DOCSLIB.ORG

Constuction of Some Archimedean Solids from Platonic Solids

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Constuction of Some Archimedean Solids from Platonic Solids CONSTUCTION OF SOME ARCHIMEDEAN SOLIDS FROM PLATONIC SOLIDS Eva Barcíková Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia Correspondig author: [email protected] Abstract In this paper we deal with obtaining of Small rhombicuboctahedron and Great rhombicuboctahedron , which are Archimedean solids, from Platonic solids. We focus on one of several ways of construction which is expansion. We show the particular steps of this process. We think that the process of expansion of Platonic or Archimedean solids can be used as the manipulating activities in a geometry lesson. Key words: Small rhombicuboctahedron, Great rhombicuboctahedron, Archimedean solids 1 Introduction The Archimedean solids took their name from Archimedes, who discussed them in a now- lost work. Later Pappus describes the 13 Archimedean solids in his fifth book of his Mathematical Collection, but it was Kepler who rediscovered the whole set of 13 solids and gave them the names by which they are known today. There are several ways to obtain an Archimedean solid from Platonic solids. Seven of them can be obtained by truncation of a Platonic solid. They are the truncated tetrahedron, truncated cube, truncated octahedron, truncated icosahedron, truncated dodecahedron, cuboctahedron and the icosidodecahedron. The other two Archimedean solids, snub cube and snub dodecahedron, are formed by a process called snubbing. Four additional solids can be obtained by expansion of Platonic solids or by expansion of one of the previous 9 Archimedean solids. Truncation is process of removing all the corners of a figure in a symmetrical fashion. Truncation is in most cases the easiest way to obtain an Archimedean solid from Platonic solid. Snubbing is a process of taking all the faces of the solid, pulling them outward so they no longer touch, then giving them each a small rotation on their centers (all clockwise or all counter-clockwise) until the spaces between can be filled with equilateral triangles. Very similar process to snubbing is expansion. We show the particular steps of this process in the following text. 2 Small rhombicuboctahedron The small rhombicuboctahedron is a 26-faced Archimedean solid with 24 vertices and 48 edges. His faces consist of 8 equilateral triangles and of 18 square faces. It is sometimes also called the truncated icosidodecahedron but this name is inappropriate. By truncation, we would obtain rectangular instead of square faces. Fig. 1 Small rhombicuboctahedron 275 There are several ways to obtain the small rhombicuboctahedron. The first option is truncation of cube. We remove all the corners of cube with edge length a. The length of small rhombicuboctahedron edge will be a. 2 1 . This truncation is not so intuitive as in other case of Archimedean solids. There is also other possibility. The small rhombicuboctahedron can be constructed as the convex hull of the centers of edges of cuboctahedron. Fig. 2 Small rhombicuboctahedron as the convex hull of the centers of edges of cuboctahedron. The third option to obtain this solid from Platonic solids is the expansion of cube. The process of expansion includes three steps: 1) Pull the faces of the polyhedron apart. 2) Replace the edges of each of the original face with squares. 3) Replace vertices where n faces meet with n-sided polygons. In our case the original polyhedron is cube. The following illustrate these three steps in detail: First we pull the faces of the cube apart. Thus, we have six separated squares. Fig. 3 In next step we simply replace the edges of each original face with squares. Finally, we replace vertices with n-sided polygons. Pulling the faces of the cube apart forms empty spaces between the three faces sharing a common vertex. The common vertex splits into three vertices, one for each of the three faces that meet at the vertex. So we can place an equilateral triangle such that the vertices of the equilateral triangle meet the three vertices that were split from the common vertex. The second and third steps of expansion are illustrated in figure 4. 276 Fig. 4 2.1 Great rhombicuboctahedron The process of expansion can be applied although on some Archimedean solid and the result will be other Archimedean solid. One of the obtained solid can be Great rhombicuboctahedron. It is also called the truncated cuboctahedron. The name suggests that the solid was created by truncation of cuboctahedron, which is not correct. Let’s look at the Great rhombicuboctahedron and find the right solid from which it can be created. Fig. 5 In second step of the process of expansion, we replace the edges of each of the original face with squares. 