Online ISSN : 2249-4626 Print ISSN : 0975-5896 DOI : 10.17406/GJSFR
Toxic Effect of Metal Ions Volatile Organic Compounds
Studying the Nature Relationship Regional Estimation of Flood Quantile
VOLUME 16 ISSUE 4 VERSION 1.0
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: H Environment & Earth Science
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: H Environment & Earth Science Volume 16 Issue 4 (Ver. 1.0)
Open Association of Research Society
© Global Journal of Science Global Journals Inc. Frontier Research. 2016 . (A Delaware USA Incorporation with “Good Standing”; Reg. Number: 0423089) Sponsors: Open Association of Research Society All rights reserved. Open Scientific Standards
This is a special issue published in version 1.0 of “Global Journal of Science Frontier Publisher’s Headquarters office Research.” By Global Journals Inc. ® All articles are open access articles distributed Global Journals Headquarters under “Global Journal of Science Frontier 945th Concord Streets, Research” Framingham Massachusetts Pin: 01701, Reading License, which permits restricted use. United States of America Entire contents are copyright by of “Global Journal of Science Frontier Research” unless USA Toll Free: +001-888-839-7392 otherwise noted on specific articles. USA Toll Free Fax: +001-888-839-7392 No part of this publication may be reproduced Offset Typesetting or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information Global Journals Incorporated storage and retrieval system, without written 2nd, Lansdowne, Lansdowne Rd., Croydon-Surrey, permission. Pin: CR9 2ER, United Kingdom The opinions and statements made in this book are those of the authors concerned. Packaging & Continental Dispatching Ultraculture has not verified and neither confirms nor denies any of the foregoing and no warranty or fitness is implied. Global Journals E- 3130 Sudama Nagar, Near Gopur Square, Engage with the contents herein at your own risk. Indore, M.P., Pin:452009, India
The use of this journal, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is Find a correspondence nodal officer near you governed by our Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy given on our website http://globaljournals.us/terms-and-condition/ To find nodal officer of your country, please menu-id-1463/ email us at [email protected]
By referring / using / reading / any type of eContacts association / referencing this journal, this signifies and you acknowledge that you have read them and that you accept and will be Press Inquiries: [email protected] bound by the terms thereof. Investor Inquiries: [email protected]
All information, journals, this journal, Technical Support: [email protected] activities undertaken, materials, services and Media & Releases: [email protected] our website, terms and conditions, privacy policy, and this journal is subject to change anytime without any prior notice. Pricing (Including by Air Parcel Charges): Incorporation No.: 0423089 License No.: 42125/022010/1186 Registration No.: 430374 For Authors: Import-Export Code: 1109007027 Employer Identification Number (EIN): 22 USD (B/W) & 50 USD (Color) USA Tax ID: 98-0673427 Yearly Subscription (Personal & Institutional): 200 USD (B/W) & 250 USD (Color) Global Journals Constitutional Editorial Board ~Integrated~
Dr. Charles A. Rarick Dr. Osman Balci, Professor
Ph.D. Department of Computer Science Professor of International Business Virginia Tech, Virginia University College of Business Ph.D. and M.S. Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York Purdue University Northwest M.S. and B.S. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey Hammond, Indiana USA Web: manta.cs.vt.edu/balci
Dr. A. Heidari Dr. Miklas Scholz
Ph.D, D.Sc, Faculty of Chemistry B.Eng. (equiv), PgC, MSc, Ph.D, CWEM, C.Env., CSci, C.Eng. California South University (CSU), Nigeria Health, Wellness and Fitness United Stated University of Lund
Dr. Maria Gullo Dr. Qiang Wu
Ph.D, Food Science and Technology Ph.D University of Technology, Sydney University of Catania Department of Mathematics, Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences Physics and Electrical Engineering University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy Northumbria University
Dr. Bingyun Li Dr. Audeh Ahmad Ahmad
Ph.D Fellow, IAES Amman Arab University For Higher Education Guest Researcher, NIOSH, CDC, Morgantown, WV Ph.D, Accounting-Ais Institute of Nano and Biotechnologies Faculty of Business Administration West Virginia University, US Alalbyt University, Jordan, Amman
Dr. Lucian Baia Dr. Sahraoui Chaieb
Ph.D Julius-Maximilians University Würzburg, Germany PhD Physics and Chemical Physics Associate professor M.S. Theoretical Physics Department of Condensed Matter Physics and B.S. Physics, École Normale Supérieure, Paris Advanced Technologies, Babes-Bolyai University, Associate Professor, Bioscience Romania King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Dr. Houfa Shen Dr. Arsha k Poghossia n
Ph.D Manufacturing Engineering, Ph.D Solid-State Physics Mechanical Engineering, Structural Engineering Leningrad Electrotechnic Institute, Russia Department of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Nano and Biotechnologies Tsinghua University, China Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Germany Dr. A. Stegou-Sagi a Dr. Adel A l Jumail y
Ph.D Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Ph.D Electrical Engineering (AI) Engineering School of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Engineering and IT National Technical University of Athens University of Technology, Sydney
Giuseppe A Provenzano Kitipong Jaojaruek
Irrigation and Water Management, Soil Science, B. Eng, M. Eng D. Eng (Energy Technology, Asian Institute of Technology). Water Science Hydraulic Engineering Kasetsart University Kamphaeng Saen (KPS) Campus Dept. of Agricultural and Forest Sciences Energy Research Laboratory of Mechanical Engineering Universita di Palermo, Italy
Dr. Ciprian LĂPUȘAN Dr. Mauro Lenzi
Ph. D in Mechanical Engineering Ph.D, Biological Science, Pisa University, Italy Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Lagoon Ecology and Aquaculture Laboratory Cluj-Napoca (Romania) Orbetello Pesca Lagunare Company
Dr. Haijian Shi Dr. Omid Gohardani
Ph.D Civil Engineering Structural Engineering M.Sc. (Computer Science), FICCT, U.S.A. Oakland, CA, United States Email: [email protected]
Dr. Yogita Bajpai Dr. Yap Yee Jiun
Ph.D Senior Aerospace/Mechanical/ B.Sc.(Manchester), Ph.D.(Brunel), M.Inst.P.(UK) Aeronautical Engineering professional Institute of Mathematical Sciences, M.Sc. Mechanical Engineering University of Malaya, M.Sc. Aeronautical Engineering Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia B.Sc. Vehicle Engineering Orange County, California, USA
Dr. Abdurrahman Arslanyilmaz Dr. Thomas Wischgoll
Computer Science & Information Systems Department Computer Science and Engineering, Youngstown State University Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio Ph.D., Texas A&M University B.S., M.S., Ph.D. University of Missouri, Columbia (University of Kaiserslautern) Gazi University, Turkey Web:avida.cs.wright.edu/personal/wischgol/index_eng.html Web:cis.ysu.edu/~aarslanyilmaz/professional_web
Dr. Chao Wang Dr. Baziotis Ioannis
Ph.D. in Computational Mechanics Ph.D. in Petrology-Geochemistry-Mineralogy Rosharon, TX, USA Lipson, Athens, Greece Dr. Xiaohong He Dr. T. David A. Forbes
Professor of International Business Associate Professor and Range Nutritionist University of Quinnipiac Ph.D Edinburgh University - Animal Nutrition BS, Jilin Institute of Technology; MA, MS, Ph.D, M.S. Aberdeen University - Animal Nutrition (University of Texas-Dallas) B.A. University of Dublin- Zoology. Web: quinnipiac.edu/x1606.xml Web: essm.tamu.edu/people-info/faculty/forbes-david
Dr. Burcin Becerik-Gerber Dr. Bassey Benjamin Esu
University of Southern Californi B.Sc. Marketing; MBA Marketing; Ph.D Marketing Ph.D in Civil Engineering Lecturer, Department of Marketing, University of Calabar DDes from Harvard University Tourism Consultant, Cross River State Tourism Development Department M.S. from University of California, Berkeley Co-rdinator , Sustainable Tourism Initiative, Calabar, M.S. from Istanbul Technical University Nigeria Web: i-lab.usc.edu
Dr. Söhnke M. Bartram Dr. Maciej Gucma
Department of Accounting and Finance Asistant Professor, Lancaster University Management School Maritime University of Szczecin Szczecin, Poland Ph.D. (WHU Koblenz) Ph.D. Eng. Master Mariner MBA/BBA (University of Saarbrücken) Web: www.mendeley.com/profiles/maciej-gucma/ Web: lancs.ac.uk/staff/bartras1/
Dr. Söhnke M. Bartram Dr. Maciej Gucma
Ph.D, (IT) in Faculty of Engg. & Tech. Asistant Professor , Professor & Head, Maritime Univeristy of Szczecin Szczecin, Poland Dept. of ISE at NMAM Institute of Technology PhD. Eng. Master Mariner Web: www.mendeley.com/profiles/maciej-gucma/
Dr. Balasubramani R Dr. Fotini Labropulu
Department of Accounting and Finance Mathematics - Luther College, University of Regina Lancaster University Management School Ph.D, M.Sc. in Mathematics Ph.D. (WHU Koblenz) B.A. (Honours) in Mathematics, University of Windsor MBA/BBA (University of Saarbrücken) Web: luthercollege.edu/Default.aspx Web: lancs.ac.uk/staff/bartras1/
M. Meguellati Dr. Vesna Stanković Pejnović Department of Electronics, Ph. D. Philospohy , Zagreb, Croatia
University of Batna, Batna 05000, Algeria Rusveltova, Skopje, Macedonia Dr. Miguel Angel Ariño Dr. Carlos García Pont
Professor of Decision Sciences Associate Professor of Marketing IESE Business School IESE Business School, University of Navarra Barcelona, Spain (Universidad de Navarra) Doctor of Philosophy (Management), CEIBS (China Europe International Business School). Massachussetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen Master in Business Administration, IESE, Ph.D. in Mathematics, University of Barcelona University of Navarra BA in Mathematics (Licenciatura) Degree in Industrial Engineering, University of Barcelona Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Web:web.iese.edu/MAArino/overview.axd Web: iese.edu/aplicaciones/faculty/facultyDetail.asp
Dr. Philip G. Moscoso Dr. Sanjay Dixit, M.D.
Technology and Operations Management Director, EP Laboratories, Philadelphia VA Medical Center IESE Business School, University of Navarra Cardiovascular Medicine - Cardiac Arrhythmia Ph.D in Industrial Engineering and Management, University of Penn School of Medicine ETH Zurich , M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering, Web: pennmedicine.org/wagform/MainPage.aspx? ETH Zurich Link: Philip G. Moscoso personal webpage
Dr. Mihaly Mezei Dr. Pina C. Sanelli
Associate Professor Associate Professor of Radiology Department of Structural and Chemical Biology Associate Professor of Public Health Mount Sinai School of Medical Center Weill Cornell Medical College Ph.D., Etvs Lornd University, Postdoctoral Training, Associate Attending Radiologist New York University, MSSM home: NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital https://www.mountsinai.org/Find%20A%20Faculty/pro MRI, MRA, CT, and CTA file.do?id=0000072500001497192632 Neuroradiology and Diagnostic Radiology Lab home - software, M.D., State University of New York at Buffalo, publications: https://inka.mssm.edu/~mezei School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Department: https://atlas.physbio.mssm.edu Web: weillcornell.org/pinasanelli/
Dr. Vivek Dubey (HON.) Er. Suyog Dixit
MS (Industrial Engineering), (M.Tech), BE (HONS. in CSE), FICCT MS (Mechanical Engineering) SAP Certified Consultant University of Wisconsin CEO at IOSRD, GAOR OSS FICCT Technical Dean, Global Journals Inc.(US) Editor-in-Chief, USA Website: www.suyogdixit.com [email protected] Email: [email protected], [email protected] Er. Pritesh Rajvaidya Jixin Zhong
Computer Science Department Department of Medicine, California State University Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, BE (Computer Science), FICCT Zhanjiang, China Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, Technical Dean, USA The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Dr. Apostolos Ch. Zarros Dr. Wen-Yih Sun
DM, Degree (Ptychio) holder in Medicine, Professor of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Purdue University, Director MRes, Master of Research in Molecular Functions in National Center for Typhoon and Flooding Research, Disease, Taiwan University of Glasgow University Chair Professor FRNS, Fellow, Royal Numismatic Society Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Member, European Society for Neurochemistry National Central University, Chung-Li, Taiwan Member, Royal Institute of Philosophy University Chair Professor Scotland, United Kingdom Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-chu, Taiwan. Ph.D., MS The University of Chicago, Geophysical Sciences BS National Taiwan University, Atmospheric Sciences Web: event.nchc.org.tw/2009
Dr. Han-Xiang Deng Dr. Michael R. Rudnick
MD., Ph.D M.D., FACP Associate Professor and Research Department Associate Professor of Medicine Division of Neuromuscular Medicine Chief, Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division (PMC) Davee Department of Neurology and Clinical Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Neurosciences Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Nephrology and Internal Medicine Web:neurology.northwestern.edu/faculty/deng.html Certified by the American Board of Internal Medicine
Web: uphs.upenn.edu/
Dr. Roberto Sanchez Dr. Aziz M. Barbar, Ph.D.
Associate Professor IEEE Senior Member Department of Structural and Chemical Biology Chairperson, Department of Computer Science Mount Sinai School of Medicine AUST - American University of Science & Technology Ph.D., The Rockefeller University Alfred Naccash Avenue - Ashrafieh Web: mountsinai.org/ Dr. Minghua He Dr. Maciej Gucma
Department of Civil Engineering PhD. Eng. Master Mariner Tsinghua University Warsaw University of Technology Beijing, 100084, China Maritime University of Szczecin Waly Chrobrego 1/2 70-500 Szczecin, Poland
Anis Bey Dr. Tao Yang
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Ph.D, Ohio State University Badji Mokhtar-Annaba Univ., M.S. Kansas State University Annaba, Algeria B.E. Zhejiang University
Chutisant Kerdvibulvech Dr. Feng Feng
Dept. of Inf.& Commun. Technol., Boston University Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand Microbiology, 72 East Concord Street R702 Chulalongkorn University, Thailand Duke University Keio University, Tokyo, Japan United States of America
Dr. Wael Abdullah Shengbing Deng
Elhelece Lecturer of Chemistry, Departamento de Ingeniería Matemática, Faculty of science, Gazan Univeristy, Universidad de Chile. KSA. Ph. D. in Inorganic Chemistry, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas. Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Egypt Blanco Encalada 2120, piso 4. Casilla 170-3. Correo 3. - Santiago, Chile
Yaping Ren Claudio Cuevas
School of Statistics and Mathematics Department of Mathematics Yunnan University of Finance and Economics Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Kunming 650221, China Recife PE Brazil
Ye Tian Dr. Alis Puteh
The Pennsylvania State University Ph.D. (Edu.Policy) UUM 121 Electrical Engineering East Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia University Park, PA 16802, USA M.Ed (Curr. & Inst.), University of Houston, USA
Dr. Diego González-Aguilera Dr. R.K. Dixit(HON.)
Ph.D. Dep. Cartographic and Land Engineering, M.Sc., Ph.D., FICCT Chief Author, India University of Salamanca, Ávila, Spain Email: [email protected]
Dr. Dodi Irawan to Dr. Alex W. Dawotola
PhD, M.Com, B.Econ Hons. Hydraulic Engineering Section, Department of Management, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business, Brawijaya University Stevinweg, Delft, Netherlands Malang, Indonesia
Ivona Vrdoljak Raguz Dr. Luisa dall’Acqua
University of Dubrovnik, Head, PhD in Sociology (Decisional Risk sector), Department of Economics and Business Economics, Master MU2, College Teacher in Philosophy (Italy), Croatia Edu-Research Group, Zürich/Lugano
Dr. Prof Adrian Armstrong Xianghong Qi
BSc Geography, LSE, 1970 University of Tennessee PhD Geography (Geomorphology) Oak Ridge National Laboratory Kings College London 1980 Center for Molecular Biophysics Ordained Priest, Church of England 1988 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Taunton, Somerset, United Kingdom Knoxville, TN 37922, United States
Thierry FEUILLET Gerard G. Dumancas
Géolittomer – LETG UMR 6554 CNRS Postdoctoral Research Fellow, (Université de Nantes) Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Institut de Géographie et d’Aménagement Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation Régional de l’Université de Nantes. Oklahoma City, OK Chemin de la Censive du Tertre – BP, Rodez United States
Dr. Yongbing Jiao Vladimir Burtman
Ph.D. of Marketing Research Scientist School of Economics & Management The University of Utah, Geophysics Ningbo University of Technology Frederick Albert Sutton Building, 115 S 1460 E Room 383 Zhejiang Province, P. R. China Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Cosimo Magazzino Jalal Kafashan
Roma Tre University Mechanical Engineering, Division of Mechatronics Rome, 00145, Italy KU Leuven, BELGIUM
Dr. Christos Kalialakis Zhibin Lin
Ph.D., Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Center for Infrastructure Engineering Studies University of Birmingham, Missouri University of Science and Technology UKM.Sc., Telecommunications, Greece B.Sc, Physics, ERL, 500 W. 16th St. Rolla, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Missouri 65409, USA Dr. Lzzet Yavuz Dr. Asunción López-Varela
MSc, PhD, D Ped Dent. BA, MA (Hons), Ph.D (Hons) Associate Professor, Facultad de Filología. Pediatric Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Complutense Madrid University of Dicle, Diyarbakir, Turkey 29040 Madrid, Spain
Prof. Dr. Eman M. Gouda Dr. Bondage Devanand Dhondiram
Biochemistry Department, Ph.D Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, No. 8, Alley 2, Lane 9, Hongdao station, Giza, Egypt Xizhi district, New Taipei city 221, Taiwan (ROC)
Della Ata Dr. Latifa Oubedda
BS in Biological Sciences National School of Applied Sciences, MA in Regional Economics University Ibn Zohr, Agadir, Morocco Hospital Pharmacy Lotissement Elkhier N°66
Pharmacy Technician Educator Bettana Salé Maroc
r. uhammad assan aza, PhD r. ai- inh ran D M H R D H L T Engineering Mathematics PhD in Biological Engineering Internetworking Engineering, Dalhousie University, Department of Biological Engineering Canada College of Engineering Inha University, Incheon, Korea
Dr. Shaopin g Xiao Dr. Shun-Chung Lee
BS, MS, Ph.D Mechanical Engineering, Department of Resources Engineering,
Northwestern University National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
The University of Iowa Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Center for Computer-Aided Design
Contents of the Issue
i. Copyright Notice ii. Editorial Board Members iii. Chief Author and Dean iv. Contents of the Issue
1. Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging. 1-13 2. Toxic Effect of Metal Ions in Water Resources.15-18 3. Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways. 19-47 4. Land use/Land Cover Dynamics and its Implication on Sustainable Land Management in Wallecha Watershed, Southern Ethiopia. 49-63 5. Landslide Hazard Zonation using Quantitative Methods in GIS, Pauri Garhwal District, Uttarakhand, India. 65-71 6. Regional Estimation of Flood Quantile at Ungauged Sites. 73-74 7. Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs) in Indoor and Outdoor Urban Atmospheres at a Terai Region of Northern India. 75-79
v. Fellows vi. Auxiliary Memberships vii. Process of Submission of Research Paper viii. Preferred Author Guidelines ix. Index
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: H
Environment & Earth Science Volume 16 Issue 4 Version 1.0 Year 2016
Type : Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal
Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA)
Online ISSN: 2249-4626 & Print ISSN: 0975-5896
Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging By Andrzej Zawal, Anna Sulikowska-Drozd, Edyta Stępień, Łukasz Jankowiak & Agnieszka Szlauer-Łukaszewska University of Szczecin, Poland Abstract- Dredging of the river to remove macrophytic vegetation and bottom sediment is a common anthropogenic disturbance in the river ecosystem that directly and indirectly influences benthic invertebrates, including molluscs. We assessed the effect of dredging on malacofauna during the year following such an intervention on the river Krąpiel (NW Poland) and describe the process of gradual recolonization of the dredged parts by gastropods and bivalves as well as its possible sources. Molluscs were adversely impacted immediately after the dredging: relative abundance of rheophilic and species typical of stagnant water or slow-flowing rivers changed and the overall species richness decreased. The fauna recovered to its pre-management state within a year. The BACI analysis showed no long-term effect of the intervention on the total abundance and diversity of the molluscs. As many as 17 mollusc species, among them Unio crassus, were present in the river before and after the dredging. Keywords: disturbance, recovery, dredging, diversity, abundance, mollusca. GJSFR-H Classification: FOR Code: 049999
RegenerationoftheMolluscanFaunaofaSmallLowlandRiverafterDredging
Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of :
© 2016. Andrzej Zawal, Anna Sulikowska-Drozd, Edyta Stępień, Łukasz Jankowiak & Agnieszka Szlauer-Łukaszewska. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
Andrzej Zawal α, Anna Sulikowska-Drozd σ, Edyta Stępień ρ, Łukasz Jankowiak Ѡ & Agnieszka Szlauer-Łukaszewska ¥
Abstract - D redging of the river to remove macrophytic structure and changes the availability of resources or the vegetation and bottom sediment is a common anthropogenic physical environment. Following the initial decreases in disturbance in the river ecosystem that directly and indirectly benthic diversity and abundance that immediately follow 201 influences benthic invertebrates, including molluscs. We a disturbance, aquatic organisms begin to colonize the r assessed the effect of dredging on malacofauna during the ea
sediments. This successional process, called benthic Y year following such an intervention on the river Kr ąpiel (NW Poland) and describe the process of gradual recolonization of recovery, is defined as a return of living resources to 11 the dredged parts by gastropods and bivalves as well as its pre-impact conditions, a reference condition (of a possible sources. Molluscs were adversely impacted neighbouring unaffected area), or both (Wilber & Clark immediately after the dredging: relative abundance of 2007). rheophilic and species typical of stagnant water or slow- There are several environmental conditions flowing rivers changed and the overall species richness identified as influencing benthic recovery rates (e.g. V decreased. The fauna recovered to its pre-management state
sediment type or the time of the disturbance), but it IV within a year. The BACI analysis showed no long-term effect of seems that lotic ecosystems regenerate relatively fast, ue ersion I the intervention on the total abundance and diversity of the s usually within months after dredging (Yount & Niemi s molluscs. As many as 17 mollusc species, among them Unio
1990; Wilber & Clark 2007). The natural succession of I crassus, were present in the river before and after the dredging. An additional 12 taxa were noted for the first time aquatic organisms in dredged areas seems congruent XVI following dredging indicating that the removal of with the process of recovery by benthic invertebrates deoxygenated sediments from the channel provided an after natural disturbances such as floods. The evidence opportunity for the establishment of more diverse mollusc shows that pre-flood conditions are usually re assemblages. Habitat preferences, mobility, and life cycle
established within weeks to months of a flood event characteristics of species determine how they survive )
which caused substantial losses of invertebrate diversity H disturbances and how fast they are able to recolonize the and reductions in density (Lepori & Hjerdt 2006; ( managed sites. Mundahl & Hunt 2011). Keywords: disturbance, recovery, dredging, diversity, Depending on their habitat preferences, abundance, mollusca.
