DOCSLIB.ORG

Rational Homotopy Theory II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Rational Homotopy Theory II Yves F´elix,Steve Halperin and Jean-Claude Thomas World Scientic Book, 412 pages, to appear in March 2012. Abstract Sullivan's seminal paper, Infinitesimal Computations in Topology, includes the ap- plication of his techniques to non-simply connected spaces, and these ideas have been used frequently by other authors. Our objective in this sequel to our \Rational Homo- topy Theory I, published by Springer-Verlag in 2001, is to provide a complete descrip- tion with detailed proofs of this material. This then provides the basis for new results, also included, and which we complement with recent advances for simply-connected spaces. There do remain many interesting unanswered questions in the field, which hopefully this text will make it easier for others to resolve. 1 Introduction Rational homotopy theory assigns to topological spaces invariants which are preserved by continuous maps f for which H∗(f; Q) is an isomorphism. The two standard approaches of the theory are due respectively to Quillen [58] and Sullivan [61], and [62]. Each constructs from a class of CW complexes X an algebraic model MX , and then constructs from MX a CW complex XQ, together with a map 'X : X ! XQ. Both H∗(XQ; Z) and πn(XQ) are rational vector spaces, and with appropriate hypotheses H∗('X ): H∗(X) ⊗ Q ! H∗(XQ; Z) ; and πn('X ): πn(X) ⊗ Q ! πn(XQ); n ≥ 2; are isomorphisms. In each case the model MX belongs to an algebraic homotopy category, and a homo- topy class of maps f : X ! Y induces a homotopy class of morphisms Mf : MX !MY (in Quillen approach) and a homotopy class of morphisms Mf : MY !MX (in Sullivan's approach). These are referred to as representatives of f. In Quillen's approach, X is required to be simply connected and MX is a rational differential graded Lie algebra which is free as a graded Lie algebra. In this case H∗('X ) and π≥2('X ) are always isomorphisms. Here, as in [18], we adopt Sullivan's approach, and in this Introduction provide an overview of the material in the monograph, together with brief summaries of the individual Chapters. Sullivan's approach associates to each path connected space X a cochain algebra MX of the form (^V; d) in which the free commutative graded algebra ^V is generated by ≥1 m m V = V , and V = ⊕m ^ V with ^ V = V ^ ··· ^V (m factors). Additionally, each ^V ≤k is preserved by d, and d also satisfies a "nilpotence" condition: (^V; d) is called a minimal Sullivan algebra. A minimal Sullivan algebra determines a simplicial set h^V; di 1 with spatial realization j^V; dj, and when (^V; d) is the model of the CW complex X then this determines (up to homotopy) the map 'X : X ! XQ = j ^ V; dj : This approach makes non-simply connected spaces accessible to rational homotopy the- ory. For example, if H1(X; Q) is finite dimensional then π1(XQ) is the Malcev completion of π1(X): π1('X ) induces an isomorphism ∼ n = lim π1(X)/π (X) ⊗ / π1(X ) ; − n 1 Q Q n where (π1 (X)) denotes the lower central series of π1(X). On the other hand, this approach also comes at the cost of a finiteness condition: If X is simply connected then H∗('X ) and π≥2('X ) are isomorphisms if and only if H∗(X; Q) is a graded vector space of finite type. In the case of non-simply connected CW complexes X, two additional ingredients are required for rational homotopy theory: first, the action by covering transformations ∗ of π1(X) on the cohomology H (Xe; Q) of the universal covering space of X; second, a Sullivan representative for a classifying map mapping X to the classifying space for ∗ π1(X) and inducing an isomorphism of fundamental groups. If H (Xe; Q) has finite type, then the groups π≥2(X) ⊗ Q can be computed from a minimal Sullivan model of Xe, and if ∗ the action of π1(X) on H (Xe; Q) is nilpotent, then this Sullivan model can be computed from . Minimal Sullivan algebras (^V; d) are equipped with a homotopy theory and a range of invariants analogous to those which arise in topology. Key among these are the graded 1 homotopy Lie algebra L = fLpgp≥0 and, when dim H (^V; d) < 1, the group GL. Here p+1 2 Lp = Hom(V ; Q), the Lie bracket is dual to the component d1 : V ! ^ V of d, and an exponential map converts L0 to GL. The group GL acts by conjugation in L and also in H(^V ≥2; d) where (^V ≥2; d) is obtained by dividing by V 1^ ^ V . A third key invariant is the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category, cat (^V; d), defined as the least m for which (^V; d) is a homotopy retract of (^V= ^>m V; d). 