasurer: budget — comparative data...... 286 1807. Aged Care: regional funding allocations...... 266 1883. Treasurer: budget — comparative data...... 286 1808. Aged Care: budget targets ...... 266 1884. Treasurer: budget — tax savings...... 286 1809. Aged Care: Caulfield General Medical 1885. Treasurer: budget — comparative data...... 287 Centre ...... 266 1886. Treasurer: budget — gambling taxes...... 288 1811. Aged Care: Hospital to Home program...... 267 1887. Treasurer: budget — investment income ...... 288 1812. Aged Care: residential aged care facilities 1888. Treasurer: budget — asset investment ...... 288 funding...... 267 1889. Treasurer: rural and regional Victoria — 1813. Aged Care: Wintringham development...... 267 infrastructure projects...... 289 1814. Aged Care: HACC service system 1890. Treasurer: projected debt level...... 289 development and resourcing...... 268 1891. Treasurer: Growing Victoria reserve...... 289 1815. Aged Care: adult day care and community 1892. Treasurer: Growing Victoria reserve...... 290 rehabilitation centres...... 268 1893. Treasurer: Snowy River...... 290 1821. Aged Care: fire risk management...... 268 1894. Treasurer: marine national parks ...... 290 1822. Aged Care: direct service delivery ...... 269 1895. Treasurer: interstate migration ...... 290 1823. Aged Care: program funding...... 269 1896. Treasurer: job creation — rural and 1825. Aged Care: HACC nursing and allied regional Victoria...... 291 health ...... 270 1897. Treasurer: budget surplus...... 291 CONTENTS

1898. Treasurer: unfunded superannuation 1954. Post Compulsory Education, Training and liabilities ...... 291 Employment: Victorian Workcover 1899. Treasurer: workers compensation — Authority chairman...... 302 common-law rights ...... 292 1955. Corrections: Victorian Workcover Authority 1900. Housing: training for departmental and chairman...... 302 community housing workers...... 292 1958. Attorney-General: Victorian Workcover 1901. Housing: training for departmental and Authority chairman...... 302 community housing workers...... 293 1959. Community Services: Victorian Workcover 1902. Housing: training for departmental and Authority chairman...... 302 community housing workers...... 293 1961. Housing: Victorian Workcover Authority 1903. Treasurer: Transport Accident chairman...... 303 Commission — dividend...... 293 1962. Aboriginal Affairs: Victorian Workcover 1904. Treasurer: Tipstar footy tipping Authority chairman...... 303 competition — revenue projections ...... 294 1963. Small Business: Victorian Workcover 1911. Transport: Scoresby freeway — current Authority chairman...... 303 vehicle numbers ...... 294 1964. Consumer Affairs: Victorian Workcover 1912. Transport: Scoresby freeway — current Authority chairman...... 303 vehicle numbers ...... 295 1965. Workcover: Transport Accident 1931. Workcover: Victorian Workcover Commission chairman...... 304 Authority — chairman...... 296 1966. Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority 1932. Workcover: Transport Accident chairman...... 304 Commission — chairman...... 296 1967. Workcover: Transport Accident 1933. Premier: Victorian Workcover Authority Commission chairman...... 304 chairman...... 297 1968. Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority 1934. State and Regional Development: Victorian chairman...... 304 Workcover Authority chairman ...... 297 1969. Workcover: Transport Accident 1935. Treasurer: Victorian Workcover Authority Commission chairman...... 305 chairman...... 297 1970. Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority 1936. Transport: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman...... 305 chairman...... 298 1971. Workcover: Transport Accident 1937. Finance: Victorian Workcover Authority Commission board...... 305 chairman...... 298 1972. Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority 1940. Energy and Resources: Victorian board...... 306 Workcover Authority chairman ...... 298 1973. Workcover: Transport Accident 1941. Environment and Conservation: Victorian Commission and Victorian Workcover Workcover Authority chairman ...... 298 Authority — chairman...... 306 1942. Agriculture: Victorian Workcover Authority 1974. Workcover: Transport Accident chairman...... 299 Commission board...... 306 1943. Local Government: Victorian Workcover 1975. Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority Authority chairman...... 299 board...... 307 1944. Health: Victorian Workcover Authority 1976. Workcover: Transport Accident chairman...... 299 Commission board...... 307 1945. Arts: Victorian Workcover Authority 1977. Workcover: Transport Accident chairman...... 299 Commission board...... 307 1946. Multicultural Affairs: Victorian Workcover 1978. Workcover: Transport Accident Authority chairman...... 300 Commission chairman...... 307 1947. Industrial Relations: Victorian Workcover 1979. Ports: ministerial staff ...... 308 Authority chairman...... 300 1980. Youth Affairs: ministerial staff ...... 308 1948. Planning: Victorian Workcover Authority 1981. Consumer Affairs: ministerial staff...... 308 chairman...... 300 1982. Sport and Recreation: ministerial staff...... 309 1950. Major Projects and Tourism: Victorian 1986. Energy and Resources: ministerial staff...... 309 Workcover Authority chairman ...... 301 1987. Small Business: ministerial staff ...... 309 1951. Gaming: Victorian Workcover Authority 1988. Industrial Relations: ministerial staff ...... 309 chairman...... 301 1989. Health: ministerial staff...... 310 1952. Education: Victorian Workcover Authority 1991. Workcover: ministerial staff...... 310 chairman...... 301 1992. Arts: ministerial staff ...... 310 1953. Police and Emergency Services: Victorian 1995. Environment and Conservation: West Workcover Authority chairman ...... 301 Gippsland Catchment Management Authority...... 311 CONTENTS

1996. Ports: channel deepening...... 311 2111. Treasurer: metropolitan transport system 1997. Ports: port and shipping revenues...... 311 subsidy...... 330 1998. Ports: Linking Victoria program ...... 312 2116. Community Services: commonwealth–state 1999. Ports: channel deepening...... 312 disability agreement ...... 330 2000. Ports: traffic targets...... 312 2119. Community Services: commonwealth 2001. Ports: boat operator licensing fees...... 312 funding for preschool programs...... 331 2002. Ports: Coode Island berthing structure...... 313 2120. Community Services: commonwealth–state 2003. Ports: grain exports...... 313 disability agreement ...... 332 2004. Ports: grain exports...... 313 2121. Community Services: commonwealth–state 2005. Ports: rail standardisation project ...... 313 disability agreement ...... 332 2006. Ports: Victorian economy...... 314 2122. Major Projects and Tourism: tourism online 2007. Ports: food and fibre exports...... 314 project...... 333 2008. Ports: freight and logistics committee...... 314 2123. Small Business: Showcasing Small Business...... 334 2009. Energy and Resources: oil and gas 2124. State and Regional Development: Regional exploration permits...... 314 Infrastructure Development Fund...... 334 2010. Energy and Resources: gas pipelines...... 315 2125. State and Regional Development: rural 2011. Energy and Resources: minerals and community development officers ...... 335 resources revenue...... 315 2139. Treasurer: TQM Legal and Accounting...... 336 2012. Energy and Resources: fisheries revenue ...... 315 2140. Treasurer: SRO — computer equipment...... 336 2013. Energy and Resources: inland and coastal 2141. Treasurer: SRO — web site development ...... 337 fishing licences...... 316 2142. Treasurer: SRO — CIPAC project...... 337 2014. Energy and Resources: yabby aquaculture...... 316 2143. Treasurer: SRO — Java development...... 337 2015. Energy and Resources: relocation of 2144. Treasurer: SRO — information technology Marine and Freshwater Resources upgrades...... 338 Institute...... 317 2146. Treasurer: SRO — ESIS computer system...... 338 2016. Energy and Resources: fisheries...... 317 2017. Energy and Resources: greenhouse gases ...... 317 2018. Energy and Resources: solar heating grants...... 317 2019. Energy and Resources: electricity consumption...... 318 2020. Energy and Resources: aquaculture industry — performance measures...... 318 2021. Energy and Resources: coastal fishing enforcement operations...... 318 2022. Workcover: TAC and VWA — overlap of responsibility...... 319 2023. Workcover: premiums ...... 319 2024. Workcover: return on investments...... 319 2025. Workcover: common law...... 320 2026. Workcover: funding ...... 320 2027. Workcover: Treasury contribution ...... 321 2029. Local Government: beach cleaning...... 321 2030. Local Government: beach cleaning...... 322 2031. Local Government: beach cleaning...... 322 2033. Local Government: libraries...... 325 2034. Local Government: boundaries ...... 325 2035. Arts: State Library — conservation of newspapers...... 326 2036. Arts: State Library — conservation of newspapers...... 326 2037. Arts: State Library — conservation of newspapers...... 326 2039. Transport: Vicroads — noise amelioration ...... 327 2040. Transport: Vicroads — noise amelioration ...... 327 2041. Transport: Vicroads — noise amelioration ...... 328 2042. Transport: Vicroads — noise amelioration ...... 328 2069. Industrial Relations: Essential Media Communications...... 330

AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICALS (CONTROL OF USE) (FURTHER AMENDMENT) BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 93

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 ‘(f) the time appointed for the asking of questions without notice and the giving of answers to questions on notice shall be 2.00 p.m. on The PRESIDENT (Hon. B. A. Chamberlain) took the Tuesday and 10.00 a.m. on Wednesday and chair at 10.03 a.m. and read the prayer. Thursday.’

(b) these amendments shall have effect until 31 December AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY 2001. CHEMICALS (CONTROL OF USE) May is very clear that the procedures of the house are (FURTHER AMENDMENT) BILL the business of the house and can be modified by the Introduction and first reading house if it so desires. As one can see from the motion, the sessional orders under which we operate at the Received from Assembly. moment were first decided by this place in November 1999 and have been twice amended since. The Read first time on motion of Hon. C. C. BROAD proposition before the house is a simple trial of a new (Minister for Energy and Resources). system, a new time for questions without notice on two sitting days — namely, Wednesdays and Thursdays.

PAPER It is a minor evolution, a minor trial of a new system; it Laid on table by Clerk: is not a great change to the way this house operates. The house has a fine tradition of operating on a Melbourne City Link Act 1995 — Orders in Council of cooperative basis. As honourable members know, we 8 May, 4 September and 11 September 2001, decreasing the do not normally have time limits on anything. Project area, pursuant to section 8(4) of the Act (three papers). Hon. R. F. Smith — You can’t keep a straight face!

BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Hon. BILL FORWOOD — Thank you, Mr Smith. I was saying ‘normally’, because the practice of this Sessional orders house has never been to prevent an honourable member Hon. BILL FORWOOD (Templestowe) — I speaking on a topic for as long as he or she wishes, but move: recently, as Mr Smith would know, the President has indicated that during the adjournment debate we should That try to limit contributions to 3 minutes. Despite the fact that there are now notional time limits on the (a) the sessional orders relating to the business of the house adjournment debate, this house has never operated adopted by the Council on 4 November 1999, as amended on 31 May 2000 and 2 November 2000, be according to the codification and strict rules that now amended as follows: operate in other parliaments. This house has a tradition that will be maintained. 1. Omit paragraph (b) and insert: Last session we decided that we would look at the ‘(b) the transaction of government business shall take precedence of all other business, except standing orders of the house, and passed a motion to business governed by standing orders that effect. That process is under way and it will nos 20A, 68A and 86, from the conclusion of continue. My understanding is that at the most recent questions on Tuesday; from the conclusion of meeting on Monday the Senate standing orders were general business on Wednesday; and from the conclusion of debate on motions to take note tabled for consideration at the meeting of the Standing of reports on Thursday.’ Orders Committee, and that process will continue. Mr Bray has done some work on those issues. 2. Omit paragraph (c) and insert: The point I am making is that there is no hard and fast ‘(c) the transaction of general business shall take way that this chamber will operate. There are always precedence of all other business on Wednesday for 3 hours following questions, opportunities for the house to look at the way it excluding any period of suspension of the operates and the way it conducts its business. This is sitting.’ just another example where for a short time some trials can be made on the way we operate, and maybe we will 3. In paragraph (d), omit ‘formal business’ and insert ‘questions’ continue to operate in this way in the future — maybe we will not. It is a flexible system. As honourable 4. Omit paragraph (f) and insert: members know, after we debate this issue this morning BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

94 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

we will deal with two other minor matters with regard I invite all ministers opposite — including the absent to the way the house operates under notices of motion, Minister for Sport and Recreation — to consider what general business, nos 9 and 10. the Premier personally committed them to. He personally committed them to answering questions When the government came to power in October 1999 directly and in a manner that does not waste the time of it made a considerable song and dance about the the Parliament. promise of being open, accountable and transparent. If one looks at some of the comments made by the The Premier also said in the letter that he would: Premier in response to the charter promoted by the Independents, one notes that in a letter dated Lead by example, by answering all questions specifically with the required detail to fully inform 12 October 1999 the Premier stated that his government members of the Parliament of the issues raised. would promote open and accountable government. He also said: It is not my intention this morning to go into detail about the way ministers opposite — — I have campaigned and fought for the creation of open and accountable government in Victoria for many years. It is my Hon. C. C. Broad — That is because you can’t! greatest priority to ensure that the Victorian community has its respect for our democratic institutions and system of government restored. Hon. BILL FORWOOD — Oh, Minister — yes, I can! Off the top of my head I could choose to use the The Premier went on to indicate also that he would be example of the Minister for Sport and Recreation leading a government that will promote debate as the yesterday. key to better policy making and outcomes for the people of Victoria. He also said in his response that he Hon. M. M. Gould — He answered the question! was personally committed to transforming Parliament Hon. BILL FORWOOD — The Leader of the into an open and democratic forum for the exchange of Government indicates that yesterday the Minister for ideas and the scrutiny of the executive government. I Sport and Recreation did answer it properly — I think stress that the Premier committed himself personally to her words were that. the scrutiny of the executive government. Hon. M. M. Gould — Yes. At that time he also made commitments to establish standing committees to review legislation and the Hon. BILL FORWOOD — Thank you. And I operation of the government, similar to the system in suspect that if honourable members refer to yesterday’s the Senate, which gets back to the point I made that the Hansard to read what was said, read the point of order Standing Orders Committee, as part of the work it is raised by my colleague Mr Atkinson and the response doing, is looking at the Senate standing orders. of the President on it, they will discover that not only did the minister not answer the question as was The PRESIDENT — Order! It is preferable if the appropriate, he then flouted the ruling. Leader of the Opposition does not refer to proceedings of a committee of this house. Hon. M. M. Gould — It was not a ruling. Don’t try to change — — Hon. BILL FORWOOD — Also in his response, in paragraph 2.2 under the heading ‘Revise both Hon. BILL FORWOOD — The English language sessional and standing orders of Parliament’, the is a wonderful thing. I suggest that members opposite Premier said: have a drink, get Hansard and read the exchange. (a) A requirement that ministers actually answer questions However, the point I wish to make goes to the matter of during question time open — —

As Premier in the Bracks Labor government I personally Honourable members interjecting. commit — The PRESIDENT — Order! I suggest the house again, he is personally committing — settle down to allow the Leader of the Opposition to put to the following: his case; then we will hear from the Leader of the Government. There are too many interjections at once. Instructing all ministers to answer questions directly and in a manner that does not waste the time of the Hon. BILL FORWOOD — Thank you very much, Parliament; Mr President. The issue we are dealing with is the issue of how people are aware of the operations of this house, BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 95

the commitment given by the government to open, As from this sessional period we now have a digitally honest, transparent and accountable government, and enhanced sound system. One of the problems in the the commitment that ministers will answer questions past was that the sound system in this place made it appropriately and within reasonable time. difficult for the media to receive broadcast quality sound. I recollect a debate some years ago when the In particular I refer to a comment made by the Leader then Leader of the Opposition, now a parliamentary of the Government during debate on sessional orders on secretary, the Honourable Theo Theophanous, was 4 November 1999. She said: wired for sound.

I am sure the opposition would like to have members of the Hon. T. C. Theophanous — Not me. media around. We agree — we would like to have members of the Hon. BILL FORWOOD — Not you? media around. The Leader of the Government Hon. T. C. Theophanous — The one next to me. continued: Hon. BILL FORWOOD — One back further — I would have liked them to have been around for today’s question time. However, if question time in the Council Mr White! We now have a sound system that can cope occurs at the same time as it does in the Assembly, the public with the media coming into this place, and one would and the media will not be able to see question time in both hope that if the house decides today that it will move houses. question time to 10 a.m. on Wednesdays and Thursdays One could suspect that one of the reasons we do not get we will have greater opportunities for television and a lot of media coverage in this house is that the 3AW — not just the Age and the Herald Sun but other ministers responsible for the carriage of government parts of the mainstream media — to follow the business in this house do not have a huge amount of processes of this house. responsibility. We do not have the Minister for Health, This is not a dastardly deed or some plan to destroy the the Treasurer or the Premier. I make the point that we way the house operates. This is a logical solution that have a Minister for Industrial Relations who does not we can try to see whether it works and review later if quite know what she does. we so wish. It is not the end of the way this house has Honourable members interjecting. operated over the past 150 years. We are not codifying the rules of the chamber, as we possibly could; all we The PRESIDENT — Order! This is hopeless. are doing is suggesting that in the interests of open, There will be plenty of time for debate and plenty of honest, transparent and accountable government we time for everybody to contribute. I ask the government ought to have question time in this place at a different members to allow the Leader of the Opposition to plead time from the Legislative Assembly — in the interests his case so that we can get on with other business. Let of attracting, if we can, the mainstream media, and so him put his case and then we will get the government’s that they can attend here. response. One of the points I should finally touch on is that there Hon. BILL FORWOOD — That has not always is a tradition in this place that it operates on a been the case, because in the early years of the Cain cooperative basis. It operates on the basis of discussion government my recollection is that there were ministers on how it can get things done. That has always been my here who did have responsibility for the portfolios of practice in the house, and that will continue. We will Attorney-General, transport and health. Under our continue to do it. What is disappointing is that government the Minister for Health was here. There sometimes new ideas are politicised. This is such a were occasions when ministers had significant good idea that I fully anticipated that the government portfolios. We should make it as easy as possible for would have accepted it because it is a good idea and it the house to be under scrutiny. It would be a good idea is committed to transparency and accountability, and to put into place a system where the key part of the would have politicised the issue and taken credit for it. work that this place does each day, that is, questions without notice, were scheduled at a time that enabled Hon. M. M. Gould interjected. members of the mainstream media to attend if they Hon. BILL FORWOOD — I thank the minister. wished. I do not know if they would take up the The government could possibly have taken credit for opportunity on offer, but what we are doing is trying to this idea of moving question time so that it would facilitate the access of this place to the mainstream facilitate greater scrutiny of the executive, as the media. Premier has indicated. I suggest that the house can BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

96 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

greatly benefit from a trial of question time on After the 1999 election the Liberal Party received Wednesdays and Thursdays at 10.00 a.m., and I 39.7 per cent of the primary vote for the Legislative commend the motion to the house. Council, yet occupied 54 per cent of the seats. The National Party received just over 7 per cent and held up Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial to 13 per cent of the seats in this place. The Labor Party Relations) — The government opposes the motion. It is received 42 per cent of the vote and only holds 31 per a shame that this motion is the first contribution of the cent of the seats. Leader of the Opposition. I remind honourable members of the comments he made before he The opposition’s motion to change sessional orders concluded his remarks about this being a cooperative without any discussion or consultation moves away house. In the seven years that I have been in this place, from the traditional practices of this house. It wants to and in a leadership position since 1996, I have always just ram it through the Parliament without any worked cooperatively with the government and the consultation. opposition. I propose to move amendments to the Honourable Bill On this occasion the first motion moved by Forwood’s motion and ask for copies of those Mr Forwood as Leader of the Opposition is to change amendments to be circulated. I move: sessional orders without consultation with the government. I am sure he consulted with the National 1. In paragraph (b), omit ‘from the conclusion of questions on Tuesday; from the conclusion of general business on Party. He talks about open, accountable and transparent Wednesday’ and insert ‘on Tuesday, from 2.00 p.m. on government, which we are, but the opposition is not Wednesday’. open, transparent and accountable. This is about changing the sessional orders that the opposition 2. In paragraph (c) omit ‘for 3 hours following questions, excluding any period of suspension of the sitting.’ and changed in 1999, and the Leader of the Opposition has insert ‘until 2.00 p.m.’. used the same argument today. The argument then was, ‘We do not want to have government question time at 3. Omit amendment No. 3. 2.30 p.m. anymore, as it used to be under the previous 4. In paragraph (f), omit ‘2.00 p.m. on Tuesday, and government. We want to change it to 2 o’clock because 10.00 a.m. on Wednesday and Thursday’ and insert we do not want to give the government the chance to ‘2.30 p.m.’. talk to its ministerial colleagues in another place’. The opposition now wants to change it. Was there any Basically the government’s proposed amendments will discussion or consultation about it? No! It will use its return to the sessional orders the opposition moved numbers and ram it through the Parliament. So much back in 1999 with question time taking place at for consultation and cooperation! 2.30 p.m. on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, as occurred under the previous government when the The Leader of the Opposition has moved a motion that Leader of the Opposition was a backbencher. This will will move question time to 10 o’clock in the morning overcome one of the major arguments of the Leader of so that he can get the media in here. He uses the the Opposition for proposing the motion, and that was argument on the assumption that the media will attend. getting the media to come to question time in the upper He said at one point that the government does not have house. With question time taking place in the other important ministers in this house. The opposition does place at 2 o’clock, by 2.30 p.m. it will be close to not care about the youth of the state, small business, conclusion and the media will be able to come. We energy and resources and the working people of this have even set up facilities that are a lot better for the state, but those areas are represented by ministers in this media than in the past. This practice has already been house. tested when it operated under the previous government. If the opposition had been prepared to consult with the The Leader of the Opposition says that we do not care government on these proposed changes, we possibly about small business, energy and resources, youth or would have been able to come to a sensible the working people in this state, but the ministers in this arrangement in line with the amendments I propose. place represent those areas. The opposition has used the argument that this house is a house of review and we Another argument presented by the Leader of the are into consultation and cooperation, but what it Opposition was that a motion before the house last proposes today is exactly what it did last year — session had looked at reviewing the sessional orders oppose the government’s agenda to reform the upper and the standing orders. An extensive consultation house. It voted down the legislation that would make process was undertaken between the former Leader of this house properly represent the people of Victoria. the Opposition and the present Leader of the BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 97

Opposition and the leaders of the government to ensure are of any relevance or importance. That is that that motion was acceptable to all parties and to disappointing because I thought opposition members allow for that process to be undertaken. That was were a little better than that. I do not often give them achieved through a consultation process and it was credit, but I thought they were genuinely concerned agreed it was an area that needed to be looked at to about those areas. ensure some of the language was brought up to the 21st century. Today the Leader of the Opposition is I oppose Mr Forwood’s motion and support the proposing to gazump all that and bring in new sessional amendments I have moved. orders and to ram them through Parliament. The opposition has the numbers and it will be a fait Hon. P. R. HALL (Gippsland) — The National accompli, without the government able to even put its Party has always been prepared to give earnest point of view, but which it will do during the course of consideration to any proposed changes to the operations the debate today. of this house. Indeed, there have been many changes to sessional orders over the years. As has been mentioned The government’s amendments are reasonable. In by previous speakers, the last change to sessional orders wanting to change question time to 10 o’clock in the took place just on two years ago in this house. During morning just to suit his media requirements, the Leader the time I have spent here it seems to be a regular of the Opposition obviously must believe that his leader occurrence that sessional orders are changed at least in the other place is not doing such a good job so he has every time there has been an election, with new ideas to try to grab the limelight. He is obviously not getting being brought in by new people to this house. The the media attention he thinks he deserves so he is trying National Party has always been prepared to consider to undermine the leader in the other place by grabbing those proposals for change. some media attention at 10 o’clock in the morning through his questioning of the government. We know The history of change has been significant. Sessional this is about the difficulties faced by the opposition and orders of 12 years or 13 years ago are significantly that the Leader of the Opposition is trying to assert different to what they are now. When I first came to this himself and trying to pick up the slack his leader in the house question time was the first item of business every other place has obviously let fall. day. The starting times for the operation of the house varied also. When I came here in 1988, Wednesday The government amendments will allow for question mornings were set aside for committee work and the time to take place at 2.30 p.m. on Tuesdays, Parliament did not sit until much later in the morning. Wednesdays and Thursdays. General business will The first item of business at that time was questions continue and the opposition will have its opportunity on without notice. Thursday with respect to reports. It will not take away any opportunities for the opposition to present its So there has been a history of changes and what we are arguments and it is an opportunity for the media to proposing here today is not so dramatic or earth attend, which was one of the major arguments of the shattering as to justify the response we have heard from Leader of the Opposition. The reason for that argument the government, which appears to say this is some is that he sees his leader in another place falling over so sinister move to refocus the whole operation of the he will try to assist in picking him up. Legislative Council in the Parliament of Victoria. It is not. As the motion clearly states — — I thought the Leader of the Opposition had worked cooperatively with the government over the time he has Hon. C. C. Broad interjected. been in the leadership position. What he has proposed Hon. P. R. HALL — I have listened very carefully here today obviously shows there is a new leader and to the interjections and to the contribution to this debate that will not be the case any more. The government by the Leader of the Government, and it seems to me does not believe Mr Forwood’s motion should be that the only reason advanced by the government for supported. The amendments I propose should be opposing the motion put forward by the Leader of the supported and they will cover the areas the Leader of Opposition is that the government was not consulted on the Opposition has presented. The government believes this matter. that starting at 2.30 p.m. will accommodate his issues. Hon. C. C. Broad — That is not correct. I am concerned about the comments the Leader of the Opposition made about the opposition’s views of youth, Hon. P. R. HALL — That is the only logical energy resources and small businesses in this state and argument that the Leader of the Government advanced about working people, and that it does not believe they in opposition to this motion. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

98 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

Hon. C. C. Broad interjected. sitting and the current spring sitting, and in fact a much-maligned system — which I hope will add to the Hon. P. R. HALL — It is? If the Honourable Candy net level of accountability that the Parliament has to the Broad has something further to add we look forward to people of Victoria through the appropriate recording of her contribution to this debate. I suggest that she get on our contributions. Indeed, there were some decent her feet instead of just interjecting all the time. contributions made in the Parliament yesterday. However, I did not have an opportunity to contribute to The Leader of the Government clearly based her debate on either the condolence motion or the motion to objections to this motion on the fact that there had been express concern for those who are grieving as a result no consultation. As I said, this is hardly an of terrorism activity. earth-shattering motion and it will not change the whole nature of the Legislative Council. One would have In the course of my contribution this morning I will thought government members would have the mental highlight that at its best this chamber has a contribution capacity to consider such a minor change while on their to make. I believe there were some fleeting moments feet in this house. We do not have to consult about yesterday when this chamber was at its best, and the every single little issue, particularly when it simply glowing contribution of the Leader of the Opposition to changes the time of questions without notice from the debate on the condolence motion for Bill Borthwick 2 o’clock in the afternoon to 10 o’clock in the morning. was one of those occasions. My entry point to this discussion is to take a direct lift from something the I happen to think changing the time of questions Leader of the Opposition said in that debate. He without notice to the start of the day is not a bad thing referred to a line in the article that Tim Colebatch wrote because at least first thing in the day when people come about Bill Borthwick, which stated that today’s to this place their minds are more alert to the business politicians have much to learn from the contribution of of the house. We might actually get some better politicians such as Bill Borthwick. contributions and better outcomes from questions without notice if we have it at the start of the day For my part I want to say to the Leader of the instead of in the middle of the afternoon, so I think it is Opposition that this resolution we are debating today not a bad change. gives rise to some valuable lessons for him and some valuable lessons for us all in the way we relate to one Further to that, it is important in this debate to recognise another for the rest of this sessional period. The first that this is a trial. The motion clearly says that ‘these lesson I draw attention to is not to be seduced by the amendments shall have effect until 31 December 2001’, politics of one-upmanship, which is at the heart of the and I and my National Party colleagues have absolutely nature of the dispute between us this morning in terms no objection to a trial of having questions without of whether there has been consultation about and notice at the start of each sitting day for the rest of this consideration of the motion and amendments before us, spring session. We are happy to support this motion. and in terms of the way we do business with one The Leader of the Government has suggested we revert another in this place. back to the sessional orders as they were two years ago In the previous sitting of this Parliament, for week upon before they were changed after the last election. Once week there was a motion on the notice paper which was again that is just a lame excuse that she has used to not brought forward but which was left there in an support opposition to this motion. No logical reason has attempt to obtain a clear level of agreement on the been advanced by the government for its opposition to reference that this chamber gave the Standing Orders the motion or for the amendments that have been put Committee of the Legislative Council, which was to before the house. As I said, the proposal is for a trial for consider the practices we should adopt and the the year 2001. It is a sensible trial, and I am optimistic it recommendations we should consider in the future on will prove to be a very successful innovation. I am the way we do business with one another. In fact, it was happy to support this motion and reject the not until the final day of the autumn sitting that an amendments. agreement was reached and the reference was duly sent Hon. G. W. JENNINGS (Melbourne) — Like Big to the committee to review the standing orders, the Kev, I am excited to join this debate this morning sessional orders and the practices and procedures of this because it is the first opportunity I have had as a place. member of the chamber to use the new sound On our first day back in this Parliament in this house, as system — a system that has caused much vexation over distinct from the sitting in Ballarat, after his laudable the course of the period between the previous autumn contribution which demonstrated the best standards and BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 99

practices of political behaviour, the Leader of the held during the period from 1992 to 1999? It was Opposition came into this place at 9 o’clock last night 2.30 p.m.! and said, ‘From here on in, as a result of a vote that we are going to ram through the Legislative Council To use the off phrase used by the Honourable Geoff tomorrow morning, there will be a change to the way Craige in this chamber, if the goose got it right when in we do business’. That undermines the integrity of the government, the gander can get it right in opposition! original reference that we worked through so The opposition can agree to 2.30 p.m., which is the assiduously in the autumn sitting. The Leader of the reasonable proposition led by the Leader of the Opposition is trying for expedience to obtain a very Government this morning, to ensure Parliament has the short-term political advantage through this motion. He capacity for question times to be held at different times is the poorer for it, and the Council in the way we as its in the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council members do business with one another will be the so they can be scrutinised by the public and the media. poorer for it. We are applying a principle to the opposition. It should not have the luxury of changing arbitrarily, at its whim, The second lesson that should be learnt is to not — the to something that suits it with its, I suggest, stale Leader of the Opposition will do it at his peril — majority in this chamber. The government believes it is confuse the stale mandate that the opposition has in this more appropriate to return to what had previously been chamber to exercise its prerogative to arbitrarily change the case — that is, a 2.30 p.m. question time for this the way in which this chamber operates. This was an chamber. underlying theme of the debate on the bill the government introduced to amend the practices of and The lesson that needs to be learnt about this stale the electoral system that applies to this Council. In fact, mandate is that it is just not good enough to say, ‘We on one occasion after another during the course of that will get away with whatever we can by exercising our debate members of the government reminded members majority in this chamber’. I am mindful of the phrase of the opposition of the stale nature of their mandate. that has rung in my ears ever since I saw the film Breaker Morant, where after certain action was taken Half the members of this chamber were elected in the during the Boer War the justification was, ‘We are 1996 election, which returned the Kennett government exercising rule 303’ — that is, meting out rough justice in the Assembly with a clear majority. In the period through the imperative of the barrel of a gun. between 1996 and 1999 there was a clear shift in the views, attitudes and voting behaviour of the Victorian In this chamber we see the exercise of rule 30:14 — people, which resulted in the change of government. that is, motions are rammed through this place on the Yet the bill the government brought to this Parliament, basis of 30 members of the opposition and 14 members and to this chamber in particular, dealing with the of the government. I have not embarrassed government’s mandate to pursue electoral reform in the Mr President or for that matter Mr Deputy President on Legislative Council, was ignored, dismissed and treated any votes taken in this place because the divide is clear. with contempt by the opposition parties within this The 30:14 rule has never been in practice, but the chamber. Quite conveniently time and again opposition underlying theory in the opposition’s denial of the members tried to hide behind the fact that there is government’s agenda in legislation or when it rams integrity within the electoral system and chose to ignore through motions in this place, as it intends to do this the reality that at the last election, although they morning, is on the basis of rule 30:14. received a minority of the votes cast within the Victorian electorate, they were returned in 14 of the A salutary lesson for all of us — but particularly for 22 seats contested at that time. members of the opposition whose vote was eroded at the last election and will continue to be eroded — is: do What underlies the Leader of the Government’s not abuse the power derived from the length of time proposed amendments to this motion is the concept that you have been elected. Remind yourselves each and what is good for the goose should be good for the every day of your political lives that many of you were gander. In terms of the time at which questions without elected as far back as 1996 and you have to ensure you notice will be asked the Leader of the Government is are in keeping with the expectations of the voters within now saying, ‘Let us go back to what was previously your constituency. considered by opposition members to be the halcyon days of parliamentary democracy in Victoria’. In their The third lesson I offer the Leader of the Opposition is view, parliamentary democracy in Victoria was at its not to confuse principles and values with being peak during the Kennett era. When was question time gratuitous and indulgent. That is consistent with the previous lesson and relates to the issue I raised at the BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

100 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

commencement of my contribution today — that is, the through the Legislative Council as distinct from the varying capacity of this chamber to get it right. When other place. this chamber gets it right, it can make a valuable contribution. In the structure of classical theatre, you do not put your bit players on the stage first. Think of tragic figures like I understand that yesterday the tenor of the Hamlet. He is on stage alone at the beginning of the contributions by all parties in this chamber was more play and the bit players do not come on stage for some moderate, more enlightened and more positive in time. In classical theatrical form the Leader of the affirming the human spirit than the contributions in the Opposition in this place has got it fundamentally wrong other place because the opportunity of rising above because during the last sessional period — — partisan politics there was lost and they tried to use some aspects of wedge politics. That spirit was lost in Hon. C. A. Furletti — She spoke first; she came on the other place, but it was not lost here. I congratulate first! all speakers on yesterday’s motion about terrorism in this place for the nature of their contributions. Hon. G. W. JENNINGS — I am honoured to follow the Leader of the Government. However, we just could not maintain the rigour in applying the best aspects of this place in restating Hon. C. A. Furletti — Do not put your bit players values and commitments to other issues. When the on first! house congratulated the new Leader of the Opposition Hon. G. W. JENNINGS — I am pleased about the and his deputy, and on the way through congratulated supporting role I play today and on any other day to the the Honourable Mark Birrell on his contribution to Leader of the Government. Parliament and the state of Victoria, Mr Hallam could not resist the opportunity that he was provided with, by It is clear that because the opposition had some success leave, to make simple and direct comments to traverse during the last sittings of Parliament in getting third-rate the line and start making gratuitous comments about the stories up in the media — which is all they had to nature of the Kennett government. His self-indulgent provide themselves with a fillip during the winter of and self-congratulatory comments undermined the good their discontent — there is a danger they will think they work that had been done at the appropriate level. are on the road to political rehabilitation.

Hon. K. M. Smith — What are you talking about? As members of the opposition have said during the course of this debate, the world will not fall over if Hon. G. W. JENNINGS — I am clear what I am question time is held at 10 o’clock; the chamber will talking about. Time and time again when we extol the not become more dysfunctional than it has been on any virtue of tradition and the cooperative relationship we number of occasions. The real challenge is whether we can have with each other when this chamber works well can pick up from where we left off at the last sitting in and negotiates the passage of legislation or motions or providing a sensible agreement in the reference we stage manages the timetabling of legislation we have gave to the Standing Orders Committee. The challenge shown repeatedly that we can get it right. But we is for us to pick up what had previously been the only always slip into becoming self-indulgent, functional chamber in this Parliament in the way the self-congratulatory and very comfortable with what parliamentary program was scheduled. suits the prevailing view of the majority in this place. Honourable members know that since November 1999 I am reminding members of the opposition that they are the progress of legislation from the Legislative not in a position to be able to be self-satisfied and Assembly has been most dysfunctional. Time and time complacent, to waste their time and the time of again members of this chamber have provided the Parliament in being self-congratulatory. That is not the discipline — — appropriate use of the time of Parliament. Hon. Bill Forwood — By agreement. The last lesson that I pass on, for what it is worth, to the Leader of the Opposition in this place is: do not steal Hon. G. W. JENNINGS — Absolutely. In fact the thunder of your leader. Do not upstage the leading what I am telegraphing is that I hope that opportunity is man in your party. The thing that would concern me if I not being lost by what I believe to be an indulgent act in were the Leader of the Opposition in passing this seeking to change the rules to provide the Leader of the motion is that it looks as if there is an attempt within Opposition in this place with the opportunity to come this place to run the political agenda of the opposition on the stage prior to his leader in the other place. When BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 101

it comes down to tintacks, that is the only rationale that That is what the government is doing in this instance. the opposition has for the change it is meting out to this Members of the government are not interested in chamber — that is the only rationale in existence. I whether having question time at 10 o’clock is going to telegraph to the opposition that that method will not improve the operation of this house, open this work; it will not be a success. If the motion is rammed government to scrutiny and show openly to the people through the Council this morning without the of Victoria the pathetic performances by leaders of the amendment of the Leader of the Government, the pilot government in this place. They are concerned about the project will fail and, come the next sittings in the new fact that they were not consulted — that is their main year, we will return to a regime that is set by agreement and only concern. That is not a reason to oppose the and the way we do business within this place will motion. resurrect the capacity to do business with one another in the interests of the Parliament and the people of It concerns me dramatically that the government does Victoria. not see fit to allow technology and change to be experienced. The motion is quite clear; it has a sunset Hon. C. A. FURLETTI (Templestowe) — I am provision; it provides that it is for this session; it is quite pleased to rise to contribute to this debate. In doing so I clear that it is for trial; it is quite clear that if it does not indicate that the opposition will be opposing the work members of the opposition are open to proposed amendment. consultation and discussion. I am disappointed that the government has taken the view that this is done in some It is very sad and disappointing to hear the comments of sinister manner and is intended to in any way prejudice the Leader of the Government and the the conventions of this place. Certainly in my role as Honourable Gavin Jennings as to the conclusions that Deputy Leader of the Opposition I would like to assure they have reached on the purpose and motive of the the government that we are always open to discussion. motion. Let us be perfectly clear about what the motion moved by the Leader of the Opposition indicates: it is a This is not an earth-shattering change. It is review of the time for questions in this place — that is inappropriate for the Leader of the Government to try to the intent and the only motive of this motion. For the indicate that this particular change will convert this government to see anything more sinister than having debate into a debate on upper house reform. I am happy an opportunity to examine an alternative mechanism as to have that debate any time, anywhere. This is a simple a trial — which is what it is, as were the sessional motion on a change to sessional orders. It is a motion orders passed by the house in November 1999, and I which can be revisited in the near future and in respect will refer to some of the comments made then — of which we would like to have the experience of reinforces the real motives and real agenda of the opening this place to scrutiny, public view, government. transparency, and the accountability that this government was elected on. The Honourable Gavin Jennings has an unfortunate manner of falling into Freudian slips. His comments as Notwithstanding Mr Jennings’s comments, members to bit players coming first and the leaders coming later on this side of the house are here not because we were is obviously an indication of what we can expect in this nominated but because we were elected by the people place of his colleagues in the future. More significant of Victoria, and we will act as Her Majesty’s opposition was his analogy of this place as a place of theatre. That for the people of Victoria. I commend the motion to the is his view of this place. house.

We saw his Freudian slip again in his contribution in Hon. G. D. ROMANES (Melbourne) — I am Ballarat. Mr Jennings was not concerned so much about pleased to rise to speak in opposition to the motion and the substance and content of the bill we were debating for the amendment. I was elected to serve in this at that time, the Fundraising Appeals (Amendment) Parliament two years ago now. Like many other Bill. He was not concerned whether that was a good members who were new to this chamber at that time I piece of a legislation that encompassed all the issues have certainly been on a learning curve since then. One that needed to be encompassed and delivered good law of the things that I have learnt is that there are traditions to Victorians. He was not worried about that. He was in this house that many members consider set this place worried about passing the legislation in Ballarat so that apart, and practices and history that they believe make it looked good for the Labor government! He criticised the Legislative Council a special place in Victoria. and challenged the opposition for having the gall to raise an amendment to a bad piece of legislation. The framework that makes this place operate according to its traditions and practices is the rules that we operate BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

102 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

under: the standing orders and the sessional orders that born-to-rule mentality that exists on the other side of we all abide by. I have sat with the President, the Clerks this house? and members of the opposition and government on the Standing Orders Committee over the past few weeks as This morning we have been told by the Leader of the we have put in place a review of the standing orders. I Opposition and the Deputy Leader of the Opposition have heard many positive expressions from members of that what is proposed in the motion is a trial to provide the opposition about how good it is to be working greater access to the house for the mainstream media together in a cooperative way to modernise the standing during question time. The Leader of the Opposition orders. We have already had 6 hours of deliberations says it is such a good idea that all members should about the standing orders of this place. spring to and support it even though it was sprung on the government without notice yesterday. What we As a member of a parliamentary committee, on many have before us is a trial, and if it is a trial we must ask occasions I have heard opposition members claiming ourselves whether it is the best option for a trial. Would how much they like the opportunity to work with and not the possibility of moving to the 2.30 p.m. time slot get to know members of other parties through the work have been a better trial? Would not that be just as of parliamentary committees. effective in achieving the result with new technology in place of accessing the mainstream media? If it were just I recall the grand notions espoused by members of the to be a trial or experiment why did the opposition not opposition in the debate on constitutional reform that speak to the government about it and talk it through to we had in this house last year when members of the see what new options we wanted to trial for the best opposition were talking up the Legislative Council as a operation of business in the house? house of review, although when in government they did not allow any of the amendments put forward by the Whenever I hear high-sounding sentiments about then Labor opposition. In fact, although espousing this democracy and the traditions of the house I will be house as a house of review, when in government the reminded of the wolf in sheep’s clothing. The opposition treated it as a rubber stamp. opposition parties do not believe in or know how to consult. This side of the house and the people of I am aware how annoyed the leadership of the Victoria should not forget how democracy and their opposition gets if it thinks that in the ordering of the rights were taken away under the seven years of business of the house the government has not consulted Kennett rule. I commend the amendment to the house. at length with it. Yesterday when at the end of the day, without any consultation with or forewarning to the Hon. K. M. SMITH (South Eastern) — I join in the government or its ministers, the Leader of the debate to say a few words. I have been in the Opposition put forward a notice of motion on the Parliament for some time and on many occasions I have sessional orders, I asked myself, ‘What is going on? Is had the opportunity to see changes made to sessional the opposition, after two years on the opposition orders for what we considered to be the better running benches, feeling it is becoming irrelevant? Is it grasping of the house. We have been prepared to accept changes at opportunities to lift its profile by shifting question to the sessional orders, whether they were made during time? Has the opposition realised it made a mistake on the time of the Cain and Kirner governments, the November 1999 by scheduling question time in this Kennett government or during the period of this place concurrent with the question time in the other government. I suggest we have always accepted place when it imposed on the house a change in changes made to sessional orders that would make the question time from 2.30 p.m. to 2.00 p.m. because it house run better. There is a need to make changes. has not been able to trip up our ministers? Did the There is a need to allow more people to be in the press opposition spring the proposal on the house to flex its gallery during question time so that they can listen to muscle?’. Yesterday was the second anniversary of the answers being given by the ministers to make the election of the Labor government. ministers more accountable and transparent, as the government promised it would be. Hon. D. McL. Davis — No, that is not correct. I support very much the motion moved by Hon. G. D. ROMANES — It was the second Mr Forwood, and I reject the government’s anniversary of the election that resulted in a Labor amendment. government. Was the opposition flexing its muscle and demonstrating that despite being in opposition it still Hon. W. R. BAXTER (North Eastern) — I has the numbers in this house? Is it reflecting a intervene in the debate because I have sat here this morning and listened to the contributions from the BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 103

Leader of the Government, the Deputy Leader of the that so long as question time is held at the same time as Government and Ms Romanes, and I cannot let them question time in the other house there will always be a pass unanswered. It seems to me there is clearly an focus by the media on the other place. The opportunity agenda being run by the government to discredit and for the people of Victoria to properly scrutinise the undermine the house at every possible opportunity, and activities of the ministers for sport and recreation, to fail to take up any chance that may be given to the youth, small business and consumer affairs, energy and government to make the house more responsive to resources and ports, and industrial relations is lessened public opinion and operate better. It is indicated by the because of timing issues as they currently exist. government’s absolute refusal to consider the motion before the house. What is happening today under this proposal is that the media will be given the opportunity to attend question I give a couple of examples that have led me to believe time at 10 o’clock on Wednesdays and Thursdays — a the government is intent on undermining the integrity totally different time from question time in the other of the house. Mr Jennings spoke at great length about a place. This is a sensible trial, and the house should stale mandate and tried to convey the impression that support it. somehow or other this house is not representative of public opinion. He inferred that the people who voted at The DEPUTY PRESIDENT the last state election had not made a conscious decision (Hon. B. W. Bishop) — Order! We will be dealing about which representatives they would return to the with the amendments first, obviously, and one at a time. house. Therefore in relation to amendment no. 1 moved by the Minister for Industrial Relations, the question is: It is probably not the opportunity to present a wide-ranging treatise about this issue because of the That the expression proposed to be omitted stand part of the question. limitations of time and for other reasons, but I ask Mr Jennings to take, for example, the 22 members who House divided on omission (members in favour vote no): were returned to the house at the last election and put aside the 22 members already here who were elected at Ayes, 28 an earlier election. What is the result? In 1999 the house Ashman, Mr Furletti, Mr elected 22 members, and if Mr Jennings’s thesis is Atkinson, Mr Hall, Mr Baxter, Mr Hallam, Mr correct there should have been overwhelming support Best, Mr Katsambanis, Mr among the public for returning Labor Party members to Birrell, Mr (Teller)Lucas, Mr the upper house, so why is it that the Liberal and Boardman, Mr Luckins, Mrs National parties won 14 seats and the Labor Party won Bowden, Mr Olexander, Mr 8 seats? That result rejects the honourable member’s Brideson, Mr Powell, Mrs (Teller) Coote, Mrs Rich-Phillips, Mr assumption that the people of Victoria were intent in Cover, Mr Ross, Dr returning members of the Labor Party to the upper Craige, Mr Smith, Mr K. M. house. Mr Jennings cannot maintain or allege there is Davis, Mr D. McL. Smith, Ms some sort of gerrymander or malapportionment because Davis, Mr P. R. Stoney, Mr the boundaries used to elect members to the upper Forwood, Mr Strong, Mr house are identical to the boundaries used to elect Noes, 13 members to the other place. Let us dispose of that Broad, Ms Madden, Mr argument now and not go down that path. Carbines, Mrs Mikakos, Ms Darveniza, Ms (Teller) Nguyen, Mr I have some other matters I want to raise about the Gould, Ms Romanes, Ms government’s general view on this issue, but I will do it Hadden, Ms Smith, Mr R. F. (Teller) at another time. Jennings, Mr Thomson, Ms McQuilten, Mr Hon. BILL FORWOOD (Templestowe) — In Amendment negatived. summing up the debate I make two comments. It seems to me the only reason the government did not accept Amendments 2 to 4 negatived. this sensible proposal is because it is scared of scrutiny and scared of having the media present in the public Motion agreed to. gallery. It is hiding. It is important that people note that the ministers of the Crown in this house hold responsible portfolios. It is important that those ministers are subject to proper scrutiny. The issue is BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

104 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

Standing orders not quite got it right. I think it is proposed that the Leader of the Government advise the house of the Hon. BILL FORWOOD (Templestowe) — I numbers of the questions. So if it is the numbers of the move: questions that are to be tabled, we believe that that would not give the opposition the opportunity, as was That until the end of December 2001 — taken yesterday, of raising the fact that some of their (a) so much of the standing orders be suspended as require questions have not been answered and that queries answers to questions on notice to be delivered verbally regarding that should be raised with the responsible in the house; and ministers for them to respond. On that basis the (b) the Leader of the Government advise the house of the government opposes the motion. numbers of the questions on notice to which answers are provided, a copy of the answer be given to the member Hon. P. R. HALL (Gippsland) — I indicate the asking the question, and that the answers be support of the National Party for the motion. It is a incorporated in Hansard. practical suggestion that, as the Leader of the Opposition indicated, simply codifies the current Very briefly, this suggested change to the way the practice. Indeed, it will not prohibit the sort of house operates is also suggested on a trial basis. It puts opportunity that arose yesterday when the Honourable in place the practice that has been observed for, I think, Roger Hallam sought further information about the virtually as long as I have been in this place, which is a numbers of questions that were being answered. That sensible way of dealing with questions on notice. With opportunity will still be available because the motion those few words I invite the house to support the clearly states that the practice will be that the minister motion. will stand up in the house and say, ‘I have answers for Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial these questions with these numbers’. As Mr Hallam put Relations) — I oppose the motion before the house. To yesterday, the opportunity will still be available for some extent what the Leader of the Opposition is members to query the provision of an answer to a moving in the motion is to codify some of the practices particular question on notice. of the house that have been in place for some time. The It has been a long time since I can recall a minister government has some concerns about the motion in that actually reading an answer to the house, and that is it does not make it clear as to what the practices would because over the past couple of Parliaments that have be and how it would be informed and put in place. By been formed here, the volume of questions on notice way of example, yesterday the Honourable Roger has been quite significant and it would take some hours Hallam asked me to very clearly and distinctly read out to read the answers to many of the questions provided the numbers of the questions that were to be tabled in on notice. It is a simple, practical suggestion that will this house. He had written letters to ministers assist the effective operation of this house. The National requesting that they follow up their colleagues in the Party is pleased to support the motion. other place for responses to those questions. It gave him the opportunity to at least follow up the fact that one of Hon. BILL FORWOOD (Templestowe) — I must the answers to the questions he referred to — he did say that I am very surprised that the government has refer to two, but one of them had been answered — was decided to oppose something that is obviously so not tabled, and the minister was able to respond to clearly in the interests of the house. I make it very clear Mr Hallam’s query. that all this motion does is put into sessional orders the way the house currently operates. The Leader of the I believe the practice the Leader of the Opposition is Government will still come in here and verbally advise proposing is sensible, but I do not think it is a fair and the house of the numbers of each of the questions that just way to go about it. It might give opposition have been answered, as has been the practice. I am very members, who are the ones who ask these questions on surprised that the government cannot find its way clear notice, the opportunity to raise the issue that day. It to support this simple motion. might take until the next day before they get a list of numbers. Once I read them out those answers are House divided on motion: distributed to honourable members but the opportunity for them to raise it is gone until at least the next day, I Ayes, 28 would imagine. Ashman, Mr (Teller) Furletti, Mr Atkinson, Mr Hall, Mr It is on that basis that the government believes it goes Baxter, Mr Hallam, Mr part of the way, but the Leader of the Opposition has Best, Mr (Teller) Katsambanis, Mr Birrell, Mr Lucas, Mr BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 105

Boardman, Mr Luckins, Mrs opposition is well aware, there have been occasions Bowden, Mr Olexander, Mr when the government has had to change the time from Brideson, Mr Powell, Mrs Coote, Mrs Rich-Phillips, Mr 8.00 p.m. by leave. A case in point was yesterday Cover, Mr Ross, Dr because of the circumstances where we had to change Craige, Mr Smith, Mr K. M. the time to well after 8 o’clock. Davis, Mr D. McL. Smith, Ms Davis, Mr P. R. Stoney, Mr The issue of changing a time of when new business can Forwood, Mr Strong, Mr be introduced is one of good management that has Noes, 14 taken place in this house. The house knows that up to a certain time new business will not be entered into Broad, Ms Madden, Mr Carbines, Mrs (Teller)Mikakos, Ms unless there is agreement between the parties. By Darveniza, Ms Nguyen, Mr (Teller) removing the 8.00 p.m. time frame and not inserting Gould, Ms Romanes, Ms another more reasonable or realistic time means that we Hadden, Ms Smith, Mr R. F. could be sitting in this place introducing new business Jennings, Mr Theophanous, Mr McQuilten, Mr Thomson, Ms without having to move a motion by leave which at least gives the house the opportunity to make a decision Motion agreed to. on it. Sessional orders We could be sitting here consistently throughout the night, as some honourable members know we have Hon. BILL FORWOOD (Templestowe) — I done from time to time but sometimes that is on one move: particular bill. As this motion stands, once debate on one piece of legislation is completed other legislation That so much of the sessional orders as would prevent new can be introduced. There is no circuit breaker proposed business being taken after 8.00 p.m. during the sittings of the Council be suspended until the end of December 2001. by the motion as to at what point one should go on to the adjournment debate. With the 10.00 p.m. rule if new This house has always operated on a cooperative basis legislation began to be debated at 9.45 p.m. then debate and by agreement. We sort out among ourselves how on that legislation would be completed. I can remember we will operate, and to my knowledge we have never on one occasion we went through to 6.45 a.m. the next had to have this rule in place in order for us to manage morning, but there was no debate of further legislation the business of the chamber. after that and we went on to the adjournment debate.

My understanding is that invariably we suspend by The Leader of the Opposition has not thought through leave that sessional order so that we can continue to his motion. If he had spoken to government members operate the way that the government of the day wishes. we would have pointed out that a circuit breaker is I cannot in my time recollect it being invoked by the required to go to an adjournment debate. The opposition. I recollect on occasions that we have moved revocation of this proposal, which I think in its spirit it after 8.00 p.m. to legitimise what is going on. has some merit, has not been thought through fully.

I have just been advised by the Minister for Industrial It is on that basis that the government opposes the Relations that the government will oppose the motion, motion. The Bracks government is committed to which I find extraordinary. This is a simple resolution consultation with the opposition parties — both leaders, that will in no way change the way the house operates; whether it be the Liberal Party or the National Party — all it will do is to prevent us each day going through on the management of the house and its operations. We moving a motion by leave suspending the particular try to put some sense into our daily lives while we are rule. It is beyond belief to me that an issue such as this in this place by finishing at a reasonable and respectable can be opposed by the government. hour. Many of us have young families and we want to see them so we try not to have long nights. I accept that Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial they cannot be avoided on occasions. Relations) — As the Leader of the Opposition has indicated, I oppose this motion. He will recall that when The Leader of the Opposition has not thought through we were elected in 1999 the opposition moved a motion the ramifications of taking away the time when to change what was the cut-off time for the introduction honourable members know the adjournment will take of new business in this place by shifting the time from place — that is, once a certain period has passed and 10.00 p.m. to 8 00 p.m. because they thought that was a when legislation that may be before the house has been clever idea, but obviously it did not work. As the completed. The government always tries to negotiate BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

106 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

with the opposition parties so that after a piece of position I have held and I know how tough it is. I am legislation has been completed honourable members also disappointed that the first lot of motions that he has know the adjournment debate will follow. It tries to do moved as Leader of the Opposition in this place have that in a time frame that allows honourable members to been to seek to change the sessional orders. What really leave the place at a respectable hour, get a reasonable irks the government is the fact that the Leader of the night’s sleep and come back and start the cut and thrust Opposition clearly consulted with the National Party of the next day. That is what we are here for and I have before the motion was put to the house and got its no objections to that. However, I am concerned that the support for the motion. However, he did not have the Leader of the Opposition has not thought through the decency to consult with the government and say, ‘We ramifications of such a motion which does not give a want to change the sessional orders; what do you think clear indication to the house, without the house making about this and how do you think this ought to take a decision, that it ought to adjourn. On that basis I place?’. oppose the motion. I heard Mr Hallam earlier say that the opposition has Hon. P. R. HALL (Gippsland) — The National accepted that it lost government. I am glad it has Party supports the motion moved by the Leader of the accepted that it lost government, but it still wants to run Opposition. The government should have seen fit to this house as though it were the government. The agree to it. I take on board the arguments advanced by government should be consulted about sessional orders. the Leader of the Government and I share the view that There ought to be a discussion at least, especially in the this Parliament, so far as is possible, should avoid long context where a committee has been established to look and lengthy sittings into the late hours of the night. A at sessional orders. The Leader of the Opposition has degree of goodwill will still exist and there will be come into the house unannounced after surreptitiously cooperation between the parties to ensure that that having spoken to the National Party without speaking occurrence is minimised. to the governing party. They have cooked up a little deal which is all about changing the sessional orders in At times when I have visitors to this chamber I find it a way that will suit the opposition. embarrassing that at some time during the night the house has to retrospectively move resolutions, as we That might be fine, but it is not the way to run this did last night — that is, to suspend standing orders to house. It does the Leader of the Opposition no good as allow new business to be taken after 8.00 p.m. From the his first act. He should have come into this house and public’s view it does not look good that the house is so sought to move a motion to implant his views and inefficient that it has to move such a motion. policy directions for the opposition right from the word go. What has he done? He has come into the house with This motion will remove that provision and will make a sessional order change which is simply a trick to try to the operations of the house more legitimate — a term get some sort of media coverage and to gain some sort one might use in this context. I understand we should of advantage which he thinks might result from these avoid long sittings so far as possible and I believe that sessional order changes. still will be the case. This motion will not increase the occurrence of late night sittings. For logistical reasons it I feel sorry for Mr Forwood because I know how makes a lot of sense and I am prepared to indicate the difficult his job is. I have been in his place, except that National Party’s support. when I was there I had 10 members to deal with and he has 30. Personally I think we did better with the press Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS (Jika Jika) — I with 10 than the opposition is doing with 30. oppose the motion. It is important to understand why the government opposes the motion. Firstly, it opposes Hon. Bill Forwood — You had more friends on our the motion because of the technical reasons that have side than yours. been put by the Leader of the Government about the way it will operate and about there being no allowance Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — That may well be made for late sittings that might occur as a result of this the case. The point is that you lost government and you motion and this change to the sessional orders. did so in the context of an opposition which had 10 members. That was because we were prepared to The more important reason for opposing the motion is debate the policy questions, no matter how difficult you purely on the principle of the lack of consultation that made it, and I remember how difficult it was to debate has occurred in relation to it. I begin my contribution by issues in this house during that time. The former congratulating the Honourable Bill Forwood on his government put the media up behind the opposition appointment as Leader of the Opposition, which is a hoping that somehow the Honourable Mark Birrell, BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 107

standing here as the Leader of the Government, would A change to sessional orders affects every member in be able to talk directly to the media and that it would this house, and every member in this house set up a take it all up. That was its way of making sure the then committee in order to look at changing those sessional opposition did not have access to the media. The orders. I do not know whose bright idea it was to trouble was that the former opposition was arguing on change the sessional orders. If I did not know better, I policy and about the Kennett government’s lack of would not have thought Bill Forwood would do this democracy and its arrogance, and it got that message because when he was Deputy Leader of the Opposition out despite what the former government did in this he used to come and talk to us about these sorts of house. things.

The change to the sessional orders is symbolic because I do not know if he passed that role on to his new the opposition did not bother to take us through the deputy, Carlo Furletti, because if he did, then Carlo process it established in this house, that of a sessional Furletti has failed miserably in his first test as deputy orders committee. It established a committee and said it leader. Whether it was Carlo Furletti’s idea in the first wanted to do things that way. It completely place I do not know, but when Mr Forwood was circumvented that by coming in here with a set of Deputy Leader of the Opposition he would normally changes that are designed to get some advantage on the have come over here and said, ‘We are intending to do pretence that somehow it is doing it for the good of the this; what do you think?’, and we might have been able Parliament. What makes it worse is that the Liberal to come to some sort of arrangement. I do not know Party claims not to be in coalition with the National whether or not he relied on his deputy, Mr Furletti, but Party, but it consulted with the National Party — and if he did then it has been an abysmal failure. this has not been denied. The National Party was consulted and its approval gained for the changes Hon. Bill Forwood — You nicked my good ideas! before the motion was moved in the house. So they were locked in. They are meant to be two independent Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — I do not know parties working separately. What a load of nonsense whether that is confirming the outline of what I have that is! This is nothing more than what we all knew just said or not, but I understood that what the Leader of from the beginning — that is, that the opposition parties the Opposition did was pass on his previous are running a surreptitious coalition. That is what is responsibilities as deputy leader to Mr Furletti. happening. They are still there, they are still consulting, Hon. Bill Forwood — Yes. they still have not voted and they still do not do things any differently from when they had a formal coalition. Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — He confirms that. This is another example of why they will stay in Part of those responsibilities is to talk to the opposition for a very long time. government about procedures in this house. Mr Furletti failed to do that. He has failed his first test as Deputy Hon. D. McL. Davis — What have you got against Leader of the Opposition. He is not capable of doing consultation? the job. It might have been better for Mr Smith to be the Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Let me tell deputy leader. I can tell Mr Smith that if I had been in members opposite — you might appreciate this, his party room I would have given him an extra vote; he Mr Davis — that the trick to getting the press in here is would have got four votes then. I have figured out that not by changing the sessional orders. That will not get Mr Smith voted for himself; I know he got Mr Craige’s members of the press in. They are not going to come vote; and we are still trying to figure out who the third here because you have changed the sessional orders; person was who voted for him, but nobody will own they are going to come here because they think you are up! We have tried to see whether anyone is prepared to somehow relevant or that you have something own up to this third vote, but unfortunately — — interesting or important to say for the people of Hon. K. M. Smith — I have been looking for them Victoria. The trouble is you have nothing interesting or too, Theo! important to say for the people of Victoria, and that is why members of the press are not here and why they Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Mr Smith has are not listening to what you have to say. been looking for him as well. A lot of people have been looking for him. If they find him he will never get All this reinforces the fact that the opposition has not anywhere, so hopefully it will be somebody like yet learnt its lesson from the arrogance for which it got Mr Craige who is on the way out rather than somebody tossed out of government. It has not learnt that lesson, who is on the way up. which is that there are appropriate ways of doing things. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

108 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

Hon. E. G. Stoney — On a point of order, hardly ever any members of the press here. No matter Mr Deputy President, we have definitely strayed a long what we might sit around talking to each other about, way from the motion. I ask you to bring unless it gets out there into the community it is of little Mr Theophanous back to the motion. value.