mobility, or life cycle characteristics (e.g. winged adult Research Volume I. Introduction insects), it may be easier or more difficult for various groups of invertebrates to colonize parts of a river that redging of rivers and canals to enable navigation have been dredged. Molluscs, due to their low mobility, and agricultural land irrigation is a common potentially belong to groups which are not able to Frontier Dpractice worldwide. During dredging, rapidly recolonize dredged river segments (Aldridge macrophytic vegetation and bottom sediment are 2000), and work carried out in the river bed may lead to removed (St ępień at al. 2015; Stępień at al. 2016). These the destruction of populations of rare gastropod and Science procedures directly and indirectly affect communities of bivalve species (Layzer et al. 1993; Rauers et al. 2004). of aquatic organisms, by killing or damaging them, The problem of the destruction of malacofauna during destroying their hiding places and feeding places, and hydraulic engineering work and the process of recolo- altering hydrological conditions. Dredging is a nization of the bottom by molluscs requires in-depth Journal disturbance in the river ecosystem according to the research. definition given by Yount & Niemi (1990), i.e. a relatively Global discrete event that disrupts community or population
Author α ¥: Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Limnology, University of Szczecin, Waska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland. e-mail: [email protected] Author σ: Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łód ź, Poland. Author ρ: Department of Plant Taxonomy and Phytogeography, University of Szczecin, Waska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland. Author Ѡ: Department of Vertebrate Zoology and Anthropology, University of Szczecin, Waska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland.
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
201 r ea
Y
2
V
IV
ue ersion I s s
I
XVI
)
H (
Research Volume
Frontier
Science Fig. 1 : Sampling localities on the Krąpiel River. K – control sites, undredged; P – dredged sites. Grey arrows indicate the connection between fish pond and the river channel of Assessing the recovery of benthic habitats Płaska et al. 2016; Dąbkowski et al. 2016). The aim of disturbed by dredging and the disposal of dredged the study was to assess the effect of dredging of a small
Journal material is an important and growing management issue lowland river on its Mollusca fauna during the year all over the world (Wilber & Clark 2007). A good following this intervention. We describe communities of understanding of this process may be helpful in molluscs in the river before and after the dredging and Global selecting methods for maintaining the navigability of follow the process of gradual recolonization of the rivers that would least affect the diversity and dredged segment by gastropods and bivalves. abundance of aquatic invertebrates, and through the II. Study Area food web, of other living resources as well. The research focused on the impact of The river Krąpiel is a tributary of the river Ina. dredging on some groups of macroinvertebrates: The segment studied (coordinates N: 53°25′ 17.38″; E: Hydrachnidia, Ostracoda, Odonata, Heteroptera, 15° 11′ 39.25 ″ – N: 53° 24′ 33.94″; E: 15° 11′ 59.31″) Trichoptera and Coleoptera (Szlauer-Łukaszewska & takes the form of a regulated channel 6-8 m wide, Zawal 2014; Zawal et al. 2015a; Zawal et al. 2015b; running alongside fish ponds (Fig. 1).
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
Before the dredging the river bed was densely shrubs were removed on both sides of the river, leaving overgrown with macrophytic vegetation, mainly only isolated trees (alders and willows). The spoil was Phragmites australis, and the bottom was covered with a deposited on the banks in the form of excavated thick layer of mud. The intervention involved cleaning out sediment. Sediment from the river was removed to such the river bed – removing the mud and vegetation a level as not to interfere with the natural slope of the covering it using an excavator with a dredge operating river bed, to avoid the formation of depressions filled from the bank of the river. The dredging was carried out with stagnant water. This resulted in the removal of in December 2008. about 80 % of the mud that had previously filled the river Following the dredging, the Krąpiel retained its bed, as well as the removal of silt and sand from some previous width. All of the rushes and macrophytic places. The openness of the channel increased 20 – 50 vegetation were removed from the river bed (except for % in places that were not previously overgrown and 80 the segment under the bridge, which was left % in places that had been overgrown with reeds untouched). In addition, a 5 m strip of rushes and willow (Phragmites). 201
r ea
Table 1: Characteristics of the sampled localities along the Krąpiel River; control (undredged) localities in bold Y
31 flow (m s–1) depth (m) bottom plants (%) shadow
Localities before after before after before after before after before after dredging dredging dredging dredging dredging dredging dredging dredging dredging dredging
K1/1 gravel, gravel, V 0.5 0.46 – 0.51 0.7 0.7 stones stones 0 0 lack lack K1 IV sand, silt, sand, silt,
K1/2 0.01 0.002 – 0.02 0.5 0.5 70 50 –70 partly partly ue ersion I
mud mud s s
sand, I D1/1 0.013 0.09 – 0.16 0.4 0.5 mud gravel 30 0 –10 lack lack
D1 XVI silt, sand, silt, D1/2 0.01 0.002 – 0.01 0.2 0.2 mud mud 90 0 – 40 partly lack
silt, D2/1 0.02 0.01– 0.05 0.2 0.5 mud silt, mud 90 0 –10 partly lack D2
D2/2 0.002 0.001– 0.002 0.1 0.2 mud mud 100 0 – 40 partly lack ) H ( D3/1 0.02 0.02 – 0.05 0.3 0.5 silt, mud sand, silt, 20 0 –10 partly lack mud D3 D3/2 0.002 0.001– 0.002 0.1 0.2 mud sand, silt, 80 0 – 40 partly partly
mud Research Volume
K2/1 0.14 0.09 – 0.2 0.5 0.5 sand, sand, 0 0 partly partly gravel gravel K2 sand, sand, K2/2 0.003 0.001– 0.003 0.2 0.2 70 30 –70 partly partly Frontier mud mud D4/1 0.001 0.001– 0.003 0.5 0.7 mud mud 40 0 – 40 partly lack D4 Science D4/2 0.04 0.03 – 0.06 0.5 1.0 mud mud 30 0 – 20 lack lack of Six sampling stations were established on a Additional mollusc samples were collected from segment of the river about 3 km long (Fig. 1). Two fish ponds (four stations) and from a small limnocrene stations were situated at undredged locations (control spring. Journal stations) – K1 upstream from the dredged segment and K2 near the bridge, and the remaining stations were at III. Methods Global dredged sites – P1, P2, P3 and P4. The investigation of molluscs in the river Krąpiel At each station, samples were taken from the was carried out in July 2008, before the dredging, and lentic (stagnant) and the lotic (drift) zone (Table 1). The from April to August 2009, after the dredging. One series former included shallow stretches, in some places of samples was collected from the sampling stations strongly overgrown with plants, and the river bottom before the dredging (total 12 samples), and after the contained a layer of deoxygenated sediment whose dredging material was collected 5 times in successive surface was covered with detritus. The latter included months (total 60 samples). Additionally, in July 5 stretches devoid of vegetation, with higher proportions samples were collected in fish ponds and 2 samples in of sand and gravel in the sediments. limnocren lying near the river.
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
The samples were taken using a hand dredge (ellipses in Fig. 5) using Van Dobben circles (Lepš & with 50 μm mesh net from a 1 m2 area marked by a Šmilauer 2003). metal square frame. To assess the impact of dredging on the The molluscs collected were preserved in 75 % mollusc community we used ‘before-after-control- alcohol. Species identification was carried out by impact’ (BACI) analysis, which makes it possible to Professor A. Piechocki. The specimens are kept in the compare data obtained in the control stations with data collection of the Department of Invertebrate Zoology and obtained in the impacted stations before and after the Hydrobiology, University of Lodz. intervention, i.e. in July 2008 and July 2009. There are a) Data analysis two aspects to be tested: BA – before and after – and The dominance and constancy of mollusc CI – control and impact site. BACI is the test for the BA species were classified according to Strzelec (1993). × CI interaction (Smith et al. 1993). The impact of The dominance categories were as follows: D– dredging was tested in two ways: (1) by testing 201 dominant species, constituting at least 5 % of the total Mollusca abundance, expressed as the number of r number of specimens, and d – rare species, constituting individuals at a given sampling station, with each ea
Y less than 5 %. The constancy categories were C – species analysed separately, and (2) by the Shannon- constant species, present in at least 50 % of sampling Wiener Index (Magurran 2004), with the Mollusca 4 stations, and c – accessory species, with frequency of biodiversity of each station analysed separately. When less than 50 % of the stations. the abundance of Mollusca was used as the dependent The mollusc species identified were divided into variable, BACI was tested using a generalized mixed three ecological groups according to the classification model (GLMM) with a log link and a negative binomial
V distribution. This should be used when the dependent by Ložek (1964): rheophilic species, associated with
IV variable shows high variation. We considered species a flowing water (R), species typical of lakes, ponds, and random effect (intercept) with scaled identity covariance. ue ersion I slow-flowing rivers (L), and species typical of small s
s In the second analysis, the Shannon-Wiener Index was temporary or overgrown pools (S).
I treated as a dependent variable and BACI was tested by The occurrence of molluscs during the period
XVI factorial ANOVA. following the dredging was analysed with respect to the following environmental factors: water flow velocity IV. Results (FLOW), plant cover (PLANT), dredging impact (DREDGING) and substrate composition (SAND, SILT, a) Composition of fauna and community structure During the entire study period a total of 1,034 ) MUD/DETRITUS). Flow velocity was measured with a
H live individuals belonging to 36 mollusc species were ( FlowTracker Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter. Vegetation cover was estimated visually by the phytosociological collected, of which 188 individuals belonging to 18 method developed by Braun-Blanquet (1964). Estimated species were collected in the river before the dredging, value of the percentage coverage arranged in bands 485 individuals belonging to 30 species were collected Research Volume including the lowest value coverage during the spring in the river after the dredging, 314 individuals belonging months to the highest in the summer months (Table 1). to 12 species were collected in the fish ponds, and 37 Bottom sediment components (stones, gravel, sand, silt individuals representing 7 species were collected from the limnocrene spring (Table 2). Frontier and mud) were assessed by allocating a numerical value to each component, where the sum of the values Taking into account only the samples from the always equaled 5, and the points allotted to respective river, 17 mollusc species were present in the samples before and after the dredging. The only species Science components reflected their shares in the sediment volume. The shaded area shows the presence of shrubs recorded in 2008 but not found later was Anodonta of or trees on the bank of the river, which for part of the day anatina. This bivalve was present in the fish ponds. As shadowing (partly) locality, or their absence (lack) (Table many as 12 taxa were noted for the first time following 1). Dredging impact was scored between 5 and 1; it was dredging of the river. It is worth noting that their Journal highest in April 2009 and lowest in August 2009. abundance was relatively low. Among the species found Substrate composition was visually estimated as the only after the dredging, only Gyraulus laevis and Physa fontinalis inhabited the fish ponds near the river, while Global proportions of fine and coarse sediment and organic matter. the genus Stagnicola (unidentified juvenile individuals) We used the DCA multivariate ordination was also found in the nearby spring. The only species method (Hill & Gauch 1980; ter Braak & Prentice 1988) that was found only in the fish ponds was Unio pictorum, to assess the range of the environmental gradient. while Valvata cristata, Bathomphalus contortus and Having verified by DCA that the environmental gradient Hippeutis complanatus were present only in the spring. covered was sufficiently long, we used CCA (ter Braak Taking into account all of the material collected, 1986; ter Braak & Verdonschot 1995) for community Anisus vortex, Bithynia tentaculata, Lymnea stagnalis, ordination of mollusc assemblages in relation to Planorbis planorbis and Radix balthica were included environmental variables. The species were grouped among the dominant and constant species (DC) (Table
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
2). The dominant but accessory species (Dc) were The dominance structure of the malacofauna Galba truncatula, Gyraulus laevis and Unio crassus. The community changed after the dredging. The presence of remaining species were rare and accessory (dc). Before 5 dominant and constant species was observed (DC: the dredging, two dominant and constant species were Bithynia tentaculata, Galba truncatula, Lymnaea noted in the malacofauna of the river (DC: Lymnaea stagnalis, Pisidium amnicum and Sphaerium corneum), stagnalis and Planorbis planorbis), and 5 dominant but and three dominant accessory species (Dc: Anisus accessory species (Dc: Anisus vortex, Galba truncatula, vortex, Unio crassus and Unio tumidus). Additionally, Planorbarius corneus, Radix balthica and Sphaerium Viviparus viviparus was a rare but constant species (dC). corneum).
Table 2: Molluscs overall abundance (ab), dominance (D) and frequency (C) in sampled sites; Ecol – habitat
preferences: R – fast flowing waters, L – stagnant and slowly flowing waters, S – ephemeral water bodies; * – only
empty shells found 201
river before river after r fish ponds limnocren ea Abbrev. dragging dragging No. Species ab D C Y of name ab D C ab D C ab D C ab D ECOL 51 1 Theodoxus fluviatilis (Linnaeus 1758) The flu 21 2.0 0.2 7 3.7 0. 2 14 2.8 0.3 R 2 Viviparus viviparus (Linnaeus 1758) Viv viv 29 2.8 0.4 7 3.7 0.3 22 4.4 0.7 R
Viviparus sp., juv. – 7 0.7 0.1 4 2.1 0.1 3 0.6 0.2
3 Potamopyrgus antipodarum (J. E. Gray 1843) Pot ant 10 1.0 0.2 10 2.0 0.3 R 4 Bithynia leachii (Sheppard 1823) – 1 0.1 0.1 1 0.2 0.1 S 5 Bithynia tentaculata (Linnaeus 1758) Bit ten 60 5.8 0.5 20 10.6 0.3 34 6.9 0.6 6 1.9 0.4 L V
6 Valvata cristata O. F. Müller 1774 – 3 0.3 0.1 0 3 8.1 S IV 7 Galba truncatula (O. F. Müller 1774) Gal tru 89 8.6 0.3 13 6.9 0.4 76 15.4 0.5 0 S
ue ersion I s
8 Lymnaea stagnalis (Linnaeus 1758) Lym sta 100 9.7 0.7 28 14.9 0.7 43 8.7 0.7 29 9.2 0.8 L s
9 Radix ampla (W. Hartmann 1821) – 4 0.4 0.1 2 1.1 0.1 2 0.4 0.1 R I 10 Radix auricularia (Linnaeus 1758) – 4 0.4 0.1 4 0.8 0.1 L XVI 11 Radix balthica (Linnaeus 1758) Rad bal 109 10.5 0.5 12 6.4 0.3 13 2.6 0.3 84 26.8 0.8 L Radix sp., juv. – 19 1.8 0.1 19 3.8 0.2 12 Stagnicola sp., juv. – 5 0.5 0.2 2 0.4 0.2 3 8.1 S 13 Planorbis carinatus O. F. Müller 1774 – 1 0.1 0.1 1 0.2 0.1 L
14 Planorbis planorbis (Linnaeus 1758) Pla pla 52 5.0 0.6 19 10.1 0.5 11 2.2 0.3 4 1.3 0.6 18 48.6 S )
15 Anisus vortex (Linnaeus 1758) Ani vor 167 16.2 0.6 19 10.1 0.2 53 10.7 0.4 95 30.3 0.8 L H ( 16 Bathyomphalus contortus (Linnaeus 1758) – 4 0.4 0.1 0 4 10.8 L 17 Planorbarius corneus (Linnaeus 1758) Pla cor 30 2.9 0.4 15 8.0 0.3 4 0.8 0.2 6 1.9 0.6 5 13.5 L 18 Gyraulus albus (O. F. Müller 1774) Gyr alb 13 1.3 0.3 5 2.7 0.2 7 1.4 0.3 1 0.3 0.2 L 19 Gyraulus crista (Linnaeus 1758) – 2 0.2 0.1 1 0.5 0.1 1 0.2 0.1 L Research Volume 20 Gyraulus laevis (Alder 1838) – 73 7.1 0.2 1 0.2 0.1 72 22.9 0.6 L 21 Hippeutis complanatus (Linnaeus 1758) – 3 0.3 0.1 0 0 3 8.1 L 22 Segmentina nitida (O. F. Müller 1774) – 2 0.2 0.1 1 0.5 0.1 1 0.2 0.1 S
23 Ancylus fluviatilis O. F. Müller 1774 – 1* 0 R Frontier 24 Physa fontinalis (Linnaeus 1758) – 3 0.3 0.2 2 0.4 0.2 1 0.3 0.2 L 25 Aplexa hypnorum (Linnaeus 1758) – 1 0.1 0.1 0 1 2.7 S 26 Anodonta anatina (Linnaeus 1758) – 8 0.8 0.3 2 1.1 0.1 0 6 1.9 0.8 R Science 27 Unio crassus Philipsson 1788 Uni cra 54 5.2 0.2 8 4.3 0.2 46 9.3 0.3 R
28 Unio pictorum (Linnaeus 1758) – 5 0.5 0.1 0 5 1.6 0.4 R of 29 Unio tumidus Philipsson 1788 Uni tum 35 3.4 0.3 5 2.7 0.1 25 5.1 0.3 5 1.6 0.4 R 30 Sphaerium corneum (Linnaeus 1758) Sph cor 48 4.6 0.4 17 9.0 0.2 31 6.3 0.6 L
31 Pisidium amnicum (O. F. Müller 1774) Pis amn 35 3.4 0.4 3 1.6 0.3 32 6.5 0.6 R Journal 32 Pisidium casertanum casertanum (Poli 1791) – 2 0.2 0.1 2 0.4 0.2 L 33 Pisidium henslowanum (Sheppard 1823) – 3 0.3 0.2 3 0.6 0.3 L 34 Pisidium casertanum ponderosum (Stelfox 1918) Pis pon 9 0.9 0.2 9 1.8 0.3 L Global 35 Pisidium subtruncatum Malm 1855 Pis sub 10 1.0 0.2 10 2.0 0.3 R 36 Pisidium supinum A. Schmidt 1851 Pis sup 13 1.3 0.3 13 2.6 0.4 R TOTAL 1034 188 495 314 37 b) Changes over time in the number of species was noted in May (to 16), then Before the dredging the presence of 18 mollusc in June the species richness remained at a similar level, species was noted in the river. Immediately following and the samples from July and August contained 20 completion of the work (in April), 10 species were noted species of molluscs. The number of individuals noted in in this same segment of the river. A substantial increase the samples increased continually from April to August.