12 of all faces of Great rhombicuboctahedron are squares which linking together 8 regular hexagons or 6 regular octagons. This means that the original solid consists either of 8 regular hexagon faces or 6 regular octagon faces. So we have two options the truncated octahedron or truncated cube. Look what happen if we use the process of expansion on truncated octahedron. First we pull the faces of the truncated octahedron apart. Thus, we have eight separated regular hexagon faces. Next we replace the edges of each original face with squares. Instead of original squares faces forms empty space between eight new edges. So we can place an regular octagon faces there. Created solid is Great rhombicuboctahedron. 277 Fig. 6 Analogically, we can use the process of expansion on truncated cube and the result will be as well Great rhombicuboctahedron. It is illustrated in figure 7. → → Fig. 7 3 Results and discussion There are several ways how to work with Archimedean solids on a mathematics lesson. We show some possibilities of construction of selected solids by the process of expansion. Of course, its depend on teacher’s creativity which way he chooses for their lessons. Students could try these constructions using Polydron, which is geometric construction product. Polydron can be used for inquiry based learning and manipulating activities. Students can discover the Archimedean solids through the game. “From the most basic early shapes of cubes and prisms, and progressing right up to the full set of Archimedean solids, the world of Polydron shapes leaves no stone unturned in its quest to help children to understand and enjoy geometry.“ (Krishnan, 2002). 4 Conclusion Although Archimedean solids have been known for millenniums, they are quite little used in school. We think that the manipulating activities in geometry give us the platform to introduction of new knowledge using the constructivist approach to teaching. There are several possibilities how to construct Archimedean solids from Platonic solids, whose could 278 be used in school by this way. In this article, we show some of them. Purpose to deal with these constructions is the development of logical thinking, spatial imagination and other skills during the discovery of the Archimedean solid’s characteristics. Acknowledgement This work has been supported by UGA VII/38/2012 "Komparácia výstupov vedeckých prác doktorandov, mladých vedeckých a pedagogických pracovníkov formou prezentácie výsledkov" 5 References Cromwell, P. R. 1997. Polyhedra. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. ISBN 9- 521-55432-2 Krishnan, K. Polyhedra. [online]. Singapore : National University of Singapore. 2002 Available at: <http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/~urops/Projects/Polyhedra.pdf > Coxeter, H.S.M. 1973. Regular Polytopes, Dover, New York, 1973 Vallo, D. - Záhorská, J. - Ďuriš, V. 2011. Objavujeme sieť štvorstena. In: Acta Mathematica 14: zborník príspevkov z IX. nitrianskej matematickej konferencie, FPV UKF v Nitre v dňoch 22. - 23. septembra 2011 - Nitra : UKF, 2011. - ISBN 978-80-8094-958-7, s. 231- 236. 279 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Archimedean Or Semiregular Polyhedra
    ON THE ARCHIMEDEAN OR SEMIREGULAR POLYHEDRA Mark B. Villarino Depto. de Matem´atica, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San Jos´e, Costa Rica May 11, 2005 Abstract We prove that there are thirteen Archimedean/semiregular polyhedra by using Euler’s polyhedral formula. Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 RegularPolyhedra .............................. 2 1.2 Archimedean/semiregular polyhedra . ..... 2 2 Proof techniques 3 2.1 Euclid’s proof for regular polyhedra . ..... 3 2.2 Euler’s polyhedral formula for regular polyhedra . ......... 4 2.3 ProofsofArchimedes’theorem. .. 4 3 Three lemmas 5 3.1 Lemma1.................................... 5 3.2 Lemma2.................................... 6 3.3 Lemma3.................................... 7 4 Topological Proof of Archimedes’ theorem 8 arXiv:math/0505488v1 [math.GT] 24 May 2005 4.1 Case1: fivefacesmeetatavertex: r=5. .. 8 4.1.1 At least one face is a triangle: p1 =3................ 8 4.1.2 All faces have at least four sides: p1 > 4 .............. 9 4.2 Case2: fourfacesmeetatavertex: r=4 . .. 10 4.2.1 At least one face is a triangle: p1 =3................ 10 4.2.2 All faces have at least four sides: p1 > 4 .............. 11 4.3 Case3: threefacesmeetatavertes: r=3 . ... 11 4.3.1 At least one face is a triangle: p1 =3................ 11 4.3.2 All faces have at least four sides and one exactly four sides: p1 =4 6 p2 6 p3. 12 4.3.3 All faces have at least five sides and one exactly five sides: p1 =5 6 p2 6 p3 13 1 5 Summary of our results 13 6 Final remarks 14 1 Introduction 1.1 Regular Polyhedra A polyhedron may be intuitively conceived as a “solid figure” bounded by plane faces and straight line edges so arranged that every edge joins exactly two (no more, no less) vertices and is a common side of two faces.