The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! It is the Why do I say this? I say this because we could have custom of this place to allow wide-ranging debate, and worked something out. As an upper house of a there has been some humour in this instance as well. Parliament we could have said, ‘We think these Debate on the subject has been stretched by changes might be of some value’. However, that did not Mr Theophanous, but I am sure he is winding up his occur, and when those things do not occur we have to contribution and will contain himself to the motion keep reminding the opposition that it is not the from here on. government. The opposition might have a majority in this house, but if it wants to run this house it ought to Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — I am glad to see put that on the table and say, ‘We want to run the house that Mr Stoney has dobbed himself in as the third and we are prepared to do anything it takes in order to person who voted for Mr Smith, although I would have run it’. But the opposition keeps telling us that it is the thought that would be the kiss of death. I notice that ministers’ responsibility to run the house and that it is nobody else was prepared to get up and take the point the government’s responsibility to run the house. The of order. opposition keeps telling us this, but then in the same — — Mr Deputy President, it is, of course, the tradition of this house that members can speak for as long as they Hon. D. McL. Davis interjected. like. I know you invited me to wind up, but I also understand that in so doing you were not implementing Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — In terms of any rule but simply making a suggestion. However, in legislation and in terms of having business before the relation to the rulings that have come from the Chair house and a whole host of other things, the opposition over the past little while — not from you, Mr Deputy keeps telling us it is our responsibility. We are happy to President, I might add — there is a fine line between accept that responsibility, but then in the same breath giving a direction and giving a suggestion, and the the opposition says it wants to change sessional orders distinction should be made very clear — not that I have without any kind of discussion with the government a lot more to say on this particular motion. and without asking whether those changes will in any way affect the efficient running of the house from the However, I did want to say that what has happened here government’s point of view. The opposition does not today is a bit unfortunate because we could probably ask any of those questions; it simply comes in here and have worked something out had an approach been puts up a set of motions such as those before us. made to the government. Let’s face it, when the time for asking questions was originally changed to As I said before, the opposition makes it even worse by 2.00 p.m., members of the government were not happy. consulting with only one party. I do not know who did I was not happy about that change, although I that consultation, although I presume it was Mr Furletti. understood why it happened. The original change in Mr Furletti was obviously sent off by the new leader to time had to do with the idea that you could catch a consult with the various parties, and he decided to go minister out here at 2 o’clock and then rush over to the off and talk to one party only. Mr Furletti had better other place and ask the same question simultaneously in mend his ways because if he does not he will not last the two chambers. very long as deputy leader. He has not impressed people so far; he has not done much and he has not Hon. Bill Forwood — We have done that one. been able to make any sort of impression. He only got there by luck, because once Mr Smith’s voters realised Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — The opposition they could not get Mr Smith up they turned around and has tried that and that has not worked; that has not supported Mr Furletti — which was probably their brought the press here. I said at the time the change was second mistake — and that is how he got up. made that the reverse problem would be that the press would not come here if question time was running at Mr Furletti is in that position, unlike Mr Forwood, who the same time in both houses. It is important that what got there with unanimous support; he even had the happens in this house is reported in the press. One of support of the other side. But the way he has come into the problems that contribute to making this house not as this house with this motion has not done him much relevant as it otherwise could be is the fact that there are good. He should have come here with some policy BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 109

position and said, ‘This is what my leadership will be Hon. K. M. SMITH — That procedure has become about’, not in some sneaky, tricky way to try to get plain stupidity. In my 13 years in this place there has some advantage by changing the sessional orders never been a time when that motion has been opposed. without consultation with anybody, knowing full well The opposition is saying, ‘Let us do away until at least that changing the sessional orders is nothing other than the end of next December with the need to move a an attempt to prop up himself and his deputy as the new motion under the sessional order that new business not leader and deputy leader — but that will be a bloody be taken after 8 o’clock’. I have even seen the Leader of difficult thing to do! Yet he comes in here with that the Government move that motion first thing in the kind of attitude on his first day as the leader. morning! That sessional order is not worth having.

The government does not support the motion. The Then Mr Theophanous got to his feet and opposed the Leader of the Government has outlined technical motion, not for any sensible reason but through elements as to why the government does not support bloody-mindedness; he said, ‘You did not consult with the motion, but we do not support it also because of the us’. His opposition is out of spite. process that the new leadership of the opposition decided to go through in putting up the change when it We do not try to run the house as though we were in knew a committee could be used to take it through the government. We have had the numbers in this place for process of change. It knew that the government would a long time, certainly since before I became a member be prepared to look at changes if they were sensible and of this place. The house has always been run on if it been consulted beforehand. Instead, the opposition traditional lines to ensure that whoever was the leadership spoke to the National Party which, as usual, government of the day had business passed by this said, ‘We, too’ — as they have said for the past seven house. We have opposed and/or amended bills when years — ‘are in anything you are in’. Away went the we considered it was necessary, but that action has led Liberal Party and moved this series of motions, which to far better legislation than that introduced. When in do it no credit and should not be supported by the government we were prepared to amend bills that we house. had introduced. You cannot have it fairer than that in the way this house deals with legislation. Hon. K. M. SMITH (South Eastern) — Mr Theophanous’s contribution to the debate has been We work in a house of review. We are prepared to talk, extremely poor, although humorous at times. If I got negotiate and work together to ensure that all the things only two votes for the deputy’s job, those two were one that should happen when in government do happen — more than Mr Theophanous got as a factional member! and it makes no difference whether the government is Liberal, Liberal–National or Labor. The house has He asked, ‘Why is the government opposing the always operated along the lines of its being able to motion?’ and then came out with his first point, which work properly. had something to do with late sittings. Then, as his second point, he spent most of his time talking about a The motions that deal with sessional orders would lack of consultation. The government is opposing the make the house run better. We could not be doing more motion only because of its bloody-mindedness and than we are doing to try to ensure it works more stupidity. smoothly than it has in the past. We are trying to remove stupid time-wasting tactics like the Each motion moved today by the opposition would government’s opposition to the motion. make this house work better and remove some of the procedures that slow down its processes. In particular, I support Mr Forwood’s position and what has been the last two motions moved by Mr Forwood would done with each of the three motions moved today. They remove what have been traditional procedures that have would make this house work better without the stupid become a waste of time. In my time in this house I have time-wasting tactics that have developed over the years seen ministers in an absolute panic as dinner time — and which are now not necessary. Until at least the end 6.30 p.m. — approached as they tried to get to their of December we could see how they will work. If they feet. I recall debate being stopped so ministers could get do not work, that is fine, because they will lapse at the to their feet and move motions under the sessional order end of December because of the sunset clause; but if concerning new business not being taken after they work, the government, too, will come to realise the 8 o’clock. house works better, as will you, Mr Deputy President. There is nothing more than moving this motion that the Hon. M. M. Gould — You supported it. opposition can do to make this place a better place to facilitate the passage of legislation. STAMP DUTY: REFORM

110 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

House divided on motion: more specific than talking just about taxation in general. It aims to talk specifically about stamp duty on property Ayes, 28 conveyancing and general insurance, and to make the Ashman, Mr Furletti, Mr point that Victoria has the highest rate of stamp duty in Atkinson, Mr Hall, Mr Australia — a rate of stamp duty that strikes at families, Baxter, Mr Hallam, Mr (Teller) Best, Mr Katsambanis, Mr businesses and investors throughout Victoria. It does so Birrell, Mr Lucas, Mr to the detriment of those families, businesses and Boardman, Mr (Teller) Luckins, Mrs investors. It does so in an unfair way which has not Bowden, Mr Olexander, Mr been thought through by the government. Brideson, Mr Powell, Mrs Coote, Mrs Rich-Phillips, Mr Cover, Mr Ross, Dr As I said, given the recent review taxation is not Craige, Mr Smith, Mr K. M. something that the government did not have an Davis, Mr D. McL. Smith, Ms opportunity to address. That was the appropriate and Davis, Mr P. R. Stoney, Mr perfect opportunity to address the matter, but at the end Forwood, Mr Strong, Mr of the day the government chose not to take that Noes, 14 opportunity to come out with a better taxation system, and one that deals in particular with stamp duty in Broad, Ms Madden, Mr Carbines, Mrs Mikakos, Ms Victoria. Darveniza, Ms Nguyen, Mr Gould, Ms Romanes, Ms It is important to place on record that this is an issue for Hadden, Ms Smith, Mr R. F. specific industries. I am sure Ms Mikakos will engage Jennings, Mr Theophanous, Mr (Teller) in debate on this matter, as we did earlier on the McQuilten, Mr (Teller) Thomson, Ms involvement of the Real Estate Institute of Victoria and Motion agreed to. its concerns in the area. I will place on the public record a number of issues that members of the real estate institute have raised with me and other members in this STAMP DUTY: REFORM place about their concerns about stamp duty. They have had a significant and public campaign on the matter. Hon. D. McL. DAVIS (East Yarra) — I move: I place on the record comments by Taxpayers Australia, That this house condemns the government for — which is the taxpayers association and a group that has (a) the failure of their taxation review process to reform significant credibility and a history of making fair and Victorian stamp duty on property conveyancing and reasonable comments on federal and state taxation general insurance; issues. It has commented on these issues for many decades, and produces a publication entitled Taxpayers (b) their failure to return to Victorian taxpayers any of the windfall gains collected due to the strength of the Australia. I am sure members of this chamber read that Victorian real estate market driven by the first home consistently and from time to time take the comments owners scheme and the low interest rate environment of the association into account, because the points it created by the federal government; and makes are non-partisan and are not meant for short-term political point scoring but are made with the (c) maintaining the highest rate of stamp duties in Australia on property conveyancing and failing to reduce the aim of producing a better taxation system at both the impact of stamp duty on Victorian families, businesses state and federal levels. and investors. Regarding stamp duty it is worthwhile referring to the In moving the motion I start with some general points. I most recent edition of Taxpayers Australia, dated make the point that when it came to power the 10 September. An article entitled ‘Victorian stamp government embarked on a tax review process that duty: a comparison’ is worth quoting. Although it is a aimed ostensibly to review business taxation, and relatively short article, it makes some of the points I indeed a wider range of taxes beyond that, to get a want to report to the house. On page 86 it states: better tax system for Victoria. That outcome was not achieved. It is important to place on record that a better The association has recently published a study on the reform taxation system was not the outcome of that review. I options for Victorian taxes. This paper is located in the ‘What’s new’ section on the association’s web site at will explain that in some detail later. www.taxpayer.com.au.

This house has, of course, at an earlier point debated the In addition to that study, research has been undertaken to government’s taxation changes. The motion is a bit compare the rates of stamp duty payable in each of the states on residential properties. That research has found that the STAMP DUTY: REFORM

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 111

stamp duty rates payable on residential properties in Victoria Taxpayers Australia go further than saying that stamp is the highest of all of Australian tax jurisdictions and duty is uncompetitive. They describe the uncompetitive confirms that Victorian taxpayers are the highest taxed landowners in Australia. nature of Victoria’s taxation system — the broader taxation system. It is important to move from that to the The rates payable by Victorians are on average 30 per cent nature of our taxation system in Victoria — a system higher than the rates payable in any other state, making put in place by the Treasurer, Mr Brumby, over the past Victoria the least tax competitive of the other jurisdictions. few months. In a press release issued by Peter McDonald, national director of Taxpayers Australia Inc., the association called on the What the Premier and the Treasurer have done is to put Victorian government to reduce the high taxes payable on in place a sneaky taxation system that aims to use purchase of a private home in Victoria. bracket creep or fiscal drag to increase taxation The press release states: collections. Ostensibly there is a reduction of $100 million in tax collections, and alleged reductions Victorians should not be forced to pay the exorbitant stamp will occur during the 2003–04 period, but only duty rates that are imposed on property purchasers in $100 million of tax cuts have occurred despite the Victoria. A typical home owner in Victoria who purchases a government’s collecting more than $1.5 billion in property for $250 000 will pay $10 660 in stamp duty. A similar property owner in New South Wales will pay only additional revenue! $7240. That represents an extra tax of over 30 per cent. The amount payable in Queensland is even lower. It is important to place on the record the number of changes made. Although the shift in payroll tax from The Victorian government must review the stamp duty rates 5.75 per cent to 5.45 per cent is a change in the rate, payable and reduce the rates to increase Victoria’s competitiveness to restore equity to home owners regardless when that is coupled with the growth in the economy of where they live. and an increase in business payrolls many businesses will pay more in payroll tax. Indeed, the figures I have The table attached to the article shows stamp duty seen indicate that payroll tax collections will increase payable at different levels, and I need not go through by $50 million, which is on top of the $187.6 million in them but will comment later in my contribution on how extra payroll tax collected in 2000–01. it impacts on different levels. The article concludes: The increase in land tax collections is also significant. These figures clearly demonstrate that Victoria imposes the In 2000–01 the government collected $111 million highest taxes on private property. The figures also demonstrate the uncompetitive nature of Victoria’s tax more and netted 143 000 additional first-time system. taxpayers. Despite changes in the threshold, which will have some impact, the revaluation of properties in 2002 On one level it is surprising for a non-partisan will lead to further increases in taxable properties above organisation like Taxpayers Australia to make these the new $115 000 threshold. The Bracks government is comments and direct criticisms of the current expecting to increase its tax take by more than arrangements in Victoria, and on another level it $30 million in 2001–02. So much for tax cuts! So reflects poorly on the government, which has managed through fiscal drag or bracket creep, growth in the to get to this position so soon after its reforms of the economy and higher wages more taxes will be paid, business tax system. The business tax changes were and the changes occurring in stamp duty directly reflect completed in the last sitting during the May–June that. period, when some of these matters were debated. But four months later this major non-partisan organisation With the increases in stamp duty there has been a that examines taxation systems throughout Australia is growth in the value of houses and property. I will refer making comments that the figures demonstrate the later to how that may have occurred and further uncompetitive nature of the Victorian taxation system. comment on the growth in taxation that has flowed It is an extraordinary indictment of the government, the from that. What has occurred is significant growth in Treasurer and the Premier that they have allowed the property values, and for many people a welcome situation to develop to the point that Victoria is now increase in property values, but it has meant that the uncompetitive and a major organisation is prepared to government is collecting more stamp duty — an make clear and unequivocal statements condemning the enormous amount of additional revenue for the Victorian taxation system. government.

It is important to look at the broader context when I go back a couple of years to the 1999–2000 state debating stamp duty; it is not just that the rate of stamp budget, which budgeted to collect $911 million in duty is uncompetitive in Victoria. The comments by stamp duty but which on revision collected STAMP DUTY: REFORM

112 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

$1.24 billion, an increase of $329 million. The The Melbourne and Sydney property markets have 2000–01 budget budgeted for $1.04 million but come much closer together, but what has not come collected $1.26 million — a $22 million increase on the much closer together is the level of stamp duty applied budgeted amount. In the current year, 2001–02, on those properties. They are being taxed very $1.15 million is budgeted for, and there is every reason disparately between the two states. On that to believe that will be exceeded. Surprisingly there is $291 000 figure, it is interesting to note that in Victoria some discussion on stamp duty in the budget estimate that would attract $13 210 as the required stamp duty on page 395 of budget paper 3: payable on the sale of that property, whereas in New South Wales $8625 in stamp duty would be levied on a Stamp duty on land transfers is expected to fall by 8.7 per property of precisely the same value, making a cent in 2001–02 reflecting activity in the property market returning to long-term trend levels. $4585 difference in the amount of stamp duty taken by the state government — by Premier Bracks, by We know that is not what has occurred in Victoria. Treasurer Brumby — from normal, everyday median There has been no return to normal trends levels, and in house buyers in metropolitan Melbourne. That is an fact the property market has gone forward. I will come extraordinary tax. back to the reasons why that may have occurred. The property market has moved on very strongly. The most Hon. J. M. Madden — People want to come to recent figures — — Victoria.

Hon. Jenny Mikakos — We stand condemned! Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — The number of people coming has slowed, and that reversal of long-term Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — You will stand interstate migration was an achievement of the Kennett condemned! government. It reversed a 35-year trend of more people moving from Victoria to other states than were moving Hon. Jenny Mikakos — How do you accept interstate. Basically that trend was reversed in the latter responsibility for a growth in the Victorian property years of the Kennett government. Unfortunately that market? reversed trend has slowed somewhat in the first years of the Bracks government, and it is my prediction that that Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — I do not think you can trend will eventually reverse again. Unfortunately under accept responsibility for that, and I will come back at a the stewardship of the Bracks government we will see a later point to explain why the property market is as reversal of that historic trend and a squandering strong as it is and the welcome aspects of certain parts of — — of that. At the moment I am simply discussing the growth in the property market, and what that has done Hon. J. M. Madden — Who is saying that? Do you to the government’s revenue. have any statistics?

I have a news release dated August 2001 from the Real Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — I am saying that. I am Estate Institute of Victoria. It provides some recent making a prediction. I do have statistics to show that figures on the value of the median house price for the number of people coming to Victoria as opposed to Melbourne, which is $291 000, a 15 per cent increase the number leaving — the net interstate migration to over the same period last year — a 15 per cent increase, Victoria — is still positive but has slowed; and the size moving all those properties up through the brackets, up of that difference has narrowed, meaning that there is a to pay more stamp duty for Mr Bracks and Mr Brumby. reversal of the trend that was begun in the Kennett The news release states: period that saw more people coming to Victoria than The figures clearly show the strength and intensity in the leaving. It is my prediction that what we will see is a Melbourne property market, especially in the last few months, reversal of that very welcome development that which saw a median price jump $24 000 — 8.9 per cent — in occurred. one quarter. Hon. J. M. Madden — That is prediction, not fact. For many years the median house price gap between Sydney and Melbourne has been around $60 000. Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — But there has been a Although the June quarter figures for Sydney had not been slowing, and that is a fact. released by the Real Estate Institute of New South Wales, they are expected to show a decrease of some 2 per cent, I want to return to the $291 000 property and place on making the median about $310 000. record the amount of stamp duty that would be required to be paid in each state of Australia. I have already placed on record the amounts for New South Wales and STAMP DUTY: REFORM

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 113

Victoria. In South Australia it is $10 470; in economic projections in budget paper 2 on page 57, Queensland, $8660; in Tasmania, $9190; in Western which states: Australia, $9545; in the ACT, $8700; and in the Northern Territory, $11 615. The important point about In line with national trends, Victorian economic growth is forecast to moderate to 2.5 per cent this year and 2.75 per cent this is that in no state would a taxpayer pay a higher in 2001–02. Victorian economic growth is forecast to amount than would be paid in Victoria on a strengthen to 3.75 per cent in 2002–03. median-priced property. That is a tax Mr Brumby and Mr Bracks have deliberately decided they will put in Those figures reverse the trends of the Kennett years, place following the tax review. They have deliberately especially the latter years where Victorian growth was decided they will keep it as a slug, a hit, an impost on greater than the average of national growth. What can Victorian taxpayers. be seen in this financial quarter is that Victorian growth will be less by about 1 percentage point than national I will quote briefly what the Herald Sun said about this economic growth. Those significant growth figures in its editorial of 17 July. Under the heading ‘Time to drive long-term investment; they drive decision making act’, it states: by people as to where they will locate; they drive the longer term prospects of state economies; and at the end The Bracks government, which is much about image and less of the day they drive the wealth and prosperity of about action, could do a lot more to fuel further growth in the Victorian economy. Its failure to amend stamp duty on Victorians by comparison with other states. residential property has created an unjust burden on home buyers. It is not only unfair, but woefully improper for I believe what we will see, following the point with the Victorian home buyers to pay nearly $4000 more stamp duty Minister for Sport and Recreation, is that the decline in when buying an average house than they would have paid in Victoria’s economic performance compared to that of New South Wales. other states will have a sad and unfortunate That was on the March figures for the median home consequence on lower levels of prosperity in Victoria price rather than the June figures, which increased the compared to other states, and will be reflected in disparity between the taxation regimes in New South population changes compared to the other states. It is an Wales and Victoria. I continue the quote: unfortunate situation.

What was introduced as a wartime wealth tax remains an However, picking up this exact point about the increasingly important revenue source, reaping an expected economic growth forecasts, it is clear that the $1.15 billion this year. Stamp duty has trebled over the past government expected there would be a level of 10 years, far outstripping any pay increases. The situation economic growth that would drag the economy must change. forward. In its projections for taxation, either on stamp I agree with the sentiment of this editorial that it is not duty or on other areas, the government has not paid only unfair and woefully improper for Victorian sufficient regard to that. In fact, the clear point is that it taxpayers to pay so much more so soon after the will collect more taxation driven by that fiscal drag, that government has implemented its business tax changes, bracket creep, than it would have if it had made proper its so-called business tax reforms. This is a key tax that provision for bringing that into account instead of in a has been discussed in that business tax reform, in the sneaky and unfortunate way being prepared to collect Harvey reforms. I will come to the Harvey review and some windfall gains in taxation. its suggestions at a later point. I know that on the issue of stamp duty there will be I make the point that this is an editorial that appeared in significant windfall gains, and those gains will not, as a major daily newspaper in Victoria just several months my motion indicates, in any measure be handed back to after those business tax changes were introduced. Those Victorian taxpayers, investors and families. I know that tax levels impacted, as I have said before, on so many it will impact on them. It will certainly mean that stamp Victorians, whether businesses, investors or average duty on property sales will continue to impact in a very home buyers. unfortunate way.

I want to comment on the economic projections and I turn to some clear examples. I would be very pleased pick up the discussion that I had with the Minister for if anyone in the house wishes to examine these figures Sport and Recreation a moment ago about the because I believe these comparisons move the issue out long-term economic trends, and why I think we might of the discussion of broad economic policy and taxation see a slow and unfortunate reversal of the long-term policy, which tends to be regarded by many Victorians population trends that are occurring. I turn to the as a little arcane, and brings it down to a human level of normal families buying very standard and sensible STAMP DUTY: REFORM

114 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

properties in normal suburbs and normal regions of the how the Premier justifies that. I am not sure how the state. Treasurer justifies that difference, either.

I turn to some residential property sales in the past two One can recall that at one point the Treasurer was the weeks in Victoria. federal member for Bendigo. I am not sure what he would say to people in Golden Square or whether he Hon. R. F. Smith — Which suburbs? thinks it is fair that they should pay such a high rate of stamp duty so soon after his decision to hold a review Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — Which suburbs would of taxation, a review that has clearly failed to you like me to pick, Mr Smith? A suburb like Mitcham implement reforms and failed to come up with a better, is a normal suburb, I would have thought, and in fairer tax system. Mitcham at 8 Salvana Avenue in the past two weeks a property was sold for $235 000. The Victorian stamp Hon. Jenny Mikakos interjected. duty on that property was $9760. The same value property in New South Wales would attract a stamp Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — Do you think the people duty of $6715, a difference of $3045. It is a very who bought that property in the past two weeks, significant impost. Ms Mikakos, should pay that enormous amount, more than $2000 in extra stamp duty? Hon. R. F. Smith interjected. Hon. Jenny Mikakos interjected. Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — That is a $235 000 property in Mitcham, in the electorate of the honourable Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — Let Hansard record that member for Mitcham. I believe that is a reasonable Ms Mikakos believes they should be very pleased with property that many ordinary, sensible Victorian families their $2000 stamp duty impost. would live in. Many first home buyers would consider buying a property like that, and I believe — through Hon. Jenny Mikakos interjected. you, Mr Deputy President — the $3045 difference in that impost that Mr Smith clearly thinks is a good thing Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — I think Ms Mikakos ought to place on families is quite unfair. to get out in her electorate and move around. She ought to go to a few auctions and see what people think. Has In Mordialloc a flat at 14/156 Lower Dandenong Road she gone to auctions and asked people whether they sold for $106 000 and attracted $2344 in stamp duty. In want to pay the enormous stamp duty impost? New South Wales the stamp duty would be $2200. There is a difference of $144 in the stamp duty impost. Hon. R. F. Smith interjected. In Moonee Ponds at 807 Mount Alexander Road a Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — Do you believe that property was sold for $315 000 in the past two weeks. people in the Mordialloc area, which is very close to The Victorian stamp duty on that property was $14 560, your area, Mr Smith — I am not sure if Mordialloc is in which is a huge impost. In New South Wales the same Chelsea Province, but it is not far away — — value property would have attracted $9665 in stamp duty, a difference of $4895 placed on Victorian families The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! Through that would not be placed on similar families in New the Chair, Mr Davis. Mr Smith, you are out of your South Wales. place.

There is no doubt the same sorts of situations apply in Hon. D. McL. DAVIS — Mr Deputy President, I country Victoria. In the past two weeks a property was make the point that these imposts are very extravagant. sold in Bendigo at 3 Tomkinson Drive, Golden Square I can give many examples, and will do so, as I continue for $200 000. It attracted $7660 in Victorian stamp my contribution. duty. The equivalent property in New South Wales would have attracted just $5490, a massive difference The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! It is now of $2170. I do not know how honourable members on 1 o’clock and time for the house to rise. In accordance the other side like Mr Smith and Ms Mikakos would be with sessional orders the debate is automatically prepared to stand up in Bendigo and say that people adjourned, with Mr Davis to continue his contribution who buy a $200 000 home in Bendigo, people who are whenever this debate is resumed. first home buyers and very average Victorians, should be slugged $2170 more for the privilege of buying a Debate interrupted pursuant to sessional orders. simple home in a place like Golden Square in Bendigo. Sitting suspended 1.00 p.m. until 2.02 p.m. I am not sure how they justify that and I am not sure QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 115

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE Industrial relations: disputes Boating: licences Hon. R. F. SMITH (Chelsea) — Will the Minister for Industrial Relations advise the house of the most Hon. PHILIP DAVIS (Gippsland) — I direct my recent industrial dispute figures for Victoria? question to the Minister for Ports. Victoria’s peak yachting organisations are concerned about what they Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial see as unnecessary and unfair charges, restrictions and Relations) — The recently released Australian Bureau inconsistency in the government’s boat operator of Statistics figures relating to June 2001 reinforce the licensing scheme. downward trend of industrial disputation in this state. In June of this year Victorian dispute figures recorded a Will the minister assure Victoria’s yachting fraternity decrease of 20 per cent compared with the figure for that consistency will apply to vessels which may or May of this year, which compares with large increases may not have reserve power available but are under sail recorded nationally and in most other states. In other alone, and advise if a yacht must be always under the states dispute figures have increased, but in this state control of a licensed boat operator? dispute figures have decreased.

Hon. C. C. BROAD (Minister for Ports) — I Furthermore, for the 12 months ended June 2001, the congratulate the shadow Minister for Ports for raising figures show that Victoria lost fewer working days to this question and providing me with this opportunity. industrial disputes compared with the same period in During debate on the boat operator licensing legislation, previous years. The June 2001 industrial disputes which is an important initiative by the Bracks figures for this state show that the lowest number of government, the government for the first time will days lost per 1000 employees is a record, the lowest introduce licensing of people driving powered figure since 1982 — 20 years. This state is reducing recreational boats, to commence from February of next industrial disputes. year for some classes of drivers. It has been extremely well received by the boating community. This is now a consistent trend. For months we have seen extremely positive disputes figures in this state One of the reasons it has been well received is that compared with previous years and compared with the licensing will also allow the opportunity for facilities previous years when the opposition was in government. and safety measures to be provided, which are important to the boating community, a much neglected The Bracks government’s approach to industrial area under the former Kennett government. relations is clearly continuing to assist Victorian industrial parties involved in those disputes to resolve The introduction of licensing for drivers of all powered their issues as quickly as possible compared with what recreational boats is in accordance with nationally the opposition did when in government by choosing agreed guidelines through the federal–state ministerial sides or picking the side it would support. council on transport. The Victorian government is absolutely in accordance with the national guidelines in The government is committed to a cooperative ensuring that this applies to all drivers of recreational workplace, one that encourages cooperative workplace powered craft. practices between the employer and employee. We will play a constructive role — not like what you lot did — In relation to the issue of yachts which may on some in preventing and resolving industrial disputes. occasions use low-power motors for berthing and so forth, it is a matter on which in the debate on the bill at We are pleased that these positive statistics will assist the time it was passed in the other place and this place I the Bracks government to retain and attract investment said that I would undertake consultations with yachting in this state so that we grow the whole of the state. organisations. That is occurring. I am confident that we will resolve that matter to the satisfaction of the Retail tenancies: leases yachting organisations and the government and, importantly, in a way which ensures that the objective Hon. C. A. FURLETTI (Templestowe) — I refer of the legislation, which is to ensure that all Victorians the Minister for Small Business to her response to my who use our waterways do so safely, is achieved. question without notice yesterday when she refused to confirm that the government would take immediate action to restore certainty to the rent review provisions of the Retail Tenancies Reform Act. Instead she indicated that the turmoil currently being experienced QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

116 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

by tenants and landlords would be dealt with in the council was a major outcome of the COAG meeting, so options discussion paper which the government has it is disappointing that the commonwealth has not even commissioned. been able to get the papers together for this meeting and has subsequently had to postpone it. The matter I raise is one that requires immediate attention. I think the minister has underestimated the It is also disappointing that the commonwealth number of small businesses and landlords affected. minister, Senator Minchin, has unilaterally announced Given the current impasse, will the minister advise the that Warwick Parer will chair what was supposed to be house when the government will introduce legislation an independent review of energy market direction. For to allay the concerns of those thousands of small those who have forgotten, Warwick Parer was severely businesses and landlords? compromised as a Liberal federal minister and will now compromise any independence that this review might Hon. M. R. THOMSON (Minister for Small have had due to his significant and direct involvement Business) — As I reiterated yesterday, in retail in Queensland coalmine management. How an tenancies we were left with a legislative nightmare and independent review can be chaired by someone with mess thanks to the previous government. It was such a direct and significant interests in the energy industry is mess that one lawyer said to me that he should be a feat that will be interesting to hear the commonwealth sending the previous minister a dozen roses every day explain. for the amount of work he got because of the confusion that legislation brought to bear on both landlords and In contrast, at the NEM ministers first meeting, tenants. ministers considered and reached agreement on a range of measures to improve the operation of the national The government has undertaken a serious review of the electricity market including the arrangements for total impact of retail tenancies on landlords and tenants. interconnections between states. That forum asked the It intends to come back with legislation that will make National Electricity Market Management Company, or workable the legislative requirements for both landlords Nemmco, to complete by the end of this year the and tenants, take the confusion out of it and make it assessment of two proposals for interconnections more useable for them. As I said yesterday, that options between South Australia and New South Wales and, paper will include the issue that Mr Furletti is so importantly, the upgrade of the Snowy interconnection concerned about and about which I too am concerned. between New South Wales and Victoria. Efficient That issue will be part of the options paper that will be interconnection can drive down wholesale electricity released shortly. The government has undertaken to prices and deliver lower electricity prices for businesses bring that legislation into the Parliament this session and small consumers and, importantly, both proposals and intends to meet that deadline. will also increase security of supply in Victoria.

Electricity: ministers forum The forum has established revised time lines for the early resolution of the major reviews currently being Hon. KAYE DARVENIZA (Melbourne West) — I undertaken by Nemmco and the National Electricity ask the Minister for Energy and Resources what Code Administrator Ltd, including NECA’s first review leadership role the Victorian government is playing in of the first three years of the national electricity market. the second national electricity market ministers forum I see the main objective of the second meeting of the being held in Melbourne on Friday, 21 September? NEM ministers forum on Friday as reaching agreement on the pursuit of demand-side participation initiatives. Hon. C. C. BROAD (Minister for Energy and The forum will also receive updates on progress with Resources) — Victoria will continue to play a items on the work program including these important leadership role in national forums such as the national interconnector assessments by Nemmco. electricity market (NEM) ministerial forum, which Victoria initiated and which is being held in Melbourne In short, the NEM ministers forum will proceed as and will be chaired by me. On the issue of leadership it planned on Friday and it will involve the jurisdictions is disappointing to say the least that the commonwealth of Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland, South government has decided to cancel the first meeting of Australia, the Australian Capital Territory and the ministerial council on energy which had been Tasmania. The states are showing that they can scheduled to be held in Melbourne on the same day as demonstrate strong leadership on the issue of energy the NEM ministers forum. At the last Council of market reform. Through its contributions at forums Australian Governments meeting the Prime Minister such as the NEM, the Bracks government is continuing claimed that the establishment of this ministerial to deliver its commitment to ensure that Victorians QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 117

have access to a secure and reliable electricity supply at staging and promoting the event, and in turn the state affordable prices. derives significant economic and promotional benefits. The event was broadcast live in many places around the Petrol: terminal gate pricing world, significantly throughout Europe, North America and South America as well as Asia. Hon. P. R. HALL (Gippsland) — Will the Minister for Consumer Affairs advise the house of the impact of I will describe for those honourable members who may the 1 August introduction of terminal gate pricing on have not been at the event how it operated. As part of country petrol prices? the international athletics season, the top eight point-scorers in each discipline throughout the grand Hon. M. R. THOMSON (Minister for Consumer prix series gathered to contest the grand prix. Those Affairs) — When the legislation came before the titles included the grand prix athlete of the year for each Parliament the government was clear in suggesting that discipline as well as the overall IAAF grand prix athlete this was not a panacea to petrol pricing for Victorian of the year. motorists. However, it has been able to develop a pattern of pricing arrangements and transparency which The 100-metre straight and lanes 1 and 2 of the is what we said the legislation would do — that is, Olympic Park track were resurfaced for the event and a create transparency. I suggest the member should have new warm-up track incorporating jumping and a look at the web site to see what is happening with throwing facilities was constructed adjacent to the terminal gate pricing. existing track and was fully utilised for the event. This clearly demonstrates that an ongoing infrastructure There is an important issue about what is happening legacy as well as significant promotional and economic with terminal gate pricing and the rebates on retail benefits to the state came about because of the event. It prices from oil companies. Consumer affairs is also provided a tremendous opportunity to display monitoring that and will provide information to the athletes from a number of nationalities and Australian Competition and Consumer Commission on backgrounds. We had strong athlete representation at the ongoing monitoring of the pricing regime in respect the event from Africa, Greece, Britain, the United of the setting of the retail price and undercutting and States, Canada, Russia and other Baltic nations. discounting in arrangement with that. Terminal gate pricing is providing that transparency. The government Freeza program said it would provide transparency. It is providing that transparency, and we believe and hope that over the Hon. A. P. OLEXANDER (Silvan) — I direct my long term it will benefit independents in the field who question to the Minister for Youth Affairs. The will be able to negotiate a better and more open and much-vaunted Freeza program evaluation has been transparent price for their fuel which can benefit all completed. It recommends that Freeza be continued and motorists including country motorists. extended and that a secure source of recurrent funding be found to ensure the future viability of the program. International Association of Athletics The minister should recall assurances he gave to the Federations Public Accounts and Estimates Committee that funding of $1 million was to be transferred to his department Hon. E. C. CARBINES (Geelong) — In light of the from the Community Support Fund to ensure the Bracks government commitment to major events, will viability of Freeza beyond December of this year. I ask the Minister for Sport and Recreation advise the house the minister: have the necessary funds been of the recent International Association of Athletics successfully transferred to his department and, if so, Federations event held at Olympic Park? when does he intend to end the considerable confusion and fear that exists within the youth community that Hon. J. M. MADDEN (Minister for Sport and after December this vital youth initiative might simply Recreation) — I thank the honourable member for her fade away? question. This event marked the first time since the 1956 Olympic Games in which an athletics event held Hon. J. M. MADDEN (Minister for Youth in Melbourne has been able to attract the world’s best Affairs) — I thank the honourable member for his and finest athletes. It is also the first time in its 17-year question. I do not know if the honourable member was history that the International Association of Athletics here last night when in answer to a question in relation Federations (IAAF) grand prix final has been held in to Freeza I again reinforced my commitment to the the Southern Hemisphere. The government entered into program. I continue to reinforce that commitment. a funding agreement with Athletics Australia to assist in QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

118 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

As members of the house may well be aware, Freeza is What the government wants to ensure as quickly as a very significant program. Honourable members possible is that the money consumers have paid out for would also appreciate that we are developing a youth travel they were intending to take has been protected. strategy, and the key aim of that youth strategy is to The Travel Compensation Fund has been in contact ensure that the long-term future for youth in this state is with the administrator, and it will continue that contact a secure one. with the administrator and try to ascertain as quickly as possible how secure those funds are. Honourable members interjecting. Information has been placed on our Consumer and Hon. J. M. MADDEN — I am glad I have captured Business Affairs Victoria web site, which clearly the imagination and attention of members opposite outlines which agencies fall into the Ansett Holdings because I know that while they struggle with attention, Group as direct subsidiaries and which agencies are they certainly struggle also with imagination. operating as franchisees and are independently licensed. We have allowed a number of those Ansett Holdings I find it quite astounding to hear from opposition Group travel agencies to remain open so they can members their sincerity — their fawning sincerity — provide advice and information to customers. and the fact that suddenly they have discovered young people in the community because really, as I have We are hoping there will be a buyer for this group and mentioned on a number of occasions, when they were that all 30 agencies will be covered by that purchase, in government they outsourced youth services; they but we have no guarantees in relation to that. However, rolled them into human services as a welfare issue; then Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria and the they put the blowtorch to the sector and they slashed Business Licensing Authority will be working with the and burnt it. administrators and, if there is a buyer, trying to fast-track the procedures to enable the agencies to get Ansett Australia: Traveland licensed quickly so we have the least possible number of hiccups for customers out there. Hon. G. D. ROMANES (Melbourne) — Will the Minister for Consumer Affairs explain the Traveland We understand that this is a really tough time for those relationship with Ansett Australia and the impact on people who have booked for their dream holiday or for consumers as a result of the Ansett collapse? their first family holiday in a long time and that they are concerned about whether their funds have been Hon. M. R. THOMSON (Minister for Consumer protected, whether they will get their tickets and Affairs) — I thank the honourable member for her whether they will get a chance to travel, and we will be question. Yesterday during questions without notice I doing all we can to provide that information as soon as talked about the Ansett Australia collapse and its effect possible. on consumers in relation to tickets purchased from Ansett. Part of the confusion is due to the collapse of Ventura Bus Lines Pty Ltd the Traveland group. There is some confusion out there about what we are talking about in relation to Traveland Hon. J. W. G. ROSS (Higinbotham) — I direct my and whether or not its agencies are licensed travel question to the Minister for Industrial Relations and agents, and we need to clarify the Traveland refer to an answer by the minister yesterday regarding arrangements. the role the Victorian government played in the resolution of an industrial dispute at Skilled Equipment The Traveland group has 30 agencies trading under it Manufacturing in Ballarat. which are now deregistered and not licensed. They include Advantage Traveland, RACV Traveland, Today another industrial dispute at Ventura Bus Lines Travel Direct and Travel Strength, and there are a Pty Ltd has meant the travelling public, and school number of others. A number are operating as individual children in particular, have no access to bus transport franchisees and are licensed in their own right and will across large areas of the south-eastern suburbs. Ventura continue to operate. management is required to implement revised bus driver rosters in order to comply with the safety The Travel Compensation Fund has a big task ahead of requirements of the national driving regulations. The it in trying to address what confronts individual company has attempted to achieve this without any travellers as well as travellers collectively throughout financial loss to its drivers through minimal multiroute Australia. In relation to these Traveland agencies, the rosters but is being stymied by industrial action. TCF will be investigating how money that has been deposited by customers is being held and disbursed. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 119

Given the Ballarat precedent, will the minister direct reported, the minister physically threatened industry Industrial Relations Victoria to assist Ventura Bus representatives — it appears he has lost the confidence Lines to meet its statutory obligations and ensure the of many in the fishing industry, and he has certainly dispute is settled quickly in the interests of the lost the confidence of the Tasmanian government. travelling public and school children in particular? The Tasmanian fisheries minister has written to the Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial senior federal Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Relations) — I thank the honourable member for his Forestry, Warren Truss, to advise him that he would question and I would be delighted to have Industrial rather Minister Tuckey not attend future fisheries Relations Victoria get in touch with Ventura Bus Lines industry meetings and that the senior minister should be and to assist in any way it can to resolve the dispute involved instead. referred to by the honourable member. Hon. B. C. Boardman — What has this to do with Fishing: scallop you?

Hon. D. G. HADDEN (Ballarat) — Will the Hon. C. C. BROAD — What it has to do with Minister for Energy and Resources inform the house Victoria, apart from what I have already outlined as to what action the Bracks government has taken to ensure what is a desirable objective of a commonwealth, the long-term sustainability of the Victorian scallop Victorian and Tasmanian joint management of the fishing fleet? fishery, is that it is the case that Minister Tuckey is talking to fisheries industry representatives in Victoria Hon. C. C. BROAD (Minister for Energy and later this week. There is a real issue about whether Resources) — Thanks to the effective and responsible anyone could have any confidence in the approach that management by the Bracks government I am pleased to federal minister takes. advise the house that the Victorian scallop fishery has steadily improved, and in August this year the scallop I call on Minister Tuckey, when he is visiting Victoria fishing season in the Victorian Bass Strait waters was at the end of this week, to come clean on what the extended by four months, to 30 November this year. commonwealth’s plans are for the future of the scallop fishery. These are issues of real concern to those While the Victorian scallop fishery is steadily Victorian scallop fishers who are licensed to operate in improving I am well aware that the fishery has faced commonwealth waters, which is, after all, virtually all significant difficulties during the past several years, of the Victorian scallop fishing industry. particularly in relation to industry concerns associated with the commonwealth’s current management These are matters of very serious concern to the arrangements for the fishery within its own central zone Victorian government and to the scallop fishing fleet. I jurisdiction. again call on the commonwealth government to outline to the Victorian and Tasmanian governments what Victoria is very willing to be involved in efforts by the plans it has, if any, for the future of this very important commonwealth to restructure the scallop fishery. fishing industry. However, to date the commonwealth has provided no information on how that might be achieved. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Hon. G. R. Craige — What have you done? Answers Hon. C. C. BROAD — While we wait on information from the commonwealth, Victorian scallop Hon. ANDREA COOTE (Monash) — I have two fishers continue to have access to the state’s fishing questions that have not been answered. It is a pity the beds in spite of the closure of areas of the fishery Minister for Small Business is not here, as the questions managed by the commonwealth. It is unfortunate that were directed to the Minister for Small Business and an offer by both the Victorian and Tasmanian the Minister for Housing in the other place. I have sent governments to discuss the future management of the letters, but have not received answers. The first was scallop fishery at the next ministerial council meeting dated 19 June and related to questions 1906 and 1907. I has been declined by the federal minister who has sent letters of request on 30 July, but have had no delegated responsibility for fisheries, Wilson Tuckey. response. Will the Minister for Industrial Relations please answer? Judging from Mr Tuckey’s recent efforts in dealing with the fisheries industry in Tasmania — where, it is PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

120 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial In thinking about that particular aspect of history it Relations) — I think the Minister for Small Business occurred to me that in those early days it was the clergy will respond to your request later in the day. who were educated and were able to write and so probably in real terms became the most appropriate Hon. C. A. FURLETTI (Templestowe) — I, too, people to be the scribes and notaries who led to the have one question remaining unanswered. It is modern notary public. It is recorded that in the question 1865, from memory, which I had directed to 13th century the then Pope authorised the Archbishop the Leader of the Government as part of a series of of Canterbury to appoint notaries public in England. It questions. It remains unanswered. is there that we see the origins as far as we are concerned of notaries public. Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial Relations) — I have received the honourable member’s That role remained with the Archbishop of Canterbury letter; I think that was for the Premier. I assure the until the antics of King Henry VIII led to a schism in honourable member that that answer will be able to be the Catholic Church, and of course the Reformation tabled next week. ensued. The Crown, through the parliament of the day, assumed the role of the Pope. So it is from that time that the appointment of notaries public has had to take PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL the course of going through the Court of Faculties, the Second reading ecclesiastical court in England, and of course the Archbishop of Canterbury — and that situation remains Debate resumed from 18 September; motion of today. The Court of Faculties not only oversaw the Hon. M. R. THOMSON (Minister for Small Business). appointment of notaries public but also ensured that notaries public were disciplined, if the need arose. I Hon. C. A. FURLETTI (Templestowe) — I am reach the following statement by assumption: I would pleased to rise to indicate to the government that the think it would also have the power to withdraw the Liberal opposition supports the passage of the Public appointment if the need arose, although I am not aware Notaries Bill, which quite dramatically changes the of that having occurred at any stage. manner in which notaries public, as they are now known, will be appointed in Victoria in the future. With British colonisation, in Australia we assumed the practice of having notaries. Notaries became an integral The role of a notary public goes back possibly part of the Australian landscape. My first contact with thousands of years and stems from the initial role of a notaries was when I was still living in Seymour in scribe. I am pleased to acknowledge the enormous country Victoria. Because my family had migrated to amount of work the shadow Attorney-General in the Australia it required the services of a notary. It is other place was able to include in his contribution in the interesting to note that a notary’s authentication and second-reading debate in that place. certification is generally used not for local purposes — that is, not for purposes of local jurisdiction — but Notaries public arose out of the need for people who almost invariably for overseas purposes. The became scribes to write and document records, whether development of the independence and status of notaries those records be official or private. The role of the throughout the Western world over the centuries, or scribe developed during the period of great growth and millennia, has led to their certification being accepted development of the Roman Empire. Whilst the world almost universally. saw the demise of the Roman Empire, the role of notaries survived, and indeed grew and expanded I remember that when I was a young lad my parents throughout the Western world as a very sophisticated required a document to be certified. The difficulty was and learned profession. Notarised records — that is, that there were no notaries around Seymour and they records authenticated or certified as being valid or were therefore required to undertake the then almost appropriate records — became accepted and were given 2-hour journey to Melbourne. In those days notaries universal recognition, not only in temporal courts but were considerably rarer than they are today, so it is more significantly in the ecclesiastical jurisdiction. In something that has remained in my mind. reading some of the history of notaries it appears that the Pope and the Catholic Church in general may have When I engaged in legal practice it became more taken ownership to some extent of the role of notaries common to need notaries. In reading the debate in the public in that notaries public could be appointed only other place the contribution of the Leader of the with the approval of the Pope or his designate. National Party reminded me of seeing a solicitor, Lori Pentilla, in Coburg. When I took my client to him to PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 121

attest to a particular document he brought out the recommendations that are listed in the second-reading contraption that was referred to by the Leader of the speech and which I do not intend to pursue. National Party — it looked like a big thumbscrew — and he imposed the large red seal that covered half a The recommendations have been implemented in the page. That is the role of the notary public, and as I said bill before us today. With the passage of the bill the it is the type of certification that is readily accepted only state which will still have the ties to England about throughout most of the Western world. which I spoke earlier will be Queensland, so we in Victoria are falling in line with the other states of The bill is a more significant piece of legislation than is Australia. indicated on its face. It is significant that we retain the office of notary public. I continue to use the correct At the moment the only qualification, apart from a term. Notaries public will be in greater demand — and I geographic qualification, required to be a notary public guess we should all hope they will because it would be is 10 years practice as a legal practitioner, and that an indication and reflective of Victoria’s increasing role includes practice with a trust account and so on. It is in a global marketplace. It would indicate that Victoria based on a person’s experience as a legal practitioner, is increasingly dealing in matters requiring overseas but that qualification is intensified in terms of education authentication, certification and verification. It is in the provisions in the bill. I will refer to that shortly. important that, in the course of changing the current controls and statutory dimensions within which notaries There is a process that must be followed and that public work, we do nothing to any great extent to involves being approved by the Victorian Society of prejudice the standing that Victorian notaries currently Notaries, which makes a recommendation to the have in overseas countries. Archbishop of Canterbury. The Victorian Society of Notaries has the vast majority of current Victorian I recall that we have a number of different categories of notaries as members. I understand there are persons who can attest to the accuracy of documents 88 members out of some 90 notaries, and hence the vast and the matters contained in those documents. We majority of Victorian notaries are members of the have, of course, ordinary witnesses who can attest to society. I am pleased to have consulted at some length statutory declarations and the like. They are generally with the president elect, Mr Peter Zablud, whom I had persons held in regard throughout the community, and the pleasure of attending Melbourne University law they include those classes of people listed in the school with. He will take over the role of president of Evidence Act. In my day there was also a category of the society in November, and I wish him good luck and witness called a commissioner of the Supreme Court of congratulations in that venture. I was pleased to have Victoria, for taking affidavits which involved a discussed the matter with him on a number of commission being granted by the Supreme Court occasions. The first occasion the issue was raised was authorising a person to act in that capacity. For part of when Mr Zablud called me with some concerns my life as a solicitor, I was a commissioner for taking because the society had not been consulted, yet the bill affidavits, which was I guess a slightly higher status of was in the marketplace. Subsequently I was informed witness than that of a justice of the peace, which still the government had taken steps to consult the society exists. On another level completely was the role of the and that many of the concerns the society had had been notary public. attended to. In the final analysis he was happy to recommend acceptance of the provisions and indicated The difference between the categories is the degree of that he was assured that some of the concerns of the independence, security and confidence that a person society would be addressed by regulation. I trust the who is receiving a document can have in the person government will honour those undertakings. who is attesting to the veracity or otherwise of that document. Therefore it is a significant process that we The bill will remove a number of barriers that exist for are dealing with today in seeking to ensure that the people to become notaries public. It makes the cosmetic status notaries public have in Victoria today remains. change of changing the English language more dramatically than would appear appropriate in the first The change arises as a result of a lengthy and intensive instance by calling the holders of the office public investigation by the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations notaries rather than notaries public. They are two Committee in 1996. I am pleased that the Honourable different things, but that seems to be a decision of the Peter Katsambanis was a member of that committee government which will be pursued. The bill reduces the and will follow me in the debate. I am sure the length of time which a practitioner requires to have in honourable member made a major contribution to the practice from 10 years to five years. It introduces the recommendations that came out of the inquiry — requirement for an applicant to complete a course PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

122 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

which is to be set by the board of examiners through the Under the heading ‘General’ the explanatory Supreme Court, and provides that appointments will be memorandum sets out the very important and respectful made by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court on the role of public notaries generally and the legal effect of certification of the board of examiners. their powers. For instance, a public notary has the power to certify as to the legal effect of documents for The Victorian Society of Notaries has been consulting international purposes for use in foreign and with the board of examiners and the Prothonotary of the international courts and to provide an international Supreme Court to ensure the appropriate course of guarantee of the authenticity and legality of these education to assist prospective public notaries has been documents. The work of public notaries ranges from prepared and will be appropriate. The bill introduces a determining and applying evidentiary procedures to procedure similar to that required for a legal preparing documents which have legal force. practitioner to sign the roll of practitioners, provides a roll of public notaries which approved applicants must Probably the most typical of the public notary services sign, and allows a six-month transition period for those today is attesting declarations or affidavits and attesting notaries public currently appointed to sign the roll so as the execution of documents and the preparation of to become recognised, acknowledged and authorised to ships’ protests. It is important to note that the role of act. notaries public is seen as credible, especially given that in Victoria the public notary currently must have at The transition period, in effect, transfers registration least 10 years legal practice behind them before they requirements from the Victorian Society of Notaries to can be given that faculty. the Supreme Court. The general thrust of the bill is positive. It brings an ancient profession into the new The parliamentary Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations millennium. It brings onshore total control and Committee was asked to review the role of notaries responsibility for that ancient profession. Most of those public, as it currently is called, back in 1995, and in with whom the opposition has consulted are happy with 1996 released its report recommending that Victoria has the provisions, and we are pleased to give the bill our its own legislation for appointing and dealing with support. public notaries. SARC recommended that only qualified legal practitioners should be eligible for Hon. D. G. HADDEN (Ballarat) — I rise to speak appointment as public notaries, that applicants should in support of the Public Notaries Bill, a very important have at least 5 years legal practice as a principal instead bill that deals with an important role of public notaries. of 10 years, that the number of notaries should not be limited to a geographic area or area of population, that The bill will provide for the appointment and regulation appointments should be made by the Supreme Court — of the practice of public notaries and will amend the which is the body through which law graduates apply to Legal Practice Act 1996, the Instruments Act 1958 and be admitted to practice as barristers and solicitors — the Evidence Act 1958. The purpose of the bill is as set and also that applicants to become public notaries out in clause 1, which is to provide for the appointment should be required to undergo an approved course of and enrolment of public notaries by the Supreme Court. training. The bill before the house embodies SARC’s I do not propose to go as far back as the Roman recommendations. Empire, as did the previous speaker, but by way of Clause 4 sets out the criteria for appointment as a public historical background I indicate that the bill proposes to notary. It states that a person who applies to be a public replace an ancient system of what is currently known as notary must be a natural person admitted to legal notaries public that dates back to 1533 and beyond that practice in Victoria; they must have held a practising to Roman times. Before the Reformation the Pope certificate in Victoria for at least five years as a delegated the appointment of notaries public to his principal; and they must have completed a satisfactory legate, who was at that time the Archbishop of course of study relating to notarial practice approved by Canterbury. At the time of King Henry VIII and the the Council of Legal Education. break from Rome the papal jurisdiction ceased with the enactment of the Ecclesiastical Licences Act 1533. Clause 5 sets out the application for certificate of Since then the faculties appointing notaries to practice eligibility for appointment as a public notary. It is in England have been held by the Archbishop of important to note that the fee is greatly reduced; in fact Canterbury. The ability to issue a faculty to any person it is roughly 10 per cent of what the fee currently is to practise as a notary is through the Victorian Society through the Victorian Society of Notaries and through of Notaries, with the final approval in the hands of the the Archbishop of Canterbury. Archbishop of Canterbury. PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 123

Clause 5 also sets out the evidence which must It is understood that the Council of Legal Education has accompany the application and provides for a discretion had discussions with Victoria University and the Leo with the board of examiners where the board may Cussen Institute of Victoria about the course of study require an applicant to provide further evidence or proposed for public notaries. The Society of Public appear in person before it. It gives powers to the board Notaries is also in contact with the Council of Legal to make inquiries as it thinks fit of the applicant. Education to assist in this regard.

The bill provides in clause 7 an appeal provision so that The current cost of an application to become a notary a person may appeal to the Supreme Court, constituted public is in the vicinity of $2000. This bill will provide by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, against a for the fee to be $285, and that is to be paid to the decision of the board of examiners, and that appeal prothonotary of the Supreme Court, a provision covered must be lodged within 30 days after the notification of in clause 5(3) of the bill. the decision. It certainly is much more affordable, and I hope it will The bill also provides for a roll of public notaries to be open the way for more legal practitioners of at least five maintained by the Supreme Court, and it provides for a years standing in Victoria who are keen to be appointed public notary’s name to be removed from that roll, as public notaries, especially in the legal areas of should the public notary not hold a current practising shipping and international and maritime law. The certificate. process will be simpler and cheaper and there will be ongoing education and support. The policy behind this bill is in a nutshell to modernise the position and the law, and to bring the role of public It is to be noted that other states and territories in notaries into modern day language and requirements. Australia, with the exception of Queensland, have their And the most important aspect is that there is no own systems for appointing public notaries through Victorian legislation which governs public notaries. their respective Supreme Courts, and it is important to note also that the submission by the Society of Public The bill provides a new scheme under which the Notaries to the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Supreme Court and the chief justice will appoint public Committee back in 1995–96 noted that no Victorian notaries. As we have heard there are currently between notarial act had been disputed by another country. 90 and 100 public notaries in the state, and it is Notaries public in some other countries do not have the important that the process continue and that public prerequisite of a legal qualification. It is a clear notaries can be expanded outside the present indication of the very high importance and respect with geographic restrictions and even expand more into rural which a public notary is regarded. and regional areas. In conclusion, I believe the bill is very important. It is The process of appointment as a public notary under the timely and it will provide for a relatively simple system bill will be a process that is not unfamiliar to legal of appointment of public notaries under Victorian practitioners who must go through that same process legislation and under the auspices of the Supreme Court when they wish to be admitted to practice as legal of Victoria. I hope it will have the effect of expanding practitioners in this state. The bill has resulted from a public notaries outside a currently restricted geographic lengthy process of consultation with persons who are area into areas of rural and regional Victoria. I directly affected by this bill. They include the Supreme commend the bill to the house. Court, the chief justice, the board of examiners, the Council of Legal Education, and the Victorian Society Hon. R. M. HALLAM (Western) — In the grand of Notaries. scheme of things I do not believe anybody would describe this as a bill of critical importance because at The bill provides that the Council of Legal Education the end of the day it does no more than update the mode should approve the formal public notary course of appointing public notaries or, as the required. The Council of Legal Education was Honourable Carlo Furletti noted, that of notaries public. established under the Legal Practice Act 1996 to I do not profess to understand the distinction the determine the qualifications, the course of study and the honourable member would make, but I understand requirements for admission to legal practice in this there is a distinction to be made. state. The council consists of members of the judiciary and the universities, and the legal profession is The bill does no more than simply remove what I represented on it. believe is generally acknowledged as an anachronism from the statute book, and it can be distilled to that one PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

124 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

simple application. On the other hand, I believe the bill authenticity and/or legality of legal documents, can be described as an example of the Parliament at particularly where those documents are relied upon for work, because the changes it introduces I hope are international purposes. In one sense the notion we have supported across party lines. They are logical and here is pretty quaint because given all that might hinge non-contentious. However, in addition they recognise upon the question of authenticity, at the end of the day that a range of circumstances in the community are that authenticity relies on the reputation of the notary changing and those changes need to be accommodated attesting to the document. On that basis it is thus in the form captured by the bill. In addition, the bill understandable that notaries are very protective of their comes to the Parliament after a review undertaken by professional reputations, their standards, and the rules an all-party parliamentary committee. On that basis if in respect of admission to their profession and in on no other we should expect it to enjoy bipartisan respect of qualifications, and so on. They are also very support. protective of the requirement that notaries have a very good working knowledge of international law. It is ironic that the bill will not rate much interest in the wider community, and in particular in the media. It is The profession of notaries has had a crucial and also a bit sad because that lack of interest can be traced traditional role for many hundreds of years, and indeed to the fact that the bill is non-contentious and that it can be traced back to early Roman times. I listened cannot be portrayed as somehow being confrontational intently to the Honourable Carlo Furletti, who talked or adversarial. It cannot be used to depict about some of that history. We can take it back a bit parliamentarians at one another’s throats. The fact is further where the birth of the profession can be traced that the vast majority of legislation processed by to what was described as the scribes in even earlier Parliament falls into that category. The bulk of writings. It simply means that where people of learning legislation going through this place enjoys bipartisan were prepared to contribute to the community they support and, heaven forbid, even demonstrates a degree became an important component in that they were able of cooperation across party lines. That is a far cry from to give advice with regard to the writing and the depiction that we see in the 5-second grab on TV transcription and even the explanation of contractual each night. However, of course I acknowledge that the documents. That was in a context when the level of profession of a parliamentarian is not the only one that literacy in the community was much less than it is claims to be misunderstood. today.

The National Party formally supports the bill before the Thus developed the profession of notaries public to the chamber, and the reason I cite is that it contains: point where the profession became recognised across jurisdictional boundaries, and that was a critical Sensible amendments arising from sensible recommendations element of their reason for being, where the status and of a sensible committee chaired by a very sensible bloke! reputation of the notaries themselves led to the I quote directly from the legislation brought to the acceptance of their verification of a particular National Party party room by our leader in the other document. The act of their attestation became the place, the honourable member for Gippsland South. I authentication. As I said, that would demonstrate why should hasten to explain that the Leader of the National the profession is so determined to protect the standards. Party happened to be the chairman of the committee that undertook the review, so perhaps that explains why What is interesting is that it was the ability of notaries he was so glowing in his support for the bill. to read, write and understand procedure, and the extent to which that stood them apart from the general The committee I refer to is the Scrutiny of Acts and population, which gave rise to the profession itself. Regulations Committee (SARC), which the honourable That has all changed because over the centuries the member for Gippsland South chaired at the time the level of literacy, at least across the Western world, has review was undertaken. But I also acknowledge that the risen dramatically. Against that background we would membership included the Honourables Peter expect that the role of notaries would diminish or even Katsambanis and Maree Luckins. I expect those dissipate altogether, because one would expect there to honourable members will welcome the opportunity to be less demand for their services. make a contribution to the debate and explain the background to the recommendations. The facts are that the profession has not faded out; quite the reverse, the role of a notary today is perhaps more The essential function of notaries public, or public important than ever. We can trace back directly to that notaries — whichever one prefers — is to provide an much-maligned concept of globalisation, where more internationally recognised guarantee as to the and more of the everyday commercial operation PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 125

transcends traditional geographic boundaries and already, where the availability of a notary in country jurisdictional lines. It is a matter of life that the level of locations was one of the questions that was addressed international commerce, trade and travel has exploded. by the Victorian Society of Notaries in respect of It has become standard for contracts today to include an appointments under the system which currently applies. arbitration clause. This is another example of the need for the community to accommodate those changing I will not make a big deal of it, but I would want to be circumstances. reassured that the new system that we have heard explained and applauded will address the issue of Today parties to a contract often see the need to include geographic location. The assumption is that because we a specific arbitration clause on the basis that should would expect more notaries public to be appointed there be a dispute they agree in advance as to how that under the new system that that geographic question dispute is to be resolved rather than run the gauntlet of a would be resolved as a matter of course. I will not make particular code of law, or worse still the risk of falling a thing about it, but it is clear, in exactly the same way between the codes of law which apply in an as justices of the peace are geographically based, that international sense. In the same sense the role of there is at least an issue that needs to be addressed. notaries becomes that much more important, particularly given that their thumbprint is recognised in I looked at the recommendations of the Scrutiny of Acts a national context. To some degree they have run and Regulations Committee that are spelt out in the against that tide based upon their relevant literacy explanatory memorandum to the bill — which as an levels. aside I commend. It states that SARC recommends that:

There is an interesting chapter of history which relates only qualified lawyers should be eligible for appointment as notaries. to the rise of the profession of notary public, which I do not intend to repeat because it has been well recorded. I I have no argument with that, and I do not believe it is suggest those who have an interest could do no better necessarily a departure from what previously applied. than read some of the debate in the other place, where Another recommendation was that: the honourable member for Berwick gave a graphic background to the development of the profession. The applicants should have at least five years legal experience. fact remains that in the late 13th century the Pope That is different from the existing regime, where bequeathed the responsibility for the appointment of 10 years experience is required. I am perfectly relaxed notaries public to the Archbishop of Canterbury. about that and hope that it will be part of the answer to That is an important chapter of the history, but there is the question of geographical location. SARC also an even more relevant chapter of history which says recommended that: that, notwithstanding the more than 700 years which the numbers of notaries should not be limited by reference to have transpired since, today we appoint notaries in this geography or population. community in exactly the same way. That of itself is worthy of note. That is the anachronism which I alluded I hope that is being addressed as I have described. It to earlier, particularly given that in this modern society also recommended that: we have no governing legislation relating to the appointments should be made by the Supreme Court; and appointment of notaries public. Given that they assume the important role that we all acknowledge, it is applicants should be required to undergo an approved course therefore important that we address that issue. I also of training. note that the quaint mode of appointment still applies in I have no argument with that because they are all Queensland, and I make that observation without pragmatic recommendations that we in the National editorial comment. Party are prepared to support. In essence what we have The bill codifies the form and process of appointment, is a new and simplified process of appointment by the specifies qualifications and training, includes an appeal Supreme Court. I note that the appointment is by the provision for someone who is disgruntled by that Supreme Court as constituted by the chief justice. I am process and includes transition arrangements. It not sure why that is included; it may be a restriction. I specifically removes all reference to geography or have no doubt there is a perfectly valid reason for it. population as a basis for appointment, which was one Maybe the minister will comment upon that in her of the criteria often referred to in the previous method response. of appointment. The reason for that is not surprising, and the circumstances have been outlined in the debate PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

126 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

The National Party is supportive of the bill to the extent The notary can request that his or her name is deleted that it relies on an existing process — that which from the roll — and that is fair enough — or the name currently applies to the appointment of barristers and can be removed because the notary is no longer on the solicitors to the Supreme Court. It is pragmatic because roll of legal practitioners. Beyond that I do not see any it uses the structure that is already in place. It employs provision that would see the authorities being able to the board of examiners that is already involved in that delete the name of a particular notary from that roll in appointment process. The difference is that the board any circumstances. I am surprised that the bill does not will now be required to implement the standard of give the Supreme Court clear authority to delete a name professional training for notaries as approved by the in certain circumstances, particularly given the extent to Council of Legal Education, again a system that is the which the professional notary relies on his or her well known, understood and respected. professional reputation and the standards applied across the profession. We would certainly support the bill to the extent that it employs an existing process and existing authorities, I acknowledge that the removal of a notary’s name and that it specifies the physical process of from the roll of legal practitioners is an automatic appointment. Currently the Crimes (Validation of trigger point for the removal of the name from the roll Orders) Bill has been introduced, where additional of public notaries, but to demonstrate the standards legislation has become necessary to retrospectively permeating the profession it would be better to have a validate orders made by the courts where the procedure specific deletion clause. Perhaps that is not a big deal in the first instance was not specified and the court and perhaps I have missed something in the structure of officials presumed upon a course of action which was the bill, but I am interested to hear the minister’s subsequently challenged with some embarrassing response. For all that, the National Party is happy to results. We acknowledge the appropriateness of having support the Public Notaries Bill. the process of appointment as is spelled out in the legislation. Hon. P. A. KATSAMBANIS (Monash) — It is with great pride that I speak in favour of the bill. It has The National Party also acknowledges the extent to been a long time coming. The bill addresses a particular which the admission process is tough. The old concept anomaly in our legal system and also addresses the of the drawbridge is appropriate in this concept because problem of one of Australia’s last remaining craft of the formal role of notaries and the extent to which unions or closed shops in areas of endeavour. As that is captured by the roll of notaries maintained by the someone who has long fought against the concept of a Supreme Court. The high standards are being closed shop, and who has long fought for the rights of maintained and that is in keeping with the community’s individuals to freely go about their lives and businesses implicit reliance on the professionalism of the and not to be fettered by unreasonable restrictions in the individual notary. conduct of their lives or businesses, I am pleased to have been involved in a minor part of the process that As an aside I note that it also seems to be relevant that led to the introduction of the bill. Victoria’s notaries are highly respected across the world and their authentication enjoys international The people who should take the vast amount of credit recognition. On that basis if no other it is important that for the bill are two individuals who are both based in those high standards are kept in place because, as I Melbourne. Firstly, Mr Nicholas Venizelakos, a understand it, not all notaries enjoy that professional solicitor who is currently practising in the Melbourne reputation. central business district and who brought this issue to a head a number of years ago when he applied to become The structure of the bill contains one anomaly. When I a notary public and was rejected. The other individual was reading the bill in preparation for the debate in this who should be congratulated for his endeavours to fight chamber, I was a bit bemused that there is no process the injustice to Mr Venizelakos when the decision was by which a notary can be removed from the Supreme made to reject him is Mr Emilios Kyrou, a partner in Court roll. I understand the bill sets some high one of Melbourne’s leading law firms. It was the standards in respect of experience and training, and that tenacity and perseverance of these two gentlemen that is the way it should be, that there is an appeal process led the charge in questioning the way notaries are that would make the mechanics fair from the view of appointed in Victoria and in many ways led to the the applicant, but once the applicant is on the roll the inquiry by the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations means of removing his or her name from the roll leaves Committee (SARC) and eventually to the bill. At the one particular circumstance unanswered — at least in conclusion of today’s events I hope the bill will become my view. an act of the Victorian Parliament that will stand as a PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 127

testimony to the great work of Mr Venizelakos and anathema to a liberal and open market economy in a Mr Kyrou. democratic nation.