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
T he Shannon-Wiener biodiversity index remained at a predominance of molluscs belonging to the first group similar level throughout the study period; seasonal (rheophiles) in the quantitative structure (68 %). The differences were not statistically significant. species whose dominance indices decreased the most Taking into account the habitat preferences of after the intervention are associated with standing or the species (R, L and S), we can observe pronounced slow-flowing water – Planorbis planorbis and changes in the fauna after the dredging (Fig. 2). Before Planorbarius corneus. In contrast, there was an increase the dredging the mollusc fauna of the Krąpiel consisted in the percentage of rheophilic bivalves in the mainly of rheophilic species and species characteristic community – Unio crassus, Unio tumidus and Pisidium of slow-flowing rivers (39 % and 44 %, respectively), amnicum. The number of species preferring standing while species associated with temporary or overgrown and slow-flowing water (L) continually increased after water bodies accounted for 17 %. Species typical of the dredging. In the quantitative structure, such slow-flowing rivers predominated in the quantitative molluscs were more abundant than rheophiles (R) from
201 structure (63 %). June to August. In August their share reached 63 %, as
r Immediately following the dredging only species before the intervention.
ea
Y from groups R and L were noted (50 % each), with clear
6 ϮϬ
V 3
H
L 3
F ϭϱ
H
S 3
V
I 3 . V R .. ^ ϭϬ
U . H IV
J > E
Q 3
L
P .
J ue ersion I s X ϱ G Z s
H 1
U I '
XVI Ϭ -XO\ $SULO 0D\ -XQH -XO\ $XJXVW
V ϮϬϬ
O D
)
X G H L
( Y
L ϭϱϬ
G
Q
L
I
R ^ ϭϬϬ
U 3 H
J
Research Volume > E Q 3
L 3 . P J . . X ϱϬ G Z
H 1 U 3 .3 ' . Frontier Ϭ -XO\ $SULO 0D\ -XQH -XO\ $XJXVW
Science Fig. 2: Changes in species number and abundance of molluscs typical for fast flowing waters (R), stagnant and of slowly flowing waters ( L), and ephemeral water bodies (S) in control sites (K) and dredged (P) sampling sites
Journal
Global
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
ϰϬ
ϯϱ
ϯϬ
V
O Ϯϱ
D X
G L
Y ϮϬ
L
G
Q L
I ϭϱ
R
U H E ϭϬ
P
201
X 1
r ϱ ea
Y Ϭ 71 s͘ǀŝǀŝƉĂƌƵƐ ͘ƚĞŶƚĂĐƵůĂƚĂ '͘ƚƌƵŶĐĂƚƵůĂ >͘ƐƚĂŐŶĂůŝƐ ͘ǀŽƌƚĞdž
ϭϴ
ϭϲ V
ϭϰ IV
ue ersion I s s V ϭϮ O
D Ɖƌŝů
I X
G
L ϭϬ
Y DĂLJ L
XVI G
Q ϴ L :ƵŶĞ
I
R
U ϲ :ƵůLJ H
E
P ƵŐƵƐƚ
ϰ X
) 1 H Ϯ (
Ϭ hŶŝŽĐƌĂƐƐƵƐ hŶŝŽƚƵŵŝĚƵƐ ^ƉŚĂĞƌŝƵŵ WŝƐŝĚŝƵŵĂŵŶŝĐƵŵ ĐŽƌŶĞƵŵ Research Volume
Fig. 3: Changes in total number of specimens of selected gastropod and bivalve species after dredging
Frontier After the dredging, from 1 to 4 species the abundance of species preferring standing and slow- associated with small temporary and overgrown pools flowing water, such as Anisus vortex, Lymnaea stagnalis,
(S) were recorded in the river segment investigated. Sphaerium corneum and Unio tumidus. In contrast, the
These were not detected immediately after the changes in the abundance of typically rheophilic Science
intervention. Their presence was noted from May, and molluscs (V. viviparus, Unio crassus and P. amnicum) of they reached their greatest share of the quantitative showed no constant tendencies (Fig. 3). structure in June (50 %). This was linked to the increase
in abundance of Galba truncatula – this snail was Journal present in very high numbers in single samples from
June and July, but was not detected in August (Fig. 3).
The direction of the changes in the composition Global of the fauna was similar at the dredged and undredged sampling stations. The greatest differences were noted during the period immediately following the intervention (April-May), when the dredged sampling stations had a higher percentage of rheophilic species than the control stations (Fig. 2). The increase in the total number of molluscs in the period from May to August is linked to changes in
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
A 8 Control B 2 Control
7 Impact Impact 6 5 ener Index 4 i 1
3 2
Mean Abundance Mean 1
0 Shannon–W 0 Before Aft er 201 Before After r
ea Fig. 4: BACI analysis. A – Mean abundance of molluscs ± 1 SD; the interaction is not significant (p = 0.919); B – Y Shannon-Wiener Index of molluscs diversity; the interaction was not significant (p > 0.05)
8 Table 3: BACI analysis of impact of dredging on 11.1 % of the variation in the mollusc species Mollusca abundance. The tests of effects of GLMM composition, and the second 7.6 %. model The results of the CCA for the samples collected from the Krąpiel following the dredging show V Source F-statistics df1 df2 Significance that the variables used in the ordination explain 20 % of IV Corrected Model 5.634 3 128 0.001 the total variance of the mollusc species (Table 5).
ue ersion I Before-after 8.544 1 128 0.004 The results of the stepwise selection of s s Control-impact 7.596 1 128 0.007 environmental variables showed that of all the I BA × CI 0.010 1 128 0.919 environmental parameters considered only the degree XVI of bottom overgrowth by macrophytic vegetation Table 4: BACI analysis of impact of dredging on (PLANTS), dredging, silt content in bottom sediments Mollusca biodiversity expressed by Shannon-Wiener significantly statistically explained (p ≤ 0.05) the range Index. The tests of effects of factorial ANOVA of variance of occurrence of species, being responsible
) respectively for 7.8 – 4.6, 3 % of the variance (Table 6). Source Sum of df Mean F-statistic p H ( squares square The ordination diagram illustrating results of the
19.421 1 19.421 47.160 0.000 CCA shows that the first group of species is the most
Before-after 0.004 1 0.004 0.009 0.927 strongly positively correlated with the plants coverage Control-impact 0.154 1 0.154 0.373 0.548 and negatively correlated with flow, and the third group Research Volume BA × CI 0.005 1 0.005 0.012 0.914 is the most strongly negatively correlated with plants Error 8.236 20 8.236 and positively correlated with flow, but flow is not
statistically significant. The second group of species is
Frontier The BACI analysis showed no effect of the the most strongly positively correlated with dredging intervention on the total abundance and diversity of the process (Fig. 5). It consists of species that attained their molluscs (Tables 3 – 4, Fig. 4ab). Abundance greatest abundance in the first period following the decreased both at the dredged and control stations, Science dredging. These are mainly mollusks preferring a and the Shannon diversity index remained at the same
of substrate devoid of macrophytes and a stronger current. level. This group of molluscs gains a favourable habitat when
c) Ecological preferences of molluscs work that deepens the river bed and removes vegetation
Journal The DCA for the mollusc species after the is carried out, and many of the species found here were
intervention showed that the length of the gradient not noted before the intervention (P. subtruncatum, P.
represented by the first ordination axis is 5.426, which supinum and P. ponderosum), or were less abundant
Global means that the species covered a full Gaussian (e.g. U. tumidus, Pisidium amnicum, and V. viviparus).
spectrum. This in turn made it possible to conduct direct ordination analyses (CCA) to determine the relationships
between the occurrence of species and the
environmental parameters tested in the Krąpiel. The
eigenvalues of the axes show that the gradient
represented by the first ordination axis substantially
differentiates the occurrence of species (0.871), as its
eigenvalue is greater than 0.5. The first axis explains
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
VLOW Pis pon GUHGJLQJ Pis sub Gal tru Rad bal Uni tum
Gyr alb Pis sup
Pla pla Pis amn
SODQWV Lym sta Viv viv
201 r
PXG VDQG ea
Y Pot ant
IORZ 91
Bit ten Sph cor Uni cra Ani vor
The flu V
IV
ue ersion I s s Fig. 5: CCA diagram for molluscs collected after dredging from the studied section of the Krąpiel River, species I abbreviations–see Table 2 (species represented in the river by 5 or more individuals are shown on the diagram) XVI
Table 5: Summary of CCA analysis between molluscs and environmental variables
Axes 1 2 3 4 Total inertia
)
Eigenvalues: 0.626 0.440 0.210 0.193 7.858 H ( Species-environment correlations: 0.907 0.837 0.701 0.661 Cumulative percentage variance
of species data: 8.0 13.6 16.2 18.7 of species-environment relation: 40.1 68.2 81.7 94.0 Research Volume Sum of all eigenvalues 7.858 Sum of all canonical eigenvalues 1.563
Table 6: Result of forward selection of environmental probably due to unfavourable oxygen conditions and a Frontier variables, using 499 permutations thick layer of deoxygenated mud on the bottom. A study of molluscs in a near-shore zone of the Włocławek Dam Conditional effects reservoir showed that on the muddy substrate greater Science Variable P F LambdaA of mollusc species richness was associated with a plants 0.61 0.002 4.20 stronger current, which probably meant better dredging 0.36 0.002 2.58 oxygenation of the water (Żbikowski et al. 2007). Richer silt 0.24 0.020 1.74 malacofauna has usually been noted in lowland rivers Journal flow 0.18 0.210 1.30 with a natural river bed, e.g. 38 species in the river sand 0.17 0.206 1.26 Krutynia (Jakubik & Lewandowski 2011) and 40 species Global in the river Wkra (Lewin 2014). The samples collected in V. Discussion the Krąpiel after the dredging contained 31 mollusc species. Because Krapiel is a small river, and studies
During the period before the dredging the have been conducted over a very short distance, mollusc fauna of the river Krąpiel was relatively poor in species richness is considered as high. The increase in qualitative terms (19 species; 2 –7 per sampling station) the number of species recorded may have resulted from and quantitatively very poor (average mollusc density of an improvement in living conditions in the river and the – 2 17 ind. m ). Species typical of standing water and restoration of the fauna (see below), but also from the severely eutrophic water were dominant. This was fact that more samples were taken during this period.
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
Despite the small number of species, the directly subject to the effect of the dredging. According
malacofauna of the Krapiel is interesting. It includes a to Diaz (1994), the effect of higher water turbidity could population of the mussel Unio crassus, typical of clean range from minor irritation or death for non-motile forms water (Zaj ąc 2004), which is protected in the EU (Annex unable to escape, to benefits for motile forms that enter II and IV of the EU Habitats and Species Directive). Unio the turbid water in search for food or protection. Layzer crassus was found both before and after the dredging of et al. (1993) pointed out that silt deposition associated the river. Sampling stations K1 and K2, where this with turbidity caused by dredging was a major factor in mussel was recorded in July 2008, were not dredged. the decline of mussels in regulated rivers, with juveniles After the intervention Unio crassus colonized the same being most heavily affected. It seems that filter feeding two places, and single individuals were also collected at snail species such as B. tentaculata also suffered from stations P1 and P3. The highest populati on density the increase in water turbidity (Jokinen 1992). Finally, –2 reached was 8 ind. m . It appears that the occurrence channel management may result in a reduction in the
201 of this species can be linked primarily to the increased number of potential host fish to which the mussels’ –1 r current in certain segments of the river (0.1– 0.5 m s ). glochidia must attach to fulfil their life cycle, thus ea
Y By comparison, in the river Wkra Unio crassus was disrupting the recruitment in the mussel population –1 recorded where the current was 0.06 – 0.6 m s , and its (Aldridge 2000). 10 density reached a maximum 20 ind. m– 2 (Le win 2014). VII. Recovery
VI. Disturbance In the river investigated, after a pronounced Management of the river with the dredge decrease in the occurrence of molluscs immediately
V affected the mollusc community in many ways. Molluscs following the dredging, a gradual regeneration of the
IV were physically eliminated from the dredged sites, which malacofauna was observed. In the summer (July– reduced overall abundance and species richness August 2009) the mollusc community in the investigated ue ersion I s s (samples from April 2009 included only 10 species; segment of the Krąpiel did not differ significantly (BACI – 2 I mean mollusc density was 5.5 ind. m ). The removal of analysis) in terms of species richness and abundance
XVI the vegetation and deepening of the river bed caused from its pre-dredging state (July 2008). The percentages an increase in the speed of the current, which in turn led of rheophilic species and species associated with to an increase in the surface area of habitats preferred standing water also returned to their prior state. The by rheophilic species such as Viviparus viviparus, Unio regeneration process of the malacofauna of this tumidus and Pisidium amnicum. This was accompanied segment of the Krąpiel lasted about 7 months. )
H by a marked decrease in the share of stagnophilic The process of regeneration of benthic ( species in the community, as their microhabitats were communities following various types of disturbances destroyed. (such as dredging, dredged spoil disposal or severe Monahan & Caffrey (1996) showed that benthic floods) has been described for flowing water bodies
Research Volume invertebrates are negatively affected by removal of (Yount & Niemi 1990, Mundahl & Hunt 2011) as well as plants from the channel even if the bottom sediment has for estuaries and tidal areas (Diaz 1994). It has been not been removed. Aquatic plants provide shelter from observed that in the case of hydraulic engineering work disturbances and predators, as well as a large surface the regeneration time for the benthos depends on the Frontier area for epiphytic algae, which molluscs utilize as a method of dredging and removal of macrophytic source of food, and sites for deposition of eggs. vegetation (Darby & Thorne 1995, Monahan & Caffrey A dramatic loss in the mussel population after 1996, Aldridge 2000). According to McCabe et al. Science dredging of a navigable waterway in England (up to 23 (1998), the negative effect of dredging on invertebrates of % of the unionid population found in the spoil on the was found to be apparent only immediately afterwards, river bank) was reported by Aldridge (2000). whereas a year later the same species of The high concentration of suspended sediment macroinvertebrates were common in the dredged area
Journal mobilized by dredging can alter the survival, growth and as well as in the reference area, and the total benthic invertebrate densities and biodiversity indices did not behaviour of stream biota. Increased water turbidity may have hindered respiration and food collection by differ, indicating that the dredging did not have a Global molluscs (especially suspension feeders) (Gulati et al. statistically significant effect on these parameters.