    [Show full text]
  • Archimedean Solids
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln MAT Exam Expository Papers Math in the Middle Institute Partnership 7-2008 Archimedean Solids Anna Anderson University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidexppap Part of the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Anderson, Anna, "Archimedean Solids" (2008). MAT Exam Expository Papers. 4. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidexppap/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Math in the Middle Institute Partnership at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAT Exam Expository Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Archimedean Solids Anna Anderson In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Teaching with a Specialization in the Teaching of Middle Level Mathematics in the Department of Mathematics. Jim Lewis, Advisor July 2008 2 Archimedean Solids A polygon is a simple, closed, planar figure with sides formed by joining line segments, where each line segment intersects exactly two others. If all of the sides have the same length and all of the angles are congruent, the polygon is called regular. The sum of the angles of a regular polygon with n sides, where n is 3 or more, is 180° x (n – 2) degrees. If a regular polygon were connected with other regular polygons in three dimensional space, a polyhedron could be created. In geometry, a polyhedron is a three- dimensional solid which consists of a collection of polygons joined at their edges. The word polyhedron is derived from the Greek word poly (many) and the Indo-European term hedron (seat).
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME of POLYHEDRA USING a TETRAHEDRON BREAKUP We
    VOLUME OF POLYHEDRA USING A TETRAHEDRON BREAKUP We have shown in an earlier note that any two dimensional polygon of N sides may be broken up into N-2 triangles T by drawing N-3 lines L connecting every second vertex. Thus the irregular pentagon shown has N=5,T=3, and L=2- With this information, one is at once led to the question-“ How can the volume of any polyhedron in 3D be determined using a set of smaller 3D volume elements”. These smaller 3D eelements are likely to be tetrahedra . This leads one to the conjecture that – A polyhedron with more four faces can have its volume represented by the sum of a certain number of sub-tetrahedra. The volume of any tetrahedron is given by the scalar triple product |V1xV2∙V3|/6, where the three Vs are vector representations of the three edges of the tetrahedron emanating from the same vertex. Here is a picture of one of these tetrahedra- Note that the base area of such a tetrahedron is given by |V1xV2]/2. When this area is multiplied by 1/3 of the height related to the third vector one finds the volume of any tetrahedron given by- x1 y1 z1 (V1xV2 ) V3 Abs Vol = x y z 6 6 2 2 2 x3 y3 z3 , where x,y, and z are the vector components. The next question which arises is how many tetrahedra are required to completely fill a polyhedron? We can arrive at an answer by looking at several different examples. Starting with one of the simplest examples consider the double-tetrahedron shown- It is clear that the entire volume can be generated by two equal volume tetrahedra whose vertexes are placed at [0,0,sqrt(2/3)] and [0,0,-sqrt(2/3)].
    [Show full text]
  • Just (Isomorphic) Friends: Symmetry Groups of the Platonic Solids
    Just (Isomorphic) Friends: Symmetry Groups of the Platonic Solids Seth Winger Stanford University|MATH 109 9 March 2012 1 Introduction The Platonic solids have been objects of interest to mankind for millennia. Each shape—five in total|is made up of congruent regular polygonal faces: the tetrahedron (four triangular sides), the cube (six square sides), the octahedron (eight triangular sides), the dodecahedron (twelve pentagonal sides), and the icosahedron (twenty triangular sides). They are prevalent in everything from Plato's philosophy, where he equates them to the four classical elements and a fifth heavenly aether, to middle schooler's role playing games, where Platonic dice determine charisma levels and who has to get the next refill of Mountain Dew. Figure 1: The five Platonic solids (http://geomag.elementfx.com) In this paper, we will examine the symmetry groups of these five solids, starting with the relatively simple case of the tetrahedron and moving on to the more complex shapes. The rotational symmetry groups of the solids share many similarities with permutation groups, and these relationships will be shown to be an isomorphism that can then be exploited when discussing the Platonic solids. The end goal is the most complex case: describing the symmetries of the icosahedron in terms of A5, the group of all sixty even permutations in the permutation group of degree 5. 2 The Tetrahedron Imagine a tetrahedral die, where each vertex is labeled 1, 2, 3, or 4. Two or three rolls of the die will show that rotations can induce permutations of the vertices|a different number may land face up on every throw, for example|but how many such rotations and permutations exist? There are two main categories of rotation in a tetrahedron: r, those around an axis that runs from a vertex of the solid to the centroid of the opposing face; and q, those around an axis that runs from midpoint to midpoint of opposing edges (see Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • How Platonic and Archimedean Solids Define Natural Equilibria of Forces for Tensegrity