The bill implements almost in full the Just as it is absurd to ask potential bakers to recommendations made by the SARC in its report into demonstrate the need for a new bakery before they can the Review of the Evidence Act and the Review of the open one in a shopping mall or on the high street, and Role and Appointment of Public Notaries that I tabled just as it is absurd and anathema to our way of life to in this place in October 1996. The review was initially ask potential plumbers to demonstrate to the plumbing undertaken by the SARC between 1992 and 1996, but it society that there is a need for plumbers in a particular had not been concluded when the Parliament was locality before they can put up their shingles and dissolved. In 1996 on my election to the Parliament I operate as plumbers, so it should be anathema to us that became a member of the committee and had the honour any individual who is properly qualified to practise law of chairing the subcommittee that concluded the review and who is entrusted by our society with such a duty into both the Evidence Act and the appointment of should have to prove a particular geographic need notaries, as well as some other issues dealing with the before being allowed to practise a particular aspect of witnessing of documents. their employment. It is wrong and it is something we are addressing today. We are correcting a major As I said, the recommendations of the committee on the injustice that has been perpetrated on many Victorians role and appointment of public notaries have now for a long time. finally been adopted almost wholly by the bill. One of the recommendations of the committee was that the The case of Mr Venizelakos makes for extraordinary appointment of public notaries was probably best reading. The fact that Mr Venizelakos had to go handled in modern Australia by national scheme through the process itself highlights a failure of our legislation because, as others who have gone before me system in Australia in the past to address these in this place and in the other place have outlined so problems. That is why I again say that I am proud to be well, the issues that public notaries deal with are not able to say I was involved in a small way in addressing confined to state borders. In fact they are not even that injustice. confined to national borders. In a large part the work of a public notary deals with trans-border and When Mr Venizelakos applied to the Victorian Society transnational issues. of Notaries of Victoria to become a notary he had to outline to the society in extraordinary detail the nature So the recommendation of the committee was ideally to of the practice that he undertook; he had to demonstrate have template legislation — national scheme a need for a notary public in the Fitzroy area where he legislation — that would deal with the appointment of was then practising; he had to demonstrate a broader notaries across the whole of Australia. Despite some need for notaries public across the whole of Melbourne efforts that have not come to pass, and that have and Victoria; and because he had not been a principal delayed the implementation of a report that was tabled solicitor for at least 10 years in Victoria he had to in this place almost five years ago. If you were to speak outline why there were exceptional circumstances in his today to Mr Venizelakos, the man who initiated all this particular case that would make him an appropriate back in 1994, he would tell you that even with the delay person to be a notary public. of a few years the bill is a positive outcome given that it addresses a real and significant injustice that has been It should be noted that prior to coming to Australia caused to many people over many years. Mr Venizelakos was for a long time a member of the Bar Association of Athens in Greece. He came to As has been pointed out, a notary public in Victoria is Australia for family reasons, studied for a Master of currently appointed by the Court of Faculties, which Laws at Monash University, then became a barrister comes under the control and supervision of the and solicitor of the Supreme Court of Victoria and took Archbishop of Canterbury. A notary public in Victoria out a full practising certificate. During the period he is appointed by a method that has long been repealed in stayed in Australia and before he could qualify as a England itself. Potential Victorian notaries public have lawyer of the Supreme Court of Victoria he worked as a to apply to a body based in England that no longer has law clerk in various legal offices in Melbourne. He built any jurisdiction over the appointment of notaries public up a specialty practice because he was the only lawyer in that nation. It seems absurd in modern 21st-century in the whole of Australia who was qualified to practise Australia and it seems an anachronism, but that law in Greece. anachronism has masked and camouflaged a closed shop that has operated on a ‘needs’ basis, which is also PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

128 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

Mr Venizelakos provided a valuable service not just to I am a fan and supporter of small government and expatriate Greeks living in Melbourne but also to many government not getting in the way of business, Australian corporations that had dealings with Greece professions and trades where it does not need to. If the and needed to have advice on Greek law. He became Victorian Society of Notaries had acted in a way that acknowledged across Melbourne — I was in private was in line with modern thinking and in a way that practice at the time and can vouch for that in a personal elevated the status of their profession rather than trying capacity — as the pre-eminent specialist in Greek law to curtail entry to their profession for what can only be in Melbourne. Yet he was deemed an unfit person to be surmised to be either some form of revenue protection a notary public by the society that had to determine his measure or some snobbery value, or maybe a application — the Victorian Society of Notaries. combination of both, we would not need legislation such as this. This created many problems that I will not outline in this debate, but in particular it created many problems It is simple stuff: anyone who for five years or more has for his clients. Often he had to respond to emergency held a practising certificate and has practised law, and situations but could not find a notary public or he found who sits a brief examination that will be set by the that a notary public was not available to book an Supreme Court and then signs the roll, will be able to appointment for his clients. Dealing as he did with practise as a notary public. As I said, it is simple stuff cross-border and cross-nation laws, a lot of the and did not take a lot of grey matter to come up with, documents he handled had to be authenticated and only yet the society failed to address it for basically an entire a notary public could authenticate them. It became a century, or at least since the celebrated case of Bailleau real problem for his clients that he could not offer the v. The Society of Notaries for the State of Victoria in service they required. There are no two ways about it: it 1904, which is probably the last case I could find in was an effective restraint of trade exercised by a craft Victoria dealing with notaries, although re Fay in 1909 union — that is, the Victorian Society of Notaries. The was a relevant case. In other words there was a whole notion of craft unions restricting access to a particular century of ignoring the needs of the public and the trade or profession disappeared in the 19th century, yet injustice perpetrated on many individuals who went here it was operating in late 20th-century Victoria! before Mr Venizelakos, of ignoring the fact that if voluntary bodies like the society were not to act in the If it were not for the tenacity and the purposefulness of best interests of the public of Victoria eventually the Mr Venizelakos, once rejected, to highlight that legislature would have to act. An entire century of injustice to our legislators and if it were not for the trying to buck reality has led to this bill. support he received from his principal solicitor, Mr Kyrou, we would never have got to debating this That is sad because the individuals in that society, some bill and the injustice would have continued to this very of whom are well known to me, are all fine and day. honourable people. Unfortunately in the perpetuation of an ancient culture they have essentially forced our hand It should be noted that to her eternal credit the then as legislators to intervene in an area where they should Attorney-General, Jan Wade, realised that what had have been able to look after themselves in the best gone on was wrong and took active steps to address the interests of the public. That is the disappointing aspect injustice by referring the role and appointment of public of the bill. I do not for one moment like to interfere in notaries in Victoria to the Scrutiny of Acts and this way except where it is absolutely necessary, but my Regulations Committee for examination, and finally we outline of the injustice to Mr Venizelakos makes it have reached the point we are at today. The bill before necessary in this case to bring this sort of bill before the us creates a new system — a Victorian system. house.

It should be put on record that I express my The Supreme Court has been charged through the board disappointment that we need this legislation because of examiners — the same people who determine professions, particularly honourable professions like the eligibility for lawyers in Victoria to hold practising legal profession and the profession, if you can call it certificates — with the role of setting any examination that — it is really a practice — of public notaries within it sees fit to determine who can be a notary public. That a broader legal profession, can self-regulate. It is only is appropriate in all the circumstances. I do not believe when there is an abject failure to self-regulate in the the examination will be too onerous. Having chaired the public interest that the legislature should become subcommittee of the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations involved. Committee that inquired into this element of our law, I have some knowledge of this area and what notaries PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 129

public are required to do on a daily basis. The Hon. JENNY MIKAKOS (Jika Jika) — I rise to examination should not be overly onerous. lend my strong support to the Public Notaries Bill. I am certainly not going to go back to Roman history, as the We will find that in time the number of people in Honourable Carlo Furletti did, but I will indicate in a Victoria who are able to act as notaries public will fairly brief contribution why the bill is long overdue increase, probably exponentially. That is a good thing, and very much needed in this state. because as society grows and matures, as we deal with an increasing global marketplace, as trade with other I take this opportunity to put on the record my personal nations increases and as travel to other nations for not congratulations to the Honourable Carlo Furletti on his just tourism purposes but for work increases, the need elevation to Deputy Leader of the Opposition. While he to have documents authenticated, particularly in nations will be seated a lot further away from me, I certainly that use different legal systems to our own such as look forward to continuing our regular sparring when it continental Europe, Asia, South America and Africa, comes to these kinds of legal bills. I wish him well in will continue to grow. his new duties.

As the world becomes a busier place the last thing our At the outset, I indicate that I am very pleased to be people want is to finalise their documentation but then following the contribution that the Honourable Peter be told they must look up the law institute diary or the Katsambanis has just made, because I also want to put telephone book to seek a notary public who may be on the record and echo a similar sentiment about the able to witness those documents in a hurry. This will role that the two individuals that he has just mentioned provide convenience for the public and will also have made in the lead-up to both the Scrutiny of Acts provide competition in the field of the provision of and Regulations Committee report that recommends notarial services. That can only be good because I very significant changes in the area of public notaries daresay it will lead to a decrease in fees. Any protection and in the subsequent development of the bill coming of revenue comes from the fact that the number of before the Parliament. notaries is contained, therefore the volume of work per notary should be increased. I do not think notaries I also congratulate and pay tribute to the very dedicated charge exorbitant fees, but I daresay the legislation will work that both Mr Kyrou and Mr Venizelakos have probably lead to a public benefit through a decrease in done in seeking to have this area of the law reformed. fees for performing notary work, which will be a good Mr Venizelakos is a close personal friend of mine. He thing. is a very fine lawyer, and I am very pleased that the bill will probably open the way for him to become However, as a matter of public policy the bill will lead registered as a public notary in the state of Victoria. It is to the elimination of one more closed shop, of injustice also very clear from reading the Scrutiny of Acts and and of the discrimination of individuals who have Regulations Committee report and in particular the effectively been barred from undertaking a profession regular extracts of evidence given by Mr Emilios Kyrou they are perfectly qualified to undertake. The correction that his views have certainly influenced to a very large of that injustice or unfairness is the greatest extent the final recommendations that were made by the accomplishment of the bill. Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee in its report. Mr Kyrou is also a very distinguished lawyer in I will not go through the detail of each and every his field. His area of expertise is administrative law. He provision in the bill because honourable members in is a former colleague of mine, having practised as a this place and the other place have covered them partner of Mallesons Stephen Jaques, a firm with which adequately. However, in closing I again pay tribute to I was previously associated. I am pleased that the significant achievement of two extraordinary Mr Kyrou’s evidence was given a great deal of weight Victorian citizens — namely, Nick Venizelakos, who in the SARC report and in particular his very strong wanted to become a notary and was not allowed to; and views expressed in his submissions to that committee Emilios Kyrou, who chose to take on the society as that it is highly inappropriate in this day and age, now Mr Venizelakos’s lawyer. The hard work and all the that we are in a new century and millennium, that we knock-backs that those two individuals received in continue to have people performing a public function trying to get through this ancient and totally ridiculous appointed by a foreign authority. It is an archaic system process must now seem worth while with the passage to have the Court of Faculties, which is attached to the of the bill into the legislation of Victoria. The Public Archbishop of Canterbury, appointing public notaries in Notaries Bill, when enacted, should stand as testament this state, which, as Mr Katsambanis indicated, does not to the effort and achievements of those two gentlemen. occur even in the United Kingdom. PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

130 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

As I said, the bill is long overdue. Victoria and misconduct by legal practitioners and allows for a legal Queensland remain the only jurisdictions in this country practitioner to be disciplined or removed from practice where public notaries continue to be appointed in effect for activities which are strictly unconnected with their by the Archbishop of Canterbury. As a staunch legal practice but where there is a finding that the republican, I certainly welcome this change to the practitioner is not of good character. Those kinds of method of appointment of public notaries in this state. provisions would enable a legal practitioner practising as a public notary to be removed from practice as a The reasons that I support the bill go far beyond my legal practitioner and therefore as a public notary where political views about the need for this country to they have engaged in some type of misconduct. become independent and to cut the remaining legal ties with the United Kingdom. My support for the bill goes I believe that method of discipline will ensure that to the heart of my views on the need for government to public notaries in this state remain people of the highest intervene where the market is not working. In this integrity. It is important that we have some method of particular case it is very clear that the members of the discipline, and this method will adequately provide for Victorian Society of Notaries have a vested interest in disciplinary proceedings in such a way as not to create a continuing the current regime whereby they make to the bureaucratic or cumbersome process that would not be Court of Faculties recommendations which are usually justified in a profession of about 100 individuals. followed. They have in effect precluded additional public notaries from being appointed in this state, I note that the Honourable Carlo Furletti referred to the particularly in order to service various ethnic change in terminology from notary public to public communities. notary. The change to public notary reflects modern English usage and is consistent with similar legislation It is important to put on the record that the particular adopted by New South Wales, South Australia and the case of Mr Venizelakos indicated that there is a very Northern Territory. The bill is not intended to change clear need for public notaries to cater for various ethnic the role envisaged of and undertaken by public notaries, communities where those notaries are experts in the law but is intended to make the terminology and position of specific countries. The system clearly does not work easier for members of the public to understand. well where you have a society precluding people being appointed on a geographical basis without having I note also that the Honourable Roger Hallam expressed regard to other public needs, such as the need to service concern about the education course new public notaries various ethnic communities. The bill is certainly very seeking appointment would have to undertake. He said important. it was important that such applicants have some understanding of international law. The bill has been I take up a point made by Mr Hallam. It is a very developed following extensive consultations with the significant change to our method of appointing public Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the Council of notaries which is currently completely unregulated by Legal Education, Victoria University and the Leo Victorian legislation and is essentially in the hands of a Cussen Institute. As honourable members will be foreign authority. aware, the Council of Legal Education currently approves the type of education legal practitioners are In my brief contribution it is important to take up just a required to undertake, and it is envisaged the council few comments that were made by some of the previous will continue discussions with various teaching speakers, in particular the issue that Mr Hallam raised institutes in developing an appropriate course of study. in his contribution, relating to disciplinary proceedings. It may well be the case that some aspects of international law should be included in the curriculum Clause 8(6) provides a method for public notaries to be given that public notaries are involved in certifying removed from the roll which is to be kept by the documents involving international trade. Supreme Court of Victoria where the public notary ceases to be a person admitted to legal practice in The final point I address is the comment made by the Victoria. In effect the provision is a way of disciplining Honourable Roger Hallam regarding the need to public notaries or removing them from the roll which maintain an adequate number of public notaries in enables them to act as a public notary where the person regional areas. I concur with his concerns. I believe the has been disciplined under the Legal Practice Act and bill will open up the appointment of public notaries in has been removed as a legal practitioner. Victoria. Currently the Victorian Society of Notaries can knock back an applicant on the basis that there is a As honourable members would be aware, the Legal public notary in a particular geographic area. He gave Practice Act has very extensive provisions relating to the example of what happened to Mr Venizelakos. I PUBLIC NOTARIES BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 131

believe the removal of this provision will mean there is see examples in the medical profession in particular, a stronger possibility legal practitioners across regional where a number of medical bodies, surgical institutions Victoria will apply to become public notaries over time. and colleges of practitioners, while they are I note in this respect that the Scrutiny of Acts and professional associations, act to restrict trade and the Regulations Committee report identified that the free market in those professions. So it is with the Victorian Society of Notaries imposed a geographic test appointment of public notaries. In that sense, with the of public need and that in 1996, when the report was opening up of the process we are seeing a welcome issued, of the 88 notaries in Victoria 55 were in the change that will allow the marketplace to do what it metropolitan area and 33 were in provincial areas. does best in allocating resources. Clearly 33 public notaries in regional Victoria is inadequate, and I look forward to the passage of the bill I will address some particular issues relating to the opening up the appointment of further public notaries qualifications for appointment of public notaries and over a period in regional Victoria. With those brief some of the changes between the existing situation and remarks I conclude my comments and urge the passage the proposed situation. of the bill. In the second-reading speech the Attorney-General Hon. G. K. RICH-PHILLIPS (Eumemmerring) — noted that under the guidelines of the Victorian Society I make some brief comments on the Public Notaries of Notaries an existing applicant is required to have Bill. I am pleased to have the opportunity to follow the practised as a principal solicitor for a period of Honourable Roger Hallam, because in doing so it 10 years. It is also noted in the speech that it is the means that Mr Hallam and I are the only non-legal government’s intention that an applicant will only be practitioners to speak on the bill. Perhaps it reflects on required to have five years of experience as a principal the nature of legal bills that come before this place, legal practitioner. Unfortunately, in reading the bill it which are generally debated by former legal appeared to me that that is not what the bill actually practitioners. In making my contribution I will have achieves. The bill requires that for an applicant to regard to what the layperson in the street would think become a public notary, he or she must have held a about the bill and the fact that for the last 200 years of practising certificate for a period of five years. A Australian history the appointment of public notaries solicitor can hold a practising certificate while not has been by the Court of Faculties of His Grace the actually practising law. A person with legal Archbishop of Canterbury. It is a quaint notion in these qualifications can be working in another field while modern times. holding a practising certificate and thus have qualified by holding the practising certificate for five years It is not without some regret that the bill will sweep without having practised law for a number of years. away 200 years of legal history in Australia. During the That creates a change of situation where in reality an debate this morning on notice of motion 6, the Leader applicant need not have practised extensively. of the Government raised an objection to the motion on the basis that it was altering the traditions of the house. Another interesting aspect of the bill is the appointment Mr Hall indicated that the traditions to which the of public notaries. Clauses 4 and 5 prescribe what is Leader of the Government referred had been in place required of an applicant in order to become a public for less than 10 years, yet with nary a look backwards notary. Clause 6 provides that the Supreme Court, the government is willing to wipe out 200 years of constituted by the chief justice, may appoint and enrol a Australian legal history. It is indicative that the person as a public notary if the person files with the government has a view of history when it suits it but court a certificate issued by the board and pays the not at other times. requisite fee. It is interesting that in that clause discretion is apparently given to the Supreme Court Ms Mikakos made an interesting point when she said through the chief justice as to whether it appoints the the introduction of the bill reflected the fact that the applicant. You could conceivably have a situation marketplace was not working and that the government where a person has met all the statutory requirements to had to intervene. That is not the case. The introduction become a public notary, yet on a whim the Supreme of the bill is creating an opportunity for the marketplace Court, through the chief justice, chooses not to appoint to work. There has been a closed shop, and the that person. There seems to be no requirement on the marketplace has not been able to work with respect to Supreme Court to actually make an appointment where the appointment of notaries because of the way public the applicant meets the requirements. notaries have been appointed by the governing body. Mr Katsambanis pointed out that it is a closed shop. It The bill seems to put that discretion in place, and while is not unusual to see closed shops in professions. We I do not wish to compare the chief justice with the COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

132 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

bureaucracy, I would be reluctant to provide that sort of COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION discretion to a bureaucrat when it came to appointing (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL people who met the relevant application criteria. Second reading We welcome the bill because it opens up the marketplace for public notaries, allows market forces to Debate resumed from 18 September; motion of take effect and allows public notaries to practise where Hon. M. R. THOMSON (Minister for Small Business). they wish to practise. It removes some of the archaic restrictions on geography and other factors, it removes Hon. M. T. LUCKINS (Waverley) — The the factor of the Archbishop of Canterbury being opposition does not oppose the bill. Community visitors involved in the appointment of a public notary, and it are the eyes and ears of and advocates for individuals in shows some progress for the legal system and for our community with an intellectual or physical competition in the legal system in this country. With disability. They are voluntary and independent those remarks, I support the bill. community representatives. They come from very diverse backgrounds, and many have had experience Motion agreed to. within their family or among friends with people who are disabled. They work to ensure that Victorians Read second time. without the capacity to communicate strongly or advocate for themselves have a voice. Third reading Community visitors are appointed under section 53, Hon. M. R. THOMSON (Minister for Small division 5, of the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Business) — By leave, I move: Services Act 1986, and they are usually appointed for a That this bill be now read a third time. term of three years by the Governor in Council on the recommendation of the Public Advocate. They are very In so doing I thank the Honourables Carlo Furletti, carefully screened and generally have undergone Dianne Hadden, Roger Hallam, Peter Katsambanis, background checks as well as police security checks Jenny Mikakos and Gordon Rich-Phillips for their before their appointment. Their functions are set out in contributions. I clarify two questions raised by the section 54 of the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Honourable Roger Hallam in his contribution. Services Act 1986. It states that the community visitor is appointed to inquire into: In relation to the method of appointment and appeals through the Supreme Court as constituted by the chief (a) the appropriateness and standard of facilities for the justice, I have been informed this was on the accommodation, physical well being and welfare of recommendation of the chief justice as the appropriate residents; way in which this should be done, so that was the way (b) the adequacy of opportunities and facilities for the it was done. recreation, occupation, education and training of residents; and In relation to the disciplinary tribunal and the capacity to deal with a notary, I have been informed that the (c) whether services are being provided in accordance with principles specified in … disciplinary tribunal would be used as a vehicle to address indiscretion as a notary or malpractice as a It refers to a section of the act, and continues: notary; that that would also result in their being struck off as a solicitor and therefore as a notary. (d) the use of restraint, collusion and aversive therapy; and

Motion agreed to. (e) whether or not the individual program plans have been complied with. Read third time. They also investigate whether any of the institutions or Remaining stages facilities have failed to comply with the provisions of the act and take up any complaint made to a community Passed remaining stages. visitor by a resident.

The handbook that is still being distributed by the Department of Human Services, the ‘Community visitors handbook’, was published in November 1999 and outlines the powers of inspection, what to do with requests, residents’ rights, DHS staff requirements, COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 133

grievance processes, accountability and guidelines for their communities. However, the second-reading staff at facilities for visits conducted by community speech goes on to state that the bill removes the visitors. requirement that a community visitor must reside in the area to which they have been appointed. So while it is They have very wide powers. A community visitor is the government’s intention to ensure that local people entitled to inspect any part of a premises or facility and inspect local facilities, it is removing that requirement, see a client usually without notice at any time. apparently at the behest of the Public Advocate, Generally they are encouraged to notify Department of because he is concerned that he lacks the flexibility to Human Services officers as a matter of courtesy, but enable him to move community visitors around the part of their very important role is to ensure that community from region to region — for example, for a residents are being properly cared for at all times. special investigation or into regions where they have a Obviously the best way to do that is to make their visits shortage of community visitors who are appropriately without notice to the facility or the premises operators. approved and trained to carry out the role.

In addition to the regular visits, clients, or people acting Clause 3 amends the definition of region in the on their behalf, can specifically request to see a Disability Services (Amendment) Act 2000, and the community visitor, and in that case the house Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Services Act 1986 so supervisor or unit manager is required to advise the that it is consistent with the regions provided for in the community visitor of the request within seven days. Health Services Act 1988. Clauses 4, 7, 9 and 13 insert The residents’ rights are also very important, and any secrecy provisions, as they are called, which is a training centre where people with intellectual or curious term. Recently we debated the Health Records physical disabilities are working or being trained is also Act in this place. That act put in place prescriptive included in the list of facilities that can be inspected by procedures with regard to the collection, maintenance, community visitors. Clients can refuse to see communication and storage of personal health community visitors if they do not have anything information. specifically to discuss. The handbook suggests that staff should respect the right of the client to refuse to discuss It prohibits the use of this information by anyone who is matters with a community visitor, but the staff should a health service provider, or defined as, which was a also inform them that the community visitors’ role is to very broad provision. However, it is known in the act on their behalf. Health Records Act as a privacy provision, so I find it curious that in the bill before the house today it is called There is also a grievance process about any concerns a secrecy provision when many of the prescriptive the facility has with regard to the conduct of procedures and provisions are exactly the same as in the community visitors, and there are some things that Health Records Act. For a government that talks about community visitors are not entitled to inquire into. They consistency I find that point worthy of note. are areas considered highly sensitive or of a highly personal nature, such as a client’s HIV or hepatitis B Proposed section 12 of the Disability Services status, or justice plan information, or the community (Amendment) Act is also called a secrecy provision. visitors may have concerns about the conduct at a The bill provides for 50 penalty units if a community centre and whether they are getting proper access. They visitor either directly or indirectly makes a record of or can also use the provisions of the grievance process. divulges or communicates to any person or makes use of any information that is or was acquired by the person Community visitors are committed to ensuring that because the person is or was appointed a community disabled individuals have a high quality of life and visitor, except in the performance of official duties or experience, the opportunity to live and act as the exercise of any functions under the powers of the independently as they can, and also have the act. opportunity to grow and fulfil their potential. Part 3 makes provision for the Public Advocate to have The bill amends five statutes — the Intellectually powers of entry and inspection of premises as defined Disabled Persons’ Services Act 1986, the Mental under the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Services Act Health Act 1986, the Disability Services (Amendment) and the Disability Services Act. Currently community Act 2000, the Guardianship and Administration Act visitors have the power to enter premises to inspect 1986 and the Health Services Act 1988. The documents and to go into any part of the premises and second-reading speech states that the intention of the communicate with the clients to ensure the client is bill is to maintain the policy basis of community visitor receiving the best possible care. However, in the past programs where local visitors visit local services within the Public Advocate has not been afforded the same COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

134 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

opportunity to properly scrutinise these facilities where activities that are able to be undertaken by clients at any he currently has a role in ensuring the advocacy of centre. people with intellectual or physical disabilities. The opposition has no problem with that and believes it is Last week I had the pleasure of visiting the Dame Mary appropriate that the Public Advocate has those rights. Herring Centre in Carnegie, where I had been invited by a lady named Lavourne who has been Clause 5 inserts proposed section 18A, and outlines the wheelchair-bound since birth with cerebral palsy. She is powers of inspection of the Public Advocate. Proposed an articulate, intelligent, warm person and a strong section 18A(1) states: advocate for other people who have a disability. She pops into the office for a cup of coffee and a chat, and The Public Advocate is entitled to enter any premises on is often seen around the Murrumbeena and Carnegie which an institution is situated and — area. She is independent and makes it her business to (a) inspect those premises; and ensure that people are educated about the rights of the disabled, and often speaks at local schools. She invited (b) see any person who is a resident of those premises me to look at the range of facilities and activities at the or is receiving any service from the institution; and centre in which clients can participate. (c) make enquiries relating to the admission, care, detention, treatment or control of any such I was thrilled to look at the artwork that the clients at person … the facility have produced. One particular artwork commemorating the centenary of Federation took many as prescribed by the five acts amended by the bill. months and contributions by many residents to In this the International Year of Volunteers I take the complete. It is beautiful. The clients also go tenpin opportunity to place on record my appreciation for the bowling once a week at Chadstone. The centre has very valuable work and great contribution made by sensory programs for clients who are limited in their many committed individuals who applied to become ability to see, feel, smell and touch, and the staff also do and be trained for the role of community visitor. They a lot of cooking with clients at the facility. While I was monitor the facilities and the institutions where people there Dale offered me a scone. The centre staff are with disabilities are cared for, and their role is to active in ensuring that residents have every opportunity advocate for the human rights of all individuals in these to develop their skills and interests. Many clients have institutions and facilities. They are rights that all acquired brain injury, and the centre provides intensive Victorians expect and deserve. They seek to ensure that programs to rehabilitate those individuals to give them residents have privacy and dignity. In the annual reports a greater quality of life. that I will refer to shortly many notes are made by I also had the opportunity to meet Edna, a volunteer community visitors about what they believe are from Clayton, who has been volunteering at centres inadequate privacy provisions for residents, particularly over the past 30 years. She will go in to centres to with regard to shared bedrooms and toileting facilities. relieve trained staff for other duties. I was impressed by The complaints or suggestions are well made and are her because she is a sensitive, loving, patient lady. She taken up by the Department of Human Services to is an example of how important it is to have volunteers ensure that proper provision for the privacy and dignity active in our community. of clients is maintained. I also have in my province the Oakleigh Centre for They also ensure that not only is a high level of hygiene Intellectually Disabled Citizens, which has a huge and cleanliness maintained for the premises but also range of activities and recreation for clients, again of that the residents are helped to maintain a level of diverse need. It also has an adult training support cleanliness. They also monitor the nutrition and health service where clients are trained. It runs a nursery and of residents to ensure they are receiving their every year sells Christmas trees that the clients have medication as prescribed and required by the managing cultivated themselves. That provides residents and doctor. individuals enrolled in the training programs with a Community visitors also take note of the social and great opportunity to watch things grow and have an physical activities available for residents. Section 53 of active interest in gardening. the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Services Act sets The clients are also taken out to do what we consider out that one of the roles of the community visitor is to the normal things on a weekly basis, such as banking, investigate the appropriateness of the facility, the shopping and so on so that they feel they are part of the educational possibilities and the supporting and cultural integrated community. It also allows them to maintain COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 135

enough independence to enable them to conduct their 2000–01 report is tabled how many community visitors affairs to the best of their ability with the support of a are trained and operating in the community. dedicated staff. It is noted in the report that 173 community visitors are I have known one of the volunteers at the centre, required to meet the obligations under the Intellectually Dorothy Curtis, for most of my life. Recently at the Disabled Persons’ Services Act, so that is 40 short of annual dinner at the Oakleigh Centre she was awarded the target required to do the job properly. It is also a life membership for 36 years of dedicated service to noted in the report that the community visitors went to the centre. I place on record my appreciation to 1165 facilities during the reporting period. Dorothy for the sacrifices she has made to assist her daughter and the sons and daughters of so many other In conclusion, I note the important work of community parents in establishing that centre. visitors to ensure that the people who are least able to advocate for themselves and the most vulnerable in our My mother was on the board of the Urimbirra Adult community have adequate care, dignity, privacy, proper Training and Support Service in Noble Park, and was nutrition and proper and appropriate health care. These active for many years. I had the opportunity at a young individuals, at great cost to themselves in time and age to become more active with people with a financial cost, having to pay for transport to conduct disability. That service is going strongly. visits, make our community so much stronger for the sacrifices they are willing to make. I commend them for So far as the numbers of community visitors who are their efforts and I commend the bill to the house. active and the number of visits are concerned, I refer to two annual reports of community visitors for 2000, one Hon. E. C. CARBINES (Geelong) — I am pleased under the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Services Act to speak in support of the Community Visitors 1986 and the other under the Health Services Act 1988. Legislation (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill. The bill The Health Services Act report notes that there were aims to further strengthen the important role played by 1619 unannounced visits to supported residential community visitors in Victoria as independent services. There are 236 supported residential services advocates for Victoria’s physically and intellectually (SRSs) operating in Victoria with over 6000 residents, disabled residents. and there are 110 appointed community visitors. I refer to the Annual Report of Community Visitors When one considers the number I mentioned earlier of 2000 under the Health Services Act 1988, which 1619 unannounced visits with 110 people, one can appropriately defines community visitors as: easily see how hard these volunteers work for the betterment of their community. These SRSs are not … the eyes and ears of the wider community by ensuring that standards of accommodation and care … reach community subsidised by either the state or federal government; expectations. they are usually operated by businesses or the for-profit sector where the residents contribute to the cost of their As a member of the Bracks government I give my housing and other recurrent costs with fees paid from thanks and appreciation in the International Year of their pension entitlements. Volunteers to the many thousands across Victoria who spend some time as community visitors, particularly In the private sector generally more stringent those who play that role in Geelong. What they do is requirements must be placed on the operator of a very much appreciated. I congratulate the Minister for facility because they are looking sometimes at the Community Services in another place for her bottom line of the financial capacity of the centre and commitment to the community visitors program in what they personally are getting out of it, and Victoria. That program commenced in 1986 under the sometimes may try to skimp on some of the associated Cain Labor government. As the second-reading speech costs. One important role of community visitors is to states, its aim was: ensure that that does not happen. … a package of reforms to address the needs of people with The annual report of the Intellectually Disabled disabilities. Persons’ Services Act 1986 notes that 133 community The community visitors program in Victoria is visitors were appointed or recommended for managed by the Office of the Public Advocate, and it appointment compared with the number at the end of very much enjoys bipartisan support. That support has the previous reporting period of 144, so 11 have been been indicative since its very inception of the value that lost in one year. I shall note with interest when the successive governments in Victoria have placed on the COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

136 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

role that the community visitors program plays in our fantastic achievement. I congratulate the community state. visitors on the steps they have taken to bring these needs to the attention of the DHS. In referring to the Annual Report of Community Visitors 2000 under the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Very important in the Barwon–South Western region is Services Act 1986, I particularly note the overview of the community visitors program at the Colanda Centre the Barwon–South Western region, which I represent as in Colac, which has up to 160 adults at any one time as a member for Geelong Province in this place. The residents. The annual report details each unit of the Barwon–South Western region is a huge geographic Colanda Centre and what has been done through the area that extends from Geelong to the South Australian community visitors program to improve the facilities border. It covers nine different municipalities and its and the programs for the residents. That is fantastic very size makes the administration of the community because I know that in the past the Geelong community visitors program difficult. It makes the planning of has had some concerns about the centre. meetings problematic and it raises transport issues for both residents and visitors. I have a small connection with a community residential unit which is in the street in which I live in Geelong. The 1999 annual report raises the issue of a serious Among the rest of the homes in our housing estate there shortage of volunteers who were prepared to take part is a community residential unit, so I am neighbours in the community visitors program. The 2000 report with a unit and understand the role it plays in the local also outlines that shortage and the steps that have been community. It is great to see the residents with undertaken in the past year to resolve this situation and intellectual disabilities coexisting with the rest of the to turn around what had become a crisis point where community with a high level of support. I often see my there was only one community visitor visiting on a neighbours from this unit out shopping at the local regular basis in our region. The report outlines that: supermarket with their carers. It is great to see them taking part in normal community activities along with … a special meeting was held in Geelong for those still ‘on the rest of us. the books’, which included some inactive community visitors and some new trainees. All resolved to make every effort to continue visiting as many facilities as possible. It is thus very The bill amends five acts: the Intellectually Disabled pleasing to report that after 12 months of training and support Services Persons’ Act 1986, the Mental Health Act for all involved, the region now has an almost full 1986, the Health Services Act 1988, the Disability complement of eight appointed community visitors and three Services (Amendment) Act 2000, and the Guardianship trainees. and Administration Act 1986. I congratulate all involved on turning around that The bill supports the Public Advocate, who manages critical shortage. the community visitors program across the state. The The report also highlights the positive relationship the Public Advocate has sought amendments to the community visitors program has with the Department legislative framework for the community visitors of Human Services in the Barwon–South Western program and to clarify the powers of the Public region. The annual report places on record thanks to the Advocate. The bill seeks to give the Public Advocate staff of the DHS in Geelong for their efforts in the same power as is currently accorded to community convening meetings, having liaison meetings and the visitors — that is, to enter registered premises and to support and training they provide in Geelong to the inspect documents. It will also empower the Public community visitors program. I record my thanks to Jan Advocate to apply resources where there are not Snell, the regional manager for the Department of enough community visitors to meet the urgent needs of Human Services, Barwon–South Western region, for residents. the responsive way in which she fulfils her duties. The bill also removes the requirement for community Over the past year many issues were raised by visitors to live in the region in which they are registered community visitors in our region. I thank them for as a community visitor. This will give greater flexibility pointing those issues out and for helping to resolve to the community visitors program to make it more them. Such things included the need for practical responsive to the needs of residents. While the assistance for residents who have very high support Barwon–South Western region has managed to turn needs. There have been fire safety issues, and it is around its shortage of community visitors, I hope the pleasing to note in the report that the installation of bill will avoid a similar situation arising again. sprinkler systems has been completed in all facilities and that training drills have commenced. That is a COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 137

I am sure all members of the house agree that the we should encourage public advocates or community visitors intellectually and physically disabled are among the to inspect on a regular basis. most vulnerable of residents in our state. The The services that provide that care to people throughout community visitors program plays an important role in country Victoria are supportive of this legislation, and ensuring that the interests of those most vulnerable therefore, as I said for the record, the National Party Victorians are protected at all times. supports the bill. We have also spoken to the Public Advocate, and I am very pleased to express my support The program also allows for independent scrutiny of the residences and the level of care that is on offer at for the role he is playing on behalf of the people who come within his care and jurisdiction. those residences.

I commend in the International Year of Volunteers The purpose of the bill is, as we have heard, to amend four acts to provide uniform provisions with regard to those Victorians who volunteer their services. They are an integral part of this community visitors program. the community visitors program. It amends the Guardianship and Administration Act of 1986 to give They volunteer their time, their service, their effort and the Public Advocate the same power as community their commitment to looking after some of our most disadvantaged people in Victoria, and I commend them visitors. As the second-reading speech alludes to, this is something that was requested by the Public Advocate. for that. We thank them very much for what they do and appreciate the role they undertake. In conclusion, I The bill also provides for a common definition of wish this bill a very speedy passage through the house. ‘region’ to apply in each act. One of the problems Hon. R. A. BEST (North Western) — It gives me country Victoria faces is that from time to time there are insufficient community visitors available in some pleasure to support this bill on behalf of the National Party. The Community Visitors Legislation regions, and unless these amendments are passed it will mean that the level of service provided to many of the (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill is a small bill, but it people who fall within the jurisdiction of the relevant is important because it relates to the care and treatment, as we have just heard, of some of the most vulnerable acts could not be met, inspections could not be undertaken and many people would have to wait until people within our community. Most honourable members would be aware of the outstanding voluntary community visitors were available. The bill actually removes the borders and allows the Public Advocate to work that community visitors do to ensure that the care provide resources of a more immediate nature. It also and treatment of the residents they visit are at the appropriate standards. removes the requirement that a community visitor must reside in a certain region, which was the point I was just Community visitors have a wide range of powers of making. inspection and inquiry in institutions and places where The background of this bill has been alluded to earlier, people with various forms of disabilities live. They are a source of very early warning to government about the and I am sure it will be referred to by other honourable members. It was established in 1986 to cover a range of adequacy and quality of residential services provided under the four acts that relate to their functions. The disability services to ensure that residents’ needs and rights were being observed. As the National Party National Party has consulted widely with a range of understands it community visitors are managed by the people and services in deciding to support this bill. I will read some letters from one of those institutions, Office of the Public Advocate and have to go through a range of checks to ensure they are well qualified to Wimmera Uniting Care, responding to contact made on 16 May by the honourable member for Wimmera in perform their role, even though it is voluntary. It is important that we have the appropriate people to care another place, Hugh Delahunty. A letter from Claire Sharry of Wimmera Uniting Care states: for the needs of the most vulnerable within our community. I think the bill looks good in that it broadens the scope and flexibility of community visitors and enables the Public I also express my respect and admiration for and Advocate to enter registered premises and inspect documents. extreme gratitude to the people who undertake the role This is a good check and balance. of community visitors. They perform an outstanding A letter from Glenda Ward of Wimmera Uniting Care function, not only on behalf of the people who fall states: within the parameters of the program but also in advocating their rights and entitlements back to … I feel that if we are providing a quality service to people, government and ministers. and especially to the most vulnerable in our community, then COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

138 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

Although, as I said, this is an uncontentious and small policies are dismantled and that the quality of life we bill which has the support of all parties, I will refer to enjoy as people who can participate in our communities the annual report of the Office of the Public Advocate. with enormous freedom is passed on to those who For the record I will read into Hansard its charter. It suffer from disabilities or are disadvantaged. It gives states: me pleasure to support the bill and provide the Public Advocate with the same rights as are enjoyed by OPA’s mission is to promote the rights and dignity of people community visitors. with disabilities, to strengthen their position in society, and to reduce their exploitation, abuse and neglect. Hon. R. H. BOWDEN (South Eastern) — I rise to Another part of the report, which refers to the services support the bill and like other honourable members I delivered under the Guardianship and Administration am a strong supporter of the work of the Public Act, talks about the volunteer programs. I will put the Advocate as well as the voluntary work and important report on the table for consideration by honourable community visitors program. The amendments to the members because it is most powerful and certainly acts, as listed in the bill, are quite important. alerted me to some of the issues confronted by the Office of the Public Advocate. Under the heading As the demographics of Victoria and Australia change, ‘Institution closures’, which is a very important issue, where we will have an ever-increasing number of older the report states: persons in the community, the valuable and much-appreciated work of volunteers in the community The Office of the Public Advocate … has had a longstanding visitors program and those associated with the many policy commitment to the closure of institutions, including aspects of the Office of the Public Advocate will be those for the intellectually disabled. Studies of the impact of increasingly required and appreciated. past closures and relocation to community settings have shown improvements for the residents in a range of lifestyle features, together with improvements in personal abilities. Sadly there will be many situations where, because of unavoidable family circumstances, as many persons in The report further states: our community get older they will not have the access to family infrastructure and close members of their The process of deinstitutionalisation and community. In the interests of individuals who may be non-institutionalisation has been a central element in the advances that have been made in the quality of life and degree clients of disability services and health services it will of independence for many with intellectual disabilities and be more important than it is today — and it is crucially mental illness. Congregate care institutions such as the one at important today — to ensure we encourage, inspire and Kew were conceived under past policies and should not be lead and that we provide resources for the wonderful allowed to remain into the future. work done by community visitors and the valuable I have had the opportunity and pleasure of mixing with work done by the Office of the Public Advocate. many of these young people who were institutionalised in years gone by. As honourable members may be At present there is a shortage of community visitors. I aware, I had a past life as a coach at the Sandhurst encourage the government to do all it can to provide the Football Club in Bendigo, which coincidentally is resources and encouragement through whatever playing in the grand final this weekend against another available means are possible to recruit, train and encourage the community visitors program. side that I coached elsewhere. The Sandhurst team used to train on the ground at the old Sandhurst Boys Centre From time to time the necessary resources have not in Bendigo. A lot of young fellows who were been able to be provided. The amendments in the bill institutionalised there at that time — I am talking about help provide that mechanism because through the a period in the mid-1970s, from 1974 to 1977 — would definition of ‘region’ and the lessening of geographical come down before dinner and watch us train and on restrictions there will be occasions where people can some Saturdays they would come along and watch us more readily move to particular areas and provide the play. It has been an absolute pleasure for me over the much-needed community visitors services. years to see those kids deinstitutionalised and to see them grow and develop in a way that reassures me that In passing I mention an aspect of the bill that I strongly the program of deinstitutionalisation has been quite favour — that is, clause 5, which inserts proposed successful. section 18A into the Guardianship and Administration Act. It clearly prescribes situations in which the Public I place on record my support for the process and role of Advocate will have the power to enter premises. the Public Advocate and for the role and wonderful Proposed section 18A(1) provides that the Public work done by community visitors. I reiterate that it is Advocate may: important that these institutions formed because of past COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 139

(c) make enquiries relating to the admission, care, detention, volunteers who provide this valuable service could be treatment or control of any such person. further encouraged.

Proposed section 18A(3) provides that: Hon. KAYE DARVENIZA (Melbourne West) — The person in charge and the members of staff or Previous speakers have outlined that that is a small bill. management of the institution must provide the Public Although small, the bill is important because Advocate with any reasonable assistance that the Public community visitors, as has already been outlined by Advocate requires to perform or exercise any power, duty or other honourable members, perform valuable voluntary function under this section effectively. work in caring for some of Victoria’s most vulnerable I will explain to the house why I regard that as an people — that is, the intellectually disabled, the important provision in the bill. I am personally familiar mentally ill and the physically disabled. The bill may be with a situation of a client in another state who receives small and the amendments in it in many instances may services. A person claims to have a power of attorney. be technical but it deals with the important community Under that power there is a suggestion that access to the visitors program. client is restricted and other aspects of the client’s movement and access are restricted by the person The purpose of the Community Visitors Legislation (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill is to make various holding the power of attorney. If the minister has not examined the question of powers of attorney in relation amendments to core statutes that provide legislative mandate for the community visitors program and the to access to clients I would appreciate that aspect being quickly reviewed because I would not like happening statute that established the Office of the Public here what has happened in another state. It may not be Advocate. They are the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ relevant in Victoria, but it could become a concern. Services Act 1986, the Mental Health Act 1986, the Health Services Act 1988, the Disability Services On a more positive note, South Eastern Province has a (Amendment) Act 2000, and the Guardianship and large number of retired persons. They are receiving Administration Act 1986. increasing support from the community visitors The amendments will ensure more effective safeguards program. I encourage those community visitors, particularly in the southern Mornington Peninsula for the rights of people who have a disability, whether that be a mental illness, a physical disability or an where they are continuing that fine work. It is my pleasure to continue to support them. intellectual disability, and will promote their inclusion as full members of the Victorian community. One of the good aspects of the bill is that the secrecy provisions are clearly delineated. Now it is beyond The community visitors program was established in question that the powers of the Public Advocate are 1986 by the previous Labor government. It was part of similar to the access powers and rights of community a whole package of reforms to address the needs of visitors. Now there can be no disputation or disabled people. The Office of the Public Advocate was also established under that same package. I can misunderstanding about the access ability of the Public Advocate and the community visitors personnel. remember quite well when the community visitors program was established because at that time I was I record my appreciation of and sincere thanks to those working in the mental health area as a psychiatric nurse. members in the community who are providing this I have to admit that the introduction of community valuable service. It is a tribute to those people in this visitors was viewed with a degree of apprehension by International Year of Volunteers. The modifications to the various institutions and service providers for the the acts to be facilitated through the bill will go a long intellectually disabled and the mentally ill. At the time way to improving the quality of service and the ability some had a concern that there would be a new group of of the clients who, in themselves, may not be able to people who had power under legislation to be able to readily request or seek those particular changes. The come into the place where the service and care were relationship, access and continuity of contact between being provided for clients and check up on and look people who may not be able to advocate their own into the sort of service and care that was being circumstances well is extremely important. The provided, so there was a degree of apprehension. safeguards and role of vigilance is well and truly noted I am pleased to say that it did not take long before all in the bill. The importance of those safeguards and that vigilance is again noted. the staff involved in the care of those clients got to know our community visitors, really welcomed their I conclude by saying that it would be fitting were the visits to the facilities and valued the time that they were government to deeply consider ways in which the able to spend with clients, particularly clients who had COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

140 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

specific issues that they wished to raise. They might … a community visitor must not, either directly or have wanted to raise them not only with the staff and indirectly — others who provided the care for them but also with (a) make a record of; or somebody outside the facility. (b) divulge or communicate to any person; or We not only learnt what a valuable contribution community visitors made to the level of service and (c) make use of — care that was being provided but we also got an any information — understanding of the commitment they had to our clients and to the services. It was not a commitment just that has been acquired by the community visitor to the clients who were being provided the services at because that person has been carrying out their duties or that particular time or on that particular day that they is a community visitor. The only time they are allowed were making a visit, but like the staff they had a real to make records or divulge information that they have commitment to ensuring that there was a high quality acquired as a community visitor is in the performance and good standard of care for those clients. They were of their official duties or in exercising any of their and still are volunteers who gave up their time. Often functions and powers that are outlined in the act. they had full-time or part-time jobs and families they had to look after and yet they gave up their time — and Clause 5 amends the Guardianship and Administration not just to do regular visits. Act to give the Public Advocate the same powers as a community visitor. At the moment the Public Advocate If honourable members look at the report they will see does not have the power to enter registered premises or there are regular visits by community visitors but that to inspect documents. Clause 5 on page 5 outlines the they also answer phone calls. If a client rings and says powers of inspection. The Public Advocate will have they want to see and speak to somebody, a community the power of inspection of premises, and to: visitor will visit them. That, of course, is on an ad hoc basis, and the community visitors are unable to prepare (b) see any person who is a resident of those premises or who is receiving any service from the institution; and and organise their lives for making that kind of commitment to clients. So the establishment of the (c) make enquiries relating to the admission, care, detention, community visitors program was a very positive and treatment or control of any such person; and very good introduction to the services. (d) inspect any document … I will run through the significant parts of the bill and The amendment does not authorise the Public Advocate outline what it does. Clauses 3, 8 and 12 amend the to inspect a person’s medical records unless the person definition of ‘region’ in the Disability Services Act, the to whom they relate has consented. Clause 5(3) Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Services Act and the provides that: Mental Health Act so that they have the same definition of region as is in the Health Services Act. Whilst it is a The person in charge and the members of staff or technical amendment and does not make any difference management of an institution must provide the Public at all to the geographical area that makes up a region, it Advocate with any reasonable assistance — simply means that when people talk about a region in so that the Public Advocate is able to perform his or her Human Services everybody will know exactly what duties and functions. they mean. It will be the same definition, so that people are not dealing with different definitions of what is a The powers provided by the amendments to the region. Guardianship and Administration Act will also enable the Public Advocate, where there are insufficient Clauses 4, 7, 9 and 13 amend the definition of community visitors to meet any urgent need, to put in ‘secrecy’, including the penalty provisions relating to adequate resources. This significant amendment will secrecy, in the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Services enhance the power of the Public Advocate in his or her Act, the Disability Services Act and the Mental Health ability to be able to protect as well as to enhance the Act. That will ensure that the act will contain the same services delivered to some of the most vulnerable definitions as the Health Services Act. The amendments citizens in this state. operate to ensure consistency across the four pieces of legislation. Clauses 6, 10 and 15 amend the Health Services Act, the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Services Act and The secrecy provisions as outlined on page 3 of the bill the Mental Health Act by removing the requirement for state : community visitors to reside in the region of their COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 141

appointment. The intention of the bill is to maintain the removed and a common secrecy provision inserted, policy of community visitors servicing their local including penalties for disclosure of confidential communities. We believe local volunteers servicing information by community visitors. local communities is the best way to go, but the amendments will provide more flexibility to enable The amendment to the Guardianship and community visitors to carry out their responsibilities Administration Act allows the Public Advocate, Julian outside the region in which they reside. Gardner, or his staff, the same powers of entry and inspection as community visitors. When future Geographical boundaries in which a person resides or generations look at our community and society we will may be appointed to serve as a community visitor are be judged on how we treat and care for the people who arbitrary because you can have one side of the street in are the most vulnerable. The intellectually and one region and the other side in another. These psychiatrically disabled are among the most amendments will remove those restrictions. The disadvantaged in our community, and it is vitally amendments are important because of the diminishing important that we are remembered as treating these number of community visitors, and a number of people with the respect and honour they deserve. speakers have referred to the issue in some detail. The Supporting community visitors is one good way of provisions will allow experienced community visitors doing just that. to go to another region, where they may assist or support community visitors of less experience or even The 1986 legislation identified the needs of the some people who are being trained to become intellectually disabled. It was important and welcomed, community visitors. Their experience and knowledge but it was left to the Kennett government to can be passed on to those who are coming through the deinstitutionalise many of the people who had been system. Honourable members need only look at the incarcerated in institutions that were the stuff horror community visitors reports on intellectual disabilities or movies were made of. They are things that we would mental health services to see the number of people in like to forget and certainly do not regard with pleasure training and the number of new people coming in to or pride. Many of them were dysfunctional. The take on this important work of volunteers. institution in Kew, Kew Cottages, is a good example. It was a mausoleum of a building and had significant Community visitors are volunteers and I cannot stress problems. Community visitors handbooks and annual too much the important contribution they make to the reports do not have anything very positive to say about community in the work they do with some of the most Kew Cottages. I remind honourable members that the vulnerable in the community. I urge honourable coalition said it would close Kew residential services as members to look at community visitors reports to get part of its pre-election policy because that type of care some depth of the type of clients community visitors was no longer appropriate. The Labor Party made no work with and the situations in which they work. such promise in its election policies. Indeed, it has been Community visitors must undertake training programs drawn to my attention that several current members of because of the wide variety and different types of Kew residential services have requested to be relocated clients they deal with in intellectual disability services into the wider community, but their request is yet to be and mental health services. met. That is a sad state of affairs and it is important that it be addressed. I congratulate all our community visitors on the excellent job they do and the contribution they make to Integration and community residential units have been the community. I commend the bill to the house. successful in so many cases. They have given the intellectually disabled the opportunity to live within our Hon. ANDREA COOTE (Monash) — I have much community and to contribute to our society. I pay pleasure in speaking to the bill, which is not opposed by tribute to Helen Calandro from Gawith Villa in my the opposition. As previous speakers have said, the bill electorate of Monash Province for the excellent work amends the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ Services they do. I give a short anecdote as an example of what Act 1986, the Mental Health Services Act 1986, the can be done and the win-win situation for both the Disability Services (Amendment) Act 2000 and the intellectually disabled person and the community at Guardianship and Administration Act 1986, which large. One of the clients of the day centre at Gawith governs the operation of the Office of the Public Villa was very keen about motor vehicles so they Advocate. The effect of the bill is to give a common searched for a position for him and eventually found a definition to regions, and in each of the first four acts I position in a car yard dealing with new cars. They gave mentioned the requirement that a community visitor him a job taking the plastic sheeting off the new cars, a must reside in the region of their appointment will be job which he loves. He was given a uniform, and not COMMUNITY VISITORS LEGISLATION (MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL

142 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

only is he absolutely happy and feeling that he do more about that, particularly as there is no publicity contributes to the community but he catches public or advertising for the campaign. transport to the job and is paid. More importantly, his workmates find him a very popular and responsible Regional changes made in the bill show that various member of the work force. This is one small story, but regions within Victoria cannot get sufficient there are many more just like it. community visitors, and that is why this area is being addressed. Part 2, clause 3, amends the proposed Community visitors are extremely important within our definition of ‘region’. Clause 8 in part 5, community. The profile of community visitors has entitled ‘Amendments to the Intellectually Disabled tended to be women in their 50s, mainly from the Persons’ Services Act 1986’, deals with this issue also. eastern suburbs, which has caused a problem that is being addressed with the amendments to the regional Clause 12 of part 6 — amendments to the Mental provisions. In the International Year of Volunteers it is Health Act 1986 — inserts a new definition of ‘region’ especially important to acknowledge the good work of to have the same meaning as the Health Services Act, community visitors. The definition of a community as does the amendment to the Disability Services visitor is an authorised individual who is appointed by (Amendment) Act in part 2, clause 3. It also amends the the Governor in Council. Their primary function is to definition of ‘region’. visit and inquire into the adequacy of residential services governed by the act, including the These changes show that regions are having difficulty appropriateness and standard of facilities for the encouraging community visitors. But it is not just a accommodation, physical wellbeing and welfare of question of fixing up the terminology in the bill; we residents; the adequacy of opportunities and facilities need also to be addressing the very real issue of the for recreation, occupation, education, training or profile of a community visitor being a woman in her rehabilitation of people receiving treatment and care; 50s mainly from the eastern suburbs. any failure to comply with the provisions of the act; and The government has to address this issue promptly. The most importantly, dealing with complaints from community services handbook mentions the visiting residents. That is pleasing to see. rights and the powers of inspection, and I will read a Some honourable members spoke about the decline in short excerpt from it. It says: the number of community visitors. The Honourable A community visitor is entitled to inspect any part of the Maree Luckins, the Honourable Ron Bowden and the premises and see a client, with or without notice, at any time. Honourable Kaye Darveniza explained how the number Usually community visitors will notify DHS staff prior to a of community visitors were declining. This is a very visit as a matter of courtesy. A community visitor can make any enquiries relating to the admission, care and treatment of worrying thing for the community. I do not believe the clients. Community visitors have the right to inspect any Bracks Labor government has encouraged people to document or record relating to the client or residential become community visitors. I have only to go back institution. recently in history to show the industrial action taken by the disability carers, which proves that point. Four Indeed, that is exactly what the Public Advocate wants. thousand of them walked off the job when bans were The Public Advocate — and it is reflected in the bill — imposed leaving 1000 clients affected. does not have the powers that mirror just the ones I have read out, and the bill contains the amendment to The shadow Minister for Community Services in the the Guardianship and Administration Act 1986, which other place, the honourable member for Mooroolbark, gives the Public Advocate the same powers as said in a press release: community visitors.

Every time disability carers walk off the job in support of I agree this is an important aspect and it is very good to these bans their clients simply don’t receive the professional see. It deals with the actual amendment to the care they are entitled to. Why should people who have the Guardianship and Administration Act, which is part 3, greatest need receive the least attention from their minister? clause 5, and it inserts a new section 18A in the It is hardly a situation to encourage community visitors Guardianship and Administration Act 1986, which to help, in a voluntary capacity, and give of their time. provides that the Public Advocate has powers of entry and inspection in relation to institutions within the Another issue is that there has been only a meaning of the Disability Services Act 1991, the Health $50 000 increase in financial support for the program. Services Act 1988, the Intellectually Disabled Persons’ This is not nearly enough and I urge the government to Services Act 1986 and the Mental Health Act 1986. BUSINESS INVESTIGATIONS (REPEAL) BILL

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 143

The Liberal Party does not oppose the bill, but I make its operation more efficient. This bill makes those strongly encourage the government to do more to changes. recognise community visitors. It is fine to bring in a bill to tidy up loose ends and insert small amendments that The bill proposes the amendment of section 13 of the make things slightly better, but it has to be addressed in act. Currently this section provides that where one a more rigorous way. I call upon the government to partner of a married or de facto couple wishes to donate give better funding and encourage far more people to either sperm or eggs, the other partner must consent to do this very worthwhile service. the donation.

Motion agreed to. The amendments will remove the requirement for spousal consent when the donor and spouse have Read second time. ceased to live together as husband and wife on a genuine domestic basis. Third reading At times women altruistically donate their eggs to Hon. M. R. THOMSON (Minister for Small family members such as sisters or cousins who are Business) — By leave, I move: unable to conceive. Some of these donors are That this bill be now read a third time. permanently estranged from their husbands although for a variety of reasons both social and religious they In so doing I thank the Honourables Maree Luckins, are not, and never will be, divorced. Section 13 has Elaine Carbines, Ron Best, Ron Bowden, Kaye prevented women in this situation from donating eggs. Darveniza and Andrea Coote for their contributions. It would seem sensible to amend this section, which Motion agreed to. disadvantages women who are legally married but permanently separated in relation to other women who Read third time. are divorced or single. Remaining stages The current act provides that a child who is born as a Passed remaining stages. result of a donor procedure may on reaching the age of 18 obtain the name of the donor of the sperm or egg that was used in the treatment procedure. This provision BUSINESS INVESTIGATIONS (REPEAL) was enacted in 1995. BILL In addition, a further provision was enacted to establish Introduction and first reading a register known as the voluntary register. It is described in section 82 of the act as a donor treatment Received from Assembly. procedure information register. This register contains information provided on a strictly voluntary basis by Read first time on motion of Hon. M. R. THOMSON donors, donor offspring and their descendants, recipient (Minister for Consumer Affairs). families and other family members.

The purpose of this register is to establish a voluntary INFERTILITY TREATMENT recording mechanism for those people who have been (AMENDMENT) BILL involved in donor procedures provided under the act Second reading and who wish to create an opportunity to make contact with those biologically related to them. This register Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial complements the role of the more formal registers Relations) — I move: under the act.