1 When (^V; d) is the minimal Sullivan model of a CW complex X such that dim H (X; Q) < ≥2 1, then GL = π1(XQ), L≥1 = π≥1(ΩXQ), and there is a natural map H(^V ; d) ! H(Xe; Q) equivariant via π1('X ) with respect to the actions of GL and the action by cover- ing transformations of π1(X). Finally, as in the simply connected case ([18]) cat (^V; d) ≤ cat X. Sullivan models (^V; d) are constructed via a functor, APL (inspired by the differen- tial forms on a manifold) from spaces to rational cochain algebras, for which H(APL(X)) ∗ and H (X; Q) are naturally isomorphic algebras. Then (^V; d) is the unique (up to iso- morphism) minimal Sullivan algebra admitting a morphism m :(^V; d) ! APL(X) for which H(m) is an isomorphism. Moreover any morphism ' :(^W; d) ! APL(X) from an arbitrary minimal Sullivan algebra determines by adjunction a homotopy class of maps j'j : X ! j ^ V; dj; in particular, jmj is homotopic to the map 'X above. This second step can be applied to construct a minimal Sullivan model (^V; d) ! (A; d) for any commutative cochain algebra satisfying H0(A; d) = lk. While these may not be Sullivan models of a topological space, the homotopy machinery of minimal Sullivan algebras is established independently of topology, and so can be applied in this more general context. 2 In particular, minimal Sullivan algebras become a valuable tool in the study of graded n Lie algebras E = E≥0 with lower central series denoted by (E ), provided that E0 acts nilpotently by the adjoint representation in each Ei, i ≥ 1, and that n dim E0=[E0;E0] < 1 ; dim Ei < 1 ; i ≥ 1 ; and \n E0 = 0 : Such Lie algebras are called Sullivan Lie algebras. Note that we may have dim E0 = 1. For a Sullivan Lie algebra, E, lim C∗(E=En) is a minimal Sullivan algebra, called −! n the associated Sullivan algebra for E, and lim E=En is its homotopy Lie algebra. (Here − n C∗(−) is the classical Cartan-Chevalley-Eilenberg cochain algebra construction.) In the reverse direction, if (^V; d) is any minimal Sullivan algebra for which dim H1(^V; d) < 1 then its homotopy Lie algebra is a Sullivan Lie algebra whose associated Sullivan algebra 2 is (^V; d1) with d1 the component of d mapping V to ^ V . In summary, the interplay between spaces, minimal Sullivan algebras and graded Lie algebras is illustrated by the diagram Graded Lie algebras O L lim C∗(L=Ln) −! n APL Minimal Sullivan j : j Spaces / / Spaces algebras A crucial technical tool in the theory of minimal Sullivan algebras is the conversion of cochain algebra morphisms to Λ-extensions (^V; d) ! (^V ⊗ ^Z; d) in which (^V; d) is a minimal Sullivan algebra and d : Zp ! ^V ⊗ ^Z≤p satisfies a "nilpotence" condition; when V 1 6= 0 it may happen that Z0 6= 0. Division by ^+V ⊗ ^Z gives a quotient cochain algebra (^Z; d) and the Λ-extension determines holonomy representations of L and, if 1 dim H (^V; d) < 1, of GL in H(^Z; d). These Λ-extensions are the Sullivan analogues of fibrations, and (^Z; d) is the Sullivan analogue of the fibre. The analogy is not merely abstract: suppose (^V; d) / (^V ⊗ ^Z; d) α β APL(p) APL(Y ) / APL(X) is a commutative diagram in which Y is a CW complex and p is the projection of a fibration with fibre F . Then β factors to give a morphism γ :(^Z; d) ! APL(F ), and, ∗ in this setting H(γ): H(^Z; d) ! H (F ; Q) is equivariant via π1(j j) with respect to the homolony representation of GL in H(^Z; d) and π1(Y ) in H(F ; Q). There are two important examples of Λ-extensions. First, if (^V; d) is a minimal Sullivan algebra then (^V 1; d) ! (^V; d) is a Λ-extension, the Sullivan analogue of a classifying map for a CW complex X. If this morphism is a Sullivan representative for the ∗ classifying map, and if H (X; Q) has finite type and the covering space action of π1(X) is nilpotent, then X is a Sullivan space and the quotient (^V ≥2; d) is a minimal Sullivan model for Xe. Many classical examples are Sullivan spaces, including all closed orientable Riemann surfaces. 3 Second, if (^V; d) is any minimal Sullivan algebra, converting the augmentation (^V; d) ! lk yields a Λ-extension (^V; d) ! (^V ⊗^U; d) with H(^V ⊗^U; d) = lk; this is the acyclic closure of (^V; d). Here the differential in the quotient ^U is zero and so the holonomy representation is a representation of the homotopy Lie algebra L of ^V in ^U.
Recommended publications
  • HE WANG Abstract. a Mini-Course on Rational Homotopy Theory