2008). This factor influenced both dredged sites and the The most invasive dredging methods (removal
undredged sites downstream. The undredged sampling of macrophytes and a thick layer of bottom sediment in
station K2, situated between two dredged segments, the entire river bed) cause the river bottom to be
can be presumed to have been affected by the changes essentially devoid of macroinvertebrates, but many
caused by the intervention, including the temporary macroinvertebrates may recover relatively quickly owing
increase in the flow rate and the amount of suspended to their motility, which enables them to escape during
sediment in the water. Only sampling site K1 was the management regime and to recolonize afterwards situated upstream from the intervention and was not (Aldridge 2000). Recolonization of the river bottom takes
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging place in many ways, including via migration from The final potential means of colonization of a undredged segments of the river upstream and dredged river segment by molluscs is passive dispersal, downstream from the site of the dredging (Williams & which not only functions on a local scale, but also Hynes 1976). affects the spread of invasive species over a large area. According to Williams & Hynes (1976), most Molluscs are transported with fish (the parasitic colonizing macroinvertebrates come from drift (over 40 Unionidae larva – the glochidium) and by ships. %). This kind of passive dispersal occurs in mollusks Transport can even take place outside of the aquatic and is not limited to their larval stages (only a few environment. It cannot be ruled out that aerial dispersal freshwater molluscs have free living larvae, e.g. from other streams nearby played a role in the Dreissena polymorpha), but also affects juvenile and colonization of the Krąpiel by molluscs. In the direct adult individuals (Kappes & Haase 2012). Natural active vicinity of the river there are fish ponds inhabited by upstream movement is slow in molluscs. It is estimated molluscs. The literature contains reports of the spread of at 0.3 –1.0 km year–1 for most snails and below 0.1 km small bivalves and gastropods by birds, mammals and 201 year–1 for bivalves (Kappes & Haase 2012). aquatic insects. This usually involves shells attaching r ea
Observations by Aldridge (2000) indicate slow themselves to feathers or insect limbs, but cases have Y recolonization of dredged areas by adult mussels. The also been confirmed of molluscs being carried in the 111 author reports that the fastest migration noted for digestive tracts of other animals (Piechocki 1979; –1 European Unionidae species is ca. 5 m day , although Kappes & Haase 2012 and literature cited within). this is a response to environmental stress factors, such The rapidity of the regeneration of the as high temperature or low dissolved oxygen. Similar malacofauna observed in the investigated segment of results were obtained by Zając & Zając (2011), who the Krąpiel is within the time range reported in the V showed that adult specimens of U. crassus literature for flowing water affected by severe IV experimentally distributed in fast-flowing parts of the disturbances. For example, Mundahl & Hunt (2011)
ue ersion I s river channel moved shorter distances than mussels showed that taxa richness and community structure s distributed in slow deep parts, which try to move actively returned to pre -flood levels at most sites within a year. I toward more preferable environmental conditions (the These researchers observed that the recovery of XVI maximum distance recorded was 5.15 m). invertebrates (excluding flying insects) depends largely Another potential means of recolonization of the on their ability to survive the disturbance and on how river is movement of organisms up from within the quickly they reproduce. Thus, densities of some substrate. This direction is important, as the hyporheos invertebrate groups recovered within months of the flood ) has been shown to consist of immature stages of many Baetidae mayflies, Chironimidae midges, Simulidae H ( invertebrates, including unionids, which after leaving fish blackflies), while others (Ephemerellidae mayflies, live for 2 – 5 years buried in the bottom sediment Hydropsychidae caddisflies and Gammarus (Piechocki & Dyduch-Falniowska 1993). Many adult amphipods), required more than 2 years (Mundahl & molluscs (e.g. Viviparus, Theodoxus or Bithynia) also Hunt 2011 and literature cited within). Research Volume spend the winter in the sediment of deeper zones of Yount & Niemi (1990) enumerated several rivers and lakes (Piechocki 1979; Jakubik 2012). If the reasons for short recovery times of river communities: dredging of the river is carried out in the winter (as in the life history traits enabling rapid repopulation, Frontier river we investigated), these seasonal migrations of accessibility of unaffected upstream and downstream snails deep into the sediment may be conducive to the areas serving as sources of organisms, or high flushing survival of some individuals in situ, which is highly rates of lotic systems that allowed them to quickly dilute Science significant for the restoration of the population. or replace waters. According to the authors cited, the The composition and abundance of the fauna river biota possesses adaptations enabling it to survive of that remains in the river (remnant species) depends on disturbances such as natural floods. Similarly, fauna of the dredging method used (equipment and duration of other aquatic habitats exposed to regular natural the work). This is of fundamental importance in the disturbances, such as tidal freshwater, exhibits eurytopic Journal process of regeneration of the benthic community. tolerance and may recover within three weeks after a According to Ledger et al. (2006), remnant species disturbance caused by dredged spoil disposal (Diaz Global potentially facilitate or inhibit settlement of other 1994). The rapidity of fauna regeneration is affected not invertebrates or algae. The effect of remnant species on only by the fertility of individual species, but also by a immigrant colonization echoes differences in their life- certain elasticity in their reproductive strategy. In history traits and foraging behaviour. For example, the Viviparus viviparus, for example, earlier reproduction authors cited experimentally showed that Radix scraping (smaller females) was observed in individuals living in epilithon promoted settlement of filter feeders and more unstable habitats (Jakubik 2012). invertebrate predators, and strongly deterred settlement Our results and the review of the literature of nonpredatory chironomids. presented above indicate that in flowing water bodies
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
communities of the benthos, including molluscs, have the State of New York, The State Education the ability to regenerate quickly following disturbances, Department, The New York State Museum, Albany, both natural and of human origin. Although it was New York, pp. 1–122. evident that molluscs were adversely impacted 12. Magurran, A. E., 2004: Measuring Biological immediately after the dredging, our study indicated that Diversity. –Blackwell Publishing, Malden. after a year the malacofauna of the Krąpiel recovered to 13 . McCabe, G., Hinton, S. A. & Emmett, R. L., 1998: its premanagement state or was even enriched. The Benthic Invertebrates and Sediment Characteristics removal of a layer of deoxygenated sediments from the in a Shallow Navigation Channel of the Lower channel provided an opportunity for the establishment of Columbia River, Before and After Dredging.– more diverse and abundant mollusc assemblages. Northwest Science 72: 116 –125.
VIII. Ackowledgements 14. Monahan, C. & Caffrey, J. M., 1996: The effect of weed control practices on macroinvertebrate 201 This research was supported by the Ministry of communities in Irish Canals.–Hydrobiologia 340: r Science and Higher Education (contract no. N 305 ea 205 – 211. Y 222537). The authors thank Professor Andrzej Piechocki 15. Mundahl, N. D. & Hunt, A. M., 2011: Recovery of
12 for the identification of the species. stream invertebrates after catastrophic flooding in southeastern Minnesota, USA. – J. Freshw. Ecol. 26: References Références Referencias 445 – 457. 1. Aldridge, D. C., 2000: The impacts of dredging and 16 . Ledger, M. L., Harris, R. M. L., Milner, A. M. &
weed cutting on a population of freshwater mussels Armitage, P. D., 2006: Disturbance, biological V (Bivalvia: Unionidae).– Biol. Conserv. 95: 247– 257. legacies and community development in stream IV 2. Braun-Blanquet, J., 1964: Pflanzensoziologie: mesocosms. – Oecologia 148:682 – 691.
ue ersion I
s Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Zweite, 17. Lepori, F. & Hjerdt, N., 2006: Disturbance and s umgearbeitete und vermehrte Auflage. – Springer- Aquatic Biodiversity: Reconciling Contrasting Views. I Verlag, Wien. – BioScience 56:809 – 818. XVI 3. Darby, S. E. & Thorne, C. R., 1995: Fluvial 18. Lepš, J. & Šmilauer, P., 2003: Multivariate analysis maintenance operations in managed alluvial rivers. of ecological data using CANOCO. – Cambridge – Aquat. Conserv. 5: 37– 54. University Press, New York, pp. 1– 289.
4. Dąbkowski, P., Buczyński, P., Stępień, E., 19. Lewin, I., 2014: Mollusc communities of lowland ) Buczy ńska, E., Stryjecki, R., Czachorowski, S., H rivers and oxbow lakes in agricultural areas with ( Śmietana, P., Szenejko, M. & Zawal, A., 2016: The anthropogenically elevated nutrient concentration. – impact of dredging of a small lowland river on water Folia Malacologica 22:87–159. beetle fauna (Coleoptera). – J. Limnol. (in press). 20. Ložek, V., 1964: Die Quartärmollusken der 5. Diaz, R. J., 1994: Response of tidal freshwater
Research Volume Tschechoslovakei.– Geologische Zentralanstalt, macrobenthos to sediment disturbance. – Tschechoslovakische Akademie der Wissensch Hydrobiologia 78: 201– 212. aften, Praha, pp. 1– 375. 6. Gulati, R. D., Pires, L. M. D. & Van Donk, E., 2008:
Frontier Lake restoration studies: Failures, bottlenecks and 21. Piechocki, A., 1979: Mięczaki (Mollusca). Ślimaki prospects o new ecotechnological measures. – (Gastropoda). Fauna Słodkowodna Polski. Zeszyt 7.
Limnologica 38: 233 – 247. – PWN, Warszawa, Poznań. 22. Piechocki, A. & Dyduch-Falniowska, A., 1993: Science 7. Hill, M. O. & Gauch, H. G., 1980: Detrended Mięczaki (Mollusca). Małże (Bivalvia). Fauna
of correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. – Vegetatio 42:47– 58. Słodkowodna Polski 7 A.–Wydawnictwo Naukowe 8. Kappes, H. & Haase, P., 2012: Slow, but steady: PWN, Warszawa. 23. Płaska, W., Kurzątkowska, A., Stępień, E., Journal dispersal of freshwater molluscs. – Aquat. Sci. 74: 1–14. Buczyńska, E., Szlauer-Łukaszewska, A.,
9. Jakubik, B., 2012: Life strategies of Viviparidae Pakulnicka, J. & Zawal, A., 2016: The effect of
Global (Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda: Architaenioglossa) dredging of a small lowland river (Krąpiel – NW
in various aquatic habitats: Viviparus viviparous Poland) on aquatic Heteroptera. – Ann. Zool. Fenn. (in press). (Linnaeus, 1758) and V. contectus (Millet, 1813). –
Folia Malacologica 20: 145 –179. 24. Rauers, H., van de Weyer, K. & Pardey, A., 2004:
10. Jakubik, B. & Lewandowski, K., 2011: Molluscs of Biozönologische Untersuchungen zur Auswirkung
the Krutynia River (Masurian Lakeland). – Folia von Unterhaltungsmaßnahmen auf Flora und Fauna
Malacologica 19:19 – 29. von Gräben, dargestellt am Beispiel zweier
11. Jokinen, E., 1992: The freshwater snails (Mollusca: Grabensysteme in NRW. – Deutsche Gesellschaft
Gastropoda) of New York State. – The University of für Limnologie, Tagungsbericht Köln. pp. 140 –144.
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
25. Smith, E. P., Orvos, D. R. & Cairns, J. Jr, 1993: Myśliwy, M., Stryjecki, R., Buczyńska, E. & Impact assessment using the before-after-control- Buczyński, P., 2015: The influence of a lowland river impact (BACI) model : concerns and comments. – dredging (the Krąpiel in NW Poland) on water mite Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50:627 – 637. fauna (Acari: Hydrachnidia). – Fundam. Appl. 26. Stępień, E., Zawal, A., Buczyński, P. & Buczyńska, Limnol. 186: 217 – 232. DOI: 10.1127/fal/2015/0735 E., 2015: Changes in the vegetation of the valley of 40. Zawal, A., Czachorowski, S., Stępień, E., Buczyńska, a small river (the Krąpiel in NW Poland) in the E., Szlauer-Łukaszewska, A., Buczyński, P., lowland river dredging.–Acta Biologica 22 (in press). Stryjecki, R. & Dąbkowski , P., 2015: Early post- 27. Stępień, E., Zawal, A., Buczyńska, E., Buczyński, P. dredging recolonization of caddisflies (Insecta: & Szenejko, M., 2016: Effects of dredging on the Trichoptera) in a small lowland river (NW Poland). – vegetation in a small lowland river. – Limnetica (in Limnology 17: 71 – 85. DOI: 10.1007/s10201-015- press). 0466-3 28. Strzelec, M., 1993: Ślimaki (Gastropoda) 201 antropogenicznych środowisk wodnych Wyżyny r ea
śląskiej. – Prace naukowe Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Y Katowicach 1358, pp. 1–103. 131 29. Szlauer-Łukaszewska, A. & Zawal, A., 2014: The impact of river dredging on ostracod assemblages in the Krąpiel River (NW Poland). – Fundam. Appl. Limnol. 185: 295 – 305. DOI: 10.1127/fal/2014/0620
30. ter Braak, C. J. F., 1986: Canonical correspondence V
analysis: a new eigenvector technique for IV multivariate direct gradient analysis. – Ecology 67: ue ersion I s 1167–1179. s 31. ter Braak, C. J. F. & Prentice, I. C., 1988: A theory of I
gradient analysis. – Adv. Ecol. Res. 18, 271– 317. XVI 32. ter Braak, C. J. F. & Verdonschot, P. F. M., 1995: Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. – Aquat.
Sci. 57, 255 – 289. )
33. Wilber, D. H. & Clark, D. G., 2007: Defining and H ( assessing benthic recovery following dredging and dredged material disposal. – Proceedings XXVII World Dredging Congress 2007, Orlando, Florida,
pp. 603 – 618. Research Volume 34. Williams, D. D. & Hynes, H. B. N., 1976: The recolonization mechanisms of stream benthos. – Oikos 27: 265 – 272. Frontier 35. Yount, J. D. & Niemi, G. J., 1990: Recovery of Lotic Communities and ecosystems from Disturbance – A Narrative Review of Case Studies. – Environmental Science Managements 14: 547– 569. 36. Zając, K., 2004: Unio crassus Philipsson, 1788. – In: of Głowaciński, Z. & Nowacki, J. (eds): Polish Red Data Book of Animals. Invertebrates. – Institute of Nature Conservation PAS, Cracow, pp. 353 – 351. Journal 37. Zając, K. & Zając, T., 2011: The role of active individual movement in habitat selection in the
Global endangered freshwater mussel Unio crassus Philipsson, 1788. – J. Conchol. 40: 446 – 461. 38. Żbikowski, J., Kakareko, T., Poznańska, M. & Kobak, J., 2007: Malacofauna of two hydrologically different habitats in the near-shore zone of the Włocławek Dam Reservoir (Vistula River, Poland). – Folia Malacologica 15: 25 – 38. 39. Zawal, A., Stępień, E., Szlauer-Łukaszewska, A., Michoński, G., Kłosowska, M., Bańkowska, A.,
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Regeneration of the Molluscan Fauna of a Small Lowland River after Dredging
201 r
ea Y 14
V IV ue ersion I s s I
XVI This page is intentionally left blank ) H ( Research Volume Frontier Science of Journal Global
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US)
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: H
Environment & Earth Science Volume 16 Issue 4 Version 1.0 Year 2016
Type : Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal
Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA)
Online ISSN: 2249-4626 & Print ISSN: 0975-5896
Toxic Effect of Metal Ions in Water Resources By Dr. Suranjana Chattopadhyay Maharaja Manindra Chandra College Metal Ions in Water Resources- Water is the most important resource. Without water life is not possible. From a chemical point of view, water, H2O, is a pure compound, but in reality, you seldom drink, see, touch or use pure water. Water from various sources contains dissolved gases, minerals, organic and inorganic substances. This photograph of Guilin shows the beauty of natural water. The rain curved an interesting landscape out of the lime stones in the area. Natural waters are often important parts of wonders of the world. GJSFR-H Classification: FOR Code: 090509
ToxicEffectofMetalIonsinWaterResources
Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of :
© 2016. Dr. Suranjana Chattopadhyay. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Toxic Effect of Metal Ions in Water Resources
Dr. Suranjana Chattopadhyay
I. Metal Ions in Water Resources II. Hydration and Hydrolysis of Metal Cations ater is the most important resource. Without water life is not possible. From a chemical point a) Hydration
of view, water, H O, is a pure compound, but in When sodium chloride dissolves in water, the W 2 reality, you seldom drink, see, touch or use pure water. sodium and chloride ions and the polar water molecules Water from various sources contains dissolved gases, are strongly attracted to one another by ion-dipole 201 r
minerals, organic and inorganic substances. This interactions. The solvent molecules (water in this case) ea photograph of Guilin shows the beauty of natural water. surround the ions removing them from the crystal and Y The rain curved an interesting landscape out of the lime forming the solution. As the dissolving process 151 stones in the area. Natural waters are often important proceeds, the individual ions are removed from the solid parts of wonders of the world. surface becoming completely separate, hydrated The total water system surrounding the planet species in the solution. Earth is called the hydrosphere . It includes freshwater In order to dissolve the sodium chloride in the V systems, oceans, atmosphere vapors, and biological water, three processes have to occur: IV waters. The Arctic, Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific oceans 1. The water molecules must be separated (H-bonds ue ersion I cover 71% of the Earth surface, and contain 97% of all s must be broken) s water. Less than 1% is fresh water, and 2-3 % is ice 2. the forces of attraction between the ions in the I caps and glaciers. The Antarctic Ice Sheet is almost the NaCl lattice must be broken XVI size of North America continent. These waters dominate 3. solute-solvent(ion-dipole)interactions must be our weather and climate, directly and indirectly affecting formed 8 2 our daily lives. They cover 3.35x10 km . The four The overall enthalpy change in forming a oceans have a total volume of 1.35x109 km3.