That this bill be now read a second time. Due to the nature of transitional provisions such as section 181(9) in the 1995 act, it is proposed to amend Victoria leads Australia with its comprehensive section 82 to include those involved with procedures legislation regarding infertility treatment. To continue that took place prior to 1 July 1988. These persons have to serve the people of the state well, there is a now a been unable to place voluntary information about need to streamline and refine some provisions of the themselves on the register. legislation to reflect current issues and practice, and to INFERTILITY TREATMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL

144 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

The bill remedies this. It will enable donors, donor second child to have any further embryos, already offspring and others involved with procedures that took created with the donor sperm or egg, implanted, despite place before 1 July 1988 to participate on the voluntary the death of the donor. register on the same terms as those involved with procedures that took place after that date. It will enable Another result of the repeal of this provision is that a them to enjoy the same benefits. Currently this group widow who had already commenced infertility has no legal means of accessing such information. treatment before her husband died will be able to have implanted the embryos created with his sperm and her The bill also makes necessary consequential eggs before his death. amendments to ensure that the authority can release information from the register to those who voluntarily The act outlines extensive requirements with respect to place information on it. consent and counselling of all donors and persons in treatment. Each person’s circumstances will be a factor These amendments ensure that everyone involved in in such counselling. treatment procedures has equal opportunity to share and exchange information via the voluntary register. It is a sad fact that parents of children and donors may die during a pregnancy or childhood and some children The register is akin to the means by which adopted will never know their biological parents. Given that the children or their adopting parents have been able to embryos in the circumstances outlined above are obtain information and, in many instances, meet years already formed, and if born will know one of their after the adoption occurred. parents, this amendment is proposed.

The voluntary register allows for information to be The provision for access to information about the donor placed by relatives of a donor or child. This means that remains unchanged — that is, a child born as a result of where a donor has died or does not wish to be found, the donation will be able to obtain the name of the those relatives may still indicate that they may be happy donor, despite the donor’s death, once they reach the to provide some information. However, information age of 18 years. about relatives can only be obtained with their consent. If a child wished to obtain further information, he or she It must be remembered that this register is entirely will be able to find out if any information about the voluntary. Stringent consent and counselling donor or their relatives is on the voluntary register. This requirements govern the access to other registers. can only occur if that information has been placed on the voluntary register. Currently, the act prohibits the use in a treatment procedure of sperm and eggs from a donor who has It is important to remember that anyone wishing to died and the use of embryos formed using the sperm or obtain information from the central register, which eggs of a donor who has died. contains the name of donors, including a donor who has died since the embryo was created, must receive The bill removes the prohibition on the use of embryos counselling before any information can be released by formed using the sperm or egg of a donor who has died. the authority. The bill does not remove the prohibition on the use of gametes (that is, sperm or eggs) of a person who has There is no intention to remove the prohibition on the died. use of the sperm or eggs of a donor who has died. The act will still not permit the creation of embryos using In the case where an embryo has been formed, the the sperm or eggs of an already deceased person. person who produced the other gamete used to form the embryo, in most cases the mother, has a large interest in In summary, this bill allows all Victorian donors or and expectation about the future access to the embryo. children born as a result of a treatment procedure to There is a very strong case for preserving the embryo to voluntarily place or obtain information, if available, allow the mother the opportunity to have it implanted, from the donor treatment procedure register, even if the rather than have the embryo destroyed. treatment procedure took place before 1988. This enhances the ability of this group to access information The principal reason underpinning this amendment is to about their biological parents or children. allow the use of embryos created with the sperm or egg of a donor who has died. For example, it will allow a It also removes barriers to egg and sperm donation for a couple who have received successful infertility small group of people who are no longer living together treatment and who wish to have a sibling of the first or with their spouses. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 145

Finally, it allows the transplantation of embryos when a areas, a busy shopping centre, people visiting the person whose eggs or sperm were used to form the sanctuary and people going through to areas beyond embryos has since died. Healesville. In the east-end area of Healesville traders have for some time been concerned about pedestrians I commend the bill to the house. crossing the Maroondah Highway at and near the Don Road intersection. The traders, council representatives Debate adjourned on motion of Hon. M. T. LUCKINS and community members have made Vicroads aware of (Waverley). their concerns about the traffic conflict, and in Debate adjourned until next day. particular pedestrians. A recent tragic accident occurred where a young girl QUESTIONS ON NOTICE was killed crossing the highway on her way to school. That incident caused a great deal of concern and Answers highlighted the issue in the Healesville community. It was a tragic death, to say the least. In the area of the Hon. M. R. THOMSON (Minister for Small Don Road and Maroondah Highway intersection a Business) — The Honourable Andrea Coote raised the proposal is in place for a much-needed development matter of questions on notice 1906 and 1907 for the where many local people will be employed. The Little Minister for Housing. My office has contacted her Creatures Brewery and Tom O’Toole from Beechworth office. The answers have been signed and should be Bakery are building a shopping area there to establish a with the honourable member shortly. brewery and a bakery. This will add enormously to the traffic conflict that occurs in this area, not only from vehicles moving through but from pedestrians. BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE In view of the recent happenings and in view of the Adjournment proposal for the building and development, I ask the Minister for Transport to give urgent consideration to Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial installing traffic lights to enable pedestrians to move Relations) — I move: across Maroondah Highway. It is a matter of absolute That the Council, at its rising, adjourn until Tuesday, urgency that funding be allocated and that traffic lights 25 September. be installed as a top priority.

Motion agreed to. Road safety: vehicle testers

Hon. B. W. BISHOP (North Western) — I direct ADJOURNMENT my adjournment issue to the Minister for Energy and Resources as the representative in this place of the Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial Minister for Transport. The matter relates to the Relations) — I move: licensing and accreditation of mechanics who undertake That the house do now adjourn. roadworthy testing in Victoria. The issue has been raised in my electorate, which I share with the Maroondah Highway–Don Road: traffic Honourable Ron Best, and also in the electorate of the control honourable member for Rodney. We are not suggesting that there be any reduction in the standards required by Hon. G. R. CRAIGE (Central Highlands) — I people who do this sort of testing for roadworthiness. I direct a matter to the attention of the Minister for understand that a general licence used to cover all light Energy and Resources as the representative in this place vehicles, including motorcycles. I am not sure whether of the Minister for Transport. The issue I raise is very it covered heavy vehicles or trucks, but it may well serious and concerns the Maroondah Highway in have done. Healesville, in particular the east-end area of Healesville where Don Road intersects the Maroondah A number of licensed categories have now come into Highway. play: MC, which is motorcycle; LV, which is light vehicles up to 4.5 tonnes; HV, which is heavy vehicles The Maroondah Highway is a very busy thoroughfare, over 4.5 tonnes; and a GE licence, which is all of the and when drivers are travelling through Healesville above. I understand accreditation in all categories is significant conflict occurs with small strip shopping needed to get into the GE category. The TX category ADJOURNMENT

146 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

covers taxis; and LB relates to buses. The categories The news of this milestone in the project has been well then include trailers, both light and heavy. received in Geelong, and I understand that the relevant tender documents will soon be issued to the short-listed The requirements are that by 30 June 2001 every companies. workshop must have at least one inspecting mechanic who has completed the accreditation training. By As a member for Geelong Province I am well aware 1 January 2002 the GE category must have mechanics that electrification of the system would bring further with accreditation in each category of vehicle being benefits to the Geelong region and would allow tested. Different mechanics may hold accreditation in Geelong trains to access the city loop. This would be a each category. By 1 January 2003 every mechanic who great bonus for Geelong residents, allowing us to access examines vehicles for roadworthiness must have by rail all points around the city without changing trains completed accreditation training. They can do their at Spencer Street station, which we currently have to training at the Box Hill or Kangan Batman institutes of do, and would therefore further reduce travel times. TAFE or, as I understand it, for those who live in country Victoria, distance learning for light vehicles. I I call on the Minister for Transport to consider the do not believe the heavy vehicle accreditation can be inclusion of electrification in the tender documents for done by distance learning. the Geelong fast rail project.

The cost of these accreditation courses is approximately Housing: rent security $520. It is a large cost for any garage if one takes into account all of the categories in which mechanics will Hon. P. A. KATSAMBANIS (Monash) — The need to be trained. I understand that this precise matter I raise with the Minister for Small Business, accreditation process also protects the garage representing the Minister for Housing in the other proprietors and mechanics in the event of customers place, relates to significant concern of my constituents suing them for non-performance for one reason or about the recently released social housing innovations another. report of the Office of Housing, a lengthy report that contains a number of recommendations about the future However, the point is that in isolated areas in country of public housing in Victoria. Victoria the volume of business is quite low, and it is done as a service for those isolated communities. It I have received many calls and letters and have had makes it difficult for those mechanics and garages to many visits from constituents in my electorate who are afford the accreditation costs, particularly if one takes concerned about the report, which calls for the transfer into account the multiple licences. Will the minister put of about 18 000 of the state’s public housing units from into place cost reductions or provide assistance to those government ownership to ownership by third party garages and mechanics who wish to continue this vital not-for-profit organisations. service to those areas of country Victoria? My constituents, who come from areas such as Port Rail: regional links Melbourne, South Melbourne, St Kilda, Prahran and South Yarra, have all made the point that so far as they Hon. E. C. CARBINES (Geelong) — I raise a are concerned this transfer from government ownership matter with the Minister for Energy and Resources in to ownership by third party organisations amounts to her capacity as the representative of the Minister for privatisation by stealth. Many of these people are Transport in the other place. The Bracks government’s elderly, and security of tenure in the area in which they announcement of multimillion dollar rail infrastructure have lived for practically all their lives, as well as projects to link for regional cities to Melbourne by fast security of the rental they pay, is important to them and rail has created much interest in regional Victoria. In their families. They fear that a transfer would lead to Geelong, the city which I represent in this house, there them being relocated, or alternatively being charged has been widespread community support for this higher rents. Such proposals were not considered or initiative, which will see the reduction of the travel time entertained in any way shape or form in the seven-year between Geelong and Melbourne to 45 minutes. The period of the Liberal–National Party government. project will deliver enormous benefits to the Geelong region, with an estimated extra $193 million injected Public consultation closed on 14 September, and it is into our local economy. interesting to note that the minister has already acted on certain aspects of the report. To say that the minister is Last week the Bracks government announced the short considering the report and will respond in due course is list of tenderers for the construction of the fast rail links. not good enough. If she can act quickly on some parts of the report she should be able to act on other parts. I ADJOURNMENT

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 147

call on the minister to immediately rule out the transfer the day of the launch. The concern that has been raised of existing public housing stock from government with me by the schools that have promoted the program ownership to these organisations as outlined by the on which I seek the minister’s comment is the need for report. I have been asked by my constituents to raise police checks for parents who are involved in the this matter with the minister because it is an urgent walking bus program. Will they require police checks matter for people living in public housing in my area. to participate in that program? The concern is not the suitability of the parents, but simply the costs associated Epsom Primary School with having so many parents involved in such a program. What is the public liability situation for Hon. R. A. BEST (North Western) — I raise with schools or parents participating in the walking bus the Minister for Energy and Resources in her capacity program? as the representative of the Minister for Transport a matter relating to an approach to the honourable Australian Football League: grand final tickets member for Bendigo East in the other place in March 2000 by the Epsom Primary School in Howard Street, Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS (Jika Jika) — I refer Epsom. The school has requested the establishment of a to the Minister for Sport and Recreation a matter about 40-kilometre-an-hour speed zone in front of the school. ticket scalping. Yesterday in the house the Honourable The honourable member raised the issue for the Ian Cover raised this issue with the minister, and in his attention of the Minister for Transport during the response the minister indicated the failure of the adjournment debate in the other place on 5 April 2000, opposition to support legislation on ticket scalping over and he acknowledged her support in his reply to her many years. I was very concerned to hear the letter of 26 April 2000. However, 17 months later Honourable Bruce Atkinson take a point of order and nothing has happened. The school is concerned that accuse the minister of misleading the house because, unless or until an accident happens the government will and I quote, ‘no such legislation has been introduced’. not act. In fact, I believe Mr Atkinson misled the house.

This is not a unique request because there are other I recall the previous Labor government tried to pass 40-kilometre-an-hour speed zones for schools in the such legislation, including the Consumer Affairs Bendigo area, some of which are on major highways. (Resale of Tickets) Bill (No. 2), which was moved on The school is annoyed that the government has Wednesday, 26 September 1990 in this house and was introduced 50-kilometre-an-hour zones in most opposed by the Liberal and National parties at that time. residential areas but still has not seen fit to provide a 40-kilometre-an-hour zone in front of the school. Some Hon. D. McL. Davis — That was last century! 17 months after supporting the school’s request, children and parents are still faced with a dangerous Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — As Minister for crossing. I urge the minister to instruct Vicroads to Consumer Affairs at the time I tried to deal with this commence this work immediately. issue on a number of occasions and was frustrated by the then Liberal and National opposition. Will the Schools: walking bus program minister confirm that the Liberal opposition has failed to support the government, as well as the previous Hon. B. N. ATKINSON (Koonung) — The matter I Labor government, in dealing with scalpers? raise with the Minister for Sport and Recreation is in regard to the walking bus, an initiative that was Honourable members interjecting. launched recently in Brunswick in conjunction with the Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — That is your Minister for Transport. It is an outstanding initiative, record on scalpers; you have always been on the side of and one I have recommended to schools in my the scalpers! province. In one particular case this proposal is a way of addressing the problem that has occurred with the Will the minister address that issue and the issue that Safety House program, where there is difficulty in Mr Atkinson has misled the house in supporting the maintaining the security of that program in knowing actions of scalpers in this place? that people will be home at the times when children are going home. Hon. B. N. Atkinson — On a point of order, Mr Deputy President, I request that the honourable The walking bus program also has some real benefits in member withdraw the remarks that involved me in terms of physical exercise and so forth for young terms of my assessment of the particular issue last people, which are areas I know the minister spoke of on night. In fact, in some ways even his facts tonight are ADJOURNMENT

148 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

wrong. The particular legislation to which he has Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Further on the referred tonight and is now using to justify this issue, point of order, Mr Deputy President, this particular and which has reflected on my credibility in this house, legislation was opposed by the then opposition — — relates to a comprehensive omnibus bill, the Prices Bill, which was introduced in this house in 1989. That bill Hon. B. N. Atkinson — Rubbish! was defeated. It contained a provision on scalpers. It was one of five major provisions, and the legislation Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — It was opposed was defeated by this house on that basis. No similar by the then opposition. I refer to the second reading of legislation has been re-presented to this house on any the Consumer Affairs (Resale of Tickets) Bill (No. 2) occasion by any government, particularly a Labor beginning at page 819 of the Legislative Assembly government; and it would be a reflection on the Chair Hansard of 25 September 1990. A division was called on the other occasions. It is offensive to me, and I ask when the opposition opposed the legislation. It is a for Mr Theophanous to withdraw. matter of record that the opposition at that time opposed it. Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — On the point of order, Mr Deputy President, I do not know what it is in The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! The particular that the honourable member finds offensive, Honourable Theo Theophanous has accused the because the fact is that I referred to a bill, which was Honourable Bruce Atkinson of misleading the house in the Consumer Affairs (Resale of Tickets) Bill (No. 2), his earlier comments. The honourable member cannot which was introduced by the Honourable Brian Mier in do that. The only way he can challenge the conduct of this house in 1990 and was defeated by the opposition. an honourable member of this house is by a substantive So the honourable member’s statement to the house that motion. no such legislation has been introduced was incorrect, Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — He did it the was false, and he did mislead the house in making that other day. statement. I have no intention of withdrawing my statement. The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! Under the rules of this house I therefore ask the honourable Honourable Members — Withdraw! member to withdraw the comments he has made this Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Let him evening. withdraw his statement about the minister! Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Mr Deputy Honourable members interjecting. President, the comment made by Mr Atkinson — —

The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! We will The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! have just a moment of quiet. Have you finished your Mr Theophanous, I believe the advice I have given to response on the point of order, Mr Theophanous? you is clear. I invite you to withdraw.

Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Yes. Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Mr Atkinson claimed the minister misled the house. If Mr Atkinson Hon. B. N. Atkinson — Further on the point of is prepared to get up and withdraw his claim that the order, Mr Deputy President, again this honourable minister misled the house, I will withdraw mine. member fails to get his facts right. The legislation that he refers to in 1990 was never put to this house, was The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! never debated by this house and was never voted on by Mr Theophanous, I have given the ruling and I have this house or the opposition. In fact, the honourable requested that you withdraw the comments you made. member is reflecting on the Chair in introducing this As I said, the only way an honourable member can particular matter to the house on this occasion because challenge — — it was ruled out of order under the standing orders of Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Why don’t you this house, and quite properly. The honourable member apply the same thing to what he said? has escalated his attack on me in his comments on the point of order. It is based on inaccuracy at any rate, but The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! I certainly take offence at the remarks he made and Mr Theophanous, the only way an honourable member urge him to withdraw. can challenge the conduct of another honourable member of this house is by substantive motion. That is ADJOURNMENT

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 149

the ruling of this house, so I request you withdraw the NAMING OF MEMBER allegation you have made of Mr Atkinson. The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! In that case Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Mr Deputy I have no option but to name the Honourable Theo President, I believe the comments I have made are all Theophanous for wilfully disregarding the authority of accurate comments and therefore will refuse to the Chair. withdraw. I give the honourable member one last chance and call The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! I prevail upon him to make any explanation or apology he sees upon the Leader of the Government to speak to her fit or, again, withdraw. member in relation to my request to the Honourable Theo Theophanous. I call the Leader of the Opposition.

I again request that the Honourable Theo Theophanous Hon. BILL FORWOOD (Templestowe) — It is withdraw. I am giving the house every opportunity to with great reluctance that I rise on this occasion. work this through, but I must again ask that the Knowing there are other forms of the house available to Honourable Theo Theophanous withdraw. members to deal with issues such as the one we have here, I ask the Honourable Theo Theophanous to Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — I understand that reconsider whether this is the most appropriate course a proposition has been put to the opposition that it allow of action. leave for a withdrawal of a similar statement — — Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS (Jika Jika) — Hon. Philip Davis — You have no basis to debate Mr Deputy President, as I said earlier, in all conscience leave! I find myself in a very difficult position, but given that the Leader of the Opposition has indicated that there are Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — This is typical of other forms available by which the minister will be able your double standards, isn’t it! to seek to redress what is clearly a double standard in relation to his incapacity to answer it, and on the basis Hon. Philip Davis — There are no double standards that the minister is able to answer my question in the here, Mr Theophanous. adjournment debate, I withdraw the comment I made. Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — He has made the The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! Thank you, same accusation, but you won’t apply the same Mr Theophanous. standards.

Hon. Philip Davis — Just withdraw and everyone will get on with business. ADJOURNMENT Debate resumed. Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Unlike you I have some standards, and they are not double standards. Freeza program

The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! For the last Hon. W. R. BAXTER (North Eastern) — I raise a time, I request that the Honourable Theo Theophanous matter for the Minister for Youth Affairs which relates withdraw without qualification. One last time, to an issue raised yesterday, in passing at least, by the Mr Theophanous, I respectfully request that you Honourables Wendy Smith and Andrew Olexander — withdraw. that is, the funding of the Freeza program.

Hon. T. C. THEOPHANOUS — Mr Deputy I draw the minister’s attention to the fact that I attended President, I am afraid that in all conscience, having a forum in Echuca on 10 September which was considered the matter, I am unable to withdraw given attended by about 200 parents and a number of high that the opposition is not prepared to extend to the school students from the town, at which time much government and to the minister the same right of discussion was had about social issues in the town and, withdrawal of a similar comment by the Honourable in particular, the consumption of drugs. While it might Bruce Atkinson. have been illuminating for a number of parents who Debate interrupted. came to the forum to learn that Echuca experiences similar drug problems to what might be evident in the metropolitan area, one of the most graphic illustrations ADJOURNMENT

150 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

was given by a high school student in the audience who Advice on the outcome of an elevation analysis noted that the Freeza program funding had been proposed by DNRE to confirm that there is no minor reduced by more than 50 per cent by this government, historical subsidence in the Gippsland region and to that that had seriously impacted upon recreational determine whether monitoring for subsidence will take activities being conducted in a safe, drug and place in the future would be appreciated. alcohol-free manner in Echuca, and that it was most disappointing indeed that the funding had been so The Alberton project believes that if the estimate of reduced. low-risk levels with regard to subsidence is soundly based there is now a compelling case for a managed The next morning I attended a meeting of the Economic removal of the moratorium on new ground water Development Committee in Rochester. Mr Paul extraction from the Latrobe aquifer. I would be pleased McKenzie, manager of aged care and disabilities for the if the minister would advise what her views are about Shire of Campaspe, appeared and happened to make the removal of the moratorium on new ground water similar observations when talking about opportunities extraction. available for young people in country towns, particularly in the Shire of Campaspe. He spoke of the Insurance: public liability tremendous benefit and advantage that had accrued to that district under the Freeza program introduced by the Hon. E. J. POWELL (North Eastern) — I raise an former government. He said it had been disappointing issue for the attention of the Minister for Industrial and costly for the municipality because the funding had Relations representing the Minister for Finance in the been so substantially reduced under this government. other house. I received a letter from the mayor of the Shire of Indigo, Cr Peter Graham, regarding public Hon. R. A. Best — Slashed! liability insurance for community organisations. His concern is about the massive increases to public Hon. W. R. BAXTER — Yes, Mr Best — slashed! liability insurance premiums, particularly for I draw the minister’s attention to those two spontaneous not-for-profit incorporated community groups. but very genuine indications of the value of that program and implore the minister to reconsider the His letter states, in part: matter and restore funding to this very valuable This shire has become a signatory to the public liability program in country and regional Victoria, to which this scheme brokered by the MAV — government professes to offer so much support. that is, the Municipal Association of Victoria — Gippsland: coastal subsidence however, this scheme covers non-incorporated, not-for-profit Hon. PHILIP DAVIS (Gippsland) — I raise an community groups conducting activities not longer than two issue for the attention of the Minister for Energy and days and not involving more than 3000 people per day at a cost of 50 cents or $1 per head, depending on cover sought. Resources. It is an issue the minister knows a great deal about — that is, the Latrobe aquifer and coastal His question is: subsidence. Where are the incorporated, not-for-profit groups in the Correspondence forwarded to me by the Alberton insurance system? project indicates that the Australian Geological Survey His concern is that local government has been Organisation has provided advice to the Victorian suggesting to clubs and management groups that they Department of Natural Resources and Environment become incorporated so as to have some protection. He (DNRE) on the technical content of two reports has a strong concern for those people. commissioned by the Victorian government regarding elevation surveys and the potential for land subsidence It is not just a concern of the Indigo Shire Council, in the Gippsland region. because many other rural councils have raised the issue with me. The concern is that some activities will no The federal Minister for Industry, Science and longer be held in country Victoria; it will become too Resources, the Honourable Nick Minchin, has stated costly. Some councils have told me their public liability that the DNRE has advised that at this time there are no premiums have increased by about 8 to 10 times what plans for full testing of the properties of the strata, most they normally pay. recent modelling suggesting that over a reasonable range of parameters, subsidence — should it occur — In July the Leader of the National Party in the other could be significantly lower than that indicated in older house called on the government to convene a public draft reports. ADJOURNMENT

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 151

forum to discuss the impact on country Victoria of the interests of the Victorian community, implement those massive increases to public liability premiums. At some strategies to deal with this situation. that time the government had not intended to have a forum, so the National Party announced that we would Pakenham bypass convene a forum, and set 24 September as its date. Hon. P. R. HALL (Gippsland) — The issue I raise The government has now decided that it will hold a is for the attention of the Minister for Energy and meeting at the convenience of the Minister for Finance. Resources in her capacity as the representative of the The National Party has cancelled its forum and will Minister for Transport in the other house. It concerns support the government’s meeting, to be held next the proposed and planned Pakenham bypass on Princes Friday, 21 September, which is the reason I raise this Highway East. issue now. Traffic movements towards the eastern end of the It is important that the minister understands the impact Monash Freeway become extraordinarily congested of the premium increases, which will deter and slow during peak hours, leading to a significant organisations and clubs from holding fetes, cultural disadvantage for drivers entering from or exiting to the activities and those sorts of events in country Victoria. Gippsland region.

I ask the government, through the Minister for Finance, The completion of the Hallam bypass will help, but the to support Victorian councils and not-for-profit signs out there tell me that that work will not be community organisations, whether incorporated or not, completed until 2004. I suppose that emphasises the and to do all it can to stop the escalating public liability importance of allowing for appropriate lead times in insurance premiums. planning and commencing new freeway extensions. The Pakenham bypass is the next major improvement Roads: holiday traffic planned for the Princes Highway East. I understand Vicroads suggests it should be done in two stages: Hon. B. C. BOARDMAN (Chelsea) — The issue I stage 1, the preliminary works, will cost in the order of raise is for the attention of the Minister for Energy and $60 million; and stage 2, the completion works, will Resources for reference to the Minister for Transport in cost about $140 million. the other place. It is an important issue that requires a prompt response. Considering that the school holidays I understand the federal government has made an offer start next Friday, with the tragic circumstances to the Victorian government to commit $30 million, or surrounding the collapse of Ansett Australia and its 50 per cent of the cost, to the first stage of the regional subsidiary, a number of people who would preliminary works to be undertaken. My request is to have either prebooked Ansett holiday packages or seek a commitment from the Victorian Minister for accommodation packages independently would like to Transport that his government will match the 50 per avail themselves of those options and packages. cent on offer from the federal government so that those Unfortunately, because there will be no Ansett flights preliminary works and this important project can available to get them from Melbourne to their commence in a timely fashion. Then traffic congestion destinations, including places throughout Victoria, no will be alleviated in the future. doubt there will be increased traffic on Victorian roads over that period. Monashlink Community Health Centre

It would be opportune for the government, in Hon. M. T. LUCKINS (Waverley) — The issue I conjunction with the Transport Accident Commission, raise for the Leader of the Government to refer to the to implement as a matter of urgency some warning to Minister for Health in the other place relates to Victorian motorists of the potential for increased traffic management at Monashlink Community Health Centre on Victorian roads and to implement traffic in my electorate. Honourable members may recall that management programs to ensure that not only do about a year ago the disaggregation of the health care Victorian motorists travelling during the school networks was completed after Parliament passed a bill holidays do so with the utmost care for themselves and to dissolve the networks following the review their own personal safety, but also that traffic flows in a conducted by Professor Stephen Duckett. smooth and orderly manner. I have been contacted by staff members at Monashlink The circumstances surrounding the shortage of airline Community Health Centre. I bring to the minister’s passengers will, no doubt, reflect on the traffic volumes. attention a number of concerns they have conveyed to The government should, with its professionalism and in me. ADJOURNMENT

152 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

In the past 12 months since the new management of the vicinity at high, not slow, speeds. A disaster could health centre took over after Monashlink Community happen at any time. I am not sure whether that upgrade Health Centre separated from Southern Health there or provision of a pedestrian safety area is the have been one Industrial Relations Commission hearing responsibility of the rail service provider or the and two staff grievance procedures; 19 staff have government. I seek the minister’s assistance and my resigned; thousands of dollars of taxpayers’ money has question is: will the minister promptly investigate this been squandered on consultants’ fees because public safety pedestrian matter and provide a safe management has absolutely no idea how to run the crossing facility and a pathway for pedestrians at that service — these are not my words; this has been point? communicated by staff — there is a hostile, secretive management environment, with staff being threatened, Pakenham Secondary College harassed, treated with contempt or completely ignored; staff who spent years building up relationships with Hon. G. K. RICH-PHILLIPS (Eumemmerring) — local agencies, including local schools are leaving the I wish to raise with the Minister for Sport and service after many years; and management has been so Recreation a matter for the Minister for Education in secretive that no-one has any idea of what is being the other place. It relates to an incident which occurred presented to the public, the board or other agencies. with one of my constituents who lives in Noble Park. Recently he and his wife were driving in a hired vehicle I ask the minister: is he or his department aware of past the Pakenham Secondary College when one of the these issues and concerns? If so, what does the minister students of the secondary college threw a ball — plan to do to ensure that Monashlink Community deliberately, as I understand it — onto the highway, Health Centre can provide appropriate health and hitting the car in which they were travelling and community services to my constituents in a timely causing approximately $500 damage to the vehicle. manner? My constituent took up the matter with the school and Rail: Somerville crossing was advised to take it up with the Department of Education, Employment and Training and to speak to Hon. R. H. BOWDEN (South Eastern) — The issue the claims liability people, who passed it on to the I have seeks the assistance of the Minister for Energy department’s insurance company. Subsequently the and Resources in her capacity as the representative of department’s insurance company rejected the claim for the Minister for Transport. It is a safety issue involving damage and advised my constituent to take up the pedestrians crossing a rail crossing in Somerville on a matter with the parents of the student who threw the stretch of road that crosses the rail line to Stoney Point. ball, which is well and good. With reference back to the The particular road is Park Lane, which is on the department, it has also advised my constituent to take southern side of Somerville. up the matter with the parents of the student who threw the ball. That particular crossing has a substantial amount of vehicular traffic in the mornings and afternoons — a lot The difficulty with that is that the department is of school traffic, ordinary suburban traffic and refusing to tell my constituent the name of the parents commercial traffic. It is quite a busy road in a normal of the student who threw the ball. So the department daytime situation. A footpath that runs parallel to Park has told my constituent to talk to these people but will Lane ceases just before the railway area so pedestrians not tell him who they are. A similar line has been have to leave the footpath and walk across the railway followed when he talked to the principal of the school. line on the roadway. Having crossed the area of the railway line and the verge on each side of the railway The latest development in the situation is that the line they have to go back onto the footpath. All the department has advised that only the Minister for pedestrians, including school children, elderly people Education can authorise the release of the name of the and so forth, have to walk on the road, so it is quite a parents to my constituent. I seek the minister’s significant traffic hazard. It is a natural outcome of assistance in getting the name of the responsible parents what was a minor situation many years ago. In view of provided to my constituent so that he can settle the the major increase in population and the expansion of claim. traffic it is now quite important. Alfred hospital There are no boom gates and there is no safe pedestrian crossing on the railway line. Indeed, there is no Hon. ANDREA COOTE (Monash) — My pedestrian crossing at all. The trains travel through that question is to the Minister for Industrial Relations for ADJOURNMENT

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 153

the Minister for Health in another place. Given the Minister for Industrial Relations: proceedings tonight, it is a very straightforward and responsibilities simple question; nonetheless it is very important. In the adjournment debate last night I asked what was the Hon. N. B. LUCAS (Eumemmerring) — I wish to number of times that fire engines attended at the Alfred raise a matter with the Minister for Industrial Relations. hospital. Could the minister please advise me as to how I refer to the minister’s media release dated 16 August much it cost on each occasion that the fire brigade headed ‘From the Minister for Industrial Relations’, attended the Alfred hospital over the past six months? with the subject ‘Government announces $1 million to take art beyond the Melbourne CBD’. The release Barwon Heads Football and Netball Club refers to a number of regional art galleries and funding totalling $921 500. Hon. I. J. COVER (Geelong) — The matter I wish to raise tonight on the adjournment with the Minister Given that the release is under the minister’s name and for Sport and Recreation concerns the future of the under her portfolio of industrial relations, I ask: under Barwon Heads Football and Netball Club, of which I what program and for what specific purposes was the am proud to say I held the no. 1 ticket during the season announcement made and what relevance does it have to just completed. While the football team in the senior the minister’s industrial relations portfolio? grades did not have an entirely successful season, the A-grade netball team were premiers, and the B, C and Responses D-grade teams all made the finals. The juniors actually performed very well during the season — and this is at Hon. M. M. GOULD (Minister for Industrial the heart of the matter I am raising. Relations) — The Honourable Jeanette Powell raised for attention of the Minister for Finance a matter The club’s home base is on Crown land in the Barwon regarding public liability insurance premiums. I will Heads camping ground and it is under threat because of raise that with her and ask her to respond to the the foreshore master plan developed by the Labor honourable member in the usual manner. government under then Premier Joan Kirner. I point out that throughout the seven years it was in office the The Honourable Maree Luckins raised with the subsequent Liberal government allowed the football Minister for Health a matter with respect to the and netball club to remain at the camping ground. Monashlink Community Health Service and some Members of the club now fear it will be ejected from its issues there. I will ask the minister to respond to her in home, possibly across the Barwon River to Ocean the usual manner. Grove, which is totally unacceptable to the club and its The Honourable Andrea Coote raised with the Minister strong junior membership, according to the president, for Health a follow-up on the matter she raised on the Ron Brain, who is quoted in today’s edition of the adjournment last night about the costs of fire brigades Bellarine Echo in an article headed ‘Don’t let us die’. attending the Alfred hospital in the past six months. I The minister is aware that the other honourable member will pass that on to the minister to respond in the usual for Geelong Province is chairing a working party manner. looking at developing a new venue at the Barwon The Honourable Neil Lucas raised a matter with respect Heads Village Park, also on Crown land, but many to a press release that I put out on the historic occasion people in the community have expressed concerns to last month when this house sat in Ballarat, where, on me that this appears to be a case of all talk and no behalf of the Minister for the Arts, as the Leader of the action. Government I announced that $1 million would be It is time for the minister to act. With his football available for art works in art localities around regional background and responsibilities for both sport and and rural Victoria. youth, he should understand the importance of sporting Hon. N. B. Lucas — On a point of order, clubs to their local communities. I ask: will the minister Mr Deputy President, yesterday evening a similar give an undertaking that the government will ensure situation occurred and the President ruled that because that the Barwon Heads Football and Netball Club there was no reference to any other minister it was fair remains in Barwon Heads and at the same time urge the and appropriate to raise the issue with the minister who Minister for Environment and Conservation, who is issued the press release and that the minister should responsible for Crown land, to guarantee that the club attempt to respond to it. That is the ruling the President remains in Barwon Heads? gave last night on a similar matter. I raised a question regarding the specific purpose of the announcement and ADJOURNMENT

154 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001

the relevance it had to the minister’s portfolio. productivity. That is a matter under consideration by Mr Deputy President, I ask you to follow the ruling the both me and the minister responsible for water President made yesterday, which is reported at page 20 resources. The government will respond when it has of Daily Hansard. completed consideration of the studies, as it has previously indicated. Hon. M. M. GOULD — On the point of order, Mr Deputy President, the President did not make a The Honourable Cameron Boardman called on the ruling but suggested a better way of handling the issue. Minister for Transport to start issuing warnings in the My response on the adjournment matter dispatches the lead-up to the school holidays regarding increased road issue, and therefore I ask you to rule that there is no traffic flows following the Ansett debacle. I will refer point of order. that matter to the minister in the other place.

The DEPUTY PRESIDENT — Order! The rules The Honourable Peter Hall raised for the Minister for relating to question time and the adjournment debate Transport a matter concerning state funding for the are different. I rule this time that the minister’s reply proposed Pakenham bypass. I will refer that matter to disposes of the issue. the minister in the other place.

Hon. C. C. BROAD (Minister for Energy and The Honourable Ron Bowden also raised for the Resources) — The Honourable Geoff Craige, who Minister for Transport the need for a safe public unfortunately had to leave early, raised for the attention crossing facility at Park Lane, Somerville. I will refer of the Minister for Transport a matter regarding the that matter to the minister in the other place. Maroondah Highway and Don Road intersection. He requested that the minister give urgent consideration to Hon. M. R. THOMSON (Minister for Small traffic lights at the intersection. I will refer that matter Business) — The Honourable Peter Katsambanis raised to the minister in the other place. for the Minister for Housing the social housing innovations report and its recommendations regarding The Honourable Barry Bishop raised for the Minister the transfer of housing stock to non-government for Transport a matter concerning accreditation of organisations and the concerns it raises with his training requirements for mechanics who do motor constituents regarding security of tenancy. I will raise vehicle testing for roadworthy certificates. I will refer that matter with the minister in the other place. that minister to the minister in the other place. Hon. J. M. MADDEN (Minister for Sport and The Honourable Elaine Carbines raised for the Minister Recreation) — The Honourable Bruce Atkinson raised for Transport the government’s Linking Victoria with me the walking bus initiative and issues project to provide fast rail services to Victoria’s concerning the Safety House program, police checks regional cities, including Geelong, and called on the and public liability. The honourable member will minister to consider the inclusion of electrification in appreciate that when the program was launched it was a the tender documents for the Geelong fast rail project. I joint pilot program established with a number of bodies, will refer that matter to the minister in the other place. and although I do not have the information with me at this moment I will seek to provide further details to the The Honourable Ron Best also raised for the Minister honourable member. for Transport a matter relating to a 40-kilometre-an-hour zone at the Epsom Primary On the issue raised by the Honourable Theo School in Howard Street, Bendigo. I will refer that Theophanous concerning ticket scalping at Australian matter to the minister in the other place. Football League finals and previous bills presented to the Parliament, what is indisputable is the failure of the The Honourable Philip Davis raised for my attention Liberal and National parties to support such legislation. the important matter of the existing moratorium on the I thank Mr Theophanous for his support on this issue issuing of new licences for the Latrobe aquifer. A and for defending attacks on my personal integrity. I moratorium was put in place some three years ago refer honourable members to Hansard of 18 September under the Kennett government. I have previously 1991, when the then Minister for Consumer Affairs, the indicated that the government will give consideration to Honourable Theo Theophanous, is recorded as saying: reviewing that moratorium following the completion of a number of reports. The honourable member referred The government has been frustrated in its attempt to stamp to two reports, but there is a further study which the out scalping by the actions of the opposition. Despite having the support of the Australian Football League (AFL), when government has under consideration regarding the the government introduced legislation on three occasions to impact of declining water levels on irrigation and ADJOURNMENT

Wednesday, 19 September 2001 COUNCIL 155

make scalping illegal, the opposition blocked it every time. The opposition is on the side of the scalpers. Times have not changed that much in relation to the stand of the opposition. I suggest that the Honourable Bruce Atkinson may make the appropriate apology at some future time.

In relation to the matter raised by the Honourable Bill Baxter regarding Echuca youth issues and Freeza funding, I suspect in some way the opposition is being mischievous. I will explain again, and I hope honourable members understand what is taking place. There have been no cuts to the program. It has been extended for six months and its programs are still being delivered. I have suggested to the house on a number of occasions that I support the program and that ongoing funding will be achieved. There is no reduction at this point in any of the programs. People are being paid during this six-month program so they should be able to continue the program during the period.

I will refer to the Minister for Education in the other place the issue raised by the Honourable Gordon Rich-Phillips regarding damage to property at the Pakenham Secondary College.

The Honourable Ian Cover raised the issue of the Barwon Heads Football and Netball club. The Honourable Elaine Carbines has chaired the working party — a very productive working party — with all stakeholders included in the process, including the City of Greater Geelong. As has been the case, I expect that the program will continue to work productively to ensure a suitable outcome for all stakeholders.

Motion agreed to.

House adjourned 6.59 p.m. 156 COUNCIL Wednesday, 19 September 2001 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 157

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Answers to the following questions on notice were circulated on the date shown. Questions have been incorporated from the notice paper of the Legislative Council. Answers have been incorporated in the form supplied by the departments on behalf of the appropriate ministers. The portfolio of the minister answering the question on notice starts each heading. Thursday, 16 August 2001

Industrial Relations: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd contracts

1497. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) 9 October 2000

(ii) $91,300

(iii) Investigate attitudes toward water safety issues.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at: www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Industrial Relations: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd contracts

1498. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Industrial Relations: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1499. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

158 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Industrial Relations: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1500. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Premier: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1501. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Premier): Will the Premier provide details of every contract entered into between the Premier’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that, as at 22 March 2001:

(i) (ii) (iii) July 2000

A contract with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd was entered into in July 2000. The value of the contract was $35,200 inclusive of GST. Sweeney Research Pty Ltd undertook market research to assist in the development of a communication strategy to identify community attitudes on racial and religious tolerance.

October 2000

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in October 2000 conducted a survey among small business owners and managers with regard to industrial relations (value of $16,500 inclusive of GST) and a qualitative study on “Victorian Community attitudes” (value of $27,500 inclusive of GST).

December 2000

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in December 2000 conducted a survey on the “One Stop Shop” concept (value of $25,465 inclusive of GST).

March 2001

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in March 2001 conducted a survey on Wodonga Regional Issues Research (value of $22,011 inclusive of GST).

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 159

Premier: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1502. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Premier): Will the Premier provide details of every contract entered into between the Premier’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

No contracts have been entered into between my Office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Premier: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1503. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Premier): Will the Premier provide details of every contract entered into between the Premier’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that, as at 22 March 2001:

(i) (ii) (iii) May 2000

A contract with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd was entered into in May 2000. The value of the contract was $87,838 inclusive of GST. Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd project managed the development of the new slogan - The Place to Be, redesigned the State logo, developed a style manual and prepared and produced connected launch event items.

September 2000

In September 2000 Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd produced a digital betacam dub containing a LPG Television Commercial. The value of the contract was $302.28 inclusive of GST.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Premier: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1504. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Premier): Will the Premier provide details of every contract entered into between the Premier’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

3 contracts were entered into between my Office and the firm Shannon’s Way in the timeframe specified: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

160 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

1. Communication strategy and planning. The contract amount was $10,012.

2. Communications and strategic advice. The contract amount was $7,000.

3. Strategic advice. The contract amount was $4,000.

I am advised that my Office has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Workcover: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1505. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd for the period October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001.

Workcover: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1506. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Workcover: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1507. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Limited since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 161

Workcover: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1508. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

(i) 14 April 2000.

(ii) $35,853.

(iii) Strategy development-Restoration of Common Law Rights.

(iv) My Office has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

Arts: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1509. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Arts): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister's department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Since October 1999, no contract has been entered into between Sweeney Research Pty Ltd and the ‘Minister’s Department’ or any departmental unit within the parameters for the Minister for the Arts portfolio. However, inquiries of the remaining areas of the Department of Premier and Cabinet have revealed that as at 22 March 2001:

(i) (ii) (iii) July 2000

A contract with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd was entered into in July 2000. The value of the contract was $35,200 inclusive of GST. Sweeney Research Pty Ltd undertook market research to assist in the development of a communication strategy to identify community attitudes on racial and religious tolerance.

October 2000

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in October 2000 conducted a survey among small business owners and managers with regard to industrial relations (value of $16,500 inclusive of GST) and a qualitative study on “Victorian Community attitudes” (value of $27,500 inclusive of GST).

December 2000

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in December 2000 conducted a survey on the “One Stop Shop” concept (value of $25,465 inclusive of GST). QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

162 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

March 2001

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in March 2001 conducted a survey on Wodonga Regional Issues Research (value of $22,011 inclusive of GST).

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Arts: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1510. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Arts): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Arts: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1511. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Arts): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon's Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Since October 1999, no contract has been entered into between Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd and the ‘Minister’s Department’ or any departmental unit within the parameters for the Minister for the Arts portfolio.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas of the Department of Premier and Cabinet have revealed that as at 22 March 2001:

(i) (ii) (iii) May 2000

A contract with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd was entered into in May 2000. The value of the contract was $87,838 inclusive of GST. Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd project managed the development of the new slogan - The Place to Be, redesigned the State logo, developed a style manual and prepared and produced connected launch event items.

September 2000

In September 2000 Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd produced a digital betacam dub containing a LPG Television Commercial. The value of the contract was $302.28 inclusive of GST.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 163

publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Arts: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1512. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS-To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Arts): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Health: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1513. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Health): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Department of Human Services has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999.

Health: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1514. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Health): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Health: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1515. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Health): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Shannon’s Way

a) Communications Strategy to launch Victorian Government Drug Initiative QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

164 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

(i) the date the contract was entered into:

The contract start date was 1 September 2000.

(ii) the value of the contract:

$22,026

(iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract:

Developed a broad communications strategy to launch the Victorian Government Drug Initiative.

(iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm:

I am advised that the Department of Human Services has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994 for both of the above contracts. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

b) Victorian Government Drug Initiative Contract

(i) the date the contract was entered into:

The contract start date was 01 November 2000.

(ii) the value of the contract:

$16,124

(iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract:

Developed products for the Victorian Government Drug Initiative Launch

(iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm:

I am advised that the Department of Human Services has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994 for both of the above contracts. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

Health: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1516. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Health): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Finance: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1517. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Finance): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 165

(i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd for the period October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001.

Finance: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1518. THE HON P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Finance): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Finance: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1519. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Finance): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Limited since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Finance: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1520. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Finance): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

166 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Multicultural Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1521. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that as at 22 March 2001:

(i) (ii) (iii) July 2000

A contract with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd was entered into in July 2000. The value of the contract was $35,200 inclusive of GST. Sweeney Research Pty Ltd undertook market research to assist in the development of a communication strategy to identify community attitudes on racial and religious tolerance.

October 2000

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in October 2000 conducted a survey among small business owners and managers with regard to industrial relations (value of $16,500 inclusive of GST) and a qualitative study on “Victorian Community attitudes” (value of $27,500 inclusive of GST).

December 2000

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in December 2000 conducted a survey on the “One Stop Shop” concept (value of $25,465 inclusive of GST).

March 2001

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in March 2001 conducted a survey on Wodonga Regional Issues Research (value of $22,011 inclusive of GST).

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Multicultural Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1522. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

No contracts have been entered into between my Office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 167

Multicultural Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1523. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that as at 22 March 2001:

(i) (ii) (iii) May 2000

A contract with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd was entered into in May 2000. The value of the contract was $87,838 inclusive of GST. Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd project managed the development of the new slogan - The Place to Be, redesigned the State logo, developed a style manual and prepared and produced connected launch event items.

September 2000

In September 2000 Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd produced a digital betacam dub containing a LPG Television Commercial. The value of the contract was $302.28 inclusive of GST.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Multicultural Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1524. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

3 contracts were entered into between my Office and the firm Shannon’s Way in the timeframe specified:

1. Communication strategy and planning. The contract amount was $10,012.

2. Communications and strategic advice. The contract amount was $7,000.

3. Strategic advice. The contract amount was $4,000.

I am advised that my Office has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Energy and Resources: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1525. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

168 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Energy and Resources: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1526. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Energy and Resources: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1527. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment entered into the following contract with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999:

(i) 15 June 2000.

(ii) $1,650.00 (including GST).

(iii) Fee for Greenhouse Discussion Paper concepts.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Natural Resources and Environment has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

Energy and Resources: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1528. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 169

Ports: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1529. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) September 2000;

(ii) $11,550;

(iii) To conduct qualitative market research for the Station Pier Logo, including the conduct of a number of group sessions; and

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Ports: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1530. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Ports: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1531. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) 25 July 2000;

(ii) $10,098 (including GST)

(iii) Preparation and production associated with the new Victorian number plate design and design of road signage (7 types); and

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

170 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Ports: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1532. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Treasurer: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1533. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Treasurer’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd for the period October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001.

Treasurer: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1534. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Treasurer’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001.

Treasurer: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1535. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Treasurer’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Limited since October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 171

Treasurer: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1536. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Treasurer’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd for the period October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001.

State and Regional Development: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1537. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Department of State and Regional Development has advised me that one contract was entered into with the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd.

The date the contract was entered into was 9 October 2000, to the value of $91,300 to investigate attitudes toward water safety issues.

I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at: www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

State and Regional Development: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1538. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001.

State and Regional Development: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1539. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

172 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001.

State and Regional Development: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1540. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001.

Environment and Conservation: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1541. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Environment and Conservation): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Environment and Conservation: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1542. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Environment and Conservation): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Environment and Conservation: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1543. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Environment and Conservation): Will the Minister provide details of every QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 173

contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Whilst no contracts were entered into within the Minister’s portfolio of Environment and Conservation, since October 1999 the Department of Natural Resources and Environment entered into the following contract with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd:

(i) 15 June 2000.

(ii) $1,650.00 (including GST).

(iii) Fee for Greenhouse Discussion Paper concepts.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Natural Resources and Environment has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

Environment and Conservation: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1544. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Environment and Conservation): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Agriculture: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1545. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Agriculture): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Agriculture: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1546. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Agriculture): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

174 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Agriculture: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1547. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Agriculture): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment entered into the following contract with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999:

(i) 15 June 2000.

(ii) $1,650.00 (including GST).

(iii) Fee for Greenhouse Discussion Paper concepts.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Natural Resources and Environment has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

Agriculture: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1548. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Agriculture): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Transport: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1549. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 175

(i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) September 2000;

(ii) $11,550;

(iii) To conduct qualitative market research for the Station Pier Logo, including the conduct of a number of group sessions; and

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Transport: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1550. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Transport: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1551. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’ department and the firm Shannon’ Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) 25 July 2000;

(ii) $10,098 (including GST)

(iii) Preparation and production associated with the new Victorian number plate design and design of road signage (7 types); and

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Transport: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1552. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’ office and the firm Shannon’ Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

176 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Local Government: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1553. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) September 2000;

(ii) $11,550;

(iii) To conduct qualitative market research for the Station Pier Logo, including the conduct of a number of group sessions; and

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Local Government: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1554. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Local Government: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1555. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) 25 July 2000;

(ii) $10,098 (including GST) QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 177

(iii) Preparation and production associated with the new Victorian number plate design and design of road signage (7 types); and

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Local Government: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1556. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Sport and Recreation: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1557. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) 9 October 2000

(ii) $91,300

(iii) Investigate attitudes toward water safety issues.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at: www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Sport and Recreation: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1558. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

178 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Sport and Recreation: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1559. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’ department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Sport and Recreation: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1560. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Youth Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1561. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Youth Affairs: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

Advice from the Department of Education, Employment and Training is that it entered into only one contract with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in the period since October 1999. Sweeney Research Pty Ltd was contracted by the Office of Employment, Training and Tertiary Education. Details are as follows:

(i) 15 October 2000.

(ii) $49,764 (including GST).

(iii) To undertake research to inform the Office of Employment, Training and Tertiary Education’s communication strategy.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Education, Employment and Training has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at:

www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

The information in this reply is based on the records of payments made by the Department to firms since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 179

Youth Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1562. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Youth Affairs: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Youth Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1563. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Youth Affairs: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

The Department of Education, Employment and Training has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Youth Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1564. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Youth Affairs: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Education: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1565. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Education): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

180 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Since October 1999, no contract has been entered into between Sweeney Research Pty Ltd and the ‘Minister’s Department’ or any departmental unit within the parameters of the Minister for Education’s portfolio.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of Education, Employment and Training have revealed that the Office of Employment, Training and Tertiary Education did engage Sweeney Research Pty Ltd on one occasion, during the relevant period. The information sought regarding these contracts is as follows:

(i) 15 October 2000.

(ii) $49,764 (including GST).

(iii) To undertake research to inform the Office of Employment, Training and Tertiary Education’s communication strategy.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Education, Employment and Training has compiled with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at

www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

The information in this reply is based on the records of payments made by the Department to firms since October 1999.

Education: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1566. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Education): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Education: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1567. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Education): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

The Department of Education, Employment and Training has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way since October 1999.

Education: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1568. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Education): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 181

between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1569. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

Advice from the Department of Education, Employment and Training is that it entered into only one contract with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in the period since October 1999. Sweeney Research Pty Ltd was contracted by the Office of Employment, Training and Tertiary Education. Details are as follows:

(i) 15 October 2000.

(ii) $49,764 (including GST).

(iii) To undertake research to inform the Office of Employment, Training and Tertiary Education’s communication strategy.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Education, Employment and Training has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at

www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

The information in this reply is based on the records of payments made by the Department to firms since October 1999.

Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1570. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

182 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1571. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

The Department of Education, Employment and Training has not entered into any contact with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

The information in this reply is based on the records of payments made by the Department to firms since October 1999.

Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1572. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Police and Emergency Services: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1573. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Police and Emergency Services): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Since October 1999, no contract has been entered into between Sweeney Research Pty Ltd and the “Minister’s Department” or any departmental unit within the parameters of the Minister for Police and Emergency Services’s portfolio.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of Justice have revealed that Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria did engage Sweeney Research Way Pty Ltd on two occasions, during the relevant period. The information sought regarding these contracts is as follows:

(i) 27 June 2000 (i) 11 September 2000

(ii) $69,150 (including variation) (ii) $43,750 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 183

(iii) Questionnaire and survey for Stage 1 of (iii) Evaluation of Victorian Homebuyers Consumer Needs and Awareness Study. Magazine.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has (iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has complied with section 54L of the Financial complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Police and Emergency Services: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1574. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Police and Emergency Services): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999.

Police and Emergency Services: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1575. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Police and Emergency Services): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Since October 1999, no contract has been entered into between Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd and the “Minister’s Department” or any departmental unit within the parameters of the Minister for Police and Emergency Services’s portfolio.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of Justice have revealed that Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria did engage Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd on two occasions, during the relevant period. The information sought regarding these contracts is as follows:

(i) 23 June 2000 (i) (i) 12 July 2000

(ii) (ii) $95,218 (including variations) (ii) (ii) $19,747

(iii) (iii) Phase 1 of Victorian Fuel Price Monitoring (iii) (iii) Phase 2 of Victorian Fuel Price Monitoring Initiative (advertising services) Initiative (new print advertisements)

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has (iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has complied with section 54L of the Financial complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

184 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Police and Emergency Services: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1576. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Police and Emergency Services): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way since October 1999.

Corrections: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1577. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Corrections): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Since October 1999, no contract has been entered into between Sweeney Research Pty Ltd and the “Minister’s Department” or any departmental unit within the parameters of the Minister for Corrections portfolio.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of Justice have revealed that Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria did engage Sweeney Research Pty Ltd on two occasions, during the relevant period. The information sought regarding these contracts is as follows:

(i) 27 June 2000 (i) 11 September 2000

(ii) $69,150 (including variation) (ii) $43,750

(iii) Questionnaire and survey for Stage 1 of (iii) Evaluation of Victorian Homebuyers Consumer Needs and Awareness Study. Magazine.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has (iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has complied with section 54L of the Financial complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Corrections: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1578. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Corrections): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 185

Corrections: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1579. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Corrections): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Since October 1999, no contract has been entered into between Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd and the “Minister’s Department” or any departmental unit within the parameters of the Minister for Corrections portfolio.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of Justice have revealed that Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria did engage Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd on two occasions, during the relevant period. The information sought regarding these contracts is as follows:

(i) 23 June 2000 (i) 12 July 2000

(ii) (ii) $95,218 (including variations) (ii) $19,747

(iii) (iii) Phase 1 of Victorian Fuel Price Monitoring (iii) Phase 2 of Victorian Fuel Price Monitoring Initiative (advertising services) Initiative (new print advertisements)

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has (iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has complied with section 54L of the Financial complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Corrections: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1580. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Corrections): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way since October 1999.

Planning: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1581. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Planning): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) September 2000; QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

186 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

(ii) $11,550;

(iii) To conduct qualitative market research for the Station Pier Logo, including the conduct of a number of group sessions; and

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Planning: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1582. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Planning): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Planning: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1583. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Planning): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) 25 July 2000;

(ii) $10,098 (including GST)

(iii) Preparation and production associated with the new Victorian number plate design and design of road signage (7 types); and

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Planning: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1584. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Planning): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 187

Manufacturing Industry: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1585. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Manufacturing Industry): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

No agency or departmental unit within the parameters of my portfolio has entered into contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of State and Regional Development have revealed that Sweeney Research Pty Ltd was engaged during the relevant period. The information sought regarding this contract is as follows:

(i) 9 October 2000

(ii) $91,300

(iii) Investigate attitudes toward water safety issues

(iv) I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Manufacturing Industry: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1586. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Manufacturing Industry): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Manufacturing Industry: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1587. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Manufacturing Industry): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

No agency or departmental unit within the parameters of my portfolio has entered into contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of State and Regional Development show that no contracts have been entered into with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

188 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Manufacturing Industry: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1588. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Manufacturing Industry): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Racing: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1589. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Racing): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

No agency or departmental unit within the parameters of my portfolio has entered into contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of State and Regional Development have revealed that Sweeney Research Pty Ltd was engaged during the relevant period. The information sought regarding this contract is as follows:

(i) 9 October 2000

(ii) $91,300

(iii) Investigate attitudes toward water safety issues

(iv) I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Racing: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1590. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Racing): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 189

Racing: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1591. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Racing): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

No agency or departmental unit within the parameters of my portfolio has entered into contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of State and Regional Development show that no contracts have been entered into with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Racing: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1592. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Racing): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Major Projects and Tourism: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1593. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) 9 October 2000

(ii) $91,300

(iii) Investigate attitudes toward water safety issues.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at: www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

190 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Major Projects and Tourism: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1594. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Major Projects and Tourism: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1595. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd from October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Major Projects and Tourism: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1596. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Gaming: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1597. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Gaming): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd for the period October 1999 to the date of the question on notice 22 March 2001. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 191

Gaming: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1598. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Gaming): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Gaming: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1599. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Gaming): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Limited since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Gaming: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1600. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Gaming): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Small Business: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1601. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

(i) 9 October 2000 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

192 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

(ii) $91,300

(iii) Investigate attitudes toward water safety issues.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at: www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Small Business: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1602. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Small Business: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1603. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Small Business: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1604. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 to the date of the Question on Notice 22 March 2001.

Consumer Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1605. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Consumer Affairs: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 193

value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Two contracts have been entered into between Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria of the Department of Justice and Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

(i) 27 June 2000 (i) 11 September 2000

(ii) $69,150 (including variation) (ii) $43,750

(iii) Questionnaire and survey for Stage 1 of (iii) Evaluation of Victorian Homebuyers Consumer Needs and Awareness Study. Magazine.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has (iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has complied with section 54L of the Financial complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Consumer Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1606. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Consumer Affairs: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999.

Consumer Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1607. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Consumer Affairs: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Two contracts have been entered into between Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria of the Department of Justice and Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

(i) 23 June 2000 (i) 12 July 2000

(ii) $95,218 (including variations) (ii) $19,747

(iii) Phase 1 of Victorian Fuel Price Monitoring (iii) Phase 2 of Victorian Fuel Price Monitoring Initiative (advertising services) Initiative (new print advertisements) QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

194 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has (iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has complied with section 54L of the Financial complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Consumer Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1608. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Consumer Affairs: Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way since October 1999.

Attorney-General: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1609. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Attorney-General): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Attorney-General’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Since October 1999, no contract has been entered into between Sweeney Research Pty Ltd and the so-called “Attorney-General’s Department” or any departmental unit within the parameters of the Attorney-General’s portfolio.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of Justice have revealed that Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria did engage Sweeney Research Pty Ltd on two occasions, during the relevant period. The information sought regarding these contracts is as follows.

(i) 27 June 2000 (i) 11 September 2000

(ii) $69,150 (including variation) (ii) $43,750

(iii) Questionnaire and survey for Stage 1 of (iii) Evaluation of Victorian Homebuyers Consumer Needs and Awareness Study. Magazine.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has (iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has complied with section 54L of the Financial complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 195

Attorney-General: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1610. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Attorney-General): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Attorney-General’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999.

Attorney-General: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1611. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Attorney-General): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Attorney-General’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Since October 1999, no contract has been entered into between Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd and the so-called “Attorney-General’s Department” or any departmental unit within the parameters of the Attorney-General’s portfolio.

However, inquiries of the remaining areas within the Department of Justice have revealed that Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria did engage Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd on two occasions, during the relevant period. The information sought regarding these contracts is as follows.

(i) 23 June 2000 (i) 12 July 2000

(ii) $95,218 (including variations) (ii) $19,747

(iii) Phase 1 of Victorian Fuel Price Monitoring (iii) Phase 2 of Victorian Fuel Price Monitoring Initiative (advertising services) Initiative (new print advertisements)

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice (iv) I am advised that the Department of Justice has has complied with section 54L of the Financial complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Attorney-General: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1612. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Attorney-General): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Attorney-General's office and the firm Shannon's Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

196 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Women’s Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1613. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Women’s Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

As at 22 March 2001 I am informed that:

The Department of Premier and Cabinet, which incorporates the Office of Women’s Policy, has entered into the following contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999:

(i) (ii) (iii) July 2000

A contract with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd was entered into in July 2000. The value of the contract was $35,200 inclusive of GST. Sweeney Research Pty Ltd undertook market research to assist in the development of a communication strategy to identify community attitudes on racial and religious tolerance.

October 2000

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in October 2000 conducted a survey among small business owners and managers with regard to industrial relations (value of $16,500 inclusive of GST) and a qualitative study on “Victorian Community attitudes” (value of $27,500 inclusive of GST).

December 2000

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in December 2000 conducted a survey on the “One Stop Shop” concept (value of $25,465 inclusive of GST).

March 2001

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd in March 2001 conducted a survey on Wodonga Regional Issues Research (value of $22,011 inclusive of GST).

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Women’s Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1614. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Women’s Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 197

Women’s Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1615. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Women’s Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

As at 22 March 2001 I am informed that:

The Department of Premier and Cabinet, which incorporates the Office of Women’s Policy, has entered into the following contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999:

(i) (ii) (iii) May 2000

A contract with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd was entered into in May 2000. The value of the contract was $87,838 inclusive of GST. Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd project managed the development of the new slogan - The Place to Be, redesigned the State logo, developed a style manual and prepared and produced connected launch event items.

September 2000

In September 2000 Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd produced a digital betacam dub containing a LPG Television Commercial. The value of the contract was $302.28 inclusive of GST.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm

Women’s Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1616. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Women’s Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My Office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Community Services: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1617. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Department of Human Services has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

198 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Community Services: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1618. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Community Services: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1619. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Shannon’s Way

a) Communications Strategy to launch Victorian Government Drug Initiative

(i) the date the contract was entered into:

The contract start date was 1 September 2000.

(ii) the value of the contract:

$22,026 (iii)the nature of the tasks performed under the contract:

Developed a broad communications strategy to launch the Victorian Government Drug Initiative. (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm:

I am advised that the Department of Human Services has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994 for both of the above contracts. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

b) Victorian Government Drug Initiative Contract

(i) the date the contract was entered into:

The contract start date was 01 November 2000.

(ii) the value of the contract:

$16,124

(iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract:

Developed products for the Victorian Government Drug Initiative Launch QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 199

(iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm:

I am advised that the Department of Human Services has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994 for both of the above contracts. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

Community Services: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1620. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Housing: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1621. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS —To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Department of Human Services has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999.

Housing: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1622. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Minister’s office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Housing: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1623. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Shannon’s Way QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

200 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

a) Communications Strategy to launch Victorian Government Drug Initiative

(i) the date the contract was entered into:

The contract start date was 1 September 2000.

(ii) the value of the contract:

$22,026

(iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract:

Developed a broad communications strategy to launch the Victorian Government Drug Initiative.

(iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm:

I am advised that the Department of Human Services has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994 for both of the above contracts. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

b) Victorian Government Drug Initiative Contract

(i) the date the contract was entered into:

The contract start date was 01 November 2000.

(ii) the value of the contract:

$16,124

(iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract:

Developed products for the Victorian Government Drug Initiative Launch

(iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm:

I am advised that the Department of Human Services has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994 for both of the above contracts. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

Housing: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1624. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Minister’s office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Aboriginal Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1625. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 201

into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Aboriginal Affairs: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1626. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Aboriginal Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1627. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment entered into the following contract with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999:

(i) 15 June 2000.

(ii) $1,650.00 (including GST).

(iii) Fee for Greenhouse Discussion Paper concepts.

(iv) I am advised that the Department of Natural Resources and Environment has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

Aboriginal Affairs: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1628. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

202 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Aged Care: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1670. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Department of Human Services has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research since October 1999.