    HE WANG Abstract. a Mini-Course on Rational Homotopy Theory

    RATIONAL HOMOTOPY THEORY HE WANG Abstract. A mini-course on rational homotopy theory. Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Elementary homotopy theory 3 3. Spectral sequences 8 4. Postnikov towers and rational homotopy theory 16 5. Commutative differential graded algebras 21 6. Minimal models 25 7. Fundamental groups 34 References 36 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 55P62 . 1 2 HE WANG 1. Introduction One of the goals of topology is to classify the topological spaces up to some equiva- lence relations, e.g., homeomorphic equivalence and homotopy equivalence (for algebraic topology). In algebraic topology, most of the time we will restrict to spaces which are homotopy equivalent to CW complexes. We have learned several algebraic invariants such as fundamental groups, homology groups, cohomology groups and cohomology rings. Using these algebraic invariants, we can seperate two non-homotopy equivalent spaces. Another powerful algebraic invariants are the higher homotopy groups. Whitehead the- orem shows that the functor of homotopy theory are power enough to determine when two CW complex are homotopy equivalent. A rational coefficient version of the homotopy theory has its own techniques and advan- tages: 1. fruitful algebraic structures. 2. easy to calculate. RATIONAL HOMOTOPY THEORY 3 2. Elementary homotopy theory 2.1. Higher homotopy groups. Let X be a connected CW-complex with a base point x0. Recall that the fundamental group π1(X; x0) = [(I;@I); (X; x0)] is the set of homotopy classes of maps from pair (I;@I) to (X; x0) with the product defined by composition of paths. Similarly, for each n ≥ 2, the higher homotopy group n n πn(X; x0) = [(I ;@I ); (X; x0)] n n is the set of homotopy classes of maps from pair (I ;@I ) to (X; x0) with the product defined by composition.
  • Natural Cadmium Is Made up of a Number of Isotopes with Different Abundances: Cd106 (1.25%), Cd110 (12.49%), Cd111 (12.8%), Cd

    Natural Cadmium Is Made up of a Number of Isotopes with Different Abundances: Cd106 (1.25%), Cd110 (12.49%), Cd111 (12.8%), Cd

    CLASSROOM Natural cadmium is made up of a number of isotopes with different abundances: Cd106 (1.25%), Cd110 (12.49%), Cd111 (12.8%), Cd 112 (24.13%), Cd113 (12.22%), Cd114(28.73%), Cd116 (7.49%). Of these Cd113 is the main neutron absorber; it has an absorption cross section of 2065 barns for thermal neutrons (a barn is equal to 10–24 sq.cm), and the cross section is a measure of the extent of reaction. When Cd113 absorbs a neutron, it forms Cd114 with a prompt release of γ radiation. There is not much energy release in this reaction. Cd114 can again absorb a neutron to form Cd115, but the cross section for this reaction is very small. Cd115 is a β-emitter C V Sundaram, National (with a half-life of 53hrs) and gets transformed to Indium-115 Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science which is a stable isotope. In none of these cases is there any large Campus, Bangalore 560 012, release of energy, nor is there any release of fresh neutrons to India. propagate any chain reaction. Vishwambhar Pati The Möbius Strip Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore 560059, India The Möbius strip is easy enough to construct. Just take a strip of paper and glue its ends after giving it a twist, as shown in Figure 1a. As you might have gathered from popular accounts, this surface, which we shall call M, has no inside or outside. If you started painting one “side” red and the other “side” blue, you would come to a point where blue and red bump into each other.
  • Arxiv:1906.03655V2 [Math.AT] 1 Jul 2020