solution is the sum of energy changes for each of these Groundwater is an important part of the water system. ) processes. Whether the dissolution process will be H When vapor is cooled, clouds and rain develop. Some exothermic or endothermic depends on the relative ( of the rain percolates through the soil and into the magnitudes of the energy changes for the three steps. underlying rocks. The water in the rocks is groundwater, In general, a substance will be insoluble if the energy which moves slowly. Dust particles and ions present in
expended to break apart the solvent and solute particles Research Volume the air are nucleation center of water drops. Thus, 2+ is significantly greater than the energy given off when waters from rain and snow also contain such ions: Ca , 2+ + + + solute-solvent interactions are established. Mg , Na , K , NH4 . These cations are balanced by
- - - - - Frontier anions, HCO3 , SO4 , NO2 , Cl , and NO3 . The pH of rain b) Hydrolysis is between 5.5 and 5.6. Metal ions in aqueous solution behave as Lewis Rain and snow waters eventually become river acids. The positive charge on the metal ion draws or lake waters. When the rain or snow waters fall, they electron density from the O-H bond in the water. This Science increases the bond's polarity making it easier to break. interact with vegetation, top soil, bed rock, river bed and of lake bed, dissolving whatever is soluble. Bacteria, algae, When the O-H bond breaks, an aqueous proton is and water insects also thrive. Solubilities of inorganic released producing an acidic solution. Most chemical salts are governed by the kinetics and equilibria of elements are metallic and form simple aqua ions with Journal z+ dissolution. The most common ions in lake and river the formula [M(H2O)n] when the oxidation state is 1, 2 waters are the same as those present in rainwater, but or 3. With the higher oxidation states the simple aqua at higher concentrations. The pH of these waters ions dissociate losing hydrogen ions to yield complexes Global depends on the river bed and lake bed. Natural waters that contain both water molecules and hydroxide or contain dissolved minerals. Waters containing Ca2+ and oxide ions, such as the vanadium(IV) species 2+ 2+ Mg ions are usually called hard water. [VO(H2O)5] . In the highest oxidation state only − oxyanions, such as the permanganate (VII) ion, MnO4 are known.[1]
Author: Head of the Department, Maharaja Manindra Chandra College. e-mail: [email protected]
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Toxic Effect of Metal Ions in Water Resources
201 r ea Y
16
Fig. : Hydration of metal ion c) Major Toxic ions and their effects Agency) is less than 0.003 mg/dm3. The maximum limit Environmental pollution by toxic metals occurs in drinking water is 0.003 mg/dm3. V globally through military, industrial, and agricultural Cadmium accumulates in kidneys, pancreas, IV processes and waste disposal (Duffus, 2002). Fuel and intestines and glands altering the metabolism of the
ue ersion I power industries generate 2.4 million tons of As, Cd, Cr, elements necessary for the body, such as zinc, copper, s s Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Se, V, and Zn annually The metal iron, magnesium, calcium and selenium. Damage to the I industry adds 0.39 million tons/yr of the same metals to respiratory tract and kidneys are the main adverse
XVI the environment, while agriculture contributes 1.4 million effects in humans exposed to cadmium compounds. In tons/yr, manufacturing contributes 0.24 million tons/yr humans exposed to fumes and dusts chronic toxicity of and waste disposal adds 0.72 million tons/yr. Metals, cadmium compounds is usually found after a few years. discharged or transported into the environment, may The main symptom of emphysema is that it often
) undergo transformations and can have a large develops without preceding bronchitis. The second H
( environmental, public health, and economic impact. basic symptom of chronic metal poisoning is kidney The pollutants of concern include cadmium, damage. It includes the loss and impairment of smell, lead, mercury, chromium, arsenic, zinc, cobalt and pathological changes in the skeletal system nickel as well as copper. They have a number of (osteoporosis with spontaneous fractures and bone Research Volume applications in basic engineering works, paper and pulp fractures), pain in the extremities and the spine, difficulty industries, leather tanning, petrochemicals, fertilizers, in walking, the formation of hypochromic anemia. The etc. Moreover, they have also negative impact on most known ‘Itai-Itai’ disease caused by cadmium
Frontier human health. exposure is mixed osteomalacia and osteoporosis. Cadmium is a metal of great toxicological Lead is a toxic metal, which accumulates in the concern. An important source of human exposure to vital organs of men and animals and enters into the
Science cadmium is food and water, especially for the body through air, water and food. According to the WHO population living in the vicinity of industrial plants, from (World Health Organization) standards, its maximum of which cadmium is emitted to the air. In the case of limit in drinking water is 0.05 mg/dm3 but the maximum exposure to occupational cadmium compounds, they discharge limit for lead in wastewater is 0.5 mg/dm3. are absorbed mainly by inhalation. However, an Lead is used as industrial raw material in the Journal important source of cadmium in soils is phosphate manufacture of storage batteries, pigments, leaded fertilizers. Large amounts of cadmium are also glass, fuels, photographic materials, matches and
Global introduced to soil together with municipal waste. The explosives. Lead being one of very important pollutants high mobility of cadmium in all types of soils is the comes from wastewaters from refinery, wastewaters reason for its rapid integration into the food chain. Daily from production of basic compounds containing lead, intake of cadmium from food in most countries of the wastewaters with the remains of after production world is 10-20 mg. Through the gastrointestinal tract solvents and paints. less than 10% cadmium is absorbed. An important The average collection of lead by an adult was source of human exposure to cadmium is food and estimated at 320-440 mg/day. Its cumulative poisoning water. In natural water, its typical concentration lies effects are serious haematological damage, anaemia, below 0.001 mg/dm3, whereas, the upper limit kidney malfunctioning, brain damage etc. Chronic recommended by EPA (Environmental Protection exposure to lead causes severe lesions in kidney, liver,
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Toxic Effect of Metal Ions in Water Resources lungs and spleen. Acute poisoning with inorganic lead utilization of chromium compounds. Chromium is an compounds occurs rarely. In the case of acute important and widely applied element in industry. The poisoning in man, the symptoms are burning in the hexavalent and trivalent chromium is often present in mouth, vomiting, abdominal cramps, diarrhea, electroplating wastewater. Other sources of chromium constipation progressing to systolic, blood pressure and pollution are leather tanning, textile, metal processing, body temperature. At the same time there is hematuria, paint and pigments, dyeing and steel fabrication. proteinuria, oliguria, central nervous system damage. Chromium is associated with nucleic acids and Alkyl lead compounds are more toxic than inorganic is the subject to the concentration in liver cells. It plays lead connections. Tetraethyl lead toxicity manifested an important role in the metabolism of glucose, certain primarily in lead damage of the nervous system. Toxic proteins and fats, is part of enzymes and stimulates the effects of lead on the central nervous system are activity of others. All compounds of chromium, with the observed more in children. In adults, the effects of lead exception of chromate, are rapidly cleared from the toxicity occur in the peripheral nervous system. blood. Chromium also accumulates in the liver and 201 Symptoms of chronic poisoning may vary. The acute kidneys. High concentrations of chromium, observed in r ea form of poisoning known as lead colic is the general the lungs of people exposed to this metal, indicate that Y state of various spastic internal organs and neurological at least part of chromium is stored in this organ in the 171 damage in the peripheral organs. Long-term lead form of insoluble compounds. The binding of chromium poisoning can lead to organic changes in the central with the elements of the blood and transport of and peripheral nervous systems. Characteristic chromium by the blood depends mainly on its valence. symptoms include pale gray skin colour and the lead Hexavalent chromium readily crosses the membranes of line on the gums (blue-black border). red blood cells and after reduction to trivalent chromium V
In nature, natural circulation of mercury vapour is bound to hemoglobin. The reduction of hexavalent to IV
has a significant influence on the content of the soil and trivalent chromium, occurring within cells, considered as ue ersion I s water. Elemental mercury in the rain water creates the activation of the carcinogenic chromium, increases s compounds by oxidation to divalent mercury. Both the because the probability of interaction of trivalent I chemical reaction, and under the influence of biological chromium on the DNA. Clinical signs of acute toxicity of XVI factors, and especially the activity of bacteria in the chromium compounds are characterized by severe sediments of water bodies methyl and di-methyl abdominal pain, vomiting and bloody diarrhea, severe mercury compounds are formed. Mercury, a fixed kidney damage with hematuria leading to anuria,
component of the waste water treatment that may be observed gastrointestinal ulceration. Chromium ) used for soil fertilization is a major threat to the inclusion compounds and chromic acid are especially dangerous H ( of the metal in nutritional products. Drinking water may and cause serious damage to internal organs. Chronic contain up to 300 ng Hg/dm3, in highly industrialized exposure leads to chronic disorders in the body. areas it can reach up to 700 ng/dm3. Daily consumption Arsenic is present in over 160 minerals. It is of mercury from food in the general population is less readily bio-accumulative and therefore its concentration Research Volume than 20 μg/day. 80% of mercury absorbed by the in polluted waters may reach 430 mg/dm3 in plants and respiratory system is retained in the body. In the case of 2.5 mg/dm3 in fish.
ingestion of inorganic mercury salts, salivation, burning Arsenic accumulates in tissues rich in keratin, Frontier in the throat, vomiting, bloody diarrhea, necrosis of the like hair, nails and skin. Arsenic and its inorganic intestinal mucosa and kidney damage, leading to anuria compounds can cause not only cancer of the respiratory and uremia can occur. The concentration of mercury system and skin, but also neoplastic lesions in other Science vapour over 1 mg/m3 damages lung tissue and causes organs. Arsenic compounds enter the body from the severe pneumonia. The classic symptoms of metallic gastrointestinal tract and through skin and respiratory of mercury vapour poisoning are manifested by tremor, system. Arsenic compounds have affinity for many mental disorders, inflammation of the gums. Its enzymes and can block their action, and above all maximum limit in drinking water is 0.0005 mg/dm3. disturb the Krebs cycle. Inorganic arsenic compounds Journal
Chromium, occurring as Cr(III) or Cr(VI) in are more harmful than organic and among them AsH3 natural environments, is an important material resource, and As2O3 should be mentioned. 70-300 mg of As2O3 is Global an essential micronutrient or toxic contaminant. Cr(III) is considered to be the average lethal dose for humans. required for normal development of human and animal The dose of 10-50 ppb for 1 kg of body weight can organisms but Cr(VI) activates teratogenic processes, cause circulatory problems, resulting in necrosis and disturbs DNA synthesis and can give rise to gangrene of limbs. The dominant effects of arsenic in mutagenous changes leading to malignant tumours humans are changes in the skin and mucous (WHO, Report 1998). Natural sources of chromium membranes as well as peripheral nerve damage. There include weathered rocks, volcanic exhalations and are xerosis soles and palms, skin inflammation with biogeochemical processes and, in the man-polluted ulceration. In addition, there is perforation of the nasal environment, mainly wastes after processing and septum.
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Toxic Effect of Metal Ions in Water Resources
3 In nature, zinc occurs in the form of minerals. An mg/dm . The ma ximum limit in drinking water is 0.05 important source of zinc pollution is the burning of coal, mg/dm3 (Fewtrell et al. 1996).The demand for copper is petroleum and its products. Incineration of municipal increased in pregnant women, children and the elderly. solid waste can introduce about 75% zinc to urban air. Good dietary sources of copper include animal liver, Also, municipal wastewater generally contains shellfish, dried fruit, nuts and chocolate. In some cases significant amounts of zinc. The use of municipal and drinking water may also provide significant levels of industrial waste in agriculture results in the accumulation copper. Copper in the body is involved in oxidation- of zinc in the surface layers of soil. Another source of reduction processes, acts as a stimulant on the amount this metal in soils are some preparations of plant and activity of hemoglobin, in the process of hardening protection products, as well as phosphatic fertilizers. of collagen, hair keratinization, melanin synthesis as well The degree of toxicity of zinc is not big, but it depends as affects on lipid metabolism and properties of the on the ionic form, and changes under the influence of myelin sheath of nerve fibers. In animal cells it is mainly
201 water hardness and pH. The daily average download of concentrated in the mitochondria, DNA, RNA, and the
r zinc by an adult is estimated at about 10-50 mg /day. nucleus. Copper readily forms a connection with various ea The toxic dose is 150-600 mg. It is necessary for the Y proteins, especially those of sulphur. Although copper is proper functioning of living organisms and it is involved an essential metal, it can, in some circumstances, lead 18 in the metabolism of proteins and carbohydrates. High to toxic effects including liver damage and doses of zinc cause damage to many biochemical gastrointestinal disturbances. Wilson's disease (also processes followed by its deposition in the kidneys, known as hepatolenticular degeneration), Indian liver, gonads. Kidneys play an important role in Childhood Cirrhosis (ICC) are characterized by an
V maintaining zinc homeostasis in the body. Zinc is accumulation of copper -containing granules within liver relatively non-toxic to humans and animals. Hazard zinc IV cells. Ingestion of high levels of copper salts is known to mainly connected with secondary copper deficiency cause gastrointestinal upsets. Additionally, absorption of ue ersion I s
s does not give specific symptoms. copper compounds by inhalation causes congestion of
I Nickel is a moderately toxic element as the nasal mucosa, gastritis, diarrhea and toxic compared to other transition metals. It is a natural symptoms such as chronic lung damage. Copper XVI element of the earth’s crust; therefore its small amounts compounds act on the intact skin, causing it to itch and are found in food, water, soil, and air. Nickel occurs inflammation. They can cause conjunctivitis, ulceration naturally in the environment at low levels. Nickel and corneal opacity, nasal congestion and as well as concentrations in the groundwater depend on the soil sore throat and nasal septum.
) used, pH, and depth of sampling. In humans, the H ( absorption of nickel from the gastrointestinal tract is less III. Some Possible Remedies than 10%. Nickel taken with food and water is poorly Among different techniques used for removal of absorbed and rapidly excreted from the body. It high concentrations of heavy metals, precipitation-
Research Volume accumulates mainly in bones, heart, skin and various filtration, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, oxidation- glands. Nickel inhalation of atmospheric air is largely reduction, solvent extraction, as well as membrane accumulated in the lungs. Practically fatal or acute separation should be mentioned (Hubicki,et al. 1999; poisoning with nickel or its salts is not found. The most D browski et al. 2004). However, some of the wastes
Frontier ą toxic compound is carbonyl nickel. An excess of inhaled contain substances such as organics, complexing nickel causes damage to the mucous membranes. agents and alkaline earth metals that may decrease the Moreover, its symptoms are allergic disorders (protein metal removal and result in unacceptable Science metabolism disorder in plasma, changes in the concentrations of heavy metals in the effluents. of chromosomes and changes in bone marrow and Large toxicity of lead requires that its contents cancer. It is known that inhalation of nickel and its are reduced to the minimum (ppb level). To this end compounds can lead to serious problems, including, there are applied chelating ions with the functional Journal among others, respiratory system cancer. Moreover, phosphonic and aminophosphonic groups. Also weakly nickel can cause skin disorder which is a common basic anion exchangers in the free base form can be occupational disease in workers who handle its large used for selective removal of lead(II) chloride complexes Global amounts. Also dermatitis is the most common effect of from the solutions of pH in the range 4-6. Also a chronic dermal exposure to nickel. Chronic inhalation combined process of cation exchange and precipitation exposure to nickel in humans also results in detrimental is often applied for lead(II) removal form wastewaters respiratory effects. (Pramanik et al. 2009). Copper is an essential nutritional element being a vital part of several enzymes. It is one of the components of human blood. The estimated adult dietary intakes are between 2 and 4 mg/day. The upper limit recommended by WHO for copper is less than 1.3
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: H
Environment & Earth Science Volume 16 Issue 4 Version 1.0 Year 2016
Type : Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal
Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA)
Online ISSN: 2249-4626 & Print ISSN: 0975-5896
Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways By Zakaria M. Sawan Cotton Research Institute Abstract- This study investigates the statistical relationship between various climatic factors and overall flower and boll production. Also, the relationship between climatic factors and production of flowers and bolls obtained during the development periods of the flowering and boll stage. Further, predicting effects of climatic factors during different convenient intervals (in days) on cotton flower and boll production compared with daily observations. Furthermore, collects information about the nature of the relationship between various climatic factors and cotton boll development and the 15-day period both prior to and after initiation of individual bolls. And, provide information on the effect of various climatic factors and soil moisture status during the development stage on flower and boll production in cotton. Evaporation, sunshine duration, relative humidity, surface soil temperature at 1800 h, and maximum air temperature, are the important climatic factors that significantly affect flower and boll production. Keywords: cotton flower and boll production, evaporation, relative humidity, soil moisture status, sunshine duration, temperature. GJSFR-H Classification: FOR Code: 040199
StudyingtheNatureRelationshipbetweenClimaticFactorsandCottonProductionbyDifferentAppliedStatisticalandMathematicalWays
Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of :
© 2016. Zakaria M. Sawan. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Studying the Nature Relationship between
Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by
Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical
Ways
Zakaria M. Sawan 201 r
Abstract- This study investigates the statistical relationship practices affect crop growth interactively, sometimes ea between various climatic factors and overall flower and boll resulting in plants responding in unexpected ways to Y production. Also, the relationship between climatic factors and their conditions (Hodges et al. 1993). 191 production of flowers and bolls obtained during the Water is a primary factor controlling plant development periods of the flowering and boll stage. Further, growth. Xiao et al. (2000) stated that, when water was predicting effects of climatic factors during different convenient intervals (in days) on cotton flower and boll applied at 0.85, 0.70, 0.55 or 0.40 ET (evapotranspiration) to cotton plants grown in pots, production compared with daily observations. Furthermore, V collects information about the nature of the relationship there was a close relationship between plant between various climatic factors and cotton boll development development and water supply. The fruit-bearing IV
ue ersion I and the 15-day period both prior to and after initiation of branches, square and boll numbers and boll size were s s individual bolls. And, provide information on the effect of increased with increased water supply. Barbour and I various climatic factors and soil moisture status during the Farquhar (2000) reported on greenhouse pot trials
XVI development stage on flower and boll production in cotton. where cotton cv. CS50 plants were grown at 43 or 76% Evaporation, sunshine duration, relative humidity, surface soil relative humidity (RH) and sprayed daily with abscisic temperature at 1800 h, and maximum air temperature, are the important climatic factors that significantly affect flower and acid (ABA) or distilled water. Plants grown at lower RH boll production. The five-day interval was found to be more had higher transpiration rates, lower leaf temperatures adequately and sensibly related to yield parameters. and lower stomatal conductance. Plant biomass was ) H
Evaporation; minimum humidity and sunshine duration were also reduced at the lower RH. Within each RH ( the most effective climatic factors during preceding and environment, increasing ABA concentration generally succeeding periods on boll production and retention. There reduced stomatal conductance, evaporation rates, was a negative correlation between flower and boll production superficial leaf density and plant biomass, and
Research Volume and either evaporation or sunshine duration, while that increased leaf temperature and specific leaf area. correlation with minimum relative humidity was positive. Temperature is also a primary factor controlling Keywords: cotton flower and boll production, rates of plant growth and development. Burke et al.