    How Platonic and Archimedean Solids Define Natural Equilibria of Forces for Tensegrity Martin Friedrich Eichenauer The Platonic and Archimedean solids are a well-known vehicle to describe Research Assistant certain phenomena of our surrounding world. It can be stated that they Technical University Dresden define natural equilibria of forces, which can be clarified particularly Faculty of Mathematics Institute of Geometry through the packing of spheres. [1][2] To solve the problem of the densest Germany packing, both geometrical and mechanical approach can be exploited. The mechanical approach works on the principle of minimal potential energy Daniel Lordick whereas the geometrical approach searches for the minimal distances of Professor centers of mass. The vertices of the solids are given by the centers of the Technical University Dresden spheres. Faculty of Geometry Institute of Geometry If we expand this idea by a contrary force, which pushes outwards, we Germany obtain the principle of tensegrity. We can show that we can build up regular and half-regular polyhedra by the interaction of physical forces. Every platonic and Archimedean solid can be converted into a tensegrity structure. Following this, a vast variety of shapes defined by multiple solids can also be obtained. Keywords: Platonic Solids, Archimedean Solids, Tensegrity, Force Density Method, Packing of Spheres, Modularization 1. PLATONIC AND ARCHIMEDEAN SOLIDS called “kissing number” problem. The kissing number problem is asking for the maximum possible number of Platonic and Archimedean solids have systematically congruent spheres, which touch another sphere of the been described in the antiquity. They denominate all same size without overlapping. In three dimensions the convex polyhedra with regular faces and uniform vertices kissing number is 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1705.01294V1
    Branes and Polytopes Luca Romano email address: [email protected] ABSTRACT We investigate the hierarchies of half-supersymmetric branes in maximal supergravity theories. By studying the action of the Weyl group of the U-duality group of maximal supergravities we discover a set of universal algebraic rules describing the number of independent 1/2-BPS p-branes, rank by rank, in any dimension. We show that these relations describe the symmetries of certain families of uniform polytopes. This induces a correspondence between half-supersymmetric branes and vertices of opportune uniform polytopes. We show that half-supersymmetric 0-, 1- and 2-branes are in correspondence with the vertices of the k21, 2k1 and 1k2 families of uniform polytopes, respectively, while 3-branes correspond to the vertices of the rectified version of the 2k1 family. For 4-branes and higher rank solutions we find a general behavior. The interpretation of half- supersymmetric solutions as vertices of uniform polytopes reveals some intriguing aspects. One of the most relevant is a triality relation between 0-, 1- and 2-branes. arXiv:1705.01294v1 [hep-th] 3 May 2017 Contents Introduction 2 1 Coxeter Group and Weyl Group 3 1.1 WeylGroup........................................ 6 2 Branes in E11 7 3 Algebraic Structures Behind Half-Supersymmetric Branes 12 4 Branes ad Polytopes 15 Conclusions 27 A Polytopes 30 B Petrie Polygons 30 1 Introduction Since their discovery branes gained a prominent role in the analysis of M-theories and du- alities [1]. One of the most important class of branes consists in Dirichlet branes, or D-branes. D-branes appear in string theory as boundary terms for open strings with mixed Dirichlet-Neumann boundary conditions and, due to their tension, scaling with a negative power of the string cou- pling constant, they are non-perturbative objects [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Panoploid Tetracombs
    Uniform Panoploid Tetracombs George Olshevsky TETRACOMB is a four-dimensional tessellation. In any tessellation, the honeycells, which are the n-dimensional polytopes that tessellate the space, Amust by definition adjoin precisely along their facets, that is, their ( n!1)- dimensional elements, so that each facet belongs to exactly two honeycells. In the case of tetracombs, the honeycells are four-dimensional polytopes, or polychora, and their facets are polyhedra. For a tessellation to be uniform, the honeycells must all be uniform polytopes, and the vertices must be transitive on the symmetry group of the tessellation. Loosely speaking, therefore, the vertices must be “surrounded all alike” by the honeycells that meet there. If a tessellation is such that every point of its space not on a boundary between honeycells