    Arxiv:1906.03655V2 [Math.AT] 1 Jul 2020

    RATIONAL HOMOTOPY EQUIVALENCES AND SINGULAR CHAINS MANUEL RIVERA, FELIX WIERSTRA, MAHMOUD ZEINALIAN Abstract. Bousfield and Kan’s Q-completion and fiberwise Q-completion of spaces lead to two different approaches to the rational homotopy theory of non-simply connected spaces. In the first approach, a map is a weak equivalence if it induces an isomorphism on rational homology. In the second, a map of path-connected pointed spaces is a weak equivalence if it induces an isomorphism between fun- damental groups and higher rationalized homotopy groups; we call these maps π1-rational homotopy equivalences. In this paper, we compare these two notions and show that π1-rational homotopy equivalences correspond to maps that induce Ω-quasi-isomorphisms on the rational singular chains, i.e. maps that induce a quasi-isomorphism after applying the cobar functor to the dg coassociative coalge- bra of rational singular chains. This implies that both notions of rational homotopy equivalence can be deduced from the rational singular chains by using different alge- braic notions of weak equivalences: quasi-isomorphism and Ω-quasi-isomorphisms. We further show that, in the second approach, there are no dg coalgebra models of the chains that are both strictly cocommutative and coassociative. 1. Introduction One of the questions that gave birth to rational homotopy theory is the commuta- tive cochains problem which, given a commutative ring k, asks whether there exists a commutative differential graded (dg) associative k-algebra functorially associated to any topological space that is weakly equivalent to the dg associative algebra of singu- lar k-cochains on the space with the cup product [S77], [Q69].
  • Recognizing Surfaces

    Recognizing Surfaces

    RECOGNIZING SURFACES Ivo Nikolov and Alexandru I. Suciu Mathematics Department College of Arts and Sciences Northeastern University Abstract The subject of this poster is the interplay between the topology and the combinatorics of surfaces. The main problem of Topology is to classify spaces up to continuous deformations, known as homeomorphisms. Under certain conditions, topological invariants that capture qualitative and quantitative properties of spaces lead to the enumeration of homeomorphism types. Surfaces are some of the simplest, yet most interesting topological objects. The poster focuses on the main topological invariants of two-dimensional manifolds—orientability, number of boundary components, genus, and Euler characteristic—and how these invariants solve the classification problem for compact surfaces. The poster introduces a Java applet that was written in Fall, 1998 as a class project for a Topology I course. It implements an algorithm that determines the homeomorphism type of a closed surface from a combinatorial description as a polygon with edges identified in pairs. The input for the applet is a string of integers, encoding the edge identifications. The output of the applet consists of three topological invariants that completely classify the resulting surface. Topology of Surfaces Topology is the abstraction of certain geometrical ideas, such as continuity and closeness. Roughly speaking, topol- ogy is the exploration of manifolds, and of the properties that remain invariant under continuous, invertible transforma- tions, known as homeomorphisms. The basic problem is to classify manifolds according to homeomorphism type. In higher dimensions, this is an impossible task, but, in low di- mensions, it can be done. Surfaces are some of the simplest, yet most interesting topological objects.
  • Rational Homotopy Theory: a Brief Introduction