evaporation, relative humidity, soil moisture status, Frontier sunshine duration, temperature. (1988) has defined the optimum temperature range for biochemical and metabolic activities of plants as the I. Introduction thermal kinetic window (TKW). Plant temperatures above or below the TKW result in stress that limits growth and Science limate affects crop growth interactively, yield. The TKW for cotton growth is 23.5 to 32°C, with an of sometimes resulting in unexpected responses to optimum temperature of 28°C. Biomass production is prevailing conditions. Many factors, such as C directly related to the amount of time that foliage length of the growing season, climate (including solar temperature is within the TKW. Hodges et al. (1993) Journal radiation, temperature, light, wind, rainfall, and dew), found that the optimum temperature for cotton stem and cultivar, availability of nutrients and soil moisture, pests leaf growth, seedling development, and fruiting was
and cultural practices affect cotton growth (El-Zik 1980). Global almost 30°C, with fruit retention decreasing rapidly as The balance between vegetative and reproductive the time of exposure to 40°C increased. Reddy et al. development can be influenced by soil fertility, soil (1998) found that when Upland cotton (G. hirsutum) cv. moisture, cloudy weather, spacing and perhaps other DPL-51 was grown in naturally lit plant growth chambers factors such as temperature and relative humidity at 30/22°C day/night temperatures from sowing until (Guinn 1982). Weather, soil, cultivars, and cultural flower bud production, and at 20/12, 25/17, 30/22, 35/27 and 40/32°C for 42 days after flower bud production, Author: Cotton Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Ministry of Agriculture & Land Reclamation, Gamaa Street, Giza, Egypt. fruit retention was severely curtailed at the two higher e-mail: [email protected] temperatures compared with 30/22°C. Species/cultivars
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways
that retain fruits at high temperatures would be more cotton. Minimizing the deleterious effects of the productive both in the present-day cotton production factors through utilizing proper cultural practices will environments and even more in future warmer world. lead to improved cotton yield. Schrader et al. (2004) stated that high temperatures that II. ata and ethods plants are likely to experience inhibit photosynthesis. D M Zhou et al. (2000) indicated that light duration is
the key meteorological factor influencing the wheat- Two uniform field trials were conducted at the
cotton cropping pattern and position of the bolls, while experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Center, o o temperature had an important function on upper (node 7 Ministry of Agriculture, Giza, Egypt (30 N, 31 : 28’E at an to 9) and top (node 10) bolls, especially for double altitude of 19 m), using the cotton cultivar Giza 75 (Gossypium barbadense L.) in 2 successive seasons (I cropping patterns with early maturing varieties. and II). The soil texture was a clay loam, with an alluvial The objectives of this investigation were to study: substratum (pH = 8.07, 42.13% clay, 27.35% silt, 201 A- The effect of various climatic factors on the overall
r 22.54% fine sand, 3.22% coarse sand, 2.94% calcium flower and boll production in Egyptian cotton. This ea carbonate and 1.70% organic matter) (Sawan et al. Y could pave the way for formulating advanced 2010). predictions as for the effect of certain climatic 20 In Egypt, there are no rain-fed areas for conditions on cotton production of Egyptian cotton. cultivating cotton. Water for the field trials was applied It would be useful to minimize the deleterious effects using surface irrigation. Total water consumed during of the factors through utilizing proper cultural practices which would limit and control their each of two growing seasons supplied by surface -1
V irrigation was about 6,000-m³ h . The criteria used to negative effects, and this will lead to an increase in
IV determine amount of water applied to the crop cotton yield. depended on soil water status. Irrigation was applied ue ersion I B- Also, this study investigated the relationship
s
s when soil water content reached about 35% of field between climatic factors and production of flowers I capacity (0-60 cm). In season I, the field was irrigated on and bolls obtained during the development periods
XVI 15 March (at planting), 8 April (first irrigation), 29 April, of the flowering and boll stage, and to determine the 17 May, 31 May, 14 June, 1 July, 16 July, and 12 August. most representative period corresponding to the In season II, the field was irrigated on 23 March (planting overall crop pattern. date), 20 April (first irrigation), 8 May, 22 May, 1 June, 18 C- Further, this study aimed at predicting effects of June, 3 July, 20 July, 7 August and 28 August. ) climatic factors during different convenient intervals H (in days) on cotton flower and boll production Techniques normally used for growing cotton in Egypt ( were followed. Each experimental plot contained 13 to compared with daily observations. The study 15 ridges to facilitate proper surface irrigation. Ridge presents a rich effort focused on evaluating the width was 60 cm and length was 4 m. Seeds were sown efficacy of regression equations between cotton
Research Volume on 15 and 23 March in seasons I and II, respectively, in crop data and climatic data grouped at different hills 20 cm apart on one side of the ridge. Seedlings time intervals, to determine the appropriate time were thinned to 2 plants per hill 6 weeks after planting, scale for aggregating climate data to be used for resulting in a plant density of about 166,000 plants ha-1. Frontier predicting flower and boll production in cotton. Phosphorus fertilizer was applied at a rate of 54 kg P O D- Furthermore, this study investigates and collects 2 5 ha-1 as calcium super phosphate during land information about the nature of the relationship between various climatic factors and cotton boll preparation. Potassium fertilizer was applied at a rate of
Science -1 development and the 15-day period both prior to 57 kg K2O ha as potassium sulfate before the first
of irrigation (as a concentrated band close to the seed and after initiation of individual bolls of field grown cotton plants in Egypt. This could pave the way for ridge). Nitrogen fertilizer was applied at a rate of 144 kg -1 formulating advanced predictions as for the effect of N ha as ammonium nitrate in two equal doses: the first
Journal was applied after thinning just before the second certain climatic conditions on production of irrigation and the second was applied before the third Egyptian cotton. It would be useful to minimize the deleterious effects of the factors through utilizing irrigation. Rates of phosphorus, potassium, and Global nitrogen fertilizer were the same in both seasons. These proper cultural practices which would limit and amounts were determined based on the use of soil tests control their negative effects, and this will lead to an (Sawan et al. 2010). improvement in cotton yield. E- And provide information on the effect of various After thinning, 261 and 358 plants were randomly climatic factors and soil moisture status during the selected (precaution of border effect was taken into development stage on flower and boll production in consideration by discarding the cotton plants in the first Egyptian cotton. This could result in formulating and last two hills of each ridge) from 9 and 11 inner advanced predictions as for the effect of certain ridges of the plot in seasons I, and II respectively. Pest climatic conditions on production of Egyptian control management was carried out on an-as-needed
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways basis, according to the local practices performed at the (Sawan et al. 2005). Range and mean values of the experimental (Sawan et al. 2010). climatic parameters recorded during the production Flowers on all selected plants were tagged in stage for both seasons and overall data are listed in order to count and record the number of open flowers, Table 1 (Sawan et al. 2006). Daily number of flowers and and set bolls on a daily basis. The flowering season number of bolls per plant which survived till maturity commenced on the date of the first flower appearance (dependent variables) during the production stage in the and continued until the end of flowering season (31 two seasons are graphically illustrated in Figures 1 and August). The period of whole September (30 days) until 2 (Sawan et al. 2005). the 20th of October (harvest date) allowed a minimum of 50 days to develop mature bolls. In season I, the III. Results and Discussion flowering period extended from 17 June to 31 August, a) Response of flower and boll development to climatic whereas in season II, the flowering period was from 21 factors on the anthesis day June to 31 August. Flowers produced after 31 August 201 Daily number of flowers and number of bolls per were not expected to form sound harvestable bolls, and r plant which survived to maturity (dependent variables) ea therefore were not taken into account (Sawan et al. Y during the production stage of the two seasons (68 days 2010). and 62 days in the first and the second seasons, 211 For statistical analysis, the following data of the respectively) are graphically illustrated in Figures 1 and dependent variables were collected: number of tagged 2 (Sawan et al. 2005). The flower- and boll-curves flowers separately counted each day on all selected reached their peaks during the middle two weeks of plants (Y ), number of retained bolls obtained from the 1 August, and then descended steadily till the end of the total daily tagged flowers on all selected plants at V season. Specific differences in the shape of these harvest (Y ), and (Y ) percentage of boll retention IV 2 3 curves in the two seasons may be due to the growth-
([number of retained bolls obtained from the total ue ersion I reactions of environment, where climatic factors (Table s number of daily tagged flowers in all selected plants at s 1) (Sawan et al. 2006) represent an important part of the harvest]/[daily number of tagged flowers on each day in I environmental effects (Miller et al. 1996). all selected plants] x 100). XVI
As a rule, observations were recorded when the i. Correlation estimates number of flowers on a given day was at least 5 flowers Results of correlation coefficients [correlation found in a population of 100 plants and this continued and regression analyses were computed, according to
Draper and Smith (1966) by means of the computer for at least five consecutive days. This rule omitted eight ) observations in the first season and ten observations in program SAS package (1985). between the initial group H ( the second season. The number of observations (n) of independent variables and each of flower and boll was 68 (23 June through 29 August) and 62 (29 June production in the first and second seasons and the through 29 August) for the two seasons, respectively. combined data of the two seasons are shown in Table 2
Variables of the soil moisture status considered were, (Sawan et al. 2002). Research Volume the day prior to irrigation, the day of irrigation, and the The correlation values indicate clearly that first and second days after the day of irrigation (Sawan evaporation is the most important climatic factor
et al. 2010). affecting flower and boll production as it showed the Frontier
The climatic factors (independent variables) highest correlation value. This factor had a significant considered were daily data of: maximum air temperature negative relationship with flower and boll production.
(°C, X ); minimum air temperature (°C, X ); maximum- Sunshine duration showed a significant negative relation 1 2 Science minimum air temperature (diurnal temperature range) with fruit production except for boll production in the first
of (°C, X ); evaporation (expressed as Piche evaporation) season, which was not significant. Maximum air 3 (mm day-1, X ); surface soil temperature, grass temperature, temperature magnitude, and surface soil 4 temperature or green cover temperature at 0600 h (°C, temperature at 1800 h, were also negatively correlated Journal X ) and 1800 h (°C, X ); sunshine duration (h day-1, X ); with flower and boll production in the second season 5 6 7 maximum relative humidity (maxRH) (%, X ), minimum and the combined data of the two seasons. Minimum 8 relative humidity (minRH) (%, X ) and wind speed (m s-1, humidity in the second season, the combined data of 9 Global X ) in season II only. The source of the climatic data the two seasons, and maximum humidity in the first 10 was the Agricultural Meteorological Station of the season were positively and highly correlated with flower
Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research and boll production. Minimum air temperature and soil
Center, Giza, Egypt. No rainfall occurred during the two surface temperature at 0600 h showed low and growing seasons (Sawan et al. 2005). insignificant correlation to flower and boll production
Daily records of the climatic factors (independent (Sawan et al. 2002). variables), were taken for each day during production The negative relationship between evaporation stage in any season including two additional periods of with flower and boll production, means that high
15 days preceding and after the production stage evaporation rate significantly reduces cotton flower and
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways
boll production. This may be due to greater plant water would cause a significant reduction in boll number. deficits when evaporation increases. Also, the negative Thus, applying specific treatments such as an additional relation between each of maximum temperature, irrigation, and use of plant growth regulators, would temperature magnitude, surface soil temperature at decrease the deleterious effect of evaporation after boll 1800 h, or sunshine duration, with flower and boll formation and hence contribute to an increase in cotton production revealed that the increase in the values of boll production and retention, and the consequence is these factors had a detrimental effect upon fruit an increase in cotton yield (Sawan et al. 2002). In this production in Egyptian cotton. On the other hand, there connection, Moseley et al. (1994) stated that methanol was a positive correlation between each of maximum or has been reported to increase water use efficiency,
minimum humidity with flower and boll production growth and development of C3 plants in arid conditions, (Sawan et al. 2002). under intense sunlight. In field trials cotton cv. DPL-50 Results obtained from the production stage of (Gossypium hirsutum), was sprayed with a nutrient
201 each season individually, and the combined data of the solution (1.33 lb N + 0.27 lb Fe + 0.27 lb Zn acre-1) or r two seasons, indicate that relationships of some climatic 30% methanol solution at a rate of 20 gallons acre-1, or ea
Y variables with the dependent variables varied markedly sprayed with both the nutrient solution and methanol from one season to another. This may be due to the under two soil moisture regimes (irrigated and dry land). 22 differences between climatic factors in the two seasons The foliar spray treatments were applied 6 times during as illustrated by the ranges and means shown in Table 1 the growing season beginning at first bloom. They found (Sawan et al. 2006). For example, maximum that irrigation (a total of 4.5 inches applied in July) temperature, minimum humidity and soil surface increased lint yield across foliar spray treatments by
V temperature at 1800 h did not show significant relations 18%. Zhao and Oosterhuis (1997) reported that in a
IV in the first season, while that trend differed in the second growth chamber when cotton (Gossypium hirsutum cv.
ue ersion I season. The effect of maximum humidity varied Stoneville 506) plants were treated with the plant growth s s markedly from the first season to the second one. regulator PGR-IV (gibberellic acid, IBA and a proprietary I Where it was significantly correlated with the dependent fermentation broth) under water deficit stress and found
XVI variables in the first season, while the inverse pattern significantly higher dry weights of roots and floral buds was true in the second season. This diverse effect may than the untreated water-stressed plants. They be due to the differences in the mean values of this concluded that PGR-IV can partially alleviate the factor in the two seasons; where it was, on average, detrimental effects of water stress on photosynthesis
) about 86% in the first season, and about 72% on and dry matter accumulation and improves the growth
H average in the second season, as shown in Table 1 and nutrient absorption of growth chamber-grown cotton ( (Sawan et al. 2006). plants. Meek et al. (1999) in a field experiment in Boll retention ratio [(The number of retained Arkansas found that application of 3 or 6 kg glycine bolls obtained from the total number of each daily betaine (PGR) ha-1, to cotton plants had the potential for
Research Volume tagged flowers in all selected plants at harvest/Total increasing yield in cotton exposed to mild water stress. number of daily tagged flowers of all selected plants) x ii. Multiple linear regression equation 100] curves for both of the two seasons are shown in By means of the multiple linear regression
Frontier Figures 3 and 4 (Sawan et al. 2002). Also, these curves analysis, fitting predictive equations (having good fit) describe why the shapes and patterns associated with were computed for flower and boll production per plant the flower and boll curves for I and II seasons were using selected significant factors from the nine climatic different. It seems reasonable that the climatic data that Science variables studied in this investigation. Wind speed were collected in these two experiments (I and II evaluated during the second season had no influence
of seasons) could provide adequate information for on the dependent variables. The equations obtained for describing how these two seasons differed and how the each of the two dependent variables, i.e. number of crop responded accordingly (Sawan 2014 a & b).
Journal flowers (Y1) and bolls per plant (Y2) in each season and These results indicate that evaporation is the for combined data from the two seasons (Table 2) most effective and consistent climatic factor affecting (Sawan et al. 2002) are as follows: boll production. As the sign of the relationship was Global negative, this means that an increase in evaporation First Season: (n = 68)
Y1 = 21.691 - 1.968 X4 - 0.241 X7 + 0.216 X8, R = 0.608** and R² = 0.3697, While R² for all studied variables was 0.4022.
Y2 = 15.434 - 1.633 X4 + 0.159 X8, R = 0.589** and R² = 0.3469 and R² for all studied variables was 0.3843. Second Season: (n = 62)
Y1 = 77.436 - 0.163 X1 - 2.861 X4 - 1.178 X7 + 0.269 X9, R = 0.644**, R² = 0.4147.
Y2 = 66.281 - 0.227X1 - 3.315X4 - 2.897X7 + 0.196X9, R = 0.629**, R² = 0.3956.
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways
In addition, R² for all studied variables was 0.4503 and 0.4287 for Y1 and Y2 equations respectively. Combined data for the two seasons: (n = 130)
Y1 = 68.143 - 0.827 X4 - 1.190 X6 - 2.718 X7 + 0.512 X9, R = 0.613**, R² = 0.3758 Y = 52.785 - 0.997 X - 0.836 X - 1.675 X + 0.426 X , R = 0.569**, R² = 0.3552 2 4 6 7 9 While R² for all studied variables was 0.4073 for Y and 0.3790 for Y . 1 2 Three climatic factors, i.e. minimum air deficit for cotton based on cultivar earliness, growing - temperature, surface soil temperature at 0600 h, and season length, and availability of irrigation water. wind speed were not included in the equations since The negative relationship between sunshine they had very little effect on production of cotton flowers duration and cotton production may be due to the fact and bolls. The sign of the partial regression coefficient that the species of Gossypium used is known to be a for an independent variable (climatic factor) indicates its short day plant (Hearn and Constable 1984), so, an effect on the production value of the dependent variable increase of sunshine duration above that needed for 201 (flowers or bolls). This means that high rates of humidity cotton plant growth will decrease flower and boll r ea and/or low values of evaporation will increase fruit production. Oosterhuis (1997) studied the reasons for Y production (Sawan et al. 2002). low and variable cotton yields in Arkansas, with 231 iii. Contribution of selected climatic factors to variations unusually high insect pressures and the development of in the dependent variable the boll load during an exceptionally hot and dry August. Relative contributions (RC %) for each of the Solutions to the problems are suggested i.e. selection of selected climatic factors to variation in flower and boll tolerant cultivars, effective and timely insect and weed V production is summarized in Table 3 (Sawan et al. 2002). control, adequate irrigation regime, use of proper crop IV Results in this table indicate that evaporation was the monitoring techniques and application of plant growth
regulators. ue ersion I most important climatic factor affecting flower and boll s s production in Egyptian cotton. Sunshine duration is the b) Effect of climatic factors during the development I second climatic factor of importance affecting periods of flowering and boll formation on the XVI production of flowers and bolls. Relative humidity and production of cotton temperature at 1800 h were factors of lower contribution Daily number of flowers and number of bolls per than evaporation and sunshine duration/day. Maximum plant that survived to maturity (dependent variables) temperature made a contribution less than the other during the production stage of the two growing seasons affecting factors. are graphically illustrated in Figures 5 and 6 (Sawan et ) H The highest contribution of evaporation to the al. 1999). Observations used in the statistical analysis ( were obtained during the flowering and boll stage (60 variation in both flower and boll production (Sawan et al. 2002) can, however, be explained in the light of results days for each season), which represent the entire production stage. The entire production stage was found by Ward and Bunce (1986) in sunflower Research Volume (Helianthus annuus). They stated that decreases of divided into four equivalent quarter's periods (15 days humidity at both leaf surfaces reduced photosynthetic each) and used for correlation and regression analyses. rate of the whole leaf for plants grown under a moderate Independent variables, their range and mean Frontier temperature and medium light level. Kaur and Singh values for the two seasons and during the periods of (1992) found in cotton that flower number was flower and boll production are listed in Table 4 (Sawan et decreased by water stress, particularly when applied at al. 1999). Both flower number and boll production show flowering. Seed cotton yield was about halved by water the higher value in the third and fourth quarters of Science stress at flowering, slightly decreased by stress at boll production stage, accounting for about 70% of total of formation, and not significantly affected by stress in the production during the first season and about 80% of the vegetative stage (6-7 weeks after sowing). Orgaz et al. total in the second season. (1992) in field experiments at Cordoba, SW Spain, grew Linear correlation between the climatic factors Journal cotton cultivars Acala SJ-C1, GC-510, Coker-310 and and the studied characteristics, i.e. flower, boll Jean cultivar at evapotranspiration (ET) levels ranging production and boll retention ratio, were calculated Global from 40 to 100% of maximum ET (ETmax) which were based on quarters of the production stage for each generated with sprinkler line irrigation. The water season. Significant relationships (< 0.15) are shown in production function of Jean cultivar was linear; seed Tables 5 and 6 (Sawan et al. 1999). Examining these -1 yield was 5.30 t ha at ETmax (820 mm). In contrast, the tables, it is clear that the fourth quarter of production production function of the three other cultivars was linear stage consistently exhibited the highest R² values up to 85% of ETmax, but leveled off as ET approached regardless of the second quarter for boll retention ratio; ETmax (830 mm) because a fraction of the set bolls did however, less data pairs were used (n = 30 for not open by harvest at high ET levels. These authors combined data of the fourth quarter “n = 15 for each concluded that it is possible to define an optimum ET quarter of each season”) to calculate the relations.
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways
Results obtained from the four quarters of the ranges and means shown in Table 4 (Sawan et al. 1999). production period for each season separately and for For example, maximum temperature and surface soil the combined data of the two seasons, indicated that temperature at 1800 h did not show significant effects in relationships varied markedly from one season to the first season, while this trend differed in the second another. This may be due to the differences between the season. climatic factors in the two seasons; as illustrated by its Multiple linear regression equations obtained from data of the fourth quarter, for: 1. Flower production,
Y = 160.0 + 11.28X1 - 4.45X3 - 2.93X4 - 5.05X5 - 11.3X6 - 0.962X8 + 2.36X9 And R²= 0.672** 2. Boll production,
Y = 125.4 + 13.74X1 - 6.76X3 - 4.34X4 - 6.59X5 - 10.3X6 - 1.25X8 + 2.16X9 201
r With an R² = 0.747**
ea 3. Boll retention ratio, Y Y = 81.93 - 0.272X3 - 2.98X4 + 3.80X7 - 0.210X8 - 0.153X9 24 And its R² = 0.615** The equation obtained from data of the second quarter of production stage for boll retention ratio, Y= 92.81 - 0.107X - 0.453X + o.298X - 0.194X + 0.239X 3 4 7 8 9 And R² = 0.737**
V R² values for these equations ranged from boll production (Table 6). These erratic correlations may
IV 0.615 to 0.747. It could be concluded that these be due to the variations in the values of this factor equations may predict flower and boll production and between the quarters of the production stages, as ue ersion I
s s boll retention ratio from the fourth quarter period within shown from its range and mean values (Table 4) (Sawan
I about 62 to 75% of its actual means. Therefore, these et al. 1999).