lies in the interior of exactly one honeycell, then it is panoploid. If one or more points of the space not on a boundary between honeycells lie inside more than one honeycell, the tessellation is polyploid. Tessellations may also be constructed that have “holes,” that is, regions that lie inside none of the honeycells; such tessellations are called holeycombs. It is possible for a polyploid tessellation to also be a holeycomb, but not for a panoploid tessellation, which must fill the entire space exactly once. Polyploid tessellations are also called starcombs or star-tessellations. Holeycombs usually arise when (n!1)-dimensional tessellations are themselves permitted to be honeycells; these take up the otherwise free facets that bound the “holes,” so that all the facets continue to belong to two honeycells. In this essay, as per its title, we are concerned with just the uniform panoploid tetracombs.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 BASIC PROPERTIES of CONVEX POLYTOPES Martin Henk, J¨Urgenrichter-Gebert, and G¨Unterm
    15 BASIC PROPERTIES OF CONVEX POLYTOPES Martin Henk, J¨urgenRichter-Gebert, and G¨unterM. Ziegler INTRODUCTION Convex polytopes are fundamental geometric objects that have been investigated since antiquity. The beauty of their theory is nowadays complemented by their im- portance for many other mathematical subjects, ranging from integration theory, algebraic topology, and algebraic geometry to linear and combinatorial optimiza- tion. In this chapter we try to give a short introduction, provide a sketch of \what polytopes look like" and \how they behave," with many explicit examples, and briefly state some main results (where further details are given in subsequent chap- ters of this Handbook). We concentrate on two main topics: • Combinatorial properties: faces (vertices, edges, . , facets) of polytopes and their relations, with special treatments of the classes of low-dimensional poly- topes and of polytopes \with few vertices;" • Geometric properties: volume and surface area, mixed volumes, and quer- massintegrals, including explicit formulas for the cases of the regular simplices, cubes, and cross-polytopes. We refer to Gr¨unbaum [Gr¨u67]for a comprehensive view of polytope theory, and to Ziegler [Zie95] respectively to Gruber [Gru07] and Schneider [Sch14] for detailed treatments of the combinatorial and of the convex geometric aspects of polytope theory. 15.1 COMBINATORIAL STRUCTURE GLOSSARY d V-polytope: The convex hull of a finite set X = fx1; : : : ; xng of points in R , n n X i X P = conv(X) := λix λ1; : : : ; λn ≥ 0; λi = 1 : i=1 i=1 H-polytope: The solution set of a finite system of linear inequalities, d T P = P (A; b) := x 2 R j ai x ≤ bi for 1 ≤ i ≤ m ; with the extra condition that the set of solutions is bounded, that is, such that m×d there is a constant N such that jjxjj ≤ N holds for all x 2 P .
    [Show full text]
  • Five-Vertex Archimedean Surface Tessellation by Lanthanide-Directed Molecular Self-Assembly
    Five-vertex Archimedean surface tessellation by lanthanide-directed molecular self-assembly David Écijaa,1, José I. Urgela, Anthoula C. Papageorgioua, Sushobhan Joshia, Willi Auwärtera, Ari P. Seitsonenb, Svetlana Klyatskayac, Mario Rubenc,d, Sybille Fischera, Saranyan Vijayaraghavana, Joachim Reicherta, and Johannes V. Bartha,1 aPhysik Department E20, Technische Universität München, D-85478 Garching, Germany; bPhysikalisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland; cInstitute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany; and dInstitut de Physique et Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg (IPCMS), CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, F-67034 Strasbourg, France Edited by Kenneth N. Raymond, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved March 8, 2013 (received for review December 28, 2012) The tessellation of the Euclidean plane by regular polygons has by five interfering laser beams, conceived to specifically address been contemplated since ancient times and presents intriguing the surface tiling problem, yielded a distorted, 2D Archimedean- aspects embracing mathematics, art, and crystallography. Sig- like architecture (24). nificant efforts were devoted to engineer specific 2D interfacial In the last decade, the tools of supramolecular chemistry on tessellations at the molecular level, but periodic patterns with surfaces have provided new ways to engineer a diversity of sur- distinct five-vertex motifs remained elusive. Here, we report a face-confined molecular architectures, mainly exploiting molecular direct scanning tunneling microscopy investigation on the cerium- recognition of functional organic species or the metal-directed directed assembly of linear polyphenyl molecular linkers with assembly of molecular linkers (5). Self-assembly protocols have terminal carbonitrile groups on a smooth Ag(111) noble-metal sur- been developed to achieve regular surface tessellations, includ- face.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Your Polyhedra the Same As My Polyhedra?