    Rational Homotopy Theory: a Brief Introduction

    Contemporary Mathematics Rational Homotopy Theory: A Brief Introduction Kathryn Hess Abstract. These notes contain a brief introduction to rational homotopy theory: its model category foundations, the Sullivan model and interactions with the theory of local commutative rings. Introduction This overview of rational homotopy theory consists of an extended version of lecture notes from a minicourse based primarily on the encyclopedic text [18] of F´elix, Halperin and Thomas. With only three hours to devote to such a broad and rich subject, it was difficult to choose among the numerous possible topics to present. Based on the subjects covered in the first week of this summer school, I decided that the goal of this course should be to establish carefully the founda- tions of rational homotopy theory, then to treat more superficially one of its most important tools, the Sullivan model. Finally, I provided a brief summary of the ex- tremely fruitful interactions between rational homotopy theory and local algebra, in the spirit of the summer school theme “Interactions between Homotopy Theory and Algebra.” I hoped to motivate the students to delve more deeply into the subject themselves, while providing them with a solid enough background to do so with relative ease. As these lecture notes do not constitute a history of rational homotopy theory, I have chosen to refer the reader to [18], instead of to the original papers, for the proofs of almost all of the results cited, at least in Sections 1 and 2. The reader interested in proper attributions will find them in [18] or [24]. The author would like to thank Luchezar Avramov and Srikanth Iyengar, as well as the anonymous referee, for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.
  • Arxiv:Math/9703211V1

    Arxiv:Math/9703211V1

    ON A COMPUTER RECOGNITION OF 3-MANIFOLDS SERGEI V. MATVEEV Abstract. We describe theoretical backgrounds for a computer program that rec- ognizes all closed orientable 3-manifolds up to complexity 8. The program can treat also not necessarily closed 3-manifolds of bigger complexities, but here some unrec- ognizable (by the program) 3-manifolds may occur. Introduction Let M be an orientable 3-manifold such that ∂M is either empty or consists of tori. Then, modulo W. Thurston geometrization conjecture [Scott 1983], M can be decomposed in a unique way into graph-manifolds and hyperbolic pieces. The classification of graph-manifolds is well-known [Waldhausen 1967], and a list of cusped hyperbolic manifolds up to complexity 7 is contained in [Hildebrand, Weeks 1989]. If we possess an information how the pieces are glued together, we can get an explicit description of M as a sum of geometric pieces. Usually such a presentation is sufficient for understanding the intrinsic structure of M; it allows one to label M with a name that distinguishes it from all other manifolds. We describe theoretical backgrounds and a general scheme of a computer algorithm that realizes in part the procedure. Particularly, for all closed orientable manifolds up to complexity 8 (all of them are graph-manifolds, see [Matveev 1990]) the algorithm gives an exact answer. The paper is based on a talk at MSRI workshop on computational and algorithmic methods in three-dimensional topology (March 10-14, 1997). The author wishes to thank MSRI for a friendly atmosphere and good conditions of work. arXiv:math/9703211v1 [math.GT] 26 Mar 1997 1.
  • Algebraic Topology - Homework 2

    Algebraic Topology - Homework 2

    Algebraic Topology - Homework 2 Problem 1. Show that the Klein bottle can be cut into two Mobius strips that intersect along their boundaries. Problem 2. Show that a projective plane contains a Mobius strip. Problem 3. The boundary of a disk D is a circle @D. The boundary of a Mobius strip M is a circle @M. Let ∼ be the equivalence relation defined by the identifying each point on the circle @D bijectively to a point on the circle @M. Let X be the quotient space (D [ M)= ∼. What is this quotient space homeomorphic to? Show this using cut-and-paste techniques. Problem 4. Show that the connected sum of two tori can be expressed as a quotient space of an octagonal disk with sides identified according to the word aba−1b−1cdc−1d−1: Then considering the eight vertices of the octagon, how many points do they represent on the surface. Problem 5. Find a representation of the connected sum of g tori as a quotient space of a polygonal disk with sides identified in pairs. Do the same thing for a connected sum of n projective planes. In each case give the corresponding word that describes this identification. Problem 6. (a) Show that the square disks with edges pasted together according to the words aabb and aba−1b result in homeomorphic surfaces. Hint: Cut along one of the diagonals and glue the two triangular disks together along one of the original edges. (b) Vague question: What does this tell you about some spaces that you know? Problem 7.
  • Rational Homotopy Theory of Mapping Spaces Via Lie Theory for L-Infinity