Aged Care: Sweeney Research Pty Ltd — contracts

1671. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Minister’s office has not entered into any contracts with Sweeney Research Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Aged Care: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1672. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s department and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

Shannon’s Way

a) Communications Strategy to launch Victorian Government Drug Initiative

(i) the date the contract was entered into:

The contract start date was 1 September 2000.

(ii) the value of the contract:

$22,026

(iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract:

Developed a broad communications strategy to launch the Victorian Government Drug Initiative. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 203

(iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm:

I am advised that the Department of Human Services has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994 for both of the above contracts. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

b) Victorian Government Drug Initiative Contract

(i) the date the contract was entered into:

The contract start date was 01 November 2000.

(ii) the value of the contract:

$16,124

(iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract:

Developed products for the Victorian Government Drug Initiative Launch

(iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm:

I am advised that the Department of Human Services has complied with section 54L of the Financial Management Act 1994 for both of the above contracts. Supply policies and the associated best practice guidelines are publicly available on the Victorian Government Purchasing Board’s web site at www.vgpb.vic.gov.au/polguid/polmenu.htm.

Aged Care: Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd — contracts

1673. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): Will the Minister provide details of every contract entered into between the Minister’s office and the firm Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999 including — (i) the date the contract was entered into; (ii) the value of the contract; (iii) the nature of the tasks performed under the contract; and (iv) the process undertaken to award this contract to the firm.

ANSWER:

The Minister’s office has not entered into any contracts with Shannon’s Way Pty Ltd since October 1999.

Housing: social housing innovations project

1724. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to the Social Housing Innovations Project and the fifty projects that will be funded:

(a) In what electorates are these projects.

(b) What are the funding details for each electorate.

(c) What funding has been allocated to each project. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

204 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

ANSWER:

Please see attachment for details of each project, identifying funding and suburb on a project by project basis.

Organisation Govt Grant Suburb

Capital Funding including ethno-specific City of Port Philip/St Kilda Housing Assoc Inc 1,600,843 Port Melbourne Doutta Galla Aged Services/ Stockbridge Community 471,000 Kensington Housing/ Macaulay Community Credit St Kilda Rooming House Issues Group Inc 1,908,750 St Kilda Albert Park 3,980,593

Common Equity Housing Limited 213,000 Ballarat Ballarat 213,000

Community Housing Limited 988,724 Croydon Bayswater 988,724

City of Wodonga 310,000 Wodonga Benalla 310,000

The State Council of the Young Mens Christian Assoc of 805,000 Bendigo Vic Bendigo 805,000

Common Equity Housing Limited 214,000 Berwick Berwick 214,000

Victorian Women's Housing Association Ltd 1,038,940 Roxburgh Park Broadmeadows 1,038,940

Paraquad Victoria 425,000 Coburg Coburg 425,000

Community Housing Ltd (ESOP) 1,154,186 Carrum Downs Frankston 1,154,186

Common Equity Housing Limited 104,000 Geelong Ecumenical Community Housing 970,765 Newtown Southern Cross Victoria Aged Care 1,169,040 Newcomb Geelong 2,243,805

Common Equity Housing Limited 116,000 Bairnsdale Common Equity Housing Limited 206,000 Maffra Common Equity Housing Limited 104,000 Wonthaggi Gippsland 426,000

Lancefield-Romsey Lions Club & Macedon Ranges Shire 175,000 Romsey QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 205

Organisation Govt Grant Suburb

Council Windarring Central Highlands Assoc for People with 766,398 Kyneton Disabilities Gisborne 941,398

Prahran Mission 550,000 Glen Waverley Glen Waverley 550,000

Supported Housing Development Foundation Ltd 195,000 West Heidelberg Ivanhoe 195,000

Ukranian Elderly People’s Home (ESOP) 594,294 Delahey Melton 594,294

Common Equity Housing Limited 312,000 Mildura Mildura 312,000

Supported Housing Development Foundation Ltd 470,000 Mitcham Supported Housing Development Foundation Ltd 349,000 Mitcham Mitcham 819,000

Common Equity Housing Limited/Community Housing Ltd 403,710 Yarra Ranges, Croydon, Bayswater Mooroolbark/ Bayswater 403,710

Mariallac House Ltd 260,000 Mordialloc Mordialloc 260,000

Common Equity Housing Limited 306,000 Yarrawonga Murray Valley 306,000

Community Housing Limited 556,952 Thornbury Northcote 556,952

Common Equity Housing Limited/Community Housing Ltd 1,073,287 not specified not specified 1,073,287

Moreland City Council 979,800 Pascoe Vale Pascoe Vale 979,800

Lions Village Anglesea Inc 247,000 Anglesea Otway Health & Community Services 650,847 Apollo Bay Polwarth 897,847

Shire of Campaspe 208,628 Kyabram Rodney 208,628 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

206 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Organisation Govt Grant Suburb

Southern Mental Health Assoc Inc 80,000 Sandringham Sandringham 80,000

Common Equity Housing Limited/Community Housing Ltd 1,056,231 Wangaratta, Seymour, Wodonga Seymour/Murray Valley 1,056,231

Common Equity Housing Limited 204,000 Shepparton Shepparton Multicultural Hostel Inc (ESOP) 822,000 Shepparton Shepparton 1,026,000

Common Equity Housing Limited 218,000 Werribee Werribee 218,000

Supported Housing Development Foundation Ltd 250,000 Spotswood Williamstown 250,000

Total 22,527,395

Capital Funding – Projects for Finalisation Ecumenical Community Housing 2,494,876 South Croydon Common Equity Housing Limited 327,000 Bendigo Loddon Mallee Housing Services Limited 536,000 Bendigo Glen Eira City Council 3,400,000 East Bentleigh Common Equity Housing Ltd/Community Housing Ltd 355,824 Donvale Common Equity Housing Limited 949,500 Geelong East Ecumenical Community Housing 1,859,967 Clifton Hill Supported Housing Development Foundation Ltd 520,000 Beaumaris Moreland City Council 1,065,000 Fawkner Gunditijmara Aboriginal Co-operative 446,890 Warrnambool Sub Total Projects for finalisation 11,955,057 Total 34,482,452

Community Services: preschool funding

1775. THE HON. M. T. LUCKINS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services):

(a) What are the names and locations of preschools which have received funds or an allocation of funds for capital works since October 1999.

(b) What funding was provided to each of these preschools. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 207

(c) What was the application process.

(d) What were the assessment criteria.

(e) From where were the funds sourced.

ANSWER:

(a) The Department of Human Services has not undertaken a major capital works program for preschools since October 1999. No major capital grant payments have been paid to preschool services since October 1999.

The Department of Human Services provided funding to all eligible preschools for equipment and maintenance in 2000. The names and locations are provided.

(b) The Department of Human Services provided funding of $1000 to each eligible preschool in 2000 for the purposes of purchasing equipment and maintenance (including computer software and hardware).

(c) Preschool services did not need to apply for this funding.

(d) All services that met the eligibility criteria of funded, independent, community based preschools were paid the $1000 equipment and maintenance payment.

(e) Funding was sourced from the Preschool Program budget.

Agency Suburb Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. HIGHTON Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. OCEAN GROVE Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. PORTARLINGTON Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. NEWCOMB Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. NEWCOMB Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. LEOPOLD Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. NEWTOWN Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. DRYSDALE Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. OCEAN GROVE Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. OCEAN GROVE Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. GEELONG EAST Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. BELMONT Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. BREAKWATER Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. GROVEDALE Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. BELMONT Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. HAMLYN HEIGHTS Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. WHITTINGTON Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. CLIFTON SPRING Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. GEELONG NORTH Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. HERNE HILL Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. LEOPOLD Geelong Kindergarten Association Ltd. BELL PARK The Combined Pre-Schools of Southern Grampians Inc HAMILTON The Combined Pre-Schools of Southern Grampians Inc HAMILTON The Combined Pre-Schools of Southern Grampians Inc CAVENDISH The Combined Pre-Schools of Southern Grampians Inc BRANXHOLME The Combined Pre-Schools of Southern Grampians Inc PENSHURST The Combined Pre-Schools of Southern Grampians Inc DUNKELD Bay City Montessori Preschool Inc. GEELONG Nullawarre and District Kindergarten Inc NULLAWARRE QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

208 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Corangamite Shire Council LISMORE Corangamite Shire Council TIMBOON Corangamite Shire Council SIMPSON Corangamite Shire Council DERRINALLUM Corangamite Shire Council TERANG Corangamite Shire Council COBDEN Moyne Shire Council MACARTHUR Moyne Shire Council PURNIM WEST Moyne Shire Council KOROIT Moyne Shire Council HAWKESDALE Alvie and District Kindergarten Inc CORAGULAC Apex Pre-School Centre Inc ELLIMINYT Apollo Bay Pre School and Infant Welfare Association Inc APOLLO BAY Balmoral and District Kindergarten Inc BALMORAL Bell Post Hill Kindergarten Inc BELL POST Bellevue Preschool Centre Inc HIGHTON Birregurra Pre-School Centre Inc BIRREGURRA Camperdown Pre-School Association Inc CAMPERDOWN Colac East Kindergarten Inc COLAC Corio Kindergarten Inc CORIO Elsa Macleod Kindergarten Inc PORTLAND Flinders Kindergarten Inc LARA Geelong West Kindergarten Inc GEELONG WEST Good Shepherd Lutheran Kindergarten Inc HAMILTON Grovedale Kindergarten Association Inc GROVEDALE North Hamilton Kindergarten Inc HAMILTON The Helen M Kininmonth Pre-School Centre Inc WINCHELSEA The Heywood Kindergarten Inc HEYWOOD Jaycee Kindergarten Inc PORTLAND Kalbarri Kindergarten Association Inc PORTLAND Lara Kindergarten Inc LARA Lorne Kindergarten Inc LORNE Moriac Kindergarten Inc MORIAC Mortlake Kindergarten Inc MORTLAKE Norlane North-Shore Kindergarten Inc NORLANE Norlane West Kindergarten Committee Inc NORLANE Port Fairy Kindergarten Inc PORT FAIRY Rosewall Kindergarten Inc CORIO Skipton Kindergarten Inc SKIPTON St Lukes Pre School (Highton) HIGHTON St Pauls Lutheran Kindergarten Inc GROVEDALE Thomson Early Learning Centre Inc GEELONG EAST Torquay Kindergarten Inc TORQUAY Whittington War Memorial Kindergarten Association Inc WHITTINGTON William Hovell Pre- School Inc CORIO Winifred Nance Kindergarten Inc COLAC Wydinia Kindergarten Inc COLAC Anglesea Kindergarten Inc ANGLESEA The Jan Juc Pre-School Inc JAN JUC Beacon Point Pre-School Centre Inc CLIFTON SPRINGS Barwon Heads Pre-School Inc BARWON HEADS QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 209

Agency Suburb Herne Hill K-6 Early Learning Centre Inc GEELONG NORTH Grovedale East Kindergarten Inc GROVEDALE Birralee Apex Kindergarten Inc PORTLAND Bond Street Kindergarten Chilwell Inc NEWTOWN Warrnambool City Council ALLANSFORD Warrnambool City Council WARRNAMBOOL Warrnambool City Council WARRNAMBOOL Warrnambool City Council WARRNAMBOOL Warrnambool City Council WARRNAMBOOL Warrnambool City Council WARRNAMBOOL Warrnambool City Council WARRNAMBOOL Coleraine and District Kindergarten Inc COLERAINE Glenelg Shire Council DARTMOOR Kathleen Millikan Centre Inc CASTERTON Lara Lake Community Pre School Inc LARA Lavers Hill & Districts Pre School Inc LAVERS HILL Corio South Norlane Kindergarten Inc CORIO Forrest Primary School Council FORREST Queenscliff Kindergarten Inc QUEENSCLIFF Nunawading Primary School Council NUNAWADING All Saints Pre School, Yarra Junction Inc YARRA JUNCTION Allandale Kindergarten Inc BORONIA Appletree Hill Pre-School Association Incorporated GLEN WAVERLEY Arrabri Kindergarten Inc BAYSWATER NORTH Ashwood Pre-School Association Incorporated ASHWOOD Auburn Kindergarten & Child Care Centre Inc HAWTHORN EAST Auburn South Pre-School Incorporated HAWTHORN EAST Balwyn East Kindergarten Incorporated BALWYN Barngeong Reserve Kindergarten Incorporated CROYDON NORTH Barriburn Pre-School Association Incorporated VERMONT SOUTH Belgrave Pre-School Incorporated BELGRAVE Bellevue Kindergarten Association Inc BALWYN NORTH Benwerrin Pre-School Association Inc BURWOOD EAST Beverley Hills Kindergarten Incorporated DONCASTER EAST Bimbadeen Pre-School Inc MOOROOLBARK Birralee Pre-School Vermont Incorporated VERMONT SOUTH Blackburn North Baptist Pre-School Inc BLACKBURN Larch Street Kindergarten Inc BLACKBURN NORTH Blackburn Pre-School Centre Incorporated BLACKBURN Box Hill North Kindergarten Association Incorporated BOX HILL NORTH Box Hill South Pre-School Centre Inc BOX HILL SOUTH Brandon Park Pre-School Association Inc MULGRAVE Brentwood Pre-School Association Incorporated GLEN WAVERLEY Brentwood Park Kindergarten Inc CROYDON Bulleen Pre School Incorporated BULLEEN Burch Memorial Pre-School Inc WONGA PARK Burwood Pre-School Inc BURWOOD Camberwell Baptist Church Kindergarten Inc HAWTHORN Bayswater North Kindergarten Inc BAYSWATER NORTH Canterbury & District Pre-School Inc SURREY HILLS Cara Armstrong Kindergarten Incorporated HAWTHORN EAST QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

210 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Catjump Pre-School Association Incorporated DONCASTER EAST Chirnside Park Pre School Inc CHIRNSIDE PARK Clayton Pre-School Inc CLAYTON Coldstream Pre-School Inc COLDSTREAM Columbia Park Pre-School Association Inc MULGRAVE Croydon Central Kindergarten Inc CROYDON Croydon Gums Kindergarten Incorporated CROYDON Croydon North Kindergarten Inc CROYDON Dandenong Ranges Montessori Pre-School Inc SILVAN Davis Street Kindergarten Association Inc KEW Daws Community Kindergarten Association Incorporated DONCASTER Deep Creek Pre-School Incorporated DONCASTER Deepdene Pre-School Centre Incorporated DEEPDENE Doncaster Kindergarten Association Incorporated DONCASTER Donvale Pre School Association Incorporated DONVALE Dr Stanley Cochrane Memorial Kindergarten Incorporated MITCHAM East Burwood Pre-School Incorporated BURWOOD EAST Koolyangarra Kindergarten Inc OAKLEIGH Eastmont Pre-School Association Incorporated VERMONT Ellie. V. Pullin Preschool Centre Inc RINGWOOD NORTH Emmanuel Anglican Kindergarten Inc OAKLEIGH Estrella Pre-School Inc ASHBURTON Fernhill Pre-School Inc MOUNT EVELYN Florence Road Pre-School Centre Incorporated SURREY HILLS Fordham Avenue Kindergarten Association Inc CAMBERWELL Forest Hill Pre-School Association Inc FOREST HILL Glass Street Kindergarten Association Inc KEW EAST Glen Iris Pre School Centre Inc GLEN IRIS Glen Waverley South Pre-School Inc GLEN WAVERLEY Glendal Pre-School Association Incorporated MOUNT WAVERLEY Gray Court Pre-School Inc MOOROOLBARK Greenwood Park Kindergarten Parents Club Incorporated RINGWOOD Gum Nut Gully Pre School Association Incorporated DONCASTER EAST Hansen Park Pre-School Inc KILSYTH Hartwell Pre School HARTWELL Heatherdale Pre-School Incorporated MITCHAM Heathmont Baptist Pre School Inc HEATHMONT Heathmont East Pre-School Association Incorporated HEATHMONT Heathmont Pre School & Kindergarten Incorporated HEATHMONT Highmount Pre-School Association Incorporated MOUNT WAVERLEY Highvale Pre-School Association Incorporated GLEN WAVERLEY Hotham Street Kindergarten Association Incorporated MONT ALBERT Hughesdale Kindergarten Inc HUGHESDALE Germain Street Kindergarten Inc OAKLEIGH SOUTH Boroondara Pre-School Inc BALWYN NORTH Indra Pre-School Association Inc BLACKBURN Jells Park Pre-School Association Incorporated WHEELERS HILL Kallista Kindergarten Association Inc KALLISTA Katrina Pre-School Association Incorporated BLACKBURN NORTH Friend Street Kindergarten Inc BOX HILL NORTH Kurboroo Kindergarten Inc WARRANWOOD QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 211

Agency Suburb Lancaster Pre School Inc MOOROOLBARK Legend Park Pre School Association Incorporated GLEN WAVERLEY The Len Jeffrey Memorial Pre- School & Infant Welfare Centre BELGRAVE SOUTH Inc Lilydale Pre-School Centre Inc LILYDALE Lilydale North Pre-School Inc LILYDALE Liverpool Road Pre-School Centre Inc KILSYTH Lower Templestowe Pre School Association Inc LOWER TEMPLESTOWE Manchester Pre-School Inc MOOROOLBARK Manresa Kindergarten Inc HAWTHORN Maroondah Pre-School Parents Club Incorporated RINGWOOD EAST Monbulk Pre-School Inc MONBULK Montrose Pre-School Inc MONTROSE Mooroolbark Early Childhood Education Centre Inc MOOROOLBARK Mount Waverley Pre-School Centre Incorporated MOUNT WAVERLEY Mt Dandenong Pre-School Inc MOUNT DANDENONG Mt Evelyn Memorial Pre-School Inc MOUNT EVELYN Mount Pleasant Kindergarten (Forest Hill) Inc FOREST HILL Mulgrave Park Pre-School Centre Inc MULGRAVE Nara Pre-School Association Incorporated MOUNT WAVERLEY North Ringwood Pre-School Incorporated RINGWOOD Canterbury Norwood Baptist Kindergarten Association Inc CANTERBURY Norwood Pre-School Parents Club Incorporated RINGWOOD Oban Pre-School Incorporated RINGWOOD Park Orchards Kindergarten Incorporated PARK Parkmore Pre-School Association Inc FOREST Parkside Pre-School Centre Incorporated BOX Pinewood Pre-School Centre Incorporated MOUNT Pope Road Blackburn Pre-School Association Incorporated BLACKBURN Rangeview Preschool Association Incorporated MITCHAM Ringwood Uniting Church Pre School RINGWOOD Robert Cochrane Kindergarten Incorporated HAWTHORN Rolling Hills Pre-School Inc MOOROOLBARK Rowen Street Kindergarten Inc BURWOOD Sarah Court Pre-School Inc MONTROSE Sassafras Pre School Centre Inc SASSAFRAS Seville Pre-School Inc SEVILLE Ward Avenue Kindergarten Inc OAKLEIGH St Augustine’s Anglican Kindergarten Incorporated MONT ALBERT NORTH St Dunstan’s Anglican Kindergarten Incorporated CAMBERWELL St John’s Pre-School Incorporated OAKLEIGH St John’s Kindergarten Committee Croydon Inc CROYDON St Luke’s Pre School (Mt Waverley) MOUNT WAVERLEY St Paul’s Anglican Kindergarten Inc CANTERBURY St Peter’s Anglican Kindergarten Box Hill Inc BOX HILL St Scholasticas Kindergarten BURWOOD Strathcare Kindergarten Inc BALWYN NORTH Studley Park Kindergarten Parents' Association Incorporated KEW Summerhill Park Kindergarten Inc GLEN IRIS Surrey Hills Pre-School Centre Inc SURREY HILLS Syndal Pre-School Association Incorporated GLEN WAVERLEY QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

212 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Tally-Ho Pre-School Incorporated GLEN WAVERLEY Tarralla Kindergarten Association Incorporated BAYSWATER NORTH Templestowe Heights Pre-School Association Incorporated LOWER TEMPLESTOWE Templestowe Pre-School Association Inc TEMPLESTOWE Birchwood Avenue Templestowe Valley Pre-School Association LOWER TEMPLESTOWE Inc Terrara Preschool Association Incorporated VERMONT SOUTH The Merrell Kindergarten Incorporated BALWYN NORTH Tunstall Square Kindergarten Incorporated DONCASTER Twin Hills Pre School Incorporated LOWER TEMPLESTOWE Upwey Pre-School Incorporated UPWEY Upwey South Pre-School Inc UPWEY SOUTH Vermont Pre-School Association Incorporated VERMONT Vista Valley Bulleen Kindergarten Association Incorporated BULLEEN Warekila Pre-School Association Inc NUNAWADING Warrandyte and District Pre-School Association Inc WARRANDYTE Wattle Hill Kindergarten Inc BURWOOD Waverley Foothills Pre-School Association Incorporated MULGRAVE Waverley Meadows Preschool Association Incorporated MULGRAVE Wayburne Pre-School Association Inc GLEN WAVERLEY Wellington Pre School Centre Inc MULGRAVE West Hawthorn Pre-School Centre Inc HAWTHORN Nottinghill Children’s Services Association Inc CLAYTON NORTH Yarra Glen Pre-School Association Inc YARRA GLEN Yarra Valley Pre-School Incorporated TEMPLESTOWE Yarraleen Pre School Incorporated BULLEEN Yongala Pre-School Inc BALWYN Upper Yarra Childrens Services Inc WARBURTON Upper Yarra Childrens Services Inc LAUNCHING PLACE Upper Yarra Childrens Services Inc WOORI YALLOCK Upper Yarra Childrens Services Inc MILLGROVE Kinderlink Inc HEALESVILLE Kinderlink Inc HEALESVILLE Kinderlink Inc HEALESVILLE Box Hill North Primary School Council BOX HILL NORTH City of Knox BAYSWATER City of Knox ROWVILLE City of Knox WANTIRNA City of Knox FERNTREE GULLY City of Knox BORONIA City of Knox ROWVILLE City of Knox WANTIRNA SOUTH City of Knox FERNTREE GULLY City of Knox SCORESBY City of Knox WANTIRNA SOUTH City of Knox WANTIRNA City of Knox ROWVILLE City of Knox WANTIRNA SOUTH City of Knox ROWVILLE City of Knox ROWVILLE City of Knox ROWVILLE QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 213

Agency Suburb City of Knox THE BASIN City of Knox FERNTREE GULLY City of Knox FERNTREE GULLY City of Knox FERNTREE GULLY City of Knox ROWVILLE City of Knox FERNTREE GULLY City of Knox BAYSWATER City of Knox UPPER FERNTREE GULLY City of Knox FERNTREE City of Knox KNOXFIELD City of Knox THE BASIN City of Knox WANTIRNA SOUTH City of Knox BORONIA WEST The Patch Early Learning Centre Inc THE PATCH Colchester Park Pre-School Inc BORONIA HEIGHTS Doncaster East Pre-School Centre Incorporated DONCASTER EAST Doncaster East Pre-School Centre Incorporated DONCASTER EAST Dover Street Pre-School Centre Incorporated CLAYTON J.J.Mcmahon Memorial Kindergarten Inc KEW North Kew Kindergarten Inc KEW Lipscombe Park Kindergarten Incorporated CROYDON Palm Grove Pre-School Centre Inc KILSYTH Pinemont Pre-School Association Inc RINGWOOD Pinjarra Kindergarten Association Inc CROYDON SOUTH The Selby Pre-School Play Centre Incorporated SELBY Tecoma Pre-School Incorporated TECOMA Wandin Pre-School Inc WANDIN Joy Avenue Pre-School Inc MOUNT Waverley Christian College Inc WANTIRNA SOUTH Alchester Village Pre-School Inc BORONIA Don Valley Community Inc DON VALLEY St James Wattle Park Kindergarten BOX HILL Ashwood Children's Centre Inc ASHWOOD Inverloch & District Pre-School Association Inc INVERLOCH La Trobe Shire TRARALGON La Trobe Shire MOE La Trobe Shire NEWBOROUGH La Trobe Shire TRARALGON La Trobe Shire TRARALGON La Trobe Shire YINNAR La Trobe Shire GLENGARRY La Trobe Shire CHURCHILL La Trobe Shire TYERS La Trobe Shire MORWELL La Trobe Shire TRARALGON La Trobe Shire MOE La Trobe Shire TRARALGON La Trobe Shire TRARALGON La Trobe Shire TRARALGON SOUTH La Trobe Shire BOOLARRA La Trobe Shire MORWELL QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

214 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb La Trobe Shire YALLOURN NORTH La Trobe Shire CHURCHILL La Trobe Shire NEWBOROUGH La Trobe Shire MORWELL La Trobe Shire TRARALGON Bairnsdale Kindergarten Incorporated BAIRNSDALE Bowen Park Kindergarten Inc WARRAGUL Bruthen Outreach Kindergarten Inc BRUTHEN Bruthen Outreach Kindergarten Inc BUCHAN Cann Valley Community Kindergarten Inc CANN RIVER Drouin Kindergarten Association Inc DROUIN Bairnsdale Early Learning Centre Inc BAIRNSDALE EAST Erica Pre-School Inc ERICA Gormandale Preschool Incorporated GORMANDALE Korumburra Kindergarten Inc KORUMBURRA Lakes Entrance Pre Schools Inc LAKES ENTRANCE Leongatha Community Pre-School Centres Inc LEONGATHA Leongatha Community Pre-School Centres Inc LEONGATHA Longford Pre School Inc LONGFORD Longwarry Pre-School Association Inc LONGWARRY Mirboo North Kindergarten Inc MIRBOO NORTH Oak Street Kindergarten Inc DROUIN Orbost Pre Schools Centre Inc ORBOST Paynesville and District Kindergarten Inc PAYNESVILLE Poowong Pre-School & Infant Welfare Centre Committee Inc POOWONG St Andrew's Uniting Kindergarten (Warragul) WARRAGUL St Lukes Anglican Kindergarten Moe Inc MOE Stratford Kindergarten Inc STRATFORD Swan Reach & District Pre-School Association Inc SWAN REACH Westdale Kindergarten Inc BAIRNSDALE Willow Grove Kindergarten Inc WILLOW GROVE Wonthaggi Kindergartens Inc WONTHAGGI Wonthaggi Kindergartens Inc WONTHAGGI Yarragon Pre-School Centre Inc YARRAGON Maffra & District Childrens Services Inc BRIAGOLONG Maffra & District Childrens Services Inc MAFFRA Maffra & District Childrens Services Inc HEYFIELD Maffra & District Childrens Services Inc MAFFRA Promontory Coast Childrens Services Inc FISH CREEK Promontory Coast Childrens Services Inc FOSTER Promontory Coast Childrens Services Inc WELSHPOOL Promontory Coast Childrens Services Inc TOORA Tarwin Valley Pre-School Inc MEENIYAN Tarwin Valley Pre-School Inc DUMBALK Sale Combined Kindergartens Inc SALE Sale Combined Kindergartens Inc SALE Sale Combined Kindergartens Inc SALE Sale Combined Kindergartens Inc SALE The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (Victoria) ORBOST The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (Victoria) ORBOST The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (Victoria) GELANTIPY QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 215

Agency Suburb St Andrew's Pre School No. 1 (Yarram) YARRAM San Remo Pre-School Centre Inc SAN REMO Lindenow & District Pre-School Inc LINDENOW Loch and District Pre-School Centre Inc LOCH Mallacoota Pre-School Association & Toy Library Inc MALLACOOTA Mary Beck Pre School and Infant Welfare Centre Inc NEERIM SOUTH Rosedale Community Pre-School Centre Inc ROSEDALE Thorpdale and District Kindergarten Inc THORPDALE Trafalgar Kindergarten Inc TRAFALGAR Grace Berglund Kindergarten Committee Inc WARRAGUL Phillip Island Kindergarten Inc COWES Jeanette Loughridge Memorial Preschool Inc CORINELLA Warragul Community Pre-School Centre Inc WARRAGUL Woolum Bellum Pre-School Association Inc MORWELL East Sale Kindergarten Inc SALE EAST Great Alpine Preschool Service Inc SWIFTS CREEK Great Alpine Preschool Service Inc OMEO The Ballan & District Pre- School Centre Inc BALLAN Stawell & District Pre-School Association Inc STAWELL Stawell & District Pre-School Association Inc STAWELL Ballarat City BALLARAT Hindmarsh Shire Council NHILL Hindmarsh Shire Council JEPARIT Hindmarsh Shire Council DIMBOOLA Hindmarsh Shire Council RAINBOW Yarriambiack Shire Council MURTOA Yarriambiack Shire Council BEULAH Yarriambiack Shire Council TEMPY Yarriambiack Shire Council PATCHEWOLLOCK Yarriambiack Shire Council RUPANYUP Yarriambiack Shire Council MINYIP Yarriambiack Shire Council HOPETOUN Alfredton Child Welfare and Pre-School Centre Inc ALFREDTON Avoca Pre School Parents Association Inc AVOCA Bakery Hill Kindergarten Inc BALLARAT Ballarat North Kindergarten Inc BALLARAT Bennett Road Kindergarten Inc HORSHAM Black Hill Pre-School Inc BLACK HILL Brown Hill Kindergarten Inc BALLARAT Buninyong Pre-School Inc BUNINYONG Clunes and District Pre-School Centre Inc CLUNES Daylesford Pre-School Centre Inc DAYLESFORD Delacombe Community Kindergarten DELACOMBE Elizabeth Watkin Kindergarten Inc BEAUFORT Felstead Avenue Kindergarten Inc HORSHAM Goroke Pre-School Centre Inc GOROKE Haddon Kindergarten Committee Inc HADDON Ballarat Uniting Church Hazel Road Pre School WENDOUREE WEST Hepburn Kindergarten Association Inc HEPBURN SPRINGS The Roberts Avenue Kindergarten Inc HORSHAM Horsham North Kindergarten Inc HORSHAM QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

216 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Iris Ramsay Kindergarten Inc BALLARAT Jack and Jill Kindergarten Inc ARARAT Kaniva Kindergarten Inc KANIVA Lake Bolac and District Kindergarten Inc WESTMERE Linda Brown Pre-School Centre Inc WENDOUREE Meredith Infant Welfare Kindergarten Inc MEREDITH Midlands Kindergarten Inc BALLARAT Mount Clear Community Kindergarten Inc MOUNT CLEAR Mount Helen Pre-School Inc MOUNT HELEN Mt. Pleasant Kindergarten Inc BALLARAT Natimuk Pre-School Centre Inc NATIMUK Natimuk Road (Horsham) Kindergarten Inc HORSHAM Rowan View Pre School Centre Inc WENDOUREE Sebastopol Kindergarten Inc SEBASTOPOL Sebastopol South Kindergarten Inc SEBASTOPOL Sebastopol West Kindergarten Inc SEBASTOPOL St Andrews Kindergarten Ararat Inc ARARAT St Arnaud Kindergarten Inc ST ARNAUD Trentham Kindergarten Association Inc TRENTHAM Wallace and District Kindergarten Inc WALLACE Wendouree Pre-School Centre Inc WENDOUREE Willaura & District Kindergarten Inc WILLAURA Woady Yaloak Pre-School Inc SCARSDALE York Street Church of Christ Ballarat BALLARAT Early Childhood Management Services Inc BACCHUS MARCH Early Childhood Management Services Inc BACCHUS MARCH Enid Rogers Jubilee Kindergarten BALLARAT Ballarat Fidelity Club Kindergarten Association Inc BALLARAT Bannockburn Kindergarten Inc BANNOCKBURN Inverleigh Kindergarten Inc INVERLEIGH Warracknabeal Memorial Kindergarten Inc WARRACKNABEAL Waubra Pre-School Inc WAUBRA Teesdale Pre-School Inc TEESDALE Creswick & District Pre-School Inc CRESWICK Rokewood Primary School Council ROKEWOOD Edenhope College Council EDENHOPE Bacchus Marsh Montessori Centre Inc BACCHUS Woomelang Group School WOOMELANG The Kinglake Kindergarten Inc KINGLAKE City of Greater Shepparton SHEPPARTON City of Greater Shepparton KATANDRA WEST City of Greater Shepparton DOOKIE City of Greater Shepparton TALLYGAROOPNA City of Greater Shepparton SHEPPARTON EAST City of Greater Shepparton SHEPPARTON City of Greater Shepparton TATURA City of Greater Shepparton SHEPPARTON City of Greater Shepparton MOOROOPNA Mitchell Shire Council KILMORE Mitchell Shire Council PYALONG Mitchell Shire Council BROADFORD QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 217

Agency Suburb Mitchell Shire Council WALLAN Mitchell Shire Council WANDONG Mitchell Shire Council WALLAN Moira Shire Council TUNGAMAH Towong Shire Council TALLANGATTA VALLEY Towong Shire Council TALGARNO Towong Shire Council MITTA MITTA Towong Shire Council TALLANGATTA Towong Shire Council WALWA Alexandra and District Kindergarten Inc ALEXANDRA Appin Park Kindergarten Inc WANGARATTA Avenel Pre-School Inc AVENEL Bernard Briggs Kindergarten Inc BENALLA Bright and District Kindergarten Association Inc BRIGHT Christopher Robin Pre-School Centre Inc WANGARATTA Coronation Kindergarten Inc WANGARATTA Corryong Preschool Centre Inc CORRYONG Eildon & District Kindergarten Inc EILDON Euroa Kindergarten Inc EUROA Glenrowan Pre-School Centre Inc GLENROWAN Nathalia & District Pre School Association Inc NATHALIA James Tilson Kindergarten Inc WANGARATTA Beechworth Preschool Inc BEECHWORTH Kiewa Valley Early Childhood Centre Inc TANGAMBALANGA Mansfield Pre-School Centres Inc MANSFIELD Alexandra Street Kindergarten (Mooroopna) Inc MOOROOPNA Mt. Beauty Kindergarten Association Inc MOUNT BEAUTY Moyhu and District Pre-School Inc MOYHU Munro Avenue Pre School Centre Inc SWANPOOL Munro Avenue Pre School Centre Inc BENALLA Nagambie Pre-School Inc NAGAMBIE Puckapunyal Kindergarten Association Inc PUCKAPUNYAL MILPO Ride Avenue Pre-School Inc BENALLA Rodney Neighbourhood Kindergarten Inc MOOROOPNA Rutherglen Kindergarten Inc RUTHERGLEN Seymour East Pre-School Centre Inc SEYMOUR Seymour Pre-School Centre Inc SEYMOUR St Andrews Shepparton Kindergarten Inc SHEPPARTON St Mels Kindergarten SHEPPARTON Wangaratta West Kindergarten Inc WANGARATTA Whorouly and District Pre-School Centre Inc WHOROULY Yackandandah Kindergarten Inc YACKANDANDAH Yea Pre School Inc YEA Myrtleford Preschool Inc MYRTLEFORD Flowerdale Kindergarten Inc FLOWERDALE Berringa Kindergarten Inc BELLBRIDGE Goulburn Region Pre-School Association Inc KATAMATITE Goulburn Region Pre-School Association Inc TOOLAMBA Goulburn Region Pre-School Association Inc MURCHISON Goulburn Region Pre-School Association Inc UNDERA Goulburn Region Pre-School Association Inc MERRIGUM QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

218 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Goulburn Region Pre-School Association Inc BARMAH Kialla Children's Centre Inc KIALLA Marjorie Hall Kindergarten Inc BANDIANA MILPO Yarrawonga Preschool & Occasional Care Centre YARRAWONGA Gowrie Street Primary School SHEPPARTON Shire of Indigo CHILTERN Wodonga Rural City Council WODONGA Wodonga Rural City Council WODONGA Wodonga Rural City Council BARANDUDAH Wodonga Rural City Council WODONGA Wodonga Rural City Council WODONGA Wodonga Rural City Council WODONGA Wodonga Rural City Council WODONGA Wodonga Rural City Council WODONGA Marysville and District Kindergarten Association Inc MARYSVILLE Cobram District Children's Services Inc COBRAM Peranbin Primary College VIOLET TOWN Strathmerton Pre-School Association Inc. STRATHMERTON Numurkah Pre-School Association Inc NUMURKAH Nangiloc and District Kindergarten Inc NANGILOC South Castlemaine Kindergarten Inc CASTLEMAINE Buloke Shire Council SEA LAKE Buloke Shire Council WYCHEPROOF Buloke Shire Council CHARLTON Macedon Ranges Shire Council GISBORNE Macedon Ranges Shire Council WOODEND Macedon Ranges Shire Council KYNETON Macedon Ranges Shire Council GISBORNE Macedon Ranges Shire Council MACEDON Helm Street Pre-School Inc KANGAROO FLAT Swan Hill & District Aboriginal Co-operative Ltd. SWAN HILL A.G. Leech Kindergarten Inc MARYBOROUGH Bendigo Pre-School Inc BENDIGO North Bendigo Pre-School Inc BENDIGO South Bendigo Kindergarten Inc BENDIGO SOUTH Birchip and District Pre- School Association Inc BIRCHIP Boort Pre-School Association Inc BOORT Californian Gully Kindergarten Inc MARYBOROUGH Castlemaine Kindergarten Inc CASTLEMAINE Cohuna and District Pre School Centre Inc COHUNA De Garis Pre-School Centre Inc MILDURA Dingee Infant Welfare & Pre-School Inc DINGEE Donald Kindergarten Inc DONALD Dr. Harry Little Pre-School Inc BENDIGO Dunolly Pre-School Centre Inc DUNOLLY Eaglehawk Pre School Association Inc EAGLEHAWK Echuca Central Kindergarten Inc ECHUCA Echuca East Pre-School Centre Inc ECHUCA Echuca South Community Pre School Centre Inc ECHUCA SOUTH Elmore and District Pre School Association Inc ELMORE Epsom Preschool Inc EPSOM QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 219

Agency Suburb Golden Square Kindergarten Inc GOLDEN SQUARE Harcourt Pre School Play Centre Inc HARCOURT Heathcote Pre-School Inc HEATHCOTE Inglewood Kindergarten Inc INGLEWOOD Kangaroo Flat Pre-School Centre Inc KANGAROO FLAT Kathleen Kelly Kindergarten Inc MILDURA Kennington Pre-School Association Inc BENDIGO Lake Boga Pre-School Inc LAKE BOGA Lancefield Kindergarten Inc LANCEFIELD Leitchville Pre-School Play Centre Inc LEITCHVILLE Loddon Campaspe Uniting Church Mobile Preschool REDESDALE Long Gully Pre School Association Inc LONG GULLY Maldon Pre School Centre Association Inc MALDON Manangatang and District Pre School Inc QUAMBATOOK Manangatang and District Pre School Inc MANANGATANG Marong & District Pre-School Inc MARONG Mildura South Kindergarten Inc MILDURA Mildura West Kindergarten Inc MILDURA Neale Street North Pre-School Inc BENDIGO Neangar (Eaglehawk) Pre-School Association Inc EAGLEHAWK Newstead Pre-School Association Inc NEWSTEAD Nyah West and District Kindergarten Association Inc NYAH WEST Ouyen Pre-School Inc OUYEN Pasadena Pre-School Association Inc MILDURA Pyramid Hill Pre-School Association Inc PYRAMID HILL Red Cliffs Kindergarten Inc RED CLIFFS Robinvale Pre-School Association Inc ROBINVALE Rushworth Kindergarten and Child Care Inc RUSHWORTH Spring Gully Kindergarten Inc SPRING GULLY St Margaret's Pre-School Incorporated MILDURA Stanhope and District Kindergarten Inc STANHOPE Airport (Strathdale) Pre-School Association Inc BENDIGO Strathfieldsaye Pre-School Inc STRATHFIELDSAYE T.L. Stone Memorial Kindergarten Inc MARYBOROUGH Wedderburn Pre-School Inc WEDDERBURN White Hills Pre-School Centre Inc WHITE HILLS Swan Hill Rural City Council SWAN HILL Swan Hill Rural City Council SWAN HILL Axedale Pre-School Inc AXEDALE Back Creek Kindergarten Inc TALBOT Goulburn Region Pre-School Association Inc COLBINABBIN The Huntly Kindergarten Inc HUNTLY The Irymple Kindergarten Inc IRYMPLE Kyabram Preschool Management Committee Inc KYABRAM Kyabram Preschool Management Committee Inc KYABRAM Merbein Pre-School Kindergarten Inc MERBEIN Millewa Pre-School Inc WERRIMULL Murrabit Pre-School Inc MURRABIT Murray Valley Aboriginal Kindergarten ROBINVALE Raywood and District Preschool Inc RAYWOOD Riddells Creek Kindergarten Centre Inc RIDDELLS CREEK QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

220 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Romsey Kindergarten Inc ROMSEY Underbool Preschool Play Centre Inc MURRAYVILLE Underbool Preschool Play Centre Inc UNDERBOOL Woorinen South Pre-School Inc WOORINEN Koondrook Preschool Inc KOONDROOK Campaspe Shire Council GIRGARRE Campaspe Shire Council GUNBOWER Campaspe Shire Council ROCHESTER Campaspe Shire Council TONGALA Campaspe Shire Council LOCKINGTON Kerang & District Pre School Inc KERANG Yarralea Children's Centre Inc ALPHINGTON Yarra City Council FITZROY Yarra City Council RICHMOND Yarra City Council CARLTON NORTH Yarra City Council CARLTON NORTH Blossom Park Kindergarten Inc BLOSSOM PARK Alfred Nuttall Memorial Kindergarten Inc FAIRFIELD Annie Dennis Childrens Centre Inc NORTHCOTE Apollo Parkways Pre-School Inc GREENSBOROUGH The Barry Road Pre-School Association Inc THOMASTOWN Batman Park Kindergarten Association Inc NORTHCOTE Boroondara Kindergarten Inc RICHMOND NORTH Briar Hill Kindergarten Inc BRIAR HILL Brunswick Kindergarten Inc BRUNSWICK Bundoora Pre-School Association Inc. BUNDOORA Carrington Boulevard Preschool Association Inc THOMASTOWN Challenger Street Pre School Association Inc DIAMOND CREEK Clyde Street Kindergarten Inc THORNBURY Coburg Kindergarten Inc COBURG Collingwood Mission Kindergarten COLLINGWOOD Dalton Road Pre-School Inc LALOR Dame Nellie Melba Kindergarten Inc RICHMOND Delta Road Pre-School Association Inc GREENSBOROUGH Denzil Don Kindergarten Inc BRUNSWICK WEST Derby Meadows Pre-School Inc EPPING Diamond Creek East Pre-School Association Inc DIAMOND CREEK Diamond Creek Memorial Kindergarten Inc DIAMOND CREEK Diamond Hills Pre-School Inc GREENSBOROUGH East Brunswick Kindergarten Inc BRUNSWICK EAST East Preston Preschool PRESTON EAST Eltham North Pre-School Association Inc ELTHAM Eltham Pre-School Association Inc ELTHAM Eltham South Pre-School Association Inc ELTHAM Epping Pre-School Inc EPPING Fairy Hills Kindergarten Association Inc IVANHOE Kookaburra Kindergarten RESERVOIR Glenroy North Kindergarten Inc GLENROY NORTH Glenroy West Kindergarten Inc GLENROY Grace Park Pre-School Inc GREENSBOROUGH Greenbrook Kindergarten Inc EPPING QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 221

Agency Suburb Greenhills Pre-School Inc GREENSBOROUGH Harbard Street Kindergarten Inc THOMASTOWN Heidelberg (Orient Place) Pre-School Inc HEIDELBERG Hurstbridge Kindergarten Inc HURSTBRIDGE Interlaken Kindergarten Rosanna Inc ROSANNA Isabel Henderson Kindergarten Inc FITZROY NORTH Ivanhoe Uniting Church Pre School IVANHOE Edward Street Pre-School Inc BUNDOORA Kent Road Uniting Church Pre-school PASCOE VALE Keon Park Kindergarten Inc KEON PARK Kingsway Drive Kindergarten Inc LALOR The Lady Gowrie Child Centre (Melbourne) Inc CARLTON NORTH Lalor East Pre-School Association Inc LALOR Lalor Park Pre-School Inc LALOR Lalor Pre-School Association Inc LALOR Lower Plenty Kindergarten Association Inc LOWER PLENTY Macleod Pre-School Play Centre Inc MACLEOD Merrilands Childrens Centre and Kindergarten RESERVOIR Mill Park Pre-School Inc MILL PARK Newlands Pre-School Centre Inc COBURG North West Brunswick Kindergarten Inc BRUNSWICK Oakbrook Kindergarten Inc EPPING Panorama Heights Pre School Inc MONTMORENCY SOUTH Panton Hill Pre School Inc PANTON HILL Pascoe Vale South Uniting Church Kindergarten PASCOE VALE Regent Baptist Kindergarten Inc RESERVOIR Research Pre-School Inc RESEARCH Rosanna Uniting Church Pre School ROSANNA Roycroft Kindergarten Inc MILL PARK Sherbourne Pre-School Association Inc MONTMORENCY St Andrew's Kindergarten, Clifton Hill Inc CLIFTON HILL William Street Pre School Centre Inc LALOR St Andrews Pre School (Sunbury) SUNBURY St Andrews Uniting Church Kindergarten MONTMORENCY St Andrews Uniting Church Kindergarten (Fairfield) FAIRFIELD St Faith's Anglican Kindergarten Inc MONTMORENCY St Helena Pre-School Inc ELTHAM St Linus Anglican Kindergarten Inc MERLYNSTON St Martins Kindergarten At Bellevue Park Inc MONTMORENCY Coolaroo South Kindergarten Inc COOLAROO St Oswald’s Anglican Kindergarten Inc OAK PARK Stables Kindergarten Inc MILL PARK Thomastown West Kindergarten Inc THOMASTOWN Thornbury Kindergarten Inc THORNBURY Wahroonga Pre-School Inc GREENSBOROUGH Warrawee Park Pre School Inc BUNDOORA Watsonia Pre-School Association Inc WATSONIA Wattletree Pre-School Inc ELTHAM NORTH Westgarth Kindergarten Inc NORTHCOTE Whittlesea Kindergarten Inc WHITTLESEA Winston Hills Pre-School Association Inc VIEW BANK QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

222 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Woodridge Pre-School Inc ELTHAM Yallambie Park Pre School Association Inc YALLAMBIE Yandell Kindergarten Inc GREENSBOROUGH Yarra Warra Pre-School Inc WARRANDYTE NORTH Yarrambat/Plenty Pre-School Association Inc YARRAMBAT Dallas Primary School Council DALLAS Brentwood Kindergarten Inc. PASCOE VALE Fawkner Kindergarten Inc FAWKNER Moomba Park Kindergarten Inc FAWKNER Derby Street Childrens Centre Inc PASCOE VALE Doris Blackburn Pre-School Centre Inc PASCOE VALE SOUTH East Ivanhoe Pre-School Centre Inc IVANHOE EAST Eltham Woods Pre-School Inc ELTHAM Epping North Pre-School EPPING Ferguson Park Pre-School Inc HURSTBRIDGE Glenroy Memorial Pre-School Inc GLENROY Greensborough Pre-School Inc GREENSBOROUGH Harold Edward Kane Memorial Kindergarten Inc HADFIELD Kangaroo Ground Pre-School Inc KANGAROO GROUND Lake Park Kindergarten Inc COBURG NORTH Moreland Kindergarten Inc MORELAND Watsonia North Pre-School Inc WATSONIA Oak Park Kindergarten Inc OAK PARK Centenary Drive Kindergarten Inc MILL PARK Shirley Robertson Kindergarten COBURG South Morang Pre-School Association Inc SOUTH MORANG St Michael's Anglican Child Care Centre Inc BROADMEADOWS The Heights Kindergarten Inc MILL PARK Turner Street Pre-School Kindergarten Inc PASCOE VALE View Bank Pre-School Association Inc VIEW BANK Yappera Childrens Centre Co-operative Limited THORNBURY Broadmeadows Pre-School Program Inc BROADMEADOWS Banyule City Council HEIDELBERG WEST Banyule City Council HEIDELBERG WEST Hume City Council COOLAROO Hume City Council TULLAMARINE Hume City Council CAMPBELLFIELD Hume City Council SUNBURY Hume City Council SUNBURY Hume City Council SUNBURY Hume City Council TULLAMARINE Hume City Council BROADMEADOWS Hume City Council TULLAMARINE Hume City Council WESTMEADOWS Hume City Council GLADSTONE PARK Hume City Council ROXBURGH PARK Hume City Council GREENVALE Hume City Council CRAIGIEBURN Hume City Council BROADMEADOWS Hume City Council COOLAROO Hume City Council BROADMEADOWS QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 223

Agency Suburb Hume City Council COOLAROO WEST Hume City Council SUNBURY Hume City Council CRAIGIEBURN Hume City Council CRAIGIEBURN Hume City Council GREENVALE Hume City Council CRAIGIEBURN Hume City Council SUNBURY K.O.D.E. Glenroy Pre-School Centre Inc GLENROY Oakhill Preschool Association Inc RESERVOIR Gower Street Kindergarten Inc PRESTON J.S. Grey Kindergarten Association Inc PRESTON WEST McLeans Road Kindergarten Inc BUNDOORA Roxburgh Park Children's Centre ROXBURGH Northern Darebin Combined Kindergarten Association Inc. KINGSBURY Northern Darebin Combined Kindergarten Association Inc. PRESTON EAST Northern Darebin Combined Kindergarten Association Inc. KEON PARK Northern Darebin Combined Kindergarten Association Inc. RESERVOIR Andrews Community Kindergarten Inc PAKENHAM Gardiner Preschool Inc GLEN IRIS Strong Drive Pre-School Inc HAMPTON PARK Dandenong North East Kindergarten Inc DANDENONG Avonsleigh Pre-School Inc AVONSLEIGH Balnarring Pre-School and Infant Welfare Association Inc BALNARRING Dingley Kindergarten Centres Inc DINGLEY Dingley Kindergarten Centres Inc DINGLEY Crib Point Pre School Association Inc WESTERNPORT Casey City Council NARRE WARREN Casey City Council NARRE WARREN Casey City Council ENDEAVOUR HILLS Casey City Council ENDEAVOUR HILLS Casey City Council NARRE WARREN Casey City Council ENDEAVOUR HILLS Casey City Council ENDEAVOUR HILLS Casey City Council BERWICK Casey City Council HALLAM Casey City Council NARRE WARREN Casey City Council HALLAM Casey City Council ENDEAVOUR Casey City Council BERWICK Casey City Council BERWICK Casey City Council DOVETON Casey City Council NARRE WARREN Casey City Council NARRE WARREN Casey City Council ENDEAVOUR HILLS Casey City Council NARRE WARREN Casey City Council BERWICK City of Stonnington WINDSOR Bonbeach Pre School Inc BONBEACH Acacia Avenue Pre-School Association Inc MENTONE Armadale Pre-School Centre Inc ARMADALE Baden-Powell Pre-School Inc FRANKSTON QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

224 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Bailey Reserve Kindergarten Inc BENTLEIGH EAST Balcombe Pre-School Association Inc MOUNT MARTHA Ballam Park Pre-School Association Inc FRANKSTON Baxter Pre-School Inc BAXTER Bayles Pre School Committee Inc BAYLES Bayview Pre-School Association Inc FRANKSTON Beaconsfield Kindergarten Inc BEACONSFIELD Beleura Hill Pre-School Inc MORNINGTON Belvedere Park Pre-School Association Inc SEAFORD Bentleigh West Kindergarten Inc BENTLEIGH Bilbungra Kindergarten Centre Inc KEYSBOROUGH Black Rock Pre-School Centre Inc BLACK ROCK Blacks Camp Pre-School Centre Inc SOMERVILLE Botany Park Pre School Committee Inc CARRUM DOWNS Bowerbird Pre-School Inc CARRUM DOWNS Brady Road East Bentleigh Kindergarten Association Inc BENTLEIGH EAST Brighton Baptist Kindergarten Inc BRIGHTON Brookville Kindergarten Inc TOORAK Bruce Park Pre-School Association Inc FRANKSTON Bruthen Street Kindergarten Inc MOORABBIN Bunyip Kindergarten Inc BUNYIP Orrong Road Pre-School Inc ELSTERNWICK Centre Road East Bentleigh Kindergarten Association Inc BENTLEIGH EAST Fenwick Street Kindergarten Inc MALVERN EAST Chelsea Heights Kindergarten Inc CHELSEA HEIGHTS Chelsea Kindergarten Association Inc CHELSEA Clarinda Kindergarten Association Inc CLARINDA Cockatoo Kindergarten Inc COCKATOO Cockatoo Kindergarten Inc COCKATOO Corrigan-Rex Pre- School Centre Inc KEYSBOROUGH Cranbourne Community Pre-School Services Inc CRANBOURNE Cranbourne Community Pre-School Services Inc CRANBOURNE Cranbourne Community Pre-School Services Inc CRANBOURNE Cranbourne Community Pre-School Services Inc CRANBOURNE Dandenong North Pre-School Inc DANDENONG Dandenong West Pre-School Inc DANDENONG Delacombe Park Pre-School Association Inc FRANKSTON Dromana Pre-School Centre Inc DROMANA East Beaumaris Pre-School Association Inc BEAUMARIS EAST East Karingal Pre-School Association Inc FRANKSTON Edithvale Pre-School Centre Association Inc EDITHVALE Elonera Pre-School Association Inc PARKDALE Ewing Kindergarten Inc MALVERN EAST Farm Road Preschool Inc CHELTENHAM Frankston Pre School Inc FRANKSTON Garfield Kindergarten Inc GARFIELD Glover Street Preschool Association Inc BENTLEIGH EAST Gordon Street Pre-School Inc BEAUMARIS The Grange Road Kindergarten Association Inc SANDRINGHAM Hampton Community Kindergarten Inc HAMPTON Hampton Park East Pre School Committee Inc HAMPTON PARK QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 225

Agency Suburb Harrisfield Kindergarten Inc NOBLE PARK Hastings Pre-School Kindergarten Inc HASTINGS Heatherhill Kindergarten Centre Inc NOBLE PARK Helen Paul Kindergarten Inc HAMPTON The Heritage Pre School Association Inc DANDENONG NORTH Holy Trinity Anglican Free Kindergarten Hampton Inc HAMPTON Jack and Jill Beaumaris Kindergarten Inc BEAUMARIS Janet Mundy Kindergarten Inc BLACK ROCK Karingal Kindergarten Inc FRANKSTON Keysborough Kindergarten Inc KEYSBOROUGH Kooweerup Pre School Committee Inc KOOWEERUP Kunyung Pre-School Association Inc MOUNT ELIZA Lady Forster Kindergarten Inc PORT MELBOURNE Lang Lang Pre-School Committee Inc LANG LANG Langwarrin Preschool Committee Inc LANGWARRIN Langwarrin Park Pre-School Committee Inc LANGWARRIN Lilian Cannam Kindergarten Inc SOUTH MELBOURNE Malvern Memorial Kindergarten Inc ARMADALE McKinnon Kindergarten Association Inc MCKINNON McNeil Kindergarten Inc CAULFIELD SOUTH Brighton Montessori School Inc BRIGHTON EAST Mentone Pre-School Association Inc MENTONE Preschool Association of Middle Park Inc MIDDLE PARK Montague Park Pre School Inc FRANKSTON Moorabbin Kindergarten Inc MOORABBIN Mordialloc Pre-School Inc MORDIALLOC Mount Martha Preschool Association Inc MOUNT MARTHA Murrumbeena Kindergarten Inc MURRUMBEENA Nar Nar Goon Kindergarten Inc NAR NAR GOON Nola Barber Kindergarten Inc ASPENDALE Norman Fischer Memorial Pre-School Centre Inc CLAYTON Aspendale North Kindergarten Inc ASPENDALE North Cheltenham Pre School Centre Inc CHELTENHAM Oakwood Park Pre-School Association Inc NOBLE PARK Olinda Avenue Pre-School Inc SPRINGVALE Olive Phillips Kindergarten Inc BEAUMARIS Olympic Avenue Kindergarten Inc CHELTENHAM Ormond Community Kindergarten Inc ORMOND Pakenham Kindergarten Inc PAKENHAM Paratea Preschool Inc FRANKSTON Parkdale Pre-School Association Inc PARKDALE Patterson Lakes Kindergarten Inc PATTERSON LAKES Pearcedale Pre School Committee Inc PEARCEDALE Rangebank Pre-School Committee Inc CRANBOURNE Rene Anderson Kindergarten Inc CARRUM Renown Kindergarten Inc SOUTH YARRA Rosebud Kindergarten Inc ROSEBUD Rosswood Pre-School Centre Inc DANDENONG NORTH Sandown Park Kindergarten Inc SPRINGVALE Seaford Heights Pre-School Association Inc SEAFORD Seaford Kindergarten Association Inc SEAFORD QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

226 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Shalimar Park Pre School Association Inc DANDENONG NORTH Somers Pre-School Association Inc SOMERS South Mornington Pre-School Association Inc MORNINGTON SOUTH Springside Kindergarten Inc KEYSBOROUGH Springvale South Kindergarten Inc SPRINGVALE SOUTH Springvalley Pre-School Inc SPRINGVALE SOUTH St Agnes Kindergarten Inc GLEN HUNTLY St Bedes Anglican Early Learning Centre Inc ELWOOD St Johns Anglican Kindergarten Inc TOORAK St John The Baptist Sandringham Kindergarten Inc SANDRINGHAM St Kilda & Balaclava Kindergarten Inc BALACLAVA St Marys Preschool Centre Inc BRIGHTON EAST St Peters Kindergarten Inc BRIGHTON St Stephens Anglican Kindergarten Gardenvale Inc GARDENVALE Sundowner Kindergarten Inc CLAYTON SOUTH Sunnyside Kindergarten Association Inc MALVERN EAST Tooradin and District Pre School Committee Inc TOORADIN Tootgarook Pre-School Inc TOOTGAROOK Tyabb Pre-School Inc TYABB Valley Brook Pre-School Committee Inc HAMPTON PARK Walkers Road Preschool Inc MOUNT ELIZA Washington Drive Pre-School Inc OAKLEIGH SOUTH Waterfall Gully Pre-School Rosebud Inc ROSEBUD Wallaroo Child and Family Centre Inc HASTINGS Westall Kindergarten Inc WESTALL Whitworth Avenue Pre-School Inc SPRINGVALE Wirilda Pre-School Association Inc FRANKSTON NORTH Wonnai Preschool Inc LANGWARRIN Rye Pre-School Inc RYE Pakenham Heights Kindergarten Inc PAKENHAM Bayport Drive Pre-School Committee Inc LANGWARRIN Bittern Pre School Association Inc BITTERN Chandler Kindergarten Centre Inc KEYSBOROUGH Coral Drive Pre School Committee Inc HAMPTON PARK Dandenong Kindergarten Inc DANDENONG Darren Reserve Kindergarten Inc SPRINGVALE SOUTH Emerald Pre School Inc EMERALD Erinwood Preschool Inc FRANKSTON Evesham Road Pre-School Association Inc CHELTENHAM Higgins Road Kindergarten Inc BENTLEIGH John Mackenzie Kindergarten TOORAK Kananook Pre-School Inc SEAFORD Leslie Moorhead Pre-School Centre Inc MORNINGTON Merinda Park Pre-School Committee Inc CRANBOURNE Rowellyn Pre School Committee Inc CARRUM DOWNS Somerville Pre School Inc SOMERVILLE Woodbine Road Pre School Committee Inc CRANBOURNE Caulfield South Preschool Association Inc CAULFIELD SOUTH Middle Park Kindergarten Inc MIDDLE PARK Highett Pre School Inc HIGHETT Springvale Pre-School Centre Inc SPRINGVALE QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 227

Agency Suburb William Road Preschool Inc CARRUM DOWNS Murphy Street Early Learning Centre Inc BRIGHTON Tanti Park Pre-School Association Inc MORNINGTON Sorrento Pre-School Association Inc SORRENTO Serrell Street Kindergarten Association Inc MALVERN EAST Dandenong South Preschool Centre Inc DANDENONG Riviera Pre-School Centre Inc SEAFORD NORTH Noble Park Preschool Association Inc NOBLE PARK Mt Eliza Pre-School Association Inc MOUNT ELIZA Holy Trinity Anglican Kindergarten Oakleigh Inc OAKLEIGH Homegarth Community Kindergarten Inc PAKENHAM Peninsula Montessori Centre Inc FRANKSTON Hurlingham Pre-School Association Inc BRIGHTON EAST Gembrook Pre-School Association Inc GEMBROOK Nagle Kindergarten Inc SANDRINGHAM Neerim Road Pre School CARNEGIE Red Hill and District Memorial Pre School and Infant Welfare RED HILL Centre Inc Ripponlea Kindergarten Inc ST KILDA EAST Aspendale Gardens Community Service Inc ASPENDALE GARDENS Regans Road Kindergarten Inc HAMPTON PARK Port Melbourne Uniting Church Children's Services Centre PORT MELBOURNE Upper Beaconsfield Kindergartens Association Inc UPPER BEACONSFIELD Doveton Uniting Church Kindergarten DOVETON Flinders Pre-School Inc FLINDERS Yarraman Centre Victoria Inc NOBLE PARK Albert Park Pre-School Centre Inc ALBERT PARK Moonee Valley City Council ESSENDON Moonee Valley City Council AVONDALE Moonee Valley City Council NIDDRIE Moonee Valley City Council KEILOR Moonee Valley City Council ESSENDON Moonee Valley City Council NORTH Moonee Valley City Council STRATHMORE Moonee Valley City Council FLEMINGTON Moonee Valley City Council AVONDALE HEIGHTS Moonee Valley City Council AIRPORT WEST Moonee Valley City Council ASCOT VALE Moonee Valley City Council STRATHMORE Moonee Valley City Council KEILOR Moonee Valley City Council KEILOR Moonee Valley City Council NORTH MELBOURNE Moonee Valley City Council ESSENDON NORTH Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Wyndham City Council HOPPERS CROSSING Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Wyndham City Council HOPPERS Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Wyndham City Council LITTLE RIVER Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

228 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Agency Suburb Wyndham City Council HOPPERS CROSSING Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Wyndham City Council HOPPERS CROSSING Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Wyndham City Council WERRIBEE Albanvale Community Kindergarten Inc ST ALBANS Albion Kindergarten Inc ALBION Ascot Kindergarten Inc ASCOT VALE+J1088 Ave Maria Kindergarten Inc ESSENDON Cambrian Pre-School Association Inc WEST MELTON Cherry Crescent Pre-School Inc BRAYBROOK Clare Court Kindergarten Inc YARRAVILLE Deer Park Pre-School Centre Inc DEER PARK Deer Park West Kindergarten Inc DEER PARK Dobson Kindergarten Inc MAIDSTONE Dorothy Carlton Pre- School Inc SUNSHINE D.J. Cunningham Pre-School Inc MELTON SOUTH East Sunshine Kindergarten Inc SUNSHINE Emma Mclean Kindergarten Inc SPOTSWOOD Epalock Crescent Kindergarten Inc ST ALBANS Fairbairn Road Kindergarten Inc SUNSHINE Home Road Kindergarten Inc NEWPORT Keilor Road Uniting Church Kindergarten ESSENDON NORTH Kingsway Pre-School Association Inc MELTON Melton Central Pre-School Inc MELTON Melton South Pre School Inc MELTON SOUTH Melton Pre School MELTON Merriwa Kindergarten Inc YARRAVILLE North Maidstone Pre School Play Centre Inc MAIDSTONE North Sunshine Kindergarten Inc SUNSHINE Point Cook Kindergarten Inc POINT COOK Ridgeway Parade Kindergarten Inc ARDEER Robina Scott Kindergarten Inc WILLIAMSTOWN Rockbank Pre School Association Inc ROCKBANK Scots Presbyterian Kindergarten Inc FOOTSCRAY WEST Sth Kingsville Pre School Inc KINGSVILLE SOUTH St Aidan’s Pre-School Centre Inc STRATHMORE The St Alban’s Anglican Kindergarten Inc ST ALBANS St Andrew’s Anglican Kindergarten Aberfeldie Inc ESSENDON St Brendan’s Kindergarten FLEMINGTON St Mary’s Anglican Kindergarten Inc NORTH MELBOURNE Sunshine Heights Kindergarten Inc SUNSHINE Sunshine Kindergarten Inc SUNSHINE Sunshine Park Estate Kindergarten Inc ST ALBANS South Sunshine Kindergarten Inc SUNSHINE The Crossway Pre-School Association Inc STRATHMORE Welwyn Kindergarten DEER West Newport Kindergarten Inc NEWPORT QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 229

Agency Suburb Westerngate Kindergarten Inc DEER PARK Willis St Kindergarten Inc ST ALBANS The Range Children's Centre Inc WILLIAMSTOWN East Melbourne Child Care Co-Operative Ltd EAST MELBOURNE Maribyrnong Kindergarten Management Group Inc FOOTSCRAY Maribyrnong Kindergarten Management Group Inc FOOTSCRAY Early Childhood Management Services Inc SYDENHAM Early Childhood Management Services Inc KEILOR Early Childhood Management Services Inc KEILOR Early Childhood Management Services Inc ST ALBANS Early Childhood Management Services Inc DELAHEY Early Childhood Management Services Inc ST ALBANS Early Childhood Management Services Inc ALTONA Early Childhood Management Services Inc TAYLORS LAKES Early Childhood Management Services Inc KEALBA Early Childhood Management Services Inc SEAHOLME Early Childhood Management Services Inc ST ALBANS NORTH Early Childhood Management Services Inc KEILOR DOWNS Early Childhood Management Services Inc SYDENHAM Early Childhood Management Services Inc ST ALBANS Early Childhood Management Services Inc BROOKLYN Early Childhood Management Services Inc ALTONA MEADOWS Early Childhood Management Services Inc ALTONA NORTH Early Childhood Management Services Inc ALTONA MEADOWS Early Childhood Management Services Inc KEILOR Early Childhood Management Services Inc TAYLORS LAKES Early Childhood Management Services Inc KEILOR DOWNS Early Childhood Management Services Inc ALTONA NORTH Early Childhood Management Services Inc ALTONA Early Childhood Management Services Inc ALTONA Melbourne City Council CARLTON Melbourne City Council NORTH MELBOURNE Quantin Binnah Community Centre Inc WERRIBEE Brookfield Pre-School Inc MELTON Diggers Rest Pre-School Inc DIGGERS REST Laverton Kindergarten Inc LAVERTON Laverton North Kindergarten Inc LAVERTON Maribyrnong Kindergarten Inc MARIBYRNONG Ascot Vale Progress Kindergarten Association Inc ASCOT Yarraville Community Kindergarten Inc YARRAVILLE Bellevue Hill Pre-School Association Inc HILLSIDE Kensington Community Children's Co-Operative Limited KENSINGTON Cooraminta Children's Centre Inc LAVERTON SOUTH Northwest Maria Montessori Pre-School Inc ESSENDON Northwest Maria Montessori Pre-School Inc ESSENDON Try Youth and Community Services (Incorporating William MELTON Forster Try Boys' Society) Inc Christ Church Anglican Kindergarten Inc ESSENDON The Empire Child Care Association Inc FOOTSCRAY QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

230 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1780. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne:

(a) What are the anticipated positive distributional impacts on industry in metropolitan and regional areas.