XVI equations seem to have practical value. Comparing Burke et al. (1990) pointed out that the Tables 6 and 7 (Sawan et al. 1999), it can be seen that usefulness of the 27.5°C midpoint temperature of the differences in R² between the fourth quarter and the TKW of cotton as a baseline temperature for a thermal entire production period of the two seasons for each of stress index (TSI) was investigated in field trials on flower, boll production, and boll retention ratio were cotton cv. Paymaster 104. This biochemical baseline ) H large (0.266, 0.325, and 0.279 respectively). These and measurements of foliage temperature were used to ( differences are sufficiently large to make a wide gap compare the TSI response with the cotton field under a typical field sampling situation. This could be performance. Foliage temperature was measured with due to the high percentage of flower and boll production hand-held 4°C field of view IR thermometer while plant
Research Volume for the fourth quarter. biomass was measured by destructive harvesting. The Equations obtained from data of the fourth biochemical based TSI and the physically based crop quarter explained more variations of flower, boll water stress index were highly correlated (r² = 0.92) for production and boll retention ratio. Evaporation, cotton across a range of environmental conditions. Frontier humidity and temperature are the principal climatic Reddy et al. (1995) in controlled environmental factors that govern cotton flower and boll production chambers pima cotton cv. S-6 produced less total during the fourth quarter; since they were most strongly biomass at 35.5°C than at 26.9°C and no bolls were Science correlated with the dependent variables studied (Table produced at the higher temperature 40°C. This confirms of 6) (Sawan et al., 1999). the results of this study as maximum temperature Evaporation, that seems to be the most showed negative significant relationship with production important climatic factor, had negative significant variables in the fourth quarter period of the production Journal relationship which means that high evaporation ratio stage. Zhen (1995) found that the most important reduces significantly flower and boll production. factors decreasing cotton yields in Huangchuan County, Maximum temperature, temperature-differentiates and Henan, were low temperatures in spring, high Global maximum humidity also showed negative significant link temperatures and pressure during summer and the with fruiting production, which indicates that these sudden fall in temperature at the beginning of autumn. climatic variables have determinable effect upon Measures to increase yields included the use of the Egyptian cotton fruiting production. Minimum humidity more suitable high-oil cotton cultivars, which mature was positively high correlated in most quarter periods early, and choosing sowing dates and spacing so that for flower, boll production and boll retention ratio. This the best use was made of the light and temperature means that an increase of this factor will increase both resources available. flower and boll production. Maximum temperature is It may appear that the grower would have no sometime positively and sometime negatively linked to control over boll shedding induced by high temperature,
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways but this is not necessarily the case. If he can irrigate, he climatic factors for different intervals of days (combined can exert some control over temperature since data of the 2 seasons) (Table 8) (Sawan et al. 2006). transpiring plants have the ability to cool themselves by Evaporation was the most important climatic evaporation. The leaf and canopy temperatures of factor affecting flower and boll production in Egyptian drought-stressed plants can exceed those of plants with cotton. The negative correlation means that high adequate quantity of water by several degrees when air evaporation ratio significantly reduced flower and boll humidity is low (Ehrler 1973). The grower can partially production. High evaporation rates could result in water overcome the adverse effects of high temperature on stress that would slow growth and increase shedding net photosynthesis by spacing plants to adequately rate of flowers and bolls (Sawan et al. 2006). Kaur and expose the leaves. Irrigation may also increase Singh (1992) found in cotton that flower number was photosynthesis by preventing stomata closure during decreased by water stress, particularly when existing at the day. Adequate fertilization is necessary for maximum flowering stage. Seed cotton yield was decreased by rates of photosynthesis. Finally, cultivars appear to differ about 50% when water stress was present at flowering 201 in their heat tolerance (Fisher 1975). Therefore, the stage, slightly decreased by stress at boll formation r ea grower can minimize boll abscission where high stage, and not significantly affected by stress in the Y temperatures occur by selecting a heat-tolerant cultivar, vegetative stage (6-7 weeks after sowing). 251 planting date management, applying an adequate The second most important climatic factor was fertilizer, planting or thinning for optimal plant spacing, minimum humidity, which had a high positive correlation and irrigating as needed to prevent drought stress with flower and boll production, and retention ratio. The (Sawan 2014b). positive correlation means that increased humidity would bring about better boll production. V c) Appropriate time scale for aggregating climatic data IV to predict flowering and boll setting behavior of The third most important climatic factor in our
study was sunshine duration, which showed a ue ersion I s cotton s significant negative relationship with flower and boll
I i. Statistical Analysis production only. The negative relationship between
Statistical analysis was conducted using the sunshine duration and cotton production may be due to XVI procedures outlined in the general linear model (GLM, the fact that the species of the genus Gossypium are SAS Institute, Inc. 1985). Data of dependent and known to be short day plants (Hearn and Constable independent variables, collected for each day of the 1984), so, an increase of sunshine duration above that production stage (60 days in each season), were sufficient to attain good plant growth will decrease ) summed up into intervals of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 10 days. H
flower and boll production. Bhatt (1977) found that ( Data from these intervals were used to compute exposure to daylight over 14 hours and high day relationships between the dependent variables (flower temperature, individually or in combination, delayed and boll setting and boll retention) and the independent flowering of the Upland cotton cv. J34. Although average variables (climatic factors) in the form of simple sunshine duration in our study was only 11.7 h, yet it Research Volume correlation coefficients for each season. Comparisons could reach 13 h, which, in combination with high between the values of “r” were done to determine the maximum temperatures (up to 38.8°C), may have best interval of days for determining effective adversely affected reproductive growth. Frontier relationships. The α-level for significance was P < 0.15. Maximum air temperature, temperature
The climatic factors attaining a probability level of magnitude and surface soil temperature at 1800 h show significance not exceeding 0.15 were deemed important significant negative relationships with flower and boll Science
(affecting the dependent variables), selected and production only. Meanwhile, the least important factors of combined with dependent variable in multiple regression were surface soil temperature at 0600 h and minimum analysis to obtain a convenient predictive equation air temperature. Our results indicate that evaporation (Cady and Allen 1972). Multiple linear regression
was the most effective climatic factor affecting cotton Journal equations (using stepwise method) comprising selected boll production. As the sign of the relationship was predictive variables were computed for the determined negative, this means that an increase in evaporation interval and coefficients of multiple determinations (R²) caused a significant reduction in boll number (Sawan et Global were calculated to measure the efficiency of the al. 2006). Thus, applying specific treatments, such as an regression models in explaining the variation in data. additional irrigation or the use of plant growth regulators
Correlation and regression analyses were computed (PGR) that would decrease the deleterious effect of according to Draper and Smith (1966) (Sawan et al. evaporation after boll formation, could contribute to an
2006). increase in cotton boll production and retention, and a. Correlation estimates consequently an increase in cotton yield. In this Significant simple correlation coefficients were connection, Meek et al. (1999) in a field experiment in estimated between the production variables and studied Arkansas found that application of 3 or 6 kg glycine
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways
betaine (PGR) ha-1 to cotton plants under mild water opportunity to avoid any adverse effect for weather stress increased yield. factors on cotton production through applying Comparing results for the different intervals of appropriate cultural practices such as adequate days with those from daily observation (Table 8) (Sawan irrigation regime or utilization of plant growth regulators. et al. 2006), the 5-day interval appeared to be the most This proposal would be true if the fluctuations in weather suitable interval, which actually revealed a more solid conditions were not extreme. Our recommendation and more obvious relationships between climatic factors would be the accumulation 5-day climatic data, and use and production characters. This was in fact indicated by this information to select the adequate cultural practices the higher R2 values obtained when using the 5-day (such as an additional irrigation or utilization of plant intervals. The 5-day interval may be the most suitable growth regulators) that would help circumvent the interval for diminishing the daily fluctuations between the unfavorable effects of climatic factors. In case of sharp factors under study to clear these relations comparing fluctuations in climatic factors, data could be collected
201 with the other intervals. However, it seems that this daily, and when stability of climatic conditions is r conception is true provided that the fluctuations in restored, the 5-day accumulation of weather data could ea
Y climatic conditions are limited or minimal. Therefore, it be used again (Sawan et al. 2006).
would be the most efficient interval used to help 26 d) Response of flower and boll development to climate circumvent the unfavorable effect of climatic factors. factors before and after anthesis day This finding gives researchers and producers a chance The effects of specific climatic factors during to deal with condensed rather than daily weather data. both pre- and post-anthesis periods on boll production b. Regression models and retention are mostly unknown. However, by V Multiple linear regression equations were determining the relationship of climatic factors with IV estimated using the stepwise multiple regression flower and boll production and retention, the overall level
ue ersion I technique to express the relation between cotton s of production can be possibly predicted. Thus, an s production variables [number of flowers (Y1); bolls per understanding of these relationships may help
I plant (Y2); and boll retention ratio (Y3)] and the studied physiologists to determine control mechanisms of XVI climatic factors (Table 9) (Sawan et al. 2006). production in cotton plants (Sawan et al. 2005). Daily Evaporation and surface soil temperature at records of the climatic factors (independent variables), 1800 h, sunshine duration and minimum humidity were taken for each day during production stage in any accounted for a highly significant amount of variation (P season including two additional periods of 15 days ) < 0.05) in cotton production variables, with the equation before and after the production stage (Table 10) (Sawan H ( obtained for the 5-day interval showing a high degree of et al. 2005). certainty. The R² values for the 5-day interval were higher In each season, the data of the dependent and than those obtained from daily data for each of the independent variables (68 and 62 days) were regarded cotton production variables. Also, the 5-day interval as the original file (a file which contains the daily Research Volume gave more efficient and stable estimates than the other recorded data for any variable during a specific period). studied intervals (data not shown) (Sawan et al. 2006). Fifteen other files before and another 15 after the The R² values for these equations clearly indicate the production stage were obtained by fixing the dependent Frontier importance of such equations since the climatic factors variable data, while moving the independent variable involved explained about 59 to 62% of the variation data at steps each of 1 day (either before or after found in the dependent variables. production stage) in a matter similar to a sliding role Science During the production stage, an accurate (Sawan et al. 2005). The following is an example (in the
of weather forecast for the next 10 days would provide an first season):
Data of any dependent Any independent variable variable (for each
Journal (for each climatic factors) flowers and bolls)
In case of original file and In case of original file and
Global Production stage files before production files after production File stage stage Date Days Date Days Date Days Original file 23 Jun-29 Aug 68 23 Jun-29 Aug 68 23 Jun-29 Aug 68 st 1 new file 23 Jun-29 Aug 68 22 Jun-28 Aug 68 24 Jun-30 Aug 68 nd 2 new file 23 Jun-29 Aug 68 21 Jun-27 Aug 68 25 Jun-31 Aug 68 th 15 new file 23 Jun-29 Aug 68 8 Jun-14 Aug 68 8 Jul -13 Sept 68 Thus, the climate data were organized into days the first year and 62 days the second year) and 15 records according to the complete production stage (68 day, 14 day, 13 day,….and 1 day periods both before
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways and after the production stage. This produced 31 maximum humidity showed insignificant correlation with climate periods per year that were analyzed for their both flower and boll production except for one day relationships with cotton flowering and boll production period only (the 15th day). Generally, the results in the (Sawan et al. 2005). two seasons indicated that daily evaporation, sunshine i. Correlation estimates duration and minimum humidity were the most effective A. Results of the correlation between climatic factors and consistent climatic factors, which exhibited and each of flower and boll production during the significant relationships with the production variables for 15 day periods before flowering day (Tables 11 and all the 15 day periods before anthesis in both seasons 12) revealed the following (Sawan et al. 2005): (Sawan et al. 2005). The factors in this study which had been found First season to be associated with boll development are the climatic Daily evaporation and sunshine duration factors that would influence water loss between plant showed consistent negative and statistically significant and atmosphere (low evaporation demand, high 201
correlations with both flower and boll production for r humidity, and shorter solar duration). This can lead to each of the 15 moving window periods before anthesis ea direct effects on the fruiting forms themselves and Y (Table 11). Evaporation appeared to be the most inhibitory effects on mid-afternoon photosynthetic rates important climate factor affecting flower and boll 271 even under well-watered conditions. Boyer et al. (1980) production. found that soybean plants with ample water supplies Daily maximum and minimum humidity showed can experience water deficits due to high transpiration consistent positive and statistically significant rates. Also, Human et al. (1990) stated that, when correlations with both flower and boll production in most sunflower plants were grown under controlled V of the 15 moving window periods before anthesis (Table temperature regimes, water stress during budding, IV 11) (Sawan et al. 2005). Maximum daily temperature
anthesis and seed filling, the CO2 uptake rate per unit ue ersion I showed low but significant negative correlation with s s leaf area as well as total uptake rate per plant,
flower production during the 2-5, 8, and 10 day periods I significantly diminished with stress, while this effect before anthesis. Minimum daily temperatures generally resulted in a significant decrease in yield per plant. XVI showed insignificant correlation with both production variables. The diurnal temperature range showed few B. The correlation between climatic factors and each of correlations with flower and boll production. Daily soil boll production and boll retention over a period of surface temperature at 0600 h showed a significant 15 day periods after flowering (boll setting) day
) positive correlation with boll production during the (Tables 13 and 14) (Sawan et al. 2005) revealed the H period extending from the 11-15 day period before following: ( anthesis, while its effect on flowering was confined only First season to the 12 and the 15 day periods prior anthesis. Daily Daily evaporation showed significant negative soil surface temperature at 1800 h showed a significant correlation with number of bolls for all the 15 day Research Volume negative correlation with flower production during the 2- periods after flowering (Table 13). Meanwhile its 10 day periods before anthesis. relationship with retention ratio was positive and
Second season significant in the 9-15 day periods after flowering. Daily Frontier Daily Evaporation, the diurnal temperature sunshine duration was positively and significantly range, and sunshine duration were negatively and correlated with boll retention ratio during the 5-13 day significantly correlated with both flower and boll periods after flowering. Daily maximum humidity had a
Science production in all the 15 day periods, while maximum significant positive correlation with the number of bolls daily temperature was negatively and significantly during the first 8 day periods after flowering, while daily of related to flower and boll formation during the 2- 5 day minimum humidity had the same correlation for only the periods before anthesis (Table 12) (Sawan et al. 2005). 11, and 12 day periods after flowering. Daily maximum
Journal Minimum daily temperature showed positive and minimum temperatures and the diurnal temperature and statistically significant correlations with both range, as well as soil surface temperature at 1800 did production variables only during the 9-15 day periods not show significant relationships with both number of
Global before anthesis, while daily minimum humidity showed bolls and retention ratio. Daily soil surface temperature the same correlation trend in all the 15 moving window at 0600 h had a significant negative correlation with boll periods before anthesis. Daily soil surface temperature retention ratio during the 3-7 day periods after anthesis. at 0600 h was positively and significantly correlated with Second season flower and boll production for the 12, 14, and 15 day Daily evaporation, soil surface temperature at periods prior to anthesis only. Daily soil surface 1800 h, and sunshine duration had a significant negative temperature at 1800 h showed negative and significant correlation with number of bolls in all the 15 day periods correlations with both production variables only during after anthesis (Table 14) (Sawan et al. 2005). Daily the first and second day periods before flowering. Daily maximum and minimum temperatures and the diurnal
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways
temperature range, and soil surface temperature at 0600 humidity and evaporation is less than 4:1 (Sawan et al. h had a negative correlation with boll production. Their 2005). significant effects were observed during the 1, and 10- Evaporation appeared to be the most important 15 day periods for maximum temperature, and the 1-5, climatic factor (in each of the 15-day periods both prior and 9-12 day periods for the diurnal temperatures to and after initiation of individual bolls) affecting number range. Meanwhile, the daily minimum temperature and of flowers or harvested bolls in Egyptian cotton. High soil surface temperature at 0600 h had a significant daily evaporation rates could result in water stress that negative correlation only during the 13-15 day periods. would slow growth and increase shedding rate of Daily minimum humidity had a significant positive flowers and bolls. The second most important climatic correlation with number of bolls during the first 5 day factor in our study was humidity. Effect of maximum periods, and the 9-15 day periods after anthesis. Daily humidity varied markedly from the first season to the maximum humidity showed no significant relation to second one, where it was significantly correlated with 201 number of bolls produced, and further no significant the dependent variables in the first season, while the r relation was observed between any of the studied inverse pattern was true in the second season. This ea
Y climatic factors and boll retention ratio. diverse effect may be due to the differences in the The results in the two seasons indicated that 28 values of this factor in the two seasons; where it was on evaporation and humidity, followed by sunshine duration average 87% in the first season, and only 73% in the had obvious correlation with boll production. From the second season (Table 10) (Sawan et al. 2005). Also, was results obtained, it appeared that the effects of air found that, when the average value of minimum humidity temperature, and soil surface temperature tended to be exceeded the half average value of maximum humidity, V masked in the first season, i.e. did not show any the minimum humidity can substitute the maximum
IV significant effects in the first season on the number of humidity on affecting number of flowers or harvested
ue ersion I bolls per plant. However, these effects were found to be bolls. In the first season (Table 10) the average value of s s significant in the second season. These seasonal minimum humidity was less than half of the value of I differences in the impacts of the previously mentioned maximum humidity (30.2/85.6 = 0.35), while in the
XVI climatic factors on the number of bolls per plant are second season it was higher than half of maximum most likely ascribed to the sensible variation in humidity (39.1/72.9 = 0.54). evaporation values in the two studied seasons where -1 -1 The third most important climatic factor in our their means were 10.2 mm.d and 5.9 mm d in the first study was sunshine duration, which showed a
) and second seasons, respectively (Sawan et al. 2005). significant negative relationship with boll production. The H There is an important question here concerning, ( r values of (Tables 11-14) (Sawan et al. 2005) indicated if there is a way for forecasting when evaporation values that the relationship between the dependent and would mask the effect of the previous climatic factors. independent variables preceding flowering (production The answer would be possibly achieved through relating stage) generally exceeded in value the relationship Research Volume humidity values to evaporation values which are between them during the entire and late periods of naturally liable to some fluctuations from one season to production stage. In fact, understanding the effects of another (Sawan et al. 2005). It was found that the ratio climatic factors on cotton production during the
Frontier between the mean of maximum humidity and the mean previously mentioned periods would have marked of evaporation in the first season was 85.8/10.2 = 8.37, consequences on the overall level of cotton production, while in the second season this ratio was 12.4. On the which could be predictable depending on those other hand, the ratio between the mean minimum Science relationships. humidity and the mean of evaporation in the first season of ii. Regression models was 30.8/10.2 = 3.02, while in the second season this An attempt was carried out to investigate the ratio was 6.75 (Table 13) (Sawan et al. 2005). From these ratios it seems that minimum humidity which is effect of climatic factors on cotton production via
Journal prediction equations including the important climatic closely related to evaporation is more sensitive than the factors responsible for the majority of total variability in ratio between maximum humidity and evaporation. It can be seen from the results and formulas that when the cotton flower and boll production. Hence, regression Global models were established using the stepwise multiple ratio between minimum humidity and evaporation is regression technique to express the relationship small (3:1), the effects of air temperature, and soil between each of the number of flowers and bolls/plant surface temperature were hindered by the effect of and boll retention ratio (Y), with the climatic factors, for evaporation, i.e. the effect of these climatic factors were each of the a) 5, b) 10, and c) 15 day periods either prior not significant. However, when this ratio is high (6:1), the to or after initiation of individual bolls (Tables 15 and 16) effects of these factors were found to be significant. (Sawan et al. 2005). Accordingly, it could be generally stated that the effects of air, and soil surface temperatures could be masked Concerning the effect of prior days the results by evaporation when the ratio between minimum indicated that evaporation, sunshine duration, and the
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways diurnal temperature range were the most effective and humidity appeared to have secondary effects, yet they consistent climatic factors affecting cotton flower and are in fact important players. The importance of boll production (Table 15). The fourth effective climatic sunshine duration has been alluded to by Moseley et al. factor in this respect was minimum humidity. On the (1994) and Oosterhuis (1997). Also, Mergeai and Demol other hand, for the periods after flower the results (1991) found that cotton yield was assisted by obtained from the equations (Table 16) indicated that intermediate relative humidity. evaporation was the most effective and consistent e) Cotton (Gossypium barbadense) flower and boll climatic factor affecting number of harvested bolls. production as affected by climatic factors and soil Regression models obtained demonstrate of moisture status each independent variable under study as an efficient i. Basic Variables and important factor (Sawan et al. 2005). Meanwhile, A. Dependant variables as defined above: (Y ) and (Y ) they explained a sensible proportion of the variation in 1 2 (Sawan et al. 2010). flower and boll production, as indicated by their R², 201
B. Independent variables (Xs): r which ranged between 0.14-0.62, where most of R2 prior 1. Irrigation on day 1 = 1. Otherwise, enter 0.0 (soil ea to flower opening were about 0.50 and after flowering all Y moisture status) (X1) but one are less than 0.50. These results agree with 2. The first and second days after the day of irrigation 291 Miller et al. (1996) in their regression study of the relation (soil moisture status) = 1. Otherwise, enter 0.0 (X2). of yield with rainfall and temperature. They suggested 3. The day prior to the day of irrigation (soil moisture that the other 0.50 of variation related to management status) to check for possible moisture deficiency on practices, which can be the same in this study. Also, the that day = 1. Otherwise, enter 0.0 (X3). regression models indicated that the relationships V 4. Number of days during days 1 (day of flowering)-12 between the number of flowers and bolls per plant and IV (after flowering) that temperature equaled or
the studied climatic factors for the 15 day period before ue ersion I exceeded 37.5 °C (high temperature) (X4). s s or after flowering (Y3) in each season explained the
5. Range of temperature (diurnal temperature) [°C] on I highly significant magnitude of variation (P < 0.05). The day 1 (day of flowering) (X5). R² values for the 15 day periods before and after XVI 6. Broadest range of temperature [°C] over days 1 flowering were higher than most of those obtained for (day of flowering)-12 (after flowering) (X6). each of the 5 and the 10 day periods before or after 7. Minimum relative humidity (minRH) [%] during day 1 flowering. This clarifies that the effects of the climatic (day of flowering) (X7).