    Rational Homotopy Theory of Mapping Spaces Via Lie Theory for L-Infinity

    RATIONAL HOMOTOPY THEORY OF MAPPING SPACES VIA LIE THEORY FOR L∞-ALGEBRAS ALEXANDER BERGLUND Abstract. We calculate the higher homotopy groups of the Deligne-Getzler ∞-groupoid associated to a nilpotent L∞-algebra. As an application, we present a new approach to the rational homotopy theory of mapping spaces. 1. Introduction In [17] Getzler associates an ∞-groupoid γ•(g) to a nilpotent L∞-algebra g, which generalizes the Deligne groupoid of a nilpotent differential graded Lie algebra [16, 17, 19, 24]. It is well known that the set of path components π0γ•(g) may be identified with the ‘moduli space’ M C (g) of equivalence classes of Maurer-Cartan elements, which plays an important role in deformation theory. Our main result is the calculation of the higher homotopy groups. Theorem 1.1. For a nilpotent L∞-algebra g there is an explicitly defined natural group isomorphism τ B : Hn(g ) → πn+1(γ•(g), τ), n ≥ 0, τ where g denotes the L∞-algebra g twisted by the Maurer-Cartan element τ. The τ group structure on H0(g ) is given by the Campbell-Hausdorff formula. As a corollary, we obtain a characterization of when an L∞-morphism induces an equivalence between the associated ∞-groupoids. Corollary 1.2. An L∞-morphism between nilpotent L∞-algebras f : g → h in- duces an equivalence of ∞-groupoids γ•(g) → γ•(h) if and only if the following two conditions are satisfied: (1) The map on Maurer-Cartan moduli M C (g) → M C (h) is a bijection. arXiv:1110.6145v2 [math.AT] 1 Aug 2015 τ τ f∗(τ) (2) The L∞-morphism f : g → h induces an isomorphism in homology in non-negative degrees, for every Maurer-Cartan element τ in g.
  • CLASSIFICATION of SURFACES Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Topology 1 3. Complexes and Surfaces 3 4. Classification of Surfaces 7

    CLASSIFICATION of SURFACES Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Topology 1 3. Complexes and Surfaces 3 4. Classification of Surfaces 7

    CLASSIFICATION OF SURFACES JUSTIN HUANG Abstract. We will classify compact, connected surfaces into three classes: the sphere, the connected sum of tori, and the connected sum of projective planes. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Topology 1 3. Complexes and Surfaces 3 4. Classification of Surfaces 7 5. The Euler Characteristic 11 6. Application of the Euler Characterstic 14 References 16 1. Introduction This paper explores the subject of compact 2-manifolds, or surfaces. We begin with a brief overview of useful topological concepts in Section 2 and move on to an exploration of surfaces in Section 3. A few results on compact, connected surfaces brings us to the classification of surfaces into three elementary types. In Section 4, we prove Thm 4.1, which states that the only compact, connected surfaces are the sphere, connected sums of tori, and connected sums of projective planes. The Euler characteristic, explored in Section 5, is used to prove Thm 5.7, which extends this result by stating that these elementary types are distinct. We conclude with an application of the Euler characteristic as an approach to solving the map-coloring problem in Section 6. We closely follow the text, Topology of Surfaces, although we provide alternative proofs to some of the theorems. 2. Topology Before we begin our discussion of surfaces, we first need to recall a few definitions from topology. Definition 2.1. A continuous and invertible function f : X → Y such that its inverse, f −1, is also continuous is a homeomorphism. In this case, the two spaces X and Y are topologically equivalent.
  • Tori in the Diffeomorphism Groups of Simply-Connected 4-Nianifolds

    Tori in the Diffeomorphism Groups of Simply-Connected 4-Nianifolds

    Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soo. {1982), 91, 305-314 , 305 Printed in Great Britain Tori in the diffeomorphism groups of simply-connected 4-nianifolds BY PAUL MELVIN University of California, Santa Barbara {Received U March 1981) Let Jf be a closed simply-connected 4-manifold. All manifolds will be assumed smooth and oriented. The purpose of this paper is to classify up to conjugacy the topological subgroups of Diff (if) isomorphic to the 2-dimensional torus T^ (Theorem 1), and to give an explicit formula for the number of such conjugacy classes (Theorem 2). Such a conjugacy class corresponds uniquely to a weak equivalence class of effective y^-actions on M. Thus the classification problem is trivial unless M supports an effective I^^-action. Orlik and Raymond showed that this happens if and only if if is a connected sum of copies of ± CP^ and S^ x S^ (2), and so this paper is really a study of the different T^-actions on these manifolds. 1. Statement of results An unoriented k-cycle {fij... e^) is the equivalence class of an element (e^,..., e^) in Z^ under the equivalence relation generated by cyclic permutations and the relation (ei, ...,e^)-(e^, ...,ei). From any unoriented cycle {e^... e^ one may construct an oriented 4-manifold P by plumbing S^-bundles over S^ according to the weighted circle shown in Fig. 1. Such a 4-manifold will be called a circular plumbing. The co^-e of the plumbing is the union S of the zero-sections of the constituent bundles. The diffeomorphism type of the pair.
  • Problems in Low-Dimensional Topology