    Are Your Polyhedra the Same as My Polyhedra? Branko Gr¨unbaum 1 Introduction “Polyhedron” means different things to different people. There is very little in common between the meaning of the word in topology and in geometry. But even if we confine attention to geometry of the 3-dimensional Euclidean space – as we shall do from now on – “polyhedron” can mean either a solid (as in “Platonic solids”, convex polyhedron, and other contexts), or a surface (such as the polyhedral models constructed from cardboard using “nets”, which were introduced by Albrecht D¨urer [17] in 1525, or, in a more mod- ern version, by Aleksandrov [1]), or the 1-dimensional complex consisting of points (“vertices”) and line-segments (“edges”) organized in a suitable way into polygons (“faces”) subject to certain restrictions (“skeletal polyhedra”, diagrams of which have been presented first by Luca Pacioli [44] in 1498 and attributed to Leonardo da Vinci). The last alternative is the least usual one – but it is close to what seems to be the most useful approach to the theory of general polyhedra. Indeed, it does not restrict faces to be planar, and it makes possible to retrieve the other characterizations in circumstances in which they reasonably apply: If the faces of a “surface” polyhedron are sim- ple polygons, in most cases the polyhedron is unambiguously determined by the boundary circuits of the faces. And if the polyhedron itself is without selfintersections, then the “solid” can be found from the faces. These reasons, as well as some others, seem to warrant the choice of our approach.
    [Show full text]
  • An Enduring Error
    Version June 5, 2008 Branko Grünbaum: An enduring error 1. Introduction. Mathematical truths are immutable, but mathematicians do make errors, especially when carrying out non-trivial enumerations. Some of the errors are "innocent" –– plain mis- takes that get corrected as soon as an independent enumeration is carried out. For example, Daublebsky [14] in 1895 found that there are precisely 228 types of configurations (123), that is, collections of 12 lines and 12 points, each incident with three of the others. In fact, as found by Gropp [19] in 1990, the correct number is 229. Another example is provided by the enumeration of the uniform tilings of the 3-dimensional space by Andreini [1] in 1905; he claimed that there are precisely 25 types. However, as shown [20] in 1994, the correct num- ber is 28. Andreini listed some tilings that should not have been included, and missed several others –– but again, these are simple errors easily corrected. Much more insidious are errors that arise by replacing enumeration of one kind of ob- ject by enumeration of some other objects –– only to disregard the logical and mathematical distinctions between the two enumerations. It is surprising how errors of this type escape detection for a long time, even though there is frequent mention of the results. One example is provided by the enumeration of 4-dimensional simple polytopes with 8 facets, by Brückner [7] in 1909. He replaces this enumeration by that of 3-dimensional "diagrams" that he inter- preted as Schlegel diagrams of convex 4-polytopes, and claimed that the enumeration of these objects is equivalent to that of the polytopes.
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on Polyhedral Molecules and Their Crystal Structures Santiago Alvarez, Jorge Echeverria
    New Perspectives on Polyhedral Molecules and their Crystal Structures Santiago Alvarez, Jorge Echeverria To cite this version: Santiago Alvarez, Jorge Echeverria. New Perspectives on Polyhedral Molecules and their Crystal Structures. Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry, Wiley, 2010, 23 (11), pp.1080. 10.1002/poc.1735. hal-00589441 HAL Id: hal-00589441 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00589441 Submitted on 29 Apr 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry New Perspectives on Polyhedral Molecules and their Crystal Structures For Peer Review Journal: Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry Manuscript ID: POC-09-0305.R1 Wiley - Manuscript type: Research Article Date Submitted by the 06-Apr-2010 Author: Complete List of Authors: Alvarez, Santiago; Universitat de Barcelona, Departament de Quimica Inorganica Echeverria, Jorge; Universitat de Barcelona, Departament de Quimica Inorganica continuous shape measures, stereochemistry, shape maps, Keywords: polyhedranes http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/poc Page 1 of 20 Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 New Perspectives on Polyhedral Molecules and their Crystal Structures 11 12 Santiago Alvarez, Jorge Echeverría 13 14 15 Departament de Química Inorgànica and Institut de Química Teòrica i Computacional, 16 Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1-11, 08028 Barcelona (Spain).
    [Show full text]