(b) What is the projected positive impact on economic growth, jobs, business costs and competition policy.

ANSWER:

(a) The anticipated positive distributional impacts on industry in metropolitan and regional areas are significant. Specifically, distributional benefits should flow to industry from lower input costs and improved accessibility by regional Victoria to the port of Melbourne as a consequence of increased container terminal competition.

(b) The project is expected to result in a significant positive impact on economic growth, jobs, business costs and competition policy.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1781. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne:

(a) How will the possible visual and environmental impacts on surrounding districts be managed.

(b) Who will be responsible for their management.

ANSWER:

(a) The management of possible visual and environmental impacts on surrounding districts will be guided by the Webb Dock Environmental Effects Statement (EES). This EES included the Westgate Terminal Project.

(b) The Melbourne Port Corporation, the Environment Protection Authority and the preferred developer, will be responsible for environmental management of the project.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1782. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne:

(a) How will the Minister continue to consult with industry.

(b) For how long will the consultations continue.

ANSWER:

(a) The MPC is holding stakeholder briefing sessions in relation to the EOI process for the project. In particular, briefing sessions are being held for shipping lines, shippers and other stakeholders. In addition, it is intended that on achievement of stated milestones, periodic media releases will be issued advising stakeholders of key outcomes.

(b) It is anticipated that stakeholder communication will continue until such time as the project has reached conclusion. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 231

Major Projects and Tourism: regional events audit

1789. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): In relation to the answer to Question No. 1463, given in this House on 16 May 2001:

(a) Which events have received funding through Tourism Victoria events program, as a result of the regional events audit.

(b) Which events have been referred to the Country Victoria Events Program.

(c) Which local governments were consulted during the audit process.

(d) Will the audit report be made publicly available.

ANSWER:

The following events have received funding as a result of the regional events audit through Tourism Victoria’s Events Program: - Grampians Gourmet Festival (Halls Gap) - Seymour Alternative Farming Expo - National Celtic Folk Festival (Geelong) - Mildura Country Music Festival - Albury Wodonga Festival of Sport - World Title Jet Sprint Boats (Mildura) - Club Marine Southern 80 Ski Race (Echuca) - Queenscliff Music Festival The following events were referred to the Country Victoria Events Program:

- Ararat Jailhouse Rock’n Roll Festival - Beechworth Harvest Festival

- Festival of St Arnaud - Ballarat Winter Festival

- Horsham Art Is Festival - Bendigo Easter Fair

- Festival of the Southern Ocean (Mallacoota) - Euroa Wool Week

- Casterton Working Dog Auction - Organs of the Ballarat Goldfields

- Albury-Wodonga Food and Wine Festival - Mansfield High Country Festival

- Awakenings Performing Arts Festival (Horsham)

Local governments consulted during the audit process are outlined in Attachment 1.

As the audit is continually evolving, it is not appropriate that it be made public.

ATTACHMENT 1

Councils Consulted by Tourism Victoria for Regional Events Audit

Alpine Shire Council Gannawarra Shire Council Ararat Rural City Council Hepburn Shire Council City of Ballarat Hindmarsh Shire Council Bass Coast Shire Council Horsham Rural City Council Borough of Queenscliff Indigo Shire Council Buloke Shire Council La Trobe Shire Council Cardinia Shire Council Loddon Shire Council Central Goldfields Shire Council Mildura Rural City Council City of Greater Bendigo Mitchell Shire Council QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

232 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

City of Greater Shepparton Moorabool Shire Council Colac Otway Shire Moyne Shire Council Corangamite Shire Council Mt Alexander Shire Council Delatite Shire Council Northern Grampians Shire Council East Gippsland Shire Council Rural City of Wangaratta Glenelg Shire Council South Gippsland Shire Council Shire of Melton Golden Plains Shire Council

Major Projects and Tourism: gold discovery anniversary

1790. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): In relation to the Gold 150 celebrations:

(a) How is the $250 000 of the $1 million allocated by the Government for marketing being spent

(b) How much of the $250 000 marketing allocation is being spent in — (i) Melbourne; (ii) in rural and regional Victoria; (iii) interstate markets; and (iv) international markets.

(c) In what publications/media outlets etc. is Government-funded Gold 150 advertising being placed.

ANSWER:

Gold 150 celebrations marketing will be focused on the second half of the year, to coincide with the discovery of gold in June 1851.

$250,000 has been set aside for marketing of the Gold 150 celebrations: $200,000 for a public awareness and education campaign, and $50,000 for a school education program. Details are outlined in Attachment 1.

ATTACHMENT 1

GOLD 150 PUBLIC AWARENESS AND EDUCATION CAMPAIGN

The public awareness and education campaign will take place from June 2001 to December 2001 and will include:

- Advertising on regional television in Victoria - Advertising, competitions and event promotion on Gold 104.3 radio in Melbourne - Promotional spots, broadcasts and competitions on ABC Radio in Melbourne and regional Victoria - Advertising and a competition in the Herald Sun newspaper - Special one hour Postcards television program throughout Victoria - One hour gold documentary on HSV 7 and Prime TV throughout Victoria - Feature section in Australian Style magazine, August edition for national distribution - Advertising in seniors publications in Victoria - Publicity in Victorian regional newspapers - Media kit and publicity in major print, radio and TV media in Victoria beginning with a launch in the last week of June - Gold 150 web site

The school education program includes:

- promotional mail out to all Victorian schools of the Gold 150 kit (this has already been done) - paper based resource kit for each Victorian school - educational web site for teachers and students

The budget for marketing is mostly being spent on Melbourne metropolitan and regional media with a small amount for interstate markets. Except for the web site and the possible oversees distribution of the TV documentary, there will be no other activity in international markets. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 233

State and Regional Development: Rural Community Development program

1791. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Further to the answer to Question No. 1468, given in this House on 16 May 2001, regarding the Rural Community Development Program:

(a) Which 31 regional councils were the recipients of the 77 grants approved.

(b) For what specific infrastructure projects did each of the council recipients use the grant.

(c) What is the anticipated total funding to be made available for this Program in 2000–2001.

(d) What was the total funding allocation for this Program in 1999–2000.

(e) What are the eligibility criteria for funding under this program.

ANSWER:

In relation to assistance to regions through local councils, these details are disclosed in the Department’s annual report. The annual report will be available later this year.

$5 million has been allocated to the program in 2000-01. The program operated in a different form in 1999-2000 as the Rural Community Development Scheme.

The eligibility criteria for Rural Community Development Program funding requires that projects:

- Demonstrate broad community and financial support - Provide for long term community benefits - Renew and enhance community facilities - Maximise e-commerce technology and ‘IT’ opportunities - Do not require recurrent funding - Are supported by a feasibility analysis, and - The land on which the development is proposed should be either: Municipal property, a Crown reserve, land owned by a public authority or land held for public purposes by trustees.

Major Projects and Tourism: Tourism Industry and Infrastructure Development program

1792. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): Further to the answer to Question No. 1475, given in this House on 16 May 2001, regarding the Tourism Industry and Infrastructure Development Program:

(a) Which local councils were the recipients of the grants approved.

(b) Which local heritage groups were the recipients of the grants approved.

(c) Which conservation groups were recipients of the grants approved.

(d) For what specific tourism-related infrastructure projects did each of the council recipients use the grant.

(e) For what specific tourism-related infrastructure projects did each of the local heritage group recipients use the grant.

(f) For what specific tourism-related infrastructure projects did each of the conservation group recipients use the grant.

(g) For what specific tourism-related infrastructure projects did Parks Victoria use the grant. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

234 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

(h) What is the anticipated total funding to be made available for this Program in 2000–2001.

(i) What was the total funding allocation for this Program in 1999–2000.

(j) What are the eligibility criteria for funding under this program.

ANSWER:

Tourism-related infrastructure projects are funded through programs that are the ministerial responsibility of my colleague, the Minister for State and Regional Development.

Tourism-related infrastructure projects funded since July 2000 by the Department of State and Regional Development (DSRD) are outlined in Attachment 1.

The eligibility criteria of the DSRD programs that have funded tourism-related infrastructure projects are available as follows:

- Living Regions Living Suburbs Program - see the answer provided by the Minister for State and Regional Development to Question on Notice no. 1740, tabled in the Legislative Council on 20/6/01.

- Council and Regional Development Body Program - see the answer provided by the Minister for State and Regional Development to Question on Notice no. 1736, which was tabled in the Legislative Council on 20/6/01.

- Rural Community Development Program, see Attachment 1.

- Regional Infrastructure Development Fund - refer to the following web site: http://www.business.vic.gov.au/Web/BV/BVWeb.nsf/CD/Regional+Infrastructure+Development+Fund?Open Document

ATTACHMENT 1

DSRD Tourism-Related Infrastructure Projects Funded since July 2000

Program Recipient Project

RIDF Parks Victoria Buchan Caves Development Works

LRLS Rural City of Ararat Gum San Lead Pagoda Heritage Museum

RIDF Castlemaine-Maldon Railway Castlemaine Station Upgrade – Stage 1 Preservation Group

RIDF Campaspe Shire Council Trains to Paddlesteamers- Meeting of the Whistles

LRLS Phillip Island Nature Park Inc. Churchill Island Heritage

RCDP South Gippsland Shire Wayside Stop for Korumburra

RCDP Baw Baw Shire Yarragon Wayside Stop

RCDP Baw Baw Shire Trafalgar Wayside Stop

RCDP Warrnambool City Council Logans Beach Facilities Improvement

RCDP City of Greater Shepparton Victoria Park Lake Upgrade

CRDBP Alpine Shire Apex Hill Complex Feasibility Study QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 235

Legend: RIDF - Regional Infrastructure Development Fund

RCDP - Rural Community Development Program

LRLS - Living Regions, Living Suburbs

CRDBP - Council and Regional Development Body Program

Rural Community Development Program Eligibility Criteria The eligibility criteria for Rural Community Development Program funding requires that projects:

- Demonstrate broad community and financial support - Provide for long term community benefits - Renew and enhance community facilities - Maximise e-commerce technology and ‘IT’ opportunities - Do not require recurrent funding - Are supported by a feasibility analysis, and - The land on which the development is proposed should be either: Municipal property, a Crown reserve, land owned by a public authority or land held for public purposes by trustees.

Major Projects and Tourism: Event Facilitation program

1793. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): Further to the answer to Question No. 1476, given in this House on 16 May 2001, regarding the Event Facilitation Program:

(a) Which local councils were the recipients of the grants approved.

(b) Which organising bodies were the recipients of the grants approved.

(c) For what specific cultural and sporting events did each of the council recipients use the grant.

(d) For what specific cultural and sporting events did each of the organising bodies use the grant.

(e) What is the anticipated total funding to be made available for this Program in 2000–2001.

(f) What was the total funding allocation for this Program in 1999–2000.

(g) What are the eligibility criteria for funding under this program.

ANSWER:

Events that have received Tourism Victoria funding from 1 July 2000 until 16 May 2001 are outlined in Attachment 1.

Tourism Victoria’s events funding amounted to approximately $1.5 million in the 2000/2001 financial year. This included $500,000 from the Living Regions Living Suburbs program.

Tourism Victoria’s Events funding amounted to approximately $1.0 million in the 1999/2000 financial year. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

236 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

The eligibility criteria associated with funding from Tourism Victoria’s Events program includes: the number of visitors to the event, length of stay, relevance to local tourism strengths, branding opportunities, economic impact, quality of experience, and future development opportunities.

ATTACHMENT 1

Events that have received Tourism Victoria funding from 1 July 2000 – 16 May 2001

NAME OF EVENT RECIPIENT

2000 Australian Dancesport Championships (Melbourne) Australian Dancing Society

2000 Melbourne Festival Melbourne International Festival of the Arts Inc.

2001 Melbourne International Flower & Garden Show IMG

2001 National Sikh Games (Melbourne) Singh Sabah Sports Club

2001 Melbourne International Blues Festival MIBF Operations P/L

2001 Melbourne International Comedy Festival Melbourne International Comedy Festival

2001 Australian F1 Grand Prix (Melbourne) Australian Grand Prix Corporation

2001 Midsumma Festival (Melbourne) Midsumma Festival Inc.

2000 World Jet Sprint Championships (Mildura) Mildura Rural City Council

2000 Queenscliff Music Festival Queenscliff Music Festival

2001 Regional World’s Longest Lunches (Regional Vic) 22 WLL organising committees around Victoria

2001 Ballarat Begonia Festival City of Ballarat

2001 Southern 80 Waterski Race (Echuca) Moama Water Sports Club Ltd

2001 Albury-Wodonga Festival of Sport Albury-Wodonga Festival of Sport

2001 Mountain Bay Country Music Festival (Mansfield) Mountain Bay Country Music Festival

2001 Australian Grand Prix Rally (Regional Victoria) Australian Grand Prix Corporation

2001 Grampians Gourmet Weekend (Halls Gap) Grampians Winemakers Inc.

2001 Seymour Alternative Farm Expo Mitchell Shire Council

2001 Shepparton Arts Festival Shepparton Arts Festival

2001 Stawell Gift Stawell Athletic Club

2001 Skilled International Cycling Series (Morn. Flying Start Cycling Peninsula)

2001 Warrnambool Racing & Equestrian Summer Racing Warrnambool Racing Club Carnival QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 237

NAME OF EVENT RECIPIENT

2000 Australian 500cc Grand Prix Motorcycles (Phillip Australian Grand Prix Corporation Island)

2001 Australian International Airshow (Avalon) Airshows Downunder

2001 Kangaroo Hoppet (Falls Creek) Kangaroo Hoppet

2001 Warrnambool International Children’s Festival Warrnambool City Council

2001 Mildura Country Music Festival Mildura Country Music Festival (Sunraysia) Inc.

Organs of the Ballarat Goldfields Organs of the Ballarat Goldfields

Rye Beach National Sandsculpting Championships Rye Beach Development Committee

Whittlesea Country Music Festival City of Whittlesea

Echuca Riverboat Jazz, Wine and Food Festival Echuca Moama District Tourism Association

Opera by the Lake Lake House

Mildura Wentworth Arts Festival Mildura Wentworth Arts Festival

Yackandandah Folk Festival Yackandandah Folk Festival

Queenscliff’s Carnival of Words Queenscliff’s Carnival of Words

Ararat Jailhouse Rock n Roll Festival Rural City of Ararat

Mallacoota Festival of the Southern Ocean Mallacoota Arts Council

Beechworth Harvest Celebration Beechworth Chamber of Commerce

Mansfield High Country Festival Mansfield High Country Festival

90 Mile Beach Country’n’Folk Festival 90 Mile Beach Tourism Development Committee

Puffing Billy Centenary : Worlds Longest Party Puffing Billy Country Tourism

Bairnsdale All Australian Line Dancing Championships Bairnsdale Country Music Club

Bendigo Easter Fair Bendigo Easter Fair

Bright Autumn Festival Bright & District Autumn Festival Committee

Broadford Motocross Festival Broadford Major Events Committee

Casterton Working Dog Event Casterton Working Dog Auction Committee

Celebration of Song and Gospel Music Festival VIVID Events QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

238 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

NAME OF EVENT RECIPIENT

Central Goldfields South Pacific Veteran Cycling Central Goldfields Shire Classic Services

Lavandula Regional Autumn Harvest Festival Lavandula Lavender Farm

Maldon Jazz, Food and Wine Festival Maldon Jazz, Food and Wine Festival

Mildura International Balloon Fiesta Mildura International Balloon Fiesta

Morwell Celebration of Roses Advance Morwell Inc.

Mount Beauty Music Muster Mount Beauty Music Muster

Red Cliffs Folk Festival Red Cliffs Folk Festival Committee

St Arnaud Festival St Arnaud Festival Committee

Sunraysia Jazz Food and Wine Festival Mildura River City Jazz Club

The E.C.Griffith Cup East Gippsland Power Boat Club

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1800. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne:

(a) What unions has the Minister met with as part of their consultations with industry.

(b) How many times has the Minister met with each union body and how many more meetings are anticipated as part of continuing consultations on this proposal.

ANSWER:

(a) As previously indicated, extensive industry, community and government consultation has been undertaken by the Melbourne Port Corporation (MPC) in relation to the Webb Dock Environmental Effects Statement (EES), which included the Westgate Terminal Project. The MPC advises that this consultation process included relevant unions.

(b) The MPC has responsibility for consultation on this project, including meetings involving unions and other key stakeholders. I am advised that further meetings will occur as required to keep stakeholders properly informed.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1801. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, how many times has the Government met with the Australian Chamber of Shipping (ACOS) and how many more meetings are anticipated as part of continuing consultations on this proposal.

ANSWER:

(a) The MPC has primary responsibility for consultation on this project, and has met on a number of occasions with ACOS and other key stakeholders.

(b) I am advised that further meetings will occur as required to keep all stakeholders properly informed. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 239

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1802. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, how many times has the Minister met with the Australian Property Institute and how many more meetings are anticipated as part of continuing consultations on this proposal.

ANSWER:

(a) The MPC has primary responsibility for consultation on this project, and has met on a number of occasions with the property industry and other key stakeholders.

(b) I am advised that further meetings will occur as required to keep all stakeholders properly informed.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1803. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, how many times has the Minister met with the Victorian Channels Authority (VCA) and how many more meetings are anticipated as part of continuing consultations on this proposal.

ANSWER:

(a) The MPC has primary responsibility for consultation on this project, and has met on a number of occasions with VCA and other key stakeholders.

(b) I am advised that further meetings will occur as required to keep all stakeholders properly informed.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1804. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, how many times has the Minister met with the Port of Melbourne Business and Industry Group and how many more meetings are anticipated as part of continuing consultations on this proposal.

ANSWER:

(a) The MPC has primary responsibility for consultation on this project, and has met on a number of occasions with key stakeholders including the Melbourne Business and Industry Group and other key stakeholders.

(b) I am advised that further meetings will occur as required to keep all stakeholders properly informed.

Aged Care: statewide programs centrally managed

1805. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS —To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): What are the statewide programs in aged care being managed centrally.

ANSWER:

Statewide programs in aged care being managed centrally include:

Positive Ageing; Research and Development; Statewide Palliative Care QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

240 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Aged Care: sub-acute services funding

1810. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to the $48 million allocated over four years to expand access to sub-acute services for elderly people, will the Minister provide a description of the type of services that will offered under this alternative care plan.

ANSWER:

A range of initiatives will be funded with the $12m additional funding available in 2001/2 for substitution services to assist Metropolitan Health Services (MHS) and major regional hospitals to address emergency hospital demand. Some examples are short stay units attached to emergency departments to relieve pressure and streamline care; greater involvement of geriatricians and gerontic nurses in the care of the elderly in acute hospitals; care coordination to ensure that patients are assessed and treated in a timely and appropriate manner and discharged home with the right support in place; and better models of care for patients awaiting placement in nursing homes and hostels. Some additional sub acute care may be provided under this fund. Given that increasing numbers of older people are being admitted to public hospitals all these initiatives will benefit older people.

At this stage proposals from individual MHS are being assessed by the Department of Human Services to determine the most appropriate mix of initiatives to meet local demand pressures. At this stage, it is not possible to describe the sub-acute services that may form part of the final funding package. Information will be available in the new financial year.

Aged Care: Hospital in the Home program and post-acute care funding

1817. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): How much of the total output cost of $20.8 million of home-based care shown in budget paper No. 3, 2000–01, was allocated to — (i) the Hospital in the Home program; and (ii) post-acute care, respectively.

ANSWER:

$5 million has been allocated to Hospital in the Home and $14.4 million to post acute care.

Aged Care: Hospital to Home program

1818. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care):

(a) In relation to the Hospital to Home program, what are the output measures for the years 1999–2000, 2000–01 and 2001–02, respectively, including the actuals, target and expected outcome for each of the corresponding years.

(b) What are the details of the funding allocation for the same period if the funding allocation contained in the 2000–01 Budget Paper No. 2 has been revised.

ANSWER:

(a) Hospital to Home funding has been allocated to Home and Community Care (HACC) services and post acute care (PAC) services.

The allocation for Hospital to Home within HACC is $2.5 million in each financial year (1999-2000, 2000-01 and 2001-02). The internal unpublished target for each financial year is 50,000 community service units. For 2001-02 the target is included within the output HACC primary health, community care and support. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 241

Measure and expenditure for the output HACC primary health, community care and support, which includes nursing, allied health and support services, are noted in the 2001-2002 Budget Estimates Budget Paper No. 3 (page 65).

Output measures for PAC are number of clients receiving PAC services.

Target Actual

1999/2000 7,600 15,820

2000/2001 20,000 24,000*

* Anticipated number of clients. Financial year not yet complete and there is a 3 month time lag in data.

No targets have been set for PAC for 2001/02 at this time.

Outcomes are not measured, however the role of PAC is to meet the recuperative needs of patients discharged from acute public hospitals. In may 2001, the role of PAC was expanded to provide post acute care to patients discharged from sub acute facilities and to prevent admission where appropriate from emergency departments. Performance indicators for the program are being developed in 2001/02.

(b) The 2000-2001 Budget Paper No. 2 indicates that $9.5 million will be allocated for Hospital-to-Home support services. This amount was not revised and was allocated.

Aged Care: Hospital Demand Strategy

1819. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care):

(a) Will the Minister clarify whether the Hospital in the Home and the Hospital to Home programs form part of the new Hospital Demand Strategy.

(b) What are the details of other programs that form part of the Hospital Demand Strategy and the details of funds allocated to each of the programs that form part of the Hospital Demand Strategy.

ANSWER:

(a) The Hospital Demand Strategy incorporates increased use of Hospital in the Home, however additional funds will not be allocated to this component as casemix and incentive funding adequately cover HITH. The Hospital Demand Strategy does not cover Hospital to Home.

(b) The Hospital Demand Strategy is a four year program totalling $582 million funding includes:

- $384 million over four years ($96 million in 2001-2002) to increase emergency department and elective surgery capacity at major metropolitan and regional hospitals, treat extra patients provide extra support for intensive care units and neonatal intensive care, open more than 300 new hospital beds and improve patient care processes;

- $48 million over four years ($12 million in 2001-2002) to take pressure off emergency departments by expanding access to sub-acute and interim care services so that elderly patients can be treated in a more appropriate environment than busy hospital emergency departments;

- $150 million over four years for a patient management strategy ($17 million in 2001-2002) to ease emergency demand by diverting elderly people and those with chronic conditions from unnecessarily ending up in emergency departments. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

242 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

At this stage, proposals from individual metropolitan health services are being assessed by the Department of Human Services to determine the most appropriate mix of initiatives to meet local demand pressures. At this stage it is not possible to provide details of funds to be allocated to each of the services that will form part of the final funding package. Information will be available in the new financial year.

Aged Care: Hospital in the Home program

1824. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to the Hospital in the Home program:

(a) Where does the program sit within the Department’s structure.

(b) How does the program operate and from which Department’s budget is the program funded.

(c) What are the criteria for patient entry into the program.

(d) What evaluation process is in place to assess program outcome.

(e) What is the proposed number of patients to be treated in the program.

ANSWER:

(a) The Hospital in the Home (HITH) program is managed by the Quality and Care Continuity Branch within the Acute Health Division.

(b) HITH patients are considered to be hospital inpatients that are receiving their care in their home rather than in the hospital. As such hospitals receive casemix funding. In addition incentive funding is provided. Health services and hospitals are expected to utilise HITH as a way of managing demand. Grants have also been provided for selected quality initiatives. The program is funded from the Acute Health Division Budget.

(c) Criteria for patient entry into HITH are:

− Be a public patient in an acute hospital; − Be assessed as clinically suitable for home based acute care; − Have appropriate support in the home, ie. A carer; − Have a suitable home environment; − Be fully informed about HITH, their rights and obligations and those of the providing hospital; − Choose to be treated in HITH and provide written consent to be treated in HITH; − Be registered as admitted patients who are transferred to HITH care.

(d) Hospitals are monitored according to number of separations and bed days in HITH and their performance is compared with their previous years performance and the performance of other like hospitals. Clinical performance indicators have been developed and have been incorporated into the Australian Health Care Standards Hospital Accreditation Program. Since the inception of the program in 1994, one evaluation, two audits and a costing study has been undertaken.

(e) Targets for 2001/02 have not been set. The Department uses bed days in HITH as the main measure of activity.

Housing: high-rise public housing estates — fire risk management

1839. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Will the Minister provide details of the strategy employed concerning fire risk management for high rise public housing estates and the associated implementation costs. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 243

ANSWER:

The Office of Housing (OoH) has implemented a strategy to minimise the risk of fires in high-rise public housing estates. The strategy comprises two types of fire safety measures. Firstly, human fire safety measures, which involve fire safety information and emergency evacuation plans. Secondly, physical fire safety measures which involve the installation and maintenance of fire safety equipment.

Human Fire Safety Measures

Fire Safety Program

A comprehensive Fire Safety Program has been developed in conjunction with the Melbourne Metropolitan Fire Brigade. The program commenced before the end of 2000 and is ongoing. The program comprises information on how to prevent and respond to fires, which is available in English and 16 community languages.

The program is delivered through the following means to ensure new and existing tenants are provided with information on fire safety:

- New tenants are provided with ‘Fire Order Stickers’ and the booklet ‘Fire Safety in Your Home’.

- Existing tenants have been provided with ‘Fire Order Stickers’ and receive information on fire safety through tenant newsletters. During July 2001, tenants will receive a ‘Home Fire Escape Plan’ with their newsletter.

- Seminars are being progressively held at high-rise estates which are delivered jointly by the Melbourne Fire Brigade and Office of Housing. During the seminars tenants are shown a video on fire safety and provided with a ‘Home Fire Escape Plan’ and the booklet ‘Fire Safety in Your Home’. As at the end of June 2001, seminars have been delivered to 14 estates, and all estates are expected to have had seminars delivered by the end of 2002.

The OoH was presented with a Community Safety Award by Victorian Fire Services in recognition of the multicultural component of the Fire Awareness Program.

Emergency Evacuation Plans

The OoH have engaged the Melbourne Metropolitan Fire Brigade to develop emergency evacuation plans which will be placed within the public areas of all high rise estates. The plans will provide tenants, visitors, staff and emergency services workers with information on the location of exit points, fire-fighting equipment and assembly areas. All high-rise estates are scheduled to have the emergency evacuation plans installed by the end of 2002.

Physical Fire Safety Measures

Additional fire hydrants have been installed in the public areas of high-rise estates, and smoke alarms have been installed in the individual units. Fire safety audits have been undertaken in the public areas of all high-rise estates.

A program to install residential sprinkler systems in all high-rise estates commenced during 1998, and is expected to be completed by the end of 2003. There are currently 15 high-rise estates that have had residential sprinklers installed. Flat hoses are being replaced by the installation of hose reels in conjunction with the residential sprinkler systems installations.

Maintenance of Human and Physical Fire Safety Measures

All of the human and physical fire safety measures are maintained to ensure compliance with the Department of Human Services Fire Risk Management Guidelines which include the requirements of the Building Code of Australia 1996, Australian Standards and Victorian legislation including the Building Act 1993 and the Building Regulations 1994. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

244 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Implementation Costs

A total of $10million is budgeted to be spent for each of the 2000/2001 and 2001/2002 financial years for the implementation of the fire safety strategy in public housing estates with the majority to be spent on the high rise buildings.

Housing: Raglan–Ingles estate, Port Melbourne

1840. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Will the Minister provide a copy of the report of the Community Advisory Committee set up in December 1999 to work up a redevelopment strategy for the Raglan/Ingles estate in Port Melbourne.

ANSWER:

A copy of the report will be forwarded to the Honourable Member as soon as possible.

Housing: public housing — tenure reviews

1841. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to the changes made by the Government concerning tenure reviews, has the Minister undertaken an evaluation to assess the effectiveness of the initiative, the corresponding impact on public housing and its relative success or otherwise in avoiding poverty traps for public housing tenants.

ANSWER:

An evaluation of the expected impact on tenants of the previous tenure review policy was undertaken by the Office of Housing prior to the changes announced in June 2000. The effectiveness of the initiative is evaluated on an ongoing basis as part of the Office of Housing’s continued reviews of tenant’s rental rebate eligibility.

As a result of these changes, specific tenure reviews of tenants will not occur until November 2002. The issue of tenure reviews and the corresponding impact on public housing is being considered further by the Eligibility Review Community Reference Group, due to report later this year.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1851. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne:

(a) Which councils has the Minister consulted with on this matter.

(b) How many meetings has the Government held with each council and how many more meetings are anticipated as part of continuing consultations on this proposal.

ANSWER:

(a) The MPC has primary responsibility for consultation on this project, and has met on a number of occasions with Councils adjacent to the MPC precinct and other key stakeholders.

(b) I am advised that further meetings will occur as required to keep all stakeholders properly informed. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 245

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1852. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne:

(a) With which cargo owners’ representatives did the Minister meet with the Australian Chamber of Shipping (ACOS).

(b) How many times has the Government met with each of the representatives and how many more meetings are anticipated as part of continuing consultations on this proposal.

ANSWER:

(a) The MPC has primary responsibility for consultation on this project, and has met on a number of occasions with the Australian Chamber of Shipping and other key stakeholders, including a range of cargo owners’ representatives.

(b) I am advised that further meetings will occur as required to keep all stakeholders properly informed.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1853. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne:

(a) Which owners of infrastructure has the Minister met with who may be affected by the development.

(b) How many times has the Minister met with each owner of industry and how many more meetings are anticipated as part of continuing consultations on this proposal.

ANSWER:

(a) The Melbourne Port Corporation (MPC) has primary responsibility for consultation on this project and advises it has met with service providers in the electricity, gas, water, sewerage and telecommunications industries at which time a range of issues relevant to the project were discussed and addressed.

(b) I am advised that further meetings will occur as required to keep all stakeholders properly informed.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1854. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, which international shipping lines have expressed their support for the third stevedore and how has this support been ‘expressed.’

ANSWER:

The Melbourne Port Corporation (MPC) has primary responsibility for consultation on this project and advises it has met with many global shipping lines who have expressed a significant level of support for the project. They consider that Melbourne’s trade level is now of such a size (and growing strongly) that it can support greater competition, which would lead to improvements in pricing, service, and especially innovation.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1855. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, what support does the Minister anticipate from the Maritime Union of Australia. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

246 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

ANSWER:

Given the expected significant benefits to the Victorian economy of the project, I expect broad support from community and industry stakeholders, including unions.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1856. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, what support does the Minister anticipate from the Transport Workers Union.

ANSWER:

Given the expected significant benefits to the Victorian economy of the project, I expect broad support from community and industry stakeholders, including unions.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1857. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, what support does the Minister anticipate from the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union.

ANSWER:

Given the expected significant benefits to the Victorian economy of the project, I expect broad support from community and industry stakeholders, including unions.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1858. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, what support does the Minister anticipate from the Communication Electrical and Plumbing Union.

ANSWER:

Given the expected significant benefits to the Victorian economy of the project, I expect broad support from community and industry stakeholders, including unions.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1859. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, what support does the Minister anticipate from the Australian Workers Union.

ANSWER:

Given the expected significant benefits to the Victorian economy of the project, I expect broad support from community and industry stakeholders, including unions. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 247

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1862. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, what support does the Minister anticipate from the Australian Services Union.

ANSWER:

Given the expected significant benefits to the Victorian economy of the project, I expect broad support from community and industry stakeholders, including unions.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1863. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, what support does the Minister anticipate from the National Union of Workers.

ANSWER:

Given the expected significant benefits to the Victorian economy of the project, I expect broad support from community and industry stakeholders, including unions.

Ports: proposed third stevedore

1864. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Government’s commitment to establish a third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne, what support does the Minister anticipate from the Victorian Trades Hall Council.

ANSWER:

Given the expected significant benefits to the Victorian economy of the project, I expect broad support from community and industry stakeholders, including unions.

Ports: West Swanson Dock

1867. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Minister’s proposal to extend the on-dock rail to West Swanson dock and the completion of a technical feasibility study in May 2001, what is the expected date that a decision will be made to proceed.

ANSWER:

The rail project is a joint project between P&O Ports and the Melbourne Port Corporation. P&O Ports and the Melbourne Port Corporation should be in a position to make a firm decision whether to proceed to implementation within the next two to three months.

Ports: West Swanson Dock

1868. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Minister’s proposal to extend the on-dock rail to West Swanson dock:

(a) With which steering group has the Minister consulted on this matter.

(b) How many meetings has the Minister held with each steering group and how many more meetings are expected. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

248 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

ANSWER:

(a) The project Steering Group comprises representatives of the Melbourne Port Corporation, P&O Ports and the Ports and Marine Division of the Department of Infrastructure.

(b) The Steering Group has met several times and it is anticipated that some further meetings will be required.

Ports: West Swanson Dock

1869. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Minister’s proposal to extend the on-dock rail to West Swanson dock:

(a) With which technical working parties has the Minister consulted on this matter.

(b) How many meetings has the Minister had with held with each technical working party and how many more meetings are expected.

ANSWER:

(a) Five working parties have been established to address the following areas relevant to the project:

1. Trade 2. Road Transport 3. Rail Transport 4. P&O Ports terminal; and 5. Melbourne Port Corporation property.

(b) The working parties have met several times and it is anticipated that some further meetings will be required.

Ports: West Swanson Dock

1874. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Minister’s proposal to extend the on-dock rail to West Swanson Dock, who are the key stakeholders that have been consulted.

ANSWER:

Key stakeholders that have been consulted as part of the project are:

- Australian Rail Track Corporation -Vicroads - Department of Infrastructure – Ports and Marine and Strategic Planning Divisions - Department of Treasury and Finance -P&O Ports; and - Melbourne Port Corporation

Ports: Webb Dock

1875. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In relation to the Minister’s proposal to extend the on-dock rail to Webb Dock, has the Webb Dock Rail Link Inception Report due for completion in May been completed.

ANSWER:

The Report is substantially complete and will shortly be circulated for comment from stakeholders. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 249

Education: extension education program

1876. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Education): Has the review of the Extension Education Program been completed.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

No, the Extension Education Review is currently nearing completion.

Education: extension education program

1877. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable Member for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable Minister for Education): What are the recommendations of the review of the Extension Education Program with regard to increased staffing at the State Library to support their education service.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

As the report and recommendations for the Extension Education Review have not been finalised at this stage, I am unable to provide the Honourable Member with any further information in relation to the likelihood of increased staffing at the State Library.

Health: pastoral carers and counsellors — funding

1878. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Health):

(a) Does the Victorian government contribute funds to any organisation/s to assist in the training of pastoral carers or counsellors to work in Victorian hospitals; if so, what are the names of these organisations.

(b) What is the amount of funding in 2000–01 and 2001–02

(c) How are the courses accredited.

(d) How are the courses supervised.

(e) Is there more than one level of pastoral carer/counsellor; if so, what qualifications are required to practice at each level.

ANSWER:

(a) Yes

(b) 2000/2001 $474.3K

2001/2002 $493.5K

(c) The courses provided by the Interchurch Chaplaincy Committee of Victoria Inc. Clinical Pastoral Education Centre located within the Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre are courses of Clinical Pastoral Education.

Clinical Pastoral Education (“CPE”) is an ecumenical and interfaith professional education for ministry. It brings ministers of religion, pastoral caregivers and theological students into supervised encounter with persons in crisis. The heart of the Clinical Pastoral Education courses is to enhance the effectiveness of pastoral caring by the trainee’s engagement in a practical caring ministry with people, and then to learn from the experience of QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

250 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

that ministry through reflection, discussion, and evaluation with other students and an accredited CPE Supervisor.

The courses are conducted in a registered CPE Centre that meet the established standards for registration by the Association for Supervised Pastoral Education in Australia Inc.

(d) Each Registered centre has an appointed Centre Director. The thirty two page documented Standards of the Association for Supervised Pastoral Education in Australia Inc. sets out the standards for both Basic and Advanced Clinical Pastoral Education as well as the three level of supervisory accreditation recognised by the Association. To graduate from each course one must complete 400 hours of supervised ministry in pastoral ministry which includes:

1.3.1 ten hours of individual supervision,

1.3.2 sixty hours of class education and peer group supervision,

1.3.3 one hundred and fifty hours in the actual practice of pastoral ministry to people, and

1.3.4 sixty hours within the total of four hundred hours allocated for personal written reflection on experience and written course requirements.

For completion of an Advanced course trainees in addition to the above, need to present to an examination committee for both a written and oral examination.

(e) Supervisors who provide the supervision are accredited by this Association at three levels:

Level I Pastoral Supervisor

In order to be accredited at Level I - Pastoral Supervisor, a Candidate shall demonstrate aptitude in the following:-

4.11.2 Basic Supervision

3.11.2 Clarity of Boundaries

3.11.3 Ministry Competence

3.11.4 Review of Written Work

3.11.5 Understanding of Professional and Ethical Conduct

4.11.2 Understanding of the Christian Faith and ability to relate to other faiths

Following accreditation at Level I the Pastoral Supervisor is authorised to function under clearly defined supervision within a CPE program conducted by an authorised Level II or Level III Supervisor. This involves a complex network of responsibilities and accountability. The following sections are intended to provide guidelines for Pastoral Supervisors, Course Conductors and Centre Directors:-

Level II Clinical Supervisor

Accreditation at Level II - Clinical Supervisor is the accreditation required to conduct an independently registered program.

The Clinical Supervisor is authorised to conduct and may be the Centre Director of an independently registered program of CPE maintaining the Standards of the Association, and in dialogue and fellowship with supervisory colleagues. The Clinical Supervisor may supervise the work of basic, post-basic and advanced students singularly or in small groups. The Clinical Supervisor may direct and coordinate the work of one or more Pastoral Supervisors. In order to be accredited at Level II Clinical Supervisor, a candidate shall demonstrate the following minimum requirements:- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 251

4.11.1 Administrative Awareness

4.11.2 Interpersonal Awareness and Competence

4.11.3 Intrapersonal Awareness and Competence

4.11.4 Educational Competence

4.11.5 Theological Awareness

Level III Clinical Pastoral Educator

The Association for Supervised Pastoral Education in Australia Inc. recognises education in supervision as a senior professional discipline. Accreditation at Level III - Clinical Pastoral Educator is the accreditation required to provide education in supervision according to the standards and constitution of the Association.

Housing: training — departmental and housing officers

1905. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to the two day training course “Challenging Behaviours and Understanding Personality Disorders” for Departmental and Housing Officers:

(a) How many people were involved in the course.

(b) What was the cost of the course.

(c) Will the course be conducted in the Monash Province; if so, when.

(d) In which areas will the course be conducted and when.

ANSWER:

(a) I am advised that the course was delivered to 87 Housing Services Officers and 55 staff from Community Housing Agencies.

(b) The total cost to deliver the deliver the course was $10,127.40.

(c) Department of Human Services, Southern Metropolitan Regional, is currently looking at several courses relating to dealing with challenging behaviours. On completion of the review, suitable training will be offered to identified program areas within the Southern Metropolitan Region, including Housing staff.

(d) The Office of Housing is also evaluating courses relating to dealing with challenging behaviours. A program will be developed for training regional Housing staff.

Housing: public housing — new and upgraded

1908. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to the construction of 659 properties available for public housing for the period 1 October 1999 to 23 March 2001, what percentage of the constructed properties is — (i) new; and (ii) upgraded.

ANSWER:

All the properties were new construction rather than upgrade. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

252 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Housing: public housing — sales and demolition

1909. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to properties available for public housing for the period 1 October 1999 until June 2001:

(a) How many properties have been sold and what is the breakdown according to the nine departmental regions.

(b) How many properties have been demolished and what is the breakdown according to the nine departmental regions.

(c) How many properties have been spot purchased and what is the breakdown according to the nine departmental regions.

(d) How many properties have been constructed and what is the breakdown according to the nine departmental regions.

ANSWER:

(a) There were 935 public housing properties sold (including house, unit and land) in the Departmental regions shown in the attached table.

(b) In the period, there were 853 dwellings demolished in the Departmental regions shown in the attached table.

(c) A total of 1884 properties, including 190 land parcels were purchased in the period, in the Departmental regions shown in the attached table.

(d) In the period, 736 dwellings were constructed in the Departmental regions, as shown in the attached table.

Please note the attached spreadsheets: a) Sold. b) Demolished. c) Spot purchased. d) Constructed.

(a) Sold Property Sales Between 1 Oct 1999 to 22 Jun 2001

Region HOUSE LAND UNIT Grand Total Barwon-South Western 125 33 10 168 Eastern Metropolitan 19 11 1 31 Gippsland 90 100 190 Grampians 73 38 5 116 Hume 60 27 87 Loddon-Mallee 50 47 97 Northern Metropolitan 36 26 1 63 Southern Metropolitan 35 21 1 57 Western Metropolitan 47 74 5 126 Grand Total 535 377 23 935

(b) Demolitions Property Demolitions Between 1 Oct 1999 to 22 Jun 2001

Region HOUSE UNIT Grand Total Barwon S-West 59 59 Eastern Metro 58 2 60 Gippsland 9 1 10 Grampians 1 1 Hume 14 2 16 Loddon Mallee 40 40 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 253

Region HOUSE UNIT Grand Total Northern Metro 77 4 81 Southern Metro 57 197 254 Western Metro 64 268 332 Grand Total 379 474 853

(c) Spot Purchased Property Purchases Between 1 Oct 1999 to 22 Jun 2001

Region HOUSE LAND UNIT Grand Total Barwon-South Western 16 7 66 89 Eastern Metropolitan 43 14 210 267 Gippsland 37 9 25 71 Grampians 19 4 40 63 Hume 48 15 29 92 Loddon-Mallee 40 59 84 183 Northern Metropolitan 106 39 294 439 Southern Metropolitan 75 14 267 356 Western Metropolitan 109 29 186 324 Grand Total 493 190 1201 1884

(d) Constructions Constructed Properties 1 Oct 1999 to 22 June 2001

Region No. of Units Barwon South West 13 Eastern Metro 105 Gippsland 21 Grampians 8 Hume 17 Loddon Mallee 67 Northern Metro 111 Southern Metro 210 Western Metro 184 Total 736

Education: eastern metropolitan region annual report

1910. THE HON. G. B. ASHMAN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Education): What was the purpose of the additional funding of $410,652 or an increase of 81% over the budgeted $253,515 in the regional office operating expenses, shown in the Eastern metropolitan Region Annual Report financial statement for the year 1999-2000 and why was the original budgeted allocation underestimated.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

This information was identified in the footnotes of the financial statement of the EMR in the Annual Report.

Education: schools nursing program

1913. THE HON. W. R. BAXTER — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Education): QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

254 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

(a) Which secondary schools are provided with nursing staff under the Secondary Schools Nursing Program.

(b) Are appointments made according to an index known as Special Learning Needs; if so, upon what criteria is that index compiled.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

(a) The list of schools which have been allocated a nurse under the Secondary School Nursing Program is provided in Attachment 1.

(b) The allocation of nurse positions to schools was made on the basis of a formula which was developed by the Department of Human Services in consultation with the Department of Education, Employment and Training (DEET). The formula took into account a range of factors reflecting the educational, health and social needs of school communities.

Attachment 1.

Schools with an allocation under the Secondary School Nursing program

Grampians Hume Loddon Mallee Ararat Community College SC Alexandra SC Bendigo SC Bacchus Marsh SC Beechworth SC Castlemaine SC Ballarat SC Benalla SC Charlton SC Beaufort SC Bright P-12 SC Eaglehawk SC Daylesford SC Broadford SC East Loddon SC Dimboola Memorial SC Cobram SC Echuca SC Donald SC Euroa SC Golden Square Edenhope SC Mansfield SC Irymple SC Mount Clear SC McGuire College Kangaroo Flat SC Murtoa College Mitchell SC Kerang TH Rainbow SC Mooroopna SC Kyneton SC Sebastopol SC Myrtleford SC Maryborough RC St Arnaud SC Nathalia SC Merbein SC Stawell SC Numurkah SC Mildura SC Ovens College Redcliffe SC Rushworth SC Robinvale SC Seymour TC Swan Hill SC Shepparton HS Tyrrell SC Wanganui Park SC Wedderburn SC Wodonga High Weeroona SC Wodonga West Yarrawonga SC Yea HS Gippsland Barwon Northern Bairnsdale SC Apollo Bay P-12 Banksia SC Drouin SC Baimbridge College Box Forest SC Korumburra SC Bellarine SC Broadmeadows SC Kurnai College Brauer SC Brunswick SC Lakes Entrance SC Camperdown College Bundoora SC Lowana College Casterton SC Collingwood SC Maffra SC Cobden TS Craigieburn SC Mallacoota P-12 Colac College Epping SC Neerim District SC Corio Community College Erinbank SC Orbost SC Derrinallum College SC Greensborough SC QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 255

Grampians Hume Loddon Mallee Sale C Flinders Park SC Lakeside SC South Gippsland SC Hawkesdale P-12 Lalor North SC Swifts Creek SC Heywood District SC Lalor SC Traralgon SC James Harrison SC Latrobe SC Warragul Regional College Matthew Flinders Girls SC Lynall Hall Community Wonthaggi SC Mortlake P-2 Merrilands SC Yarram SC Newcomb SC Moreland City College Norlane High Northcote High North Geelong SC Northland SC Portland SC Pascoe Vale Girl SC Terang College Peter Lalor SC Western Heights SC Preston Girls SC Princess Hill SC Reservoir SC Sunbury Downs SC Thomastown SC Thornbury Darebin SC Upfield SC

Southern Eastern Western Albert Part SC Ashwood SC Altona SC Carwatha College Brandon Park SC Bayside SC Chandler SC Ferntree Gully SC Braybrook C Cleeland SC Forest Hill Brimbank SC Coomoora SC Hawthorn SC Buckley Park SC Cranbourne SC Lilydale Heights SC Cooperfield SC Dandenong HS Maroondah SC Debney Park SC Doveton SC Monash SC Deer Park SC Dromana SC Monbulk SC Essendon East Keilor District Eumemmerring SC- campus one Mullauna SC Footscray City College Eumemmerring SC- campus two Pembroke SC Galvin Park SC Glen Eira SC South Oakleigh Gilmore Girls College Hampton Park SC Upper Yarra Hoppers Crossing SC Heatherhill SC Wellington SC Kealba SC Karingal Park SC Keilor Downs SC Koo Wee Rup SC Kensington CS Langwarrin SC Kurunjang SC Lyndhurst SC Laverton SC Monterey SC Maribyrnong SC Moorabbin City SC St. Albans SC Mordialloc SC Sunshine SC Mornington SC Taylors Lakes SC Mt Erin SC The Grange P-12 Noble Park Wilson Park SC Patterson River SC Rosebud SC Springvale SC Westall SC Westport SC QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

256 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

Small Business: Small Business Advisory Council

1914. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: Given that Ms Kylie McKenna did not take up her appointment as a member of the Small Business Advisory Council, will her position be filled; if so, by whom.

ANSWER:

I am presently considering the matter of a further appointment to the Small Business Advisory Council, in light of Ms Kylie McKenna not taking up her appointment.

Major Projects and Tourism: Tourism Victoria — board

1915. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism):

(a) On what dates has the Board of Tourism Victoria formally met since September 1999.

(b) Where did each Board meeting take place.

(c) Which Tourism Victoria Board meetings has the Minister for Tourism attended.

ANSWER:

The following meetings of the Board of Tourism Victoria have been held since April 1996 to June 2001:

MEETING DATE VENUE 10 April 1996 55 Swanston Street Melbourne Minister Asher attended meeting (in part) 8 May 1996 Drouin East 10 July 1996 120 Collins Street Melbourne. 11 September 1996 55 Swanston Street Melbourne 29 October 1996 55 Swanston Street Melbourne 11 December 1996 55 Swanston Street Melbourne 12 February 1997 55 Swanston Street Melbourne 5 March 1997 55 Swanston Street Melbourne 14 May 1997 55 Collins Street Melbourne 11 June 1997 55 Collins Street Melbourne 13 August 1997 Ballarat 15 October 1997 55 Collins Street Melbourne 10 December 1997 55 Collins Street Melbourne 11 February 1998 55 Collins Street Melbourne 15 April 1998 55 Collins Street Melbourne Minister Asher attended meeting (in part) 24 July 1998 55 Collins Street Melbourne Minister Asher attended meeting (in part) 27 August 1998 55 Collins Street Melbourne 23 September 1998 55 Collins Street Melbourne 29 October 1998 55 Collins Street Melbourne 26 November 1998 Phillip Island 17 December 1998 55 Collins Street Melbourne 25 February 1999 55 Collins Street Melbourne 25 March 1999 Geelong 29 April 1999 55 Collins Street Melbourne 31 May 1999 55 Collins Street Melbourne 28 June 1999 55 Collins Street Melbourne QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 257

MEETING DATE VENUE 26 July 1999 55 Collins Street Melbourne 30 August 1999 55 Collins Street Melbourne 27 September 1999 55 Collins Street Melbourne 25 October 1999 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 1 December 1999 Colac 13 December 1999 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 31 January 2000 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 28 February 2000 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 27 March 2000 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 1 May 2000 Mildura 29 May 2000 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 26 June 2000 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 17 July 2000 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 31 July 2000 30 Collins Street, Melbourne. 28 August 2000 Albury - Wodonga 25 September 2000 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 30 October 2000 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 27 November 2000 Metung 6 December 2000 Daylesford 29 January 2001 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 7 February 2001 187 Flinders Lane, Melbourne 26 February 2001 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 26 March 2001 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 9 April 2001 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 30 April 2001 55 Collins Street, Melbourne 25 June 2001 111 Little Collins Street, Melbourne I have attended two Board meetings on 6 December 2000 and the 25 June 2001.

Major Projects and Tourism: overseas tourism marketing budget

1916. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): How much money has been or will be spent on overseas tourism marketing for representative offices and office expenses and for actual marketing campaigns in — (i) 1999-2000; (ii) 2000-01; and, (iii) 2001-02.

ANSWER:

Tourism Victoria’s total overseas expenditure was as follows:

1999-2000 $5.23m

Tourism Victoria’s total overseas expenditure is expected to be:

2000-2001 $5.23m

2001-2002 $9.51m

State and Regional Development: annual summit of rural and regional mayors

1917. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development):

(a) When will the next Annual Summit of Rural and Regional Mayors be held. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

258 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

(b) Has the feasibility study on the concept of a regional embassy in Melbourne, one of the recommendations from the 2000 Local Government Summit, referred to by the Treasurer in the Weekly Times on 16 August 2000, been completed; if so, what were the recommendations of the study.

ANSWER:

The next Annual Summit of Rural and Regional Mayors is planned for September 2001.

The Department of State and Regional Development is working with rural and regional councils on the establishment of a regional embassy in Melbourne.

State and Regional Development: regional strategic leadership

1918. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): What are the reasons for the 37 per cent under expenditure from $4.3 million to $2.7 million of the output group relating to Regional Strategic Leadership in 2000-01 as shown on page 295 of the 2001–02 Budget Paper No. 3.

ANSWER:

The major reasons for the under expenditure relating to the Regional Strategic Leadership output are timing differences in the creation and implementation of programs.

State and Regional Development: regional development web site

1919. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): What was the reason for the delay in the establishment and launch of the Regional Development web site which page 295 of 2001-02 State Budget Paper No. 3 shows was originally scheduled for September 2000 but later revised to February 2001.

ANSWER:

The Regional Development web site became functional on 12 February 2001.

The delay in launching the site was due to an investigation by the Department of State and Regional Development into the most appropriate content that should be featured, and the future requirements of the Department in terms of the delivery of information via the Internet and other electronic mediums.

The updated Regional Development web site incorporates new features including:

- Guidelines and application forms for the new Rural Leadership and Community Events Program;

- Details of the new Office of Rural Communities and network of nine Rural Community Development Officers;

- A series of new Fact Sheets outlining the aims, eligibility criteria, funding initiatives and media releases of the Regional Infrastructure Development Fund; and

- Assistance to Regional Industries including the new Rural Commerce Unit.

State and Regional Development: timeliness of advice to RIDF applicants

1920. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): What is the cause of the increase from a target 90 days to an expected 120 days of the output measure Timeliness of advice to RIDF applicants – after close of funding round in 2000-01 as shown on page 296 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001-02. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 259

ANSWER:

Due to the extensive assessment process applied to Regional Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF) applications, which includes: seeking advice from other Departments and Agencies; assessment by an Interdepartmental Committee; and recommendations to me on each application, it can take time to notify applicants of the result of their application.

It is the Government’s view that given the scale of some of the grants awarded from the RIDF, the professional and comprehensive RIDF assessment process justifies the additional time taken to assess some applications.

The Department typically keeps applicants informed of the status of their application throughout the assessment process.

State and Regional Development: Bonlac closure

1921. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): What projects has the Government facilitated for Toora in Gippsland in the wake of the Bonlac closure.

ANSWER:

The Government has provided funding of $19,575 to the South Gippsland Shire to conduct an investigation into the economic opportunities within Corner Inlet that includes the township of Toora. That investigation is still being carried out.

State and Regional Development: one-stop shops pilot

1922. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Why was the implementation of the one-stop shops pilot deferred to 2001-02 according to page 297 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001-02.

ANSWER:

The timeframe for the One Stop Shop pilot has been extended to allow for further consultation with stakeholders and Government agencies, and to plan for consultations with local communities regarding their service needs. The four pilot shops will be implemented in early 2002.

State and Regional Development: business development output costs

1923. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): What is the reason that Business Development output costs have fallen from a targeted $28.7 million in 2000-01 to $24.9 million in 2001-02, as shown on page 294 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001-02.

ANSWER:

The primary reason that Business Development output costs have fallen from a targeted $28.7 million in 2000-01 to $24.9 million in 2001-02, is that there was a movement in Major Events funding from this output to the Sport and Major Event Facilitation Output. Other reasons include: the completion of the Forest Industry Structural Assistance Package (FISAP); one off funding for Olympic activities in 2000-01; and other minor corporate related funding.

State and Regional Development: business events assistance

1924. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

260 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

(a) What were the five Business Events assisted in 2000-01.

(b) What are the five Business Events to be assisted in 2001-02 referred to on page 294 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001-02

ANSWER:

The five Business Events assisted in 2000-01 were:

- Victorian Manufacturing Week - Melbourne Marine Week - Victorian Wine Week - Melbourne Furnishing Festival - Australian Automotive Week

The five business Events to be assisted in 2001-02 referred to on page 294 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001-02 are:

- Victorian Manufacturing Week - Victorian Marine Week (previously Melbourne Marine Week) - Victorian Wine Week - Furnishing Festival Victoria (previously Melbourne Furnishing Festival) - Australian Automotive Week

State and Regional Development: administration of business event funding

1925. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Why is the output target for ‘average response time/turnaround time’ for Administration of business event funding, shown on page 294 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001-02 not being used in 2001-02.

ANSWER:

In the review of the Department’s performance indicators for 2001-2002, it was decided that as Business Events is only one element of the Business Development Output, only one performance indicator was necessary: the number of events assisted.

Timeliness of Business Event assistance remains an internal measure for the Department.

State and Regional Development: enterprise improvement services

1926. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): What Enterprise Improvement Services are directed to clients in rural Victoria as shown on page 294 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001-02.

ANSWER:

The Enterprise Improvement Services referred to on page 294 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001-02, are available to clients of the Department of State and Regional Development throughout Victoria. The Department works closely with client companies to assist in the selection of Enterprise Improvement Services, which will be most beneficial to the company taking into account its particular business circumstances. The Enterprise Improvement Services include:

- Generic Diagnostic Report - Business Plan - Change Management - Strategic Training QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 261

- Strategic Research Project - Supply Chain Management Program - Cleaner Production Program

State and Regional Development: regional development output

1927. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Why was the ‘Regional Development’ Output Grouping merged with ‘Business’ in the 2001-02 Budget Paper No. 3.

ANSWER:

During 2000-01 the Department of State and Regional Development undertook a review of the structure of its outputs and their associated performance indicators. The decision to maintain an output structure that reflects the organisational structure of the Department resulted in the former Industry Development, Regional Development and Small Business Output Groups being combined together with the Regulation Reform Output, to form the new Business Output Group. Apart from the combining of the two liquor licensing Outputs into a single Output, the individual Outputs within these Output Groups remain the same.

State and Regional Development: strategic audit of Victorian industry

1928. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development):

(a) What eight sectors were audited under the Strategic Audit of Victorian Industry in 2000–01 as detailed on page 284 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001–02.

(b) What were the outcomes of these audits.

(c) Why are only two sector audits targeted to be completed in 2001–02 as detailed on page 288 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001–02.

ANSWER:

The eight sectors examined under the strategic audit of Victorian industry in 2000-01 are: automotive; textile, clothing, footwear and leather; metal fabrication; precision engineering; transport, distribution and logistics; environmental management and renewable energy; professional and technical services; and information and communications technology. The strategic audit of Victorian industry was planned to cover ten sectors initially. The two remaining ones, sport and recreation, and financial services are to be completed this financial year.

Through the strategic audit process a detailed and shared understanding of the particular sector’s competitiveness is developed, with the stakeholders jointly preparing a plan to maximise growth of the sector. In addition, this process contributes to the development of industry policy more generally for the Victorian economy.

State and Regional Development: rural community development networks

1929. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Where are the 20 Rural Community Development Networks to be established in 2001-02 as detailed on page 296 of Budget Paper No. 3, 2001–2002.

ANSWER:

No specific locations have been designated for Rural Community Development Networks. Rather, it is intended that networks be established in accordance with the wishes and needs of local communities during the year. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

262 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001

State and Regional Development: monitoring and administrative systems — regional areas

1930. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Are the selection/management/ performance monitoring and administrative systems publicly available for — (i) regional economic development program; (ii) local economic development initiatives and; (iii) regional grants for local government and regional development boards (referred to on page 295 2001-2002 Budget Paper No. 3).

ANSWER:

The selection process is by application on a case by case basis with application forms made available to potential applicants.

The management and administrative systems are based on established internal systems including Financial Assistance Guidelines, Legal documentation and Program Manuals that provide each Case Officer and Program Manager with clearly defined criteria.

The performance monitoring targets are reported in the Department’s Annual Report.

Small Business: Ethnic Enterprise Advisory Council

1938. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: In relation to the Ethnic Enterprise Advisory Council:

(a) How many applications have been received up to 19 June 2001.

(b) How many applications by female applicants have been received up to 19 June 2001.

(c) How many applications by male applicants have been received up to 19 June 2001.

(d) How many applications by regional applicants have been received up to 19 June 2001.

(e) How many applications by metropolitan applicants have been received up to 19 June 2001.

(f) How many advertisements were placed in ethnic newspapers seeking applicants in — (i) 2000; (ii) between 1 January 2001 and 30 May 2001; and (iii) from 1 June 2001.