    Problems in Low-Dimensional Topology

    Problems in Low-Dimensional Topology Edited by Rob Kirby Berkeley - 22 Dec 95 Contents 1 Knot Theory 7 2 Surfaces 85 3 3-Manifolds 97 4 4-Manifolds 179 5 Miscellany 259 Index of Conjectures 282 Index 284 Old Problem Lists 294 Bibliography 301 1 2 CONTENTS Introduction In April, 1977 when my first problem list [38,Kirby,1978] was finished, a good topologist could reasonably hope to understand the main topics in all of low dimensional topology. But at that time Bill Thurston was already starting to greatly influence the study of 2- and 3-manifolds through the introduction of geometry, especially hyperbolic. Four years later in September, 1981, Mike Freedman turned a subject, topological 4-manifolds, in which we expected no progress for years, into a subject in which it seemed we knew everything. A few months later in spring 1982, Simon Donaldson brought gauge theory to 4-manifolds with the first of a remarkable string of theorems showing that smooth 4-manifolds which might not exist or might not be diffeomorphic, in fact, didn’t and weren’t. Exotic R4’s, the strangest of smooth manifolds, followed. And then in late spring 1984, Vaughan Jones brought us the Jones polynomial and later Witten a host of other topological quantum field theories (TQFT’s). Physics has had for at least two decades a remarkable record for guiding mathematicians to remarkable mathematics (Seiberg–Witten gauge theory, new in October, 1994, is the latest example). Lest one think that progress was only made using non-topological techniques, note that Freedman’s work, and other results like knot complements determining knots (Gordon- Luecke) or the Seifert fibered space conjecture (Mess, Scott, Gabai, Casson & Jungreis) were all or mostly classical topology.
  • A Family of Complex Nilmanifolds with in Nitely Many Real Homotopy Types

    A Family of Complex Nilmanifolds with in Nitely Many Real Homotopy Types

    Complex Manifolds 2018; 5: 89–102 Complex Manifolds Research Article Adela Latorre*, Luis Ugarte, and Raquel Villacampa A family of complex nilmanifolds with innitely many real homotopy types https://doi.org/10.1515/coma-2018-0004 Received December 14, 2017; accepted January 30, 2018. Abstract: We nd a one-parameter family of non-isomorphic nilpotent Lie algebras ga, with a ∈ [0, ∞), of real dimension eight with (strongly non-nilpotent) complex structures. By restricting a to take rational values, we arrive at the existence of innitely many real homotopy types of 8-dimensional nilmanifolds admitting a complex structure. Moreover, balanced Hermitian metrics and generalized Gauduchon metrics on such nilmanifolds are constructed. Keywords: Nilmanifold, Nilpotent Lie algebra, Complex structure, Hermitian metric, Homotopy theory, Minimal model MSC: 55P62, 17B30, 53C55 1 Introduction Let g be an even-dimensional real nilpotent Lie algebra. A complex structure on g is an endomorphism J∶ g Ð→ g satisfying J2 = −Id and the integrability condition given by the vanishing of the Nijenhuis tensor, i.e. NJ(X, Y) ∶= [X, Y] + J[JX, Y] + J[X, JY] − [JX, JY] = 0, (1) for all X, Y ∈ g. The classication of nilpotent Lie algebras endowed with such structures has interesting geometrical applications; for instance, it allows to construct complex nilmanifolds and study their geometric properties. Let us recall that a nilmanifold is a compact quotient Γ G of a connected, simply connected, nilpotent Lie group G by a lattice Γ of maximal rank in G. If the Lie algebra g of G has a complex structure J, then a compact complex manifold X = (Γ G, J) is dened in a natural way.