factors during the 15 day periods before or after ) 8. Maximum relative humidity (maxRH) [%] during day flowering are very important for Egyptian cotton boll H 1 (day of flowering) (X8). ( production and retention. Thus, an accurate climatic 9. Minimum relative humidity (minRH) [%] during day 2 forecast for the effect of these 15 day periods provides (after flowering) (X9). an opportunity to avoid any possible adverse effects of 10. Maximum relative humidity (maxRH) [%] during day unusual climatic conditions before flowering or after boll Research Volume 2 (after flowering) (X10). formation by utilizing additional treatments and/or 11. Largest maximum relative humidity (maxRH) [%] on adopting proper precautions to avoid flower and boll days 3-6 (after flowering) (X11). reduction. Frontier 12. Lowest minimum relative humidity (minRH) [%] on The main climatic factors from this study days 3-6 (after flowering) (X12). (Sawan et al. 2005) affecting the number of flowers and 13. Largest maximum relative humidity (maxRH) [%] on bolls, and by implication yield, is evaporation, sunshine days 7-12 (after flowering) (X13). Science duration and minimum humidity, with evaporation (water
14. Lowest minimum relative humidity (minRH) [%] on of stress) being by far the most important factor. Various days 7-12 (after flowering) (X14). activities have been suggested to partially overcome 15. Lowest minimum relative humidity (minRH) [%] on water stress. Temperature conditions during the days 50-52 (after flowering) (X15). Journal reproduction growth stage of cotton in Egypt do not 16. Daily light period (hour) (X16). appear to limit growth even though they are above the optimum for cotton growth (Sawan 2013). This is ii. Statistical analysis Global contradictory to the finding of Holaday et al. (1997). A Simple correlation coefficients between the possible reason for that contradiction is that the effects initial group of independent variables (climatic factors of evaporation rate and humidity were not taken into and soil moisture status) (X’s) and the corresponding consideration in the research studies conducted by dependent variables (Y’s) were computed for each other researchers in other countries. The matter of fact is season and the combined data of the two seasons. that temperature and evaporation are closely related to These correlation coefficients helped determine the each other to such an extent that the higher evaporation significant climatic factors and soil moisture status rate could possible mask the effect of temperature affecting the cotton production variables. The level for (Sawan 2014a). Sunshine duration and minimum significance was P < 0.15. Those climatic factors and
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways
soil moisture status attaining a probability level of correlation with flower and boll production. The positive significance not exceeding 0.15 were deemed important relationship between relative humidity with flower and (affecting the dependent variables) (Sawan et al. 2010). boll production means that low relative humidity rate Those factors were combined with dependent variables reduces significantly cotton flower and boll production. in multiple regression analysis to obtain a predictive This may be due to greater plant water deficits when model as described by Cady and Allen (1972). Multiple relative humidity decreases. Also, the negative linear regression equations (using the stepwise method) relationship between the variables of maximum comprising selected predictive variables were computed temperature exceeding 37.5 °C (X4), range of diurnal for the determined interval. Coefficients of multiple temperature on flowering (X5), and sunshine duration determinations (R2) were calculated to measure the (X16) with flower and boll production revealed that the efficiency of the regression models in explaining the increased values of these factors had a detrimental variation in data. Correlation and regression analysis effect upon Egyptian cotton fruit production. Results
201 were computed according to Draper and Smith (1985) obtained from the production stage of each season, and r using the procedures outlined in the general linear the combined data of the two seasons showed marked ea
Y model (GLM) (SAS Institute 1985). variability in the relationships of some climatic variables with the dependent variables. This may be best 30 a. Correlation estimates Simple correlation coefficients between the explained by the differences between climatic factors in independent variables and the dependent variables for the two seasons as illustrated by the ranges and means flower and boll production in each season and shown in Table 1. For example, maximum temperature combined data of the two seasons are shown in Tables exceeding 37.5 °C (X4) and minRH did not show V 17-19 (Sawan et al. 2010). The simple correlation values significant relations in the first season, while that trend IV indicated clearly that relative humidity was the most differed in the second season. These results indicated
ue ersion I important climatic factor. Relative humidity also had a that relative humidity was the most effective and s s significant positive relationship with flower and boll consistent climatic factor affecting boll production. The I production; except for lowest minRH on days 50-52 second most important climatic factor in our study was XVI (after flowering). Flower and boll production were sunshine duration, which showed a significant negative positively and highly correlated with the variables of relationship with boll production. largest maxRH (X11, X13) and lowest minRH (X14, X15) b. Multiple linear regression models, beside in the first season, minRH (X7, X9), largest maxRH contribution of climatic factors and soil moisture
) (X11), and lowest minRH (X12, X14, X15) in the second status to variations in the dependent variables H
( season, and the combined data of the two seasons. Regression models were established using the Effect of maxRH varied markedly from the first to the stepwise multiple regression technique to express the second season. MaxRH was significantly correlated relationship between the number of flowers and bolls with the dependent variables in the first season, while per plant-1 (Y) with the climatic factors and soil moisture Research Volume the inverse pattern was true in the second season. This status (Table 20). Relative humidity (%) was the most diverse effect may be best explained by the differences important climatic factor affecting flower and boll of 87% in the first season, and only 73% in the second production in Egyptian cotton [minRH during day 1 (X7),
Frontier season (Table 1). Also, when the average value of minRH during day 2 (X9), largest maxRH on days 3-6 minRH exceeded the half average value of maxRH, the (X11), lowest minRH on days 3-6 (X12), largest maxRH minRH can substitute for the maxRH on affecting on days 7-12 (X13), lowest minRH on days 7-12 (X14)
Science number of flowers or harvested bolls. In the first season and lowest minRH on days 50-52 (X15)]. Sunshine (Table 1) the average value of minRH was less than half duration (X16) was the second climatic factor of
of of the value of maxRH (30.2/85.6 = 0.35), while in the importance affecting production of flowers and bolls. second season it was higher than half of maxRH Maximum temperature (X4), broadest range of
Journal (39.1/72.9 = 0.54). Sunshine duration (X16) showed a temperature (X6) and soil moisture status (X1) made a significant negative relation with fruit production in the contribution affecting flower and boll production. The first and second seasons and the combined data of the soil moisture variables (X2, X3), and climatic factors (X5,
Global two seasons except for boll production in the first X8, X10) were not included in the equations since they season, which was not significant. Flower and boll had very little effects on production of cotton flowers production were negatively correlated in the second and bolls. season and the combined data of the two seasons with Relative humidity showed the highest the number of days during days 1 -12 that temperature contribution to the variation in both flower and boll equaled or exceeded 37.5 °C (X4), range of temperature production (Table 20). This finding can be explained in (diurnal temperature) on flowering day (X5) and the light of results found by Ward and Bunce (1986) in broadest range of temperature over days 1-12 (X6). The sunflower (Helianthus annuus). They stated that soil moisture status showed low and insignificant decreases of relative humidity on both leaf surfaces
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways reduced photosynthetic rate of the whole leaf for plants minimum relative humidity value and flower and boll grown under a moderate temperature and medium light production, indicate that low evaporation rate, short level. period of sunshine duration and high value of minimum Reddy et al. (1993) found that cotton humidity would enhance flower and boll formation. The (Gossypium hirsutum) fruit retention decreased rapidly 5-day interval was found to give adequate and sensible as the time of exposure to 40°C increased. Gutiérrez relationships between climatic factors and cotton and López (2003) studied the effects of heat on the yield production growth under Egyptian conditions when of cotton in Andalucia, Spain, during 1991-98, and compared with other intervals and daily observations. It found that high temperatures were implicated in the may be concluded that the 5-day accumulation of reduction of unit production. There was a significant climatic data during the production stage, in the negative relationship between average production and absence of sharp fluctuations in these factors, could be number of days with temperatures greater than 40°C satisfactorily used to forecast adverse effects on cotton and the number of days with minimum temperatures production and the application of appropriate 201 greater than 20°C. Wise et al. (2004) indicated that production practices circumvent possible production r ea restrictions to photosynthesis could limit plant growth at shortage. Y high temperature in a variety of ways. In addition to Finally, the early prediction of possible adverse 311 increasing photorespiration, high temperatures (35- effects of climatic factors might modify their effect on 42°C) can cause direct injury to the photosynthetic production of Egyptian cotton. Minimizing deleterious apparatus. Both carbon metabolism and thylakoid effects through the application of proper management reactions have been suggested as the primary site of practices, such as, adequate irrigation regime, and injury at these temperatures. utilization of specific plant growth regulators could limit V
Regression models obtained explained a the negative effects of some climatic factors. IV
sensible proportion of the variation in flower and boll ue ersion I s production, as indicated by their R2, which ranged References Références Referencias s between 0.53-0.72. These results agree with Miller et al. I 1. Barbour MM, Farquhar GD (2000) Relative humidity- (1996) in their regression study of the relation of yield XVI and ABA-induced variation in carbon and oxygen with rainfall and temperature. They suggested that the 2 isotope ratios of cotton leaves. Plant, Cell and other R 0.50 of variation was related to management Environment 23: 473-485. practices, which coincide with the findings of this study. 2. Bhatt JG (1977) Growth and flowering of cotton
Thus, an accurate climatic forecast for the effect of the ) (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by daylength 5-7 day period during flowering may provide an H ( opportunity to avoid possible adverse effects of unusual and temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science 89: 583-588. climatic conditions before flowering or after boll 3. Boyer JS, Johnson RR, Saupe SG (1980) Afternoon formation by utilizing additional treatments and/or
water deficits and grain yields in old and new Research Volume adopting proper precautions to avoid flower and boll soybean cultivars. Agron J 72: 981-986. reduction (Sawan 2013). 4. Burke JJ, Mahan JR, Hatfield JL (1988) Crop
IV. Conclusions specific thermal kinetic windows in relation to wheat Frontier and cotton biomass production. Agron J 80: 553- Evaporation, sunshine duration, relative 556. humidity, surface soil temperature at 1800 h, and 5. Cady FB, Allen DM (1972) Combining experiments maximum temperature, were the most significant Science to predict future yield data. Agron J 64: 211-214. climatic factors affecting flower and boll production of
of Egyptian cotton. Also, it could be concluded that the 6. Draper NR, Smith H (1966) Applied Regression fourth quarter period of the production stage is the most Analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, NY. 407 appropriate and usable production time to collect data pp. Journal for determining efficient prediction equations for cotton 7. El-Zik KM (1980) The cotton plant - its growth and flower and boll production in Egypt, and making development. Western Cotton Prod. Conf. Summary Proc., Fresno, CA, p. 18-21. valuable recommendations. Further, it could be Global concluded that during the 15-day periods both prior to 8. Guinn G (1982) Causes of square and boll shedding and after initiation of individual bolls, evaporation, in cotton. USDA Tech. Bull. 1672. USDA, minimum relative humidity and sunshine duration, were Washington, DC. the most significant climatic factors affecting cotton 9. Gutiérrez Mas JC, López M (2003) Heat, limitation of flower and boll production and retention in Egyptian yields of cotton in Andalucia. Agricultura, Revista cotton. The negative correlation between each of Agropecuaria 72: 690-692. evaporation and sunshine duration with flower and boll 10. Hearn AB, Constable GA (1984) The Physiology of formation along with the positive correlation between Tropical Food Crops. Chapter 14: Cotton. P. 495-527
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways
(Edited by Goldsworth, P.R.; Fisher, N.M.), John growth. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 54: Wiley & Sons Ltd., NY. 664 pp. 17-29. 11. Hodges HF, Reddy KR, McKinion JM, Reddy VR 23. Reddy KR, Robana RR, Hodges HF, Liu XJ, (1993) Temperature effects on cotton. Bulletin Mckinion JM (1998) Interactions of CO2 enrichment Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment and temperature on cotton growth and leaf Station No. 990: 15. characteristics. Environ Exp Bot 39: 117-129. 12. Holaday AS, Haigler CH, Srinivas NG, Martin LK, 24. SAS Institute, Inc (1985) SAS User’s Guide: Taylor JG (1997) Alterations of leaf photosynthesis Statistics. 5th ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. pp. and fiber cellulose synthesis by cool night 433-506. temperatures. In Proceedings Beltwide Cotton 25. Sawan ZM (2013) Studying the relationship between Conferences, January 6-10, New Orleans, LA, climatic factors and cotton production by different National Cotton Council, TN pp 1435-1436. applied methods. Journal of Stress Physiology &
201 13. Human JJ, Du Toit D, Bezuidenhout HD, De Bruyn Biochemistry 9: 251-278. r LP (1990) The influence of plant water stress on net 26. Sawan ZM (2014a) Climatic factors: evaporation, ea
Y photosynthesis and yield of sunflower (Helianthus sunshine, relative humidity, soil and air temperature annuus L.). J Agron Crop Sci 164: 231-241. and cotton production. Annual Research & Review 32 14. Kaur R, Singh OS (1992) Response of growth in Biology,4: 2835-2855. stages of cotton varieties to moisture stress. Indian 27. Sawan ZM (2014b) Nature relation between climatic J Plant Physiol 35: 182-185. variables and cotton production. Journal of Stress 15. Meek CR, Oosterhuis DM, Steger AT (1999) Drought Physiology & Biochemistry 9: 251-278.
V tolerance and foliar sprays of glycine betaine. In 28. Sawan ZM, Hanna LI, Gad El Karim GhA,
IV Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January McCuistions WL (2002) Relationships between
ue ersion I 3-7, Orlando, FL, USA. Memphis, USA. National climatic factors and flower and boll production in s s Cotton Council, 559-561. Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense). Journal I 16. Mergeai G, Demol J (1991) Contribution to the study of Arid Environment 52: 499-516.
XVI of the effect of various meteorological factors on 29. Sawan ZM, Hanna LI, McCuistions WL (1999) Effect production and quality of cotton (Gossypium of climatic factors during the development periods hirsutum L.) fibers. Bulletin des Recherches of flowering and boll formation on the production of Agronomiqued de Gembloux 26: 113-124. Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense).
) 17. Miller JK, Krieg DR, Paterson RE (1996) Relationship Agronomie 19: 435-443.
H ( between dryland cotton yields and weather 30. Sawan ZM, Hanna LI, McCuistions WL (2005) parameters on the Southern Hig Plains. In Response of flower and boll development to climatic Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January factors before and after anthesis in Egyptian cotton. 9-12, Nashville, TN, USA, Memphis, USA, National Climate Research 29: 167-179.
Research Volume Cotton Council, 1165-1166. 31. Sawan ZM, Hanna LI, McCuistions WL (2006) 18. Moseley D, Landivar JA, Locke D (1994) Evaluation Appropriate time scale for aggregating climatic data of the effect of methanol on cotton growth and yield to predict flowering and boll setting behaviour of
Frontier under dry-land and irrigated conditions. In cotton in Egypt. Communication in Biometry and Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January Crop Science 1: 11-19. 5-8, San Diego, CA, USA. Memphis, USA. National 32. Sawan ZM, Hanna LI, McCuistions WL, Foote RJ
Science Cotton Council, 1293-1294. (2010) Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense) 19. Oosterhuis DM (1997) Effect of temperature flower and boll production as affected by climatic of extremes on cotton yields in Arkansas. In factors and soil moisture status. Theoretical and Proceedings of the Cotton Research Meeting, held Applied Climatology 99: 217-227. at Monticello, Arkansas, USA, February 13 [Edited 33. Schrader SM, Wise RR, Wacholtz WF, Ort DR, Journal by Oosterhuis, D.M.; Stewart, J.M.]. Special Report- Sharkey TD (2004) Thylakoid membrane responses Agricultural Experiment Station, Division of to moderately high leaf temperature in Pima Cotton.
Global Agriculture, University of Arkansas, No. 183: 94-98. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 725-735. 20. Orgaz F, Mateos L, Fereres E (1992) Season length 34. Ward DA, Bunce JA (1986) Responses of net and cultivar determine the optimum evapotranspira- photosynthesis and conductance to independent tion deficit in cotton. Agron J 84: 700-706. changes in the humidity environments of the upper 21. Reddy KR, Hodges HF, McKinion JM (1993) and lower surfaces of leaves of sunflower and Temperature effects on Pima cotton leaf growth. soybean. J Exper Botany 37: 1842-1853. Agron J 85: 681-686. 35. Wise RR, Olson AJ, Schrader SM, Sharkey TD 22. Reddy KR, Hodges HF, McKinion JM (1995) Carbon (2004) Electron transport is the functional limitation dioxide and temperature effects on pima cotton of photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants
©2016 Global Journals Inc. (US) Studying the Nature Relationship between Climatic Factors and Cotton Production by Different Applied Statistical and Mathematical Ways
at high temperature. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: the plant growth regulator PGR-IV under water- 717-724. deficit stress. Environ Exper Botany 38: 7-14. 36. Xiao J-F, Liu Z-G, Yu X-G, Zhang J-Y, Duan A-W 38. Zhou Z-G, Meng Y-L, Shi Pei, Shen Y-Q, Jia Z-K (2000) Effects of different water application on lint (2000) Study of the relationship between boll weight yield and fiber quality of cotton under drip irrigation. in wheat-cotton double cropping and Acta Gossypii Sinica 12: 194-197. meteorological factors at boll-forming stage. Acta 37. Zhao D-L, Oosterhuis D (1997) Physiological Gossypii Sinica 12: 122-126. response of growth chamber-grown cotton plants to