ANSWER:

(a) 81 (b) 15 (c) 66 (d) 12 (e) 69 (f) (i) 10 (ii) 0 (iii)0

Consumer Affairs: Florida Direct

1939. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Consumer Affairs: How many complaints did the Department of Consumer and Business Affairs receive about Florida Direct in the period between 1 October 1999 and 20 June 2001.

ANSWER:

Consumer and Business Affairs Victoria have received twenty-three complaints. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Thursday, 16 August 2001 COUNCIL 263

Industrial Relations: Essential Media Communications

1983. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations:

(a) Which contracts or consultancies have been undertaken for Industrial Relations Victoria by Essential Media Communications since 28 October 1999.

(b) What is the date each of these contracts or consultancies was let.

(c) What was the value of each contract or consultancy.

(d) What was the purpose of each contract or consultancy.

(e) What was or is the expected completion date of each consultancy or contract.

ANSWER:

Since 28 October 1999, Essential Media Communications (EMC) has entered into two consultancies: one on 6 September 2000, valued at $14,475, to communicate the report of the Industrial Relations Taskforce; and the other on 22 January 2001, to the value of $95,000, to develop and implement the Youth Rights at Work Campaign. The completion dates of the consultancies were 22 December 2000, and 1 June 2001, respectively.

Industrial Relations: Essential Media Communications

1984. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations: In relation to the communications consultancy with respect to the Industrial Relations Taskforce and the letting of a consultancy to Essential Media Communications:

(a) Why did the Government not let this consultancy before the first week of September 2000.

(b) What was the urgency that required normal public processes to be bypassed in haste.

(c) Who attended the briefing regarding the consultancy held by Industrial Relations Victoria at — (i) 1.30 p.m. on Friday, 1 September 2000; and (ii) 3.30 p.m. on Friday, 1 September 2000.

ANSWER:

It was not appropriate to let the consultancy until after the final report of the Industrial Relations Taskforce was presented by the Chairperson of the Taskforce.

All appropriate processes for tendering and quotation were followed. In this case, the Department of State and Regional Development Purchasing Policies and Guidelines for tenders and quotations of more than $15,000, but less than $100,000, was used.

Industrial Relations: Essential Media Communications

1985. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations: Was Ms Elizabeth Lukin, a principal of the firm Essential Media Communications to whom her Department has let a number of industrial relations’ consultancies and communications consultancies, employed by the Australian Labor Party at a time when the Minister was a member of the Executive of the Australian Labor Party.

ANSWER:

This question does not relate in any way to the administration of the State of Victoria, and as such, no reply will be offered. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

264 COUNCIL Thursday, 16 August 2001 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 265

QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Answers to the following questions on notice were circulated on the date shown. Questions have been incorporated from the notice paper of the Legislative Council. Answers have been incorporated in the form supplied by the departments on behalf of the appropriate ministers. The portfolio of the minister answering the question on notice starts each heading. Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Planning: security of payments task force

1765. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Planning): Has the Security of Payments Taskforce presented its final report to the Minister; if so, will it be made publicly available.

ANSWER:

The Chairperson of the Security of Payments Taskforce, Mr. Tony Robinson MP, has presented the final report of the Taskforce to me.

The Report is currently being considered on a whole of Government basis as it potentially affects a number of Portfolios.

Multicultural Affairs: Office of Multicultural Affairs — staff

1778. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): What is the total full-time equivalent staff, part-time staff, and casual staff, respectively, of the Office of Multicultural Affairs as at 31 March 2001.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

As at 31 March 2001, the Victorian Office of Multicultural Affairs had:

– thirteen equivalent full-time staff of which seven were permanent and six were temporary fixed-term staff;

– one part-time fixed term staff member (0.6 EFT); and,

– two part-time casual staff members (1.2 EFT).

Multicultural Affairs: Victorian Multicultural Commission — staff

1779. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): What is the total full-time equivalent staff, part-time staff, and casual staff, respectively, of the Victorian Multicultural Commission as at 31 March 2001.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

As at 31 March 2001, the Victorian Multicultural Commission had five equivalent full-time staff. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

266 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Aged Care: regional funding allocations

1806. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to the aged care services and regional administration funding across Victoria, what are the funding allocations to each of the nine Departmental regions for the current financial year.

ANSWER:

Notional budget allocations relating to Aged Care services and internal regional program management costs for 2001-2002 are provided in the Aged, Community and Mental Health Divisional Policy and Funding Plan 2001-2001 and the 2001 – 2002 version of the Victoria – Public hospitals Policy and Funding Guidelines.

Aged Care: regional funding allocations

1807. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to aged care services and the regional administration budget for 2001–02, what are the specific amounts budgeted for — (i) aged care in-patient; (ii) aged care community based services; and (iii) other costs, including regional administration.

ANSWER:

Details of the aged care admitted patient services are provided in the Victoria – Public Hospital Policy and Funding Guidelines 2001-2002.

The budgets for all Aged Care Assessments and Home and Community Care services cannot be finalised until formal approval of grants from the Commonwealth is received.

Aged Care: budget targets

1808. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable Minister for Aged Care): In relation to final figures for the 2000–01 budget, were payments to agencies providing aged care services on target or were there any instances of net overpayment or underpayment affecting possible carry forward amounts from that budget year; if so, what are the details.

ANSWER:

The Department is not aware of any overpayments or underpayments that may significantly affect the carry forward.

Aged Care: Caulfield General Medical Centre

1809. THE HON. J. W. G. ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to Caulfield General Medical Centre:

(a) How much money has been allocated to upgrade the aged care facilities on the site since the election of the current Government.

(b) Will there be any future plans for continued redevelopment of the aged care facilities on the site; if so, what funding will be required to implement the plan.

ANSWER:

Capital funds of approximately $2.0M have been allocated for refurbishment of the Montgomery Hostel closed by the previous Government, to enable the reopening of 30 high care residential aged care beds. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 267

Planning is progressing for future capital works at Caulfield General Medical Centre. Once planning and the evaluation of options is complete budget implications for the future development of the site will be determined.

Aged Care: Hospital to Home program

1811. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to the Hospital to Home program — (i) where does the program sit within the Department’s structure; (ii) how does the program operate; and (iii) from which Department’s budget is the program funded.

ANSWER:

(i) The Home and Community Care Program (managed by the Aged, Community and Mental Health Division) and the Post Acute Care Program (managed by the Acute Health Division).

(ii) As above.

(iii) Hospital to Home is funded through the Department of Human Services, Acute Program.

Aged Care: residential aged care facilities funding

1812. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to the $25 million earmarked to redevelop the eight residential aged care facilities, what is the breakdown of funds to be allocated to each facility.

ANSWER:

Agency Estimated Allocation $ m

Maryborough District Health Service (Avoca & Dunolly) 3.8 Ballarat Health Service Stage 2 4.0 Rural Northwest Health (Hopetoun) 2.0 Beechworth Hospital Stage 1 6.5 West Wimmera Health Service (Rainbow) 3.7 Wonthaggi & District Hospital 3.0 Omeo District Hospital 1.3 Certification Works (various sites) 0.7 Total 25

Aged Care: Wintringham development

1813. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to the Wintringham proposed development of a 45 bed nursing home, are these bed allocations part of the State off-line bed pool.

ANSWER:

The bed allocations at the proposed development at Wintringham are not part of the state bed pool. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

268 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Aged Care: HACC service system development and resourcing

1814. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): Will the Minister provide a more detailed explanation in relation to ‘HACC service system development and resourcing’ itemised in the 2001–02 Budget Paper No. 3.

ANSWER:

The Output HACC Service System Development and Resourcing includes a number of activities of which the main component is HACC Service System Resourcing. Service System Resourcing includes projects that assist service providers to better meet the needs of all people in the HACC target group.

It covers services, which use advocacy, training and information strategies to improve the service system and resource service providers. Included under this activity are:

– Program Development and Access workers;

– Continence Nurses & Allied Health professionals undertaking resourcing services;

– Community Service Officers undertaking planning and development;

– Maintenance grants for Senior Citizens Centres; and

– HACC Response Service

It may also include funds used to assist the agency’s involvement in a Primary Care Partnership and one off projects to improve quality, effectiveness and efficiency of HACC services and service system.

Aged Care: adult day care and community rehabilitation centres

1815. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to Adult Day Care Centres and Community Rehabilitation Centres, what are the output measures and expenditure for 2001–02.

ANSWER:

The budget allocations relating to Community rehabilitation centres for 2001 – 2002 as at July 2001 is provided in the 2001-2002 version of the Victoria – Public Hospitals Policy and Funding Guidelines.

The budget for Adult Day Care Centres 2001-2002 is part of the Home and Community Care (HACC) Services budget which cannot be finalised until formal approval of the HACC state plan.

Aged Care: fire risk management

1821. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to the $10 million allocation over two years announced in this year’s budget for fire risk management, will the Minister provide a list of facilities, including a breakdown of funds to be allocated to such facilities over the two year period.

ANSWER:

The $10m is part of the $18m allocated for upgrades to a range of facilities and general Fire Risk Management.

Work has commenced on acute and residential aged care facilities under previous funding allocations and the $18m will continue Priority 1 works for acute and residential aged care facilities. This stage of the works program is directed toward rural facilities and the funding allocation to individual facilities will be priority ordered in accordance with a risk assessment. At this stage agency level allocations are not finalised. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 269

Aged Care: direct service delivery

1822. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to the implementation of the 2001–02 Budget, what is the detailed financial breakdown of the aged care direct service delivery in the following aged care program streams:

(a) Geriatric care in total and specifically in terms of — (i) in-patient geriatric evaluation and management; (ii) in-patient geriatric respite; (iii) continence clinic; and (iv) cognitive, dementia and memory clinics.

(b) Aged Care rehabilitation in total and specifically in terms of — (i) in-patient rehabilitation; and (ii) community rehabilitation centres.

(c) Palliative care in total and specifically in both in-patient hospice care and community palliative care.

(d) Aged care assessment services (ACAS) and home and community care assessments (HACC).

(e) Independent living in total and specifically to — (i) VICPACS; (ii) Delivered Meals (HACC); (iii) Personal Care; (iv) Property Maintenance; and (v) Flexible Service Response.

(f) Social Support in total and specifically in relation to day centres as well as social support service that come under the HACC program.

(g) Aged care respite delivered under the HACC program and aged care respite delivered under the carers program.

(h) Complex community care in total and specifically relating to linkages package and acquired brain injury program.

(i) Nursing and allied health in total and specifically in relation to HACC and non-HACC allied health and nursing including low cost eye scheme.

(j) Prevention and promotion in total and specifically in the areas of falls prevention, senior card and senior week, community grants and any other promotional and preventative initiatives.

(k) Aged care training, research and development programs, respectively.

ANSWER:

Last year’s Aged Care budget, including the program items that you have asked for, have been rolled over as at 1 July 2001 and where applicable, cost and wage adjustments have been incorporated. Final details for 2001/02 are not yet been available.

The budgets for all Home and Community Care services cannot be finalised until formal approval of the State Plan by the Commonwealth.

The budgets for all Aged Care Assessment Services cannot be finalised until formal notification of funding from the Commonwealth.

For new initiatives refer to 2001-02 Budget Paper No.3.

Other available information is in the Aged, Community and Mental Health Divisional Policy and Funding Plan 2001-2002 and the 2001-02 Victoria – Public Hospitals Policy and Funding Guidelines.

Aged Care: program funding

1823. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): What are the specific amounts being spent on the implementation of — (i) aged care services and regional administration; (ii) Statewide programs including carry over from 2000–01 and QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

270 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

any growth funding for the current year; and (iii) head office costs and overheads, capital asset charge and depreciation costs, respectively.

ANSWER:

Budgets for Aged & Home Care services provided externally and departmental program management and services Care Services are published in the Aged, Community and Mental Health Division Policy and Funding Plan 2001-2002.

Details of growth funding for 2001-2002 are published in the Aged, Community and Mental Health Division Policy and Funding Plan 2001-2002.

Head Office costs, including overheads, capital asset charge and depreciation costs are published in Budget Paper No.3. Data on carry-over from 2000/01 are still to be finalised.

Aged Care: HACC nursing and allied health

1825. THE HON. J. W. G ROSS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aged Care): In relation to HACC nursing and allied health, what are the separate output measures and expenditure for 2001–02.

ANSWER:

Measures and expenditure for the Output HACC Primary Health, Community Care and Support, which includes nursing, allied health and support services, are noted in the 2001-2002 Budget Estimates Budget Paper No. 3 (page 65).

Expenditure figures for 2001-2002 are not available at this time.

Housing: SAAP funding

1827. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): What is the basis for the Minister’s claim that in relation to SAAP funding there is a shortfall which has been in existence for many years in the funding received by Victoria from the commonwealth government of approximately $2.5 million per annum on a per capita basis, (PAEC 2000–01 Report, page 292).

ANSWER:

Commonwealth funding to the States for SAAP builds off a historical service base dating back to 1985. In the period since 1985 Commonwealth additional funds have been offered to the States and Territories, generally on a per capita basis. As a consequence, inequities between the States and Territories arising from the original levels of funding have been perpetuated. The shortfall is approximately $2.5 million per annum.

A number of the States and Territories, other than Victoria were provided with award supplementation funding totalling $45 million over three years ($15 million in the first financial year 2000/01) under the arrangements in the current SAAP Agreement. This arrangement has placed Victoria at a further disadvantage in relation to population share. Victoria now receives only 21.5% of national SAAP funds or approximately $5m per annum less than its per capita share would require. Victoria is now providing significant additional State only funds above the matching agreement with the Commonwealth to address the Commonwealth funding shortfall.

Housing: SAAP funding

1828. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): What is the explanation for the discrepancy between the total SAAP QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 271

funding for 2000–01 provided by the Commonwealth and State Governments shown in the PAEC Report for 2000–01, as $58.4 million compared, with the figures released by the Commonwealth of $55.97 million.

ANSWER:

The Commonwealth amount of $55.97 million relates to the gross funds provided under the SAAP IV bilateral agreement in 2000-01 consisting of $33.77 million of Commonwealth funds and $22.2 million of State matching funds.

The amount advised to PAEC includes:

− the Commonwealth and State base (matched) funds for 2000/2001;

− additional State only funds;

− projected Commonwealth growth funds for 2000/2001; and

− additional State growth funds provided over and above the requirements of the Commonwealth/State bilateral agreement to provide additional assistance to those who are homeless.

Housing: Office of Housing operating expenses

1829. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Will the Minister detail the operating expenses for the Office of Housing and specific items showing — (i) employee related expenses; (ii) purchase of supplies and services; (iii) depreciation; (iv) capital asset charge; and (v) other expenses.

ANSWER:

This and related information is consolidated in Annual Reports of the Department of Human Services. The Honourable Member is referred to the Annual Reports of the Department of Human Services.

Housing: SAAP funding

1830. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): What is the funding breakdown of the Commonwealth and State Government’s contribution for SAAP for the 2001–02.

ANSWER:

In total the State Budget, which includes both Commonwealth and State funds, has allocated $63.4m in 2001-02 to the Supported Accommodation program.

The Commonwealth will provide $33.8m in 2001-02 for SAAP with the State providing the balance ($29.6m) comprising $22.6m of matching contributions under the SAAP agreement and $7m in non matched amounts, including accumulated additional State funds provided in 2000-01 and 2001-02 budgets.

Small Business: commonwealth–state housing agreement

1831. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: What are the details of the Commonwealth Government’s contribution for 2001–02 under the Commonwealth State Housing Agreement and separate contribution made by State Government. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

272 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

ANSWER:

The Commonwealth’s funding allocations to Victoria in 2001/02 under the Commonwealth State Housing Agreement (CSHA), and other agreements relating to GST and interest subsidy, total $226.5 million:

$M Base Funding 181.4 GST compensation 15.0 Housing assistance for Indigenous people 3.6 Community housing 15.9 Crisis accommodation assistance 9.9 Interest subsidy 0.7 Total 226.5

The State Government will provide $102.8m to the Office of Housing as part of Victoria’s CSHA matching requirements and GST compensation arrangements in 2001/02. In addition, Victoria will provide the second year instalment in respect of the Government’s $94.5m Social Housing Innovations Project, bringing total State contributions to $140.8m. Details are as follows:

$M State matching funds 88.8 GST compensation 13.7 Embedded tax savings 0.3 Social Housing Innovations Project 38.0 Total 140.8

Housing: women’s housing policy

1832. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to the investigation initiated by the Government to inform the development of a Women’s Housing Policy — (i) who is undertaking the review; (ii) what are the associated costs of the investigation; and (iii) what progress has been made.

ANSWER:

(i) A Ministerial Advisory Committee, chaired by Karen Overington MP, has been established to lead the policy development process and conduct an appropriate public consultation process. The Committee includes representatives of a broad range of groups, including women’s housing services, domestic violence services, disability services, migrant resource centres, the Tenants’ Union of Victoria and the Real Estate Institute of Victoria. The Ministerial Advisory Committee is supported by a secretariat from the Office of Housing.

(ii) The policy development process is being conducted by the Office of Housing. Expenses associated with the consultation process and in-house meeting costs will be funded from existing Office of Housing budgets.

(iii) The Committee’s consultations (currently underway) are based on a strategy to ensure that there are substantial and inclusive opportunities for community input into the policy development.

During June and early July 2001, the Ministerial Advisory Committee held 14 public forums throughout Victoria. Some of the key issues that emerged from the consultations included the need for policies that reflected the differences between metropolitan, regional and rural areas, the links between crisis and transitional housing systems and the importance of security of tenure and of income. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 273

Focus group discussions are now being arranged for groups such as women in prison, women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, women with a disability and women living on public housing estates.

The one-on-one interviews will be conducted after the focus groups have been completed.

The outcomes of these consultations and the contents of submissions to other projects will form the basis of a draft report on Women’s Housing. Public comment on the draft report will be sought before the report is finalised for further consideration by the Office of Housing.

Housing: Thomson estate, Geelong

1833. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Will the Minister provide a progress report on the redevelopment of the Thomson Estate in Geelong.

ANSWER:

The media release titled Thomson Estate Redevelopment Transforming Homes dated 24 May 2001 provides a comprehensive progress report on the redevelopment.

Since that media release significant progress has occurred.

The upgrade of one house is complete, and the other three Stage 1 upgrades will be completed progressively throughout 2001. In July 2001 construction commenced on 4 houses and 11 two-bedroom units.

Tenders have been called for the design and construction of 48 public housing dwellings and the development of up to 48 dwellings for sale to the private sector. It is anticipated that a contract will be let later this year.

These contracts incorporate minor adjustments in unit numbers, which were made to satisfy obligations to existing tenants.

Tenders will be called for a further 8 dwellings subject to the availability of vacant sites and the satisfaction of special design requirements regarding the accommodation of the disabled.

The Community Liaison Committee chaired by Mr Ian Trezise MP convened a community information meeting on 30 July at the Geelong East Elderly Citizen’s Centre. This was attended by approximately 70 residents and provided an opportunity to provide advice about the above development.

MEDIA RELEASE

From the Minister for Housing & Aged Care

Thursday, 24 May 2001

THOMSON ESTATE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSFORMING HOMES

The $5.6 million redevelopment of the Thomson Estate in Geelong is underway with the upgrade of the first home now completed, Housing Minister Bronwyn Pike said today.

“This renovated home heralds a bright new future for residents of the estate,” Ms Pike said.

“The redevelopment project will transform the ageing houses on the Thomson estate into spacious, modern homes for tenants which are close to shops and transport in Victoria’s second largest city.

“The redevelopment will also create around 70 jobs over the life of the project and provide a boost to the local economy.”

Ms Pike visited the estate with Geelong MP Ian Trezise to view progress made in the redevelopment. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

274 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

The redevelopment involves the construction of more than 70 social housing properties, more than 50 homes that will be privately owned, and the upgrade of four homes.

As part of Stage 1, four houses are being upgraded and four new homes will be built. The housing upgrades include improving kitchens and bathrooms, environmentally sustainable design features and changes to make the housing more suitable for people with disabilities.

Construction of the new four-bedroom homes, featuring solar hot water heaters, will begin in July. Building will start on another 14 houses as part of Stage 2 later this year.

The construction of a further 51 social housing and 49 private homes will be put out to tender in the next two months.

A Community Liaison Committee, chaired by Mr Trezise, was formed last year to ensure local community involvement during the course of the redevelopment.

The Committee includes estate residents and representatives of local Government, the Department of Human Services, and community agencies.

Mr Trezise said the project reflected the Bracks Government’s commitment to building stronger communities.

“Improving the quality of housing on this estate has benefits for the whole community,” Mr Trezise said.

“This estate became run down over a number of years and the redevelopment is needed to repair years of neglect and restore community confidence.”

“The Bracks Government is committed to building stronger communities and involving Victorians in decision-making processes that affect their lives,” Ms Pike said.

“We will work closely with tenants and the community over the next three years to build a stronger and more cohesive Thomson Estate.”

Media contact: Tim Winkler — 96515799 / 0407 688 632 www.vic.gov.au

Housing: public tenants — eligibility criteria review

1834. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Has the proposed review of the eligibility criteria for public tenants been completed; if so, will the Minister provide a copy of the report.

ANSWER:

The Eligibility Review Community Reference Group was established in October 2000 and is chaired by the Office of Housing with representation from community groups, academic institutions, housing advocates and public housing tenants.

The Reference Group has produced a consultation paper on proposed principles and directions for change relating to public housing eligibility criteria. The paper has been sent to major housing stakeholders and published on the Department of Human Services’ web site.

The key principles from the paper have been included in the Segmented Waiting List Review consultation paper, “Summary of Proposed Directions” and feedback on these principles was sought at regional sessions conducted in July 2001. A final report to the Minister for Housing is expected later this year. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 275

Housing: segmented waiting list review

1835. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing):

(a) Has the review for the segmented waiting list been completed.

(b) Has the Community Reference Group provided its recommendation to the Minister; if so, will the Minister provide a copy of the report.

ANSWER:

The Segmented Waiting List Review held its final round of consultations from 18 to 31 July 2001 in metropolitan Melbourne and regional centres across Victoria. These consultations were based on a paper, “Summary of Proposed Directions”, which outlined proposals for public housing eligibility, assessment and allocations.

The Community Reference Group for the Review, chaired by Ann Barker MP, is currently considering the feedback gained from the consultation process and is expected to report to the Minister for Housing later this year.

Housing: interdepartmental committee on homelessness

1837. THE HON. R. H. BOWDEN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to development of a whole-of-government approach to homelessness through the establishment of an interdepartmental committee and a Ministerial advisory committee, respectively, will the Minister please supply details of the formation of the interdepartmental committee, including — (i) list of committee members and their respective positions within the committee; (ii) how often the committee has met (detailing meeting dates); (iii) the terms of reference of the committee; (iv) the issues it has discussed; (v) the committee’s recommendations; and (vi) the minutes of meetings held.

ANSWER:

(i) Membership of the IDC comprises:

DEPARTMENT POSITION Department of Human Services – Office of Housing (Chair) Director of Housing – Aged, Community and Mental Health Director – Community Care Director – Public Health Assistant Director, Drugs, Food and Health Development – Regional Management Regional Director Department of Justice Deputy Secretary, Justice Operations Department of Education, – Office of Schools General Manager, School Programs and Student Welfare – Post-Compulsory Education, Training and Employment Director – Office of Youth Affairs Director Department of Treasury and Finance Director, Portfolio Analysis Department of Premier and Cabinet Assistant Secretary, Social Policy Office of Local Government Executive Director

(ii) The full IDC has met formally on three occasions: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

276 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

– 31 May 2000 – 27 September 2000 – 25 October 2000

At various dates and times, members of the IDC and their representatives have met to progress specific initiatives related to portfolio responsibilities and to initiate cross-government responses.

(iii) The Terms of Reference of the Inter Departmental Committee are:

(a) To develop across Government strategies for the prevention of homelessness, and for those who are homeless.

(b) To improve coordination of service delivery for people who are homeless.

(c) To address issues around substance abuse and homelessness.

(iv) the IDC has discussed the following issues

– Process and structure of the VHS and the role of the IDC

– The community consultations undertaken by the Ministerial Advisory Committee – The scope of actions occurring across IDC areas in relation to homelessness

– Identification of possible areas where preventative, early intervention and responsive initiatives could be developed. These areas included, but were not limited to:

–Corrections –Child Protection/Juvenile Justice

–Drug and Alcohol crisis responses –Mental Health

–Aged and frail people at risk

–Preventative educational initiatives

These discussions have resulted in the development of a number of joint initiatives for people exiting prison, people with a mental illness, and younger people at risk of homelessness.

(v) The discussions and development work undertaken by the IDC and relevant portfolio areas has resulted in design and coordination of proposals considered by the VHS MAC and the Project Team. These were:

– Transitional Housing initiative for young people exiting Juvenile Justice

– Transitional Housing initiative for people leaving prison

– Mental health and housing initiative.

These initiatives are currently being implemented across the State.

(vi) Not applicable.

Multicultural Affairs: budget

1842. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): Why was the 2001–02 budget of the Multicultural Affairs portfolio reduced by $1 million compared with last year. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 277

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The budget allocation for financial year 2001–2002 is $3.9 million with the difference from the previous financial year being due to the one-off allocation of $1 million towards the racial and religious tolerance legislation and community education program.

Multicultural Affairs: budget

1843. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): Why was the 2000–01 budget for Multicultural Affairs revised down from $4.9 million to $4.5 million.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The revision was due to a projected underspend, primarily within the allocated funds for the Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation community education campaign and the Language Allowance.

Multicultural Affairs: budget

1844. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): In relation to the allocation of $800,000 in the 2000–01 budget for Multicultural Affairs’ briefs (advice to the Minister, Parliamentarians, etc.) and $2.4 million to Education Strategies, ECCV funding and language allowance:

(a) How was this funding allocated and spent, giving details of amounts allocated and spent in each area.

(b) If there are amounts unspent for this financial year, will these amounts be rolled over into the 2001–02 budget year; if so, how will these amounts be shown in the 2001–02 budget.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The $800,000 allocation towards the Advice major output incorporates the Victorian Office of Multicultural Affairs’ (VOMA’s) staff salaries and on-costs. The $2.4 million allocation towards the Access and Communication major output incorporates VOMA’s administrative, project and grant operational expenditure, including:

– $1 million towards the Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation and community education campaign, of which approximately $700,000 was carryover for the education campaign as the legislation only passed through Parliament in June 2001;

– $500,000 towards the language proficiency allowance, which was underspent; and,

– $140,000 towards the Ethnic Communities’ Council of Victoria’s core grant allocation, which was fully allocated.

Amounts unspent have been submitted for carryover by VOMA and will be determined through the DTF and DPC administrative procedures.

Unspent amounts are identified within an overall departmental context in the 2001-02 Budget Estimates, Budget Paper No.3. These unspent amounts, in an estimated form, are identified under “Unspent previous year appropriation carried over” in Table 4.5, which is entitled “Consolidated Fund payment: Total Annual Appropriations”. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

278 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Multicultural Affairs: budget

1845. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): In relation to the Multicultural Affairs 2001–02 budget, what is the target expenditure for the target of 420 briefs.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The 2001-02 Budget Papers do not identify a target expenditure specifically for producing 420 briefs. Rather, they identify an overall target expenditure for the Major Output of Advice of $2.1 million, which refers to VOMA’s overall recurrent budget allocation for 2001-02.

However, in the previous financial year’s budget papers the Advice output referred primarily to the production of briefs and identified a target expenditure of $0.8 million, which correlated to VOMA’s total salaries and oncosts allocation. For FY 2001-02 the allocation is similar at $808,400.

Multicultural Affairs: budget

1846. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): What is the target expenditure for funding of the Ethnic Communities Council of Victoria and the Language Allowance programs for the 2001–02 budget year in the Multicultural Affairs budget.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Ethnic Communities Council of Victoria receives $140,000 per annum under a triennial government funding arrangement and the budget for the language allowance in the 2001-02 budget year is $500,000.

Multicultural Affairs: budget

1847. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs):

(a) What were the output costs in the 2000–01 Multicultural Affairs budget (including expenditure) for education strategies for the Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation.

(b) What are the target outputs, including expenditure for the 2001–02 budget, for this program.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Government always intended to develop and implement its community education campaign on passage of the legislation. Given that the Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation was passed by Parliament on 14 June 2001 and the Act will come into effect on 1 January 2002, there has been no specific expenditure against the allocated funds of $700,000 in FY 2000-01.

The funds committed to this aspect of the Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation campaign have therefore been carried-over into FY 2001-02.

Other outputs and expenditure in the 2000-2001 Multicultural Affairs budget with reference to education strategies for the Racial and Religious Tolerance Bill include a grant of $81,818 to Diversity Victoria. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 279

Multicultural Affairs: Racial and Religious Tolerance Bill — community consultations

1848. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs):

(a) What are the costs to date for community consultations on the Racial and Religious Tolerance Bill.

(b) How much money was allocated for the said consultations and how much remains unused.

(c) What are the details, including costs, of any consultants that have been engaged to assist in the preparation of the Bill and in conducting community consultation meetings relating to the Bill.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The budget allocated to the consultation phase for the introduction of the Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation was $300,000 and the total cost to date for community consultation on the Racial and Religious Tolerance Bill is $227,789.

There are no unspent funds as a grant of $81,818 was made to Diversity Victoria.

Sweeney Research Pty Ltd was engaged to research and assist in developing a communication strategy to publicise the Government’s proposed Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation. The cost of research undertaken by Sweeney Research totalled $35,200 GST inclusive.

The Strategy Shop was engaged as part of the consultation process to facilitate the public and Indigenous consultations. The total cost of the facilitation process was $42,128.75 GST inclusive.

No consultants were engaged to assist in the preparation of the Bill as relevant units within the Department of Premier and Cabinet and other government departments and agencies were consulted in the preparation of the Racial and Religious Tolerance Bill.

Multicultural Affairs: Racial and Religious Tolerance Bill — education campaign

1849. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs):

(a) What funds were allocated in the 2000–01 budget for the education campaign to accompany the Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation.

(b) How were these funds expended, including the programs and projects involved.

(c) Were all the funds expended; if so, what are the details.

(d) What are the budget outputs showing expenditure and performance for the education campaign.

(e) What funds have been allocated for the 2001–02 budget.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Government always intended to develop and implement its community education campaign on passage of the legislation. Given that the Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation was passed by Parliament on 14 June 2001 and the Act will come into effect on 1 January 2002, there has been no specific expenditure against the allocated funds of $700,000 in FY 2000-01. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

280 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

The funds committed to this aspect of the Racial and Religious Tolerance legislation campaign have therefore been carried-over into FY 2001-02.

Other outputs and expenditure in the 2000-2001 Multicultural Affairs budget with reference to education strategies for the Racial and Religious Tolerance Bill include a grant of $81,818 to Diversity Victoria.

Multicultural Affairs: Ethnic Enterprise Advisory Council

1850. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs):

(a) What progress has been made towards establishing the Ethnic Enterprise Advisory Council.

(b) How many members will the council have and what are the selection criteria.

(c) What funds have been allocated for the operation of the council.

(d) What costs have already been incurred in work to establish the council.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Ethnic Enterprise Advisory Council is being established and appointments are expected to be finalised shortly.

(a) The Council will consist of approximately 15 members. Selection criteria for membership of the Council requires that nominees should possess proven expertise, skills and experience relevant to business and have sound relationships which can build Victoria’s export base. They should also have the capacity to think and act strategically.

(b) Approximately $50,000 per annum will be incurred in costs, covering sitting fees and other aspects of the work of the Council.

(c) Advertising costs of $17,663.44 have been incurred to date in the establishment of the Council.

Premier: racial and religious vilification

1860. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Premier): What strategies have been initiated to combat both racial and religious vilification since July 2000.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Racial and Religious Tolerance education campaign is currently being planned for implementation. During this time the Victorian Office of Multicultural Affairs has consulted widely with community groups, Government Departments and agencies to ascertain existing anti-vilification programs and areas of perceived shortfall.

Diversity Victoria was funded through the Victorian Office of Multicultural Affairs in October 2000 to provide a community training program concentrating on the issues of vilification and diversity.

As part of the State Government’s commitment to supporting anti-racism initiatives the Victorian Office of Multicultural Affairs organised events in Victoria for Harmony Day, which occurred on 21 March 2001. Such events included a postcard and poster campaign; a lunch for community leaders and young people and 200 community based events across Victoria. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 281

Premier: Emily’s List Victoria — funding

1861. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Premier): What financial assistance or resources have been provided by the Department of Premier and Cabinet to Emily’s List Victoria.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

No financial assistance or resources have been provided by the Department of Premier and Cabinet to Emily’s List Victoria.

Ports: West Swanson Dock

1866. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: Has the technical feasibility study in May 2001 in relation to the Minister’s proposal to extend the on-dock rail to West Swanson dock been completed.

ANSWER:

The technical aspects of the study are complete. When the report is approved by the Steering Committee it will be circulated for feedback from stakeholders. It is expected that stakeholder comments will be received and incorporated in the report and completed in the next two to three months.

Multicultural Affairs: Macedonian Teachers Association of Victoria

1870. THE HON. C. A. FURLETTI — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): In the course of negotiating a resolution of the legal proceedings taken by the Macedonian Teacher’s Association of Victoria (MTAV) against the State of Victoria, which proceedings were determined by the HREOC on 8 September 2000 and did the Government offer and/or agree to:

(a) An apology to MTAV or to any person or class of persons.

(b) Contribute to the MTAV/s costs of the proceedings; if so, on what date or dates was that offer or agreement made.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

When this Government took Office, a legal action by the Macedonian Teachers’ Association of Victoria (MTAV) against the State of Victoria was unresolved. The Government undertook to have the matter resolved via the legal process and as part of this process various suggestions were made about how the issue might be resolved. No agreement for an apology or a contribution towards the MATV costs of proceedings was made. The State of Victoria sought leave to appeal to the High Court. The High Court dismissed this application in May 2000. As is usual, it also made an order about costs. In this case, the costs order was made against the State in favour of the MATV. Those costs were paid. On 8 September 2000, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) determined that the language directive was indeed unlawful. This decision resulted in the subsequent withdrawal of the language directive. No apology was issued by the State. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

282 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Corrections: prisoner capacity and population

1871. THE HON. B. C. BOARDMAN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Corrections):

(a) What was the ‘design’ prisoner capacity of the following facilities, as at 30 June 1999, 20 October 1999, 30 June 2000, 31 December 2000, 31 March 2001 and 31 May 2001, respectively — (i) HM Prison Ararat; (ii) HM Prison Barwon; (iii) HM Prison Beechworth; (iv) HM Prison Bendigo; (v) HM Prison Dhurringile; (vi) HM Prison Langi Kal Kal; (vii) HM Prison Loddon; (viii) HM Melbourne Assessment Prison; (ix) HM Prison Tarrengower; (x) HM Prison Won Wron; (xi) Fulham Correctional Centre; (xii) Dame Phyllis Frost Centre; and (xiii) Port Philip Prison.

(b) What was the actual prisoner populations of the following facilities, as at 30 June 1999, 20 October 1999, 30 June 2000, 31 December 2000, 31 March 2001 and 31 May 2001, respectively — (i) HM Prison Ararat; (ii) HM Prison Barwon; (iii) HM Prison Beechworth; (iv) HM Prison Bendigo; (v) HM Prison Dhurringile; (vi) HM Prison Langi Kal Kal; (vii) HM Prison Loddon; (viii) HM Melbourne Assessment Prison; (ix) HM Prison Tarrengower; (x) HM Prison Won Wron; (xi) Fulham Correctional Centre; (xii) Dame Phyllis Frost Centre; and (xiii) Port Philip Prison.

ANSWER:

I am advised that:

(a)

PRISON DESIGN CAPACITIES Location Design Capacity Ararat * 256 Barwon 250 Beechworth 123 Bendigo 80 Dame Phyllis Frost Centre 125 Dhurringile 106 Fulham 590 Langi Kal Kal 100 Loddon 250 Melbourne Assessment Prison 250 Port Phillip Prison 580 Tarrengower 38 Won Wron 127 *Note: Ararat capacity temporarily increased by 50 from April 2001 due to temporary use of Aradale facility.

(b) PRISONER POPULATION BY LOCATION – 30.6.1999 TO 31.5.2001

Location Prisoner Population 30.6.99 20.10.99 30.6.00 31.12.00 31.3.01 31.5.01 Ararat 261 268 279 297 344 371* Barwon 261 285 294 318 305 292 Beechworth 121 122 131 132 123 132 Bendigo 68 75 80 79 80 79 QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 283

Dame Phyllis Frost Centre 144 148 153 163 175 169 Dhurringile 113 122 119 122 120 120 Fulham 582 626 623 643 684 688 Langi Kal Kal 97 75 100 108 108 92 Loddon 262 285 307 309 307 308 Melbourne Assessment Prison 276 274 269 274 275 266 Port Phillip Prison 588 651 646 672 699 705 Tarrengower 35 33 30 48 53 47 Won Wron 107 116 122 120 111 113 Total 2915 3080 3153 3285 3385 3384 *Note: Includes 27 prisoners placed at Aradale.

The shortfall in prison accommodation is being addressed through the Corrections Long Term Management Strategy which aims to reduce the growth in prisoner numbers through diversion and rehabilitation initiatives, complemented by a major redevelopment of Victoria’s prison infrastructure over the next four years.

– A Temporary Bed Strategy has seen the construction of 690 temporary beds across the prison system. The first of six 50-bed Relocatable Cellular Accommodation units has been built at the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, and another five units will be commissioned at various prisons over the next six months.

– The 2000 State Budget funded the expansion of the prison system by 357 permanent beds to be built at existing prisons, which are due to become operational progressively.

– The 2001 State Budget approved a further building program which will result in a net gain of an additional 716 permanent prison beds by December 2004. The program includes building three new prisons, and closure of three existing prisons.

Corrections: prisoners’ bank accounts

1872. THE HON. B. C. BOARDMAN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Corrections): With reference to the ‘global’ bank account for prisoners’ weekly pay managed on behalf of prisoners by the Public Correctional Enterprise (CORE):

(a) How many individual ‘internal’ prisoner accounts are currently operating which collectively are represented by the ‘global’ bank account, as at 31 March 2001, 30 April 2001 and 31 May 2001, respectively.

(b) What is the total monetary balance in these individual ‘internal’ prisoner accounts as at 31 March 2001, 30 April 2001 and 31 May 2001, respectively.

(c) How many of these ‘internal’ prisoner accounts have a deficit balance as at 31 March 2001, 30 April 2001 and 31 May 2001, respectively.

(d) What is the total amount of monetary surplus or deficit of these individual ‘internal’ prisoner accounts as at 31 March 2001, 30 April 2001 and 31 May 2001, respectively.

(e) If all of the monies owed to prisoners, as detailed in the individual ‘internal’ prisoner accounts, needed to be paid out at a single point in time, would the amount held in the single ‘global’ bank account be sufficient to meet this liability; if not, why.

ANSWER:

I am advised that: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

284 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

(a) Each prison provider operates a trust account in which the individual balances of each prisoner are held. The number of such individual balances will equal the number of prisoners held by that providers at that point, although a small number of balances may be held for prisoners who have been discharged directly from court and are yet to collect their money, or have escaped and are not yet apprehended. Information with regard to prisoner numbers has been provided in response to question 1871.

(b) The balances held in CORE’s trust account are:

31 March 2001 $1,210,403.18

30 April 2001 $1,157,276.11

31 May 2001 $1,559,945.91

(c) Nil.

(d) The trust accounts operated for the purpose of holding prisoner money do not operate on the basis of a surplus or a deficit. They hold the sum of actual prisoner money balances.

(e) Yes

Corrections: Office of the Correctional Services Commissioner — staff

1873. THE HON. B. C. BOARDMAN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Corrections): In relation to employees within the Office of the Commissioner for Corrections:

(a) What explanation is there for the increase in employee numbers from 63 to 78 during the period 20 October 1999 to 31 March 2001.

(b) What was the actual cost of employee remuneration and entitlements as at 20 October 1999 and 31 March 2001, respectively.

(c) What was the organisational structure of the Office as at 20 October 1999 and 31 March 2001, respectively.

(d) With regards to the organisational structure as at 20 October 1999 and 31 March 2001, how many employees worked in each area/unit of the Office, what were their classifications and what duties were performed in each area/unit.

(e) How many employees were classified as Senior Executives as at 20 October 1999 and 31 March 2001, respectively.

(f) What was the level of effective full time employees within the Office as at 31 May 2001.

ANSWER:

I am advised that:

The increase in employee numbers resulted from:

– the transfer of 7 staff from the Information Systems Branch following an internal restructure

– 3 additional staff to the Monitoring and Review Unit

– 3 staff to implement new initiatives

– 2 trainees recruited under the Youth Employment Scheme QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 285

As at 20 October 1999, 4 employees were classified as Senior Executives. This does not include the Deputy Commissioner who resigned during October 1999. As at 31 March 2001, 4 employees were classified as Senior Executives.

The number of effective full time employees within the OCSC as at 31 May 2001 was 85.

Treasurer: regional railway lines standardisation — funding

1879. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): From where is the standardisation of regional railway lines to be funded, and where is this commitment recorded in the budget documents.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The rail standardisation initiative is to be met from asset investment funding.

The initiative is listed in Table B7 Asset Investment Initiatives – Department of Infrastructure as ‘rail standardisation’ on page 249 of Budget Paper No. 2. There is also a brief description on page 251.

Treasurer: country rail services — funding

1880. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What are the capital works associated with the re-opening of country rail services and from where is the costed estimate of $33 million to be funded, and where does this program appear in the Budget documents.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Funding of $32.7m is provided for rail infrastructure works to enable the restoration of passenger rail services to the four regional centres of Mildura, Bairnsdale, Ararat and South Gippsland (Leongatha). In addition, freight services will recommence on the South Gippsland (Leongatha) line.

The funding is to be met from asset investment funding.

The initiative is listed in Table B7 Asset Investment Initiatives – Department of Infrastructure as ‘re-opening of country rail lines’ on page 249 of Budget Paper No. 2. There is also a brief description on page 251.

Treasurer: Better Business Taxes package

1881. THE HON R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Why do the tax savings attributed to the reform package ‘Better Business Taxes: Lower, Fewer, Simpler’, not include the reduction claimed in respect of 2000–01 shown in Table B20 on page 273 of budget paper no. 2.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The $774 million in tax savings attributed to the reform package “Better Business Taxes: Lower, Fewer, Simpler” was calculated over the forecast period 2001-02 to 2004-05. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

286 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Inclusion of the 2000-01 current period impacts arising from the early abolition of non-residential lease duty for leases entered into after 26 April 2001, would increase estimated tax savings for business by $0.9 million.

Treasurer: budget — comparative data

1882. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Why is the Government not providing standardised data where changes in output groupings and performance indicators make year on year comparison impossible or misleading.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Accrual output budgeting and management is a relatively recent development and, in this context, performance measures and output definitions are still evolving. It is acknowledged that it will take some time to refine output definitions and performance measures to provide the most appropriate information for resource allocation decisions and performance monitoring.

This means that there will be changes in performance and output measures year by year as such measures are refined and improved. Where practical, historical performance measures are maintained to enable year on year comparisons. However, in some cases it is not possible or appropriate to maintain old performance measures, particularly where a significant change in output definition or composition means that the old performance measures are no longer relevant and continued publication may provide a misleading picture of output performance.

Treasurer: budget — comparative data

1883. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Why do the budget documents not include a comparison of individual tax class yields to disclose the underlying trend compared with — (i) previous year’s budget; (ii) previous year’s revised budget; and (iii) budgetary targets for the forward years.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The degree of information supplied at an individual tax class level is similar to that supplied in previous budget papers, including those of the previous government.

A detailed comparison of individual tax class yields for the 2000-01 Budget, the 2000-01 revised estimate and the budgetary target for 2001-02 can be found in Table 3.2 on page 393 of Budget Paper No. 3.

Estimates of taxation revenue in broader classes for the period 2001-02 to 2004-05 can be found at Note 2, p202 in Budget Paper No. 2.

Treasurer: budget — tax savings

1884. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): How does the Government rationalise the calculation of tax savings over forward years when the figure cited in the Budget includes the accumulated roll up of savings expected in the earlier out years.

ANSWER:

I am informed that: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 287

The cited $774.3 million figure does indeed represent the accumulated savings over the forward estimates period (ie. 2001-02 to 2004-05). This is entirely justifiable on the basis that this represents the total reduction in taxes that taxpayers will enjoy over this period as a result of the Government tax reforms. In other words, over this period Victorian taxpayers will pay a total of $774.3 million less in taxes than they otherwise would have paid. Nowhere in the budget papers is it claimed that $774.3 million represents an annual tax saving.

Treasurer: budget — comparative data

1885. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What is the comparative position of the states and territories in respect of taxing levels after the effects of the 2000–01 budgets have been included in each case.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The following table shows Victoria’s relative tax position following incorporation of all 2000-01 Budget announcements in other jurisdictions:

Table 1: Tax competitiveness 2000–2001 (a) % of GSP $ per capita CGC (b) Victoria 4.5 1 475 Na NSW 4.9 1 660 91 Queensland 4.0 1 114 938 South Australia 4.7 1 304 -1 243 Western Australia 3.6 1 265 976 Tasmania 4.3 1 070 - 412 Northern Territory 2.9 1 019 - 259 ACT 3.4 1 361 - 527 Australian average 4.4 1 419 277 (a) 1999-2000 data (from State Budgets) adjusted for all 2000-01 Budget tax changes (b) Commonwealth Grants Commission basis. A positive (negative) number indicates a higher (lower) tax burden for Victoria

In 2001-02, on measures of percentage of GSP and dollars per capita, Victoria’s tax competitiveness has improved.

Table 2: Tax comparisons (c)

% of GSP $ per capita CGC $m (d) Victoria 4.4 1 452 na NSW 4.8 1 621 126 Queensland 4.0 1 113 832 South Australia 4.6 1 285 .1 222 Tasmania 4.0 996 -43 Northern Territory 2.9 1 012 -324 ACT 3.3 1 329 -478 Australian average 4.4 1 397 273 (c) 1999-2000 data (from ABS) adjusted for 2001-02 Budget tax changes in all jurisdictions apart from Western Australia. (d) Commonwealth Grants Commission basis. A positive (negative) number indicates a higher (lower) tax burden for Victoria QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

288 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Treasurer: budget — gambling taxes

1886. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Why is the expected yield from gambling taxes according to note 2 at page 202 of budget paper 2 substantially less than that expected to be recorded as a receipt in the consolidated fund shown in table 4.2 on page 441 of budget paper no. 2.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

There is no underlying difference in the expected yield from gambling taxes as presented in Budget Paper No. 2 and Budget Paper No. 3.

Table 4.2 on page 441 of Budget Paper No. 3 presents cash receipts of gambling taxes into the consolidated fund, whereas Note 2 on page 202 of Budget Paper No. 2 presents gambling tax revenue earned by the Victorian Government. The difference between the gambling tax estimates presented in these two tables reflects the revenue after allowing for offsetting remittance of tax revenue collected on behalf of other jurisdictions in relation to lottery sales in those jurisdictions (Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory, Norfolk Island, Nauru, Christmas Island, Cook Island, Fiji and Western Samoa) and, to a minor extent, accrual adjustments for taxes receivable in order to show the consolidated fund table on a gross cash receipts basis.

Treasurer: budget — investment income

1887. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Why is investment income shown in table 3.4 on page 30 of budget paper no. 2 expected to decline so sharply in 2001–02.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Investment income is expected to decline sharply in 2001-02. The $445 million decrease is largely due to a one-off revenue boost in 2000-01 of $60 million in relation to realised investment gains on retirement of Victorian Accelerated Infrastructure Program bonds and a $353 million reduction in investment income from public authority dividends and tax equivalents.

The conclusion of a profitable long term gas supply contract with ESSO/BHP accounts for the major part of the expected decline in public authority income.

An expected decline in distributions from the water industry (reflecting a return to longer term climatic conditions) and the Transport Accident Commission (reflecting weaker investment returns and an increase in the valuation of claim liabilities) also contribute to the decline in public authority income.

Treasurer: budget — asset investment

1888. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What financial data was used to calculate the claim that the planned $2.13 billion spending on asset investment represents an increase of 45 per cent.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

New infrastructure projects with a total estimated investment of $2.13 billion have been approved since the 2000-01 Budget. These new infrastructure projects, together with previously announced projects, will contribute to QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 289

net purchases of fixed assets rising from $1,341 million in 2000-01 to $1,950 million in 2004-05, an increase of 45 per cent, as shown on page 156 of Budget Paper No. 2.

Treasurer: rural and regional Victoria — infrastructure projects

1889. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What particular infrastructure projects are included in the cited $2.13 billion and what documentation has been used to support the claim that more than 45 per cent of this will be targeted at rural and regional Victoria.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The $2.13 billion includes all projects for which the Government has approved new state funding since 200-01 Budget. It includes the total State contribution to the total estimated cost of the projects.

As part of the 2001-02 Budget, the Government produced, for the first time, a regional Budget paper - Growing the whole State - which provided an outline of specific asset initiatives for every region of Victoria.

The Government will shortly publish Budget Information Paper No. 1 (2001-02 Public Sector Asset Investment Program). The document contains a full list of all asset investment projects by location.

Treasurer: projected debt level

1890. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Why is the projected debt level cited in the Budget Speech ($2.5 billion at June 2005) different from that appearing in Table 8.4 on page 152 and Chart 8.7 on page 153 of Budget Paper No. 2.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Table 8.4 shows that total State (non-financial public) sector debt will decline to $3.5 billion (excluding Growing Victoria) by June 2005 and that State general government sector net debt will decline to $2.5 billion.

The Treasurer’s speech refers to the decline in net debt to $2.5 billion by June 2005. It is quite clear from context of the speech and reference to the numbers and text in Budget Paper No. 2 that the reference in the speech is to the decline in State general government sector net debt (consistent with Table 8.4) and not to the total State non-financial public sector debt.

Treasurer: Growing Victoria reserve

1891. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): In what form is the balance of the Growing Victoria reserve held.

ANSWER: I am informed that:

The Growing Victoria Reserve is invested 100% in Australian fixed interest securities. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

290 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Treasurer: Growing Victoria reserve

1892. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Why does the report on Growing Victoria in appendix G, on page 315–6 of Budget Paper No. 3 not show the progressive balance of the reserve over the reported years, particularly when this is included in Table 8.3 on page 150 of Budget Paper No. 2.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Appendix G on pages 315-316 of Budget Paper No. 2 shows all asset investment projects approved for funding from the Growing Victoria infrastructure reserve. It does not show the progressive balance of the reserve over the reported years because that is not the purpose of the table. As indicated in the question, information on the balance of the reserve is disclosed in Table 8.3 on page 150 of Budget Paper No. 2 and it was not considered necessary to duplicate that information in Appendix G.

Treasurer: Snowy River

1893. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What demonstrated effect has the $40 million dedicated to the restoration of environmental flows to the Snowy River in 2000–01 shown in Table B10, on page 259 of Budget Paper No. 2 had upon the measured flow of the river.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

This Question does not fall within my Portfolio responsibilities and should be more appropriately referred to the Minister for Energy and Resources.

Treasurer: marine national parks

1894. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What part, if any, of the $40 million dedicated to the establishment of marine national parks will be expended should the legislation establishing those parks not proceed.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Bracks Government has a policy commitment to Marine National Parks and is presently examining options for their re-introduction. Any financial expenditure regarding Marine National Parks will be considered as part of this process.

Treasurer: interstate migration

1895. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What net interstate migration is expected over the budget out years and to what extent have the estimates of economic growth over those years been adjusted to account for this factor.

ANSWER:

I am informed that: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 291

In the budget projections, population gains from net interstate migration for Victoria are based on the series R projections prepared by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. These projections assume a gradual decline from an annual gain of 7100 persons in 1999-2000 until reaching a net inflow of 2000 from 2003-04 onwards. More information about these assumptions is available in the ABS publication “Population projections, Australia, 1999 to 2101”, catalogue no. 3222.0, released 17 August 2000, especially pages 43-44 and 59-65.

The budget projections for economic growth have been derived fully consistent with these population projections.

Treasurer: job creation — rural and regional Victoria

1896. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): On what data has the Treasurer relied to claim, at the Public Accounts and Estimates Committee hearing on 1 June 2001, that more than half the new jobs in Australia in the past year were created in Victoria, and more than one in three of those jobs were in rural and regional Victoria.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Data published by the ABS on 10 May 2001 shows that of 124 500 jobs created nationwide over the year to April 2001, 53% or 66 100 of these were created in Victoria. This data also shows that over that period, 25 000, or more than one in three, of these jobs were created in rural and regional Victoria.

Treasurer: budget surplus

1897. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What documentation has been received from the Auditor-General to sustain the Treasurer’s claim that there is nothing in the assumptions underpinning the Budget which would lead the Auditor-General to not believe there will be a surplus of at least $100 million in 2001–02.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The statement is based on the Auditor’s General Report on his review of the 2001-02 Estimated Financial Statements. This report can be found in Budget Paper No. 2, Chapter 10, Estimated Financial Statements and Notes, on page 215.

Treasurer: unfunded superannuation liabilities

1898. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What assumptions have been made in respect of the Beneficiary Choice Program in projecting the expected trend in unfunded superannuation liabilities as disclosed at page 207 of Budget Paper No. 2.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The expected impact of the Beneficiary Choice Program (BCP) was included in estimating the State’s unfunded superannuation liability in the 2001-02 Budget. As stated in the Budget documents, the realisation of this impact is contingent on the take-up level achieved.

While the first BCP period for pensioners formally closed on 18 May 2001, there are approximately 7500 pensioners who are still considering, or are yet to consider, their options under the second phase of the Program. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

292 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

As the Government does not wish to prejudice the decision making process of those yet to make their choices under the BCP, the Government will not be providing an indication of the take-up rate achieved to date or the take-up rate assumed in the Budget numbers at this time. Full details of the impact of the BCP on the State’s unfunded liability as at 30 June 2001 will be revealed in the Annual Financial Statements for 2000-01 to be released by 29 October 2001.

Treasurer: workers compensation — common-law rights

1899. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What is the net impact of the restoration of common law rights to worker’s compensation on the 2001–02 Budget.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The net impact of the restoration of common law rights to worker’s compensation on the 2001-02 Budget is $27.4 million. This represents the amount of additional funding provided to departments ($20.5 million) and non-government organisations which receive funding from the Victorian Government ($6.9 million) to meet increased Work-cover premiums resulting from new common law and statutory benefits.

Housing: training for departmental and community housing workers

1900. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to training for departmental and community housing workers to assist them in dealing with clients with drug and alcohol dependency issues:

(a) Will the series of Training Needs Analysis be completed.

(b) With which members of the community sector has the Office of Housing consulted on this matter.

ANSWER:

(a) A Training Needs Analysis (TNA) is currently being undertaken for staff employed in agencies funded by the Supported Accommodation Assistance Program (SAAP).

It is anticipated the TNA will be completed by the end of 2001 and consultation will occur with both SAAP and other related sector workers and clients of the services. A key consultative input to the TNA and training strategy will come from the consultation with people who are or who have been homeless. This process is being managed through the Victorian Homelessness Strategy (VHS). As priority areas arising from the TNA are identified, targeted consultation will be arranged.

The Community Housing sector TNA will be undertaken later this year. The methodology for undertaking this TNA, including the consultation phase, is being developed in conjunction with the Community Housing Federation of Victoria (CHFOV). Consultation will occur when this TNA is conducted and the recommendations arising will inform the development of a Community Housing Training Strategy for implementation over the next three years.

Discussions are currently underway within the Department of Human Services for a TNA to be undertaken as part of the Government’s “Saving Lives” Initiative. This TNA will assist in the development of a specific drug and alcohol training strategy for Office of Housing and funded community sector staff as a means of ensuring the ongoing capacity of the sector to respond appropriately to this client group.

(b) Consultation with relevant stakeholders will occur as outlined above. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 293

Housing: training for departmental and community housing workers

1901. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to training for departmental and community housing workers to assist them in dealing with clients with drug and alcohol dependency issues, what has been the recommendation of this consultation and when will the recommendations be implemented.

ANSWER:

Discussions are currently underway within the Department of Human Services for a Training Needs Analysis (TNA) to be undertaken as part of the Government’s “Saving Lives” Initiative. The purpose of this TNA is to assist in the development of a specific drug and alcohol training strategy for Office of Housing and funded community sector staff as a means of ensuring the capacity of the sector to respond appropriately to this client group.

The methodology for undertaking a TNA is a consultative one, in which a sample of workers are directly involved in the identification of their skills and training needs. In this regard, the outcome of the consultation process is the report from the TNA and its recommendations will be used to underpin the development of the targeted training strategy. As the TNA has not yet commenced, the results of the consultative methodology are not yet available

It is anticipated that the TNA and the development of a drug and alcohol training strategy will be completed by the end of 2001.

Housing: training for departmental and community housing workers

1902. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): In relation to training for departmental and community housing workers:

(a) When will a review of the occupational health and safety procedures for community housing providers be conducted.

(b) How will the review of occupational health and safety procedures be conducted.

(c) In which regions will the review be conducted.

(d) What is the time frame for the review.

ANSWER:

A review of occupational health and safety procedures is planned to commence in September 2001. As part of this review, the boundaries between client service delivery, occupational health and safety, Residential Tenancies Act 1997 provisions and appropriate civil sanctions will be identified. This will help to ensure that workers are able to employ the most appropriate response when dealing with clients presenting with challenging behaviour. The outcome of the review will inform the development of appropriate and targeted training provision that will skill workers to make appropriate judgments to achieve safety for themselves and their fellow workers.

Treasurer: Transport Accident Commission — dividend

1903. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What dividend, if any, was imposed on the Transport Accident Commission in 2000-2001 and/or is anticipated in the framing of the budgets for 2001-02 and out years.

ANSWER:

I am informed that: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

294 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

In 2000-01, the Transport Accident Commission (“TAC”) paid dividends of $175.743 million. This payment includes a final dividend payment of $135.43 million relating to the 1990/00 financial year (total dividend for 1990/00 was $223.743 million) and $40 million in accident prevention dividend. This was lower than expected due to weaker investment returns, particularly from overseas equity markets, and an increase in the valuation of claims liabilities arising from lower domestic bond rates.

In the framing of the 2001-02 budget, and out years, the forecast dividend payments are based on the benchmark of 50 per cent of net operating profit after tax, taking into consideration other commercial factors which will affect the dividend forecasts including the views of the board of directors, the liquidity, operating cash flow and forecast cash requirements, gearing and interest cover (where relevant), retained earnings and any other specific commercial factors relating to the business.

The forecasts for dividends are only preliminary estimates and there is a high likelihood of variation to the estimates as the profitability of the TAC is subject to a number of market influences including investment returns and movements in domestic bond rates.

Treasurer: Tipstar footy tipping competition — revenue projections

1904. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What revenue projections were included in the Budget in respect of the Tipstar Footy tipping competition for the years 2000-2001, 2001-02 and out years.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The aggregate revenue projections for public lotteries in the 2001-02 Budget Papers include the revenue to be derived from the Tipstar Footy Tipping competition (as well as all other lotteries), but this revenue is not separately identified by product line.

Transport: Scoresby freeway — current vehicle numbers

1911. THE HON. G. B. ASHMAN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport):

(a) What are the latest daily vehicle numbers east and west bound on Burwood Highway between Mountain Highway and Templeton Road.

(b) What are the latest daily vehicle numbers in each direction of each road at the intersection of Burwood Highway and Stud Road.

(c) What is the estimated change in vehicle numbers at each of these locations after the construction of the Scoresby Freeway.

ANSWER:

(a) There are currently approximately 20,000 vehicles per day in each direction on Burwood Highway between Mountain Highway and Templeton Street. These volumes are predicted to increase by about 30% in year 2011. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 295

(b) & (c) Burwood Road / Stud Road Intersection

Approximate Current Predicted Change in Daily Daily Traffic Volume Traffic Volume at Year (24 hr) 2011 Stud Road – North Leg North Bound 19,000 20% reduction South Bound 19,000 20% reduction Stud Road – South Leg North Bound 24,000 30% reduction South Bound 24,000 35% reduction Burwood Highway – West Leg East Bound 20,000 25% increase West Bound 20,000 30% increase Burwood Highway – East Leg East Bound 15,000 30% increase West Bound 15,000 30% increase

Transport: Scoresby freeway — current vehicle numbers

1912. THE HON. G. B. ASHMAN — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport):

(a) What are the current vehicle numbers using Wantirna Road, Boronia Road, and Stud Road to travel from Ringwood to Burwood Highway, and what is the estimated reduction in vehicle numbers after the completion of the Scoresby Freeway.

(b) What are the current vehicle numbers using the Heatherdale Road, Canterbury Road, Wantirna Road, Boronia Road, Stud Road to Burwood Highway and what is the estimated reduction in vehicle numbers after the completion of the Scoresby freeway.

ANSWER:

(a)

Road Approximate Current Predicted Change in Daily Daily Traffic Volume Traffic Volume at Year (24 hr) 2011 Wantirna Road Maroondah Hwy to Canterbury Rd 24,000 10% reduction Canterbury Rd to Boronia Rd 28,000 30% reduction Boronia Road 44,000 No change Stud Road 40,000 20% reduction QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

296 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

(b)

Road Approximate Current Predicted Change in daily Daily Traffic Volume Traffic Volume at Year (24hr) 2011

Heatherdale Road 15,000 70% reduction Canterbury Road 49,000 10% increase Wantirna Road Canterbury Rd to Boronia Rd 28,000 30% reduction Boronia Road 44,000 No change Stud Road 40,000 20% reduction

Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority — chairman

1931. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What are the terms and conditions of Mr James MacKenzie’s appointment as Chair of the Victorian Workcover Authority.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Under section 26 of the Accident Compensation Act 1985 (the Act), the Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister, appoint part-time Directors of the Board from time to time, being persons who have such managerial, commercial or other qualifications or experience as the Minister considers necessary to enable the Authority to perform its functions and exercise its powers.

A part-time Director may hold office for a term not exceeding five years as is specified in the instrument of appointment and is entitled to be paid such remuneration as is specified in the instrument of appointment.

Section 27 of the Act provides that the Governor in Council may appoint one of the Directors to be Chairperson.

Mr James MacKenzie was appointed as Chairperson of the Victorian WorkCover Authority Board for the period 23 February 2001 to 11 December 2003 (both dates inclusive).

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission — chairman

1932. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What are the terms and conditions of Mr James MacKenzie’s appointment as Chair of the Transport Accident Commission.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Section 15(2) of the Transport Accident Act 1986 (the Act), provides that the Board of the Transport Accident Commission is to consist of not less than 4, and not more than 9 Directors appointed by the Governor in Council on the nomination of the Minister.

Section 16(1) of the Act requires that the term of appointment be specified in the instrument of appointment, and the term of appointment be limited to three years. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 297

Under section 16(6) of the Act, a Director is entitled to be paid such remuneration as is specified in the instrument of appointment or as may be fixed from time to time by the Governor in Council; and such travelling and other allowances and expenses as may be fixed from time to time by the Governor in Council.

Mr James MacKenzie was appointed as Chairperson of the Transport Accident Commission Board for the period 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2002 (both dates inclusive).

Premier: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1933. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Premier): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Premier’s office, department or any agency within the Department of Premier and Cabinet; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

State and Regional Development: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1934. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s office, department or any agency within the Department of State and Regional Development; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie to the date of the Question on Notice, 20 June 2001.

In relation to the Department of State and Regional Development, I am advised that the Department has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie to the date of the Question on Notice, 20 June 2001.

In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Treasurer: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1935. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Treasurer’s office, department or any agency within the Department of Treasury and Finance; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am informed that: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

298 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

My office or the Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Transport: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1936. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s office, department or any agency within the Department of Infrastructure; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

My office has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Finance: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1937. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Finance): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s office, department or any agency within the Department of Treasury and Finance; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

My office or the Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Energy and Resources: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1940. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am informed that the Department of Natural Resources and Environment has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Environment and Conservation: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1941. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Environment and Conservation): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 299

of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment has not entered into a contract with Mr James Mackenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Agriculture: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1942. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Agriculture): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment has not entered into a contract with Mr James Mackenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Local Government: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1943. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Health: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1944. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Health): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am advised that for the period from 20 October 1999 until 20 June 2001 the Department of Human Services has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Arts: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1945. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Arts): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

300 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Multicultural Affairs: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1946. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Multicultural Affairs): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

I am advised that the Department of Premier and Cabinet has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Industrial Relations: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1947. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations: Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie to the date of the Question on Notice, 20 June 2001. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Planning: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1948. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Planning): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of Infrastructure has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 301

Major Projects and Tourism: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1950. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie to the date of the Question on Notice, 20 June 2001. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Gaming: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1951. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD – To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Gaming): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of Treasury and Finance has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Education: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1952. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Education): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of Education, Employment and Training has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Police and Emergency Services: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1953. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Police and Emergency Services): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

1. I am not aware that the Department of Justice has entered into any arrangement of this type with Mr James MacKenzie

2. I also not aware of whether he is associated with any companies and, if so, the names of those companies. The Honourable Member should provide more specific detail regarding company names or what he considers constitutes “associated with”. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

302 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1954. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am informed as follows:

I am advised that the Department of Education, Employment and Training has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Corrections: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1955. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Corrections): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

1. I am not aware that the Department of Justice has entered into any arrangement of this type with Mr James MacKenzie

2. I also not aware of whether he is associated with any companies and, if so, the names of those companies. The Honourable Member should provide more specific detail regarding company names or what he considers constitutes “associated with”.

Attorney-General: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1958. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Attorney-General): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Attorney-General’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

1. I am not aware that the Department of Justice has entered into any arrangement of this type with Mr James MacKenzie

2. I am also not aware of whether he is associated with any companies and, if so, the names of those companies. The Honourable Member should provide more specific detail regarding company names or what he considers constitutes “associated with”.

Community Services: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1959. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 303

ANSWER:

I am advised that for the period from 20 October 1999 until 20 June 2001 the Department of Human Services has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Housing: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1961. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Housing): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am advised that for the period from 20 October 1999 until 20 June 2001 the Department of Human Services has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Aboriginal Affairs: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1962. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs): Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

The Department of Natural Resources and Environment has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Small Business: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1963. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement.

ANSWER:

I am advised that the Department of State and Regional Development has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie to the date of the Question on Notice, 20 June 2001. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Consumer Affairs: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1964. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Consumer Affairs: Does Mr James MacKenzie, current Chairman of the Victorian Workcover Authority, or any company associated with him, have a contract or a retainer with the Minister’s department; if so, what are the costs of the arrangement. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

304 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

ANSWER:

1. I am advised that the Department of Justice has not entered into a contract with Mr James MacKenzie. In relation to companies with which Mr MacKenzie may be associated, the Member may wish to specify any companies with which he has a concern.

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission chairman

1965. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What are the duties of the Chairman of the Transport Accident Commission.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The powers and duties of the Board of Management are set out in section 15(1) of the Transport Accident Act 1986.

Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1966. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What are the duties of the Chairman of Workcover.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The power and duties of the Chairperson of the Victorian WorkCover Authority Board of Management are set out in section 27(3)(a) of the Accident Compensation Act 1985.

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission chairman

1967. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What is the expected time commitment on a weekly basis of the Chairman of Transport Accident Commission in order to fulfil his duties.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The time commitment of the Chairperson of the Transport Accident Commission Board of Management is determined by the individual and is that time necessary to fulfil their statutory obligations as a Director and as Chairperson.

Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1968. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What is the expected time commitment on a weekly basis of the Chairman Workcover in order to fulfil his duties.

ANSWER:

I am informed that: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 305

The time commitment of the Chairperson of the Victorian WorkCover Authority Board of Management is determined by the individual and is that time necessary to fulfil their statutory obligations as a Director and as Chairperson.

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission chairman

1969. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What is the annual remuneration package of the Chairman of the Transport Accident Commission including all benefits and entitlements.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Under section 16(6)(b) of the Transport Accident Act 1986 a Director is entitled to be paid such travelling and other allowances and expenses as may be fixed from time to time by the Governor in Council.

The annual remuneration package of the Chairperson of the Transport Accident Commission is within the band of $70,000 - $79,999.

Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority chairman

1970. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What is the annual remuneration package of the Chairman of Workcover including all benefits and entitlements.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Under section 26(3) of the Accident Compensation Act 1985 a part-time Director is entitled to be paid:

(a) such remuneration as is specified in the instrument of appointment or as may be fixed from time to time by the Governor in Council; and

(b) such travelling and other allowances and expenses as may be fixed from time to time by the Governor in Council.

The annual remuneration package of the Chairperson of the Victorian WorkCover Authority is within the band of $70,000 - $79,999.

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission board

1971. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What policy is in place in relation to conflicts of interest of board members of the Transport Accident Commission.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Government guidelines require that prior to the appointment of a director to a Government body, the candidate must provide a declaration of private interests which is reviewed by the responsible Minister. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

306 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

In addition to this requirement, Direction 9.4 under the Financial Management Act 1994, requires directors of the Transport Accident Commission Board of Management to provide an updated declaration of private interests on an annual basis.

Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority board

1972. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): What policy is in place in relation to conflicts of interest of board members of Workcover.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Government guidelines require that prior to the appointment of a director to a Government body, the candidate must provide a declaration of private interests which is reviewed by the responsible Minister.

In addition to this requirement, Direction 9.4 under the Financial Management Act 1994, requires directors of the Victorian WorkCover Authority Board of Management to provide an updated declaration of private interests on an annual basis.

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission and Victorian Workcover Authority — chairman

1973. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): How will the Government ensure that potential conflicts of interest between the Transport Accident Commission and Workcover are avoided or resolved while these two organisations have a common Chairman.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Any potential conflict of interest will be identified through the requirements under Direction 9.4 under the Financial Management Act 1994. This requires directors of both the Transport Accident Commission and the Victorian WorkCover Authority Boards to provide an updated declaration of private interests on an annual basis.

Guidelines pertaining to the declaration of private interests require that where a conflict of interest arises, there may be a number of alternative options for management and resolution. Ultimately the appropriate action/s will be determined on a ‘case by case’ basis through mutual discussion and agreement.

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission board

1974. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): Will any existing board members of the Transport Accident Commission be reappointed by the Government on the expiration of their current term; if so, on what basis will this decision of reappointment be made.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Prior to the terms of appointment for current members of the Transport Accident Commission Board expiring, the Government will assess the membership of the Board.

Any decision to re-appoint a Director or appoint a new Director will be based on the relevant skills and experienced of the candidates and how these complement the current members of the Board. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 307

Workcover: Victorian Workcover Authority board

1975. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): Will any existing board members of Workcover be reappointed by the Government on the expiration of their current term; if so, on what basis will this decision of reappointment be made.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Prior to the terms of appointment for current members of the Victorian WorkCover Authority Board expiring, the Government will assess the membership of the Board.

Any decision to re-appoint a Director or appoint a new Director will be based on the relevant skills and experienced of the candidates and how these complement the current members of the Board.

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission board

1976. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): Was Professor Stephen Cordner advised by the Government of its intention not to reappoint him as a board member of the Transport Accident Commission prior to the article that appeared in the Australian Financial Review on 19 June 2001; if so, when and by what means.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Government made a decision not to re-appoint Professor Stephen Cordner as a Director of the Transport Accident Commission. In addition, Professor Cordner made it clear that he had no intention of continuing on the Board, after his term had expired on 30 June 2001.

The Government’s decision was conveyed to Professor Stephen Cordner prior to 19 June 2001.

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission board

1977. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): Is it government policy to publicly announce the intention not to re-appoint board members of the Transport Accident Commission in the media prior to the board member actually being informed of that decision.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

There is no express Government policy regarding Transport Accident Commission Board members, but the usual practice is for any decision not to reappoint being conveyed to the relevant Transport Accident Commission Board member before any public announcement.

Workcover: Transport Accident Commission chairman

1978. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): Is it the Government’s intention to continue the appointment of Mr James MacKenzie as Chairman of the Transport Accident Commission beyond his initial 12 month appointment. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

308 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The appointment of Mr James MacKenzie as Chairperson of the Transport Accident Commission Board is for a one-year period. An executive search will be undertaken to determine the appropriate person to fill the position on a long-term basis.

Ports: ministerial staff

1979. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost.

ANSWER:

All staff working in my office are employed by the Premier. Therefore, there are no Ministerial staff employed by me working in my office.

As at 30 May 2001, no staff working in my office were on secondment from the Victorian Public Service.

Youth Affairs: ministerial staff

1980. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Youth Affairs: As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost.

ANSWER:

All staff in my office are employed by the Premier. Therefore there are no Ministerial staff employed by me working in my office.

Two members of staff were on secondment from the Victorian Public Service as at 30 May 2001.

The Honourable Member may wish to refer to the Budget Papers for details on expenditure.

Consumer Affairs: ministerial staff

1981. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Consumer Affairs: As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost.

ANSWER:

All staff in my office are employed by the Premier. Therefore there are no Ministerial staff employed by me in my office.

One member of staff was on secondment from the Victorian Public Service as at 30 May 2001.

The honourable member may wish to refer to the budget Papers for details on expenditure. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 309

Sport and Recreation: ministerial staff

1982. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation: As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost.

ANSWER:

All staff in my office are employed by the Premier. Therefore there are no Ministerial staff employed by me working in my office.

Two members of staff were on secondment from the Victorian Public Service as at 30 May 2001.

The Honourable Member may wish to refer to the Budget Papers for details on expenditure.

Energy and Resources: ministerial staff

1986. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost.

ANSWER:

All staff working in my office are employed by the Premier. Therefore, there are no Ministerial staff employed by me working in my office.

As at 30 May 2001, no staff working in my office were on secondment from the VPS.

Small Business: ministerial staff

1987. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost.

ANSWER:

All staff in my office are employed by the Premier. Therefore there are no Ministerial staff employed by me working in my office.

One member of staff was on secondment from the Victorian Public Service as at 30 May 2001.

The honourable member may wish to refer to the Budget Papers for details on expenditure.

Industrial Relations: ministerial staff

1988. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations: As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

310 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

ANSWER:

All staff working in my office are employed by the Premier. Therefore, there are no Ministerial staff employed by me working in my office.

As at 30 May 2001, no staff working in my office were on secondment from the Victorian Public Service.

The Honourable Member may wish to refer to the Budget Papers for details on expenditure.

It is not considered appropriate that names of staff be provided.

Health: ministerial staff

1989. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Health): As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost.

ANSWER:

Two members of staff from my office were on secondment from the Victorian Public Service as at 30 May 2001.

All other staff working in my office are employed by the Premier. Therefore, there are no Ministerial staff employed by me working in my office.

The Honourable Member may wish to refer to the Budget Papers for details on expenditure.

Workcover: ministerial staff

1991. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Workcover): As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

All staff working in my office are employed by the Premier. Therefore, there are no Ministerial staff employed by me working in my office. As at 30 May 2001, no staff working in my office were on secondment from the Victorian Public Service.

Arts: ministerial staff

1992. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Arts): As at 30 May 2001, how many staff were employed by the Minister — (i) in the Minister’s office as Ministerial staff, what are their names and what is the cost; and (ii) on secondment from the Victoria Public Service, what are their names and what is the cost.

ANSWER:

I advise that:

All staff working in the Office of the Minister for Arts are employed by the Premier. Therefore, there are no Ministerial staff employed by me in the Office of the Minister for Arts. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 311

The Member may wish to refer to the Budget Papers for details on expenditure.

Environment and Conservation: West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority

1995. THE HON. P. R. HALL — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Environment and Conservation): In relation to the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority, for each of the financial years 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 2001-02 respectively, will the Minister provide details of — (i) the actual or projected operating revenue; (ii) funding provided by the Government and the purposes of this funding; and (iii) expenditure on the willow reduction program.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

(i) Actual or projected operating revenue of the WGCMA is documented and reported each year in the Annual Report as tabled in Parliament. The 1999/2000 Report contains the figures for that year.

For 2000-2001 actual revenue is $9,182,035

Estimated revenue for 2001-2002 cannot be accurately provided at this stage as decisions by the Commonwealth are yet to be finalised about successful Natural Heritage Trust projects.

Funding provided by the State Government through the Catchment and Water Program of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment is identified in the CMA’s annual Regional Management Plan. These plans detail specific activities based on priorities determined in the Regional Catchment Strategy.

1998-1999 $3,957,000 1999-2000 $5,178,000 2000-2001 $4,975,000 * 2001-2002 $5,440,000

* This figure represents a reduction in waterway funding to West Gippsland to fund high priority projects by other Catchment Management Authorities. The figure is still substantially higher than the waterway allocation to West Gippsland in 1998-1999 and is significantly higher than waterway allocations to any other CMA in 2000-01.

(iii) Expenditure on the Willow Reduction Program is determined by the funding priorities of the CMA Board.

Ports: channel deepening

1996. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What funding has been provided in the 2001-02 Budget and out years for channel deepening in Victorian ports.

ANSWER:

There has been no Budget allocation in 2001-02 and out years for channel deepening in Victorian Ports. The Victorian Channels Authority is currently undertaking pre-feasibility studies into Channel Deepening in Port Phillip. The studies are expected to be completed by the end of October 2001.

Ports: port and shipping revenues

1997. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What revenues were derived from port and shipping activities in 2000-01 and what is the estimate for 2001-02. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

312 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

ANSWER:

Revenues derived by publicly owned port corporations in respect of operational port and shipping activities during 2000/01 were as follows:

– Melbourne Port Corporation – $78.5 million

– Victorian Channels Authority – $19.4 million

Revenue estimates for 2001/02 are not publicly available.

Ports: Linking Victoria program

1998. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What infrastructure projects relevant to the Ports portfolio have been approved for 2001-02 under the “Linking Victoria” program, and what level of funding has been provided in 2001-02 and out years.

ANSWER:

Infrastructure projects announced under “Linking Victoria” and relevant to the Ports portfolio which have been approved for 2001/02 include (1) rail standardisation ($96 million over 5 years); and (2) the construction of the Albury-Wodonga Rail Bypass ($30 million over 3 years).

Ports: channel deepening

1999. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: When does the government expect to have the Victorian Channels Authority’s assessment on the economic, environmental and technical aspects of Port Phillip Channel deepening, and will this assessment be made publicly available when received.

ANSWER:

The Victorian Channels Authority (VCA) has advised me that it anticipates providing to me its assessment of the economic, environmental and technical aspects of the proposed Port Phillip Channel Deepening by the end of October 2001. The technical reports which form the basis of VCA’s assessment will be made publicly available.

Ports: traffic targets

2000. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: On what date will the 30 per cent target of traffic entering and leaving Victorian ports by rail be achieved.

ANSWER:

No specific date has been set to achieve the 30 per cent target.

Ports: boat operator licensing fees

2001. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What revenue is expected from boat operator licensing fees in 2001-02, and how much of that revenue will be consumed in operational costs as opposed to the promotion of water safety.

ANSWER:

Revenue from recreational boat operator licensing for the year 2001/2002 is estimated at $2,960,000. As part of the Boating Safety Funding Program $2,000,000 has been made available in 2001/2002 for boating safety programs. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 313

Expenditure is expected to be $1,750,000 for 2001/2002.

In 2000/2001 a total of $4,125,000 has already been allocated for system development and implementation costs.

Ports: Coode Island berthing structure

2002. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What funds (if any) have been allocated in the 2001-02 Budget to provide a berthing structure for Coode Island.

ANSWER:

No funds have been allocated in the 2001/02 Budget to provide for a berthing structure for Coode Island.

In 2000/01, the Government (through the Department of State and Regional Development) provided a grant of $3.7 million to the Melbourne Port Corporation (MPC) to carry out berth upgrade works at Coode Island.

Ports: grain exports

2003. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What revenue was generated by grain exports through Victorian ports in 2000-01 and what is the estimate for 2001-02.

ANSWER:

Revenue data for grain exports are not available.

Forecasts for 2001/02 are not available.

Ports: grain exports

2004. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What additional grain exports have been handled since the $40 million Port of Melbourne grain terminal was opened in August 2000.

ANSWER:

During 2000/01, 880,000 revenue tonnes of grain went through the ABA grain facility at Appleton Dock. Of this volume, approximately 45% was trade diverted from NSW.

Ports: rail standardisation project

2005. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What funding was directed to the Port of Geelong rail standardisation project in 2000-01, what has been allocated in the 2001-02 Budget, and will this complete the project.

ANSWER:

The Department of Infrastructure allocated funding of $170,000 in 2000-01.

Construction work is being funded jointly by the Government (via its Regional Infrastructure Development Fund - $1.9 million) in 2001/01. The balance of the funding to complete the project is sourced from the private-sector. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

314 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Ports: Victorian economy

2006. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: In respect of the claim that the Port of Melbourne now contributes $5.8 billion per annum to the Victorian economy, what are the major components of this contribution, and how are these measured.

ANSWER:

I am advised by the Melbourne Port Corporation (MPC) that the key components of Port of Melbourne contribution to GSP ($5.8 billion) are –

Operational impact $1, 498M Global efficiency impact $4, 341M TOTAL $5, 839M

Operational impact = contribution of the port to the economy as a result of the value added or income generated by the port industry.

Global efficiency impact = the contribution of the port to economic activity as a result of its cost advantage over alternate transport modes (principally land transport to another port)

Ports: food and fibre exports

2007. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What progress is anticipated over 2001-02 in respect of the government’s target of $12 billion exports of food and fibre by 2010.

ANSWER:

The Department of State and Regional Development (DSRD) has advised that during 2000/01, the export of food commodities from Victoria totalled $6.64 billion. The aggregate value of food and fibre exports over this period was $7.52 billion.

Further progress towards the $12 billion target is anticipated over 2001/02.

Ports: freight and logistics committee

2008. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Ports: What funding has been allocated in the 2001-02 Budget to resource the Freight and Logistics Committee.

ANSWER:

The Freight and Logistics Committee is supported by a secretariat within the Ports and Marine Division of the Department of Infrastructure. $350,000 has been allocated from the 2001— 02 budget for the development of the Victorian Freight and Logistics Strategy.

Energy and Resources: oil and gas exploration permits

2009. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: How many permits for oil and gas exploration were issued during 2000-01, to what value, and what are the estimates for 2001-02.

ANSWER:

I am informed that: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 315

During 2000-01:

– two new offshore permits with a total estimated value of $24,170,000 were granted; and

– eleven onshore permits with a total estimated value of $20,380,000 were renewed

It is anticipated that exploration expenditure for 2001-02 will be similar to the level for 2000-01.

Energy and Resources: gas pipelines

2010. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: What cost, revenue and risk factors arise for Victoria from the development of the Longford to Tasmania and Iona to Adelaide gas pipelines.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The costs for Victoria arising from development of these pipelines are the normal costs associated with providing regulatory approvals. These costs are recovered by the charging of fees that are provided for under the Pipelines Act 1967, the Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1982 and the Commonwealth Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1967.

The revenue from pipelines is based on a per kilometre fee onshore (currently $162/km/year) and offshore (currently $80/km/year).

The normal risks associated with building pipelines apply to these two proposed pipelines. These risks are addressed in the safety and environment case submitted by the proponent.

Energy and Resources: minerals and resources revenue

2011. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: What were the major components of the $21.7 million revenue reported by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment in respect of “Minerals and Resources” (Output Group 401) for 1999-2000 and why was this substantially greater than the previous year.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Reported operating revenue to Output Group 401 for 1999-2000 was $21,728,000, an increase of $4.67m over the previous financial year. The majority of this amount was for an expanded role and greater commitments to improving energy use by the Sustainable Energy Authority Victoria.

Energy and Resources: fisheries revenue

2012. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: What were the major components of the $33.5 million revenue reported by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment in respect of Fisheries (Output Group 404) for 1999-2000, and why was there such a dramatic increase compared to the previous year.

ANSWER:

I am informed that: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

316 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

The major components of the $33.5 million operating revenue reported by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment in respect of Fisheries (Output Group 404) for 1999-2000 were:

State Funding $28.87m External Revenue $3.08m Net Assets $1.58m

Revenue for the Fisheries Output Group increased from the previous year as follows:

– State funding increased by $10.37m due mainly to the introduction of the Recreational Fishing Licence ($4m) and additional funding to assist with the buy-out of commercial fishing licences ($5m).

– External Revenue increased by $2.36m due to incorporation of Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute (MAFRI) back into the Department requiring that external sources of revenue for the Institute be incorporated in the NRE Financial Report.

– Net Assets increased by $0.84m due to redevelopment of MAFRI Snobs Creek facility.

Energy and Resources: inland and coastal fishing licences

2013. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: What revenue was derived from licences for inland and coastal fishing in 2000-01, and what is the estimate for 2001-02.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

There is no distinction between licences for inland and coastal fishing. Revenue from Recreational Fishing Licences is as follows:

2000-01 2001-02 (estimated) $3.85 m $3.8 m

Energy and Resources: yabby aquaculture

2014. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: What demonstrable effect upon production volumes and export earnings can be attributed to the Yabby Aquaculture Development Strategy.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Since the release of the Yabby Aquaculture Development Strategy in February 2000, six multi-waters Aquaculture Licences have been issued across regional Victoria. Each licence has established harvesting arrangements with other land-holders, with more than sixty separate properties listed, featuring more than 150 farm dams. A further forty properties are scheduled to be listed in the near future. Industry forecasts indicate production of yabbies in this financial year will exceed 40 tonne, more than a two-fold increase on the previous years’ total industry yabby production. Industry has indicated that as a result of increased production, significant export yabby sales should be achieved. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 317

Energy and Resources: relocation of Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute

2015. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: What funding has been allocated in the 2001-02 Budget for the relocation of MAFRI and does this represent the total cost of relocation.

ANSWER:

Funding allocated in the 2001-02 Budget for the re-location of MAFRI is $13.96 million.

The total cost of the project will not be finalised until the EPA works approval process has been completed.

Energy and Resources: fisheries

2016. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: Why is the output “Fisheries” included in the Energy and Resources portfolio.

ANSWER:

The allocation of Ministerial portfolio responsibilities is the prerogative of the Premier of the day.

Energy and Resources: greenhouse gases

2017. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources:

(a) What targets have been adopted for greenhouse gases in Victoria.

(b) How do these compare with international benchmarks.

(c) What funding has been allocated to this issue in the 2001-02 Budget.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

(a) No target level has been set for greenhouse gases in Victoria.

(b) If Australia ratifies the Kyoto Protocol it will have a target of 108% of 1990 emissions in the period 2008-2012.

(c) The 2001-02 budget for greenhouse programs is $11.5M, in addition to the $15M provided to the Sustainable Energy Authority Victoria (of which $5M is solar hot water rebates) and $1M through the Department of State and Regional Development to the Co-operative Research Centre for Clean Power from Lignite.

Energy and Resources: solar heating grants

2018. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: What was the number and value of solar heating grants allocated in 2000-01 and what are the figures for 2001-02.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

In 2000-01 a total of 2,272 solar water heaters were installed and contracted for a total grant allocation of $2,127,744.

For 2001-02 the budget is $6,850,000 (including a carryover of $1.85M unspent from 2000-01). QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

318 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Energy and Resources: electricity consumption

2019. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources:

(a) How many days did electricity consumption reach peak demand in 2000-01.

(b) What were the highest levels of megawatts demand reached during those days.

(c) How does this compare with the intended demand output to be generated by the peak demand power station in the Latrobe Valley.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

(a) According to Nemmco’s Statement of Opportunities published on 30 March 2001, Victoria reached its peak electricity consumption on 8 February 2000.

(b) The electricity consumption in Victoria on 8 February 2001 was 8088MW.

(c) The Edison Mission International subsidiary, Valley Power, is proposing to construct a 300 MW gas fired peaking plant on the 3/4 Bench at Loy Yang in the Latrobe Valley. Allowing for assumptions regarding availability of the plant, Nemmco advises that the plant is expected to be able to contribute up to 270 MW of supply at peak demand into the national electricity market. Compared with Victoria’s summer peak demand in 2000/01 of 8088MW, this represents 3.3 per cent.

Energy and Resources: aquaculture industry — performance measures

2020. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: Why has the Government decided to no longer employ private sector investment levels as a performance measure in respect of the aquaculture industry.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The measure of new private investment in aquaculture was discontinued in 2000-01. It was considered to be inconsistent with the Department of Treasury and Finance Guidelines for the specification of Output Performance measures under the Management Reform Program. Specifically it was considered to be an indicator of one of the Outcomes of the Output and was not within the direct control of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment or directly related to activities undertaken in the Output. Accordingly it was considered inappropriate for the purpose of certification of Output Revenue in the quarterly reporting process.

Private sector investment information on aquaculture is still gathered by the Department and information for 2000-01 will be available shortly.

Energy and Resources: coastal fishing enforcement operations

2021. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources: What funding has been allocated in the 2001-02 Budget for coastal fishing enforcement operations and how does this compare to the previous year.

ANSWER:

I am informed that: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 319

The budget allocated for coastal fishing enforcement in 2001-02 is $6.02 million compared to $5.62 million in 2000-01. This figure is the amount budgeted for all coastal fishing enforcement including illegal coastal fishing.

Workcover: TAC and VWA — overlap of responsibility

2022. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): On what particular provision of the law did the Minister rely to report, as he did to the Public Accounts and Estimates Committee on 2 August 2001, that the quantum of any periodic payment required by way of reimbursement for the overlap of responsibilities of the Transport Accident Commission and the Victorian WorkCover Authority would be determined legally.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Payments between the TAC and VWA occur under two separate arrangements. Recovery rights of each organisation are set out in various sections of their respective legislation. These provisions define the legal entitlements of the parties and establish the framework for payments.

The second arrangement centres on disputes involving claimants dealing with both TAC and VWA. In these cases disputes are dealt with under an established protocol agreed by both organisations. Senior managers of TAC and VWA meet in accordance with that protocol to resolve disputes in accordance with the terms of the inter-agency agreement.

Workcover: premiums

2023. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): Given the Minister’s claims regarding a turnaround in the performance of the WorkCover scheme, why has he summarily dismissed any prospect of a reduction in premiums in the short term.

ANSWER:

A key objective in premium setting is stability. The overall financial performance of schemes such as WorkCover is determined by the rise and fall of liabilities and investment returns. It would be unreasonable to increase and decrease premiums annually according to the saw-toothing effect of these influences, particularly those attributable to investment markets. A preferable and more responsible approach is to set premiums at a level sensitive to medium to long-term established trends in the fundamentals in the scheme.

Workcover: return on investments

2024. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): Why was the Victorian WorkCover Authority’s return on investments for 2000-01 so dramatically lower than the previous year.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

VWA’s return on investment was significantly lower than in the previous year (a return of 6.8% compared to 14.8% in the previous year) due to prevailing market conditions.

The VWA experience of lower investment returns in 2000-01 is common to many public and private agencies with funds under management. In this respect comparisons with like funds or 3 rolling averages are better measures of performance than year to year comparisons. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

320 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

It is noteworthy that VWA’s investment strategy did not change between the two years, and that the return of 6.8% was above average and comfortably exceeds the benchmark return of 5.14%. This return places VWA in the top quartile of “growth” fund returns according to the Intech Growth survey.

Further, over the 3 years to June 2001 the fund has returned 10% p.a. (after fees) relative to estimated average weekly earnings growth of 3.7% p.a., hence a 6.3% real return has been achieved. This compares favourably with the target of 4% over three years.

Workcover: common law

2025. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): How does the Minister explain the apparent inconsistency in his evidence to the Public Accounts and Estimates Committee in August 2001 that the turnaround in liability trends for the last 6 months of the 2000-01 year demonstrates that common law can be managed in a WorkCover scheme when his formal presentation notes that it is “too early for new common-law experience to become apparent”.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The most recent actuarial valuation of the financial position of the WorkCover Scheme showed that there had been a significant improvement over the last six months as evidenced by the outstanding claims liability at 30 June 2001 being $130m less than that projected from the 31 December 2000 actuarial valuation. The most significant factor in this turn around has been improvements in the management of common law cases.

How well the surge of old common law claims has been managed over the last six months is indicative of the improved common law processes of case preparation and management that has been put in place.

However it should be emphasised that it will take some years before a sufficient number of new common law claims have been processed (ie lodged, managed and resolved) before the new common law experience is fully reflected in the Scheme’s liabilities.

It is the establishment of this capability based on the best work practices of the TAC Scheme and the VWA’s early results that gives me confidence that new common law can be managed equally effectively. There is no inconsistency in this evidence. It is reasonable to extrapolate from existing common law matters to the handling of, as yet unlodged, new common law matters.

Workcover: funding

2026. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): If the operation of the WorkCover scheme has been so clearly turned around, as the Minister testified to the Public Accounts and Estimates Committee on 2 August 2001, why has the funding level of the scheme declined from 91.2 per cent as at 30 June 2000 to the 87.5 per cent he reported in respect of 30 June 2001.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The short answer to the question is that most of the movement can be attributed to the Scheme’s liabilities deteriorating substantially over the first six months due to an unanticipated surge in pre 1997 common law claims and then significantly improving due to the implementation of the new common law unit.

The most significant factor in the deterioration in liabilities over the first six months is the surge in pre 1997 common law numbers, which occurred in August 2000. This surge accounted for nearly 85% of the difference QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 321

between the liability position projected to 31 December 2000 from the 30 June 2000 actuarial valuation of $4,811m and the actual position of $5,532m, an increase of $721m.

The VWA’s results for the second half of the year have shown a significant improvement with the outstanding liability at 30 June 2001 of $5,516m being some $130m less than that projected from the 31 December 2000 actuarial valuation of $5,646m.

The main contributor to the improved performance being the management of old common law claims which is the subject of a separate question. In fact TaylorFry (one of the actuarial firms) stated:

“So far from the 2000 surge we have seen every trend improving, with higher denial rates, less appeals and lower settlement costs. The signs are very positive.”

Workcover: Treasury contribution

2027. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for WorkCover): How is the annual contribution by the Department of Treasury and Finance to the Victorian WorkCover Authority in respect of public health and safety determined.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The Department of State and Regional Development’s (DSRD) occupational health and safety (OHS) functions were transferred to the Victorian WorkCover Authority (VWA) in July 1996. At this time the Department of Treasury and Finance (DTF), VWA and DSRD established a funding agreement based on the historical funding level, taking into account the fees and penalties payable to VWA under the Accident Compensation Act 1996 (the Act), such as revenue from registration, licence, certification and inspection fees and penalties.

This agreement covered the 1996/97 to 1999/00 financial years. During this period VWA presented a funding proposal each year for health and safety activities. These proposals were based on the forward estimates advised to the VWA by DTF in 1996/97.

The funding level for the 2000/01 financial year was based on a continuation of the funding agreement that was in existence from 1996/97 to 1999/00. However, it was adjusted to allow for the productivity savings for the 2000/01 financial year, and the prior 3 years, which VWA had not been asked to meet.

The 2001/02 Budget included $6.225 million for VWA public safety initiatives (refer Budget Paper No. 3).

Local Government: beach cleaning

2029. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government): What inspection procedures have been implemented to ensure that the beach cleaning best practice guidelines have been complied with.

ANSWER:

The Victorian Beach Cleaning Best Practice Guidelines were developed in consultation with local government and a variety of interested parties and were designed to assist responsible authorities to keep Victoria’s beaches clean and safe.

They were intended to be applied in a sympathetic way recognising that different needs are generated by differing local circumstances. They were not meant to be prescriptive but were designed to encourage beach managers to consider their cleaning policy in light of the beach cleaning model which was developed during the project and outlined in the guidelines. Therefore no audits or inspections of beach cleaning practices have been carried out QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

322 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

given that the application of the guidelines is not enforceable. Beach managers may have performed their own inspections to gauge how the implementation of new best practices have affected the beach environment.

The implementation of the guidelines has been encouraged via the establishment of the Victorian Beach Cleaning Best Practice Committee (VBCBPC) to foster networks and facilitate forums, which will continue for a two year period. A central data collection agency will be established by the VBCBPC and this data will be analysed and trends reported on to assist local government in implementing best practices in beach cleaning. In addition the revised subsidy arrangements seek to encourage best practice by sanctioning a component of the funding pool to be submission based on beach cleaning projects displaying best practices.

Local Government: beach cleaning

2030. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government): Has any funding been provided in the 2001-02 Budget to assist councils to comply with the beach cleaning best practice guidelines issued by the Government.

ANSWER:

The Victorian Beach Cleaning Best Practice Guidelines were designed to assist responsible authorities to keep Victoria’s beaches clean and safe and to ensure that the natural beach environment is valued and protected.

It is important to note that the guidelines are not meant to be prescriptive and do not constitute a document to be “complied” with. They are to be used as a tool to assist councils determine their particular beach circumstances and guide in the best practices to be implemented to clean the beaches in their particular environment. Councils claiming a subsidy are however required to demonstrate that best practices in beach cleaning pertaining to their particular environment have been adopted.

Specific funds have been applied for councils to implement the guidelines however the funding to be sanctioned in the next funding round for 2001/2002 will target projects exhibiting best practices in beach cleaning. This will be approximately $100,000 of a pool of approximately $1.31 million.

Local Government: beach cleaning

2031. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government): What criteria are employed by the Government to determine the allocation of beach cleaning subsidies to municipalities.

ANSWER:

The subsidy is basically a part reimbursement of expenditure incurred over the summer beach-cleaning season which spans 1 October to 30 April. In the 2000/2001 year the funds have been allocated solely on a pro-rata of eligible expenditure basis to the total pool. The total funds allocated in Victoria were $ 1.29 million.

Revised terms and conditions were prepared following the review of funding arrangements conducted by the Beach Cleaning Funding Working Party in December 2000. The terms and conditions specify:

1. The entities that are eligible to receive a subsidy 2. The period of year assessed 3. The area and type of beach eligible 4. Approved works 5. Emptying of rubbish receptacles and sharps containers 6. On-costs and plant charges 7. Conformance with best practice 8. Data collection 9. Certification QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 323

Attached is a copy of the expanded terms and conditions on which the current subsidy was assessed.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BEACH CLEANING SUBSIDY 2000/2001

1. Entities Eligible to Receive Subsidy:

1.1. The subsidy is restricted to coastal and inland waterway beaches that are within the jurisdiction of municipal councils.

1.2. The work may be undertaken by the council directly, outsourced to contractors, undertaken by voluntary groups or undertaken by Committees of Management established under the Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978 who are reimbursed by the Council; and that

1.3. Works on Crown Land remaining under the control of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment do not attract the subsidy.

2. Period of Year Assessed

2.1. Eligible Council expenditure incurred between 1 October 2000 and 30 April 2001 will be considered for the subsidy.

2.2. Only the immediately passed season’s beach cleaning expenditure will be assessed.

3. Area and Type of Beach Eligible

3.1. The subsidy is only available towards the expenditure incurred in meeting council responsibilities for cleaning the sanded areas of beaches and inland waterways.

3.2. “Sand” is defined as any fine granulated natural surface directly abutting the water, including fine pebbles.

3.3. The cleaning of sand dunes forming part of the beach is eligible for expenditure reimbursement.

3.4. The cleaning of adjacent non-sanded areas is ineligible.

3.5. The areas of a beach eligible for funding should encompass areas recommended in the Syringes on Victorian Beaches Taskforce Report, including area around stormwater drain outfalls; and that

3.6. The cleaning of grassy verges and riverbanks and the mowing of adjacent grassy areas are specifically excluded from the cost of beach cleaning.

4. Approved Works

4.1. The funding is available for recurrent expenditure purposes only.

4.2. Costs associated with plant purchases are excluded (the issue of plant charges is dealt with under On-Costs and Plant Charges).

4.3. The costs of replenishing sand on beaches is excluded; and

4.4. The costs of maintaining foreshore buildings, toilet blocks and barbeques are excluded.

5. Emptying of Rubbish Receptacles and Sharps Containers

5.1. Eligible:

5.1.1 The cost of emptying rubbish bins on the sanded areas of beaches is eligible expenditure due to the difficult nature of accessibility. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

324 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

5.1.2. The costs of removal of seaweed around drains outpouring onto the sanded area of a beach is eligible expenditure, in line with the recommendations in the Syringes on Victorian Beaches Taskforce report, “Safe Beaches – making a difference”.

5.2. Ineligible:

5.2.1. The cost of emptying sharps containers is ineligible.

6. On-Costs and Plant Charges:

6.1. Eligible:

6.1.1. Expenditure on wages and salaries and labour on-costs associated with cleaning the beach are eligible for the subsidy.

6.1.2. The standard rate for on-costs to be applied to work carried out by in-house teams is 26%; and

6.1.3. All relevant plant charges incurred at internal hourly rates used in carrying out beach cleaning may be included as eligible expenditure.

6.2. Ineligible:

6.2.1. The cost of surveys, supervision, administrative expenses (salaries, fees, commissions, travelling expenses, etc.) and expenditure on the purchase of plant and tools are ineligible as charges against the subsidy.

7. Conformance with Best Practice

7.1. Where requested in the claim form, Councils will need to demonstrate that best practices in beach cleaning have been adopted to be eligible for the subsidy.

8. Data Collection

8.1. All data collection requests as detailed in the claim formed must be completed.

9. Certification

9.1. A signed statement is required from each Committee of Management certifying that the works referred to in the claim were carried out by them in accordance with the terms and conditions of the subsidy. The Chief Executive Officer or their delegate must endorse this statement.

9.2. The Chief Executive Officer or their appointed delegate must certify the overall beach-cleaning claim.

10. Claims:

10.1. All claims for reimbursement of expenditure incurred must be lodged with the Local Government Branch no later than Friday 18 May 2001. Late claims will not be accepted.

10.2. The amount payable to any council will be determined by the actual expenditure of all eligible councils.

10.3. Claims for expenditure must be made on the attached claim form. Each separate beach area incurring beach cleaning expenditure must be listed on the claim form indicating the management body, who performed the cleaning, the separate cost of cleaning that beach and the area in square metres of each beach. In a contracting situation a proportional estimate for each separate beach will be required.

10.4. Vouchers are not required but full particulars - name, number and amount of voucher - are to be shown in the appropriate part of the form.

10.5. Claims lacking the necessary certifications will not be processed. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 325

10.6. Claim forms must show the amount expended and clearly show amounts for wages, oncost and plant separately.

11. Timing of Payment

11.1. Payment will be made by the end of June 2001 in a lump sum amount.

12. Lodgement of Claims

12.1. Claims for the Subsidy and Certifications must be lodged by Friday 18 May 2001.

12.2. Completed forms and supporting documentation should be returned to:

Colin Morrison Manager Funding Programs Local Government Division Department of Infrastructure DX 210233 MELBOURNE VIC 3000.

Local Government: libraries

2033. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government):

(a) What funding has been provided in the 2001-02 Budget for library construction and refurbishment.

(b) How does this compare with the equivalent figure for 2000-01.

(c) What is the metropolitan/country breakdown for each year.

ANSWER:

The Bracks Government is contributing to the extension, refurbishment, upgrade and replacement of existing library buildings throughout Victoria through the Living Libraries Program. A total of $12 million of funding provided through the Community Support Fund is being allocated over a three year period from 2000/01.

Thirteen projects were funded under the program in 2000/01, with grants totalling $3.493 million. A list of funded projects is attached.

The balance of the funds available through the Community Support Fund will be allocated over the next two financial years. Submissions for funding in 2001/02 close on 13 September 2001.

In addition to the Living Libraries Program, the Government has made available $200,000 in 2000/01 and $800,000 in 2001/02 to assist the Mount Alexander Shire Council in refurbishing and extending the historic Castlemaine Library.

Local Government: boundaries

2034. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Local Government): What funding (if any) has been provided in the 2001-02 Budget to process any application for municipal boundary change. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

326 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

ANSWER:

There is no specific budget allocation, nor does the Local Government Act 1989, direct with which entity the responsibility for costs lie. The main costs are expected to be those arising from the operations of a panel appointed to advise me on a boundary change.

If a Local Government Panel were to be appointed the associated costs would be drawn from the usual budget of the Local Government Division, Department of Infrastructure. This has been the practice to date, although the Act is silent on the issue of who bears the costs of such a statutory panel.

The Minister has discretion under sec. 220 of the Local Government Act 1989 to appoint a Panel to conduct a review of any matter relating to local government restructuring. As such, the panel does not ‘process any application for municipal boundary change’ as the Question implies.

Arts: State Library — conservation of newspapers

2035. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Arts): Has the specialist cleaning service and conservation treatment for newspapers at the Maribyrnong store of the State Library of Victoria completed its work.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

Yes, all work has been completed.

Arts: State Library — conservation of newspapers

2036. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for the Arts): What was the total cost of the specialist cleaning service and conservation treatment for newspapers at the Maribyrnong store of the State Library of Victoria.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The total cost for the specialist cleaning service and conservation treatment of the newspaper collection at the Maribyrnong store was $195,461.86.

Arts: State Library — conservation of newspapers

2037. THE HON. ANDREA COOTE — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations (for the Honourable the Minister for Arts): Who provided the specialist cleaning service and conservation treatment for newspapers at the Maribyrnong store of the State Library of Victoria, and how were they chosen.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The specialist cleaning service and conservation treatment of the newspaper collection at the Maribyrnong store was provided by Jopa Services - specialist cleaners of Dingley. Jopa Services were chosen based on their previous experience and their proven ability to meet requirements.

The mould identification and air sampling services were provided by EML Consulting Services of Surrey Hills, upon the recommendation of the mycology department of RMIT. EML are one of the few organisations in Melbourne equipped to identify mould samples. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 327

Transport: Vicroads — noise amelioration

2039. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport): What amount did each Vicroads region spend on noise amelioration works in each region in 2000-01.

ANSWER:

Metropolitan South East Region $3.44M Metropolitan North West Region $4.34M Northern Region $0.13M South Western Region $1.46M Eastern, North Eastern and Western Nil

Transport: Vicroads — noise amelioration

2040. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport): For each noise amelioration project with a value of $200 000 or over in each Vicroads region in 2000-01:

(a) What was the location of the project.

(b) Which road was treated.

(c) What works were carried out.

(d) How many metres or kilometres of fencing or other measures were installed.

(e) What type of fencing, barrier or other noise amelioration measure was installed.

(f) In what months were the works undertaken.

(g) How much was expended in 2000-01.

(h) What further amount has been paid or is expected to be paid in 2001-02.

ANSWER:

Metropolitan South East Eastern Freeway, Collingwood to North Balwyn Construct noise fence varying from 1.3m to 6m high and associated landscaping Length - 4640m Type – Plywood with some clear acrylic panels Works Undertaken – April 2000 to May 2001 Expenditure - $3.19M Expected expenditure in 2001-2002 - $0.2M

Frankston Freeway, at Beach Street overpass, Frankston Construction of 3m high noise fence Length – 235m Type – Plywood with some clear acrylic panels Works Undertaken – April 2000 to May 2001 Expenditure - $0.25M Expected expenditure in 2001-2002 - Nil QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

328 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Metropolitan North West

Geelong Road, Laverton North to Little River Noise amelioration as part of road widening/upgrade works Length – 5980m Type - Timber noise fences with feature panels Works Undertaken – December 2000 to June 2001 Expenditure - $4.34M Expected expenditure in 2001-2002 - $2.64M

South Western Region Geelong Road, Little River to Corio Noise amelioration as part of road widening/upgrade works Length – 2730m Type - Timber noise fences, rock gabion noise walls Works Undertaken – November 2000 to June 2001 Expenditure - $1.46M Expected expenditure in 2001-2002 - $0.31M

Transport: Vicroads — noise amelioration

2041. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport): What amount is budgeted to be spent by Vicroads on noise amelioration works in each region in 2001-02.

ANSWER: Metropolitan South East Region $3.06M Metropolitan North West Region $3.08M Eastern Region $0.03M South Western Region $0.31M Northern, North Eastern and Western Nil

Transport: Vicroads — noise amelioration

2042. THE HON. P. A. KATSAMBANIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for Transport): For each proposed project for noise amelioration along roads scheduled by region in 2001-02:

(a) What is the location of the project.

(b) Which road is to be treated.

(c) What works are to be carried out.

(d) How many metres or kilometres of fencing or other measures are to be installed.

(e) What type of fencing, barrier or other noise amelioration measure are to be installed.

(f) In what months are the works to be undertaken.

(g) How much will be expended in 2001-02. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 329

ANSWER:

Metropolitan South East

Eastern Freeway, Collingwood to North Balwyn Completion of landscaping and minor works No additional length Type - Plywood with some clear acrylic panels From August 2001 to September 2001 Budget 2001/2002 - $0.2M

Eastern Freeway, Hoddle Street to Alexander Parade, Collingwood Construct noise fence varying from 2m to 4m high and associated landscaping Length – 543m Type - Plywood with some clear acrylic panels From April 2002 to September 2002 Budget 2001/2002 - $2.22M

Frankston Freeway, Beach Street overpass, Frankston Construction of 3m high noise fence Length – 293m Type - Plywood with some clear acrylic panels From April 2002 to September 2002 Budget 2001/2002 - $0.64M

Metropolitan North West

Geelong Road, Laverton North to Little River Noise amelioration as part of road widening/upgrade works Length – 1980m Type - Timber noise fences with feature panels From July 2001 to June 2002 Budget 2001/2002 – $2.64M

Calder Freeway, Diggers Rest Noise fencing Length – 468m Type - 3m high timber fence From December 2001 to February 2002 Budget 2001/2002 - $0.44M

Eastern Region

Bass Highway, Bay Road to the Gurdies Noise fence in association with highway duplication Length – 110m Type - Timber plank November 2001 Budget 2001/2002 - $0.03M

South Western Region

Geelong Road, Little River to Corio Noise amelioration as part of road widening/upgrade works Length – 2870m Type - Timber noise fences, rock gabion noise walls QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

330 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

From July 2001 to September 2001 Budget 0.31M

Industrial Relations: Essential Media Communications

2069. THE HON. D. McL. DAVIS — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Industrial Relations: Was Ms Elizabeth Lukin, a principal of the firm Essential Media Communications to whom the Minister’s Department has let a number of industrial relations’ consultancies and communications consultancies, employed by the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) at a time when the Minister was a member of the Executive of the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU).

ANSWER:

This question does not relate in any way to the administration of the State of Victoria, and as such, no reply will be offered.

Treasurer: metropolitan transport system subsidy

2111. THE HON. R. M. HALLAM — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What is the anticipated total cost to the 2001-02 Budget of providing a subsidy for the operation of the Metropolitan Transport System.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The estimated full accrual cost to the 2001-02 Budget of providing Metropolitan Transport Services is $1,009.2 million as shown in Table 2.3.1 on page 108 within the 2001-02 Budget Paper No. 3.

A Description of Metropolitan Transport Services and performance targets for these services in 2001-02 are provided on pages 128-30 of the 2001-02 Budget Paper No. 3.

Community Services: commonwealth–state disability agreement

2116. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services): Further to the answer to Question No. 1123, given in this House on 14 November 2000 relating to funds allocated under the 2000-01 Commonwealth State Disability Agreement:

(a) How many persons with disabilities have been assisted from this funding by the Department of Human Services region.

(b) What are the ages of the persons with disabilities assisted from this funding by the Department of Human Services region.

(c) What is the total amount of funding spent by the Department of Human Services region.

ANSWER:

The response provided to Question No. 1123, relating to funds allocated under the Commonwealth State Disability Agreement, noted that the funds allocated to Victoria by the Commonwealth under the bilateral agreement were $12.29 million in 2000/2001. Of the new funds allocated to Victoria, $2 million were allocated to respite services in 2000/01.

The following information is provided further to the response to Question 1123: QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 331

(a) How many persons with disabilities have been assisted from this funding by the Department of Human Services region?

For the financial year 2000/2001 260 additional households received respite services as a result of the $2 million provided as part of the bilateral agreement.

(b) What are the ages of the persons with disabilities assisted from this funding by the Department of Human Services region.

The target group for people receiving the new respite services is people with a disability whose carer is aged over 65 years.

(c) What is the total amount of funding spent by the Department of Human Services region.

The total funds expended by DisAbility Services for 2000 – 01 for the provision of respite services across Victoria was $31.8 million.

Community Services: commonwealth funding for preschool programs

2119. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services):

(a) Have any funds been allocated for 2001-02 to assist children aged 0-6 years with developmental delay/disabilities.

(b) From which output group or groups has the funding been allocated.

(c) How much funding has been allocated from each output group or groups.

(d) How much of this funding is from the Commonwealth.

(e) How much of this funding is for services provided by non-government agencies.

(f) How many children will this funding assist.

ANSWER:

I am responding to this question in relation to services provided within my portfolio as Minister for Community Services.

For 2001-02, funding of $29.72 million has been allocated from the Community Care output group to assist children aged 0-6 years with a developmental delay / disability. The DisAbility Services output group has also allocated funding of $0.2 million.

Funding from the Community Care output group consists of State funding of $24.79 million and Commonwealth funding of $4.93 million. This funding is for a range of programs for children 0-6 years with a developmental delay / disability and their families including Specialist Children’s Services teams, funded non-government early intervention agencies, Special Education Program, Early Choices, Family Choice, Preschool Field Officer and Strengthening Parent Support programs.

Of the total funding of $29.72 million, $20.1 million is for services provided by non-government agencies.

Combined State and Commonwealth funding will enable support to be provided to approximately 14,000 children and families in the 2001-02 financial year. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

332 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Community Services: commonwealth–state disability agreement

2120. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services):

(a) What funds did the Commonwealth make available to assist Victoria under the Commonwealth/State Disability Agreement for each of the financial years 1996-97, 1997-98, 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-01, respectively.

(b) What funds does Victoria expect to receive from the Commonwealth in 2001-02.

ANSWER:

(a) Commonwealth funding made available under the CSDA is:

1996-97 $67.367M 1997-98 $68.593M 1998-99 $74.869M 1999-00 $78.377M 2000-01 $95.195M

(b) Commonwealth funding to be made available in 2001-02 is $112.989M.

Community Services: commonwealth–state disability agreement

2121. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business (for the Honourable the Minister for Community Services):

(a) What funds did Victoria make available to meet its responsibilities under the Commonwealth/State Disability Agreement for each of the financial years 1996-97, 1997-98, 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-01, respectively.

(b) What funds does Victoria expect to make available to meet its responsibilities under the Agreement in 2001-02.

(c) What is the amount of funding allocated to Disability Services from user fees and charges collections.

ANSWER:

(a) Funding Victoria made available to meet its responsibilities under the CSDA is:

1996-97 $360.984M 1997-98 $454.525M 1998-99 $476.664M 1999-00 $516.993M 2000-01 $588.470M

(b) Budgeted Victorian funding to meet its responsibilities for 2001-02 is $608.217M

(c) Funding allocated to Disability Services from user fees and charges collections are:

2000-01 $2.600M 2001-02 $2.700M QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 333

Major Projects and Tourism: tourism online project

2122. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Sport and Recreation (for the Honourable the Minister for Major Projects and Tourism): In relation to the tourism online project:

(a) How many private sector tourism operators have registered on www.visitvictoria.com as at 1 August 2001.

(b) How many private sector tourism operators have registered on www.visitvictoria.com as at 1 August 2001, in each of the following tourism regions — (i) The Bays and Peninsulas; (ii) Goldfields; (iii) Goulburn Murray Waters; (iv) The Grampians; (v) The Great Ocean Road; (vi) Lakes and Wilderness; (vii) Legends, Wine and High Country; (viii) Macedon Ranges and Spa Country; (ix) Murray Outback; (x) Phillip Island and Gippsland Discovery; (xi) The Murray; (xii) Yarra Valley, Dandenong and the Ranges; and (xiii) Melbourne.

(c) How many Internet users accessed the www.visitvictoria.com site as at 1 August 2001.

ANSWER:

3508 tourism operators had registered with www.visitvictoria.com as at 1 August 2001.

The regional dispersal of all operators registered on www.visitvictoria.com, as at 1 August 2001, is outlined in Attachment 1.

564,684 Internet users accessed the www.visitvictoria.com web site from 1 June 2000 to 1 August 2001.

ATTACHMENT 1

Regional Dispersal of Operators Registered at www.visitvictoria.com

REGION SIGNED UP AS AT 01/08/01 Sign-up by region: Bays and Peninsulas 108 The Goldfields 106 Goulburn Murray Waters 88 The Grampians 69 Great Ocean Road 404 Lakes and Wilderness 87 Legends Wine & High Country 192 Macedon Ranges & Spa Country 108 Murray Outback 54 Phillip Island & Gippsland Discovery 122 The Murray 25 Yarra Valley Dandenongs & Ranges 136 Melbourne 190 Sub-total 1689 Pre-registered with State-wide campaigns* 509 Sign-up in progress** 1310 Total 3508

* The technology used does not divide these groups according to product region. ** As the sign-up process is completed, operators are then assigned to the relevant product region. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

334 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Small Business: Showcasing Small Business

2123. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Small Business: Further to the answer to Question No. 1743, given in this House on 5 June 2001 regarding the ‘Showcasing Small Business’ initiative:

(a) What business awards program will the Department of State and Regional Development be sponsoring.

(b) What regional trade expos will the department be participating in.

(c) What seminars/conferences/workshops will the department be organising.

(d) What youth initiatives will be supported.

(e) What financial support is being given for each of those activities.

(f) How many small businesses are expected to be involved in each activity.

ANSWER:

In relation to (a), (b), (d) and (e), the Department of State and Regional Development will be either supporting or sponsoring a range of events as I detailed in my answer to Question No. 1743, under the ‘Showcasing Small Business’ initiative for 2001-02.

At this stage as Minister for Small Business I have indicated support to a range of other events such as the Australian Retailers’ Association Victoria Young Retailer Award, Leader Newspapers Awards and various regional business awards and regional business expos in Ballarat and Bendigo. Youth initiatives to be supported in 2001-02 include the Young Achievement Australia program and the Shell LiveWIRE program. The level of financial support to these events has not been finalised.

With reference to (c), the Department will be organising a fortnightly pre-business workshop for 2001-02 on a cost recovery basis. This would involve approximately 400 participants over the year. Additionally, the Department will sponsor the Australian Businesswomen’s Network seminar for $1000 with approximately 250 business women expected to attend.

For (f), based upon levels of attendance and participation at a number of events held during 2000-01, the following levels of participation could be expected:

– Telstra and Victorian Government Small Business Awards – up to 250 participants

– Australian Retailers Association Victoria – up to 100 businesses

– Leader Newspapers Awards – up to 500 businesses

– Regional Business Expos in Ballarat and Bendigo – up to 1,000 businesses

– Young Achievement Australia program – up to 1,600 participants and

– Shell LiveWIRE program – up to 250 participants.

State and Regional Development: Regional Infrastructure Development Fund

2124. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Further to the answer to Question No. 1720, given in this House on 20 June 2001:

(a) How many of the 15 projects rated as ‘higher priority projects’ in 2000 received funding under the Regional Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF) in 2000 and 2001, respectively. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 335

(b) How many of the 9 projects rated as ‘higher priority projects’ as at 22 May 2001 received funding under the fund in 2001.

(c) How many of the 100 applications deemed ‘lower priority projects’ in 2000 received funding in 2000 and 2001, respectively.

(d) How many of the 14 applications deemed ‘lower priority projects’ as at 22 May 2001 received funding under the fund in 2001.

(e) How many applications have been considered by the fund committee seeking $2 million or more.

ANSWER:

Of the 15 projects rated as ‘higher priority projects’ in 2000 and the 9 projects rated as “higher priority projects” as at 22 May 2001, all received funding under the Regional Infrastructure Development Fund (RIDF).

Of the 100 applications rated as ‘lower priority projects’ in 2000 and the 14 projects rated as ‘lower priority projects’ as at 22 May 2001, none were successful in obtaining funding under the RIDF.

As at 29 August 2001, 33 applications seeking $2 million or more have been assessed by the RIDF Interdepartmental Committee.

State and Regional Development: rural community development officers

2125. THE HON. BILL FORWOOD — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Minister for State and Regional Development): Further to the answer to Question No. 1297, given in this House on 29 November 2000:

(a) What are the roles and responsibilities of the Rural Community Development Officers (RCDOs).

(b) What performance measurements are used to assess the performance of the RCDOs.

(c) Which RCDOs are located in local government offices.

(d) Does the Government lease this space; if so, at what cost.

(e) Does each RCDO have an office budget; if so, what is the budget for each office.

(f) Will any additional RCDOs be employed.

ANSWER:

Rural Community Development Officers (RCDO’s) are required to:

– Advise on the performance of rural communities and on current and emerging issues impacting on their social, economic and commercial growth and development.

– Contribute effectively to policy, program and service development and implementation in respect of the interests and concerns of rural communities, and assist and support their growth and development.

– Deliver information services and promote awareness of the Government’s strategic priorities for rural Victoria and the assistance and support available to rural communities, businesses, community organisations and other key stakeholders.

– Develop and strengthen consultative networks and relationships within and across rural communities, government and the non-government and private sectors.

– Facilitate participation of rural communities and their access to Victorian Government support initiatives and in particular, assist implementation and delivery of DSRD programs and services. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

336 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

– Support and service the Government’s consultative processes with rural communities.

Each RCDO has an annual performance plan that includes a range of performance indicators which relate to their duties, as shown above.

RCDO’s at Ararat, Colac, Horsham and Warrnambool are located in local government offices.

The Government leases this space at $12,450 per annum.

Budgets for RCDOs are provided for in the Department of State and Regional Development’s overall budget, details of which are contained in the 2001/2002 Budget Papers.

There are no plans to employ additional RCDOs.

Treasurer: TQM Legal and Accounting

2139. THE HON. A. P. OLEXANDER — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer):

(a) What is the loss to the State Revenue Office flowing from the failure of TQM Legal & Accounting to fully account for money collected from Victorian taxpayers.

(b) What action has the Treasurer taken to recover these monies from TQM, MMK Cameroon Pty Ltd, the Director of Keith Fernandez and Office Manager, Michael Kelly.

(c) Has the State Revenue Office changed its guidelines or procedures to ensure that all the tax collected by the agents is remitted to State Revenue.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The State Revenue Office (SRO) has commenced a proceeding in the Supreme Court seeking an accounting for and orders to pay all duty collected and not passed on to it. The parties to that proceeding include MMK Cameron Pty Ltd (formerly TQM Legal & Accounting Pty Ltd), Keith Fernandez and Michael Kelly. In January this year, the SRO referred this matter to the Major Fraud Group of the Victoria Police.

As these proceedings are continuing, it would not be appropriate for me to make any comment about the matters before the Supreme Court.

The SRO continuously monitors the reporting and payment patterns of and conducts audits upon agents collecting stamp duty on its behalf. Rigorous probity checks, including personal interviews are conducted on all persons seeking to be SRO agents. Similar checks are carried out on existing agents as part of the SRO’s audit program.

The SRO is reviewing existing agents to confirm their suitability for continued participation in this regime. This review has led to a significant reduction (approx 40%) in the number of approved agents with further reductions expected as a result of this review and the continuing audit program.

Treasurer: SRO — computer equipment

2140. THE HON. A. P. OLEXANDER — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer):

(a) What is the total cost expended by the State Revenue Office on computer hardware, software and information technology in 1999-2000 and 2000-01, respectively.

(b) What is the planned allocation in 2001-02 and 2002-03 respectively. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

Tuesday, 18 September 2001 COUNCIL 337

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The total cost expended by the State Revenue Office (SRO) for computer hardware, software and IT was $21,840,230 for 1999/2000 and $17,278,077 for 2000/2001. These amounts include all IT expenditure on capital projects and operating expenditure paid to the SRO’s IT service provider CSC Information Technology Solutions Pty Ltd.

The planned expenditure for 2001-02 is $15,336,263.

Treasurer: SRO — web site development

2141. THE HON. A. P. OLEXANDER — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What is the total cost expended by the State Revenue Office on the development of web sites over the past two financial years.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The total expenditure on web site development at the State Revenue Office during the two years to 30 June 2001 was $156,000.

Treasurer: SRO — CIPAC project

2142. THE HON. A. P. OLEXANDER — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer):

(a) What was the total expenditure on the CIPAC project by the State Revenue Office over the past two financial years.

(b) What was the result of the CIPAC project.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

During the last 2 financial years, $1,039,169 was expended on the project.

During those financial years, a total of $22,843,609 in pay-roll tax, penalties and interest was collected and the CIPAC project employed data matching techniques to detect and pursue unpaid payroll tax.

Treasurer: SRO — Java development

2143. THE HON. A. P. OLEXANDER — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What was the total expenditure on the Java development by the State Revenue Office over the past two financial years.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The State Revenue Office spent $640,653 on Java developments in the financial year 1999/2000. There was no expenditure on Java developments in the financial year 2000/2001. 338 COUNCIL Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Treasurer: SRO — information technology upgrades

2144. THE HON. A. P. OLEXANDER — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): What was the total expenditure by the State Revenue Office on ‘incorrect’ advice that required duplication or follow up advice with respect to its planned computer hardware, software and information technology upgrades.)

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The SRO has not expended any amount on “incorrect advice”.

Treasurer: SRO — ESIS computer system

2146. THE HON. A. P. OLEXANDER — To ask the Honourable the Minister for Energy and Resources (for the Honourable the Treasurer): Will the Treasurer list all projects undertaken by the State Revenue Office separately to the ESIS computer system and provide — (i) the total expenditure so far for these projects; and (ii) any further planned expenditure.

ANSWER:

I am informed that:

The projects currently undertaken by the State Revenue Office separately to the Esys computer system are the E-Business project, Compliance data matching project, and the Ballarat Technology park project.

The total expenditure so far on these projects is $6,664,000 with a further $7,225,000 of planned expenditure.